php-general Digest 24 Nov 2005 06:58:48 -0000 Issue 3812

2005-11-23 Thread php-general-digest-help

php-general Digest 24 Nov 2005 06:58:48 - Issue 3812

Topics (messages 226375 through 226397):

Re: Is there an alternative for $_FILES['guildimage']['type'] == image/jpeg
226375 by: Ben
226377 by: Stephen Leaf

Re: Is there an alternative for $_FILES['guildimage']['type']
226376 by: eric van blokland

Re: Assistance debugging php 5.x.x
226378 by: Jochem Maas
226379 by: eric van blokland
226381 by: Jochem Maas
226383 by: eric van blokland

preg_match_all for dummies
226380 by: Kristen G. Thorson

Re: Can't execute external program
226382 by: Henry Castillo
226384 by: comex
226386 by: Henry Castillo

Re: PHP and email
226385 by: Anas Mughal
226389 by: Manuel Lemos

Code generators
226387 by: Danny
226397 by: Thiago Silva

readfile and get_file_contents don't work
226388 by: Richard K. Miller

Re: mysqli unclonable object
226390 by: Matt Monaco
226394 by: Curt Zirzow
226396 by: Matt Monaco

Re: NTLM, PHP and Apache
226391 by: Manuel Lemos

http protocols defining what gets sent between web server and browser
226392 by: bruce
226393 by: David Tulloh
226395 by: Curt Zirzow

Administrivia:

To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To post to the list, e-mail:
php-general@lists.php.net


--
---BeginMessage---

Curt Zirzow wrote:


You should really consider using the fileinfo extension, or mabey
even  http://php.net/getimagesize.  The ['type'] information
can't be trusted to be what it says it is.


Any reason why no one is suggesting the use of mime_content_type? 
http://ca.php.net/mime_content_type


It seems to work well for me and there's no need to trust whatever the 
browser claims a file is or having to worry about different browsers 
inconsistently describing a mime type.


- Ben
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
I'd say because it's been depreciated.

LXXVI. Mimetype Functions
Introduction
Warning
   This extension has been deprecated as the PECL extension fileinfo provides 
the same functionality (and more) in a much cleaner way.

On Wednesday 23 November 2005 12:45 pm, Ben wrote:
 Curt Zirzow wrote:
  You should really consider using the fileinfo extension, or mabey
  even  http://php.net/getimagesize.  The ['type'] information
  can't be trusted to be what it says it is.

 Any reason why no one is suggesting the use of mime_content_type?
 http://ca.php.net/mime_content_type

 It seems to work well for me and there's no need to trust whatever the
 browser claims a file is or having to worry about different browsers
 inconsistently describing a mime type.

 - Ben
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
You could use the exif_imagetype() function

http://nl2.php.net/manual/en/function.exif-imagetype.php
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---

eric van blokland wrote:

LOL @ Jochem
 
Well I sure can't argue with that! (serious)
 
But with or without comments, the code is broken or breaks 
something. I've tracked down the weird bevahiour a little further. Now I 
would sure like, if one of you has about 30 minutes time to look at my 
problem with me, using VNC and Skype
If you got the spare time I would really appreciate it and as I've been 
unable to create some actual reproduce code, the only thing that's left 
is looking at the real thing. I'm still sure it's related to the way I 
use references, wheter it is or isn't a bug in the compiler, it sure 
would be nice to know this particular DON'T about references.
 
Please let me know


1. it could be considered over-engineered
2. you seem to be reinventing the wheel (templating?)
3. you are lacking knowledge regarding php5 OO
(for starters why are not you using __construct() for the ctors?)
4. YOU ARE USING REFERENCES ALL OVER THE PLACE!!! ;-)

regarding no. 4, some examples:

function fs_handle_object_properties($object)  {
//   ^--- destroy it


// why bother sticking the object in a 'serialize container'?
// and where was the class defined in the example code???
function fs_serialize($object) {
// ^--- destroy it
$container=new fs_serialize_container();

$container-object=$object;
// ^--- destroy it
return serialize($container);
}


// what happens in this code when $name
// is 'properties' or some other value that
// is the name of pre-defined object attribute?
function fs_handle_object_properties($object)  {
global $stdo;
$changed=false;
if(isset($object-properties)  is_array($object-properties)) 
  {
foreach($object-properties as $name= $property) {
if(isset($property-changed)  
$property-changed==true){

Re: [PHP] Is there a way to determine wich browser a visitor uses in php?

2005-11-23 Thread David Grant
$_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'] contains whatever the browser passes to the
server to identify itself, which may be faked by certain browsers at the
discretion of the user.

The two user agents you provide as an example are both extremely common.

Cheers,

David Grant

twistednetadmin wrote:
 Thanks guys. That helps alot!
 
 But this:
 ?php
 print $_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'];
 ?
 
 Returned this using Mozilla: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 Firefox/1.0.7
 And this using IE: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)
 
 Does that just mean that it's not completely accurate?
 

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Is there a way to determine wich browser a visitor uses in php?

2005-11-23 Thread Frank Armitage
twistednetadmin wrote:
 Thanks guys. That helps alot!
 
 But this:
 ?php
 print $_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'];
 ?
 
 Returned this using Mozilla: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 Firefox/1.0.7
 And this using IE: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)
 
 Does that just mean that it's not completely accurate?
 

Try get_browser()
http://php.net/manual/en/function.get-browser.php

HTH
Frank

-- 
tradeOver | http://www.tradeover.net
ready to become the King of the World?

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] cms type session - how to ?

2005-11-23 Thread Gregory Machin
Sorry for the lack of clarity on the single page... eg :
http://127.0.0.1/index.php?
where the index.php holds the logic of what is displayed and by passing vars
back to it's self determins what is next displayed .. hope that helps..



On 11/22/05, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, November 22, 2005 3:24 am, Gregory Machin wrote:
  I'm looking for a how to , on creating sessions similar to those used
  my
  cms's
  that ref only a single page..

 http://php.net/session_start

 ???

 I don't understand what you mean by that ref only a single page and
 suspect not many others understand that either.

 --
 Like Music?
 http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm





--
Gregory Machin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.linuxpro.co.za
www.exponent.co.za
Web Hosting Solutions
Scalable Linux Solutions
www.iberry.info (support and admin)

+27 72 524 8096


[PHP] Re: Autodeleting news when it has become yesterdays news

2005-11-23 Thread Mark Rees
I have a news-script on a webpage. Or an eventscript you might call it.
This lists up events thats gonna happen on a given day. ie concerts and
sportsevents.
To get this deleted without having to log on to the adminpage when the event
is over would have been a great relief.

1. Is it just as simple as writing a query that executes and removes news
with yesterdays date?
-
Even simpler, why don't you keep the data instead of deleting it and write a
query for the homepage which only displays events whcih occur in the future?

2. And how should I set it to execute if so?

If you do want to execute a regular PHP script to delete data for some
reason, look into cron (*nix) or task scheduler (windows)

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Decision table/business rule parser?

2005-11-23 Thread Geoff - Creative Living
Hi folks

  As an alternative, I worked briefly on a native PHP Petri-net workflow
  engine with a guy called Tony Marston before we parted ways. He has
  written it up here:
  
  http://www.tonymarston.net/php-mysql/workflow.html

 I wrote to Tony a couple of months ago and he said that his workflow code 
 might
 be available someday, but wasn't available currently. His ideas are published
 on his website, but only code snippets.
 

The code is Tony's, so I can't help, I'm afraid. I think you'll find
it's itertwined with his development framework, so I'm not sure how
useful it would be as a standalone in any case.




Geoff Caplan
Creative Living

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Accessing Arrays in HTML

2005-11-23 Thread Jochem Maas

Shaun wrote:

Hi,

I am trying to create a form on my page. The idea is that for each project 
people can select whether they are allocated for scheduling, non_scheduling 
or both. Here is an example of my form:


take the time to work out what it is that is being POSTed:

echo 'pre';
var_dump( $_POST );
echo '/pre';





...


tr
   tdinput name=project[25][Scheduling] type=checkbox value=25td
   tdinput name=project[25][Non_Scheduling] type=checkbox 


...


   '.$fields[$i].',
   '.$fields[$i][0].',
   '.$fields[$i][1].',


the 2 lines above should probably something like:

'.$fields[$i]['Scheduling'].',
'.$fields[$i]['Non_Scheduling'].',



  ));


...

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Accessing Arrays in HTML

2005-11-23 Thread David Grant
Shaun,

This:

$values[] = $value;

Does this:

$values[] = array('Scheduling' = '44');

Therefore, it must be accessed like this:

$values[$i]['Scheduling'] // gives '44'

But not this:

$values[$i][0] // index doesn't exist.

Cheers,

David Grant

Shaun wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I am trying to create a form on my page. The idea is that for each project 
 people can select whether they are allocated for scheduling, non_scheduling 
 or both. Here is an example of my form:
 
 tr
tdinput name=project[44][Scheduling] type=checkbox 
 value=44/td
tdinput name=project[44][Non_Scheduling] type=checkbox 
 value=44td
tdProject 1/td
   /tr
 tr
tdinput name=project[25][Scheduling] type=checkbox value=25td
tdinput name=project[25][Non_Scheduling] type=checkbox 
 value=25/td
tdProject 2/td
 /tr
 
 I am trying to access the arrays in the HTML as follows:
 
 if (is_array($_POST['project'])){
$fields='';
$values='';
foreach ($_POST['project'] as $project_id = $value) {
 $fields[] = $project_id;
 $values[] = $value;
}
$i = 0;
$num_elements = count($fields);
while($i  $num_elements){
 if(($values[$i]) != 0){
  echo 'br /$i = '.$i.'br /';
  print_r($fields);
  $query = (INSERT INTO Allocations (
User_ID,
Project_ID,
Scheduling,
Non_Scheduling
   ) VALUES (
'.$user_id.',
'.$fields[$i].',
'.$fields[$i][0].',
'.$fields[$i][1].',
   ));
  echo $query.'br /';
 }
 $i++;
}
   }
 
 However I can't access the 'Scheduling / 'Non_Scheduling' part. Can anyone 
 see where I am going wrong here?
 
 Thanks for your advice 
 

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] PHP and email

2005-11-23 Thread David Grant
Hi Angelo,

Why not send them all in one go?  If you want to reduce server load, you
should perhaps adjust the 'nice'ness of the script.

If you do the following:

nice --adjustment=19 ./script.php

Your script will run in the background and use only spare resources.

Cheers,

David Grant

Angelo Zanetti wrote:
 Hi
 
 I have a dedicated server in the states.
 
 I need to send about 8000 emails (once off). There pretty small +- 5KB.
 
 
 so I want to write a php script and run it from the command line in the
 background. I was thinking of sending 50 emails then waiting 90 seconds
 then sending again.
 
 Or
 
 the same script gets run by cron every 90 seconds and just sends 50 emails.
 
 What do you recommend?
 
 thanks
 
 clive

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Is there a way to determine wich browser a visitor uses in php?

2005-11-23 Thread Yaswanth Narvaneni
Dirty Code

if((ereg(Nav, getenv(HTTP_USER_AGENT))) || (ereg(Gold,
getenv(HTTP_USER_AGENT))) || (ereg(X11,
getenv(HTTP_USER_AGENT))) || (ereg(Mozilla, getenv(
HTTP_USER_AGENT))) || (ereg(Netscape, getenv(HTTP_USER_AGENT)))
AND (!ereg(MSIE, getenv(HTTP_USER_AGENT $c_browser =
Netscape;
elseif(ereg(MSIE, getenv(HTTP_USER_AGENT))) $c_browser = MSIE;
elseif(ereg(Lynx, getenv(HTTP_USER_AGENT))) $c_browser = Lynx;
elseif(ereg(Opera, getenv(HTTP_USER_AGENT))) $c_browser = Opera;
elseif(ereg(WebTV, getenv(HTTP_USER_AGENT))) $c_browser = WebTV;
elseif(ereg(Konqueror, getenv(HTTP_USER_AGENT))) $c_browser = Konqueror;
elseif((eregi(bot, getenv(HTTP_USER_AGENT))) || (ereg(Google,
getenv(HTTP_USER_AGENT))) || (ereg(Slurp,
getenv(HTTP_USER_AGENT))) || (ereg(Scooter,
getenv(HTTP_USER_AGENT))) || (eregi(Spider,
getenv(HTTP_USER_AGENT))) || (eregi(Infoseek,
getenv(HTTP_USER_AGENT $c_browser = Bot;
else $c_browser = Other;


On 11/23/05, Frank Armitage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 twistednetadmin wrote:
  Thanks guys. That helps alot!
 
  But this:
  ?php
  print $_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'];
  ?
 
  Returned this using Mozilla: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
  rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 Firefox/1.0.7
  And this using IE: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)
 
  Does that just mean that it's not completely accurate?
 

 Try get_browser()
 http://php.net/manual/en/function.get-browser.php

 HTH
 Frank

 --
 tradeOver | http://www.tradeover.net
 ready to become the King of the World?

 --
 PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
 To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




--
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice there is. -- Fortune Cookie

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Assistance debugging php 5.x.x

2005-11-23 Thread eric van blokland
Curt Zirzow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message *
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...

 On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 07:41:10PM +0100, Eric wrote:

  I would like to have some assistance in debugging php. It's about a

  bug in php not a script of mine.



 First off there is a big difference between 5.0.x and 5.1.x as well as

 5.0.1 and 5.0.5, what version are we talking about?

I tried it with different versions of php5 even a recent CVS of 5.1.x, the
code runs fine on all versions of 5 except for the specific anomaly



 

  I can't post a bug report as I do not exactly know why my code is

  suffering from a php bug. It's related to a very complex

  objects-model

 ...



 If it isn't your code is there ever a known state at which it did

 work?



Yes, by just escaping a single line, the surfaced error doesn't occur
anymore, however, as of the simplicity of the specific line of code, I
believe the compiler is already choking without that line while errors will
begin to surface with the line included.

 ...

  where objects, cross-referenced, wake up from a session. (note,

  these are cross-references, not circular, all circular (parent -

  child) references are unset before the objects are serialized)



 This almost sounds like some douglas adams, story.. I'd wake up dizzy

 with all those circular but not circular references.

Circular references:

Object A has Object B, while Object B has a parent attribute which is
referenced back to its parent: Object A

Cross-referenced:

Object A has a child Object X, Object B also has a child, it's a reference
to the very same Object X

The dizzy making thing here? Object B is also a child of Object A, which
appears to be the causing this problem: php still hates references



 Curt.

 --

 cat .signature: No such file or directory

Thank you for your reply! Think you can help me?

Kind regards,

Eric van Blokland


RE: [PHP] Assistance debugging php 5.x.x

2005-11-23 Thread Jay Blanchard
[snip]
I understand your point, but I can't offer you the project as it's company
property. Again, I will try to make a reproduce/example script.
Meanwhile, try to believe my assumption that the PHP compiler is broken
because:
[/snip]

Have you thought about sending your description of the problem to the DEV
list? Again, they are going to ask for code snippets, error messages, items
from the log. Code snippets or explicit examples of the code, while in the
pursuit of solutions, would probably not violate any company
ownership/rights issue. 

[snip]
Still, to rule out any mistakes of mine, I tried the code at a
ZendPlatform enabled server and the bug seems to disappear. Not really,
though, because a value seem to leak to someplace else and even worse: while
ZendPlatform seems te work perfectly (I can debug everything, even this
specific piece of code) httpd segfaults when debugging this code with the
evil parameter
[/snip]

Again, without seeing the specific piece of code, as a starting point, it
would be hard for us to speculate.

[snip]
- Back to the error message: even the error message is corrupted, the
compiler doesn't seem to know what it's doing (what would explain de httpd
segfault with ZendPlatform: PHP does something it's not meant to do)
[/snip]

In what way is the error message corrupted?

At this point we can only speak in hypotheticals. Assuming your code is
correct the compiler is broken somehow. Without knowing what the code is we
cannot begin to know how the compiler is broken.

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



RE: [PHP] Assistance debugging php 5.x.x

2005-11-23 Thread Jay Blanchard
[snip]
Object A has Object B, while Object B has a parent attribute which is
referenced back to its parent: Object A

Cross-referenced:

Object A has a child Object X, Object B also has a child, it's a reference
to the very same Object X

The dizzy making thing here? Object B is also a child of Object A, which
appears to be the causing this problem: php still hates references
[/snip]

I'd love to see the UML for this.

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Autodeleting news when it has become yesterdays news

2005-11-23 Thread Matt Stone

- Original Message - 
From: twistednetadmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 7:02 AM
Subject: [PHP] Autodeleting news when it has become yesterdays news


I have a news-script on a webpage. Or an eventscript you might call it.
This lists up events thats gonna happen on a given day. ie concerts and
sportsevents.
To get this deleted without having to log on to the adminpage when the
event
s over would have been a great relief.

1. Is it just as simple as writing a query that executes and removes news
with yesterdays date?


Yup,

DELETE FROM your_table WHERE date_column = curdate() -1;

Cheers
Matt

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



RE: [PHP] Assistance debugging php 5.x.x

2005-11-23 Thread eric van blokland
-- Forwarded message --
From: eric van blokland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 23, 2005 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Assistance debugging php 5.x.x
To: Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED]



On 11/23/05, Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 [snip]
 I understand your point, but I can't offer you the project as it's company
 property. Again, I will try to make a reproduce/example script.
 Meanwhile, try to believe my assumption that the PHP compiler is broken
 because:
 [/snip]

 Have you thought about sending your description of the problem to the DEV
 list? Again, they are going to ask for code snippets, error messages,
 items
 from the log. Code snippets or explicit examples of the code, while in the
 pursuit of solutions, would probably not violate any company
 ownership/rights issue.

 [snip]
 Still, to rule out any mistakes of mine, I tried the code at a
 ZendPlatform enabled server and the bug seems to disappear. Not really,
 though, because a value seem to leak to someplace else and even worse:
 while
 ZendPlatform seems te work perfectly (I can debug everything, even this
 specific piece of code) httpd segfaults when debugging this code with the
 evil parameter
 [/snip]

 Again, without seeing the specific piece of code, as a starting point, it
 would be hard for us to speculate.

 [snip]
 - Back to the error message: even the error message is corrupted, the
 compiler doesn't seem to know what it's doing (what would explain de httpd
 segfault with ZendPlatform: PHP does something it's not meant to do)
 [/snip]

 In what way is the error message corrupted?

 At this point we can only speak in hypotheticals. Assuming your code is
 correct the compiler is broken somehow. Without knowing what the code is
 we
 cannot begin to know how the compiler is broken.

 Screwed up error message:

   Cannot use a scalar value as an array  In function [fs_sso-edit()]  In
file [/include/libraries/footsteps.php] on line [834]fs_sso-edit()

  [/structure_edit.php] on line [62]

This error is correct for all but, that the error occurs in fuction
fs_register_property() which is called by object fs_sso from function
edit()

I will now start stripping the code of the affected objects for an example
script, I hope (but doubt) the error will still occur in de example script


Re: [PHP] Accessing Arrays in HTML

2005-11-23 Thread Bernhard Janetzki
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 13:07, Shaun wrote:
 Hi,

 I am trying to create a form on my page. The idea is that for each project
 people can select whether they are allocated for scheduling, non_scheduling
 or both. Here is an example of my form:

[...]

 However I can't access the 'Scheduling / 'Non_Scheduling' part. Can anyone
 see where I am going wrong here?

 Thanks for your advice
Scheduling or Non_Scheduling is an array key.

Greets Boerni

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Autodeleting news when it has become yesterdays news

2005-11-23 Thread David Grant
twistednetadmin wrote:
 Just at the beginning of the page with the news is my thought. So that it
 checks for the eventdate and erases the overdued ones before it collects the
 news.

If you wanted to do that, I'd recommend adding some sort of probability
factor into it, so not all scripts have to run the function.

e.g. 1% chance of cleaning up the database.

?php
if (rand(1,100)  99) {
deleteItems();
}
?

Cheers,

David Grant

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] PHP and email

2005-11-23 Thread Rory Browne
On 11/23/05, David Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Angelo,

 Why not send them all in one go?  If you want to reduce server load, you
 should perhaps adjust the 'nice'ness of the script.

Because niceness would only affect the script itself and not any smtp
servers it comes across along the way.

renicing would make the script nice to the local computer, but sending
8000 in one go, will overload the remote smtp servers which do not
know the local nice value.


 If you do the following:

 nice --adjustment=19 ./script.php

 Your script will run in the background and use only spare resources.
but that will only affect the local machine.

You could adjust the bandwidth using trickle, but to answer the mans
question - it doesn't really matter. Personally I'd perfer the former,
but you have to make sure that your script doesn't time out by setting
some php.ini value(forget the name of it.)

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] PHP and email

2005-11-23 Thread John Nichel

Angelo Zanetti wrote:

Hi

I have a dedicated server in the states.

I need to send about 8000 emails (once off). There pretty small +- 5KB.


so I want to write a php script and run it from the command line in the 
background. I was thinking of sending 50 emails then waiting 90 seconds 
then sending again.


Or

the same script gets run by cron every 90 seconds and just sends 50 emails.

What do you recommend?


I would send them one at a time.  While the script itself could probably 
handle sending 50+ at a time, you have to think about the mail server. 
Say you have the 8000 emails in an array


#!/usr/local/bin/php
?php

//  Stuff to get email addresses
//  and create message

foreach ( $emails as $email ) {
mail ( $email, $subject, $message, $headers );
sleep ( 10 );
}

?

YMMV

--
John C. Nichel IV
Programmer/System Admin (ÜberGeek)
Dot Com Holdings of Buffalo
716.856.9675
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Assistance debugging php 5.x.x

2005-11-23 Thread eric van blokland
I've got some example code on what I'm doing, however, as I expected, the
error is gone!

All involved objects were taken from the project, but not related code has
been stripped-off. (Which means that some of that at code level not related
code is in fact related at compiler level. I still suspect references.
Anyway, the code is still a bit rough, I'm going to do some further testing.
The code is useless for debugging, but might give you an idea on what I'm
doing, if you like i could make it available for download.



On 11/23/05, Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 [snip]
 I understand your point, but I can't offer you the project as it's company
 property. Again, I will try to make a reproduce/example script.
 Meanwhile, try to believe my assumption that the PHP compiler is broken
 because:
 [/snip]

 Have you thought about sending your description of the problem to the DEV
 list? Again, they are going to ask for code snippets, error messages,
 items
 from the log. Code snippets or explicit examples of the code, while in the
 pursuit of solutions, would probably not violate any company
 ownership/rights issue.

 [snip]
 Still, to rule out any mistakes of mine, I tried the code at a
 ZendPlatform enabled server and the bug seems to disappear. Not really,
 though, because a value seem to leak to someplace else and even worse:
 while
 ZendPlatform seems te work perfectly (I can debug everything, even this
 specific piece of code) httpd segfaults when debugging this code with the
 evil parameter
 [/snip]

 Again, without seeing the specific piece of code, as a starting point, it
 would be hard for us to speculate.

 [snip]
 - Back to the error message: even the error message is corrupted, the
 compiler doesn't seem to know what it's doing (what would explain de httpd
 segfault with ZendPlatform: PHP does something it's not meant to do)
 [/snip]

 In what way is the error message corrupted?

 At this point we can only speak in hypotheticals. Assuming your code is
 correct the compiler is broken somehow. Without knowing what the code is
 we
 cannot begin to know how the compiler is broken.




RE: [PHP] Assistance debugging php 5.x.x

2005-11-23 Thread Jay Blanchard
[snip]
I've got some example code on what I'm doing, however, as I expected, the
error is gone! 

All involved objects were taken from the project, but not related code has
been stripped-off. (Which means that some of that at code level not related
code is in fact related at compiler level. I still suspect references.
Anyway, the code is still a bit rough, I'm going to do some further testing.
The code is useless for debugging, but might give you an idea on what I'm
doing, if you like i could make it available for download. 
[/snip]

How long is the code example? Could it not be pasted here or pastebin?

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Assistance debugging php 5.x.x

2005-11-23 Thread eric van blokland
Example is still quite large, all database functionality and other arbitrary
code has been stripped. Over 50.000 lines of code have been reduced to a few
hundred. Example can be downloaded here:

http://213.10.83.232/example.tar

Explanation of example:

- When you load index.php, the involved objects will be loaded into your
session.
- If you use the reset link, the objects will be reinitialized.
- Continue just reloads index.php, objects will just wakeup from the session
- You can change the title of the fs_ssl object, via the text input
- Underneath the submit button, the current title of fs_ssl is displayed
- The error that occurs in the real project:
On changing (submitting) the title of ssl, the sso-properties array gets
overwritten, this does not happen with this example

Further, just explore the code to see what I'm doing exactly, if you need
more comment on what i'm doing, I will add comments to the example source
code.


On 11/23/05, Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 [snip]
 I've got some example code on what I'm doing, however, as I expected, the
 error is gone!

 All involved objects were taken from the project, but not related code has
 been stripped-off. (Which means that some of that at code level not
 related
 code is in fact related at compiler level. I still suspect references.
 Anyway, the code is still a bit rough, I'm going to do some further
 testing.
 The code is useless for debugging, but might give you an idea on what I'm
 doing, if you like i could make it available for download.
 [/snip]

 How long is the code example? Could it not be pasted here or pastebin?




Re: [PHP] PHP and email

2005-11-23 Thread Angelo Zanetti



John Nichel wrote:

Angelo Zanetti wrote:


Hi

I have a dedicated server in the states.

I need to send about 8000 emails (once off). There pretty small +- 5KB.


so I want to write a php script and run it from the command line in 
the background. I was thinking of sending 50 emails then waiting 90 
seconds then sending again.


Or

the same script gets run by cron every 90 seconds and just sends 50 
emails.


What do you recommend?



I would send them one at a time.  While the script itself could probably 
handle sending 50+ at a time, you have to think about the mail server. 
Say you have the 8000 emails in an array


#!/usr/local/bin/php
?php

//  Stuff to get email addresses
//  and create message

foreach ( $emails as $email ) {
mail ( $email, $subject, $message, $headers );
sleep ( 10 );
}

?

YMMV



Thanks to those who have replied so far, yes our main concern is the 
smtp server falling over or dying. So to come back to John Nichel's answer:


 John, have you done this personally and I assume the effects were 
good?? IE everything ran smoothly?


thanks
Angelo

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



RE: [PHP] PHP and email

2005-11-23 Thread Jim Moseby
 
 John Nichel wrote:
  Angelo Zanetti wrote:
  
  Hi
 
  I have a dedicated server in the states.
 
  I need to send about 8000 emails (once off). There pretty 
 small +- 5KB.
 
 
  so I want to write a php script and run it from the 
 command line in 
  the background. I was thinking of sending 50 emails then 
 waiting 90 
  seconds then sending again.
 
  Or
 
  the same script gets run by cron every 90 seconds and just 
 sends 50 
  emails.
 
  What do you recommend?
  
  
  I would send them one at a time.  While the script itself 
 could probably 
  handle sending 50+ at a time, you have to think about the 
 mail server. 
  Say you have the 8000 emails in an array
  
  #!/usr/local/bin/php
  ?php
  
  //  Stuff to get email addresses
  //  and create message
  
  foreach ( $emails as $email ) {
  mail ( $email, $subject, $message, $headers );
  sleep ( 10 );
  }
  
  ?
  
  YMMV
 
 
 Thanks to those who have replied so far, yes our main concern is the 
 smtp server falling over or dying. So to come back to John 
 Nichel's answer:
 
   John, have you done this personally and I assume the effects were 
 good?? IE everything ran smoothly?

I have done it just as John has described above, though I didn't have 8000
to send.  All went well, no hiccups.  A couple of things I would mention is
that I seem to remember reading somewhere that the sleep() function on
Windows eats a lot of processor.  Not an issue for me since I'm on Linux,
but worth a mention.  And the function John suggested above will take over
22 hours to send 8000 emails.  Since you say its a one shot deal, its
probably OK.

JM

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



RE: [PHP] Assistance debugging php 5.x.x

2005-11-23 Thread Jay Blanchard
[snip]
Example is still quite large, all database functionality and other arbitrary
code has been stripped. Over 50.000 lines of code have been reduced to a few
hundred. Example can be downloaded here:

http://213.10.83.232/example.tar

Explanation of example:

- When you load index.php, the involved objects will be loaded into your
session.
- If you use the reset link, the objects will be reinitialized. 
- Continue just reloads index.php, objects will just wakeup from the session
- You can change the title of the fs_ssl object, via the text input
- Underneath the submit button, the current title of fs_ssl is displayed
- The error that occurs in the real project: 
On changing (submitting) the title of ssl, the sso-properties array gets
overwritten, this does not happen with this example

Further, just explore the code to see what I'm doing exactly, if you need
more comment on what i'm doing, I will add comments to the example source
code.
[/snip]

As soon as I have several hours of time to spare *cough* I will explore the
code *cough*.

1. If the error does not occur with this example the situation you
originally described becomes non-reproducable. If we cannot reproduce the
error we have no chance of offering a solution. As you add things back into
this example code, when does it break?
2. The folks on this list are here to help, but I don't think that anyone
has time to sort through 100's of lines of code looking for what may be a
potential error, without wanting to charge a consulting fee.
3. You have no comments in your example code? Brilliant!

I know that I am being sarcastic here. 

I (and others) really would like to help, but I need you to help me (us) do
that. I understand that the code is sensitive (company copyright/work
product issues) and lengthy. I strongly suspect that the application may be
overly complex (based on a quick read through the code) and that you could
accomplish that which you are trying to do without being so obsfuscate. I
also think that you should send the information you have given us thus far
to the PHP-DEV list (http://www.php.net/mailinglists) and see what response
that they have to offer given your assertion that the compiler is broken. It
is more likely that someone lurking that list will be aware of problems like
this where the compiler is concerned. 

Happy Thanksgiving!

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Assistance debugging php 5.x.x

2005-11-23 Thread eric van blokland
1. That's what I've warned about from the beginning, that outside the
complete project environment the error probably wouldn't occur.
2. I understand this completely, naturally. I would like to thank everybody
spending time in reading my posts, particulary you, Jay. But that's why I
would like to give you, or anyone else for that matter, an attended tour
through the project.
3. I'm beeing pushed to present results, writting comments in my code would
take almost twice the time writing the code itself. And in most cases, it's
faster just to read my code instead of reading the comment. And finally, you
wouldn't be able to read my comments, as my comments would be in dutch.

Happy Thanksgiving back at you!


On 11/23/05, Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 [snip]
 Example is still quite large, all database functionality and other
 arbitrary
 code has been stripped. Over 50.000 lines of code have been reduced to a
 few
 hundred. Example can be downloaded here:

 http://213.10.83.232/example.tar

 Explanation of example:

 - When you load index.php, the involved objects will be loaded into your
 session.
 - If you use the reset link, the objects will be reinitialized.
 - Continue just reloads index.php, objects will just wakeup from the
 session
 - You can change the title of the fs_ssl object, via the text input
 - Underneath the submit button, the current title of fs_ssl is displayed
 - The error that occurs in the real project:
 On changing (submitting) the title of ssl, the sso-properties array gets
 overwritten, this does not happen with this example

 Further, just explore the code to see what I'm doing exactly, if you need
 more comment on what i'm doing, I will add comments to the example source
 code.
 [/snip]

 As soon as I have several hours of time to spare *cough* I will explore
 the
 code *cough*.

 1. If the error does not occur with this example the situation you
 originally described becomes non-reproducable. If we cannot reproduce the
 error we have no chance of offering a solution. As you add things back
 into
 this example code, when does it break?
 2. The folks on this list are here to help, but I don't think that anyone
 has time to sort through 100's of lines of code looking for what may be a
 potential error, without wanting to charge a consulting fee.
 3. You have no comments in your example code? Brilliant!

 I know that I am being sarcastic here.

 I (and others) really would like to help, but I need you to help me (us)
 do
 that. I understand that the code is sensitive (company copyright/work
 product issues) and lengthy. I strongly suspect that the application may
 be
 overly complex (based on a quick read through the code) and that you could
 accomplish that which you are trying to do without being so obsfuscate. I
 also think that you should send the information you have given us thus far
 to the PHP-DEV list (http://www.php.net/mailinglists) and see what
 response
 that they have to offer given your assertion that the compiler is broken.
 It
 is more likely that someone lurking that list will be aware of problems
 like
 this where the compiler is concerned.

 Happy Thanksgiving!





Re: [PHP] PHP and email

2005-11-23 Thread John Nichel

Angelo Zanetti wrote:



John Nichel wrote:


Angelo Zanetti wrote:


Hi

I have a dedicated server in the states.

I need to send about 8000 emails (once off). There pretty small +- 5KB.


so I want to write a php script and run it from the command line in 
the background. I was thinking of sending 50 emails then waiting 90 
seconds then sending again.


Or

the same script gets run by cron every 90 seconds and just sends 50 
emails.


What do you recommend?




I would send them one at a time.  While the script itself could 
probably handle sending 50+ at a time, you have to think about the 
mail server. Say you have the 8000 emails in an array


#!/usr/local/bin/php
?php

//  Stuff to get email addresses
//  and create message

foreach ( $emails as $email ) {
mail ( $email, $subject, $message, $headers );
sleep ( 10 );
}

?

YMMV




Thanks to those who have replied so far, yes our main concern is the 
smtp server falling over or dying. So to come back to John Nichel's answer:


 John, have you done this personally and I assume the effects were 
good?? IE everything ran smoothly?


I use some code just like that at least once a month to send out a 
newsletter for a site I run, and it works fine.  I'm only sending out 
appx 1400 emails though, so I can afford to let it sleep for a longer 
period of time.  You can probably go lower on the sleep time, but it all 
depends on your setup.


A better solution, if you have access to it and your mail server 
supports it, is to just inject the whole thing...that way you're not 
making a SMTP connection each time.


--
John C. Nichel IV
Programmer/System Admin (ÜberGeek)
Dot Com Holdings of Buffalo
716.856.9675
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] syntax checking?

2005-11-23 Thread Bing Du

Bing Du wrote:


Jay Blanchard wrote:


[snip]
How should PHP syntax be checked before execution?  Anything similar 
to what option -c does in Perl?


% perl -c test.pl
[/snip]

from the command line

/usr/local/bin/php -i myScript.php
[/snip]

Ooops, sorry, should be an ell l

/usr/local/bin/php -l myScript.php



Too late :).  I've already tried -i.  Boy, that returns tons of 
information .  My machine was choked.


Bing


Even with error_reporting set to E_ALL in php.ini, I still get 'Errors 
parsing file.php' using the php command with the -l option.  Anyway to 
see more than that?


Thanks,

Bing

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



RE: [PHP] Assistance debugging php 5.x.x

2005-11-23 Thread Jay Blanchard
[snip]
1. That's what I've warned about from the beginning, that outside the
complete project environment the error probably wouldn't occur. 
2. I understand this completely, naturally. I would like to thank everybody
spending time in reading my posts, particulary you, Jay. But that's why I
would like to give you, or anyone else for that matter, an attended tour
through the project. 
3. I'm beeing pushed to present results, writting comments in my code would
take almost twice the time writing the code itself. And in most cases, it's
faster just to read my code instead of reading the comment. And finally, you
wouldn't be able to read my comments, as my comments would be in dutch. 

Happy Thanksgiving back at you!
[/snip]

1. Again, when adding code back nto your example when does it break? That
would give us a better clue.
2. I really do wish that there was more time available for me to help you.
If I find some spare time in quantities great enough it would have to be
sometime next weekmaybe.
3. Always comment your code. It is not an option. I hear this excuse all of
the time. It is only the fool who does not comment his code, especially code
so complex. Commenting may have helped you more precisely locate the
problem. And how do you know that I do not read Dutch, have a person on my
staff that speaks and writes fluent Dutch, or have access to google
Translate? :) We have an office in Pijnacker!

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



RE: [PHP] syntax checking?

2005-11-23 Thread Jay Blanchard
[snip]
Even with error_reporting set to E_ALL in php.ini, I still get 'Errors 
parsing file.php' using the php command with the -l option.  Anyway to 
see more than that?
[/snip]

Here are some command line options http://us2.php.net/features.commandline

You could run it in a browser to get line numbers and more precise error
messages

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] syntax checking?

2005-11-23 Thread Bing Du

Jay Blanchard wrote:


[snip]
Even with error_reporting set to E_ALL in php.ini, I still get 'Errors 
parsing file.php' using the php command with the -l option.  Anyway to 
see more than that?

[/snip]

Here are some command line options http://us2.php.net/features.commandline

You could run it in a browser to get line numbers and more precise error
messages


Just found out this web based PHP syntax checking tool 
http://www.meandeviation.com/tutorials/learnphp/php-syntax-check/, it 
helped me find the problem.  Pretty nice.


Bing

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



RE: [PHP] syntax checking?

2005-11-23 Thread Jay Blanchard
[snip]
Just found out this web based PHP syntax checking tool 
http://www.meandeviation.com/tutorials/learnphp/php-syntax-check/, it 
helped me find the problem.  Pretty nice.
[/snip]

Nice find. Tried it and it works pretty well.

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP] Re: PHP and email

2005-11-23 Thread Petr Smith
Thanks to those who have replied so far, yes our main concern is the 
smtp server falling over or dying. So to come back to John 
Nichel's answer:


 John, have you done this personally and I assume the effects were 
good?? IE everything ran smoothly?



I have done it just as John has described above, though I didn't have 8000
to send.  All went well, no hiccups.  A couple of things I would mention is
that I seem to remember reading somewhere that the sleep() function on
Windows eats a lot of processor.  Not an issue for me since I'm on Linux,
but worth a mention.  And the function John suggested above will take over
22 hours to send 8000 emails.  Since you say its a one shot deal, its
probably OK.



I don't think the long running script with sleep function is the best 
approach to this problem. I would recommend writing the whole queue 
somewhere (to database) and run script every 5 minutes, load some not 
sent yet e-mails (100), send them and write info (it_was_sent tag) back 
to database.


It's always better to not have long running script, you never know what 
can go wrong and if it fails somewhere or process is killed or machine 
rebooted or something happens, you don't know which emails were sent and 
which not. And there's no stupidest thing as sending the same company 
newsletter twice to the same client.


Petr

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Is there an alternative for $_FILES['guildimage']['type'] == image/jpeg

2005-11-23 Thread Curt Zirzow
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 06:48:25AM +0100, twistednetadmin wrote:
 This did the trick:
 
 elseif ($_FILES['guildimage']['type'] == image/pjpeg or image/jpeg)

Not for reasons you think.  The (or image/jpeg) is going to 
evaulate as TRUE, so your expression will always be true. For
example:

  var_dump((bool) image/jpeg); 


You should really consider using the fileinfo extension, or mabey
even  http://php.net/getimagesize.  The ['type'] information
can't be trusted to be what it says it is.

Curt.
-- 
cat .signature: No such file or directory

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Re: PHP and email

2005-11-23 Thread John Nichel

Petr Smith wrote:
Thanks to those who have replied so far, yes our main concern is the 
smtp server falling over or dying. So to come back to John Nichel's 
answer:


 John, have you done this personally and I assume the effects were 
good?? IE everything ran smoothly?




I have done it just as John has described above, though I didn't have 
8000
to send.  All went well, no hiccups.  A couple of things I would 
mention is

that I seem to remember reading somewhere that the sleep() function on
Windows eats a lot of processor.  Not an issue for me since I'm on Linux,
but worth a mention.  And the function John suggested above will take 
over

22 hours to send 8000 emails.  Since you say its a one shot deal, its
probably OK.



I don't think the long running script with sleep function is the best 
approach to this problem. I would recommend writing the whole queue 
somewhere (to database) and run script every 5 minutes, load some not 
sent yet e-mails (100), send them and write info (it_was_sent tag) back 
to database.


What's to stop you from writing this 'sent tag' using the sleep method? 
 What I wouldn't like about the every 5 minutes cron method is that the 
script will run _every_ five minutes regardless if it's sending mail or 
not.  Not to mention the fact that even with a small number like a 100, 
you could still cause problems with the mail server trying to make that 
many SMTP connections in less than a second or two.


It's always better to not have long running script, you never know what 
can go wrong and if it fails somewhere or process is killed or machine 
rebooted or something happens, you don't know which emails were sent and 
which not. And there's no stupidest thing as sending the same company 
newsletter twice to the same client.


You computer is full of scripts/programs/daemons that have long 
runs...some 24/7.  That isn't a problem as long as you think ahead. 
With proper logging, I can easily pick up where I left off should the 
script fail for one reason or another.


--
John C. Nichel IV
Programmer/System Admin (ÜberGeek)
Dot Com Holdings of Buffalo
716.856.9675
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] syntax checking?

2005-11-23 Thread John Nichel

Jay Blanchard wrote:

[snip]
Just found out this web based PHP syntax checking tool 
http://www.meandeviation.com/tutorials/learnphp/php-syntax-check/, it 
helped me find the problem.  Pretty nice.

[/snip]

Nice find. Tried it and it works pretty well.



I get this when I try to check a php script on my machine...

Sorry! bad URL :-(

Guess it only works if you're on a Windows client.  ;)

--
John C. Nichel IV
Programmer/System Admin (ÜberGeek)
Dot Com Holdings of Buffalo
716.856.9675
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] mysqli unclonable object

2005-11-23 Thread Curt Zirzow
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:13:22AM -0500, Matt Monaco wrote:
 On a Fedora 4 machine running MySQL 4.1 I am having trouble declaring an 
 instance of a mysqli extension.
 
 class Data extends mysqli {
 
 
 $link = new Data(localhost, user, password, db);
 
 This invokes the error Trying to clone unclonable object of type Data. 
 However if I create the link with a reference ...
 $link = new Data();
 ...everything works fine.

This is because you have the ini option: 

  zend.ze1_compatibility_mode = On


Curt.
-- 
cat .signature: No such file or directory

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Assistance debugging php 5.x.x

2005-11-23 Thread Jochem Maas

Eric,

everything you have written suggests to me that the problem is in your code
(that may be being caused by changes to the engine, which have either removed
an ability due to the fact that it was dangerous [e.g. reference issues], or
abilities that have been changed because they were deemed wrong)

regardless of whether that is the case or not you are best off by assuming that
the problem is in your code:

1. if its your code you have the power to fix it, which is a better situation
to be in than have to rely on third parties to fix an underlying texchnology.

2. it avoids 'blaming' core developers until such time as you can _prove_ the
engine has a bug.

eric van blokland wrote:

1. That's what I've warned about from the beginning, that outside the
complete project environment the error probably wouldn't occur.
2. I understand this completely, naturally. I would like to thank everybody
spending time in reading my posts, particulary you, Jay. But that's why I
would like to give you, or anyone else for that matter, an attended tour
through the project.
3. I'm beeing pushed to present results, writting comments in my code would
take almost twice the time writing the code itself. And in most cases, it's
faster just to read my code instead of reading the comment. And finally, you


the last 3 lines are bullshit on all counts (apart from the implied deadline
pressure), do yourself a favor and starting commenting! :-)


wouldn't be able to read my comments, as my comments would be in dutch.


I'd be happy to translate for you Jay ;-)

having said that there is no reason to write comments in dutch if your
english is as good as it is, but comments in any language are always better than
none. (assuming the comments actually have some baring on the actual code -
i.e. comments like '// Bill Gates has lots of money' don't really help!)

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Assistance debugging php 5.x.x

2005-11-23 Thread eric van blokland
LOL @ Jochem

Well I sure can't argue with that! (serious)

But with or without comments, the code is broken or breaks something. I've
tracked down the weird bevahiour a little further. Now I would sure like, if
one of you has about 30 minutes time to look at my problem with me, using
VNC and Skype
If you got the spare time I would really appreciate it and as I've been
unable to create some actual reproduce code, the only thing that's left is
looking at the real thing. I'm still sure it's related to the way I use
references, wheter it is or isn't a bug in the compiler, it sure would be
nice to know this particular DON'T about references.

Please let me know

On 11/23/05, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Eric,

 everything you have written suggests to me that the problem is in your
 code
 (that may be being caused by changes to the engine, which have either
 removed
 an ability due to the fact that it was dangerous [e.g. reference issues],
 or
 abilities that have been changed because they were deemed wrong)

 regardless of whether that is the case or not you are best off by assuming
 that
 the problem is in your code:

 1. if its your code you have the power to fix it, which is a better
 situation
 to be in than have to rely on third parties to fix an underlying
 texchnology.

 2. it avoids 'blaming' core developers until such time as you can _prove_
 the
 engine has a bug.

 eric van blokland wrote:
  1. That's what I've warned about from the beginning, that outside the
  complete project environment the error probably wouldn't occur.
  2. I understand this completely, naturally. I would like to thank
 everybody
  spending time in reading my posts, particulary you, Jay. But that's why
 I
  would like to give you, or anyone else for that matter, an attended tour
  through the project.
  3. I'm beeing pushed to present results, writting comments in my code
 would
  take almost twice the time writing the code itself. And in most cases,
 it's
  faster just to read my code instead of reading the comment. And finally,
 you

 the last 3 lines are bullshit on all counts (apart from the implied
 deadline
 pressure), do yourself a favor and starting commenting! :-)

  wouldn't be able to read my comments, as my comments would be in dutch.

 I'd be happy to translate for you Jay ;-)

 having said that there is no reason to write comments in dutch if your
 english is as good as it is, but comments in any language are always
 better than
 none. (assuming the comments actually have some baring on the actual code
 -
 i.e. comments like '// Bill Gates has lots of money' don't really help!)



Re: [PHP] Is there an alternative for $_FILES['guildimage']['type'] == image/jpeg

2005-11-23 Thread Ben

Curt Zirzow wrote:


You should really consider using the fileinfo extension, or mabey
even  http://php.net/getimagesize.  The ['type'] information
can't be trusted to be what it says it is.


Any reason why no one is suggesting the use of mime_content_type? 
http://ca.php.net/mime_content_type


It seems to work well for me and there's no need to trust whatever the 
browser claims a file is or having to worry about different browsers 
inconsistently describing a mime type.


- Ben

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP] Re: Is there an alternative for $_FILES['guildimage']['type']

2005-11-23 Thread eric van blokland
You could use the exif_imagetype() function

http://nl2.php.net/manual/en/function.exif-imagetype.php


Re: [PHP] Is there an alternative for $_FILES['guildimage']['type'] == image/jpeg

2005-11-23 Thread Stephen Leaf
I'd say because it's been depreciated.

LXXVI. Mimetype Functions
Introduction
Warning
   This extension has been deprecated as the PECL extension fileinfo provides 
the same functionality (and more) in a much cleaner way.

On Wednesday 23 November 2005 12:45 pm, Ben wrote:
 Curt Zirzow wrote:
  You should really consider using the fileinfo extension, or mabey
  even  http://php.net/getimagesize.  The ['type'] information
  can't be trusted to be what it says it is.

 Any reason why no one is suggesting the use of mime_content_type?
 http://ca.php.net/mime_content_type

 It seems to work well for me and there's no need to trust whatever the
 browser claims a file is or having to worry about different browsers
 inconsistently describing a mime type.

 - Ben

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Assistance debugging php 5.x.x

2005-11-23 Thread Jochem Maas

eric van blokland wrote:

LOL @ Jochem
 
Well I sure can't argue with that! (serious)
 
But with or without comments, the code is broken or breaks 
something. I've tracked down the weird bevahiour a little further. Now I 
would sure like, if one of you has about 30 minutes time to look at my 
problem with me, using VNC and Skype
If you got the spare time I would really appreciate it and as I've been 
unable to create some actual reproduce code, the only thing that's left 
is looking at the real thing. I'm still sure it's related to the way I 
use references, wheter it is or isn't a bug in the compiler, it sure 
would be nice to know this particular DON'T about references.
 
Please let me know


1. it could be considered over-engineered
2. you seem to be reinventing the wheel (templating?)
3. you are lacking knowledge regarding php5 OO
(for starters why are not you using __construct() for the ctors?)
4. YOU ARE USING REFERENCES ALL OVER THE PLACE!!! ;-)

regarding no. 4, some examples:

function fs_handle_object_properties($object)  {
//   ^--- destroy it


// why bother sticking the object in a 'serialize container'?
// and where was the class defined in the example code???
function fs_serialize($object) {
// ^--- destroy it
$container=new fs_serialize_container();

$container-object=$object;
// ^--- destroy it
return serialize($container);
}


// what happens in this code when $name
// is 'properties' or some other value that
// is the name of pre-defined object attribute?
function fs_handle_object_properties($object)  {
global $stdo;
$changed=false;
if(isset($object-properties)  is_array($object-properties)) 
  {
foreach($object-properties as $name= $property) {
if(isset($property-changed)  
$property-changed==true){
$object-changed=true;   
$changed=true;
$object-$name=$property-value;
  
}
}


// if you are already using $_SESSION why complicate matters
// by also storing duplicate stuff in $_COOKIE? _seems_ a
// waste of time.
function fs_process_properties(){   
if(isset($_COOKIE['fs_properties'])){   
$properties=explode(';',$_COOKIE['fs_properties']);


function fs_unserialize($string)   {   
//   ^-- destroy it


class std_page  {

/* ... */
function edit($structure)  {
//^-- ???
global $stdo;   
foreach($this-properties as $key=$property){ 
  
// ^-- $property is an object 

print $property-parse();
}


and so on. getting rid of all the referencing of objects will most
probably get rid of your problems - I'll pass on the argument
as to whether it should work as it is.

-

you might also want to read up on __call(), __set()
and __get(). oh and there are the functions is_array(),
is_object() and the keyword 'instanceof' which you
might want to consider making more use of in order to
check your variables.


 
On 11/23/05, *Jochem Maas* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Eric,

everything you have written suggests to me that the problem is in
your code
(that may be being caused by changes to the engine, which have
either removed
an ability due to the fact that it was dangerous [e.g. reference
issues], or
abilities that have been changed because they were deemed wrong)

regardless of whether that is the case or not you are best off by
assuming that
the problem is in your code:

1. if its your code you have the power to fix it, which is a better
situation
to be in than have to rely on third parties to fix an underlying
texchnology.

2. it avoids 'blaming' core developers until such time as you can
_prove_ the
engine has a bug.

eric van blokland wrote:
  1. That's what I've warned about from the beginning, that outside the
  complete project environment the error probably wouldn't occur.
  2. I understand this completely, naturally. I would like to thank
everybody
  spending time in reading my posts, particulary you, Jay. But
that's why I
  would like to give you, or anyone else for that matter, an
attended tour
  through the project.
  3. I'm beeing pushed to present results, writting comments in my
code would
  take almost twice the time writing the code itself. And in most
cases, it's
  faster just to read my code instead of reading the comment. And

Re: [PHP] Assistance debugging php 5.x.x

2005-11-23 Thread eric van blokland
1. Overengineering perhaps...
2. Reinventing the wheel? Probably, but I just like to know every single
bit of the wheel I use
3. I do get confused every now and then about PHP5 OO
4. References everywhere? Yes, the code was originally written for PHP4 I
have already started removing them, but seriously, does PHP5 cares about
passing an object reference by reference (it's useless and overhead, ok, but
does it matter?)
Because the code originates from PHP4, I don't have __constructor functions



On 11/23/05, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 eric van blokland wrote:
  LOL @ Jochem
 
  Well I sure can't argue with that! (serious)
 
  But with or without comments, the code is broken or breaks
  something. I've tracked down the weird bevahiour a little further. Now I
  would sure like, if one of you has about 30 minutes time to look at my
  problem with me, using VNC and Skype
  If you got the spare time I would really appreciate it and as I've been
  unable to create some actual reproduce code, the only thing that's left
  is looking at the real thing. I'm still sure it's related to the way I
  use references, wheter it is or isn't a bug in the compiler, it sure
  would be nice to know this particular DON'T about references.
 
  Please let me know

 1. it could be considered over-engineered
 2. you seem to be reinventing the wheel (templating?)
 3. you are lacking knowledge regarding php5 OO
 (for starters why are not you using __construct() for the ctors?)
 4. YOU ARE USING REFERENCES ALL OVER THE PLACE!!! ;-)

 regarding no. 4, some examples:

 function fs_handle_object_properties($object)  {
//   ^--- destroy it


I will

// why bother sticking the object in a 'serialize container'?
 // and where was the class defined in the example code???
 function fs_serialize($object) {
 // ^--- destroy it
 $container=new fs_serialize_container();

 $container-object=$object;
 // ^--- destroy it
 return serialize($container);
 }


The container is used so references within $object to $object will remain
intact, the class is missing from the example code, because the example
isn't going to serialize or unserialize anything

// what happens in this code when $name
 // is 'properties' or some other value that
 // is the name of pre-defined object attribute?
 function fs_handle_object_properties($object)  {
global $stdo;
$changed=false;
if(isset($object-properties) 
 is_array($object-properties)) {
foreach($object-properties as $name= $property)   {
if(isset($property-changed) 
 $property-changed==true){
$object-changed=true;
$changed=true;
$object-$name=$property-value;
}
}


This is most definitely a bug, or overlook issue, however, this is not the
cause of my problem

// if you are already using $_SESSION why complicate matters
 // by also storing duplicate stuff in $_COOKIE? _seems_ a
 // waste of time.
 function fs_process_properties(){
if(isset($_COOKIE['fs_properties'])){
$properties=explode(';',$_COOKIE['fs_properties']);



This function is used for external data input from the clients. I do not
post all forms, some are sent by cookie

function fs_unserialize($string)   {
 //   ^-- destroy it


I will

class std_page  {

 /* ... */
function edit($structure)  {
 //^-- ???
global $stdo;
foreach($this-properties as $key=$property)  {
 // ^-- $property is an
 object 
print $property-parse();
}


 and so on. getting rid of all the referencing of objects will most
 probably get rid of your problems - I'll pass on the argument
 as to whether it should work as it is.

 -


I will remove them

you might also want to read up on __call(), __set()
 and __get(). oh and there are the functions is_array(),
 is_object() and the keyword 'instanceof' which you
 might want to consider making more use of in order to
 check your variables.


But still I would like to ask you to take a look with me


  On 11/23/05, *Jochem Maas* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Eric,
 
  everything you have written suggests to me that the problem is in
  your code
  (that may be being caused by changes to the engine, which have
  either removed
  an ability due to the fact that it was dangerous [e.g. reference
  issues], or
  abilities that have been changed because they were deemed wrong)
 
  regardless of whether that is the case or not you are best off by
  assuming that
  the problem is in your code:
 
  1. if its your code you have the power to fix 

[PHP] preg_match_all for dummies

2005-11-23 Thread Kristen G. Thorson

I am a regex retard.

I am trying to pull keywords out of this crazy bbcode-like file, but 
only for bbcode-like code NOT enclosed in HTML comments.  I currently 
have managed to create this regex:


'/(?!!--)\[!(\w+)::.*!\](?!--)/U'

Which matches

[!keyword::crazy bbcode!]

and not

!--[!keyword::crazy bbcode!]--

That's a step in the right direction.  But it includes in the match 
keywords within phrases like this:


!-- A sentence including some [!keyword::crazy bbcode!]. --

I want to ignore all bbcode within HTML quotes.  How do I do this?


thanks

kgt

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Assistance debugging php 5.x.x

2005-11-23 Thread Jochem Maas



eric van blokland wrote:

1. Overengineering perhaps...
2. Reinventing the wheel? Probably, but I just like to know every single
bit of the wheel I use


hmm, did you build your own PC? and the CPU did you build that? do you
know exactly how it works? me niether.


3. I do get confused every now and then about PHP5 O


we have a club. :-)


4. References everywhere? Yes, the code was originally written for PHP4 I
have already started removing them, but seriously, does PHP5 cares about
passing an object reference by reference (it's useless and overhead, ok, but
does it matter?)


its not my code, I haven't even seen it run, how do I know if it will
actually help? but I have a strong feeling that it will fix the issue.

so change the code and find out. given the fact that you are migrating
php4 OO code to php5 you might consider reading up on all the potential
problems that might occur.


Because the code originates from PHP4, I don't have __constructor functions


its __construct(), and given that the code contains php5 only syntax
I would suggest removing anything that is there for the benefit of
php4.

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP] Re: Can't execute external program

2005-11-23 Thread Henry Castillo
Hi
Still desperate
DOCUMENT_ROOT is /var/www/html
Check all settings at http://provi.voicenetworx.net:8080/t.php
From the command line it runs perfectly:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] html]# /var/www/html/myprog -E 123456789098.dat sample1.txt
sample1.new
(no output, it just creates the file .new)

Here is the php I've created, fairly simple:
?php
exec(/var/www/html/myprog -E 123456789098.dat sample1.txt
sample1.new);
phpinfo();
?



On 11/22/05, n.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 is /var/www/html your web root dir ?
 maybe its the plobrem.

 On 11/23/05, Henry Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  That was on of the first things I checked:
  safe mode is set to off
   Any ideas...
  Henry
Voip tech said the following on 11/20/2005 10:31 PM:
   Hello,
   I cannot get exec(), system() or passthru() to run an extenal program.
   From the command line it runs perfectly:
 
  snip
 
   I'm getting frustrated, Any help will be deeply appreciated
   Henry
 
  The answer is probably in your php.ini. Look into whether you are
  running in safe mode or not, and if you are whether you have your
  program in the safe_mode_exec_dir or not. Also check disable_functions
  to see if any of the ones you are having trouble with are listed.
 
  - Ben
 
 


 --
 Tomorrow will be a good day :-)



Re: [PHP] Assistance debugging php 5.x.x

2005-11-23 Thread eric van blokland
I will start with removing obsolete references from my code. But if the
problem persist, could you please try to find some time to look at the issue
with me. Thank you for the support so far. I'll be back here in one or two
days

Have a nice evening!


On 11/23/05, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 eric van blokland wrote:
  1. Overengineering perhaps...
  2. Reinventing the wheel? Probably, but I just like to know every single
  bit of the wheel I use

 hmm, did you build your own PC? and the CPU did you build that? do you
 know exactly how it works? me niether.

  3. I do get confused every now and then about PHP5 O

 we have a club. :-)

  4. References everywhere? Yes, the code was originally written for PHP4
 I
  have already started removing them, but seriously, does PHP5 cares about
  passing an object reference by reference (it's useless and overhead, ok,
 but
  does it matter?)

 its not my code, I haven't even seen it run, how do I know if it will
 actually help? but I have a strong feeling that it will fix the issue.

 so change the code and find out. given the fact that you are migrating
 php4 OO code to php5 you might consider reading up on all the potential
 problems that might occur.

  Because the code originates from PHP4, I don't have __constructor
 functions

 its __construct(), and given that the code contains php5 only syntax
 I would suggest removing anything that is there for the benefit of
 php4.




Re: [PHP] Re: Can't execute external program

2005-11-23 Thread comex
 Hi
 Still desperate

Try adding 21 to the command line; maybe that will show an error.

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Re: PHP and email

2005-11-23 Thread Anas Mughal
I have implemeted a system that dispatches between 600 to 2000 emails every
night. An email is sent for each recepient. My system is hosted on a shared
Linus server. I have not heard any complaints from the hosting company so
far.

Here are my recommendations:

- Have a cron job that kicks off your PHP script at intervals long enough to
guarantee the completion of an earlier execution of the script.
- Have a sleep interval between a predefined number of emails sent. You need
to figure out what works well for you depending on your dispatch frequency,
etc. (I would keep the sleep interval short.)
- No need to nice anything. The problem is the load on the smtp server. You
need to give it some time to process what you sent already before sending
more emails.
- Log all outbound activity. We log the email addresses of who receives each
message. That provides auditing and helps in recovering any failures.
- We use flags in our database to flag what messages were sent successfully.
That way, we can search and resend any failed messages.

Hope this helps.
--
Anas Mughal


[PHP] Re: Can't execute external program

2005-11-23 Thread Henry Castillo
I added 21 but still nothing... as a matter of fact it won't execute
anything. I put echo exec('asdf');
and nothing happend either ( i should've echoed an error)
However it'll execute some other commands  echo exec('ls -lart'); will
output correctly.
Any ohter Idea?
Henry


[PHP] Code generators

2005-11-23 Thread Danny
Hi there,

There´s a lot of manufacturers, about PHP code generators. What do you think
about that?

I mean, it seems like PHP Nuke fashion or other portal systems. Everybody
has its portal, but all web pages seems to be the same, because all are
under the same design.

I would like to gather opinions about it.

Example: http://www.yessoftware.com/index2.php

Thank you

P.S. Please sorry my poor english, I´m trying to improve my skills
--
dpc


[PHP] readfile and get_file_contents don't work

2005-11-23 Thread Richard K . Miller
I compiled PHP from source on Fedora Core 4, but I must have left  
something out because readfile and get_file_contents aren't working.   
If I try to connect to a http://; address I get the error failed to  
open stream: HTTP request failed.  Any ideas why?


Richard

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] PHP and email

2005-11-23 Thread Manuel Lemos

Hello,

on 11/24/2005 11:38 AM Angelo Zanetti said the following:
Thanks to those who have replied so far, yes our main concern is the 
smtp server falling over or dying. So to come back to John Nichel's answer:


 John, have you done this personally and I assume the effects were 
good?? IE everything ran smoothly?


I think you are making a big confusion. SMTP servers do not send e-mail. 
SMTP servers only receive e-mail. What sends e-mail are MTA (Mail 
Transfer Agents). Some MTA come with SMTP servers but those are 
independent operations.


There is no reason for an SMTP server or MTA to die unless it is not 
configure to work upto the operating system limits.


What mail server do you use?

--

Regards,
Manuel Lemos

Metastorage - Data object relational mapping layer generator
http://www.metastorage.net/

PHP Classes - Free ready to use OOP components written in PHP
http://www.phpclasses.org/

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] mysqli unclonable object

2005-11-23 Thread Matt Monaco
Thanks for your attention Curt, but unfortunatly that is not the issue.
Compatibility mode is not on.

For documentation's sake, I think the problem is that there are other links
in the code using the same credentials.  When you declare a link resource to
a database, PHP first searches to see if there is already one open,
therefore despite the fact that this link wasn't even using the same library
(mysql vs mysqli) it didn't matter; only one connection to the database
could be made (as root in this case).

If this is incorrect or anyone has additional insight, please reply.

Thanks,
Matt


Curt Zirzow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:13:22AM -0500, Matt Monaco wrote:
 On a Fedora 4 machine running MySQL 4.1 I am having trouble declaring an
 instance of a mysqli extension.

 class Data extends mysqli {
 

 $link = new Data(localhost, user, password, db);

 This invokes the error Trying to clone unclonable object of type Data.
 However if I create the link with a reference ...
 $link = new Data();
 ...everything works fine.

 This is because you have the ini option:

  zend.ze1_compatibility_mode = On


 Curt.
 -- 
 cat .signature: No such file or directory 

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP] Re: NTLM, PHP and Apache

2005-11-23 Thread Manuel Lemos

Hello,

on 11/23/2005 02:58 AM Joe Wollard said the following:

I'm running a rogue (the company knows about it but doesn't support it) web
server for my dept and I'd like to be able to authenticate users
transparently. The company is currently doing this on their own supported
Intranet servers via NTLM on IIS. All I'm really looking for here is a way
to extract the user name from the 'Authentication:' HTTP header using PHP on
Apache (FC4). It seems that some of the string can be extracted using
base64_decode(). Unfortunately it is not the part of the string that I need.
It's just the domain name, the computer's NET BIOS name and the Auth-type
which of course is NTLMSSP.

I found a mod_ntlm for Apache, but even if I could compile it on FC4 (yes, I
tried) I'm not sure I need/want the full functionality of NTLM - just a way
to extract the user name of the user logged into the client machine from the
HTTP header using apache.


mod_ntlm is exactly what tou need.



It seems that there are many sites out there that do this in Java and Perl,
but none describe a way to do this in PHP..any ideas?


PHP or any other language do not do anything. The Web server 
authentication module performs the authentication dialog and pass it to 
the scripts of any language through the environment variable LOGON_USER. 
All you need to do is to call GetEnv(LOGON_USER);



--

Regards,
Manuel Lemos

Metastorage - Data object relational mapping layer generator
http://www.metastorage.net/

PHP Classes - Free ready to use OOP components written in PHP
http://www.phpclasses.org/

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP] http protocols defining what gets sent between web server and browser

2005-11-23 Thread bruce
hi...

this might not be a php question but might still provide interest...

I'm working on a project, and need to know if there's anyone who's a guru
with Web Server/Client interactions. Basically, I'm trying to get a much
better/deeper understanding of the HTTP protocols defining the information
that is sent/transfered between the web server/client browser apps.

I'm interested in understanding what the various information is that gets
transfered between the apps, as well as understanding what information can
be spoofed/altered on the client side, as it goes back to the server.

I know you can get the querystring information from the
get/put/request/etc... I'm more interested in any other information that
gets transferred as potentially part of the header structure, like machine
id, mac address, date/time, etc I'm interested in whether this can be
spoofed/altered, and potentially rendered invalid by a 'man in the middle'
type of attack.

Searching google isn't getting me what i really want!!

So, if you have the skills/expertise in this area, and you're willing to
talk to me for a few minutes, I'd appreciate it. As stated, the underlying
reason for the questions is to get a better understanding of 'man in the
middle attacks' as this applies to web server apps.

Thanks

bruce
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] http protocols defining what gets sent between web server and browser

2005-11-23 Thread David Tulloh
I find the LiveHTTPHeaders extension for firefox to be very good for 
this kind of thing.

http://livehttpheaders.mozdev.org/

It gives you a realistic (as opposed to theoretical) view of exactly 
what is being sent between the browser and the server.  Networking 
details that you listed like the mac address are handled in the 
networking layer rather than by the browser, you probably also want to 
look up TCP/IP headers.



David

bruce wrote:


hi...

this might not be a php question but might still provide interest...

I'm working on a project, and need to know if there's anyone who's a guru
with Web Server/Client interactions. Basically, I'm trying to get a much
better/deeper understanding of the HTTP protocols defining the information
that is sent/transfered between the web server/client browser apps.

I'm interested in understanding what the various information is that gets
transfered between the apps, as well as understanding what information can
be spoofed/altered on the client side, as it goes back to the server.

I know you can get the querystring information from the
get/put/request/etc... I'm more interested in any other information that
gets transferred as potentially part of the header structure, like machine
id, mac address, date/time, etc I'm interested in whether this can be
spoofed/altered, and potentially rendered invalid by a 'man in the middle'
type of attack.

Searching google isn't getting me what i really want!!

So, if you have the skills/expertise in this area, and you're willing to
talk to me for a few minutes, I'd appreciate it. As stated, the underlying
reason for the questions is to get a better understanding of 'man in the
middle attacks' as this applies to web server apps.

Thanks

bruce
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 



--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] mysqli unclonable object

2005-11-23 Thread Curt Zirzow
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 06:48:50PM -0500, Matt Monaco wrote:
 Thanks for your attention Curt, but unfortunatly that is not the issue.
 Compatibility mode is not on.

What does this say just before you do $link = new ...:

  var_dump(ini_get('zend.ze1_compatibility_mode'));

If it says string(1) 0, then either your using php4 or some buggy
version of php5.

 For documentation's sake, I think the problem is that there are other links
 in the code using the same credentials.  When you declare a link resource to
 a database, PHP first searches to see if there is already one open,
 therefore despite the fact that this link wasn't even using the same library
 (mysql vs mysqli) it didn't matter; only one connection to the database
 could be made (as root in this case).
 
 If this is incorrect or anyone has additional insight, please reply.

Only the old mysql extension has any sort of credential checking
and if they are the same, returns the same connection (which can be
bypassed with an option to mysql_connect().  mysqli has no such
credential checking.


Curt.
-- 
cat .signature: No such file or directory

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] http protocols defining what gets sent between web server and browser

2005-11-23 Thread Curt Zirzow
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:53:50PM -0800, bruce wrote:
 hi...
 
 this might not be a php question but might still provide interest...
 
 I'm working on a project, and need to know if there's anyone who's a guru
 with Web Server/Client interactions. Basically, I'm trying to get a much
 better/deeper understanding of the HTTP protocols defining the information
 that is sent/transfered between the web server/client browser apps.

I'd probably recomend this book:
  http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0672324547/103-9975129-7570262

Curt.
-- 
cat .signature: No such file or directory

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] mysqli unclonable object

2005-11-23 Thread Matt Monaco
I get string(1) , should that be taken just the same as 0?  In addition 
phpinfo() indicates php 5.0.4 - does the upgrade to .5 involve remove .4 
first?


btw, as I'm new to the mailing list thing, why do some names appear in 
quotes and others do not?

Thanks,
Matt


Curt Zirzow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 06:48:50PM -0500, Matt Monaco wrote:
 Thanks for your attention Curt, but unfortunatly that is not the issue.
 Compatibility mode is not on.

 What does this say just before you do $link = new ...:

  var_dump(ini_get('zend.ze1_compatibility_mode'));

 If it says string(1) 0, then either your using php4 or some buggy
 version of php5.

 For documentation's sake, I think the problem is that there are other 
 links
 in the code using the same credentials.  When you declare a link resource 
 to
 a database, PHP first searches to see if there is already one open,
 therefore despite the fact that this link wasn't even using the same 
 library
 (mysql vs mysqli) it didn't matter; only one connection to the database
 could be made (as root in this case).

 If this is incorrect or anyone has additional insight, please reply.

 Only the old mysql extension has any sort of credential checking
 and if they are the same, returns the same connection (which can be
 bypassed with an option to mysql_connect().  mysqli has no such
 credential checking.


 Curt.
 -- 
 cat .signature: No such file or directory 

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP] Re: Code generators

2005-11-23 Thread Thiago Silva
Danny wrote:

 Hi there,
 
 There´s a lot of manufacturers, about PHP code generators. What do you
 think about that?
 
 I mean, it seems like PHP Nuke fashion or other portal systems. Everybody
 has its portal, but all web pages seems to be the same, because all are
 under the same design.
 
 I would like to gather opinions about it.
 
 Example: http://www.yessoftware.com/index2.php
 
 Thank you
 
 P.S. Please sorry my poor english, I´m trying to improve my skills
 --
 dpc

Funny.
This is getting more and more popular, in many different levels.
I've seen RAD pop up here and there on PHP(I'm planning/developing one
since 2003).
Now, i'm not sure, but maybe this is getting a lot of atention, these days,
because ruby on rails way of doing things
Or simply, people are tired of doing the same old things the same old way.
(Ok, we are tired for a long time, but seems that only now, tools like that
are having attention).

I think that what ever can do the boring work for you the exacly same way
(maybe, better) that you would, is welcome.

I'm having a look right now in that app (from yessoftware).
Seems interesting. Too bad is commercial/for-windows product :(

Thiago

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php