Re: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-09-02 Thread Peter Ford
tedd wrote:
 At 2:02 PM -0700 9/1/09, Jessi Berkelhammer wrote:
 As a monolingual North American, I am also very uncomfortable with
 this thread.

 A rant about abbreviations/IRC jargon is an appropriate discussion for
 list, but criticizing how non-native English speakers write English is
 not. This thread began with a mention of the attitude that
 non-native English speakers have, as if non-native English speakers
 are a unified group that are are more likely to have a bad attitude
 than native English speakers. Of course such a generalization could
 make people uncomfortable.

 -jessi

 tedd wrote:
  At 11:16 AM -0300 9/1/09, Martin Scotta wrote:
  As a non-english speaker I feel very uncomfortable with this thread.

   You shouldn't feel uncomfortable because no one is talking about you.
  
 
 As a fellow monolingual North American, I feel very uncomfortable about
 your statement as well. Does any other monolingual North American feel
 the same way as I do? Please expound on your feelings about this most
 disheartening and distasteful topic. (Boy has this thread degenerated
 into some politically correct bullsh#t, huh?)
 
 Look if you are not the one using u as a substitute for you, then I
 don't see any support for the discomfort you may feel about this thread.
 But you are free to feel as it is your nature (shudder).
 
 If non-English users (or anyone else for that matter) want to use u
 for you that's fine -- but I'll refrain from helping them as well. I
 am sure that if I were writing in their language and shortened it to
 uncomprehending gibberish, I would receive the same treatment from them.
 Why is this so hard to understand -- am I using words that are two lengthy?
 
 Cheers,
 
 tedd
 


Words that are two lengthy: of, an, to, it (etc.)
Words that are too lengthy: antidisestablishmentarianism,
internationalisation and that other one that begins with flocci... something

Sorry tedd :)

+1 on hating l33tsp34k and txtspk though (not tho). The American standardisation
of English spelling did quite enough damage to the beautiful language of
Shakespeare (who couldn't even spell his own name consistently), without any
more neologisms creeping in.

-- 
Peter Ford  phone: 01580 89
Developer   fax:   01580 893399
Justcroft International Ltd., Staplehurst, Kent

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] IRC and English (Bible)

2009-09-02 Thread tedd

At 9:40 AM +0100 9/2/09, Peter Ford wrote:

The American standardisation
of English spelling did quite enough damage to the beautiful language of
Shakespeare (who couldn't even spell his own name consistently), without any
more neologisms creeping in.


Okay, Shakespeare... 2B || !2B is an example of what we were talking about.

As to Shakespeare spelling his name consistently, I can't comment. 
But there is a story where Shakespeare assisted in the translation 
of the King James version of the Bible.


Shakespeare was born in 1564 and supposedly worked on the Bible when 
he was 46 years old. The Bible was published one year later in 1611.


In King James version of the Bible one can go to the 46th Psalm and 
count 46 words from the beginning and find the work Shake. 
Similarly, one can count 46 words forward from the end of the 46 
Psalm and find the word Spear.


For proof of the word count, here's a link (count for yourself):

http://bartelby.org/108/19/46.html

Was this Shakespeare's addition or a coincidence? It's probably a 
coincidence for I find it highly unlikely that Shakespeare influenced 
the writing of the Bible, but I find it interesting speculation.


Cheers,

tedd

--
---
http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



RE: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-09-02 Thread Ford, Mike
 -Original Message-
 From: Peter Ford [mailto:p...@justcroft.com]
 Sent: 02 September 2009 09:40
 
 
 Words that are two lengthy: of, an, to, it (etc.)
 Words that are too lengthy: antidisestablishmentarianism,
 internationalisation and that other one that begins with
 flocci... something
 
 Sorry tedd :)

Ooh! Ooh! Ooh! Please, sir, I know that one: it's 
floccinaucinihilipilification!

(God knows why I ever learnt that -- probably some pointless schoolboy 
challenge 40-odd years ago!!  Is that the one that means the act of valuing as 
worthless, or am I confusing it with something else?

Back on topic, I must admit that a lot of txtspk sails by without me noticing 
-- I suspect as a legacy of online chatting on DEC-10s back in the 70s, using 
10cps teletypes, with a line length limit of 80 characters!


Cheers!

Mike
 -- 
Mike Ford,
Electronic Information Developer, Libraries and Learning Innovation,  
Leeds Metropolitan University, C507, Civic Quarter Campus, 
Woodhouse Lane, LEEDS,  LS1 3HE,  United Kingdom 
Email: m.f...@leedsmet.ac.uk 
Tel: +44 113 812 4730




To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to 
http://disclaimer.leedsmet.ac.uk/email.htm


Re: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-09-01 Thread tedd

At 9:06 PM -0400 8/31/09, Paul M Foster wrote:

I'm sorry, but is anyone else annoyed by people who attempt to use IRC
jargon on mailing lists? For example, substituting u for you. Oddly
enough, I'm seeing this primarily in foreign language posters, not in
native English speakers. It's often accompanied by English so broken I
don't even bother trying to decypher it, and sometimes an *attitude*
(after which, I blacklist the poster).

Am I the only one? It's okay if I am. Just wondering.

Paul


Paul:

u r not the only 1. I h8 that 2!

l8er  :)

tedd

--
---
http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-09-01 Thread Martin Scotta
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:44 AM, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:

 At 9:06 PM -0400 8/31/09, Paul M Foster wrote:

 I'm sorry, but is anyone else annoyed by people who attempt to use IRC
 jargon on mailing lists? For example, substituting u for you. Oddly
 enough, I'm seeing this primarily in foreign language posters, not in
 native English speakers. It's often accompanied by English so broken I
 don't even bother trying to decypher it, and sometimes an *attitude*
 (after which, I blacklist the poster).

 Am I the only one? It's okay if I am. Just wondering.

 Paul


 Paul:

 u r not the only 1. I h8 that 2!

 l8er  :)

 tedd

 --
 ---
 http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com


 --
 PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
 To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


Yo estoy de acuerdo en que respetar el idioma es importante, aunque claro,
redactando sobre la computadora tiene ciertos beneficios. Yo, por ejemplo,
evito utilizar acentos.

Entiendo que pueda molestarles el hecho de las comunes abreviaturas. Eso es
lo malo del lenguaje. Es de todos y, al mismo tiempo, de nadie. Nadie puede
cambiarlo individualmente, sólo se puede mutar a través de su uso por parte
la población, éste va cambiando día a día.

Lamentablemente, a mi modo de ver, los mas jóvenes son quienes incurren en
este tipo de acciones, y no se reduce solamente al ingles, creo que este
fenómeno se da tambien en otros lenguajes (supongo) impulsado por la
deficiencia de los métodos de ingreso de texto de dispositivos moviles.

¿Por que utilizo el español? Después de todo hay una lista para ello.
El mundo en internet esté en ingles y yo, como hispano-hablante debi pasar
por un proceso de varios años para poder lograr entender, hablar y luego
redactar en ingles. ¿pasaron ustedes por el mismo proceso para participar en
esta lista?

Aqui somos muchos, de diferentes paises y culturas, lo importante -a mi modo
de ver- es la comunicación, no el medio o la forma. Con lo cual esta
recriminación carece totalmente de sentido.

Es realmente triste que en una lista de un lenguaje de codigo abierto que
pregona la libre participación y el mutuo beneficio a través de compartir
conocimiento se realize semejante acotación; aunque mucho mas triste es que
una persona oficialmente perteneciente a dicha comunidad se sume a dicho
reclamo.

Please do not reply that It's a English based list.
Or is it allowed  to discriminate here?

As a non-english speaker I feel very uncomfortable with this thread.

With the best intentions for the community, sincerely yours,

Martin Scotta
Spanish Speaker


Re: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-09-01 Thread Luke
2009/9/1 Martin Scotta martinsco...@gmail.com

 On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:44 AM, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:

  At 9:06 PM -0400 8/31/09, Paul M Foster wrote:
 
  I'm sorry, but is anyone else annoyed by people who attempt to use IRC
  jargon on mailing lists? For example, substituting u for you. Oddly
  enough, I'm seeing this primarily in foreign language posters, not in
  native English speakers. It's often accompanied by English so broken I
  don't even bother trying to decypher it, and sometimes an *attitude*
  (after which, I blacklist the poster).
 
  Am I the only one? It's okay if I am. Just wondering.
 
  Paul
 
 
  Paul:
 
  u r not the only 1. I h8 that 2!
 
  l8er  :)
 
  tedd
 
  --
  ---
  http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com
 
 
  --
  PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
  To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
 
 
 Yo estoy de acuerdo en que respetar el idioma es importante, aunque claro,
 redactando sobre la computadora tiene ciertos beneficios. Yo, por
 ejemplo,
 evito utilizar acentos.

 Entiendo que pueda molestarles el hecho de las comunes abreviaturas. Eso es
 lo malo del lenguaje. Es de todos y, al mismo tiempo, de nadie. Nadie puede
 cambiarlo individualmente, sólo se puede mutar a través de su uso por parte
 la población, éste va cambiando día a día.

 Lamentablemente, a mi modo de ver, los mas jóvenes son quienes incurren en
 este tipo de acciones, y no se reduce solamente al ingles, creo que este
 fenómeno se da tambien en otros lenguajes (supongo) impulsado por la
 deficiencia de los métodos de ingreso de texto de dispositivos moviles.

 ¿Por que utilizo el español? Después de todo hay una lista para ello.
 El mundo en internet esté en ingles y yo, como hispano-hablante debi pasar
 por un proceso de varios años para poder lograr entender, hablar y luego
 redactar en ingles. ¿pasaron ustedes por el mismo proceso para participar
 en
 esta lista?

 Aqui somos muchos, de diferentes paises y culturas, lo importante -a mi
 modo
 de ver- es la comunicación, no el medio o la forma. Con lo cual esta
 recriminación carece totalmente de sentido.

 Es realmente triste que en una lista de un lenguaje de codigo abierto que
 pregona la libre participación y el mutuo beneficio a través de compartir
 conocimiento se realize semejante acotación; aunque mucho mas triste es
 que
 una persona oficialmente perteneciente a dicha comunidad se sume a dicho
 reclamo.

 Please do not reply that It's a English based list.
 Or is it allowed  to discriminate here?

 As a non-english speaker I feel very uncomfortable with this thread.

 With the best intentions for the community, sincerely yours,

 Martin Scotta
 Spanish Speaker


I don't think we were implicating anyone in particular for this kind of
behaviour, Martin, I'm certainly not.

I'm a 'young person' myself (being 17) and do not under any circumstances
write in such a way purely because it's harder to understand.

To be honest, on this list it is mostly the foreign people that tend to use
'u' and such, is it discriminatory to state a fact?

-- 
Luke Slater
:O)

this text is protected by international copyright. it is illegal for
anybody apart from the recipient to keep a copy of this text.
dieser text wird von internationalem urheberrecht geschuetzt. allen
ausser dem/der empfaenger/-in ist untersagt, eine kopie dieses textes
zu behalten.


Re: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-09-01 Thread Ashley Sheridan
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 11:16 -0300, Martin Scotta wrote:
 On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:44 AM, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  At 9:06 PM -0400 8/31/09, Paul M Foster wrote:
 
  I'm sorry, but is anyone else annoyed by people who attempt to use IRC
  jargon on mailing lists? For example, substituting u for you. Oddly
  enough, I'm seeing this primarily in foreign language posters, not in
  native English speakers. It's often accompanied by English so broken I
  don't even bother trying to decypher it, and sometimes an *attitude*
  (after which, I blacklist the poster).
 
  Am I the only one? It's okay if I am. Just wondering.
 
  Paul
 
 
  Paul:
 
  u r not the only 1. I h8 that 2!
 
  l8er  :)
 
  tedd
 
  --
  ---
  http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com
 
 
  --
  PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
  To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
 
 
 Yo estoy de acuerdo en que respetar el idioma es importante, aunque claro,
 redactando sobre la computadora tiene ciertos beneficios. Yo, por ejemplo,
 evito utilizar acentos.
 
 Entiendo que pueda molestarles el hecho de las comunes abreviaturas. Eso es
 lo malo del lenguaje. Es de todos y, al mismo tiempo, de nadie. Nadie puede
 cambiarlo individualmente, sólo se puede mutar a través de su uso por parte
 la población, éste va cambiando día a día.
 
 Lamentablemente, a mi modo de ver, los mas jóvenes son quienes incurren en
 este tipo de acciones, y no se reduce solamente al ingles, creo que este
 fenómeno se da tambien en otros lenguajes (supongo) impulsado por la
 deficiencia de los métodos de ingreso de texto de dispositivos moviles.
 
 ¿Por que utilizo el español? Después de todo hay una lista para ello.
 El mundo en internet esté en ingles y yo, como hispano-hablante debi pasar
 por un proceso de varios años para poder lograr entender, hablar y luego
 redactar en ingles. ¿pasaron ustedes por el mismo proceso para participar en
 esta lista?
 
 Aqui somos muchos, de diferentes paises y culturas, lo importante -a mi modo
 de ver- es la comunicación, no el medio o la forma. Con lo cual esta
 recriminación carece totalmente de sentido.
 
 Es realmente triste que en una lista de un lenguaje de codigo abierto que
 pregona la libre participación y el mutuo beneficio a través de compartir
 conocimiento se realize semejante acotación; aunque mucho mas triste es que
 una persona oficialmente perteneciente a dicha comunidad se sume a dicho
 reclamo.
 
 Please do not reply that It's a English based list.
 Or is it allowed  to discriminate here?
 
 As a non-english speaker I feel very uncomfortable with this thread.
 
 With the best intentions for the community, sincerely yours,
 
 Martin Scotta
 Spanish Speaker

I disagree (and I did translate and read your Spanish message). This
mailing list is English (I'm not sure if similar ones exist for
Spanish-speaking people) so I wouldn't say that the people on the list
can be accused of behaving the same way as these 'txt'ers. While Spanish
is a very popular language, English is by far the most popular language
of the world, being spoken as a main language (not necessarily the
mother tongue though) in more countries than any other. It's also the
most popular second language for those that don't speak it as a main
language.

I think the main point of this thread was to point out the issue of
those who use 'txt spk' for normal conversations. It makes a bit of
sense to do this for phone text messages, and is only natural that it
came to be (character limits on a message, easier to type on a phone,
etc) but there should be no excuse for posters on this list. It takes
barely any more time to type 'you' instead of 'u', but trying to read a
message full of stuff like that, I get a migrane and feel disinclined to
help out purely because it takes too much effort to understand!

Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk




--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-09-01 Thread tedd

At 3:27 PM +0100 9/1/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:

On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 11:16 -0300, Martin Scotta wrote:
-snip-
 

 Martin Scotta
 Spanish Speaker


I disagree (and I did translate and read your Spanish message). This
mailing list is English (I'm not sure if similar ones exist for
Spanish-speaking people) so I wouldn't say that the people on the list
can be accused of behaving the same way as these 'txt'ers. While Spanish
is a very popular language, English is by far the most popular language
of the world, being spoken as a main language (not necessarily the
mother tongue though) in more countries than any other. It's also the
most popular second language for those that don't speak it as a main
language.

I think the main point of this thread was to point out the issue of
those who use 'txt spk' for normal conversations. It makes a bit of
sense to do this for phone text messages, and is only natural that it
came to be (character limits on a message, easier to type on a phone,
etc) but there should be no excuse for posters on this list. It takes
barely any more time to type 'you' instead of 'u', but trying to read a
message full of stuff like that, I get a migrane and feel disinclined to
help out purely because it takes too much effort to understand!

Thanks,
Ash


Ash:

I agree with you -- this was not a slam against non-English speaking 
people but rather a compliant against those who are too lazy to type 
out you (instead shorten it to u).


My take on this is, programming does not allow you to take liberties 
with syntax, you must spell exactly as you are required. Likewise, 
don't take such liberties with this list. In short, if you want us to 
take the time to understand your problem, then don't make our work 
harder by requiring us to first figure out the syntax of your 
question.


I ignore anyone using shortened words, such as u instead of you. 
I figure that they don't want to take the time to ask correctly, then 
I don't want to take the time to figure out what they are asking.


Cheers,

tedd

--
---
http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



RE: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-09-01 Thread Bob McConnell
From: Luke

 2009/9/1 Martin Scotta martinsco...@gmail.com
 
 On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:44 AM, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:

  At 9:06 PM -0400 8/31/09, Paul M Foster wrote:
 
  I'm sorry, but is anyone else annoyed by people who attempt to use IRC
  jargon on mailing lists? For example, substituting u for you. Oddly
  enough, I'm seeing this primarily in foreign language posters, not in
  native English speakers. It's often accompanied by English so broken I
  don't even bother trying to decypher it, and sometimes an *attitude*
  (after which, I blacklist the poster).
 
  Am I the only one? It's okay if I am. Just wondering.
 
  Paul
 
  Paul:
 
  u r not the only 1. I h8 that 2!
 
  l8er  :)
 
  tedd
 
 Yo estoy de acuerdo en que respetar el idioma es importante, aunque claro,
 redactando sobre la computadora tiene ciertos beneficios. Yo, por
 ejemplo,
 evito utilizar acentos.

 Entiendo que pueda molestarles el hecho de las comunes abreviaturas. Eso es
 lo malo del lenguaje. Es de todos y, al mismo tiempo, de nadie. Nadie puede
 cambiarlo individualmente, sólo se puede mutar a través de su uso por parte
 la población, éste va cambiando día a día.

 Lamentablemente, a mi modo de ver, los mas jóvenes son quienes incurren en
 este tipo de acciones, y no se reduce solamente al ingles, creo que este
 fenómeno se da tambien en otros lenguajes (supongo) impulsado por la
 deficiencia de los métodos de ingreso de texto de dispositivos moviles.

 ¿Por que utilizo el español? Después de todo hay una lista para ello.
 El mundo en internet esté en ingles y yo, como hispano-hablante debi pasar
 por un proceso de varios años para poder lograr entender, hablar y luego
 redactar en ingles. ¿pasaron ustedes por el mismo proceso para participar
 en
 esta lista?

 Aqui somos muchos, de diferentes paises y culturas, lo importante -a mi
 modo
 de ver- es la comunicación, no el medio o la forma. Con lo cual esta
 recriminación carece totalmente de sentido.

 Es realmente triste que en una lista de un lenguaje de codigo abierto que
 pregona la libre participación y el mutuo beneficio a través de compartir
 conocimiento se realize semejante acotación; aunque mucho mas triste es
 que
 una persona oficialmente perteneciente a dicha comunidad se sume a dicho
 reclamo.

 Please do not reply that It's a English based list.
 Or is it allowed  to discriminate here?

 As a non-english speaker I feel very uncomfortable with this thread.

 With the best intentions for the community, sincerely yours,

 Martin Scotta
 Spanish Speaker

 
 I don't think we were implicating anyone in particular for this kind of
 behaviour, Martin, I'm certainly not.
 
 I'm a 'young person' myself (being 17) and do not under any circumstances
 write in such a way purely because it's harder to understand.
 
 To be honest, on this list it is mostly the foreign people that tend to use
 'u' and such, is it discriminatory to state a fact?
 
 -- 
 Luke Slater

But is it a fact that can be verified and documented or merely a common 
impression?

Be that as it may, the purpose of this list is to communicate. We all come here 
to get or give help. It is difficult to do that when questions or answers are 
not expressed clearly. If it is too difficult to read the question, fewer 
people are likely to make an effort to understand it well enough to reply. So 
the more effort that goes into making a request readable, the more likely there 
will be useful replies. This is a trade off that many of us have to make every 
day, no matter what language(s) we are comfortable with. Ever hold a verbal 
conversation with a Texan, a Bostonian and an Australian all at once?

But often even English speakers have problems expressing themselves in written 
form. It appears to me that most high schools in the USofA stopped teaching 
grammar sometime in the late 1970's. This is actually one of the better lists 
that I read regularly. Texting abbreviations are simply the most recent form of 
corruption. 133t 5p34k is even worse. Don't even get me started on homonyms.

Bob McConnell

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



RE: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-09-01 Thread Ashley Sheridan
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 11:05 -0400, Bob McConnell wrote:
 From: Luke
 
  2009/9/1 Martin Scotta martinsco...@gmail.com
  
  On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:44 AM, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   At 9:06 PM -0400 8/31/09, Paul M Foster wrote:
  
   I'm sorry, but is anyone else annoyed by people who attempt to use IRC
   jargon on mailing lists? For example, substituting u for you. Oddly
   enough, I'm seeing this primarily in foreign language posters, not in
   native English speakers. It's often accompanied by English so broken I
   don't even bother trying to decypher it, and sometimes an *attitude*
   (after which, I blacklist the poster).
  
   Am I the only one? It's okay if I am. Just wondering.
  
   Paul
  
   Paul:
  
   u r not the only 1. I h8 that 2!
  
   l8er  :)
  
   tedd
  
  Yo estoy de acuerdo en que respetar el idioma es importante, aunque claro,
  redactando sobre la computadora tiene ciertos beneficios. Yo, por
  ejemplo,
  evito utilizar acentos.
 
  Entiendo que pueda molestarles el hecho de las comunes abreviaturas. Eso es
  lo malo del lenguaje. Es de todos y, al mismo tiempo, de nadie. Nadie puede
  cambiarlo individualmente, sólo se puede mutar a través de su uso por parte
  la población, éste va cambiando día a día.
 
  Lamentablemente, a mi modo de ver, los mas jóvenes son quienes incurren en
  este tipo de acciones, y no se reduce solamente al ingles, creo que este
  fenómeno se da tambien en otros lenguajes (supongo) impulsado por la
  deficiencia de los métodos de ingreso de texto de dispositivos moviles.
 
  ¿Por que utilizo el español? Después de todo hay una lista para ello.
  El mundo en internet esté en ingles y yo, como hispano-hablante debi pasar
  por un proceso de varios años para poder lograr entender, hablar y luego
  redactar en ingles. ¿pasaron ustedes por el mismo proceso para participar
  en
  esta lista?
 
  Aqui somos muchos, de diferentes paises y culturas, lo importante -a mi
  modo
  de ver- es la comunicación, no el medio o la forma. Con lo cual esta
  recriminación carece totalmente de sentido.
 
  Es realmente triste que en una lista de un lenguaje de codigo abierto que
  pregona la libre participación y el mutuo beneficio a través de compartir
  conocimiento se realize semejante acotación; aunque mucho mas triste es
  que
  una persona oficialmente perteneciente a dicha comunidad se sume a dicho
  reclamo.
 
  Please do not reply that It's a English based list.
  Or is it allowed  to discriminate here?
 
  As a non-english speaker I feel very uncomfortable with this thread.
 
  With the best intentions for the community, sincerely yours,
 
  Martin Scotta
  Spanish Speaker
 
  
  I don't think we were implicating anyone in particular for this kind of
  behaviour, Martin, I'm certainly not.
  
  I'm a 'young person' myself (being 17) and do not under any circumstances
  write in such a way purely because it's harder to understand.
  
  To be honest, on this list it is mostly the foreign people that tend to use
  'u' and such, is it discriminatory to state a fact?
  
  -- 
  Luke Slater
 
 But is it a fact that can be verified and documented or merely a common 
 impression?
 
 Be that as it may, the purpose of this list is to communicate. We all come 
 here to get or give help. It is difficult to do that when questions or 
 answers are not expressed clearly. If it is too difficult to read the 
 question, fewer people are likely to make an effort to understand it well 
 enough to reply. So the more effort that goes into making a request readable, 
 the more likely there will be useful replies. This is a trade off that many 
 of us have to make every day, no matter what language(s) we are comfortable 
 with. Ever hold a verbal conversation with a Texan, a Bostonian and an 
 Australian all at once?
 
 But often even English speakers have problems expressing themselves in 
 written form. It appears to me that most high schools in the USofA stopped 
 teaching grammar sometime in the late 1970's. This is actually one of the 
 better lists that I read regularly. Texting abbreviations are simply the most 
 recent form of corruption. 133t 5p34k is even worse. Don't even get me 
 started on homonyms.
 
 Bob McConnell
 
I don't think homonyms are the main problem, I believe it's homophones.
I see a lot of people use there, their and they're
interchangeably. The one that really gets my goat though, is 'loose' and
'lose'. Very different words, but to many people, they might as well be
the same!

Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk




--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-09-01 Thread tedd

At 11:16 AM -0300 9/1/09, Martin Scotta wrote:

As a non-english speaker I feel very uncomfortable with this thread.


You shouldn't feel uncomfortable because no one is talking about you.

Cheers,

tedd

--
---
http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-09-01 Thread Ashley Sheridan
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 13:33 -0400, tedd wrote:
 At 11:16 AM -0300 9/1/09, Martin Scotta wrote:
 As a non-english speaker I feel very uncomfortable with this thread.
 
 You shouldn't feel uncomfortable because no one is talking about you.
 
 Cheers,
 
 tedd
 
 -- 
 ---
 http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com
 
I'll second that, I've not once seen you use txt spk, 744t speak, or any
other abominable mess that passes for language these days!

Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk




-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-09-01 Thread Daniel Brown
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 13:36, Ashley Sheridana...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
 I'll second that, I've not once seen you use txt spk, 744t speak, or any
 other abominable mess that passes for language these days!

744t speak is that like 733t speak 2.0?  ;-P

-- 
/Daniel P. Brown
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/
Check out our great hosting and dedicated server deals at
http://twitter.com/pilotpig

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-09-01 Thread Ashley Sheridan
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 14:07 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:

 On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 13:36, Ashley Sheridana...@ashleysheridan.co.uk 
 wrote:
  I'll second that, I've not once seen you use txt spk, 744t speak, or any
  other abominable mess that passes for language these days!
 
 744t speak is that like 733t speak 2.0?  ;-P
 

Yeah, but the newer version...

Damnit, my typing has degraded a little after 11 hours!

Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk




Re: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-09-01 Thread Jessi Berkelhammer
As a monolingual North American, I am also very uncomfortable with this 
thread.


A rant about abbreviations/IRC jargon is an appropriate discussion for 
list, but criticizing how non-native English speakers write English is 
not. This thread began with a mention of the attitude that non-native 
English speakers have, as if non-native English speakers are a unified 
group that are are more likely to have a bad attitude than native 
English speakers. Of course such a generalization could make people 
uncomfortable.


-jessi

tedd wrote:
 At 11:16 AM -0300 9/1/09, Martin Scotta wrote:
 As a non-english speaker I feel very uncomfortable with this thread.

 You shouldn't feel uncomfortable because no one is talking about you.

 Cheers,

 tedd



Daniel Brown wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 21:06, Paul M Fosterpa...@quillandmouse.com 

wrote:

I'm sorry, but is anyone else annoyed by people who attempt to use IRC
jargon on mailing lists? For example, substituting u for you. Oddly
enough, I'm seeing this primarily in foreign language posters, not in
native English speakers. It's often accompanied by English so broken I
don't even bother trying to decypher it, and sometimes an *attitude*
(after which, I blacklist the poster).

Am I the only one? It's okay if I am. Just wondering.


Same here, Paul.  You're correct in associating it primarily with
non-native-English speakers, as well.  Worse still: they use that same
language in professional job proposals.  Worse beyond that: they are
selected for said jobs.  I've dropped clients because they have put me
onto a team with folks like that.  Sort of cutting out the bottom of
the barrel, really.



--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-09-01 Thread Daniel Brown
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 17:02, Jessi Berkelhammerjberkelham...@desc.org wrote:
 As a monolingual North American, I am also very uncomfortable with this
 thread.

 A rant about abbreviations/IRC jargon is an appropriate discussion for list,
 but criticizing how non-native English speakers write English is not. This
 thread began with a mention of the attitude that non-native English
 speakers have, as if non-native English speakers are a unified group that
 are are more likely to have a bad attitude than native English speakers. Of
 course such a generalization could make people uncomfortable.

If you're going to quote me in your email, at least don't
insinuate that I've said something that I haven't, Jessi.

-- 
/Daniel P. Brown
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/
Check out our great hosting and dedicated server deals at
http://twitter.com/pilotpig

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-09-01 Thread Paul M Foster
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 02:02:31PM -0700, Jessi Berkelhammer wrote:

 As a monolingual North American, I am also very uncomfortable with this
 thread.

 A rant about abbreviations/IRC jargon is an appropriate discussion for
 list, but criticizing how non-native English speakers write English is
 not. This thread began with a mention of the attitude that non-native
 English speakers have, as if non-native English speakers are a unified
 group that are are more likely to have a bad attitude than native
 English speakers. Of course such a generalization could make people
 uncomfortable.

I would argue that it's perfectly acceptable to criticize how non-native
English speakers write English. But that's neither here nor there.

You've clearly misread or misunderstood the original post, so let's
parse it:

I'm sorry, but is anyone else annoyed by people who attempt to use IRC
jargon on mailing lists?

Just a question, aimed at no one in particular, but expressing
annoyance.

For example, substituting 'u' for 'you'.

Just a statement to clarify the original proposition.

Oddly enough, I'm seeing this primarily in foreign language posters,
not in native English speakers. 

Again, an observation. It does not say *all* foreign language posters
are doing this. It only says that I've observed this *primarily* in
foreign language posters. It doesn't say foreign language posters are
bad or inferior, or even that they're part of al Qaeda. Just that I've
noticed this trend in foreign language posters mostly.

It's often accompanied by English so broken I don't even bother trying
to decypher it,

Another observation. It points out that where I've seen IRC-like idioms
in foreign language posters, I've also *often* observed very poor English.
Not *always*, but *often*. Again, I'm not disparaging all foreign
language posters.

and sometimes an *attitude* (after which, I blacklist the poster).

Another observation.

So we have the set of IRC-idiom posters. Of those (according to my post)
*primarily* they are foreign language posters. So foreign language
posters who post IRC-idioms are a large subset of IRC-idiom posters. Of
*that* subset, I *often* see very broken English (a subset of the
subset). And *sometimes* I see an attitude accompanying the posts (a
subset of the subset of the subset).

Okay? If your native language is English, the above should have been
clear in the first place. And if it's not English, then I've just done
you the favor of parsing it for you. (You can send cash to thank me. ;-)

Paul

-- 
Paul M. Foster

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-09-01 Thread tedd

At 2:02 PM -0700 9/1/09, Jessi Berkelhammer wrote:
As a monolingual North American, I am also very uncomfortable with 
this thread.


A rant about abbreviations/IRC jargon is an appropriate discussion 
for list, but criticizing how non-native English speakers write 
English is not. This thread began with a mention of the attitude 
that non-native English speakers have, as if non-native English 
speakers are a unified group that are are more likely to have a bad 
attitude than native English speakers. Of course such a 
generalization could make people uncomfortable.


-jessi

tedd wrote:

 At 11:16 AM -0300 9/1/09, Martin Scotta wrote:

 As a non-english speaker I feel very uncomfortable with this thread.



  You shouldn't feel uncomfortable because no one is talking about you.
 


As a fellow monolingual North American, I feel very uncomfortable 
about your statement as well. Does any other monolingual North 
American feel the same way as I do? Please expound on your feelings 
about this most disheartening and distasteful topic. (Boy has this 
thread degenerated into some politically correct bullsh#t, huh?)


Look if you are not the one using u as a substitute for you, then 
I don't see any support for the discomfort you may feel about this 
thread. But you are free to feel as it is your nature (shudder).


If non-English users (or anyone else for that matter) want to use u 
for you that's fine -- but I'll refrain from helping them as well. 
I am sure that if I were writing in their language and shortened it 
to uncomprehending gibberish, I would receive the same treatment from 
them. Why is this so hard to understand -- am I using words that are 
two lengthy?


Cheers,

tedd

--
---
http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP] IRC and English

2009-08-31 Thread Paul M Foster
I'm sorry, but is anyone else annoyed by people who attempt to use IRC
jargon on mailing lists? For example, substituting u for you. Oddly
enough, I'm seeing this primarily in foreign language posters, not in
native English speakers. It's often accompanied by English so broken I
don't even bother trying to decypher it, and sometimes an *attitude*
(after which, I blacklist the poster).

Am I the only one? It's okay if I am. Just wondering.

Paul

-- 
Paul M. Foster

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-08-31 Thread Stephen

Paul M Foster wrote:

I'm sorry, but is anyone else annoyed by people who attempt to use IRC
jargon on mailing lists? For example, substituting u for you. Oddly
enough, I'm seeing this primarily in foreign language posters, not in
native English speakers. It's often accompanied by English so broken I
don't even bother trying to decypher it, and sometimes an *attitude*
(after which, I blacklist the poster).

Am I the only one? It's okay if I am. Just wondering.
  

IRC ??

I haven't used that in years. :)

More likely it is the habits learned in texting carrying over to email.

Stephen

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-08-31 Thread Daniel Brown
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 21:06, Paul M Fosterpa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
 I'm sorry, but is anyone else annoyed by people who attempt to use IRC
 jargon on mailing lists? For example, substituting u for you. Oddly
 enough, I'm seeing this primarily in foreign language posters, not in
 native English speakers. It's often accompanied by English so broken I
 don't even bother trying to decypher it, and sometimes an *attitude*
 (after which, I blacklist the poster).

 Am I the only one? It's okay if I am. Just wondering.

Same here, Paul.  You're correct in associating it primarily with
non-native-English speakers, as well.  Worse still: they use that same
language in professional job proposals.  Worse beyond that: they are
selected for said jobs.  I've dropped clients because they have put me
onto a team with folks like that.  Sort of cutting out the bottom of
the barrel, really.

-- 
/Daniel P. Brown
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/
Check out our great hosting and dedicated server deals at
http://twitter.com/pilotpig

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] IRC and English

2009-08-31 Thread Paul M Foster
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 09:10:54PM -0400, Stephen wrote:

 Paul M Foster wrote:
 I'm sorry, but is anyone else annoyed by people who attempt to use IRC
 jargon on mailing lists? For example, substituting u for you. Oddly
 enough, I'm seeing this primarily in foreign language posters, not in
 native English speakers. It's often accompanied by English so broken I
 don't even bother trying to decypher it, and sometimes an *attitude*
 (after which, I blacklist the poster).

 Am I the only one? It's okay if I am. Just wondering.

 IRC ??

 I haven't used that in years. :)

 More likely it is the habits learned in texting carrying over to email.

I don't text, and seldom IRC, but you're probably right. I think the
jargon is about the same, though probably expanded in texting.

Paul

-- 
Paul M. Foster

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php