Re: kdeconnect naming

2015-03-07 Thread Jonathan Riddell

I've just brought back kdeconnect-kde into Kubuntu with only the files
for kioslave and file action in the .deb, this adds back file browsing
in dolphin which is still kde4.

Jonathan



On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 10:53:09AM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer 
wrote:
 On Thursday 05 March 2015 22:05:59 Albert Vaca wrote:
  Maybe in Debian kdeconnect could be a virtual package, and then have 
  kdeconnect-plasma and kdeconnect-kde that would provide it? I would love
  to find a nice way to have coexisting packages for KDE4 and Plasma5, not
  only for KDE Connect but for every other KDE application in the same
  situation.
 
 It might be worth *if* we keep KDE4 stuff for Strech. But we are trying the 
 opposite, so I would say let's just wait 6 to 8 months after the freeze ends 
 and see if we really need it.
 
 -- 
 The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance.
   http://www.devtopics.com/best-programming-jokes/
 
 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
 http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
 http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/



-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk


Re: kdeconnect naming

2015-03-07 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Thursday 05 March 2015 22:05:59 Albert Vaca wrote:
 Maybe in Debian kdeconnect could be a virtual package, and then have 
 kdeconnect-plasma and kdeconnect-kde that would provide it? I would love
 to find a nice way to have coexisting packages for KDE4 and Plasma5, not
 only for KDE Connect but for every other KDE application in the same
 situation.

It might be worth *if* we keep KDE4 stuff for Strech. But we are trying the 
opposite, so I would say let's just wait 6 to 8 months after the freeze ends 
and see if we really need it.

-- 
The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance.
  http://www.devtopics.com/best-programming-jokes/

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: kdeconnect naming

2015-03-04 Thread David Suarez
Hi,

  On Tuesday 03 March Aleix Pol wrote:
  I know Albert is, better send an e-mail to the official mailing list
[1] for fresher information.

Maybe you missunderstood me... but thanks, already suscribed some time ago.

2015-03-04 1:47 GMT+01:00 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez perezme...@gmail.com:
 On Tuesday 03 March 2015 15:35:40 David Suarez wrote:
 I was thinking on the final user, when he will search for kdeconnect on his
 package manager and gets listed:

 kdeconnect
 kdeconnect-plasma

 Could be confusing at first sight.

 Agreed, but if we manage to get plasma in shape in some months/a year we might
 consider dropping the KDE 4 version.

Yep yep. Maybe this year I could help a bit more inside KDE team ;)

Cheers !

  David

-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: kdeconnect naming

2015-03-03 Thread Aleix Pol
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:35 PM, David Suarez david.sephi...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 El 03/03/2015 14:23, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez perezme...@gmail.com
 escribió:

 On Tuesday 03 March 2015 00:40:18 Aleix Pol wrote:
 [snip]
  I don't think kdeconnect-plasma is a bad idea.

 I don't think that kdeconnect-plasma is a bad name, it goes with the new kde
 release.

 I was thinking on the final user, when he will search for kdeconnect on his
 package manager and gets listed:

 kdeconnect
 kdeconnect-plasma

 Could be confusing at first sight.

 I agree with this. But Debian's real maintainer is David, so he is the one
 who
 has to ACK the name.

 For me it's not a problem naming it kdeconnect-plasma. Better this way, so
 upstream name is not changed.

 And, if like Aleix suggest, we will see more kdeconnect-* things, better to
 stay with it.

  I can see other kdeconnect-* happening some day.

 Are Albert and you planning something soon ?

 Cheers,

   David

I know Albert is, better send an e-mail to the official mailing list
[1] for fresher information.

Aleix

[1] kdeconn...@kde.org

-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: kdeconnect naming

2015-03-03 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Tuesday 03 March 2015 00:40:18 Aleix Pol wrote:
[snip] 
 I don't think kdeconnect-plasma is a bad idea. I can see other
 kdeconnect-* happening some day.

I agree with this. But Debian's real maintainer is David, so he is the one who 
has to ACK the name.

-- 
3: Que ocurre en el escritorio de Windows cuando se abre una ventana
* Se cierra una puerta
Damian Nadales
http://mx.grulic.org.ar/lurker/message/20080307.141449.a70fb2fc.es.html

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: kdeconnect naming

2015-03-03 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Tuesday 03 March 2015 15:35:40 David Suarez wrote:
 Hi,
 
 El 03/03/2015 14:23, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez perezmeyer
 perezme...@gmail.com@ perezme...@gmail.comgmail.com
 
 perezme...@gmail.com escribió:
  On Tuesday 03 March 2015 00:40:18 Aleix Pol wrote:
  [snip]
  
   I don't think kdeconnect-plasma is a bad idea.
 
 I don't think that kdeconnect-plasma is a bad name, it goes with the new
 kde release.
 
 I was thinking on the final user, when he will search for kdeconnect on his
 package manager and gets listed:
 
 kdeconnect
 kdeconnect-plasma
 
 Could be confusing at first sight.

Agreed, but if we manage to get plasma in shape in some months/a year we might 
consider dropping the KDE 4 version.


-- 
$ make war
make: *** No rule to make target `war'.  Stop.  Try `love' instead
  David Gravereaux

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: kdeconnect naming

2015-03-03 Thread David Suarez
Hi,

El 03/03/2015 14:23, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez perezmeyer
perezme...@gmail.com@ perezme...@gmail.comgmail.com
perezme...@gmail.com escribió:

 On Tuesday 03 March 2015 00:40:18 Aleix Pol wrote:
 [snip]
  I don't think kdeconnect-plasma is a bad idea.

I don't think that kdeconnect-plasma is a bad name, it goes with the new
kde release.

I was thinking on the final user, when he will search for kdeconnect on his
package manager and gets listed:

kdeconnect
kdeconnect-plasma

Could be confusing at first sight.

 I agree with this. But Debian's real maintainer is David, so he is the
one who
 has to ACK the name.

For me it's not a problem naming it kdeconnect-plasma. Better this way, so
upstream name is not changed.

And, if like Aleix suggest, we will see more kdeconnect-* things, better to
stay with it.

  I can see other kdeconnect-* happening some day.

Are Albert and you planning something soon ?

Cheers,

  David
-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: kdeconnect naming

2015-03-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
I don't see a reason to diverge from Debian here.

Scott K

On Monday, March 02, 2015 08:24:26 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote:
 I'm packaging the Plasma 5 version of kdeconnect, I'd like to ask for a FFe
 and any testers very welcome
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdeconnect/+bug/1427349
 ppa:jr/ppa  install kdeconnect-plasma5
 
 Upstream releases the kdelibs4 version as kdeconnect-kde and plans to
 release the plasma 5 version as kdeconnect-plasma5.  The naming is
 inelegant and debian have changed the source and binary to just
 kdeconnect.  What should I name the plasma 5 version?  It does overlap and
 replace the kdelibs4 version in various ways but with be released with a
 different tar upstream.
 
 Jonathan


-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk


Re: kdeconnect naming

2015-03-02 Thread Jonathan Riddell
 What should I name the plasma 5 version?  It does overlap and replace the
kdelibs4 version in various ways but with be released with a different tar
upstream.

 How about kdeconnect5, renaming the kde4 version to kdeconnect4 (adding a
 transitional package for kdeconnect) ?


Ug it's already different from the upstream tar name, I wouldn't want to
make another change compared to upstream when there's no reason to.

Jonathan
-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: kdeconnect naming

2015-03-02 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Debian haven't made a decision as it hasn't been packaged yet.  The
question for now is should we diverge from probable upstream naming.

Jonathan


On 2 March 2015 at 22:45, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:

 I don't see a reason to diverge from Debian here.

 Scott K

 On Monday, March 02, 2015 08:24:26 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote:
  I'm packaging the Plasma 5 version of kdeconnect, I'd like to ask for a
 FFe
  and any testers very welcome
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdeconnect/+bug/1427349
  ppa:jr/ppa  install kdeconnect-plasma5
 
  Upstream releases the kdelibs4 version as kdeconnect-kde and plans to
  release the plasma 5 version as kdeconnect-plasma5.  The naming is
  inelegant and debian have changed the source and binary to just
  kdeconnect.  What should I name the plasma 5 version?  It does overlap
 and
  replace the kdelibs4 version in various ways but with be released with a
  different tar upstream.
 
  Jonathan


 --
 kubuntu-devel mailing list
 kubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel

-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: kdeconnect naming

2015-03-02 Thread Aleix Pol
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Jonathan Riddell j...@jriddell.org wrote:
 I'm packaging the Plasma 5 version of kdeconnect, I'd like to ask for a FFe
 and any testers very welcome
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdeconnect/+bug/1427349
 ppa:jr/ppa  install kdeconnect-plasma5

 Upstream releases the kdelibs4 version as kdeconnect-kde and plans to
 release the plasma 5 version as kdeconnect-plasma5.  The naming is inelegant
 and debian have changed the source and binary to just kdeconnect.  What
 should I name the plasma 5 version?  It does overlap and replace the
 kdelibs4 version in various ways but with be released with a different tar
 upstream.

 Jonathan


 --
 kubuntu-devel mailing list
 kubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel


I don't think kdeconnect-plasma is a bad idea. I can see other
kdeconnect-* happening some day.

Aleix

-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk


Re: kdeconnect naming

2015-03-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
OK.  I misread the email then.  I'd just call it what upstream is going to 
call it then if Debian is willing to do the same.  I agree it's inelegant, but 
users will rarely see it since this will get installed primarily via 
metapackage (I assume).

Scott K

On Monday, March 02, 2015 11:32:00 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote:
 Debian haven't made a decision as it hasn't been packaged yet.  The
 question for now is should we diverge from probable upstream naming.
 
 Jonathan
 
 On 2 March 2015 at 22:45, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
  I don't see a reason to diverge from Debian here.
  
  Scott K
  
  On Monday, March 02, 2015 08:24:26 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote:
   I'm packaging the Plasma 5 version of kdeconnect, I'd like to ask for a
  
  FFe
  
   and any testers very welcome
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdeconnect/+bug/1427349
   ppa:jr/ppa  install kdeconnect-plasma5
   
   Upstream releases the kdelibs4 version as kdeconnect-kde and plans to
   release the plasma 5 version as kdeconnect-plasma5.  The naming is
   inelegant and debian have changed the source and binary to just
   kdeconnect.  What should I name the plasma 5 version?  It does overlap
  
  and
  
   replace the kdelibs4 version in various ways but with be released with a
   different tar upstream.
   
   Jonathan
  
  --
  kubuntu-devel mailing list
  kubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
  Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel


-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk


Re: kdeconnect naming

2015-03-02 Thread David Suarez
Hi!

El 02/03/2015 20:24, Jonathan Riddell j...@jriddell.org escribió:

 I'm packaging the Plasma 5 version of kdeconnect, I'd like to ask for a
FFe and any testers very welcome
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdeconnect/+bug/1427349
 ppa:jr/ppa  install kdeconnect-plasma5
 Upstream releases the kdelibs4 version as kdeconnect-kde and plans to
release the plasma 5 version as kdeconnect-plasma5.  The naming is
inelegant and debian have changed the source and binary to just
kdeconnect.

I think that the naming, *-kde is for differentation beetween pc - android
software. In Debian we just changed it, to only kdeconnect, to avoid
redundance.

 What should I name the plasma 5 version?  It does overlap and replace the
kdelibs4 version in various ways but with be released with a different tar
upstream.

How about kdeconnect5, renaming the kde4 version to kdeconnect4 (adding a
transitional package for kdeconnect) ?

Cheers,

  David
-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk