Re: [ADMIN] Email issue

[Kurt Wendt]

Yeah - GMail has been tossing a BUNCH of the recent ProFox emails into my
SPAM. I have keep trying to say it's not Spam - as I've done it a lot in
the past year, but, it keeps trying to push ProFox into Spam! Maybe
its cause it Knows that the Fox is Dead! Yikes!

OK - that just meant to be humorous - don't Stone me...

-K

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:12 AM Ed Leafe  wrote:

> On Apr 23, 2024, at 11:22, Joe Yoder  wrote:
> >
> > I no longer get any of the list emails.  The only way for me to get
> answers
> > to my questions is by going to the archive.  Does anyone know how to
> > restore delivery?
>
> I checked the list status, and your account is still active. So I checked
> the logs on the server, and they show mail going out normally via google:
>
> 91011:Apr 23 10:31:35 mail postfix/smtp[268230]: 9BDC5120630: to=<
> j...@wheypower.com>, relay=aspmx.l.google.com[142.251.163.26]:25,
> delay=0.96, delays=0.14/0.31/0.15/0.37, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0
> OK  1713886295 s15-20020a0562140caf00b006992314d921si13547765qvs.223 -
> gsmtp)
>
> So if you're not getting emails from the list, check your spam folder, and
> if they aren't there, contact your email provider.
>
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/caamusvhognj9r5r4cwius6+heetbkf79kz48gikt8sucqww...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: VFPAdvanced - My Problem, My Tests & Some Results

[Kurt Wendt]

Hey Paul,

Completely understood why my suggestion would not work in your case. And,
WOW - I'm Thrilled to hear that Alan's suggestion blew you away - and put
your data processing into Turbo Speed Mode!

And, yeah -  I still may at some point create a VFP app for work.

-K


On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 2:55 PM Paul H. Tarver  wrote:

> I think that is still why I'm programming in VFP. It is fun to still be
> learning new stuff about this language and what I can do with it after all
> these years! :)
>
> Enjoy your new role but don't leave VFP too far behind!
>
> PS: I understand your comments about set and forget with no updates and if
> this were an in-house project that I was doing and not a retail product,
> I'd probably take your advice! But paying customers demand, so we try to
> achieve.
>
> Paul H. Tarver
> Tarver Program Consultants, Inc.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt
> Wendt
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2024 10:20 PM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: VFPAdvanced - My Problem, My Tests & Some Results
>
> Thank you Paul for your kind words.
>
> One suggestion - why not suggest that the Import process is run at the End
> of the Day - and have the User start it up and just walk away for the
> night. Then - NO NEED to have any kind of Status updates on the screen - as
> nobody is watching it!
>
> Also, an alternate option - suggest client run this on a machine not in use
> - and it can run unattended.
>
> The idea behind both suggestions is simply then you need not truly worry
> about screen updating and a status.
>
> Anyway - its just a thought...
>
> Yeah - my new job is truly my Dream job - its FUN - and I enjoy going to
> work every day - and I get to run printers, and even get to do 3D Design
> work!
>
> When work is FUN -- Then LIFE is GOOD!!!
>
> My Motto - Trademark Pending...
>
>
> -K
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 12:35 PM Paul H. Tarver  wrote:
>
> > There is a status line that displays the indexing progress, but that
> > doesn't show up in my compiled app where I rely on progress bars to give
> > the user feedback. I tried building the IDX without the COMPACT option
> and
> > while the indexes are huge, there was no improvement on the speed of
> > building them, so I'm probably going to go back to using the COMPACT
> option
> > as I think Rushmore likes that better. Since there is no time benefit
> > either way, I'll go with the smaller indexes.
> >
> > I also had a chance to test building the indexes after the import. The
> > import took less than 30 minutes, but the index process is the definitely
> > the slow part. But this also proved that the Indexes were NOT the cause
> of
> > the large allocation of memory used during the import. I'm not sure what
> is
> > causing that since I'm releasing the memory variable and the array I'm
> > importing the text into after writing the data to the DBF, but the
> process
> > ends up allocating between 3-4Gb of RAM before it finishes and it only
> > released when I shut VFP down. It works, but is weird since I'm not using
> > that much to process each batch and that is with the Indexes closed so
> I'm
> > sure they aren't the problem.
> >
> > Working in this environment with such large chunks of data has been an
> > experience for sure!
> >
> > Glad you are back at work albeit in something exciting like 3DP! :)
> >
> > Paul H. Tarver
> > Tarver Program Consultants, Inc.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt
> > Wendt
> > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2024 9:55 AM
> > To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> > Subject: Re: VFPAdvanced - My Problem, My Tests & Some Results
> >
> > Hey there Paul,
> >
> > Interesting write-up, and it was a good read this morning.
> >
> > Will admit - I have NOT Touched VFP in a while. AS I've had my head down
> in
> > the 3DP world for a while now. In fact, life kinda went to hell again for
> > me - as I lost my job last July - co. imploded - letting almost EVERYONE
> go
> > from the Essentium site in Irvine, CA - whilst only letting a couple
> folks
> > go from HQ in TX. And, it was miserable - a little over 6 months
> > unemployed. But, luckily I got a new gig - also in Irvine - and I am
> > actually doing 3D Design work for the job, as well as heavily working
> with
> > 3D Printers. In fact, I had thrown the idea around about doing a small
> > database application for them. But, so far, I have not really dived into
> >

Re: VFPAdvanced - My Problem, My Tests & Some Results

[Kurt Wendt]

Thank you Paul for your kind words.

One suggestion - why not suggest that the Import process is run at the End
of the Day - and have the User start it up and just walk away for the
night. Then - NO NEED to have any kind of Status updates on the screen - as
nobody is watching it!

Also, an alternate option - suggest client run this on a machine not in use
- and it can run unattended.

The idea behind both suggestions is simply then you need not truly worry
about screen updating and a status.

Anyway - its just a thought...

Yeah - my new job is truly my Dream job - its FUN - and I enjoy going to
work every day - and I get to run printers, and even get to do 3D Design
work!

When work is FUN -- Then LIFE is GOOD!!!

My Motto - Trademark Pending...


-K

On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 12:35 PM Paul H. Tarver  wrote:

> There is a status line that displays the indexing progress, but that
> doesn't show up in my compiled app where I rely on progress bars to give
> the user feedback. I tried building the IDX without the COMPACT option and
> while the indexes are huge, there was no improvement on the speed of
> building them, so I'm probably going to go back to using the COMPACT option
> as I think Rushmore likes that better. Since there is no time benefit
> either way, I'll go with the smaller indexes.
>
> I also had a chance to test building the indexes after the import. The
> import took less than 30 minutes, but the index process is the definitely
> the slow part. But this also proved that the Indexes were NOT the cause of
> the large allocation of memory used during the import. I'm not sure what is
> causing that since I'm releasing the memory variable and the array I'm
> importing the text into after writing the data to the DBF, but the process
> ends up allocating between 3-4Gb of RAM before it finishes and it only
> released when I shut VFP down. It works, but is weird since I'm not using
> that much to process each batch and that is with the Indexes closed so I'm
> sure they aren't the problem.
>
> Working in this environment with such large chunks of data has been an
> experience for sure!
>
> Glad you are back at work albeit in something exciting like 3DP! :)
>
> Paul H. Tarver
> Tarver Program Consultants, Inc.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt
> Wendt
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2024 9:55 AM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: VFPAdvanced - My Problem, My Tests & Some Results
>
> Hey there Paul,
>
> Interesting write-up, and it was a good read this morning.
>
> Will admit - I have NOT Touched VFP in a while. AS I've had my head down in
> the 3DP world for a while now. In fact, life kinda went to hell again for
> me - as I lost my job last July - co. imploded - letting almost EVERYONE go
> from the Essentium site in Irvine, CA - whilst only letting a couple folks
> go from HQ in TX. And, it was miserable - a little over 6 months
> unemployed. But, luckily I got a new gig - also in Irvine - and I am
> actually doing 3D Design work for the job, as well as heavily working with
> 3D Printers. In fact, I had thrown the idea around about doing a small
> database application for them. But, so far, I have not really dived into
> that...
>
> Yeah, I suspect that every time you import a record - it has to do a
> Re-org of that IDX file - and the building of it would probably be Much
> faster after importing all data.
>
> I'm curious...
>
> Doesn't VFP normally give some kinda of a screen updating when building an
> IDX file? And, if so - maybe you could use THAT as a way to show the user
> what is happening!
>
> It's just a thought - and mostly a WAG.
>
> Goodluck!
>
> -Kurt
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:52 AM Paul H. Tarver  wrote:
>
> > Just got the Stats for February, 2024 and when the ProFox List Statistics
> > for January is one of the top posts for the month of February, I realized
> > I've been busy to comment and I assume everyone else has been busy too,
> so
> > consider this a kick-off post for March to help improve or at least
> > stimulate some conversation in here!
> >
> >
> >
> > So, last month, I took the plunge and purchased a copy of VFPA 10.2. I
> have
> > a software app I wrote a long time ago to help telemarketers comply with
> > the
> > Telemarketing Sales Rule by scrubbing their call lists against the
> National
> > Do Not Call List sold by the Federal Trade Commission. The program
> (which I
> > creatively named Call List Scrubber) was originally written in VFP6 and
> > just
> > like VFP, it is a mature and stable product requiring little maintenance,
> > is
> > easy to use and is easy to supp

Re: VFPAdvanced - My Problem, My Tests & Some Results

[Kurt Wendt]

Hey there Paul,

Interesting write-up, and it was a good read this morning.

Will admit - I have NOT Touched VFP in a while. AS I've had my head down in
the 3DP world for a while now. In fact, life kinda went to hell again for
me - as I lost my job last July - co. imploded - letting almost EVERYONE go
from the Essentium site in Irvine, CA - whilst only letting a couple folks
go from HQ in TX. And, it was miserable - a little over 6 months
unemployed. But, luckily I got a new gig - also in Irvine - and I am
actually doing 3D Design work for the job, as well as heavily working with
3D Printers. In fact, I had thrown the idea around about doing a small
database application for them. But, so far, I have not really dived into
that...

Yeah, I suspect that every time you import a record - it has to do a
Re-org of that IDX file - and the building of it would probably be Much
faster after importing all data.

I'm curious...

Doesn't VFP normally give some kinda of a screen updating when building an
IDX file? And, if so - maybe you could use THAT as a way to show the user
what is happening!

It's just a thought - and mostly a WAG.

Goodluck!

-Kurt

On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:52 AM Paul H. Tarver  wrote:

> Just got the Stats for February, 2024 and when the ProFox List Statistics
> for January is one of the top posts for the month of February, I realized
> I've been busy to comment and I assume everyone else has been busy too, so
> consider this a kick-off post for March to help improve or at least
> stimulate some conversation in here!
>
>
>
> So, last month, I took the plunge and purchased a copy of VFPA 10.2. I have
> a software app I wrote a long time ago to help telemarketers comply with
> the
> Telemarketing Sales Rule by scrubbing their call lists against the National
> Do Not Call List sold by the Federal Trade Commission. The program (which I
> creatively named Call List Scrubber) was originally written in VFP6 and
> just
> like VFP, it is a mature and stable product requiring little maintenance,
> is
> easy to use and is easy to support.
>
>
>
> That having been said, the full National Do Not Call List has grown to
> almost 3Gb in size and while we changed several years ago from using FREADs
> to using the Scripting.FileSystemObject, up until now we could import and
> store the information in a DBF and didn't exceed 2Gb by using several
> tricks
> not the least of which was storing the area codes as a 3 byte text field
> and
> the 7 digit number as an 4byte integer. Oh, and I built the original
> program
> to use IDX files instead of compound NDX files so that was another trick
> that helped us over the years as we dealt with the unceasing growth in the
> National Do Not Call List.
>
>
>
> While most of our users only purchase individual area code DNC lists from
> the FTC, in January we had a new client who did purchase the full national
> list and you guessed it, Call List Scrubber could no longer import the full
> National DNC list and function. So, I helped the client split the file into
> two roughly equal portions, set up two installs for them and they are able
> to function and use the product for now. But..That meant I needed to find
> some alternative and permanent solution. One choice and the one that most
> of
> you would probably recommend would be for me to upsize to a SQL database or
> perhaps use SQLite. But that would require almost a full re-write of the
> product and I don't really have time for that at the moment and more
> importantly, I don't have the motivation to do a full re-write at this time
> (perhaps later), so I started casting about for solutions and VFPAdvanced
> came to mind.
>
>
>
> I reached out to Chen via email and asked a few questions about how to
> implement this product which he graciously answered and I ultimately
> purchased version 10.2 from him to test and to play with to see if the
> large
> file fix would work in my application. The installation went very smoothly
> after I upgraded my installation per his instructions. I easily set up the
> program to run side by side with VFP9 and I have continued working in VFP9
> for the majority of my work and I simply setup a new startup shortcut to
> use
> when I want to use VFPA10 instead. Works completely as advertised and does
> not crossover into my standard installation in any way.
>
>
>
> Now that I've completed my initial testing I'd like to share some of my
> results and invite some comments:
>
>
>
> First, to answer the obvious question: Yes, when I use VFPA, I can import
> the full National DNC file with 250Million + telephone numbers into my
> program without any other changes beyond recompiling with VFPA 10.2. After
> importing the NDNC text file (~3Gb) and stripping off the not used
> characters like commas, spaces, etc; the resulting finished DBF is 2.004Gb,
> the Area Code IDX is 1.083Gb and the full 10 digit number index is
> 1.750GB.
>
>
>
> Second, I did several tests with VFPA and found if I split the 

Re: [NF] T'was the Night Before Crisis

[Kurt Wendt]

There we go again!!!

Of course -- Truly Tis that Time of Year!

So -- Happy Holidays to all -- and Hopefully St. Nick brings you some
awesome Cold and Tasty IPA's!

- Kurt the 3D Printer Guy!

On Fri, Dec 22, 2023, 1:41 PM Ted Roche  wrote:

> 'Twas the night before crisis, and all through the house,
> Not a program was working, not even a browse.
> The programmers were wrung out, too mindless to care,
> Knowing chances of shipping hadn't a prayer.
>
> The users were nestled all snug in their beds,
> While visions of inquiries danced in their heads.
> When out in the lobby there arose such a clatter,
> That I sprang from my cube to see what was the matter.
> And what to my wondering eyes should appear,
> But a SUPER PROGRAMMER, oblivious to fear.
>
> More rapid than eagles, his programs they came,
> And he whistled and shouted and called them by name:
> On Update! On Add! On Inquiry! On Delete!
> On Batch Jobs! On Closing! On Functions Complete!
> His eyes were glazed over, his fingers were lean,
> >From weekends and nights in front of the screen.
>
> A wink of his eye, and a twist of his head,
> Soon gave me to know I had nothing to dread.
> He spoke not a word, but went straight to his work,
> Turning specs into code, then he turned with a jerk.
> And laying his finger on the ENTER key,
> The system came up, and worked perfectly.
>
> The updates, updated; the deletes, they deleted;
> The inquiries, inquired; and the closing completed.
> He tested each whistle, he tested each bell,
> With nary an abend, and all had gone well.
> The system was finished, the tests were concluded,
> The client's last changes were even included!
>
> And the client exclaimed with a snarl and a taunt,
> "It's just what I asked for, but NOT what I want"
>
> (attributed variously, my copy came from here[1])
>
> [1]
> http://www.mdarwin.ca/humour/night-before-xmas/night-before-crisis.phtml
>
>
> https://web.archive.org/web/20070923102738/http://www.mdarwin.ca/humour/night-before-xmas/night-before-crisis.phtml
>
> Merry Christmas, Chag Hanukkah sameach, happy Qwanza, merry Solstice,
> happy Saturnalia and so forth to all!
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/caamusvja1nn68owsnvon_ftncq1fzedhdhf5aesaczx7rxi...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Unemployed Destitute FoxPro Guy

[Kurt Wendt]

Well, Ironically - the 1st email I sent out - it was to one of them listed
in your first listing set you initially wrote about - it was Rejected. This
was the error I got back:
Your message to *moham...@pace-solutionsinc.com* has been blocked. See
technical details below for more information.The response from the remote
server was:

550 5.4.1 Recipient address rejected: Access denied. AS(201806281) [
DM6NAM12FT052.eop-nam12.prod.protection.outlook.com
<http://dm6nam12ft052.eop-nam12.prod.protection.outlook.com/>
2023-10-30T16:50:53.350Z
08DBD889CEAFE4CF]'

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 9:48 AM Virgil Bierschwale 
wrote:

> that was my intent.
> I wanted them to know that I had the list
>
> In the most recent data download, there are a little over 50,000 distinct
> email addresses
>
> so I probably sent out about 25,000 several years ago.
>
> Let me know if you want the raw data and I can point you to it.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 11:43 AM Kurt Wendt  wrote:
>
> > So - exactly how many emails did you send? On that webpage - there's a
> > mention of 0.57% work wanted emails sent. But, was not really sure of the
> > final # of emails sent. Also, on that webpage - you show the content of
> an
> > email. Was that actually the email you sent out?
> >
> > If so, Ouch - considering what you wrote, and point them to a DB access
> > form, where they can pull up the Info that YOU have stored about them - I
> > can't imagine someone reading that would be very Comfy with it! Just
> > sayin'...
> >
> > -K
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 9:22 AM Virgil Bierschwale 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > here is a list I compiled where I sent an email to everyone of these
> > > employers.
> > >
> > > https://version5.guestworkervisas.com/newversionemailer.php
> > >
> > > Click on the excel button and you can download a spreadsheet with all
> the
> > > email addresses and phone numbers.
> > >
> > > I didn't have any luck as they pretty well control who goes to work in
> > > corporate america these days, but you may have better luck.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 11:17 AM Kurt Wendt 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey Virgil,
> > > >
> > > > Sorry I didn't respond to this earlier. It got dumped into my SPAM
> > > Folder -
> > > > and I just now saw it.
> > > >
> > > > Gotta say - getting a list like this from an unknown source - it all
> > > sounds
> > > > VERY Sketchy. And, I see its really a list of like recruiters but for
> > > > Foreign workers in the USA. So, as you stated on that webpage that
> has
> > > the
> > > > list - true American workers will probably get Ignored. But, I'm
> going
> > to
> > > > give it a shot - as I did see one listing for a recruiter in the
> SoCal
> > > > area.
> > > >
> > > > L8r,
> > > > Kurt
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:27 AM Virgil Bierschwale <
> vbier...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Don't know if this will help or not, but somebody sent me a list of
> > > about
> > > > > 534  hiring individuals.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have posted it online at the following link.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://guestworkervisas.com/?page_id=64054
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:04 PM Kurt Wendt 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I know I have not posted much here in the past few years. Life
> has
> > > > been a
> > > > > > Lot of Ups & Downs in the past few years. I even had what I
> > > considered
> > > > to
> > > > > > be my "Dream Job".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But, alas- Essentium essentially Imploded a couple months ago -
> > > Sadly.
> > > > > > Letting almost everyone go from CA site - then they vacated the
> > > > building
> > > > > > last week. Although the TX HQ continues to operate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've been struggling to find work. Already applied to like 65-70
> > jobs
> > > > in
> > > > > > past 2 months - and so far, got no positive response nor Any
> > > > interviews.
> > > > > So
> > > > > > - yeah, super frustrated! I even applied to several

Re: Unemployed Destitute FoxPro Guy

[Kurt Wendt]

So - exactly how many emails did you send? On that webpage - there's a
mention of 0.57% work wanted emails sent. But, was not really sure of the
final # of emails sent. Also, on that webpage - you show the content of an
email. Was that actually the email you sent out?

If so, Ouch - considering what you wrote, and point them to a DB access
form, where they can pull up the Info that YOU have stored about them - I
can't imagine someone reading that would be very Comfy with it! Just
sayin'...

-K

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 9:22 AM Virgil Bierschwale 
wrote:

> here is a list I compiled where I sent an email to everyone of these
> employers.
>
> https://version5.guestworkervisas.com/newversionemailer.php
>
> Click on the excel button and you can download a spreadsheet with all the
> email addresses and phone numbers.
>
> I didn't have any luck as they pretty well control who goes to work in
> corporate america these days, but you may have better luck.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 11:17 AM Kurt Wendt  wrote:
>
> > Hey Virgil,
> >
> > Sorry I didn't respond to this earlier. It got dumped into my SPAM
> Folder -
> > and I just now saw it.
> >
> > Gotta say - getting a list like this from an unknown source - it all
> sounds
> > VERY Sketchy. And, I see its really a list of like recruiters but for
> > Foreign workers in the USA. So, as you stated on that webpage that has
> the
> > list - true American workers will probably get Ignored. But, I'm going to
> > give it a shot - as I did see one listing for a recruiter in the SoCal
> > area.
> >
> > L8r,
> > Kurt
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:27 AM Virgil Bierschwale 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Don't know if this will help or not, but somebody sent me a list of
> about
> > > 534  hiring individuals.
> > >
> > > I have posted it online at the following link.
> > >
> > > https://guestworkervisas.com/?page_id=64054
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:04 PM Kurt Wendt 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I know I have not posted much here in the past few years. Life has
> > been a
> > > > Lot of Ups & Downs in the past few years. I even had what I
> considered
> > to
> > > > be my "Dream Job".
> > > >
> > > > But, alas- Essentium essentially Imploded a couple months ago -
> Sadly.
> > > > Letting almost everyone go from CA site - then they vacated the
> > building
> > > > last week. Although the TX HQ continues to operate.
> > > >
> > > > I've been struggling to find work. Already applied to like 65-70 jobs
> > in
> > > > past 2 months - and so far, got no positive response nor Any
> > interviews.
> > > So
> > > > - yeah, super frustrated! I even applied to several FoxPro jobs, but
> > > still
> > > > a no go!
> > > >
> > > > Figured I would reach out to folks here - in case anyone knows of any
> > > > opportunities!
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > Kurt
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> > > > multipart/alternative
> > > >   text/plain (text body -- kept)
> > > >   text/html
> > > > ---
> > > >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/caamusvjj2qlukih25fo7jwhykxpwujksqx+gzp1iqj9aebg...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Unemployed Destitute FoxPro Guy

[Kurt Wendt]

Hey Virgil,

Sorry I didn't respond to this earlier. It got dumped into my SPAM Folder -
and I just now saw it.

Gotta say - getting a list like this from an unknown source - it all sounds
VERY Sketchy. And, I see its really a list of like recruiters but for
Foreign workers in the USA. So, as you stated on that webpage that has the
list - true American workers will probably get Ignored. But, I'm going to
give it a shot - as I did see one listing for a recruiter in the SoCal area.

L8r,
Kurt

On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:27 AM Virgil Bierschwale 
wrote:

> Don't know if this will help or not, but somebody sent me a list of about
> 534  hiring individuals.
>
> I have posted it online at the following link.
>
> https://guestworkervisas.com/?page_id=64054
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:04 PM Kurt Wendt  wrote:
>
> > I know I have not posted much here in the past few years. Life has been a
> > Lot of Ups & Downs in the past few years. I even had what I considered to
> > be my "Dream Job".
> >
> > But, alas- Essentium essentially Imploded a couple months ago - Sadly.
> > Letting almost everyone go from CA site - then they vacated the building
> > last week. Although the TX HQ continues to operate.
> >
> > I've been struggling to find work. Already applied to like 65-70 jobs in
> > past 2 months - and so far, got no positive response nor Any interviews.
> So
> > - yeah, super frustrated! I even applied to several FoxPro jobs, but
> still
> > a no go!
> >
> > Figured I would reach out to folks here - in case anyone knows of any
> > opportunities!
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Kurt
> >
> >
> > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> > multipart/alternative
> >   text/plain (text body -- kept)
> >   text/html
> > ---
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAAMUSVgeLb=pguhicpdpettrfs7kcb_3shgib+en6nai_xv...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: FW: SQL Upsize

[Kurt Wendt]

Hey there Graham,

Now, I know this is going to be more of a WAG or a total Shot-in-the-Dark,
Butt...

Also, I will admit - I am not familiar with the exact process you're
attempting to do. I did try something similar MANY Years ago, admittedly -
back in like 2012. Anyway...

So, my question is this - did your Process at least create the Database
files in SQL - and SOME of the records did make it into the Database? If
so, why not push the records into SQL Databases from FoxPro after the SQL
databases were already created?

Now, I know - it's Not Addressing your original problem. But, I figured I
would throw some suggestions out there...

-Kurt


On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 8:44 AM Graham Brown  wrote:

> Hi all
>
>
>
> I am upsizing a Foxpro DBC to SQL 2008 r2. This worked fine with earlier
> versions of SQL but gives errors to newer versions of SQL. I am using ODBC
> rather than Native client although it doesn't make any difference to the
> errors.
>
>
>
> For one specific table the upsize says 988 rows failed. Only a few records
> show an error in the report (6) and this is connectivity error failed to
> convert numeric to float. The destination fields do not show float so not
> sure what it is complaining about.
>
>
>
> Has anyone seen the same please.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Graham
>
>
>
> Ps Sent the last one to owner@, sorry Ed.
>
>
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAAMUSVhX-D__WKgqggLt6vJW=-bza3hyepwqthmf04cpmcu...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Unemployed Destitute FoxPro Guy

[Kurt Wendt]

I know I have not posted much here in the past few years. Life has been a
Lot of Ups & Downs in the past few years. I even had what I considered to
be my "Dream Job".

But, alas- Essentium essentially Imploded a couple months ago - Sadly.
Letting almost everyone go from CA site - then they vacated the building
last week. Although the TX HQ continues to operate.

I've been struggling to find work. Already applied to like 65-70 jobs in
past 2 months - and so far, got no positive response nor Any interviews. So
- yeah, super frustrated! I even applied to several FoxPro jobs, but still
a no go!

Figured I would reach out to folks here - in case anyone knows of any
opportunities!

Thanks in advance,
Kurt


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAAMUSVizFC=swhfvt69tfn160_6-_clv03ws2k8ahzoxdep...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: ProFox List Statistics for September 2023

[Kurt Wendt]

Wow - I agree - that IS a Slow month! Maybe I'm going to have to do a Post
as well. Thanks for the prompt Eric!

-Kurt

On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 1:56 PM Eric Selje  wrote:

> Slow month! Let's pick it up (see new thread).
>
> Eric
>
> On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 7:03 AM List Administrator Account <
> list...@leafe.com>
> wrote:
>
> > ==
> > ProFox List Statistics
> > September 2023
> > ==
> > Subscriber Count at End of Month:
> > ProFox: 305
> > ProFoxTech: 184
> > ==
> >
> > Total Posts: 14
> > (Down 50.0% from August 2023)
> >
> > Total [OT] Posts: 0
> > (Unchanged from August 2023)
> >
> > Total [NF] Posts: 0
> > (Down 100.0% from August 2023)
> >
> >
> > Daily Message Counts for September 2023
> > 
> > DOW  Date  Count
> > ---    -
> >  F 1  -   8
> >  T 5  -   2
> >  W 6  -   4
> >
> >
> > Message Counts By Day of Week for September 2023
> > 
> > DOW  Count
> > ---  -
> > Tue -2
> > Wed -4
> > Fri -8
> >
> >
> > Distinct Posters to the List
> > (changes relative to August 2023)
> > 
> > Non-OT messages: 11 (Down 21.43%)
> > OT messages: 0 (Unchanged)
> > NF messages: 0 (Down 100.0%)
> > Total number: 11 (Down 21.43%)
> >
> >
> > Top 11 Contributors by Number of Non-OT Posts
> > 
> > |Posts   Contributor   |
> > 
> >   1.2MB Software Solutions, LLC
> >   2.2Eric Selje
> >   3.2Vincent Teachout
> >   4.1Ted Roche
> >   5.1Kurt Wendt
> >   6.1Paul H. Tarver
> >   7.1Richard Kaye
> >   8.1Ed Leafe
> >   9.1List Administrator Account
> >  10.1Stephen Russell
> >  11.1Rick Schummer
> >
> >
> > Top 0 Contributors by Number of OT Posts
> > 
> > |Posts   OT%  Contributor  |
> > 
> >
> >
> > Top 0 Contributors by Number of NF Posts
> > 
> > |Posts   Contributor   |
> > 
> >
> >
> > Top 11 Contributors by Total Number of Posts
> > 
> > |Posts   Contributor   |
> > 
> >   1.2MB Software Solutions, LLC
> >   2.2Eric Selje
> >   3.2Vincent Teachout
> >   4.1Ted Roche
> >   5.1Kurt Wendt
> >   6.1Paul H. Tarver
> >   7.1Richard Kaye
> >   8.1Ed Leafe
> >   9.1List Administrator Account
> >  10.1Stephen Russell
> >  11.1Rick Schummer
> >
> >
> > Top 3 Contributors by Number of New Threads Started
> > 
> > |Posts   Contributor   |
> > 
> >   1.1Rick Schummer
> >   2.1List Administrator Account
> >   3.1Vincent Teachout
> >
> >
> > Top 4 Non-OT Threads by Total Number of Posts
> > --
> > |Posts   Subject |
> > --
> >   1.   10Just call me Master, for short
> >   2.2Southwest Fox 2023: URGENT - Now or never, register today
> >   3.1Southwest Fox 2023 is ON!
> >   4.1ProFox List Statistics for August 2023
> >
> >
> > Top 0 OT Threads by Total Number of Posts
> > --
> > |Posts   Subject |
> > --
> >
> >
> > Top 4 Threads by Total Number of Posts
> > 

Re: Just call me Master, for short

[Kurt Wendt]

I agree.
But then again -- Stephen is a hilarious guy!!!

-K

On Wed, Sep 6, 2023, 3:23 PM Vincent Teachout  wrote:

> That's hilarious!
>
>
>
>
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
>
> --- Original Message ---
> On Wednesday, September 6th, 2023 at 11:23 AM, Stephen Russell <
> srussell...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > I got a chuckle. I clicked on the link and.
> >
> > Mimecast requires you to enroll this device to access message links
> >
> > Your IT department has enabled Targeted Threat Protection for all users.
> > This is a service that protects you from email attacks and provides live
> > security training.
> >
> > Enter your email address and we'll send you an authentication code to
> > verify your identity.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 2:28 PM Richard Kaye rk...@invaluable.com wrote:
> >
> > > Congrats, Vince!
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > rk
> > >
> > > From: ProfoxTech profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com On Behalf Of Vincent
> > > Teachout
> > > Sent: Friday, September 1, 2023 1:18 PM
> > > To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> > > Subject: Just call me Master, for short
> > >
> > > And... Done!
> > >
> > > Master of Science in Information Security.
> > >
> > >
> https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/Bhq1CR6M0Phj8zgioDwqf?domain=parchment.com
> > >
> > > If you have any Science or Information Security that needs mastering,
> just
> > > let me know.
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAAMUSVjm0ow4RA=cvJ32pX==o8exzdctpyzwxcsaow4zfjz...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: vfp and thor set up on a clean windows 11 machine

[Kurt Wendt]

Jeff - you can't attach screenshots in this forum - it simply won't work.
Some folks use something like a website to post an image to - then post the
Link to the image here.

-Kurt

On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 9:14 AM Jeff Roberts  wrote:

> This is the error I get trying to run superbrowse. Another problem is some
> of the Thor apps like superbrowse don't show up on my menu until I run the
> thor updater, then the are all there. Screenshot of error attached.
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 10:40 AM Alan Bourke 
> wrote:
>
> > For VFP9 on Windows 11 I pretty much just install it with all options
> > ticked from the .ISO image, into the default location, then install all
> the
> > service packs that are on VFPX. If I had to have an earlier version
> around
> > I'd probably run that in a VM.
> >
> > Regarding Thor if I remember I just followed the instructions - what
> error
> > are you getting ?
> >
> > --
> >   Alan Bourke
> >   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAAMUSVh8DFkD-kQUxn=t8stm-je2ojxi09dcofyehzwwcw2...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[NF] Only in Silicon Valley!

[Kurt Wendt]

A buddy of mine sent me this on LinkedIn - I thought it was pretty darnn
funny - and I thought it would be a perfect thing to share with you folks:

https://media-exp1.licdn.com/dms/image/C5622AQEWmcdYTvXRRg/feedshare-shrink_800-alternative/0?e=1606348800=beta=E7QGPkizex7UxnfQZm9hOvEM9mYHlRl7YfphhFv4WL4

-K-


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/caamusvj2y1zt+az6-np43u4m112uskvbr7f8o0ow-u7joqh...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: My memo field(s) Are Bloated......

[Kurt Wendt]

I like Charlie's idea.

But am I mistaken - wasn't there at some point a utility to kinda Zip memos
& Unzip on the fly???

-K-

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020, 1:59 PM MB Software Solutions, LLC <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:

> On 10/5/2020 2:30 PM, Charlie wrote:
> > 
> > Or, create additional tables, 1 memo field each (assuming your 8 memo
> > fields hold roughly equivalent amounts of data). Then link them back
> > to the main table - aka main tables primary key. Of course, this would
> > impact your data queries when pulling data. And if you really need all
> > 8 memo fields every time you pull data, this approach will probably
> > hurt performance (8 joins - very fast, but not as fast as pulling from
> > 1 table).
> >
>
> I sometimes think the "penalty" for such an approach is negligible.
> Anyone have experience on that?  I mean, if you get results in 1.5
> seconds compared to 1.2 secondsis that really a big deal?  Even 8
> seconds vs. 7 seconds.  You get my drift.
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/caamusvjd5fb5v9atnm2qobzs7+nexy1v-d53id+szv0flts...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Virtual Fox Fest

[Kurt Wendt]

I too miss visiting Arizona - as I have not been there in years!!!

Admittedly - have not posted on here for a LONG TIME either...

FYI - I now live in LA area and work for Northrop-Grumman doing Tech
support.

And - even working on the side at NGC on a special model R/C aircraft
project - w/6' wide wingspan - doing 3D Printing of parts or tools for the
build.


Kurt

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020, 9:33 AM Eric Selje  wrote:

> I'm really impressed with this HopIn platform. It definitely works best in
> Chrome (except on my iPad, where it works best on Safari because Chrome
> wouldn't allow me to share my camera/mic).
>
> I like that you can "lurk" when someone's asking vendor questions, or turn
> them on and ask yourself. You can share your screen immediately. It's got a
> lot going for it.
>
> I do miss Arizona though.
>
> E
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 10:29 AM MB Software Solutions, LLC <
> mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm in now...thanks!
> >
> >
> > On 10/15/2020 11:26 AM, Frank Cazabon wrote:
> > > Have you registered Andy logged in on hopin?
> > >
> > > On 15 October 2020 11:18:38 GMT-04:00, "MB Software Solutions, LLC" <
> > mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> > >> Aw manWTF am I doing wrong?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 10/15/2020 11:17 AM, Frank Cazabon wrote:
> > >>> Nope. The welcome just finished and waiting for the first session to
> > >> begin at half past the hour.
> > >>> On 15 October 2020 11:15:50 GMT-04:00, "MB Software Solutions, LLC"
> > >>  wrote:
> >  Anybody else having trouble viewing the webinar?
> > 
> > 
> >  --
> >  This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> >  https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> > 
> > 
> >  ___
> >  Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> >  Subscription Maintenance:
> >  https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> >  OT-free version of this list:
> >  https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> >  Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
> >  This message:
> > 
> > >>
> >
> https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/93aac18e-a9e7-9529-49b9-fa282a4b2...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
> >  ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the
> > >> opinions
> >  of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This
> >  statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too
> > >> stupid
> >  to see the obvious.
> > 
> >  Report [OT] Abuse:
> > 
> > >>
> >
> http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/93aac18e-a9e7-9529-49b9-fa282a4b2...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
> > >>
> > >> ___
> > >> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> > >> Subscription Maintenance:
> > >> https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> > >> OT-free version of this list:
> > >> https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> > >> Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
> > >> This message:
> > >>
> >
> https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/849d3e96-d8ba-4fcd-0952-8f49f3108...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
> > >> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions
> > >> of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This
> > >> statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too
> stupid
> > >> to see the obvious.
> > >>
> > >> Report [OT] Abuse:
> > >>
> >
> http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/849d3e96-d8ba-4fcd-0952-8f49f3108...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/caamusvhltuq9anl2+j+cdok8vh6njfxq_+extn-ml521fdf...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

FoxPro Technical Consultant

[Kurt Wendt]

Thought some folks might B interested...

https://jooble.org/

desc

/4301757139100240321?

ckey

=

foxpro

&

rgn

=-1&

pos

=1&

elckey

=4315966069413504275=1=-7526240361938335854=55&

relb

=100&

brelb

=100&

bscr

=5905.224&

scr

=5905.224=198001&

letterType

=1&

iid

=3065742513444537868


https://jooble.org/m/jdp/-3968487207807795396/Visual-FoxPro-Architect-jobs-in-West-Mifflin-PA-West-Mifflin%2C-PA?ckey=foxpro=-1=2=6560604642985973569=1=-9001484253529916433=20412=100=100=3695.7395=3695.7395=8718194579502644364


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: 

Re: File sharing services

[Kurt Wendt]

I use WeTransfer.com - but probably not what seek.

Does Google drive have API access???

-K-

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020, 1:52 PM Richard Kaye  wrote:

> Calling on the collective wisdom. What are people using th4eses days to
> share files with customers beside Dropbox? Preferably something that can be
> accessed via APIs.
>
> TIA
>
> --
>
> rk
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/caamusvgpbsjnt4xqd7eaoxyvyfrbrjnovpdgju9hucd5chn...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Pandemic/Penetration Testing Job

[Kurt Wendt]

I'd say - Go For It! - but, then again - I saw the other thread

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020, 10:03 AM Eric Selje  wrote:

> Shame. PenTesting / FoxPro is a combination I could do, and for 200k a yr!
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 9:01 AM Kurt at VR-FX  wrote:
>
> > It sounds painful. Yes - its actually listed in a job on this website:
> >
> >
> https://jooble.org/alert-vacancy/XNDJGCDZEPVNTCDBBRTD/0/?ed=43941=553f4d65-3bc7-4916-81e0-976eb715d4e6=1_source=letter_medium=email_campaign=93_3
> >
> > I thought it was pretty funny they should list something like that - and
> > wanted to share it here - as well as fact that there's 5 jobs listed -
> > but, some of the links look like total BS type headhunters!
> >
> > -K-
> >
> >
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/caamusvgplfwvpc09xo1dgjoiauor6mh_pta5juh505g2on6...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Congrats Eric Selje!

[Kurt Wendt]

That's sad indeed. Fun with the Fox is Always better!!!

:-)
-K-


On Tue, Apr 21, 2020, 10:13 AM Eric Selje  wrote:

> Thanks! And sadly probably not so I'll have to do all my fun stuff on the
> side.
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:14 AM MB Software Solutions, LLC <
> mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > "Congratulate Eric for starting a new position as Senior Information
> > Technology Security Officer at United States Courts"
> >
> >
> > Well now...are you gonna be using any VFP at that gig?   lol
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >
> >
> > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> > multipart/alternative
> >   text/plain (text body -- kept)
> >   text/html
> > ---
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAAMUSVhH7qxMEGpKU95FGEN0agKKgn=xo80rl41c-j4ypek...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Who Likes Burgers & Foxpro ( job in California)

[Kurt Wendt]

That's funny about the .Net jobs!!!

On Tue, Apr 7, 2020, 2:35 PM MB Software Solutions, LLC <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:

> On 4/6/2020 4:15 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> > Agreed!!!
> >
> > A really stupid job ad!
>
>
> So many of them are!!!  They always advertise for Jesus Christ but
> they'll settle for a lowly prophet.  Go ahead and apply.  ;-)
>
> (This reminds me of the early days of DotNet when the recruiters
> advertised wanting somebody with more years experience than the product
> had been out there.  lol)
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAAMUSVi+5cOvgs9FTs=nxc9n7du6adwsssn0y3s2q5-zb6s...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Who Likes Burgers & Foxpro ( job in California)

[Kurt Wendt]

Agreed!!!

A really stupid job ad!

On Mon, Apr 6, 2020, 12:49 AM Alan Bourke  wrote:

> They will find precisely zero people with .NET and COBOL experience at a
> guess. I would say they need three developers, not one.
>
> --
>   Alan Bourke
>   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/caamusvghnnqmg4lgq021y3huxoswpunu-d1-zyw-iqvzosv...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Who Likes Burgers & Foxpro ( job in California)

[Kurt Wendt]

Yes, the job is for a fast food restaurant. But honestly, I hate a job
listing like this where it mentions like when do you get from Technologies,
and who the hell does all this kind of stuff all together. Seriously,
somebody that does both Foxborough, and COBOL

WTF?!?!

-K-

-- Forwarded message -
From: Indeed 
Date: Sun, Apr 5, 2020, 4:58 PM
Subject: 1 new foxpro job in California
To: 


Jack In The Box | Jack in the Box, Inc. has an opportunity for you!
 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
[image: indeed-logo]

1 new foxpro job in California
‌
Developer III

Jack In The Box | Jack in the Box, Inc. [image: 3.4/5 rating]   7,093
reviews

-
San Diego, CA 92123
C++, Visual Basic, Java, COBOL, LotusScript, Assembler, *FoxPro*, .Net.
Responsible for leading the initial design and development of the advanced
and/or highly…
Easily apply
Apr 3

1 new job found

View all jobs

View jobs: since yesterday

- for last 7 days

Would you like to help other job seekers?
[image: Company Logo]


Rate your experience working at
SD3D Printing


[image: Write a review]


Your review helps other jobseekers determine if this company is the right
fit.
Edit this job alert

Salaries estimated if unavailable. When a job posting doesn't include a
salary, we estimate it by looking at similar jobs. Estimated salaries are
not endorsed by the companies offering those positions and may vary from
actual salaries.
© 2020 Indeed, Inc.
6433 Champion Grandview Way, Building 1, Austin, TX 78750
Privacy Policy  | Terms
 | Help Center

Unsubscribe from this email

| Manage subscriptions



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAAMUSViPB=p8tian7jvcpzmgeekm4-ch3utdw+dka-qfg_9...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] USB wireless

[Kurt Wendt]

Stress testing the internet. That is so funny, and yet so true! This whole
thing is a huge stress test on the internet!

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020, 9:26 AM Richard Kaye  wrote:

> It won't make a difference inside your network but outside there are a
> whole lot of people trying to work, learn and entertain themselves from
> home. We're globally stress testing the internet right now.
>
> --
>
> rk
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech  On Behalf Of Paul Newton
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 12:23 PM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: RE: [NF] USB wireless
>
> Hi Richard
>
> Same here - not sure why COVID should make a huge difference though
>
> Paul
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech  On Behalf Of Richard Kaye
> Sent: 25 March 2020 16:00
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: RE: [NF] USB wireless
>
> Sent by an external sender
> --
>
> Anecdotally we're experiencing a lot of latency issues, particularly with
> our international customers. COVID is also breaking the internet...
>
> --
>
> rk
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech  On Behalf Of Ted Roche
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 11:26 AM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: [NF] USB wireless
>
> Hi, Paul:
>
> Do you know if the port and adapter are USB 2 or 3?
>
> What does a speed testing site like speedtest.net (or the UK equivalent)
> tell you your current connection is?
>
> Of course, it all depends on where the bottleneck is: your machine,
> adapter, home net speed, VPN overhead, the office's VPN server max speed,
> the office internet speed, what app you're trying to run (not big DBFs
> remotely, I hope!), etc., but I'm sure you know all that.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:23 AM Paul Newton 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > At the moment I am working from home and connected via VPN.  At the
> > moment I am using an AC 600 dual-band USB wireless adapter and I was
> > wondering if I would see noticeably better performance with, say, an AC
> 1900 adapter.
> > Your thoughts would be much appreciated.  Thanks
> >
> > Paul Newton
> >
> >
> > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
> >   text/plain (text body -- kept)
> >   text/html
> > ---
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/caamusvhjrvkskqeytrdyszkvtnsoz4bb+cath8bbqwgntwm...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] OMG - TeamViewer is Changing!

[Kurt Wendt]

Thanks Ted - just setup the Follow!

On Mon, Mar 9, 2020, 3:35 AM Ted Roche  wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 9:48 AM Eric Selje  wrote:
>
> > I love seeing artifacts like that on public signage.
> >
> >
> You'd enjoy following https://twitter.com/KevlinHenney -- folks send him
> pictures of BSODs and such on airport terminal boards, train stations,
> kiosks, etc.
>
> --
> Ted Roche
> Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
> http://www.tedroche.com
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAAMUSVhRzbpL4ExxvrYyengOQUPVpJSD7EODq=2m3whr7tt...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] OMG - TeamViewer is Changing!

[Kurt Wendt]

Exactly!

It kinda blew my mind when I saw it!!!

On Sun, Mar 8, 2020, 6:47 AM Eric Selje  wrote:

> I love seeing artifacts like that on public signage.
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 12:42 PM Kurt @ Gmail  wrote:
>
>> So - a few days I was driving south on the 405 here in LA. And, most of
>> you are probably already familiar with the really big Digital billboards
>> that are popping up all over America - on the sides of major highways.
>>
>> Well, I see this one - with an Ad for The Walking Dead (one of my
>> favorite shows) - but, in the lower left 1/3 of the sign is this Blue
>> Box! And,  as I got closer, I saw it said "TeamViewer is Changing"! I
>> had to laugh my ass off at that technical glitch. Am sure most folks
>> driving by had no idea as to what is TeamViewer. But, it sure was funny!
>>
>> Lastly, as I'm now located in LA - if anyone here is local to LA and
>> wants to meet up for Beers & some Tech talk - feel free to drop me a line.
>>
>> L8r,
>> Kurt
>>
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/caamusvj1napjshd1dxrtqvwpqfmppznicqg1lxd1rqjqef9...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public

[Kurt Wendt]

Nice one Peter!!!

Set Irony Off
Set Debug On

:-)
-K-


On Wed, Dec 18, 2019, 1:47 AM Peter Cushing 
wrote:

>
> On 17/12/2019 21:54, Ricardo Araoz wrote:
> >
> > (should I declare the irony or you people are smart enough to notice it?)
> >
> >
> SET IRONY ON
>
> ;-)
>
> This communication is intended for the person or organisation to whom it
> is addressed. The contents are confidential and may be protected in law.
> Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If
> you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
> telephone or email.
>
> www.whisperingsmith.com
>
> Whispering Smith Ltd Head Office:61 Great Ducie Street, Manchester M3 1RR.
> Tel:0161 831 3700
> Fax:0161 831 3715
>
> London Office: 101 St. Martin's Lane,London, WC2N 4AZ  Tel:0207 299 7960
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAAMUSVjVS_7M+bWn088fgUy=1sx206e06ncz9wo3ysqrtr5...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: FoxPro Job

[Kurt Wendt]

Actually, HR wasn't involved at all. I was interviewed by the department
where the position was to occur, as well as multiple people in that
department including I'm assuming maybe users of the system as well as
programmers of the system.

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019, 3:03 PM Gene Wirchenko  wrote:

> At 10:56 2019-04-26, Kurt at VR-FX  wrote:
> >Hey Ted - yeah, I hear ya. Turns out - I was NOT the Only one in
> >this forum to have applied to the UCLA FoxPro job - and we BOTH did
> >Two rounds of interviews - and we BOTH Did well in those interviews
> >- yet Neither of us were considered for the job! Which I find rather
> >shocking. Since I KNOW there are so VERY Few active VFP dev's these
> >days! Oh well - that's how the cookie crumbles...
>
>   I wonder who they ended up hiring.  Maybe, you should check in
> a few months and see if they require additional help^W^Wwhom they
> should have hired in the first place.
>
>   That result was not shocking to me.  I do not think much of
> many HR departments.  They might have a very good darts teams though.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Gene Wirchenko
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAAMUSVgh+5xNSQVrYL=Yt-sESbRYL6weRATE5L5s=pswz1j...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: FoxPro Job

[Kurt Wendt]

I bet there are going to be a ton of people replying to you and back to
this guy. I suspect even by this very moment somebody already beat me to it
...

-K-

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019, 1:40 PM Eric Selje  wrote:

> Matthew Bergman from ProAmMotors is looking for some help.
>
> matt...@proamotors.com
>
> He says "*We are currently looking for a way to import orders via a CSV
> file into SBT.*"
>
> If anyone can help him, shoot him an email.
>
> Eric
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/caamusvgxmwsqpyepxa_u7+59j3bp6zfci2fdpbm7_5qot98...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Looking for Visual FoxPro Developer - Philadelphia PA

[Kurt Wendt]

Nice one Alan!!!

On Thu, Apr 4, 2019, 7:34 AM Alan Bourke  wrote:

> > Seems like they need a specialist.
>
> This is a job for (flings cape open) Fox-Man!
>
> Faster than a speeding bullet!
> Tighter than a gnat's chuff!
>
> --
>   Alan Bourke
>   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAAMUSVhedJFPAYJtYwZg90t1h9pz=ntr4rnwvnt_9rtf-5u...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] UCLA Job & a 3DP Job...

[Kurt Wendt]

Thanks so much Ted!!!

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, 1:37 PM Ted Roche  wrote:

> Bon Voyage and good luck with your move and new position!
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 4:27 PM Kurt @ Gmail  wrote:
>
> > So - sadly - I got rejected from the UCLA job! Believe me - it kinda
> > freaked me out. They claimed that they had a pool of good candidates.
> > But, alas - can that be true??? I mean - WTF - we know there are hardly
> > any VFP programmers still around these days - and a good number of them
> > have passed away over the years! They even claimed one foolish candidate
> > did not even know the color of the FoxPro logo! Ugh...
> >
> > As such, I kinda freaked out when I got the rejection letter -
> > especially as I REALLY Needed to move ASAP - as life at my sister's
> > house had become a disaster!!! Well, I then remembered I personally knew
> > the CEO's of 2 different 3DP co's down in San Diego. I reached out to
> > BOTH of them - and Bang - one of them got back to me in like 25min -
> > telling me it was perfect timing - since he was currently looking for
> > someone - and indeed had an open position - for a person to run &
> > deliver 3D Print jobs.
> >
> > I am now preparing to move down to SD this next weekend and leave SF.
> > Hopefully it works out for the best. Of course, it will put me even
> > Farther away from the FoxPro realm. However, I will still try to pop my
> > head up here on occasion. Heck, maybe I can even meet some of the ProFox
> > folks in person down there.
> >
> > L8r,
> >
> > -K-
> >
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/caamusvii5vfv1ktyvmtu8fq8mg2bymvftn--hklepikcrkt...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Initialising in a Class

[Kurt Wendt]

Kind of like LMGTFY!

:-)
-K-


On Wed, Dec 26, 2018, 10:31 AM Ted Roche  wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 12:58 PM Paul H. Tarver  wrote:
>
> > So if I scratch FoxPro behind the ears, it will go get my slippers?
>

There are some things better to do yourself.
>
> --
> Ted Roche
>


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/caamusviwyac+3+_nc9lrjdbf9htsdov8s6fot0mx1kxm812...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Urgent requirement for the position of : Programmer IV@ Torrance CA

[Kurt Wendt]

Bummer. Thanks for the feedback.

On Sat, Dec 8, 2018, 12:06 PM Bill Anderson  wrote:

>
> I got notice from two different agencies that it got filled...
>
> Bill Anderson
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Dec 7, 2018, at 4:54 PM, Kurt @ Gmail  wrote:
> >
> > This is TOTALLY BOGUS! The phone number below for this job - you call it
> - and its a disconnected #! How the Heck can a stupid recruiting firm
> operate like that - using a phone # in an email for a # that doesn't even
> work!?!?! That's just Insane!
> >
> > -K-
> >
> >> On 11/29/2018 3:14 PM, Richard Quilhot wrote:
> >> Anyone looking for VFP gig in CA?
> >> Rick Q
> >> quilh...@gmail.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -- Forwarded message -
> >> From: Kulwinder Singh 
> >> Date: Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:20 PM
> >> Subject: Urgent requirement for the position of : Programmer IV@
> Torrance CA
> >> To: 
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> Currently, I am recruiting candidates for one of my requirement as
> >> mentioned below. If you have a matching profile, please send me the
> updated
> >> resume along with contact details at the earliest.
> >>
> >>
> >> *Job Title: Programmer IV Project Location : **Torrance CA*
> >>
> >> Skills Required and Job Description:
> >> *Visual FoxPro development experience required*
> >>
> >> Job Description/Skills
> >>
> >> Hours:8:00am to 5:00pm Work Week 1 - Monday, 2 - Tuesday, 3 -
> Wednesday, 4
> >> - Thursday, 5 - Friday Description/Comment:Reviews, analyzes, and
> modifies
> >> programming systems including encoding, testing, debugging and
> documenting
> >> programs. May require an associate's degree in a related area and 5-8
> years
> >> of experience in the field or in a related area. Familiar with standard
> >> concepts, practices, and procedures within a particular field. Relies on
> >> limited experience and judgment to plan and accomplish goals. Performs a
> >> variety of tasks. Works under general supervision; typically reports to
> a
> >> project leader or manager. A certain degree of creativity and latitude
> is
> >> required. Additional Job Details:Visual FoxPro development experience
> >> required. SQLServer experience
> 
> a plus.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Sincerely yours,
> >> KulwinderSingh
> >> E TalentNetwork
> >> http://etalentnetwork.com
> >> 8251 Greensboro Drive
> >> McLean VA
> >> kulwind...@etalentnetwork.com
> >> (877) 715-3865 Ext 1161
> >>
> >>
> >> Note: Please allow me to reiterate that I have chosen to contact you
> either
> >> because your resume has been posted to one of the internet job sites to
> >> which we subscribe, or because you have previously submitted your
> resume to
> >> our company. I assumed that you are either looking for a new employment
> >> opportunity, or you are interested in investigating the current job
> market.
> >>
> >> If you would prefer I contact you at a later date, please indicate your
> >> date of availability so that I may honor your request. In any event, I
> >> respectfully recommend you continue to avail yourself to the employment
> >> options and job market information we provide with our e-mail notices.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> You have received this message because either you have contacted our
> >> Company to express interest in employment, or you have posted your
> Resume
> >> in an area accessible to recruiters or HR professionals, which implies
> an
> >> interest in being contacted regarding employment opportunities.
> >>
> >> If you would prefer to no longer receive any emails whatsoever from our
> >> Company, you may opt out at anytime by clicking here
> >> <
> http://jobs.tscti.com/optout.jsp?d=313231355f7175696c686f747240676d61696c2e636f6d=122=1543528698443
> >
> >> .
> >>
> >> Lookup Candidate
> >> <
> http://jobs.tscti.com/employers/open_candidate.jsp?canid=03927860414873795714903593141729=0=-1=1=11962510
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> >> multipart/alternative
> >>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
> >>   text/html
> >> ---
> >>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAAMUSVgFo8j3kjSzOt5M1vUO86Awj+UbWxtpNWTQ_4=j=tk...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] you know it comming

[Kurt Wendt]

Understood! And, I must admit, you do give me a chuckle!-K-
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5280696d-14af-4f4f-b878-7f7727a8f...@email.android.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [ADMIN] Testing post to ProFox

[Kurt Wendt]

PGRpdiBkaXI9J2F1dG8nPlBpbmchPC9kaXY+


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
text/html (html body -- converted)
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cf84b5b3-ed18-4552-a3ec-363ace93b...@email.android.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Modulo 97 of a very large number

[Kurt Wendt]
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--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
text/html (html body -- converted)
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/132514ab-b06e-45d6-99a0-f4d669901...@email.android.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Modulo 97 of a very large number

[Kurt Wendt]

How about store orig # as char str - then take chunks starting 
from left - do Mod of them but results stored as multiple of 10 based upon orig 
str pos - then I think U can add those sub results together. Just a quick 
thought off top of my head...-K-
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/46098cb2-81e6-467b-a86f-b6ef4eac7...@email.android.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Thread Start Test

[Kurt Wendt]

Andy, what? If you had a handy, how come you didn't translate 
what I wrote???Dang...
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/89fc9027-d43e-4497-a306-1771fac4a...@email.android.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Thread Start Test

[Kurt Wendt]

PGRpdiBkaXI9J2F1dG8nPkdvb2Qgb25lIERhdmUhPC9kaXY+


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
text/html (html body -- converted)
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/838f0b4e-674f-4e01-bcf4-4376ec759...@email.android.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Thread Start Test

[Kurt Wendt]

This Thread has now being unraveled...:-)-K-
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/75beb955-bf95-4b9b-adf8-a4bb73c2b...@email.android.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: VFP Programmers

[Kurt Wendt]

I don't know why it did that, I am doing this email from my 
cell phone, while driving to Indiana cross country for a big 3D printing 
Festival!
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3af8f62c-118a-4da6-93ae-4770afdad...@email.android.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: VFP Programmers

[Kurt Wendt]

PGRpdiBkaXI9J2F1dG8nPiZuYnNwO3llcywgSSBhbSBpbiB0aGUgYXJlYSwgSSBhbSBsb2NhdGVk
IG9uIExvbmcgSXNsYW5kIGJ1dCBjYW4gZWFzaWx5IGdldCB0byBOZXcgSmVyc2V5ITxkaXYgZGly
PSJhdXRvIj4mbmJzcDs8L2Rpdj48ZGl2IGRpcj0iYXV0byI+Jm5ic3A7VGhhbmtzLCZuYnNwOzwv
ZGl2PjxkaXYgZGlyPSJhdXRvIj4mbmJzcDtLdXJ0PC9kaXY+PC9kaXY+


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
text/html (html body -- converted)
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/7a4f9985-45a3-4362-a40d-e62a91366...@email.android.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [ADMIN] Hiccup

[Kurt Wendt]

PGRpdiBkaXI9J2F1dG8nPkhhIGhhIE1pY2hhZWwhPGRpdiBkaXI9ImF1dG8iPjxicj48L2Rpdj48
ZGl2IGRpcj0iYXV0byI+SSB3cm90ZSB0aGlzIHJlcGx5IG9uIG15IGNlbGwgYWxvbmcgd2l0aCB0
aGUgcmVwbHkgZnJvbSBvdGhlciB0aHJlYWQgLSBhbmQgdGhpcyBvbmUgZ290IHNjcmV3ZWQgdXAg
YW5kIHRoZSByZXBseSBpbiBvdGhlciB0aHJlYWQgd2FzIGZpbmUhIFdURj8hPyE/PC9kaXY+PGRp
diBkaXI9ImF1dG8iPjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2IGRpcj0iYXV0byI+LUstPC9kaXY+PC9kaXY+


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
text/html (html body -- converted)
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/61ce0cc9-689b-44f0-aff3-0729b6682...@email.android.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [ADMIN] Hiccup

[Kurt Wendt]

PGRpdiBkaXI9J2F1dG8nPk5pY2Ugb25lIFZpbmNlISEhPC9kaXY+


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
text/html (html body -- converted)
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/ef9b0bdb-b158-4b75-b405-e762cecbe...@email.android.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Open systems Drive you crazy

[Kurt Wendt]

Gene - I SO Agree with you - Its why I don't like working from 
home - as its lonely and I am a VERY Social type animalBut now - I don't have a 
choice...:-(-K-
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/7f4e7572-9486-41d5-a58b-7d51f8d77...@email.android.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Shrinking/compressing PDFs

[Kurt Wendt]

PGRpdiBkaXI9J2F1dG8nPlNlZW4gdGhpcyBwb3N0aW5nLCBJIGNhbiBvbmx5IHRoaW5rIGFib3V0
IHRoZSBzaHJpbmthZ2UgZXBpc29kZSBmcm9tIFNlaW5mZWxkITxkaXYgZGlyPSJhdXRvIj4mbmJz
cDs8L2Rpdj48ZGl2IGRpcj0iYXV0byI+Jm5ic3A7SGFoYWhhPC9kaXY+PC9kaXY+


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
text/html (html body -- converted)
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/d72352e9-5372-4836-8770-5e85c1518...@email.android.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Elon Musk and his Commodore VIC-20

[Kurt Wendt]

Hey Mike,

Thanks for posting this. I don't think I've ever been to this Wait But Why 
website before. The comics at the start of this Elon posting/article are really 
hysterical. And, I happen to be a HUGE fan of Elon - and am currently reading 
that Bio book mentioned in this website. 

Am going to pass this to some of the folks here at work to check out this link. 

Myself - I started on an Apple II and a Commodore Pet 1200 (I think that's the 
# for it), as well as on a TRS-80.

-K-

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of 
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 5:09 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: [NF] Elon Musk and his Commodore VIC-20

https://waitbutwhy.com/2015/05/elon-musk-the-worlds-raddest-man.html

Didn't one of you guys say that's how you got started (on that computer)?

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f1907d...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: How many of you use foreign key constraints and References in your database schema?

[Kurt Wendt]

Interesting discussion - considering a situation here at my job just 
today/yesterday.

An email from a manager claiming that since this one employee is no longer with 
the co. (although the email was late since the guy left about 4 weeks ago) - 
was asking to have this User removed from these various systems. So - I 
responded yesterday that I had deleted the user record from this one system. 

Then - this buddy of mine, another programmer here - he was out yesterday, so 
he asks me about the deletion of the record. He was worried that the deletion 
of the record would cause problems if there are FK constraints! I told him he 
need not worry - since for the most part in the system I did it - there really 
are mostly no FK's in there. Of course, I know there are a couple - but, 
nothing that would be impacted by the removal of a user from a table. 

So - yes - I can relate. 

-K-

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of 
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 3:39 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: How many of you use foreign key constraints and References in your 
database schema?

On 2017-11-01 15:21, Bill Anderson wrote:
> Mike,
> 
>>> Where's your preference in design with these in mind?<<
> 
> My philosophy is that the back end database, whatever it is, should be 
> a dumb as a rock. A database should only be concerned with its 
> internal integrity and no more. Anything else is pretty much geared 
> toward vendor lock-in.
> 
> But having noted that, FK constraints are absolutely a part of the 
> data integrity. So yes, use 'em.
> 
> Views? Sure, that's basically the only way to communicate. Business 
> rules?
> Nope, stay away. That's for middleware.
> 
> Bill Anderson


Hi Bill!

I agree completely.

--Mike


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f1906a...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Open systems Drive you crazy

[Kurt Wendt]

Steve - pretty Cool Arse video! I especially got a kick out of one shot about 
1:40 in which shows Zortrax 3D Printers being used for his devices. I will 
continue to watch the rest of the video piecemeal - as its definitely 
interesting!

-K-

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen 
Russell
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 3:00 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: [NF] Open systems Drive you crazy

Great watch here.

Super Hacker George Hotz: I Can Make Your Car Drive Itself for Under $1,000
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqdYbwY9vPU
I like how he looks at a problem.
--
Stephen Russell

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f19068...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Tech buzzwords

[Kurt Wendt]

Oh man - that video was Hysterical! I had to keep myself in check - sitting at 
my desk at work - watching that video - and NOT laugh out loud!!!

:-)
-K-

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen 
Russell
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 10:13 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Tech buzzwords

Had not seen that video.  As I heard footsteps in the hall, I stiffened up.  
LOL!

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:59 AM, <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:

> Charlie's recent post made me think of some buzzwords in Tech over the 
> years that just made a person either laugh, cringe, roll-their-eyes, 
> or some combination thereof.  I thought it'd be fun to list some tech 
> buzzwords over the years in this thread.  The CIO at my gig from 
> 1999-2002 loved to use the word "synergy."
>
> Charlie's post about horrible results also made me think of this:
> https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0535/6917/products/plannin
> gdemotivator.jpeg?v=1403276085  Love those despair.com demotivational 
> posters!!  I recall them at GLGDW back in 2002/2003.
>
> Another buzzword was "paradigm" which always make me think of the 
> Reebok Terrible Terry Tate ads from years ago.  Still hilarious today.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DOm_RiklE4
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f1905f...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Reactivated old FOXil

[Kurt Wendt]

Hey Woody - nice to hear from you. I can surely relate to your job hours. I 
leave every morning at 6:40am - commute mostly by trains @ nearly 4.5 Hrs round 
trip - and arrive back to my place in the evenings at 7:05pm (or 19:05). So, 
yeah - nearly a 12.5 Hr day. Not much time left for me personally during the 
week. Although - on the upside - since 3/4 of my time is on the Long Island 
Railroad - I can actually work on my personal 3D CG projects on the train, or 
even do e-mails.

Anyway - best of luck to you on your current job situation. 

Regards,
Kurt

-Original Message-

In the meantime I checked the 60-age mark, managed to survive 5 years as a 
freelancer  (after the breakdown of the ProLib companies in 2009), and 2 years 
ago I changed back into employment. They offered me some obscene amount of 
money to get me onboard to manage and enhance their inhouse software. Finally I 
couldn't resist, even after sleeping over that decision
for three nights..   Thus now I find myself in a 9 to 18 job, with driving
86km each morning and evening  (which means starting at 7:30 and returning at 
19:30), but I'm very happy with my salary (and 30 days of payed vacations
:) )  It could be worse than that 

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f1905d...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] learn more about what you hate so much.

[Kurt Wendt]

As long as Kevin doesn't give a Damn about Android dev. - then I guess XOJO 
suites him just fine - even though it has a Strange name!

:-)
-K-

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen 
Russell
Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 11:06 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] learn more about what you hate so much.

XOJO doesn't support Android development yet.  Xamarin does which is write once 
and portable class libraries allow you to reuse a lot of your base.


On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Kevin Cully 
wrote:

> For 20 years now, Microsoft has been telling me that I've been 
> developing with an inferior tool and that .NET is better.  Is it ready now?
>
> I think I'll stick with Foxpro and now Xojo for developing business 
> solutions.
>
> I don't hate .NET.  I'm just going to continue to ignore it.
>
>
> On 10/04/2017 11:01 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
>
>> This is the 2017 .NET Conference Keynote
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yecu4g5JYB8
>>
>> It has morphed from the .NET you all hated so much 15 years ago.  
>> They show working in Chrome and not Bing.
>>
>> the beginning goes over NuGet if you are unfamiliar with posting 
>> packages to it.
>>
>>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f19050...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: just thanks Tamar E. Granor

[Kurt Wendt]

Hey Gary - good to see you back here again! Hope all is well with you. 

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 
GlobeTax!
Tel. +1-212-747-9100


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Gary
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 9:57 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: just thanks Tamar E. Granor

Just thank you...[What's new in Nine PG-18.] Since I upgraded to FP-9,  I've 
been stumped nursing all my data driven apps along. All my special properties 
that make things work were absent... then page 18  ''rt. Click border area', to 
unhide those needed jewels... thank you, thank you, thank you. Sorry I haven't 
interacted MUCH, MY OUTLOOK MAKES THREADS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO FOLLOW. Gary 
Jeurink


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f19037...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Fwd: 2017 News from Hentzenwerke Publishing!

[Kurt Wendt]

I love that book cover - with the Casket in the Car. It sure doesn't have a 
furry dead Fox in there yet!!!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of 
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2017 5:55 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: 2017 News from Hentzenwerke Publishing!

On 2017-08-04 05:21, Michael J. Babcock wrote:
> Got this from HWP (Whil) today. If you didn't get one, you can 
> probably still use that same link (not sure if that cryptic string is 
> specific to me or not?) to add yourself to his mailing list.
> 
> The only VFP10 I've heard is some modified Chinese version, which I'm 
> not sure I'd ever use. Still, VFP9SP2, as old as it is, still kicks 
> ass!




Here's the Amazon link to the "VFP 10: Hard to Kill" book:  
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1930919131/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8=hentzenwerkepubl=1789=9325=as2=1930919131=96d0a966d2a7d0493ee0482962e81830

or http://preview.tinyurl.com/vfp10-hard-to-kill

Written by Whil, and edited by our beloved Ted Roche I see!  :-)

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f19024...@drexchvm01.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Validating email addresses

[Kurt Wendt]

Wow Gene - had no idea you were Canadian! Look at that - learn something new 
every day.

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Gene 
Wirchenko
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 11:37 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Validating email addresses

At 10:33 2017-07-18, Kurt Wendt <kurt_we...@globetax.com> wrote:
>Kevin - am sitting here at work eating some lunch. I read that one part 
>of your reply below and almost burst out laughing! Funny indeed.

  Oh, you think it is funny, do you, punk?

  You really should not push your luck with us Canadians.  You would not 
like me when I am angry.  (You might not like me at any other time, but that is 
another matter.)

[snip]

Sincerely,

Gene "polite ... for now" Wirchenko


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f1901a...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Validating email addresses

[Kurt Wendt]

Kevin - am sitting here at work eating some lunch. I read that one part of your 
reply below and almost burst out laughing! Funny indeed.

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
>From what I hear, Canada has gotten so serious about spam that if they find 
>you not honoring unsubscribe requests they'll send a Royal Mounted Policeman 
>to your house to kick your dog and poke your youngest child in the eye.  And 
>then they get mad.  Canadians :: Very friendly ... until they're not.  
>http://fightspam.gc.ca/eic/site/030.nsf/eng/home

Hth,
Kevin

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f1901a...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: "An IF | ELSE | ENDIF statement is missing"

[Kurt Wendt]

Hey  Paul - I think your reply is more in the way of Derailment instead of 
HiJacking!
:-)

I must admit - sometimes when I want a little break from work - I come hang out 
here in the land of ProFox - just for the entertainment value it affords me!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul H. 
Tarver
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 4:14 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: "An IF | ELSE | ENDIF statement is missing"

Not to hijack this thread, but were you two talking about Monty and the errant 
for the Holy Grail? :)

Paul H. Tarver
Tarver Program Consultants, Inc.
Email: p...@tpcqpc.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul Hill
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 2:11 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: "An IF | ELSE | ENDIF statement is missing"

On 13 July 2017 at 18:51, Malcolm Greene <pro...@bdurham.com> wrote:
> Not to hijack this thread, but Python's indentation-as-syntax 
> eliminates problems like this. I know this doesn't solve the problem 
> at hand, just pointing out how another language handles this situation.

It makes it worse!  It's the number one reason I don't like Python!

I was recently writing some Python code on my Raspberry PI.
I got so frustrated I ended up re-writing in C.

--
Paul

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f19012...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] has anyone played with Linux on a thumb drive?

[Kurt Wendt]

Not yet - but, I'm sure Michael's working on it!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 7:33 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] has anyone played with Linux on a thumb drive?

Yes.

Any other questions?

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Michael Madigan <mmadi10...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I wonder, does this really work?
>

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f19007...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Latest Ransomware "vaccine"

[Kurt Wendt]

Ted - interesting info.

Our CTO here at my job sent out a co. wide email last night warning about this 
new Petya Ransomware - warning EVERYBODY Not to just Open email attachments 
unless they are absolutely SURE they are safe. So - I just forwarded your 
posting below to him and our Network dept. - in case they want to try and 
implement the suggestion. 

So - thanks for giving us the heads-up!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 11:55 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: [NF] Latest Ransomware "vaccine"

How to Enable the NotPetya/Petna/Petya Vaccine

To vaccinate your computer so that you are unable to get infected with the 
current strain of NotPetya/Petya/Petna (yeah, this naming is annoying), simply 
create a file called perfc in the C:\Windows folder and make it read only.  For 
those who want a quick and easy way to perform this task, Lawrence Abrams has 
created a batch file that performs this step for you.

Source: 
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/vaccine-not-killswitch-found-for-petya-notpetya-ransomware-outbreak/


--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f19007...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: joke

[Kurt Wendt]

First of all - what are you doing hanging around Trading Desks? Ur pretty far 
away from NYC - being you're in TN! Myself - I am right here in the Financial 
District. 

On another note - seems you made a slight error. This shoulda been marked [NF]. 
Now - if the joke was old and about Bill Gates wanting to buy a Fox -- and 
instead bought Fox SW - then THAT would be Valid as Not NF!

:-)

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen 
Russell
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 12:24 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: joke

*By the way, here's the joke going around trading desks on Wall Street:
"Jeff Bezos said to Alexa, 'Buy me something on Whole Foods,' and Alexa bought 
Whole Foods."*



--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Analyst
Ring Container Technology
Oakland TN

901.246-0159 cell


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYLP9aLPcyPciOQuQDu_v=whhb0sb+086_a8xxv8-qy...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Report [OT] Abuse: 
http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/CAJidMYLP9aLPcyPciOQuQDu_v=whhb0sb+086_a8xxv8-qy...@mail.gmail.com
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f19006...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Do you prefer Digest Mode?

[Kurt Wendt]

That's strange! You sent the identical reply on Tues. - although it was from 
your other email account. While this reply reached the List only Today!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of JW
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:09 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Do you prefer Digest Mode?

For a list like ProFox, where the ability to interact in real time, or at least 
its email equivalent, is really useful when trying to solve a problem, Digest 
Mode is probably not a good idea.

There are lists where timeliness is less crucial, though, and seeing their 
contents once a day is fine. As Kurt pointed out, it's incumbent on the digest 
recipient to format responses properly.

-Jerry


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f19006...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Do you prefer Digest Mode?

[Kurt Wendt]

Pete - FYI - I DID see your reply last night - the original one. But, I saw 
that in my personal home email. Here at work today - will admit I did NOT see 
that reply. So - who knows - maybe you mistakenly ONLY wrote your reply to me 
instead of to the list. And, I actually just now checked on my Cell Ph - and 
that is truly the case - your original reply you ONLY sent to me. 

As for your actual comment - maybe anything you said in the Past was always OT 
- but, this time around - you properly stuck to the topic! Good job!!!   :-)

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Pete Theisen
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 6:56 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Do you prefer Digest Mode?

Well, I replied to this 8 hours ago, but my reply didn't make it.

I said that "anything I say is considered [OT]". I didn't think that was 
offensive but . . .

Maybe the list has a filter that stops anything with [OT] in the body text, or 
something. It ain't easy being green . . .


On 06/12/2017 08:53 PM, Kurt at VR-FX wrote:
> Wow - seems we are ALL in a Agreement!
>
> Hey Pete - what do YOU think??
>
> :-)
> -K-
>
>
> On 6/12/2017 8:46 PM, Vince Teachout wrote:
>> Ugh. No Digest Mode for me, thanks.
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f19005...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [ADMIN] Changed List E-mail Address

[Kurt Wendt]

Gene - FYI - I filter my emails simply by "profox" being within the email 
address. If you had done it the same way - instead basing it on the Entire 
email addy - then you would Not have had the problem that occurred on your end. 
Just sayin'...

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Edward Leafe
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 4:53 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Changed List E-mail Address

On Jun 6, 2017, at 2:46 PM, Gene Wirchenko <ge...@telus.net> wrote:
> 
> I noticed that just today some E-mails from the list have not been 
> getting routed to my ProFox folder.  The culprit is that the To address has 
> changed from
>  profox@leafe.com <mailto:profox@leafe.com> to
>  pro...@mail.leafe.com <mailto:pro...@mail.leafe.com>
> 
> Some were mine, and I had specified the first address in my post, but it 
> was changed to the second.
> 
> Is this deliberate/permanent?

No, it was a test to see if it would help with some ISPs that are blocking 
ProFox emails. I changed it back, so you should start seeing them back in the 
right folder.


-- Ed Leafe







--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f19003...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] URGENT Request - MailMerge w/PDF

[Kurt Wendt]

You're postings do tend to make me chuckle!

By the way - I checked out that tool on CodePlex - and it ROCKS It does 
Exactly what I needed to do - so - problems ALL Solved!

So - in that regards - seems I WILL have this done Quick, Accurate (cause I do 
good work) - and Cheap (since that tool was Free)! Ha - you thought Quick, 
Cheap & Accurate could not be done - and, so - I've proven that concept wrong.  
Good Day sir!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 11:06 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] URGENT Request - MailMerge w/PDF

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Kurt Wendt <kurt_we...@globetax.com> wrote:
> Gosh Ted - that's a "Nice" thought!

Sorry, it must be Cynical Thursday.

> Not sure how I gave you the idea my co. here is Cheap. Hmmm...They are a 
> very professional co. in a fancy building here at the bottom of Manhattan. So 
> - nope - they aren't cheap. If they need to purchase a tool to do it - then 
> they will.

Well, good for you! I'm glad to hear it.

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18ffa...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] URGENT Request - MailMerge w/PDF

[Kurt Wendt]

Gosh Ted - that's a "Nice" thought!

Correct - its not really a VFP project. Just need a way to get data from Excel 
onto a PDF form that is already digitally signed. 

Not sure how I gave you the idea my co. here is Cheap. Hmmm...They are a 
very professional co. in a fancy building here at the bottom of Manhattan. So - 
nope - they aren't cheap. If they need to purchase a tool to do it - then they 
will. 

There were instructions online - but, it turns out it was a bit BS - since it 
claims it could only do 1 doc at a time. Thus - if I have 1000 records in the 
Excel file - I would have to do the process 1000 times - which, yeah - is total 
BS. Hard to believe someone actually posted that answer as a reply to someone 
else with an almost Identical request to mine!

I'm going to look into the CodePlex thing right now...

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 6:56 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] URGENT Request - MailMerge w/PDF

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Kurt Wendt <kurt_we...@globetax.com> wrote:
>
> Any thoughts on this??
>

Thoughts? Boy, are you in trouble!

Okay, so [NF] means Not Fox, so you don't want to hear about the 42 ways to do 
this in VFP. The CodePlex code may be worth trying out; some of the people on 
their forum report it works for them.

It seems to me you're looking at the classic IT conundrum: Fast, cheap, 
accurate: pick two. If you want it fast and accurate, it won't be cheap. If you 
want it cheap and accurate, it won't get done fast.
If you want it cheap and fast, it won't be accurate. And IIRC, your employer is 
big on cheap. And fast. So...

Otherwise, you're looking at a specialized tool. Years ago, I worked with a 
client that used OmniForm (now from ScanSoft) to mail merge their internal data 
onto government-supplied forms. ScanSoft may have a solution for you, although 
I'm not familiar with their current product lines.

Adobe are the people who invented PDF, and likely have some tools that would 
work for you. If this truly is a one-off job, and not a "we'll ask you to do 
this every 6 months, as an emergency," it might be cheaper to search for an 
Adobe professional who could bang this out.
Searching online, it seems like a lot of Adobe products can mail merge via 
ODBC, which is likely what you want.

Random surfing turned up: https://www.evermap.com/automailmerge.asp,
no idea if it works, but $149 is reasonable.

I thought there was a way to do this using CutePDFPro; I've used it to create 
the data-fillable PDF form templates, but I don't see a solution that includes 
merge-from-database.

Good luck!

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18ffa...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] URGENT Request - MailMerge w/PDF

[Kurt Wendt]

Alan - as I wrote in the original posting - the PDF Files come from a Client. 
Its also Digitally Signed. On that PDF - they need to have name and addresses 
on the PDF - based upon data from an Excel file. Thus a mail merge. But, yeah - 
PDF already exists! It is NOT something that I can generate from VFP - so, VFP 
is NOT involved - thus why I posted as [NF].

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 4:16 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] URGENT Request - MailMerge w/PDF

Not clear on what you're trying to do - are these actual PDF forms or do you 
just need to put data into an existing vanilla PDF?

If it's any help I did some code recently to add a customer signature captured 
from a signature pad to a PDF invoice. One of the methods I investigated was 
generating the invoice first and then merging the signature graphic in. It used 
the free Debenu Quick PDF Lite Library
(http://www.debenu.com/products/development/debenu-pdf-library-lite/)
which has support for merging graphics into PDFs. Ultimately I didn't end up 
going down this route but here's the business end of it FWIW. You might need 
the paid version to merge text or fill PDF forms.

* -- Parameters are target PDF, the filename of the graphic with the signature, 
and the image dimensions.


Function SignPDF(lcPDFFile as String, lcSigFile as String, loParms as
Object)
Local lnFileID, lnImageID

With goApplication.oDebenuPDF

If .LoadFromFile(lcPDFFile, "") > 0

? "PageHeight=" + Transform(.PageHeight) 

.SelectPage(1)  && - -TODO each page
or last?
.NormalizePage(0)
.SetOrigin(1)   && -- Top left
lnFileID = .SelectedDocument
lnImageID = .AddImageFromFile(lcSigFile, 0) 

If lnImageID > 0

If .SelectImage(lnImageID) > 0

if .DrawImage(loParms.ImgLeft, loParms.ImgTop, ;
loParms.ImgWidth, loParms.ImgHeight) > 0

If .SaveToFile(lcPDFFile) = 0
?"ERROR: Could not save " + lcPDFFile
Else
? "Merge successful."
Endif   

Else
? "Could not draw image."
endif   

Else
? "Could not select image."
Endif   

Else
? "ImageID = 0"
Endif

Else
? "Could not load image file."
EndIf

EndWith

Endfunc




--
  Alan Bourke
  alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18ffa...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[NF] URGENT Request - MailMerge w/PDF

[Kurt Wendt]

Hey folks,

I have this crazy request here at work - and its super urgent. So - I need to 
figure out how to do this - and do it FAST!

They have these spreadsheets of Data - and these PDF Files. I've done work 
recently with putting field names in PDF files. But, now I have to merge it 
with data from an Excel file. The other stuff I've been working on - its NOT 
time sensitive - and for that people have .Net code and pulling data from SQL. 
This new project is really a One-Shot-Deal!

Doing a Google search I came up with some PDF Mail Merge utility that resides 
on CodePlex - and I see CodePlex so far is STILL running (although I looked 
thru recently archive postings since I knew that CodePlex was recently 
discussed about shutting down).

So - this PDF Mail Merge utility on CodePlex - is it really the easiest way to 
go? I'm still researching on Google to see how to do this particular mail merge.

Any thoughts on this??

TIA!
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst
[GlobeTax_SecondaryLogo_TwoColor_Lo]<https://www.globetax.com/>
One New York Plaza - 34th Floor
New York, NY 10004-1936, USA
Tel. +1-212-747-9100
Direct +1-212-405-8246
www.GlobeTax.com<https://www.globetax.com/>

GlobeTax does not provide or offer, and this is not, tax, investment or legal 
advice. This email and any attachments hereto is intended only for use by the 
addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, please immediately notify the sender at 
+1-212-747-9100 and permanently delete the original and any copies of this 
email.



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/related
  multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
  image/png
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18ffa...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [ADMIN] Spring Cycling for Charity

[Kurt Wendt]

Ed - yeah - the CK Video clip is pretty darned funny - and I can also relate to 
it. With my eyes going bad, chronic back pain for YEARS now, bad knees - yup - 
been there, done that.

Was also reading your blog post - and saw your comment about idea on redesign 
of bike handle bars. Have you researched what's already out there - as I  
BELIEVE that some exotic handle bar designs already exist - even some may be 
specific for your problem. On the other hand - I could actually prototype 
something for you via 3D Printing. 

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Edward Leafe
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 12:07 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Spring Cycling for Charity

On May 18, 2017, at 9:26 AM, Fred Taylor <fbtay...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I feel for you Ed.  My knee and my back certainly do.  

Thanks.

> Guess I'll wreck my
> kidneys/liver with all the naproxen and acetaminophen I take.


The Louis CK bit I linked to in the blog post is so true: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzEhoyXpqzQ 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzEhoyXpqzQ>


-- Ed Leafe







--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18ff8...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [ADMIN] Spring Cycling for Charity

[Kurt Wendt]

Ted - you bring up some interesting points.

I'm on another forum besides this one - and many of you I am sure can guess 
what kind of forum it is. And, if your 1st guess was for Bachelors and meeting 
women - you'd be wrong. So - yeah - it's about 3D Printing. 

Well - there is a chap on there - he was very well known in the beginning when 
the forum started - his knickname was Wing Commander. He's located down under 
in Australia. I actually did a Skype call with him a couple years ago. A Very 
interesting chap indeed.

So - at one point - this project he was working on - for which he used 3D 
Printing to produce some of the parts - in particular - I remember the pedals 
he had 3D Printed. His project - a type of bike that's a stand up unit. It's 
like you are walking or jogging when riding the Bike. Its supposedly less 
strenuous on the body that jogging. And, although it's not a solution for Ed - 
the discussion here just reminded me of WC's product design!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 
Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 1:04 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Spring Cycling for Charity

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Edward Leafe <e...@leafe.com> wrote:
>
> https://blog.leafe.com/inevitable/ 
> <https://blog.leafe.com/inevitable/>
>

Ed:

Sorry to hear your ailments are limiting your activities. I suspect we have a 
quorum of old guys in the forum who can catalog their glass ankles, rotator 
cuffs, sleep apnea, fading eyesight, bad knees, diminished hearing, etc. -- and 
that's just me! A good friend says "Old age is not for the faint of heart."

Inevitable, probably, but certainly working your medical providers to refer you 
to physical or occupational therapy when available. I've had OTs come up with 
some good adaptations over the years.

I hope you can find some accommodations that will let you continue to cycle.  A 
number of friends have moved from road bikes to slower-speed trekking and even 
upright cruisers, "don't go too fast, but they go pretty far." I live near the 
foothills to the White Mountains, and swear some of my short rides are more 
vertical than horizontal, but I enjoy getting out and getting some fresh air 
and rubber-necking.

Also, I don't know if there's anything local, but another friend, a well-known 
long-distance runner, is enjoying swimming as fitness exercise. Worth 
considering.

--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18ff8...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Friday Afternoon Discussion: Passwords

[Kurt Wendt]

Except - Ted - if your Internet is currently Dead - then your index card box is 
pretty useless!!!   :-)

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 4:25 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Friday Afternoon Discussion: Passwords

I use LastPass, a cellphone for 2FA, and... an index card box full of 
pen-and-ink password notes. The latter has never been unavailable when the 
internets on the blink, never ran out of batteries, I've never forgotten the 
cable or adapter, and it's pretty invulnerable to 440-pound hackers in 
Cleveland. So, yeah...

It's a risk-benefits calculation.

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Gene Wirchenko <ge...@telus.net> wrote:
> At 11:54 2017-05-08, "Paul H. Tarver" <p...@tpcqpc.com> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> Woohoo! All this time I thought I was normal and today Ken confirmed 
>> I AM a computer geek because I use LastPass!
>>
>> I'm a member of a community! YEAH! :)
>
>
>  I just use a Word document.  There goes *my* geek status.  Sniff, 
> sniff.  Good-bye, cruel world!
>
>  No, wait.  I do not have to do what every other geek does.  After 
> all, I use VFP.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Gene Wirchenko
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fed...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Debug Window is HIDING From ME!

[Kurt Wendt]

Wow Tracy - that worked like a Charm!!! Thanks SO Much!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Tracy 
Pearson
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 4:39 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Debug Window is HIDING From ME!

Kurt Wendt wrote on 2017-03-30: 
>  So - I noticed a strange problem had been happening to me recently.
Although - at the time - I had a ton of stuff open and I had not rebooted my 
Work PC here for a LONG time. Well, I just rebooted it a couple of days ago
- and, I am now having this strange problem again!
>  
>  The problem - the VFP Debug window - its like its "Hidden". I just 
> went
to the VFP menu, clicked on Debugger under Tools. But, the Debug window does 
NOT appear on the screen! However, if I click on the Fox icon at the bottom of 
my screen (and I have Two sessions of VFP currently open) - it display 3 small 
windows - 2 VFP sessions - and the 3rd small window is the Debug window. But, 
if I click on it - it does NOT go full size on my screen.
>  
>  I find this VERY Weird - and have NO Clue as to why it's happening.  
> FYI
- I'm running VFP 9 SP2 on Win7 Pro 64-bit.
>  
>  Kurt Wendt
>  Senior Systems Analyst

Kurt,

You should be able to right click the thumbnail that shows the debug window.

Select Move, press one of the arrow keys once, then start moving the mouse 
without pressing a button.
The window should appear, and you should be able to place it where you want.

Then click the mouse button to let it go and you'll be good to go.

Tracy Pearson
PowerChurch Software


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fdd...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Debug Window is HIDING From ME!

[Kurt Wendt]

So - I noticed a strange problem had been happening to me recently. Although - 
at the time - I had a ton of stuff open and I had not rebooted my Work PC here 
for a LONG time. Well, I just rebooted it a couple of days ago - and, I am now 
having this strange problem again!

The problem - the VFP Debug window - its like its "Hidden". I just went to the 
VFP menu, clicked on Debugger under Tools. But, the Debug window does NOT 
appear on the screen! However, if I click on the Fox icon at the bottom of my 
screen (and I have Two sessions of VFP currently open) - it display 3 small 
windows - 2 VFP sessions - and the 3rd small window is the Debug window. But, 
if I click on it - it does NOT go full size on my screen. 

I find this VERY Weird - and have NO Clue as to why it's happening.  FYI - I'm 
running VFP 9 SP2 on Win7 Pro 64-bit.

Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst

One New York Plaza - 34th Floor
New York, NY 10004-1936, USA
Tel. +1-212-747-9100
Direct +1-212-405-8246
www.GlobeTax.com 

GlobeTax does not provide or offer, and this is not, tax, investment or legal 
advice. This email and any attachments hereto is intended only for use by the 
addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, please immediately notify the sender at 
+1-212-747-9100 and permanently delete the original and any copies of this 
email.


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fdd...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: VFP9SP2 report error with _pagetotal variable

[Kurt Wendt]

The problem as I see it - is how can VFP predict full length of the report at 
the start? Many things are dependent on the data - even to the point of things 
like starting a new grouping on a new page - which could cause a gap at a 
bottom of a page. Unless, of course, VFP can internally run the report without 
you seeing it - in like a 1st pass - so that it can properly determine total # 
of pages! Anyway - those are my thoughts on the matter...

Although - truthfully - I have even done much in the way of reports for years. 
The one system I worked on here had "reports" - but, they were ALL just Excel 
files. The other system I still currently support - it has reports - but, they 
just work and have not needed ANY Modifications in the past nearly 2 years 
since I have been support this system. 

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Richard Kaye
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 1:24 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: VFP9SP2 report error with _pagetotal variable

[Page ]+ALLTRIM(TRANSFORM(_pageno))+IIF(_pagetotal>1,[ of 
]+ALLTRIM(TRANSFORM(_pagetotal)),[])

This is the expression I use. I can't recall seeing it misbehave.

--

rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 1:21 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: VFP9SP2 report error with _pagetotal variable

The MSDN suggests your string to print it is too complicated to parse and 
recognize that _PAGETOTAL is being invoked, and to force VFP to run the report 
in two-pass mode. The IIF() near the end of the article should resolve:

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa977060(v=vs.71).aspx

HWP's What's New in VFP8 also has some good suggestions.

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:10 PM,
<mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> On 2017-03-27 13:10, Richard Kaye wrote:
>>
>> How do you have REPORTBEHAVIOR set?
>
>
>
> I tried it with 80 and 90, both.  Same problem.
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fdd...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: VFP9SP2 report error with _pagetotal variable

[Kurt Wendt]

Mike - I believe this is a VERY Common problem and has been covered here on the 
forum a number of times over the years. As I know I had the problem in the past 
as well. I don't think VFP can truly generate the total page count until AFTER 
the report is completed. So - what people have suggested in the past - which I 
think I did once - is to run the report Twice. The 1st time around it will 
generate the total # of pages. Then you capture that value and then USE it when 
printing the actual report the 2nd time. Maybe something like the 1st time 
around the report is generated but goes to a PDF file or something like that. 
Although - that part is just a WAG on my part...

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of 
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 11:39 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: VFP9SP2 report error with _pagetotal variable

See https://www.screencast.com/t/8bj9GNQk for what's happening.  
Outermost group is CUST_ID.  In Report Writer, Data Grouping tab, I've selected 
Group starts on NEW PAGE NUMBER 1 (the last radio option).  I must admit I've 
never used this option before; most of my reports are always the New Line or 
New Page option.

I'm using this expression in my footer to produce what you see:  "Page " 
+  allt(str(_pageno)) + " of " + allt(str( _pagetotal))

Obviously the _pagetotal internal variable is not getting set correctly.

Ideas on how to fix?  tia!
--Mike


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fdd...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: New Excel BREAKS Prior Working Automation!

[Kurt Wendt]

To let people know my resolution. I circumvented the whole cut commands. 
Instead, I captured the values from each cell and put them in an Array. Then, 
from the area - I inserted them into the new spreadsheet a cell at a time using 
".value=".  The other tricky part is that I had to capture all the values from 
the 1st spreadsheet BEFORE I opened/created the New spreadsheet. When I didn't 
do that - that's what was causing part of the problems...

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 4:58 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: New Excel BREAKS Prior Working Automation!

OK - one last tidbit of info. IT now seems its due to a Patch/Update. All these 
users experiencing the problems - they have been using Excel 2013 for a WHILE! 
So - it seems problem is not intrinsic to Excel 2013 itself - but, rather - a 
recent patch/update that broke something!

Anyway - I'm outta here. 

TGIF!!!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 2:54 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: New Excel BREAKS Prior Working Automation!

Gene - thanks again for your feedback - and your humor. 

So - I am trying to press onwards with this problem today. The Kludge I 
mentioned before - was to literally read EACH Cell from the Source spreadsheet 
- then push that value into the proper cell of the Target spreadsheet. And, 
here's where it gets REALY Strange. 

If I run this operation on MY regular work PC - it works fine. I even stepped 
thru the code - to check the value of the " Val_2_Copy" var. - and it has a 
proper value. However, on the machine that I Remote into - which has Excel 2013 
instead of 2010 (which mine has) - the value of the " Val_2_Copy" var. actually 
contains NULL! WTF?!?! That's Nuts - doesn't make Sense - all due to the Excel 
version.

Anyway - here is the specific code/kludge which I am attempting to use to copy 
of the data of the Cells:
FOR Col_No = 0 TO 3  && Columns A thru D
Column_Code = CHR(65 + Col_No)
FOR Row_Cntr = 1 TO rowcount  && This is the Dest File Rows
Source_Row = Row_Cntr + 6
Source_range = '"'+Column_Code + 
ALLTRIM(STR(Source_Row))+'"'
Dest_range = '"'+Column_Code + 
ALLTRIM(STR(Row_Cntr))+'"'
oWorkBook.Activate
Val_2_Copy = 
oExcel.ActiveSheet.RANGE(_range).VALUE
oWorkBook2.Activate
oExcel.ActiveSheet.RANGE(_range).VALUE = 
Val_2_Copy 
ENDFOR 
ENDFOR

Any input would be GREATLY Appreciated - since, at this point - I seem to be 
Banging my head against a Wall!

I did have ONE thought. Could there possibly be a new setting in Excel that 
STOPS direct access of data via Automation???

I know - it's a Shot-in-the-Dark...

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Gene 
Wirchenko
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 2:41 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: New Excel BREAKS Prior Working Automation!

At 18:53 2017-03-15, Kurt at VR-FX <v...@optonline.net> wrote:
>Hey there Gene!
>
>Guess great minds thing alike! Yup - been there - done that! Did the 
>Wait command - but, alas - to no avail...

  So do similarly deluded fools, but as that use case has nothing, nothing 
to do with us, I will press on.

>Am working alternate kludge - but, today & tomorrow am in a 3D PRinting 
>conference - so back to this problem on Fri...

  You stated that the code worked on a computer that it did not work on 
normally.  Something about running the debugger did it.  It is possible that 
I/O had something to do with it.  Maybe, it has to be explicit.  Some forms of 
the wait command will not wait, such as:
   wait "Hello!" window nowait

  What you are looking for is a condition that will break the problem.  
*Then*, you refine it.

  I may be telling you what you already know, but do so in case you have 
overlooked something.

[snip]

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14

RE: Screen Running & Order of Objects Firing...

[Kurt Wendt]

Tracy - just knowing that LISA order isn't quite enough. The minutiae I was 
after was specifically the order of firing between the Form and the Objects on 
the Form. Since the Inits of the objects happens first and THEN the Form - I 
know the code change would then work! And, it did the 1st time round. 

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Tracy 
Pearson
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 4:50 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Screen Running & Order of Objects Firing...

Kurt Wendt wrote on 2017-03-24: 
>  Forget it. I got it. Co-worker pointed me in the right direction.
>  
>  She suggested " You can type in 'Event Order' under the Search Tab 
> under
Help." - and, once I did that - I found this help topic: "Event Sequence in 
Visual FoxPro" - which is Exactly what I was looking for.
>  
>  Anyway - TGIF Folks!
>  
>  Regards,
>  Kurt Wendt
>  Senior Systems Analyst
>  Tel. +1-212-747-9100
>  www.GlobeTax.com
> 

Kurt,

It was a long time ago that Jim Booth said it in a class I took he was 
teaching. 
Just remember it with the acronym L.I.S.A. Load, Init, Show, Activate.

Tracy Pearson
PowerChurch Software


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fdd...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Screen Running & Order of Objects Firing...

[Kurt Wendt]

Isn't LisaG a Pop band from the 80's???

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 4:58 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Screen Running & Order of Objects Firing...

LISAG

And if you forget, it's on the Wiki:
http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~FormEventSequence

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Fred Taylor <fbtay...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And don't forget G - GotFocus   (LISAG)
>
> Fred
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Tracy Pearson <tr...@powerchurch.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Kurt Wendt wrote on 2017-03-24:
>> >  Forget it. I got it. Co-worker pointed me in the right direction.
>> >
>> >  She suggested " You can type in 'Event Order' under the Search Tab 
>> > under
>> Help." - and, once I did that - I found this help topic: "Event 
>> Sequence in Visual FoxPro" - which is Exactly what I was looking for.
>> >
>> >  Anyway - TGIF Folks!
>> >
>> >  Regards,
>> >  Kurt Wendt
>> >  Senior Systems Analyst
>> >  Tel. +1-212-747-9100
>> >  www.GlobeTax.com
>> >
>>
>> Kurt,
>>
>> It was a long time ago that Jim Booth said it in a class I took he 
>> was teaching.
>> Just remember it with the acronym L.I.S.A. Load, Init, Show, Activate.
>>
>> Tracy Pearson
>> PowerChurch Software
>>
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fdc...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Screen Running & Order of Objects Firing...

[Kurt Wendt]

Forget it. I got it. Co-worker pointed me in the right direction. 

She suggested " You can type in 'Event Order' under the Search Tab under Help." 
- and, once I did that - I found this help topic: "Event Sequence in Visual 
FoxPro" - which is Exactly what I was looking for. 

Anyway - TGIF Folks!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 
Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 3:28 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Screen Running & Order of Objects Firing...

Hopefully that Subject line makes sense. I'm trying to find that in the Online 
VFP help - as I HAVE seen it there before - I just can't find it now.

As in, 1st it's the Form Load, then the Load of the Objects on the Form, and 
then the Form Init - and so on.

Can anyone point me to where I can find that in the online help?

Thanks!

Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fdc...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Screen Running & Order of Objects Firing...

[Kurt Wendt]

Hopefully that Subject line makes sense. I'm trying to find that in the Online 
VFP help - as I HAVE seen it there before - I just can't find it now.

As in, 1st it's the Form Load, then the Load of the Objects on the Form, and 
then the Form Init - and so on.

Can anyone point me to where I can find that in the online help?

Thanks!

Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst

One New York Plaza - 34th Floor
New York, NY 10004-1936, USA
Tel. +1-212-747-9100
Direct +1-212-405-8246
www.GlobeTax.com 

GlobeTax does not provide or offer, and this is not, tax, investment or legal 
advice. This email and any attachments hereto is intended only for use by the 
addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, please immediately notify the sender at 
+1-212-747-9100 and permanently delete the original and any copies of this 
email.


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fdc...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Monday Survey Question

[Kurt Wendt]

I have no idea how many are actually unused. They got ALL the books WAY before 
I was here on the scene... :-)

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 2:47 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Monday Survey Question

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Kurt Wendt <kurt_we...@globetax.com> wrote:

> Turns out - there are a BUNCH of VFP books here at my day job - none of them 
> being used. AT one point - they were going to throw them away when they moved 
> to the new office (which occurred about a year ago) - but, they were not 
> tossed. They are still here...

And still unused? :)


-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fdc...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Monday Survey Question

[Kurt Wendt]

Hey Ted - interesting pop-quiz!

Turns out - there are a BUNCH of VFP books here at my day job - none of them 
being used. AT one point - they were going to throw them away when they moved 
to the new office (which occurred about a year ago) - but, they were not 
tossed. They are still here...

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 2:09 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Monday Survey Question

Greetings, happy campers. Pop quiz this fine Monday.

1. How many VFP books do you own?

2. How many are dead-tree paper and how many ebooks?

3. What is your most well-worn VFP books? Or most referenced ebook?

4. What book do you regret not owning?

5. Would you buy VFP books if you could find them?

6. Preferred format? Paper, PDF, CHM, ePub, HTML, other (which?)

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fdc...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: New Excel BREAKS Prior Working Automation!

[Kurt Wendt]

OK - one last tidbit of info. IT now seems its due to a Patch/Update. All these 
users experiencing the problems - they have been using Excel 2013 for a WHILE! 
So - it seems problem is not intrinsic to Excel 2013 itself - but, rather - a 
recent patch/update that broke something!

Anyway - I'm outta here. 

TGIF!!!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 2:54 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: New Excel BREAKS Prior Working Automation!

Gene - thanks again for your feedback - and your humor. 

So - I am trying to press onwards with this problem today. The Kludge I 
mentioned before - was to literally read EACH Cell from the Source spreadsheet 
- then push that value into the proper cell of the Target spreadsheet. And, 
here's where it gets REALY Strange. 

If I run this operation on MY regular work PC - it works fine. I even stepped 
thru the code - to check the value of the " Val_2_Copy" var. - and it has a 
proper value. However, on the machine that I Remote into - which has Excel 2013 
instead of 2010 (which mine has) - the value of the " Val_2_Copy" var. actually 
contains NULL! WTF?!?! That's Nuts - doesn't make Sense - all due to the Excel 
version.

Anyway - here is the specific code/kludge which I am attempting to use to copy 
of the data of the Cells:
FOR Col_No = 0 TO 3  && Columns A thru D
Column_Code = CHR(65 + Col_No)
FOR Row_Cntr = 1 TO rowcount  && This is the Dest File Rows
Source_Row = Row_Cntr + 6
Source_range = '"'+Column_Code + 
ALLTRIM(STR(Source_Row))+'"'
Dest_range = '"'+Column_Code + 
ALLTRIM(STR(Row_Cntr))+'"'
oWorkBook.Activate
Val_2_Copy = 
oExcel.ActiveSheet.RANGE(_range).VALUE
oWorkBook2.Activate
oExcel.ActiveSheet.RANGE(_range).VALUE = 
Val_2_Copy 
ENDFOR 
ENDFOR

Any input would be GREATLY Appreciated - since, at this point - I seem to be 
Banging my head against a Wall!

I did have ONE thought. Could there possibly be a new setting in Excel that 
STOPS direct access of data via Automation???

I know - it's a Shot-in-the-Dark...

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Gene 
Wirchenko
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 2:41 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: New Excel BREAKS Prior Working Automation!

At 18:53 2017-03-15, Kurt at VR-FX <v...@optonline.net> wrote:
>Hey there Gene!
>
>Guess great minds thing alike! Yup - been there - done that! Did the 
>Wait command - but, alas - to no avail...

  So do similarly deluded fools, but as that use case has nothing, nothing 
to do with us, I will press on.

>Am working alternate kludge - but, today & tomorrow am in a 3D PRinting 
>conference - so back to this problem on Fri...

  You stated that the code worked on a computer that it did not work on 
normally.  Something about running the debugger did it.  It is possible that 
I/O had something to do with it.  Maybe, it has to be explicit.  Some forms of 
the wait command will not wait, such as:
   wait "Hello!" window nowait

  What you are looking for is a condition that will break the problem.  
*Then*, you refine it.

  I may be telling you what you already know, but do so in case you have 
overlooked something.

[snip]

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fdb...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: New Excel BREAKS Prior Working Automation!

[Kurt Wendt]

Gene - thanks again for your feedback - and your humor. 

So - I am trying to press onwards with this problem today. The Kludge I 
mentioned before - was to literally read EACH Cell from the Source spreadsheet 
- then push that value into the proper cell of the Target spreadsheet. And, 
here's where it gets REALY Strange. 

If I run this operation on MY regular work PC - it works fine. I even stepped 
thru the code - to check the value of the " Val_2_Copy" var. - and it has a 
proper value. However, on the machine that I Remote into - which has Excel 2013 
instead of 2010 (which mine has) - the value of the " Val_2_Copy" var. actually 
contains NULL! WTF?!?! That's Nuts - doesn't make Sense - all due to the Excel 
version.

Anyway - here is the specific code/kludge which I am attempting to use to copy 
of the data of the Cells:
FOR Col_No = 0 TO 3  && Columns A thru D
Column_Code = CHR(65 + Col_No)
FOR Row_Cntr = 1 TO rowcount  && This is the Dest File Rows
Source_Row = Row_Cntr + 6
Source_range = '"'+Column_Code + 
ALLTRIM(STR(Source_Row))+'"'
Dest_range = '"'+Column_Code + 
ALLTRIM(STR(Row_Cntr))+'"'
oWorkBook.Activate
Val_2_Copy = 
oExcel.ActiveSheet.RANGE(_range).VALUE
oWorkBook2.Activate
oExcel.ActiveSheet.RANGE(_range).VALUE = 
Val_2_Copy 
ENDFOR 
ENDFOR

Any input would be GREATLY Appreciated - since, at this point - I seem to be 
Banging my head against a Wall!

I did have ONE thought. Could there possibly be a new setting in Excel that 
STOPS direct access of data via Automation???

I know - it's a Shot-in-the-Dark...

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Gene 
Wirchenko
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 2:41 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: New Excel BREAKS Prior Working Automation!

At 18:53 2017-03-15, Kurt at VR-FX <v...@optonline.net> wrote:
>Hey there Gene!
>
>Guess great minds thing alike! Yup - been there - done that! Did the 
>Wait command - but, alas - to no avail...

  So do similarly deluded fools, but as that use case has nothing, nothing 
to do with us, I will press on.

>Am working alternate kludge - but, today & tomorrow am in a 3D PRinting 
>conference - so back to this problem on Fri...

  You stated that the code worked on a computer that it did not work on 
normally.  Something about running the debugger did it.  It is possible that 
I/O had something to do with it.  Maybe, it has to be explicit.  Some forms of 
the wait command will not wait, such as:
   wait "Hello!" window nowait

  What you are looking for is a condition that will break the problem.  
*Then*, you refine it.

  I may be telling you what you already know, but do so in case you have 
overlooked something.

[snip]

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fdb...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: New Excel BREAKS Prior Working Automation!

[Kurt Wendt]

RK - of course! That's what the original code essentially does! 

So - here is a cut down version of the original code (yeah - I really should 
have posted this initially, was going to do so - but I forgot to include it!):
oWorkBook.Activate
rangeA = '"A7:D'+ALLTRIM(STR(lastrow))+'"'
oRange = oExcel.ActiveSheet.RANGE()
oRange.SELECT
oRange.COPY()

oWorkBook2.Activate
oExcel.ActiveSheet.Paste

jdate=ALLTRIM(STR(ROUND(julian(DTOC(DATE())),0)))
mCSVname = csvpath+'BO'+jdate
mCSVname = FORCEEXT(mCSVname,"csv")

oExcel.ActiveWorkBook.SAVEAS (mCSVname,xlCSV)
oExcel.ActiveWorkBook.CLOSE(.F.) && the .F. parameter will prevent the 
dialogue box


Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Richard Kaye
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 3:27 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: New Excel BREAKS Prior Working Automation!

Despite the tip, did you try not closing the source workbook before you pasted?

--

rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 3:23 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: New Excel BREAKS Prior Working Automation!

Good afternoon fellow ProFoxers!

I hope you are faring well - for those of you like me in the NE USA  hit by the 
storm. They sent out emergency communications yesterday from my job - saying 
office would be closed today - yet, instead of FEET of Snow - I woke up and all 
the Rain/sleet seems to have melted it down to like 3 or 4 inches tall at best! 
Well - alas - I digress.

So - here's the deal. Recently I had a User get a problem with a particular 
option in an application - something that had always worked. Stranger still - 
as the old saying goes "It works on MY Machine" is also occurring - since the 
problem would NOT occur on my machine. Even went a step farther, as he had the 
gal sitting next to him try the same option - and it failed for her. I then 
went farther. I logged into another machine, and it worked. Went to a QA gal - 
she tried it - and it work. In the end - a buddy of mine in Systems who deals 
with networking and user support - he had like 7 different users try it - and 
it failed for all of them. In the end - his deduction was problem being tied to 
Excel - as I am running 2010 - and the systems experiencing the problem are 
2013. 

Short explanation of the actual problem. This app - reads in an Excel file 
using Automation. Grabs the data in the header area of spreadsheet and fills in 
var's. Then it takes the main data - a bunch of rows/columns - and pushes the 
data into a CSV file that it creates via Automation. The 2nd phase shows a 
screen w/Header info - and displays name of the CSV file. Then asks if you want 
to Proceed with processing the data. Here in lies the problem. In my case - 
when I run the option - the CSV file is fine. But, for the users that are 
having the problem - the CSV file is EMPTY!

Now - before reporting this problem to you all here - I've been doing a bunch 
of research - as well as Testing various options. I even looked at a prior 
thread here in this forum - as it was VERY Similar to my own conundrum: 
"Copy Excel worksheet to another workbook". And, one of the tricks I noticed 
that was mentioned is that after Copying the range of Cells from the FROM Excel 
file - and before Pasting into the TO Workbook (that will become the CSV file) 
- that it was suggested to CLOSE the From Workbook. So - I did that - but, then 
I get the following error message being thrown:"The object invoked has 
disconnected from its clients."

I even tried a similar operation by hand (as I have remote access to another PC 
in my office that has Excel 2013 - so I can test for the problem) - by doing 
the Copy of the Cells, Closed the workbook - then went to the Other workbook 
and did Paste - and it worked - NO Error and data was pasted!

As such - I'm rather stumped! It's really SUCH a Drag when changes to Office 
now crash out Code that previously worked. 

A fellow developer has suggested another Kludge - as Gene so adeptly states the 
term - which is to do a more manual pasting of cell data one by one - literally 
assigning the values to the Cells instead of by doing the Paste command. I did 
do a test by simply assigning "Hello World" to a single cell - and that DID 
work. But, I'd rather a more Elegant solution AND something that knows what the 
Actual problem is and can fix it with less code. Especially since I worry that 
this problem may run DEEPER than the users think - and that a BUNCH of other 
similar options in this application may ALSO Start to fail for all these users!

TIA!

Regards.
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst


[excessive quoting remo

New Excel BREAKS Prior Working Automation!

[Kurt Wendt]

Good afternoon fellow ProFoxers!

I hope you are faring well - for those of you like me in the NE USA  hit by the 
storm. They sent out emergency communications yesterday from my job - saying 
office would be closed today - yet, instead of FEET of Snow - I woke up and all 
the Rain/sleet seems to have melted it down to like 3 or 4 inches tall at best! 
Well - alas - I digress.

So - here's the deal. Recently I had a User get a problem with a particular 
option in an application - something that had always worked. Stranger still - 
as the old saying goes "It works on MY Machine" is also occurring - since the 
problem would NOT occur on my machine. Even went a step farther, as he had the 
gal sitting next to him try the same option - and it failed for her. I then 
went farther. I logged into another machine, and it worked. Went to a QA gal - 
she tried it - and it work. In the end - a buddy of mine in Systems who deals 
with networking and user support - he had like 7 different users try it - and 
it failed for all of them. In the end - his deduction was problem being tied to 
Excel - as I am running 2010 - and the systems experiencing the problem are 
2013. 

Short explanation of the actual problem. This app - reads in an Excel file 
using Automation. Grabs the data in the header area of spreadsheet and fills in 
var's. Then it takes the main data - a bunch of rows/columns - and pushes the 
data into a CSV file that it creates via Automation. The 2nd phase shows a 
screen w/Header info - and displays name of the CSV file. Then asks if you want 
to Proceed with processing the data. Here in lies the problem. In my case - 
when I run the option - the CSV file is fine. But, for the users that are 
having the problem - the CSV file is EMPTY!

Now - before reporting this problem to you all here - I've been doing a bunch 
of research - as well as Testing various options. I even looked at a prior 
thread here in this forum - as it was VERY Similar to my own conundrum: 
"Copy Excel worksheet to another workbook". And, one of the tricks I noticed 
that was mentioned is that after Copying the range of Cells from the FROM Excel 
file - and before Pasting into the TO Workbook (that will become the CSV file) 
- that it was suggested to CLOSE the From Workbook. So - I did that - but, then 
I get the following error message being thrown:"The object invoked has 
disconnected from its clients."

I even tried a similar operation by hand (as I have remote access to another PC 
in my office that has Excel 2013 - so I can test for the problem) - by doing 
the Copy of the Cells, Closed the workbook - then went to the Other workbook 
and did Paste - and it worked - NO Error and data was pasted!

As such - I'm rather stumped! It's really SUCH a Drag when changes to Office 
now crash out Code that previously worked. 

A fellow developer has suggested another Kludge - as Gene so adeptly states the 
term - which is to do a more manual pasting of cell data one by one - literally 
assigning the values to the Cells instead of by doing the Paste command. I did 
do a test by simply assigning "Hello World" to a single cell - and that DID 
work. But, I'd rather a more Elegant solution AND something that knows what the 
Actual problem is and can fix it with less code. Especially since I worry that 
this problem may run DEEPER than the users think - and that a BUNCH of other 
similar options in this application may ALSO Start to fail for all these users!

TIA!

Regards.
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst

One New York Plaza - 34th Floor
New York, NY 10004-1936, USA
Tel. +1-212-747-9100
Direct +1-212-405-8246
www.GlobeTax.com 

GlobeTax does not provide or offer, and this is not, tax, investment or legal 
advice. This email and any attachments hereto is intended only for use by the 
addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, please immediately notify the sender at 
+1-212-747-9100 and permanently delete the original and any copies of this 
email.



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fdb...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Copy Excel worksheet to another workbook

[Kurt Wendt]

Hey rk - Great program name!!! Gosh - U must be bored - and its not even a 
Friday...  :-)

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Richard Kaye
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 1:04 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Copy Excel worksheet to another workbook

Clearly I'm avoiding doing anything productive right now.

**
*Program: FunWithExcel1.prg
*Date: 02/16/2017 12:46
*VFP Version: Visual FoxPro 09.00..7423 for Windows
*Notes: open a workbook, copies the 2nd sheet before the current 2nd sheet, 
makes another copy after the 3rd sheet
**
ACTIVATE SCREEN
CLEAR
LOCAL m.ox AS Excel.Application, m.ow AS Excel.Workbook, m.oss AS 
Excel.Worksheet
m.ox=CREATEOBJECT([excel.application])
m.ox.Workbooks.Open([c:\rfc\copytest.xlsx])
m.ow=m.ox.ActiveWorkbook
?m.ow.Sheets.Count
m.oss=ow.Sheets(2)  && this example has 2 sheets. get a ref to the 2nd sheet
m.oss.copy(ow.Sheets(2))&& copy it before the 2nd sheet
?m.ow.Sheets.Count
m.oss.copy(,ow.Sheets(3))   && copy it after the 3rd sheet
?m.ow.Sheets.Count
m.ox.Visible=.t.

--

rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Richard Kaye
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 12:36 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Copy Excel worksheet to another workbook

ox=CREATEOBJECT([excel.application])
ox.Visible=.t.
ox.Workbooks.Open(GETFILE([xlsx]))
ow=ox.ActiveWorkbook
ow.SaveCopyAs([c:\rfc\copytest.xlsx])
ox.Workbooks.Open([c:\rfc\copytest.xlsx])

This copies the entire document, not an individual sheet.
--

rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jan Bucek
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 12:12 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Copy Excel worksheet to another workbook

Dne 16.2.2017 v 17:48 Paul Newton napsal(a):
> Hi all
>
> I want to use automation to copy the active worksheet into another 
> workbook (as an additional worksheet) I believe I need something like 
> this ActiveSheet.Copy After:=Workbooks("YourWorkbookName.xls"). 
> Sheets("Sheet3") But I can't find how to send the correct way to do it 
> in VFP
>
> o = CreateObject("Excel.Application")
> o.Visible = .t.
> o.Workbooks.Open("C:\O32\OperaNext\Opera32\DEMODATA\SQSLACL.XLS")
> o.ActiveSheet.Copy(What to put here?)

And what about a little different way?

1. select all
2. copy
3. open another workbook
4. paste


>
> Any help would be much appreciated
>
> Paul Newton
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fd7...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: So what tech do you like to work in nowadays? (was Re: TaskPane entry for ProFox outdated)

[Kurt Wendt]

Ed - you mean containers like Tupperware???
:-)

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 12:12 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: So what tech do you like to work in nowadays? (was Re: TaskPane 
entry for ProFox outdated)

On Feb 13, 2017, at 2:13 PM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com

> What tech do you find yourself enjoying nowadays?  I don't just mean doing it 
> for a paycheck, but something that you REALLY like, akin to the golden days 
> when you were loving the Fox.

I still love working in Python, even when it's not for my day job. I also love 
fooling around with containers and related things, but so far it's just a 
curiosity thing.


-- Ed Leafe







--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/signed
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  application/pgp-signature
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fd6...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: SQL Backend Question

[Kurt Wendt]

Hello Paul,

Welcome to the fold. Like you - I've been working w/Fox since Foxbase+. Where I 
work - they have been trying to phase out all the old FoxPro systems (which are 
all currently VFP 9 systems) - and replace them with new systems based upon VB 
or C# and .Net. As it is - the core systems that were/are still in use (one of 
those systems was JUST Phased out to a new system yesterday - sadly it was a 
system I supported but I'm not involved with the new replacement system) - all 
have SQL as the main data files - although processing does use temp DBF files. 

I suspect that some here may suggest using something else to do development - 
like C# and .Net or some such tech. Will be interesting to see what other folks 
say. Although, I suspect that for you this late in the game - it may not make 
such great sense to completely switch to a newer tech!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul H. 
Tarver
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 9:54 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: SQL Backend Question

Ok, I've lurked here long enough. I've been subscribed to this list for several 
months and I have thoroughly enjoyed the questions and answers that have come 
through during that time. I'm even a little star-struck when I see the names of 
Foxpro experts that I have depended upon for years to help educate me to be a 
better Foxpro programmer. Thank you all for all you do in this list group. Now 
it is time for me to ask what is probably going to sound like a dumb question 
coming from someone who has been using Foxpro since Foxlan but I figure I have 
nothing to lose here and everything to gain. 

 

For the past few years I have been honing my skills as a developer of data 
interfaces and until recently, the few full-fledged data entry projects I've 
build relied upon native Foxpro dbf files. However, my interface work has been 
depending more and more upon using SQL pass-through language to issue queries 
against various SQL backend systems and I have been pretty successful at 
retrieving data from various systems and then re-formatting that data for other 
uses. 

 

For a while now, I've been contemplating building a data-entry and maintenance 
system from the ground up that depends completely upon using a SQL database 
(Firebird, MySQL, MS SQL, Postgres or something similar). My problem is that I 
have all these data handling classes built into a couple of simple toolbars 
that I can drop on form and provide the standard Add, Delete, Undo, Save and 
Exit functionality as well as a vcr toolbar to skip between records. These 
tools include all of the code necessary to detect changes enable various 
buttons based on conditions, etc. stuff we are all familiar with. 

 

Now I'm trying to wrap my head around the whole concept of changing the way I 
depend upon Foxpro to handle much of the behind the scenes table activity and 
create a new user interface that conforms to the how SQL works while 
maintaining as much of the familiar functionality I'm so happy with in Foxpro. 

 

Does anyone have any recommendations for where I should go to learn more about 
the best practices for developing user interfaces that work efficiently with 
SQL backends, and what do I need to know about how to collect data and insert 
it into the sql tables, detect user changes to flag for saving data. In some 
software they seemed to have ditched the Add, Delete, Undo, Save, Exit concept 
to just save everytime there is keystroke.
And in other systems, they keep parts of that old style of user interaction.
Are there any libraries that can be purchased or downloaded to handle some of 
the behind the scenes data manipulation for SQL that I can use to learn how 
this stuff should work. 

 

For something that seems to be easy, I'm having a hard time letting go of my
20+ years of doing things the Foxpro way to make the transition. 

 

Any thoughts?

 

Paul H. Tarver
Tarver Program Consultants, Inc.





--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fd5...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: 3 days no posts....

[Kurt Wendt]

Nice one Jerry - U seem to know me Well! I Sit Corrected!1

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Wolper
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 1:03 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: 3 days no posts

> I'm not really here - I'm just a hologram...

I thought you were a 3-D print job.

-Jerry


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fd5...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: 3 days no posts....

[Kurt Wendt]

Buenas Dias!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of José 
Enrique Llopis
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 4:47 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: 3 days no posts

Greetings from the other side of the world!

Jose Enrique Llopis
Alicante - Spain


-Mensaje original-
De: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] En nombre de Dave Crozier Enviado 
el: miércoles, 25 de enero de 2017 18:50
Para: ProFox Email List
Asunto: 3 days no posts

Just to let the rest of the world know we are still here!

Dave

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fd5...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: 3 days no posts....

[Kurt Wendt]

Hi Dave,

I'm not really here - I'm just a hologram...

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Tracy 
Pearson
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 12:59 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: 3 days no posts

Dave Crozier wrote on 2017-01-25: 
>  Just to let the rest of the world know we are still here!
>  
>  Dave
>  

Dave,

Good to know. Apparently I'm still here too.

Tracy Pearson
PowerChurch Software


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fd5...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Happy Holidays to All!

[Kurt Wendt]

Sort of like the "Bat Phone"!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen 
Russell
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 2:10 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Happy Holidays to All!

For a better event, Trump handed in his phone for the secure one the President 
carries.

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Kurt @ VR-FX <v...@optonline.net> wrote:

> Naughty, naughty Dave - as this may start a Flame War in the NF area & 
> force this thread into the OT Abyss!
>
> :-(
> -K-
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jan 20, 2017, at 4:13 AM, Dave Crozier <da...@flexipol.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Busy day for you today Michael, being inaugurated and all that!
> >
> > ;-)
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael
> Madigan
> > Sent: 20 January 2017 01:57
> > To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
> > Subject: Re: [NF] Happy Holidays to All!
> >
> > A  belated Happy Holidays to you.
> >
> >  From: Ken Dibble <krdib...@stny.rr.com>
> > To: profox@leafe.com
> > Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2016 11:20 AM
> > Subject: [NF] Happy Holidays to All!
> >
> > Here's wishing all of you at ProFox a very Merry Christmas and Happy
> Hanukkah!
> >
> > Thanks to all of you who have provided help and/or thought-provoking
> ideas this year. And thanks to Ed for keeping it all going.
> >
> > Ken Dibble
> > www.stic-cil.org
> >
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fd2...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: RIP Sytze de Boer (was: Re: Has anyone implemented List & Label?)

[Kurt Wendt]

And for those who would like to put a face to his name - I just came across his 
Contact webpage for his business:
http://www.kissms.co.nz/contact-information.htm

I really will miss his very cordial replies and commentaries on this forum!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Gene 
Wirchenko
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 1:22 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RIP Sytze de Boer (was: Re: Has anyone implemented List & Label?)

At 15:39 2017-01-08, Jonnie de Boer <sytze.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi Everyone
>
>This is Sytze's son, I am writing because he passed away on Friday 
>(sudden heart attack while mowing the lawns, very quick, the way he 
>wanted) and I know he was an avid reader on this forum and often 
>commented to me about his gleanings he received from it.
>I dont think he met any of you in person, but I know he spoke/emailed 
>to many of you personally and held many of you in high regards.
>Would like to pass on this news in case any of you wondered why he went 
>quiet :)

Dear Mr. de Boer:

  Thank you for writing.

  My condolences to you and your family.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fc9...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Anybody there?

[Kurt Wendt]

Maybe Dave has some Masochistic tendencies!   :-)

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul Newton
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 9:45 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Anybody there? 

Seem as if you have been self-spamming ...

Paul

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier
Sent: 06 January 2017 14:30
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Anybody there? 

Found two of them in our spam trap 

Hmmm..

Dave

-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe
Sent: 06 January 2017 14:27
To: ProFox Mailing List <profox@leafe.com>
Subject: Re: Anybody there? 

On Jan 6, 2017, at 8:23 AM, Dave Crozier <da...@flexipol.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> I can't see the brainteaser that was the man one and I sent it a couple 
> of times as I can't see any of them...

Well, I’ve seen it twice already.

And here is what the archives show since yesterday: http://imgur.com/a/cpzpV


-- Ed Leafe






___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/ee180d08-0b0b-4b29-abd3-a82c6e12c...@leafe.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/18725b8cd2d5d247873a2baf401d4ab2a4424...@ex2010-a-fpl.fpl.LOCAL
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Report [OT] Abuse: 
http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/18725b8cd2d5d247873a2baf401d4ab2a4424...@ex2010-a-fpl.fpl.LOCAL
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/9a8106afb0ef9b44b69045c4448935a20141283...@nlbawexmbx1.infor.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Report [OT] Abuse: 
http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/9a8106afb0ef9b44b69045c4448935a20141283...@nlbawexmbx1.infor.com
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fc8...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Zooming fonts in FoxPro IDE code windows

[Kurt Wendt]

Thanks Paul. I was just looking at Matt's webpage - and saw the video he 
posted. But, before finishing reading his webpage - I read your posting below 
and tried it - and it does indeed work nicely. Thanks for that quick tip!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul Newton
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 3:35 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Zooming fonts in FoxPro IDE code windows

I find that AltOE and AltOR work just as well ... but I wish there were a 
quicker way to align left sides of controls than AltOAL

Paul Newton

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Mike 
Copeland
Sent: 04 January 2017 07:15
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Zooming fonts in FoxPro IDE code windows

Speaking on behalf of old farts who sit closer and closer to the monitor every 
day...I thank you for bringing this to our attention, and to Matt Slay for 
providing the solution!

Mike Copeland


Ted Roche wrote:
> Matt has a pretty cool little hack with accompanying video:
>
> http://mattslay.com/zooming-the-font-size-in-foxpro-ide-code-windows/
>
>


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18fc8...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Arago

[Kurt Wendt]

Andy - that's pretty funny! U Brit's w/Ur funny terms. I know Fag is a Cig - 
but, here in the USA - its used completely differently. However, would you 
REALLY Actually go out to a Pub while compiling???

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of AndyHC
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 2:04 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Arago

IBM System 360 Assembler we had three sizes of compiles (well assembles)
- 'fag', 'coffee', and 'pub' 
fwiw IBM also used 2-byte dates - 7 bits for year and 9 bits for day-of-year.

On 20-Dec-2016 7:21 AM, Ken Dibble wrote:
>
>> Wow, 15-20 min sounds Painful!
>
> It was longer on the 286. On the 386 I could time it to go with my 
> coffee breaks. *L*
>
> Ken
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18f67...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Software recommendations: Sharing photo album for comments & ID?

[Kurt Wendt]

Ted - if you like the way FaceBook does the ID'ing of faces - why not create a 
special FB account - maybe like a Fan webpage. Call it Roche Family - then 
simply make it private and limit to who has access. Wouldn't that work?

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 10:48 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: [NF] Software recommendations: Sharing photo album for comments & ID?

I'm looking for a web-based photo album I can share with a few friends and 
relatives in order to ID folks in a photo album from the 1940s I'm digitizing. 
I'm not comfortable with posting them to Facebook, but I like the style of 
ID'ing faces it uses. Ideally, I'd limit access to a list of folks who could 
comment and download but not delete.

Anyone got suggestions, experiences to share?


--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18f65...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Qarbon Viewletbuilder, TechSmith Camtasia, others? ...for presentation demos

[Kurt Wendt]

I'm just now following up on this e-mail thread. I used Camtasia in the past - 
I think I only used a demo version at the time. But, was thrilled when someone 
turned me on to CamStudio. It did seem very similar to Camtasia - but, its 
open-source and thus free. So - I suggest Mike that you check it out. And, yeah 
- Man-wai, you beat me to the punchline on this one - but, I'm glad you posted 
about it!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Man-wai 
Chang
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 10:46 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Qarbon Viewletbuilder, TechSmith Camtasia, others? ...for 
presentation demos

CamStudio is freeware, but might not have all those fancy functions.

http://camstudio.org/

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 AM,
<mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> Years ago, I used Qarbon ViewletBuilder to create training videos for 
> my software.  It's time for me to again do so, but I no longer have 
> Qarbon's ViewletBuilder, so I'm asking what other folks would 
> recommend.  I will say that Qarbon's product was pretty easy to use.

--
 .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3) /( _ )\ 
http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18f59...@drexchvm01.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] EXTERNAL SSD hard drives

[Kurt Wendt]

Interesting! I may still have an old floppy drive of that style as well. So - 
Dave - if your search fails - I may do a search for Adam!

I know - some of us computer geeks keep our old crap for YEARS! I still have an 
old DELL box, that has 2 300Mhz CPUS in it - and this was WAY Prior to Duo 
chips!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 7:13 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] EXTERNAL SSD hard drives

I'll have a look around the computer shack... I'm sure I have one around 
somewhere.

Dave

-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Adam Buckland
Sent: 21 November 2016 12:06
To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
Subject: RE: [NF] EXTERNAL SSD hard drives

My final year project from 1987 was on a 20mb drive attached to an Amstrad 1512 
which now no longer works... 

I'm looking to get it onto a pc to relive old times and to prove that i could 
write real code.

Assembler / Debugger and emulator for the MS6502   written in Turbo Pascal

It's on a 360KB disk though!




From: ProFox [profox-boun...@leafe.com] on behalf of Dave Crozier 
[da...@flexipol.co.uk]
Sent: 21 November 2016 08:25
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [NF] EXTERNAL SSD hard drives

I do in fact Adam and it is only a single sided 160Kb one - not even double 
sided... Why, do you need one?

Dave

-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Adam Buckland
Sent: 20 November 2016 07:40
To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
Subject: RE: [NF] EXTERNAL SSD hard drives

Dave,

You wouldn't have a 5 1/4" drive attached to that machine would you?

Adam.




From: ProFox [profox-boun...@leafe.com] on behalf of Dave Crozier 
[da...@flexipol.co.uk]
Sent: 17 November 2016 09:51
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [NF] EXTERNAL SSD hard drives

Funnily enough, I still have a 20Mb ... yes 20Mb Seagate RLL drive running in a 
286 with 128Kb (Kb NOT Mb) of memory running MsDos 3.0 and stacker software to 
make the 20Mb look like 40Mb!! All it does is simply routes comms packets from 
the Radio Amateur network onto my LAN. It has been turned on almost 
continuously since 1986 and never faltered apart from a couple of mains outages.

Dave

-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke
Sent: 17 November 2016 09:42
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] EXTERNAL SSD hard drives


I've blown up a 300MB drive when installing it, back when that was a seriously 
big drive, but that's it.

--
  Alan Bourke
  alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, at 09:37 AM, Paul Hill wrote:
> On 16 November 2016 at 21:01,
> <mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> > How long do you normally use a laptop hard drive before replacing it 
> > (before disaster strikes it)?
>
> I don't think I've ever had a drive I personally own die.
> Still got a 9Gb SCSI drive running in my Amiga 4000 :-)
>
> --
> Paul
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f18f57...@drexchvm01.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] EXTERNAL SSD hard drives

[Kurt Wendt]

Oh yes - Borland Sidekick. Good stuff indeed!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 10:04 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] EXTERNAL SSD hard drives

Chatting about old technology reminded me of the old days when we had to use 
TSR programs like Borland Sidekick to get around the 640Mb memory limit. Oh how 
times have changed!!

Dave

-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt
Sent: 17 November 2016 14:28
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] EXTERNAL SSD hard drives

Wow - a piece of computing history that's still operational and running. 
Kudos!!!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst 


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 4:51 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] EXTERNAL SSD hard drives

Funnily enough, I still have a 20Mb ... yes 20Mb Seagate RLL drive running in a 
286 with 128Kb (Kb NOT Mb) of memory running MsDos 3.0 and stacker software to 
make the 20Mb look like 40Mb!! All it does is simply routes comms packets from 
the Radio Amateur network onto my LAN. It has been turned on almost 
continuously since 1986 and never faltered apart from a couple of mains outages.

Dave

-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke
Sent: 17 November 2016 09:42
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] EXTERNAL SSD hard drives


I've blown up a 300MB drive when installing it, back when that was a seriously 
big drive, but that's it.

--
  Alan Bourke
  alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, at 09:37 AM, Paul Hill wrote:
> On 16 November 2016 at 21:01,
> <mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> > How long do you normally use a laptop hard drive before replacing it 
> > (before disaster strikes it)?
> 
> I don't think I've ever had a drive I personally own die.
> Still got a 9Gb SCSI drive running in my Amiga 4000 :-)
> 
> --
> Paul
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f2fe...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.