[Proto-Scripty] Re: Event.stop with two observers on same object
OK, I read those two points on Event#stop, but still believed Event#stop would prevent any further event processing, as the method name indicates. Maybe a clarifying line in the docs would help here, e.g. Note: further observers on the same element will be called despite Event#stop. Steffen On Jun 16, 3:38 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote: Hi, Interesting question. It's the expected behavior. The documentation [1] says that Event#stop will: * Prevent further bubbling of the event * Prevent the default behavior of the event (where the browser allows it) Not triggering other observers doesn't fall under either of those categories. It would also create a non-deterministic situation (since neither browsers nor Prototype guarantee the order in which event handlers are called). It would also be cross-talk (since your handler doesn't necessarily have anything to do with other handlers on the element), which is usually a bad idea, although I think a successful argument could be made that preventing bubbling also creates a cross- talk situation. :-) [1]http://prototypejs.org/api/event/stop HTH, --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Sortable onUpdate not working on IE7
Hi,
The updateTeamList is a function in a .js file that is used by this
page.
Is the script tag including that JS file *below* the script tag that
contains the document.observe call? If so, move it above it.
If that's not it, I'd pick up with #3 on this list:
http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/faq#xyzprob
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
On Jun 16, 9:26 pm, Adriano Santi antiu...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a page with a simple sortable UL, with the id attribute
lister. I'm using the following code:
document.observe(dom:loaded, function() {
Sortable.create('lister',{tag:'li', onUpdate:updateTeamList});
});
However, when the page is loaded, IE7 gives me the following errors:
A Runtime Error has occurred. Do you wish to Debug?
Line: 259
Error: 'updateTeamList' is undefined
The updateTeamList is a function in a .js file that is used by this
page. Other functions from the same file work, and on Firefox,
everything works with absolutely no glitches. Just FYI, this is the
function in question:
function updateTeamList() {
args = Sortable.serialize('lister');
Sortable.destroy('lister');
loadXMLDoc('ajax/team_list_update.php', args);
}
I've been googling left and right but haven't found any instances of
this occurring to anyone else. Does anyone have a clue what might be
happening here?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Problems with pollDoScroll and IE family (1.6.1 rc)
Hi,
When I replace pollDoScroll.defer(); with pollDoScroll.delay(0);
everything works.
That's weird, since xyz.defer() is functionally equivalent (with a bit
more overhead) to xyz.delay(0.01).
How is the process to get in tough with the Prototype devels?
http://prototypejs.org/contribute
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
On Jun 16, 3:57 pm, gnaegi florian.gna...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David
Thanks for the link, but this does not help me. I know what
pollDoScroll() does. My problem is that when I use prototype in my
webapp, I get Out of stack space error messages in IE because the
pollDoScroll() method is executed over 600 times in a recursion and
the expression document.documentElement.doScroll('left'); will always
fail.
I traced it down to the fact that together with ExtJS
pollDoScroll.defer(); does not seem to wait long enough. I don't know
if this is an ExtJS-Prototype combination problem or if this is
because my app does some other things while loading.
When I replace pollDoScroll.defer(); with pollDoScroll.delay(0);
everything works.
How is the process to get in tough with the Prototype devels? Is this
something we can change in the release or is there a reason why it
uses pollDoScroll.defer(); instead of pollDoScroll.delay(0);?
Thanks for any hints
Florian
On Jun 6, 10:06 pm, david david.brill...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Florian,
i found this comment on the dean edwards blog.
go and see it:http://dean.edwards.name/weblog/2006/06/again/#comment121098
I think it explain your problem.
--
david
On 3 juin, 19:08, Florian Gnägi florian.gna...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I get errors with prototype 1.6.1rc in IE browsers. In IE debugger I
get the Out of stack space message.
I could track it down to the lines 635 and 636 in event.js. When I
remove the lines, everything runs smoothly.
http://github.com/sstephenson/prototype/blob/483c7886de5c0c6e721dee06...
Could this be a sideeffect of using prototype with ExtJS?
Thanks for any hints
Florian
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Creating new lines and bypassing them through escapeHTML
@kangax Rob: I didn't mean to step into someone's holy war here. By seems to be recommended I meant what I said earlier, used in the unit tests and such. Let's just change them to something reasonable and move on. -- T.J. On Jun 17, 7:10 am, RobG robg...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 15, 5:48 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote: Heya, I thought it wouldn't come as a surprise that using XHTML makes no sense... Hey, HTML and CSS make no sense, let alone XHTML. But that's OT. :-) I'm just saying, the doctype that seems to be recommended is XHTML transitional, By who? Certainly not by those who understand the issues involved - search the archives at: news:comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html URL:http://groups.google.com/group/comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html?lnk= XHTML is pretty much dead, it is essentially replaced by HTML 5. The vast majority of documents with an XHTML DOCTYPE are served as text/ html, so they are treated by browsers as invalid HTML. It was something of a fad to pretend to use XHTML, it serves no useful purpose. I always chuckle when I see an IIS server using the default XHTML DOCTYPE, then serve it as text/html. If it was served as XML, IE would not know what to do with it since IE is one of the few modern browsers that don't know what XML is. A clear case of style over substance. so that's what I use as I don't have a strong reason for doing anything else, and in the XHTML transitional doctype, br/ is correct and I'm guessing requires less work from the browser. But of course, you're right that if you don't specify any doctype or if you specify an HTML doctype, you want br. I don't know if that's going to be 99% of the time, but it's going to be a big number. Probably 99.999% The take away for the OP is: Use a doctype (just about any doctype), and then use br or br/ depending on what doctype you're using. The DOCTYPE is pretty much irrelevant except for switching to or from standards mode (or almost standards mode). Whether the document is treated as XML or HTML depends on the response header content type. -- Rob --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Event.stop with two observers on same object
Maybe a clarifying line in the docs would help here, e.g. I'm with you; open a ticket on Lighthouse[1] and assign it to me? [1] https://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886-prototype/overview -- T.J. :-) On Jun 17, 8:33 am, steffenb sbart...@tzi.de wrote: OK, I read those two points on Event#stop, but still believed Event#stop would prevent any further event processing, as the method name indicates. Maybe a clarifying line in the docs would help here, e.g. Note: further observers on the same element will be called despite Event#stop. Steffen On Jun 16, 3:38 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote: Hi, Interesting question. It's the expected behavior. The documentation [1] says that Event#stop will: * Prevent further bubbling of the event * Prevent the default behavior of the event (where the browser allows it) Not triggering other observers doesn't fall under either of those categories. It would also create a non-deterministic situation (since neither browsers nor Prototype guarantee the order in which event handlers are called). It would also be cross-talk (since your handler doesn't necessarily have anything to do with other handlers on the element), which is usually a bad idea, although I think a successful argument could be made that preventing bubbling also creates a cross- talk situation. :-) [1]http://prototypejs.org/api/event/stop HTH, --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Creating new lines and bypassing them through escapeHTML
Sorry, holy war reads a lot stronger than I meant it to. I'm just frustrated by the utter bollocks that comes out of the W3C more often than not. -- T.J. On Jun 17, 9:44 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote: @kangax Rob: I didn't mean to step into someone's holy war here. By seems to be recommended I meant what I said earlier, used in the unit tests and such. Let's just change them to something reasonable and move on. -- T.J. On Jun 17, 7:10 am, RobG robg...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 15, 5:48 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote: Heya, I thought it wouldn't come as a surprise that using XHTML makes no sense... Hey, HTML and CSS make no sense, let alone XHTML. But that's OT. :-) I'm just saying, the doctype that seems to be recommended is XHTML transitional, By who? Certainly not by those who understand the issues involved - search the archives at: news:comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html URL:http://groups.google.com/group/comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html?lnk= XHTML is pretty much dead, it is essentially replaced by HTML 5. The vast majority of documents with an XHTML DOCTYPE are served as text/ html, so they are treated by browsers as invalid HTML. It was something of a fad to pretend to use XHTML, it serves no useful purpose. I always chuckle when I see an IIS server using the default XHTML DOCTYPE, then serve it as text/html. If it was served as XML, IE would not know what to do with it since IE is one of the few modern browsers that don't know what XML is. A clear case of style over substance. so that's what I use as I don't have a strong reason for doing anything else, and in the XHTML transitional doctype, br/ is correct and I'm guessing requires less work from the browser. But of course, you're right that if you don't specify any doctype or if you specify an HTML doctype, you want br. I don't know if that's going to be 99% of the time, but it's going to be a big number. Probably 99.999% The take away for the OP is: Use a doctype (just about any doctype), and then use br or br/ depending on what doctype you're using. The DOCTYPE is pretty much irrelevant except for switching to or from standards mode (or almost standards mode). Whether the document is treated as XML or HTML depends on the response header content type. -- Rob --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and forms
Thanks for the cleanup. I have made those changes. Feel free to post
others. The problem I have is that the form had two dynamic places:
div id=territories/div
and
div id=adjForm/div
There is an onChange that calls the javascript function getTerritories
() allows the
div id=territories/div to display which has a form element
called territory. At the end of the same function, it calls the other
javascript function getAdjForm(). getAdjForm() looks to see if the
form element territory exists. That's the problem, for some reason, it
cannot see it. What can I do to make it where it does not fail the if
statement in that function?
On Jun 16, 11:33 am, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com wrote:
A few things...
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
You can clean this up as:
var params = $('createAdjForm').serialize();
There are other points that you could optimize, but thats not your
question...
And at whatever point you want adjForm to appear, you need to add:
$('adjForm').show()
Rick
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:46 PM, anthony mrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a form that when a user selects something from a drop-down,
another element in the form appears. There is another piece of the
form, that is never showing up, I need to understand what I am doing
wrong and how to fix it:
script type=text/javascript language=JavaScript
function getAdjForm() {
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
alert($('territory').value);
if ($('adjType').value !== $('territory').value !== ){
new Ajax.Updater(
adjForm,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index',
'action'='get-adj-
form'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params});
}
}
function getTerritories() {
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
new Ajax.Updater(
territories,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index', 'action'='get-
territories'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params});
if ($('adjType').value !== ){
//alert('d');
getAdjForm();
}
}
function getCustomer() {
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
new Ajax.Updater(
customer,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index', 'action'='get-
customer'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params});
}
/script
form method=POST id=createAdjForm action=
p
table border=0 CELLSPACING=10
tr
td
bSelect Adjustment Type/b
/td
td
?php echo $this-formSelect('adjType',
$this-adjType, array
(onChange=getAdjForm()), array(=Select an Adjustment Type) +
$this-adjTypes) ?
/td
/tr
tr
td
bSubmitting Territory/b
/td
td
?php echo $this-formSelect('shortTerritory',
$this-
shortTerritory, array(onChange=getTerritories()), array
(=Select a Territory) + $this-shortTerritories) ?
div id=territories/div
/td
/tr
tr
td valign=top
bJustification/b
/td
td
?php echo
$this-formTextarea('justification',$this-
justification,array(rows=5,cols=75)) ?
/td
/tr
/table
hr
div id=adjForm
/div
***
This issue is that the data that should be here:
div id=adjForm
/div
Is never showing. When getAdjForm(); is called from getTerritories(),
the $('territory').value !== seems to be the problem. Does the
browser not know that was an element because it just appeared?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Curvy Corners + draggables (script.aculo.us)
Hi, everybody! I'm a Brazilian WebDev and I've found a script to round corners without images (Script's name is Curvy Corners: http://www.curvycorners.net/demos/). I was trying to round corners of the draggables, but they lose your functions. Some help? Regards. Rafael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Handle on sortable list doesn't work in IE.
I've assigned a handle on my sortable and it works fine in Firefox but
not at all in IE. In IE you can use any of the elements in the LI to
reorder the list. I would like to only be able to use the REORDER
element to reorder the list. Any suggestions?
div id=dragDrop
ul class=sortlist id=list_to_sort
li id=item_1 class=sortlistItem Name - Date - Detail - span
id=thehandleREORDER/span/li
/ul
/div
script language=JavaScript
Sortable.create(list_to_sort, {
elements:$$('#list_to_sort li.sortlist'),
handles:$$('#list_to_sort #thehandle'),
onUpdate: function() {
new Ajax.Request(updateRowOrder.cfm, {
method: post,
parameters: { data: Sortable.serialize(list_to_sort) }
});
}
});
/script
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Need help resolving conflict between Proto and Uize frameworks
I know it's probably a lousy idea but I have both prototype and uize
referenced in the head of my document:
[code]
script type=text/javascript src=js/Uize.js/script
script type=text/javascript src=javascript/prototype.js/
script
[/code]
The only time I use a prototype function in the body of the document
is to create a function that plays a movie when a thumbnail is
clicked.
The function is:
[code]
script
function setMovie( url, title )
{
$('movieHost').innerHTML = '';
var elEmbed = document.createElement( 'embed' );
elEmbed.src = url;
elEmbed.setAttribute(width, 100%);
elEmbed.setAttribute(height,100%);
elEmbed.setAttribute(scale,aspect);
elEmbed.setAttribute(bgcolor,black);
$('movieHost').appendChild( elEmbed );
$('nowPlaying').innerHTML = title;
}
new Ajax.Request( '', {
method: 'get',
onSuccess: function( transport ) {
var bFirst = true;
for( var b = 0; b movieTags.length; b++ ) {
if ( bFirst )
{
setMovie( url, title );
bFirst = false;
}
var html = 'a href=javascript:void
setMovie(\''+url+'\',\''+title
+'\');';
html += title+'/abr/';
}
}
} );
/script
[/code]
The only problem I'm having is that I call the function at body
onload:
[code]
BODY onload=setMovie('Quicktimes/mov1.mov', 'Suzuki :
quot;Fencequot; 1 of 12')
[/code]
In order that the first movie starts playing right away...
And everything is fine... EXCEPT that about 10 or 15 seconds into the
first movie it skips back to the beginning and starts playing again.
Once it's done that everything works fine until a page reload - and
then it plays and skips back.
I've tried changing the order of the script references in the head
section... but that breaks the uize framework.
Is there some way to recode the function with absolutes?
Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and forms
Ok, I have found a better way to explain this.
var params = $('createAdjForm').serialize();
alert(params);
This does not show the form elements that were included via: div
id=territories/div
Why is that the case?
On Jun 17, 9:06 am, anthony mrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the cleanup. I have made those changes. Feel free to post
others. The problem I have is that the form had two dynamic places:
div id=territories/div
and
div id=adjForm/div
There is an onChange that calls the javascript function getTerritories
() allows the
div id=territories/div to display which has a form element
called territory. At the end of the same function, it calls the other
javascript function getAdjForm(). getAdjForm() looks to see if the
form element territory exists. That's the problem, for some reason, it
cannot see it. What can I do to make it where it does not fail the if
statement in that function?
On Jun 16, 11:33 am, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com wrote:
A few things...
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
You can clean this up as:
var params = $('createAdjForm').serialize();
There are other points that you could optimize, but thats not your
question...
And at whatever point you want adjForm to appear, you need to add:
$('adjForm').show()
Rick
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:46 PM, anthony mrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a form that when a user selects something from a drop-down,
another element in the form appears. There is another piece of the
form, that is never showing up, I need to understand what I am doing
wrong and how to fix it:
script type=text/javascript language=JavaScript
function getAdjForm() {
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
alert($('territory').value);
if ($('adjType').value !== $('territory').value !== ){
new Ajax.Updater(
adjForm,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index',
'action'='get-adj-
form'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params});
}
}
function getTerritories() {
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
new Ajax.Updater(
territories,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index', 'action'='get-
territories'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params});
if ($('adjType').value !== ){
//alert('d');
getAdjForm();
}
}
function getCustomer() {
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
new Ajax.Updater(
customer,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index', 'action'='get-
customer'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params});
}
/script
form method=POST id=createAdjForm action=
p
table border=0 CELLSPACING=10
tr
td
bSelect Adjustment Type/b
/td
td
?php echo $this-formSelect('adjType',
$this-adjType, array
(onChange=getAdjForm()), array(=Select an Adjustment Type) +
$this-adjTypes) ?
/td
/tr
tr
td
bSubmitting Territory/b
/td
td
?php echo $this-formSelect('shortTerritory',
$this-
shortTerritory, array(onChange=getTerritories()), array
(=Select a Territory) + $this-shortTerritories) ?
div id=territories/div
/td
/tr
tr
td valign=top
bJustification/b
/td
td
?php echo
$this-formTextarea('justification',$this-
justification,array(rows=5,cols=75)) ?
/td
/tr
/table
hr
div id=adjForm
/div
***
This issue is that the data that should be here:
div id=adjForm
/div
Is never showing. When getAdjForm(); is called from getTerritories(),
the $('territory').value !== seems to be the problem. Does the
browser not know that was an element because it just appeared?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and forms
Because the contents are from an AJAX request and they dont exist in the
DOM probably .
OR..
They are outside the /form tag
Paste full code to a pastie and we can help
- Original Message -
From: anthony mrsmi...@gmail.com
To: Prototype script.aculo.us prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 4:52 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and forms
Ok, I have found a better way to explain this.
var params = $('createAdjForm').serialize();
alert(params);
This does not show the form elements that were included via: div
id=territories/div
Why is that the case?
On Jun 17, 9:06 am, anthony mrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the cleanup. I have made those changes. Feel free to post
others. The problem I have is that the form had two dynamic places:
div id=territories/div
and
div id=adjForm/div
There is an onChange that calls the javascript function getTerritories
() allows the
div id=territories/div to display which has a form element
called territory. At the end of the same function, it calls the other
javascript function getAdjForm(). getAdjForm() looks to see if the
form element territory exists. That's the problem, for some reason, it
cannot see it. What can I do to make it where it does not fail the if
statement in that function?
On Jun 16, 11:33 am, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com wrote:
A few things...
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
You can clean this up as:
var params = $('createAdjForm').serialize();
There are other points that you could optimize, but thats not your
question...
And at whatever point you want adjForm to appear, you need to add:
$('adjForm').show()
Rick
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:46 PM, anthony mrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a form that when a user selects something from a drop-down,
another element in the form appears. There is another piece of the
form, that is never showing up, I need to understand what I am doing
wrong and how to fix it:
script type=text/javascript language=JavaScript
function getAdjForm() {
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
alert($('territory').value);
if ($('adjType').value !== $('territory').value !== ){
new Ajax.Updater(
adjForm,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index',
'action'='get-adj-
form'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params});
}
}
function getTerritories() {
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
new Ajax.Updater(
territories,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index', 'action'='get-
territories'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params});
if ($('adjType').value !== ){
//alert('d');
getAdjForm();
}
}
function getCustomer() {
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
new Ajax.Updater(
customer,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index', 'action'='get-
customer'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params});
}
/script
form method=POST id=createAdjForm action=
p
table border=0 CELLSPACING=10
tr
td
bSelect Adjustment Type/b
/td
td
?php echo $this-formSelect('adjType',
$this-adjType, array
(onChange=getAdjForm()), array(=Select an Adjustment Type) +
$this-adjTypes) ?
/td
/tr
tr
td
bSubmitting Territory/b
/td
td
?php echo $this-formSelect('shortTerritory',
$this-
shortTerritory, array(onChange=getTerritories()), array
(=Select a Territory) + $this-shortTerritories) ?
div id=territories/div
/td
/tr
tr
td valign=top
bJustification/b
/td
td
?php echo
$this-formTextarea('justification',$this-
justification,array(rows=5,cols=75)) ?
/td
/tr
/table
hr
div id=adjForm
/div
***
This issue is that the data that should be here:
div id=adjForm
/div
Is never showing. When getAdjForm(); is called from getTerritories(),
the $('territory').value !== seems to be the problem. Does the
browser not know that was an element because it just appeared?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Need help resolving conflict between Proto and Uize frameworks
is it run inside a dom:loaded wrapper ?
- Original Message -
From: piers piersplow...@gmail.com
To: Prototype script.aculo.us prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 4:14 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Need help resolving conflict between Proto and Uize
frameworks
I know it's probably a lousy idea but I have both prototype and uize
referenced in the head of my document:
[code]
script type=text/javascript src=js/Uize.js/script
script type=text/javascript src=javascript/prototype.js/
script
[/code]
The only time I use a prototype function in the body of the document
is to create a function that plays a movie when a thumbnail is
clicked.
The function is:
[code]
script
function setMovie( url, title )
{
$('movieHost').innerHTML = '';
var elEmbed = document.createElement( 'embed' );
elEmbed.src = url;
elEmbed.setAttribute(width, 100%);
elEmbed.setAttribute(height,100%);
elEmbed.setAttribute(scale,aspect);
elEmbed.setAttribute(bgcolor,black);
$('movieHost').appendChild( elEmbed );
$('nowPlaying').innerHTML = title;
}
new Ajax.Request( '', {
method: 'get',
onSuccess: function( transport ) {
var bFirst = true;
for( var b = 0; b movieTags.length; b++ ) {
if ( bFirst )
{
setMovie( url, title );
bFirst = false;
}
var html = 'a href=javascript:void setMovie(\''+url+'\',\''+title
+'\');';
html += title+'/abr/';
}
}
} );
/script
[/code]
The only problem I'm having is that I call the function at body
onload:
[code]
BODY onload=setMovie('Quicktimes/mov1.mov', 'Suzuki :
quot;Fencequot; 1 of 12')
[/code]
In order that the first movie starts playing right away...
And everything is fine... EXCEPT that about 10 or 15 seconds into the
first movie it skips back to the beginning and starts playing again.
Once it's done that everything works fine until a page reload - and
then it plays and skips back.
I've tried changing the order of the script references in the head
section... but that breaks the uize framework.
Is there some way to recode the function with absolutes?
Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Handle on sortable list doesn't work in IE.
Sure. You have to use a className for the handles, since you
presumably have more than one of them. You cannot have the same ID
more than once in any given page. If you do, you get either
unpredictable results or nothing, depending on how pedantic the
browser or code is feeling that particular day. Also, the parameter is
named handle, not handles.
Try this:
div id=dragDrop
ul class=sortlist id=list_to_sort
li id=item_1 class=sortlistItem Name - Date - Detail -
span class=thehandleREORDER/span
/li
/ul
/div
script language=JavaScript
Sortable.create(list_to_sort, {
element:'li', /*this is the default, but I'm adding it to show you
how this should be written*/
handle:'thehandle',
onUpdate: function() {
new Ajax.Request(updateRowOrder.cfm, {
method: post,
parameters: {
data: Sortable.serialize(list_to_sort)
}
});
}
});
/script
Walter
On Jun 17, 2009, at 11:05 AM, Maya wrote:
I've assigned a handle on my sortable and it works fine in Firefox but
not at all in IE. In IE you can use any of the elements in the LI to
reorder the list. I would like to only be able to use the REORDER
element to reorder the list. Any suggestions?
div id=dragDrop
ul class=sortlist id=list_to_sort
li id=item_1 class=sortlistItem Name - Date - Detail - span
id=thehandleREORDER/span/li
/ul
/div
script language=JavaScript
Sortable.create(list_to_sort, {
elements:$$('#list_to_sort li.sortlist'),
handles:$$('#list_to_sort #thehandle'),
onUpdate: function() {
new Ajax.Request(updateRowOrder.cfm, {
method: post,
parameters: { data: Sortable.serialize(list_to_sort) }
});
}
});
/script
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and forms
Here was the problem.
I should have been calling the function (getAdjForm) using onComplete:
function getTerritories() {
var params = $('createAdjForm').serialize();
new Ajax.Updater(
territories,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index', 'action'='get-
territories'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params,
onComplete: getAdjForm});
}
I have a lot to learn.
On Jun 17, 10:54 am, Alex McAuley webmas...@thecarmarketplace.com
wrote:
Because the contents are from an AJAX request and they dont exist in the
DOM probably .
OR..
They are outside the /form tag
Paste full code to a pastie and we can help
- Original Message -
From: anthony mrsmi...@gmail.com
To: Prototype script.aculo.us prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 4:52 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and forms
Ok, I have found a better way to explain this.
var params = $('createAdjForm').serialize();
alert(params);
This does not show the form elements that were included via: div
id=territories/div
Why is that the case?
On Jun 17, 9:06 am, anthony mrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the cleanup. I have made those changes. Feel free to post
others. The problem I have is that the form had two dynamic places:
div id=territories/div
and
div id=adjForm/div
There is an onChange that calls the javascript function getTerritories
() allows the
div id=territories/div to display which has a form element
called territory. At the end of the same function, it calls the other
javascript function getAdjForm(). getAdjForm() looks to see if the
form element territory exists. That's the problem, for some reason, it
cannot see it. What can I do to make it where it does not fail the if
statement in that function?
On Jun 16, 11:33 am, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com wrote:
A few things...
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
You can clean this up as:
var params = $('createAdjForm').serialize();
There are other points that you could optimize, but thats not your
question...
And at whatever point you want adjForm to appear, you need to add:
$('adjForm').show()
Rick
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:46 PM, anthony mrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a form that when a user selects something from a drop-down,
another element in the form appears. There is another piece of the
form, that is never showing up, I need to understand what I am doing
wrong and how to fix it:
script type=text/javascript language=JavaScript
function getAdjForm() {
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
alert($('territory').value);
if ($('adjType').value !== $('territory').value !== ){
new Ajax.Updater(
adjForm,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index',
'action'='get-adj-
form'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params});
}
}
function getTerritories() {
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
new Ajax.Updater(
territories,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index', 'action'='get-
territories'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params});
if ($('adjType').value !== ){
//alert('d');
getAdjForm();
}
}
function getCustomer() {
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
new Ajax.Updater(
customer,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index', 'action'='get-
customer'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params});
}
/script
form method=POST id=createAdjForm action=
p
table border=0 CELLSPACING=10
tr
td
bSelect Adjustment Type/b
/td
td
?php echo $this-formSelect('adjType',
$this-adjType, array
(onChange=getAdjForm()), array(=Select an Adjustment Type) +
$this-adjTypes) ?
/td
/tr
tr
td
bSubmitting Territory/b
/td
td
?php echo $this-formSelect('shortTerritory',
$this-
shortTerritory, array(onChange=getTerritories()), array
(=Select a Territory) + $this-shortTerritories) ?
div id=territories/div
/td
/tr
tr
td valign=top
bJustification/b
/td
td
?php echo
$this-formTextarea('justification',$this-
justification,array(rows=5,cols=75)) ?
/td
/tr
/table
hr
div id=adjForm
/div
***
This issue is that the data that should be here:
div id=adjForm
/div
Is never showing. When getAdjForm(); is called from getTerritories(),
the $('territory').value !== seems to be the problem. Does the
browser not know that was an element because it just appeared?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
[Proto-Scripty] Re: AJAX exception handling
No harm in asking!https://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886-prototype/overview Thank you for the reference. I found this interesting ticket on the subject: https://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886/tickets/634-no-exception-on-error-in-oncreate-method-of-ajaxrequest Tobie Langel, one of the core members, agrees that exceptions should be rethrown in ajax callbacks instead of dieing silently. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: MySQL - order ID
I'm quite positive that it's something wrong with your script, because
on drop (clone) this gets inserted in html:
li class=clone id=span class=remove(x)/spanDescription/
li
Instead of being:
li class=clone id=Item_someNumberDescriptionspan class=remove
(x)/span/li
For some reason it creates 2 instances instead of one (both of the
above). If you drag out items in ascending order by the id (1,2,3).
Right! There wasn't any _ just the id, now everything is fine.
The problem I'm seeing now is that when I clone an item, it's becoming
undraggable until you drop on more item.
Basically last dropped item won't move, previous items will start
moving. It will also create a space [0] =
You'll understand what I'm talking about when you'll look at the
examplehttp://scriptaculous.host22.com/
What does your HTML look like? Are your list element IDs in the form
that Sortable requires?
ul id=my_sortable_list
li id=someString_1The visible draggable part/li
li id=someString_3The visible draggable part/li
li id=someString_4The visible draggable part/li
/ul
Unless your LIs have an ID and that IDegigins with one or more
letters
a-z, has exactly one underscore in it followed by a unique number
(which should be the ID column value from your database, just to tie a
bow on things here) then you won't get anything out of
Sortable.serialize() -- not even an error.
Walter
On Jun 13, 2009, at 12:29 PM, WLQ wrote:
As you've noted the post should give you some feedback like this:
whatever_your_list_ID_is = Array(
0 = 12,
1 = 13,
2 = 24,
3 = 2,
4 = 42
)
But it does not return any number on the other side:
Array
(
[whatever_your_list_ID_is] = Array
(
[0] =
[1] =
[2] =
[3] =
)
)
Yes, mysql_query doesn't return a list, it returns a resource
iedenttifier. You have to create the list yourself using a loop nd
my
y
sql_fetch_object or mysql_fetch_array or one of theotther
fetchers.
efoefefore we go much furthe I need t to remind you that this is not
a P
PHP
he
uag
uages on earth.
The example I posted was working code ripped out obusy usy site.
However it relies on the MyActiveRecord ORM to do anything.
define('MYACTIVERECORD_CONCTN_STR''mysyql://use/user::pa 'm'mysysql://
databasename')R', 'm'mysysql
re_once('MyActiveRecord.0.5.php');
claswiets eendnd MyActyActivvetendns Mds My
$lisecord{}
iveRecordextetendnds getulu,'osipn nSCC),nul,,,po
ion nSC');
;
s' ts',',
poon nts',nulu,
ulu,
nSC'n 'n
w
w
w h//prin-w / /tioc ctiti
ipn
tn
tionitt
itt th
Th alis all there is to that. Anything else, I really rethihthis
is
that bn:0-312-3178617-31S -3 n-ISn6IS -32-d17't17't knoway be -he curr784-2 (
is). PHP s). and Mnd s). pm. pmens).ntmeny by Luke Welling and
Laura
homson Thomso
)
)
Waltealter
AMS)
*Where I best meanmean eanst.
t.
On Jun 13, 2009 9:04 :04 AM, WLQ wrote:
I've followed your link and tried to buihe listlist as you suggested
there. But it gives me.
ERRNO: 2 TEXT: Invalid argument supplied for foreach()
LOCATION: ...,
line 7
http://jsbin.com/elocu/edit
re' a list list ofs. (I ums. (I uatabasebaseoblems.ve the st of p
sortable too).
clones any item but not
the
first, it wil nde nd ertverted.vd. But you wout ont be able to
move
it (inside of cloned sortable), when you drag and drop one more
it
apparently
receives the ability of being dragged. What is extremely weir.
Here's
one more weirdness, if you drag items from originals in order they
appear, then they will be cloned but won't be reverted. I've also
added your print_r($_POST) to the update_order.php but it's giving
some unfair results.
I've uploaded the whole pack to a some website.
Checkoutttpthttp://scris.hculous.host22.com/
cul On Jun 8, 1:00 pm, Walter Lee Davis wam/
@wdstudio.com/scote:
Gaa! I always get this backward. As Mr. Wonka w, d say,
Strike
that; reverse it!
er_yoatv your_your_lv = Arrtv = Array(
_ID_is 2 12 = 0
r_lv 13 =
our_lis2,
2 13 ,= = 0 42 =
= 0 42 = = 0 42 = 4
= 0 42
O 8, 2009, a,= 3,
ote: 42 wrote:
wrote data generated by Sortablewrotialize looks like this after
PHP
grabs it from the POST:
whatever_your_list_ID_is = Array(
0 = 1tev
1 = 13,
2 = 24,
3 = 2,
4 = 42
)
The keys of the array give the position, the values give the
numerical
part of the list item ID. So in this case, the list looked like
this
in the DOM when serialize() wrapped it up:
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Curvy Corners + draggables (script.aculo.us)
Before I take a look at your issue... I have a rewrite of CurvyCorners that i did that makes it run way faster. I was using it in a project and was annoyed by how long it took to render the corners. I can't say its any cleaner, but I corrected an unecessary loop. I've attched the rewrite to this email along with an example usage (same file, its at the bottom). Can you post your code? http://jsbin.com Rick On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Rafael M Ximenes rmalv...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, everybody! I'm a Brazilian WebDev and I've found a script to round corners without images (Script's name is Curvy Corners: http://www.curvycorners.net/demos/). I was trying to round corners of the draggables, but they lose your functions. Some help? Regards. Rafael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- curvy-doesnt-suck.js Description: JavaScript source
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Need help resolving conflict between Proto and Uize frameworks
Maybe I'm nuts but you're calling
setMovie() in the body tag
meanwhile... you have an Ajax.Request getting some data that will call...
setMovie() when successful
So... i suspect, that onload starts playing, then the ajax request finishes
and resets your player.
I dont recommend onload='' ever btw.
should change to:
script
document.observe('dom:loaded', function () {
call function in here
});
/script
I think even Alex would agree with me on this particular inline event ;)
Rick
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Alex McAuley
webmas...@thecarmarketplace.com wrote:
is it run inside a dom:loaded wrapper ?
- Original Message -
From: piers piersplow...@gmail.com
To: Prototype script.aculo.us
prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 4:14 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Need help resolving conflict between Proto and
Uize
frameworks
I know it's probably a lousy idea but I have both prototype and uize
referenced in the head of my document:
[code]
script type=text/javascript src=js/Uize.js/script
script type=text/javascript src=javascript/prototype.js/
script
[/code]
The only time I use a prototype function in the body of the document
is to create a function that plays a movie when a thumbnail is
clicked.
The function is:
[code]
script
function setMovie( url, title )
{
$('movieHost').innerHTML = '';
var elEmbed = document.createElement( 'embed' );
elEmbed.src = url;
elEmbed.setAttribute(width, 100%);
elEmbed.setAttribute(height,100%);
elEmbed.setAttribute(scale,aspect);
elEmbed.setAttribute(bgcolor,black);
$('movieHost').appendChild( elEmbed );
$('nowPlaying').innerHTML = title;
}
new Ajax.Request( '', {
method: 'get',
onSuccess: function( transport ) {
var bFirst = true;
for( var b = 0; b movieTags.length; b++ ) {
if ( bFirst )
{
setMovie( url, title );
bFirst = false;
}
var html = 'a href=javascript:void setMovie(\''+url+'\',\''+title
+'\');';
html += title+'/abr/';
}
}
} );
/script
[/code]
The only problem I'm having is that I call the function at body
onload:
[code]
BODY onload=setMovie('Quicktimes/mov1.mov', 'Suzuki :
quot;Fencequot; 1 of 12')
[/code]
In order that the first movie starts playing right away...
And everything is fine... EXCEPT that about 10 or 15 seconds into the
first movie it skips back to the beginning and starts playing again.
Once it's done that everything works fine until a page reload - and
then it plays and skips back.
I've tried changing the order of the script references in the head
section... but that breaks the uize framework.
Is there some way to recode the function with absolutes?
Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and forms
Always nice to find your own mistakes and learn from them - well done!
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:30 PM, anthony mrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Here was the problem.
I should have been calling the function (getAdjForm) using onComplete:
function getTerritories() {
var params = $('createAdjForm').serialize();
new Ajax.Updater(
territories,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index', 'action'='get-
territories'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params,
onComplete: getAdjForm});
}
I have a lot to learn.
On Jun 17, 10:54 am, Alex McAuley webmas...@thecarmarketplace.com
wrote:
Because the contents are from an AJAX request and they dont exist in the
DOM probably .
OR..
They are outside the /form tag
Paste full code to a pastie and we can help
- Original Message -
From: anthony mrsmi...@gmail.com
To: Prototype script.aculo.us
prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 4:52 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and forms
Ok, I have found a better way to explain this.
var params = $('createAdjForm').serialize();
alert(params);
This does not show the form elements that were included via: div
id=territories/div
Why is that the case?
On Jun 17, 9:06 am, anthony mrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the cleanup. I have made those changes. Feel free to post
others. The problem I have is that the form had two dynamic places:
div id=territories/div
and
div id=adjForm/div
There is an onChange that calls the javascript function getTerritories
() allows the
div id=territories/div to display which has a form element
called territory. At the end of the same function, it calls the other
javascript function getAdjForm(). getAdjForm() looks to see if the
form element territory exists. That's the problem, for some reason, it
cannot see it. What can I do to make it where it does not fail the if
statement in that function?
On Jun 16, 11:33 am, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com wrote:
A few things...
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
You can clean this up as:
var params = $('createAdjForm').serialize();
There are other points that you could optimize, but thats not your
question...
And at whatever point you want adjForm to appear, you need to add:
$('adjForm').show()
Rick
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:46 PM, anthony mrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a form that when a user selects something from a drop-down,
another element in the form appears. There is another piece of the
form, that is never showing up, I need to understand what I am
doing
wrong and how to fix it:
script type=text/javascript language=JavaScript
function getAdjForm() {
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
alert($('territory').value);
if ($('adjType').value !== $('territory').value !== ){
new Ajax.Updater(
adjForm,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index',
'action'='get-adj-
form'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params});
}
}
function getTerritories() {
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
new Ajax.Updater(
territories,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index', 'action'='get-
territories'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params});
if ($('adjType').value !== ){
//alert('d');
getAdjForm();
}
}
function getCustomer() {
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
new Ajax.Updater(
customer,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index', 'action'='get-
customer'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params});
}
/script
form method=POST id=createAdjForm action=
p
table border=0 CELLSPACING=10
tr
td
bSelect Adjustment Type/b
/td
td
?php echo $this-formSelect('adjType',
$this-adjType, array
(onChange=getAdjForm()), array(=Select an Adjustment
Type) +
$this-adjTypes) ?
/td
/tr
tr
td
bSubmitting Territory/b
/td
td
?php echo $this-formSelect('shortTerritory',
$this-
shortTerritory, array(onChange=getTerritories()), array
(=Select a Territory) + $this-shortTerritories) ?
div id=territories/div
/td
/tr
tr
td valign=top
bJustification/b
/td
td
?php echo
$this-formTextarea('justification',$this-
justification,array(rows=5,cols=75)) ?
/td
/tr
/table
hr
div id=adjForm
/div
***
This issue is that the data that should be here:
div id=adjForm
/div
Is never showing. When getAdjForm(); is called from
getTerritories(),
the $('territory').value !== seems to be the problem. Does the
browser not
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and forms
Maybe add it on onSuccess too ! just to be safe!
- Original Message -
From: anthony mrsmi...@gmail.com
To: Prototype script.aculo.us prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 5:30 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and forms
Here was the problem.
I should have been calling the function (getAdjForm) using onComplete:
function getTerritories() {
var params = $('createAdjForm').serialize();
new Ajax.Updater(
territories,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index', 'action'='get-
territories'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params,
onComplete: getAdjForm});
}
I have a lot to learn.
On Jun 17, 10:54 am, Alex McAuley webmas...@thecarmarketplace.com
wrote:
Because the contents are from an AJAX request and they dont exist in the
DOM probably .
OR..
They are outside the /form tag
Paste full code to a pastie and we can help
- Original Message -
From: anthony mrsmi...@gmail.com
To: Prototype script.aculo.us
prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 4:52 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and forms
Ok, I have found a better way to explain this.
var params = $('createAdjForm').serialize();
alert(params);
This does not show the form elements that were included via: div
id=territories/div
Why is that the case?
On Jun 17, 9:06 am, anthony mrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the cleanup. I have made those changes. Feel free to post
others. The problem I have is that the form had two dynamic places:
div id=territories/div
and
div id=adjForm/div
There is an onChange that calls the javascript function getTerritories
() allows the
div id=territories/div to display which has a form element
called territory. At the end of the same function, it calls the other
javascript function getAdjForm(). getAdjForm() looks to see if the
form element territory exists. That's the problem, for some reason, it
cannot see it. What can I do to make it where it does not fail the if
statement in that function?
On Jun 16, 11:33 am, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com wrote:
A few things...
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
You can clean this up as:
var params = $('createAdjForm').serialize();
There are other points that you could optimize, but thats not your
question...
And at whatever point you want adjForm to appear, you need to add:
$('adjForm').show()
Rick
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:46 PM, anthony mrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a form that when a user selects something from a drop-down,
another element in the form appears. There is another piece of the
form, that is never showing up, I need to understand what I am doing
wrong and how to fix it:
script type=text/javascript language=JavaScript
function getAdjForm() {
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
alert($('territory').value);
if ($('adjType').value !== $('territory').value !== ){
new Ajax.Updater(
adjForm,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index',
'action'='get-adj-
form'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params});
}
}
function getTerritories() {
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
new Ajax.Updater(
territories,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index', 'action'='get-
territories'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params});
if ($('adjType').value !== ){
//alert('d');
getAdjForm();
}
}
function getCustomer() {
var params = Form.serialize($('createAdjForm'));
new Ajax.Updater(
customer,
?= $this-url(array('controller'='index', 'action'='get-
customer'))?,
{method:'post',
parameters: params});
}
/script
form method=POST id=createAdjForm action=
p
table border=0 CELLSPACING=10
tr
td
bSelect Adjustment Type/b
/td
td
?php echo $this-formSelect('adjType',
$this-adjType, array
(onChange=getAdjForm()), array(=Select an Adjustment Type)
+
$this-adjTypes) ?
/td
/tr
tr
td
bSubmitting Territory/b
/td
td
?php echo $this-formSelect('shortTerritory',
$this-
shortTerritory, array(onChange=getTerritories()), array
(=Select a Territory) + $this-shortTerritories) ?
div id=territories/div
/td
/tr
tr
td valign=top
bJustification/b
/td
td
?php echo
$this-formTextarea('justification',$this-
justification,array(rows=5,cols=75)) ?
/td
/tr
/table
hr
div id=adjForm
/div
***
This issue is that the data that should be here:
div id=adjForm
/div
Is never showing. When getAdjForm(); is called from
getTerritories(),
the $('territory').value !== seems to be the problem. Does the
browser not know that was an element because it just appeared?
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Handle on sortable list doesn't work in IE.
Perfect! Thank you. It works now. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: MySQL - order ID
We're not getting this done by pasting little bits of code back and
forth. You're missing something in here, the server process that does
the clone in the database has to return the new ID -- that's the only
place it can come from. If you go back to my example, I had the last
line of the onSuccess method update the clone's ID with the
responseText from the server. So in your PHP clone code, make sure
that the last thing it does is print 'item_someNumber' (where
someNumber is in fact the most recently added element ID. In MAR, this
would look like this:
//create_clone.php
$original = $_POST['original'];
if($master = MyActiveRecord::FindById('originals',$original){
$data = get_object_vars($original);
array_shift($data); //get rid of the ID
$new = MyActiveRecord::Create('clones',$data);
$new-save();
if(false === $new-get_errors()){
header('Content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8');
//this is the part you need:
print 'item_' . $new-id;
}else{
header('HTTP/1.0 500 Server Error',true,500);
exit;
}
}else{
header('HTTP/1.0 404 Missing',true,404);
}
Walter
On Jun 17, 2009, at 12:57 PM, WLQ wrote:
I'm quite positive that it's something wrong with your script, because
on drop (clone) this gets inserted in html:
li class=clone id=span class=remove(x)/spanDescription/
li
Instead of being:
li class=clone id=Item_someNumberDescriptionspan
class=remove
(x)/span/li
For some reason it creates 2 instances instead of one (both of the
above). If you drag out items in ascending order by the id (1,2,3).
Right! There wasn't any _ just the id, now everything is fine.
The problem I'm seeing now is that when I clone an item, it's
becoming
undraggable until you drop on more item.
Basically last dropped item won't move, previous items will start
moving. It will also create a space [0] =
You'll understand what I'm talking about when you'll look at the
examplehttp://scriptaculous.host22.com/
What does your HTML look like? Are your list element IDs in the form
that Sortable requires?
ul id=my_sortable_list
li id=someString_1The visible draggable part/li
li id=someString_3The visible draggable part/li
li id=someString_4The visible draggable part/li
/ul
Unless your LIs have an ID and that IDegigins with one or more
letters
a-z, has exactly one underscore in it followed by a unique number
(which should be the ID column value from your database, just to
tie a
bow on things here) then you won't get anything out of
Sortable.serialize() -- not even an error.
Walter
On Jun 13, 2009, at 12:29 PM, WLQ wrote:
As you've noted the post should give you some feedback like this:
whatever_your_list_ID_is = Array(
0 = 12,
1 = 13,
2 = 24,
3 = 2,
4 = 42
)
But it does not return any number on the other side:
Array
(
[whatever_your_list_ID_is] = Array
(
[0] =
[1] =
[2] =
[3] =
)
)
Yes, mysql_query doesn't return a list, it returns a resource
iedenttifier. You have to create the list yourself using a loop nd
my
y
sql_fetch_object or mysql_fetch_array or one of theotther
fetchers.
efoefefore we go much furthe I need t to remind you that this is not
a P
PHP
he
uag
uages on earth.
The example I posted was working code ripped out obusy usy site.
However it relies on the MyActiveRecord ORM to do anything.
define('MYACTIVERECORD_CONCTN_STR''mysyql://use/user::pa
'm'mysysql://
databasename')R', 'm'mysysql
re_once('MyActiveRecord.0.5.php');
claswiets eendnd MyActyActivvetendns Mds My
$lisecord{}
iveRecordextetendnds getulu,'osipn nSCC),nul,,,po
ion nSC');
;
s' ts',',
poon nts',nulu,
ulu,
nSC'n 'n
w
w
w h//prin-w / /tioc ctiti
ipn
tn
tionitt
itt th
Th alis all there is to that. Anything else, I really rethihthis
is
that bn:0-312-3178617-31S -3 n-ISn6IS -32-d17't17't knoway be -he
curr784-2 (
is). PHP s). and Mnd s). pm. pmens).ntmeny by Luke Welling and
Laura
homson Thomso
)
)
Waltealter
AMS)
*Where I best meanmean eanst.
t.
On Jun 13, 2009 9:04 :04 AM, WLQ wrote:
I've followed your link and tried to buihe listlist as you
suggested
there. But it gives me.
ERRNO: 2 TEXT: Invalid argument supplied for foreach()
LOCATION: ...,
line 7
http://jsbin.com/elocu/edit
re' a list list ofs. (I ums. (I uatabasebaseoblems.ve the st of p
sortable too).
clones any item but not
the
first, it wil nde nd ertverted.vd. But you wout ont be able to
move
it (inside of cloned sortable), when you drag and drop one
more
it
apparently
receives the ability of being dragged. What is extremely weir.
Here's
one more weirdness, if you drag items from originals in order
they
appear, then they will be cloned but won't be reverted. I've
[Proto-Scripty] Clarification on PUT method in Ajax.Request
The documentation on Ajax.Request, for the method option, says: method 'post' The HTTP method to use for the request. The other widespread possibility is 'get'. As a Ruby On Rails special, Prototype also reacts to other verbs (such as 'put' and 'delete' by actually using 'post' and putting an extra '_method' parameter with the originally requested method in there. Do I understand this to mean that Prototype is incapable of issuing a true HTTP PUT request, that to issue one, I must deal with the raw XHR object? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Sortable onUpdate not working on IE7
On Jun 17, 1:31 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote: Is the script tag including that JS file *below* the script tag that contains the document.observe call? If so, move it above it. It's way above. All my external .js files are called on the head of the html. First one called is prototype, then scriptaculous, then the one with the custom functions. The document.observe call is way at the bottom of the document, after the list it affects. -A --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
