[Proto-Scripty] Re: .select on a combo
hi,
have you tried to use the Element class methods readAttribute/
writeAttribute instead that ordinary getAttribute/setAttribute?
i recently experienced some issues using getAttribute to retrieve
setted parameters.
Federico
On Sep 18, 7:33 pm, speedpac...@gmail.com speedpac...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Marko,
Great idea on combining the different attributes into one value
attribute with the pipe character. I'll consider it for a later
version, because this obviously also requires changes on the
serverside as we'll end up with other values being sent to the
server...
The class tihngy I knew and was on my todo list to change to that...
Unfortunately it doesn't fix my issue at this time (unless I'm
misinterpreting what you are saying...)
Have you gotten a chance to look into that biyt of code not giving me
the result I believed I should have received (and did before I
upgraded...)
Thanks again for the feedback - I really do appreciate it!
David.
On Sep 18, 7:01 pm, Marko gm.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Instead of adding attributes on element you can rewrite it like this:
option value=N15 domain=hjkhhjh.ch prepaid_total=18.50 EUR
postpaid_total=23.15 EURRegistreer voor 1 Jaar/option
=
option value=code|domain|pre_total|post_totalRegistreer voor 1
Jaar/option
=
option value=N15|hjkhhjh.ch|18.50 EUR|23.15 EURRegistreer voor 1
Jaar/option
You can get value like this:
selectedItem = orderOptions.select('[value=' +
orderOptions.getValue() + ']');
=
As this is equal to orderOptions you can do:
selectedItem = $F(this)
Then you can split it and get array:
selectedItem.split(|)
You can also rewrite your selects like this:
Instead of: td f=prepaid
write just: td class=prepaid
tdPrepaid = rec[0].select('[f=prepaid]');
=
tdPrepaid = rec[0].select('.prepaid');
This way you will preserve valid HTML
I think you get idea how to rewrite it.
- Marko
speedpac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying my secod post here - I never got my first to end up on the
list, so l'ts try it through the google groups website directly now...
I'm having an issue that I hope someone here can help me with...
I have the following code:
HTML:
--
select id=orderOption[hjkhhjh.ch] domain=hjkhhjh.ch
name=orderOption[hjkhhjh.ch]
option value=N15 domain=hjkhhjh.ch prepaid_total=18.50 EUR
postpaid_total=23.15 EURRegistreer voor 1 Jaar/option
option value=N16 domain=hjkhhjh.ch prepaid_total=36.30 EUR
postpaid_total=45.40 EURRegistreer voor 2 Jaar/option
option value=N19 domain=hjkhhjh.ch prepaid_total=53.40 EUR
postpaid_total=66.60 EURRegistreer voor 3 Jaar/option
option value=N17 domain=hjkhhjh.ch prepaid_total=87.00 EUR
postpaid_total=109.00 EURRegistreer voor 5 Jaar/option
option value=N18 domain=hjkhhjh.ch prepaid_total=170.50 EUR
postpaid_total=213.50 EURRegistreer voor 10 Jaar/option
/select
What I'm trying to do is when a user selects an option from the list,
the prepaid_total and postpaid_total price should show on a different
div...
this is the javascript that worked up until a few weeks ago when I
upgraded to the new release of prototype:
JAVASCRIPT:
orderOptions.observe('change', function(event) {
alert('clicked for ' + orderOptions.getAttribute
('domain'));
rec = $('domainSearchResult').select('[domain=' +
orderOptions.getAttribute('domain') + ']');
tdPrepaid = rec[0].select('[f=prepaid]');
tdPostpaid = rec[0].select('[f=postpaid]');
alert(orderOptions.getValue());
selectedItem = orderOptions.select('[value=' +
orderOptions.getValue() + ']');
alert(selectedItem);
tdPrepaid[0].update(selectedItem[0].getAttribute
('prepaid_total'));
tdPostpaid[0].update(selectedItem[0].getAttribute
('postpaid_total'));
});
The two first alerts give me what I expect, the third one just returns
NOTHING... I used to be able to select the options with the value
like that, but it seems to be no longer working...
Any idea?
Also - I know adding attributes to the elements like that is not the
way to go - I just don't know how I can do this otherwise :(
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Problem with insert ()
Hey there,
I've got a wired problem with insert ().
Here is a snippet of my code:
chkMsg = new Ajax.PeriodicalUpdater ('', '/ajax/chkmgs.php', {
method: 'get',
frequency: 2,
decay: 1.5,
onSuccess: function test (originalRequest) {
var reg = /id=newMessage(\d+)/;
var result;
var currentmessageids = new Array ();
var newmessages = Array ();
while (result = reg.exec($('messages').innerHTML)){
currentmessageids.push (result[1]);
}
newmessages = originalRequest.responseText.split (---NEW---);
newmessages.each ( function (value) {
result = reg.exec (value);
if (!currentmessageids.in_array (result[1])) {
// MY PROBLEM ON THE SECOND RUN //
$('messages').insert (value);
}
})
},
});
the first time this runs (onload) everything's fine. But when the
second update happens, the script stops. Firefox prompt 'Script is not
responding' Safari crashes. When I replace the insert with an update
() the same. With an alert () it works.
I have no idea what the problem is. Maybe someone can help me out on
this? I assume it's my fault and already tried to search for a
solution, maybe got the wrong search parameters, didn't find anything
helpfull.
So any help is very welcome...
thanks olly
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Masked Input in Prototype
On Jul 29, 11:27 pm, Alex McAuley webmas...@thecarmarketplace.com wrote: why not just port the jquery one... wont take long ! Sorry for resurrecting this topic after two months. In case anyone comes to this thread looking for masked input for prototype (I know I did :-). I thought I'd mention that I've ported the jQuery version to prototype. You can get the code here: http://bjartekv.github.com/MaskedInput/ Regards, Bjarte --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Problem with insert ()
Hi,
Your regexp doesn't have the 'g' flag, so I suspect this is an endless
loop:
while (result = reg.exec($('messages').innerHTML)){
currentmessageids.push (result[1]);
}
Adding the 'g' flag should fix it.[1]
Somewhat OT, but I would recommend grabbing innerHTML to a local var
and then reusing it, it's inefficient to go off and look up the
element and then retrieve its innerHTML on every loop.
[1]
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Core_JavaScript_1.5_Reference/Global_Objects/RegExp/exec
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www / crowder software / com
On Sep 19, 11:37 pm, ohnesorge ohneso...@design-xpress.de wrote:
Hey there,
I've got a wired problem with insert ().
Here is a snippet of my code:
chkMsg = new Ajax.PeriodicalUpdater ('', '/ajax/chkmgs.php', {
method: 'get',
frequency: 2,
decay: 1.5,
onSuccess: function test (originalRequest) {
var reg = /id=newMessage(\d+)/;
var result;
var currentmessageids = new Array ();
var newmessages = Array ();
while (result = reg.exec($('messages').innerHTML)){
currentmessageids.push (result[1]);
}
newmessages = originalRequest.responseText.split (---NEW---);
newmessages.each ( function (value) {
result = reg.exec (value);
if (!currentmessageids.in_array (result[1])) {
// MY PROBLEM ON THE SECOND RUN //
$('messages').insert (value);
}
})
},
});
the first time this runs (onload) everything's fine. But when the
second update happens, the script stops. Firefox prompt 'Script is not
responding' Safari crashes. When I replace the insert with an update
() the same. With an alert () it works.
I have no idea what the problem is. Maybe someone can help me out on
this? I assume it's my fault and already tried to search for a
solution, maybe got the wrong search parameters, didn't find anything
helpfull.
So any help is very welcome...
thanks olly
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] walking the DOM
I have little experience manipulating the dom other than using $( to
get/set style elements so direct advice and a link for education would
be appreciated.
Overall, the problem I have is a bunch of stacked divs with different
z-indexes. Sometimes the user will want to move a dive to the front.
This is not a problem, but I worry that with the page open for 6 - hours
(all functions are performed with AJAX) my z-index number will grow too
large.
So, what I would like to do is decrement the z-index of all the divs
involved when incrementing the one I am bringing to the front. I don't
want to decrement the z-index of all the divs.
I don't want to decrement the ones that are currently display=none nor
the ones that stay visible all the time, nor divs that are children of
the stacked divs.
The stacked divs are all children of body, but so are some that should
not be affected. If it would make the job easier, I could move all the
stacked divs into a container div.
So, how to walk though all the stacked divs to change their z-index, if
currently being displayed ?
If prototype does not offer assistance (but I can't imagine that), let
me know and I will post in a .js group.
--
Bill Drescher
william {at} TechServSys {dot} com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: walking the DOM
Hi Bill,
If you make them all children of one container, then you can process
them in a loop like so:
var divsToSuppress, n;
divsToSuppress = $('containerName').children();
for (n = divsToSuppress.length - 1; n = 0; --n) {
divsToSuppress[n].setStyle({'zIndex': '4'}); // = Or whatever
value
}
Alternately, if you give all of these stackable divs some class name,
you can use
divsToSuppress = $$('div.xyz');
...at the beginning of that.
FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Sep 20, 12:01 pm, bill will...@techservsys.com wrote:
I have little experience manipulating the dom other than using $( to
get/set style elements so direct advice and a link for education would
be appreciated.
Overall, the problem I have is a bunch of stacked divs with different
z-indexes. Sometimes the user will want to move a dive to the front.
This is not a problem, but I worry that with the page open for 6 - hours
(all functions are performed with AJAX) my z-index number will grow too
large.
So, what I would like to do is decrement the z-index of all the divs
involved when incrementing the one I am bringing to the front. I don't
want to decrement the z-index of all the divs.
I don't want to decrement the ones that are currently display=none nor
the ones that stay visible all the time, nor divs that are children of
the stacked divs.
The stacked divs are all children of body, but so are some that should
not be affected. If it would make the job easier, I could move all the
stacked divs into a container div.
So, how to walk though all the stacked divs to change their z-index, if
currently being displayed ?
If prototype does not offer assistance (but I can't imagine that), let
me know and I will post in a .js group.
--
Bill Drescher
william {at} TechServSys {dot} com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: A better way to check for an element.
Mislav's when() seems a bit redundant when called inside of
document.observe('dom:loaded')...
I think this topic would be interesting to discuss in the the proto-dev
mailing list, ie. exceptions thrown for non-existant elements... i'd also
like to see some kind of support for catching stupid coding: documents with
elements that have the same id (like... div id=myDiv/div div
id=myDiv/div...ugh.) I wrote a snippet that used mutation events to check
the document for junk like this, but sadly, DOMContentLoaded,
DOMNodeInsterted et al aren't supported widely enough to warrant production
level usage.
Rick
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Radoslav Stankov rstan...@gmail.comwrote:
You can use something like my CD3.Behavior lib (
http://github.com/RStankov/controldepo-3-widgets/blob/master/src/behaviors.js
)
code
CD3.Behaviors({'#element:click': yourClickHandler });
// -- or --
CD3.Behaviors('#element', function(){
this.observe('click', yourClickHandler);
});
// -- or ... CD3.Behaviors have really large set of possible uses
/code
Or ... use Mislav's when() function
http://mislav.uniqpath.com/js/when-available-in-prototype/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: A better way to check for an element.
Thats not to say that when() isn't pretty cool :)
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.comwrote:
Mislav's when() seems a bit redundant when called inside of
document.observe('dom:loaded')...
I think this topic would be interesting to discuss in the the proto-dev
mailing list, ie. exceptions thrown for non-existant elements... i'd also
like to see some kind of support for catching stupid coding: documents with
elements that have the same id (like... div id=myDiv/div div
id=myDiv/div...ugh.) I wrote a snippet that used mutation events to check
the document for junk like this, but sadly, DOMContentLoaded,
DOMNodeInsterted et al aren't supported widely enough to warrant production
level usage.
Rick
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Radoslav Stankov rstan...@gmail.comwrote:
You can use something like my CD3.Behavior lib (
http://github.com/RStankov/controldepo-3-widgets/blob/master/src/behaviors.js
)
code
CD3.Behaviors({'#element:click': yourClickHandler });
// -- or --
CD3.Behaviors('#element', function(){
this.observe('click', yourClickHandler);
});
// -- or ... CD3.Behaviors have really large set of possible uses
/code
Or ... use Mislav's when() function
http://mislav.uniqpath.com/js/when-available-in-prototype/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: including prototype dynamically, and observe:domloaded
If none of the above work...
document.write('script type=text/javascript src='
http://somewhere/edu/is//prototype.js;\/script');
have you tried removing the extra / before prototype.js?
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Ngan Pham nganp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi jrochkind,
I believe document.write is execute properly and full before your observe
call is done. However, document.write's job is simply to write the string
to the browser, nothing more. It's then the browser's job to interpret the
string and do whatever it has to do on a different tangent. In this case,
load an external javascript document. So immediately after document.write
has performed it's job, the next statement is ran--which causes the problem
for you since the external prototype script is not ready.
As stated above this isn't a good thing to do in general. However, to
answer your questionyou either of the follow (there may be more
options):
1. Modify the prototype.js file and add a function call at the bottom to
let your page know prototype is loaded.
2. Use a setInterval function to periodically check for prototype's
existence. Once it's available you can then stop the checking and resume
your code.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.eduwrote:
Thanks Alex, I think that post does have the right analysis of what
was going on in my case and why it wasn't working.
And thanks for the alert that loading prototype via document.write in
general may be a bad idea.
Is there any good way to have an external .js file trigger a load of
Prototype, or is this basically just a lost cause, and if you want
Prototype on a page, you've just got to include a script tag that
references a prototype.js file directly on the page, no ifs and or
buts?
Jonathan
On Sep 17, 3:23 pm, Alexander Wallace alexmlwall...@gmail.com wrote:
While I don't recommend loading prototype via document.write,
this might be due to including both the doc.write(prototype) and the
doc.observe() function within the same enclosing script tag.
See:
http://kossovsky.net/index.php/2009/07/script-as-blocking-element-and...
But I really don't recommend loading prototype.js using document.write.
I'm not sure how that would interfere with the IE method of dom:loaded
(which involves using document.writing a deferred script element and
watching its .onreadystatechange), but I can't imagine the outcome
would be bug-free.
-Alex
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:54 PM, jrochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
So theoretically (Prototype 1.6), it should be possible to have
javascript code include the Prototype library into a page via
document.write, right?
document.write('script type=text/javascript src='
http://somewhere/
edu/is//prototype.js\/script');
Okay, this mostly works. Unless you want the same script that did this
to then immediately call any Prototype function, such as
document.observe.
document.write('script type=text/javascript src='
http://somewhere/
edu/is//prototype.js\/script');
document.observe(dom:loaded, function() { alert('loaded!'); });
This does NOT work, because at the point that document.observe is up
there, Prototype is NOT actually loaded yet. Although it will be
eventually.
Can anyone explain what's going on? Does the browser not do or fully
process the document.write until after the current script is fully
done?
Is there any way to have a script include the prototype library
dynamically, and then have that same script call some prototype
functions, such as in particular document.observe?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: walking the DOM
T.J. Crowder wrote:
Hi Bill,
If you make them all children of one container, then you can process
them in a loop like so:
var divsToSuppress, n;
divsToSuppress = $('containerName').children();
for (n = divsToSuppress.length - 1; n = 0; --n) {
divsToSuppress[n].setStyle({'zIndex': '4'}); // = Or whatever
value
}
Alternately, if you give all of these stackable divs some class name,
you can use
divsToSuppress = $$('div.xyz');
...at the beginning of that.
Where xyz is the class name ?
bill
FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Sep 20, 12:01 pm, bill will...@techservsys.com wrote:
I have little experience manipulating the dom other than using $( to
get/set style elements so direct advice and a link for education would
be appreciated.
Overall, the problem I have is a bunch of stacked divs with different
z-indexes. Sometimes the user will want to move a dive to the front.
This is not a problem, but I worry that with the page open for 6 - hours
(all functions are performed with AJAX) my z-index number will grow too
large.
So, what I would like to do is decrement the z-index of all the divs
involved when incrementing the one I am bringing to the front. I don't
want to decrement the z-index of all the divs.
I don't want to decrement the ones that are currently display=none nor
the ones that stay visible all the time, nor divs that are children of
the stacked divs.
The stacked divs are all children of body, but so are some that should
not be affected. If it would make the job easier, I could move all the
stacked divs into a container div.
So, how to walk though all the stacked divs to change their z-index, if
currently being displayed ?
If prototype does not offer assistance (but I can't imagine that), let
me know and I will post in a .js group.
--
Bill Drescher
william {at} TechServSys {dot} com
--
Bill Drescher
william {at} TechServSys {dot} com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: walking the DOM
Where xyz is the class name ?
Yup.
-- T.J. :-)
On Sep 20, 2:47 pm, bill will...@techservsys.com wrote:
T.J. Crowder wrote:
Hi Bill,
If you make them all children of one container, then you can process
them in a loop like so:
var divsToSuppress, n;
divsToSuppress = $('containerName').children();
for (n = divsToSuppress.length - 1; n = 0; --n) {
divsToSuppress[n].setStyle({'zIndex': '4'}); // = Or whatever
value
}
Alternately, if you give all of these stackable divs some class name,
you can use
divsToSuppress = $$('div.xyz');
...at the beginning of that.
Where xyz is the class name ?
bill
FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Sep 20, 12:01 pm, bill will...@techservsys.com wrote:
I have little experience manipulating the dom other than using $( to
get/set style elements so direct advice and a link for education would
be appreciated.
Overall, the problem I have is a bunch of stacked divs with different
z-indexes. Sometimes the user will want to move a dive to the front.
This is not a problem, but I worry that with the page open for 6 - hours
(all functions are performed with AJAX) my z-index number will grow too
large.
So, what I would like to do is decrement the z-index of all the divs
involved when incrementing the one I am bringing to the front. I don't
want to decrement the z-index of all the divs.
I don't want to decrement the ones that are currently display=none nor
the ones that stay visible all the time, nor divs that are children of
the stacked divs.
The stacked divs are all children of body, but so are some that should
not be affected. If it would make the job easier, I could move all the
stacked divs into a container div.
So, how to walk though all the stacked divs to change their z-index, if
currently being displayed ?
If prototype does not offer assistance (but I can't imagine that), let
me know and I will post in a .js group.
--
Bill Drescher
william {at} TechServSys {dot} com
--
Bill Drescher
william {at} TechServSys {dot} com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: walking the DOM
T.J. Crowder wrote:
Where xyz is the class name ?
Yup.
Thanks
--
Bill Drescher
william {at} TechServSys {dot} com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] newbie - form submit
Hello all, I'd love to create a contact form using prototype and php. However, I want to make sure that, if the javascript is disable, the submission should be server side validated and submitted as well. If javascript is enable, the onclick event will trigger, hence, the js validation Will occur. If the javascript isn't enable, the onclick event will not trigger, so the submit button will get called, and the server side validation will occur. I don't know if it's precise, however, it works. Now what I'd like to do is, without leaving the same page, when the form is submitted, the div that contains the form gets hidden, and it should be replaced by a div telling: The contact was send. I'm so newbie, that I've found a validation class called: Really easy field validation with Prototype and it seems to be very nice. Can anyone summarize the steps to accomplish this without losing the server side submission if, js Is disable somehow? Should I try to edit (I really don't like this idea) the validation class for doing this? Or can this be done otherwise? Thanks a lot to any feedback on this, Regards, MEM --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: newbie - form submit
Never rely on client side validation, that's for convenience for your users, not security.First, make the functionality works (including security) without javascript. Then override the submit button with javascript by observing the submit. In that event code you submit the form via ajax, hide the div, display what you want, etc. then use event.stop to keep the default submit behavior from occurring. Good luck with this. Some links: http://api.prototypejs.org/dom/event.html#stop-class_method http://api.prototypejs.org/dom/event.html#stop-class_method http://api.prototypejs.org/dom/document.html#observe-class_method http://api.prototypejs.org/dom/element.html#update-class_methodand http://api.prototypejs.org/ajax/ajax/updater.html On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:47 AM, MEM tal...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I'd love to create a contact form using prototype and php. However, I want to make sure that, if the javascript is disable, the submission should be server side validated and submitted as well. If javascript is enable, the onclick event will trigger, hence, the js validation Will occur. If the javascript isn't enable, the onclick event will not trigger, so the submit button will get called, and the server side validation will occur. I don't know if it's precise, however, it works. Now what I'd like to do is, without leaving the same page, when the form is submitted, the div that contains the form gets hidden, and it should be replaced by a div telling: The contact was send. I'm so newbie, that I've found a validation class called: Really easy field validation with Prototype and it seems to be very nice. Can anyone summarize the steps to accomplish this without losing the server side submission if, js Is disable somehow? Should I try to edit (I really don't like this idea) the validation class for doing this? Or can this be done otherwise? Thanks a lot to any feedback on this, Regards, MEM --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Prototype Selector Speed
Hello, I have been using prototype for a few months now, and so far I have enjoyed the functionality that it brings. However, I have noticed that it's speed is lacking. This makes me tentative to use prototype for a rather large project that I have been planning. To confirm this, I ran the tests from http://mootools.net/slickspeed/ by checking out the project from SVN, and used the latest versions of all of the frameworks listed. Prototype and mootools consistently finished at the bottom, which concerns me a little. After looking at the results I have been seriously considering switching to JQuery, although I am disappointed at their lack of OOP support. Is there any plans in the future to improve on prototype's speed? Also has there been a tentative release date set for scripty2? I'm reluctant to develop anything that heavily uses scriptaculous, since it appears scripty2 is in alpha state, although it has been that way since June. Thanks, -Andy --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
