Re: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC10 – Establishing the Network Security Subcommittee of the SCWG

2018-09-27 Thread Robin.Lin 
TWCA votes “YES” on Ballot SC10.

Regards,
Robin Lin

From: Public  On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via Public
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2018 8:26 AM
To: CABFPub 
Subject: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC10 – Establishing the Network 
Security Subcommittee of the SCWG

Voting ends on 4 October 2018 at 22:00 UTC.

From: Servercert-wg [mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of 
Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Servercert-wg
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 9:02 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 
mailto:servercert...@cabforum.org>>
Subject: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC10 – Establishing the Network Security 
Subcommittee of the SCWG
Ballot SC10 – Establishing the Network Security Subcommittee of the SCWG

Purpose of Ballot
The Network Security Working Group of the CA/Browser Forum expired on June 19, 
2018 under the terms of Ballot 203 which established the Working Group. The 
Server Certificate Working Group wishes to establish a Network Security 
Subcommittee pursuant to Bylaws 5.3.1(e).
The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA and 
endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and Wayne Thayer of Mozilla.
--- MOTION BEGINS ---
The Server Certificate Working Group hereby establishes the Network Security 
Subcommittee as an official Subcommittee.

1. Mission: To improve security policies and practices for Certificate 
Management Systems encoded in the guidelines maintained by the SCWG.

2. End Date: This Subcommittee shall continue until it is dissolved by a vote 
of the SCWG
3. Deliverables: The Network Security Subcommittee shall propose ballots to the 
SCWG to improve the minimal security standards within the mission defined above 
This includes modifying the existing Network and Certificate System Security 
Requirements (NCSSR) or to create new requirements, guidelines, or best 
practices. Among other activities, the Network Security Subcommittee shall 
perform security analysis on typical CA Management Systems offering options to 
the Server Certificate Working Group for establishing minimal security 
standards. Risk analysis will also be used to provide a better understanding of 
threats and vulnerabilities in Certificate Management Systems. This process can 
be used to provide better reasoning and justification of existing or future 
security guidelines.
4. Participation: Any member of the SCWG is eligible and may declare their 
participation in the Network Security Subcommittee by requesting to be added to 
the mailing list.
5. Chair: Ben Wilson shall be the initial Chair of the Network Security 
Subcommittee.  The Subcommittee may change its Chair from time to time by 
consensus of the Members participating in the Subcommittee or by voting method 
chosen by the Members by consensus.
6. Communication: Subcommittee communications and documents shall be posted on 
mailing-lists where the mail-archives are publicly accessible, and the 
Subcommittee shall publish minutes of its meetings.
7. Effect of SCWG Charter or Forum Bylaws Amendment for Subcommittees: In the 
event the SCWG Charter or the Forum Bylaws is amended to add general rules 
governing Chartered Working Group Subcommittees and how they operate (“General 
Rules”), the provisions of the General Rules shall take precedence over this 
charter.
--- MOTION ENDS ---


The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
Ballot SC10 – Establishing the Network Security Subcommittee of the SCWG


Start time (22:00 UTC)


End time (22:00 UTC)


Discussion (7 days)


20 September 2018


27 September 2018


Vote for approval (7 days)


27 September 2018


4 October 2018


Additional Information (not part of Ballot)
Bylaws v1.9
5.3.1 Formation of Chartered Working Groups
(e) CWGs may establish any number of subcommittees within its own Working Group 
to address any of such CWG’s business (each, a “Subcommittee”). A CWG-created 
Subcommittee needs to be approved by the CWG itself according to the approval 
process set forth in the CWG charter, but approval of the Forum is not 
necessary. Subcommittees must exist under an approved CWG.

Ballot 203: Formation of Network Security Working Group (v2)



Purpose of Ballot: To form a Network Security Working Group to re-evaluate the 
CAB Forum's Network Security Guidelines.



The following motion has been proposed by Gervase Markham of Mozilla and 
endorsed by Jeremy Rowley of DigiCert and Moudrick Dadashov of SSC:



-- MOTION BEGINS –



In accordance with Section 5.3 of the CA/B Forum Bylaws, the chartering of a 
new Working Group requires a ballot. This ballot charters the Network Security 
Working Group.



The CAB Forum's Network Security Guidelines were adopted in August 2012 but 
have not been updated since. Significant doubts have been raised as to their 
fitness for purpose in 2017. Therefore, the Working Group’s charter will be as 
follows:



Scope



1. Consider options for revising, replacing or scrapping the Network Security

Re: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC10 – Establishing the Network Security Subcommittee of the SCWG

2018-09-27 Thread Tim Hollebeek via Public 
DigiCert votes “YES” on Ballot SC10.

 

-Tim

 

From: Public  On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via Public
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 5:26 PM
To: CABFPub 
Subject: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC10 – Establishing the Network 
Security Subcommittee of the SCWG

 

Voting ends on 4 October 2018 at 22:00 UTC.

 

From: Servercert-wg [mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of 
Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Servercert-wg
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 9:02 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 

Subject: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC10 – Establishing the Network Security 
Subcommittee of the SCWG


Ballot SC10 – Establishing the Network Security Subcommittee of the SCWG


 


Purpose of Ballot 


The Network Security Working Group of the CA/Browser Forum expired on June 19, 
2018 under the terms of Ballot 203 which established the Working Group. The 
Server Certificate Working Group wishes to establish a Network Security 
Subcommittee pursuant to Bylaws 5.3.1(e).

The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA and 
endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and Wayne Thayer of Mozilla.

--- MOTION BEGINS ---

The Server Certificate Working Group hereby establishes the Network Security 
Subcommittee as an official Subcommittee.

1. Mission: To improve security policies and practices for Certificate 
Management Systems encoded in the guidelines maintained by the SCWG. 


2. End Date: This Subcommittee shall continue until it is dissolved by a vote 
of the SCWG

3. Deliverables: The Network Security Subcommittee shall propose ballots to the 
SCWG to improve the minimal security standards within the mission defined above 
This includes modifying the existing Network and Certificate System Security 
Requirements (NCSSR) or to create new requirements, guidelines, or best 
practices. Among other activities, the Network Security Subcommittee shall 
perform security analysis on typical CA Management Systems offering options to 
the Server Certificate Working Group for establishing minimal security 
standards. Risk analysis will also be used to provide a better understanding of 
threats and vulnerabilities in Certificate Management Systems. This process can 
be used to provide better reasoning and justification of existing or future 
security guidelines.

4. Participation: Any member of the SCWG is eligible and may declare their 
participation in the Network Security Subcommittee by requesting to be added to 
the mailing list. 

5. Chair: Ben Wilson shall be the initial Chair of the Network Security 
Subcommittee.  The Subcommittee may change its Chair from time to time by 
consensus of the Members participating in the Subcommittee or by voting method 
chosen by the Members by consensus.  

6. Communication: Subcommittee communications and documents shall be posted on 
mailing-lists where the mail-archives are publicly accessible, and the 
Subcommittee shall publish minutes of its meetings.

7. Effect of SCWG Charter or Forum Bylaws Amendment for Subcommittees: In the 
event the SCWG Charter or the Forum Bylaws is amended to add general rules 
governing Chartered Working Group Subcommittees and how they operate (“General 
Rules”), the provisions of the General Rules shall take precedence over this 
charter.

--- MOTION ENDS ---

 

The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows: 


Ballot SC10 – Establishing the Network Security Subcommittee of the SCWG

Start time (22:00 UTC) 

End time (22:00 UTC) 


Discussion (7 days) 

20 September 2018 

27 September 2018 


Vote for approval (7 days) 

27 September 2018 

4 October 2018 

  


Additional Information (not part of Ballot)


Bylaws v1.9


5.3.1 Formation of Chartered Working Groups


(e) CWGs may establish any number of subcommittees within its own Working Group 
to address any of such CWG’s business (each, a “Subcommittee”). A CWG-created 
Subcommittee needs to be approved by the CWG itself according to the approval 
process set forth in the CWG charter, but approval of the Forum is not 
necessary. Subcommittees must exist under an approved CWG.

 

Ballot 203: Formation of Network Security Working Group (v2) 

 

Purpose of Ballot: To form a Network Security Working Group to re-evaluate the 
CAB Forum's Network Security Guidelines.

 

The following motion has been proposed by Gervase Markham of Mozilla and 
endorsed by Jeremy Rowley of DigiCert and Moudrick Dadashov of SSC:

 

-- MOTION BEGINS –

 

In accordance with Section 5.3 of the CA/B Forum Bylaws, the chartering of a 
new Working Group requires a ballot. This ballot charters the Network Security 
Working Group.

 

The CAB Forum's Network Security Guidelines were adopted in August 2012 but 
have not been updated since. Significant doubts have been raised as to their 
fitness for purpose in 2017. Therefore, the Working Group’s charter will be as 
follows:

 

Scope

 

1. Consider options for revising, replacing or scrapping the

[cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC10 – Establishing the Network Security Subcommittee of the SCWG

2018-09-27 Thread Kirk Hall via Public 
Voting ends on 4 October 2018 at 22:00 UTC.

From: Servercert-wg [mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of 
Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Servercert-wg
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 9:02 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 

Subject: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC10 – Establishing the Network Security 
Subcommittee of the SCWG
Ballot SC10 – Establishing the Network Security Subcommittee of the SCWG

Purpose of Ballot
The Network Security Working Group of the CA/Browser Forum expired on June 19, 
2018 under the terms of Ballot 203 which established the Working Group. The 
Server Certificate Working Group wishes to establish a Network Security 
Subcommittee pursuant to Bylaws 5.3.1(e).
The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA and 
endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and Wayne Thayer of Mozilla.
--- MOTION BEGINS ---
The Server Certificate Working Group hereby establishes the Network Security 
Subcommittee as an official Subcommittee.

1. Mission: To improve security policies and practices for Certificate 
Management Systems encoded in the guidelines maintained by the SCWG.

2. End Date: This Subcommittee shall continue until it is dissolved by a vote 
of the SCWG
3. Deliverables: The Network Security Subcommittee shall propose ballots to the 
SCWG to improve the minimal security standards within the mission defined above 
This includes modifying the existing Network and Certificate System Security 
Requirements (NCSSR) or to create new requirements, guidelines, or best 
practices. Among other activities, the Network Security Subcommittee shall 
perform security analysis on typical CA Management Systems offering options to 
the Server Certificate Working Group for establishing minimal security 
standards. Risk analysis will also be used to provide a better understanding of 
threats and vulnerabilities in Certificate Management Systems. This process can 
be used to provide better reasoning and justification of existing or future 
security guidelines.
4. Participation: Any member of the SCWG is eligible and may declare their 
participation in the Network Security Subcommittee by requesting to be added to 
the mailing list.
5. Chair: Ben Wilson shall be the initial Chair of the Network Security 
Subcommittee.  The Subcommittee may change its Chair from time to time by 
consensus of the Members participating in the Subcommittee or by voting method 
chosen by the Members by consensus.
6. Communication: Subcommittee communications and documents shall be posted on 
mailing-lists where the mail-archives are publicly accessible, and the 
Subcommittee shall publish minutes of its meetings.
7. Effect of SCWG Charter or Forum Bylaws Amendment for Subcommittees: In the 
event the SCWG Charter or the Forum Bylaws is amended to add general rules 
governing Chartered Working Group Subcommittees and how they operate (“General 
Rules”), the provisions of the General Rules shall take precedence over this 
charter.
--- MOTION ENDS ---


The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
Ballot SC10 – Establishing the Network Security Subcommittee of the SCWG


Start time (22:00 UTC)


End time (22:00 UTC)


Discussion (7 days)


20 September 2018


27 September 2018


Vote for approval (7 days)


27 September 2018


4 October 2018


Additional Information (not part of Ballot)
Bylaws v1.9
5.3.1 Formation of Chartered Working Groups
(e) CWGs may establish any number of subcommittees within its own Working Group 
to address any of such CWG’s business (each, a “Subcommittee”). A CWG-created 
Subcommittee needs to be approved by the CWG itself according to the approval 
process set forth in the CWG charter, but approval of the Forum is not 
necessary. Subcommittees must exist under an approved CWG.

Ballot 203: Formation of Network Security Working Group (v2)



Purpose of Ballot: To form a Network Security Working Group to re-evaluate the 
CAB Forum's Network Security Guidelines.



The following motion has been proposed by Gervase Markham of Mozilla and 
endorsed by Jeremy Rowley of DigiCert and Moudrick Dadashov of SSC:



-- MOTION BEGINS –



In accordance with Section 5.3 of the CA/B Forum Bylaws, the chartering of a 
new Working Group requires a ballot. This ballot charters the Network Security 
Working Group.



The CAB Forum's Network Security Guidelines were adopted in August 2012 but 
have not been updated since. Significant doubts have been raised as to their 
fitness for purpose in 2017. Therefore, the Working Group’s charter will be as 
follows:



Scope



1. Consider options for revising, replacing or scrapping the Network Security 
Guidelines.



Deliverables

1. A report with one or more proposals for the future of the Network Security 
Guidelines.

2. For proposals involving replacement, details of the availability and 
applicability of the proposed alternative, and what modifications if any would 
be needed to it in order to make it

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot FORUM-4 v3

2018-09-27 Thread Moudrick M. Dadashov via Public 

SSC votes: "Yes".

Thanks,
M.D.

On 9/14/2018 9:50 PM, Tim Hollebeek via Public wrote:


As no additional typos or mistakes appear to have been found in the 
proposed redline, Ballot FORUM-4 v2 is hereby withdrawn, and this new 
Ballot FORUM-4 v3 submitted in its place.  Apologies for not including 
the latest ETSI fixes; I really wanted to include them, but I’m just 
worried that discussion may not be over yet.


Ballot FORUM-4 v3: Fix mistakes made during passage of Governance 
Reform Ballot 206


Purpose of Ballot

The Governance Reform ballot (Ballot 206 under the old ballot 
numbering scheme) was extremely complicated and took roughly two years 
to draft.


The changes to the Bylaws from Ballot 216 were intended to be included 
in the Governance Reform ballot, but were accidentally not included.


The attached version of the Bylaws restores the important discussion 
period changes that were approved by the members but then accidentally 
overwritten.


The following motion has been proposed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert 
and endorsed by Wayne Thayer of Mozilla and Moudrick Dadashov of SSC.


--- MOTION BEGINS ---

This ballot replaces the “Bylaws of the CA/Browser Forum” version 1.9 
with version 2.0 of those Bylaws, attached to this ballot.


--- MOTION ENDS ---

The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:

Discussion (7 days)

Start Time: 2018-09-14, 2:50 pm Eastern Time

End Time: 2018-09-21, 2:50 pm Eastern Time

Vote for approval (7 days)

Start Time: 2018-09-21, 2:50 pm Eastern Time

End Time: 2018-09-28, 2:50 pm Eastern Time



___
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public


___
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

[cabfpub] Voting ends on Ballot FORUM-4 v3 on Friday, Sept. 28 at 2:50 pm Eastern Time

2018-09-27 Thread Kirk Hall via Public 
Voting ends on Ballot FORUM-4 v3 on Friday, Sept. 28 at 2:50 pm Eastern Time

From: Servercert-wg [mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of 
Tim Hollebeek via Servercert-wg
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2018 11:50 AM
To: CABFPub ; servercert...@cabforum.org
Subject:[Servercert-wg] Ballot FORUM-4 v3


As no additional typos or mistakes appear to have been found in the proposed 
redline, Ballot FORUM-4 v2 is hereby withdrawn, and this new Ballot FORUM-4 v3 
submitted in its place.  Apologies for not including the latest ETSI fixes; I 
really wanted to include them, but I'm just worried that discussion may not be 
over yet.

Ballot FORUM-4 v3: Fix mistakes made during passage of Governance Reform Ballot 
206

Purpose of Ballot

The Governance Reform ballot (Ballot 206 under the old ballot numbering scheme) 
was extremely complicated and took roughly two years to draft.
The changes to the Bylaws from Ballot 216 were intended to be included in the 
Governance Reform ballot, but were accidentally not included.

The attached version of the Bylaws restores the important discussion period 
changes that were approved by the members but then accidentally overwritten.

The following motion has been proposed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and 
endorsed by Wayne Thayer of Mozilla and Moudrick Dadashov of SSC.

--- MOTION BEGINS ---

This ballot replaces the "Bylaws of the CA/Browser Forum" version 1.9 with 
version 2.0 of those Bylaws, attached to this ballot.

--- MOTION ENDS ---

The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:

Discussion (7 days)

Start Time: 2018-09-14, 2:50 pm Eastern Time

End Time: 2018-09-21, 2:50 pm Eastern Time

Vote for approval (7 days)

Start Time: 2018-09-21, 2:50 pm Eastern Time

End Time: 2018-09-28, 2:50 pm Eastern Time




CABF-Bylaws-v.2.0-redline-for-ballot v3.docx
Description: CABF-Bylaws-v.2.0-redline-for-ballot v3.docx
___
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Re: [cabfpub] Validation Method 10

2018-09-27 Thread Ryan Sleevi via Public 
I would actually make a more specific request:

If you use Method 10 for anything other than exactly
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn as specified, please
speak up. If you use https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn ,
please specify what draft revision of that document you use. If you use
that method with a whitelist, please speak up.

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:54 AM Tim Hollebeek via Public <
public@cabforum.org> wrote:

>
>
> The Validation WG is going to work on tightening up method 10.  TLS ALPN
> currently uses that method, as well as the deprecated TLS SNI method.  If
> any CAs out there are using method 10 in another way, please let us know.
>
>
>
> -Tim
>
>
> ___
> Public mailing list
> Public@cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
___
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

[cabfpub] Validation Method 10

2018-09-27 Thread Tim Hollebeek via Public 
 

The Validation WG is going to work on tightening up method 10.  TLS ALPN
currently uses that method, as well as the deprecated TLS SNI method.  If
any CAs out there are using method 10 in another way, please let us know.

 

-Tim

 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Re: [cabfpub] [EXTERNAL][Servercert-wg] Ballot SC9 v4 – Establish the Validation Subcommittee of the SCWG

2018-09-27 Thread Bruce Morton via Public 
Entrust votes Yes to ballot SC9.

Bruce.

From: Servercert-wg [mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of 
Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg
Sent: September 19, 2018 11:49 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 

Subject: [EXTERNAL][Servercert-wg] Ballot SC9 v4 – Establish the Validation 
Subcommittee of the SCWG

WARNING: This email originated outside of Entrust Datacard.
DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you trust the sender and know the 
content is safe.

Here is an updated version of this ballot that will allow the Validation WG to 
continue as a Subcommittee after the October 3rd sunset for Legacy Working 
Groups that is built into our new bylaws. I have attempted to incorporate the 
feedback received on Kirk's earlier versions of the ballot into this version. 
Note that v3 of this ballot was never circulated.

I am beginning the discussion period for this ballot immediately in hopes that 
we can get this passed 2 weeks from today and avoid any temporary gap in which 
the Validation Subcommittee does not formally exist. I would appreciate it if 
you would review this ASAP and provide any feedback that might require us to 
restart the discussion period.

=
Purpose of Ballot

The Validation Working Group of the CA/Browser Forum will expire on October 3, 
2018 under the provisions of the new Bylaws adopted in Ballot 206.  The Server 
Certificate Working Group wishes to establish a Validation Subcommittee 
pursuant to the provisions of Bylaws Section 5.3.1(e). This ballot is based on 
the language in Ballot 143 which was approved by the Forum Members for formally 
establishing the legacy Validation Working Group in 2015: 
https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group

The following motion has been proposed by Wayne Thayer of Mozilla and endorsed 
by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA.

--- MOTION BEGINS ---

The Server Certificate Working Group hereby establishes the Validation 
Subcommittee as an official Subcommittee of the Server Certificate Working 
Group (SCWG).

* Mission: To improve the information validation practices encoded in the 
guidelines maintained by the SCWG.

* End Date: This Subcommittee shall continue until such time as it is dissolved 
by a ballot of the SCWG.

* Initial Chair: Tim Hollebeek shall be the initial Chair of the Validation 
Subcommittee.  The Subcommittee may change its Chair and may choose and change 
a Vice Chair from time to time by consensus of the Members participating in the 
Subcommittee.

* Scope: The scope of this Subcommittee is to address issues arising under 
adopted CA/Browser Forum guidelines and requirements related to the validation 
of certificate information and the inclusion of information in certificates.  
The Subcommittee will consider all matters relating to the validation and 
inclusion of information in certificates under adopted CA/Browser Forum 
guidelines and requirements.

* Deliverables: Ballots recommending improvements related to the matters that 
are within the scope of this Subcommittee.

Participation: Any member of the SCWG is eligible and may declare their 
participation in the Validation Subcommittee by requesting to be added to the 
mailing list.

Communication:  Subcommittee communications and documents shall be posted on 
mailing lists where the mail-archives are publicly accessible. The Subcommittee 
shall publish minutes of its meetings.

* Effect of SCWG Charter or Forum Bylaws Amendment for Subcommittees: In the 
event the SCWG Charter or the CA/Browser Forum Bylaws is amended to add general 
rules governing Chartered Working Group Subcommittees and how they operate 
(“General Rules”), the provisions of the General Rules shall take precedence 
over this charter.

--- MOTION ENDS ---

The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:

Discussion (7 days)
Start Time: 2018-09-19, 16:00 UTC
End Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days)
Start Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC
End Time: 2018-10-03, 16:00 UTC

Additional Information (not part of ballot)

* Ballot 143 – Formalization of Validation Working Group (approved Feb 2015)
https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group

The CA-Browser Forum formally establishes the Validation Working Group as an 
official working group of the CAB Forum, replacing the previous informal EV 
working group. The scope of this working group is to address issues arising 
under adopted CAB Forum standards related to the validation of certificate 
information and the inclusion of information in certificates.

Scope: The Validation Working Group will consider all matters relating to the 
validation and inclusion of information in certificates under adopted CAB Forum 
guidelines.

Deliverables: The Working Group shall produce one or more documents offering 
options to the

Re: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC9 – Establish the Validation Subcommittee of the SCWG

2018-09-27 Thread Doug Beattie via Public 
GlobalSign votes yes on Ballot SC9.

 

Doug

 

 

From: Public  On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via Public
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 2:04 AM
To: CABFPub 
Subject: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC9 – Establish the Validation 
Subcommittee of the SCWG

 

Voting has started on this ballot, and will end on October 3 at 16:00 UTC

 

From: Servercert-wg [mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of 
Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 8:49 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 
mailto:servercert...@cabforum.org> >
Subject: [EXTERNAL][Servercert-wg] Ballot SC9 v4 – Establish the Validation 
Subcommittee of the SCWG

 

Here is an updated version of this ballot that will allow the Validation WG to 
continue as a Subcommittee after the October 3rd sunset for Legacy Working 
Groups that is built into our new bylaws. I have attempted to incorporate the 
feedback received on Kirk's earlier versions of the ballot into this version. 
Note that v3 of this ballot was never circulated.

 

I am beginning the discussion period for this ballot immediately in hopes that 
we can get this passed 2 weeks from today and avoid any temporary gap in which 
the Validation Subcommittee does not formally exist. I would appreciate it if 
you would review this ASAP and provide any feedback that might require us to 
restart the discussion period.

 

=

Purpose of Ballot

The Validation Working Group of the CA/Browser Forum will expire on October 3, 
2018 under the provisions of the new Bylaws adopted in Ballot 206.  The Server 
Certificate Working Group wishes to establish a Validation Subcommittee 
pursuant to the provisions of Bylaws Section 5.3.1(e). This ballot is based on 
the language in Ballot 143 which was approved by the Forum Members for formally 
establishing the legacy Validation Working Group in 2015: 
https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group

The following motion has been proposed by Wayne Thayer of Mozilla and endorsed 
by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA.

--- MOTION BEGINS ---

The Server Certificate Working Group hereby establishes the Validation 
Subcommittee as an official Subcommittee of the Server Certificate Working 
Group (SCWG). 

* Mission: To improve the information validation practices encoded in the 
guidelines maintained by the SCWG.

* End Date: This Subcommittee shall continue until such time as it is dissolved 
by a ballot of the SCWG. 

* Initial Chair: Tim Hollebeek shall be the initial Chair of the Validation 
Subcommittee.  The Subcommittee may change its Chair and may choose and change 
a Vice Chair from time to time by consensus of the Members participating in the 
Subcommittee.

* Scope: The scope of this Subcommittee is to address issues arising under 
adopted CA/Browser Forum guidelines and requirements related to the validation 
of certificate information and the inclusion of information in certificates.  
The Subcommittee will consider all matters relating to the validation and 
inclusion of information in certificates under adopted CA/Browser Forum 
guidelines and requirements.

* Deliverables: Ballots recommending improvements related to the matters that 
are within the scope of this Subcommittee.

Participation: Any member of the SCWG is eligible and may declare their 
participation in the Validation Subcommittee by requesting to be added to the 
mailing list.

Communication:  Subcommittee communications and documents shall be posted on 
mailing lists where the mail-archives are publicly accessible. The Subcommittee 
shall publish minutes of its meetings.

* Effect of SCWG Charter or Forum Bylaws Amendment for Subcommittees: In the 
event the SCWG Charter or the CA/Browser Forum Bylaws is amended to add general 
rules governing Chartered Working Group Subcommittees and how they operate 
(“General Rules”), the provisions of the General Rules shall take precedence 
over this charter.

--- MOTION ENDS ---

The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:

Discussion (7 days)
Start Time: 2018-09-19, 16:00 UTC
End Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days)
Start Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC
End Time: 2018-10-03, 16:00 UTC



Additional Information (not part of ballot)

* Ballot 143 – Formalization of Validation Working Group (approved Feb 2015)
https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group

The CA-Browser Forum formally establishes the Validation Working Group as an 
official working group of the CAB Forum, replacing the previous informal EV 
working group. The scope of this working group is to address issues arising 
under adopted CAB Forum standards related to the validation of certificate 
information and the inclusion of information in certificates.

Scope: The Validation Working Group will consider all matters relating to the 
validation

Re: [cabfpub] Election results CA/B Forum Vice Chair

2018-09-27 Thread Don Sheehy via Public 
Thanks 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 27, 2018, at 1:16 AM, Kirk Hall via Public  wrote:
> 
> Don and Clemens, thank you for counting the ballots.
>  
> I am reposting this result to the Public list.  Congratulations, Dean!
>  
> From: Management [mailto:management-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Don 
> Sheehy
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 7:25 PM
> To: managem...@cabforum.org; Wanko, Clemens 
> Subject: [EXTERNAL][cabfman] Election results CA/B Forum Vice Chair
>  
> The polls have closed for the vice chair election. The voting results have 
> been tallied and agreed to by Clemens and myself.  Congratulations to Dean 
> Coclin! 
>  
> Don Sheehy
> ___
> Public mailing list
> Public@cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
___
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

[cabfpub] 答复: Ballot FORUM-4 v3

2018-09-27 Thread Xiu Lei via Public 
GDCA votes YES on Ballot FORUM-4 v3.

 

Thanks.

  _  

Best regards,

Xiu Lei

Security Policy Committee

Global Digital Cybersecurity Authority CO., LTD. (GDCA) 

  http://www.gdca.com.cn 

 

发件人: public-boun...@cabforum.org [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] 代
表 Tim Hollebeek via Public
发送时间: 2018年9月15日 2:50
收件人: CABFPub; servercert...@cabforum.org
主题: [cabfpub] Ballot FORUM-4 v3

 

 

As no additional typos or mistakes appear to have been found in the proposed
redline, Ballot FORUM-4 v2 is hereby withdrawn, and this new Ballot FORUM-4
v3 submitted in its place.  Apologies for not including the latest ETSI
fixes; I really wanted to include them, but I’m just worried that
discussion may not be over yet.

 

Ballot FORUM-4 v3: Fix mistakes made during passage of Governance Reform
Ballot 206

 

Purpose of Ballot

 

The Governance Reform ballot (Ballot 206 under the old ballot numbering
scheme) was extremely complicated and took roughly two years to draft. 

The changes to the Bylaws from Ballot 216 were intended to be included in
the Governance Reform ballot, but were accidentally not included.

 

The attached version of the Bylaws restores the important discussion period
changes that were approved by the members but then accidentally overwritten.

 

The following motion has been proposed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and
endorsed by Wayne Thayer of Mozilla and Moudrick Dadashov of SSC.

 

--- MOTION BEGINS ---

 

This ballot replaces the “Bylaws of the CA/Browser Forum” version 1.9 with
version 2.0 of those Bylaws, attached to this ballot.

 

--- MOTION ENDS ---

 

The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:

 

Discussion (7 days)

 

Start Time: 2018-09-14, 2:50 pm Eastern Time

 

End Time: 2018-09-21, 2:50 pm Eastern Time

 

Vote for approval (7 days)

 

Start Time: 2018-09-21, 2:50 pm Eastern Time

 

End Time: 2018-09-28, 2:50 pm Eastern Time

 

 

___
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Re: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC9 – Establish the Validation Subcommittee of the SCWG

2018-09-27 Thread 陳立群 via Public 
Chunghwa Telecom votes "Yes" to Ballot SC9

Sincerely Yours,

  Li-Chun Chen
  Chunghwa Telecom

From: Public  On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via Public
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 2:04 AM
To: CABFPub 
Subject: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC9 – Establish the Validation 
Subcommittee of the SCWG

Voting has started on this ballot, and will end on October 3 at 16:00 UTC

From: Servercert-wg [mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of 
Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 8:49 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 

Subject: [EXTERNAL][Servercert-wg] Ballot SC9 v4 – Establish the Validation 
Subcommittee of the SCWG

Here is an updated version of this ballot that will allow the Validation WG to 
continue as a Subcommittee after the October 3rd sunset for Legacy Working 
Groups that is built into our new bylaws. I have attempted to incorporate the 
feedback received on Kirk's earlier versions of the ballot into this version. 
Note that v3 of this ballot was never circulated.

I am beginning the discussion period for this ballot immediately in hopes that 
we can get this passed 2 weeks from today and avoid any temporary gap in which 
the Validation Subcommittee does not formally exist. I would appreciate it if 
you would review this ASAP and provide any feedback that might require us to 
restart the discussion period.

=
Purpose of Ballot

The Validation Working Group of the CA/Browser Forum will expire on October 3, 
2018 under the provisions of the new Bylaws adopted in Ballot 206.  The Server 
Certificate Working Group wishes to establish a Validation Subcommittee 
pursuant to the provisions of Bylaws Section 5.3.1(e). This ballot is based on 
the language in Ballot 143 which was approved by the Forum Members for formally 
establishing the legacy Validation Working Group in 2015: 
https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group

The following motion has been proposed by Wayne Thayer of Mozilla and endorsed 
by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA.

--- MOTION BEGINS ---

The Server Certificate Working Group hereby establishes the Validation 
Subcommittee as an official Subcommittee of the Server Certificate Working 
Group (SCWG). 

* Mission: To improve the information validation practices encoded in the 
guidelines maintained by the SCWG.

* End Date: This Subcommittee shall continue until such time as it is dissolved 
by a ballot of the SCWG. 

* Initial Chair: Tim Hollebeek shall be the initial Chair of the Validation 
Subcommittee.  The Subcommittee may change its Chair and may choose and change 
a Vice Chair from time to time by consensus of the Members participating in the 
Subcommittee.

* Scope: The scope of this Subcommittee is to address issues arising under 
adopted CA/Browser Forum guidelines and requirements related to the validation 
of certificate information and the inclusion of information in certificates.  
The Subcommittee will consider all matters relating to the validation and 
inclusion of information in certificates under adopted CA/Browser Forum 
guidelines and requirements.

* Deliverables: Ballots recommending improvements related to the matters that 
are within the scope of this Subcommittee.

Participation: Any member of the SCWG is eligible and may declare their 
participation in the Validation Subcommittee by requesting to be added to the 
mailing list.

Communication:  Subcommittee communications and documents shall be posted on 
mailing lists where the mail-archives are publicly accessible. The Subcommittee 
shall publish minutes of its meetings.

* Effect of SCWG Charter or Forum Bylaws Amendment for Subcommittees: In the 
event the SCWG Charter or the CA/Browser Forum Bylaws is amended to add general 
rules governing Chartered Working Group Subcommittees and how they operate 
(“General Rules”), the provisions of the General Rules shall take precedence 
over this charter.

--- MOTION ENDS ---

The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:

Discussion (7 days)
Start Time: 2018-09-19, 16:00 UTC
End Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days)
Start Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC
End Time: 2018-10-03, 16:00 UTC

Additional Information (not part of ballot)

* Ballot 143 – Formalization of Validation Working Group (approved Feb 2015)
https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group

The CA-Browser Forum formally establishes the Validation Working Group as an 
official working group of the CAB Forum, replacing the previous informal EV 
working group. The scope of this working group is to address issues arising 
under adopted CAB Forum standards related to the validation of certificate 
information and the inclusion of information in certificates.

Scope: The Validation Working Group will consider all matters relating to the

Re: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC9 – Establish the Validation Subcommittee of the SCWG

2018-09-27 Thread Robin.Lin 
TWCA votes “YES” on SC9.

Robin Lin

From: Public  On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via Public
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 2:04 AM
To: CABFPub 
Subject: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC9 – Establish the Validation 
Subcommittee of the SCWG

Voting has started on this ballot, and will end on October 3 at 16:00 UTC

From: Servercert-wg [mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of 
Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 8:49 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 
mailto:servercert...@cabforum.org>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL][Servercert-wg] Ballot SC9 v4 – Establish the Validation 
Subcommittee of the SCWG

Here is an updated version of this ballot that will allow the Validation WG to 
continue as a Subcommittee after the October 3rd sunset for Legacy Working 
Groups that is built into our new bylaws. I have attempted to incorporate the 
feedback received on Kirk's earlier versions of the ballot into this version. 
Note that v3 of this ballot was never circulated.

I am beginning the discussion period for this ballot immediately in hopes that 
we can get this passed 2 weeks from today and avoid any temporary gap in which 
the Validation Subcommittee does not formally exist. I would appreciate it if 
you would review this ASAP and provide any feedback that might require us to 
restart the discussion period.

=
Purpose of Ballot

The Validation Working Group of the CA/Browser Forum will expire on October 3, 
2018 under the provisions of the new Bylaws adopted in Ballot 206.  The Server 
Certificate Working Group wishes to establish a Validation Subcommittee 
pursuant to the provisions of Bylaws Section 5.3.1(e). This ballot is based on 
the language in Ballot 143 which was approved by the Forum Members for formally 
establishing the legacy Validation Working Group in 2015: 
https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group

The following motion has been proposed by Wayne Thayer of Mozilla and endorsed 
by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA.

--- MOTION BEGINS ---

The Server Certificate Working Group hereby establishes the Validation 
Subcommittee as an official Subcommittee of the Server Certificate Working 
Group (SCWG).

* Mission: To improve the information validation practices encoded in the 
guidelines maintained by the SCWG.

* End Date: This Subcommittee shall continue until such time as it is dissolved 
by a ballot of the SCWG.

* Initial Chair: Tim Hollebeek shall be the initial Chair of the Validation 
Subcommittee.  The Subcommittee may change its Chair and may choose and change 
a Vice Chair from time to time by consensus of the Members participating in the 
Subcommittee.

* Scope: The scope of this Subcommittee is to address issues arising under 
adopted CA/Browser Forum guidelines and requirements related to the validation 
of certificate information and the inclusion of information in certificates.  
The Subcommittee will consider all matters relating to the validation and 
inclusion of information in certificates under adopted CA/Browser Forum 
guidelines and requirements.

* Deliverables: Ballots recommending improvements related to the matters that 
are within the scope of this Subcommittee.

Participation: Any member of the SCWG is eligible and may declare their 
participation in the Validation Subcommittee by requesting to be added to the 
mailing list.

Communication:  Subcommittee communications and documents shall be posted on 
mailing lists where the mail-archives are publicly accessible. The Subcommittee 
shall publish minutes of its meetings.

* Effect of SCWG Charter or Forum Bylaws Amendment for Subcommittees: In the 
event the SCWG Charter or the CA/Browser Forum Bylaws is amended to add general 
rules governing Chartered Working Group Subcommittees and how they operate 
(“General Rules”), the provisions of the General Rules shall take precedence 
over this charter.

--- MOTION ENDS ---

The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:

Discussion (7 days)
Start Time: 2018-09-19, 16:00 UTC
End Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days)
Start Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC
End Time: 2018-10-03, 16:00 UTC

Additional Information (not part of ballot)

* Ballot 143 – Formalization of Validation Working Group (approved Feb 2015)
https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group

The CA-Browser Forum formally establishes the Validation Working Group as an 
official working group of the CAB Forum, replacing the previous informal EV 
working group. The scope of this working group is to address issues arising 
under adopted CAB Forum standards related to the validation of certificate 
information and the inclusion of information in certificates.

Scope: The Validation Working Group will consider all matters relating to the 
validation and inclusion of information in

Re: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC9 – Establish the Validation Subcommittee of the SCWG

2018-09-27 Thread Neil Dunbar via Public 
TrustCor votes YES on Ballot SC9

Regards,

Neil

> On 26 Sep 2018, at 19:03, Kirk Hall via Public  wrote:
> 
> Voting has started on this ballot, and will end on October 3 at 16:00 UTC
>  
> From: Servercert-wg [mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org 
> ] On Behalf Of Wayne Thayer via 
> Servercert-wg
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 8:49 AM
> To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 
> mailto:servercert...@cabforum.org>>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL][Servercert-wg] Ballot SC9 v4 – Establish the Validation 
> Subcommittee of the SCWG
>  
> Here is an updated version of this ballot that will allow the Validation WG 
> to continue as a Subcommittee after the October 3rd sunset for Legacy Working 
> Groups that is built into our new bylaws. I have attempted to incorporate the 
> feedback received on Kirk's earlier versions of the ballot into this version. 
> Note that v3 of this ballot was never circulated.
>  
> I am beginning the discussion period for this ballot immediately in hopes 
> that we can get this passed 2 weeks from today and avoid any temporary gap in 
> which the Validation Subcommittee does not formally exist. I would appreciate 
> it if you would review this ASAP and provide any feedback that might require 
> us to restart the discussion period.
>  
> =
> Purpose of Ballot
> 
> The Validation Working Group of the CA/Browser Forum will expire on October 
> 3, 2018 under the provisions of the new Bylaws adopted in Ballot 206.  The 
> Server Certificate Working Group wishes to establish a Validation 
> Subcommittee pursuant to the provisions of Bylaws Section 5.3.1(e). This 
> ballot is based on the language in Ballot 143 which was approved by the Forum 
> Members for formally establishing the legacy Validation Working Group in 
> 2015:https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group
>  
> 
> 
> The following motion has been proposed by Wayne Thayer of Mozilla and 
> endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA.
> 
> --- MOTION BEGINS ---
> 
> The Server Certificate Working Group hereby establishes the Validation 
> Subcommittee as an official Subcommittee of the Server Certificate Working 
> Group (SCWG). 
> 
> * Mission: To improve the information validation practices encoded in the 
> guidelines maintained by the SCWG.
> 
> * End Date: This Subcommittee shall continue until such time as it is 
> dissolved by a ballot of the SCWG. 
> 
> * Initial Chair: Tim Hollebeek shall be the initial Chair of the Validation 
> Subcommittee.  The Subcommittee may change its Chair and may choose and 
> change a Vice Chair from time to time by consensus of the Members 
> participating in the Subcommittee.
> 
> * Scope: The scope of this Subcommittee is to address issues arising under 
> adopted CA/Browser Forum guidelines and requirements related to the 
> validation of certificate information and the inclusion of information in 
> certificates.  The Subcommittee will consider all matters relating to the 
> validation and inclusion of information in certificates under adopted 
> CA/Browser Forum guidelines and requirements.
> 
> * Deliverables: Ballots recommending improvements related to the matters that 
> are within the scope of this Subcommittee.
> 
> Participation: Any member of the SCWG is eligible and may declare their 
> participation in the Validation Subcommittee by requesting to be added to the 
> mailing list.
> 
> Communication:  Subcommittee communications and documents shall be posted on 
> mailing lists where the mail-archives are publicly accessible. The 
> Subcommittee shall publish minutes of its meetings.
> 
> * Effect of SCWG Charter or Forum Bylaws Amendment for Subcommittees: In the 
> event the SCWG Charter or the CA/Browser Forum Bylaws is amended to add 
> general rules governing Chartered Working Group Subcommittees and how they 
> operate (“General Rules”), the provisions of the General Rules shall take 
> precedence over this charter.
> 
> --- MOTION ENDS ---
> 
> The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
> 
> Discussion (7 days)
> Start Time: 2018-09-19, 16:00 UTC
> End Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC
> 
> Vote for approval (7 days)
> Start Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC
> End Time: 2018-10-03, 16:00 UTC
> 
> 
> Additional Information (not part of ballot)
> 
> * Ballot 143 – Formalization of Validation Working Group (approved Feb 2015)
> https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group
>  
> 
> 
> The CA-Browser Forum formally establishes the Validation Working Group as an 
> official working group of the CAB Forum, replacing the previous informal EV 
> working group. The scope of this

[cabfpub] 回复： Voting has started on Ballot SC9 – Establish the Validation Subcommittee of the SCWG

2018-09-27 Thread 陈晓曈 via Public 
SHECA votes yes on Ballot SC9.


--
Regards，
Toria Chen


Chen Xiaotong  Dept. of Strategic Development
 Shanghai Electronic Certificate Authority Center Co.,Ltd.







-- 原始邮件 --
发件人: "CA/Browser Forum Public Discuss";
发送时间: 2018年9月27日(星期四) 凌晨2:03
收件人: "CABFPub";

主题: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC9 – Establish the Validation 
Subcommittee of the SCWG



  
Voting has started on this ballot, and will end on October 3 at 16:00 UTC
 
 
 
From: Servercert-wg [mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of 
Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg
 Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 8:49 AM
 To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 

 Subject: [EXTERNAL][Servercert-wg] Ballot SC9 v4 – Establish the Validation 
Subcommittee of the SCWG
 
 

Here is an updated version of this ballot that will allow the Validation WG to 
continue as a Subcommittee after the October 3rd sunset for Legacy Working 
Groups that is built into our new bylaws. I have attempted to incorporate the 
feedback  received on Kirk's earlier versions of the ballot into this version. 
Note that v3 of this ballot was never circulated.
 
  
 
 
  
I am beginning the discussion period for this ballot immediately in hopes that 
we can get this passed 2 weeks from today and avoid any temporary gap in which 
the Validation Subcommittee does not formally exist. I would appreciate it if  
you would review this ASAP and provide any feedback that might require us to 
restart the discussion period.
 
  
 
 
  
=
 
  
Purpose of Ballot
 
 The Validation Working Group of the CA/Browser Forum will expire on October 3, 
2018 under the provisions of the new Bylaws adopted in Ballot 206.  The Server 
Certificate Working Group wishes to establish a Validation Subcommittee 
pursuant to the provisions  of Bylaws Section 5.3.1(e). This ballot is based on 
the language in Ballot 143 which was approved by the Forum Members for formally 
establishing the legacy Validation Working Group in 2015:  
https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group
 
 The following motion has been proposed by Wayne Thayer of Mozilla and endorsed 
by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA.
 
 --- MOTION BEGINS ---
 
 The Server Certificate Working Group hereby establishes the Validation 
Subcommittee as an official Subcommittee of the Server Certificate Working 
Group (SCWG). 
 
 * Mission: To improve the information validation practices encoded in the 
guidelines maintained by the SCWG.
 
 * End Date: This Subcommittee shall continue until such time as it is 
dissolved by a ballot of the SCWG. 
 
 * Initial Chair: Tim Hollebeek shall be the initial Chair of the Validation 
Subcommittee.  The Subcommittee may change its Chair and may choose and change 
a Vice Chair from time to time by consensus of the Members participating in the 
Subcommittee.
 
 * Scope: The scope of this Subcommittee is to address issues arising under 
adopted CA/Browser Forum guidelines and requirements related to the validation 
of certificate information and the inclusion of information in certificates.  
The Subcommittee will consider  all matters relating to the validation and 
inclusion of information in certificates under adopted CA/Browser Forum 
guidelines and requirements.
 
 * Deliverables: Ballots recommending improvements related to the matters that 
are within the scope of this Subcommittee.
 
 Participation: Any member of the SCWG is eligible and may declare their 
participation in the Validation Subcommittee by requesting to be added to the 
mailing list.
 
 Communication:  Subcommittee communications and documents shall be posted on 
mailing lists where the mail-archives are publicly accessible. The Subcommittee 
shall publish minutes of its meetings.
 
 * Effect of SCWG Charter or Forum Bylaws Amendment for Subcommittees: In the 
event the SCWG Charter or the CA/Browser Forum Bylaws is amended to add general 
rules governing Chartered Working Group Subcommittees and how they operate 
(“General Rules”), the provisions  of the General Rules shall take precedence 
over this charter.
 
 --- MOTION ENDS ---
 
 The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
 
 Discussion (7 days)
 Start Time: 2018-09-19, 16:00 UTC
 End Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC
 
 Vote for approval (7 days)
 Start Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC
 End Time: 2018-10-03, 16:00 UTC
  

 
 
Additional Information (not part of ballot)
 
 * Ballot 143 – Formalization of Validation Working Group (approved Feb 2015)
 
https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group
 
 The CA-Browser Forum formally establishes the Validation Working Group as an 
official working group of the CAB Forum, replacing the previous informal EV 
working group. The scope of this working group is to address issues arising 
under

Re: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC9 – Establish the Validation Subcommittee of the SCWG

2018-09-27 Thread Hornemann, Leyla via Public 
D-TRUST votes "YES" to ballot SC9 v4.

Regards,
Leyla

Von: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] Im Auftrag von Kirk Hall via 
Public
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. September 2018 20:04
An: CABFPub 
Betreff: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC9 – Establish the Validation 
Subcommittee of the SCWG

Voting has started on this ballot, and will end on October 3 at 16:00 UTC

From: Servercert-wg [mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of 
Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 8:49 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 
mailto:servercert...@cabforum.org>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL][Servercert-wg] Ballot SC9 v4 – Establish the Validation 
Subcommittee of the SCWG

Here is an updated version of this ballot that will allow the Validation WG to 
continue as a Subcommittee after the October 3rd sunset for Legacy Working 
Groups that is built into our new bylaws. I have attempted to incorporate the 
feedback received on Kirk's earlier versions of the ballot into this version. 
Note that v3 of this ballot was never circulated.

I am beginning the discussion period for this ballot immediately in hopes that 
we can get this passed 2 weeks from today and avoid any temporary gap in which 
the Validation Subcommittee does not formally exist. I would appreciate it if 
you would review this ASAP and provide any feedback that might require us to 
restart the discussion period.

=
Purpose of Ballot

The Validation Working Group of the CA/Browser Forum will expire on October 3, 
2018 under the provisions of the new Bylaws adopted in Ballot 206.  The Server 
Certificate Working Group wishes to establish a Validation Subcommittee 
pursuant to the provisions of Bylaws Section 5.3.1(e). This ballot is based on 
the language in Ballot 143 which was approved by the Forum Members for formally 
establishing the legacy Validation Working Group in 2015: 
https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group

The following motion has been proposed by Wayne Thayer of Mozilla and endorsed 
by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA.

--- MOTION BEGINS ---

The Server Certificate Working Group hereby establishes the Validation 
Subcommittee as an official Subcommittee of the Server Certificate Working 
Group (SCWG).

* Mission: To improve the information validation practices encoded in the 
guidelines maintained by the SCWG.

* End Date: This Subcommittee shall continue until such time as it is dissolved 
by a ballot of the SCWG.

* Initial Chair: Tim Hollebeek shall be the initial Chair of the Validation 
Subcommittee.  The Subcommittee may change its Chair and may choose and change 
a Vice Chair from time to time by consensus of the Members participating in the 
Subcommittee.

* Scope: The scope of this Subcommittee is to address issues arising under 
adopted CA/Browser Forum guidelines and requirements related to the validation 
of certificate information and the inclusion of information in certificates.  
The Subcommittee will consider all matters relating to the validation and 
inclusion of information in certificates under adopted CA/Browser Forum 
guidelines and requirements.

* Deliverables: Ballots recommending improvements related to the matters that 
are within the scope of this Subcommittee.

Participation: Any member of the SCWG is eligible and may declare their 
participation in the Validation Subcommittee by requesting to be added to the 
mailing list.

Communication:  Subcommittee communications and documents shall be posted on 
mailing lists where the mail-archives are publicly accessible. The Subcommittee 
shall publish minutes of its meetings.

* Effect of SCWG Charter or Forum Bylaws Amendment for Subcommittees: In the 
event the SCWG Charter or the CA/Browser Forum Bylaws is amended to add general 
rules governing Chartered Working Group Subcommittees and how they operate 
(“General Rules”), the provisions of the General Rules shall take precedence 
over this charter.

--- MOTION ENDS ---

The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:

Discussion (7 days)
Start Time: 2018-09-19, 16:00 UTC
End Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days)
Start Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC
End Time: 2018-10-03, 16:00 UTC

Additional Information (not part of ballot)

* Ballot 143 – Formalization of Validation Working Group (approved Feb 2015)
https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group

The CA-Browser Forum formally establishes the Validation Working Group as an 
official working group of the CAB Forum, replacing the previous informal EV 
working group. The scope of this working group is to address issues arising 
under adopted CAB Forum standards related to the validation of certificate 
information and the inclusion of information in certificates.

Scope: The Validation Working Group will consider all matters relating

Re: [cabfpub] [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC9 v4 – Establish the Validation Subcommittee of the SCWG

2018-09-27 Thread InigoBarreira via Public 
360 votes YES to v4 of ballot SC9


De: Servercert-wg [servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org] en nombre de Dimitris 
Zacharopoulos via Servercert-wg [servercert...@cabforum.org]
Enviado: jueves, 27 de septiembre de 2018 9:01
Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List; 
public@cabforum.org
Asunto: Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC9 v4 – Establish the Validation 
Subcommittee of the SCWG


HARICA votes "yes" to ballot SC9 v4.


Dimitris.

On 19/9/2018 6:48 μμ, Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg wrote:
Here is an updated version of this ballot that will allow the Validation WG to 
continue as a Subcommittee after the October 3rd sunset for Legacy Working 
Groups that is built into our new bylaws. I have attempted to incorporate the 
feedback received on Kirk's earlier versions of the ballot into this version. 
Note that v3 of this ballot was never circulated.

I am beginning the discussion period for this ballot immediately in hopes that 
we can get this passed 2 weeks from today and avoid any temporary gap in which 
the Validation Subcommittee does not formally exist. I would appreciate it if 
you would review this ASAP and provide any feedback that might require us to 
restart the discussion period.

=
Purpose of Ballot

The Validation Working Group of the CA/Browser Forum will expire on October 3, 
2018 under the provisions of the new Bylaws adopted in Ballot 206.  The Server 
Certificate Working Group wishes to establish a Validation Subcommittee 
pursuant to the provisions of Bylaws Section 5.3.1(e). This ballot is based on 
the language in Ballot 143 which was approved by the Forum Members for formally 
establishing the legacy Validation Working Group in 2015: 
https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group

The following motion has been proposed by Wayne Thayer of Mozilla and endorsed 
by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA.

--- MOTION BEGINS ---

The Server Certificate Working Group hereby establishes the Validation 
Subcommittee as an official Subcommittee of the Server Certificate Working 
Group (SCWG).

* Mission: To improve the information validation practices encoded in the 
guidelines maintained by the SCWG.

* End Date: This Subcommittee shall continue until such time as it is dissolved 
by a ballot of the SCWG.

* Initial Chair: Tim Hollebeek shall be the initial Chair of the Validation 
Subcommittee.  The Subcommittee may change its Chair and may choose and change 
a Vice Chair from time to time by consensus of the Members participating in the 
Subcommittee.

* Scope: The scope of this Subcommittee is to address issues arising under 
adopted CA/Browser Forum guidelines and requirements related to the validation 
of certificate information and the inclusion of information in certificates.  
The Subcommittee will consider all matters relating to the validation and 
inclusion of information in certificates under adopted CA/Browser Forum 
guidelines and requirements.

* Deliverables: Ballots recommending improvements related to the matters that 
are within the scope of this Subcommittee.

Participation: Any member of the SCWG is eligible and may declare their 
participation in the Validation Subcommittee by requesting to be added to the 
mailing list.

Communication:  Subcommittee communications and documents shall be posted on 
mailing lists where the mail-archives are publicly accessible. The Subcommittee 
shall publish minutes of its meetings.

* Effect of SCWG Charter or Forum Bylaws Amendment for Subcommittees: In the 
event the SCWG Charter or the CA/Browser Forum Bylaws is amended to add general 
rules governing Chartered Working Group Subcommittees and how they operate 
(“General Rules”), the provisions of the General Rules shall take precedence 
over this charter.

--- MOTION ENDS ---

The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:

Discussion (7 days)
Start Time: 2018-09-19, 16:00 UTC
End Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days)
Start Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC
End Time: 2018-10-03, 16:00 UTC


Additional Information (not part of ballot)

* Ballot 143 – Formalization of Validation Working Group (approved Feb 2015)
https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group

The CA-Browser Forum formally establishes the Validation Working Group as an 
official working group of the CAB Forum, replacing the previous informal EV 
working group. The scope of this working group is to address issues arising 
under adopted CAB Forum standards related to the validation of certificate 
information and the inclusion of information in certificates.

Scope: The Validation Working Group will consider all matters relating to the 
validation and inclusion of information in certificates under adopted CAB Forum 
guidelines.

Deliverables: The Working Group shall produce one or more documents offering

Re: [cabfpub] [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC9 v4 – Establish the Validation Subcommittee of the SCWG

2018-09-27 Thread Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public 


HARICA votes "yes" to ballot SC9 v4.


Dimitris.

On 19/9/2018 6:48 μμ, Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg wrote:
Here is an updated version of this ballot that will allow the 
Validation WG to continue as a Subcommittee after the October 3rd 
sunset for Legacy Working Groups that is built into our new bylaws. I 
have attempted to incorporate the feedback received on Kirk's earlier 
versions of the ballot into this version. Note that v3 of this ballot 
was never circulated.


I am beginning the discussion period for this ballot immediately in 
hopes that we can get this passed 2 weeks from today and avoid any 
temporary gap in which the Validation Subcommittee does not formally 
exist. I would appreciate it if you would review this ASAP and provide 
any feedback that might require us to restart the discussion period.


=
Purpose of Ballot

The Validation Working Group of the CA/Browser Forum will expire on 
October 3, 2018 under the provisions of the new Bylaws adopted in 
Ballot 206.  The Server Certificate Working Group wishes to establish 
a Validation Subcommittee pursuant to the provisions of Bylaws Section 
5.3.1(e). This ballot is based on the language in Ballot 143 which was 
approved by the Forum Members for formally establishing the legacy 
Validation Working Group in 2015: 
https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group


The following motion has been proposed by Wayne Thayer of Mozilla and 
endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and Dimitris Zacharopoulos of 
HARICA.


--- MOTION BEGINS ---

The Server Certificate Working Group hereby establishes the Validation 
Subcommittee as an official Subcommittee of the Server Certificate 
Working Group (SCWG).


* Mission: To improve the information validation practices encoded in 
the guidelines maintained by the SCWG.


* End Date: This Subcommittee shall continue until such time as it is 
dissolved by a ballot of the SCWG.


* Initial Chair: Tim Hollebeek shall be the initial Chair of the 
Validation Subcommittee.  The Subcommittee may change its Chair and 
may choose and change a Vice Chair from time to time by consensus of 
the Members participating in the Subcommittee.


* Scope: The scope of this Subcommittee is to address issues arising 
under adopted CA/Browser Forum guidelines and requirements related to 
the validation of certificate information and the inclusion of 
information in certificates.  The Subcommittee will consider all 
matters relating to the validation and inclusion of information in 
certificates under adopted CA/Browser Forum guidelines and requirements.


* Deliverables: Ballots recommending improvements related to the 
matters that are within the scope of this Subcommittee.


Participation: Any member of the SCWG is eligible and may declare 
their participation in the Validation Subcommittee by requesting to be 
added to the mailing list.


Communication:  Subcommittee communications and documents shall be 
posted on mailing lists where the mail-archives are publicly 
accessible. The Subcommittee shall publish minutes of its meetings.


* Effect of SCWG Charter or Forum Bylaws Amendment for Subcommittees: 
In the event the SCWG Charter or the CA/Browser Forum Bylaws is 
amended to add general rules governing Chartered Working Group 
Subcommittees and how they operate (“General Rules”), the provisions 
of the General Rules shall take precedence over this charter.


--- MOTION ENDS ---

The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:

Discussion (7 days)
Start Time: 2018-09-19, 16:00 UTC
End Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days)
Start Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC
End Time: 2018-10-03, 16:00 UTC


Additional Information (not part of ballot)

* Ballot 143 – Formalization of Validation Working Group (approved Feb 
2015)

https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group

The CA-Browser Forum formally establishes the Validation Working Group 
as an official working group of the CAB Forum, replacing the previous 
informal EV working group. The scope of this working group is to 
address issues arising under adopted CAB Forum standards related to 
the validation of certificate information and the inclusion of 
information in certificates.


Scope: The Validation Working Group will consider all matters relating 
to the validation and inclusion of information in certificates under 
adopted CAB Forum guidelines.


Deliverables: The Working Group shall produce one or more documents 
offering options to the Forum for validation within the scope defined 
above.



* Bylaws v1.9

5.3.1 Formation of Chartered Working Groups
(e) CWGs may establish any number of subcommittees within its own 
Working Group to address any of such CWG’s business (each, a 
“Subcommittee”). A CWG-created Subcommittee needs to be approved by 
the CWG itself according to the approval process set forth in the CWG 
charter, but