Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Tim Sutton]

Hi
On Oct 29, 2014 10:37 AM, "Nathan Woodrow"  wrote:
>
> The name is QEP, which is what we are going with. Tim asked for the
mandate vote to make me the manager for the topic and that is what I have
gone with.

Yes just to back Nathan up on this, the PSC is there to provide support for
Nathan if he has difficult decisions to make, but otherwise he has our
mandate to manage the QEP
process.

Regards

Tim

>
> Nathan
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014, 5:41 PM Matthias Kuhn  wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> With the current initiative to get #1 approved by the PSC, I wondered if
>> there was ever an agreement on the name.
>>
>> The vote counts quoted below are about even, it seems that currently
>> there's a tendency in the dev community to use QEP more often than RFC
>> (probably also because of the name of the github repo) but I don't
>> remember that there was ever an official decision.
>>
>> I don't mind too much which one it is but I think it would be good to
>> have an official statement and clear guidelines what to use.
>>
>> I would therefore like to ask the PSC and Nathan to decide on this topic
>> and communicate the outcome.
>>
>> Thank you very much
>> Matthias
>>
>> On 03.09.2014 22:35, Larry Shaffer wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Current vote counts:
>> >
>> > 3 @ +0 for QEP (Alexander, Anita, Larry)
>> > 7 @ +1 for QEP (Vincent, Martin, Richard, Nyall, Werner, Salvatore,
>> > Nathan)
>> >
>> > 1 @ +0 for RFC (Matthias)
>> > 7 @ +1 for RFC (Stéphane, Luigi, Pirmin, Alessandro, Denis, Andreas,
>> > Marco)
>> >
>> > 1 @ +0 for ??? (Tim)
>> >
>> > Please let me know if your vote is not correctly listed.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Larry
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Qgis-developer mailing list
>> > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
>>
>> --
>> Help getting QGIS to the next level of quality before November 15!
>>
http://blog.vitu.ch/10102014-1046/crowdfunding-initiative-automated-testing
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Nathan Woodrow]

The name is QEP, which is what we are going with. Tim asked for the mandate
vote to make me the manager for the topic and that is what I have gone with.

Nathan

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014, 5:41 PM Matthias Kuhn  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> With the current initiative to get #1 approved by the PSC, I wondered if
> there was ever an agreement on the name.
>
> The vote counts quoted below are about even, it seems that currently
> there's a tendency in the dev community to use QEP more often than RFC
> (probably also because of the name of the github repo) but I don't
> remember that there was ever an official decision.
>
> I don't mind too much which one it is but I think it would be good to
> have an official statement and clear guidelines what to use.
>
> I would therefore like to ask the PSC and Nathan to decide on this topic
> and communicate the outcome.
>
> Thank you very much
> Matthias
>
> On 03.09.2014 22:35, Larry Shaffer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Current vote counts:
> >
> > 3 @ +0 for QEP (Alexander, Anita, Larry)
> > 7 @ +1 for QEP (Vincent, Martin, Richard, Nyall, Werner, Salvatore,
> > Nathan)
> >
> > 1 @ +0 for RFC (Matthias)
> > 7 @ +1 for RFC (Stéphane, Luigi, Pirmin, Alessandro, Denis, Andreas,
> > Marco)
> >
> > 1 @ +0 for ??? (Tim)
> >
> > Please let me know if your vote is not correctly listed.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Larry
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Qgis-developer mailing list
> > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
> --
> Help getting QGIS to the next level of quality before November 15!
> http://blog.vitu.ch/10102014-1046/crowdfunding-initiative-
> automated-testing
>
>
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Matthias Kuhn]

Hi,

With the current initiative to get #1 approved by the PSC, I wondered if
there was ever an agreement on the name.

The vote counts quoted below are about even, it seems that currently
there's a tendency in the dev community to use QEP more often than RFC
(probably also because of the name of the github repo) but I don't
remember that there was ever an official decision.

I don't mind too much which one it is but I think it would be good to
have an official statement and clear guidelines what to use.

I would therefore like to ask the PSC and Nathan to decide on this topic
and communicate the outcome.

Thank you very much
Matthias

On 03.09.2014 22:35, Larry Shaffer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Current vote counts:
>
> 3 @ +0 for QEP (Alexander, Anita, Larry)
> 7 @ +1 for QEP (Vincent, Martin, Richard, Nyall, Werner, Salvatore,
> Nathan)
>
> 1 @ +0 for RFC (Matthias)
> 7 @ +1 for RFC (Stéphane, Luigi, Pirmin, Alessandro, Denis, Andreas,
> Marco)
>
> 1 @ +0 for ??? (Tim)
>
> Please let me know if your vote is not correctly listed.
>
> Regards,
>
> Larry
>
>
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


-- 
Help getting QGIS to the next level of quality before November 15!
http://blog.vitu.ch/10102014-1046/crowdfunding-initiative-automated-testing


___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Tom Kralidis]

+1 for RFC. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 3, 2014, at 16:35, Larry Shaffer  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Current vote counts:
> 
> 3 @ +0 for QEP (Alexander, Anita, Larry)
> 7 @ +1 for QEP (Vincent, Martin, Richard, Nyall, Werner, Salvatore, Nathan)
> 
> 1 @ +0 for RFC (Matthias)
> 7 @ +1 for RFC (Stéphane, Luigi, Pirmin, Alessandro, Denis, Andreas, Marco)
> 
> 1 @ +0 for ??? (Tim)
> 
> Please let me know if your vote is not correctly listed.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Larry
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Larry Shaffer]

Hi,

Current vote counts:

3 @ +0 for QEP (Alexander, Anita, Larry)
7 @ +1 for QEP (Vincent, Martin, Richard, Nyall, Werner, Salvatore, Nathan)

1 @ +0 for RFC (Matthias)
7 @ +1 for RFC (Stéphane, Luigi, Pirmin, Alessandro, Denis, Andreas, Marco)

1 @ +0 for ??? (Tim)

Please let me know if your vote is not correctly listed.

Regards,

Larry
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Stéphane Brunner]

+1 RFC we directly know what it is :-)

CU
Stéph


2014-09-03 14:34 GMT+02:00 Luigi Pirelli :

> +1 RFC
>
> On 3 September 2014 10:45, Pirmin Kalberer  wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 2. September 2014, 07.01:41 schrieb Larry Shaffer:
> >>
> >> QEP or RFC?
> >>
> >
> > +1 for RFC
> > I assume the PSC will decide this together with process.
> >
> > Pirmin
> >
> > --
> > Pirmin Kalberer
> > Sourcepole  -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
> > http://www.sourcepole.com
> >
> > ___
> > Qgis-developer mailing list
> > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>



-- 
camptocamp.com
mapfish.org
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Luigi Pirelli]

+1 RFC

On 3 September 2014 10:45, Pirmin Kalberer  wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. September 2014, 07.01:41 schrieb Larry Shaffer:
>>
>> QEP or RFC?
>>
>
> +1 for RFC
> I assume the PSC will decide this together with process.
>
> Pirmin
>
> --
> Pirmin Kalberer
> Sourcepole  -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
> http://www.sourcepole.com
>
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Pirmin Kalberer]

Am Dienstag, 2. September 2014, 07.01:41 schrieb Larry Shaffer:
> 
> QEP or RFC?
> 

+1 for RFC
I assume the PSC will decide this together with process.

Pirmin

-- 
Pirmin Kalberer
Sourcepole  -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
http://www.sourcepole.com

___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Vincent Picavet]

Hi,
I was more in favor of RFC at the beginning, but QEP will ease search on 
search engine.

So +1 for QEP.

Vincent

Le mercredi 3 septembre 2014 03:56:48, Martin Dobias a écrit :
> +1 for QEP
> 
> Martin
> 
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Larry Shaffer  wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually),
> > specifically for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to think
> > the QGIS project is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the naming of the
> > process, since there is some disagreement.
> > 
> > QEP or RFC?
> > 
> > +0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well).
> > 
> > I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should not
> > confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in using them
> > is fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo name. QEP shows
> > a renewed configuration over the older, existing RFC process.
> > 
> > Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not be as
> > popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Larry Shaffer
> > Dakota Cartography
> > Black Hills, South Dakota
> > 
> > ___
> > Qgis-developer mailing list
> > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> 
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Richard Duivenvoorde]

On 02-09-14 21:40, Tim Sutton wrote:
> How do you pronounce QEP? 'Q-eeepeee'?

I think depending on your country of origin,
I would try 'kep' sounding like 'cap' in english :-)
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Zoltan Szecsei]

On 2014/09/02 21:40, Tim Sutton wrote:

How do you pronounce QEP? 'Q-eeepeee'?

+0 from me, I don't mind either RFC/QEP




How do you pronounce "RFC"  :-)

QEP?  "Kwep" could work.

(yes, this is a critical issue :-)  )

Regards,
Zoltan

--

===
Zoltan Szecsei PrGISc [PGP0031]
Geograph (Pty) Ltd.
GIS and Photogrammetric Services

P.O. Box 7, Muizenberg 7950, South Africa.

Mobile: +27-83-6004028
Fax:+27-86-6115323 www.geograph.co.za
===

___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Martin Dobias]

+1 for QEP

Martin


On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Larry Shaffer  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually), specifically
> for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to think the QGIS project
> is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the naming of the process, since there
> is some disagreement.
>
> QEP or RFC?
>
> +0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well).
>
> I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should not
> confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in using them is
> fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo name. QEP shows a
> renewed configuration over the older, existing RFC process.
>
> Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not be as
> popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration.
>
> Regards,
>
> Larry Shaffer
> Dakota Cartography
> Black Hills, South Dakota
>
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Tim Sutton]

Hi

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:36 , Richard Duivenvoorde 
 wrote:

On 02-09-14 15:01, Larry Shaffer wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually),
 specifically for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to 
think
 the QGIS project is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the naming 
of the

 process, since there is some disagreement.
 
 QEP or RFC?


+1 for QEP


How do you pronounce QEP? 'Q-eeepeee'?

+0 from me, I don't mind either RFC/QEP 


Regards






we also do QUGS (QGIS User Groups), and as said: PEP is for python and
JSR for java etc. As we have a pretty distinguishable starting char,
let's use it :-)
But let democracy take place

Regards,

Richard Duivenvoorde



___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Richard Duivenvoorde]

On 02-09-14 15:01, Larry Shaffer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually),
> specifically for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to think
> the QGIS project is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the naming of the
> process, since there is some disagreement.
> 
> QEP or RFC?

+1 for QEP

we also do QUGS (QGIS User Groups), and as said: PEP is for python and
JSR for java etc. As we have a pretty distinguishable starting char,
let's use it :-)
But let democracy take place

Regards,

Richard Duivenvoorde



___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Nyall Dawson]

On 02/09/2014 11:01 pm, "Larry Shaffer"  wrote:

> QEP or RFC?
>

+1 for QEP

Nyall
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Werner Macho]

I also like the idea of having our own QEP..

RFC is for Network things
PEP for Python ..

So +1 for QEP

regards
Werner

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Salvatore Larosa  wrote:
> +1 for QEP from me, I really like the idea of an unique and personal tag.
>
> All the Best,
> -SL
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Alexander Bruy  
> wrote:
>> +0 for QEP from me
>>
>> 2014-09-02 16:01 GMT+03:00 Larry Shaffer :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually), specifically
>>> for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to think the QGIS project
>>> is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the naming of the process, since there
>>> is some disagreement.
>>>
>>> QEP or RFC?
>>>
>>> +0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well).
>>>
>>> I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should not
>>> confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in using them is
>>> fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo name. QEP shows a
>>> renewed configuration over the older, existing RFC process.
>>>
>>> Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not be as
>>> popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Larry Shaffer
>>> Dakota Cartography
>>> Black Hills, South Dakota
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>>> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alexander Bruy
>> ___
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
>
> --
> Salvatore Larosa
> linkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/larosasalvatore
> twitter: @lrssvt
> skype: s.larosa
> IRC: lrssvt on freenode
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Salvatore Larosa]

+1 for QEP from me, I really like the idea of an unique and personal tag.

All the Best,
-SL

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Alexander Bruy  wrote:
> +0 for QEP from me
>
> 2014-09-02 16:01 GMT+03:00 Larry Shaffer :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually), specifically
>> for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to think the QGIS project
>> is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the naming of the process, since there
>> is some disagreement.
>>
>> QEP or RFC?
>>
>> +0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well).
>>
>> I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should not
>> confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in using them is
>> fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo name. QEP shows a
>> renewed configuration over the older, existing RFC process.
>>
>> Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not be as
>> popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Larry Shaffer
>> Dakota Cartography
>> Black Hills, South Dakota
>>
>> ___
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
>
> --
> Alexander Bruy
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



-- 
Salvatore Larosa
linkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/larosasalvatore
twitter: @lrssvt
skype: s.larosa
IRC: lrssvt on freenode
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Alexander Bruy]

+0 for QEP from me

2014-09-02 16:01 GMT+03:00 Larry Shaffer :
> Hi,
>
> I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually), specifically
> for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to think the QGIS project
> is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the naming of the process, since there
> is some disagreement.
>
> QEP or RFC?
>
> +0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well).
>
> I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should not
> confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in using them is
> fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo name. QEP shows a
> renewed configuration over the older, existing RFC process.
>
> Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not be as
> popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration.
>
> Regards,
>
> Larry Shaffer
> Dakota Cartography
> Black Hills, South Dakota
>
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



-- 
Alexander Bruy
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Anita Graser]

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Larry Shaffer  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually), specifically
> for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to think the QGIS project
> is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the naming of the process, since there
> is some disagreement.
>
> QEP or RFC?
>
> +0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well).

+0 for QEP from me as well

Best wishes,
Anita
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Alessandro Pasotti]

2014-09-02 15:55 GMT+02:00 Denis Rouzaud :
> +1 for RFC because it's a "standard" and there's already enough acronyms
> around.

Same reasons for me.

+1 for RFC

-- 
Alessandro Pasotti
w3:   www.itopen.it
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Denis Rouzaud]

+1 for RFC because it's a "standard" and there's already enough acronyms 
around.



On 02.09.2014 15:53, Nathan Woodrow wrote:


+1 to QEP

Mainly because the name is clear. I didn't know what RFC was when I 
first started so google sorted that out and it will for QEP for new 
users. If you are going to write a QEP/RFC you are already involved so 
you will know what it is, we will make it clear on the website. Its 
also nice and personal for the project like PEP is for Python.


On Sep 2, 2014 11:19 PM, "Andreas Neumann" > wrote:


Hi,

I also prefer RFC.

Andreas

Am 02.09.2014 13 :06, schrieb Marco Hugentobler:
> +1 for RFC, since universally understood.
>
> Regards,
> Marco
>
> On 02.09.2014 15 :01, Larry Shaffer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually),
>> specifically for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to
>> think the QGIS project is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the
>> naming of the process, since there is some disagreement.
>>
>> QEP or RFC?
>>
>> +0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well).
>>
>> I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should
>> not confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in
>> using them is fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo
>> name. QEP shows a renewed configuration over the older,
existing RFC
>> process.
>>
>> Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not
be as
>> popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Larry Shaffer
>> Dakota Cartography
>> Black Hills, South Dakota
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org

>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
> --
> Dr. Marco Hugentobler
> Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
> Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
> marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch
 http://www.sourcepole.ch
> Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee
>
>
>
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org

> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>

___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org 
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Nathan Woodrow]

+1 to QEP

Mainly because the name is clear. I didn't know what RFC was when I first
started so google sorted that out and it will for QEP for new users. If you
are going to write a QEP/RFC you are already involved so you will know what
it is, we will make it clear on the website. Its also nice and personal for
the project like PEP is for Python.
On Sep 2, 2014 11:19 PM, "Andreas Neumann"  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I also prefer RFC.
>
> Andreas
>
> Am 02.09.2014 13:06, schrieb Marco Hugentobler:
> > +1 for RFC, since universally understood.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Marco
> >
> > On 02.09.2014 15:01, Larry Shaffer wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually),
> >> specifically for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to
> >> think the QGIS project is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the
> >> naming of the process, since there is some disagreement.
> >>
> >> QEP or RFC?
> >>
> >> +0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well).
> >>
> >> I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should
> >> not confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in
> >> using them is fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo
> >> name. QEP shows a renewed configuration over the older, existing RFC
> >> process.
> >>
> >> Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not be as
> >> popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Larry Shaffer
> >> Dakota Cartography
> >> Black Hills, South Dakota
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Qgis-developer mailing list
> >> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dr. Marco Hugentobler
> > Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
> > Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
> > marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch
> > Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Qgis-developer mailing list
> > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >
>
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Andreas Neumann]

Hi,

I also prefer RFC.

Andreas

Am 02.09.2014 13:06, schrieb Marco Hugentobler:
> +1 for RFC, since universally understood.
> 
> Regards,
> Marco
> 
> On 02.09.2014 15:01, Larry Shaffer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually),
>> specifically for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to
>> think the QGIS project is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the
>> naming of the process, since there is some disagreement.
>>
>> QEP or RFC?
>>
>> +0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well).
>>
>> I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should
>> not confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in
>> using them is fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo
>> name. QEP shows a renewed configuration over the older, existing RFC
>> process.
>>
>> Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not be as
>> popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Larry Shaffer
>> Dakota Cartography
>> Black Hills, South Dakota
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Marco Hugentobler
> Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
> Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
> marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch
> Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> 

___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Matthias Kuhn]

+0 for RFC,
since I have not figured out the meaning of PEP for a long time while 
reading it repeatedly (because I had more important things to do than 
to look the meaning up)

Regards,
Matthias

On Die 02 Sep 2014 15:06:41 CEST, Marco Hugentobler wrote:
> +1 for RFC, since universally understood.
>
> Regards,
> Marco
>
> On 02.09.2014 15:01, Larry Shaffer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually),
>> specifically for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to
>> think the QGIS project is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the
>> naming of the process, since there is some disagreement.
>>
>> QEP or RFC?
>>
>> +0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well).
>>
>> I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should
>> not confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in
>> using them is fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo
>> name. QEP shows a renewed configuration over the older, existing RFC
>> process.
>>
>> Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not be as
>> popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Larry Shaffer
>> Dakota Cartography
>> Black Hills, South Dakota
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
> --
> Dr. Marco Hugentobler
> Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
> Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
> marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch
> Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee
>
>
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Marco Hugentobler]

+1 for RFC, since universally understood.

Regards,
Marco

On 02.09.2014 15:01, Larry Shaffer wrote:

Hi,

I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually), 
specifically for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to 
think the QGIS project is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the 
naming of the process, since there is some disagreement.


QEP or RFC?

+0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well).

I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should 
not confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in 
using them is fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo 
name. QEP shows a renewed configuration over the older, existing RFC 
process.


Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not be as 
popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration.


Regards,

Larry Shaffer
Dakota Cartography
Black Hills, South Dakota


___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



--
Dr. Marco Hugentobler
Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch
Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee

___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[Qgis-developer] QEP or RFC?

[Larry Shaffer]

Hi,

I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually), specifically
for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to think the QGIS project
is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the naming of the process, since
there is some disagreement.

QEP or RFC?

+0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well).

I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should not
confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in using them
is fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo name. QEP shows a
renewed configuration over the older, existing RFC process.

Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not be as
popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration.

Regards,

Larry Shaffer
Dakota Cartography
Black Hills, South Dakota
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer