qmail Digest 10 Mar 2001 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 1299
qmail Digest 10 Mar 2001 11:00:01 - Issue 1299 Topics (messages 58713 through 58798): sending a newsletter 58713 by: Jon 58719 by: Charles Cazabon 58728 by: Jon 58733 by: Charles Cazabon 58741 by: Jon 58746 by: Charles Cazabon 58747 by: Peter Green Traffic measurement 58714 by: Qmaillist 58757 by: Markus Stumpf Re: NAKEDWIFE.EXE Virus - Filter available 58715 by: Erwin Hoffmann 58793 by: Kari Suomela 58794 by: Kari Suomela 58795 by: Todd Finney 58796 by: Kari Suomela Re: Qmail Queue is out of control 58716 by: Frédéric Beléteau 58720 by: Charles Cazabon 58723 by: Frédéric Beléteau 58724 by: Charles Cazabon 58730 by: Frédéric Beléteau 58735 by: Charles Cazabon 58752 by: Sean C Truman Re: My qmail could not send to another host 58717 by: Charles Cazabon 58760 by: Edward J. Allen III Re: mailer-daemon: editing error messages ? 58718 by: Charles Cazabon 58740 by: José Carreiro 58745 by: Charles Cazabon Slowing down for Exchange servers 58721 by: Michael T. Babcock 58722 by: Charles Cazabon OK I give up!!! 58725 by: Kirti S. Bajwa 58727 by: Charles Cazabon 58729 by: Kurth Bemis 58731 by: Kirti S. Bajwa 58732 by: Charles Cazabon 58734 by: Peter Green 58737 by: Kirti S. Bajwa 58753 by: Adam McKenna Strange DNS problem 58726 by: Karl Monaghan Re: apop and authenticated smtp 58736 by: Kris Kelley CHECKATTATCH - qmail-inject... 58738 by: jsunday.parview.com 58749 by: Erwin Hoffmann 58750 by: Jesse Sunday Re: Recommended patches for high-volume ezmlm server 58739 by: Mate Wierdl 58743 by: Don Rose Re: qmail postfix 58742 by: Mate Wierdl 58754 by: Markus Stumpf Re: Selective relaying -Nonstandard style, tough one. Anyone got any ideas? A challenge! 58744 by: Michael T. Babcock What is so sad... Re: OK I give up!!! 58748 by: Choz Sun 58751 by: Kurth Bemis 58761 by: Sean C Truman 58772 by: Kurth Bemis 58776 by: Sean C Truman Is there anyway to have CHECKATTATCH delete the attatchment before rejecting it??? 58755 by: Jesse Sunday Q-Mail - pop3d log script 58756 by: Sean Coyle Bare linefeeds not accepted by Qmail? - Vendor agrees 58758 by: Cameron Childress 58770 by: Cameron Childress Re: Error 554 from hotmail 58759 by: Tim Hunter 58775 by: James R Grinter News server 58762 by: Peter Mitev 58764 by: Charles Cazabon 58766 by: Aaron L. Meehan traffic 58763 by: Qmaillist 58781 by: Sean Coyle 58791 by: Qmaillist Re: Yet another weird POP3 problem 58765 by: Sean Coyle logrotation 58767 by: Qmaillist 58768 by: Greg White 58769 by: Tim Hunter 58771 by: Edward J. Allen III OK - I did not GIVE up - POP3 Problem!! 58773 by: Kirti S. Bajwa Re: Connections Deferred 58774 by: James R Grinter Fastforward not using users/assign (two questions)? 58777 by: Leander Berwers 58798 by: Gerrit Pape supervised pop3d 58778 by: Todd A. Jacobs 58780 by: Tim Hunter 58782 by: Kris Kelley pop3d needs SUID root? 58779 by: Todd A. Jacobs 58783 by: Chris Johnson 58784 by: Ricardo Cerqueira 58785 by: Aaron L. Meehan 58786 by: Mark Delany 58787 by: Mark Delany 58788 by: Aaron L. Meehan Please help!!! 58789 by: Avery Brooks 58792 by: THCI Billing Department qmail-scanner handoff to qmail-queue not going well 58790 by: Chris Garrigues question with qmail-remote 58797 by: Rick Yang Administrivia: To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To bug my human owner, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To post to the list, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Hey, Background - we have been running a simple newsletter on our site for over a year now - we coded the adding/remove of people on the list ourself, as it very customised for the site. Up to now we have been sending the newsletter by using qmail-inject for every email address on the list. Now its got to a stage which is too much (50,000 email addresses on the list). I have been reading this list and some people has been talking about sending the messages stright into qmail-queue and not qmail-inject. Would this speed up everything for me - less load on the server, faster send time? Also someone else mentioned using qmail-remote to send the message, if it was sent ok move onto the next email, if not put into queue - and
Re: Recommended patches for high-volume ezmlm server
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:24:11AM -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote: On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 09:48:22PM +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote: On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 12:16:52PM -0800, Don Rose wrote: I am building a server to house several very high volume mailing lists (2-4M users each) and wanted to know which patches were recommended for use with ezmlm and ezmlm-idx, as well as qmail itself. I have read about the big-concurrency patch and that seems relevant, but I'm not sure about the others. No others are. I am theorizing: having millions of users means lots of bad addresses. So now, when ezmlm-warn sends out its gripes, it may mean a few hundred thousand separate messages in the queue. Is that a load in the queue not to worry about? Those don't get send out all at the same time. And your theory is broken - ezmlm subscriber lists are almost by definition high-quality. Greetz, Peter.
Re: Recommended patches for high-volume ezmlm server
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 08:40:53AM -0800, Don Rose wrote: Actually the lists are only announcement-type lists so users won't be posting, so the only messages that should be queued are like you said the bounce probes, and the messages the mods post to it. I was thinking of setting up 2 or 3 QMQP servers on a LocalDirector to handle the actual sending of the messages, so the original machine isn't too busy to recieve new mail. Using a LocalDirector for QMQP is overkill. If one of your QMQP servers is down, the 'clients' will use another one automatically. This just means a slight delay, and nothing to worry about. Greetz, Peter.
Re: logging
Hello, * Kari Suomela [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010308 21:28] wrote: Thursday March 08 2001 19:27, Pawel Garbowski wrote to All: # Start Qmail-smtpd env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/bin" \ tcpserver -v -p -x /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u514 -g512 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 21 /dev/null PG in this way for example: PG echo "connect from $TCPREMOTEHOST ($TCPREMOTEIP)" | PG /var/qmail/bin/splogger qmail PG exec /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd Sorry, if this is a dumb question, but *where* would I add those lines? /var/qmail/rc? Check it out ;-) Running qmail with tcpserver: /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R -x /etc/tcpserv.smtp.cdb -u 82 -g 81 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtp-wrapper where qmail-smtp-wrapper is: #!/usr/local/bin/bash echo "connect from $TCPREMOTEHOST ($TCPREMOTEIP)" | /var/qmail/bin/splogger qmail exec /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd greets, pawel -- pawel garbowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quota Exceeded and Procmail
I applied the "permanent failure" quota patch from jhayward yesterday, and realized that if the qmail-start is calling "|preline procmail" the patch doesn't come into play. Does anyone know of a way for qmail to trap the procmail "quota exceeded" error, and immediately bounce the message? I'd like to avoid having these messages age in the queue, if possible. -- Todd A. Jacobs CodeGnome Consulting, LTD
Re: OK I give up!!!
Hello Kurth On 09-Mar-01, you wrote: yeppers - you forgot to read life with qmail. :-) Thanks for everybody's help. All of you folks are very helpful. thats why were here :-) Kirti Don't just read it, print it out !!! Install it from source as per the directions. Regards...Martin -- --- A guy sees a fat lady carrying a duck. The guy says, "What are you doing with that pig?" The fat lady snorts, "That's not a pig, it's a duck." The guy says, "I'm not talking to you, I'm talking to the duck." == Jack Carter
Virtual hosts
I have a qmail system running on RH6.2. User accounts are in a mysql database.I'm using Ianpatterson's checkpassword-mysql-2.0.0pre1patch and takeshi'sqmail-1.03-mysql-0.6.6 patch. However, I have been trying to implement virtual domains by putting the domains name in the virtualhosts table( as per ians instructions) without success. Any mail sent to the virtual domain bounces with the error "Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host,it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. (#5.4.6)". Anybody got an idea where i could be going wrong? Joe
Re: What is so sad... Re: OK I give up!!!
Sean C Truman wrote: I can download Redhat for free and so can you. They sell support for the product so they can have funding to continue the development. Just as OpenBSD sells t-shirts and CD's to help fund the project. only difference is that OpenBSD hasn't started selling support yet. We actually download it before installing it on clients machines, then inform them of their options for support from us as well as from RedHat. OpenBSD may not sell support, but I know several companies that do. I hope those companies donate some of that profit back to OpenBSD either as cash or by hiring developers. -- Michael T. Babcock (PGP: 0xBE6C1895) http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/
Re: Quota Exceeded and Procmail
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 05:06:42AM -0800, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: I applied the "permanent failure" quota patch from jhayward yesterday, and realized that if the qmail-start is calling "|preline procmail" the patch doesn't come into play. Does anyone know of a way for qmail to trap the procmail "quota exceeded" error, and immediately bounce the message? I'd like to avoid having these messages age in the queue, if possible. Just a quick idea or two off the top of my head, but: 1. Modify procmail to exit status 100 on quota exceeded. 2. (Untested, but logically sound, methinks...) Use a shell conditional to exit 100 on a procmail failure -- this depends on how likely other procmail failures are, I guess -- if procmail fails for any reason, mail will bounce Here's a slick little item from the qmail archives, that I found while making sure I wasn't off base here: http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1998/04/msg00487.html HTH, -- Greg White Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. -- John F. Kennedy
Re: Virtual hosts
Hello, * Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010310 16:53] wrote: I have a qmail system running on RH6.2. User accounts are in a mysql database.I'm using Ian patterson's checkpassword-mysql-2.0.0pre1patch and takeshi's qmail-1.03-mysql-0.6.6 patch. However, I have been trying to implement virtual domains by putting the domains name in the virtualhosts table( as per ians instructions) without success. Any mail sent to the virtual domain bounces with the error "Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host, it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. (#5.4.6)". Anybody got an idea where i could be going wrong? Wrap yours lines... put all yours virtualdomains in control/locals file greets, p. -- pawel garbowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Virtual hosts
Actually, i would like to put everything in a database. Any ideas? - Original Message - From: "Pawel Garbowski" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 7:01 PM Subject: Re: Virtual hosts Hello, * Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010310 16:53] wrote: I have a qmail system running on RH6.2. User accounts are in a mysql database.I'm using Ian patterson's checkpassword-mysql-2.0.0pre1patch and takeshi's qmail-1.03-mysql-0.6.6 patch. However, I have been trying to implement virtual domains by putting the domains name in the virtualhosts table( as per ians instructions) without success. Any mail sent to the virtual domain bounces with the error "Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host, it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. (#5.4.6)". Anybody got an idea where i could be going wrong? Wrap yours lines... put all yours virtualdomains in control/locals file greets, p. -- pawel garbowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
qmail-pop3d bug
The usual mailbox vs. maildir war has flared up on inet-access, and points out a bug in qmail-pop3d. When you do a LIST command, it gives you the size of each message. Pop3d just reports the file sizes, while it's clear from the RFC that it's supposed to report the wire size of each message, i.e., the size using cr/lf as a line terminator, so the sizes it reports are too small. I gather nobody's ever reported this as a bug, and I expect that the only thing that uses the size is the "don't download bigger than size X" option for which it's close enough, but it's still wrong. I use courier-imap, and its POP daemon does get the sizes right, presumably by reading the files and adding the number of \n characters. Regards, John Levine, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://iecc.com/johnl, Sewer Commissioner Finger for PGP key, f'print = 3A 5B D0 3F D9 A0 6A A4 2D AC 1E 9E A6 36 A3 47
Which program?
I'm trying to set up some cgi scripts that send e-mail via the localhost (i.e. FormMail.pl from www.worldwidemart.com/scripts). Near the top, it has "path to e-mail program", where I put /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject. However, this doesn't seem to be working. There are two possibilities as I see them. First, it calls the program with a -t option, which I'm not familiar with. Second, I've configured qmail to work with tcpserver, so I'm not sure if I'm even sending the script to the right binary. Are either of these possibilities right? Or am I totally off-base? Thanks in advance for any help you may be able to provide. Alex Le Fevre __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Re: qmail-pop3d bug
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 01:12:13PM -0500, John R Levine wrote: The usual mailbox vs. maildir war has flared up on inet-access, and points out a bug in qmail-pop3d. When you do a LIST command, it gives you the size of each message. Pop3d just reports the file sizes, while it's clear from the RFC that it's supposed to report the wire size of each message, i.e., the size using cr/lf as a line terminator, so the sizes it reports are too small. Yes, this is known. I gather nobody's ever reported this as a bug, and I expect that the only thing that uses the size is the "don't download bigger than size X" option for which it's close enough, but it's still wrong. I use courier-imap, and its POP daemon does get the sizes right, presumably by reading the files and adding the number of \n characters. Yes. This behaviour is known. Fixing it, however, involves a *huge* performance downgrade of qmail-pop3d. I have studied the wording in RFC1939 heavily (section 11 "Message Format" specifically) and I think it is unclear. 'Usually, during the AUTHORIZATION state of the POP3 session, the POP3 server can calculate the size of each message in octets when it opens the maildrop. . simply counts each occurance of this character in a message as two octets.' The concept is obvious. The design decision made in qmail-pop3d however, is understandable, and I (as one of a few users who are aware of this 'bug') can perfectly live with it. The only other maildir MDA+pop3 implementation that I have played with is Cistron's. Their Maildir MDA counts the number of lines (it's passing the message through anyway) and adds a Lines: header. The pop3d opens each message (something qmail-pop3d doesn't have to do right now) and reads the headers to find the Lines: line. It then uses this to calculate the LF-CRLF overhead. This is not as expensive as counting the number of lines from the pop3d itself, but it does take away a lot of the performance benefit of Maildir. Greetz, Peter.
Re: Which program?
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 12:20:01PM -0800, Alex Le Fevre wrote: I'm trying to set up some cgi scripts that send e-mail via the localhost (i.e. FormMail.pl from www.worldwidemart.com/scripts). Near the top, it has "path to e-mail program", where I put /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject. However, this doesn't seem to be working. There are two possibilities as I see them. First, it calls the program with a -t option, which I'm not familiar with. Second, I've configured qmail to work with tcpserver, so I'm not sure if I'm even sending the script to the right binary. Are either of these possibilities right? Or am I totally off-base? Thanks in advance for any help you may be able to provide. /usr/sbin/sendmail and /usr/lib/sendmail should be symlinks to /var/qmail/bin/sendmail on your system. Pointing FormMail.pl to /usr/sbin/sendmail or /usr/lib/sendmail should work just fine. Greetz, Peter.
Re: qmail-pop3d bug
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 09:21:46PM +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote: [snip] 'Usually, during the AUTHORIZATION state of the POP3 session, the POP3 server can calculate the size of each message in octets when it opens the maildrop. . simply counts each occurance of this character in a message as two octets.' Note that the lack of counting those extra line-terminators means some progress bars will proceed slightly past 100% when downloading messages from qmail-pop3d. Funny, but not annoying. Greetz, Peter.
traffic again
Hello again How can I make qmail log the bytes when a user fetches his mail? Thanks in advance
RE: Recommended patches for high-volume ezmlm server
So having multiple QMQP machines as opposed to a single machine wouldn't deliver the mail faster? We've already got the LocalDirector in place doing other things and we wanted to utilize it for this if we could. For this usage, its not a matter of redundant failover, but more a matter of load balancing, so that 3 machines can deliver millions of emails faster than a single one could. Am I wrong in my thinking here? -Original Message- From: Peter van Dijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 3:53 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: Recommended patches for high-volume ezmlm server On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 08:40:53AM -0800, Don Rose wrote: Actually the lists are only announcement-type lists so users won't be posting, so the only messages that should be queued are like you said the bounce probes, and the messages the mods post to it. I was thinking of setting up 2 or 3 QMQP servers on a LocalDirector to handle the actual sending of the messages, so the original machine isn't too busy to recieve new mail. Using a LocalDirector for QMQP is overkill. If one of your QMQP servers is down, the 'clients' will use another one automatically. This just means a slight delay, and nothing to worry about. Greetz, Peter.
Re: qmail-pop3d bug
Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 01:12:13PM -0500, John R Levine wrote: The usual mailbox vs. maildir war has flared up on inet-access, and points out a bug in qmail-pop3d. When you do a LIST command, it gives you the size of each message. Pop3d just reports the file sizes, while it's clear from the RFC that it's supposed to report the wire size of each message, i.e., the size using cr/lf as a line terminator, so the sizes it reports are too small. [ ... ] Yes. This behaviour is known. Fixing it, however, involves a *huge* performance downgrade of qmail-pop3d. A solution I have considered is storing the messages in wire format. Especially for POP/IMAP-only clients, seems like it could be a medium-sized performance win, since the line-conversion is done only once, regardless of how many times the message is downloaded. If the message were kept in wire-format from SMTP through delivery, no line conversion would be required at either end, and a larger performance gain would be possible. Has anybody tried this, or anything like it? -ScottG.
[Fwd: Administrivia: Mailing List Software]
Hey guys, lets make this poor man happy and let us all tell him about how well qmail/ezmlm works! This guy is Elias Levy (aleph1) and he runs the Bugtraq mailing list. Please send an email directly to him if you want to suggest qmail/ezmlm for running a large mailing list with a secure piece of software. And he also is sick of handling bounces... -- Andre Please ignore those RedHat advisories that got approved earlier. Someone is looping the list onto itself and those slipped by. As its painfully obvious to many we have reached a point were we have outgrown LISTSERV. We are looking for alternatives. Ideally we would like to find a well written and security mailing list management software. One of the issues we are trying to address is that of diverging interest. We'd like to give people the capability to filter mailing list content to their taste. I am not agreeable to the idea of breaking up the list into smaller more focused pieces. What I'd like is to give subscribers the ability to filter messages server side or client side. In either case I should be able to tag messages as belonging to one or more topics (e.g. Advisories / Linux / RedHat or Chat / Unix) during the moderating process. One way to do this is to add a new mail header to the approved message (e.g. X-Bugtraq-Topic). Subscribers would then be able to tell the mailing list software what topics they were interested in or if the mailing list is not capable of this, at the very least they can filter messages client side via procmail or similar facilities. Open Source software is preferred as we may wish to modify it and audit it. We are tired of L-Soft not responding to our needs or actively developing LISTSERV. An emulation layer for LISTSERV command would also be nice, as well a software than understood more than a handle of bounced message formats. So do any of you have any suggestions as to a piece of software that may meet our needs? -- Elias Levy SecurityFocus.com http://www.securityfocus.com/ Si vis pacem, para bellum
Redirect email!
I have two LINUX servers. One server ns1.mydomain.com is a DNS server (djbdns). The second server ns2.mydomain.com handles email (qmail), web, etc. When I am logging onto ns1.mydomain.com, I get a message on the screen that "You have new mail", even though I have no email application installed on it. I think the message is a "system" generated message that I have "news" account missing on the server or something similar. How can I setup qmail so that any system message generated on the first server ns1.mydomain.com are automatically directed to my mail server, which is mail.mydomain.com (located on ns2.mydomain.com)? Is this question for the dns mailing list?? Kirti
Absolute path, plus a few other questions...
I am having a bit of confusion here, is the absolute path to qmail: /usr/sbin/sendmail or /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject Thank you, I am still having an issue with qmail. Qmail seems to be running, but I can't send any email from a form. If I send from PINE I am ok. There is NOTHING in the logs. Does anyone know how to redirect the qmail log from the /var/log/message file to maybe /var/log/qmail ?? I do appreciate your time. Avery Brooks
Re: Absolute path, plus a few other questions...
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject This is more correct than /usr/sbin/sendmail Thank you, I am still having an issue with qmail. Qmail seems to be running, but I can't send any email from a form. If I send from PINE I am ok. There is NOTHING in the logs. Read http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ and setup your qmail with those instructions. As to e-mailing from a form, try reading the code for the form script and working out what it is doing. Try running a few of the shell commands it calls by hand and seeing what the output of them is. -- "But what...is it good for?" - Engineer at the Advanced Computing Systems Division of IBM, 1968, commenting on the microchip
Re: [Fwd: Administrivia: Mailing List Software]
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 11:49:08PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote: Hey guys, lets make this poor man happy and let us all tell him about how well qmail/ezmlm works! This guy is Elias Levy (aleph1) and he runs the Bugtraq mailing list. Please send an email directly to him if you want to suggest qmail/ezmlm for running a large mailing list with a secure piece of software. And he also is sick of handling bounces... Whilst bounce processing is indeed a sale point for ezmlm, much of what Elias wants is above and beyond ezmlm. For example categorization and subscription by category. Sure you can (painfully) make a sublist for each category, as long as they don't invent and rename categories on the fly. Elias also talks about an emulation layer for LISTSERV. I've not heard of anyone providing that for ezmlm. This is not to under-rate ezmlm, as a base toolkit it would perform admirably, but the BUGTRAQ dood wants a lot of value-adds that are not part of ezmlm. Regards.
Re: Redirect email!
At 12:10 PM 3/10/2001, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote: put the account on the second machine in your .qmail file... did you read life with qmail yet? i don't think that you did.as you'd know because its in there :-) ~kurth I have two LINUX servers. One server ns1.mydomain.com is a DNS server (djbdns). The second server ns2.mydomain.com handles email (qmail), web, etc. When I am logging onto ns1.mydomain.com, I get a message on the screen that "You have new mail", even though I have no email application installed on it. I think the message is a "system" generated message that I have "news" account missing on the server or something similar. How can I setup qmail so that any system message generated on the first server ns1.mydomain.com are automatically directed to my mail server, which is mail.mydomain.com (located on ns2.mydomain.com)? Is this question for the dns mailing list?? Kirti
RE: How to add big-todo and big-concurrency patch ?
How can I check whether the patch was successfully installed or not ? Rgds Ronnie * qmail newbie * -Original Message- From: Todd A. Jacobs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 5:38 PM To: Thum Chee Weng, Ronnie Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: How to add big-todo and big-concurrency patch ? On Fri, 9 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's a text file, rite. But the 1st few lines looks like a readme. why ? Can i just save the file as 'big-todo.103.patch' in my qmail server and run the patch. Yes. Patch is pretty smart about that sort of thing. :) -- Todd A. Jacobs CodeGnome Consulting, LTD This email had been checked by Asiatravelmart.com's Virus Scanner. Please email any questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Redirect email!
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote: How can I setup qmail so that any system message generated on the first server ns1.mydomain.com are automatically directed to my mail server, which is mail.mydomain.com (located on ns2.mydomain.com)? Put your desired address into your .qmail file. -- Todd A. Jacobs CodeGnome Consulting, LTD
RE: How to add big-todo and big-concurrency patch ?
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I check whether the patch was successfully installed or not ? Patch will exit with no errors. -- Todd A. Jacobs CodeGnome Consulting, LTD
