Re: [qmailtoaster] Roundcube
You give up too easy. What did your logs say? On 04/17/2015 01:03 PM, Dave M wrote: Well, after installing round cube and its needed files, It has messed up Dovecot My Centos 7 install is now non functional, Good news, I do get the roundcube login screen ( sad grin ) Thankfully, I did a VM Snapshot, and am about to reverse this roundcube attempt. Dave M On 17/04/2015 11:05 AM, Sebastian Grewe wrote: It does? I had to login via IMAP credentials, are these cached in a DB? I don't remember having troubles logging in to Roundcube after changing my mail password. And for sending mails it can also use the same credentials used on Login. Sent from my iPhone On 17 Apr 2015, at 19:54, Dan McAllister q...@it4soho.com wrote: My only caveat is the same one I tell people who use QMT in general -- DO NOT use the default SQL passwords! You don't have to make them super hard, but leaving them default is just ASKING for trouble! (Yes, roundcube creates and uses a MySQL database of users - separate from the vpopmail database.) Dan McAllister IT4SOHO On 4/17/2015 2:15 PM, Dave M wrote: Thanks for the info Dan, I to am finding more ofo our users are requesting it be added. I am running a Centos 6 and 7 VM test boxes, so I will go ahead and test further. Any caveats to worry about? Cheers, Dave M On 17/04/2015 10:09 AM, Dan McAllister wrote: Dave: I offer both on my sites: roundcube at mail.domain.com squirrelmail at www.domain.com/webmail MOST of my clients prefer the roundcube... Just my experience Dan McAllister IT4SOHO On 4/17/2015 2:00 PM, Dave M wrote: Any one had the opportunity to install roundcube as apposed to squirrel mail, in qmail-toaster Centos 6 or 7 Just looking to see if its possible and worth it. Cheers Dave M - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com -- IT4SOHO, LLC 33 - 4th Street N, Suite 211 St. Petersburg, FL 33701-3806 CALL TOLL FREE: 877-IT4SOHO 877-484-7646 Phone 727-647-7646 Local 727-490-4394 Fax We have support plans for QMail! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Q7
yet another tip. Isolate your ip in iptables like so -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -s 192.168.0.1 --dport 5150 -j ACCEPT using non-standard port replacing the private ip with your public IP address. The only problem with this approach is accessing it from the road where your IP is changing. On 04/03/2015 11:41 AM, Hasan Akgöz wrote: second tip ; It does this by using simple Access List Rules which are included in the two files /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny . Firstly allow access by placing the following inside /etc/hosts.allow: /etc/hosts.allow sshd: 1.2.3.0/255.255.255.0 http://1.2.3.0/255.255.255.0( 1.2.3.0 secure network ) Then disallow all further access by placing this in /etc/hosts.deny: /etc/hosts.deny sshd: ALL third tip : Change the absolute ssh port. For example 2122 . 2015-04-03 17:01 GMT+03:00 Dan McAllister q...@it4soho.com mailto:q...@it4soho.com: On 4/2/2015 5:20 PM, Dave M wrote: This should make you smile I have just this minute finished an install of Centos7 to prepare for the qmail-toaster install. After the first update , and reboot, I logged in via ssh Up pops the security message: *There were 249 failed login attempts since the last successful login.* Thankfully the default firewall took care of them Just be careful doing installs with live external IP, and disabling the firewall until you are done Made me laugh : ) Just a tip -- Instead of leaving your SSH port open, put a connection limit on it: The following entries are from an iptables config file: -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -m limit --limit 2/minute -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -j DROP You can fail your login attempt twice per minute, then you're dropped for the remainder of the minute. In most cases, they fail the login twice in like a 10-second period, fail a few more times (with unsuccessful connections this time) and finally quit -- blissfully unaware that they could try 2 more times in 60 seconds. The point is, if you're just fat-fingering your SSH password, no worries - wait 60 seconds But if you're trying a brute-force attack, good luck -- instead of hundreds of tries per minute, you now get just 2... Needless to say, you can adjust to your own recipe... Dan McAllister IT4SOHO -- IT4SOHO, LLC 33 - 4th Street N, Suite 211 St. Petersburg, FL 33701-3806 CALL TOLL FREE: 877-IT4SOHO 877-484-7646 Phone 727-647-7646 Local 727-490-4394 Fax We have support plans for QMail! --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: smtp auth
I'm going to ask the stupid question. What are you using to edit this file? SYS wrote: Hi Eric, my results Note 1.2.3.4 replaced with real IP Error: qmailctl cdb Reloaded /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp tcprules: fatal: unable to parse this line: 1.2.3.4:allow,BADMIMETYPE="",BADLOADERTYPE="M",CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="50",CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="10",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue",NOP0FCHECK="1",REQUIRE_AUTH=0 My settings: /var/qmail/supervise/submission/runn #!/bin/sh QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail` NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail` MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming` SMTPD="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd" TCP_CDB="/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp.cdb" AUTH_CDB="/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.submission.cdb HOSTNAME=`hostname` VCHKPW="/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw" #export REQUIRE_AUTH=1 exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 1200 \ /usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l $HOSTNAME -x $TCP_CDB -c "$MAXSMTPD" \ -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 587 \ $SMTPD $VCHKPW /bin/true 21 qmailctl: ( parts ) cdb) tcprules /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp.cdb /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp.tmp /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp chmod 644 /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp* echo "Reloaded /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp" # build cdb for submission tcprules /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.submission.cdb /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.submission.tmp /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.submission chmod 644 /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.submission* echo "Reloaded /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.submission" tcp.submission ( 3 lines ) 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private",NOP0FCHECK="1" 1.2.3.4:allow,BADMIMETYPE="",BADLOADERTYPE="M",CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="50",CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="10",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue",NOP0FCHECK="1",REQUIRE_AUTH=0 :allow,BADMIMETYPE="",BADLOADERTYPE="M",CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="50",CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="10",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue",NOP0FCHECK="1",REQUIRE_AUTH=1 Please advise Dave M ___ --
Re: [qmailtoaster] question concerning chkuser
Have you tried increaaing the limit to 200? Rajesh M. wrote: hi i have a problem with one of my clients the client composes multiple emails ie over 200 separate emails in his outbox and then sends them together. each mail is addressed to one single recepient email id only. in chkuser i had set the limit to : CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT to 50 which i assumed that one single email may have upto 50 recepients however while sending these 200 emails together my client gets chkuser error that : The following recipient(s) cannot be reached: 'a...@b.com' on 14/10/2014 2:46 AM 550 5.7.1 sorry, you are violating our security policies (chkuser) i wanted to know why this error comes since each email contains one single recepient only rajesh - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com --
Re: [qmailtoaster] tls connect errors
What do your secure (TLS) logs say? On 10/13/2014 09:36 AM, Rajesh M. wrote: urgent help required please emails sentby our clients to various domains are bouncing back from all 4 servers which has identical qmail installation. if it cannot be fixed immediately then please let me know how to disable tls based outgoing emailing rajesh - Original Message - From: Rajesh M. [mailto:24x7ser...@24x7server.net] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:03:47 +0530 Subject: [qmailtoaster] tls connect errors hi eric we are getting tls connect errors 2014-10-11 17:22:42.852046500 delivery 272885: deferral: TLS_connect_failed: _error:14077410:SSL_routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3_alert_handshake_failure;_connected_to_82.148.101.101./ in our previous centos 5 32 bit installation of qmail the permissions were -rw-r--r-- 1 root qmail 493 Oct 13 01:01 rsa512.pem -rw-r--r-- 1 root qmail1689 Nov 13 2012 servercert.pem and this works correctly in the new installation 64 bit the permissions are -rw-r--r-- 1 root qmail 493 Oct 13 01:01 rsa512.pem -rw-r- 1 root vchkpw 2830 Oct 10 22:27 servercert.pem and we are getting tls errors help required please rajesh - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com --
Re: [qmailtoaster] tls connect errors : extremely urgent
What version of SSL are you running? On 10/13/2014 11:42 AM, Rajesh M. wrote: hi i also get following message deferral: TLS_connect_failed:_error:14077410:SSL_routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3_alert_handshake_failure;deferral: TLS_connect_failed:_error:14077410:SSL_routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3_alert_handshake_failure; rajesh - Original Message - From: Rajesh M. [mailto:24x7ser...@24x7server.net] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 23:06:10 +0530 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] tls connect errors i am getting errors like this 2014-10-13 22:59:11.643242500 delivery 68: deferral: TLS_connect_failed;_connected_to_94.56.16.164./ basically i am referring to email communication betwen my server to the recepient's server. my users are sending using normal smtp authenticated connection using outlook. rajesh - Original Message - From: Cecil Yother, Jr. [mailto:c...@yother.com] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:21:01 -0700 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] tls connect errors What do your secure (TLS) logs say? On 10/13/2014 09:36 AM, Rajesh M. wrote: urgent help required please emails sentby our clients to various domains are bouncing back from all 4 servers which has identical qmail installation. if it cannot be fixed immediately then please let me know how to disable tls based outgoing emailing rajesh - Original Message - From: Rajesh M. [mailto:24x7ser...@24x7server.net] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:03:47 +0530 Subject: [qmailtoaster] tls connect errors hi eric we are getting tls connect errors 2014-10-11 17:22:42.852046500 delivery 272885: deferral: TLS_connect_failed: _error:14077410:SSL_routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3_alert_handshake_failure;_connected_to_82.148.101.101./ in our previous centos 5 32 bit installation of qmail the permissions were -rw-r--r-- 1 root qmail 493 Oct 13 01:01 rsa512.pem -rw-r--r-- 1 root qmail1689 Nov 13 2012 servercert.pem and this works correctly in the new installation 64 bit the permissions are -rw-r--r-- 1 root qmail 493 Oct 13 01:01 rsa512.pem -rw-r- 1 root vchkpw 2830 Oct 10 22:27 servercert.pem and we are getting tls errors help required please rajesh - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SMTP issue
On 10/02/2014 10:19 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 02/10/2014 19:16, Tonix - Antonio Nati ha scritto: Il 02/10/2014 18:52, Eric Broch ha scritto: On 10/2/2014 10:29 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 02/10/2014 18:02, Eric Broch ha scritto: On 10/2/2014 9:10 AM, Eric Broch wrote: On 10/2/2014 8:30 AM, Bharath Chari wrote: On 10/02/2014 04:59 PM, Eric Broch wrote: On 10/2/2014 1:32 AM, Bharath Chari wrote: On 09/25/2014 06:44 PM, Bharath Chari wrote: On 09/25/2014 05:50 PM, Eric Broch wrote: H. Is it always exactly one minute from begin to end? That would appear to indicate some timer cutting out. It could be spamdyke closing the session depending on your idle-timeout-secs= value. I'm guessing 60, which is probably ok. I've upped mine to 180, and I don't recall exactly why I did that. Wouldn't hurt to bump it up I suppose. Still, the other end should have replied to your 220 message before 58 seconds elapsed. I wonder if there's a routing table misconfigured somewhere along the way. I've seen instances where an errant routing table entry can cause every nth packet to get dropped along the way. Are you seeing reliable pings over a period of a minute or so? If not, I'd suspect a network issue. At this point, I'd guess that QMT may be terminating a little soon, and there's also a network problem somewhere along the way. Again, just a guess. P.S. Nice to see such accomplished people as Tonino and Bharath helping out. Thanks guys! No, it is not always one minute, sometimes it is up to thirty seconds longer. I don't think spamdyke is closing the session as my idle-timeout-secs is set to 480, and I don't recall either why I set mine so high. While telnet(ing) to their host on port 25 initially and it is 'trying' to connect, I can open another terminal and run the same telnet command and I'll get their greeting right away. I agree, their host should have replied faster than 58 seconds after the SMTP greeting, unless the greeting is never getting to there host. There host does not have ICMP protocol turned on. I could ask them to do so. If I have spamdyke set to terminate after 480 seconds what else would be terminating the connection? And, ditto. Thanks for the help Tonino and Bharath!!! Thanks hardly required. The problem still remains :( OK, since you're having a problem even when doing a RAW telnet (the initial connection), the MTA related issue can be ruled out for now. However, it would be great if you could telnet from ANOTHER network and see if the pattern remains the same (of the initial connection being slow, and the next connection being fast). Are you doing the telnet using IP or hostname? Let's rule out DNS lookup related issues. Bharath @Eric Broch: Curious to know how this issue panned out. Did it resolve itself? Bharath - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com Bharath, And, also, it doesn't matter whether I use the hostname of the IP Address same results. I can telnet on port 25 to the problem host from [an]other location(s) and it works just fine. There you go. There's probably nothing you can do from your end - it's most likely a firewall at their end. However, as a last ditch test, can you also try to telnet to port 25 on their mail server from ANOTHER machine on the same network as the QMT machine. Wishing you the best :) Bharath - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com Thanks again, Bharath I've done that too (from ANOTHER machine on the same network) with the same results--delay or no connection at all. Eric - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com Hi Bharath, I just received an email from the problematic mx host's IT department. They've done a test with SmtpDiag from their mx host and they cannot connect to our mx host from their side either. Eric - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com Tonino, I suppose all your network comes out using the same IP, or more IP which are mapped to same domain. Yes. On our end we have a NAT(ed) firewall. We also have an MPLS circuit for certain private address ranges on the WAN interface. Check if you have reverse IP issues... Reverse DNS checks out Okay on both ends. You have the IP address which is connecting to external exchange
Re: [qmailtoaster] Fail2Ban
This is very useful. Be sure your setup works before trusting/relying on it. On 8/7/14 7:57 AM, Finn Buhelt wrote: Hi Dan. It's always a good idea to test the filters I have learned - due to differences in log entries - it is easy to check if Your filter will catch what You want. fail2ban-regex /path_to_log/logfile /path_to_filter/filter.conf Example: fail2ban-regex /var/log/maillog /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/vpopmail.conf will give You a overview of what happens when fail2ban runs the vpopmail.conf filter / Finn Den 07-08-2014 kl. 00:09 skrev Dan McAllister: I am curious -- has anyone looked into a fail2ban implementation for QMT One of my larger mail servers is being attacked (from China, currently, but when it started in Malaysia and I blocked all malaysian IPs, they just moved to another IP) with essentially a brute-force password guessing attack on users in one of the domains. They are using the SUBMISSION port to attempt logins, but I'd like to be able to ban SUBMISSION as well as IMAP/POP access (independently, or together) based on failed login attempts. (Ideally, same IP fail to login on any of those ports more than 5 times in a 5 minute period, and I'd like to simply tar-pit the entire IP address for 24 hours or so!) I'm (as amazing as it sounds) not all that familiar with fail2ban, but I've considered it several times and just never had the time to investigate. Assistance and experiences equally desired! :) Dan McAllister QMT DNS/Mirror Admin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Numerous copies of emails
Same is happening to me. On 07/17/2014 12:41 PM, Finn Buhelt wrote: Hi List (Eric). Have any of You any idea why I sometimes is getting numerous copies of some of the emails from the qmailtoaster-list ? Looking in my logfiles I don't see any specific issue other than normal entries though the from content in the CHKUSER log entry is different CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from qmailtoaster-list-return-16827-finn CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from qmailtoaster-list-return-16825-finn - it is as if the mails get submitted x times to me (can be 1 to 6 times) - today it started when I received the reply to Firewall by Me - up until then only one copy of each mail - and it is only happening when getting mails from qmailtoaster-list. Only change I can recall, I have updated clamd to the latest I'm runnig COS 6.5 and the latest and greatest QMT. Cheers, Finn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Roundcube Survey
This is the same memory I have of Horde. On 05/29/2014 02:32 PM, Angus McIntyre wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: I'm not necessarily against providing horde .qt. packages, but someone else will need to step up to help make that happen. Note, it's possible that I'll change my tune once I become more familiar with it. ;) Horde has the reputation of being horrifying to install and configure. However, my last brush with Horde was many years ago, and it may have moved on since then. Angus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] wiki
I am on v0.8.7. I'll upgrade and see if the issue goes away. I'm pretty sure I installed this through YUM so I may have to install from source. On 05/07/2014 10:03 AM, Dave M wrote: Hi philip, I am using version: fail2ban-0.8.11-2.el6.noarch And don’t see any errors ( yet ) CJ what is your version, it maybe version specific From: Philip Nix Guru Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 10:00 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] wiki Hello Are you using the sendmail-whois action ? if so check your process you probably have a hanging 100% whois process running known fail2ban bug -P On 05/07/2014 05:50 PM, Dave M wrote: Hi CJ As I have just finished the install, I will monitor it and see if it needs to be restarted at any time. Dave M From: cj yother Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 9:41 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] wiki Just thought I'd mention this. It seems appropriate. I've had to restart my Fail2Ban daily. For some reason (which I have not investigated yet) it stop banning. Has anyone else experienced this? On 05/07/2014 08:33 AM, Dave M wrote: Figured it out Check it out here: http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Fail2ban_Centos6 Dave M From: Dave M Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 9:09 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] wiki Hi all I have now setup fail2ban on our Centos6 qmailtoaster ( currently with 7 Jails qmail-iptables, squirrelmail-iptables, fail2ban, ssh-iptables, dos-hosts, password-fail, username-notfound) Can some one please remind me how I can add it to the wiki Thanks Dave M --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: qmail migration to sendmail
On 04/28/2014 09:29 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 04/28/2014 03:56 AM, Wicus Roets wrote: Hi, There are quite a few references on the net on migrating from sendmail to qmail. However, we’ve now had a query to migrate one vpopmail domain to a hostmonster shared solution. (which is running sendmail) Of course the client is using IMAP and does not want to lose any mail during the migration. Having had minimal to no exposure on sendmail (as we started with qmail back in the day), how painful would such a migration be ? Currently I’m assuming I’d only need to create the users on the hostmonster platform and then move/copy the individual maildir folder’s /cur contents to sendmail’s . However, early reading states that sendmail uses a single file for all mail whereas qmail uses individual files. Anyone been through this exercise before to possibly advise on some pointers ? I certainly haven't. (FWIW, sendmail reminds me of assembler macros!). There appears to be several imap migration utilities according to google. One was mentioned here not too long ago, but I don't recall which it was. Any of these should work regardless of the storage format, as they work using the imap protocol on both ends of the migration. While it's not as efficient as moving copying one directory to another server. If both servers are running you can open your client with both accounts and simply copy the mail from one to the other. I've done this before and it works fine. -- CJ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: heartbleed bug
FYI, This fix has only come out in the past few days. On 04/08/2014 04:54 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 04/08/2014 01:04 PM, Peter Peterse wrote: Finn Buhelt schreef op 8-4-2014 21:53: Hi list Will this affects QMT ? ( latest release uses openssl-1.01 which is hit) "New security holes are always showing up. The latest one, the so-called http://heartbleed.com/Heartbleed Bug http://heartbleed.com/ in the OpenSSL https://www.openssl.org/ cryptographic library, is an especially bad one" - taken from zdnet.com Regards, Finn Hi Finn, I've read CentOS 6 is affected and CentOS 5 not. CentOS 5.10 contains OpenSSL 0.9.8e Regards, Peter RHEL/CentOS has fixed this in openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7 The fixed package was in all of the mirrors I happened to catch. To check if your package has the fix applied, you can: $ rpm -q openssl --changelog | grep CVE-2014-0160 If you get nothing back (and you're on COS6) you should (yum) update your openssl package. --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Blocking more spam
On 02/24/2014 09:46 AM, Angus McIntyre wrote:
On Feb 22, 2014, at 12:18 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
It's not a terrible idea though. I wonder if fail2ban could be configured to
count DENIED_RDNS messages for each IP address, and if there were more than
a certain number of failed attempts in a given time period, then block the
IP address.
I'd like to hear from anyone with more familiarity with F2B than myself
about this possibility. This might be an additional F2B configuration we
could include.
For Fail2Ban to be effective, you'd want (a) repeat attempts from one IP to
be large enough that you could usefully reduce load by banning offenders, and
(b) the total number of offenders to be small enough that you don't end up
adding thousands of entries to iptables. (I'm assuming that if you add enough
entries to iptables you will eventually start seeing some kind of a
performance hit, but I don't know if that is in fact the case, or where the
cutoff point comes).
I did a quick informal study with:
grep DENIED_RDNS /var/log/qmail/smtp/current | awk '{print $9}' | sort
| uniq -c | grep -v 1 | grep -v 2
to find out how many hosts made 3 or more attempts.
In a sample based on about 90 minutes worth of mail, there were just over 100
hosts, only 8 of which made 3 or more attempts to deliver. The 'worst
offender' made 15 attempts.
In a larger sample, representing about 10 days worth of mail, 8206 hosts were
denied, with the 'worst offender' making 1325 attempts, and 528 hosts making
3 or more attempts.
In my (unscientific) sample, just under 7000 of the hosts sent a single
message each. There were 27 hosts that tried to send more than 100 messages,
and that accounted for just over 10,000 messages, about 40% of the total. Of
course, if you set 100 as the cut-off point, you can't ban them until they
deliver their 100th message, so - based on my sample - you'd reduce load by
about 25%.
That doesn't sound bad, though.
If you set the ban point at 20 messages, you'd ban about 100 hosts, and
reduce load by 47%.
Banning at 10 messages leads to banning 150 hosts, and reduces load by about
52%.
But I've been looking at 10 days of mail, which is probably unreasonable.
Fail2Ban allows you to tune the 'findtime' for a jail (i.e. the period for
which Fail2Ban will track failed attempts). The default seems to be 600
seconds (10 minutes). Would a 1-day window be appropriate for this
application?
cat `find /var/log/qmail/smtp/ -mtime -1` | grep DENIED_RDNS | awk
'{print $9}' | more | sort | uniq -c
gets me results for just 1 day.
A 1-day sample of my messages turned up 941 unique hosts, and 2672 messages.
Banning after 10 failures would have banned 43 hosts and reduced load by
about 37% (i.e. 37% of the attempted delivery connections would have been
rejected by iptables rather than spamdyke).
Incidentally, things get interesting if you look at networks rather than
individual IPs. There are definite 'clusters', and it could be that banning a
few selected class C's would have substantial payoff. (The old joke about
eliminating 95% of all spam by null-routing China, Florida and BurstNet comes
to mind). But you might not want to give a robot power to ban class C's
without supervision (Things have gotten awfully quiet around here lately
...)
I think you could write a Fail2Ban rule, and depending on where you set the
cutoff point, it would probably reduce your server load by 25-50% of the
difference between banning-by-spamdyke and banning-by-firewall. Assume that
if you keep the number of entries in iptables reasonably low, there's no cost
to an iptables ban. Assume also that having fail2ban scan the
quickly-changing smtp/current log and tracking up to n hosts (where 'n' is
the number of hosts failing for RDNS_DENIED per day) is also 'free'. Then you
can reduce load by 25-50% of however much load spamdyke is putting on your
box. And I have no idea how to calculate what that might be.
TL;DR: It looks as if this approach would offer savings, but you need to look
at usage patterns on your own servers to figure out how big those savings
might be.
Angus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Nice analysis Angus.
On my server I allow 3 attempts then you're gone for 24 hours. Since I
have e mail confirmation of bans I know it's reducing the load
considerably during peak SPAM barrages. I know in my application it has
certainly cut down on unwanted attempts to SPAM or gain access through
password guessing.
I've seen delays in administrating iptables (hand editing) when the
files are large, but no noticable difference in access speed. This is
only anecdotal and I have no hard number to back up my claim.
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Blocking more spam
Tony, Why not use the Fail2ban construct? It's all ready to go and uses regular expressions to ban. CJ On 2/22/14 10:07 PM, Tony White wrote: Okay, I have finished the create and delete scripts. Essentially the perl script monitors the current file in the smtp directory. It scans the file for both "DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE" and "DENIED_RDNS_MISSING" constructing two files one that creates iptables rules and the other is a file that deletes the same rules. As I am using the current file can someone tell me how often their current file is reset please? My timing is almost 9 hours under normal circumstances. Using the script is done via the crontab and I will be using 5 minute intervals. This will guarantee a rolling set of ip addresses that have no dns entries. I welcome suggestions/comments from other users. After final testing I will release the script to all QMT users. best wishes Tony White On 23/02/2014 05:06, cj yother wrote: Yes, you can do this and it will reduce the load on the server. When you're hit with a spam message that has no RDNS and they are sending hundreds or thousands to your server it will stop them after x attempts and ban them for x hours/days. This will reduce the load on Spamdyke and in turn your server. Like you say it might not be a lot, but it sure feels good! On 02/22/2014 09:18 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 02/22/2014 01:50 AM, Tony White wrote: Hi folks, Is this a viable option please? 90% of the SPAM I am getting lately always returns DENIED_RDNS_MISSING or DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE In all cases the email From User is the same as the Recipient but with prefix or postfix characters. Can we perhaps use this to build a script to test denied messages and maybe the username similarity then put the ip address in the iptables as a "drop"? Given that this would not improve the effectiveness at all, but would only (ever so slightly) reduce the load on the server, do you think it'd be worth the effort? Is your host suffering from a heavy load? Also, I'd be a little concerned that these spam attempts would then be more difficult to measure. They could be logged before being dropped, but then whatever mechanism that gathers spam stats would have one more thing to count. It's not a terrible idea though. I wonder if fail2ban could be configured to count DENIED_RDNS messages for each IP address, and if there were more than a certain number of failed attempts in a given time period, then block the IP address. I'd like to hear from anyone with more familiarity with F2B than myself about this possibility. This might be an additional F2B configuration we could include. -- --
Re: [qmailtoaster] of PTR smtpgreeting and spf
On 01/31/2014 02:38 PM, Jim Shupert wrote: Friends, I wish to solve 2 matters Who is your ISP? 1-- DNS does not match SMTP Banner 2-- a spf record Try one of these https://www.google.com/#q=spf+record+generatorsafe=off If you check out a couple of them, you'll begin to see how they work. There is also a page with a legend telling you what all of the entries mean. ---matter 1 I am now doing DNS for a domain at my isp ( twtelecom ) that I am doing a mailserver domain = theppsgroup.com mailserver - mailhost.theppsgroup.com 168.215.62.222 the above machine is named sifter.pps-inc.com but I have edited the /var/qmail/control/smtpgreeting to read mailhost.theppsgroup.com - Welcome Blah Blah When I run http://mxtoolbox.com/ Domain Name:= theppsgroup.com I get 7 warnings 1 is Warning - Reverse DNS does not match SMTP Banner my PTR reads ptr= 222.62.215.168.in-addr-arpa. 86400 IN PTR should my smtpgreeting to read 168.215.62.222 - Welcome Blah Blah ? why do i still get thsi warning? matter 2 indeed I have no spf and I would like to add a SPF maybe a TXT i am thinking my SPF would read theppsgroup.com. IN SPF "v=spf1 a mx -all" do you agree? I am referencing the wisdom of http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/SPF Thanks much once I get that Ironed out reckon I will try TLS jshupert --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Suddenly shows the error message
On 12/31/2013 10:46 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 12/31/2013 11:30 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: I doubt restarting will help, but it certainly not Qmailadmin. If it works from the outside you have something internally preventing it from working not the application itself. On 12/31/2013 08:27 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: It's very strange that qmailadmin works from external connections, but not internal ones. Have you tried clearing all web caches on client browsers? Have you restarted httpd on the server? -- Let's be careful, Max. Your logic seems rational, but caching can cause some very strange behavior. Anything cached could fail, while new sessions work properly. I wouldn't presume that *all* external connections work and *all* internal ones do not. We do know that *some* of them do, and it's possible that all of them do, but I'm not sure that's been established. Also, some form of caching may be happening on the server, which is why I suggested restarting httpd. I don't know the details of qmailadmin well enough though to say for sure whether this would affect anything or not, but it certainly wouldn't hurt. Well I would agree, but in this case you should ask the outside connection to clear his cache and retry. I believe I mentioned this before. Also check if the browsers are the same. It could in fact be a browser issue, although I doubt it. -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Suddenly shows the error message
Have you checked your Apache los? It sounds like a php error. Have you updated your php recently? Sent with AquaMail for Android http://www.aqua-mail.com On December 29, 2013 7:04:01 PM Chandran Manikandan tech2m...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, Please help me urgently below message from my server. When i tried to open qmailadmin below message shows and i would need to remove vacation message from qmailadmin also. Could you please help me anyone. But my website and squirrelmail are working. Internal Server Error The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request. Please contact the server administrator, postmas...@panasiagroup.net and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error. More information about this error may be available in the server error log. -- Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS) Server at admin.panasiagroup.net Port 80 -- *Thanks,* *Manikandan.C* *System Administrator*
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Common Email signature with all mails
On 11/25/2013 12:15 PM, Postmaster wrote: I guess we can debate about how useful or useless those disclaimers are. However, just my 2p on this issue: - Let define it: A disclaimer is generally any statement intended to specify or delimit the scope of rights and obligations that may be exercised and enforced by parties in a legally recognized relationship :)) - a legal opinion contains a huge disclaimer as well :) - in several countries there is certain requirement towards how communication can/cannot be conducted: 1. In Germany every bank is putting information about the Board members and names (the same as on every headed paper) 2. In the UK, the FSA regulated companies are putting their FSA registered number and other information in the footer section (the same as on headed paper) - I am a little bit surprised to learn that somebody thought that disclaimer are legally binding. I am not going to discuss the disclaimer on McDonald coffee: "Carefully, very hot!". No way. If stupidity is outlawed will only outlaws be stupid? Regards Alex On 25/11/2013 19:24, Dan McAllister wrote: On 11/25/2013 1:11 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: The problem has to do with electronic signatures. Any sort of signing that's done needs to happen after the footer is added. Having the server add a footer would break gpg that's implemented by the client. There might be a suitable way to add a footer on the server for submitted (authenticated) messages that are otherwise unsigned, before adding a DKIM signature. We can certainly look into this at some point, but it's not a priority in my view. Of course, anyone can make it their own priority and write some code to do it. This is after all a community project. P.S. I'd beg to differ that "all" enterprises implement this at the server, although many of them do. Many of them also run Exchange, which I do not recommend in most cases. ;) P.P.S. There is also some disagreement as to the effectiveness of these disclaimers. Personally, I think they're rather silly (although IANAL). I wonder if there's ever been a case in court where a disclaimer had any effect. To Eric's point: I have a number of financial advisors and insurance agencies that seem to think that these "signatures" are a requirement (e.g.: "requests to bind insurance cannot be made via email", etc.) However, recent legal opinions in several states have held that these "signatures" cannot be legally binding -- in part because they're being delivered via e-mail, which makes them every bit as unenforceable as the typed of email they're warning against. Never the less, the professional organizations still suggest that these disclaimers be present. Kind of reminds me of the warning on the back of the peanut butter jar that reads: "WARNING: This product is manufactured in a plant that may use peanuts." Really? Dan -- PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF OUR NEW ADDRESS === IT4SOHO, LLC 33 - 4th Street N, Suite 211 St. Petersburg, FL 33701-3806 CALL TOLL FREE: 877-IT4SOHO 877-484-7646 Phone 727-647-7646 Local 727-490-4394 Fax We have support plans for QMail! --
Re: [qmailtoaster] SpamAssassin Working?
Are you running Spamdyke? Sent with AquaMail for Android http://www.aqua-mail.com On November 1, 2013 8:45:19 AM Tim Whitaker wiriki...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everybody... I've been running qmail toaster on a fresh CentOS 5.9 install for about a month now and all has been well except for one thing... spam. I have googled as much as I could to try and figure out what my problem might be and I've made some changes but still some really annoying spam is coming through with file attachments and such. My problem is I can't figure out how to find any logs to tell me if SpamAssassin is actually working. I know the service is running. In there spirit of giving too much information, here's a bunch of stuff: cat /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private cat /var/qmail/control/simcontrol :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif qmailctl stat authlib: up (pid 16643) 49008 seconds clamd: up (pid 16614) 49008 seconds imap4: down 49008 seconds imap4-ssl: down 49008 seconds pop3: up (pid 16603) 49008 seconds pop3-ssl: up (pid 16665) 49008 seconds send: up (pid 16626) 49008 seconds smtp: up (pid 16635) 49008 seconds spamd: up (pid 16622) 49008 seconds submission: up (pid 16685) 49007 seconds authlib/log: up (pid 16645) 49008 seconds clamd/log: up (pid 16616) 49008 seconds imap4/log: down 49008 seconds imap4-ssl/log: down 49008 seconds pop3/log: up (pid 16605) 49008 seconds pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 16671) 49008 seconds send/log: up (pid 16610) 49008 seconds smtp/log: up (pid 16640) 49008 seconds spamd/log: up (pid 16631) 49008 seconds submission/log: up (pid 16661) 49008 seconds
Re: [qmailtoaster] cannot configure email account in Thunderbird
If you look closely at the configuration he already has the full username and password. The SSL config is likely the cause. It's been a while since I set one up and don't have a reference to look at, but change the STARTTLS setting. On 09/13/2013 04:30 AM, ChandranManikandan wrote: Hi All, Please find the attachment of my problem. I was using courier imap and it was working perfect. After migrate from courier to dovecot. I could not able to create email account in thunderbird 17.0.8 and it's showing always in this message. FYR attached screenshot. How to fix this issue. Please help me anyone. -- Thanks Best Regards, Manikandan.C - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: cannot configure email account in Thunderbird
Ah, yes I see what you're talking about. That should be the full e mail address. I have had trouble with the SSL and Authentication methods complaining often with Thunderbird and wouldn't rule if you change the username and still have problems. On 09/13/2013 02:59 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: I see username: hari What are you looking at, Max? STARTTLS is the recommended setting. Also, so long as you have STARTTLS, you can use PLAIN or LOGIN as authentication options. Encrypted Password authentication is typically cram-md5, which we're expecting to deprecate in the future. -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] winmail.dat
Try reading this. http://kb.mozillazine.org/Winmail.dat_attachments On 07/17/2013 04:14 PM, Eric Broch wrote: Hello list, I have one user using Thunderbird email client with our QMT server who when sent an email by a particular peer receives attachments as winmail.dat. The peer is using Outlook/Exchange. The reason that this is so strange is that this user is the only one who is having this problem. The peer can send email (and attachments) to anyone else (who are also using Thunderbird) in our domain and the attachments come across fine. Has anyone seen this? Any suggestions? This seems like strange behavior indeed. I have a plan of attack but was fishing for solutions from the list first. The QMT is running all the latest updates. Thanks much! Eric - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com --
Re: [qmailtoaster] UNable to send
Closing the port using your IPtables would be the quickest or at the firewall level. On 06/25/2013 12:36 PM, System Admin wrote: Emai server spamming I have over 200 thousand in the out queue Box must be compromised Any thing We can do to block outgoing . madmac On 6/25/2013 12:09 PM, System Admin wrote: Hi all, Currently our mail mail server can only receive but not send any email. What logs can I check, and what might the problem be. Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] UNable to send
Yes, port 25. That should still allow incoming traffic and outgoing on port 587 if secure connection is used, but block the spammer. On 06/25/2013 12:51 PM, System Admin wrote: Hi Cecil, I am very familiar with IP tables, but what port to close for outgoing ? Surely can close 25, ? used qmHandle -s, to see the ammount then qmHandle -D, to remove all from Q, yes did warn all users. Thanks madmac On 6/25/2013 11:41 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: Closing the port using your IPtables would be the quickest or at the firewall level. On 06/25/2013 12:36 PM, System Admin wrote: Emai server spamming I have over 200 thousand in the out queue Box must be compromised Any thing We can do to block outgoing . madmac On 6/25/2013 12:09 PM, System Admin wrote: Hi all, Currently our mail mail server can only receive but not send any email. What logs can I check, and what might the problem be. Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: DNS Cache
On 05/25/2013 02:34 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 05/25/2013 12:30 PM, Dan McAllister wrote: # QMT _/*does not*/_ provide *DNS resolution* (in fact, _*NO MTA*_ that I am aware of does this itself -- it would violate a *nix principle of separation of function) I'm going to respectfully disagree. The resolv.conf man page states: DESCRIPTION The resolver is a set of routines in the C library that provide access to the Internet Domain Name System (DNS). The resolver configuration file contains information that is read by the resolver routines the first time they are invoked by a process. The file is designed to be human readable and contains a list of keywords with values that provide various types of resolver information. On a normally configured system this file should not be necessary. The only name server to be queried will be on the local machine; the domain name is determined from the host name and the domain search path is constructed from the domain name. /quote As a test, I commented out everything in my /etc/resolv.conf file. It has caching-nameserver installed, and still resolves just fine. To be honest, I was surprised. I was under the impression that *something* (eg nameserver 127.0.0.1) was required in resolv.conf, but indeed it is not, provided that a resolver (such as caching-nameserver or pdns-recursor) is running on localhost. So it appears to me that according to the resolv.conf man page, it's normal for a host to have a resolving name server on board. That being said, what is not normal and it is strongly discouraged is to have an *authoritative* DNServer on a mail server/host. That's an entirely different matter. Capice? ;) I have been successfully running both master and slave DNS servers with my primary and secondary Email /DNS/web servers for years without issue. What are your concerns running an authoritative DNS server along with your email/webserver? -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: DNS Cache
On 05/25/2013 04:06 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 05/25/2013 03:01 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: On 05/25/2013 02:34 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 05/25/2013 12:30 PM, Dan McAllister wrote: # QMT _/*does not*/_ provide *DNS resolution* (in fact, _*NO MTA*_ that I am aware of does this itself -- it would violate a *nix principle of separation of function) I'm going to respectfully disagree. The resolv.conf man page states: DESCRIPTION The resolver is a set of routines in the C library that provide access to the Internet Domain Name System (DNS). The resolver configuration file contains information that is read by the resolver routines the first time they are invoked by a process. The file is designed to be human readable and contains a list of keywords with values that provide various types of resolver information. On a normally configured system this file should not be necessary. The only name server to be queried will be on the local machine; the domain name is determined from the host name and the domain search path is constructed from the domain name. /quote As a test, I commented out everything in my /etc/resolv.conf file. It has caching-nameserver installed, and still resolves just fine. To be honest, I was surprised. I was under the impression that *something* (eg nameserver 127.0.0.1) was required in resolv.conf, but indeed it is not, provided that a resolver (such as caching-nameserver or pdns-recursor) is running on localhost. So it appears to me that according to the resolv.conf man page, it's normal for a host to have a resolving name server on board. That being said, what is not normal and it is strongly discouraged is to have an *authoritative* DNServer on a mail server/host. That's an entirely different matter. Capice? ;) I have been successfully running both master and slave DNS servers with my primary and secondary Email /DNS/web servers for years without issue. What are your concerns running an authoritative DNS server along with your email/webserver? You're going to have a hard time convincing me you've had no issues, Max. ;) It's had its moments with configuration initially, but once setup all appears to work very well. I only started this email/web/dns config with the .iso that Jake released. It's an awesome installation script. Too bad it isn't current version of CentOS. Security and manageability are the concerns. It certainly can be done, but problems can unnecessarily arise that are avoided by keeping things separate. I admit that separation is not always possible. I don't think I've ever been hacked since I've started using CentOS. I would hope I could at least recognize that. As for manageability, my server is a micro server and only a few sites now and no clients other than myself. To be honest, I have my authoritative DNS split across 2 servers - a public resolver, and a database server. Third and fourth servers (nginx, php51) are used for maintaining DNS records. So a total of 4 servers are used for the entire thing. Do I have 4 physical servers for this? Of course not. They're all virtual. Is this overkill? Perhaps. It works quite nicely though, and scales much better. Each server has it's own relatively small job to do. KISS. 2 hard iron servers, 1 master, 1 slave. Not much simpler can be done. No plans for scaling. You probably don't want to know how many pieces I'm planning to split QMT into. Of course everything will still be able to be put on a single host, but there will be options for spreading things out, making things more secure, more manageable, and much more scalable. Stay tuned on the devel list for that (but don't hold your breath). Sadly, I've moved to Postfix. My frustration with Vpopmail left me no alternative. I wanted to run newer version of php that broke vpopmail and I couldn't get it fixed. I am now running CentOS 6.3 with Postfix / Postfixadmin / Apache. All SSH is restricted to specific IP's and non standard port. No ftp. Minimal access. Super simple, secure, reliable and updates have been a breeze, knock on wood (tapping my head). My requirements are far less than those on the list. -- CJ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: DNS Cache
On 05/24/2013 06:50 PM, Eric Shubert
wrote:
On
05/24/2013 11:26 AM, Aleksander Podsiadły wrote:
Dnia 2013-05-24, pią o godzinie 10:19
-0700, System Admin pisze:
Their Techs say we need to clear our DNS
Cache on our email server
IMHO there is no DNS cache on your email server. You should
clean your
DNS server cache:
8--
rndc flush
8-- EOT
I believe this is probably an effective answer, although there are
still some assumptions being make.
Addressing Eric B's first reply, I don't run nscd personally. I
figure that if/since there's a resolver running on the QMT host,
that would be caching entries, so nscd would be superfluous. I
could be wrong about this I suppose. If you're not running a
resolver on your QMT host, I suppose nscd might be helpful.
If you have the caching-nameserver package installed (a localhost
bind resolver) and properly configured ("nameserver 127.0.0.1" is
first line in /etc/resolv.conf), then Alexsander's reply should do
the trick.
If you have the djbdns software running as your resolver, you can
probably find the appropriate command to clear its cache by
googling a bit.
Personally, I've begun using PowerDNS (pdns-recursor package) as
my QMT localhost resolver. I'd have to look up the command for
clearing its cache.
There are several options when configuring QMT's name resolution.
Up to now I don't believe there has been a 'stock' configuration
per se. If I were to choose one though, it'd be the pdns-recursor
package.
So bottom line here is, Dave needs to identify how his QMT's name
resolution is configured in order to get the appropriate answer. A
start would be by posting the contents of /etc/resolv.conf, and if
nameserver 127.0.0.1 is the first line, then identify which (of 3
I've identified) resolver software he's using.
HTH.
Thanks to everyone for their participation.
Have you tried to resolve the server in question using dig? Is
there a chance something else is going on? I would trust your skill
with your server before I was told by somebody unfamiliar with your
system that you must clear your cache. You may have a totally
unrelated problem.
--
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: vpopmail defaultdomain
On 05/03/2013 10:11 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 05/03/2013 07:58 AM, cj yother wrote: On 05/02/2013 10:22 PM, Myers, Jon W wrote: this is probably yet another thing for the vpopmail list, but I'm not on that list yet... I've setup /home/vpopmail/etc/defaultdomain to contain my main domain name. Users can SOMETIMES login with just their username (tested from android phones, and squirrelmail). But the results (without changing any settings, usernames, or passwords) are inconsistent. Has anyone else run into this problem? I know I can get a plugin for squirrelmail (vlogin) that helps with this, but its not going to help the email app thats pre-installed on android phones. Of course this worked fine on my old vpopmail 5.0 server, but is now sporadic on the new vpopmail 5.4.33 powered qmail toaster. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail:qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com Isn't authentication handled by courier? -- Not directly. Courier (and dovecot) hand the actual authentication off to vpopmail, as does qmail-smtpd for submissions. Courier no longer supports vpopmail, which is one reason (of several) that QMT is going to be using dovecot in the future. My answer to Jon's question is, I don't know. There, I said it. I had used QMT for a couple years before I even knew there was such a thing as defaultdomain for logins. I just got used to using the whole email address, although it did feel a little goofy at first. I still haven't found a client app which tries or gets that right for the account name. :( OK, so I guess the question is does it only use FQDN or does it have some relationship with the IP? -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] todo
On 04/20/2013 12:22 PM, Eric Broch wrote: I tried the Python tool, queue-repair.py, and it did not work. Is there another one? On 4/20/2013 1:19 PM, Carlos Herrera Polo wrote: Your queue is corrupt. Try exec queue repair utility El abr 20, 2013 2:10 p.m., "Eric Broch" ebr...@whitehorsetc.com escribi: Hello list, I just backed up and restored an email server. I have a message in the send log unable to open todo/2883667 Is this harmful? Eric - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com Did it execute? You may need to change permissions. --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Renaming base FQDN
On 04/01/2013 02:17 PM, Dnk wrote: Is there a doc (looked on the wiki) detailing how to rename the base FQDN of a qmail toaster? Thanks! — Sent from Mailbox for iPhone Most of it's here link I think these cover all of them. /var/qmail/control/me type in your hostname if you still using localhost for smtp server it might get caught by SORBS, like me # vi /var/qmail/control/me mailsvr.mycompany.com /var/qmail/control/smtpgreeting type in your hostname if you still using localhost for smtp server it might get caught by SORBS, like me # vi /var/qmail/control/smtpgreeting mailsvr.mycompany.com - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server other control files /var/qmail/control/defaultdomain /var/qmail/control/defaulthost /var/qmail/control/plusdomain edit them and replace it with your domain /var/qmail/control/locals add your hostname /home/vpopmail/etc/defaultdomain default vpopmail's domain type domain name that will be the default for qmtiso if the domain name is listed here, no domain is needed for user authentication i.e. w/o /home/vpopmail/etc/defaultdomain users need to authenticate as u...@mycompany.com but with /home/vpopmail/etc/defaultdomain user only need to authenticate as user # vi /home/vpopmail/etc/defaultdomain mycompany.com --
Re: [qmailtoaster] squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.20-1.3.17.src.rpm was not found
Sorry to be slightly off topic, but what version of CentOS does it install? Is it still 5.1 and then update to 5.8? On 03/05/2013 09:40 AM, Helmut Fritz wrote: Interesting, the current version is 1.4.22-1.4.0. not sure why it would try to find 1.4.20-1.3.17. How are you trying to update? Through the update script? From: Edwin Casimero [mailto:ecasim...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 9:19 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.20-1.3.17.src.rpm was not found Hi Guys, I just bought QMT x86_64 iso and it is a great time saver. I'm updating the qmt packages and squirrelmail src.rpm is missing: "squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.20-1.3.17.src.rpm was not found" Not Found The requested URL /squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.20-1.3.17.src.rpm was not found on this server. Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request. Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS) Server at mirrorb.qmailtoaster.com Port 80 Maybe the mirror people can fix this missing file. Best wishes, Edwin --
Re: [qmailtoaster] squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.20-1.3.17.src.rpm was not found
Edwin, Thanks. I was hoping it was on the 6.x If you're not bent on using Squirrelmail, you might consider giving RoundCube a try. I have been using it for some time now and like it better than Squirelmail. Thanks, CJ On 03/05/2013 09:19 AM, Edwin Casimero wrote: Hi Guys, I just bought QMT x86_64 iso and it is a great time saver. I'm updating the qmt packages and squirrelmail src.rpm is missing: "squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.20-1.3.17.src.rpm was not found" Not Found The requested URL /squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.20-1.3.17.src.rpm was not found on this server. Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request. Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS) Server at mirrorb.qmailtoaster.com Port 80 Maybe the mirror people can fix this missing file. Best wishes, Edwin --
[qmailtoaster] re: qtp-newmodel dependency failure
Hello, I am attempting to install a toaster on CentOS 6.3 I have installed qmailtoaster plus and in attempting to run the script it gives me this error. qtp-dependencies v0.3.2 qtp-install-rpmforge v0.4.0 - getting latest version of rpmforge-release ... qtp-install-rpmforge - rpmforge-release-0.5.2-2.el6.rf.x86_64 is installed, upgrading to 0.5.2-2 qtp-install-rpmforge - your distro/ver is not supported by RPMforge, exiting. qtp-dependencies - installing automake17 compat-libf2c compat-libgcc compat-libsdc++-33 ... Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, security Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.tocici.com * extras: mirrors.sonic.net * updates: centos.mirror.facebook.net Setting up Install Process No package automake17 available. No package compat-libf2c available. No package compat-libgcc available. No package compat-libsdc++-33 available. Error: Nothing to do qtp-dependencies - installation of base dependencies failed, exiting qtp-newmodel - dependent packages processing failed, exiting Any ideas? -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] QMT-CentOS6-12010.07.sh
Sebastian, I looked at it and thought I understood how to make it work, but it didn't. I don't have the error in front of me. If my current install fails maybe I'll revisit it. It looks promising. CJ On 02/14/2013 09:21 AM, Sebastian Grewe wrote: You could try the chef solo installation I described : http://www.grewe.ca/chef-solo-qmailtoaster/ This was tested on CentOS 6.3 64 bit and might work for you too. Cheers, Sebastian On 14.02.2013, at 16:26, Dan McAllister q...@it4soho.com wrote: CJ - The script is for COS 6 only -- and I believe that there is a perl dependency error in COS 6.3 I haven't worked on this in a while, I've been swamped by clients who have updated their Windows SBS 2003 systems to SBS 2011 (a nightmare upgrade BTW) and I've had to devote many an hour learning Exchange 2010 (barf) and SharePoint (more barf) Dan On 2/13/2013 10:28 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: On 12/04/2012 03:09 PM, Dan McAllister wrote: Greetings all... I've received a few requests lately from people wanting the latest QMT-CentOS6 script... the latest of which is attached (with the file extension changed to avoid being blocked by spam/av filters). Save the file, remove the .TXT from the name and run it as a bash script (as root: "bash QMT-CentOS6-12.10.28.sh") Please provide feedback as to how well it works for you! Thanks Dan McAllister -- IT4SOHO, LLC PO Box 507 St. Petersburg, FL 33731-0507 CALL TOLL FREE: 877-IT4SOHO We have support plans for QMail! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com Dan, I am about to run your script. Can this be run to upgrade 5.8? or does it need to run on 6.0 or better? Will it run on 6.3? Thanks, CJ -- -- IT4SOHO, LLC PO Box 507 St. Petersburg, FL 33731-0507 CALL TOLL FREE: 877-IT4SOHO We have support plans for QMail! --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: qtp-newmodel dependency failure
On 02/15/2013 11:06 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 02/15/2013 11:59 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: Hello, I am attempting to install a toaster on CentOS 6.3 I have installed qmailtoaster plus and in attempting to run the script it gives me this error. qtp-dependencies v0.3.2 qtp-install-rpmforge v0.4.0 - getting latest version of rpmforge-release ... qtp-install-rpmforge - rpmforge-release-0.5.2-2.el6.rf.x86_64 is installed, upgrading to 0.5.2-2 qtp-install-rpmforge - your distro/ver is not supported by RPMforge, exiting. qtp-dependencies - installing automake17 compat-libf2c compat-libgcc compat-libsdc++-33 ... Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, security Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.tocici.com * extras: mirrors.sonic.net * updates: centos.mirror.facebook.net Setting up Install Process No package automake17 available. No package compat-libf2c available. No package compat-libgcc available. No package compat-libsdc++-33 available. Error: Nothing to do qtp-dependencies - installation of base dependencies failed, exiting qtp-newmodel - dependent packages processing failed, exiting Any ideas? I believe SteveH is looking at the qtp-install-rpmforge script when he gets a few moments to see why it's failing with repoforge (the new rpmforge). You're welcome to have a look too to see what has changed, and what the script needs to do to accommodate it. Thanks, but I wouldn't know where to start. Thanks for the update. CJ --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Unable to change bounce processing with qmailadmin
On 02/15/2013 05:39 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: I'm running qmailadmin 1.2.16 (with vpopmail 5.4.33), and when I click on an account's catchall button or otherwise attempt to change the catchall status for the domain, it simply returns a blank page without having changed anything. The url appears to be properly formatted, and I see what appears to be a normal message in the apache access log. I'm running the same version on several hosts, and they all have this problem. Anyone else experiencing this? I'm guessing that the latest upgrade broke something. The permissions of the files all look ok. I've looked at the C source code, and it appears that if there's a problem, it should be showing a message somewhere. I'm wonder if perhaps it's not getting to that point in the code. Anyone have any input on this? Thanks. Eric, I am experiencing the same problem here. On the same machine I am having trouble with vadddomain CJ -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] re: missing Perl dependencies qmailtoaster-plus
I have installed CentOS 6.3 and used the QMTCentOS6.sh script from Dan. It did fail on Perl dependencies as Dan predicted. I have installed those dependencies, Fetching with LWP: http://www.perl.org/CPAN/modules/03modlist.data.gz Going to read '/root/.cpan/sources/modules/03modlist.data.gz' DONE Going to write /root/.cpan/Metadata Mail::DomainKeys is up to date (1.0). cpan[2] install Net::Ident Net::Ident is up to date (1.23). but still get this error: Getting source packages ...(this may take a while) daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.6.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed qtp-dependencies v0.3.2 qtp-install-rpmforge v0.4.0 - getting latest version of rpmforge-release ... qtp-install-rpmforge - rpmforge-release-0.5.2-2.el6.rf.x86_64 is installed, upgrading to 0.5.2-2 qtp-install-rpmforge - your distro/ver is not supported by RPMforge, exiting. qtp-dependencies - installing perl(Mail::DomainKeys) perl(Net::Ident) ... Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, security Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirrors.loosefoot.com * extras: mirror.web-ster.com * updates: centos.sonn.com Setting up Install Process No package perl(Mail::DomainKeys) available. No package perl(Net::Ident) available. Error: Nothing to do qtp-dependencies - installation of dependent packages failed, exiting qtp-newmodel - dependent packages processing failed, exiting Any ideas on a solution?? -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] QMT-CentOS6-12010.07.sh
On 12/04/2012 03:09 PM, Dan McAllister wrote: Greetings all... I've received a few requests lately from people wanting the latest QMT-CentOS6 script... the latest of which is attached (with the file extension changed to avoid being blocked by spam/av filters). Save the file, remove the .TXT from the name and run it as a bash script (as root: *bash QMT-CentOS6-12.10.28.sh*) Please provide feedback as to how well it works for you! Thanks Dan McAllister -- IT4SOHO, LLC PO Box 507 St. Petersburg, FL 33731-0507 CALL TOLL FREE: 877-IT4SOHO We have support plans for QMail! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com Dan, I am about to run your script. Can this be run to upgrade 5.8? or does it need to run on 6.0 or better? Will it run on 6.3? Thanks, CJ --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
On 02/12/2013 07:06 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 02/11/2013 11:27 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: On 02/11/2013 07:27 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. Yes you can do what qtp-newmodel does manually, and it should be the same so long as you don't muck things up. Note that when vpopmail changes in just about any way, several other packages need to be rebuild/reinstalled as well, because there are static linkages involved. If you change something in ./configure, it will possibly not work depending on which flags you change, because the database may not be suitable for the changed flags. I used the same flags as the qtp-newmodel and it didn't work either. I am still getting segmentation faults when trying to use vadddomain. It works when compiled from source, but doesn't play nice with my toaster install, so I know it can work on this OS. Oh well. Time to visit CentOS 6 Thanks, CJ - I'd sure like to know what you've done to break this. Sometimes it's not worth the effort finding out though, and it's better to simply start from scratch again. It's certainly not and it's two identical systems that I have, neither works. Comparing repos with Sebastian was a start, but that doesn't tell the whole story. BTW, I saw some testing repos listed there. I certainly hope they weren't enabled, which could be the cause of your problem. They may have been enabled, but how do I back out of that? The interesting thing is if I compile vpopmail from source the vadddomain works, but it's just not compatible with my installation. It'd be interesting for you and Sebastian to create a (sorted) list of all packages on your systems (his works, yours doesn't) and run a diff on them. That could be revealing. -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
I dug deeper into the repos that were enabled and found that remi and rpmforge were not enabled. by enabling them I get this list of updates. Sorry it's a bit long, but do you see anything in here that might be causing the problem. My feeling has been that it's something between the database and vpopmail and it looks like many mysql updates. ideas, thoughts? Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.hmc.edu * epel: linux.mirrors.es.net * extras: mirror.stanford.edu * remi: rpms.famillecollet.com * rpmforge: mirror.hmc.edu * updates: mirrors.sonic.net remi | 2.5 kB 00:00 remi/primary_db | 475 kB 00:01 rpmforge | 1.9 kB 00:00 Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package awstats.noarch 0:7.0-2.el5.rf set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: perl(Geo::IP) for package: awstats -- Processing Dependency: libcurl.so.3 for package: gnupg --- Package curl.i386 0:7.21.7-5.el5.remi.2 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: libcurl = 7.21.7-5.el5.remi.2 for package: curl -- Processing Dependency: libcurl.so.4 for package: curl --- Package htop.i386 0:1.0.2-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package libcurl-devel.i386 0:7.21.7-5.el5.remi.2 set to be updated epel/filelists_db | 4.8 MB 00:02 remi/filelists_db | 913 kB 00:01 rpmforge/filelists_db | 6.1 MB 00:02 updates/filelists_db | 528 kB 00:00 --- Package monitorix.noarch 0:2.5.2-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package multitail.i386 0:5.2.9-1.el5.rf set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.16 for package: courier-authlib-toaster -- Processing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.16 for package: qmail-toaster -- Processing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.16 for package: ezmlm-toaster -- Processing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.16 for package: qmailadmin-toaster -- Processing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.16 for package: vpopmail-toaster -- Processing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.16 for package: vqadmin-toaster -- Processing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlclient_16) for package: courier-authlib-toaster -- Processing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlclient_16) for package: vqadmin-toaster -- Processing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlclient_16) for package: qmailadmin-toaster -- Processing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlclient_16) for package: qmail-toaster -- Processing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlclient_16) for package: vpopmail-toaster --- Package mysql.i386 0:5.5.30-1.el5.remi set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: mysql-libs = 5.5.30-1.el5.remi for package: mysql --- Package mysql-bench.i386 0:5.5.30-1.el5.remi set to be updated --- Package mysql-devel.i386 0:5.5.30-1.el5.remi set to be updated --- Package mysql-server.i386 0:5.5.30-1.el5.remi set to be updated --- Package nss_ldap.i386 0:253-51.el5_9.1 set to be updated --- Package perl-Cache-Memcached.noarch 0:1.29-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-Class-Singleton.noarch 0:1.4-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.i386 0:2.052-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-Crypt-DES.i386 0:2.05-3.2.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA.i386 0:0.28-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-Date-Manip.noarch 0:5.56-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-Digest-SHA.i386 0:5.71-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-File-Copy-Recursive.noarch 0:0.38-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-Geography-Countries.noarch 0:2009041301-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-IO-Compress-Base.noarch 0:2.015-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-IO-Compress-Zlib.noarch 0:2.015-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-IO-Multiplex.noarch 0:1.13-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-Log-Dispatch.noarch 0:2.26-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate.noarch 0:1.19-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-Log-Log4perl.noarch 0:1.26-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-MIME-Lite.noarch 0:3.028-1.el5.rf set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: perl(Email::Date::Format) = 1.000 for package: perl-MIME-Lite --- Package perl-Mail-Sender.noarch 0:0.8.16-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-MailTools.noarch 0:2.09-1.el5.rf set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: perl(Test::Pod) = 1 for package: perl-MailTools --- Package perl-Net-SNMP.noarch 0:5.2.0-1.2.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-Net-Server.noarch 0:0.99-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-Params-Validate.i386 0:0.95-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-XML-DOM.noarch 0:1.44-2.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package perl-rrdtool.i386 0:1.4.7-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package php.i386 0:5.4.11-1.el5.remi set to be updated --- Package php-cli.i386 0:5.4.11-1.el5.remi set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: libedit.so.0 for package: php-cli --- Package php-common.i386 0:5.4.11-1.el5.remi set to be
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
On 02/12/2013 10:14 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 02/12/2013 10:17 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: I dug deeper into the repos that were enabled and found that remi and rpmforge were not enabled. by enabling them I get this list of updates. Sorry it's a bit long, but do you see anything in here that might be causing the problem. My feeling has been that it's something between the database and vpopmail and it looks like many mysql updates. ideas, thoughts? I'd be a little more concerned with what's already installed first. Do a diff against Sebastian's list and see what that reveals. I think mysql differences are a good start. Could be something else though. Once we've had a look at the diffs, updating certain packages might be the answer. BTW, enabling the disabled repos and updating did not do it. --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
On 02/12/2013 11:10 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 02/12/2013 11:21 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: On 02/12/2013 10:14 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 02/12/2013 10:17 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: I dug deeper into the repos that were enabled and found that remi and rpmforge were not enabled. by enabling them I get this list of updates. Sorry it's a bit long, but do you see anything in here that might be causing the problem. My feeling has been that it's something between the database and vpopmail and it looks like many mysql updates. ideas, thoughts? I'd be a little more concerned with what's already installed first. Do a diff against Sebastian's list and see what that reveals. I think mysql differences are a good start. Could be something else though. Once we've had a look at the diffs, updating certain packages might be the answer. There is a whole list of differences. 2 of my repos weren't enabled. I enabled those and updated to no avail. At this point it's too much of a waste of time to continue. Thanks for all your help. I attached the two text files of the differences. If you find something glaring let me know, but I need to move on. Thanks -- - Things I notice: .) your apr/httpd is not stock (jason), but I doubt that's the problem .) you have compat- modules that Sebastian doesn't. I'd get rid of them. Haven't tried this yet. .) you don't have compat-mysql51 (from remi), which Sebastian does. .) you're running mysql 5.1 (jason), and Sebastian's running mysql 5.5 (remi). I updated and am now running the above mentioned packages. I ran qtp-newmodel and Perhaps you need a compat-mysql51 package of some sort. I don't know off hand what that package provides. Any reason in particular you're running mysql 5.1? Did one of the COS5.x upgrades update it? (I'm still running COS5.7) repo wasn't enabled, now is. After upgrading packages, you'dq need to rebuild/reinstall vpomail et al. rebuilt vpopmail. Still same issue. -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
On 02/12/2013 12:07 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 02/12/2013 12:18 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: On 02/12/2013 11:10 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 02/12/2013 11:21 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: On 02/12/2013 10:14 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 02/12/2013 10:17 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: I dug deeper into the repos that were enabled and found that remi and rpmforge were not enabled. by enabling them I get this list of updates. Sorry it's a bit long, but do you see anything in here that might be causing the problem. My feeling has been that it's something between the database and vpopmail and it looks like many mysql updates. ideas, thoughts? I'd be a little more concerned with what's already installed first. Do a diff against Sebastian's list and see what that reveals. I think mysql differences are a good start. Could be something else though. Once we've had a look at the diffs, updating certain packages might be the answer. There is a whole list of differences. 2 of my repos weren't enabled. I enabled those and updated to no avail. At this point it's too much of a waste of time to continue. Thanks for all your help. I attached the two text files of the differences. If you find something glaring let me know, but I need to move on. Thanks -- - Things I notice: .) your apr/httpd is not stock (jason), but I doubt that's the problem .) you have compat- modules that Sebastian doesn't. I'd get rid of them. Haven't tried this yet. .) you don't have compat-mysql51 (from remi), which Sebastian does. .) you're running mysql 5.1 (jason), and Sebastian's running mysql 5.5 (remi). I updated and am now running the above mentioned packages. I ran qtp-newmodel and Perhaps you need a compat-mysql51 package of some sort. I don't know off hand what that package provides. Any reason in particular you're running mysql 5.1? Did one of the COS5.x upgrades update it? (I'm still running COS5.7) repo wasn't enabled, now is. After upgrading packages, you'dq need to rebuild/reinstall vpomail et al. rebuilt vpopmail. Still same issue. I dunno, Max. I think it's probably time to start from scratch. FWIW, this is one of the dangers you get in to by enabling too many repos. I generally try to keep things as "stock COS" as possible. Repoforge (formerly rpmforge) is the only foreign repo I use on my QMTs. I've found this to be very reliable. I don't mean to suggest that other repos are not good, only that they should be used cautiously and only where necessary. That's for sure. It's not a big deal. I need to clean house anyways. I am passing on my customers to another host and once they're migrated I'd like to try the COS6 install. I had several repos trying different features, like Zarafa. --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
On 02/11/2013 07:27 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. Yes you can do what qtp-newmodel does manually, and it should be the same so long as you don't muck things up. Note that when vpopmail changes in just about any way, several other packages need to be rebuild/reinstalled as well, because there are static linkages involved. If you change something in ./configure, it will possibly not work depending on which flags you change, because the database may not be suitable for the changed flags. I used the same flags as the qtp-newmodel and it didn't work either. I am still getting segmentation faults when trying to use vadddomain. It works when compiled from source, but doesn't play nice with my toaster install, so I know it can work on this OS. Oh well. Time to visit CentOS 6 Thanks, CJ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Opscode Chef Qmailtoaster : Chef Solo
On 02/10/2013 12:15 PM, Sebastian Grewe wrote: Hey List, I have announced it a while back that I have been working on a Cookbook for Opscode Chef to simplify the installation of Qmailtoaster. As it was mainly desgined to work for me and Hosted Chef, I noticed that it might not be as widely accepted as it could be. So I went ahead and wrote a little documentation on how to install Qmailtoaster using my Cookbook (and dependencies) using Chef Solo. This will allow you to install everything without the need of a Chef Server or Hosted Chef account with a single command. Documentation: http://www.grewe.ca/chef-solo-qmailtoaster/ Github Repo: https://github.com/TheSerapher/chef-qmailtoaster Feel free to try it out on any CentOS 6.3 Virtual Machine (I used VirtualBox during my tests). I am also actively developing this cookbook so I am open for suggestions and bug reports on the Github repository! Feedback welcome :-) Cheers, Sebastian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com Will this work on hard iron or only VM? --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
OK, I tried (somewhat foolishly) to re compile vpopmail from source.
While it worked when I tried to add a domain. Unfortunately it borked
my existing installation and did not play nicely with vqadmin. I was
able to run newmodel and get it all back working, but the segmentation
fault still exists. I am beginning t think this is a permission issue,
but don't know where to start. Is there a list or can somebody give me
a permission list for the vpopmail directory?
Thanks,
CJ
On 02/07/2013 01:58 AM, Sebastian Grewe wrote:
Maybe something is wrong with your vpopmail table for that domain (dom_89)?
Unless of course the domain is always another one.
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 23:27:01 -0800
Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com wrote:
snip
umask(077) = 022
open(., O_RDONLY) = 5
chdir(/home/vpopmail) = 0
chdir(domains)= 0
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, \1\0\0\0\16, 5) = 5
read(4, \7\0\0\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0, 16384) = 11
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, \365\0\0\0\3select cur_users, level_cur, level_max,
level_start0, level_start1, level_start2, level_end0, level_end1,
level_end2, level_mod0, level_mod1, level_mod2, level_index0,
level_index1, level_index2, the_dir from dir_control where domain =
'dom_89', 249) = 249
read(4,
\1\0\0\1\20F\0\0\2\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\tcur_users\tcur_users\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0F\0\0\3\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\tlevel_cur\tlevel_cur\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0F\0\0\4\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\tlevel_max\tlevel_max\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\5\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_start0\flevel_start0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\6\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_start1\flevel_start1\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\7\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_start2\flevel_start2\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\10\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_end0\nlevel_end0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\t\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_end1\nlevel_end1\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\n\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_end2\nlevel_end2\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\v\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_mod0\nlevel_mod0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\f\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_mod1\nlevel_mod1\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\r\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_mod2\nlevel_mod2\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\16\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_index0\flevel_index0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\17\3def\10vpopmail\vdir...,
16384) = 1290
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
On 02/06/2013 10:45 PM, Sebastian Grewe wrote:
Looks like it crashes right after receiving the results from the DB.
Run strace -f -s1024 to see more data.
I'd guess it might help to run gdb as well but I'd have to look up how
to use it exactly - it might help better.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On 07.02.2013, at 07:28, Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com
mailto:c...@yother.com wrote:
On 02/06/2013 10:17 PM, Sebastian Grewe wrote:
Try recompiling it. Maybe a library got updated?
Already did to no avail.
Last several lines. Let me know if you need the whole trace
lseek(5, 112, SEEK_SET) = 112
read(5, o\17\0\0\0\0\0\0, 8) = 8
close(5)= 0
open(/var/qmail/users/cdb, O_RDONLY) = 5
lseek(5, 112, SEEK_SET) = 112
read(5, o\17\0\0\0\0\0\0, 8) = 8
close(5)= 0
umask(077) = 022
open(., O_RDONLY) = 5
chdir(/home/vpopmail) = 0
chdir(domains)= 0
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, \1\0\0\0\16, 5) = 5
read(4, \7\0\0\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0, 16384) = 11
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, \365\0\0\0\3select cur_users, level_cur..., 249) = 249
read(4, \1\0\0\1\20F\0\0\2\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_contr..., 16384) = 1290
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Also strace or gdb might help to figure out why it crashes.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On 07.02.2013, at 06:50, Cecil Yother, Jr.c...@yother.com wrote:
On 02/06/2013 09:35 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 02/06/2013 07:50 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
On 02/06/2013 06:39 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 02/06/2013 12:38 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
I am getting a segmentation fault when I try to add a new domain using
vpopmail. Has anyone ever experienced this? Any ideas on where to
start to debug?
./vadddomainmoparclassified.com http://moparclassified.com
Please enter password for postmaster:
enter password again:
Segmentation fault
REAL_DIST=CentOS
DISTRO=CentOS
OSVER=5.9
QTARCH=i686
QTKERN=2.6.18-348.1.1
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
Quick question. Can I install vpopmail from source using the same flags
as the newmodel script and expect it to work correctly? as opposed to
using default ./configure, make, make install?
On 02/10/2013 09:46 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
OK, I tried (somewhat foolishly) to re compile vpopmail from source.
While it worked when I tried to add a domain. Unfortunately it borked
my existing installation and did not play nicely with vqadmin. I was
able to run newmodel and get it all back working, but the segmentation
fault still exists. I am beginning t think this is a permission issue,
but don't know where to start. Is there a list or can somebody give
me a permission list for the vpopmail directory?
Thanks,
CJ
On 02/07/2013 01:58 AM, Sebastian Grewe wrote:
Maybe something is wrong with your vpopmail table for that domain
(dom_89)? Unless of course the domain is always another one.
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 23:27:01 -0800
Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com wrote:
snip
umask(077) = 022
open(., O_RDONLY) = 5
chdir(/home/vpopmail) = 0
chdir(domains)= 0
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, \1\0\0\0\16, 5) = 5
read(4, \7\0\0\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0, 16384) = 11
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, \365\0\0\0\3select cur_users, level_cur, level_max,
level_start0, level_start1, level_start2, level_end0, level_end1,
level_end2, level_mod0, level_mod1, level_mod2, level_index0,
level_index1, level_index2, the_dir from dir_control where domain =
'dom_89', 249) = 249
read(4,
\1\0\0\1\20F\0\0\2\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\tcur_users\tcur_users\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0F\0\0\3\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\tlevel_cur\tlevel_cur\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0F\0\0\4\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\tlevel_max\tlevel_max\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\5\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_start0\flevel_start0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\6\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_start1\flevel_start1\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\7\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_start2\flevel_start2\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\10\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_end0\nlevel_end0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\t\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_end1\nlevel_end1\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\n\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_end2\nlevel_end2\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\v\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_mod0\nlevel_mod0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\f\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_mod1\nlevel_mod1\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\r\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_mod2\nlevel_mod2\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\16\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_index0\flevel_index0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\17\3def\10vpopmail\vdir...,
16384) = 1290
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
On 02/06/2013 10:45 PM, Sebastian Grewe wrote:
Looks like it crashes right after receiving the results from the DB.
Run strace -f -s1024 to see more data.
I'd guess it might help to run gdb as well but I'd have to look up how
to use it exactly - it might help better.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On 07.02.2013, at 07:28, Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com
mailto:c...@yother.com wrote:
On 02/06/2013 10:17 PM, Sebastian Grewe wrote:
Try recompiling it. Maybe a library got updated?
Already did to no avail.
Last several lines. Let me know if you need the whole trace
lseek(5, 112, SEEK_SET) = 112
read(5, o\17\0\0\0\0\0\0, 8) = 8
close(5)= 0
open(/var/qmail/users/cdb, O_RDONLY) = 5
lseek(5, 112, SEEK_SET) = 112
read(5, o\17\0\0\0\0\0\0, 8) = 8
close(5)= 0
umask(077) = 022
open(., O_RDONLY) = 5
chdir(/home/vpopmail) = 0
chdir(domains)= 0
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, \1\0\0\0\16, 5) = 5
read(4, \7\0\0\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0, 16384) = 11
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, \365\0\0\0\3select cur_users, level_cur..., 249) = 249
read(4, \1\0\0\1\20F\0\0\2\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_contr..., 16384)
= 1290
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Also strace or gdb might help to figure out why it crashes.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On 07.02.2013, at 06:50, Cecil Yother, Jr.c...@yother.com wrote:
On 02/06/2013 09:35 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 02/06/2013 07:50 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
On 02/06/2013 06:39 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 02/06/2013 12:38 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
I am getting a segmentation fault when I try to add a new
domain using
vpopmail. Has anyone ever experienced this? Any
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
Here is my list. CentOS-Base.repo CentOS-Debuginfo.repo CentOS-Media.repo CentOS-Vault.repo epel-testing.repo epel.repo mirrors-rpmforge mirrors-rpmforge-extras mirrors-rpmforge-extras.rpmorig mirrors-rpmforge-testing mirrors-rpmforge-testing.rpmorig mirrors-rpmforge.rpmorig qmailtoaster-plus.repo remi.repo rpmforge.repo rpmforge.repo.dist rpmforge.repo.rpmnew utterrambling.repo Utterrambling is the only difference. Ideas? On 02/08/2013 12:49 AM, Sebastian Grewe wrote: Maybe it tried to compile on 64bit? Just kidding .. here my Repos * base * epel * extras * remi * rpmforge * updates On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 23:59:43 -0800 Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com wrote: It looks like you are running a 64 bit system. Mine is 32 bit. I wonder if that's the difference. What repos are you using? On 02/07/2013 11:42 PM, Sebastian Grewe wrote: Installed the updates without issues. That makes your issue even weirder because I'd expect it to break for me too... On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:38:21 +0100 Sebastian Grewe sebast...@grewe.ca wrote: Okay so I checked my Own server and it's also running CentOS 5.9. I have not installed some of the latest updates yet and vadddomain works fine. Installing these updates now: Dependencies Resolved = Package Arch Version Repository Size = Installing: kernel x86_64 2.6.18-348.1.1.el5updates 22 M kernel-devel x86_64 2.6.18-348.1.1.el5updates 5.8 M Updating: device-mapper-multipath x86_64 0.4.7-54.el5_9.1 updates 3.0 M dhclient x86_64 12:3.0.5-33.el5_9 updates 287 k freetype x86_64 2.2.1-32.el5_9.1 updates 312 k kernel-headers x86_64 2.6.18-348.1.1.el5updates 1.5 M kpartx x86_64 0.4.7-54.el5_9.1 updates 445 k nspr x86_64 4.9.2-2.el5_9 updates 121 k nspr-devel x86_64 4.9.2-2.el5_9 updates 111 k nss x86_64 3.13.6-3.el5_9updates 1.1 M nss-develx86_64 3.13.6-3.el5_9updates 244 k tzdata x86_64 2012j-1.el5 updates 793 k Removing: kernel x86_64 2.6.18-308.24.1.el5 installed 98 M kernel-devel x86_64 2.6.18-308.24.1.el5 installed 16 M I will report back once completed. On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:35:44 -0800 Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com wrote: On 02/07/2013 04:24 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: That's up to you, but I wouldn't quite yet. I'd like to know if anyone else is running QMT on COS5.9, with or w/out this problem. Anybody? In searching for a solution I found a Gentoo thread that resembled my problem. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13908 I ran gdb like they did and this was the output. Maybe it will help in debugging. I don't know where to go from here. [root@viktorya bin]# gdb vadddomain GNU gdb (GDB) CentOS (7.0.1-45.el5.centos) Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
On 02/07/2013 01:58 AM, Sebastian Grewe wrote:
Maybe something is wrong with your vpopmail table for that domain (dom_89)?
Unless of course the domain is always another one.
Isn't 89 the gid and uid given to all qmail users?
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 23:27:01 -0800
Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com wrote:
snip
umask(077) = 022
open(., O_RDONLY) = 5
chdir(/home/vpopmail) = 0
chdir(domains)= 0
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, \1\0\0\0\16, 5) = 5
read(4, \7\0\0\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0, 16384) = 11
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, \365\0\0\0\3select cur_users, level_cur, level_max,
level_start0, level_start1, level_start2, level_end0, level_end1,
level_end2, level_mod0, level_mod1, level_mod2, level_index0,
level_index1, level_index2, the_dir from dir_control where domain =
'dom_89', 249) = 249
read(4,
\1\0\0\1\20F\0\0\2\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\tcur_users\tcur_users\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0F\0\0\3\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\tlevel_cur\tlevel_cur\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0F\0\0\4\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\tlevel_max\tlevel_max\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\5\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_start0\flevel_start0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\6\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_start1\flevel_start1\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\7\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_start2\flevel_start2\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\10\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_end0\nlevel_end0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\t\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_end1\nlevel_end1\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\n\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_end2\nlevel_end2\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\v\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_mod0\nlevel_mod0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\f\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_mod1\nlevel_mod1\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\r\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_mod2\nlevel_mod2\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\16\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_index0\flevel_index0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\17\3def\10vpopmail\vdir...,
16384) = 1290
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
On 02/06/2013 10:45 PM, Sebastian Grewe wrote:
Looks like it crashes right after receiving the results from the DB.
Run strace -f -s1024 to see more data.
I'd guess it might help to run gdb as well but I'd have to look up how
to use it exactly - it might help better.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On 07.02.2013, at 07:28, Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com
mailto:c...@yother.com wrote:
On 02/06/2013 10:17 PM, Sebastian Grewe wrote:
Try recompiling it. Maybe a library got updated?
Already did to no avail.
Last several lines. Let me know if you need the whole trace
lseek(5, 112, SEEK_SET) = 112
read(5, o\17\0\0\0\0\0\0, 8) = 8
close(5)= 0
open(/var/qmail/users/cdb, O_RDONLY) = 5
lseek(5, 112, SEEK_SET) = 112
read(5, o\17\0\0\0\0\0\0, 8) = 8
close(5)= 0
umask(077) = 022
open(., O_RDONLY) = 5
chdir(/home/vpopmail) = 0
chdir(domains)= 0
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, \1\0\0\0\16, 5) = 5
read(4, \7\0\0\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0, 16384) = 11
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, \365\0\0\0\3select cur_users, level_cur..., 249) = 249
read(4, \1\0\0\1\20F\0\0\2\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_contr..., 16384) = 1290
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Also strace or gdb might help to figure out why it crashes.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On 07.02.2013, at 06:50, Cecil Yother, Jr.c...@yother.com wrote:
On 02/06/2013 09:35 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 02/06/2013 07:50 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
On 02/06/2013 06:39 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 02/06/2013 12:38 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
I am getting a segmentation fault when I try to add a new domain using
vpopmail. Has anyone ever experienced this? Any ideas on where to
start to debug?
./vadddomainmoparclassified.com http://moparclassified.com
Please enter password for postmaster:
enter password again:
Segmentation fault
REAL_DIST=CentOS
DISTRO=CentOS
OSVER=5.9
QTARCH=i686
QTKERN=2.6.18-348.1.1.el5
BUILD_DIST=cnt50
BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat
This machine's OS is supported and has been tested
Thanks,
CJ
-
I don't know.
Are you running the latest vpopmail-toaster package? If so, I'd ask
about this on the vpopmail users list (mailto:vch...@inter7.com).
Yes I am. Any other way to add users?
--
Vqadmin.
Doesn't work either Internal Server Error
Re: [qmailtoaster] re: segmentation fault
On 02/07/2013 05:40 AM, Johannes Weberhofer wrote: Am 06.02.2013 20:38, schrieb Cecil Yother, Jr.: I am getting a segmentation fault when I try to add a new domain using vpopmail. Has anyone ever experienced this? Any ideas on where to start to debug? ./vadddomain moparclassified.com Please enter password for postmaster: enter password again: Segmentation fault REAL_DIST=CentOS DISTRO=CentOS OSVER=5.9 QTARCH=i686 QTKERN=2.6.18-348.1.1.el5 BUILD_DIST=cnt50 BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat This machine's OS is supported and has been tested I've seen segfaults like this after migrating to a new server when the binaries and libraries did not match in version or architecture... Johannes No migration. I started with a QMTISO and have simply done the yum updates to get me here. It was working when setup. I have two identical servers and both are doing the same thing. It sounds like a yum update has broken it, but I have no idea how far back it was. -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Hello
On 02/07/2013 12:02 AM, Tony White wrote: http://www.kievzelenbud.com/ok/fmdntso8t3n.png Tony, did you get hacked? --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
FWIW, if I add a user ./vadduser t...@example.com test it works fine and
I can see the new user in qmailadmin. If I try to delete the user
./vdeluser t...@example.com it segfaults.
On 02/07/2013 01:58 AM, Sebastian Grewe wrote:
Maybe something is wrong with your vpopmail table for that domain (dom_89)?
Unless of course the domain is always another one.
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 23:27:01 -0800
Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com wrote:
snip
umask(077) = 022
open(., O_RDONLY) = 5
chdir(/home/vpopmail) = 0
chdir(domains)= 0
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, \1\0\0\0\16, 5) = 5
read(4, \7\0\0\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0, 16384) = 11
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, \365\0\0\0\3select cur_users, level_cur, level_max,
level_start0, level_start1, level_start2, level_end0, level_end1,
level_end2, level_mod0, level_mod1, level_mod2, level_index0,
level_index1, level_index2, the_dir from dir_control where domain =
'dom_89', 249) = 249
read(4,
\1\0\0\1\20F\0\0\2\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\tcur_users\tcur_users\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0F\0\0\3\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\tlevel_cur\tlevel_cur\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0F\0\0\4\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\tlevel_max\tlevel_max\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\5\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_start0\flevel_start0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\6\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_start1\flevel_start1\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\7\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_start2\flevel_start2\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\10\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_end0\nlevel_end0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\t\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_end1\nlevel_end1\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\n\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_end2\nlevel_end2\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\v\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_mod0\nlevel_mod0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\f\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_mod1\nlevel_mod1\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\r\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_mod2\nlevel_mod2\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\16\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_index0\flevel_index0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\17\3def\10vpopmail\vdir...,
16384) = 1290
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
On 02/06/2013 10:45 PM, Sebastian Grewe wrote:
Looks like it crashes right after receiving the results from the DB.
Run strace -f -s1024 to see more data.
I'd guess it might help to run gdb as well but I'd have to look up how
to use it exactly - it might help better.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On 07.02.2013, at 07:28, Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com
mailto:c...@yother.com wrote:
On 02/06/2013 10:17 PM, Sebastian Grewe wrote:
Try recompiling it. Maybe a library got updated?
Already did to no avail.
Last several lines. Let me know if you need the whole trace
lseek(5, 112, SEEK_SET) = 112
read(5, o\17\0\0\0\0\0\0, 8) = 8
close(5)= 0
open(/var/qmail/users/cdb, O_RDONLY) = 5
lseek(5, 112, SEEK_SET) = 112
read(5, o\17\0\0\0\0\0\0, 8) = 8
close(5)= 0
umask(077) = 022
open(., O_RDONLY) = 5
chdir(/home/vpopmail) = 0
chdir(domains)= 0
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, \1\0\0\0\16, 5) = 5
read(4, \7\0\0\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0, 16384) = 11
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, \365\0\0\0\3select cur_users, level_cur..., 249) = 249
read(4, \1\0\0\1\20F\0\0\2\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_contr..., 16384) = 1290
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Also strace or gdb might help to figure out why it crashes.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On 07.02.2013, at 06:50, Cecil Yother, Jr.c...@yother.com wrote:
On 02/06/2013 09:35 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 02/06/2013 07:50 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
On 02/06/2013 06:39 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 02/06/2013 12:38 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
I am getting a segmentation fault when I try to add a new domain using
vpopmail. Has anyone ever experienced this? Any ideas on where to
start to debug?
./vadddomainmoparclassified.com http://moparclassified.com
Please enter password for postmaster:
enter password again:
Segmentation fault
REAL_DIST=CentOS
DISTRO=CentOS
OSVER=5.9
QTARCH=i686
QTKERN=2.6.18-348.1.1.el5
BUILD_DIST=cnt50
BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat
This machine's OS is supported and has been tested
Thanks,
CJ
-
I don't know.
Are you running the latest vpopmail-toaster package? If so, I'd ask
about this on the vpopmail users list
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
I did this yesterday,but will try again. Don't recall , but probably vpopmail first. Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: On 02/07/2013 09:35 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: No migration. I started with a QMTISO and have simply done the yum updates to get me here. It was working when setup. I have two identical servers and both are doing the same thing. It sounds like a yum update has broken it, but I have no idea how far back it was. I would try rebuilding vpopmail and associated packages. Using qtp-newmodel, select vpopmail and it should select the others which are dependent. Possibly there's some dynamic library in COS5.9 that's breaking it. Do you recall if you did 5.9 upgrade or vpopmail-5.4.33 upgrade first? -- -Eric 'shubes' - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
On 02/07/2013 09:34 AM, Sebastian Grewe wrote: BTW what did apache log regarding that Internal server error when trying to add the domain via web interface? I'd assume something like killed child? Yes, that's correct. Cheers, Sebastian On 07.02.2013, at 18:22, "Cecil Yother, Jr." c...@yother.com wrote: I did this yesterday,but will try again. Don't recall , but probably vpopmail first. Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: On 02/07/2013 09:35 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: No migration. I started with a QMTISO and have simply done the yum updates to get me here. It was working when setup. I have two identical servers and both are doing the same thing. It sounds like a yum update has broken it, but I have no idea how far back it was. I would try rebuilding vpopmail and associated packages. Using qtp-newmodel, select vpopmail and it should select the others which are dependent. Possibly there's some dynamic library in COS5.9 that's breaking it. Do you recall if you did 5.9 upgrade or vpopmail-5.4.33 upgrade first? -- -Eric 'shubes' - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
On 02/07/2013 10:11 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: If you've already rebuilt vpomail-5.4.33 and dependencies since you upgraded to COS5.9, then my guess is that there's a problem with vpopmail and COS5.9. These functions are used so infrequently that it could go unnoticed for some time. Anyone else out there running COS5.9? If so, which vpopmail version? vadduser working ok? These are the most recent updates. Would any of these cause the issue? device-mapper-multipath.i386 0.4.7-54.el5_9.1 updates freetype.i386 2.2.1-32.el5_9.1 updates freetype-demos.i386 2.2.1-32.el5_9.1 updates freetype-devel.i386 2.2.1-32.el5_9.1 updates kpartx.i386 0.4.7-54.el5_9.1 updates nspr.i386 4.9.2-2.el5_9 updates nspr-devel.i386 4.9.2-2.el5_9 updates nss.i386 3.13.6-3.el5_9 updates nss-devel.i386 3.13.6-3.el5_9 updates nss-pkcs11-devel.i386 3.13.6-3.el5_9 updates nss-tools.i386 CJ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
On 02/07/2013 10:11 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: If you've already rebuilt vpomail-5.4.33 and dependencies since you upgraded to COS5.9, then my guess is that there's a problem with vpopmail and COS5.9. These functions are used so infrequently that it could go unnoticed for some time. Anyone else out there running COS5.9? If so, which vpopmail version? vadduser working ok? Any chance this would have anything to do with it? qtp-dependencies - installing compat-libf2c compat-libgcc compat-libsdc++-33 ... Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirrors.finalasp.com * epel: mirrors.kernel.org * extras: mirror.hmc.edu * updates: ftpmirror.your.org Setting up Install Process No package compat-libf2c available. No package compat-libgcc available. No package compat-libsdc++-33 available. Nothing to do --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
Should I roll it back? Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: On 02/07/2013 01:12 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: On 02/07/2013 10:11 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: If you've already rebuilt vpomail-5.4.33 and dependencies since you upgraded to COS5.9, then my guess is that there's a problem with vpopmail and COS5.9. These functions are used so infrequently that it could go unnoticed for some time. Anyone else out there running COS5.9? If so, which vpopmail version? vadduser working ok? These are the most recent updates. Would any of these cause the issue? device-mapper-multipath.i386 0.4.7-54.el5_9.1 updates freetype.i386 2.2.1-32.el5_9.1 updates freetype-demos.i386 2.2.1-32.el5_9.1 updates freetype-devel.i386 2.2.1-32.el5_9.1 updates kpartx.i386 0.4.7-54.el5_9.1 updates nspr.i386 4.9.2-2.el5_9 updates nspr-devel.i386 4.9.2-2.el5_9 updates nss.i386 3.13.6-3.el5_9 updates nss-devel.i386 3.13.6-3.el5_9 updates nss-pkcs11-devel.i386 3.13.6-3.el5_9 updates nss-tools.i386 CJ - I could see where nspr might. If you've rebuilt since then though, that would seem to eliminate the possibility of a library update being the culprit. -- -Eric 'shubes' - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
On 02/07/2013 06:35 PM, Bharath Chari wrote: On Friday 08 February 2013 04:37 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: On 02/07/2013 10:11 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: If you've already rebuilt vpomail-5.4.33 and dependencies since you upgraded to COS5.9, then my guess is that there's a problem with vpopmail and COS5.9. These functions are used so infrequently that it could go unnoticed for some time. Anyone else out there running COS5.9? If so, which vpopmail version? vadduser working ok? Any chance this would have anything to do with it? qtp-dependencies - installing compat-libf2c compat-libgcc compat-libsdc++-33 ... Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirrors.finalasp.com * epel: mirrors.kernel.org * extras: mirror.hmc.edu * updates: ftpmirror.your.org Setting up Install Process No package compat-libf2c available. No package compat-libgcc available. No package compat-libsdc++-33 available. Nothing to do CJ, FWIW, try installing compat-libf2c-34 compat-libgcc-296 compat-libstdc++-33 via YUM. Bharath I did to no avail. Is vpopmail compatible with the CentOS 6 install? CJ
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
On 02/07/2013 04:24 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: That's up to you, but I wouldn't quite yet. I'd like to know if anyone else is running QMT on COS5.9, with or w/out this problem. Anybody? In searching for a solution I found a Gentoo thread that resembled my problem. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13908 I ran gdb like they did and this was the output. Maybe it will help in debugging. I don't know where to go from here. [root@viktorya bin]# gdb vadddomain GNU gdb (GDB) CentOS (7.0.1-45.el5.centos) Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as i386-redhat-linux-gnu. For bug reporting instructions, please see: http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/... Reading symbols from /home/vpopmail/bin/vadddomain...(no debugging symbols found)...done. (gdb) run moparclassified.com test Starting program: /home/vpopmail/bin/vadddomain moparclassified.com test Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0037fd40 in strncpy () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
It looks like you are running a 64 bit system. Mine is 32 bit. I wonder if that's the difference. What repos are you using? On 02/07/2013 11:42 PM, Sebastian Grewe wrote: Installed the updates without issues. That makes your issue even weirder because I'd expect it to break for me too... On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:38:21 +0100 Sebastian Grewe sebast...@grewe.ca wrote: Okay so I checked my Own server and it's also running CentOS 5.9. I have not installed some of the latest updates yet and vadddomain works fine. Installing these updates now: Dependencies Resolved = Package Arch Version Repository Size = Installing: kernel x86_64 2.6.18-348.1.1.el5updates 22 M kernel-devel x86_64 2.6.18-348.1.1.el5updates 5.8 M Updating: device-mapper-multipath x86_64 0.4.7-54.el5_9.1 updates 3.0 M dhclient x86_64 12:3.0.5-33.el5_9 updates 287 k freetype x86_64 2.2.1-32.el5_9.1 updates 312 k kernel-headers x86_64 2.6.18-348.1.1.el5updates 1.5 M kpartx x86_64 0.4.7-54.el5_9.1 updates 445 k nspr x86_64 4.9.2-2.el5_9 updates 121 k nspr-devel x86_64 4.9.2-2.el5_9 updates 111 k nss x86_64 3.13.6-3.el5_9updates 1.1 M nss-develx86_64 3.13.6-3.el5_9updates 244 k tzdata x86_64 2012j-1.el5 updates 793 k Removing: kernel x86_64 2.6.18-308.24.1.el5 installed 98 M kernel-devel x86_64 2.6.18-308.24.1.el5 installed 16 M I will report back once completed. On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:35:44 -0800 Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com wrote: On 02/07/2013 04:24 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: That's up to you, but I wouldn't quite yet. I'd like to know if anyone else is running QMT on COS5.9, with or w/out this problem. Anybody? In searching for a solution I found a Gentoo thread that resembled my problem. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13908 I ran gdb like they did and this was the output. Maybe it will help in debugging. I don't know where to go from here. [root@viktorya bin]# gdb vadddomain GNU gdb (GDB) CentOS (7.0.1-45.el5.centos) Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as i386-redhat-linux-gnu. For bug reporting instructions, please see: http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/... Reading symbols from /home/vpopmail/bin/vadddomain...(no debugging symbols found)...done. (gdb) run moparclassified.com test Starting program: /home/vpopmail/bin/vadddomain moparclassified.com test Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0037fd40 in strncpy () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) - To unsubscribe, e-mail
[qmailtoaster] re: segmentation fault
I am getting a segmentation fault when I try to add a new domain using vpopmail. Has anyone ever experienced this? Any ideas on where to start to debug? ./vadddomain moparclassified.com Please enter password for postmaster: enter password again: Segmentation fault REAL_DIST=CentOS DISTRO=CentOS OSVER=5.9 QTARCH=i686 QTKERN=2.6.18-348.1.1.el5 BUILD_DIST=cnt50 BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat This machine's OS is supported and has been tested Thanks, CJ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
On 02/06/2013 06:39 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 02/06/2013 12:38 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: I am getting a segmentation fault when I try to add a new domain using vpopmail. Has anyone ever experienced this? Any ideas on where to start to debug? ./vadddomain moparclassified.com Please enter password for postmaster: enter password again: Segmentation fault REAL_DIST=CentOS DISTRO=CentOS OSVER=5.9 QTARCH=i686 QTKERN=2.6.18-348.1.1.el5 BUILD_DIST=cnt50 BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat This machine's OS is supported and has been tested Thanks, CJ - I don't know. Are you running the latest vpopmail-toaster package? If so, I'd ask about this on the vpopmail users list (mailto:vch...@inter7.com). Yes I am. Any other way to add users? --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
On 02/06/2013 09:35 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 02/06/2013 07:50 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: On 02/06/2013 06:39 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 02/06/2013 12:38 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: I am getting a segmentation fault when I try to add a new domain using vpopmail. Has anyone ever experienced this? Any ideas on where to start to debug? ./vadddomain moparclassified.com Please enter password for postmaster: enter password again: Segmentation fault REAL_DIST=CentOS DISTRO=CentOS OSVER=5.9 QTARCH=i686 QTKERN=2.6.18-348.1.1.el5 BUILD_DIST=cnt50 BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat This machine's OS is supported and has been tested Thanks, CJ - I don't know. Are you running the latest vpopmail-toaster package? If so, I'd ask about this on the vpopmail users list (mailto:vch...@inter7.com). Yes I am. Any other way to add users? -- Vqadmin. Doesn't work either Internal Server Error -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
On 02/06/2013 10:17 PM, Sebastian Grewe
wrote:
Try recompiling it. Maybe a library got updated?
Already did to no avail.
Last several lines. Let me know if you need the whole trace
lseek(5, 112, SEEK_SET) = 112
read(5, "o\17\0\0\0\0\0\0", 8) = 8
close(5) = 0
open("/var/qmail/users/cdb", O_RDONLY) = 5
lseek(5, 112, SEEK_SET) = 112
read(5, "o\17\0\0\0\0\0\0", 8) = 8
close(5) = 0
umask(077) = 022
open(".", O_RDONLY) = 5
chdir("/home/vpopmail") = 0
chdir("domains") = 0
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, "\1\0\0\0\16", 5) = 5
read(4, "\7\0\0\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0", 16384) = 11
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, "\365\0\0\0\3select cur_users, level_cur"..., 249) = 249
read(4, "\1\0\0\1\20F\0\0\2\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_contr"..., 16384) =
1290
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Also strace or gdb might help to figure out why it crashes.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On 07.02.2013, at 06:50, "Cecil Yother, Jr." c...@yother.com wrote:
On 02/06/2013 09:35 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 02/06/2013 07:50 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
On 02/06/2013 06:39 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 02/06/2013 12:38 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
I am getting a segmentation fault when I try to add a new domain using
vpopmail. Has anyone ever experienced this? Any ideas on where to
start to debug?
./vadddomain moparclassified.com
Please enter password for postmaster:
enter password again:
Segmentation fault
REAL_DIST=CentOS
DISTRO=CentOS
OSVER=5.9
QTARCH=i686
QTKERN=2.6.18-348.1.1.el5
BUILD_DIST=cnt50
BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat
This machine's OS is supported and has been tested
Thanks,
CJ
-
I don't know.
Are you running the latest vpopmail-toaster package? If so, I'd ask
about this on the vpopmail users list (mailto:vch...@inter7.com).
Yes I am. Any other way to add users?
--
Vqadmin.
Doesn't work either Internal Server Error
--
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
--
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
On 02/06/2013 10:20 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 02/06/2013 10:50 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: On 02/06/2013 09:35 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 02/06/2013 07:50 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: On 02/06/2013 06:39 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 02/06/2013 12:38 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: I am getting a segmentation fault when I try to add a new domain using vpopmail. Has anyone ever experienced this? Any ideas on where to start to debug? ./vadddomain moparclassified.com Please enter password for postmaster: enter password again: Segmentation fault REAL_DIST=CentOS DISTRO=CentOS OSVER=5.9 QTARCH=i686 QTKERN=2.6.18-348.1.1.el5 BUILD_DIST=cnt50 BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat This machine's OS is supported and has been tested Thanks, CJ - I don't know. Are you running the latest vpopmail-toaster package? If so, I'd ask about this on the vpopmail users list (mailto:vch...@inter7.com). Yes I am. Any other way to add users? -- Vqadmin. Doesn't work either Internal Server Error That's a tough place to be in, not being able to add a domain. Please post to the vpopmail list and see if anyone there is helpful. Yes, it's really sucking right now. I have with no response. --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: segmentation fault
snip
umask(077) = 022
open(".", O_RDONLY) = 5
chdir("/home/vpopmail") = 0
chdir("domains") = 0
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, "\1\0\0\0\16", 5) = 5
read(4, "\7\0\0\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0", 16384) = 11
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, "\365\0\0\0\3select cur_users, level_cur, level_max,
level_start0, level_start1, level_start2, level_end0, level_end1,
level_end2, level_mod0, level_mod1, level_mod2, level_index0,
level_index1, level_index2, the_dir from dir_control where domain
= 'dom_89'", 249) = 249
read(4,
"\1\0\0\1\20F\0\0\2\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\tcur_users\tcur_users\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0F\0\0\3\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\tlevel_cur\tlevel_cur\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0F\0\0\4\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\tlevel_max\tlevel_max\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\5\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_start0\flevel_start0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\6\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_start1\flevel_start1\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\7\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_start2\flevel_start2\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\10\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_end0\nlevel_end0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\t\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_end1\nlevel_end1\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\n\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_end2\nlevel_end2\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\v\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_mod0\nlevel_mod0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0
\0\0\0H\0\0\f\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_mod1\nlevel_mod1\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0H\0\0\r\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\nlevel_mod2\nlevel_mod2\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\16\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_control\vdir_control\flevel_index0\flevel_index0\f?\0\v\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0L\0\0\17\3def\10vpopmail\vdir"...,
16384) = 1290
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
On 02/06/2013 10:45 PM, Sebastian Grewe wrote:
Looks like it crashes right after receiving the results from
the DB. Run strace -f -s1024 to see more data.
I'd guess it might help to run gdb as well but I'd have to
look up how to use it exactly - it might help better.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On 07.02.2013, at 07:28, "Cecil Yother, Jr." c...@yother.com
wrote:
On 02/06/2013 10:17 PM, Sebastian
Grewe wrote:
Try recompiling it. Maybe a library got updated?
Already did to no avail.
Last several lines. Let me know if you need the whole trace
lseek(5, 112, SEEK_SET) = 112
read(5, "o\17\0\0\0\0\0\0", 8) = 8
close(5) = 0
open("/var/qmail/users/cdb", O_RDONLY) = 5
lseek(5, 112, SEEK_SET) = 112
read(5, "o\17\0\0\0\0\0\0", 8) = 8
close(5) = 0
umask(077) = 022
open(".", O_RDONLY) = 5
chdir("/home/vpopmail") = 0
chdir("domains") = 0
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, "\1\0\0\0\16", 5) = 5
read(4, "\7\0\0\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0", 16384) = 11
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
write(4, "\365\0\0\0\3select cur_users, level_cur"..., 249) =
249
read(4, "\1\0\0\1\20F\0\0\2\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_contr"...,
16384) = 1290
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Also strace or gdb might help to figure out why it crashes.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On 07.02.2013, at 06:50, "Cecil Yother, Jr." c...@yother.com wrote:
On 02/06/2013 09:35 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 02/06/2013 07:50 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
On 02/06/2013 06:39 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 02/06/2013 12:38 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
I am getting a segmentation fault when I try to add a new domain using
vpopmail. Has anyone ev
Re: [qmailtoaster] Dependencies Update
I use a cron to update weekly and have not had any issues to date. On 1/29/13 4:57 PM, Josh Bowling wrote: Hi all, I installed qmailtoaster on a couple CentOS 5.8 boxes a few weeks ago and am about to run a full `yum update` on the systems. Is there any chance that an update, say to one of qmailtoaster's dependencies, would break anything? I doubt it will, but just wondering if anyone has ever had anything like this happen to them with qmailtoaster. Thanks! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Problem sending mail to comcast.net
I found this in the archives. All of the senders experiencing the bounced messages mentioning cname lookup failure appear to be running the qmail mail server software. Qmail, if not using a third party patch that was written in the late 90's, has an issue sending to domains whose name servers respond to DNS queries of type "ANY" with more than 512 bytes of data; that is a bug in qmail and the author has never fixed it because he wants you to use his DNS server software which also eliminates the issue in a different way. Google's name servers do respond to queries of type "ANY" with more than 512 bytes of data, so when an unpatched qmail server tries to send an email to a domain whose lowest cost MX record ends in .google.com, qmail is going to do a DNS query of type ANY against one ofgoogle.com's authoritative name servers, get back more than it can correctly handle and defer repeatedly until ultimately bouncing the message with that cname lookup failure. http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!category-topic/apps/mail-settings/mIGTQVZiFxo Can anyone confirm that Qmailtoaster has been patched with this patch - http://www.ckdhr.com/ckd/qmail-103.patch??? http://www.memoryhole.net/qmail/#oversize-dns On 12/13/2012 08:46 AM, rvau...@libertycasting.com wrote: This is what I get when I dig comcast.net [root@mail1 pdns-recursor]# dig comcast.net ; DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-20.P1.el5_8.5 comcast.net ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 15929 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;comcast.net. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: comcast.net. 2530 IN A 207.223.8.109 comcast.net. 2530 IN A 76.96.39.101 comcast.net. 2530 IN A 207.223.8.110 comcast.net. 2530 IN A 76.96.39.102 ;; Query time: 0 msec ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) ;; WHEN: Thu Dec 13 11:39:38 2012 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 93 html head meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type" /head body bgcolor="#FF" text="#00" Have you done any DNS testing to see if comcast.net resolves?br br br div class="moz-cite-prefix"On 12/13/2012 04:53 AM, Rvaught wrote:br /div blockquote cite="" type="cite" pre wrap=""My resolv.conf has : Search libertycasting.com Nameserver 192.168.120.20 ( this local a network dns forwarder) I still have bind installed . I think on my old server I was running the tinydns. I installed pdns-recursor package Still have same problem -Original Message- From: Eric Shubert [a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:e...@shubes.net">"mailto:e...@shubes.net"mailto:e...@shubes.net/a] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 1:17 PM To: a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com">"mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com"qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/a Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Problem sending mail to comcast.net On 12/12/2012 11:00 AM, Rvaught wrote: /pre blockquote type="cite" pre wrap=""Since I have set up my new QMT server I am having trouble sending mail to this domain. This is the error I receive: lt;a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:chlevi...@comcast.net">"mailto:chlevi...@comcast.net"chlevi...@comcast.net/a a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:chlevi...@comcast.net">"mailto:chlevi...@comcast.net"lt;mailto:chlevi...@comcast.netgt;/agt;: CNAME lookup failed temporarily. (#4.4.3) I'm not going to
Fwd: [qmailtoaster] QMT-CentOS6-12010.07.sh
Original Message
Subject:[qmailtoaster] QMT-CentOS6-12010.07.sh
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 18:09:17 -0500
From: Dan McAllister q...@it4soho.com
Reply-To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Greetings all...
I've received a few requests lately from people wanting the latest
QMT-CentOS6 script... the latest of which is attached (with the file
extension changed to avoid being blocked by spam/av filters).
Save the file, remove the .TXT from the name and run it as a bash script
(as root: *bash QMT-CentOS6-12.10.28.sh*)
Please provide feedback as to how well it works for you!
Thanks
Dan McAllister
--
IT4SOHO, LLC
PO Box 507
St. Petersburg, FL 33731-0507
CALL TOLL FREE:
877-IT4SOHO
We have support plans for QMail!
#!/bin/bash
# Version 2012-10-27 - Re-added EPEL RPMforge for SpamAssassin support
# Version 2012-07-24 - ClamAV 0.97.5 has been fixed -- stop blocking updates
# Version 2012-07-11 - Switch source back to .com (.net is expired domain)
# Version 2012-02-03 - Update cleanup for publication to QMT Community
# Move QTP install to near-end to remove yum-clean error messages
# Update source of current.txt to qmailtoaster.com (vs. org)
# Update source of packages to mirror list (mirrors.qmailtoaster.net vs com)
# Force workaround of ClamAV 0.97.3 -- it has a bad patch, use 0.97.2 instead
# -- Dan McAllister (IT4SOHO) d...@it4soho.com or +1-727-647-7646
# Version 2011-10-30 - New Build for CentOS 6
# -- Dan McAllister (IT4SOHO) d...@it4soho.com or +1-727-647-7646
#
# Check options --
# -t or -v turns on VERBOSE (shows yum output)
# -a or -d turns on DEBUG (which implies VERBOSE) and forces a re-install
# of ALL QMAIL-TOASTER packages
#
VERSION=2012.10.27
PACKAGES=
vpopmail-toaster vqadmin-toaster ucspi-tcp-toaster \
libsrs2-toaster libdomainkeys-toaster \
qmail-toaster squirrelmail-toaster spamassassin-toaster \
ripmime-toaster clamav-toaster simscan-toaster \
qmailmrtg-toaster ezmlm-toaster autorespond-toaster \
qmailadmin-toaster courier-authlib-toaster courier-imap-toaster \
maildrop-toaster control-panel-toaster isoqlog-toaster \
daemontools-toaster \
QMTSOURCE=http://mirrors.qmailtoaster.com/current/SRPMS;
REMOVE_FIRST=
SKIP_LIST=
DEPENDENCIES=
rpm-build wget openssh openssh-clients \
elfutils elfutils-libs file gdb libedit patch pkgconfig \
unzip xz xz-lzma-compat \
httpd httpd-tools httpd-manual crypto-utils mod_perl mod_ssl webalizer \
apr apr-util apr-util-ldap fontconfig freetype gd libX11 \
libX11-common libXau libXpm libjpeg libpng libxcb mailcap \
mysql mysql-devel mysql-server mysql-libs \
perl perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker perl-TimeDate perl-NetAddr-IP perl-Error \
perl-Font-AFM perl-BSD-Resource perl-Newt perl-Digest-SHA1 \
perl-HTML-Parser perl-Net-DNS perl-Archive-Tar perl-IO-Zlib \
perl-Time-HiRes perl-Digest-SHA perl-IO-Socket-INET6 \
perl-IO-Socket-SSL perl-Mail-DKIM perl-Encode-Detect \
php php-common php-cli php-imap php-ldap php-pear \
gcc gcc-c++ gcc-java compat-gcc-34 compat-gcc-34-c++ make automake* \
alsa-lib atk autoconf avahi-libs cairo cloog-ppl cpp cups-libs \
ecj glibc-devel glibc-headers gnutls gtk2 hicolor-icon-theme \
jasper-libs java-1.5.0-gcj java_cup jpackage-utils \
kernel-headers libICE libSM libXcomposite libXcursor \
libXdamage libXext libXfixes libXft libXi libXinerama \
libXrandr libXrender libXtst libart_lgpl libgcj libgcj-devel \
libgomp libstdc++-devel libtasn1 libthai libtiff mpfr \
pango pixman ppl sinjdoc zip zlib-devel \
bzip2-devel bzip2-libs gmp-devel curl libcurl curl-devel \
libidn-devel ncurses-devel aspell procmail mrtg \
libtool libtool-ltdl libtool-ltdl-devel gdbm-devel expect tcl \
pcre pcre-devel \
PERLDEPSRPMFORGE=perl-IP-Country perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP \
\
PERLDEPSEPEL=perl-Mail-SPF razor-agents perl-Razor-Agent
VERBOSE=-q
DEBUG=
MYSQLPW='IamQMail'
#
COL60=\\033[60G
NORMAL=\\033[0;39m
WHITE=\\033[1;39m
GREEN=\\033[1;32m
RED=\\033[1;31m
YELLOW=\\033[1;33m
BLUE=\\033[1;34m
SHOWDWNLOAD=echo -en ${COL60}${BLUE}Downloading${NORMAL}
SHOWREBUILD=echo -en ${COL60}${BLUE}Building...${NORMAL}
SHOWINSTALL=echo -en ${COL60}${BLUE}Installing.${NORMAL}
SHOWSKIP=echo -en${COL60} ${WHITE}[${YELLOW} SKIP ${WHITE}] ${NORMAL} \n
SHOWOK=echo -en ${COL60} ${WHITE}[${GREEN} -OK- ${WHITE}] ${NORMAL} \n
SHOWDONE=echo -en${COL60} ${WHITE}[${GREEN} DONE ${WHITE}] ${NORMAL} \n
SHOWFAIL=echo -en${COL60} ${WHITE}[${RED}FAILED${WHITE}] ${NORMAL} \n
#
# You must run this script as root!
if [ `id -u` -ne 0 ] ; then
echo $0: OOPS! You must be
Re: [qmailtoaster] Squirrelmail alternatives? Looking for recs
On 12/06/2012 09:24 AM, Diana Calder wrote: Anyone using something other than Squirrelmail for webmail with Qmailtoaster? I'm working my way through researching the options listed in the Wiki but I'd like to get some feedback from someone who's actually using one of the alternative webmail packages. So far, it looks like atmail is gone (the free community version, at least), and AfterLogic lite, eGroupware, Horde, and RoundCube all look like they're worth taking a deeper look at. I'd prefer something that looks a little less dated than Squirrelmail and that has a good mobile interface. Our Intranet is a hosted Noodle instance, so I'm not really interested in extra bells and whistles like calendars and such - just good solid email features like a decent address book (though a nice shared one in addition to personal ones would be nice), the ability to set a vacation response, basic filtering, and allowing individual users to change their password. eGroupware is probably overkill for our needs and even Horde may be a little over the top - but they're also the two nicest looking. I'll be continuing to research but some helpful comments from the Qmailtoaster community would be greatly appreciated. Hoping for some good recommendations, Diana Diana, I have been using RoundCube and I'm very pleased with it. You can set it up and use it simultaneously with Squirrelmail. I have used Horde and I liked it, but it's difficult to setup and I found it to be buggy. Things worked when it was set up and then magically didn't work with no explanation and the Horde mailing list needs to take lessons from the toaster list, ;) Atmail free was short on features, you're not missing anything. --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Connection Problems
On 11/14/2012 06:55 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 11/14/2012 05:52 PM, Carlos Herrera Polo wrote: Have you check firewall rules ? El nov 14, 2012 5:50 p.m., "Rvaught" rvau...@libertycasting.com mailto:rvau...@libertycasting.com escribi: I had my Qmail Toaster crash from a failed raid array . I now have a new mair server setup . I can connect with email clients that are on the same subnet with the server Ok. Other clients on different subnets can not . I have the other subnets listed in tcp.smtp the same as the old server . Is there some place else I need to adjust . __ __ __ __ My guess would be a routing problem (outside of QMT). Can they ping the QMT host? I would do a dig too and make sure your DNS resolves. --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: strange display error in qmailadmin
On 11/12/2012 11:15 AM, Postmaster wrote: On 12/11/2012 16:43, Giuseppe Perna wrote: 2012/11/12 Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net: On 11/12/2012 06:44 AM, Giuseppe Perna wrote: goodmorning, my sistem qmailtoaster is update. i have this strange error dispaly in qmailadmin: mailboxes - address, full name, used, quota (mb), edit box, clear box, box default under used, I have this number busted 17592186043641.26. the share/quota is set to Noquota, or unlimited Thanks -- - This is not a correct figure of course, but it's not unusual for QMT either. Quotas in QMT have been broken for years. With the recent release of vpopmail-toaster-5.4.33-1.4.0 they are allegedly fixed. I haven't heard any reports verifying this though. One piece I think we're missing is fixing erroneous quota data that's left over in the vpopmail database. Does anyone have any info on this? (I'm sorry that I haven't had time to look into this, and as I don't use quotas myself, it's not anywhere close to the front burner). Bottom Line is that this isn't anything that would cause a malfunction in this case (Noquota being used). Thanks for bringing this to light Giuseppe. It'd be nice to get this fixed. -- -Eric 'shubes' - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com hy Eric thanks for you repaly, I found that did not work either panel admin-toaster for the domain with the share busted. If I do I access http://ipserver/admin-toaster - vqadmin --- view domain, insert the name of the domain I get blank page hello - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com I had a similar problem. I discovered that in my MySQL in the database vpopmail (qmailtoaster DB), table dir_control had some values (I think it was cur_users) set to unusually high number. When I manually corrected that the problem has been fixed. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com I have tried this fix and while it works sometimes, it doesn't always work. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] re: attacks
I am seeing a pronounced increase in attacks on one of my servers. Is anyone else experiencing this too? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] re: attacks
On 11/07/2012 11:25 AM, Postmaster wrote: On 07/11/2012 19:54, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: I am seeing a pronounced increase in attacks on one of my servers. Is anyone else experiencing this too? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com fail2ban and hakuna-matata - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com I use fail2ban and it works wonderfully. I was just curious if it was just me or everybody experiencing an uptick in these type of intrusions. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] re: attacks
On 11/07/2012 11:06 AM, Angus McIntyre wrote: Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: I am seeing a pronounced increase in attacks on one of my servers. Is anyone else experiencing this too? If by attacks you mean grinders attempting to guess SMTP usernames and passwords, yes. Yes Over the last few months, they seem to be getting faster, and over the*last week* or so I've been seeing an uptick in the number of different hosts trying it. same here. fail2ban seems to handle them quite nicely. Angus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] re: attacks
On 11/07/2012 12:18 PM, Eric Broch wrote: On 11/7/2012 11:54 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: I am seeing a pronounced increase in attacks on one of my servers. Is anyone else experiencing this too? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com Not sure we're talking the same thing, but I'm getting a heck of a lot of these: Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.mydomain.com. I tried to deliver a bounce message to this address, but the bounce bounced! . . . ... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com I was getting a lot of those, but no longer. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] re: attacks
On 11/07/2012 01:57 PM, Eric Broch wrote: On 11/7/2012 2:40 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: On 11/07/2012 12:18 PM, Eric Broch wrote: On 11/7/2012 11:54 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: I am seeing a pronounced increase in attacks on one of my servers. Is anyone else experiencing this too? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com Not sure we're talking the same thing, but I'm getting a heck of a lot of these: Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.mydomain.com. I tried to deliver a bounce message to this address, but the bounce bounced! . . . ... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com I was getting a lot of those, but no longer. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com Cecil, Did they simply go away, or did you do something specifically to eradicate it? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com No they just stopped. --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Search or indexing
On 11/05/2012 12:27 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 11/05/2012 12:27 PM, Postmaster wrote: I am still experimenting and trying to find the Holly Grail. It's called Android. ;) Touche' - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke
On 10/29/2012 11:19 AM, Dave MacDonald wrote: Thanks for the reply. My problem is now my mail queue willnot send, remote queue currently 88 an going up triedqmHandle -a waited a bit, theqmHandle -l, still more not going out. This is a complete rebuild, using Centos ISO, all yum and qtp-menu updates, re-added all domains and users, tested some at random, no errors. Now its live, email not going out of box, Commented all out in spamdyke config. Restarted email server etc. Please help On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:05 AM, David Good dav...@ntcb.com wrote: On 10/29/2012 12:38 PM, Dave MacDonald wrote: Hi List for testing, how do I disable spamdyke? http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Spamdyke - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com Firewall? --
Re: [qmailtoaster] List
No, just trouble free Qmail servers here. On 09/13/2012 04:31 PM, Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. wrote: Did the list go down? I have not seen any posts for 2 days which is surprising me. Obviously if this posts, it is another quiet day. Gilbert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com --
[qmailtoaster] re:
I know this is a question I should know the answer to, but I need confirmation. When I see this in my log files vpopmail[21736]: vchkpw-pop3: vpopmail user not found It's coming through port 110 correct? TIA --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Squirrelmail very slow!!!!
Possible DNS or network issue? Are there website hosted on the same host? Can you access them quickly? On 09/05/2012 01:02 PM, Kalil Costa - Brasilsite wrote: Hi guys, My webmail is very very slow, at time I have waited 40 / 70 secs to open the main box. SMTP, POP3 and IMAP works fine. I use the last version of qmailtoaster (07/31/2011) Someone knows this issue ? Thanks a lot. Kalz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: qtp-backup
On 08/13/2012 08:26 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 08/13/2012 08:07 AM, Maxwell Smart wrote: On 08/13/2012 07:56 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 08/12/2012 08:56 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: On 8/12/12 8:29 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 08/12/2012 08:05 PM, Maxwell Smart wrote: On 08/12/2012 02:46 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 08/12/2012 02:20 PM, Maxwell Smart wrote: Can I use a non standard ftp for qtp-backup? CJ - Define a non standard ftp. My bad, non standard port. 3121 -- FTP uses 2 ports. OK, but doesn't port 20 accept transfers after your initial connection? and not otherwise? - That depends on the arrangement the server makes with the client, which depends (IIRC) on whether active or passive mode is used. I am using passive ports Are you having difficulty getting FTP to work? Why do I get the feeling that this has more to do with FTP than the subject line? ;) No it's working, but it actually didn't send the backup by ftp last night. Not sure I setup the correct config file. It appears both are the same, but not sure how it works. qtp-backup uses the curl command for transferring the backup to an ftp server: # tail $(which qtp-backup) Of course it sets those $variables all up before invoking the command. You might want to echo the values of the command before the command is invoked, so you can see their values. Or you could set -x in the qtp-backup script in order to step through what it does, or run it with bash -n to see what it does without actually running it. I set all the variables Does curl work outside of qtp-backup? It's installed, but haven't tested functionality. curl 7.15.5 (i686-redhat-linux-gnu) libcurl/7.15.5 OpenSSL/0.9.8b zlib/1.2.3 libidn/0.6.5 Protocols: tftp ftp telnet dict ldap http file https ftps Features: GSS-Negotiate IDN IPv6 Largefile NTLM SSL libz - Please test curl using a suitable command. I expect that there's likely a firewall issue somewhere. Are both hosts (ftp client and ftp server) on public addresses, or is there NAT going on on either end? Do you have control of the FTP server? If so, which software is being used? Here's a nice explanation which I expect will be helpful: http://slacksite.com/other/ftp.html OK, I ran the backup and successfully transferred the files to the second server. I ran qtp-restore and everything appears to have run correctly, but I cannot see any of the accounts. The mail is in the correct vpopmail folder and the mysql database has been created with all the accounts, but if I try to access any of the accounts via webmin or admin-toaster there is nothing there. The list appears in admin-toaster, but when I click on the domain to view it's users it says Domain has no postmaster!! and if I click on show users it says Domain example.com does not exist Qmailctl stat shows Any ideas? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: qtp-backup
On 08/13/2012 08:26 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 08/13/2012 08:07 AM, Maxwell Smart wrote: On 08/13/2012 07:56 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 08/12/2012 08:56 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: On 8/12/12 8:29 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 08/12/2012 08:05 PM, Maxwell Smart wrote: On 08/12/2012 02:46 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 08/12/2012 02:20 PM, Maxwell Smart wrote: Can I use a non standard ftp for qtp-backup? CJ - Define a non standard ftp. My bad, non standard port. 3121 -- FTP uses 2 ports. OK, but doesn't port 20 accept transfers after your initial connection? and not otherwise? - That depends on the arrangement the server makes with the client, which depends (IIRC) on whether active or passive mode is used. I am using passive ports Are you having difficulty getting FTP to work? Why do I get the feeling that this has more to do with FTP than the subject line? ;) No it's working, but it actually didn't send the backup by ftp last night. Not sure I setup the correct config file. It appears both are the same, but not sure how it works. qtp-backup uses the curl command for transferring the backup to an ftp server: # tail $(which qtp-backup) Of course it sets those $variables all up before invoking the command. You might want to echo the values of the command before the command is invoked, so you can see their values. Or you could set -x in the qtp-backup script in order to step through what it does, or run it with bash -n to see what it does without actually running it. I set all the variables Does curl work outside of qtp-backup? It's installed, but haven't tested functionality. curl 7.15.5 (i686-redhat-linux-gnu) libcurl/7.15.5 OpenSSL/0.9.8b zlib/1.2.3 libidn/0.6.5 Protocols: tftp ftp telnet dict ldap http file https ftps Features: GSS-Negotiate IDN IPv6 Largefile NTLM SSL libz - Please test curl using a suitable command. I expect that there's likely a firewall issue somewhere. Are both hosts (ftp client and ftp server) on public addresses, or is there NAT going on on either end? Do you have control of the FTP server? If so, which software is being used? Here's a nice explanation which I expect will be helpful: http://slacksite.com/other/ftp.html OK, I ran the backup and successfully transferred the files to the second server. I ran qtp-restore and everything appears to have run correctly, but I cannot see any of the accounts. The mail is in the correct vpopmail folder and the mysql database has been created with all the accounts, but if I try to access any of the accounts via webmin or admin-toaster there is nothing there. The list appears in admin-toaster, but when I click on the domain to view it's users it says Domain has no postmaster!! and if I click on show users it says Domain example.com does not exist Qmailctl stat shows # qmailctl stat authlib: up (pid 17613) 640 seconds clamd: up (pid 17616) 640 seconds imap4: up (pid 17618) 640 seconds imap4-ssl: up (pid 17619) 640 seconds pop3: up (pid 17603) 640 seconds pop3-ssl: up (pid 17608) 640 seconds send: up (pid 17607) 640 seconds smtp: up (pid 17611) 640 seconds spamd: up (pid 17604) 640 seconds submission: up (pid 17612) 640 seconds authlib/log: up (pid 17617) 640 seconds clamd/log: up (pid 17620) 640 seconds imap4/log: up (pid 17605) 640 seconds imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 17606) 640 seconds pop3/log: up (pid 17602) 640 seconds pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 17621) 640 seconds send/log: up (pid 17610) 640 seconds smtp/log: up (pid 17614) 640 seconds spamd/log: up (pid 17609) 640 seconds submission/log: up (pid 17615) 640 seconds If I try to send a test email through logwatch.pl for instance I get Can't execute sendmail -t: No such file or directory Any ideas? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: qtp-backup
On 08/13/2012 02:38 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: On 08/13/2012 08:26 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 08/13/2012 08:07 AM, Maxwell Smart wrote: On 08/13/2012 07:56 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 08/12/2012 08:56 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: On 8/12/12 8:29 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 08/12/2012 08:05 PM, Maxwell Smart wrote: On 08/12/2012 02:46 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 08/12/2012 02:20 PM, Maxwell Smart wrote: Can I use a non standard ftp for qtp-backup? CJ - Define a non standard ftp. My bad, non standard port. 3121 -- FTP uses 2 ports. OK, but doesn't port 20 accept transfers after your initial connection? and not otherwise? - That depends on the arrangement the server makes with the client, which depends (IIRC) on whether active or passive mode is used. I am using passive ports Are you having difficulty getting FTP to work? Why do I get the feeling that this has more to do with FTP than the subject line? ;) No it's working, but it actually didn't send the backup by ftp last night. Not sure I setup the correct config file. It appears both are the same, but not sure how it works. qtp-backup uses the curl command for transferring the backup to an ftp server: # tail $(which qtp-backup) Of course it sets those $variables all up before invoking the command. You might want to echo the values of the command before the command is invoked, so you can see their values. Or you could set -x in the qtp-backup script in order to step through what it does, or run it with bash -n to see what it does without actually running it. I set all the variables Does curl work outside of qtp-backup? It's installed, but haven't tested functionality. curl 7.15.5 (i686-redhat-linux-gnu) libcurl/7.15.5 OpenSSL/0.9.8b zlib/1.2.3 libidn/0.6.5 Protocols: tftp ftp telnet dict ldap http file https ftps Features: GSS-Negotiate IDN IPv6 Largefile NTLM SSL libz - Please test curl using a suitable command. I expect that there's likely a firewall issue somewhere. Are both hosts (ftp client and ftp server) on public addresses, or is there NAT going on on either end? Do you have control of the FTP server? If so, which software is being used? Here's a nice explanation which I expect will be helpful: http://slacksite.com/other/ftp.html OK, I ran the backup and successfully transferred the files to the second server. I ran qtp-restore and everything appears to have run correctly, but I cannot see any of the accounts. The mail is in the correct vpopmail folder and the mysql database has been created with all the accounts, but if I try to access any of the accounts via webmin or admin-toaster there is nothing there. The list appears in admin-toaster, but when I click on the domain to view it's users it says Domain has no postmaster!! and if I click on show users it says Domain example.com does not exist Qmailctl stat shows # qmailctl stat authlib: up (pid 17613) 640 seconds clamd: up (pid 17616) 640 seconds imap4: up (pid 17618) 640 seconds imap4-ssl: up (pid 17619) 640 seconds pop3: up (pid 17603) 640 seconds pop3-ssl: up (pid 17608) 640 seconds send: up (pid 17607) 640 seconds smtp: up (pid 17611) 640 seconds spamd: up (pid 17604) 640 seconds submission: up (pid 17612) 640 seconds authlib/log: up (pid 17617) 640 seconds clamd/log: up (pid 17620) 640 seconds imap4/log: up (pid 17605) 640 seconds imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 17606) 640 seconds pop3/log: up (pid 17602) 640 seconds pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 17621) 640 seconds send/log: up (pid 17610) 640 seconds smtp/log: up (pid 17614) 640 seconds spamd/log: up (pid 17609) 640 seconds submission/log: up (pid 17615) 640 seconds If I try to send a test email through logwatch.pl for instance I get Can't execute sendmail -t: No such file or directory Any ideas? I got it sorted. Thanks for all the suggestions. I had the incorrect mysql vpopmail password. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: qtp-backup
On 8/12/12 8:29 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 08/12/2012 08:05 PM, Maxwell Smart wrote: On 08/12/2012 02:46 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 08/12/2012 02:20 PM, Maxwell Smart wrote: Can I use a non standard ftp for qtp-backup? CJ - Define a non standard ftp. My bad, non standard port. 3121 -- FTP uses 2 ports. OK, but doesn't port 20 accept transfers after your initial connection? and not otherwise? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: vqadmin
On 08/08/2012 02:45 PM, Postmaster wrote: On 09/08/2012 00:06, Eric Shubert wrote: On 08/08/2012 01:53 PM, Postmaster wrote: FYG I followed this advice here - http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Troubleshooting#No_Menus_etc and my problem with no menus in vqadmin has been resolved. Are you sure it was vqadmin that was having trouble? Those files both belong to the control-panel-toaster package. Sorry, Eric, you are right - this is related to /admin-toaster/ not showing anything - recent post by Cecil/Maxwell. In relation to vqadmin, I fixed my issue with vqadmin by going to vpopmail-dir_control-cur_users or cur_level in mysql (you can use phpMyAdmin for easy navigation) had a meaningless number of 12203203804 ;)) It was some kind of a buffer overflow in the browser and hence Log into http://yourdomain.com/admin-toaster/ click: Vqadmin click: List Domains did not work. As soon as that number has been changed to zero vqadmin started working. I have an account that is having the same issue, but when I change the value to 0 I get the following message: /Internal Server Error/ /The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request./ /Please contact the server administrator, root@localhost and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error./ /More information about this error may be available in the server error log./ I don't see anything in the logs that would indicate what's happening.
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: 554 Your email was rejected because it contains the MBL_303159.UNOFFICIAL virus
On 08/07/2012 10:05 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 08/07/2012 09:03 AM, Maxwell Smart wrote: On 08/07/2012 08:59 AM, Marco Volkert wrote: Hi, Not sure if this is the right list, but my users getting this error: 554 Your email was rejected because it contains the MBL_303159.UNOFFICIAL virus if they try to send an email. Regardless of protocol and format. Some users told me they are also waiting for external emails but the senders get a similar error message. For now, I disabled clamav in /var/qmail/control/simcontrol so my users are able to send emails. Is this issue already known? What can I do that the mail server is working as usual (with clamav)? simscan 1.4.0 clamav: 0.97.5/m:54/d:15226 spam: 3.3.2 Regards, Marco Volkert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com That appears to be coming from your network. ClamAV only scans incoming e mail. Your issue appears to be with outgoing e mails being infected. - Not true, CJ. SpamAssassin scans only incoming, but Clamav scans everything, including submissions. Marco, this appears to be a signature that's included in the sane security additional signatures. You might have some old signature files hanging around which need to be cleaned up. Please post the following: # ls -lR /usr/share/clamav Learn something new every day. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] re: admin-toaster
Just an FYI. It appears that php 5.3 finishes off admin toaster. Qmailadmin still appears to work, but admin-toaster is completely borked. --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: wrong address
On 07/10/2012 09:58 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 07/09/2012 07:47 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: I have a customer that is getting mail that's not addressed to him, but the delivered to address is correct. It's all SPAM from different return addresses from yahoo.com. Here is the header. They all have bob as the first name before the @ but none of the recipients are on my server yet it reaches b...@xyz.com Any ideas on how to prevent this? From: - Mon Jul 09 16:10:31 2012 X-Account-Key: account6 X-UIDL: 1341848754.4017.area510.net,S=3406 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: gingermuttinij...@yahoo.com Delivered-To: b...@xyz.com Received: (qmail 4015 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jul 2012 15:45:53 - Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 4007, pid: 4009, t: 0.7633s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.97.4 /m: 54/d:14650 spam: 3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on viktorya.area510.net Received: from unknown (HELO nm28-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com) (98.139.212.252) by area510.net with SMTP; 9 Jul 2012 15:45:53 - Received-SPF: none (area510.net: domain at yahoo.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: from [98.139.212.151] by nm28.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jul 2012 15:45:50 - Received: from [98.139.215.248] by tm8.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jul 2012 15:45:50 - Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1061.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jul 2012 15:45:50 - X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 30358.37543...@omp1061.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 72956 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jul 2012 15:45:49 - DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1341848749; bh=KGVKk+9tl9DXcmg2j2FB/5PjzyMTpPWDTv6xMpx1UJY=; h=Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;b=FM6kElk4CrmK4RpWtQGI/Tge58dsI40Nfq7dZAZnXD2KnrjLML/oDIdh6yrugHllCN5qfZFdPmwsyXBrw9m52anaSyEDGzmQ/d4MaRPHKL11Opm5wJXnTyBuwWP/hDrY9+U3NVtxZvWHlcVZGVJ5qIRdEgwqZ0mq9l0gfXUhwLU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;b=fUyEXw9lTPDI8eOCK0fxAAGbD2aAokjN0G1pvB5sN88t/jXTdMzJjfttAv85jJzs4DKtY5kE7BXXV1a1jJ52ODvYAa9Z0dgUGXwvtioa4gGdSWi6zwsUM+pTZo58XYJI4Z4fRJ6N4TB+xTvyUamgBCEq+Z7Rku5tjzdKplAH6sI=; Received: from [118.174.38.138] by web140505.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 08:45:49 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.120.356233 Message-ID: 1341848749.21056.androidmob...@web140505.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:45:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Ginger Muttini gingermuttinij...@yahoo.com Subject: re: To: b...@dea.xohost.com b...@dea.xohost.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=1211670101-1783750882-1341848749=:21056 This is consistent with b...@xyz.com being a bcc address, which I expect is the case. The sender's yahoo account has likely been compromised. I don't think spamdyke will do much good, as it's coming from a yahoo server. I see SA listed as a spam checker, but don't see any score. Did SA not scan the message? I expect that SA is going to be your best bet in this case. The return address is never the same, so not sure if it's a compromised account or constantly new accounts. So, I am not seeing his address because it's bcc? SA did score it at 3.25 and my SA is set at 5 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] moving on...
On 07/10/2012 12:16 PM, Waschbsch Martin IT-Dienstleistungen wrote: Hi everyone, I just wanted to let you guys know that I am going to move away from QMT. There are lots of mixed feelings involved: I really like QMT and did not want to move away from it, but as I am now being paid to support and enhance a mail server built around exim (full time!), it only makes sense to focus on that completely. I hope that you guys keep on working and making good use of QMT! Also, a big thank you to all the helpful people on the list and especially to Eric and Jake who have both helped me a lot with QMT (and understanding mail servers in general). Cheers and so long, Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com Sorry to hear that you're leaving, but good luck in your new venture. CJ --
[qmailtoaster] re: wrong address
I have a customer that is getting mail that's not addressed to him, but the delivered to address is correct. It's all SPAM from different return addresses from yahoo.com. Here is the header. They all have bob as the first name before the @ but none of the recipients are on my server yet it reaches b...@xyz.com Any ideas on how to prevent this? From: - Mon Jul 09 16:10:31 2012 X-Account-Key: account6 X-UIDL: 1341848754.4017.area510.net,S=3406 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path:gingermuttinij...@yahoo.com Delivered-To: b...@xyz.com Received: (qmail 4015 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jul 2012 15:45:53 - Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 4007, pid: 4009, t: 0.7633s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.97.4 /m: 54/d:14650 spam: 3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on viktorya.area510.net Received: from unknown (HELO nm28-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com) (98.139.212.252) by area510.net with SMTP; 9 Jul 2012 15:45:53 - Received-SPF: none (area510.net: domain at yahoo.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: from [98.139.212.151] by nm28.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jul 2012 15:45:50 - Received: from [98.139.215.248] by tm8.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jul 2012 15:45:50 - Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1061.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jul 2012 15:45:50 - X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 30358.37543...@omp1061.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 72956 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jul 2012 15:45:49 - DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1341848749; bh=KGVKk+9tl9DXcmg2j2FB/5PjzyMTpPWDTv6xMpx1UJY=; h=Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;b=FM6kElk4CrmK4RpWtQGI/Tge58dsI40Nfq7dZAZnXD2KnrjLML/oDIdh6yrugHllCN5qfZFdPmwsyXBrw9m52anaSyEDGzmQ/d4MaRPHKL11Opm5wJXnTyBuwWP/hDrY9+U3NVtxZvWHlcVZGVJ5qIRdEgwqZ0mq9l0gfXUhwLU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;b=fUyEXw9lTPDI8eOCK0fxAAGbD2aAokjN0G1pvB5sN88t/jXTdMzJjfttAv85jJzs4DKtY5kE7BXXV1a1jJ52ODvYAa9Z0dgUGXwvtioa4gGdSWi6zwsUM+pTZo58XYJI4Z4fRJ6N4TB+xTvyUamgBCEq+Z7Rku5tjzdKplAH6sI=; Received: from [118.174.38.138] by web140505.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 08:45:49 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.120.356233 Message-ID: 1341848749.21056.androidmob...@web140505.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:45:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Ginger Muttini gingermuttinij...@yahoo.com Subject:re: To: b...@dea.xohost.com b...@dea.xohost.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=1211670101-1783750882-1341848749=:21056
[qmailtoaster] re: backup question
I have two servers, server A and server B. They are both Centos 5.8, built on the V2gnu iso. They are basically identical with all updates. I have about a dozen e mail domains on server A and 2 e mail domains on server B. Can I run the qtp-backup on server B and restore those on server A so that all my mail domains reside on one server? TIA --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Issue with qtp-ami-up2date
On 06/19/2012 08:01 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 06/18/2012 08:13 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: On 06/18/2012 07:58 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 06/17/2012 11:33 PM, Casey Price wrote: Hi all, Just noticed a problem on one of my virtualized xen QMT boxes when running qtp-ami-up2date Received the following error: /usr/sbin/qtp-config: line 168: 1.el5: syntax error: invalid arithmetic operator (error token is ".el5") I'm running CentOS 5.8 i386. Any ideas? Thanks, -- Casey Price Leave it to CJ to break something. ;) Please post: # rpm -q | grep toaster | sort That part of the code is comparing the installed version of a package to the version listed as current. It's a little tricky to do, at least in a shell script. Given that it's choking on "1.el5", where it appears to need simply "1", I'm guessing that a package that is installed on your system which has "el5" in it at the end, where the stock QMT packages do not. The result of the command above may show us this. Have you built your own customized version of any packages? Hey, wait a minute, what did I do? -- Sorry Max, I got you and Casey mixed up. You're in the clear. Whew!! --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Issue with qtp-ami-up2date
On 06/18/2012 07:58 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 06/17/2012 11:33 PM, Casey Price wrote: Hi all, Just noticed a problem on one of my virtualized xen QMT boxes when running qtp-ami-up2date Received the following error: /usr/sbin/qtp-config: line 168: 1.el5: syntax error: invalid arithmetic operator (error token is ".el5") I'm running CentOS 5.8 i386. Any ideas? Thanks, -- Casey Price Leave it to CJ to break something. ;) Please post: # rpm -q | grep toaster | sort That part of the code is comparing the installed version of a package to the version listed as current. It's a little tricky to do, at least in a shell script. Given that it's choking on "1.el5", where it appears to need simply "1", I'm guessing that a package that is installed on your system which has "el5" in it at the end, where the stock QMT packages do not. The result of the command above may show us this. Have you built your own customized version of any packages? Hey, wait a minute, what did I do? --
[qmailtoaster] re: vpopmail
Is there a script to reset all the permissions in the /home/vpopmail/domains directory? --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: 2 NIC
I am not sure I quite understand why it doesn't work and a resolver is needed. If I do a dig it answers to the proper IP. It stands to reason that I should be able to access that server through a web browser, and it cannot. What is a resolver going to tell my system that it already doesn't know ? On 05/21/2012 10:52 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: I don't think so. I don't think you should have the same name twice in your hosts file. I'm not sure off hand which address linux would return in this case. (How would it know when to return which one?) What makes this work is that one resolver (your local resolver) is used when connected to the LAN which returns the LAN address corresponding to the name, and a different resolver (internet authoritative dns) is used when connected to the WAN. A firewall such as IPCop can be used as a local resolver to provide the local addresses (recommended method). This can also be implemented in a single bind host using the split horizon feature, but that's a bit tricky. --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: 2 NIC
On 05/21/2012 11:12 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 05/21/2012 10:59 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: I am not sure I quite understand why it doesn't work and a resolver is needed. If I do a dig it answers to the proper IP. It stands to reason that I should be able to access that server through a web browser, and it cannot. What is a resolver going to tell my system that it already doesn't know ? On 05/21/2012 10:52 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: I don't think so. I don't think you should have the same name twice in your hosts file. I'm not sure off hand which address linux would return in this case. (How would it know when to return which one?) What makes this work is that one resolver (your local resolver) is used when connected to the LAN which returns the LAN address corresponding to the name, and a different resolver (internet authoritative dns) is used when connected to the WAN. A firewall such as IPCop can be used as a local resolver to provide the local addresses (recommended method). This can also be implemented in a single bind host using the split horizon feature, but that's a bit tricky. -- Did doesn't look at /etc/hosts. If your dig answers with the proper IP, you should be ok. Yes, it does. So that's why I'm a bit confused. --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: 2 NIC
On 05/21/2012 11:46 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 05/21/2012 11:24 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: It resolves to the correct address, but will not answer. I just added the LAN address, ie. Listen 192.168.0.168:80 to the httpd.conf file and now it answers and I'm able to access the pages, but it's not answering them via the WAN. -- That's nothing to do with name resolution. It's a problem with apache config. Have you tried Listen *:80 ? It was Listen *:80 and didn't work, but it still doesn't answer to the WAN which it should. I know the WAN address works since I can use a proxy server or access from my home without issue. It's not a big deal since I can do what I need to, but the setup is not working as expected and I want to know why. I hesitate to ask this, but what's the point of using 2 nics on a web server this way? Because server management, and file transfers are faster using the LAN. --
