Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: concerning server for qmailtoaster

2009-11-27 Thread Rajesh M
hi eric

here is the SMART DATA as you wished to view.

Also forgive my ignorance but what exactly is a nitrous kit

thanks
rajesh


##
LocationSCSI device C
Drive size  232.88 GB
Make and model  ATA WDC WD2500AAJS-0
Supports SMART? Yes
SMART enabled?  Yes
Errors logged   7934 errors detected
Passed drive check? Yes
Offline data collection status  Offline data collection activity
was completed without error.
Auto Offline Data Collection: Enabled.
Self-test execution status  The previous self-test completed having
the read element of the test failed.
Total time to complete Offline data collection  4980 seconds.
Offline data collection capabilitiesSMART execute Offline immediate.
Auto Offline data collection on/off support.
Suspend Offline collection upon new
command.
Offline surface scan supported.
Self-test supported.
Conveyance Self-test supported.
Selective Self-test supported.
SMART capabilities  Saves SMART data before entering
power-saving mode.
Supports SMART auto save timer.
Error logging capabilityError logging supported.
General Purpose Logging supported.
Short self-test routine recommended polling time2 minutes.
Extended self-test routine recommended polling time 61 minutes.
Conveyance self-test routine recommended polling time   5 minutes.
Raw Read Error Rate 0
Spin Up Time2250
Start Stop Count6
Reallocated Sector Ct   0
Seek Error Rate 0
Power On Hours  11833
Spin Retry Count0
Calibration Retry Count 0
Power Cycle Count   6
Power-Off Retract Count 5
Load Cycle Count6
Temperature Celsius 34
Reallocated Event Count 0
Current Pending Sector  19
Offline Uncorrectable   16
Multi Zone Error Rate   0

#




 Jake Vickers wrote:
 Rajesh M wrote:
 hello

 i have a centos server
 2 X dual core 1.6 ghz
 with 4 gb ram
 with around 4200 email boxes

 i was facing problems of high load during office hours -- top command
 used
 display load ranging from 5 to 35.  I log server load every minute.

 i increased ram from 4 gb to 8 gb and processor from 1.6 ghz to 2 ghz
 but
 However it did not make any significant change in the load.

 Then i upgraded from the 250 gb sata drive to a 1 TB sata drive

 there was a huge change in the load -- the load came down dramatically
 it
 is now between 1 - 2.5 even during peak working hours

 what could be reasoning for this ?

 is this related to disk i/o ?


 I think you answered your own question there. The load dropped after you
 changed the drive, so I think it would be safe to say that your drive
 was introducing latency.
 I also have some videos (http://video.qmailtoaster.com) that show some
 tips on how to increase throughput on your system.



 Right.

 Do you still have the old drive? It might be interesting to check the
 SMART data on it for indications of problems.

 I also suspect that when your load was high that the cpu wait % was
 rather high. Did you happen to notice cpu wait % at the time?

 Everyone with a QMT that does any kind of volume should check out Jake's
 tuning videos. The stock QMT is exactly that - stock. One of Jake's tips
 in particular is like adding a nitrous kit to your QMT. Be sure to
 check it out!

 --
 -Eric 'shubes'


 -
 Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
 (www.vickersconsulting.com)
 Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
 installations.
   If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
 -
  Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
 packages.

   To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
  For additional commands, e-mail:
 qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com









-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
  If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
 Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
 
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: concerning server for qmailtoaster

2009-11-27 Thread Maxwell Smart




Rajesh,

He is referring to an addition to cars that increase the horsepower
with nitrous oxide injected into the intake. This is a very popular
way to increase performance in street cars and drag race cars. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrous  So he's saying that Jake's
tweaks act like adding "nitrous". 

Cheers,

CJ

Rajesh M wrote:

  hi eric

here is the SMART DATA as you wished to view.

Also forgive my ignorance but what exactly is a "nitrous" kit

thanks
rajesh


##
Location 	SCSI device C
Drive size 	232.88 GB
Make and model 	ATA WDC WD2500AAJS-0
Supports SMART? 	Yes
SMART enabled? 	Yes
Errors logged 	7934 errors detected
Passed drive check? 	Yes
Offline data collection status 	Offline data collection activity
was completed without error.
Auto Offline Data Collection: Enabled.
Self-test execution status 	The previous self-test completed having
the read element of the test failed.
Total time to complete Offline data collection 	4980 seconds.
Offline data collection capabilities 	SMART execute Offline immediate.
Auto Offline data collection on/off support.
Suspend Offline collection upon new
command.
Offline surface scan supported.
Self-test supported.
Conveyance Self-test supported.
Selective Self-test supported.
SMART capabilities 	Saves SMART data before entering
power-saving mode.
Supports SMART auto save timer.
Error logging capability 	Error logging supported.
General Purpose Logging supported.
Short self-test routine recommended polling time 	2 minutes.
Extended self-test routine recommended polling time 	61 minutes.
Conveyance self-test routine recommended polling time 	5 minutes.
Raw Read Error Rate 	0
Spin Up Time 	2250
Start Stop Count 	6
Reallocated Sector Ct 	0
Seek Error Rate 	0
Power On Hours 	11833
Spin Retry Count 	0
Calibration Retry Count 	0
Power Cycle Count 	6
Power-Off Retract Count 	5
Load Cycle Count 	6
Temperature Celsius 	34
Reallocated Event Count 	0
Current Pending Sector 	19
Offline Uncorrectable 	16
Multi Zone Error Rate 	0

#




  
  
Jake Vickers wrote:


  Rajesh M wrote:
  
  
hello

i have a centos server
2 X dual core 1.6 ghz
with 4 gb ram
with around 4200 email boxes

i was facing problems of high load during office hours -- top command
used
display load ranging from 5 to 35.  I log server load every minute.

i increased ram from 4 gb to 8 gb and processor from 1.6 ghz to 2 ghz
but
However it did not make any significant change in the load.

Then i upgraded from the 250 gb sata drive to a 1 TB sata drive

there was a huge change in the load -- the load came down dramatically
it
is now between 1 - 2.5 even during peak working hours

what could be reasoning for this ?

is this related to disk i/o ?


  
  I think you answered your own question there. The load dropped after you
changed the drive, so I think it would be safe to say that your drive
was introducing latency.
I also have some videos (http://video.qmailtoaster.com) that show some
tips on how to increase throughput on your system.


  

Right.

Do you still have the old drive? It might be interesting to check the
SMART data on it for indications of problems.

I also suspect that when your load was high that the cpu wait % was
rather high. Did you happen to notice cpu wait % at the time?

Everyone with a QMT that does any kind of volume should check out Jake's
tuning videos. The stock QMT is exactly that - stock. One of Jake's tips
in particular is like adding a "nitrous" kit to your QMT. Be sure to
check it out!

--
-Eric 'shubes'


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
  If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
 Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
packages.

  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
 For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




  
  





-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
  If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
 Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
 
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com


  


-- 
Cecil Yother, Jr. "cj"
cj's
2318 Clement Ave
Alameda, CA  94501

tel 

[qmailtoaster] Re: concerning server for qmailtoaster

2009-11-27 Thread Eric Shubert

These appear to indicate a problem with the drive:
Errors logged   7934 errors detected
Self-test execution status 	The previous self-test completed having the 
read element of the test failed.


I don't know that this conclusively proves that this is the cause of 
your past problem, but together with the fact that the problem went away 
with a new drive seems to be a pretty good indication of a problematic 
drive.


Check the serial number online at the WD site. If it's still under 
warranty (usually 3yr), they'll send you a new one if you send the 
faulty one to them (get an RMA for this). WD is great about that. You 
simply need to pay for shipping the old drive to them. I've done this on 
numerous occasions, and with other manufacturers as well.


--
-Eric 'shubes'

Rajesh M wrote:

hi eric

here is the SMART DATA as you wished to view.

Also forgive my ignorance but what exactly is a nitrous kit

thanks
rajesh


##
LocationSCSI device C
Drive size  232.88 GB
Make and model  ATA WDC WD2500AAJS-0
Supports SMART? Yes
SMART enabled?  Yes
Errors logged   7934 errors detected
Passed drive check? Yes
Offline data collection status  Offline data collection activity
was completed without error.
Auto Offline Data Collection: Enabled.
Self-test execution status  The previous self-test completed having
the read element of the test failed.
Total time to complete Offline data collection  4980 seconds.
Offline data collection capabilitiesSMART execute Offline immediate.
Auto Offline data collection on/off support.
Suspend Offline collection upon new
command.
Offline surface scan supported.
Self-test supported.
Conveyance Self-test supported.
Selective Self-test supported.
SMART capabilities  Saves SMART data before entering
power-saving mode.
Supports SMART auto save timer.
Error logging capabilityError logging supported.
General Purpose Logging supported.
Short self-test routine recommended polling time2 minutes.
Extended self-test routine recommended polling time 61 minutes.
Conveyance self-test routine recommended polling time   5 minutes.
Raw Read Error Rate 0
Spin Up Time2250
Start Stop Count6
Reallocated Sector Ct   0
Seek Error Rate 0
Power On Hours  11833
Spin Retry Count0
Calibration Retry Count 0
Power Cycle Count   6
Power-Off Retract Count 5
Load Cycle Count6
Temperature Celsius 34
Reallocated Event Count 0
Current Pending Sector  19
Offline Uncorrectable   16
Multi Zone Error Rate   0

#





Jake Vickers wrote:

Rajesh M wrote:

hello

i have a centos server
2 X dual core 1.6 ghz
with 4 gb ram
with around 4200 email boxes

i was facing problems of high load during office hours -- top command
used
display load ranging from 5 to 35.  I log server load every minute.

i increased ram from 4 gb to 8 gb and processor from 1.6 ghz to 2 ghz
but
However it did not make any significant change in the load.

Then i upgraded from the 250 gb sata drive to a 1 TB sata drive

there was a huge change in the load -- the load came down dramatically
it
is now between 1 - 2.5 even during peak working hours

what could be reasoning for this ?

is this related to disk i/o ?


I think you answered your own question there. The load dropped after you
changed the drive, so I think it would be safe to say that your drive
was introducing latency.
I also have some videos (http://video.qmailtoaster.com) that show some
tips on how to increase throughput on your system.



Right.

Do you still have the old drive? It might be interesting to check the
SMART data on it for indications of problems.

I also suspect that when your load was high that the cpu wait % was
rather high. Did you happen to notice cpu wait % at the time?

Everyone with a QMT that does any kind of volume should check out Jake's
tuning videos. The stock QMT is exactly that - stock. One of Jake's tips
in particular is like adding a nitrous kit to your QMT. Be sure to
check it out!

--
-Eric 'shubes'





-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: concerning server for qmailtoaster

2009-11-15 Thread David
I have got to get registered to get these.. Ive putting it off to long.. 
I ve been working with qmt since 2004 and luv it.. I feel like it is an 
integral part of my core systems and if it has an issue then the whole 
core has an issue.
I want to be more part of development but I am still putting together 
gear to help with this.

Dave
Eric Shubert wrote:

Jake Vickers wrote:

Rajesh M wrote:

hello

i have a centos server
2 X dual core 1.6 ghz
with 4 gb ram
with around 4200 email boxes

i was facing problems of high load during office hours -- top 
command used

display load ranging from 5 to 35.  I log server load every minute.

i increased ram from 4 gb to 8 gb and processor from 1.6 ghz to 2 
ghz but

However it did not make any significant change in the load.

Then i upgraded from the 250 gb sata drive to a 1 TB sata drive

there was a huge change in the load -- the load came down 
dramatically it

is now between 1 - 2.5 even during peak working hours

what could be reasoning for this ?

is this related to disk i/o ?
  


I think you answered your own question there. The load dropped after 
you changed the drive, so I think it would be safe to say that your 
drive was introducing latency.
I also have some videos (http://video.qmailtoaster.com) that show 
some tips on how to increase throughput on your system.





Right.

Do you still have the old drive? It might be interesting to check the 
SMART data on it for indications of problems.


I also suspect that when your load was high that the cpu wait % was 
rather high. Did you happen to notice cpu wait % at the time?


Everyone with a QMT that does any kind of volume should check out 
Jake's tuning videos. The stock QMT is exactly that - stock. One of 
Jake's tips in particular is like adding a nitrous kit to your QMT. 
Be sure to check it out!





-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




[qmailtoaster] Re: concerning server for qmailtoaster

2009-11-14 Thread Eric Shubert

Jake Vickers wrote:

Rajesh M wrote:

hello

i have a centos server
2 X dual core 1.6 ghz
with 4 gb ram
with around 4200 email boxes

i was facing problems of high load during office hours -- top command 
used

display load ranging from 5 to 35.  I log server load every minute.

i increased ram from 4 gb to 8 gb and processor from 1.6 ghz to 2 ghz but
However it did not make any significant change in the load.

Then i upgraded from the 250 gb sata drive to a 1 TB sata drive

there was a huge change in the load -- the load came down dramatically it
is now between 1 - 2.5 even during peak working hours

what could be reasoning for this ?

is this related to disk i/o ?
  


I think you answered your own question there. The load dropped after you 
changed the drive, so I think it would be safe to say that your drive 
was introducing latency.
I also have some videos (http://video.qmailtoaster.com) that show some 
tips on how to increase throughput on your system.





Right.

Do you still have the old drive? It might be interesting to check the 
SMART data on it for indications of problems.


I also suspect that when your load was high that the cpu wait % was 
rather high. Did you happen to notice cpu wait % at the time?


Everyone with a QMT that does any kind of volume should check out Jake's 
tuning videos. The stock QMT is exactly that - stock. One of Jake's tips 
in particular is like adding a nitrous kit to your QMT. Be sure to 
check it out!


--
-Eric 'shubes'


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com