Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Plans for R 4.1 in Fedora?
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 16:08, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > This seems like a good opportunity to give this a go: > https://github.com/juhp/fbrnch#parallel-building > I did ask for some enhancements for bootstrap builds there, but I don't know how well it works yet. Also, I'm not too sure it understands our virtual Provides/BuildRequires, but if that is added, then it's a good choice for determining build order. > On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 21:59, Tom Callaway wrote: >> >> That is a very good point. Oh well. Anyone want to help generate the build >> order? :) >> >> ~spot >> >> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, 3:57 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade >> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri., Jun. 4, 2021, 10:08 a.m. Tom Callaway, wrote: Is there a way to know which R components provide graphics drivers? I would really rather not rebuild everything if we do not have to. >>> >>> Unless you mean rebuild for testing purposes, because you added the R(ABI) >>> = major.minor Provides/Requires, you need to rebuild the world anyway. >>> ~spot On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 6:28 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 22:18, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > what should be our plan for R 4.1 update in Fedora? > > See [1]. The plan is to wait for the next RStudio release and > coordinate updates. > > [1] https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-fedora/2021-May/000736.html > > > What are the pitfalls and the changes that we should be aware? > > The NEWS says: "The graphics engine version, R_GE_version, has been > bumped to 14 and so packages that provide graphics devices should be > reinstalled." But anyway, we should do the customary mass rebuild of > packages to avoid other possible incompatibilities and "Package was > built under version 4.0" messages. > > Iñaki > > > The second semester (with the corresponding induced pandemic chaos) > > is > > dimming down around here so I have at least time to breath again. :-) > > > > FWIW I am in no hurry to have 4.1 in Fedora 34, my main interest is > > to > have > > it in rawhide and later if we find it suitable to backport it to F34. > > > > FWIW since our last talk Octave (for version 7 at least) is starting > > by > > default to have the major version in the path for packages. :-) > > > > Best regards, > > -- > > José Abílio > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > > ___ > > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list > > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora > > > > -- > Iñaki Úcar > > ___ > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora > > > > -- > Iñaki Úcar -- Elliott ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Plans for R 4.1 in Fedora?
This seems like a good opportunity to give this a go: https://github.com/juhp/fbrnch#parallel-building On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 21:59, Tom Callaway wrote: > That is a very good point. Oh well. Anyone want to help generate the build > order? :) > > ~spot > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, 3:57 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade < > quantum.anal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri., Jun. 4, 2021, 10:08 a.m. Tom Callaway, wrote: >> >>> Is there a way to know which R components provide graphics drivers? I >>> would >>> really rather not rebuild everything if we do not have to. >>> >>> >> Unless you mean rebuild for testing purposes, because you added the >> R(ABI) = major.minor Provides/Requires, you need to rebuild the world >> anyway. >> >> >>> >>> ~spot >>> >>> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 6:28 AM Iñaki Ucar >>> wrote: >>> >>> > On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 22:18, José Abílio Matos >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Hi all, >>> > > what should be our plan for R 4.1 update in Fedora? >>> > >>> > See [1]. The plan is to wait for the next RStudio release and >>> > coordinate updates. >>> > >>> > [1] https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-fedora/2021-May/000736.html >>> > >>> > > What are the pitfalls and the changes that we should be aware? >>> > >>> > The NEWS says: "The graphics engine version, R_GE_version, has been >>> > bumped to 14 and so packages that provide graphics devices should be >>> > reinstalled." But anyway, we should do the customary mass rebuild of >>> > packages to avoid other possible incompatibilities and "Package was >>> > built under version 4.0" messages. >>> > >>> > Iñaki >>> > >>> > > The second semester (with the corresponding induced pandemic >>> chaos) is >>> > > dimming down around here so I have at least time to breath again. :-) >>> > > >>> > > FWIW I am in no hurry to have 4.1 in Fedora 34, my main interest >>> is to >>> > have >>> > > it in rawhide and later if we find it suitable to backport it to F34. >>> > > >>> > > FWIW since our last talk Octave (for version 7 at least) is >>> starting by >>> > > default to have the major version in the path for packages. :-) >>> > > >>> > > Best regards, >>> > > -- >>> > > José Abílio >>> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>> > > >>> > > ___ >>> > > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list >>> > > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org >>> > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Iñaki Úcar >>> > >>> > ___ >>> > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list >>> > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org >>> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora >>> > >>> >>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>> >>> ___ >>> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list >>> R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora >>> >> -- Iñaki Úcar [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Plans for R 4.1 in Fedora?
That is a very good point. Oh well. Anyone want to help generate the build order? :) ~spot On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, 3:57 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade < quantum.anal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri., Jun. 4, 2021, 10:08 a.m. Tom Callaway, wrote: > >> Is there a way to know which R components provide graphics drivers? I >> would >> really rather not rebuild everything if we do not have to. >> >> > Unless you mean rebuild for testing purposes, because you added the R(ABI) > = major.minor Provides/Requires, you need to rebuild the world anyway. > > >> >> ~spot >> >> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 6:28 AM Iñaki Ucar >> wrote: >> >> > On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 22:18, José Abílio Matos >> wrote: >> > > >> > > Hi all, >> > > what should be our plan for R 4.1 update in Fedora? >> > >> > See [1]. The plan is to wait for the next RStudio release and >> > coordinate updates. >> > >> > [1] https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-fedora/2021-May/000736.html >> > >> > > What are the pitfalls and the changes that we should be aware? >> > >> > The NEWS says: "The graphics engine version, R_GE_version, has been >> > bumped to 14 and so packages that provide graphics devices should be >> > reinstalled." But anyway, we should do the customary mass rebuild of >> > packages to avoid other possible incompatibilities and "Package was >> > built under version 4.0" messages. >> > >> > Iñaki >> > >> > > The second semester (with the corresponding induced pandemic chaos) >> is >> > > dimming down around here so I have at least time to breath again. :-) >> > > >> > > FWIW I am in no hurry to have 4.1 in Fedora 34, my main interest is >> to >> > have >> > > it in rawhide and later if we find it suitable to backport it to F34. >> > > >> > > FWIW since our last talk Octave (for version 7 at least) is >> starting by >> > > default to have the major version in the path for packages. :-) >> > > >> > > Best regards, >> > > -- >> > > José Abílio >> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> > > >> > > ___ >> > > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list >> > > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org >> > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Iñaki Úcar >> > >> > ___ >> > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list >> > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org >> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora >> > >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ___ >> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list >> R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora >> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Plans for R 4.1 in Fedora?
On Fri., Jun. 4, 2021, 10:08 a.m. Tom Callaway, wrote: > Is there a way to know which R components provide graphics drivers? I would > really rather not rebuild everything if we do not have to. > > Unless you mean rebuild for testing purposes, because you added the R(ABI) = major.minor Provides/Requires, you need to rebuild the world anyway. > > ~spot > > On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 6:28 AM Iñaki Ucar > wrote: > > > On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 22:18, José Abílio Matos > wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > what should be our plan for R 4.1 update in Fedora? > > > > See [1]. The plan is to wait for the next RStudio release and > > coordinate updates. > > > > [1] https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-fedora/2021-May/000736.html > > > > > What are the pitfalls and the changes that we should be aware? > > > > The NEWS says: "The graphics engine version, R_GE_version, has been > > bumped to 14 and so packages that provide graphics devices should be > > reinstalled." But anyway, we should do the customary mass rebuild of > > packages to avoid other possible incompatibilities and "Package was > > built under version 4.0" messages. > > > > Iñaki > > > > > The second semester (with the corresponding induced pandemic chaos) > is > > > dimming down around here so I have at least time to breath again. :-) > > > > > > FWIW I am in no hurry to have 4.1 in Fedora 34, my main interest is > to > > have > > > it in rawhide and later if we find it suitable to backport it to F34. > > > > > > FWIW since our last talk Octave (for version 7 at least) is starting > by > > > default to have the major version in the path for packages. :-) > > > > > > Best regards, > > > -- > > > José Abílio > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > > > > ___ > > > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list > > > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org > > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora > > > > > > > > -- > > Iñaki Úcar > > > > ___ > > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list > > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ___ > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Plans for R 4.1 in Fedora?
Is there a way to know which R components provide graphics drivers? I would really rather not rebuild everything if we do not have to. ~spot On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 6:28 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 22:18, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > what should be our plan for R 4.1 update in Fedora? > > See [1]. The plan is to wait for the next RStudio release and > coordinate updates. > > [1] https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-fedora/2021-May/000736.html > > > What are the pitfalls and the changes that we should be aware? > > The NEWS says: "The graphics engine version, R_GE_version, has been > bumped to 14 and so packages that provide graphics devices should be > reinstalled." But anyway, we should do the customary mass rebuild of > packages to avoid other possible incompatibilities and "Package was > built under version 4.0" messages. > > Iñaki > > > The second semester (with the corresponding induced pandemic chaos) is > > dimming down around here so I have at least time to breath again. :-) > > > > FWIW I am in no hurry to have 4.1 in Fedora 34, my main interest is to > have > > it in rawhide and later if we find it suitable to backport it to F34. > > > > FWIW since our last talk Octave (for version 7 at least) is starting by > > default to have the major version in the path for packages. :-) > > > > Best regards, > > -- > > José Abílio > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > > ___ > > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list > > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora > > > > -- > Iñaki Úcar > > ___ > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
