This seems like a good opportunity to give this a go: https://github.com/juhp/fbrnch#parallel-building
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 21:59, Tom Callaway <spo...@gmail.com> wrote: > That is a very good point. Oh well. Anyone want to help generate the build > order? :) > > ~spot > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, 3:57 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade < > quantum.anal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri., Jun. 4, 2021, 10:08 a.m. Tom Callaway, <spo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Is there a way to know which R components provide graphics drivers? I >>> would >>> really rather not rebuild everything if we do not have to. >>> >>> >> Unless you mean rebuild for testing purposes, because you added the >> R(ABI) = major.minor Provides/Requires, you need to rebuild the world >> anyway. >> >> >>> >>> ~spot >>> >>> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 6:28 AM Iñaki Ucar <iu...@fedoraproject.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 22:18, José Abílio Matos <jama...@fc.up.pt> >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Hi all, >>> > > what should be our plan for R 4.1 update in Fedora? >>> > >>> > See [1]. The plan is to wait for the next RStudio release and >>> > coordinate updates. >>> > >>> > [1] https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-fedora/2021-May/000736.html >>> > >>> > > What are the pitfalls and the changes that we should be aware? >>> > >>> > The NEWS says: "The graphics engine version, R_GE_version, has been >>> > bumped to 14 and so packages that provide graphics devices should be >>> > reinstalled." But anyway, we should do the customary mass rebuild of >>> > packages to avoid other possible incompatibilities and "Package was >>> > built under version 4.0" messages. >>> > >>> > Iñaki >>> > >>> > > The second semester (with the corresponding induced pandemic >>> chaos) is >>> > > dimming down around here so I have at least time to breath again. :-) >>> > > >>> > > FWIW I am in no hurry to have 4.1 in Fedora 34, my main interest >>> is to >>> > have >>> > > it in rawhide and later if we find it suitable to backport it to F34. >>> > > >>> > > FWIW since our last talk Octave (for version 7 at least) is >>> starting by >>> > > default to have the major version in the path for packages. :-) >>> > > >>> > > Best regards, >>> > > -- >>> > > José Abílio >>> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>> > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list >>> > > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org >>> > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Iñaki Úcar >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list >>> > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org >>> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora >>> > >>> >>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list >>> R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora >>> >> -- Iñaki Úcar [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
