Is there a way to know which R components provide graphics drivers? I would really rather not rebuild everything if we do not have to.
~spot On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 6:28 AM Iñaki Ucar <iu...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 22:18, José Abílio Matos <jama...@fc.up.pt> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > what should be our plan for R 4.1 update in Fedora? > > See [1]. The plan is to wait for the next RStudio release and > coordinate updates. > > [1] https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-fedora/2021-May/000736.html > > > What are the pitfalls and the changes that we should be aware? > > The NEWS says: "The graphics engine version, R_GE_version, has been > bumped to 14 and so packages that provide graphics devices should be > reinstalled." But anyway, we should do the customary mass rebuild of > packages to avoid other possible incompatibilities and "Package was > built under version 4.0" messages. > > Iñaki > > > The second semester (with the corresponding induced pandemic chaos) is > > dimming down around here so I have at least time to breath again. :-) > > > > FWIW I am in no hurry to have 4.1 in Fedora 34, my main interest is to > have > > it in rawhide and later if we find it suitable to backport it to F34. > > > > FWIW since our last talk Octave (for version 7 at least) is starting by > > default to have the major version in the path for packages. :-) > > > > Best regards, > > -- > > José Abílio > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list > > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora > > > > -- > Iñaki Úcar > > _______________________________________________ > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
