[Radiant] Re: Performance worse when moving to Radiant 0.9.1? [DEMO PROJECT]
It's clearly the new Ragel Radius parser: https://github.com/radiant/radiant/issues/247#issuecomment-1578856 On Jul 13, 2:28 pm, Johannes Fahrenkrug jfahrenk...@gmail.com wrote: Jim, if you can point me in the right direction I can look at this myself, too. Cheers, Johannes On Jul 11, 2:31 pm, Johannes Fahrenkrug jfahrenk...@gmail.com wrote: No problem, I hope it helps! I just tried it with 1.0RC2: Same thing. 460k take almost 10 seconds to render. On Jul 11, 2:23 pm, Jim Gay j...@saturnflyer.com wrote: Wow. Thanks so much for putting this together. On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug jfahrenk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jim, I have created both a 0.8.1 and 0.9.1 demo project that showcases the significant performance decline:https://github.com/jfahrenkrug/Radiant-Performance-Decline Rendering 460k of plain text with Radiant 0.8.1 takes 32ms. Rendering the same text with Radiant 0.9.1 takes 9400ms(!!!). I hope this project helps you to find the bottleneck. Thanks and cheers, Johannes On Jul 7, 12:11 pm, Johannes Fahrenkrug jfahrenk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jim, thanks for your reply. It's a client project, so I have to see what information I can give out. I have the feeling Radius got slower. I'll report back. - Johannes On Jul 5, 3:27 pm, Jim Gay j...@saturnflyer.com wrote: I've not seen this. Can you post some stats and some code to help figure it out? Perhaps there were changes that only affect performance in a situation like that of your site (however it is setup) and we're finding the edge. On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug jfahrenk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, we have a big site running on Radiant 0.8.2. Internally we're moving the site to Radiant 0.9.1. That worked nicely, but most pages need about 1 sec (!) longer to render. Most pages have lots of parts and snippets. Are there any known changes from 0.8 to 0.9 that would explain this performance impact? Thanks and cheers, Johannes -- Jim Gay Saturn Flyer LLChttp://www.saturnflyer.com 571-403-0338 -- Jim Gay Saturn Flyer LLChttp://www.saturnflyer.com 571-403-0338
[Radiant] Re: Performance worse when moving to Radiant 0.9.1? [DEMO PROJECT]
Jim, if you can point me in the right direction I can look at this myself, too. Cheers, Johannes On Jul 11, 2:31 pm, Johannes Fahrenkrug jfahrenk...@gmail.com wrote: No problem, I hope it helps! I just tried it with 1.0RC2: Same thing. 460k take almost 10 seconds to render. On Jul 11, 2:23 pm, Jim Gay j...@saturnflyer.com wrote: Wow. Thanks so much for putting this together. On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug jfahrenk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jim, I have created both a 0.8.1 and 0.9.1 demo project that showcases the significant performance decline:https://github.com/jfahrenkrug/Radiant-Performance-Decline Rendering 460k of plain text with Radiant 0.8.1 takes 32ms. Rendering the same text with Radiant 0.9.1 takes 9400ms(!!!). I hope this project helps you to find the bottleneck. Thanks and cheers, Johannes On Jul 7, 12:11 pm, Johannes Fahrenkrug jfahrenk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jim, thanks for your reply. It's a client project, so I have to see what information I can give out. I have the feeling Radius got slower. I'll report back. - Johannes On Jul 5, 3:27 pm, Jim Gay j...@saturnflyer.com wrote: I've not seen this. Can you post some stats and some code to help figure it out? Perhaps there were changes that only affect performance in a situation like that of your site (however it is setup) and we're finding the edge. On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug jfahrenk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, we have a big site running on Radiant 0.8.2. Internally we're moving the site to Radiant 0.9.1. That worked nicely, but most pages need about 1 sec (!) longer to render. Most pages have lots of parts and snippets. Are there any known changes from 0.8 to 0.9 that would explain this performance impact? Thanks and cheers, Johannes -- Jim Gay Saturn Flyer LLChttp://www.saturnflyer.com 571-403-0338 -- Jim Gay Saturn Flyer LLChttp://www.saturnflyer.com 571-403-0338
[Radiant] Re: Performance worse when moving to Radiant 0.9.1? [DEMO PROJECT]
Hi Jim, I have created both a 0.8.1 and 0.9.1 demo project that showcases the significant performance decline: https://github.com/jfahrenkrug/Radiant-Performance-Decline Rendering 460k of plain text with Radiant 0.8.1 takes 32ms. Rendering the same text with Radiant 0.9.1 takes 9400ms(!!!). I hope this project helps you to find the bottleneck. Thanks and cheers, Johannes On Jul 7, 12:11 pm, Johannes Fahrenkrug jfahrenk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jim, thanks for your reply. It's a client project, so I have to see what information I can give out. I have the feeling Radius got slower. I'll report back. - Johannes On Jul 5, 3:27 pm, Jim Gay j...@saturnflyer.com wrote: I've not seen this. Can you post some stats and some code to help figure it out? Perhaps there were changes that only affect performance in a situation like that of your site (however it is setup) and we're finding the edge. On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug jfahrenk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, we have a big site running on Radiant 0.8.2. Internally we're moving the site to Radiant 0.9.1. That worked nicely, but most pages need about 1 sec (!) longer to render. Most pages have lots of parts and snippets. Are there any known changes from 0.8 to 0.9 that would explain this performance impact? Thanks and cheers, Johannes -- Jim Gay Saturn Flyer LLChttp://www.saturnflyer.com 571-403-0338
Re: [Radiant] Re: Performance worse when moving to Radiant 0.9.1? [DEMO PROJECT]
Wow. Thanks so much for putting this together. On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug jfahrenk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jim, I have created both a 0.8.1 and 0.9.1 demo project that showcases the significant performance decline: https://github.com/jfahrenkrug/Radiant-Performance-Decline Rendering 460k of plain text with Radiant 0.8.1 takes 32ms. Rendering the same text with Radiant 0.9.1 takes 9400ms(!!!). I hope this project helps you to find the bottleneck. Thanks and cheers, Johannes On Jul 7, 12:11 pm, Johannes Fahrenkrug jfahrenk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jim, thanks for your reply. It's a client project, so I have to see what information I can give out. I have the feeling Radius got slower. I'll report back. - Johannes On Jul 5, 3:27 pm, Jim Gay j...@saturnflyer.com wrote: I've not seen this. Can you post some stats and some code to help figure it out? Perhaps there were changes that only affect performance in a situation like that of your site (however it is setup) and we're finding the edge. On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug jfahrenk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, we have a big site running on Radiant 0.8.2. Internally we're moving the site to Radiant 0.9.1. That worked nicely, but most pages need about 1 sec (!) longer to render. Most pages have lots of parts and snippets. Are there any known changes from 0.8 to 0.9 that would explain this performance impact? Thanks and cheers, Johannes -- Jim Gay Saturn Flyer LLChttp://www.saturnflyer.com 571-403-0338 -- Jim Gay Saturn Flyer LLC http://www.saturnflyer.com 571-403-0338
[Radiant] Re: Performance worse when moving to Radiant 0.9.1? [DEMO PROJECT]
No problem, I hope it helps! I just tried it with 1.0RC2: Same thing. 460k take almost 10 seconds to render. On Jul 11, 2:23 pm, Jim Gay j...@saturnflyer.com wrote: Wow. Thanks so much for putting this together. On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug jfahrenk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jim, I have created both a 0.8.1 and 0.9.1 demo project that showcases the significant performance decline:https://github.com/jfahrenkrug/Radiant-Performance-Decline Rendering 460k of plain text with Radiant 0.8.1 takes 32ms. Rendering the same text with Radiant 0.9.1 takes 9400ms(!!!). I hope this project helps you to find the bottleneck. Thanks and cheers, Johannes On Jul 7, 12:11 pm, Johannes Fahrenkrug jfahrenk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jim, thanks for your reply. It's a client project, so I have to see what information I can give out. I have the feeling Radius got slower. I'll report back. - Johannes On Jul 5, 3:27 pm, Jim Gay j...@saturnflyer.com wrote: I've not seen this. Can you post some stats and some code to help figure it out? Perhaps there were changes that only affect performance in a situation like that of your site (however it is setup) and we're finding the edge. On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug jfahrenk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, we have a big site running on Radiant 0.8.2. Internally we're moving the site to Radiant 0.9.1. That worked nicely, but most pages need about 1 sec (!) longer to render. Most pages have lots of parts and snippets. Are there any known changes from 0.8 to 0.9 that would explain this performance impact? Thanks and cheers, Johannes -- Jim Gay Saturn Flyer LLChttp://www.saturnflyer.com 571-403-0338 -- Jim Gay Saturn Flyer LLChttp://www.saturnflyer.com 571-403-0338
