Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling

2011-11-24 Thread Ken Freeman
My experience with seat bags is that they essentially do not affect
handling in any way I can detect.  Rear rack trunks OTOH cause problems
nearly no matter what.

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:11 PM, jimD rasterd...@comcast.net wrote:

 I'll echo Patrick's observation.
 My Riv custom is my most favorite handling bike of all time.
 I have a Tournesol that's a front loader and fun to ride but takes more
 concentration than the Riv.
 That having been said, once I ride either bike for several days in a row I
 get totally accommodated
 to how they handle.

 My experience with my Riv is that it is very happy with a seat bag.  In
 addition to the seat bag I often add a bar tube and carry something less
 than 10 lbs in the bar bag with minimal impact on handling.
 I may not be particularly sensitive to handling nuances. My theory is,
 ride what you brung.
 -JimD

 On Nov 23, 2011, at 7:59 AM, PATRICK MOORE wrote:

 This was my experience exactly on the Sam Hillborne, both with all the
 weight (no more than 35 lb in my case) in the back and even worse when some
 of that weight was in the front in a bar bag (Ostrich, firmly attached by
 decaleur to stem and front rack). Front low riders did slow the flop a bit
 but made the steering feel very sluggish -- very *oddly* sluggish with 30
 lb divided evenly between the two: it was very hard to initiate a turn!. My
 own solutions was to sell the Sam Hill and buy a Fargo, which handles
 unobjectionably in all loaded conditions; but of course that is rather
 drastic. I personally would also be interested in others' suggestions for
 solutions. I expect finding the right mix of front/rear and high/low is one
 area to investigate?

 Jan's experience of feeling more confident in mid, fast turn with a low
 trail bike is interesting; perhaps it's simply lack of experience with
 either or both kinds, but my own impression is that higher trail corner as
 on rails bikes (Rivs) feel more confidence inspiring than the Herse -- not
 that the Herse is bad, just not ideal -- it takes more concentration; one
 is not as blithely and unconcernedly ready to let the bike go.

 Now the trike seems to handle the same with or without a front load.
 (That's a joke, Steve -- tho' it's true.)


 On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:05 AM, allenmichael allenmich...@mac.comwrote:

 I just did my first tour this past summer on a 56 Atlantis.  The
 Atlantis was terrific except for climbing at very low speeds.  I was
 carrying a lot of weight, about 65 lbs., and some of it was on the
 front.  I had a riv high rider nitto rack with two loaded panniers and
 my wife's sleeping pad riding up there.

 At low speed, almost no speed, the front tire (and all of the front
 weight) kept wanting to flop over.  The worst part of the trip, by
 far, was fighting with this weight and trying to keep the bike on the
 road under these conditions.  To the point where I don't think I would
 take this bike again if I had to carry so much weight.

 Any suggestions, apart from carrying less weight or balancing it
 better or loading it lower?  Other bikes?  Other handlebar set-ups (I
 had noodle drop bars, just above the saddle)?  Other tires (I had 1.75
 Marathon Plus)?

 Thanks,
 Michael Allen


 --
 Patrick Moore
 Albuquerque, NM
 For professional resumes, contact
 Patrick Moore, ACRW
 http://resumespecialties.com/index.html




 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




-- 
Ken Freeman
Ann Arbor, MI USA

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] New Movie - A Boy Finds His Bicycle

2011-11-24 Thread William Pustow
Four thumbs up! It should be a smash at the Cannes film festival!
On Nov 24, 2011, at 12:24 AM, Amit Singh wrote:

 I just published a new (my first!) movie (trailer) to my MobileMe
 Gallery that I'd like to share with you.  Click the link below to
 check it out.
 
 A Boy Finds His Bicycle
 http://gallery.me.com/infinitus/100023
 
 Enjoy the movie trailer!
 
 Ah, and as we all prepare to sit down with our families and break
 bread, I want to wish you a safe and joyous Thanksgiving!
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Digest for rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com - 4 Messages in 3 Topics

2011-11-24 Thread Hank Greenblatt
absolutely loved the movie trailer!
Hank Greenblatt
Washingtonville , NY
On Nov 24, 2011, at 8:53 AM, rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com wrote:

   Today's Topic Summary
 Group: http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch/topics
 
 New Movie - A Boy Finds His Bicycle [2 Updates]
 Noticed anything different about front bag handling [1 Update]
 FS: 1994 Bridgestone MB-1 (Pepper Grey Metallic) 52cm [1 Update]
  New Movie - A Boy Finds His Bicycle
 Amit Singh asd...@gmail.com Nov 23 09:24PM -0800  
 
 I just published a new (my first!) movie (trailer) to my MobileMe
 Gallery that I'd like to share with you. Click the link below to
 check it out.
  
 A Boy Finds His Bicycle
 http://gallery.me.com/infinitus/100023
  
 Enjoy the movie trailer!
  
 Ah, and as we all prepare to sit down with our families and break
 bread, I want to wish you a safe and joyous Thanksgiving!
  
 William Pustow bpus...@aol.com Nov 24 08:13AM -0500  
 
 Four thumbs up! It should be a smash at the Cannes film festival!
 On Nov 24, 2011, at 12:24 AM, Amit Singh wrote:
  
  
  Noticed anything different about front bag handling
 Ken Freeman kenfreeman...@gmail.com Nov 24 07:17AM -0500  
 
 My experience with seat bags is that they essentially do not affect
 handling in any way I can detect. Rear rack trunks OTOH cause problems
 nearly no matter what.
  
  
 -- 
 Ken Freeman
 Ann Arbor, MI USA
  
  FS: 1994 Bridgestone MB-1 (Pepper Grey Metallic) 52cm
 Johnny Alien johnnyal...@verizon.net Nov 23 04:43PM -0800  
 
 I am taking this off the market. I am not sure I want to get rid of it.
  
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group 
 rbw-owners-bunch.
 You can post via email.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an empty message.
 For more options, visit this group.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: New Movie - A Boy Finds His Bicycle

2011-11-24 Thread Pondero
Go, Amit!

Now that I've poured through the Rivendell Flickr Pool numerous times,
I find that I'm enjoying photos (and videos) of bikes being used, or
at least with their owners, more and more.  Usable bikes being used,
or something like that.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: New Movie - A Boy Finds His Bicycle

2011-11-24 Thread tdusky
That is a very big boy!
Can't wait to see the film.

Tom Dusky
Huntington Woods, Mi

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: FS: 1994 Bridgestone MB-1 (Pepper Grey Metallic) 52cm

2011-11-24 Thread Mojo
Smart man! 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/XT0ToYgmjkcJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Atlantis Sighting in Pittsburgh

2011-11-24 Thread Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery
I know lots of Riv riders hereabouts who aren't on this list, or at least never 
post to this list. Furthermore, I know a handful of Riv riders who don't even 
really know about Rivendell, just that they like their Rivendell bikes. The 
regulars on the list can't be more than, I dunno, 40 or 50 people? By now, 
there are several thousand Rivendells riding around!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/kJ7QrSTk_GAJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling

2011-11-24 Thread Jan Heine
On Nov 23, 10:47 am, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Imagine trying to carry a heavy backpack. You lean forward. When you
 remove the backpack, while still leaning forward, you fall over. On
 the other hand, when you add a backpack and don't lean forward, you
 also fall over. So does the backpack help or hurt your balance? It's
 neither, the backpack is part of the system that balances. Trying to
 add a backpack without changing the other variables  (lean angle
 forward/back) does not work well.

 I like that metaphor.  Thanks for that.  Have you used that one before?
  I'd never heard it before.

It came to me as I was thinking about how to explain the load being a
factor. That is what I like about online discussions - they get you to
think about things in different ways.

Jan Heine
Editor
Bicycle Quarterly
http://www.bikequarterly.com

Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling

2011-11-24 Thread Jan Heine
On Nov 24, 4:17 am, Ken Freeman kenfreeman...@gmail.com wrote:
 My experience with seat bags is that they essentially do not affect
 handling in any way I can detect.

Except when you rise out of the saddle. Then, the load is unsupported,
and tends to be the tail wagging the bike. But that applies to all
rear loads, including panniers. Rear low-riders perhaps have the least
effect in that situation, as they are so low that you don't move them
much as you move the bike from side to side. (But rear low-riders,
being so far back, have other issues that make them a good choice only
if you carefully balance your weight distribution when loading the
bike.)

Jan Heine
Editor
Bicycle Quarterly
http://www.bikequarterly.com

Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] FS: 58 cm Tournesol Sportif

2011-11-24 Thread Michael S
Hi All,
Not Riv content, but some of the parts are from there...

Unfortunately my schedule and small child is not going to allow me to
commute for the forseeable future. It's no use sitting in my basement,
so I'm selling my Tournesol Sportif. I received it Sept 2009, and have
probably ridden it 8k miles or so. I'll take new photos this weekend,
but here is a link to some photos from about a year ago:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/87558561@N00/4180333430/
I can email the geometry drawing to you if you're interested. TT 58 cm
cc, ST 60 cm cc, HT 19.2 cm, 72.5 STA, 72 HTA, 42.5 CS. Saddle height
is 77 cm in the photos, drop is around 6 cm. Rene Singer lugs, unknown
tubing mix.

There are a few changes to the setup and not a standard parts group,
so here's the list of components:
Nitto Pearl 10 cm stem, Oval Concepts Deep 42 cm bars, Shimano brake
levers to brazed on polished Paul Racers and VO straddle cable wheels.
That's a logoless CK threaded headset too...
Ultegra seatpost, white and black Fizik Antares saddle
Drivetrain is the mashup of Simplex downtube shifters and fd, Campy
Centaur 175 mm compact crankset (with proper spacers for the 7 spd
chain), older shimano rd, and a couple freewheels. It works great.
Wheelset is 130 mm spaced Phil Wood freewheel hub (36h) and Schmidt
dynohub (32h) laced with db spokes to polished Sun CR18 rims. The rims
are two years old and the rear has a dent, so I will include the new
pair of silver Velocity A23 rims and a new pair of Grand Bois tires. I
had the original wheels built for bombproof commuting, but I was
planning on lightening things up a bit.
The cool details are the custom CPG brazed on taillight, the eDelux
headlight, the painted to match topeak pump, the custom rack and
decaleur to hold the Berthoud bag rock steady. 40 mm Honjo fenders
(now with a stairtread mudflap) keep you dry. I'll throw in the Nitto
cages if you want, but no pedals.

The bike has been used, but is in good shape with only a few minor
chips. No dents. The gray color (stolen from IF's catalog) was chosen
to be low maintenence for commuting, but it has some metallic in it to
add some depth in the sun.

I can tell you all the little quirks but would prefer to not list them
here. None of them are that big of a deal, but I want to provide full
disclosure. I'll pack it well myself and it will arrive safely.

I don't really know how much this is worth. If you add everything up
you get around 6k, but as Steve will tell you it's making everything
work together that's the real pain. I'm thinking $3600 shipped, open
to reasonable offers.

I'm happy to answer any questions. Thanks.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: New Movie - A Boy Finds His Bicycle

2011-11-24 Thread Montclair BobbyB
Too funny... Perhaps it should be entitled, A Boy Finds His
iMovie...


On Nov 24, 9:32 am, tdusky tdu...@comcast.net wrote:
 That is a very big boy!
 Can't wait to see the film.

 Tom Dusky
 Huntington Woods, Mi

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling

2011-11-24 Thread Ken Freeman
I have a Carradice but haven't used it much yet.  My usual saddle bags are
3-liter or so wedges, that are tightly coupled to the saddle.

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Jan Heine hein...@earthlink.net wrote:

 On Nov 24, 4:17 am, Ken Freeman kenfreeman...@gmail.com wrote:
  My experience with seat bags is that they essentially do not affect
  handling in any way I can detect.

 Except when you rise out of the saddle. Then, the load is unsupported,
 and tends to be the tail wagging the bike. But that applies to all
 rear loads, including panniers. Rear low-riders perhaps have the least
 effect in that situation, as they are so low that you don't move them
 much as you move the bike from side to side. (But rear low-riders,
 being so far back, have other issues that make them a good choice only
 if you carefully balance your weight distribution when loading the
 bike.)

 Jan Heine
 Editor
 Bicycle Quarterly
 http://www.bikequarterly.com

 Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




-- 
Ken Freeman
Ann Arbor, MI USA

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: New bags at Soma

2011-11-24 Thread Montclair BobbyB
Not bad!  These look remarkably similar to the Zimbale bags (at
Harris: http://sheldonbrown.com/harris/bags/zimbale.html), although
for the same $ you can have your choice of size 7 or 11 liter.  I have
a Zimbale that is roughly 2 years old and I like the quality and
looks.  One can never have too many bag choices, though!  Thx

On Nov 23, 6:59 pm, Michael_S mikeybi...@rocketmail.com wrote:
 I spotted two new canvas and leather bags at Soma Fab. They come in black
 only but look fairly nice to me. I have no idea where they are made.

 http://store.somafab.com/cakirobag.html

 ~mike

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling

2011-11-24 Thread PATRICK MOORE
Large and heavily loaded saddlebags do wag but not horribly so; and, at
least on the right bikes, rear panniers affect handling very little even
with rather heavy loads: I was amazed, at least on one of my Rivs, the
first one, at how well I could corner (eg, tight S bends across narrow
wooden bridges on bike paths) with a rear load in panniers on a Tubus rack,
and how easy it was, with even 40 lb (I weighed the load) to ride at 10 mph
with no hands (faster was even easier). My later and present Riv commuter
does not handle rear loads nearly as well, even though, unladen, it handes
better. And I've owned at least one bike (that Fuji) that handled better
with a 30 lb rear load than unladen.

And it's not merely the stiffness of the frame. The Motobecane that I sold
to Eric Norris was a very light 531 frame and a considerably lighter frame
than that of the current Riv, yet it handled rear loads much better -- the
rear *would* wag when I stood but only if the load was over 30 lb or so. I
think that the cause is something about the frame geometry; and of course
this all implies a stiff rack.

*And* I never hand any problem with asymmetric loading -- I'd often carry
25 lb in just one rear pannier with no ill effect. I remember once carrying
a 2' high stack of library books 10 miles, all stuffed into one very large
rear pannier; this on an early Raleigh Technium that did waggle but not
because of one-sided loading.

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Jan Heine hein...@earthlink.net wrote:

 On Nov 24, 4:17 am, Ken Freeman kenfreeman...@gmail.com wrote:
  My experience with seat bags is that they essentially do not affect
  handling in any way I can detect.

 Except when you rise out of the saddle. Then, the load is unsupported,
 and tends to be the tail wagging the bike. But that applies to all
 rear loads, including panniers. Rear low-riders perhaps have the least
 effect in that situation, as they are so low that you don't move them
 much as you move the bike from side to side. (But rear low-riders,
 being so far back, have other issues that make them a good choice only
 if you carefully balance your weight distribution when loading the
 bike.)

 Jan Heine
 Editor
 Bicycle Quarterly
 http://www.bikequarterly.com

 Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




-- 
Patrick Moore
Albuquerque, NM
For professional resumes, contact
Patrick Moore, ACRW
http://resumespecialties.com/index.html

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling

2011-11-24 Thread Kelly Sleeper

It really isn't low trail against every other trail.  Yet you couldn't tell 
that from this thread. Down the line there are nothing but excuses and defiance 
of the experience of others.   

Many say their bikes ride great with medium to high trail and have no issues 
with front loads... Oh that's because you don't know ...  

The low trail (extra low) road bad at low speeds and bad at high speeds but I 
got used to it.   

The high trail is unnoticeable with front load... low trail folks yell... but 
if you ride low trail bike it's much better you just don't know it because you 
are used to  it.   

Sheesh sounds like politicians.. no matter what low trail is the only way to 
go... now it's ohh  saddle bags and rear loads are bad too.. if loose and 
you are sprinting, climbing blah blah and throwing the bike side to side ... 
throw a loose load on the front and throw the bike side to side...  hell put a 
big loose load anywhere and throw it side to side... ohhh wait you'll get used 
to it.

Kinda of reminds me of the cheating husband to his wife... are you going to 
believe me or your lying eyes

The truth is some people prefer the handling of low trail bike and others 
medium and other high and some in-between...   some want to take the way they 
ride and tweak trail, weight load, handlebar height, stem length, body weight, 
arm length, shoe size, and run formulas. Then there is a new racers (oh sorry 
randonneurs) routine to ride a bike... weight front bag, banana, nuts, rain 
coat... place 2 lbs packages at 10 mile intervals incase it rains and I need to 
replace weight of rain gear in front rack along the way.. (after all optimal 
performance on this bike is with 12.7779076 lbs front)Get the air pressure 
to exactly 40.1155576 lbs  (new electronic air monitoring for tires will be out 
next year to update your home computer that will send snmp traps to you via 
email in case of fluctuation about 2.3357%)   Ok... check.. I can ride my bike 
now and carve turns and feel like a really good race bike 

No Thank You.. I purchased a Rivendell as it handles front loads, rear loads, 
front and rear loads and doesn't need a load to feel great..   I check the 
tires once a week.. and carry what I need as an all around bicycle... I change 
handle bars, tires, bags etc often .. then join a Rivendell Owners group on the 
web to discuss and explore the wonderful uses of it..   only to have to defend 
not the bike but my own experience as someone else decides unilaterally that 
since they don't feel the same way I'm wrong... and no evidence from anyone is 
valid...they are just used to it and don't know.

I'm sarcastic blunt and things make sense or they don't.   Low trail sounds 
great the way Jan did it .. built the bike to be a performance (race machine) 
for a specific purpose.. He loves it.  The bikes are beautiful and I'm sure 
they  ride great and people get used to them just as Most bikes ride 
wonderfully and people get used to them.   After all they are bicycles  
After all from the vast difference of experiences and not just opinions it's 
obvious that it's not just a trail thing.  It's also true that there are 
trade offs in bike design.  It may be true that low trail bikes with  xyz 
handle a front load of x better than bike z with x amount of load at frame size 
k rider weight L and front to rear load weight M under N amount of power.  It's 
not the answer to all loads though and writing off others experience is just 
tiring at best.

Don't tell low trail bike owners they have a nice bike either... they know it 
already.. you were just to dumb to figure it out as quickly as they did.  Guess 
we only need one bike geometry after all.

FYI:  this is not a personal attack on anyone no matter how much you may want 
to try and feel it is.  Also no single sentence by itself above stands alone.. 
overall this is just stating in a sarcastic but honest statement of opinion 
based perceptions.. so far in this thread and others.  It also goes back to my 
original notice to the original poster that I disagree with the instant 
assertion that front loads are bad for all but bike X because your bike can't 
handle it BS!   Mine and others experience and knowledge of how our bikes 
handle are just as valid as others opinions.   I don't argue or believe my bike 
is better than yours except for me, that is the same respect I expect / demand 
from you.  If not I am sarcastic enough and a big enough asshole to be as 
obnoxious and oblivious to the truth as anyone just not as eloquent. 

Your friendly bear in the china shop

Kelly






-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/KYrH8-T-tx4J.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 

Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling

2011-11-24 Thread David Faller

Thanks, Kelly, for saying what many of us are probably thinking!

Every hobby has a joyous geekery about it, and every hobby shared with 
like-mined enthusiasts always gets explored to its extremes.  I think 
that's normal and, to some degree, part of the fun; but the fun bleeds 
right out of it when the discussions devolve into intellectual warfare.


I think you are a very good representative of how bicycle enthusiasm 
ought to be enjoyed.  A great number of folks on this groups make it 
about the minutia instead of the fundamental enjoyment.


Having someone occasionally call bullshit! to the crowd is grounding 
and refreshing, and thank you for it.



Dave


On 11/24/2011 9:19 AM, Kelly Sleeper wrote:

It really isn't low trail against every other trail.  Yet you couldn't tell 
that from this thread. Down the line there are nothing but excuses and defiance 
of the experience of others.

Many say their bikes ride great with medium to high trail and have no issues 
with front loads... Oh that's because you don't know ...

The low trail (extra low) road bad at low speeds and bad at high speeds but I 
got used to it.

The high trail is unnoticeable with front load... low trail folks yell... but 
if you ride low trail bike it's much better you just don't know it because you 
are used to  it.

Sheesh sounds like politicians.. no matter what low trail is the only way to 
go... now it's ohh  saddle bags and rear loads are bad too.. if loose and 
you are sprinting, climbing blah blah and throwing the bike side to side ...
throw a loose load on the front and throw the bike side to side...  hell put a 
big loose load anywhere and throw it side to side... ohhh wait you'll get used 
to it.

Kinda of reminds me of the cheating husband to his wife... are you going to believe 
me or your lying eyes

The truth is some people prefer the handling of low trail bike and others 
medium and other high and some in-between...   some want to take the way they 
ride and tweak trail, weight load, handlebar height, stem length, body weight, 
arm length, shoe size, and run formulas. Then there is a new racers (oh sorry 
randonneurs) routine to ride a bike... weight front bag, banana, nuts, rain 
coat... place 2 lbs packages at 10 mile intervals incase it rains and I need to 
replace weight of rain gear in front rack along the way.. (after all optimal 
performance on this bike is with 12.7779076 lbs front)Get the air pressure 
to exactly 40.1155576 lbs  (new electronic air monitoring for tires will be out 
next year to update your home computer that will send snmp traps to you via 
email in case of fluctuation about 2.3357%)   Ok... check.. I can ride my bike 
now and carve turns and feel like a really good race bike

No Thank You.. I purchased a Rivendell as it handles front loads, rear loads, 
front and rear loads and doesn't need a load to feel great..   I check the 
tires once a week.. and carry what I need as an all around bicycle... I change 
handle bars, tires, bags etc often .. then join a Rivendell Owners group on the 
web to discuss and explore the wonderful uses of it..   only to have to defend 
not the bike but my own experience as someone else decides unilaterally that 
since they don't feel the same way I'm wrong... and no evidence from anyone is 
valid...they are just used to it and don't know.

I'm sarcastic blunt and things make sense or they don't.   Low trail sounds great the way Jan did 
it .. built the bike to be a performance (race machine) for a specific purpose.. He loves it.  The 
bikes are beautiful and I'm sure they  ride great and people get used to them just as 
Most bikes ride wonderfully and people get used to them.   After all they are 
bicycles  After all from the vast difference of experiences and not just opinions it's obvious 
that it's not just a trail thing.  It's also true that there are trade offs in bike 
design.  It may be true that low trail bikes with  xyz handle a front load of x better than bike z 
with x amount of load at frame size k rider weight L and front to rear load weight M under N amount 
of power.  It's not the answer to all loads though and writing off others experience is just tiring 
at best.

Don't tell low trail bike owners they have a nice bike either... they know it 
already.. you were just to dumb to figure it out as quickly as they did.  Guess 
we only need one bike geometry after all.

FYI:  this is not a personal attack on anyone no matter how much you may want 
to try and feel it is.  Also no single sentence by itself above stands alone.. 
overall this is just stating in a sarcastic but honest statement of opinion 
based perceptions.. so far in this thread and others.  It also goes back to my 
original notice to the original poster that I disagree with the instant 
assertion that front loads are bad for all but bike X because your bike can't 
handle it BS!   Mine and others experience and knowledge of how our bikes 
handle are just as valid as 

Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling

2011-11-24 Thread jimD
I like bikes that ride differently. I like my front loader, I like my Saluki, I 
love my Riv custom.
Not one of them rides like the other. All of then are fun. Shoot, I even like 
my Madone though
I haven't ridden it in more than a year.
For me it's a gestalt thing (to steal an R.Sach's perspective).
-JimD
On Nov 24, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Kelly Sleeper wrote:

 
 It really isn't low trail against every other trail.  Yet you couldn't tell 
 that from this thread. Down the line there are nothing but excuses and 
 defiance of the experience of others.   
 
 Many say their bikes ride great with medium to high trail and have no issues 
 with front loads... Oh that's because you don't know ...  
 
 The low trail (extra low) road bad at low speeds and bad at high speeds but I 
 got used to it.   
 
 The high trail is unnoticeable with front load... low trail folks yell... but 
 if you ride low trail bike it's much better you just don't know it because 
 you are used to  it.   
 
 Sheesh sounds like politicians.. no matter what low trail is the only way to 
 go... now it's ohh  saddle bags and rear loads are bad too.. if loose and 
 you are sprinting, climbing blah blah and throwing the bike side to side ... 
 throw a loose load on the front and throw the bike side to side...  hell put 
 a big loose load anywhere and throw it side to side... ohhh wait you'll get 
 used to it.
 
 Kinda of reminds me of the cheating husband to his wife... are you going to 
 believe me or your lying eyes
 
 The truth is some people prefer the handling of low trail bike and others 
 medium and other high and some in-between...   some want to take the way they 
 ride and tweak trail, weight load, handlebar height, stem length, body 
 weight, arm length, shoe size, and run formulas. Then there is a new racers 
 (oh sorry randonneurs) routine to ride a bike... weight front bag, banana, 
 nuts, rain coat... place 2 lbs packages at 10 mile intervals incase it rains 
 and I need to replace weight of rain gear in front rack along the way.. 
 (after all optimal performance on this bike is with 12.7779076 lbs front)
 Get the air pressure to exactly 40.1155576 lbs  (new electronic air 
 monitoring for tires will be out next year to update your home computer that 
 will send snmp traps to you via email in case of fluctuation about 2.3357%)   
 Ok... check.. I can ride my bike now and carve turns and feel like a really 
 good race bike 
 
 No Thank You.. I purchased a Rivendell as it handles front loads, rear loads, 
 front and rear loads and doesn't need a load to feel great..   I check the 
 tires once a week.. and carry what I need as an all around bicycle... I 
 change handle bars, tires, bags etc often .. then join a Rivendell Owners 
 group on the web to discuss and explore the wonderful uses of it..   only to 
 have to defend not the bike but my own experience as someone else decides 
 unilaterally that since they don't feel the same way I'm wrong... and no 
 evidence from anyone is valid...they are just used to it and don't know.
 
 I'm sarcastic blunt and things make sense or they don't.   Low trail sounds 
 great the way Jan did it .. built the bike to be a performance (race machine) 
 for a specific purpose.. He loves it.  The bikes are beautiful and I'm sure 
 they  ride great and people get used to them just as Most bikes ride 
 wonderfully and people get used to them.   After all they are bicycles  
 After all from the vast difference of experiences and not just opinions it's 
 obvious that it's not just a trail thing.  It's also true that there are 
 trade offs in bike design.  It may be true that low trail bikes with  xyz 
 handle a front load of x better than bike z with x amount of load at frame 
 size k rider weight L and front to rear load weight M under N amount of 
 power.  It's not the answer to all loads though and writing off others 
 experience is just tiring at best.
 
 Don't tell low trail bike owners they have a nice bike either... they know it 
 already.. you were just to dumb to figure it out as quickly as they did.  
 Guess we only need one bike geometry after all.
 
 FYI:  this is not a personal attack on anyone no matter how much you may want 
 to try and feel it is.  Also no single sentence by itself above stands 
 alone.. overall this is just stating in a sarcastic but honest statement of 
 opinion based perceptions.. so far in this thread and others.  It also goes 
 back to my original notice to the original poster that I disagree with the 
 instant assertion that front loads are bad for all but bike X because your 
 bike can't handle it BS!   Mine and others experience and knowledge of how 
 our bikes handle are just as valid as others opinions.   I don't argue or 
 believe my bike is better than yours except for me, that is the same respect 
 I expect / demand from you.  If not I am sarcastic enough and a big enough 
 asshole to be as obnoxious and oblivious to the truth as anyone just not 

Re: [RBW] Noticed anything different about front bag handling

2011-11-24 Thread James Valiensi
Hi,
When I ordered my custom Rivendell back in 02 I requested braze-on mounts for a 
small front rack. I had to send a drawing to Grant to show where I thought the 
mounts needed to be. At this time I don't Rivendell had a request for such 
mounts. 
When I got the bike I eventually mounted a Berthoud front rack and handle bar 
bag. The Nitto Mark's rack was still years away. The handle bar bag I used was 
a small one. I did many rides with the set up and never liked it.

The weight of the bag made the steering feel floppy. Especially going up hill. 
And when I got off the bike the bag would twist the front around; to me this 
was miserable. 

So I'd say adding a front bag to my Rivendell did indeed affect the handling - 
in a negative way. Perhaps the Rivendell does not have enough fork rake to 
offset the bag.
 
James Valiensi, PE
Northridge, CA
H818.775.1847 M.818.585.1796



On Nov 24, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Jan Heine wrote:

 On Nov 23, 10:47 am, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Imagine trying to carry a heavy backpack. You lean forward. When you
 remove the backpack, while still leaning forward, you fall over. On
 the other hand, when you add a backpack and don't lean forward, you
 also fall over. So does the backpack help or hurt your balance? It's
 neither, the backpack is part of the system that balances. Trying to
 add a backpack without changing the other variables  (lean angle
 forward/back) does not work well.
 
 I like that metaphor.  Thanks for that.  Have you used that one before?
  I'd never heard it before.
 
 It came to me as I was thinking about how to explain the load being a
 factor. That is what I like about online discussions - they get you to
 think about things in different ways.
 
 Jan Heine
 Editor
 Bicycle Quarterly
 http://www.bikequarterly.com
 
 Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Stolen Hillborne: Chicago

2011-11-24 Thread tthomashardie
Hi Jim,

Thanks for the information. The lock I used had the newer flat key
not the cylinder type. More proof any lock can be defeated. I still
plan to used multiple locks on the future.

My best,

Tim


On Nov 23, 1:44 pm, CycloFiend cyclofi...@earthlink.net wrote:
 on 11/23/11 10:08 AM, tthomashardie at tthomashar...@gmail.com wrote:

  I used the modified Sheldon method, but through the seat stays rather
  than the chain stays. The front wheel had a locking skewer. I'm not
  sure how they got it. The lock was missing too. Some people on the
  forums suggest that they could have used brute force. Maybe pull-up in
  cargo van and smash the lock/core and drive off. I really don't know.
  I do know that true security is a myth and anything can get stolen. In
  the future I plan to start using two good locks. Sort of a pain to
  carry around, but it will take twice as long to rip off. An extra
  couple seconds or minutes could be as good a deterrent as anything.

 General locking instructions and theories have been covered well, and they
 all lead to the same conclusion - if you leave it locked, you may lose it.
 The longer it's left, the more likely the lift.  The more you leave it in
 the same place each time, the more times a potential theif has to evaluate
 the coinditions. The best you can hope for is diverting a low-tech thief to
 another, less well defended bicycle.

 However, something in your description caught my eye, and it was a topic I
 was related to another person over the weekend - if you have a Kryptonite
 lock from 8-10 years ago with an open-end lock that uses a cylinder type
 key, they are prone to attacks with - believe it or not - a Bic pen cylinder
 (or similar - this is not a case of French constructeur superiority...).

 Basically, you can work the open end of the pen barrel into the lock and
 smoosh it around for a while until it pushes out the tumblers and then twist
 it around to open the lock. There was a well-travelled video of this, a
 subsequent recall from Kryptonite (pretty sure now discontinued) and much
 internet chatter.

 But, as I was helping a friend work on his son's bike, there it was - that
 prototypical krypto with that exact lock type. And he asked me if it was a
 good lock...

 This doesn't apply to the newer, middle of the hasp, slotted key types.

 - Jim All bikes weigh 40#'s.  (Weight of bike) + (Weight of lock) = 40

 --
 Jim Edgar
 cyclofi...@earthlink.net

 Cyclofiend Bicycle Photo Galleries -http://www.cyclofiend.com
 Current Classics - Cross Bikes
 Singlespeed - Working Bikes

 Gallery updates now appear here -http://cyclofiend.blogspot.com

 Nigel did some work for some of the other riders at Allied, onces who still
 rode metal.  He hadn't liked it when Chevette had gone for a paper frame.
 -- William Gibson, Virtual Light

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] FS: Schmidt SON Classic 32 spoke 650B wheel, Deore XT cantis, Rivendell Baggins Saddlebag

2011-11-24 Thread David Mayne
I have a Peter White built front wheel with Schmidt SON Classic in silver,
32 spokes laced to a Velocity Synergy 650B  rim, about 500 miles on it,
excellent condition. Peter sells the hub at a closeout price of $200, I'd
like $220 for the wheel. Seattle pickup only, please, I do not want to mess
with shipping this.

NOS Deore XT cantis Model SH-BRM737-R, (no stradle cable) $25 + shipping.

1 large (and I mean very large) Rivendell Baggins Saddlebag, well used but
not abused. pics below, $90 + shipping.

http://dmayne.home.mindspring.com/bike/baggins1.jpg
http://dmayne.home.mindspring.com/bike/baggins2.jpg
http://dmayne.home.mindspring.com/bike/baggins3.jpg
http://dmayne.home.mindspring.com/bike/baggins4.jpg
http://dmayne.home.mindspring.com/bike/baggins5.jpg


Thanks,

David

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Front Bag Handling: Shifty's Test Results

2011-11-24 Thread Shifty
I appreciate eveyone's input regarding front bag handling. As Doug P. 
suggested, I apparently I opened up a vein in the process! The snow finally 
melted enough today in Minneapolis to test weight in the front with an old 
trunk rack shown here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/66219337@N06/6392142867/

I filled the bag with 7-8 lbs. worth of stuff; rain jacket/pants, u-lock, 
tube, pump, air cartridge+inflator, multi-tool, wallet, phone and a second 
lock I didn't realize I had packed until half way into the ride. I later 
weighed everything at 7.5 lbs on a grocer's scale but it felt a lot 
heavier. 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/66219337@N06/6392143227/in/photostream/

First impressions were that the weight made the steering heavy so, it 
tracked nicely. The longer I rode however, the more annoyed I became with 
the heaviness in front, it was almost like wearing wrist weights. Yeah, the 
handling is slower but wow, the weight sucks all the joy out of my bikes 
typical ride handling. Verdict: HATE IT!

Next, I put the bag back on the rack and because I only use this bag on our 
tandem, am annoyed by the high riding weight in back–kind of like when my 
wife isn't pedaling enough on our tandem...uh, hem. The front end is back 
to the lively handling that I prefer. I can live with the sluggish weight 
feel in back to get my steering more lively again. Verdict: LIKE IT! 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/66219337@N06/6392143619/in/photostream/

Lastly, I put about half the weight in my saddlebag and leave the rest in 
the front. Despite not liking my knees hitting the front bag on aggressive 
climbs, I really want a front bag to work for map viewing, occasional phone 
access and mainly, to grab food and clothing layers without stopping. 
Verdict: LOVE IT! 

To no great surprise, even distribution of weight is the Holy Grail for 
bike handling. For me, 4-5 lbs is the max I can tolerate up front for 
non-tour riding. 

Happy Thanksgiving to all,
Shifty

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/fHUXoR8sAyQJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: FS: Handsome XOXO 53cm New

2011-11-24 Thread murphyjrfk
yes Fred just the framset and headset.

On Nov 23, 1:12 pm, yavo fyavor...@gmail.com wrote:
 Just the frame/fork/headset?
 Fred









 On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:00 PM, murphyjrfk murphyj...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi guys,
  thought i might offer this for sale up here before it sits in the
  basement for a while. i have a handsome cycles xoxo their xo 1 copy.
  it's pretty cool. funny thing is i got it because i thought a riv was
  always going to be unattainable. figured man this is sorta close. and
  then-well a gently used atlantis falls into my lap-(now my better half
  hates it cause i carry it around and make her look at it all the time-
  but that's ok). best bike day ever! anyways. i have this frame new
  never built just a ritchey headset itstalled now it's just sitting
  there. it's a neat bike. open to offers-obviously don't expect retail.
  or bridgestone prices!
  thanks

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  RBW Owners Bunch group.
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

 --
 Fred Yavorsky
 Jenkintown, PAhttp://www.twistcomm.com/Bikes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] FS: Nitto Campee Rack, Velo Orange Hub

2011-11-24 Thread Irv
Selling my Nitto Campee Rack. Detachable Low rider pannier racks.
High Quality Fillet Brazed Welds

Picture here - 
http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a35/modernfuturist/For%20Sale/ddd2505f.jpg

$220 shipped


Also selling a brand new Velo Orange 130mm rear spaced cassette
freewheel hub.

Picture here - 
http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a35/modernfuturist/For%20Sale/d92bd947.jpg

$90 shipped


E-mail me off list if interested.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] FS: Avocet 02 Air 40M Saddle

2011-11-24 Thread Chris Halasz
Avocet 02 Air 40M saddle, fantastic condition (logos are a little
rubbed off).

This is the more recent model.

Pics on request.

$90 shipped CONUS.

Thanks,

Chris

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling

2011-11-24 Thread William Pustow
What he said..

On Nov 24, 2011, at 1:23 PM, David Faller wrote:

 . I purchased a Rivendell as it handles front loads, rear loads, front and 
 rear loads and doesn't need a load to feel great..   I check the tires once 
 a week.. and carry what I need as an all around bicycle... I change handle 
 bars, tires, bags etc often .. then join a Rivendell Owners group on the web 
 to discuss and explore the wonderful uses of it..   only to have to defend 
 not the bike but my own experience as someone else decides unilaterally that 
 since they don't feel the same way I'm wrong... and no evidence from anyone 
 is valid...they are just used to it and don't know.
 
 I'm sarcastic blunt and things make sense or they don't.   Low trail sounds 
 great the way Jan did it .. built the bike to be a performance (race 
 machine) for a specific purpose.. He loves it.  The bikes are beautiful and 
 I'm sure they  ride great and people get used to them just as Most bikes 
 ride wonderfully and people get used to them.   After all they are 
 bicycles  After all from the vast difference of experiences and not just 
 opinions it's obvious that it's not just a trail thing.  It's also true 
 that there are trade offs in bike design.  It may be true that low trail 
 bikes with  xyz handle a front load of x better than bike z with x amount of 
 load at frame size k rider weight L and front to rear load weight M under N 
 amount of power.  It's not the answer to all loads though and writing off 
 others experience is just tiring at best.
 
 Don't tell low trail bike owners they have a nice bike either... they know 
 it already.. you were just to dumb to figure it out as quickly as they did.  
 Guess we only need one bike geometry after all.
 
 FYI:  this is not a personal attack on anyone no matter how much you may 
 want to try and feel it is.  Also no single sentence by itself above stands 
 alone.. overall this is just stating in a sarcastic but honest statement of 
 opinion based perceptions.. so far in this thread and others.  It also goes 
 back to my original notice to the original poster that I disagree with the 
 instant assertion that front loads are bad for all but bike X because your 
 bike can't handle it BS!   Mine and others experience and knowledge of how 
 our bikes handle are just as valid as others opinions.   I don't argue or 
 believe my bike is better than yours except for me, that is the same respect 
 I expect / demand from you.  If not I am sarcastic enough and a big enough 
 asshole to be as obnoxious and oblivious to the truth as anyone just not as 
 eloquent.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] FS: Nitto Campee Rack, Velo Orange Hub

2011-11-24 Thread James Warren

Irv,

Is that a sweet Protovelo with the lugs of a Rivendell custom?

Any photos of the whole bike?

-Jim W.


On Nov 23, 2011, at 12:39 PM, Irv wrote:

 Selling my Nitto Campee Rack. Detachable Low rider pannier racks.
 High Quality Fillet Brazed Welds
 
 Picture here - 
 http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a35/modernfuturist/For%20Sale/ddd2505f.jpg
 
 $220 shipped
 
 
 Also selling a brand new Velo Orange 130mm rear spaced cassette
 freewheel hub.
 
 Picture here - 
 http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a35/modernfuturist/For%20Sale/d92bd947.jpg
 
 $90 shipped
 
 
 E-mail me off list if interested.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: FS: 58 cm Tournesol Sportif

2011-11-24 Thread Michael S
Sorry, I forgot to add:

Michael Scholten
Grand Rapids, MI

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] A well traveled topic: 650b or 700c Hilsen?

2011-11-24 Thread Justin August
H folks-
For reasons that are personal and non-important I'm looking at upgrading my 
Bleriot to a Hilsen. The practical aspects are the addition of DT shifters and 
my Bleriot always feels just a bit too small. I'm debating between the two 
Hisens 58 and 59 due to tire size. I have a fixed gear 650b city bike that I 
love and enjoyed the 650b on longer rides with the Bleirot. Perhaps I'm 
worrying too much but does it make sense to have my only (for now) two bikes be 
this tire size? Wouldn't. Diversity be a better thing? I feel lost!

-justin

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/_su55sDM4UgJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] A well traveled topic: 650b or 700c Hilsen?

2011-11-24 Thread jimD
I celebrate diversity. My Saluki is 650B and the Riv custom 700C. I find subtle 
differences between the two wheel sizes but nothing dramatic. So having the 
diversity has persuaded me that there isn't
anything 'magic' about wheel size. Tire diameter and inflation pressure seem 
far more dramatic to me.
Others feel differently and favor one wheel size over the other.

If you go the diversity route you get to experience both sizes and formulate 
your own beliefs. 

With diversity comes complexity.
If you want a generator hub you have to choose between wheel sizes. You need 
different replacement tubes. You can't swap wheels from one bike to the next. 
All food for thought.
-JimD

On Nov 24, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Justin August wrote:

 H folks-
 For reasons that are personal and non-important I'm looking at upgrading my 
 Bleriot to a Hilsen. The practical aspects are the addition of DT shifters 
 and my Bleriot always feels just a bit too small. I'm debating between the 
 two Hisens 58 and 59 due to tire size. I have a fixed gear 650b city bike 
 that I love and enjoyed the 650b on longer rides with the Bleirot. Perhaps 
 I'm worrying too much but does it make sense to have my only (for now) two 
 bikes be this tire size? Wouldn't. Diversity be a better thing? I feel lost!
 
 -justin
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/_su55sDM4UgJ.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Ot; Weightlifting; old school.

2011-11-24 Thread Richard
Greetings. I used to ride bikes but stopped totally a few months back to 
exclusively devote my spare time to becoming immensely strong; squat deadlift 
bench and overhead. I think aerobic exercise was wearing me down. I am eating a 
lot and getting strong. 



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Ot; Weightlifting; old school.

2011-11-24 Thread David Faller

You are correct about the OT part.

On 11/24/2011 7:51 PM, Richard wrote:
Greetings. I used to ride bikes but stopped totally a few months back 
to exclusively devote my spare time to becoming immensely strong; 
squat deadlift bench and overhead. I think aerobic exercise was 
wearing me down. I am eating a lot and getting strong.






--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups RBW Owners Bunch group.

To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: A well traveled topic: 650b or 700c Hilsen?

2011-11-24 Thread William
Remember you can run skinny 700c wheels on a 650B Hilsen

http://www.flickr.com/photos/45758191@N04/5467655268/in/set-72157624977899459


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/kinhl1hZvYcJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: A well traveled topic: 650b or 700c Hilsen?

2011-11-24 Thread Liesl
I have two 650B's – a Saluki and a ProtoBleriot set up as a
singlespeed.  I do like having a dynohub wheel that can go back and
forth between the two.  But I must say that don't like the persistent
tire limitations.  There are only so many 650B tires.  I had a heck of
time finding a skinnyish (meaning 36 or less) knobbyish tire for
winter use – try looking for a 650B that fits this bill.  Not too
many.  But look for a 700?  lots.  Even look for a 27.  Lots.  Don't
get me wrong; as a shorter person, I am in love with with my Saluki
and Proto.  But my next bike(s) will have common wheel sizes for the
petrapocalypse.

yours, liesl

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: A well traveled topic: 650b or 700c Hilsen?

2011-11-24 Thread rob markwardt
I've got 27, 700c, 650B, and 26 inch bikes.  Love them all but will
let you know if I find the MAGICAL size..will keep searching.

On Nov 24, 8:33 pm, Liesl li...@smm.org wrote:
 I have two 650B's – a Saluki and a ProtoBleriot set up as a
 singlespeed.  I do like having a dynohub wheel that can go back and
 forth between the two.  But I must say that don't like the persistent
 tire limitations.  There are only so many 650B tires.  I had a heck of
 time finding a skinnyish (meaning 36 or less) knobbyish tire for
 winter use – try looking for a 650B that fits this bill.  Not too
 many.  But look for a 700?  lots.  Even look for a 27.  Lots.  Don't
 get me wrong; as a shorter person, I am in love with with my Saluki
 and Proto.  But my next bike(s) will have common wheel sizes for the
 petrapocalypse.

 yours, liesl

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Ot; Weightlifting; old school.

2011-11-24 Thread rob markwardt
Interesting.  I used to be immensely strong but now I just ride
bikes.  I eat a lot but just get fatter and weaker.

On Nov 24, 7:51 pm, Richard sharpjewlaw...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Greetings. I used to ride bikes but stopped totally a few months back to 
 exclusively devote my spare time to becoming immensely strong; squat deadlift 
 bench and overhead. I think aerobic exercise was wearing me down. I am eating 
 a lot and getting strong.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Ot; Weightlifting; old school.

2011-11-24 Thread rcnute
My bikes rest against my squat cage, so I can't use it.

Ryan

On Nov 24, 9:19 pm, rob markwardt robmar...@hotmail.com wrote:
 Interesting.  I used to be immensely strong but now I just ride
 bikes.  I eat a lot but just get fatter and weaker.

 On Nov 24, 7:51 pm, Richard sharpjewlaw...@yahoo.com wrote:



  Greetings. I used to ride bikes but stopped totally a few months back to 
  exclusively devote my spare time to becoming immensely strong; squat 
  deadlift bench and overhead. I think aerobic exercise was wearing me down. 
  I am eating a lot and getting strong.- Hide quoted text -

 - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Stolen Hillborne: Chicago

2011-11-24 Thread Benedikt
Sorry to hear about your bike.  I hope it turns up.

I'm still waiting for the day, and I think it will be soon, when you
can hide a GPS unit in the frame, bars, somewhere and track down your
bike via your phone if it's missing.


On Nov 23, 9:28 pm, tthomashardie tthomashar...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Jim,

 Thanks for the information. The lock I used had the newer flat key
 not the cylinder type. More proof any lock can be defeated. I still
 plan to used multiple locks on the future.

 My best,

 Tim

 On Nov 23, 1:44 pm, CycloFiend cyclofi...@earthlink.net wrote:







  on 11/23/11 10:08 AM, tthomashardie at tthomashar...@gmail.com wrote:

   I used the modified Sheldon method, but through the seat stays rather
   than the chain stays. The front wheel had a locking skewer. I'm not
   sure how they got it. The lock was missing too. Some people on the
   forums suggest that they could have used brute force. Maybe pull-up in
   cargo van and smash the lock/core and drive off. I really don't know.
   I do know that true security is a myth and anything can get stolen. In
   the future I plan to start using two good locks. Sort of a pain to
   carry around, but it will take twice as long to rip off. An extra
   couple seconds or minutes could be as good a deterrent as anything.

  General locking instructions and theories have been covered well, and they
  all lead to the same conclusion - if you leave it locked, you may lose it.
  The longer it's left, the more likely the lift.  The more you leave it in
  the same place each time, the more times a potential theif has to evaluate
  the coinditions. The best you can hope for is diverting a low-tech thief to
  another, less well defended bicycle.

  However, something in your description caught my eye, and it was a topic I
  was related to another person over the weekend - if you have a Kryptonite
  lock from 8-10 years ago with an open-end lock that uses a cylinder type
  key, they are prone to attacks with - believe it or not - a Bic pen cylinder
  (or similar - this is not a case of French constructeur superiority...).

  Basically, you can work the open end of the pen barrel into the lock and
  smoosh it around for a while until it pushes out the tumblers and then twist
  it around to open the lock. There was a well-travelled video of this, a
  subsequent recall from Kryptonite (pretty sure now discontinued) and much
  internet chatter.

  But, as I was helping a friend work on his son's bike, there it was - that
  prototypical krypto with that exact lock type. And he asked me if it was a
  good lock...

  This doesn't apply to the newer, middle of the hasp, slotted key types.

  - Jim All bikes weigh 40#'s.  (Weight of bike) + (Weight of lock) = 40

  --
  Jim Edgar
  cyclofi...@earthlink.net

  Cyclofiend Bicycle Photo Galleries -http://www.cyclofiend.com
  Current Classics - Cross Bikes
  Singlespeed - Working Bikes

  Gallery updates now appear here -http://cyclofiend.blogspot.com

  Nigel did some work for some of the other riders at Allied, onces who still
  rode metal.  He hadn't liked it when Chevette had gone for a paper frame.
  -- William Gibson, Virtual Light

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.