[RBW] Re: Anyone tried adding a larger sprocket to a 7-speed cassette?

2013-01-13 Thread Tom Harrop
Just thought I'd update this thread in case someone else googles it up. I 
made the switch to a 7-speed 13–28 HG cassette plus a 36t sprocket and a 
SRAM 8-speed chain. To put it scientifically, I would say the drivetrain 
feels a bazillion times better. No more ghost shifting or chain skipping 
under load. The shift from the 28 to the 36 is just fine by my standards.

I'm afraid it wasn't a very scientific experiment—aside from the new chain 
and cassette I also switched the bottom bracket cable guide, which didn't 
look like it was guiding the cables very smoothly (unless two 20° bends are 
a good thing), so that could have been partly responsible for the ghost 
shifting. Anyway, I'm happy and I won't be going back to 9 speed anytime 
soon. The 'frankencassette' looks bizarre with 7 black sprockets and the 
silver 36t, but I can't see it when I'm riding, as they say.

Thanks again for the input!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/8DY_ef-0XyAJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Campagnolo cable guide 626/A on a Ram

2013-01-13 Thread Steve Wimberg
I've never been a huge fan of how the derailer cables are routed underneath the 
bottom bracket of my Ram, due to the fact that they are just rubbing against 
the bare frame.  Does anyone have any thoughts on using something like this 
Campy cable guide?

http://velobase.com/ViewComponent.aspx?ID=E553FEF8-9918-4B47-B24E-AE4603CBCB14

It attaches to the downtube and routes the cables above and to the side of the 
bottom bracket.  However, from what I can find, it looks like it is sized for a 
1 1/8 tube, while I believe the Ram down tube is 1 1/4.  If that is indeed 
the case, could the guide possibly be made to squeeze out that extra 1/8?

Thanks for any info,
Steve




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread Jan Heine
Weight is easily measured, but it's really not that important in itself. 

If I fill up three water bottles and add them to my bike, I've just added 
about 5 pounds, yet the bike feels the same most of the time. During normal 
riding, the extra 5 pounds are a non-issue. (I may feel the extra weight 
when I rise out of the saddle and throw the bike from side to side, or when 
I carry the bike into the basement, and it probably is measurable against 
the stopwatch on a long climb.) In summary, the overall bike weight is not 
very important.

That doesn't mean that a heavy bike feels and rides the same as a lighter 
one. Here is why: If, during the design process of my bike, I added just 
half a pound to the frame of my bike by going to thicker tubing walls, by 
using larger tubing diameters, or by adding extra tubes, then my bike would 
feel radically different. Through almost a decade of testing at *Bicycle 
Quarterly*, we've found that frame flex characteristics, more than anything 
else, determine the feel of a bike. We tested this in a double-blind test, 
with three bikes that were identical, except one had thicker tubing walls. 
(Even the weights were equalized.) Two of our three testers could tell the 
bikes apart with 100% accuracy, and both strongly preferred the thinwall 
frames. This was despite the difference between the frames being very small 
- one was flexible by today's standards, the others were super-flexible. (I 
suspect that the third tester might have been able to tell the difference 
if we had tested bikes that were more dissimilar, for example, a Surly 
Long-Haul Trucker tubeset against that of a Roadeo.)

So the weight of the frame often does impact the ride and performance, 
because it usually is inversely correlated with stiffness. We've also found 
that it's not the overall flex that matters as much as the balance of the 
frame. Traditional frames had evolved over decades of trial and error until 
they arrived at a formula that worked well: A relatively flexible top tube 
(usually 1/8 smaller in diameter than the down tube), a somewhat stiffer 
top tube, and very stiff (i.e., heavy and relatively short) chainstays. 
Most of today's best racing bikes are still built to that formula, and 
actually perform very well. Some of today's builders change that balance, 
for example, with oversize top tubes, but their bikes often don't perform 
as well as a result.

If you are interested in this topic, I suggest looking at our blog's 
Journey of Discovery series, where we have more details on this:

http://janheine.wordpress.com/category/a-journey-of-discovery/

and especially the entry on Frame Stiffness.

There are other factors that influence your bike's performance and feel, 
most notably the resistance of the tires, your riding position (more 
upright makes it harder to put out power), and aerodynamics (of the rider, 
not the bike).

Also, in the latest *Bicycle 
Quarterly*http://www.bikequarterly.com/current_issue.html, 
we tested two titanium race bikes with electronic shifting, and then 
compared their hillclimbing performance against a steel 650B randonneur 
bike with fenders, lights, and even a handlebar bag in a hillclimbing 
competition. The results were truly surprising and showed that factors 
other than weight are important in determining a bicycle's performance.

It is important to remember that performance isn't everything. Not every 
bike is optimized for performance, and not every rider seeks out 
performance. It all depends on how you ride and what your priorities are. 
And different people seem to have different pedal strokes and 
sensitivities. Some riders can make almost any bike go, while others really 
benefit from a bike that is fine-tuned to their pedal stroke.

Jan Heine
Editor
Bicycle Quarterly
www.bikequarterly.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/JbblnIbcfVYJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Quickbeam BB length.

2013-01-13 Thread ccanter
Can anyone tell me what came stock on their complete bike from Riv?
Thanks
Clyde

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread eflayer
You might try a 16.5 lb Specialized Roubaix and let us know what you think 
about that :). Mine weighs about 4 lbs less than my lightest steel bike. I 
still like steel a ton, but for pure fast club road rides, the Roubaix is 
more fun in most ways.
On Saturday, January 12, 2013 9:33:04 PM UTC-8, Scot Brooks wrote:

 I spend about equal time on my Sam Hillborne and my Soma Double Cross. To 
 abbreviate the way they're normally set up, the Sam's got a 40/24 12-36 
 drivetrain, 35c Soma New Xpress tires, front rack/basket/Shopsack. The 
 Soma's got a 48/34 11-34 drivetrain, 35c Schwalbe Marathon Racers, front 
 rack, front and rear Sackville bags. 

 Anyway, I always assumed that my Soma was kind of a lightweight go-fast 
 bike with it's fancy Tange Prestige tubing and slightly more aggressive 
 geometry (shorter chain stays anyway). Compared to the Sam, it just takes 
 off like crazy and *feels *incredibly quick and nimble. Lo-and-behold, I 
 got one of those hook scale things today, and the total weight of each bike 
 was 35lbs for the Sam and 31lbs for the Soma. 

 I thought it was the weight that explained the difference in feel, but 
 clearly that's not the case. Both are equally pleasurable to ride, but 
 there must be far more factors involved in the overall feel of each bike 
 than I might have guessed. 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/4hz-iWJpuXMJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread Jan Heine
As a reader pointed out, I should have said somewhat stiffer *down* tube 
instead of top tube below.

On Sunday, January 13, 2013 6:33:31 AM UTC-8, Jan Heine wrote:

  a formula that worked well: A relatively flexible top tube (usually 1/8 
 smaller in diameter than the down tube), a somewhat stiffer top tube, and 
 very stiff (i.e., heavy and relatively short) chainstays. 

 Jan Heine
 Editor
 Bicycle Quarterly
 www.bikequarterly.com


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/NRpbdk34I8kJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Campagnolo cable guide 626/A on a Ram

2013-01-13 Thread Eric Norris
I have some experience using Campagnolo and other old-school clamp-on devices. 
I don't think the 1 1/8 clamp can be stretched to fit 1 1/4. The diameter of 
the circle the clamp would need to fit around is about .4 inches longer (do the 
math here: http://math.about.com/library/blcirclecalculator.htm), which is too 
long, even if you used a longer screw.

Eric N
www.CampyOnly.com
CampyOnlyGuy.blogspot.com
Twitter: @CampyOnlyGuy

On Jan 13, 2013, at 6:06 AM, Steve Wimberg st...@stevewimberg.com wrote:

 I've never been a huge fan of how the derailer cables are routed underneath 
 the bottom bracket of my Ram, due to the fact that they are just rubbing 
 against the bare frame.  Does anyone have any thoughts on using something 
 like this Campy cable guide?
 
 http://velobase.com/ViewComponent.aspx?ID=E553FEF8-9918-4B47-B24E-AE4603CBCB14
 
 It attaches to the downtube and routes the cables above and to the side of 
 the bottom bracket.  However, from what I can find, it looks like it is sized 
 for a 1 1/8 tube, while I believe the Ram down tube is 1 1/4.  If that is 
 indeed the case, could the guide possibly be made to squeeze out that extra 
 1/8?
 
 Thanks for any info,
 Steve
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: 2013 Riding Plans anyone?

2013-01-13 Thread Marc Irwin
So far, beyond a few local charity rides, I,m planning;
Riv Rally east,(if it happens),
Midwest Riv Rally June
Adventure Cycling (Minn) June
Torch Lake Mi.  July
Fifties Forum Annual ride in Boston this year July 27
Week long trip from Montrieal to Mont Laurier and return July 29-Aug?

Marc

On Saturday, January 12, 2013 10:44:35 PM UTC-5, Noah Deuce wrote:

 Looking forward to seeing pictures and tales from everyone's rides!

 I've got lots of fun plans for 2013:

 Commuting to  from Broomfield on a regular basis (13 miles one-way), then 
 catching the bus the rest of the way to Denver for work;
 Anti-Epic Gravel Grinder in late-April;
 Various Rocky Mountain Randonneur populaires and brevets;
 Gold Rush Gravel Grinder in Spearfish, SD in early-June;
 Odin's Revenge in Gothenburg, NE in late-June;
 Gravel Worlds in Lincoln, NE in September.

 Also planning a multi-day bikepack over Rollins Pass to Winter Park, and 
 then up along the Great Divide Mountain Bike Route to Steamboat Springs.

 Going to be a great year!



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/KisvfCCuA6EJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Campagnolo cable guide 626/A on a Ram

2013-01-13 Thread Dave
I think more than a few of us may have been initially weirded-out by 
using the bottom bracket shell as a cable guide, but honestly it really 
doesn't make any difference.  Friction is friction, and no one in the 
history of derailleurs has even sawn through their bottom bracket.  What 
I and many others do is to put a couple inches of Teflon cable housing 
lining on the cables under the shell.  They stay there just fine and 
provide a slick crud barrier for the cables, smooth out the shifting a 
hair, and take out the creepy thought of slowly, ever slowly, cutting 
into the shell.  You'll need to keep an eye on it a couple times per 
year; the cable will eventually cut its way through the Teflon and 
you'll need to replace it.



On 1/13/2013 6:06 AM, Steve Wimberg wrote:

I've never been a huge fan of how the derailer cables are routed underneath the 
bottom bracket of my Ram, due to the fact that they are just rubbing against 
the bare frame.  Does anyone have any thoughts on using something like this 
Campy cable guide?

http://velobase.com/ViewComponent.aspx?ID=E553FEF8-9918-4B47-B24E-AE4603CBCB14

It attaches to the downtube and routes the cables above and to the side of the bottom bracket. 
 However, from what I can find, it looks like it is sized for a 1 1/8 tube, while I 
believe the Ram down tube is 1 1/4.  If that is indeed the case, could the guide 
possibly be made to squeeze out that extra 1/8?

Thanks for any info,
Steve






--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread ted
Some 15 or 20 years ago I changed from a semi-custom Nobilette frame
to a Gios Torino frame. The Gios was noticeably stiffer. When I did
jumps (on either flats or hills) the Gios responded with more
immediacy and directness than the Nobilette. With the Nobilette it
seemed I could feel the frame flexing or winding up, and on the Gios
the increase in effort seemed to go directly to rear wheels contact
patch. My performance in races and group rides with local racing clubs
was as good or better with the Gios.
In my experience a stiffer frame does not necessarily imply reduced
performance.
I suspect that differences in riders physiques and pedaling styles
affect what a bike fine-tuned to their pedaling stroke is.

On Jan 13, 6:56 am, Jan Heine hein...@earthlink.net wrote:
 As a reader pointed out, I should have said somewhat stiffer *down* tube
 instead of top tube below.







 On Sunday, January 13, 2013 6:33:31 AM UTC-8, Jan Heine wrote:

   a formula that worked well: A relatively flexible top tube (usually 1/8
  smaller in diameter than the down tube), a somewhat stiffer top tube, and
  very stiff (i.e., heavy and relatively short) chainstays.

  Jan Heine
  Editor
  Bicycle Quarterly
 www.bikequarterly.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread Michael
I think it is difficult to measure the effect of weight on a bike's 
performance, when there are so many other factors that contribute to the 
ride, as Jan pointed out.
 

 My Bleriot (22.1 lbs) is only about 3 lbs. heavier than my Giant defy 3.
 I am not sure which bike is faster than the other.
 The Bleriot feels slower, but I have my fastest commute time on it.
  
 The Defy feels bouncy and twitchy but faster in take off and general 
 riding.
 The Bleriot feels stable and predictable and lower to the ground. I prefer 
 the Bleriot ride because I feel safer on it and there have been times like 
 yesterday when I am sure I would have crashed if I had been on the Defy 
 road bike, but the wide tires of the Bleriot helped me roll harmlessly over 
 road cracks along the narrow shoulder as a car passed.
  

 
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/MG5GD0XtnU8J.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread ted
Is that 16.5 lbs your measurement? Does it include saddle, pedals, and
cages (race bikes are often weighed without those components)?
What is your lightest steel bike, and what wheels and components are
on it?
Also keep in mind that adding 4 lbs to your 16.5 lb roubaix is an
increase of nearly 25% whereas adding the same 4 lbs to a 31 lb bike
is only a 13% increase.

On Jan 13, 6:54 am, eflayer eddie.fla...@att.net wrote:
 You might try a 16.5 lb Specialized Roubaix and let us know what you think
 about that :). Mine weighs about 4 lbs less than my lightest steel bike. I
 still like steel a ton, but for pure fast club road rides, the Roubaix is
 more fun in most ways.







 On Saturday, January 12, 2013 9:33:04 PM UTC-8, Scot Brooks wrote:

  I spend about equal time on my Sam Hillborne and my Soma Double Cross. To
  abbreviate the way they're normally set up, the Sam's got a 40/24 12-36
  drivetrain, 35c Soma New Xpress tires, front rack/basket/Shopsack. The
  Soma's got a 48/34 11-34 drivetrain, 35c Schwalbe Marathon Racers, front
  rack, front and rear Sackville bags.

  Anyway, I always assumed that my Soma was kind of a lightweight go-fast
  bike with it's fancy Tange Prestige tubing and slightly more aggressive
  geometry (shorter chain stays anyway). Compared to the Sam, it just takes
  off like crazy and *feels *incredibly quick and nimble. Lo-and-behold, I
  got one of those hook scale things today, and the total weight of each bike
  was 35lbs for the Sam and 31lbs for the Soma.

  I thought it was the weight that explained the difference in feel, but
  clearly that's not the case. Both are equally pleasurable to ride, but
  there must be far more factors involved in the overall feel of each bike
  than I might have guessed.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: 2013 Riding Plans anyone?

2013-01-13 Thread El Sapo


 I will be building up and riding an Atlantis alot this year. That cool 
 vibe (homeless guy) I've been putting down on the bike trail riding one or 
 another of my harem of restored 80's MTN bikes is due for a major 
 makeover. How you like me now?

 

 As Manny advised above, I've started to stop in the middle of my ride to 
 take in the sights. I might even carry a flask on a cold day and enjoy an 
 adult beverage. 

 
I also plan on finding out where that trail that goes under the bypass 
leads. 
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/fKl8jscKaqIJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Do Pitlocks scratch paint on your seat tube collar?

2013-01-13 Thread Mike B
I have pitlocks on front and rear wheels and seatpost.   No problem with 
seatpost slipping.  Yeah you lose a little paint but its under the pitlock 
and you don't notice it.  You're gonna lose some paint in other places just 
from riding anyway.  Just forget about it and learn to love patina.  I 
highly recommend pitlocks.  If you get more than one make sure you get the 
same key to fit each and make things simpler for you.  The solution for not 
losing your saddle is to put plumbers putty in the hex head.  If you want 
to adjust your saddle latter on you can easily drill it out.  I'm in NYC 
where they would steal the paint off your frame if given half a chance.   
If someone wants your bike bad enough they will get it.  Just try to make 
it a pain in the ass for them so hopefully they move on to different 
pastures.  Pitlocks are the pain in the ass.

Mike


On Thursday, January 10, 2013 12:02:30 AM UTC-5, Michael wrote:

 Thinking about getting pitlocks for my seatpost and saddle (yes, they 
 actually have one that clamps onto the post at the saddle bolt, thus 
 blocking access to it). Noone can steal your seatpost *or* saddle, then.
  
 I am more concerned about the pitlocks scratching the paint on the seat 
 tube collar.
 How has yours worked out?


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/C2WVs19SoHUJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: FS: Rivendell Bleriot 53cm Complete

2013-01-13 Thread HTC
Where are you (and the bike) located?

On Saturday, January 12, 2013 8:31:12 PM UTC-7, Johnny Alien wrote:

 There tends to be a fair share of hills around here and it does come in 
 handy.

 On Saturday, January 12, 2013 10:19:22 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:

 Wow! Very nice bike!
 I hope it sells quickly for you.
  
 I have a 55 Bleriot with a double crank. A triple like yours has would 
 feel great on the hills around here.
 Someone is gonna be happy.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/3XiZxa7__ZoJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Bagman2 Q/R with Expedition Support and Camper longflap

2013-01-13 Thread hsmitham
I was wondering if anyone has any experience with Carridice's Camper long 
flap and the Bagman expedition saddle bag support? I'm considering this 
combination from Carradice purely on asethics and thought some of you might 
have some thoughts.

http://www.carradice.co.uk/index.php?page_id=productunder=typeproduct_id=35
http://www.carradice.co.uk/products/other/bagman

Thanks,

Hugh Smitham
Los Angeles, Ca

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/cCHMzgSQPmsJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Panaracer Tour Tire

2013-01-13 Thread David Banzer
I wonder if they're just Paselas with a black sidewall and reflective 
strip?

The casing is 27tpi, and I believe Paselas are 66tpi. Based on that I'd 
guess they're going to feel different than a Pasela.
I'm sure they're worth a try though, price certainly is right.

David
Chicago

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/7zn0eIeEzSwJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Bleriot Price Check

2013-01-13 Thread wrickster
I would think $1100 is a little too low. Personally I would be looking to 
recoup the replacement price of the frame. The new buyer would be getting 
the complete bike already built-up for the price of the frameset alone. 
-Ricky


On Friday, January 11, 2013 10:17:16 PM UTC-5, Johnny Alien wrote:

 I may need to sell my 53cm Bleriot.  What has been the going rate? I am 
 not sure what to ask for it. It would be complete with standard mid-level 
 Riv parts. I can list out what it has if that is helpful or if someone is 
 interested in it.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/BRJxKPKBzXgJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Tektro/Silver Big Mouths v. Dia Compe 750s

2013-01-13 Thread David Banzer
Considering both the Tektro/Silver Big Mouth brakes or the Dia Compe 750's 
for a project.
Which do you prefer? Why?

I have the Tektro/Silvers on a 650b bike right now and like them, but 
aesthetically prefer the look of centerpulls.
I also have my eyes on the mini Dia Compe front rack that's out there that 
mounts to the front brake.

Thanks!
David
Chicago

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/4CP4C2uigVgJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Do Pitlocks scratch paint on your seat tube collar?

2013-01-13 Thread Alex Zeibot
Hi Michael,
Scroll down to the 5th picture and the info under it.  That should give you
a good idea.  Hope it will help you. Good luck.
http://www.peterwhitecycles.com/pitlock.asp


On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Michael john11.2...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thinking about getting pitlocks for my seatpost and saddle (yes, they
 actually have one that clamps onto the post at the saddle bolt, thus
 blocking access to it). Noone can steal your seatpost *or* saddle, then.

 I am more concerned about the pitlocks scratching the paint on the seat
 tube collar.
 How has yours worked out?

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/F2CGdHq-arUJ.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: FS: 64cm Atlantis

2013-01-13 Thread Keith Beato
Hi Rudy
Is the frame still for sale? What year is it?
Keith from Alameda

On Monday, October 8, 2012 1:42:39 PM UTC-7, rudi wrote:

 I'm selling my 64cm Atlantis, serial #AT-0141. Frame, fork, headset only. 
 It's an early one, and I've gotten lots of good riding out of it. About a 
 year ago, the rear dropout broke, and the good folks at Riv took it in and 
 repaired it and repainted it the original Atlantis color. We added a 
 kickstand plate, but I wish we'd added fork eyelets. While the frame was 
 being repaired I got myself an AHH, and that has become my main ride. I 
 never built the Atlantis back up, so it is in like new condition, ready for 
 your build. 

 Asking $1,200. I'd prefer to sell it to someone local, in the Bay Area as 
 I had a slight snag with the last time I shipped. But if the Bay Area is 
 saturated with 64cm Atlantis-es, then I'll have it professionally boxed and 
 shipped at cost. Please send me a message off list if interested.

 Here http://www.flickr.com/photos/34323747@N06/sets/72157631723545067/are 
 some pics. 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/OYAb62Us294J.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Panaracer Tour Tire

2013-01-13 Thread Tom Bancroft
Judging by the similar weight and looks, probably a Marathon competitor. 
Maybe try these: http://www.somafab.com/archives/product/new-express

I have the non-hypertex ones in 650b and they're just like a Pasela.

Tom

On Saturday, January 12, 2013 7:47:53 AM UTC-8, Mike wrote:

 When I started riding bigger tires on my commuter and road bike, one in 
 the same at the time, I used Continental Contacts initially, but after 
 reading through the Rivendell Catalog I switched over to Paselas, first 35s 
 then 32s as I got into randonneuring. The tires were great, my main 
 complaint was and still is, issues with the sidewalls, that they're not 
 that durable. I used T-Serves, again, first 35s and then 32s which are now 
 on my randonneuring bike and like those well enough. Still, Schwalbe 
 Marathons seem to have taken over for me. I currently have them on my 
 commuter, my LHT (40s) and my Hilsen (35)s. I like them well enough, while 
 they're sluggish, they're durable and dependable. I think they're ideal for 
 just riding. Still, I'm always on the lookout for new tires and noticed 
 these new Panaracer Tour Tires. 

 http://www.universalcycles.com/shopping/product_details.php?id=58386

 http://www.universalcycles.com/shopping/product_details.php?id=58385

 They seem to come in a good range of sizes (32, 35, 38, 42) and the price 
 is right. Has anyone else seen or used these? I wonder if they're just 
 Paselas with a black sidewall and reflective strip? Given the low price I'm 
 sure to try them out at some point, most likely the 38s or 42s. 

 --mike


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/YzITeF-K1EAJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread Scot Brooks
In honor of Jan, I did my Ballard Trader Joe's grocery trip this morning with 
decreased tire pressures (about 65psi) and front loaded maybe 10 pounds of food 
in the basket. The Soma still climbed like mad rat. Budget grocery randonneur :)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/ifgdHEHPPf0J.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Plastic Fenders and Hetres

2013-01-13 Thread C.J. Filip
Toshi - In terms of controlling water spray, do you get adequate
coverage over the Hetre with the P45 Longboards?

On Jan 11, 7:13 pm, Toshi Takeuchi tto...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yes, P45 Longboards from Riv on my 650b Ram.

 Toshi







 On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Michael john11.2...@gmail.com wrote:
  toshi:

  are those P45 longboards?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread PATRICK MOORE
It may not be weight, or it may be lower wheel weight, but I consistently
-- over 10 years -- find myself climbing faster, particularly when I stand,
on my 18 lb (pedals, cage, but no seat bag or bottle) gofast --
particularly noticeable because it is geared higher (75) than my other
bikes. In particular I often find myself *not* bailing on one particular
very steep 1/4 mile section, when I fully intend to, as I do on the other
fixies and which is a struggle on the 34-to-40 outer ring low on the Fargo
(38X32X29, 38X26X27.5 wheels respectively, even without a grocery load.

OTOH, the Herse I used to own, which was a tank, felt faster than either
the similarly weighted Sam Hill and the slightly heavier Fargo (with Kojak
wheelset) even when cruising in a 73 gear compared to a 67 to 69 gear --
this with decidedly non-optimum tires (IRC Tandem belted 30 mm -- these
felt better than the doggy 35 mm Pasela Tourguards). The Sam felt much like
the Fargo with Kojak wheelset: Not bad at all but certainly more sluggish
on the flats as on the hills.

I have no fixed idea why there should be such differences, but I guess
that, beside weight and wheel weight, and tire quality, there is fit: the
Herse fit as well or almost as well as my custom Rivs.

FWIW again, the much lighter-tubed and narrower-tubed '73 Motobecane felt
faster than the Sam or Fargo, but slower overall than the Herse or the
Rivs. 67 gear -- shod with said IRCs.

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Scot Brooks scothinck...@gmail.comwrote:

 In honor of Jan, I did my Ballard Trader Joe's grocery trip this morning
 with decreased tire pressures (about 65psi) and front loaded maybe 10
 pounds of food in the basket. The Soma still climbed like mad rat. Budget
 grocery randonneur :)

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/ifgdHEHPPf0J.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




-- 

-
Patrick Moore, Albuquerque, NM, USA
For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW
http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
-

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Panaracer Tour Tire

2013-01-13 Thread Garth
no these are not a re-done Pasela.  Much much heavier and the tpi is 
different, as mentioned above.


if you want a similar tire to the Tour, it would their Crosstown tire. The 
weights are nearly identical, both 27tpi.  I've ridden the Crosstowns 
(rebranded from Performance Bike) and they felt heavy and slow compared to 
the same size tire in their Metro K , which just zing.  Yeah. check out 
Performance Bikes Metro K tires in 35mm I like 'em !Sidewalls are 
great, and they feel lively and really roll easily. Easily the best tire 
for the $$ easily and a Sleeper . Likely because it's not a Brand 
name .  But it's made by one ! ..lol  Tires don't come from just anyone. 


http://www.performancebike.com/bikes/Product_10054_10551_1070099_-1_400904_400013_400238


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/z0ERV1fidY8J.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread PATRICK MOORE
One more remark on sensations of fastness -- which can be correlated, at
least to some degree, with actual speed if you are accustomed to (1) riding
the same gears or very similar gears on different bikes and (2) are
sufficiently aware of your cadence: the tricycle (narrow-tubed 531, and
light for a trike at ~28 lb with Old School parts, felt noticeably draggier
than the Rivs, the Herse, and the Motobecane, and as well a bit slower than
the Sam and the Fargo/Kojaks, gearing taken into account. I attribute this
to the third wheel: the tires were, IIRC, IRC Tandem quality. Pushing the
(in this case) 71 cruising gear my cadence and the related effort/torque
was slower/higher, ceteris paribus.

Patrick ceteris paribus to you to, buddy Moore

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:22 PM, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:

 It may not be weight, or it may be lower wheel weight, but I consistently
 -- over 10 years -- find myself climbing faster, particularly when I stand,
 on my 18 lb (pedals, cage, but no seat bag or bottle) gofast --
 particularly noticeable because it is geared higher (75) than my other
 bikes. In particular I often find myself *not* bailing on one particular
 very steep 1/4 mile section, when I fully intend to, as I do on the other
 fixies and which is a struggle on the 34-to-40 outer ring low on the Fargo
 (38X32X29, 38X26X27.5 wheels respectively, even without a grocery load.

 OTOH, the Herse I used to own, which was a tank, felt faster than either
 the similarly weighted Sam Hill and the slightly heavier Fargo (with Kojak
 wheelset) even when cruising in a 73 gear compared to a 67 to 69 gear --
 this with decidedly non-optimum tires (IRC Tandem belted 30 mm -- these
 felt better than the doggy 35 mm Pasela Tourguards). The Sam felt much like
 the Fargo with Kojak wheelset: Not bad at all but certainly more sluggish
 on the flats as on the hills.

 I have no fixed idea why there should be such differences, but I guess
 that, beside weight and wheel weight, and tire quality, there is fit: the
 Herse fit as well or almost as well as my custom Rivs.

 FWIW again, the much lighter-tubed and narrower-tubed '73 Motobecane felt
 faster than the Sam or Fargo, but slower overall than the Herse or the
 Rivs. 67 gear -- shod with said IRCs.


 On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Scot Brooks scothinck...@gmail.comwrote:

 In honor of Jan, I did my Ballard Trader Joe's grocery trip this morning
 with decreased tire pressures (about 65psi) and front loaded maybe 10
 pounds of food in the basket. The Soma still climbed like mad rat. Budget
 grocery randonneur :)

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/ifgdHEHPPf0J.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




 --

 -
 Patrick Moore, Albuquerque, NM, USA
 For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW
 http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
 -




-- 

-
Patrick Moore, Albuquerque, NM, USA
For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW
http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
-

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Panaracer Tour Tire

2013-01-13 Thread Will
For a fast, light, high volume and surprisingly tough tire, I feel Schwalbe 
Kojaks should be considered in this conversation. The 700 x 35's are my bees 
knees tire of choice. No reflective sidewall strips though. No tread pattern 
either. But that just adds to their zing. And while they are tough and long 
lasting for me here in southern New England, I'm not sure how they would hold 
up in goat head country. I just threw on a pair of Marathon Race 700 x 38's for 
the winter and they are noticeably sluggish compared to the Kojaks FWIW.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/62F7IS1ZD4gJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread Garth
Keep it simple. 

The tires.   Unless you compare with the same tire on very similar wheels, 
the comparison is moot. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/UR0T1GTJJVcJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Panaracer Tour Tire

2013-01-13 Thread PATRICK MOORE
I'm not sure how they would hold up in goat head country.

They hold up as well as anything else; certainly better IME than Paselas,
non-Tourguard, which positively sucked in all goatheads from the
surrounding 25 sq feet.

Even better are the Big Apples, tho' these are of course much heavier. They
do roll well, though, for their mass.

Odd: I get no more flats on the Michelin Pro Race 3s, 22 mm actual, than on
any of the wider tires; ditto for 22 mm Turbos and 23 mm Contis. Anyone got
an explanation? Do they slip stealthily between the thorns?

Oh, and while I remember: if any of y'all have read Jan's blog on Tire
Savers, let me add this:

1. I think -- no statistical analysis -- that they do help ward off
punctures by knocking the would-be penetrant off before it can rotate a
second time and be pushed alla way through.

2. Erstwhile listmember Gary 9,000 miles last year -- it was a bad year
Blakely, late of ABQ and now in CO -- swore that they did work for
goatheads.

3. You install them so that they **do not contact** the tire but sit
slightly above it -- exactly 37/512 above the tread's highest point. (So
they say.) And bend them to follow the tread's contour.

Patrick real men ride supple, light and puncture-prone tires Moore



On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Will wroma...@optonline.net wrote:

 For a fast, light, high volume and surprisingly tough tire, I feel
 Schwalbe Kojaks should be considered in this conversation. The 700 x 35's
 are my bees knees tire of choice. No reflective sidewall strips though.
 No tread pattern either. But that just adds to their zing. And while they
 are tough and long lasting for me here in southern New England, I'm not
 sure how they would hold up in goat head country. I just threw on a pair of
 Marathon Race 700 x 38's for the winter and they are noticeably sluggish
 compared to the Kojaks FWIW.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/62F7IS1ZD4gJ.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




-- 

-
Patrick Moore, Albuquerque, NM, USA
For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW
http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
-

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Panaracer Tour Tire

2013-01-13 Thread PATRICK MOORE
A late aside: here in ABQ, roadies use The System which includes training
on tires lined with old tires from which the bead has been cut. Me, I'd
rather fix flats.

(I am no initiate, but I think that The System also includes certain arcane
dietary methods such as riding without breakfast to burn fat, and other
arcana.)

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:47 PM, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm not sure how they would hold up in goat head country.

 They hold up as well as anything else; certainly better IME than Paselas,
 non-Tourguard, which positively sucked in all goatheads from the
 surrounding 25 sq feet.

 Even better are the Big Apples, tho' these are of course much heavier.
 They do roll well, though, for their mass.

 Odd: I get no more flats on the Michelin Pro Race 3s, 22 mm actual, than
 on any of the wider tires; ditto for 22 mm Turbos and 23 mm Contis. Anyone
 got an explanation? Do they slip stealthily between the thorns?

 Oh, and while I remember: if any of y'all have read Jan's blog on Tire
 Savers, let me add this:

 1. I think -- no statistical analysis -- that they do help ward off
 punctures by knocking the would-be penetrant off before it can rotate a
 second time and be pushed alla way through.

 2. Erstwhile listmember Gary 9,000 miles last year -- it was a bad year
 Blakely, late of ABQ and now in CO -- swore that they did work for
 goatheads.

 3. You install them so that they **do not contact** the tire but sit
 slightly above it -- exactly 37/512 above the tread's highest point. (So
 they say.) And bend them to follow the tread's contour.

 Patrick real men ride supple, light and puncture-prone tires Moore



 On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Will wroma...@optonline.net wrote:

 For a fast, light, high volume and surprisingly tough tire, I feel
 Schwalbe Kojaks should be considered in this conversation. The 700 x 35's
 are my bees knees tire of choice. No reflective sidewall strips though.
 No tread pattern either. But that just adds to their zing. And while they
 are tough and long lasting for me here in southern New England, I'm not
 sure how they would hold up in goat head country. I just threw on a pair of
 Marathon Race 700 x 38's for the winter and they are noticeably sluggish
 compared to the Kojaks FWIW.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/62F7IS1ZD4gJ.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




 --

 -
 Patrick Moore, Albuquerque, NM, USA
 For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW
 http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
 -




-- 

-
Patrick Moore, Albuquerque, NM, USA
For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW
http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
-

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Bagman2 Q/R with Expedition Support and Camper longflap

2013-01-13 Thread René Sterental

 I have the bag and like it a lot, but for support I use my Nitto Big Rear
 Rack or the R14. Have no experience with the supports.


René


-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Bagman2 Q/R with Expedition Support and Camper longflap

2013-01-13 Thread PATRICK MOORE
I've used many different saddlebags and, if aesthetics alone were the
criterion, I'd definitely prefer an old school, green, Carradice. The
Camper Longflap carries quite a bit more than the Nelson Longflap and even
more than the Adam, but far less than the Hoss -- the Sackville Medium, the
only Sackville I've used, carries almost as much as the Hoss and more than
the nominally similar-volumed CL, thanks to its more effective design. But
I think C's old school bags look better in overall form, if not in details.

I've not used the new Bagman with the stay struts, but I have used the old
Expedition, non-strutted, both QR and non-QR. It works well but is limited
to the same 10 kg as the SQR, which I, personally, prefer because it holds
the bag high and thus obviates the need for the bottom support -- thus not
compromising the bag's full volume. Frankly, if I had to use a Bagman with
struts, I'd prefer a small and light rack like the Fly (11 oz, capacity 20
kg) or the Mark's (what is its capacity?).

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:15 PM, hsmitham hughsmit...@gmail.com wrote:

 I was wondering if anyone has any experience with Carridice's Camper long
 flap and the Bagman expedition saddle bag support? I'm considering this
 combination from Carradice purely on asethics and thought some of you might
 have some thoughts.


 http://www.carradice.co.uk/index.php?page_id=productunder=typeproduct_id=35
 http://www.carradice.co.uk/products/other/bagman

 Thanks,

 Hugh Smitham
 Los Angeles, Ca

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/cCHMzgSQPmsJ.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




-- 

-
Patrick Moore, Albuquerque, NM, USA
For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW
http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
-

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Bagman2 Q/R with Expedition Support and Camper longflap

2013-01-13 Thread Don
Hugh:

I had a Carradice Camper and thought it was great! It holds a lot of stuff. 
I used it without a support and it sits quite nicely under the saddle. IMO 
the Carradice looks much better than the Rivendell bags. Those bags are a 
little too-too . . . . Unfortunately I sold it because I couldn't mount the 
bike by swinging my leg over the Carradice unless I stood at the edge of 
the sidewalk with the bike in the street. (Hip repalcement).

On Friday, January 11, 2013 9:15:15 PM UTC-8, hsmitham wrote:

 I was wondering if anyone has any experience with Carridice's Camper long 
 flap and the Bagman expedition saddle bag support? I'm considering this 
 combination from Carradice purely on asethics and thought some of you might 
 have some thoughts.


 http://www.carradice.co.uk/index.php?page_id=productunder=typeproduct_id=35
 http://www.carradice.co.uk/products/other/bagman

 Thanks,

 Hugh Smitham
 Los Angeles, Ca


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/nnJ6AJ7qPYsJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery
There is very little useful information contained in that oft-discussed 
quantity known as bike weight. If you shave 100 grams off your handlebar, the 
effect is different than shaving 100 grams off your tires. Even specifying 
frame weight tells only a small part of the story, since you can reduce frame 
weight in a variety of ways.

Personally, I don't think about weight. I select components that have the 
appropriate mix of function, looks, weight, durability, street cred, and 
affordability, and let the bike weight be the dependent variable. Then I add 30 
pounds of miscellaneous crap in various bags and accessories. Then I ride and 
don't think about weight, or even speed.

For me, as an unracer and unrandonneur, weight and speed are irrelevant, except 
that I need to have a rough idea how many minutes I should expect for my 
commute, so I'm not late.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/yD1xmlY3e2AJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery
I should have clarified that I don't place much importance on bike weight. To a 
small extent I consider the weight of tires and rims, such that I don't use 
1000-gram tires if punctures don't seem to be a major concern, nor do I use 
400-gram rims on a bike I plan to thrash.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/57PweOWyxk4J.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Sunday Toodle Ride Report

2013-01-13 Thread Michael Rivers
Out and about for a ride on a misty, seasonably warm day here in DC.

http://flic.kr/s/aHsjDB9kpG

I am hoping to be able to ride through the rest of the winter if it stays this 
mild. I don't do snow (although I have great respect for my Northern Bretheren).

Michael

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/NKXYDNf4ISsJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Sunday Toodle Ride Report

2013-01-13 Thread Steve Palincsar
On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 13:04 -0800, Michael Rivers wrote:
 Out and about for a ride on a misty, seasonably warm day here in DC.
 
 http://flic.kr/s/aHsjDB9kpG

WOD trail, eastern end?




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Bagman2 Q/R with Expedition Support and Camper longflap

2013-01-13 Thread PATRICK MOORE
I don't necessarily agree about the too too, tho' I think that Riv could
have made them as strong and useful with a coarser finish, but I do agree
that the old Nelson/Camper/Junior type look better, to my eye at least.

But!! There can be no question for one who has used a Sackville Medium that
the SM is a more **efficient** design: that is, it can carry more with less
saddle-to-tire clearance, and by spades, compared to the Carradices and the
Bagginses. Again, in my experience, the SM can carry almost as much as the
Hoss (and far more than the Camper) while requiring far less clearance; and
the SM loads easier than the Carradice types and buttons up easier than the
Baggins types.

(For the record: I've used several each of the Juniors, Nelsons, N
Longflaps, Camper Longflaps, and one each of the the smaler Nelson --
forget the name, the Adam, the Hoss, various home-mades, and now the SM, as
well as various Bagmans and SQRs and other mounting kits.)

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Don dgen...@gmail.com wrote:

  IMO the Carradice looks much better than the Rivendell bags. Those bags
 are a little too-too . . . .



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Campagnolo cable guide 626/A on a Ram

2013-01-13 Thread ascpgh
I agree with Eric and Dave; some cable housing liner is the ticket. I use a 
bit more to make sure that it extends up beyond where the  spray of the 
front wheel could put some grit into it. The diameter of the BB shell is 
large enough that it doesn't really bear through the plastic sleeve that 
fast; once a season maybe. Having had frames with the hook cable guide 
things, the friction of the route around the BB shell is lower as the hooks 
accumulate wear at a much higher rate. 

Andy Cheatham
Pittsburgh, PA

I've never been a huge fan of how the derailer cables are routed underneath 
 the bottom bracket of my Ram, due to the fact that they are just rubbing 
 against the bare frame.  Does anyone have any thoughts on using something 
 like this Campy cable guide? 


 http://velobase.com/ViewComponent.aspx?ID=E553FEF8-9918-4B47-B24E-AE4603CBCB14
  



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/A6NF1nlWkfsJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Sunday Toodle Ride Report

2013-01-13 Thread Michael Rivers
Absolutely!  Hope to run into you one day, Steve. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/PY5t_Gh9JtwJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Panaracer Tour Tire

2013-01-13 Thread Mike
On Jan 13, 11:47 am, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:

 Patrick real men ride supple, light and puncture-prone tires Moore



Ha!

I don't mind heavy tires. I rode a very cold and rainy 600k a few
years ago on 700x32 Schwalbe Marathons and had no flats. I'll concede
time on the bike than time replacing a tube or fixing a flat on the
side of the road.

I hadn't thought to compare the TPI between this tire and a Pasela.
That should be the giveaway that they're not the same.

I know Compass Bicycles uses the Pasela mold for their 26 tire but
with a different compound than what's used for the Pasela. It would be
nice if Compas produced a 700x35 version of that tire.

--mike

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Waxed Canvas Bag Instructions

2013-01-13 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
The basic canvas bags that I've seen (back to the Baggins and Sackville 
bags) all have enough of a base treatment to keep things waterproof.  I had 
gone to the double-seal system when I got my Country Bag as my older Banana 
Bag (which saw a lot of trail/mixed-terrain miles with no rear fender in 
place) had gotten really, really grungy.  When I started cleaning it off, 
it seemed like the mud and dirt had gotten into the fabric.  From my 
experience in owning Filson/Barbour garments, mud and dirt clean off better 
from a slightly thicker coating.  I had gotten a bit of seepage of rain at 
the seams, so wanted to make sure that since I was using the bag for longer 
rides and possibly randos that it was well sealed. 

Retreating is really necessary only when you start having seepage - usually 
evident at the seams first, depending on the bag's construction. With my 
jacket that sees the most usage, that's maybe every 2 - 3 years, but there 
are a lot more moving parts and seams exposed directly to the rain than 
with most seat/saddlebags.

- Jim

cyclofiend.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/4yPFBciDaeAJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: FS: Rivendell Bleriot 53cm Complete

2013-01-13 Thread HTC
Where are you (and the bike) located?  Are you open to test rides? 


 On Saturday, January 12, 2013 8:31:12 PM UTC-7, Johnny Alien wrote:

 There tends to be a fair share of hills around here and it does come in 
 handy.

 On Saturday, January 12, 2013 10:19:22 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:

 Wow! Very nice bike!
 I hope it sells quickly for you.
  
 I have a 55 Bleriot with a double crank. A triple like yours has would 
 feel great on the hills around here.
 Someone is gonna be happy.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/LR57T3WEmaYJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: My Rumpkins ok?

2013-01-13 Thread wrickster
Yes it's safe. Rubber peeling off the* bottom* of the bead has been a 
common occurrence for me when un-mounting , re-mounting tires with tire 
irons. -Ricky

On Friday, January 11, 2013 7:01:33 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:

 Had a flat, and before remounting the Rumpkin, I saw some rubber was 
 peeling off of the bottom of the bead. About a 2 inch long piece.
 Bead is ok, just the rubber from the inside edge of the tire peeled off.
 Is this still safe to ride on?
  
  


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/qmepQf4aerEJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] 64cm Atlantis

2013-01-13 Thread keith beato
Just out of curiosity. What year did you buy yours? I bought mine in 2006

On Jan 13, 2013, at 6:48 AM, Keith Beato wrote:

 Hi Rudy
 Is the frame still for sale? What year is it?
 Keith from Alameda
 
 On Monday, October 8, 2012 1:42:39 PM UTC-7, rudi wrote:
 I'm selling my 64cm Atlantis, serial #AT-0141. Frame, fork, headset only. 
 It's an early one, and I've gotten lots of good riding out of it. About a 
 year ago, the rear dropout broke, and the good folks at Riv took it in and 
 repaired it and repainted it the original Atlantis color. We added a 
 kickstand plate, but I wish we'd added fork eyelets. While the frame was 
 being repaired I got myself an AHH, and that has become my main ride. I never 
 built the Atlantis back up, so it is in like new condition, ready for your 
 build. 
 
 Asking $1,200. I'd prefer to sell it to someone local, in the Bay Area as I 
 had a slight snag with the last time I shipped. But if the Bay Area is 
 saturated with 64cm Atlantis-es, then I'll have it professionally boxed and 
 shipped at cost. Please send me a message off list if interested.
 
 Here are some pics. 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/OYAb62Us294J.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Quickbeam BB length.

2013-01-13 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Hey there Clyde - _Pretty_ sure it was a 110 Shimano. 

When Google Groups had the old format, I had aggregated a page with bb 
lengths for various models, according to some of the group members.  It was 
here - 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch/web/bb-spindle-lengths - 
but it seems to have evaporated.  Internet Wayback Machine says that's a 
non-crawlable page... ooh that wacky internet.  I _may_ have archived that 
info, but it will take a bit to track down.

There have been a few threads in this (newer) group format, so you might 
also just search topics here too.  

110 - 115 is pretty much the going range for Sugino cranks.

hope that helps!

Jim

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/N5HzKW-mYdQJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Sunday Toodle Ride Report

2013-01-13 Thread René Sterental
Nice!

On Sunday, January 13, 2013, Michael Rivers wrote:

 Out and about for a ride on a misty, seasonably warm day here in DC.

 http://flic.kr/s/aHsjDB9kpG

 I am hoping to be able to ride through the rest of the winter if it stays
 this mild. I don't do snow (although I have great respect for my Northern
 Bretheren).

 Michael

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/NKXYDNf4ISsJ.
 To post to this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.comjavascript:;
 .
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com javascript:;.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Today's Ride Photos

2013-01-13 Thread Eric Norris
Not on a Rivendell, but I *was* riding a steel bike made by a good friend of 
Grant's ...

http://campyonlyguy.blogspot.com/2013/01/today-ride-photos.html 

--Eric
campyonly...@me.com
www.campyonly.com
www.wheelsnorth.org
Blog: http://campyonlyguy.blogspot.com
Twitter: @campyonlyguy

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Quickbeam BB length.

2013-01-13 Thread Garth

The Tange and Shimano BB's can be a bit odd in sizing.   Study the specs 
carefully. You'll notice a 107 and a 110 have the same drive side length !

http://thebikesmiths.com/uploaded/thumbnails/db_file_img_4941_500xauto.jpg

http://web.archive.org/web/20101022002409/http://blog.harriscyclery.com/relative-chainline-bottom-brackets/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/VsWRDaxX_8IJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Panaracer Tour Tire

2013-01-13 Thread PATRICK MOORE
Think of it this way: A flat is, at most, 15 minutes by the side of the
road for, at worst, several hours of riding. So: several hours of riding
pleasure versus 15 minutes of pain, compared to several hours of annoyance.

Of course, I ride 60 km, not 600, so what do I know. Only that I am
sensitive to balky tires and won't ride them, dammit!

Patrick real men embrace the pain of punctures Moore

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Mike mjawn...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Jan 13, 11:47 am, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:

  Patrick real men ride supple, light and puncture-prone tires Moore
 
 

 Ha!

 I don't mind heavy tires. I rode a very cold and rainy 600k a few
 years ago on 700x32 Schwalbe Marathons and had no flats. I'll concede
 time on the bike than time replacing a tube or fixing a flat on the
 side of the road.

 I hadn't thought to compare the TPI between this tire and a Pasela.
 That should be the giveaway that they're not the same.

 I know Compass Bicycles uses the Pasela mold for their 26 tire but
 with a different compound than what's used for the Pasela. It would be
 nice if Compas produced a 700x35 version of that tire.

 --mike

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




-- 

-
Patrick Moore, Albuquerque, NM, USA
For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW
http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
-

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Panaracer Tour Tire

2013-01-13 Thread PATRICK MOORE
Actually: Real men change tubes and apply patches with nary a thought.

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 4:21 PM, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:

 Think of it this way: A flat is, at most, 15 minutes by the side of the
 road for, at worst, several hours of riding. So: several hours of riding
 pleasure versus 15 minutes of pain, compared to several hours of annoyance.

 Of course, I ride 60 km, not 600, so what do I know. Only that I am
 sensitive to balky tires and won't ride them, dammit!

 Patrick real men embrace the pain of punctures Moore


 On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Mike mjawn...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Jan 13, 11:47 am, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:

  Patrick real men ride supple, light and puncture-prone tires Moore
 
 

 Ha!

 I don't mind heavy tires. I rode a very cold and rainy 600k a few
 years ago on 700x32 Schwalbe Marathons and had no flats. I'll concede
 time on the bike than time replacing a tube or fixing a flat on the
 side of the road.

 I hadn't thought to compare the TPI between this tire and a Pasela.
 That should be the giveaway that they're not the same.

 I know Compass Bicycles uses the Pasela mold for their 26 tire but
 with a different compound than what's used for the Pasela. It would be
 nice if Compas produced a 700x35 version of that tire.

 --mike

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




 --

 -
 Patrick Moore, Albuquerque, NM, USA
 For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW
 http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
 -




-- 

-
Patrick Moore, Albuquerque, NM, USA
For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW
http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
-

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: FS: Rivendell Bleriot 53cm Complete

2013-01-13 Thread Johnny Alien
I am in the central PA area and test rides are totally cool if you are in 
the area.

On Sunday, January 13, 2013 4:41:46 PM UTC-5, HTC wrote:

 Where are you (and the bike) located?  Are you open to test rides? 


 On Saturday, January 12, 2013 8:31:12 PM UTC-7, Johnny Alien wrote:

 There tends to be a fair share of hills around here and it does come in 
 handy.

 On Saturday, January 12, 2013 10:19:22 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:

 Wow! Very nice bike!
 I hope it sells quickly for you.
  
 I have a 55 Bleriot with a double crank. A triple like yours has would 
 feel great on the hills around here.
 Someone is gonna be happy.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/zNwb3gtbpokJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Panaracer Tour Tire

2013-01-13 Thread Steve Palincsar
On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 16:21 -0700, PATRICK MOORE wrote:
 Think of it this way: A flat is, at most, 15 minutes by the side of
 the road for, at worst, several hours of riding. So: several hours of
 riding pleasure versus 15 minutes of pain, compared to several hours
 of annoyance.
 
 
 Of course, I ride 60 km, not 600, so what do I know. Only that I am
 sensitive to balky tires and won't ride them, dammit!
 

I'd say the chances of riding 600km and not having a flat at all are
pretty good, unless you're using extremely flat-prone tires like
Challenge Parigi Roubaix; and even there I went on average 300 miles
between flats.  Nothing else I've ever used even came close to that
average.  I routinely go over 1,000 miles between flats on a Grand Bois
Cypres, and that's a long way from an ultra-flat-proof armored slug.






-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread eflayer
my Roubaix weighs 16.5 with all the normal road riding parts; pedals saddle 
cages, etc. what's your point? light is fast and fun. some like/need a 30 
lb bike, some prefer lighter. why truck when you can fly?
On Sunday, January 13, 2013 9:37:23 AM UTC-8, ted wrote:

 Is that 16.5 lbs your measurement? Does it include saddle, pedals, and 
 cages (race bikes are often weighed without those components)? 
 What is your lightest steel bike, and what wheels and components are 
 on it? 
 Also keep in mind that adding 4 lbs to your 16.5 lb roubaix is an 
 increase of nearly 25% whereas adding the same 4 lbs to a 31 lb bike 
 is only a 13% increase. 

 On Jan 13, 6:54 am, eflayer eddie.fla...@att.net wrote: 
  You might try a 16.5 lb Specialized Roubaix and let us know what you 
 think 
  about that :). Mine weighs about 4 lbs less than my lightest steel bike. 
 I 
  still like steel a ton, but for pure fast club road rides, the Roubaix 
 is 
  more fun in most ways. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  On Saturday, January 12, 2013 9:33:04 PM UTC-8, Scot Brooks wrote: 
  
   I spend about equal time on my Sam Hillborne and my Soma Double Cross. 
 To 
   abbreviate the way they're normally set up, the Sam's got a 40/24 
 12-36 
   drivetrain, 35c Soma New Xpress tires, front rack/basket/Shopsack. The 
   Soma's got a 48/34 11-34 drivetrain, 35c Schwalbe Marathon Racers, 
 front 
   rack, front and rear Sackville bags. 
  
   Anyway, I always assumed that my Soma was kind of a lightweight 
 go-fast 
   bike with it's fancy Tange Prestige tubing and slightly more 
 aggressive 
   geometry (shorter chain stays anyway). Compared to the Sam, it just 
 takes 
   off like crazy and *feels *incredibly quick and nimble. Lo-and-behold, 
 I 
   got one of those hook scale things today, and the total weight of each 
 bike 
   was 35lbs for the Sam and 31lbs for the Soma. 
  
   I thought it was the weight that explained the difference in feel, but 
   clearly that's not the case. Both are equally pleasurable to ride, but 
   there must be far more factors involved in the overall feel of each 
 bike 
   than I might have guessed. 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/6pO3C4C4zWoJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] ISO old, single-pivot Shimano 600 rear brake caliper (allen).

2013-01-13 Thread PATRICK MOORE
Have much to trade. Would like to keep it cheap. No need for pads or wheel
guides.

Could conceivably use a second front as a nutted rear -- am trying to match
the front that I have.

Thanks.

-- 

-
Patrick Moore, Albuquerque, NM, USA
For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW
http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
-

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

attachment: 600 calipers.JPG

Re: [RBW] Re: Panaracer Tour Tire

2013-01-13 Thread PATRICK MOORE
Unless you are riding in goathead country. But we agree on the essential
point: why ride slugs when you can ride greyhounds?

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Steve Palincsar palin...@his.com wrote:

 I'd say the chances of riding 600km and not having a flat at all are
 pretty good









 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




-- 

-
Patrick Moore, Albuquerque, NM, USA
For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW
http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
-

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread Robert Zeidler
Agreed. I normally ride anywhere from 66-69cm bikes. I love my Rivs for the 
ride quality. But if I'm doing a metric or a double-metric century w/thousands 
of feet in climbing on New England hills where there's a lot of 8-12% grades 
all the time, I'm taking my Roubaix (64cm, 18.2lbs), or a Seven (67cm, 19 lbs), 
or a Calfee (69cm, 19.8lbs w/disc brakes). If for no other reason that I can 
ride at a fast clip, but still enjoy the company of others, occasionally pass 
some people, and never quite run out of gas. This mostly comes into play on any 
long climb, where, even though I'm old, tall, heavy-ish, and relatively slow, I 
can get by w/ Cytomax as fuel and keep the cool kids in sight. 

IMHO, lighter is always righter. 

RGZ

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 13, 2013, at 9:54 AM, eflayer eddie.fla...@att.net wrote:

 You might try a 16.5 lb Specialized Roubaix and let us know what you think 
 about that :). Mine weighs about 4 lbs less than my lightest steel bike. I 
 still like steel a ton, but for pure fast club road rides, the Roubaix is 
 more fun in most ways.
 On Saturday, January 12, 2013 9:33:04 PM UTC-8, Scot Brooks wrote:
 I spend about equal time on my Sam Hillborne and my Soma Double Cross. To 
 abbreviate the way they're normally set up, the Sam's got a 40/24 12-36 
 drivetrain, 35c Soma New Xpress tires, front rack/basket/Shopsack. The Soma's 
 got a 48/34 11-34 drivetrain, 35c Schwalbe Marathon Racers, front rack, front 
 and rear Sackville bags. 
 
 Anyway, I always assumed that my Soma was kind of a lightweight go-fast bike 
 with it's fancy Tange Prestige tubing and slightly more aggressive geometry 
 (shorter chain stays anyway). Compared to the Sam, it just takes off like 
 crazy and feels incredibly quick and nimble. Lo-and-behold, I got one of 
 those hook scale things today, and the total weight of each bike was 35lbs 
 for the Sam and 31lbs for the Soma. 
 
 I thought it was the weight that explained the difference in feel, but 
 clearly that's not the case. Both are equally pleasurable to ride, but there 
 must be far more factors involved in the overall feel of each bike than I 
 might have guessed. 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/4hz-iWJpuXMJ.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Quickbeam BB length.

2013-01-13 Thread Michael Rivers
Shimano 110 came out when I switched to Campy 110 because I wanted smaller Q 
cranks and I only used the big ring. The chain line is fine when I run her 
fixed. 

Silver QB
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrivers/sets/72157618452191962/

Michael

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/O74bRnVNG6YJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread PATRICK MOORE
You go, guy! I wholeheartedly agree with the general proposition that,
ceteris paribus, lighter is righter. Of course there are many cetera to
considera!

Patrick 18, ~25 (with empty Sackville Med and #4 HpX and lights), ~29/33
lb, all ready to ride Moore

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Robert Zeidler zeidler.rob...@gmail.comwrote:


 IMHO, lighter is always righter.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Sunday Toodle Ride Report

2013-01-13 Thread Eric Platt
Very nice.  Would like to ride that trail again someday.  Busy, but well
maintained from my memories. (The trail, that is, not the memories.)

Eric Platt
St. Paul, MN

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 4:46 PM, René Sterental orthie...@gmail.com wrote:

 Nice!


 On Sunday, January 13, 2013, Michael Rivers wrote:

 Out and about for a ride on a misty, seasonably warm day here in DC.

 http://flic.kr/s/aHsjDB9kpG

 I am hoping to be able to ride through the rest of the winter if it stays
 this mild. I don't do snow (although I have great respect for my Northern
 Bretheren).

 Michael

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/NKXYDNf4ISsJ.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



 --
 Sent from Gmail Mobile

  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery
A few years ago, I had an 80s univega that was similar in many ways to a 
Rambouillet. No racks or fenders, skinny 700x25 tires, roadie gearing, about 
21-22 lbs. It was the lightest, raciest bike I ever had, and very comfortable 
for me. I rode it 200 miles that year, with 150 of those miles coming in a 
single ride. I rode it so few times because, like previous similar attempts, I 
found that riding a road bike was too confining. I relish the freedom to roll 
off the pavement more than I care about riding my fastest or keeping up with 
faster riders. To each his/her own, but now my speed bike is a Surly 
Cross-check with 700x40 marathon supremes. That said, I do sometimes get a wild 
hair and casually pass roadies on expensive bikes. This is especially fun on 
my Brompton or Pugsley.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/zH46jTStyp0J.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread C.J. Filip
Four bikes in my stable.  The heaviest ones get ridden the most.
Heaviest being ~30lbs on my Saluki (and preferred ride) with rack and
bags.  My lightest, a steel Specialized Allez circa 2003 weighing in
at ~19lbs, is a joy to ride, but I physically can't ride it without
being kitted up and ride in semi-sterile and relatively rare
conditions of paved roads in these parts.   Boiler plate Riv-inspired
response, but true.

On Jan 13, 5:02 pm, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery thill@gmail.com
wrote:
 A few years ago, I had an 80s univega that was similar in many ways to a 
 Rambouillet. No racks or fenders, skinny 700x25 tires, roadie gearing, about 
 21-22 lbs. It was the lightest, raciest bike I ever had, and very comfortable 
 for me. I rode it 200 miles that year, with 150 of those miles coming in a 
 single ride. I rode it so few times because, like previous similar attempts, 
 I found that riding a road bike was too confining. I relish the freedom to 
 roll off the pavement more than I care about riding my fastest or keeping up 
 with faster riders. To each his/her own, but now my speed bike is a Surly 
 Cross-check with 700x40 marathon supremes. That said, I do sometimes get a 
 wild hair and casually pass roadies on expensive bikes. This is especially 
 fun on my Brompton or Pugsley.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Today's Ride Photos

2013-01-13 Thread Manuel Acosta
We just saw someone riding on a Richard Sachs.Beautiful bike btw. Looked 
cold

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/0w98KFZDylYJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Sunday Toodle Ride Report

2013-01-13 Thread dougP
Lunch looks especially good.  None of that stuff packaged in rocket 
wrappers.

dougP

On Sunday, January 13, 2013 1:04:16 PM UTC-8, Michael Rivers wrote:

 Out and about for a ride on a misty, seasonably warm day here in DC.

 http://flic.kr/s/aHsjDB9kpG

 I am hoping to be able to ride through the rest of the winter if it stays 
 this mild. I don't do snow (although I have great respect for my Northern 
 Bretheren).

 Michael



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/A9BYWv7Q3DgJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread charlie
I love riding my Hillborne and don't even know what it weighs. I know I 
weigh 257 so it makes little difference to me if my bike weighs 2-5 pounds 
less than another one. I own an 80's go fast standard dimension Columbus SL 
tubed bicycle and it is no faster or more comfortable for me to ride. I put 
quite a few miles on three other frames similarly constructed with old 
school skinny tubing of varying thicknesses and my best ride so far has 
been my Surly Trucker with oversized tubing and my new (two top tubed) 
Hillborne. Maybe at my weight, I need them. A pure performance bike 
probably should have a more flexible frame and tuned to rider weight but I 
want a frame to last and will gladly give up a slight edge in performance 
for that feature.

On Saturday, January  12, 2013 9:33:04 PM UTC-8, Scot Brooks wrote: 

 I spend about equal time on my Sam Hillborne and my Soma Double Cross. To 
 abbreviate the way they're normally set up, the Sam's got a 40/24 12-36 
 drivetrain, 35c Soma New Xpress tires, front rack/basket/Shopsack. The 
 Soma's got a 48/34 11-34 drivetrain, 35c Schwalbe Marathon Racers, front 
 rack, front and rear Sackville bags. 

 Anyway, I always assumed that my Soma was kind of a lightweight go-fast 
 bike with it's fancy Tange Prestige tubing and slightly more aggressive 
 geometry (shorter chain stays anyway). Compared to the Sam, it just takes 
 off like crazy and *feels *incredibly quick and nimble. Lo-and-behold, I 
 got one of those hook scale things today, and the total weight of each bike 
 was 35lbs for the Sam and 31lbs for the Soma. 

 I thought it was the weight that explained the difference in feel, but 
 clearly that's not the case. Both are equally pleasurable to ride, but 
 there must be far more factors involved in the overall feel of each bike 
 than I might have guessed. 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/ZL0SX6NZRh0J.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread dougP
As long as I can carry my Atlantis up stairs  load onto the hooks on the 
train, it's not too heavy.  My guess is at least 35 lbs.  But the scale is 
upstairs and the bike is in the cold garage; maybe later.

dougP

On Sunday, January 13, 2013 12:38:01 PM UTC-8, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery 
wrote:

 I should have clarified that I don't place much importance on bike weight. 
 To a small extent I consider the weight of tires and rims, such that I 
 don't use 1000-gram tires if punctures don't seem to be a major concern, 
 nor do I use 400-gram rims on a bike I plan to thrash.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/MZ4tuWctSvQJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Enjoy every minute of it.

2013-01-13 Thread Manuel Acosta
With school back on session, the short weekends 
are dedicated to cramming everything that I want/need to do before the 
Monday starts. Seeing friends and family, doing working stuff, hanging out 
with friends all make priority before riding my bike for myself. It's hard 
to find the time to do something for yourself without feeling guilty so I 
learned a long time ago that as long as I got to ride my bike no matter how 
far or how long or even the quality riding I must and need to enjoy it 
because the alternative would be not riding your bike. And that wouldn't be 
fun.

Pictures prove that while California can get cold but it will still be 
clear on some days:
http://flic.kr/s/aHsjDAZUc8

-Manny There's no such things as junk miles. Acosta

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/vr0sRR2WkDEJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Enjoy every minute of it.

2013-01-13 Thread René Sterental

 Nice. I was stuck at work all weekend... No riding for me...



-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: An interesting match of the Nitto R-15 rear rack and Berthoud panniers

2013-01-13 Thread Dave


On Monday, November 5, 2012 5:04:23 PM UTC-8, dougP wrote:

 Jim:

 Is the lower horizontal bar on the R-15 intended for pannier mounting?  


Just wanted to give post info that the standard Ortlieb rolltop bags mount 
to the lower bar of the r-15 rack without any issues.  The clips are 
adjustable and I was able to mount them after a few quick adjustments.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/nk6CvM4pjbMJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: An interesting match of the Nitto R-15 rear rack and Berthoud panniers

2013-01-13 Thread René Sterental
Photos would prove you really did... ;-)

On Sunday, January 13, 2013, Dave wrote:



 On Monday, November 5, 2012 5:04:23 PM UTC-8, dougP wrote:

 Jim:

 Is the lower horizontal bar on the R-15 intended for pannier mounting?


 Just wanted to give post info that the standard Ortlieb rolltop bags mount
 to the lower bar of the r-15 rack without any issues.  The clips are
 adjustable and I was able to mount them after a few quick adjustments.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/nk6CvM4pjbMJ.
 To post to this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 
 'rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com');
 .
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
 'rbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com');.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread eflayer
I was surprised the OP did not think that pounds of extra weight might not 
be responsible for the go fast feel of his go fast bike...even though by 
some standards both are relatively heavy. But 4 pounds is 4 pounds. I was 
suggesting weight is a significant factor in the gestalt of how a bike 
rides and feels to the rider. My custom steel with carbon fork weighs about 
21 pounds. My Roubaix weighs about 16.5. I like them both a lot, but for 
pure paved road riding, given a choice, I most often seem to choose the 
Roubaix.
On Sunday, January 13, 2013 7:13:37 PM UTC-8, ted wrote:

 Cool, thanks for the added detail. 
 As to my point, Im not sure I have one, though Im not sure what yours 
 was either. The original poster seemed to opine that the 4 lb 
 difference between a 31lb bike and a 35 lb bike didn't matter much. 
 You suggested he try a bike that weighs about half as much, or about 
 16lbs less, or about 4 times as big a weight difference than he was 
 talking about. 
 By all means ride what you like. 

 On Jan 13, 3:40 pm, eflayer eddie.fla...@att.net wrote: 
  my Roubaix weighs 16.5 with all the normal road riding parts; pedals 
 saddle 
  cages, etc. what's your point? light is fast and fun. some like/need a 
 30 
  lb bike, some prefer lighter. why truck when you can fly? 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  On Sunday, January 13, 2013 9:37:23 AM UTC-8, ted wrote: 
  
   Is that 16.5 lbs your measurement? Does it include saddle, pedals, and 
   cages (race bikes are often weighed without those components)? 
   What is your lightest steel bike, and what wheels and components are 
   on it? 
   Also keep in mind that adding 4 lbs to your 16.5 lb roubaix is an 
   increase of nearly 25% whereas adding the same 4 lbs to a 31 lb bike 
   is only a 13% increase. 
  
   On Jan 13, 6:54 am, eflayer eddie.fla...@att.net wrote: 
You might try a 16.5 lb Specialized Roubaix and let us know what you 
   think 
about that :). Mine weighs about 4 lbs less than my lightest steel 
 bike. 
   I 
still like steel a ton, but for pure fast club road rides, the 
 Roubaix 
   is 
more fun in most ways. 
  
On Saturday, January 12, 2013 9:33:04 PM UTC-8, Scot Brooks wrote: 
  
 I spend about equal time on my Sam Hillborne and my Soma Double 
 Cross. 
   To 
 abbreviate the way they're normally set up, the Sam's got a 40/24 
   12-36 
 drivetrain, 35c Soma New Xpress tires, front rack/basket/Shopsack. 
 The 
 Soma's got a 48/34 11-34 drivetrain, 35c Schwalbe Marathon Racers, 
   front 
 rack, front and rear Sackville bags. 
  
 Anyway, I always assumed that my Soma was kind of a lightweight 
   go-fast 
 bike with it's fancy Tange Prestige tubing and slightly more 
   aggressive 
 geometry (shorter chain stays anyway). Compared to the Sam, it 
 just 
   takes 
 off like crazy and *feels *incredibly quick and nimble. 
 Lo-and-behold, 
   I 
 got one of those hook scale things today, and the total weight of 
 each 
   bike 
 was 35lbs for the Sam and 31lbs for the Soma. 
  
 I thought it was the weight that explained the difference in feel, 
 but 
 clearly that's not the case. Both are equally pleasurable to ride, 
 but 
 there must be far more factors involved in the overall feel of 
 each 
   bike 
 than I might have guessed. 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/uhWMZ-Bo3h8J.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: ISO old, single-pivot Shimano 600 rear brake caliper (allen).

2013-01-13 Thread PATRICK MOORE
I neglected to say that I need a 600 caliper in normal -- not short --
reach size. The spec chart says that the reach required is 54 mm.

Thanks.

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 4:45 PM, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:

 Have much to trade. Would like to keep it cheap. No need for pads or wheel
 guides.

 Could conceivably use a second front as a nutted rear -- am trying to
 match the front that I have.

 Thanks.

 --

 -
 Patrick Moore, Albuquerque, NM, USA
 For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW
 http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
 -




-- 

-
Patrick Moore, Albuquerque, NM, USA
For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW
http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
-

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Panaracer Tour Tire

2013-01-13 Thread Mike
On Sunday, January 13, 2013 3:33:44 PM UTC-8,


 I'd say the chances of riding 600km and not having a flat at all are 
 pretty good, unless you're using extremely flat-prone tires like 
 Challenge Parigi Roubaix; and even there I went on average 300 miles 
 between flats.  Nothing else I've ever used even came close to that 
 average.  I routinely go over 1,000 miles between flats on a Grand Bois 
 Cypres, and that's a long way from an ultra-flat-proof armored slug. 


Much of the 600k I was referring to was along Hwy 101 and there tends to be 
a fair amount of debris. As I mentioned, it was cold and rainy and I didn't 
want to be stuck changing a flat in the cold and rain. From the tires I had 
on hand for the ride, my choice was between Jack Brown Greens and the 
Marathons. I just didn't want to take any chances. I had a strong ride and 
finished well with no flats. I doubt I would have finished any faster with 
a different tire as I rode most of the 2nd day with a group and had no 
issues keeping up with them.

During this years randonneuring adventures which included multiple perms 
and brevets along with the Cascade 1200k, I only had one flat. The flat was 
on the morning of the 3rd day on a debris strewn road around Soap Lake. I 
didn't even fix the flat, just swapped out tubes after pulling the wire out 
of the tire.

Mike real men have legs that can do the work regardless of the tires J. 
Oh snap!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/Fx3MQj26YXoJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread Scot Brooks
Eflayer, 
I was just saying that I was surprised they felt so different but were both, in 
fact, bikes that might shop in the husky section of the store. I like hearing 
about the interesting nuances of bicycle feel, especially in this case where I 
have two bikes that I love equally and like to fawn over with analytical 
discussion. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/xLx3x6S_DHEJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread Peter Morgano
The idea of me weighing a bike is like weighing myself, pointless other
than to illustrate what I already know. I sure do like to ride the bikes I
have though. I guess if it ever gets to where I am using a scale to weigh
my food I can worry about a few pounds here or there on a bike. Not that
there isnt a whole set of people for which this does make sense, and more
power to them. This argument is somewhat helmet-like where the two sides
probably will never see eye to eye and someone will get all un-civil
like and ruin it.

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:13 PM, eflayer eddie.fla...@att.net wrote:

 I was surprised the OP did not think that pounds of extra weight might not
 be responsible for the go fast feel of his go fast bike...even though by
 some standards both are relatively heavy. But 4 pounds is 4 pounds. I was
 suggesting weight is a significant factor in the gestalt of how a bike
 rides and feels to the rider. My custom steel with carbon fork weighs about
 21 pounds. My Roubaix weighs about 16.5. I like them both a lot, but for
 pure paved road riding, given a choice, I most often seem to choose the
 Roubaix.

 On Sunday, January 13, 2013 7:13:37 PM UTC-8, ted wrote:

 Cool, thanks for the added detail.
 As to my point, Im not sure I have one, though Im not sure what yours
 was either. The original poster seemed to opine that the 4 lb
 difference between a 31lb bike and a 35 lb bike didn't matter much.
 You suggested he try a bike that weighs about half as much, or about
 16lbs less, or about 4 times as big a weight difference than he was
 talking about.
 By all means ride what you like.

 On Jan 13, 3:40 pm, eflayer eddie.fla...@att.net wrote:
  my Roubaix weighs 16.5 with all the normal road riding parts; pedals
 saddle
  cages, etc. what's your point? light is fast and fun. some like/need a
 30
  lb bike, some prefer lighter. why truck when you can fly?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  On Sunday, January 13, 2013 9:37:23 AM UTC-8, ted wrote:
 
   Is that 16.5 lbs your measurement? Does it include saddle, pedals,
 and
   cages (race bikes are often weighed without those components)?
   What is your lightest steel bike, and what wheels and components are
   on it?
   Also keep in mind that adding 4 lbs to your 16.5 lb roubaix is an
   increase of nearly 25% whereas adding the same 4 lbs to a 31 lb bike
   is only a 13% increase.
 
   On Jan 13, 6:54 am, eflayer eddie.fla...@att.net wrote:
You might try a 16.5 lb Specialized Roubaix and let us know what
 you
   think
about that :). Mine weighs about 4 lbs less than my lightest steel
 bike.
   I
still like steel a ton, but for pure fast club road rides, the
 Roubaix
   is
more fun in most ways.
 
On Saturday, January 12, 2013 9:33:04 PM UTC-8, Scot Brooks wrote:
 
 I spend about equal time on my Sam Hillborne and my Soma Double
 Cross.
   To
 abbreviate the way they're normally set up, the Sam's got a 40/24
   12-36
 drivetrain, 35c Soma New Xpress tires, front
 rack/basket/Shopsack. The
 Soma's got a 48/34 11-34 drivetrain, 35c Schwalbe Marathon
 Racers,
   front
 rack, front and rear Sackville bags.
 
 Anyway, I always assumed that my Soma was kind of a lightweight
   go-fast
 bike with it's fancy Tange Prestige tubing and slightly more
   aggressive
 geometry (shorter chain stays anyway). Compared to the Sam, it
 just
   takes
 off like crazy and *feels *incredibly quick and nimble.
 Lo-and-behold,
   I
 got one of those hook scale things today, and the total weight of
 each
   bike
 was 35lbs for the Sam and 31lbs for the Soma.
 
 I thought it was the weight that explained the difference in
 feel, but
 clearly that's not the case. Both are equally pleasurable to
 ride, but
 there must be far more factors involved in the overall feel of
 each
   bike
 than I might have guessed.

  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/uhWMZ-Bo3h8J.

 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Enjoy every minute of it.

2013-01-13 Thread Mike
Yet another great set of photos Manny! It looks like you're riding out in 
the Marin Headlands more. Be sure to check out the Green Gulch trail if 
it's still open. You start it from Muir Beach at the Green Gulch Farm. It's 
a really great climb up to the ridge and then down Coastal Trail to 
Tennessee Valley Beach.

--mike

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/uFPv-q1laU8J.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Forget bike weight: let's talk about the Portacatena!

2013-01-13 Thread campyonlyguy
I have one, still in the original package. I've never had a bike with the 
proper dropouts ... or the space (see below).

The PC was reputed to be used by racers on descents--with the chain on the 
Portacatena, the freewheel would not buzz, and they could zip by their 
opponents undetected.

I suspect one problem with the PC was that if you parked the chain while riding 
(or when stopped( and then started pedalling, it would rip by the holder off of 
the dropout.  I haven't tried it, but that's my theory.

The PC also needs a fair amount of space between the smallest cog and the 
dropout. No biggie with a 5- or 6-speed freewheel, but beyond that the space 
inside the dropouts began to get pretty full. Check out the gap on amy modern 
bike, and you'll see that a holder that needs a chain's worth of space is no 
longer practical.

--Eric


On Jan 13, 2013, at 8:07 PM, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:

 http://campagnolo.wikispaces.com/Portacatena (Scroll down a bit.)
 
 And of course Eric knows about it: 
 http://campyonlyguy.blogspot.com/2010/08/today-history-lesson-portacatena.html
 
 That's a really neat device, too -- wonder why it never became more popular. 
 Much better to have a chainrest and easy wheel removal instead of another 
 blanking cog. I wonder if I can jury rig something on the Ram I am building 
 up. I am using (for the moment) seven speed freewheel wheels while the Ram 
 has (I've been told) 132.5 OL spacing. 
 
 -- 
 
 -
 Patrick Moore, Albuquerque, NM, USA
 For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW
 http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
 -
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
 7959582180_a2dd9dcd8f_z.jpg

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Panaracer Tour Tire

2013-01-13 Thread Mike
But ultimately, while real men fix flats, suffer big miles, ride supple 
tires, mix goatheads in their cereal, etc RBW Owner's Bunchers tend to 
just ride.

--mike

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/MA8K5KN67rEJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Forget bike weight: let's talk about the Portacatena!

2013-01-13 Thread Benz, Sunnyvale, CA
I would think that with the prevalence of STI/Ergo/Rapidfire/Gripshifters 
and their lack of a lockout, it will be a significant liability when one 
attempts to upshift to a larger gear while pushing super hard and 
got...nothing but a freewheeling crank with its associated crash.

Bishop Bikes made a rando bike with an integrated portacatena:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/bishopbikes/sets/72157628089348263/

I saw that in person at NAHBS-2012 and it was pure sex on wheels.



On Sunday, January 13, 2013 8:07:49 PM UTC-8, Patrick Moore wrote:

 http://campagnolo.wikispaces.com/Portacatena (Scroll down a bit.)

 And of course Eric knows about it: 
 http://campyonlyguy.blogspot.com/2010/08/today-history-lesson-portacatena.html

 That's a really neat device, too -- wonder why it never became more 
 popular. Much better to have a chainrest and easy wheel removal instead of 
 another blanking cog. I wonder if I can jury rig something on the Ram I am 
 building up. I am using (for the moment) seven speed freewheel wheels while 
 the Ram has (I've been told) 132.5 OL spacing. 

 -- 

 -
 Patrick Moore, Albuquerque, NM, USA
 For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW
 http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
 -


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/ikk6-qCxLJ8J.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Weight's a weird thing

2013-01-13 Thread Benz, Sunnyvale, CA
Although I do not dispute that weight plays a part in how a bike *feels*, 
unless your Rivs weigh close to 30 lb or you weigh closer to 100 than 200 
lb, those few pounds is only a very small percentage of the total 
bike+rider+accessories weight, which is what's important in a purely 
physics-based examination of performance factors. My experience is aligned 
with Jan's - I don't believe bike weight plays a primary factor in 
performance, at least at my level. Fit (aggressive vs. relaxed) and its 
associated rider position plays a much larger role in overall performance. 
As an example, my Della Santa and Independent Fab differ by probably 5 or 
more pounds (partially due to component mix), but both allow me to mix it 
with the boys. And yes, long 8-12% roads are (unfortunately) common around 
these parts.

Stating this does not exclude me from being a weight-weenie though, as my 
chest of Ti hardware will attest to. :)


On Sunday, January 13, 2013 4:03:26 PM UTC-8, z-man wrote:

 Agreed. I normally ride anywhere from 66-69cm bikes. I love my Rivs for 
 the ride quality. But if I'm doing a metric or a double-metric century 
 w/thousands of feet in climbing on New England hills where there's a lot of 
 8-12% grades all the time, I'm taking my Roubaix (64cm, 18.2lbs), or a 
 Seven (67cm, 19 lbs), or a Calfee (69cm, 19.8lbs w/disc brakes). If for no 
 other reason that I can ride at a fast clip, but still enjoy the company of 
 others, occasionally pass some people, and never quite run out of gas. This 
 mostly comes into play on any long climb, where, even though I'm old, tall, 
 heavy-ish, and relatively slow, I can get by w/ Cytomax as fuel and keep 
 the cool kids in sight. 

 IMHO, lighter is always righter. 

 RGZ

 Sent from my iPad

 On Jan 13, 2013, at 9:54 AM, eflayer eddie@att.net javascript: 
 wrote:

 You might try a 16.5 lb Specialized Roubaix and let us know what you think 
 about that :). Mine weighs about 4 lbs less than my lightest steel bike. I 
 still like steel a ton, but for pure fast club road rides, the Roubaix is 
 more fun in most ways.
 On Saturday, January 12, 2013 9:33:04 PM UTC-8, Scot Brooks wrote:

 I spend about equal time on my Sam Hillborne and my Soma Double Cross. To 
 abbreviate the way they're normally set up, the Sam's got a 40/24 12-36 
 drivetrain, 35c Soma New Xpress tires, front rack/basket/Shopsack. The 
 Soma's got a 48/34 11-34 drivetrain, 35c Schwalbe Marathon Racers, front 
 rack, front and rear Sackville bags. 

 Anyway, I always assumed that my Soma was kind of a lightweight go-fast 
 bike with it's fancy Tange Prestige tubing and slightly more aggressive 
 geometry (shorter chain stays anyway). Compared to the Sam, it just takes 
 off like crazy and *feels *incredibly quick and nimble. Lo-and-behold, I 
 got one of those hook scale things today, and the total weight of each bike 
 was 35lbs for the Sam and 31lbs for the Soma. 

 I thought it was the weight that explained the difference in feel, but 
 clearly that's not the case. Both are equally pleasurable to ride, but 
 there must be far more factors involved in the overall feel of each bike 
 than I might have guessed. 

  -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/4hz-iWJpuXMJ.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.comjavascript:
 .
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/RppDIOcEO8cJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Campagnolo cable guide 626/A on a Ram

2013-01-13 Thread Benz, Sunnyvale, CA
Seeing that the cable stop on the chainstay is on the bottom of the 
chainstay, even if you can route the rear derailleur cable using the 
Campagnolo cable guide, how will you address the chainstay cable stop issue?

Go with the Teflon cable lining. New cable installations should likely have 
extra lengths of housing you can salvage the lining from.



On Sunday, January 13, 2013 6:06:26 AM UTC-8, stevew wrote:

 I've never been a huge fan of how the derailer cables are routed 
 underneath the bottom bracket of my Ram, due to the fact that they are just 
 rubbing against the bare frame.  Does anyone have any thoughts on using 
 something like this Campy cable guide? 


 http://velobase.com/ViewComponent.aspx?ID=E553FEF8-9918-4B47-B24E-AE4603CBCB14
  

 It attaches to the downtube and routes the cables above and to the side of 
 the bottom bracket.  However, from what I can find, it looks like it is 
 sized for a 1 1/8 tube, while I believe the Ram down tube is 1 1/4.  If 
 that is indeed the case, could the guide possibly be made to squeeze out 
 that extra 1/8? 

 Thanks for any info, 
 Steve 






-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/5_hEwZLUkcIJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Campagnolo cable guide 626/A on a Ram

2013-01-13 Thread Peter Morgano
Thought I was original and clever using this trick a few years ago ah
shoot!

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Benz, Sunnyvale, CA
benzouy...@gmail.comwrote:

 Seeing that the cable stop on the chainstay is on the bottom of the
 chainstay, even if you can route the rear derailleur cable using the
 Campagnolo cable guide, how will you address the chainstay cable stop issue?

 Go with the Teflon cable lining. New cable installations should likely
 have extra lengths of housing you can salvage the lining from.




 On Sunday, January 13, 2013 6:06:26 AM UTC-8, stevew wrote:

 I've never been a huge fan of how the derailer cables are routed
 underneath the bottom bracket of my Ram, due to the fact that they are just
 rubbing against the bare frame.  Does anyone have any thoughts on using
 something like this Campy cable guide?

 http://velobase.com/**ViewComponent.aspx?ID=**E553FEF8-9918-4B47-B24E-**
 AE4603CBCB14http://velobase.com/ViewComponent.aspx?ID=E553FEF8-9918-4B47-B24E-AE4603CBCB14

 It attaches to the downtube and routes the cables above and to the side
 of the bottom bracket.  However, from what I can find, it looks like it is
 sized for a 1 1/8 tube, while I believe the Ram down tube is 1 1/4.  If
 that is indeed the case, could the guide possibly be made to squeeze out
 that extra 1/8?

 Thanks for any info,
 Steve




  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/5_hEwZLUkcIJ.

 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: An interesting match of the Nitto R-15 rear rack and Berthoud panniers

2013-01-13 Thread Dave
boring nighttime indoor photos prove it ;)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8374/8379739522_6fd5818baf.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8369/8379739794_36371a5f02.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8323/8379739226_50542d0f01_z.jpg


On Sunday, January 13, 2013 7:19:45 PM UTC-8, René wrote:

 Photos would prove you really did... ;-)

 On Sunday, January 13, 2013, Dave wrote:



 On Monday, November 5, 2012 5:04:23 PM UTC-8, dougP wrote:

 Jim:

 Is the lower horizontal bar on the R-15 intended for pannier mounting?  


 Just wanted to give post info that the standard Ortlieb rolltop bags 
 mount to the lower bar of the r-15 rack without any issues.  The clips are 
 adjustable and I was able to mount them after a few quick adjustments.

 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/nk6CvM4pjbMJ.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



 -- 
 Sent from Gmail Mobile


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/abLSDJ2jz-4J.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: An interesting match of the Nitto R-15 rear rack and Berthoud panniers

2013-01-13 Thread René Sterental
Beautiful rack! How do you like it compared to the R14 and the Nitto Big
Rear?

René

On Sunday, January 13, 2013, Dave wrote:

 boring nighttime indoor photos prove it ;)

 http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8374/8379739522_6fd5818baf.jpg

 http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8369/8379739794_36371a5f02.jpg

 http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8323/8379739226_50542d0f01_z.jpg


 On Sunday, January 13, 2013 7:19:45 PM UTC-8, René wrote:

 Photos would prove you really did... ;-)

 On Sunday, January 13, 2013, Dave wrote:



 On Monday, November 5, 2012 5:04:23 PM UTC-8, dougP wrote:

 Jim:

 Is the lower horizontal bar on the R-15 intended for pannier mounting?


 Just wanted to give post info that the standard Ortlieb rolltop bags
 mount to the lower bar of the r-15 rack without any issues.  The clips are
 adjustable and I was able to mount them after a few quick adjustments.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/**
 msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/**nk6CvM4pjbMJhttps://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/nk6CvM4pjbMJ
 .
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.**com
 .
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
 group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en
 .



 --
 Sent from Gmail Mobile

  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/abLSDJ2jz-4J.
 To post to this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 
 'rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com');
 .
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
 'rbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com');.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Evening Ride

2013-01-13 Thread Brian Hanson
I had a nice 20ish mile ride to the north end of Lk Washington tonight.  It
was a bit too chilly for my shoes, but the rest of me stayed warm.  The
Hilsen is in top form with the Jack Browns (green front, blue back).  There
was ice encountered, but trod upon without incident.  Tomorrow, it will be
the Hunqa's turn.

http://flic.kr/s/aHsjDB9tYP

Brian Hanson
Seattle, WA

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.