Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: no power out of duplexer SOLVED with more questions - Thanks for the answers

2010-09-08 Thread Thomas Oliver
 I agree. The users would not even notice if you cut the power in half. 
One 2 meter repeater we took over was running on the 10 watt exciter 
with the amp bypassed for I don't know how long.  The caretaker before 
we got it bypassed the amp because of desense or intermod or self 
oscillation issues, we used to have some high powered VHF paging 
transmitters close by that were exactly 600 Khz apart and no circulator, 
We are now blessed because they moved to 900.


It was only when were replacing the functioning repeater we discovered 
the amp was bypassed, He never told anyone.


tom

On 9/7/2010 11:50 PM, Glenn (Butch) Kanvick wrote:



Hi John.
Sometimes you might not want to tel the others what you do to the 
repeater, then they cannot complain about any adjustments that you make.

Butch, KE7FEL/r

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:12 PM, W3ML w...@arrl.net 
mailto:w...@arrl.net wrote:


Thanks to everyone for their comments and answers about my questions.

I did turn it back so I am sure someone will say something. Once
when a ham said he could not hit it, I drove over and sat outside
his house with a 25 watt radio and brought it up with an S8 signal.
It seems when a repeater goes up anywhere, someone will complain
about something to do with it.

Thanks and 73
John, W3ML









Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: no power out of duplexer SOLVED with more questions - Thanks for the answers

2010-09-08 Thread Chuck Kelsey
More likely he had the radio programmed wrong.

Chuck
WB2EDV


- Original Message - 
From: MCH m...@nb.net
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: no power out of duplexer SOLVED with 
more questions - Thanks for the answers


 His antenna could be in a null. It happens, as Murphy is a ham.

 Joe M.




[Repeater-Builder] Wildfire at the Boulder, CO repeater site

2010-09-08 Thread Nate Duehr
Thought the RB list might be interested in this one.

Here's a photo of one of our Colorado Repeater Association repeater sites near 
Boulder, CO Monday afternoon around 4PM.

http://www.9news.com/9slideshows/09-06-10-Boulder-fire-aerials/9703.jpg

(Sorry it's small, use your browser's zoom feature to blow it up a bit.  In 
most browsers, you can do this easily by holding down CTRL and rolling your 
mouse scroll wheel.)

As of 7AM, both repeaters (145.46  447.975) are still on-air, running on an 
authorized connection to a generator on-site.  Power was cut to the area quite 
some time ago.  A number of other systems on-site are off-air for unknown 
reasons, either a mixture of damage and/or simply having no power.  I know 
another person who frequents the list (Mike Mullarky) has gear up there also.

Will be interesting to see what damage there is at the site when we can get up 
there, which really could be weeks...

Map of the fire boundaries as of 12:30 yesterday afternoon:
http://www.bouldercolorado.gov/files/Communication/fourmile/Four_Mile_Fire_Web_Perimeter_1230.pdf

The little circle that jumped the lines (well, there really aren't well-defined 
fire-lines yet anyway) at the top right is the mountain the repeater system is 
on.

Over 96 structures destroyed already, and counting...  and that wasn't a 
complete count yesterday, according to the Sheriff's Office during a press 
briefing.

--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com



[Repeater-Builder] schematic and/or pinout diagram, Maxar 80, D51TSA4000BK

2010-09-08 Thread KP3FT
Hi all,
Does anyone have a scanned schematic and/or a pinout diagram for a Maxar 80 
lowband?  I moving one that is presently at 49.520 MHz, up to 50.065 MHz, but 
have no idea what the pins are for PTT, etc.  There is no microphone or other 
cables that came with the radio.  Thanks for any help.
Jeff KP3FT



[Repeater-Builder] Can't get Vertex VXR5000 to program

2010-09-08 Thread wspx472
I got this to work before but now, no joy. I am using CE8 software, have the 
correct cable, and an older DOS PC. I get either a box saying there was 
communication problems or it quickly flashes Done! but hasn't actually read 
the repeater. Is there some special trick I have forgotten?



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Can't get Vertex VXR5000 to program

2010-09-08 Thread Gary W. Gibbs
Read the repeater first 
NIMS: 100 200 300 400 700 800 
Arrl  Extra Class VE 
HAZ MAT- A O 
sent from my blackberry mobile device 

-Original Message-
From: wspx472 wpxs...@gmail.com
Sender: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:24:15 
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Can't get Vertex VXR5000 to program

I got this to work before but now, no joy. I am using CE8 software, have the 
correct cable, and an older DOS PC. I get either a box saying there was 
communication problems or it quickly flashes Done! but hasn't actually read 
the repeater. Is there some special trick I have forgotten?




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Can't get Vertex VXR5000 to program

2010-09-08 Thread Maire-Radios
the last time that happened to me I needed a new cable.


  - Original Message - 
  From: wspx472 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 3:24 PM
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Can't get Vertex VXR5000 to program



  I got this to work before but now, no joy. I am using CE8 software, have the 
correct cable, and an older DOS PC. I get either a box saying there was 
communication problems or it quickly flashes Done! but hasn't actually read 
the repeater. Is there some special trick I have forgotten?



  

Re: [Repeater-Builder] schematic and/or pinout diagram, Maxar 80, D51TSA4000BK

2010-09-08 Thread George Henry
I know that they are available on the Batlabs site...  try 
http://www.batlabs.com/nosynth.html and scroll down to the Moxy section.  I 
believe that the pinouts for the Maxar, Maxar 80, and Moxy were all the same.

George, KA3HSW / WQGJ



From: KP3FT kp...@yahoo.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, September 8, 2010 1:58:15 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] schematic and/or pinout diagram, Maxar 80, 
D51TSA4000BK

  
Hi all,
Does anyone have a scanned schematic and/or a pinout diagram for a Maxar 80 
lowband? I moving one that is presently at 49.520 MHz, up to 50.065 MHz, but 
have no idea what the pins are for PTT, etc. There is no microphone or other 
cables that came with the radio. Thanks for any help.
Jeff KP3FT





Re: [Repeater-Builder] schematic and/or pinout diagram, Maxar 80, D51TSA4000BK

2010-09-08 Thread Jeff KP3FT
Hi George,
Thanks for the reply.  I had downloaded the diagram for the Moxy earlier from 
that website, but discovered the connector is different for the Maxar 80.  Not 
sure if the pinout #s are the same though.  I could spend the money and get a 
manual, but that is another 20 dollars and more time, plus I don't think I need 
much information really, since the new target frequency is not much higher than 
the original frequency and may not need retuning.  It's for a beacon 
transmitter, so RX tuning isn't necessary.  
Jeff KP3FT

--- On Wed, 9/8/10, George Henry ka3...@att.net wrote:

From: George Henry ka3...@att.net
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] schematic and/or pinout diagram, Maxar 80, 
D51TSA4000BK
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, September 8, 2010, 3:40 PM







 



  



  
  
  I know that they are available on the Batlabs site...  try 

http://www.batlabs.com/nosynth.html and scroll down to the Moxy section.  I 

believe that the pinouts for the Maxar, Maxar 80, and Moxy were all the same.



George, KA3HSW / WQGJ





From: KP3FT kp...@yahoo.com

To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Wed, September 8, 2010 1:58:15 PM

Subject: [Repeater-Builder] schematic and/or pinout diagram, Maxar 80, 

D51TSA4000BK



  

Hi all,

Does anyone have a scanned schematic and/or a pinout diagram for a Maxar 80 

lowband? I moving one that is presently at 49.520 MHz, up to 50.065 MHz, but 

have no idea what the pins are for PTT, etc. There is no microphone or other 

cables that came with the radio. Thanks for any help.

Jeff KP3FT








 





 



  






  

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Can't get Vertex VXR5000 to program

2010-09-08 Thread wspx472
That's what I was trying to do.

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Gary W. Gibbs  ke5...@... wrote:

 Read the repeater first 
 NIMS: 100 200 300 400 700 800 
 Arrl  Extra Class VE 
 HAZ MAT- A O 
 sent from my blackberry mobile device 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: wspx472 wpxs...@...
 Sender: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:24:15 
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Reply-To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Can't get Vertex VXR5000 to program
 
 I got this to work before but now, no joy. I am using CE8 software, have the 
 correct cable, and an older DOS PC. I get either a box saying there was 
 communication problems or it quickly flashes Done! but hasn't actually read 
 the repeater. Is there some special trick I have forgotten?





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Can't get Vertex VXR5000 to program

2010-09-08 Thread Gary W. Gibbs
That has happened to me twice and I read it then it would program.  Sorry it 
didn't help you. 
NIMS: 100 200 300 400 700 800 
Arrl  Extra Class VE 
HAZ MAT- A O 
sent from my blackberry mobile device 

-Original Message-
From: wspx472 wpxs...@gmail.com
Sender: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:32:58 
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Can't get Vertex VXR5000 to program

That's what I was trying to do.

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Gary W. Gibbs  ke5...@... wrote:

 Read the repeater first 
 NIMS: 100 200 300 400 700 800 
 Arrl  Extra Class VE 
 HAZ MAT- A O 
 sent from my blackberry mobile device 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: wspx472 wpxs...@...
 Sender: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:24:15 
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Reply-To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Can't get Vertex VXR5000 to program
 
 I got this to work before but now, no joy. I am using CE8 software, have the 
 correct cable, and an older DOS PC. I get either a box saying there was 
 communication problems or it quickly flashes Done! but hasn't actually read 
 the repeater. Is there some special trick I have forgotten?






[Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

2010-09-08 Thread RichardK
Good evening, our club has a Wacom WP-639 four can duplexer as part of our 
repeater system.  Input Fq is 147.915 and Output Fq is 147.315.  We have a 
600kHz (+) offset.  Very simply, our main problem is when we run the 
transmitter at full power 100 watts, there is a HUGE desense on the receive 
side of things.  When we drop the transmitter power level to around 20-50 
watts, the receive side opens WAY up to a large area where people can get into 
the repeater.  As we begin to bring up the transmitter power, white noise 
begins to appear and the receive side starts to desense again.  All the cables 
have been switched to double sheilded cables and all the same wavelength in 
length.  We have the duplexer seperated  sheilded from the transmitter  
preamp parts.  We have not replaced the antenna feed coax with double sheilded 
coax yet.  Antenna is a Hustler G7 atop a 55' mast.  The duplexer was retuned 
just over 1 year ago. Any suggestions as to what we could look into next?  Some 
of us believe the problem is with the tuning of the duplexer receive cans.  
Thank you very much.



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

2010-09-08 Thread Andrew Seybold
What repeater are you running? Is it a GE Mastr II by chance?

 

Andy

 

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of RichardK
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 3:11 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

 

  

Good evening, our club has a Wacom WP-639 four can duplexer as part of
our repeater system. Input Fq is 147.915 and Output Fq is 147.315. We
have a 600kHz (+) offset. Very simply, our main problem is when we run
the transmitter at full power 100 watts, there is a HUGE desense on the
receive side of things. When we drop the transmitter power level to
around 20-50 watts, the receive side opens WAY up to a large area where
people can get into the repeater. As we begin to bring up the
transmitter power, white noise begins to appear and the receive side
starts to desense again. All the cables have been switched to double
sheilded cables and all the same wavelength in length. We have the
duplexer seperated  sheilded from the transmitter  preamp parts. We
have not replaced the antenna feed coax with double sheilded coax yet.
Antenna is a Hustler G7 atop a 55' mast. The duplexer was retuned just
over 1 year ago. Any suggestions as to what we could look into next?
Some of us believe the problem is with the tuning of the duplexer
receive cans. Thank you very much.





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

2010-09-08 Thread Ken Arck
At 03:11 PM 9/8/2010, RichardK wrote:


Good evening, our club has a Wacom WP-639 four can duplexer as part 
of our repeater system. Input Fq is 147.915 and Output Fq is 
147.315. We have a 600kHz (+) offset. Very simply, our main problem 
is when we run the transmitter at full power 100 watts, there is a 
HUGE desense on the receive side of things. When we drop the 
transmitter power level to around 20-50 watts, the receive side 
opens WAY up to a large area where people can get into the repeater. 
As we begin to bring up the transmitter power, white noise begins 
to appear and the receive side starts to desense again. All the 
cables have been switched to double sheilded cables and all the same 
wavelength in length. We have the duplexer seperated  sheilded from 
the transmitter  preamp parts. We have not replaced the antenna 
feed coax with double sheilded coax yet. Antenna is a Hustler G7 
atop a 55' mast. The duplexer was retuned just over 1 year ago. Any 
suggestions as to what we could look into next? Some of us believe 
the problem is with the tuning of the duplexer receive cans. Thank 
you very much.

---The WP-639 is spec'd at only 80 db of isolation @ a 600 kHz 
split. At 100 watts, that simply isn't enough to prevent desense. You 
need more isolation

Ken
--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of repeater controllers and accessories.
http://www.arcomcontrollers.com/
Authorized Dealers for Kenwood and Telewave and
we offer complete repeater packages!
AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
http://www.irlp.net
We don't just make 'em. We use 'em!



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

2010-09-08 Thread Ken Arck
At 04:38 PM 9/8/2010, Andrew Seybold wrote:


What repeater are you running? Is it a GE Mastr II by chance?




---You hinting at the issue of Mastr II amp going spurious when the 
power is turned down too far?

Ken

--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of repeater controllers and accessories.
http://www.arcomcontrollers.com/
Authorized Dealers for Kenwood and Telewave and
we offer complete repeater packages!
AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
http://www.irlp.net
We don't just make 'em. We use 'em!



Re: [Repeater-Builder] schematic and/or pinout diagram, Maxar 80, D51TSA4000BK

2010-09-08 Thread Jeff KP3FT
Hi George,
If you don't mind going to the trouble, that would be great.  Just verifying if 
the pin number/functions are the same as the Moxy would be good because I 
already have the Moxy pinout.
73
Jeff KP3FT

--- On Wed, 9/8/10, George Henry ka3...@att.net wrote:

From: George Henry ka3...@att.net
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] schematic and/or pinout diagram, Maxar 80, 
D51TSA4000BK
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, September 8, 2010, 7:45 PM







 



  



  
  
  I think I have a Maxar 80 manual at the office...  I will check tomorrow 

morning.  I think the only real difference in the connectors is that the 

Maxar 80 connector has 2 large pins at the top for power, while the Moxy has 

all pins the same size, and uses the first 2 in the 2nd row for power.  All 

the metering, audio, and PTT pins are the same...  I *THINK*...



- Original Message - 

From: Jeff KP3FT kp...@yahoo.com

To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 2:53 PM

Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] schematic and/or pinout diagram, Maxar 80, 

D51TSA4000BK



Hi George,

Thanks for the reply. I had downloaded the diagram for the Moxy earlier from 

that website, but discovered the connector is different for the Maxar 80. 

Not sure if the pinout #s are the same though. I could spend the money and 

get a manual, but that is another 20 dollars and more time, plus I don't 

think I need much information really, since the new target frequency is not 

much higher than the original frequency and may not need retuning. It's for 

a beacon transmitter, so RX tuning isn't necessary.

Jeff KP3FT



--- On Wed, 9/8/10, George Henry ka3...@att.net wrote:



From: George Henry ka3...@att.net

Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] schematic and/or pinout diagram, Maxar 80, 

D51TSA4000BK

To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com

Date: Wednesday, September 8, 2010, 3:40 PM



I know that they are available on the Batlabs site... try



http://www.batlabs.com/nosynth.html and scroll down to the Moxy section. I



believe that the pinouts for the Maxar, Maxar 80, and Moxy were all the 

same.



George, KA3HSW / WQGJ







From: KP3FT kp...@yahoo.com



To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com



Sent: Wed, September 8, 2010 1:58:15 PM



Subject: [Repeater-Builder] schematic and/or pinout diagram, Maxar 80,



D51TSA4000BK











Hi all,



Does anyone have a scanned schematic and/or a pinout diagram for a Maxar 80



lowband? I moving one that is presently at 49.520 MHz, up to 50.065 MHz, 

but



have no idea what the pins are for PTT, etc. There is no microphone or 

other



cables that came with the radio. Thanks for any help.



Jeff KP3FT










 





 



  






  

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

2010-09-08 Thread Richard Kelly

 i'm at work right now--I will get that info tomorrow!!
 
Rich K
W2RRK

 x


 


To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
From: aseyb...@andrewseybold.com
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 16:38:49 -0700
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question












What repeater are you running? Is it a GE Mastr II by chance?
 
Andy
 


From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of RichardK
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 3:11 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question
 
  



Good evening, our club has a Wacom WP-639 four can duplexer as part of our 
repeater system. Input Fq is 147.915 and Output Fq is 147.315. We have a 600kHz 
(+) offset. Very simply, our main problem is when we run the transmitter at 
full power 100 watts, there is a HUGE desense on the receive side of things. 
When we drop the transmitter power level to around 20-50 watts, the receive 
side opens WAY up to a large area where people can get into the repeater. As we 
begin to bring up the transmitter power, white noise begins to appear and the 
receive side starts to desense again. All the cables have been switched to 
double sheilded cables and all the same wavelength in length. We have the 
duplexer seperated  sheilded from the transmitter  preamp parts. We have not 
replaced the antenna feed coax with double sheilded coax yet. Antenna is a 
Hustler G7 atop a 55' mast. The duplexer was retuned just over 1 year ago. Any 
suggestions as to what we could look into next? Some of us believe the problem 
is with the tuning of the duplexer receive cans. Thank you very much.




  

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

2010-09-08 Thread Kevin Custer
  On 9/8/2010 6:11 PM, RichardK wrote:
 Good evening, our club has a Wacom WP-639 four can duplexer as part of our 
 repeater system.  Input Fq is 147.915 and Output Fq is 147.315.  We have a 
 600kHz (+) offset.  Very simply, our main problem is when we run the 
 transmitter at full power 100 watts, there is a HUGE desense on the receive 
 side of things.  When we drop the transmitter power level to around 20-50 
 watts, the receive side opens WAY up to a large area where people can get 
 into the repeater.  As we begin to bring up the transmitter power, white 
 noise begins to appear and the receive side starts to desense again.  All 
 the cables have been switched to double sheilded cables and all the same 
 wavelength in length.  We have the duplexer seperated  sheilded from the 
 transmitter  preamp parts.  We have not replaced the antenna feed coax with 
 double sheilded coax yet.  Antenna is a Hustler G7 atop a 55' mast.  The 
 duplexer was retuned just over 1 year ago. Any suggestions as to what we 
 could look into next?  Some of us believe the problem is with the tuning of 
 the duplexer receive cans.  Thank you very much.


The Wacom WP-639 is insufficient for 100 solid state watts, unless you 
run a GE MASTR II PLL exciter and no preamp.

You will either need to replace the duplexer with another unit capable 
of properly isolating 100 solid state watts, add additional filters, 
change to a less noisy transmitter and amplifier (tubes are better - no 
I'm not kidding).

Kevin Custer - W3KKC



[Repeater-Builder] Possible to purchase IRLP node numbers for AllStar nodes to thus enable IRLP connections on AllStar system?

2010-09-08 Thread Kent Johnson
Bcc to 2010 VoIP Conference List 

-Original Message-
From: David Cameron (IRLP) [mailto:dcame...@irlp.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 7:56 AM
To: Kent Johnson
Subject: Re: Possible to purchase IRLP node numbers for AllStar

Kent, the short answer is no. I have had far too many complaints about 

people being brought into full duplex telephone calls and non-radio 

endpoints due to Allstar nodes on IRLP.

The philosophy of IRLP is to keep radios on all ends of a link.

Dave Cameron

VE7LTD

 

 



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

2010-09-08 Thread Eric Lemmon
I'm not surprised- you're asking too much of a duplexer that has four 5
cans.  According to my CommShop program, a duplexer with an 80 dB spec is
more suitable with transmitter power in the 10-15 watt range, assuming a
solid-state PA and a receiver sensitivity around 0.35 uV at 12 dB SINAD.  On
a 100 watt repeater, I'd expect something like a WP-642, which has six 8
cans.  BTDT, got the T-shirt and mug...

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of RichardK
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 3:11 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

  

Good evening, our club has a Wacom WP-639 four can duplexer as part of our
repeater system. Input Fq is 147.915 and Output Fq is 147.315. We have a
600kHz (+) offset. Very simply, our main problem is when we run the
transmitter at full power 100 watts, there is a HUGE desense on the receive
side of things. When we drop the transmitter power level to around 20-50
watts, the receive side opens WAY up to a large area where people can get
into the repeater. As we begin to bring up the transmitter power, white
noise begins to appear and the receive side starts to desense again. All
the cables have been switched to double sheilded cables and all the same
wavelength in length. We have the duplexer seperated  sheilded from the
transmitter  preamp parts. We have not replaced the antenna feed coax with
double sheilded coax yet. Antenna is a Hustler G7 atop a 55' mast. The
duplexer was retuned just over 1 year ago. Any suggestions as to what we
could look into next? Some of us believe the problem is with the tuning of
the duplexer receive cans. Thank you very much.



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

2010-09-08 Thread Richard Kelly

Good evening Eric,
 
Maybe this is why when the trasmit power is dropped to the 20-50 watt range, 
the receive opens way up like it should.  However, according to the spec sheets 
regarding the Wacom SP-639 Duplexer, it is rated for 200 watts.  So, again, not 
sure what's going on.  We will be trying other things such as adding a second 
ground rod outside the shack instead of the single one we use now.  We will 
also try isolating the amp some more and replacing the coax feed line with hard 
line.  Thank you very much.  We will be contacting Wacom directly tomorrow.
 
Rich Kelly, W2RRK

 x


 
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 From: wb6...@verizon.net
 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 18:10:44 -0700
 Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question
 
 I'm not surprised- you're asking too much of a duplexer that has four 5
 cans. According to my CommShop program, a duplexer with an 80 dB spec is
 more suitable with transmitter power in the 10-15 watt range, assuming a
 solid-state PA and a receiver sensitivity around 0.35 uV at 12 dB SINAD. On
 a 100 watt repeater, I'd expect something like a WP-642, which has six 8
 cans. BTDT, got the T-shirt and mug...
 
 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of RichardK
 Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 3:11 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question
 
 
 
 Good evening, our club has a Wacom WP-639 four can duplexer as part of our
 repeater system. Input Fq is 147.915 and Output Fq is 147.315. We have a
 600kHz (+) offset. Very simply, our main problem is when we run the
 transmitter at full power 100 watts, there is a HUGE desense on the receive
 side of things. When we drop the transmitter power level to around 20-50
 watts, the receive side opens WAY up to a large area where people can get
 into the repeater. As we begin to bring up the transmitter power, white
 noise begins to appear and the receive side starts to desense again. All
 the cables have been switched to double sheilded cables and all the same
 wavelength in length. We have the duplexer seperated  sheilded from the
 transmitter  preamp parts. We have not replaced the antenna feed coax with
 double sheilded coax yet. Antenna is a Hustler G7 atop a 55' mast. The
 duplexer was retuned just over 1 year ago. Any suggestions as to what we
 could look into next? Some of us believe the problem is with the tuning of
 the duplexer receive cans. Thank you very much.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
  

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

2010-09-08 Thread Ken Arck
At 06:18 PM 9/8/2010, Richard Kelly wrote:


  We will be trying other things such as adding a second ground rod 
 outside the shack instead of the single one we use now.  We will 
 also try isolating the amp some more and replacing the coax feed 
 line with hard line.


--That is a complete waste of time as that is not the problem. Your 
duplexer simply cannot provide enough isolation for the power level 
you're trying to run.

More grounding and replacing coax with hardline (unless your coax 
isn't doubleshield to start with) will buy you nothing.

Ken

--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of repeater controllers and accessories.
http://www.arcomcontrollers.com/
Authorized Dealers for Kenwood and Telewave and
we offer complete repeater packages!
AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
http://www.irlp.net
We don't just make 'em. We use 'em!



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

2010-09-08 Thread Mike Besemer (WM4B)
Rich,

 

Eric speaks the truth.  The will HANDLE 200 watts without arcing, etc, but
do not provide nearly enough isolation at 600 KHz spacing to handle 100
watts.  For a 35 watt transmitter, I run cans that provide around 96 dB of
isolation. the 85 dB your cans can provide just ain't gonna cut it. 

 

73,

 

Mike

WM4B

 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 9:19 PM
To: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

 

  

Good evening Eric,
 
Maybe this is why when the trasmit power is dropped to the 20-50 watt range,
the receive opens way up like it should.  However, according to the spec
sheets regarding the Wacom SP-639 Duplexer, it is rated for 200 watts.  So,
again, not sure what's going on.  We will be trying other things such as
adding a second ground rod outside the shack instead of the single one we
use now.  We will also try isolating the amp some more and replacing the
coax feed line with hard line.  Thank you very much.  We will be contacting
Wacom directly tomorrow.
 
Rich Kelly, W2RRK

 x


 
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 From: wb6...@verizon.net
 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 18:10:44 -0700
 Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question
 
 I'm not surprised- you're asking too much of a duplexer that has four 5
 cans. According to my CommShop program, a duplexer with an 80 dB spec is
 more suitable with transmitter power in the 10-15 watt range, assuming a
 solid-state PA and a receiver sensitivity around 0.35 uV at 12 dB SINAD.
On
 a 100 watt repeater, I'd expect something like a WP-642, which has six 8
 cans. BTDT, got the T-shirt and mug...
 
 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of RichardK
 Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 3:11 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question
 
 
 
 Good evening, our club has a Wacom WP-639 four can duplexer as part of our
 repeater system. Input Fq is 147.915 and Output Fq is 147.315. We have a
 600kHz (+) offset. Very simply, our main problem is when we run the
 transmitter at full power 100 watts, there is a HUGE desense on the
receive
 side of things. When we drop the transmitter power level to around 20-50
 watts, the receive side opens WAY up to a large area where people can get
 into the repeater. As we begin to bring up the transmitter power, white
 noise begins to appear and the receive side starts to desense again. All
 the cables have been switched to double sheilded cables and all the same
 wavelength in length. We have the duplexer seperated  sheilded from the
 transmitter  preamp parts. We have not replaced the antenna feed coax
with
 double sheilded coax yet. Antenna is a Hustler G7 atop a 55' mast. The
 duplexer was retuned just over 1 year ago. Any suggestions as to what we
 could look into next? Some of us believe the problem is with the tuning of
 the duplexer receive cans. Thank you very much.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

2010-09-08 Thread Joe
 I'm afraid your wasting your time.  According to the document for the 
Wacom 639 duplexer, this is what it says:


MIN. FREQ. SPACING: 600 KHz
POWER: TO 200 WATTS

Notice that it says TO 200 watts.  That would be if you were at 2MHz 
of spacing or more.  You are only at 600KHz spacing, so you power level 
will be much less.  I know it's not what you want to hear, but I believe 
you have the wrong duplexer for a 100 watt solid state repeater.


73, Joe, K1ike

On 9/8/2010 9:18 PM, Richard Kelly wrote:



Good evening Eric,

Maybe this is why when the trasmit power is dropped to the 20-50 watt 
range, the receive opens way up like it should.  However, according to 
the spec sheets regarding the Wacom SP-639 Duplexer, it is rated for 
200 watts.  So, again, not sure what's going on.  We will be trying 
other things such as adding a second ground rod outside the shack 
instead of the single one we use now.  We will also try isolating the 
amp some more and replacing the coax feed line with hard line.  Thank 
you very much.  We will be contacting Wacom directly tomorrow.


Rich Kelly, W2RRK





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

2010-09-08 Thread Richard Kelly

Hello again Ken,
 
Thank you for replying with more info, we appreciate it.  My email address if 
you want to get off this posting is w2...@arrl.net 
 
How would we go about providing MORE isolation than what we have done so far?  
 
Rich Kelly W2RRK

 x


 
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 From: ah...@ah6le.net
 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 18:24:41 -0700
 Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question
 
 At 06:18 PM 9/8/2010, Richard Kelly wrote:
 
 
  We will be trying other things such as adding a second ground rod 
  outside the shack instead of the single one we use now. We will 
  also try isolating the amp some more and replacing the coax feed 
  line with hard line.
 
 
 --That is a complete waste of time as that is not the problem. Your 
 duplexer simply cannot provide enough isolation for the power level 
 you're trying to run.
 
 More grounding and replacing coax with hardline (unless your coax 
 isn't doubleshield to start with) will buy you nothing.
 
 Ken
 
 --
 President and CTO - Arcom Communications
 Makers of repeater controllers and accessories.
 http://www.arcomcontrollers.com/
 Authorized Dealers for Kenwood and Telewave and
 we offer complete repeater packages!
 AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
 http://www.irlp.net
 We don't just make 'em. We use 'em!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
  

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

2010-09-08 Thread no6b
At 9/8/2010 18:24, you wrote:
At 06:18 PM 9/8/2010, Richard Kelly wrote:
 
 
   We will be trying other things such as adding a second ground rod
  outside the shack instead of the single one we use now.  We will
  also try isolating the amp some more and replacing the coax feed
  line with hard line.


--That is a complete waste of time as that is not the problem. Your
duplexer simply cannot provide enough isolation for the power level
you're trying to run.

More grounding and replacing coax with hardline (unless your coax
isn't doubleshield to start with) will buy you nothing.

Replacing copper-braided coax with RG-214 or hardline is hardly a waste of 
time.  The duplexer isolation may not be quite enough, but that can be 
easily remedied by adding an extra pass cavity to the TX.  Just another 10 
to 15 dB of TX noise suppression is likely all you need.  RG-8, RG-213 or 
LMR-400 antenna feed, OTOH, will make any duplexer moot due to all the 
desense it will generate, sooner or later.

Bob NO6B



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

2010-09-08 Thread NORM KNAPP
I got a set of 4 sinclair cans, like a Q202g on a GE mastr II running 100 watts 
with pll exciter and GE preamp with no desense. Antenna is roughly 300' away 
fed with LDF7-50A. Is this a miracle or typical?

- Original Message -
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed Sep 08 20:10:44 2010
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

  

I'm not surprised- you're asking too much of a duplexer that has four 5
cans. According to my CommShop program, a duplexer with an 80 dB spec is
more suitable with transmitter power in the 10-15 watt range, assuming a
solid-state PA and a receiver sensitivity around 0.35 uV at 12 dB SINAD. On
a 100 watt repeater, I'd expect something like a WP-642, which has six 8
cans. BTDT, got the T-shirt and mug...

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of RichardK
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 3:11 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

Good evening, our club has a Wacom WP-639 four can duplexer as part of our
repeater system. Input Fq is 147.915 and Output Fq is 147.315. We have a
600kHz (+) offset. Very simply, our main problem is when we run the
transmitter at full power 100 watts, there is a HUGE desense on the receive
side of things. When we drop the transmitter power level to around 20-50
watts, the receive side opens WAY up to a large area where people can get
into the repeater. As we begin to bring up the transmitter power, white
noise begins to appear and the receive side starts to desense again. All
the cables have been switched to double sheilded cables and all the same
wavelength in length. We have the duplexer seperated  sheilded from the
transmitter  preamp parts. We have not replaced the antenna feed coax with
double sheilded coax yet. Antenna is a Hustler G7 atop a 55' mast. The
duplexer was retuned just over 1 year ago. Any suggestions as to what we
could look into next? Some of us believe the problem is with the tuning of
the duplexer receive cans. Thank you very much.






Re: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

2010-09-08 Thread Scott Zimmerman
Rich,

The short answer is: You need to find a bigger duplexer. Four 8 cans 
would work well such as a Wacom WP-641. You could simply call and order 
one if Wacom was still in business. (RIP) Unfortunately Tx/Rx bought 
them years ago for the name and to quash competition. They can be found 
occasionally for around $600 or so on the used market.

Other alternatives are as follows:
1) You can use two antennas and split the 639 duplexer so that 2 cans 
are in series between the TX and the TX antenna, and the other two are 
in series between the RX and the RX antenna. Terry WX3M a list member is 
doing this with VERY good results on one of his VHF machines. Of course 
this involves the expense of additional feedline and a second antenna. I 
think you said you had this machine on an 80' mast. 50' or so of 
vertical isolation coupled with the additional isolation of splitting 
the duplexer *may* be enough isolation to get rid of all the desense. TX 
goes on bottom, RX on top.

2) Buy additional Band Pass / Band Reject (BPBR) cans. You can add these 
additional cans between the Tx and/or Rx and the duplexer. These cans 
will give additional isolation. Even if you can find just Pass or Notch 
cavities, tune them and put them in the correct place.

With both of the above options, you are looking to add to the isolation 
between your transmitter and receiver. You'll find you'll do best by 
adding cans to your transmitter that notch side-band noise at your 
receiver's frequency. In other words, do what you can to insure your 
receiver is not hearing your own transmitter's sideband noise on it's 
input. Pass cans tuned to the TX frequency or NOTCH cavities tuned to 
your *RX* frequency placed in the transmit line are your best hope.

Good luck,
Scott



Scott Zimmerman
Amateur Radio Call N3XCC
474 Barnett Road
Boswell, PA 15531

On 9/8/2010 9:52 PM, Richard Kelly wrote:


 Hello again Ken,

 Thank you for replying with more info, we appreciate it. My email
 address if you want to get off this posting is w2...@arrl.net
 mailto:w2...@arrl.net

 How would we go about providing MORE isolation than what we have done so
 far?

 Rich Kelly W2RRK


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

2010-09-08 Thread Ken Arck

At 08:21 PM 9/8/2010, n...@no6b.com wrote:




Replacing copper-braided coax with RG-214 or hardline is hardly a waste of
time.



--Notice I said:

More grounding and replacing coax with hardline (unless your coax
isn't doubleshield to start with) will buy you nothing.

I was assuming he wasn't running something along the lines of RG-8 
but I did think to qualify that.


Ken

--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of repeater controllers and accessories.
http://www.arcomcontrollers.com/
Authorized Dealers for Kenwood and Telewave and
we offer complete repeater packages!
AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
http://www.irlp.net
We don't just make 'em. We use 'em!


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

2010-09-08 Thread Jeff DePolo

The PLL exciter is why you're having such good success running a 4-cavity
duplexer.  If you had a PM exciter, chances are you'd be experiencing
desense.  The PLL exciter produces about 22 dB less noise at 600 kHz offset,
reducing the noise supression requirement of the duplexer by a like amount.


See: http://www.repeater-builder.com/pdf/GE_Isolation_Curves.pdf

The OP also mentioned he was using a preamp - that's not helping his
situation either.  Even with a good receiver he's probably on the edge of
crunching it with only a 4-pack.  Personally, I'd never run a preamp with
nothing but a 4-cavity duplexer on 2m, but if it works for you, God bless...

A Q202G gives more isolation than a WP639 from what I've seen/measured, in
part because the cavities are larger diameter (I think they're 7 versus
5?).

--- Jeff WN3A
 

 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
 [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of NORM KNAPP
 Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 11:38 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question
 
   
 
 I got a set of 4 sinclair cans, like a Q202g on a GE mastr II 
 running 100 watts with pll exciter and GE preamp with no 
 desense. Antenna is roughly 300' away fed with LDF7-50A. Is 
 this a miracle or typical? 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com  
 Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com  
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com  
 Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com  
 Sent: Wed Sep 08 20:10:44 2010 
 Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question 
 
 
 
 I'm not surprised- you're asking too much of a duplexer that 
 has four 5 
 cans. According to my CommShop program, a duplexer with an 80 
 dB spec is 
 more suitable with transmitter power in the 10-15 watt range, 
 assuming a 
 solid-state PA and a receiver sensitivity around 0.35 uV at 
 12 dB SINAD. On 
 a 100 watt repeater, I'd expect something like a WP-642, 
 which has six 8 
 cans. BTDT, got the T-shirt and mug... 
 
 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY 
 
 
 -Original Message- 
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com  
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
 [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com  
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of RichardK 
 Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 3:11 PM 
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com  
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question 
 
 Good evening, our club has a Wacom WP-639 four can duplexer 
 as part of our 
 repeater system. Input Fq is 147.915 and Output Fq is 
 147.315. We have a 
 600kHz (+) offset. Very simply, our main problem is when we run the 
 transmitter at full power 100 watts, there is a HUGE desense 
 on the receive 
 side of things. When we drop the transmitter power level to 
 around 20-50 
 watts, the receive side opens WAY up to a large area where 
 people can get 
 into the repeater. As we begin to bring up the transmitter 
 power, white 
 noise begins to appear and the receive side starts to 
 desense again. All 
 the cables have been switched to double sheilded cables and 
 all the same 
 wavelength in length. We have the duplexer seperated  
 sheilded from the 
 transmitter  preamp parts. We have not replaced the antenna 
 feed coax with 
 double sheilded coax yet. Antenna is a Hustler G7 atop a 55' 
 mast. The 
 duplexer was retuned just over 1 year ago. Any suggestions as 
 to what we 
 could look into next? Some of us believe the problem is with 
 the tuning of 
 the duplexer receive cans. Thank you very much. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



[Repeater-Builder] Re: Wacom WP-639 Duplexer question

2010-09-08 Thread burkleoj
Rich,
While there have been a lot of good suggestions thrown at you, you are fighting 
an uphill battle without knowing the spec's that were obtained when the 
duplexer was re-tuned the last time or finding someone with a tracking 
generator or network analyzer to verify the duplexer tuning.

Simple method to eliminate coax and/or antenna as possible source of your 
desense is to tune it up with a good VHF dummy load. I make the repeater work 
as good as possible running into a dummy load before I connect it to an antenna.

If you discover that as others have stated and I also have found out the same 
results, that your duplexer may not have enough isolation, I recommend adding a 
12 pass cavity between the transmitter and the duplexer as the first step. If 
you are still a little short on isolation, then the addition of another 12 
pass cavity between the receiver and the duplexer may be necessary. I always 
try the cavity on the transmitter side first. For this you need a true pass 
cavity, one that has two connectors and no notch adjustment. Motorola, GE, and 
DB-Products for starters have made these 12 pass cavities since the 70's. 
These pass cavities can often be found used for a reasonable price.

600 KHz split repeaters can be a challenge. I personally like to see a little 
over 100 db of isolation, especially if you have a decent preamp added to the 
receiver.  Kevin is dead-on about how clean tubes can be compared to solid 
state PA's. I can run our UHF Micor tube repeaters at 150 watts with a Angle 
Linear preamp on the receiver, with less isolation required from the duplexer, 
than the same Micor repeater with a 75 watt solid state PA requires for no 
desense.

For example, I have a Motorola Micor 2 Meter 147.250/147.850 repeater running 
in my garage on my test duplexer, which is a Sinclair 6 can that has about 94 
db of isolation. I have the transmitter set at 60 Watts. With no preamp, I have 
no desense and some headroom before any desense would occur. With the factory 
12 db gain Micor preamp, I have no desense, and a little headroom before 
desense would occur. With a Angle Linear or ARR preamp with higher gain, I have 
about 5 db of desense. To eliminate the desense would require another 5 db of 
isolation from the duplexer, which would put it at just about 100 to 102 db of 
required isolation from the duplexer.

Good luck and let us know how you are progressing.

Joe - WA7JAW

 

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, RichardK shutterbug13...@... wrote:

 Good evening, our club has a Wacom WP-639 four can duplexer as part of our 
 repeater system.  Input Fq is 147.915 and Output Fq is 147.315.  We have a 
 600kHz (+) offset.  Very simply, our main problem is when we run the 
 transmitter at full power 100 watts, there is a HUGE desense on the receive 
 side of things.  When we drop the transmitter power level to around 20-50 
 watts, the receive side opens WAY up to a large area where people can get 
 into the repeater.  As we begin to bring up the transmitter power, white 
 noise begins to appear and the receive side starts to desense again.  All 
 the cables have been switched to double sheilded cables and all the same 
 wavelength in length.  We have the duplexer seperated  sheilded from the 
 transmitter  preamp parts.  We have not replaced the antenna feed coax with 
 double sheilded coax yet.  Antenna is a Hustler G7 atop a 55' mast.  The 
 duplexer was retuned just over 1 year ago. Any suggestions as to what we 
 could look into next?  Some of us believe the problem is with the tuning of 
 the duplexer receive cans.  Thank you very much.





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Possible to purchase IRLP node numbers for AllStar nodes to thus enable IRLP connections on AllStar system?

2010-09-08 Thread Kris Kirby
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Kent Johnson wrote:
 Bcc to 2010 VoIP Conference List
 
 -Original Message- From: David Cameron (IRLP) 
 [mailto:dcame...@irlp.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 7:56 AM 
 To: Kent Johnson Subject: Re: Possible to purchase IRLP node numbers 
 for AllStar
 
 Kent, the short answer is no. I have had far too many complaints about
 
 people being brought into full duplex telephone calls and non-radio
 
 endpoints due to Allstar nodes on IRLP.
 
 The philosophy of IRLP is to keep radios on all ends of a link.
 
 Dave Cameron
 
 VE7LTD

I call BS.

--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR
Disinformation Analyst


[Repeater-Builder] 6 Meter Repeater

2010-09-08 Thread Charles Rader
I am tossing around the idea of building a 6 meter repeater.  This will have
to be single site if I do this. What are you guys using for the repeater,
duplexer, and antenna?

 

Thanks,

Charles KC5DGC