[Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR-400 Cable

2008-10-05 Thread George Sintchak
When You say you're hearing a buzz in the background indicates to 
me either severe line noise or, more likely, TV video from some high 
power station TV transmitter. Try a substitute simple home made 
ground plane antenna to rule out intermod generated from the antenna. 
If noise is still present, you probably have to add a bandpass cavity 
between your receiver and the duplexer Rx port to kill out of band 
strong signals. Most duplexers don't have good out of band rejection 
curves, usually only down -20 to -30 dB. Next thing to add would be a 
circulator between your TX output and the duplexer Tx port. I know 
these will add $$$ to your project, but in today's high noise RF 
environments, they are almost always a necessity. YMMV. 

73's, George


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 At 10/3/2008 00:10, you wrote:
 Here is the latest. I terminated the cable at the antenna with a 
dummy 
 load and no desense. I hooked back up to the antenna and if listen 
to the 
 receiver with the squelch
 open I hear a buzz in the background of the receiver white noise 
audio in 
 addition to desense which doesn't show up when terminated.
 
 Sounds like you probably have a mix that's external to your 
hardware, but 
 still possible that the mix is occurring within the shielding of 
the LMR-400.
 
 Bob NO6B





[Repeater-Builder] Re: Krylon Spray Paint

2008-05-04 Thread George Sintchak
Skipp,

I was also surprised by your problem with the Krylon clear spray. 
I have also been using the clear UV-resistant Krylon #1305 spray (NOT 
the regular stuff)for over 45 years on both my ham  commercial 
installations without any problems. The UV clear spray is usually a 
special item available only from Art  picture frame distributors. 
It's usually NOT found in your local hardware or craft store. Even 
the UV stuff will eventually crack/flake off after many years. I 
believe the only thing that has changed in the formula, over the 
years, is the propellant used. YMMV. 

WA2VNV, George

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, skipp025 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Hi Al, 
 
 Might have been another brand of paint but I bought mostly 
 Krylon because it was only $.99 cents a big spray can for 
 many decades. But the clear spray paint did something to the 
 antenna to make it unusable and I still have it here. The 
 issue is how a person should first try to investigate the 
 properties of sealers and paints for RF issues before they 
 hit the same brick wall. 
 
 cheers, 
 s. 
 
  Al Wolfe k9si@ wrote:
 
  Skipp,
  I'm very surprised at your experience with clear Krylon. I 
have
 been 
  using it quite successfully since 1964 in many hundreds of
 commercial as 
  well as amateur antenna projects. It's been S. O. P. to hose down 
all 
  connections and hardware with it after antenna structure and 
electrical 
  connections are assembled. Never had a problem with it effecting
 antenna 
  performance. It dries thin enough that even small screws and nuts
 covered 
  with it can be easily undone. An application of clear Krylon has
 always been 
  the final step in over forty years on antenna work here from 500
 kHz. to 12 
  GHz.
  
  But then I haven't bought a new can of clear Krylon in a year 
or
 two so 
  maybe it's been changed.
  
  73,
  Al, K9SI, retired, mostly
  
  
  
  Re: antenna question - Dip It and Scotch Kote
  Posted by: skipp025 skipp025@ skipp025
  Date: Sun May 4, 2008 6:44 am ((PDT))
  
   I constructed a 6 meter beam some years back, worked like a bomb
   even at 25ft above ground elevation. To ensure my pride and joy
   would last a long time I sprayed it with clear Krylon brand 
spray
   paint.
  
   The antenna was instantly unusable regardless of my efforts to
   remove the paint, re-tune or otherwise modify the antenna. I 
later
   learned that type of paint contained materials with a horible
   D-Factor. I was never able to use the antenna again, although it
   remains in my back yard as a reminder.
  
   cheers,
   s.
 





[Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola N1254A Power Amp for 2M repeater info

2008-04-02 Thread George Sintchak
Eric, 
Tnx for the suggestion - I called Motorola and after navigating - my 
life history, etc. with the call screener - Parts ID said they no 
longer support or have any info on anything this old. I also tried to 
get the 68P manual number so I could search more, but they didn't 
want to look for anything more. Dead end for them. 

How long ago did you get the N1275A manual from them? 

George
WA2VNV 


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 George,
 
 Call Motorola at 800-422-4210, and navigate to Parts ID.  Ask for 
the manual
 number that covers the amp.  That's how I finally located the 
manual for my
 N1275A amplifier.
 
 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George 
Sintchak
 Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 7:48 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola N1254A Power Amp for 2M 
repeater info


SNIP



[Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola N1254A Power Amp for 2M repeater info

2008-04-02 Thread George Sintchak

Ron, 
Tnx for your input. I have an older Mocom70 mobile manual that's no 
help. 

What I'm specifically looking for is the schematic on the Input 
attenuator  RF sense keying PC board, NLD7141A, so I can 
enable/disable the amplifier from the repeater controller. 

This input RF sense keying board would not normally be used in a base 
station or a mobile, so it's a little different. I'd also like to see 
the schematic of the power controller section to see if I could 
utilize the temperature sensor to activate an external heat sink fan. 
I don't like to run a fan continously as they tend to fail after a 
few months. Default case is to key a 12 Volt heat sink fan only on 
transmit - thus I would like to get a schematic of the RF sense 
keying board without having to reverse engineer it - not easy to 
remove. 

George
WA2VNV

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Ron Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 George,
 
 Is this PA in a unified chassis.  Mot built base stations with such 
a PA that was mounted beside the exciter With heat sink sticking 
out.  It used the same PA as in the mobiles.
 
 73, ron, n9ee/r
 
 
 
 
 From: George Sintchak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2008/04/01 Tue PM 09:48:06 CDT
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola N1254A Power Amp for 2M 
repeater info
 
 
 
 Hi All,
 I've searched the archives  website for info on this Amp and 
can't find anything. It's sort of similar to the N1275A or the N1248A 
convert-a-com amps but for a Motorcycle (I was told).  It looks like 
the back end of a MoCom 70 heat sink. I need more specific schematic 
or manual info so I can integrate it into the repeater keying control 
logic.  The Amp is working fine on 147 MHz, keys up on RF input and 
makes rated output. I want to use it in repeater service at reduced 
(~40 Watts) output, possibly with a small fan for cooling, as 
needed.  Anyone have any history/info using this Amp?
 Model N1254A, 150.8 to 162.0 MHz,  Mfg Aug 1977.
 Max input 7 Watts, Output 60 Watts. FCC # CC 3303.
 Power Amp board TLD8922A uses M9622/23/24  two M9625's for final 
transistors.
 Output directional coupler/power monitor board, TLD8922A.
 Input attenuator (-3 dB)  RF sense keying board, NLD7141A.
 Input/Output bypass relays are 23C84103B01.
 Any info, links, etc. much appreciated. 
 Tnx,  73's
 George
  
  




[Repeater-Builder] Motorola N1254A Power Amp for 2M repeater info

2008-04-01 Thread George Sintchak

Hi All,

I've searched the archives  website for info on this Amp and can't find
anything. It's sort of similar to the N1275A or the N1248A convert-a-com
amps but for a Motorcycle (I was told).  It looks like the back end of a
MoCom 70 heat sink. I need more specific schematic or manual info so I
can integrate it into the repeater keying control logic.  The Amp is
working fine on 147 MHz, keys up on RF input and makes rated output. I
want to use it in repeater service at reduced (~40 Watts) output,
possibly with a small fan for cooling, as needed.  Anyone have any
history/info using this Amp?

Model N1254A, 150.8 to 162.0 MHz,  Mfg Aug 1977.

Max input 7 Watts, Output 60 Watts. FCC # CC 3303.

Power Amp board TLD8922A uses M9622/23/24  two M9625's for final
transistors.

Output directional coupler/power monitor board, TLD8922A.

Input attenuator (-3 dB)  RF sense keying board, NLD7141A.

Input/Output bypass relays are 23C84103B01.

Any info, links, etc. much appreciated.

Tnx,  73's

George











[Repeater-Builder] Re: Possible interference on 146.160

2007-11-10 Thread George Sintchak

Some years back, when we installed the repeater (also 146.760/160) in 
a new building, we noticed a weak buzz...buzz signal ~once a second, 
very near the input frequrncy. After much searching, it turned out to 
be the smoke alarm heads within the building, all hard wired into 
their own AC line. Not all of them emitted a signal. Fortunately the 
signal was pretty weak and drifted around somewhat. We use PL on the 
input so it masked the problem so it wasn't a serious problem. Good 
luck hunting.

George


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, lpcoates 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi
 
 Our radio club has a portable repeater on 146.760 (-).  Each time 
we 
 install it on a commercial building we find what appears to be 
 interference on or very near the input frequncy of 146.160.  This 
 repeater was installed at two private homes for several weeks each 
and 
 worked flawlessley.  Tonight it began to act up after just a few 
 minutes.  Another repeater was tried at one of these commercial 
sites 
 and it also appeared to be receiving interference on 146.160.  
Tonight 
 I tried a simple test of tuning my hand held to 146.160 and found 
 several hot spots in the room where I picked up something as well 
as 
 picking up something radiating from the electrical conduit.  Both 
of 
 the commercial sites have elevator equipment, one quite old and one 
 very modern.  One site hosts several other radio systems from 400 
MHz 
 to 10 GHz and the other site has not other radio equipment.  Both 
 buildings are 12 story office buildings.
 
 My question is, have other people found that this frequency is 
 especially prone to interference from nearby electrical and 
electronic 
 equipment?  I know that the output frequency of 146.760 can be a 
 problem because it's very close to the 41nd harmonic of the 
colorburst 
 crystal, but I haven't been able to find any mention of problems on 
the 
 input frequency of 146.160.
 
 Thanks
 
 Bruce - VE5BNC





[Repeater-Builder] Mirage B1016 / B1016G 2 Meter Amplifier

2007-10-06 Thread George Sintchak
I have a Mirage B1016 Amp that uses SRF3417 bipolar transistors as
the finals dated from 1988. I have schematics dated 5-1-84 and also a
newer schematic for the G gasfet version dated 8/7/89 that uses
MRF247's. The amp is operating normal and making rated output power
of 160 Watts in class C FM mode with ~10 Watts input. I'm not over-
driving the amp.

Here's the problem. I'm trying to improve the linearity in SSB mode
(Class AB1) as the amplifier has 2-tone IMD distortion products only
down about -10 dB as measured on my 7L14 spectrum analyzer. They
should be down about -30 dB. Adjusting the bias pot for the finals
makes no improvement in IMD.

The bias network network in my 1988 amplifier doesn't match the
schematic and uses some unusual(?)circuit involving a 7808 TO-220
voltage regulator that seems to derive power from rectification of
the input drive signal. It also uses two 30 Ohm 5W resistors instead
of the 50 Ohm 5W resistors as shown on the schematics. I suspect
Mirage used this method as there is no keyed +13.6 Volts to supply
the 7808 in the usual case. The regulator is not damaged as it
supplies the standard 8 Volts when I power it directly from 13 V with
a clip lead. In regular RF operation, I don't see any 8 volts on the
7808 output. The newer G version schematic uses the 50 Ohm
resistors and ties the red Xmit LED into the circuit as part of the
self bias network. No 7808 shown.

Does anyone have a schematic that shows the 7808 bias circuit for my
1988 Amp? I've done the usual internet searching and found nothing
about it. Do I have a one of a kind factory experiment? Any ideas?

George, WA2VNV




[Repeater-Builder] Milcom/Uniden ARX2125 220MHz Amplifier - Need Parts

2007-09-21 Thread George Sintchak
Anyone have an extra Amp available for spare parts. It looks like I've 
lost one of the finals due to self oscillation and destruction.  
Polyfet has a few in stock (lotsa $$$) but it's no longer reccommended 
for new designs.  I can't seem to find a suitable (newer)substitute 
using the AT package.  Any Ideas out there? 

George, WA2VNV



[Repeater-Builder] Re: First repeater?

2007-06-26 Thread George Sintchak
I remember reading an article about a repeater in the late 40's or 
early 50's that was on a mountain top in Arizona. It was AM mode, 
repeated from 28 MHz (I think) to 50 or 144 Mhz, or maybe it was 
split site. To be legal, all was logged on a very slow tape recorder. 
That's about all I can remember - do a search on that. There might be 
an article on it in the QST archives.

George, WA2VNV


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, mch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I know this is somewhat controversial, but I'm looking for the 
date/year
 the first ham repeater was put on the air. Anyone know of a webpage 
with
 repeater history? Would like to have this info tonight for a
 presentation tomorrow.
 
 Joe M.





[Repeater-Builder] Re: Repeater Builder language

2007-03-25 Thread George Sintchak
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. 
The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at 
Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a 
wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be 
in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed 
it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed 
ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and 
I awlyas thought slpeling was ipmorantt! Jsut ejony a good lugah.

QED




[Repeater-Builder] Milcom/Uniden ARX2125 220 MHz Amplifier schematics/info

2007-02-22 Thread George Sintchak
Hello all. I'm looking for more info, schematics, etc on this nice 220 
MHz amp, built around 1992. I have the info that N2CKH has posted on 
his website (see http://www.n2ckh.com/125m_rptr.htm) but I would like 
more specific info (schematics) about this amplifier chassis. I've 
searched the 'net and both Uniden  Milcom websites without any other 
results. This Amp was part of the now defunct ACSB system that UPS was 
going to use back when we lost part of the 220 band. Any new info would 
be helpful. ( I already have info on the CA2832C hybrid and the Polyfet 
F1004 devices)
Tnx, 
George, WA2VNV



[Repeater-Builder] Re: 1953 Motorola BaseRadio for 6meters

2007-02-19 Thread George Sintchak
Gez! Sorry for your confusion. The It in the sentance referred 
to the preceeding noun, that being receivers, meaning that 
the Sensicon A series receivers all had miniature tubes. The 
receiver I think you have, a 13V(A), has all Loctal tubes (do yo 
know what they are?). As I asked earlier, What is the model number 
stamped on the front panel?
George


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Rod Shaner [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 That's really weird, because it's all enclosed in a metal box, and 
the  
 only visible connector is a RCA connector on each end! There 
doesn't SEEM  
 to be any plethora of tube supply wires, etc..I'll have to look 
again.
 R.
 
 On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:53:30 -0500, George Sintchak [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 wrote:
 
  The K-8436-A Permakay filter (first generation)was the large sized
  455 kHz unit that was used in the Sensicon A series receivers. 
It
  had all miniature tubes. That filter was superceeded with the 
TU455
  series (smaller size - 2nd generation) 455 kHz filters used in
  the Unichannel G (and other) series receivers.
  George
 
  --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Rod Shaner kb8fly@
  wrote:
 
  How about this:
  Filter number on I.F. is K-8436-A. Possibly K-6436-A (hard to
  resolve
  whether it's an eight or a six.)
 
  Another idea:
  How about using enough preamps that the selectivity is increased
  and
  sensitivity (spread) is decreased?
  As I understand it, the receiver is too broadbanded at present 
by a
  factor
  of 3.
SNIP



[Repeater-Builder] Re: 1953 Motorola BaseRadio for 6meters

2007-02-18 Thread George Sintchak
I remember having a similar 6 Volt Tx/Rx version in the mobile. That 
vintage Xmtr used 807's in the final for 50 Watts output and an AT 
cut FT243 xtal running at 1.0943 MHz with 48 times multiplication to 
get adequate deviation of +/-15 kHz. The xtal would rattle in it's 
holder. (that was normal) It was a MONSTER TVI generator in it's 
day because it put out spurs +/- 1.09 MHz either side of the main 
carrier for about +/- 5 MHz. They were only down about 20 dB due to 
the large 48x multiplication and not enough selectivity in the stages 
to eliminate the unwanted emissions. (There's a story here how I 
ended up on 6M FM back in ~1961 on 52.525  52.640; wow, it's been a 
long time!)

The receivers (13VA) didn't have the (newer research line) Permakay 
455 kHz IF filter and the rcvr selectivity was determined by the 1.7 
MHz last IF stages. Tubes are mostly Loctal types, hard to find 
today. Not too practical to narrowband these old clunkers. Sad to 
say, they belong on a shelf in a Museum somewhere. That being said, 
I'm still using a high band version (16VA) of the same rcvr on 2 
Meters as a repeater monitor receiver. The (then) wide band channel 
spacing was 120 or 240 KHz on high band. The broadcast people liked 
to use this family of receivers because it has a 600 Ohm audio output 
winding along with the 4 Ohms for the spkr. They made nice HiFi audio 
studio link 150 MHz receivers and could feed dedicated phone lines 
directly.

Good luck with your project. You need to find someone who still has 
one of the infamous red or yellow Motorola schematic books that 
Sherman Wolf published in Boston in the late 60's for more info. 

George, WA2VNV.


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, rod_shaner [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Hi all,
 I'm seeking schematics, manuals, and advice on peaking a working 
 unit. Its model number is FSTR520BR(FW)1ASP2. Just tearing that 
model 
 number apart is a workload!
 It was a commercial base radio, and it's crystalled for 52.525 FM. 
 Right now I'm trying to get as much as possible out of the 
receiver. 
 It works, but 25 mile away 40W signal radiated through a vertical 
 antenna is just out of the noise on this end. My receive antenna's 
 base is 30 inches off the ground for test purposes.
 
 Advice is requested.
 
 Thanks.





[Repeater-Builder] Re: 1953 Motorola BaseRadio for 6meters

2007-02-18 Thread George Sintchak
As I mentioned in my earlier posting, The last IF is probably 1.7 MHz 
if the receiver model is a FMRU13V(A). A rcvr without the (A) in 
the model number was a less selective receiver that (I believe) used 
a higher freq last IF. That may be what you have with the 2.9 MHz 
last IF for low band receiver. NONE of these receivers had any type 
of Permakay filter or a 455 kHz last IF! What is the complete model 
number stamped on the blue front panel of the receiver under the 
Motorola name? You really need one of those Yellow schematic books 
I mentioned before. You are really testing my memory on all of 
this

George

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Rod Shaner [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 What is the IF for this 1953 Motorola 520BR rig? 2.9MHz??
 
 R.
 
 On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 20:09:50 -0500, Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  www.com-spec.com/narrow.htm
 
 
 
 -- 
 Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: 
http://www.opera.com/mail/





[Repeater-Builder] Re: Super Sataionmaster Disassembly

2007-01-13 Thread George Sintchak
Steve, I will send you an email with description  pictures of PD220 
antenna dissassenbly I did about a year ago. I want to contribute this 
as an article for the group, but didn't have the time to finish it up 
yet, but all the info you need is included. Need ur email address.

George / WA2VNV





[Repeater-Builder] Re: Micro Exciter, Low Output?

2006-05-29 Thread George Sintchak
Don, You don't mention what band/frequency the Micor is on, (I assume 
UHF) and if you have a station monitor as you stated, it has a 
wattmeter built in that can measure the power level from the low 
level exciter board up through the output stage. Of course, you'll 
need an RF RCA connector to connect to the low level exciter board 
output. Not sure what you mean by the statement What 
difference should I see in exciter output from sitting in an no 
receive, idle state, opposed to transmitting? ???

George

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, donlspivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 I'm currently in the process of converting a Micor (unified type 
 chassis) base station to repeater duty. I have all factory docs, a 
 service monitor and a Motorola test set, unfortunately I don't have 
a 
 low wattage slug for my wattmeter.
 
 I was fortunate (dumb luck, I guess) to find two Micor Unified 
chassis 
 with ALL ham band split components, (one is missing the PA and 
power 
 control boards, but it has the good receiver). I've got it up and 
 running using the original squelch gate card and station control 
 module for now. It receives great, the COR is tripping but it's not 
 yet transmitting.
 
 Not having a means of measuring the 400mw output of the exciter, 
I'm 
 depending on the ball park readings the manual and various 
articles 
 I've found say the test set should be displaying. 
 
 I tuned the exciter as per the manual, however, when plugging the 
test 
 set into the PA and switched to position 1, the manual says there 
 should be a reading of 15uA which is drive from the exciter, I'm 
only 
 seeing 3 or 4uA. I tuned up the second exciter and see the same 
 reading. I swapped the exciter filter and no change. I even took a 
 TFD6112APR filter, drilled holes to allow retuning and tuned it 
under 
 operating conditions, same reading.
 
 I'm either seeing a false reading from the test set or there's a 
 problem with the PA/power control board (if it's not an issue with 
the 
 exciter(s), of course). 
 
 I did not have the luxury of testing the base station first, the 
 crystals were removed from the channel elements. Yes weird, but I 
 believe these base stations were used by the FBI at one time.
 
 Also, I currently have the xmit channel element running all the 
time. 
 I may not leave it this way, but this machine is going to a site of 
 limited accessibility and I want to age the crystal. What 
difference 
 should I see in exciter output from sitting in an no receive, idle 
 state, opposed to transmitting?
 
 I could be missing something simple and obvious here, but I would 
 appreciate a push in the right direction as well as any tips and 
 tricks you guys may have to help me finish this project. Thanks.
 
 Don









 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Info needed. 450 MHz, 75 Watt Amp Micor TLE1713A-3

2006-03-13 Thread George Sintchak
Micor series TLE1713A-3.  Looking for schematics, metering info, etc. 
and/or a manual if you have one to spare or can copy part of a manual. 
For non-commercial use in an amatuer repeater. The amplifier seems to 
be working fine. 2 Watts in ~90+ max Watts out (un-controlled) at 449 
MHz. I will be controlling the output to use at the ~50-60 Watt level. 
I just need documentation at the rptr site for future reference. This 
way, if I have the documentation, I'll never need to fix it - Inverse 
Murphy's Law.  :D  Tnx.

George, WA2VNV







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/