Re: [ReviewBoard 1.5] RC1 to RC3 upgrade communication explenation
The randpool thing is just a warning from a third party library. You can ignore it. It shouldn't cause any problems, and is something we have no control over. The lines in red are harmless as well. Doing a database upgrade causes those to print, and then we apply the evolution for you, so you don't have to do anything. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Jan Koprowski jan.koprow...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, While upgrading I get something like this: Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. Upgrading Review Board from 1.5 RC1 to 1.5 RC3 (dev) red There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. /red red Project signature has changed - an evolution is required /red No fixtures found. how fix this /user/gkblditp/system/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ pycrypto-2.3-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This application uses RandomPool, which is BROKEN in older releases. See http://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken /how fix this Evolution successful. Upgrade complete. What is it mean? Regards, Jan Koprowski -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: [ReviewBoard 1.5] RC1 to RC3 upgrade communication explenation
Speaking of which. Is 1.5 RC3 (dev) coming off the release-1.5.x branch or master? -David On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: The randpool thing is just a warning from a third party library. You can ignore it. It shouldn't cause any problems, and is something we have no control over. The lines in red are harmless as well. Doing a database upgrade causes those to print, and then we apply the evolution for you, so you don't have to do anything. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Jan Koprowski jan.koprow...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, While upgrading I get something like this: Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. Upgrading Review Board from 1.5 RC1 to 1.5 RC3 (dev) red There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. /red red Project signature has changed - an evolution is required /red No fixtures found. how fix this /user/gkblditp/system/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ pycrypto-2.3-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This application uses RandomPool, which is BROKEN in older releases. See http://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken /how fix this Evolution successful. Upgrade complete. What is it mean? Regards, Jan Koprowski -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: [ReviewBoard 1.5] RC1 to RC3 upgrade communication explenation
I get it from master. Thanks :) On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 8:35 AM, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote: Speaking of which. Is 1.5 RC3 (dev) coming off the release-1.5.x branch or master? -David On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: The randpool thing is just a warning from a third party library. You can ignore it. It shouldn't cause any problems, and is something we have no control over. The lines in red are harmless as well. Doing a database upgrade causes those to print, and then we apply the evolution for you, so you don't have to do anything. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Jan Koprowski jan.koprow...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, While upgrading I get something like this: Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. Upgrading Review Board from 1.5 RC1 to 1.5 RC3 (dev) red There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. /red red Project signature has changed - an evolution is required /red No fixtures found. how fix this /user/gkblditp/system/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ pycrypto-2.3-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This application uses RandomPool, which is BROKEN in older releases. See http://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken /how fix this Evolution successful. Upgrade complete. What is it mean? Regards, Jan Koprowski -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Jan Koprowski -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Cannot see the SVN repositories in the combo when creating a request.
I setup the server (Debian 5.0) as explained in the documentation http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/linux/. All apt-get and easy_install commands worked successfully. # rb-site --version rb-site 0.1 ||/ Name Version +++-==- ii memcached 1.2.2-1+lenny1 ii patch 2.5.9-5 ii python-dev 2.5.2-3 ii python-mysqldb 1.2.2-7 ii python-svn 1.6.0-1 # easy_install -U ReviewBoard Searching for ReviewBoard Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/ Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/ Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/ Reading http://www.review-board.org/ Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/ Best match: ReviewBoard 1.0.9 Processing ReviewBoard-1.0.9-py2.5.egg ReviewBoard 1.0.9 is already the active version in easy-install.pth Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin Using /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.9-py2.5.egg Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/ Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard Finished processing dependencies for ReviewBoard Thanks for your help Didier On 09/28/2010 09:02 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: What version of Review Board are you using? Most likely, you don't have the proper pysvn package installed. Make sure the 'python-svn' Debian package is installed. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com mailto:chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 7:07 AM, dtrosset did...@trosset.fr mailto:did...@trosset.fr wrote: Bonjour, I installed reviewboard successfully, using apache, mod_python and mysql on a Debian system. I created some users, and two SVN repositories. But when I want to create a Review Request, the Repositories combo box is empty. No way to create a request. What did I do wrong? Thanks Didier -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com mailto:reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: How to use post-review with a private GitHub repository?
Hello, Christian.
Thank you very much for your response.
Yes, I configured the repository the way you said. But I just noticed
that the problem was that Review Board wasn't generating the right
raw file URL mask for organization accounts. I had to change it
from:
http://github.com/api/v2/yaml/blob/show/ORGANIZATION/PROJECT/revision?login=ORGANIZATIONtoken=MY_API_TOKEN
to:
http://github.com/api/v2/yaml/blob/show/ORGANIZATION/PROJECT/revision?login=MEtoken=MY_API_TOKEN
Even though I had set the username to ME in the form.
However, it's still not working and I think this time it's a bug:
=
Uploading diff, size: 648218
HTTP POSTing to
https://example.org/reviews/api/json/reviewrequests/62/diff/new/: {}
Got API Error 105 (HTTP code 200): One or more fields had errors
Error data: {'fields': {'path': [object of type 'Revision' has no
len()]}, 'stat': 'fail', 'err': {'msg': 'One or more fields had errors',
'code': 105}, 'deprecated': {'in_version': '1.5'}}
Error uploading diff
The generated diff file was empty. This usually means no files were
modified in this change.
Try running with --output-diff and --debug for more information.
Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached.
=
I can see the following traceback in the Apache logs:
=
ERROR:root:Error uploading new diff: object of type 'Revision' has no
len()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /srv/dev/review-board/virtualenv/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.5rc2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/webapi/json.py, line 1169,
in new_diff
request.FILES.get('parent_diff_path'))
File /srv/dev/review-board/virtualenv/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.5rc2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/reviews/forms.py, line 249,
in create
history)
File /srv/dev/review-board/virtualenv/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.5rc2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line
63, in create
diff_file, basedir, check_existance=(not parent_diff_file)))
File /srv/dev/review-board/virtualenv/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.5rc2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line
137, in _process_files
f2, revision = tool.parse_diff_revision(f.origFile, f.origInfo)
File /srv/dev/review-board/virtualenv/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.5rc2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/git.py, line 82, in
parse_diff_revision
self.client.validate_sha1_format(file_str, revision)
File /srv/dev/review-board/virtualenv/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.5rc2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/git.py, line 348,
in validate_sha1_format
if self.raw_file_url and len(sha1) != self.FULL_SHA1_LENGTH:
TypeError: object of type 'Revision' has no len()
=
Cheers,
- Gustavo.
On Sep 28, 6:49 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
When adding the repository entries, did you type the paths by hand?
You should make sure to configure the repository with a Hosting Service of
GitHub (Private) and then fill in the requested fields from there. You
will need your API Token from your GitHub account (the one owning the
project in question).
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Gustavo Narea
gna...@tech.2degreesnetwork.com wrote:
Hello,
I cannot find the way to get post-review to work with a private GitHub
repository. Can you please give me a hand? This is driving me crazy,
specially after spending days migrating to Git pretty much to use
Review Board. :)
I have successfully configured the repository on the Web interface and
I have a local mirror of that repository, which I had to create just
to be able to run post-review (it errors out if I call it from another
directory); both repositories are registered in Review Board (i.e.,
g...@github.com:us/project.git and /srv/mirror/project).
I'm trying to generate a review for all the changes that happened in a
feature branch, which was started from master. This is how I run it:
$ cd /srv/mirror/project
$ post-review --server=http://example.org/reviews/--guess-summary --
guess-description --username=foo --password=bar --submit-as=baz --
tracking-branch=origin/master
But I get the following:
(...)
Uploading diff, size: 648218
HTTP POSTing to
http://example.org/reviews/api/json/reviewrequests/57/diff/new/:{}
Got API Error 207 (HTTP code 200): The file was not found in the
repository
Error data: {'deprecated': {'in_version': '1.5'}, 'stat': 'fail',
'file': '.bzrignore', 'err': {'msg': 'The file was not found in the
repository', 'code': 207}, 'revision':
'e4537c290c47cd2946318c6e02f2edb6d7a732b7'}
Error uploading diff
Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached.
If I add the --output-diff, I get the diff and seems OK.
I think the fact that it fails with the file .bzrignore is a
coincidence and is nothing to do
Re: How to use post-review with a private GitHub repository?
I forgot to mention how I'm running post-review:
$ cd /srv/mirrors/project
$ post-review --server=http://example.org/reviews/ --guess-summary
--guess-description --username=foo --password=baz --submit-as=bar --
tracking-branch=origin/master -d
Cheers.
On Sep 29, 10:40 am, Gustavo Narea gna...@tech.2degreesnetwork.com
wrote:
Hello, Christian.
Thank you very much for your response.
Yes, I configured the repository the way you said. But I just noticed
that the problem was that Review Board wasn't generating the right
raw file URL mask for organization accounts. I had to change it
from:
http://github.com/api/v2/yaml/blob/show/ORGANIZATION/PROJECT/revision?login=ORGANIZATIONtoken=MY_API_TOKEN
to:
http://github.com/api/v2/yaml/blob/show/ORGANIZATION/PROJECT/revision?login=MEtoken=MY_API_TOKEN
Even though I had set the username to ME in the form.
However, it's still not working and I think this time it's a bug:
=
Uploading diff, size: 648218
HTTP POSTing
tohttps://example.org/reviews/api/json/reviewrequests/62/diff/new/:{}
Got API Error 105 (HTTP code 200): One or more fields had errors
Error data: {'fields': {'path': [object of type 'Revision' has no
len()]}, 'stat': 'fail', 'err': {'msg': 'One or more fields had errors',
'code': 105}, 'deprecated': {'in_version': '1.5'}}
Error uploading diff
The generated diff file was empty. This usually means no files were
modified in this change.
Try running with --output-diff and --debug for more information.
Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached.
=
I can see the following traceback in the Apache logs:
=
ERROR:root:Error uploading new diff: object of type 'Revision' has no
len()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /srv/dev/review-board/virtualenv/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.5rc2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/webapi/json.py, line 1169,
in new_diff
request.FILES.get('parent_diff_path'))
File /srv/dev/review-board/virtualenv/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.5rc2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/reviews/forms.py, line 249,
in create
history)
File /srv/dev/review-board/virtualenv/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.5rc2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line
63, in create
diff_file, basedir, check_existance=(not parent_diff_file)))
File /srv/dev/review-board/virtualenv/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.5rc2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line
137, in _process_files
f2, revision = tool.parse_diff_revision(f.origFile, f.origInfo)
File /srv/dev/review-board/virtualenv/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.5rc2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/git.py, line 82, in
parse_diff_revision
self.client.validate_sha1_format(file_str, revision)
File /srv/dev/review-board/virtualenv/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.5rc2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/git.py, line 348,
in validate_sha1_format
if self.raw_file_url and len(sha1) != self.FULL_SHA1_LENGTH:
TypeError: object of type 'Revision' has no len()
=
Cheers,
- Gustavo.
On Sep 28, 6:49 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
When adding the repository entries, did you type the paths by hand?
You should make sure to configure the repository with a Hosting Service of
GitHub (Private) and then fill in the requested fields from there. You
will need your API Token from your GitHub account (the one owning the
project in question).
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Gustavo Narea
gna...@tech.2degreesnetwork.com wrote:
Hello,
I cannot find the way to get post-review to work with a private GitHub
repository. Can you please give me a hand? This is driving me crazy,
specially after spending days migrating to Git pretty much to use
Review Board. :)
I have successfully configured the repository on the Web interface and
I have a local mirror of that repository, which I had to create just
to be able to run post-review (it errors out if I call it from another
directory); both repositories are registered in Review Board (i.e.,
g...@github.com:us/project.git and /srv/mirror/project).
I'm trying to generate a review for all the changes that happened in a
feature branch, which was started from master. This is how I run it:
$ cd /srv/mirror/project
$ post-review --server=http://example.org/reviews/--guess-summary--
guess-description --username=foo --password=bar --submit-as=baz --
tracking-branch=origin/master
But I get the following:
(...)
Uploading diff, size: 648218
HTTP POSTing to
http://example.org/reviews/api/json/reviewrequests/57/diff/new/:{}
Got API Error 207 (HTTP code 200): The file was not found in the
repository
Error data: {'deprecated': {'in_version':
Re: RB and GIT configuration
Hello Mr. Christian, I have upgraded to rc2 and given the gitweb link. But i still get error stating A repository was not found at the specified path. When i login to gitweb i can see the repository but when i give the same in the path it gives error. Can i get some examples. Or shall i send u actual snapshots of the links so that it is much clear? Details regarding ny git setup: Setup on Ubuntu server Is a private setup Using gerrit for authentication Regards, Chetan D On Sep 28, 3:37 pm, Chetan chetan@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Can anyone share me the steps to configure RB with GIT version control system. I access my git repo from ubuntu by executing git clone ssh://user_id@ip_address:port_no/tst_prj.git Now when i try to give ssh://user_id@ip_address:port_no/tst_prj.git as the PATH value under new repository tab i get below error. (New repository-repository Hosting- Path) (-2, 'Name or service not known') The git project is on a seperate GIT server inside the organisation. It is a private git setup. RB and GIT are on 2 different servers. I have not cloned the git repository on RB server. Request your assistance on setting up GIT with RB -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Manual server updates required: Install GNU Patch problem after installation on Windows/Apache
Have insalled memcached and restarted apache afterward. It made no difference. Can anyone help? I really want to use this product for my whole team but if the installation is this hard I will have to look at alternatives. Thanks On Sep 20, 1:11 pm, Ian ian.cr...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Tim. I have followed your advice as closely as I can, though our setups differ slightly: * I did not install memcached (maybe this is my problem?) * I am using SQL lite * I am using Python 2.5 So here's what I did do after reading your post: * GNU Patch originally installed itself at C:\Program Files (x86)\GnuWin32 on my system. I copied it to C:\GnuWin32 to mirror your setup in case the spaces/path length were a problem. * I copied patch.exe to c:\windows\system32 * I changed my system path to mimic yours as close as possible: c: \python25;C:\Python25\Scripts;c:\GnuWin32\bin;%SystemRoot% \system32;%SystemRoot%;%SystemRoot%\System32\Wbem * I didn't add C:\PHP or C:\MySQL\MySQL Server 5.1\bin to the PATH as I don't have these in my setup. I then restarted apache and still the same problem. I then rebooted and still no good. I am now thinking I should try installing memcached as this appears to be the only significant difference between your system and mine. Will update when I have tried this. Any other thoughts appreciated. On Sep 18, 2:58 am, Tim Pinet tim.pi...@gmail.com wrote: I had a hell of a time to get patch.exe to work too. I had to put it in C:\GnuWin32\bin and C:\Windows\system32 and set my PATH environment variable to: C:\GnuWin32\bin;C:\PHP\;%SystemRoot%\system32;%SystemRoot%;%SystemRoot%\Syst em32\Wbem;C:\MySQL\MySQL Server 5.1\bin;C:\Python26;C:\Python26\Scripts I wrote my entire install experience in my blog (http://blogs.pinet.ca/tim/2010/08/24/code-review-goodness-with-review... ). Tim -Original Message- From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ian Sent: September-17-10 12:36 PM To: reviewboard Subject: Manual server updates required: Install GNU Patch problem after installation on Windows/Apache Hi guys, I see a number of people have had this issue but none of their resolutions have helped me so I post again. I have installed everything on Windows following the instructions and all I see when I browse the site is Manual server updates required and underneath that Install GNU patch.exe. * Patch is installed and I can run it from the command line. * It is on my system path. * I have tried changing Apache to run as myself so it has full priveleges and this did not work * I have tried copying patch to Apache's bin folder, this did not work. * There are no logs in my RB installation dir. Apache has some logs about Python version Python version mismatch, expected '2.5', found '2.5.4'. but I'm not sure this is a serious issue. Can someone help me? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Cannot see the SVN repositories in the combo when creating a request.
It's fixed. Someone messed around with the pysvn installation in the directory /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ . Simple as this! Thanks to activating the logs (I didn't realize until very recently that they need to be activated through the django AdminitstratorUI) I had indications that helped me finding the cause of the issue. Thanks anyway. Didier On 09/29/2010 09:06 AM, Didier Trosset wrote: I setup the server (Debian 5.0) as explained in the documentation http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/linux/. All apt-get and easy_install commands worked successfully. # rb-site --version rb-site 0.1 ||/ Name Version +++-==- ii memcached 1.2.2-1+lenny1 ii patch 2.5.9-5 ii python-dev 2.5.2-3 ii python-mysqldb 1.2.2-7 ii python-svn 1.6.0-1 # easy_install -U ReviewBoard Searching for ReviewBoard Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/ Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/ Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/ Reading http://www.review-board.org/ Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/ Best match: ReviewBoard 1.0.9 Processing ReviewBoard-1.0.9-py2.5.egg ReviewBoard 1.0.9 is already the active version in easy-install.pth Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin Using /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.9-py2.5.egg Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/ Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard Finished processing dependencies for ReviewBoard Thanks for your help Didier On 09/28/2010 09:02 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: What version of Review Board are you using? Most likely, you don't have the proper pysvn package installed. Make sure the 'python-svn' Debian package is installed. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com mailto:chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 7:07 AM, dtrosset did...@trosset.fr mailto:did...@trosset.fr wrote: Bonjour, I installed reviewboard successfully, using apache, mod_python and mysql on a Debian system. I created some users, and two SVN repositories. But when I want to create a Review Request, the Repositories combo box is empty. No way to create a request. What did I do wrong? Thanks Didier -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com mailto:reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Cannot see the SVN repositories in the combo when creating a request.
FYI, I do not see the Show this repository option that is told about in the Manage Repositories documentation page. It looks like this documentation is for 1.5rc. I had a look in the MySQL tables, there's no such field in the corresponding table. BTW, I'd be glad to test 1.5. Just don't know how to set it up. Didier On 09/29/2010 09:06 AM, Didier Trosset wrote: I setup the server (Debian 5.0) as explained in the documentation http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/linux/. All apt-get and easy_install commands worked successfully. # rb-site --version rb-site 0.1 ||/ Name Version +++-==- ii memcached 1.2.2-1+lenny1 ii patch 2.5.9-5 ii python-dev 2.5.2-3 ii python-mysqldb 1.2.2-7 ii python-svn 1.6.0-1 # easy_install -U ReviewBoard Searching for ReviewBoard Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/ Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/ Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/ Reading http://www.review-board.org/ Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/ Best match: ReviewBoard 1.0.9 Processing ReviewBoard-1.0.9-py2.5.egg ReviewBoard 1.0.9 is already the active version in easy-install.pth Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin Using /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.9-py2.5.egg Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/ Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard Finished processing dependencies for ReviewBoard Thanks for your help Didier On 09/28/2010 09:02 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: What version of Review Board are you using? Most likely, you don't have the proper pysvn package installed. Make sure the 'python-svn' Debian package is installed. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com mailto:chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 7:07 AM, dtrosset did...@trosset.fr mailto:did...@trosset.fr wrote: Bonjour, I installed reviewboard successfully, using apache, mod_python and mysql on a Debian system. I created some users, and two SVN repositories. But when I want to create a Review Request, the Repositories combo box is empty. No way to create a request. What did I do wrong? Thanks Didier -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com mailto:reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Issue 1657 in reviewboard: Diff viewer path2id missing attribute error in ReviewBoard 1.0.8 with Bazaar
Comment #4 on issue 1657 by julian.mehnle: Diff viewer path2id missing attribute error in ReviewBoard 1.0.8 with Bazaar http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1657 Here's the stack trace from my Apache error log. Attachments: reviewboard-bzr-NoneType-object-has-no-attribute-path2id-stacktrace.txt 5.0 KB -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1657 in reviewboard: Diff viewer path2id missing attribute error in ReviewBoard 1.0.8 with Bazaar
Comment #5 on issue 1657 by julian.mehnle: Diff viewer path2id missing attribute error in ReviewBoard 1.0.8 with Bazaar http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1657 Here's the (correct) stack trace from my Apache error log. Attachments: reviewboard-bzr-NoneType-object-has-no-attribute-path2id-stacktrace.txt 5.2 KB -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1657 in reviewboard: Diff viewer path2id missing attribute error in ReviewBoard 1.0.8 with Bazaar
Comment #6 on issue 1657 by julian.mehnle: Diff viewer path2id missing attribute error in ReviewBoard 1.0.8 with Bazaar http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1657 The repository path is bzr+ssh://anonbzr@hostname/trunk/. The diff changes one file, config/database.yml.sample. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 1834 in reviewboard: GitHub support should accommodate GitHub Organizations
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 1834 by mike.d.conley: GitHub support should accommodate GitHub Organizations http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1834 *NOTE: If you have a patch, please submit it to http://reviews.reviewboard.org/ What version are you running? 1.5RC2 What's the URL of the page this enhancement relates to, if any? http://github.com/blog/674-introducing-organizations Describe the enhancement and the motivation for it. On June 29th, 2010, GitHub introduced organizations for project management. This changes the permission structure somewhat, and Review Board's GitHub support doesn't let us use it. What operating system are you using? What browser? Ubuntu Lucid, Firefox 3.6 Please provide any additional information below. We've got a workaround with a post-receive hook on GitHub causing a pull on a server-local copy of the repository, so this isn't critical for us. Just something you might want for the future. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 1835 in reviewboard: Update Djblets' versions of jQuery and jQuery UI
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 1835 by ben.hollis: Update Djblets' versions of jQuery and jQuery UI http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1835 What version are you running? 0.6.3 Djblets is using jQuery 1.3.2 and jQuery UI 1.6rc5. It'd be nice if it could upgrade those packages in order to take advantage of the speed and bugfixes of the jQuery 1.4.2 and jQuery UI 1.8.5 releases. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1834 in reviewboard: GitHub support should accommodate GitHub Organizations
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Labels: Component-SCMTools Milestone-Release1.5.x Comment #1 on issue 1834 by chipx86: GitHub support should accommodate GitHub Organizations http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1834 Thanks for the info. I wasn't aware of the new Organizations support, but it looks very interesting. So the GitHub hosting option in Review Board won't work with the Organizations? The raw URL is basically incorrect I assume? Do you have an organization I can look at that's public? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1834 in reviewboard: GitHub support should accommodate GitHub Organizations
Updates: Status: Confirmed Comment #3 on issue 1834 by chipx86: GitHub support should accommodate GitHub Organizations http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1834 Okay. I'll look at this for 1.5.1. I want to get RB moved onto this now. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 1836 in reviewboard: Comment flags appearing in wrong positions in the diff or not appearing at all.
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1836 by sst...@mdtadvisers.com: Comment flags appearing in wrong positions in the diff or not appearing at all. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1836 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What version are you running? 1.0.5 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? https://plapp01mdt:9444/r/568/#review207 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Add a large number of comments to a large diff. 2. Publish the review. 3. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? When I use the e-mail link to access the review and then view the diff, the comment flags are moving to new locations each time I open the diff. Some comment flags are not appearing at all. As you can see from the URL, we have over 500 reviews in our system and we have 2000+ comments in the system. This review had 22 comments in it. What operating system are you using? What browser? Windows XP. Internet Explorer 8. Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1657 in reviewboard: Diff viewer path2id missing attribute error in ReviewBoard 1.0.8 with Bazaar
Comment #7 on issue 1657 by julian.mehnle: Diff viewer path2id missing attribute error in ReviewBoard 1.0.8 with Bazaar http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1657 I also tried using a *local* bzr repository, but I get the same behavior, so this is not specific to bzr+ssh repos. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1800 in reviewboard: Error uploading updated diff
Comment #4 on issue 1800 by 12gaugemedia: Error uploading updated diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1800 Any thoughts on this? I'd like to make sure these changes get into the next release. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
