date:20120120

ReviewBoard and Active Directory issue: DEBUG - Search root

2012-01-20 Thread slaventii

Hello,
I tried to setup ReviewBoard with Active Directory but I cant login
with my domain account.
In log I found:
2012-01-20 03:43:19,841 - DEBUG - Search root dc=domain,dc=local

Authentication Method:Active Directory
Domain name:domain.local
Use TLS for authentication: with and without same result
Domain controller:dc.domain.local


I added ldap.set_option(ldap.OPT_X_TLS_REQUIRE_CERT,
ldap.OPT_X_TLS_ALLOW in /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.6.3-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/accounts/backends.py to work
with TSL

What I missing ?

Thanks.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Migrating Review Board Database

2012-01-20 Thread Chris Baron

Thanks for the responses.

From the command line, I did an rb-site --version and '0.1' was
returned.

How would I let django evolutions do its thing ?

On Jan 20, 1:10 am, Anton Cohen an...@antoncohen.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Chris Baron topher.ba...@gmail.comwrote:

  There is a reviewboard 0.1 version in production.

  There is a 1.6 version in a test environment.  Anyone have suggestions
  on the best way to copy the 0.1 production data, transform it into 1.6
  data?

 What will need to be done will depend on the specific version you are
 moving from, and what is missing/different in the database. I did a
 migration from a pre-1.0 to 1.5.5. Though it wasn't 0.1, if it had a
 version it probably would have been something like 0.9.

 I detailed the upgrade in this 
 post:http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/msg/5b445e99632190ab

 If your old version is close enough to 1.0 you may not need to
 manually manipulate the database at all, just install a new site with a
 dump of the old database, and let the Django evolutions do their thing. If
 your old version is really, really old, there may be a lot of manual DB
 manipulation. I was pretty lucky that there was only one table missing and
 I could copy the whole table from a new install.

 -Anton

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Can't install; FTP blocked

2012-01-20 Thread Laurent

Hi,

I'm trying to install ReviewBoard on a new server here (at work). We
must go through a proxy to access the outside, and direct FTP is
blocked.

I've been able to install most components by supplying an HTTP proxy
to various tools, but I've hit a wall with P4PythonInstaller.

From looking at the code, it seems to connect via FTP to
ftp.perforce.com to grab some files. This is blocked in our network,
but could be possible through the HTTP proxy.

I believe there's two solutions, both of which I would like an answer
for:
- Which files are actually needed? I might manage to grab the files
from another computer and move them to the linux box hosting this, so
that the setup.py file doesn't try to download them.
- How to tell the script to use our proxy instead? Or maybe grab the
files from HTTP directly? I assume perforce publishes those on the
website too.

Thanks!

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

rbssh really slow

2012-01-20 Thread Alexandru Palade

I had set up a ReviewBoard server with a subversion deployment via
svnserve and ssh. They are both on the same server. Everything is
working OK, minus the fact that is running incredibly slow. The VPS
I'm running on is a cheap one, so I don't have big expectations from
it, but I encountered something strange.

Being on the server, I narrowed down where exactly it was slow.
Everytime rbssh is invoked, the operation gets slow. So I tried the
following:

ssh reviewboard@127.0.0.1 (runs under a second)
rbssh reviewboard@127.0.0.1 (runs in about 30s)

Looking at the stacktrace of rbssh, it appears that is stuck waiting
for the connection in the paramiko library. So it might be a paramiko
problem, rather than a rbssh problem, but I am just wondering if
anyone has any ideas why could it go so slow. The authentification is
made with keys.

Thank you for this great product,
Alex

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

回复： Digest for reviewboard@googlegroups.com - 2 Messages in 1 Topic

2012-01-20 Thread 深圳手机(王)

It seems can't resolve my problem by this way.
  My sys is win XP, not ubuntu.
 -- 原始邮件 --
   发件人: rv_saraswathirv.n...@gmail.com;
 发送时间: 2012年1月17日(星期二) 凌晨2:11
 收件人: reviewboardreviewboard@googlegroups.com; 
 
 主题: Re: Digest for reviewboard@googlegroups.com - 2 Messages in 1 Topic

  
Issue resolved.

In Ubuntu11.10 (at least in my version of installation), it seems that
apache runs as a process under a user called daemon.  So, I changed
the ownership of data directory to this user, and it starts
working.  Thanks for all the help.
regards,
RV
On Jan 13, 7:44 pm, rv_nath rv.n...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thank you.  I will try this out.

 regards,
 RV

 13 जनवरी 2012 4:21 अपराह्न को, reviewboard@googlegroups.com ने लिखा:









Today's Topic Summary

  Group:http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/topics

 - Startup problems #134d6b1d192a2183_group_thread_0 [2 Updates]

Startup 
  problemshttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/t/d33c2476bafb53bf

 rv_saraswathi rv.n...@gmail.com Jan 12 06:39AM -0800

 Christian,
 Thanks for the reply. I started apache using sudo apachectl -k
 start. Is it becoz of this? If yes, I need a way to figure out how
 to start Apa;che w/o using sudo command. Any help appreciated.

 regards
 RV

 Anton Cohen an...@antoncohen.com Jan 12 05:13PM -0800

  Thanks for the reply. I started apache using sudo apachectl -k
  start. Is it becoz of this? If yes, I need a way to figure out how
  to start Apa;che w/o using sudo command. Any help appreciated.

 It's best not to use apache2ctl to start and stop httpd. In Ubuntu
 11.10
 you can use 'service' and 'update-rc.d'.

 To enable apache2 on boot:
 sudo update-rc.d apache2 enable

 To disable apache2 on boot:
 sudo update-rc.d apache2 disable

 To start apache2 manually:
 sudo service apache2 start

 You can replace 'start' with stop, restart, reload (or graceful),
 status,
 and a few others.

 In older Ubuntu and Debian versions without the 'service' command you
 can
 do:
 sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 start

 For reference, on Red Hat-based systems the equivalent commands are:
 sudo chkconfig httpd on
 sudo service httpd start

 -Anton

   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
  reviewboard.
  You can post via email reviewboard@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, 
  sendreviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.coman empty message.
  For more options, 
  visithttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/topicsthis group.

  --
  Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
  Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

 --

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Using post-review with CVS commitinfo

2012-01-20 Thread zhibin wang

reviewed. just have a test. thank you.

On 1月12日, 上午4时52分, Tom tom.o...@gmail.com wrote:
 I need help with a problem with post-review when it's invoked within
 commitinfo under CVS. CVS and RB 1.6.3 are running on separate Linux
 servers. RBtools are installed on the CVS server. I have an apparently
 valid repository definition in the RB admin web interface, the path
 for which is:

 :pserver:user:password@cvsserver/usr/local/cvs/repository

 commitinfo invokes a script that simply does this:

 post-review -dn --server=http://rbserver--repository-
 url=:pserver:user:password@cvsserver/usr/local/cvs/repository

 If I manually run that post-review command from within my checkout
 directory, it works fine. However, when I try to commit a file, it
 fails:

  RBTools 0.3.4
  Home = /var/cvs
  svn info :pserver:user:password@cvsserver/usr/local/cvs/repository
  git rev-parse --git-dir

 No supported repository could be access at the supplied url.

 I'm sure I'm overlooking something trivial, but what is it?

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

review board access error: 500 Inrernal server error | review board------with log

2012-01-20 Thread zhibin wang

Hello everyone, It's Chinese spring festival, hope you all earn more
and more money in the next year!
When I installed the review board, It can't be accessed. Input http://
localhost  in the IE explorer, The UI displays:
Something broke!(Error 500)
On the title bar of the explorer, it displays: 500 Inrernal server
error | review board.
My system config is:
OS: MS Win XP SP3
SW list:
01_apach.txt
01_MY_SQL.txt
01_python-2.5.4.msi
02_setuptools-0.6c11.win32-py2.5.exe
03_patch-2.5.9-7-setup.exe
04_memcached-1.2.6-win32-bin
05_PIL-1.1.7.win32-py2.5.exe
06_pycrypto-2.3.win32-py2.5.exe
07_MySQL-python-1.2.2.win32-py2.6.exe
10_mod_python-3.3.1.win32-py2.5-Apache2.2.exe
Django-1.3.1

easy_install in cmd line is:
easy_install ReviewBoard
rb-site install C:\reviews

and added the python, GnuWin32\bin path to the system varibal path.
then added the config in reviews to the appach's config.

I tryed for more times but can't get the key.
Who can tell me the reson?
thank you very very much!

I get the logs today, as following:
-

--

Environment:

Request Method: GET

Request URL: http://localhost/



Django Version: 1.3.1

Python Version: 2.5.5

Installed Applications:

['django.contrib.admin',

 'django.contrib.auth',

 'django.contrib.contenttypes',

 'django.contrib.markup',

 'django.contrib.sites',

 'django.contrib.sessions',

 'djblets.datagrid',

 'djblets.feedview',

 'djblets.gravatars',

 'djblets.log',

 'djblets.siteconfig',

 'djblets.util',

 'djblets.webapi',

 'reviewboard.accounts',

 'reviewboard.admin',

 'reviewboard.attachments',

 'reviewboard.changedescs',

 'reviewboard.diffviewer',

 'reviewboard.notifications',

 'reviewboard.reports',

 'reviewboard.reviews',

 'reviewboard.scmtools',

 'reviewboard.site',

 'reviewboard.webapi',

 'django_evolution']

Installed Middleware:

('django.middleware.gzip.GZipMiddleware',

 'django.middleware.common.CommonMiddleware',

 'django.middleware.doc.XViewMiddleware',

 'django.middleware.http.ConditionalGetMiddleware',

 'django.middleware.locale.LocaleMiddleware',

 'django.contrib.sessions.middleware.SessionMiddleware',

 'django.contrib.auth.middleware.AuthenticationMiddleware',

 'djblets.siteconfig.middleware.SettingsMiddleware',

 'reviewboard.admin.middleware.LoadSettingsMiddleware',

 'djblets.log.middleware.LoggingMiddleware',

 'reviewboard.admin.middleware.CheckUpdatesRequiredMiddleware',

 'reviewboard.admin.middleware.X509AuthMiddleware',

 'reviewboard.site.middleware.LocalSiteMiddleware')





Traceback:

File d:\python25\lib\site-packages\django-1.3.1-py2.5.egg\django\core
\handlers\base.py in get_response

  89.response = middleware_method(request)

File d:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.3-py2.5.egg
\reviewboard\admin\middleware.py in process_request

  31. load_site_config()

File d:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.3-py2.5.egg
\reviewboard\admin\siteconfig.py in load_site_config

  224.auth_backend_map = dict(get_registered_auth_backends())

File d:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.3-py2.5.egg
\reviewboard\accounts\backends.py in get_registered_auth_backends

  521. for entry in
pkg_resources.iter_entry_points('reviewboard.auth_backends'):

File D:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\pkg_resources.py in
iter_entry_points

  476.entries = dist.get_entry_map(group)

File D:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\pkg_resources.py in get_entry_map

  2229.self._get_metadata('entry_points.txt'), self

File D:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\pkg_resources.py in parse_map

  2038.raise ValueError(Entry points must be listed
in groups)



Exception Type: ValueError at /

Exception Value: Entry points must be listed in groups

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

post-review running on ubnutu server not posting review requests

2012-01-20 Thread Andrew Murray

Hi All,

I'm having problems understanding exactly how post-review should work
as all attemtpts I make to use it don't seem to work as I expect.

I have an ubuntu 11.10 x64 server on which I'm running the review
board website via apache, I have path.to.reviewboardwebsite in the
below command in the host file and I'm using subversion - the checkout
doesn't exist on the server, instead I'm providing the repo url and
the branch url in the command below.

This is the command I'm issuing.

post-review --summary=summary --description=description --
repository-url=svn://somerepourl --server=http://
path.to.reviewboardwebsite --username=somebody --password=password --
target-people=andrewmurray --branch=svn://branch/url --revision-
range=3919:4067 --publish

I don't get any errors or feedback from the terminal, instead I get a
massive ream of what looks like code being echoed to the terminal
(potentially the output of a diff operation?) and it eventually stops.
I don't know if it's of any use but the last thing echoed is svn:
'diff' returned 2\n] At this point, due to no errors I'm assuming
that it has created the new review request and that when I browse to
the review board website I'll see the new review request. However,
there are no review requests listed at all.

Does anyone have any idea what the problem could be and how I might
fix it?

Many thanks,
Andy

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: No repository types = epic fail

2012-01-20 Thread Christian Hammond

This looks like an improperly populated database. Was this an older version
that you upgraded, and if so, can you tell me the process you used?

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 2:39 AM, dakisan peteda...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hey there,

 Managed to breathe life into RB on an unbuntu box, but am having a
 strange issue now whereby I can't add a repository because there are
 no repository types listed.

 Following found in the logs, hope someone can help troubleshoot this:

 Exception thrown for user admin at
 http://reviews.dev.vivomiles.com/admin/db/scmtools/repository/add/

 'tool'
 Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
 django/core/handlers/base.py, line 111, in get_response
response = callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
 django/contrib/admin/options.py, line 307, in wrapper
return self.admin_site.admin_view(view)(*args, **kwargs)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
 django/utils/decorators.py, line 93, in _wrapped_view
response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
 django/views/decorators/cache.py, line 79, in _wrapped_view_func
response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
 django/contrib/admin/sites.py, line 197, in inner
return view(request, *args, **kwargs)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
 django/utils/decorators.py, line 28, in _wrapper
return bound_func(*args, **kwargs)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
 django/utils/decorators.py, line 93, in _wrapped_view
response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
 django/utils/decorators.py, line 24, in bound_func
return func(self, *args2, **kwargs2)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
 django/db/transaction.py, line 217, in inner
res = func(*args, **kwargs)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
 django/contrib/admin/options.py, line 864, in add_view
if form.is_valid():
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-
 py2.6.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/forms.py, line 613, in is_valid
return (super(RepositoryForm, self).is_valid() and
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
 django/forms/forms.py, line 121, in is_valid
return self.is_bound and not bool(self.errors)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
 django/forms/forms.py, line 112, in _get_errors
self.full_clean()
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-
 py2.6.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/forms.py, line 532, in full_clean
return super(RepositoryForm, self).full_clean()
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
 django/forms/forms.py, line 268, in full_clean
self._clean_form()
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
 django/forms/forms.py, line 296, in _clean_form
self.cleaned_data = self.clean()
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-
 py2.6.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/forms.py, line 548, in clean
self._clean_hosting_info()
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-
 py2.6.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/forms.py, line 480, in
 _clean_hosting_info
tool_name = self.cleaned_data['tool'].name
 KeyError: 'tool'

 --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: post-review running on ubnutu server not posting review requests

2012-01-20 Thread Christian Hammond

Hi Andrew,

I'd need to see the full debug output to have any real idea of what's 
happening. You can pass --debug to get this.

Christian



On Jan 19, 2012, at 1:46, Andrew Murray scko...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All,
 
 I'm having problems understanding exactly how post-review should work
 as all attemtpts I make to use it don't seem to work as I expect.
 
 I have an ubuntu 11.10 x64 server on which I'm running the review
 board website via apache, I have path.to.reviewboardwebsite in the
 below command in the host file and I'm using subversion - the checkout
 doesn't exist on the server, instead I'm providing the repo url and
 the branch url in the command below.
 
 This is the command I'm issuing.
 
 post-review --summary=summary --description=description --
 repository-url=svn://somerepourl --server=http://
 path.to.reviewboardwebsite --username=somebody --password=password --
 target-people=andrewmurray --branch=svn://branch/url --revision-
 range=3919:4067 --publish
 
 I don't get any errors or feedback from the terminal, instead I get a
 massive ream of what looks like code being echoed to the terminal
 (potentially the output of a diff operation?) and it eventually stops.
 I don't know if it's of any use but the last thing echoed is svn:
 'diff' returned 2\n] At this point, due to no errors I'm assuming
 that it has created the new review request and that when I browse to
 the review board website I'll see the new review request. However,
 there are no review requests listed at all.
 
 Does anyone have any idea what the problem could be and how I might
 fix it?
 
 Many thanks,
 Andy
 
 -- 
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Reviewboard installation help

2012-01-20 Thread Christian Hammond

The memcached error is concerning. Does your domain have any non-ASCII
characters in it?

Christian

On Jan 19, 2012, at 14:07, iamagui chella5...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi there,

Please pardon me, if I am using the wrong group and guide me to the
appropriate group, thanks.

I installed the reviewboard on a VM. Below are the steps:
-
sudo -s
mkdir reviewBoard
cd reviewBoard/
apt-get update
apt-get install python-setuptools
apt-get install python-dev
apt-get install memcached
apt-get install patch
apt-get install python-mysqldb

# REFERENCE:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7896541/trying-to-install-pycrypto-on-ubuntu-via-buildout-src-config-h-no-such-file-or

wget http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/pycrypto-2.4.tar.gz
tar -xzvf pycrypto-2.4.tar.gz
cd pycrypto-2.4
./configure
python setup.py install
easy_install ReviewBoard

Had trouble with the optional pylucene, so skipped it.
-
After running rb-site install /var/www/reviews.board.com, while trying
to access XX.XX.XX.XX, I am getting ‘Review Board is taking a nap’.
Please help.

Below is the output of rb-install:

* Welcome to the Review Board site installation wizard

This will prepare a Review Board site installation in:

/var/www/reviews.board.com

We need to know a few things before we can prepare your site for
installation. This will only take a few minutes.

* Make sure you have the modules you need

Depending on your installation, you may need certain Python
modules and servers that are missing.

If you need support for any of the following, you will need to
install the necessary modules and restart the install.

Databases (optional):
* PostgreSQL (psycopg2)

* What's the host name for this site?

This should be the fully-qualified host name without the http://,
port or path.

Domain Name: X

* What URL path points to Review Board?

Typically, Review Board exists at the root of a URL. For example,
http://reviews.example.com/. In this case, you would specify /.

However, if you want to listen to, say,
http://example.com/reviews/, you can specify /reviews/.

Note that this is the path relative to the domain and should not
include the domain name.

The default is /

Root Path [/]:

* What URL will point to the media files?

While most installations distribute media files on the same server
as the rest of Review Board, some custom installs may instead have
a separate server for this purpose.

The default is media/

Media URL [media/]:

* What database type will you be using?

You can type either the name or the number from the list below.

(1) mysql
(2) sqlite3 (not supported for production use)

Database Type: 1

* What database name should Review Board use?

NOTE: You need to create this database and grant user modification
rights before continuing. See your database documentation for more
information.

The default is reviewboard

Database Name [reviewboard]:

* What is the database server's address?

This should be specified in hostname:port form. The port is
optional if you're using a standard port for the database type.

The default is localhost

Database Server [localhost]: XX.XX.XX.XX

* What is the login and password for this database?

This must be a user that has table creation and modification
rights on the database you already specified.

Database Username: X

Database Password:

* What cache mechanism should be used?

memcached is strongly recommended. Use it unless you have a good
reason not to.

You can type either the name or the number from the list below.

(1) memcached (recommended)
(2) file

Cache Type: 1

* What memcached connection string should be used?

This is generally in the format of memcached://hostname:port/

The default is memcached://localhost:11211/

Memcache Server [memcached://localhost:11211/]: memcached://XX.XX.XX.XX:11211/

* What web server will you be using?

You can type either the name or the number from the list below.

(1) apache
(2) lighttpd

Web Server: 1

* What Python loader module will you be using?

Based on our experiences, we recommend using wsgi with Review
Board.

You can type either the name or the number from the list below.

(1) wsgi (recommended)
(2) fastcgi
(3) modpython (no longer supported)

Python Loader: 1

* Create an administrator account

To configure Review Board, you'll need an

Re: Migrating Review Board Database

2012-01-20 Thread Christian Hammond

Ah. Ignore that. That's the version of the rb-site tool, not of the site
you have installed. You should be able to see on the Review Board install
what version you have. It's right after Review Board. If it says beta,
it's pre-1.0 somewhere.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Chris Baron topher.ba...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks for the responses.

 From the command line, I did an rb-site --version and '0.1' was
 returned.

 How would I let django evolutions do its thing ?

 On Jan 20, 1:10 am, Anton Cohen an...@antoncohen.com wrote:
  On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Chris Baron topher.ba...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
   There is a reviewboard 0.1 version in production.
 
   There is a 1.6 version in a test environment.  Anyone have suggestions
   on the best way to copy the 0.1 production data, transform it into 1.6
   data?
 
  What will need to be done will depend on the specific version you are
  moving from, and what is missing/different in the database. I did a
  migration from a pre-1.0 to 1.5.5. Though it wasn't 0.1, if it had a
  version it probably would have been something like 0.9.
 
  I detailed the upgrade in this post:
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/msg/5b445e99632190ab
 
  If your old version is close enough to 1.0 you may not need to
  manually manipulate the database at all, just install a new site with a
  dump of the old database, and let the Django evolutions do their thing.
 If
  your old version is really, really old, there may be a lot of manual DB
  manipulation. I was pretty lucky that there was only one table missing
 and
  I could copy the whole table from a new install.
 
  -Anton

 --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

34 matches

Mail list logo