Re: Pre-Commit Workflow
Guess it might be easier if I provide the script and associated document which I'm muttering about here :). https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z3XtAsVoCx9BDWS8itFZ0mOTd9d66tPus7eSE13m0eM It's very much a prototype - just knocked up in handful of shell scripts (I've only included a couple of the more stable ones at the moment in the Appendices - will post a couple more down the line... maybe). I may re-implement in python and extend beyond the bzr only support at some point (providing other people find it useful or another approach isn't found). AFAICT, it should be sufficient to replace bzr with svn throughout to have support there, but I haven't tested this. --diff and --overlap require interdiff from patchutils - if you don't have them installed, it should gracefully die should you attempt to use those switches. It could be greatly enhanced by the use of the reviewboard web api, but this was considered overkill and too painful for bash :). All very hokey and incomplete, but functional enough to meet my requirements. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Migrate data from 1.6.12 version to 1.7.21?
Hi, We are in the process of upgrading our Review Board version from 1.6.12 to 1.7.21 . However we had issues upgrading python so we installed latest ReviewBoard on another server with higher version of python (as we faced certificate issues while running easy_install ReviewBoard==1.6.12 -- received error SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed -- Some packages may not be found!) . Now we need the data to be migrated on to this new server but he have a difference of version. I was thinking of directly taking a backup of mysql db dump(.sql file) and restore it back to the newly installed instance. (using mysqldump command) Will it be successful even if the versions are different? If not, can you please suggest a way (maybe some utility) to migrate data across different versions? Thanks, Shravanthi -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Migrate data from 1.6.12 version to 1.7.21?
Hi Shravanthi, I don't know why you hit that SSL error (I'd love to see the whole output), but yes, it should be possible to take a dump of 1.6.12, install it on the new server, and then run the 'rb-site upgrade' script. It is important that the database you are importing into be completely empty before you do this. No tables, no data. 'rb-site upgrade' will inspect the version stored in the database contents, and inspect the records we keep on the database structure, and then apply the changes necessary to convert it to a 1.7.21-compatible database. Please note that 'rb-site upgrade' may also give you additional instructions at the end that you will need to follow. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:09 AM, shravanthi s shrav...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We are in the process of upgrading our Review Board version from 1.6.12 to 1.7.21 . However we had issues upgrading python so we installed latest ReviewBoard on another server with higher version of python (as we faced certificate issues while running easy_install ReviewBoard==1.6.12 -- received error SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed -- Some packages may not be found!) . Now we need the data to be migrated on to this new server but he have a difference of version. I was thinking of directly taking a backup of mysql db dump(.sql file) and restore it back to the newly installed instance. (using mysqldump command) Will it be successful even if the versions are different? If not, can you please suggest a way (maybe some utility) to migrate data across different versions? Thanks, Shravanthi -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: The current directory does not contain a checkout... (problem posting from perforce)
Thanks! On Thursday, 20 February 2014 16:44:25 UTC-5, David Trowbridge wrote: Darryl, The --p4-* options have a bug where settings in a .p4config file still had higher priority than the command-line options. I'll make sure that the fix for that bug is in the next rbtools point release. Thanks, -David On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Darryl McCutcheon dar...@themccutcheons.ca javascript: wrote: I'm seeing a couple issues with the perforce integration as well. The one above with the case mismatch, as well as the --p4-client parameter is not respected in RBTools 0.5.7. An integration with eclipse and reviewboard ( https://code.google.com/p/p4reviewboard/) breaks because this parameter is not respected. On Saturday, 15 February 2014 20:03:45 UTC-5, David Trowbridge wrote: Greg, You're probably getting hit by case mismatches ( https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3221). We'll be fixing this for 0.5.8. -David On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Greg Dean gr...@familydean.net wrote: Hi there, I've updated to 0.5.7 and I'm running from cygwin and I get the same result. Can rbt be run from cygwin? Here is what I get: $ rbt post -d -o 299074 DEBUG:root:Checking for a Subversion repository... DEBUG:root:Checking for a Git repository... DEBUG:root:Checking for a Mercurial repository... DEBUG:root:Checking for a CVS repository... DEBUG:root:Checking for a Perforce repository... DEBUG:root:Running: p4 info DEBUG:root:Checking for a Plastic repository... DEBUG:root:Checking for a ClearCase repository... DEBUG:root:Checking for a Bazaar repository... ERROR:root:The current directory does not contain a checkout from a supported source code repository. On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 1:14:16 PM UTC-8, Karl Nordstrom wrote: Thanks for the quick fix! 0.5.7 did it. Karl On Monday, 3 February 2014 13:50:03 UTC-8, Karl Nordstrom wrote: Okay, looking forward to getting the fix. Thanks, Karl On Monday, 3 February 2014 13:28:17 UTC-8, David Trowbridge wrote: Karl, It looks like we introduced a regression in 0.5.6 where it only will post from the client root. We'll get this sorted out asap. -David On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Karl Nordstrom north...@gmail.comwrote: I am attempting to generate a diff using rbt diff from a perforce workspace. I get the same error when I do rbt post. (Thank you for helping with the previous problem I was having, it appears to be resolved with RBTools 0.5.6.) My p4config is as follows: P4PORT=stork:1666 P4USER=knordstrom P4CLIENT=knordstrom_passenger The p4config appears to be setup correctly. I can do p4 diff from the commandline and generate a diff without errors. Unfortunately, this diff is not in a format that ReviewBoard understands. My .reviewboard rc file is as follows (just one line): REVIEWBOARD_URL = http://reviewboard/; I have tried the following on the commandline: rbt diff -d rbt diff -d 25012 (the latest changelist number) rbt post -d rbt post -d 25012 In all cases I get the same result: DEBUG:root:Checking for a Subversion repository... DEBUG:root:Checking for a Git repository... DEBUG:root:Checking for a Mercurial repository... DEBUG:root:Checking for a CVS repository... DEBUG:root:Checking for a Perforce repository... DEBUG:root:Running: p4 info DEBUG:root:Checking for a Plastic repository... DEBUG:root:Checking for a ClearCase repository... DEBUG:root:Checking for a Bazaar repository... ERROR:root:The current directory does not contain a checkout from a supported source code repository. When I do p4 info it provides relevant information. I'm hesitant to post it here as it shows company specific information. Is there something that I need to do in the configuration? Is this something to do with the way that Perforce works? As far as I can tell, Perforce works on workspaces (a collection of files that are being edited) rather than directories. That said, I would have thought that RBTools could find it via p4 diff, which references p4config. Ideally, I want to post to reviewboard based on changed files rather than an already committed changelist, but right now any solution would be welcome. Does anyone have an example of how to configure RBTools to work with Perforce? I have searched all over and have not found any concrete examples. Thanks, Karl -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/pow erpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack
Re: updating to reviewboard 1.7.21 fails with Unable to execute the manager command syncdb
It looks like you may be using Python 3? If so, you will have to use 2.x (we recommend 2.7), as the 1.7.x releases are not compatible with 3.x. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Marcello marcello.cesc...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I have an issue updating from 1.7.16 to 1.7.21 (on debian 7.4) # rb-site upgrade /srv/reviewboard/ Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. The log output below, including warnings and errors, can be ignored unless upgrade fails. -- begin log output -- Creating tables ... There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. There are unapplied evolutions for attachments. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. There are unapplied evolutions for hostingsvcs. There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. There are unapplied evolutions for site. [!] Unable to execute the manager command syncdb: No module named copy_reg [!] Unable to execute the manager command evolve: No module named copy_reg --- end log output --- Resetting in-database caches. Upgrade complete! -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
updating to reviewboard 1.7.21 fails with Unable to execute the manager command syncdb
Hi, I have an issue updating from 1.7.16 to 1.7.21 (on debian 7.4) # rb-site upgrade /srv/reviewboard/ Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. The log output below, including warnings and errors, can be ignored unless upgrade fails. -- begin log output -- Creating tables ... There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. There are unapplied evolutions for attachments. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. There are unapplied evolutions for hostingsvcs. There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. There are unapplied evolutions for site. [!] Unable to execute the manager command syncdb: No module named copy_reg [!] Unable to execute the manager command evolve: No module named copy_reg --- end log output --- Resetting in-database caches. Upgrade complete! -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: updating to reviewboard 1.7.21 fails with Unable to execute the manager command syncdb
Hello Christian, no, only python 2.7 (Version: 2.7.3-4+deb7u1) is installed. Am Freitag, 21. Februar 2014 20:55:46 UTC+1 schrieb Marcello: Hi, I have an issue updating from 1.7.16 to 1.7.21 (on debian 7.4) # rb-site upgrade /srv/reviewboard/ Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. The log output below, including warnings and errors, can be ignored unless upgrade fails. -- begin log output -- Creating tables ... There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. There are unapplied evolutions for attachments. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. There are unapplied evolutions for hostingsvcs. There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. There are unapplied evolutions for site. [!] Unable to execute the manager command syncdb: No module named copy_reg [!] Unable to execute the manager command evolve: No module named copy_reg --- end log output --- Resetting in-database caches. Upgrade complete! -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: updating to reviewboard 1.7.21 fails with Unable to execute the manager command syncdb
What version of Django is on there? Also, how did you install Review Board? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Marcello marcello.cesc...@gmail.comwrote: Hello Christian, no, only python 2.7 (Version: 2.7.3-4+deb7u1) is installed. Am Freitag, 21. Februar 2014 20:55:46 UTC+1 schrieb Marcello: Hi, I have an issue updating from 1.7.16 to 1.7.21 (on debian 7.4) # rb-site upgrade /srv/reviewboard/ Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. The log output below, including warnings and errors, can be ignored unless upgrade fails. -- begin log output -- Creating tables ... There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. There are unapplied evolutions for attachments. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. There are unapplied evolutions for hostingsvcs. There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. There are unapplied evolutions for site. [!] Unable to execute the manager command syncdb: No module named copy_reg [!] Unable to execute the manager command evolve: No module named copy_reg --- end log output --- Resetting in-database caches. Upgrade complete! -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Snapshot/Static view support of reviewboard
I wanted to apologize for the silence on this. I'm afraid that we don't
know the answer. ClearCase support was a third-party contribution, and none
of the core team really knows much about it =/
-David
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Mayank Kumar mayank...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We are still not able to find any solution for this issue.
Does anyone has any idea about this issue?
Regards
Mayank
On Friday, 14 February 2014 16:09:41 UTC+5:30, Mayank Kumar wrote:
Hi,
Does ReviewBoard supports SnapShot view of clearcase to create a review
request when the repository is created using a different dynamic view??
We are using Clearcase with ReviewBoard(version 1.7) and repositories are
created using a Dynamic view VOBs.
I can create a review request successfully using a dynamic view on my
client PC.
But when I am trying to create a review request using a snapshot view, I
am facing some issue. Below is the output of the rbt post command:
C:\cc_views\mayankk_static_view_rb_demo\bse_opt109_components*rbt post
-d*
DEBUG:root:Checking for a ClearCase repository...
DEBUG:root:Running: cleartool pwv -short
DEBUG:root:Running: diff --version
DEBUG:root:Running: cleartool lsview -full -properties -cview
DEBUG:root:Running: cleartool describe -short vob:.
DEBUG:root:Running: cleartool pwv -root
DEBUG:root:repository info: Path: C:\cc_views\mayankk_static_
view_rb_demo\bse_opt109_components, Base path:
C:\cc_views\mayankk_static_view_rb_demo\bse_opt109_components, Supports
changesets: False
DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to http://myIP:8080/reviewboard/api/
DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to http://myIP:8080/reviewboard/
api/info/
DEBUG:root:Running: cleartool lscheckout -all -cview -me -fmt
%En\t%PVn\t%Vn\n
DEBUG:root:Running: cleartool get -to
c:\docume~1\mayankk\locals~1\temp\tmpdvg6hf
C:\cc_views\mayankk_static_view_rb_demo\bse_opt109_
components\Source\common\code\TDDefaultParameters.c@@\main\lte_bse_
int_tdscdma_r17p1\tdscdma_bse_del_cttl_int\lte_bse_tdscdma_
rb_demo_mayankk\0
DEBUG:root:Running: cleartool get -to
c:\docume~1\mayankk\locals~1\temp\tmp13lksw
C:\cc_views\mayankk_static_view_rb_demo\bse_opt109_
components\Source\common\code\TDDefaultParameters.c
DEBUG:root:Running: diff -uN c:\docume~1\mayankk\locals~1\temp\tmpdvg6hf
c:\docume~1\mayankk\locals~1\temp\tmp13lksw
DEBUG:root:Command exited with rc 1: ['diff', '-uN',
'c:\\docume~1\\mayankk\\locals~1\\temp\\tmpdvg6hf',
'c:\\docume~1\\mayankk\\locals~1\\temp\\tmp13lksw']
--- c:\docume~1\mayankk\locals~1\temp\tmpdvg6hf 2014-02-14
15:21:11.406507600 +0530
+++ c:\docume~1\mayankk\locals~1\temp\tmp13lksw 2014-02-14
15:21:11.609623500 +0530
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
#undef SID
#endif
-
+//added comment for testing RB 1
#include TDDefaultParameters.h
#include rrc_ch.h
@@ -2258,3 +2258,4 @@
/**
**
* End of source module $RCSfile: l23/common/TDDefaultParameters.c $
***
**/
+//added comment for testing RB 2
\ No newline at end of file
---
DEBUG:root:Running: cleartool describe -fmt %On
C:\cc_views\mayankk_static_view_rb_demo\bse_opt109_
components\Source\common\code\TDDefaultParameters.c@@\main\
lte_bse_int_tdscdma_r17p1\tdscdma_bse_del_
cttl_int\lte_bse_tdscdma_rb_demo_mayankk\0
DEBUG:root:Running: cleartool describe -fmt %On
C:\cc_views\mayankk_static_view_rb_demo\bse_opt109_
components\Source\common\code\TDDefaultParameters.c
DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to http://myIP:8080/reviewboard/
api/review-requests/
DEBUG:root:Making HTTP POST request to http://myIP:8080/reviewboard/
api/review-requests/
DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to http://myIP:8080/reviewboard/
api/review-requests/201/diffs/
DEBUG:root:Making HTTP POST request to http://myIP:8080/reviewboard/
api/review-requests/201/diffs/
DEBUG:root:Got API Error 207 (HTTP code 400): The file was not found in
the repository
DEBUG:root:Error data: {u'stat': u'fail', u'file':
u'C:/cc_views/mayankk_static_view_rb_demo/bse_opt109_
components/Source/common/code/TDDefaultParameters.c@@/main/
lte_bse_int_tdscdma_r17p1/tdscdma_bse
_del_cttl_int/lte_bse_tdscdma_rb_demo_mayankk/0', u'err': {u'msg': u'*The
file was not found in the repository*', u'code': 207}, u'revision':
u'\\main\\lte_bse_int_tdscdma_r17p1\\tdscdma_bse_del_cttl_in
t\\lte_bse_tdscdma_rb_demo_mayankk\\0'}
Traceback (most recent call last):
File C:\Python27\Scripts\rbt-script.py, line 8, in module
load_entry_point('RBTools==0.5.6', 'console_scripts', 'rbt')()
File
C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\rbtools-0.5.6-py2.7.egg\rbtools\commands\main.py,
line 127, in main
command.run_from_argv([RB_MAIN] + args)
File C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\rbtools-0.5.6-py2.7.
egg\rbtools\commands\__init__.py, line 158, in run_from_argv
exit_code = self.main(*args) or 0
File
Re: Snapshot/Static View support in RB
I wanted to apologize for the silence on this. I'm afraid that we don't know the answer. ClearCase support was a third-party contribution, and none of the core team really knows much about it =/ -David On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Vivek Gupta vivek2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We, in our organization, are doing a feasibility study of using Clearcase with ReviewBoard (ver 1.7). We have created repositories using Dynamic view VOBs in CC. We have successfully created review requests using dynamic view on the client PC. Our question here is..Whether ReviewBoard support Static/Snapshot views?? When we try to raise a review request using snapshot view, we encounter following error: *rbtools.commands.CommandError: Error uploading diff* *The file was not found in the repository (HTTP 400, API Error 207)* Would be great if anyone throws some light on this. Thanks Vivek :) -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
2.0 needs Python 2.6.5 or newer
After having problems running rb-site to upgrade my installation, I realised that Ubuntu 9.04 only has Python 2.6.2, while Django needs 2.6.5 or newer ( http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19365230/django-init-keywords-must-be-strings-error-while-running-runserver ). http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/2.0-beta-1/mentions support for Python 2.6, but are there enough people using ancient installations that it's worth mentioning it needs to be 2.6.5 or newer? -- Bruce -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: 2.0 needs Python 2.6.5 or newer
Bruce, You're right. We'll make sure that the combined release notes for the 2.0 final mention the 2.6.5 dependency. -David On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Bruce Cran bruce.c...@gmail.com wrote: After having problems running rb-site to upgrade my installation, I realised that Ubuntu 9.04 only has Python 2.6.2, while Django needs 2.6.5 or newer ( http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19365230/django-init-keywords-must-be-strings-error-while-running-runserver ). http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/2.0-beta-1/mentions support for Python 2.6, but are there enough people using ancient installations that it's worth mentioning it needs to be 2.6.5 or newer? -- Bruce -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Issue 3257 in reviewboard: LDAP Authentication Error with Email Attribute
Comment #5 on issue 3257 by frikoda...@gmail.com: LDAP Authentication Error with Email Attribute http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3257 Thanks for quick response:) -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Issue 3258 in reviewboard: POST /api/review-requests/id/diffs/ fails if the review request doesn't have a repository
Status: Started Owner: trowb...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-API New issue 3258 by trowb...@gmail.com: POST /api/review-requests/id/diffs/ fails if the review request doesn't have a repository http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3258 Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.6.2-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py, line 114, in get_response response = wrapped_callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.6.2-py2.6.egg/django/views/decorators/cache.py, line 52, in _wrapped_view_func response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.6.2-py2.6.egg/django/views/decorators/vary.py, line 19, in inner_func response = func(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8alpha3-py2.6.egg/djblets/webapi/resources.py, line 445, in __call__ result = view(request, api_format=api_format, *args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8alpha3-py2.6.egg/djblets/webapi/resources.py, line 663, in post return self.create(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8alpha3-py2.6.egg/djblets/webapi/decorators.py, line 115, in _call return view_func(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8alpha3-py2.6.egg/djblets/webapi/decorators.py, line 136, in _checklogin return view_func(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8alpha3-py2.6.egg/djblets/webapi/decorators.py, line 115, in _call return view_func(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0beta3-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/webapi/decorators.py, line 110, in _check return view_func(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8alpha3-py2.6.egg/djblets/webapi/decorators.py, line 115, in _call return view_func(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8alpha3-py2.6.egg/djblets/webapi/decorators.py, line 115, in _call return view_func(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8alpha3-py2.6.egg/djblets/webapi/decorators.py, line 285, in _validate return view_func(*args, **new_kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0beta3-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/webapi/resources/diff.py, line 272, in create request=request) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0beta3-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/reviews/forms.py, line 95, in __init__ data, *args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0beta3-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line 41, in __init__ if self.repository.get_scmtool().get_diffs_use_absolute_paths(): AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_scmtool' -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Issue 3259 in reviewboard: Should be able to seamlessly switch between commit-level reviews diff-level reviews
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 3259 by vlov...@gmail.com: Should be able to seamlessly switch between commit-level reviews diff-level reviews http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3259 *** For customer support, please post to reviewbo...@googlegroups.com *** If you have a patch, please submit it to http://reviews.reviewboard.org/ *** *** Do not post confidential information in this enhancement request! What version are you running? 1.7.19 What's the URL of the page this enhancement relates to, if any? r/#/diff/#index_header Describe the enhancement and the motivation for it. It should be possible to review change sets in addition to patch-level reviews to integrate more nicely with a more common git workflow. Additionally, you should be able to pick which range of changes to be looking at within the review so you can switch between looking at the entire review for context a specific review to find issues on a commit-level. What operating system are you using? What browser? Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Issue 3259 in reviewboard: Should be able to seamlessly switch between commit-level reviews diff-level reviews
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 2638 Comment #1 on issue 3259 by trowb...@gmail.com: Should be able to seamlessly switch between commit-level reviews diff-level reviews http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3259 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Issue 2638 in reviewboard: Add patch series
Comment #2 on issue 2638 by trowb...@gmail.com: Add patch series http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2638 Issue 3259 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Issue 3258 in reviewboard: POST /api/review-requests/id/diffs/ fails if the review request doesn't have a repository
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 3258 by trowb...@gmail.com: POST /api/review-requests/id/diffs/ fails if the review request doesn't have a repository http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3258 Fixed in release-2.0.x (25fae79). -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Issue 3260 in reviewboard: Dashboard column selector is in a seemingly-random order
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Dashboard Component-Docs New issue 3260 by trowb...@gmail.com: Dashboard column selector is in a seemingly-random order http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3260 What version are you running? 2.0 beta 3 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? /dashboard/ When opening the column selector (using the pencil in the upper right), the list of columns is sorted by column ID, which makes for an apparently random order. We should fix it to list the columns in a more sensible order (probably alphabetically). The dashboard documentation mirrors the same order, so we'll need to update that, too. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
