Re: Help, upgrading to 2.0.7 broke my server!
I just ran into the same problem upgrading from 2.0.6 to 2.0.8. Running postgres as well In prostgres dropping the index is achieved by: DROP index scmtools_repository_8c446842; running rb-site upgrade again after that completed successfully On Tuesday, 16 September 2014 13:44:48 UTC+12, Christian Hammond wrote: Hmmm, it should have tried to drop the old index in that upgrade. Very odd. What version were you running before this? (I have to take off for a couple hours, but will be back.. hopefully the other instructions will have helped.) Christian -- Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com javascript: Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com On September 15, 2014 at 6:43:27 PM, Ian (iand...@mac.com javascript:) wrote: Upgraded from 2.0.6 and using PostgreSQL. $ sudo rb-site manage /Library/Server/Web/Data/WebApps/ReviewBoard evolve -- --sql Password: -- Evolve application scmtools ALTER TABLE scmtools_repository ADD COLUMN hooks_uuid varchar(32) NULL; CREATE UNIQUE INDEX scmtools_repository_8c446842 ON scmtools_repository (archived_timestamp, path, local_site_id); CREATE UNIQUE INDEX scmtools_repository_f22c3cf5 ON scmtools_repository (hooks_uuid, local_site_id); On Monday, September 15, 2014 6:40:21 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: What version did you upgrade from? That looks like it may be a duplicate index. Can you run: rb-site manage /path/to/site evolve -- --sql And show me what that says? Also, are you using MySQL? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com On September 15, 2014 at 6:37:05 PM, Ian (iand...@mac.com ) wrote: I did the easy_install -U thing to update Review Board, and then the rb-side upgrade thing to upgrade my site. I get this output though, and now I can't view anything in Review Board. Any workarounds much appreciated! $ sudo rb-site upgrade /Library/Server/Web/Data/WebApps/ReviewBoard Password: Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. The log output below, including warnings and errors, can be ignored unless upgrade fails. -- -- Creating tables ... There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. Project signature has changed - an evolution is required Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) *CommandError: Error applying evolution: relation scmtools_repository_8c446842 already exists* -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
New incremental indexing command in reviewboard 2.0.3 fails to execute
Hi, I upgraded to 2.0.3 and put the new incremental index upgrade into the crontab but it didn't seem to work. So for testing I executed this on the command line: rb-site manage /var/www/codereview update_index -a 1 and got this error: rb-site: error: no such option: -a I noticed the same error when trying to follow some suggestion to run rebuild_index with -v 3 How are you supposed to pass parameters to rb-site commands? Cheers Christian -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: New incremental indexing command in reviewboard 2.0.3 fails to execute
Ok thanks, that did the trick On Thursday, 17 July 2014 09:05:31 UTC+12, David Trowbridge wrote: It looks like we made a small mistake in the crontab. The command should be: rb-site manage /var/www/codereview update_index -- -a 1 (note the bare -- argument) We'll get this fixed soon. -David On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Christian Wuerdig christia...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Hi, I upgraded to 2.0.3 and put the new incremental index upgrade into the crontab but it didn't seem to work. So for testing I executed this on the command line: rb-site manage /var/www/codereview update_index -a 1 and got this error: rb-site: error: no such option: -a I noticed the same error when trying to follow some suggestion to run rebuild_index with -v 3 How are you supposed to pass parameters to rb-site commands? Cheers Christian -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Unable to view SVN diff after migration from 1.7.x to 2.0.1
I've had a similar issue intermittently. Adding windows-1252 to the list of encodings mentioned by David fixed the issue On 3/06/2014 5:42 AM, Roudaille77 rudy.he...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have just updated my ReviewBoard site but I can't visualize the Subversion diff anymore... I can see : There was an error displaying this diff. Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 236, in get renderer = self.create_renderer(context, *args, **kwargs) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews/views.py, line 1102, in create_renderer *args, **kwargs) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 326, in create_renderer self.diff_file = self._get_requested_diff_file() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 367, in _get_requested_diff_file request=self.request) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 373, in populate_diff_chunks chunks = generator.get_chunks() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py, line 148, in get_chunks large_data=True) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.8.1-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py, line 109, in cache_memoize data = lookup_callable() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py, line 147, in lambda lambda: list(self._get_chunks_uncached()), File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py, line 154, in _get_chunks_uncached old = get_original_file(self.filediff, self.request, encoding_list) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 172, in get_original_file encoding, data = convert_to_unicode(data, encoding_list) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 50, in convert_to_unicode return e, six.text_type(s, e) LookupError: unknown encoding: Any idea ? -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
How to configure the search properly
Hi, We always had trouble with the search largely due to this bug: https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2544 Now with 2.0 I tried the search again and it worked a little bit better - instead of coming up with an error 500 I always got No results So I figured maybe I need to rebuild the index which I did with sudo rb-site manage /var/www/codereview/ rebuild_index It warned me that it will delete all indices and then claimed Indexing 1 review request - hm, we have about 11,000+ review requests in the system so that is a bit weird Also the search is now broken - I'm getting a server error 500 again and the stack trace points to: IOError: The path to your Whoosh index '/var/www/codereview/index' is not writable for the current user/group. Typing something into the search box will yield perfectly good results after a little while in the drop down (as long as what I'm looking for is part of the Summary) just hitting enter on the search box won't work properly. So my questions are: 1. How do I properly configure the search - mainly which user should own the index? Apparently not root because that's what it is now and that's not working. 2. How can I track down the indexing problem (in the sense that it claims it can only index 1 request)? Cheers Christian -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Search fails with HTTP 500
Sounds like this problem: https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2544 Shouldn't this be added as fix to RB instead of having individuals patching it? I don't really like running a custom patched version. This always gets you into trouble when upgrading. Cheers Christian On Saturday, August 3, 2013 3:29:32 AM UTC+12, Igor Berger wrote: Hello, I have Review Board working except for search. When I try to search from the search box, I get exceptions below. I've successfully rebuild the index (using rb-site manage /path/to/site index -- --full) just in case, even though I have crontab setup to do it. Any ideas? Thank you, Igor. Server: Review Board 1.7.9 Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS PyLucene 2.3.1-1.1ubuntu2.1 Python 2.7.3 OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.0-b12, mixed mode) Client: Chrome 28 on Windows 7 2013-08-02 15:22:56,027 - ERROR - - Exception thrown for user igor.berger at http://ourhostname/reviews/r/search/?q=hello java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Not a valid hit number: 0 Java stacktrace: java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Not a valid hit number: 0 at org.apache.lucene.search.Hits.hitDoc(Hits.java:202) at org.apache.lucene.search.Hits.doc(Hits.java:155) Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py, line 111, in get_response response = callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/accounts/decorators.py, line 22, in _check return view_func(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews/views.py, line 1405, in search for hit in searcher.search(parser.parse(query))] JavaError: java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Not a valid hit number: 0 Java stacktrace: java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Not a valid hit number: 0 at org.apache.lucene.search.Hits.hitDoc(Hits.java:202) at org.apache.lucene.search.Hits.doc(Hits.java:155) 2013-08-02 15:22:56,030 - ERROR - None - igor.berger - /reviews/r/search/ - Internal Server Error: /reviews/r/search/ Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py, line 111, in get_response response = callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/accounts/decorators.py, line 22, in _check return view_func(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews/views.py, line 1405, in search for hit in searcher.search(parser.parse(query))] JavaError: java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Not a valid hit number: 0 Java stacktrace: java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Not a valid hit number: 0 at org.apache.lucene.search.Hits.hitDoc(Hits.java:202) at org.apache.lucene.search.Hits.doc(Hits.java:155) -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Search fails with HTTP 500
I have the same issue. I logged it in the issue tracker a while back and someone pointed me to a different issue with some workaround/fix but I haven't got around trying it. Don't have the link right now but if you check in the tracker you should find it otherwise I can send it tomorrow. Cheers Christian On 8/08/2013 12:12 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi Igor, Wish I knew. There wasn't any information on what actually causes this problem. You could try downgrading to an earlier version of pylucene, but I don't know when the problem first occurred, and not everyone seems to be hitting this. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Igor Berger codewiz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, Thanks for looking into it. Any search term produces the error. If I type a term that actually appears in some reviews, I see an auto-suggest drop-down populated with relevant reviews. If I click on one of the results, that review opens correctly in a new tab. I've upgraded to 1.7.12 since my original post. Expectedly, the problem remains. Is there anything I can reinstall or a cache I can clear to try to fix this? Thanks again, Igor. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Slight glitch in upgrade to 1.7.9
Hi, I just upgraded from 1.7.6 to 1.7.9 and got the following error when trying to view the diffs of any review request: _log() got an unexpected keyword argument 'request' Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 43, in view_diff diffset.id, request=request) File /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/__init__.py, line 1608, in debug root.debug(msg, *args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/__init__.py, line 1128, in debug self._log(DEBUG, msg, args, **kwargs) TypeError: _log() got an unexpected keyword argument 'request' Running 'easy_install -U Djblets' fixed it. Is that not meant to be automatically upgraded? Cheers Christian -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Slight glitch in upgrade to 1.7.9
Hi Christian, about 18h ago. Cheers Christian On Wednesday, June 5, 2013 10:54:11 AM UTC+12, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Christian, Can you tell me when you downloaded 1.7.9? I put out a hotfix that should have taken care of this problem. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Jun 4, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Christian Wuerdig christia...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Hi, I just upgraded from 1.7.6 to 1.7.9 and got the following error when trying to view the diffs of any review request: _log() got an unexpected keyword argument 'request' Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 43, in view_diff diffset.id, request=request) File /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/__init__.py, line 1608, in debug root.debug(msg, *args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/__init__.py, line 1128, in debug self._log(DEBUG, msg, args, **kwargs) TypeError: _log() got an unexpected keyword argument 'request' Running 'easy_install -U Djblets' fixed it. Is that not meant to be automatically upgraded? Cheers Christian -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Upgrading to 1.7.1 results in weird timestamps
Hi Christian, it's for new and existing requests. Updating the user timezone to Pacific/Auckland fixed it thanks. Cheers Christian On Monday, January 7, 2013 10:37:03 PM UTC+13, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Christian, Is this for new review requests? 1.7 added timezone support. If you go into your user settings (My Account under your username dropdown on the top bar), you can configure your timezone. You should see all times update relative to that timezone. The server's timezone settings should ideally be changed to UTC as well. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Christian Wuerdig christia...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Some additional info: The time zone under General in Reviewboard is set to Pacific/Auckland If I modify a review request now I get this: Last Updated Jan. 7, 2013, 3:08 a.m. Cheers Christian On Monday, January 7, 2013 3:51:21 PM UTC+13, Christian Wuerdig wrote: Hi, after the upgrade to 1.7.1 we can see strange timestamps in the dashboard: Like: Posted January 7th, 2013, 2 p.m. Last Updated: 11 hours, 19 minutes from now In the REST API for that request: last_updated2013-01-07T14:**08:21Z/last_updated time_added2013-01-07T14:00:**10Z/time_added Local time on the server is Mon Jan 7 15:49:37 NZDT 2013 Seems like there were some changes done on how RB (or Python, or Django?) deal with different time zones (we are in New Zealand here so currently we have *UTC/GMT +13 hours)*. It was all working as expected under 1.6.13. Anything I missed when upgrading? Any environment variables which need to be set? Cheers Christian -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Upgaded from 1.6.3 to 1.7.1 - Styles missing
Hi Christian, Unfortunately I don't have the rb-site upgrade console output anymore but I'm pretty sure it didn't say anything in that regards (I went over it again yesterday to check if I missed anything). The webserver presented me with the page telling me to fix the access rights to the htdocs/media/ext directory. Running rb-site manage /var/www/codereview/ resolve-check static-media results in: Couldn't find manual update check 'static-media' (rb-site --version shows 1.7.1) Anyway, it's up and running. Thanks for your hard work. Cheers Christian On Monday, January 7, 2013 10:22:44 PM UTC+13, Christian Hammond wrote: When upgrading to 1.7.1, both rb-site and a Manual Updates page should say these need to be added, tell you what to add, and then make you run an 'rb-site manage $sitedir resolve-check static-media' command to use the site. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Christian Wuerdig christia...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Thanks - this had me my head scratching for a while. Is this something which is supposed to happen automatically under normal circumstances? Because I can't find any documentation about it. For the record: I upgraded from 1.6.13 to 1.7.1 on a Ubuntu 12.04. Cheers Christian On Friday, January 4, 2013 6:15:13 AM UTC+13, Brian wrote: Hello, I upgraded from v1.6.3 to v1.7.1 this morning using the following steps: easy_install -U ReviewBoard rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard /etc/init.d/memcached restart service apache2 restart then found that I had to do: chown -R www-data /var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/**media/ext service apache2 restart The upgrade seemed to go ok except the styles are missing when I look at our site, I just see text. I found here (https://groups.google.com/**forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/** reviewboard/PRKV4CPZoZYhttps://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/reviewboard/PRKV4CPZoZY) that I apparently missed something in the rb-site upgrade so I added Alias /static /var/www/reviewboard/htdoc/**static to my Apache config and restarted Apache again. But I'm still not seeing the styles. Any ideas? Thanks, Brian -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Ready VM or Recommended distribution for Review Board 1.7
I installed it on a Ubuntu following http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/linux/ step by step using MySQL as backend. No problems encountered. Hope this helps. On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 6:20:15 AM UTC+13, Erik Putrycz wrote: Are there any downloadable appliances with Review Board 1.7? I found bitnami review board but they only have 1.6 Otherwise, which distribution would result in the easiest install? Would CentOS 6.3 work? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Upgaded from 1.6.3 to 1.7.1 - Styles missing
Thanks - this had me my head scratching for a while. Is this something which is supposed to happen automatically under normal circumstances? Because I can't find any documentation about it. For the record: I upgraded from 1.6.13 to 1.7.1 on a Ubuntu 12.04. Cheers Christian On Friday, January 4, 2013 6:15:13 AM UTC+13, Brian wrote: Hello, I upgraded from v1.6.3 to v1.7.1 this morning using the following steps: easy_install -U ReviewBoard rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard /etc/init.d/memcached restart service apache2 restart then found that I had to do: chown -R www-data /var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/media/ext service apache2 restart The upgrade seemed to go ok except the styles are missing when I look at our site, I just see text. I found here ( https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/reviewboard/PRKV4CPZoZY) that I apparently missed something in the rb-site upgrade so I added Alias /static /var/www/reviewboard/htdoc/static to my Apache config and restarted Apache again. But I'm still not seeing the styles. Any ideas? Thanks, Brian -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Upgrading to 1.7.1 results in weird timestamps
Hi, after the upgrade to 1.7.1 we can see strange timestamps in the dashboard: Like: Posted January 7th, 2013, 2 p.m. Last Updated: 11 hours, 19 minutes from now In the REST API for that request: last_updated2013-01-07T14:08:21Z/last_updated time_added2013-01-07T14:00:10Z/time_added Local time on the server is Mon Jan 7 15:49:37 NZDT 2013 Seems like there were some changes done on how RB (or Python, or Django?) deal with different time zones (we are in New Zealand here so currently we have *UTC/GMT +13 hours)*. It was all working as expected under 1.6.13. Anything I missed when upgrading? Any environment variables which need to be set? Cheers Christian -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Upgrading to 1.7.1 results in weird timestamps
Some additional info: The time zone under General in Reviewboard is set to Pacific/Auckland If I modify a review request now I get this: Last Updated Jan. 7, 2013, 3:08 a.m. Cheers Christian On Monday, January 7, 2013 3:51:21 PM UTC+13, Christian Wuerdig wrote: Hi, after the upgrade to 1.7.1 we can see strange timestamps in the dashboard: Like: Posted January 7th, 2013, 2 p.m. Last Updated: 11 hours, 19 minutes from now In the REST API for that request: last_updated2013-01-07T14:08:21Z/last_updated time_added2013-01-07T14:00:10Z/time_added Local time on the server is Mon Jan 7 15:49:37 NZDT 2013 Seems like there were some changes done on how RB (or Python, or Django?) deal with different time zones (we are in New Zealand here so currently we have *UTC/GMT +13 hours)*. It was all working as expected under 1.6.13. Anything I missed when upgrading? Any environment variables which need to be set? Cheers Christian -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Upgrade problem 1.6.6 to 1.6.9 with MySql
Hi, I tried to upgrade review board from 1.6.6 to 1.6.9 but `rb-site upgrade` spit some errors like _mysql_exceptions. OperationalError: (1005, Can't create table 'reviewboard.#sql-2a4_3' (errno: 150)) A google search led me to an older post in this group: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/reviewboard/bHj8P1VPV84 And indeed changing all reviewboard tables to InnoDb solved the issue. I just thought I mention this here in case someone else runs into this problem and it wasn't straight forward to solve (at least not for me). The problem was caused by initially setting up rb on a Ubuntu 10.10 which used MySQL 5.0 and MyISAM was the default storage engine there. Since MySQL 5.5 the default storage engine is InnoDb. Maybe it could be added to the MySQL specific documentation of the Administration Guide. Cheers Christian -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Diff fie size limited to 1 MB
Hi Christian, we just hit that issue here by some reviews missing the diff files. In general this is caused when someone works on a feature branch in the repository and then merges in the changes from the trunk. Although it is supposed to happen regularly sometimes there can be two or three weeks between a trunk merge which can amount to larger diffs. I would appreciate if that limit can be made configurable Cheers Christian On Thursday, May 17, 2012 7:23:28 AM UTC+12, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Ashish, What's the size you're hitting with your diffs, and what's in them? Diffs that are megabytes in size are generally impossible to review. I'll look at making the limit flexible, but I want to better understand the problems people are hitting. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Ashish Sharma ashiish.sha...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, With the release of Review Board (1.6.6), the diff file size is limited to 1MB only. Since my setup has a limit of 15MB with earlier version and with the latest update I am facing problems How can it be increased to say atleast to 10MB. thanks Ashish -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Diff fie size limited to 1 MB
Sorry, ignore that, just realized that it is configurable since 1.6.7 On Friday, June 22, 2012 3:51:56 PM UTC+12, Christian Wuerdig wrote: Hi Christian, we just hit that issue here by some reviews missing the diff files. In general this is caused when someone works on a feature branch in the repository and then merges in the changes from the trunk. Although it is supposed to happen regularly sometimes there can be two or three weeks between a trunk merge which can amount to larger diffs. I would appreciate if that limit can be made configurable Cheers Christian On Thursday, May 17, 2012 7:23:28 AM UTC+12, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Ashish, What's the size you're hitting with your diffs, and what's in them? Diffs that are megabytes in size are generally impossible to review. I'll look at making the limit flexible, but I want to better understand the problems people are hitting. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Ashish Sharma ashiish.sha...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, With the release of Review Board (1.6.6), the diff file size is limited to 1MB only. Since my setup has a limit of 15MB with earlier version and with the latest update I am facing problems How can it be increased to say atleast to 10MB. thanks Ashish -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
