Re: Review Board 1.7.20 is out
Hi, Review Board 1.7.20 is already available in Bitnami as well. http://bitnami.com/stack/reviewboard Best regards, Victoria. On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Hey everyone, We have a small bug fix release out. 1.7.20 fixes issues with JSON fields in the admin UI, compatibility issues with the Mercurial backend, API issues with file attachments, and more. http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2013/12/10/review-board-1-7-20-released/ We're gearing up for a new RBTools release with some real goodies, and another beta of Review Board 2.0. Stay tuned! Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Review Board 1.6.21 and 1.7.17 released
Hi, Review Board 1.7.18 is already in BitNami. Installers, virtual machines and cloud images have been updated. http://bitnami.com/stack/reviewboard Best regards, Victoria. On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Matthew Woehlke mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com wrote: On 2013-11-05 23:16, Christian Hammond wrote: We just put out two new releases, 1.6.21 and 1.7.17. These fix a couple security vulnerabilities, so please upgrade. Users with the can_change_status permission no longer need the can_edit_reviewrequest permission in order to close or reopen review requests. Does this mean that bug 3011¹ is fixed? (¹ http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3011) -- Matthew -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Review Board 1.7.14 is released
Hi, The BitNami installers, virtual machines and cloud images have been also updated. They include Django 1.4.8, Djblets 0.7.18 and Review Board 1.7.14. http://bitnami.com/stack/reviewboard Best regards, Victoria. On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Christian Hammond christ...@beanbaginc.com wrote: Hi everyone, Review Board 1.7.14 is out. As promised, it updates to the latest security release for Django, and has a handful of other bug fixes, including a small security fix affecting some users using private groups and repositories in the API. Along with this, we've added Team support for Bitbucket. More info at http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2013/09/15/review-board-1-7-14-released/ Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Announce - BitNami installers for ReviewBoard updated (Django security update)
Hi, Just wanted to let you know that we have released BitNami ReviewBoard 1.7.12-1. This version includes the latest version of Django 1.4 which fixes two cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities http://blog.bitnami.com/2013/08/new-django-v146-and-v152-released.html https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2013/aug/13/security-releases-issued/ Best regards, Victoria. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Review Board 1.6.18 and 1.7.12 released
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On 07/28/2013 06:02 AM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi everyone, We have a couple new releases tonight. Review Board 1.6.18 and 1.7.12 focus on tightening security, and giving extension writers a couple new abilities to make their lives easier. It's late here, so I'm going to direct you to the news post for further information: http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2013/07/28/review-board-1-6-18-and-1-7-12-released/ We also have a new guide on beefing up security for your file attachments. This is especially important for those of you with public installations, so please read it. http://support.beanbaginc.com/support/solutions/articles/110173-securing-file-attachments Packages for Fedora 18, Fedora 19 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (and clones) are now available for testing at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard They should appear in the 'updates-testing' or 'epel-testing' repository mirrors within 48 hours, or they can be downloaded manually and tried out from the link above. Please report any issues you discover with these packages to https://bugzilla.redhat.com and the ReviewBoard component. The BitNami packages have been also udpated. BitNami ReviewBoard 1.7.12 installers, virtual machines and cloud images are already available at http://bitnami.com/stack/reviewboard -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Review Board -Add Repository Issue(with Perforce)
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:58 AM, RB lanka.a...@gmail.com wrote: 1.I have installed perforce Command-Line Client(Version 2012.1). 2.Later i installed p4python27. As Bitnami Review Board stack comes with python 2.7.5 and p4pyhon27 is compatible with python 2.7.5 there should not be any issues. 3.Later i installed latest Bitnami Review Board stack for windows. 4.Later i started both Apache Web Server and MySQL Database. I am able to acccess ReviewBoard log-in url. I have created a user. 5.Then when i try to add the perforce repository and save it, i am getting the following error: DLL load failed: The specified module could not be found. OK. I have finally been able to create a Perforce repository in ReviewBoard. I used the public.perforce.com:1666 repository for testing. This is the exact steps I followed: - Install BitNami ReviewBoard - Go to the Windows Start Menu - BitNami ReviewBoard - Register BitNami Python in the Windows Registry. - Open the BitNami environment. Go to the Windows Start Menu - BitNami ReviewBoard - Use BitNami Reviewboard (this will open a windows command prompt). - Install p4python27.exe from the command line (it needs to be the 32 bit binary). I used [this version][1]. Only the API component is necessary. Now to check that the module is loaded correctly in the Python version installed with BitNami: - Execute `python` - In the python console execute `import P4` If you don't receive any error from the console, it means that the module is installed correctly. You are receiving the error when accessing reviewboard because when importing that module in the application running with apache + mod_wsgi the msvcr90.dll is not found. (The issue is similar to [this][2]). In order to fix you need to have installed [vcredist 2008 x86][3] and the mt.exe tool installed. mt.exe is included in the [Microsoft Windows Software Development Kit][4] (only the windows development tools component is required). Then execute the following: mt.exe -inputresource:c:\bitnami\reviewboard-1.7.11-0\python\bin\python.exe;#1 -out:pyd.manifest mt.exe -manifest pyd.manifest -outputresource:c:\bitnami\reviewboard-1.7.11-0\python\Lib\site-packages\P4API.pyd;#2 Restart apache and try to create a new Perforce repostiory. I have also replied to you in the BitNami forums (answers.bitnami.com). I hope this helps. [1]: http://www.mmnt.net/db/0/0/ftp.perforce.com/perforce/r12.1/bin.ntx86 [2]: http://code.google.com/p/pyodbc/issues/detail?id=214 [3]: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=29 [4]: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=3138 On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:13:24 PM UTC+5:30, victoria wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:29 AM, RB lanka...@gmail.com wrote: Hi , I have installed Bitnami Review board stack for windows only. I have installed perforce(Version 2012.1) and p4python27 which is compatible with Python 2.7.5. But still i am getting the same issue. Can you suggest a solution for this. RB Can you explain the exact steps that you follow and point us to the packages that you used? Thanks On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 12:18:14 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, We don't support Review Board on Windows due to a number of difficult-to-resolve compatibility errors with our dependencies. I'd recommend using a Linux machine (dedicated or in a VM), or the BitNami installer for Windows. The latter will make sure all your dependencies are correct. Some future enhancements to Review Board may not work on Windows, for what it's worth. Christian On Jul 9, 2013, at 1:43, RB lanka...@gmail.com wrote: I have set-up ReviewBoard on windows 64-bit. I have installed P4 and p4python. I am facing an issue while Adding Repository(perforce) in Review Board stack. I am getting the following error: DLL load failed: The specified module could not be found. Has anyone faced the same issue. If so what could be the reason for this issue. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group
Re: Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Robert Burkhall rburk...@gmail.com wrote:
0
http://answers.bitnami.com/vote/14546/down/
I found a workaround of the above issue that relates to Windows
Installations.
1) CD {install
path}\reviewboard-1.7.9-0\apps\reviewboard\Lib\site-packages
2) Verify that ReviewBoard-1.7.9-py2.7.egg ReviewBoard-1.7.11-py2.7.egg
exists
3) Rename ReviewBoard-1.7.9-py2.7.egg to ReviewBoard-1.7.9-py2.7.egg.old
4) Rename ReviewBoard-1.7.11-py2.7.egg to ReviewBoard-1.7.9-py2.7.egg
5) Restart Apache service
6) Site is working normally
I couldn't find the location in a config file that pointed to the old .egg
folder, so making sure the new folder exists and renaming it worked. This
is not the suggested fix, however it will get you over the issue for now.
Hi Robert,
Thanks for posting your solution. I saw that you also did it in the BItNami
forums. As you mention this is only a workaround. We will look into it on
our side. Thanks again!
Best regards,
Victoria.
On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 11:11:10 AM UTC-4, Robert Burkhall wrote:
Hi Victoria,
The issue has been resolved with the release of 1.7.9.11, however I get
the following message after following the upgrade instructions.
Manual server updates required
A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After
these changes are made, you should restart your server.
If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing
list http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard.
Review Board version mismatch
The version of Review Board running does not match the version the site
was last upgraded to. You are running *1.7.9* and the site was last
upgraded to *1.7.11*.
Please upgrade your site to fix this by running:
$ rb-site upgrade
C:/BitNami/reviewboard-1.7.9-**0/apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/**reviewboard
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 6:24:07 AM UTC-4, victoria wrote:
Hi Robert,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Robert Burkhall rbur...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Victoria,
I like the the Reviewboard stack that's been created and it's only
missing
the python-ldap. However, I've seen a strange issue with IE that is
not
apparent in Firefox or Chrome. Has only else reported any issue using
the
stack with IE9 in our case?
I'm glad that you like it. Regarding the python-ldap module, have you
tried to install this
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/**python-ldap/2.4.12https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-ldap/2.4.12
? What is the issue that you are finding with IE? Could it be related
to JavaScript not enalbed or something like that? If that is not the
case and it is shown correctly with Firefox and Chrome it seems to it
could be an issue with the ReviewBoard web interface and IE support...
On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 4:19:58 PM UTC-5, victoria wrote:
Hi,
As I already mentioned in the list in BitNami we were working on a
Windows installer for Review Board. Well, we have just released it
and
you can download it from
http://bitnami.org/stack/**reviewboardhttp://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard
This version includes Python, Django, MySQL, Apache with mod_wsgi,
Git, Subversion and all the required dependencies.
As you already may know Review Board is not longer officially
supported on Windows. It is was difficult to install on Windows and
lot of incompatibilities with different Python versions or modules
made difficult to support. However we (in BitNami) still have people
asking if we planned to provide a windows installer of Review Board
as
we already do for Linux. As we offer all-in-one installer which
includes all the required dependencies most of those incompatibility
issues should not appear. You still will want to use a Linux version
for a production environment but I'm sure that for lot of users will
find useful the Windows installer to give a try to ReviewBoard and
discover if it is the right solution for them. Also we will keep it
update so you can quickly test new versions when released. Please
notice that the the installation should be fully functional (although
not officially supported by the ReviewBoard team) and we will love to
hear from you if you find any issue so we can fix it.
Christian I also wanted to take the opportunity to thank you for the
support you provide to me for getting this done :)
Well I hope you all enjoy it!
Best regards,
Victoria.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--**~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard...@googlegroups.**com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/**group/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board -Add Repository Issue(with Perforce)
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:29 AM, RB lanka.a...@gmail.com wrote: Hi , I have installed Bitnami Review board stack for windows only. I have installed perforce(Version 2012.1) and p4python27 which is compatible with Python 2.7.5. But still i am getting the same issue. Can you suggest a solution for this. RB Can you explain the exact steps that you follow and point us to the packages that you used? Thanks On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 12:18:14 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, We don't support Review Board on Windows due to a number of difficult-to-resolve compatibility errors with our dependencies. I'd recommend using a Linux machine (dedicated or in a VM), or the BitNami installer for Windows. The latter will make sure all your dependencies are correct. Some future enhancements to Review Board may not work on Windows, for what it's worth. Christian On Jul 9, 2013, at 1:43, RB lanka...@gmail.com wrote: I have set-up ReviewBoard on windows 64-bit. I have installed P4 and p4python. I am facing an issue while Adding Repository(perforce) in Review Board stack. I am getting the following error: DLL load failed: The specified module could not be found. Has anyone faced the same issue. If so what could be the reason for this issue. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Review Board 1.6.17 and 1.7.10 released
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On 06/22/2013 11:51 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi everyone, We have two new releases out tonight. Both are important security updates for a vulnerability that was reported to us that affects primarily public-facing sites. 1.7.10 contains some additional bug fixes and improvements. For more info, see http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2013/06/22/review-board-1617-and-1710-released/ Fedora and EPEL 6 packages are now on their way to the updates-testing repository. As this contains a fix for a security issue, I'd appreciate it if karma could be provided at the below links in order to push it to stable ASAP. ** IMPORTANT: Fedora 17 is no longer supported for ReviewBoard[1], please upgrade to Fedora 18/19 or switch to using easy_install. ** Fedora 19: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard-1.7.10-1.fc19 Fedora 18: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard-1.7.10-1.fc18 EPEL 6: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard-1.7.10-1.el6 If you wish to test these packages before they filter out to the mirrors, you can download the RPMs directly and install them with 'yum localinstall --nogpgcheck ReviewBoard*.rpm': Fedora 19: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/ReviewBoard/1.7.10/1.fc19/noarch/ReviewBoard-1.7.10-1.fc19.noarch.rpm Fedora 18: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/ReviewBoard/1.7.10/1.fc18/noarch/ReviewBoard-1.7.10-1.fc18.noarch.rpm EPEL 6: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/ReviewBoard/1.7.10/1.el6/noarch/ReviewBoard-1.7.10-1.el6.noarch.rpm [1] Fedora 17 has upgraded to Django 1.4 in the main repo. People who have been using ReviewBoard up to this point will have just been holding their local Django at 1.3 in yum. However, I can no longer build a new copy of ReviewBoard because 1.6.x won't build against Django 1.4 and ReviewBoard 1.7.x requires other dependencies that are two new to be carried in Fedora 17. If you need long-term supportability for ReviewBoard, I recommend using RHEL 6. Otherwise, please upgrade your systems to Fedora 18 or 19 (the latter which is in its release-candidate stage now and quite stable). Review Board 1.7.10 released on BitNami as well. Installers, virtual machines and cloud images available in http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Review Board 1.7.9 is released
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On 06/04/2013 05:47 AM, Christian Hammond wrote: On Jun 4, 2013, at 2:44 AM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com mailto:step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On Tuesday, June 4, 2013, pfee wrote: Hi Christian, Stephen, While testing Stephen's Fedora packages, on a F18 machine I upgraded from 1.7.7.1 to 1.7.9. Following the upgrade, I expected visiting the site's /dashboard URL would have told me to run rb-site upgrade. Instead I got a 500 Something broke... message. Despite not being prompted, I ran rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard anyway. The site came back to life and started working again as expected, however someone upgrading for the first time would not know to do this. Ah, thanks for reminding me. Not that anyone actually reads the updates notes, but I usually put a reminder in that you always need to run rb-site upgrade after installing the packages. I'll tweak the update notes when I get to work. I've been meaning to patch the Fedora packages to do this automatically, by having rb-site install save a config file with a list of installed sites so I can have the %post script run the upgrade on package install. I've actually been wanting such a file for Review Board upstream that rb-site can write to, so that we can be more intelligent about upgrades. If you come up with a good way to do it, let me know :) Has Review Board formally and without question dropped Windows support? If so, it becomes reasonably easy to hardcode a requirement on a file such as /etc/ReviewBoard/sites which could be as simple as one-path-per-line, and then patch rb-site to amend it when doing an install and to iterate through it when calling 'rb-site upgrade' with no arguments. Then all I would have to do in the Fedora packages is call 'rb-site upgrade' in the %post section on upgrades. Just a comment from BitNami. Even if Windows is not supported it would be great you don't have any path hardcoded. Currently we allow to have different installations in the systems in different installation paths, installing as root as an not root user. Of course this is also possible without using the BitNami installers. Having that hardcoded will affect this flexibility. If those are necessary I would suggest to have default values..but not hardcoded and not customizables values. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Getting 403 Forbidden when accessing Reviewboard
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On 05/22/2013 04:01 AM, Justin O'Doherty wrote: # cat /proc/version Linux version 2.6.18-308.4.1.el5 (mockbu...@hs20-bc2-4.build.redhat.com mailto:mockbu...@hs20-bc2-4.build.redhat.com) (gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-52)) #1 SMP Wed Mar 28 01:54:56 EDT 2012 Architecture: x86_64 I had a look in the EPEL repository that you mentioned, but couldnt see a compatible package for the system. Ok, you're on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. I can only support up to ReviewBoard 1.5.7 on that platform natively because the system version of Python is only 2.4. Since the OS is so old, I haven't gone through the effort of packaging up all of ReviewBoard's dependencies against the python26 alternate compiler in EPEL. Is there a reason that ReviewBoard needs to be installed on this particular (very old) OS, or can you look at RHEL 6 (or perhaps something like OpenShift, BitNami or of course RBCommons for hosting?) Regarding BitNami, the linux installer may also work for you if using the native system packages is not a requirement. It bundles Apache, Python and mod_wsgi and it will not use the (old) system packages. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Review Board 1.7.7.1 is released
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On Sun 21 Apr 2013 05:05:19 PM EDT, Christian Hammond wrote: We had a regression when creating new site installations. While unfortunate, it gave us the opportunity for a cool version number. So it all works out in the end. Review Board 1.7.7.1 is out. If you already have a working site, then no need to upgrade, but if you had trouble creating a site, get it. Release notes are available: http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/1.7.7.1/ Packages for Fedora 18, 19 and RHEL/CentOS 6 have been built and will be showing up in the updates-testing or epel-testing repositories within 48 hours. Please remember that you will need to run 'rb-site upgrade /path/to/site' after installing these new packages. Fedora: yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ReviewBoard RHEL: yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing ReviewBoard The Bodhi update links can be found at: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/ReviewBoard If you install these testing packages and find issues or they work properly, please note this on the Web UI so I can know when it's safe to submit them for the stable repositories. Hi, Just wanted to let you know that the BitNami installers, virtual machine and cloud images for ReviewBoard have been also updated. http://bitnami.com/stack/reviewboard Best regards, Victoria. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: New BitNami Review Board Stack
Hi, On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:11 PM, mohan boddu mohaninvit...@gmail.com wrote: Fernando, I installed your BitNami review board tool and I would like to thank you since the installation pretty simple and hassle free. Now, I want to integrate it with mercurial. Could you please let me know how to integrate it with mercurial. Which version of the BitNami stack are you using and in which platform? Any help would be appreciated. Thank you. On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:07:52 AM UTC-6, fern...@bitrock.com wrote: Thanks Sridhar, looking forward to your feedback! Fernando Ruiz On Feb 13, 11:12 pm, Sridhar Srigiriraju ssridh...@gmail.com wrote: Fernando, I really appreciate the effort you have taken up. I recently finished installing review board on our Linux server and was thoroughly frustrated because of all the underlying dependencies. It took me several iterations to figure out on how to just get it up and running. I will will definitely check this out and let you know feedback, if any Thanks Sridhar On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Fernando Ruiz ferna...@bitrock.com wrote: Hi, I am one of the BitNami project developers. We package popular opensource web applications and make them available as freely available installers, virtual machines and Amazon Machine images. I am writing because I wanted to let you know that we are working on an installer that greatly simplifies the installation of Review Board and runtime dependencies. It includes ready-to-run versions of Apache (with mod_wsgi), MySQL, Python and Memcached. It also includes integration with Subversion, Git and Mercurial out of the box. You can download it here: http://clients.bitrock.com/files/reviewboard/20120210/**http://clients.bitrock.com/**files/reviewboard/20120210/** bitnami-reviewboard-1.6.3-0-linux-installer.runhttp://** clients.bitrock.com/files/**reviewboard/20120210/bitnami-**reviewb..http://clients.bitrock.com/files/reviewboard/20120210/bitnami-reviewb... md5: 50b1e9f212f09fb13bb988839d2df885 http://clients.bitrock.com/files/reviewboard/20120210/**http://clients.bitrock.com/**files/reviewboard/20120210/** bitnami-reviewboard-1.6.3-0-linux-x64-installer.runhttp:/** /clients.bitrock.com/files/**reviewboard/20120210/bitnami-**reviewb..http://clients.bitrock.com/files/reviewboard/20120210/bitnami-reviewb... md5: 359dcd6dcee3ea67d263c04aaeee3a59 If you have a few minutes, we would appreciate if you can check the stack and provide your feedback and suggestions. We plan to release the native installers (for Linux), pre-configured virtual machines and Amazon Images soon but we would really like to have your feedback first, to make sure we are not making any dumb mistakes and to learn about any improvement suggestions you may have. Please let us know if this is not the right place to ask for this kind of feedback Best regards, Fernando Ruiz -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/ http://www.**reviewboard.org/donate/http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/ http://www.**reviewboard.org/users/ http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscribe@** googlegroups.com reviewboard%...@**googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/** group/reviewboard?hl=en http://groups.google.com/** group/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard
Hi, As I already mentioned in the list in BitNami we were working on a Windows installer for Review Board. Well, we have just released it and you can download it from http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard This version includes Python, Django, MySQL, Apache with mod_wsgi, Git, Subversion and all the required dependencies. As you already may know Review Board is not longer officially supported on Windows. It is was difficult to install on Windows and lot of incompatibilities with different Python versions or modules made difficult to support. However we (in BitNami) still have people asking if we planned to provide a windows installer of Review Board as we already do for Linux. As we offer all-in-one installer which includes all the required dependencies most of those incompatibility issues should not appear. You still will want to use a Linux version for a production environment but I'm sure that for lot of users will find useful the Windows installer to give a try to ReviewBoard and discover if it is the right solution for them. Also we will keep it update so you can quickly test new versions when released. Please notice that the the installation should be fully functional (although not officially supported by the ReviewBoard team) and we will love to hear from you if you find any issue so we can fix it. Christian I also wanted to take the opportunity to thank you for the support you provide to me for getting this done :) Well I hope you all enjoy it! Best regards, Victoria. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Review Board 1.7.6 is released!
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On Thu 21 Feb 2013 10:14:29 AM CET, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, 1.7.6 is out. The big highlight is support for Perforce ticket-based auth, which I know will make a lot of you happy. There's also a scattering of fixes and feature enhancements. See http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.7.6/ for more information. I've released updated Fedora 18 and Rawhide packages for ReviewBoard 1.7.6: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-djblets-0.7.11-1.fc18,ReviewBoard-1.7.6-1.fc18 Review Board 1.7.6 released on BitNami as well. Installers, virtual machines and cloud images available in http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Review Board 1.7.4 released
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that in BitNami we have already released installers, vms and cloud images for ReviewBoard 1.7.4. You can get them in http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard Best regards, Victoria. On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Ah, okay. Well you definitely don't want to run a production site that way, but for a dev environment, sure. What you may be hitting is stale generated media files. Check to see if you have a reviewboard/htdocs/static/ directory. If so, delete it and restart, see if it improves. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Jan 31, 2013, at 9:38 PM, Tao Zhou moon...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Christian: Yes, you are quite right. As I didn't use virtualenv and didn't know how to upgrade an existing site, I just start reviewboard with 'manage.py runserver' with latest code and thought it was same with deployed one, I will later cleanup my environment and have a test and see if the issue was fixed or not next Monday. Thanks! Tao On Thursday, January 31, 2013 6:41:20 PM UTC+8, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Tao, This doesn't look like you're running a standard install, but rather a development install. Am I correct? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Jan 31, 2013, at 2:34 AM, Tao Zhou moo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Christian: Seems the view diff issue for clearcase repo on Windows has not been fixed completely in this release, I have tried and now all diffs could be displayed normally, but the spinning.gif keeping loading and loading, and below is the error message on Chrome console Resource interpreted as Image but transferred with MIME type image/x-png: http://localhost:8080/reviews/static/rb/images/edit.png;. jquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 Uncaught TypeError: undefined is not a function reviews.js:1840 (anonymous function)reviews.js:1840 kjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 l.fireWithjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 p.extend.readyjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 Djquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 isshow:false and if click on diff area to ad comment, it fails, with new error message as below: Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'create' of undefined diffviewer.js:279 $.extend.showCommentDlgdiffviewer.js:279 endSelectiondiffviewer.js:553 (anonymous function)diffviewer.js:419 p.event.dispatchjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 g.handle.h On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:08:28 PM UTC+8, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi everyone, Review Board 1.7.4 is out. It fixes a couple problems with 1.7.3 that users of IE and developers generating patches on Windows have hit. It's a pretty small release, but if you have 1.7.3 installed, you should upgrade. http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2013/01/30/review-board-1-7-4-released/ Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
Re: Review Board 1.7.4 released
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Great! Thanks Victoria :) We'll work out something at some point to link to your builds for Windows users in the docs and site. Hey! Thanks but we are still working on Windows :) I plan to send you a beta build today or on Monday so you can take a look at it. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Feb 1, 2013, at 12:22 AM, victoria ka...@bitrock.com wrote: Hi, I just wanted to let you know that in BitNami we have already released installers, vms and cloud images for ReviewBoard 1.7.4. You can get them in http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard Best regards, Victoria. On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Ah, okay. Well you definitely don't want to run a production site that way, but for a dev environment, sure. What you may be hitting is stale generated media files. Check to see if you have a reviewboard/htdocs/static/ directory. If so, delete it and restart, see if it improves. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Jan 31, 2013, at 9:38 PM, Tao Zhou moon...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Christian: Yes, you are quite right. As I didn't use virtualenv and didn't know how to upgrade an existing site, I just start reviewboard with 'manage.py runserver' with latest code and thought it was same with deployed one, I will later cleanup my environment and have a test and see if the issue was fixed or not next Monday. Thanks! Tao On Thursday, January 31, 2013 6:41:20 PM UTC+8, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Tao, This doesn't look like you're running a standard install, but rather a development install. Am I correct? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Jan 31, 2013, at 2:34 AM, Tao Zhou moo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Christian: Seems the view diff issue for clearcase repo on Windows has not been fixed completely in this release, I have tried and now all diffs could be displayed normally, but the spinning.gif keeping loading and loading, and below is the error message on Chrome console Resource interpreted as Image but transferred with MIME type image/x-png: http://localhost:8080/reviews/static/rb/images/edit.png;. jquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 Uncaught TypeError: undefined is not a function reviews.js:1840 (anonymous function)reviews.js:1840 kjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 l.fireWithjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 p.extend.readyjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 Djquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 isshow:false and if click on diff area to ad comment, it fails, with new error message as below: Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'create' of undefined diffviewer.js:279 $.extend.showCommentDlgdiffviewer.js:279 endSelectiondiffviewer.js:553 (anonymous function)diffviewer.js:419 p.event.dispatchjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 g.handle.h On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:08:28 PM UTC+8, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi everyone, Review Board 1.7.4 is out. It fixes a couple problems with 1.7.3 that users of IE and developers generating patches on Windows have hit. It's a pretty small release, but if you have 1.7.3 installed, you should upgrade. http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2013/01/30/review-board-1-7-4-released/ Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out
Re: Ready VM or Recommended distribution for Review Board 1.7
Hi, On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:41 AM, victoria ka...@bitnami.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Matthew Woehlke mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com wrote: On 2013-01-07 12:20, Erik Putrycz wrote: Are there any downloadable appliances with Review Board 1.7? I found bitnami review board but they only have 1.6 In BitNami we are already working on the installers and virtual appliances for Review Board 1.7. I will let you know as soon as they are ready. I just wanted to let you know that the BitNami installers, virtual machines and cloud images are already available for download. You can find them in http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard Best regards, Victoria. Best regards, Victoria. Otherwise, which distribution would result in the easiest install? Would CentOS 6.3 work? If you're willing to run non-LTS Fedora, and the still-in-beta version 18 thereof, I'm happily doing likewise using Stephen's packages of RB 1.7.1. -- Matthew -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7.2 is released
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On 01/17/2013 01:58 AM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi everyone, Review Board 1.7.2 is out. Lots of bug fixes and a few new features. See the news post and release notes for more info. http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2013/01/16/review-board-1-7-2-released/ We'll have a new RBTools out pretty soon with some nice improvements as well. BitNami installers, vms and cloud images for 1.7.2 are also available at http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard Fedora packages are now available for testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard-1.7.2-1.fc18 -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Ready VM or Recommended distribution for Review Board 1.7
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Matthew Woehlke mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com wrote: On 2013-01-07 12:20, Erik Putrycz wrote: Are there any downloadable appliances with Review Board 1.7? I found bitnami review board but they only have 1.6 In BitNami we are already working on the installers and virtual appliances for Review Board 1.7. I will let you know as soon as they are ready. Best regards, Victoria. Otherwise, which distribution would result in the easiest install? Would CentOS 6.3 work? If you're willing to run non-LTS Fedora, and the still-in-beta version 18 thereof, I'm happily doing likewise using Stephen's packages of RB 1.7.1. -- Matthew -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.6.6 released
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Can Özmen canoz...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, I did Option B and I'm now on 1.6.6. Great :-) Thanks for the help. That was quick. I really appreciate it. P.S. rb-site died on me complaining about not finding libreadline5.so even when libreadline6 was installed. But I was logged in as bitnami and the bitnami environment was not loaded, maybe that's why. I'll be happy to send any outputs or logs. Hi I didn't get that error even if the bitnami environment is not loaded. If you have the chance of try it and you reproduce it. Could you copy the command that you executed and the output you get? In any case as mentioned it may be just that bitnami environment was not loaded. I'm glad that you got it working! :) -- Can Özmen On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 at 6:59 PM, victoria wrote: On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Can Özmen canoz...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I was able to install 1.6.6 with the -U option. Both the .egg and rb-site script seems to be updated correctly. I then had to install libreadline5 via apt-get to get rb-site working. But rb-site still fails with: pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: ReviewBoard==1.6.6 Is there way to see where setuptools is looking for packages/distributions? Should I delete the 1.6.5 .egg? Why did you need to install libreadline5? And when do you get that error? What are you executing? This is what I execute and works for me: sudo easy_install --prefix apps/reviewboard --script-dir apps/reviewboard/bin --install-dir apps/reviewboard/lib -U ReviewBoard Then if you execute the rb-site comand you will get the error below (sorry I previously missed this step) bitnami@xxx:~$ /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard /opt/bitnami/python/bin/.python.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libpython2.6.so.1.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or director This is because rb-site is not loading the bitnami environment. If you open the rb-site script you will see that it is pointing to .python.bin. You can: Option A.- Edit rb-site and change .python.bin with python. bitnami@xxx:~$ sudo /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. Creating tables ... Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.5 to 1.6.6 Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... No fixtures found. No evolution required. Resetting in-database caches. Upgrade complete. Option B.- Login as root and load the bitnami environment bitnami@xxx:~$ sudo su root@xxx:/home/bitnami# . /opt/bitnami/scripts/setenv.sh -- notice the space between the dot and the script path. root@domU-12-31-39-0A-25-90:/home/bitnami# /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. Creating tables ... Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... No fixtures found. No evolution required. Resetting in-database caches. Upgrade complete. Thanks, Can. -- Can Özmen On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 at 12:30 PM, victoria wrote: On May 1, 7:11 pm, Can Özmen canoz...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Victoria, easy_install could only find 1.6.5 from Bitnami's repo the last I checked. I'll wait a few days more I guess. Hi, With easy_install you should download ReviewBoard from the official repository. I tested the steps on my side and with option -U ReviewBoard it worked for me and found the the new version 1.6.6 (don't forget to use also the other options so it doesn't install the new version in a different location). Happy Workers Day, Can. On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 2:52:15 PM UTC+3, victoria wrote: On Apr 30, 4:50 pm, Can Özmen canoz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Great work. I have a fresh 1.6.5 installed through BitNami on an EC2 instance. What's the upgrade procedure? Couldn't find it on the site or in the admin dashboard of the app. P.S. I have nothing in my install so I can wipe if necessary. For upgrading the BitNami installation you only need to take into account the path in which ReviewBoard is installed. According to the ReviewBoard official documentation the upgrade will involves two steps: 1.- Upgrade ReviewBoard with easy_install. Load the BitNami environment and execute: easy_install --prefix apps/reviewboard --script-dir apps/reviewboard/ bin --install-dir apps/reviewboard/lib -U ReviewBoard 2.- Upgrade your sites. The default site is created in /opt/bitnami/ apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade /opt/bitnami/apps/ reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard In any case if as you mention you don't have any data yet, it may be easier just launched a new instance. Best regards, Victoria. On Wednesday, April 25
Re: Review Board 1.6.6 released
On May 1, 7:11 pm, Can Özmen canoz...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Victoria, easy_install could only find 1.6.5 from Bitnami's repo the last I checked. I'll wait a few days more I guess. Hi, With easy_install you should download ReviewBoard from the official repository. I tested the steps on my side and with option -U ReviewBoard it worked for me and found the the new version 1.6.6 (don't forget to use also the other options so it doesn't install the new version in a different location). Happy Workers Day, Can. On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 2:52:15 PM UTC+3, victoria wrote: On Apr 30, 4:50 pm, Can Özmen canoz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Great work. I have a fresh 1.6.5 installed through BitNami on an EC2 instance. What's the upgrade procedure? Couldn't find it on the site or in the admin dashboard of the app. P.S. I have nothing in my install so I can wipe if necessary. For upgrading the BitNami installation you only need to take into account the path in which ReviewBoard is installed. According to the ReviewBoard official documentation the upgrade will involves two steps: 1.- Upgrade ReviewBoard with easy_install. Load the BitNami environment and execute: easy_install --prefix apps/reviewboard --script-dir apps/reviewboard/ bin --install-dir apps/reviewboard/lib -U ReviewBoard 2.- Upgrade your sites. The default site is created in /opt/bitnami/ apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade /opt/bitnami/apps/ reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard In any case if as you mention you don't have any data yet, it may be easier just launched a new instance. Best regards, Victoria. On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:50:37 PM UTC+3, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, Review Board 1.6.6 is out, and adds support for getting GitHub API tokens for private repos. See the news post and release notes at http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/04/25/review-board-166-released/ Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board Bitnami stack blog post
On Apr 1, 3:22 pm, Jim Priest pri...@thecrumb.com wrote: I'm doing a presentation of Review Board at an upcoming development conference and was tinkering around with Review Board on Bitnami. The installation process was very easy - hopefully this will open the door to more Review Board users who were intimidated by installation. I blogged about it here: http://thecrumb.com/2012/03/31/review-board-on-virtualbox/ Hi I'm from the BitNami team and it seem that I missed this message in the list. Thanks for using BitNami! If you have any feedback good or bad I will be glad to hear it! Suggestions accepted. Thanks! Jim -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.6.6 released
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Can Özmen canoz...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I was able to install 1.6.6 with the -U option. Both the .egg and rb-site script seems to be updated correctly. I then had to install libreadline5 via apt-get to get rb-site working. But rb-site still fails with: pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: ReviewBoard==1.6.6 Is there way to see where setuptools is looking for packages/distributions? Should I delete the 1.6.5 .egg? Why did you need to install libreadline5? And when do you get that error? What are you executing? This is what I execute and works for me: sudo easy_install --prefix apps/reviewboard --script-dir apps/reviewboard/bin --install-dir apps/reviewboard/lib -U ReviewBoard Then if you execute the rb-site comand you will get the error below (sorry I previously missed this step) bitnami@xxx:~$ /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard /opt/bitnami/python/bin/.python.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libpython2.6.so.1.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or director This is because rb-site is not loading the bitnami environment. If you open the rb-site script you will see that it is pointing to .python.bin. You can: Option A.- Edit rb-site and change .python.bin with python. bitnami@xxx:~$ sudo /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. Creating tables ... Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.5 to 1.6.6 Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... No fixtures found. No evolution required. Resetting in-database caches. Upgrade complete. Option B.- Login as root and load the bitnami environment bitnami@xxx:~$ sudo su root@xxx:/home/bitnami# . /opt/bitnami/scripts/setenv.sh -- notice the space between the dot and the script path. root@domU-12-31-39-0A-25-90:/home/bitnami# /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. Creating tables ... Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... No fixtures found. No evolution required. Resetting in-database caches. Upgrade complete. Thanks, Can. -- Can Özmen On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 at 12:30 PM, victoria wrote: On May 1, 7:11 pm, Can Özmen canoz...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Victoria, easy_install could only find 1.6.5 from Bitnami's repo the last I checked. I'll wait a few days more I guess. Hi, With easy_install you should download ReviewBoard from the official repository. I tested the steps on my side and with option -U ReviewBoard it worked for me and found the the new version 1.6.6 (don't forget to use also the other options so it doesn't install the new version in a different location). Happy Workers Day, Can. On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 2:52:15 PM UTC+3, victoria wrote: On Apr 30, 4:50 pm, Can Özmen canoz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Great work. I have a fresh 1.6.5 installed through BitNami on an EC2 instance. What's the upgrade procedure? Couldn't find it on the site or in the admin dashboard of the app. P.S. I have nothing in my install so I can wipe if necessary. For upgrading the BitNami installation you only need to take into account the path in which ReviewBoard is installed. According to the ReviewBoard official documentation the upgrade will involves two steps: 1.- Upgrade ReviewBoard with easy_install. Load the BitNami environment and execute: easy_install --prefix apps/reviewboard --script-dir apps/reviewboard/ bin --install-dir apps/reviewboard/lib -U ReviewBoard 2.- Upgrade your sites. The default site is created in /opt/bitnami/ apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade /opt/bitnami/apps/ reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard In any case if as you mention you don't have any data yet, it may be easier just launched a new instance. Best regards, Victoria. On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:50:37 PM UTC+3, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, Review Board 1.6.6 is out, and adds support for getting GitHub API tokens for private repos. See the news post and release notes at http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/04/25/review-board-166-released/ Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today
Re: Review Board 1.6.6 released
On Apr 30, 4:50 pm, Can Özmen canoz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Great work. I have a fresh 1.6.5 installed through BitNami on an EC2 instance. What's the upgrade procedure? Couldn't find it on the site or in the admin dashboard of the app. P.S. I have nothing in my install so I can wipe if necessary. For upgrading the BitNami installation you only need to take into account the path in which ReviewBoard is installed. According to the ReviewBoard official documentation the upgrade will involves two steps: 1.- Upgrade ReviewBoard with easy_install. Load the BitNami environment and execute: easy_install --prefix apps/reviewboard --script-dir apps/reviewboard/ bin --install-dir apps/reviewboard/lib -U ReviewBoard 2.- Upgrade your sites. The default site is created in /opt/bitnami/ apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade /opt/bitnami/apps/ reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard Best regards, Victoria. On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:50:37 PM UTC+3, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, Review Board 1.6.6 is out, and adds support for getting GitHub API tokens for private repos. See the news post and release notes at http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/04/25/review-board-166-released/ Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.6.6 released
On Apr 30, 4:50 pm, Can Özmen canoz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Great work. I have a fresh 1.6.5 installed through BitNami on an EC2 instance. What's the upgrade procedure? Couldn't find it on the site or in the admin dashboard of the app. P.S. I have nothing in my install so I can wipe if necessary. For upgrading the BitNami installation you only need to take into account the path in which ReviewBoard is installed. According to the ReviewBoard official documentation the upgrade will involves two steps: 1.- Upgrade ReviewBoard with easy_install. Load the BitNami environment and execute: easy_install --prefix apps/reviewboard --script-dir apps/reviewboard/ bin --install-dir apps/reviewboard/lib -U ReviewBoard 2.- Upgrade your sites. The default site is created in /opt/bitnami/ apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade /opt/bitnami/apps/ reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard In any case if as you mention you don't have any data yet, it may be easier just launched a new instance. Best regards, Victoria. On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:50:37 PM UTC+3, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, Review Board 1.6.6 is out, and adds support for getting GitHub API tokens for private repos. See the news post and release notes at http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/04/25/review-board-166-released/ Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
