Re: [routing-wg] 2019-08 Review Phase (RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and Unassigned RIPE NCC Address Space)

2020-02-23 Thread Randy Bush
> I don't think is objective to say that the proposal as asking the NCC
> to "inject" invalids.
> 
> The proposal is providing the information of the invalids (in this
> case unallocated/unassigned) by means of RPKI.

ok.  i was kind of on the fence.  but american press has made me
oversensitive to fake language such as this; so it threw me over the
edge.  i do not support the proposal.

randy



Re: [routing-wg] 2019-08 Review Phase (RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and Unassigned RIPE NCC Address Space)

2020-02-23 Thread Jared Mauch



> On Feb 23, 2020, at 8:45 AM, Nick Hilliard  wrote:
> 
> JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via routing-wg wrote on 23/02/2020 13:06:
>> I don't think is objective to say that the proposal as asking the NCC
>> to "inject" invalids.
>> The proposal is providing the information of the invalids (in this
>> case unallocated/unassigned) by means of RPKI.
> 
> Jordi,
> 
> You're splitting hairs here.  The end result is the same.

I’m cornered about something like this as we’ve been down this road before with 
bogon lists, etc and even though it’s well intentioned by smart people(tm), the 
distributed legacy and cleanup has often taken years to recover.

- Jared


Re: [routing-wg] 2019-08 Review Phase (RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and Unassigned RIPE NCC Address Space)

2020-02-23 Thread Hank Nussbacher

On 20/02/2020 16:39, Petrit Hasani wrote:

I support this proposal.  Should have been done a long time ago.

Regards,
Hank


Dear colleagues,

Policy proposal 2019-08, "RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and Unassigned RIPE NCC Address 
Space", is now in the Review Phase.

The goal of the proposal is to ask the RIPE NCC to create ROAs with origin AS0 
for all unallocated and unassigned address space under its control.

The proposal has been updated following the last round of discussion. Version 2 
of the proposal includes a specification for the RIPE NCC to create all AS0 
ROAs under a specific Trust Anchor.

The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis on this latest proposal version to 
support the community’s discussion.

You can find the proposal and impact analysis at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-08
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-08#impact-analysis

And the draft documents at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-08/draft

As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week 
Review Phase is to continue discussion of the proposal, taking the impact 
analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft RIPE Policy Document.

At the end of the Review Phase, the Working Group (WG) Chairs will determine 
whether the WG has reached rough consensus. It is therefore important to 
provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the 
previous phase.

We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document and send 
any comments to  before 20 March 2020.

Kind regards,

--
Petrit Hasani
Policy Officer
RIPE NCC










Re: [routing-wg] 2019-08 Review Phase (RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and Unassigned RIPE NCC Address Space)

2020-02-23 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via routing-wg
I don't think is the same, because some people may read it as "the NCC" is 
forcing us to do some routing thing, which is not the case.


El 23/2/20 14:46, "routing-wg en nombre de Nick Hilliard" 
 escribió:

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via routing-wg wrote on 23/02/2020 13:06:
> I don't think is objective to say that the proposal as asking the NCC
> to "inject" invalids.
> 
> The proposal is providing the information of the invalids (in this
> case unallocated/unassigned) by means of RPKI.

Jordi,

You're splitting hairs here.  The end result is the same.

Nick





**
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.







Re: [routing-wg] 2019-08 Review Phase (RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and Unassigned RIPE NCC Address Space)

2020-02-23 Thread Nick Hilliard

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via routing-wg wrote on 23/02/2020 13:06:

I don't think is objective to say that the proposal as asking the NCC
to "inject" invalids.

The proposal is providing the information of the invalids (in this
case unallocated/unassigned) by means of RPKI.


Jordi,

You're splitting hairs here.  The end result is the same.

Nick



Re: [routing-wg] 2019-08 Review Phase (RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and Unassigned RIPE NCC Address Space)

2020-02-23 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via routing-wg
Hi Erik,

I don't think is objective to say that the proposal as asking the NCC to 
"inject" invalids.

The proposal is providing the information of the invalids (in this case 
unallocated/unassigned) by means of RPKI.

Furthermore, because this is done via a specific TAL, operators can choose to 
use it or not.

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 

El 22/2/20 17:13, "routing-wg en nombre de Erik Bais" 
 escribió:

I agree with Job Snijders his remarks on this ML on the topic.  

I don't think this is a good way forward. Please keep the RIPE NCC away 
from injecting invalids into the RPKI system. 

I applaud the authors for their work, but I don't think that the downside, 
cost projection and possible future scope creep is worth going down this rabbit 
hole.  

I oppose this policy. 

regards,
Erik Bais 

On 20/02/2020, 15:40, "routing-wg on behalf of Petrit Hasani" 
 wrote:

Dear colleagues,

Policy proposal 2019-08, "RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and Unassigned RIPE 
NCC Address Space", is now in the Review Phase.

The goal of the proposal is to ask the RIPE NCC to create ROAs with 
origin AS0 for all unallocated and unassigned address space under its control.

The proposal has been updated following the last round of discussion. 
Version 2 of the proposal includes a specification for the RIPE NCC to create 
all AS0 ROAs under a specific Trust Anchor.

The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis on this latest proposal 
version to support the community’s discussion.

You can find the proposal and impact analysis at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-08

https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-08#impact-analysis

And the draft documents at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-08/draft

As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this 
four week Review Phase is to continue discussion of the proposal, taking the 
impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft RIPE Policy 
Document.

At the end of the Review Phase, the Working Group (WG) Chairs will 
determine whether the WG has reached rough consensus. It is therefore important 
to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from 
the previous phase.

We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft 
document and send any comments to  before 20 March 2020.

Kind regards,

--
Petrit Hasani
Policy Officer
RIPE NCC











**
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.