Re: Water
> From: mbgu...@julian.uwo.ca > Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 18:52:57 -0400 > To:silver-list@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: Water > Reply-to: silver-list@eskimo.com Glad I could be of help! Jim > Just what I was looking for! Many thx Jim > Chris > > At 11:07 PM 8/17/98 +, you wrote: > >> From: mbgu...@julian.uwo.ca > >> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 00:30:04 -0400 > >> To:silver-list@eskimo.com > >> Subject: Re: Water > >> Reply-to: silver-list@eskimo.com > > > >Hey guys, > > You might try Yucca plant. It will suds up just like soap, when you > >put it in water and shake it up, and it will continue to do that for > >years. Some call it nature's soap. It will not harm you if you take > >it internally, and in fact it has some very good benefits, such as > >being a good colon cleanser! > > Hope this helps! > > Jim > > > > > >> Many thx Brooks for your comments much appreciated. While I realize that > >> wetting water has more solublity etc... why go through so much trouble when > >> a little natural detergent could get same results?? > >> > >> There seems to be all sorts of over priced stuff being sold and I tend to > >> discount the sales hype. Am looking for do it your self stuff. > >> > >> Assume you have also seen Grander's living water site? > >> > >> > >> http://www.cableregina.com/users/dstewart/ > >> > >> Have you read Davis and Rawls books? They are must read. > >> > >> Chris > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> At 02:56 PM 8/16/98 -0500, you wrote: > >> >In reply to your inquiry about surface tension, I offer the following > >> >commentary: In layman's terms, surface tension reflects the "wetness > " or > >> >solubility coeffient of water. Decreasing the surface tension is, > >> essentially, > >> >what detergents do to water. In animal biological processes the > >> efficiency of > >> >water transportof all incorporated products---is greatly affected by > >> this > >> >"wetness". Generally, the less the surface tension of the water > fraction , > >> >the greater its penetrating/osmotic exchange potential. e.g. The > >> solution can > >> >move itself, plus the dissolved material entrained, into and out of > >> >cells.more easily. The net effect of this is that all affected > >> biological > >> >processes are enhanced, both in speed and efficiency, whenever the surface > >> >tension of the transport fluid is reduced.One of my older engineering > >> sons > >> >has had an interest in water characteristcs for some years and has > >> performed a > >> >number of experimental evaluations. Among them were several related to > >> surface > >> >tension. I discussed your post with him and he offered the following: > About > >> >10 years ago my son contacted a gentleman named Dr. Patrick Flanagan > >> (inventor > >> >of the neurophone and several other interesting devices). Dr. Flanagan's > >> wife, > >> >Gail, a quite creditable research scientist in her own right, performed > >> >extensive evaluations of water samples from around the world-among > them > >> >samples of the glacial melt waters of Hunza. Her most striking > discovery was > >> >one relating to the samples from Hunzaland. In addition to many suspended > >> >minerals, this water possessed unusual solubility characteristics. Far > >> greater > >> >than would normally be expected of water with such high hardness > >> coefficients. > >> >Mrs. Flanagan determined the unusual character stemmed from an unusual > >> >crystalline cluster structure possessing a net negative charge. The > > >> source of > >> >this charge she subsequently discovered, and in turn determined a > method of > >> >synthesizing it. The result lof her research was a substance called '" > >> >Electro-Catalytic Colloidal Mineral Concentrate". The claim was that this > >> >substance, added to distilled water in small quantities, would lower the > >> >surface tension enormously. My son obtained some of this substance and > >> tested > >> >it. This substance did, indeed, greatly lower the surface tension of ALL > >> the > >> >water to which it was added.but most dramaticallydistilled > water. In > >> >fact, it lowered the surface tension far below that caused by ordinary > >> >detergents. The substance is non-toxic and is used to condition water for > >> >human consumption. I do not, personally, know Dr. Flanagan or how he > can be > >> >contacted. At the time my son was conferring with him he was in > Flagstaff, > >> >Arizona.I hope these comments are of use to you. Brooks Bradley. > >> > > >> > > >> >bgu...@julian.uwo.ca wrote: > >> > > >> >> Recently, I picked up a magazine called "Lifestyle and wellness". In the > >> >> Summer 98 issue distributed mainly in the Toronto area and Canada > >> >> (416-492-6598). There is an interesting article on Water and health. > In the > >> >> article some researchers claim that IR absorption of water
Re: Water
Just what I was looking for! Many thx Jim Chris At 11:07 PM 8/17/98 +, you wrote: >> From: mbgu...@julian.uwo.ca >> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 00:30:04 -0400 >> To:silver-list@eskimo.com >> Subject: Re: Water >> Reply-to: silver-list@eskimo.com > >Hey guys, > You might try Yucca plant. It will suds up just like soap, when you >put it in water and shake it up, and it will continue to do that for >years. Some call it nature's soap. It will not harm you if you take >it internally, and in fact it has some very good benefits, such as >being a good colon cleanser! > Hope this helps! > Jim > > >> Many thx Brooks for your comments much appreciated. While I realize that >> wetting water has more solublity etc... why go through so much trouble when >> a little natural detergent could get same results?? >> >> There seems to be all sorts of over priced stuff being sold and I tend to >> discount the sales hype. Am looking for do it your self stuff. >> >> Assume you have also seen Grander's living water site? >> >> >> http://www.cableregina.com/users/dstewart/ >> >> Have you read Davis and Rawls books? They are must read. >> >> Chris >> >> >> >> >> At 02:56 PM 8/16/98 -0500, you wrote: >> >In reply to your inquiry about surface tension, I offer the following >> >commentary: In layman's terms, surface tension reflects the "wetness " or >> >solubility coeffient of water. Decreasing the surface tension is, >> essentially, >> >what detergents do to water. In animal biological processes the >> efficiency of >> >water transportof all incorporated products---is greatly affected by >> this >> >"wetness". Generally, the less the surface tension of the water fraction , >> >the greater its penetrating/osmotic exchange potential. e.g. The >> solution can >> >move itself, plus the dissolved material entrained, into and out of >> >cells.more easily. The net effect of this is that all affected >> biological >> >processes are enhanced, both in speed and efficiency, whenever the surface >> >tension of the transport fluid is reduced.One of my older engineering >> sons >> >has had an interest in water characteristcs for some years and has >> performed a >> >number of experimental evaluations. Among them were several related to >> surface >> >tension. I discussed your post with him and he offered the following: About >> >10 years ago my son contacted a gentleman named Dr. Patrick Flanagan >> (inventor >> >of the neurophone and several other interesting devices). Dr. Flanagan's >> wife, >> >Gail, a quite creditable research scientist in her own right, performed >> >extensive evaluations of water samples from around the world-among them >> >samples of the glacial melt waters of Hunza. Her most striking discovery was >> >one relating to the samples from Hunzaland. In addition to many suspended >> >minerals, this water possessed unusual solubility characteristics. Far >> greater >> >than would normally be expected of water with such high hardness >> coefficients. >> >Mrs. Flanagan determined the unusual character stemmed from an unusual >> >crystalline cluster structure possessing a net negative charge. The >> source of >> >this charge she subsequently discovered, and in turn determined a method of >> >synthesizing it. The result lof her research was a substance called '" >> >Electro-Catalytic Colloidal Mineral Concentrate". The claim was that this >> >substance, added to distilled water in small quantities, would lower the >> >surface tension enormously. My son obtained some of this substance and >> tested >> >it. This substance did, indeed, greatly lower the surface tension of ALL >> the >> >water to which it was added.but most dramaticallydistilled water. In >> >fact, it lowered the surface tension far below that caused by ordinary >> >detergents. The substance is non-toxic and is used to condition water for >> >human consumption. I do not, personally, know Dr. Flanagan or how he can be >> >contacted. At the time my son was conferring with him he was in Flagstaff, >> >Arizona.I hope these comments are of use to you. Brooks Bradley. >> > >> > >> >bgu...@julian.uwo.ca wrote: >> > >> >> Recently, I picked up a magazine called "Lifestyle and wellness". In the >> >> Summer 98 issue distributed mainly in the Toronto area and Canada >> >> (416-492-6598). There is an interesting article on Water and health. In the >> >> article some researchers claim that IR absorption of water changes when >> >> >> exposed to magnetic energy and also when held by healers and others >> >> depending on their state of mind etc. They also refer to work of Water >> >> Sciences Research in Dallas Texas (972-682-9162). Has anyone heard of their >> >> work? >> >> >> >> This would be a good way to corroborate Davis and Rawls work which showed >> >> that surface tension of water increased with north pole and decreased with >> >> south pole tr
Re: .999 vs .9999/ OT - Ozone
At 02:35 AM 8-18-98 +, chc wrote: > > What is the difference between .999 and .? > If . is much better healthwise, Does anyone know > where we can buy . silver??? The 'four 9' (or .) is 10 times better than .999, as regards freedom from impurities, including lead. Personally, I've decided to avoid colloidal lead. Silver Solutions is where I bought my electrodes last year -- 1 pair of 6 inch long, 'ultra fine' . silver, 14 gauge wires for $15.00. The wires came with good xeroxed instructions that included the information and updates seen on their web site at: http://www.silversolutions.com By the way, I've e-mailed them twice for prices on larger quantities of . silver wire, but they've failed to answer me. Why don't some more people ask them, too, and maybe they'll wake up ? e-mail: i...@silversolutions.com --Bill -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com List maintainer: Mike Devour
Fw: Clinton Executes Executive Order - August 14, 1998
-Original Message- From: Ron Johnson To: y2k-survi...@infostream.net Date: Tuesday, August 18, 1998 11:29 AM Subject: Clinton Executes Executive Order - August 14, 1998 >For those that aren't aware of it, the Export Administration Act of 1979 >expired. This governs the export of weapons of mass destruction and >supposedly this also covers cryptography. Bill Clinton has declared a >national emergency because of >this, no kidding, and under those powers he can extend the act without >Congressional approval and has. The exact executive order is available >on the White House Web Page. See it for yourself. > >http://www.pub.whitehouse.gov/uri-res/I2R?urn:pdi://oma.eop.gov.us/1998/8/1 4/3.text.1 > >Heres the order: >== > >THE WHITE HOUSE > >Office of the Press Secretary > > >For Immediate ReleaseAugust 14, 1998 > > > > > NOTICE > > - - - - - - - > > CONTINUATION OF EMERGENCY >REGARDING EXPORT CONTROL REGULATIONS > > > On August 19, 1994, consistent with the authority provided me under > >the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et >seq.), I issued Executive Order 12924. In that order, I declared a >national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat >to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United >States in light of the expiration of the Export Administration Act of >1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2401 et seq.). Because the Export >Administration Act has not been renewed by the Congress, the national >emergency declared on August 19, 1994, must continue in effect beyond >August 19, 1998. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the >National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the >national emergency declared in Executive Order 12924. > > This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and >transmitted to the Congress. > > > WILLIAM J. CLINTON > > THE WHITE HOUSE, > August 13, 1998. > > # # # > > -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com List maintainer: Mike Devour
Re: CS dose for Lyme treatment?
JohnJ wrote: > >Dear Marsha > > How do you make your 30PPM solutions? I'm unsure of the potency of > >mine and haven't had enough improvement with my Lyme Disease. John, There is an article at: http://www.xpressnet.com/bhealthy/bodywght.html that describes a dosage protocol for Lyme treatment. The dose is referenced to their own 30 ppm mild-silver-protein product. One has to *assume* that a similar home-made product will be about as effective *AND*, most importantly, adjust for the concentration of the CS that you use, if it is either less or more concentrated. So if their protocol tells you to take 1 teaspoon 3 times a day, then you would triple that if your CS was only 10ppm, instead of the 30 ppm they sell. Determining the potency of your home made CS is not an exact science, but their protocol will at least help you get into the ballpark of a therapeutic dose. Their admonition to adjust dosage in response to how you feel is also important. To summarize, The dose you take needs to be adjusted for your body weight (per their article), the strength of *your* CS, and the symptoms you experience. If you need further help, just ask on list. Be well, Mike D. [Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian] [mdev...@mail.id.net ] [Speaking only for myself... ] -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com List maintainer: Mike Devour
Re: CS dose for Lyme treatment?
Hi Jeff, I'm taking 1 tablespoon, 2x daily for my Lyme. I'm about 95% back to normal after starting the silver at the end of February of this year. Nick -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com List maintainer: Mike Devour
Re: .999 vs .9999/ OT - Ozone
chc wrote: > > Dear list members; > > What is the difference between .999 and .? > If . is much better healthwise, Does anyone know where we acn buy > . silver??? > > Sorry if I missed this posting earlier, but I am just getting into home > silver making. chc & list, I get fine silver from a wholesale jewlery supplier in the Denver area; earlier this year, they told me that a rep. from the producer, Handy & Harmon, had told them that, while the fine silver they were selling was labeled .999 fine, that in fact it was . fine or better - they don't produce fine silver that is only .999 fine. Someone else earlier this year had some .999 fine silver analysed, and also found that traces of possibly harmful metals were almost non-existant, which makes some sense in relation to the above information. When a producer labels fine silver as .999 fine, they aren't saying, "there's 1 part per thousand of something else in here"; rather, they are saying, "we state that this product is AT LEAST this pure"; an important distinction. While their product might well be beyond . fine all of the time, they don't say that. (This world we live in is way too litigation happy as it is...) Someone on a website was telling people to ask a .999 fine silver dealer to supply a signed statement, stating / guaranteeing they were getting .999 fine silver; seems like this would only serve to get a potential supplier agrevated / feeling insulted, to put it mildly... If you don't trust your supplier, find another! Be Well! Bruce K. Stenulson Applied Technology The Alternate Health Approaches Forum http://web.idirect.com/~showcase/althealth/index.html -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com List maintainer: Mike Devour
Re: .999 vs .9999/ OT - Ozone
Chc - Contact this guy; he's the best expert I know of after a year of researching!: Saul Pressman HIS WEBSITE : http://www.plasmafire.com/ PLASMAFIRE INT'L. 7186 - 205th Street LANGLEY, BC CANADA V2Y 1T1 Phone : 604-532-9596 Contact Marsha from this list for silver. Mike D (the moderator) knows her well. Dameon -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com List maintainer: Mike Devour
.999 vs .9999/ OT - Ozone
Dear list members; What is the difference between .999 and .? If . is much better healthwise, Does anyone know where we acn buy . silver??? Sorry if I missed this posting earlier, but I am just getting into home silver making. OFF TOPIC: If anyone is using ozone, would they please comment on the best way to make it; where to buy supplies, and how it is working for you?? Thanks in advance for all of you help.. chc -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com List maintainer: Mike Devour
About high voltage for snake/insect bites.
Harvey; Glad to hear your friend is doing better!!! Jennifer's question asking if your friend had tried the "shock treatment" got me to thinking, I didn't tell you how *long* to apply the treatment! The simple answer is that the voltage from a high voltage, source such as a stun gun, is applied for only a brief part of a second because the patient will uncontrollably jump away. Wait several minutes and if no improvement is seen in the bite/sting area, such as reduced swelling, (and if the patient will let you) apply another "hit" and hope for the best. One or two "hits" should be all it takes to alter the venom if it's going to work. Naturally, the sooner the treatment is applied after the bite/sting the larger the chance of "deactivating" the venom. In the case of a snake bite the electricity should be applied *across* the puncture wounds (think of one wound as positive and the other negative). I remind folks that this is an EMERGENCY TREATMENT and one not to be done lightly, it is very unpleasant. _Field and Stream_ magazine ran several articles on this type of treatment about 8 years ago. A friend of ours saved them and gave them to my father, who was a D.O.. Dad read them and then bought a "stun gum" for the express purpose of including it in our emergency kit. Several months later the same friend was stung on the hand by a wasp or hornet and within seconds had a walnut-sized lump on the back of his hand in reaction to the sting. He keeps horses and went over to the electric fence, took the electrified handle off the gate and touched it to the lump (it took several tries before he made contact because he applied it himself and giving oneself a high voltage shock is not a natural act!). Within 30 seconds the limp was gone and the sting disappeared, no pain, swelling or redness! Some people may say this treatment is bunk, they are welcome to their opinion, but there is medical proof it *does* work for certain types of venom (above mentioned articles). All the best, Don T. ## Harvey Flatbush wrote: > Dear Jennifer and all the rest of you that came to the rescue. > > At 05:26 PM 8/17/98 -0700, you wrote: > >Harvey: > > > >Just wondering how your friend is doing? Did you try the coil shock > >treatment? Did it help? Just interested in how things are going. > >-- > >Health, Hope, Joy & Healing : > > May you Prosper, even as your Soul Prospers > > > >Jennifer > > > > There was an overwhelming response to my request for help concerning a > friend with a brown Recluse Spider bite. Several to the lists and > many more to me directly. Thank you all so much. > <...snip...> > The poisons from the bite were starting to attack other areas of scar > tissue but like I said, everything seems to be in regression now. I > liken you all to the Lone Ranger riding to the rescue of someone in > need. > > Many many thanks you all again, > > Harvey > > > Harvey Flatbush < > ha...@iomet.com >http://www.iomet.com > < Ione, Washington > -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com List maintainer: Mike Devour
Re: Water
> From: mbgu...@julian.uwo.ca > Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 00:30:04 -0400 > To:silver-list@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: Water > Reply-to: silver-list@eskimo.com Hey guys, You might try Yucca plant. It will suds up just like soap, when you put it in water and shake it up, and it will continue to do that for years. Some call it nature's soap. It will not harm you if you take it internally, and in fact it has some very good benefits, such as being a good colon cleanser! Hope this helps! Jim > Many thx Brooks for your comments much appreciated. While I realize that > wetting water has more solublity etc... why go through so much trouble when > a little natural detergent could get same results?? > > There seems to be all sorts of over priced stuff being sold and I tend to > discount the sales hype. Am looking for do it your self stuff. > > Assume you have also seen Grander's living water site? > > > http://www.cableregina.com/users/dstewart/ > > Have you read Davis and Rawls books? They are must read. > > Chris > > > > > At 02:56 PM 8/16/98 -0500, you wrote: > >In reply to your inquiry about surface tension, I offer the following > >commentary: In layman's terms, surface tension reflects the "wetness " or > >solubility coeffient of water. Decreasing the surface tension is, > essentially, > >what detergents do to water. In animal biological processes the > efficiency of > >water transportof all incorporated products---is greatly affected by > this > >"wetness". Generally, the less the surface tension of the water fraction , > >the greater its penetrating/osmotic exchange potential. e.g. The > solution can > >move itself, plus the dissolved material entrained, into and out of > >cells.more easily. The net effect of this is that all affected > biological > >processes are enhanced, both in speed and efficiency, whenever the surface > >tension of the transport fluid is reduced.One of my older engineering > sons > >has had an interest in water characteristcs for some years and has > performed a > >number of experimental evaluations. Among them were several related to > surface > >tension. I discussed your post with him and he offered the following: About > >10 years ago my son contacted a gentleman named Dr. Patrick Flanagan > (inventor > >of the neurophone and several other interesting devices). Dr. Flanagan's > wife, > >Gail, a quite creditable research scientist in her own right, performed > >extensive evaluations of water samples from around the world-among them > >samples of the glacial melt waters of Hunza. Her most striking discovery was > >one relating to the samples from Hunzaland. In addition to many suspended > >minerals, this water possessed unusual solubility characteristics. Far > greater > >than would normally be expected of water with such high hardness > coefficients. > >Mrs. Flanagan determined the unusual character stemmed from an unusual > >crystalline cluster structure possessing a net negative charge. The > source of > >this charge she subsequently discovered, and in turn determined a method of > >synthesizing it. The result lof her research was a substance called '" > >Electro-Catalytic Colloidal Mineral Concentrate". The claim was that this > >substance, added to distilled water in small quantities, would lower the > >surface tension enormously. My son obtained some of this substance and > tested > >it. This substance did, indeed, greatly lower the surface tension of ALL > the > >water to which it was added.but most dramaticallydistilled water. In > >fact, it lowered the surface tension far below that caused by ordinary > >detergents. The substance is non-toxic and is used to condition water for > >human consumption. I do not, personally, know Dr. Flanagan or how he can be > >contacted. At the time my son was conferring with him he was in Flagstaff, > >Arizona.I hope these comments are of use to you. Brooks Bradley. > > > > > >bgu...@julian.uwo.ca wrote: > > > >> Recently, I picked up a magazine called "Lifestyle and wellness". In the > >> Summer 98 issue distributed mainly in the Toronto area and Canada > >> (416-492-6598). There is an interesting article on Water and health. In the > >> article some researchers claim that IR absorption of water changes when > > >> exposed to magnetic energy and also when held by healers and others > >> depending on their state of mind etc. They also refer to work of Water > >> Sciences Research in Dallas Texas (972-682-9162). Has anyone heard of their > >> work? > >> > >> This would be a good way to corroborate Davis and Rawls work which showed > >> that surface tension of water increased with north pole and decreased with > >> south pole treated water. > >> > >> I am planning to build a simple IR LED and photo cell set up to do my own > >> experiments. But am still confused as to what all this means. Is low > >> surface tens
Re: silver and paramecium
> From: "It's not me" > To: > Subject: Re: silver and paramecium > Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 02:28:49 -0600 > Reply-to: silver-list@eskimo.com Hi Vern, I don't know. I do know with the slide I made, I put a drop of CS in the water holding the paramecium, and I could see where the silver traveled. It didn't disperse into the whole drop, but made a stream through part of it. The paramecium would be moving very fast, and as they hit the silver, they would usually come out of it, and them go just a little way and come to a stop and die. From what I saw, I don't think it would take a lot of CS to kill all the one celled animals in the water, but it might take 5 or 10 minutes to do it if you only put a small amount of silver in the water. I would think an ounce would work for a 16 oz glass, but it might only take a teaspoonful to do the same job, just take a bit longer to kill all the bugs! I'm sorry I don't have a better answer for you than that. If I get a chance to check one of these days, I will try it out. I will try getting a 16 ounce glass of pond water, and check it for "bugs" then after I know for sure there are bugs, I will put a teaspoon of CS in it and start checking it until I see no more activity from the bugs. Now there seemed to be some type of bacteria in the water with the paramecium that was not killed by the CS. I think these smaller critters take longer to kill, but they might be less harmful to you, but then again they might not be! Take Care! Jim > Jim, > Do you have any idea how much CS of a given ppm would have to be added to > say a 16 oz. glass of water to get the paramecium to stop moving? > Vern > > -Original Message- > From: jein...@troi.csw.net > To: silver-list@eskimo.com > Date: Saturday, August 15, 1998 9:54 PM > Subject: silver and paramecium > > > Hi List, > I did some experimenting on the paramecium that Reid sent to me. I > > > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line. > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > > List maintainer: Mike Devour > > > -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com List maintainer: Mike Devour
