[freenet-support] Related topic (Privacy): Britain wants to track all telecom usage

2009-11-12 Thread Brian Mearns
I thought quite a few people on this list might be interested in this
story, regarding privacy on networks. Maybe it will lead to more
people using Freenet, or maybe it will lead to increased legal
pressure on Freenet users.

http://spectrum.ieee.org/blog/computing/it/riskfactor/british-government-we-want-access-to-your-every-phone-call-email-and-web-search

The second paragraph gives the long and short of it.

The British government has decided to go ahead with its plans under
what it calls the Intercept Modernisation Programme to force every
telecommunication company and Internet service provider to keep a
record of all of its customers' personal communications, showing who
they have contacted, when and where, as well as the web sites they
have visited, according to the London Telegraph and various other
British papers.

-Brian

-- 
Feel free to contact me using PGP Encryption:
Key Id: 0x3AA70848
Available from: http://keys.gnupg.net
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [freenet-support] Related topic (Privacy): Britain wants to track all telecom usage

2009-11-12 Thread mihail
It's shocking stuff. Monitor all emails and texts! Even in East Germany
twenty years ago the Stasi did not routine look through all letters.

Celebrate the fall of the Berlin Wall this week and then have a look
around and see how far we have really come.

M!

 I thought quite a few people on this list might be interested in this
 story, regarding privacy on networks. Maybe it will lead to more
 people using Freenet, or maybe it will lead to increased legal
 pressure on Freenet users.

 http://spectrum.ieee.org/blog/computing/it/riskfactor/british-government-we-want-access-to-your-every-phone-call-email-and-web-search

 The second paragraph gives the long and short of it.

 The British government has decided to go ahead with its plans under
 what it calls the Intercept Modernisation Programme to force every
 telecommunication company and Internet service provider to keep a
 record of all of its customers' personal communications, showing who
 they have contacted, when and where, as well as the web sites they
 have visited, according to the London Telegraph and various other
 British papers.

 -Brian

 --
 Feel free to contact me using PGP Encryption:
 Key Id: 0x3AA70848
 Available from: http://keys.gnupg.net
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at
 http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe



___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [freenet-support] Piracy will not be tolerated

2009-11-12 Thread Jonas Islander
Ichi wrote:
 First, I appreciate that Matthew had to ban Toni.  Open discussion
 of Freenet documents is just plain stupid, for obvious reasons.
 
 Second, I'm sure that Freenet and this list are already illegal in
 many countries. If Freenet ever becomes popular, it will undoubtedly
 become illegal everywhere, more or less.

Well, BitTorrent is heavily used for illegal filesharing, but the clients 
(uTorrent, Azureus, etc) and the technology itself are legal. When the 
copyright industry tries to shut BitTorrent filesharing down, they target 
websites that list illegal torrents. I doubt the industry will be able to 
criminalise the use of any piece of filesharing software as long as it has 
legitimate uses.

In the case of Freenet, it doesn't seem practical to go after individual 
filesharers, so the entertainment industry will likely direct legal actions 
against the developers. Perhaps one day the current developers will have to 
abandon the project and new ones will have to take over - who will only be 
known by their Freenet identities?

-- 
Please send private email to Jonas Islander jonas.islan...@fastmail.fm









signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Recommended message board -- frost? freemail? etc.

2009-11-12 Thread Jonas Islander
Joel C. Salomon wrote:
 I've used Freenet in the past (the early days of 0.7) and I'd like to try 
 again.
 
 Back then, there was Frost, which I used until the DOS/spam made it
 unpleasant to do so.  Now I read about frost, freemail, freetalk, c.,
 and I wonder: which of these are working?  Which have active
 discussions?  Pointers?

Frost is still littered with spam bots, at least the main boards. I think it's 
mostly used for less savory activiities, judging from the comments I've seen on 
FMS.

FMS seems to work great. I think it needs more users, but the ones already 
there provide a pleasant and lively atmosphere. It's completely spam-free.

Haven't tried Freemail or Freetalk.

-- 
Please send private email to Jonas Islander jonas.islan...@fastmail.fm





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Piracy will not be tolerated

2009-11-12 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thursday 12 November 2009 14:04:08 Jonas Islander wrote:
 Ichi wrote:
  First, I appreciate that Matthew had to ban Toni.  Open discussion
  of Freenet documents is just plain stupid, for obvious reasons.
  
  Second, I'm sure that Freenet and this list are already illegal in
  many countries. If Freenet ever becomes popular, it will undoubtedly
  become illegal everywhere, more or less.
 
 Well, BitTorrent is heavily used for illegal filesharing, but the clients 
 (uTorrent, Azureus, etc) and the technology itself are legal. When the 
 copyright industry tries to shut BitTorrent filesharing down, they target 
 websites that list illegal torrents. I doubt the industry will be able to 
 criminalise the use of any piece of filesharing software as long as it has 
 legitimate uses.

They will try, and it is likely they will succeed in some places. But most are 
resisting this and at least so far buying into the idea that you can cheaply 
detect and (executively) punish pirates.
 
 In the case of Freenet, it doesn't seem practical to go after individual 
 filesharers, so the entertainment industry will likely direct legal actions 
 against the developers. Perhaps one day the current developers will have to 
 abandon the project and new ones will have to take over - who will only be 
 known by their Freenet identities?

Perhaps so, but we have some way to go before Freenet is that reliable, or 
before it can function in the face of a government or ISP willing to spend a 
little money to get rid of it...


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Piracy will not be tolerated

2009-11-12 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 06:42:02 mih...@riseup.net wrote:
 I'd also ask why it is physically based in the UK 

Freenet is not based in the UK. I am based in the UK.

 which is undoubtedly the 
 western country most repressive of internet use.

Definitely not true. A number of european countries block stuff - often 
judicially - for gambling or other silly reasons, whereas in the UK the *only* 
blocking so far is Cleanfeed, and discussions on blocking terrorist 
advocacy/resourcing have apparently petered out, probably when they realised it 
was more useful to monitor it than block it ...
 
 Only yesterday the 'interception modernatization programme' which would
 attempt to record all emails was dropped for 'tecnhical' reasons:
 http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/nov/09/home-office-plan-data-storage

Fascinating, I thought it was a done deal. Of course it is technically 
challenging - they are not asking to store data (traffic data is actually a lot 
more useful most of the time), but parsing facebook traffic en masse to 
identify private contacts will be fairly expensive, given you have to 
constantly update it as facebook evolves ... It also applies to Skype, good 
luck there; for all we know it'll apply to Freenet too, could be fun! :)

I am very happy that they ditched the central database - it would have had a 
system of black boxes, which of course would be remotely reprogrammable to 
gather just about anything with no real supervision...

A side-issue is how to intercept the content of Skype calls (when you have a 
warrant, note that warrants are self-signed since RIPA) - this is technically 
rather challenging even with collusion from Skype if the user is smart.
 
 M!
 
  First, I appreciate that Matthew had to ban Toni.  Open discussion
  of Freenet documents is just plain stupid, for obvious reasons.
 
  Second, I'm sure that Freenet and this list are already illegal in
  many countries. If Freenet ever becomes popular, it will undoubtedly
  become illegal everywhere, more or less.
 
  With any luck, Freenet will be fully anonymous and secure by then.
  Even now, this support list could be hosted anonymously and securely at
  reasonable cost.
 
  And BTW, why is Freenet incorporated in the USA, and not somewhere
  with lower legal and political risks?
 
  VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote:
 
  bimbek wrote:
 
   Oh, with all the respect Matthew Toseland, you did not
   need to ban the poor guy.
  
   I hope that one day you will not ban all of us just because
   some US court would say that using freenet is illegal...
 
  Actually somebody will (whether or not it will be Matthew
  Toseland or not i don't know). Since i'm sure that if Freenet
  will become illegal, this e-mail list will have to shut down,
  thus de-facto banning everybody from it.
  --
  Best regards,
   Ichi  mailto:i...@xerobank.net
 
  ___
  Support mailing list
  Support@freenetproject.org
  http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
  Unsubscribe at
  http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
  Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
 
 
 
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
 
 




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Related topic (Privacy): Britain wants to track all telecom usage

2009-11-12 Thread Ancoron Luciferis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Sweden has it already and they use a dedicated super computer for that.
According to the official top-500 list from june 2009 (
http://www.top500.org/list/2009/06/100 ) it is placed on position 30
with an official overall maximum power of 102.8 TFlop/s.

According to some other sites the swedish government decided to watch
all internet traffic on at least 20 main nodes. This includes ALL
traffic, not only connection tracking but also content. Most other
countries (including germany) just enforce the providers to keep a
record of connections made. This can simply be avoided by using a proxy
through a secure tunnel. The swedish government don't rely on ISPs
providing the required data. They track it themselves, therefore you'll
have to establish a secure connection to some proxy in another country
before your traffic will not be visible in clear-text to the government.

So far so good.

We are on the best way to make ourselves into slaves (well, we are already).


Greetz and have a nice day,

AncoL


mih...@riseup.net wrote:
 It's shocking stuff. Monitor all emails and texts! Even in East Germany
 twenty years ago the Stasi did not routine look through all letters.
 
 Celebrate the fall of the Berlin Wall this week and then have a look
 around and see how far we have really come.
 
 M!
 
 I thought quite a few people on this list might be interested in this
 story, regarding privacy on networks. Maybe it will lead to more
 people using Freenet, or maybe it will lead to increased legal
 pressure on Freenet users.

 http://spectrum.ieee.org/blog/computing/it/riskfactor/british-government-we-want-access-to-your-every-phone-call-email-and-web-search

 The second paragraph gives the long and short of it.

 The British government has decided to go ahead with its plans under
 what it calls the Intercept Modernisation Programme to force every
 telecommunication company and Internet service provider to keep a
 record of all of its customers' personal communications, showing who
 they have contacted, when and where, as well as the web sites they
 have visited, according to the London Telegraph and various other
 British papers.

 -Brian

 --
 Feel free to contact me using PGP Encryption:
 Key Id: 0x3AA70848
 Available from: http://keys.gnupg.net
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at
 http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

 
 
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
 
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkr9CMoACgkQHwxOsqv2bG2rPgCgkx4ZGp6DaBdFRROclEwf7ZBV
oV8An25PuavtGdB3U1MsnaicAOf4TTzy
=lCKT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe