Re: Unable to create new store: freenet.node.NodeInitException: Operation not supported (3)

2019-09-25 Thread CyberLeo

On 9/25/19 9:36 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
Hm, I’m not loving the exception logging there; the stack trace of the 
source of the problem does not appear to be included. The useful part of 
that trace seems like


https://github.com/freenet/fred/blob/build01484/src/freenet/node/Node.java#L862
https://github.com/freenet/fred/blob/build01484/src/freenet/node/Node.java#L2900

I’d expect wrapper.log (or stderr depending on how you’ve started the 
node) to contain more information after the string "Could not open store: "


Can you find such a log line?


Ah yes. It was in the wrapper.log, not in the freenet log where I was 
looking.


And now that you've pointed that out, the problem was obvious: NFS 
locking wasn't running!


After starting statd and lockd, switching the datastore type from ram to 
salt-hash worked perfectly.


Thanks for your help!

The log:

8<
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 | Setting datastore size to 
524056200KiB
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 | Initializing CHK Datastore 
(7668822 keys)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 | Could not open store: 
java.io.IOException: Operation not supported
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 | java.io.IOException: Operation 
not supported
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
sun.nio.ch.FileDispatcherImpl.lock0(Native Method)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
sun.nio.ch.FileDispatcherImpl.lock(FileDispatcherImpl.java:94)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.lock(FileChannelImpl.java:1072)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
java.nio.channels.FileChannel.lock(FileChannel.java:1053)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.store.saltedhash.SaltedHashFreenetStore.openStoreFiles(SaltedHashFreenetStore.java:838)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.store.saltedhash.SaltedHashFreenetStore.(SaltedHashFreenetStore.java:192)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.store.saltedhash.SaltedHashFreenetStore.construct(SaltedHashFreenetStore.java:149)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.node.Node.makeStore(Node.java:2980)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.node.Node.makeStore(Node.java:2973)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.node.Node.initSaltHashFS(Node.java:2803)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.node.Node.makeStore(Node.java:862)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.node.Node$StoreTypeCallback.set(Node.java:336)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.node.Node$StoreTypeCallback.set(Node.java:309)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.config.Option.set(Option.java:73)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.config.Option.setValue(Option.java:62)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.config.SubConfig.set(SubConfig.java:318)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.clients.http.wizardsteps.DATASTORE_SIZE._setDatastoreSize(DATASTORE_SIZE.java:122)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.clients.http.wizardsteps.DATASTORE_SIZE.postStep(DATASTORE_SIZE.java:93)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.clients.http.FirstTimeWizardToadlet.handleMethodPOST(FirstTimeWizardToadlet.java:262)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.clients.http.ToadletContextImpl.callToadletMethod(ToadletContextImpl.java:747)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.clients.http.ToadletContextImpl.handle(ToadletContextImpl.java:660)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.clients.http.SimpleToadletServer$SocketHandler.run(SimpleToadletServer.java:1036)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.support.PooledExecutor$MyThread.innerRun(PooledExecutor.java:249)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.support.PooledExecutor$MyThread.realRun(PooledExecutor.java:189)
INFO   | jvm 1| 2019/08/18 20:36:40 |   at 
freenet.support.io.NativeThread.run(NativeThread.java:156)

8<


On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 8:07 PM, CyberLeo <mailto:cyber...@sdf.lonestar.org>> wrote:

You know, I just realized I sent this from the wrong address and it
never made it to the list.

On 8/19/19 2:10 AM, CyberLeo wrote:
> During test-setup of a new node from 

Re: Unable to create new store: freenet.node.NodeInitException: Operation not supported (3)

2019-09-25 Thread CyberLeo
You know, I just realized I sent this from the wrong address and it 
never made it to the list.


On 8/19/19 2:10 AM, CyberLeo wrote:
During test-setup of a new node from Github release build01484, I get 
the following exception, both during the new startup wizard and whenever 
I instruct the node to change the datastore type from ram to salt-hash. 
The store type remains as ram.


The node is a VM running FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE amd64, NFS-mounted home 
directory from the host, and the host filesystem is backed by a 
dedicated ZFS dataset with plenty of space.


Any ideas on how to start troubleshooting the source of this error?

Thanks!

8<
Aug 18, 2019 20:36:40:281 (freenet.node.Node, HTTP socket 
handler@1389158290(3), ERROR): Unable to create new store

freenet.node.NodeInitException: Operation not supported (3)
 at freenet.node.Node.initSaltHashFS(Node.java:2900)
 at freenet.node.Node.makeStore(Node.java:862)
 at freenet.node.Node$StoreTypeCallback.set(Node.java:336)
 at freenet.node.Node$StoreTypeCallback.set(Node.java:309)
 at freenet.config.Option.set(Option.java:73)
 at freenet.config.Option.setValue(Option.java:62)
 at freenet.config.SubConfig.set(SubConfig.java:318)
 at 
freenet.clients.http.wizardsteps.DATASTORE_SIZE._setDatastoreSize(DATASTORE_SIZE.java:122) 

 at 
freenet.clients.http.wizardsteps.DATASTORE_SIZE.postStep(DATASTORE_SIZE.java:93) 

 at 
freenet.clients.http.FirstTimeWizardToadlet.handleMethodPOST(FirstTimeWizardToadlet.java:262) 


 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
 at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) 

 at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) 


 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
 at 
freenet.clients.http.ToadletContextImpl.callToadletMethod(ToadletContextImpl.java:747) 

 at 
freenet.clients.http.ToadletContextImpl.handle(ToadletContextImpl.java:660)
 at 
freenet.clients.http.SimpleToadletServer$SocketHandler.run(SimpleToadletServer.java:1036) 

 at 
freenet.support.PooledExecutor$MyThread.innerRun(PooledExecutor.java:249)
 at 
freenet.support.PooledExecutor$MyThread.realRun(PooledExecutor.java:189)

 at freenet.support.io.NativeThread.run(NativeThread.java:156)
Aug 18, 2019 20:36:40:305 
(freenet.clients.http.wizardsteps.DATASTORE_SIZE, HTTP socket 
handler@1389158290(3), ERROR): Should not happen, please 
report!freenet.config.InvalidConfigValueException: Unable to create new 
store: freenet.node.NodeInitException: Operation not supported (3)
freenet.config.InvalidConfigValueException: Unable to create new store: 
freenet.node.NodeInitException: Operation not supported (3)

 at freenet.node.Node.makeStore(Node.java:868)
 at freenet.node.Node$StoreTypeCallback.set(Node.java:336)
 at freenet.node.Node$StoreTypeCallback.set(Node.java:309)
 at freenet.config.Option.set(Option.java:73)
 at freenet.config.Option.setValue(Option.java:62)
 at freenet.config.SubConfig.set(SubConfig.java:318)
 at 
freenet.clients.http.wizardsteps.DATASTORE_SIZE._setDatastoreSize(DATASTORE_SIZE.java:122) 

 at 
freenet.clients.http.wizardsteps.DATASTORE_SIZE.postStep(DATASTORE_SIZE.java:93) 

 at 
freenet.clients.http.FirstTimeWizardToadlet.handleMethodPOST(FirstTimeWizardToadlet.java:262) 


 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
 at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) 

 at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) 


 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
 at 
freenet.clients.http.ToadletContextImpl.callToadletMethod(ToadletContextImpl.java:747) 

 at 
freenet.clients.http.ToadletContextImpl.handle(ToadletContextImpl.java:660)
 at 
freenet.clients.http.SimpleToadletServer$SocketHandler.run(SimpleToadletServer.java:1036) 

 at 
freenet.support.PooledExecutor$MyThread.innerRun(PooledExecutor.java:249)
 at 
freenet.support.PooledExecutor$MyThread.realRun(PooledExecutor.java:189)

 at freenet.support.io.NativeThread.run(NativeThread.java:156)
8<



--
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo


Technical Administrator

CyberLeo.Net Webhosting
http://www.CyberLeo.Net

Element9 Communications
http://www.Element9.net


Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/


Re: [freenet-support] Constructive Criticism of Freenet

2012-10-17 Thread CyberLeo
of their browser; yet it is still
the most stigmatized browser in existence due to the continued
prevalence of Internet Explorer 6, a legacy implementation that is no
longer supported, but in continued use simply because it can be.

-- 
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1401

2011-08-27 Thread CyberLeo
On 08/26/2011 10:50 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Freenet 0.7.5 build 1401 is now available. Please upgrade, it will be 
> mandatory at midnight. This build turns off New Load Management, for the time 
> being. If performance continues to be poor we will know the problem is 
> elsewhere (it is possible that it is a problem with the asyncGet changes, 
> although I don't see how). There are also fixes related to dropping peers due 
> to the one IP per connection setting. You should not normally enable this 
> setting on darknet (core settings); it can cause your friends to be lost.
> 
> Thanks, and sorry for all the problems lately.

I just noticed this warning appearing today on my FreeBSD-native node,
running 1401. Everything seems to be running alright, so I'm not sure
how accurate the message might be (aside from the strange rejection of a
Sun Java implementation because it is not a Sun Java implementation).

Is this bug-worthy?

8<
You are trying to run Freenet under a non-Sun/Oracle Java: Sun
Microsystems Inc. 1.6.0 (OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM). This is not
recommended: Freenet may not run well. Please get Sun/Oracle Java from
http://www.java.com/getjava/ if possible.
8<

I had just switched Java versions yesterday to get rid of the huge red
XML vulnerability message I was receiving with the official Sun JDK.

-- 
Thanks!
-CyberLeo
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


[freenet-support] FCP information

2011-03-26 Thread CyberLeo
Hi!

I was going through the client protocol documentation[0], and had a
question.

One of the things I found visually interesting about the old FuqID
client atop the 0.5 network was the presentation of a splitfile as a
multicoloured bar that filled in to show which blocks in the splitfile
were pending, found, or failed.

Since the fetching and decoding are now handled by the node instead of
the client, and the most detailed information offered by the
SimpleProgress stanza is a blind block count, is there an easy way via
the FCP to obtain a bitmap of unfetched/fetched/failed/fatal blocks for
a given download or upload, so that such a progress bar can be
constructed clientside?

Thanks.

[0] http://new-wiki.freenetproject.org/FCPv2

-- 
Thanks!
-CyberLeo
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [freenet-support] [Freenet-Support] wrapper-FreeBSD.zip oddity

2010-12-21 Thread CyberLeo
On 12/21/2010 02:22 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Would you mind filing a bug? This is most convenient for us.
> https://bugs.freenetproject.org/

As requested:

https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=4614

Thank you.

-- 
Thanks!
-CyberLeo
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


[freenet-support] [Freenet-Support] wrapper-FreeBSD.zip oddity

2010-12-20 Thread CyberLeo
As a test, I installed Freenet on a FreeBSD machine (8.1-RELEASE amd64)
using the headless installer[1] and noticed some oddity when it
bootstrapped.

The 1run.sh script ran just fine, but when it downloaded
wrapper_FreeBSD.zip and unpacked it, the zipfile appeared to contain the
linux wrapper code instead. As the required wrapper binary did not
exist, run.sh proceeded to run the jvm in foreground.

When I checked the originating site for the appropriate wrapper[2], I
noticed that they did have wrapper packages for FreeBSD x86 and amd64,
although they are built for an earlier OS version (6.x). Once I stuck
the appropriate binary and library from this package into the Freenet
directory (and installed compat6x to solve missing library errors), it
appears to run perfectly fine.

Are the erroneous contents of the wrapper_FreeBSD.zip file just an
oversight, or is this a side effect of a lack of inherent FreeBSD
support within Freenet?

[1]http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/freenet07.tar.gz
[2]http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/download.jsp#stable

-- 
Thanks!
-CyberLeo
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [freenet-support] Straw poll: Should Freenet require Javascript?

2010-10-18 Thread CyberLeo
On 10/18/2010 02:29 PM, Ray Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 14:11 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote:
> 
>> It would be really helpful if people could spend a little time to
>> understand what is being debated before they start ranting.
> 
> Try again. I subscribed to this list lastMay? I have received
> perhaps a half dozen messages since then until this last week. Suddenly
> I have 50 messages some dating back to June and July. The first message
> I received in the bunch was the straw poll on javascript. Since then I
> have carefully read every message I have received. There has been very
> little discussion as to why js is needed, or I am missing a bunch of
> messages, or the discussion seriously needs to be brought down to a
> level that I can understand. So don't tell me to understand before I
> start ranting if you are not part of the solution of helping me
> understand. Until I understand, my vote still stands at no.

When first joining a mailing list, it's generally good etiquette to
peruse the list archives prior to posting; not only to get a feel for
the community, but also to ensure your question or statement hasn't been
brought up in the past.

http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/

As for the Javascript requirement...

I suggest switching 'require' for 'intelligently utilize'. I can see how
the use of Javascript and AJAX-type functionality can make the FProxy
experience much better; however, there is a lot to be said for
gracefully degrading to support user agents that are unwilling or unable
to execute javascript, such as Lynx, or possibly Curl. Likewise, since
this is still highly experimental software, there is at least a slight
probability of a bug or a maliciously crafted insert slipping a bit of
Javascript through the content filter, so having the option to disable
it completely (at the expense of a slower or less-featureful FProxy
experience) might be beneficial for those truly paranoid.

-- 
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Technical Administrator
CyberLeo.Net Webhosting
http://www.CyberLeo.Net


Furry Peace! - http://.fur.com/peace/
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


[freenet-support] Invalidate Multicast Received

2010-07-08 Thread CyberLeo
I see tons of these messages in my wrapper.log, roughly 8 every 8
seconds. The original packets seem to be spanning-tree advertisements
generated by a wireless bridge attached to my network. Is there some way
to get Freenet to ignore such multicast traffic?

INFO   | jvm 1| 2010/07/08 03:52:30 | CyberGarage warning :
Invalidate Multicast Recieved : /ff02:0:0:0:0:0:0:c,/239.255.255.250
INFO   | jvm 1| 2010/07/08 03:52:30 | CyberGarage warning :
Invalidate Multicast Recieved : /ff02:0:0:0:0:0:0:c,/239.255.255.250
INFO   | jvm 1| 2010/07/08 03:52:30 | CyberGarage warning :
Invalidate Multicast Recieved : /ff02:0:0:0:0:0:0:c,/239.255.255.250
INFO   | jvm 1| 2010/07/08 03:52:31 | CyberGarage warning :
Invalidate Multicast Recieved : /ff02:0:0:0:0:0:0:c,/239.255.255.250
INFO   | jvm 1| 2010/07/08 03:52:31 | CyberGarage warning :
Invalidate Multicast Recieved : /ff02:0:0:0:0:0:0:c,/239.255.255.250
INFO   | jvm 1| 2010/07/08 03:52:31 | CyberGarage warning :
Invalidate Multicast Recieved : /ff02:0:0:0:0:0:0:c,/239.255.255.250
INFO   | jvm 1| 2010/07/08 03:52:31 | CyberGarage warning :
Invalidate Multicast Recieved : /ff02:0:0:0:0:0:0:c,/239.255.255.250
INFO   | jvm 1| 2010/07/08 03:52:31 | CyberGarage warning :
Invalidate Multicast Recieved : /ff02:0:0:0:0:0:0:c,/239.255.255.250

Thanks!

-- 
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Technical Administrator
CyberLeo.Net Webhosting
http://www.CyberLeo.Net


Furry Peace! - http://.fur.com/peace/
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [freenet-support] Progress bar fail

2009-12-05 Thread CyberLeo
bbac...@googlemail.com wrote:
> The progress bar goes crazy. I was downloading a file. The % value
> does not match the bar,
> the bar is wrong, the value is correct. See attached screenshot.

Both are correct, but the reasons are obscure.

All splitfiles in freenet occupy twice the number of data blocks, due to
the redundant information added to allow them to survive random blocks
dropping out of the mesh. Because of this redundancy, your node need
only acquire half the total number of data blocks to successfully
reconstruct the entire file. This is also, presumably, why the first
half of the progress bar is shaded light green.

-- 
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Technical Administrator
CyberLeo.Net Webhosting
http://www.CyberLeo.Net


Furry Peace! - http://.fur.com/peace/
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


[freenet-support] Out of memory kills node?

2009-10-21 Thread CyberLeo
About once every 1-2 weeks, my node will shut down completely.

In the wrapper log, I see:
INFO   | jvm 2| 2009/10/20 16:30:59 | Out of memory: Emergency
shutdown to protect database integrity in progress...

followed by a full thread dump and db shutdown, and then

ERROR  | wrapper  | 2009/10/20 16:33:09 | Shutdown failed: Timed out
waiting for the JVM to terminate.
ERROR  | wrapper  | 2009/10/20 16:33:09 | JVM did not exit on request,
terminated
INFO   | wrapper  | 2009/10/20 16:33:09 | JVM exited on its own while
waiting to kill the application.
STATUS | wrapper  | 2009/10/20 16:33:09 | JVM exited in response to
signal SIGKILL (9).
STATUS | wrapper  | 2009/10/20 16:33:09 | <-- Wrapper Stopped

then terminates without restarting. Is a total shutdown instead of a
simple restart intended? The machine itself runs comfortably, and never
oomkills, and the wrapper has wrapper.java.maxmemory=256.

I can upload the entire wrapper.log and wrapper.conf someplace, if needed.

Thanks!

-- 
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Technical Administrator
CyberLeo.Net Webhosting
http://www.CyberLeo.Net


Furry Peace! - http://.fur.com/peace/
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


[freenet-support] Null Pointer Exception on FCP

2009-08-14 Thread CyberLeo
Attempting to connect via FCP to a node that has its 'seized' protection
set to 'high', but hasn't had the password entered to unlock it yet,
logs a NullPointerException in the wrapper.log[1] and closes the connection.

[1] wrapper.log.gz

-- 
Thanks!
-CyberLeo


wrapper.log.gz
Description: application/gzip
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] Node name isn't defined.

2009-06-15 Thread CyberLeo
Hi!

Since I started this instance of freenet, mid 2007, I've repeatedly
received an alert 'Your node name isn't defined.'. Despite deciding that
the nickname provided is suitable and clicking 'apply', the alert comes
back every time the node restarts. Is there some regular expression it
uses to determine if the nickname is of the autogenerated kind, or is it
just not remembering that I chose that nickname?

Thanks.

-- 
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


[freenet-support] Why is the development of the freenet project going so slow

2009-02-26 Thread CyberLeo
bqz69 wrote:
> I was just wondering?

> I do not have any capabilities of programming myself, and is only a 
> possibly enduser of Freenet.

I think that about sums it up right there. Most people involved in the
project are end-users, and there seems to be only one paid and two or
three volunteer coders working on it. While end-user feedback is very
important in such a project, so is actual code weaving.

Given that, I think they've been doing an excellent job.

-- 
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Technical Administrator
CyberLeo.Net Webhosting
http://www.CyberLeo.Net


Furry Peace! - http://.fur.com/peace/



Re: [freenet-support] Why is the development of the freenet project going so slow

2009-02-26 Thread CyberLeo
bqz69 wrote:
> I was just wondering?

> I do not have any capabilities of programming myself, and is only a 
> possibly enduser of Freenet.

I think that about sums it up right there. Most people involved in the
project are end-users, and there seems to be only one paid and two or
three volunteer coders working on it. While end-user feedback is very
important in such a project, so is actual code weaving.

Given that, I think they've been doing an excellent job.

-- 
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Technical Administrator
CyberLeo.Net Webhosting
http://www.CyberLeo.Net


Furry Peace! - http://.fur.com/peace/
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


[freenet-support] https and FProxy

2008-04-05 Thread CyberLeo
Andy Dixon wrote:
> I am running Freenet on a Dedicated Server down in London and  
> accessing it remotely. This way it has a fast connection and at the  
> moment 100gb for caches.
> 
> Could anyone tell me how to se up freenet so it gets tunneled over  
> https instead of http?

Research a program called 'stunnel'. It supports wrapping any TCP 
protocol in SSL, with a bunch of features for encryption and 
authentication, and there are Windows and Posix ports of it.

-- 
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Technical Administrator
CyberLeo.Net Webhosting
http://www.CyberLeo.Net


Furry Peace! - http://.fur.com/peace/



Re: [freenet-support] https and FProxy

2008-04-05 Thread CyberLeo
Andy Dixon wrote:
> I am running Freenet on a Dedicated Server down in London and  
> accessing it remotely. This way it has a fast connection and at the  
> moment 100gb for caches.
> 
> Could anyone tell me how to se up freenet so it gets tunneled over  
> https instead of http?

Research a program called 'stunnel'. It supports wrapping any TCP 
protocol in SSL, with a bunch of features for encryption and 
authentication, and there are Windows and Posix ports of it.

-- 
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Technical Administrator
CyberLeo.Net Webhosting
http://www.CyberLeo.Net
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Furry Peace! - http://.fur.com/peace/
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Build 754 uses all available RAM

2006-06-01 Thread CyberLeo
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> I run my nodes in -Xmx100M. Well recently it's been 256 thanks to the
> wrapper. Were you downloading many huge files? The JVM will not use a
> gigabyte of RAM unless you actually tell it that it can. If it's using
> (much) more than your -Xmx setting, then there is a bug _in the JVM_. It
> should OOM and fail. So what was your -Xmx setting (if you are using the
> wrapper, wrapper.java.maxmemory in wrapper.conf) ?

wrapper.conf:
wrapper.java.maxmemory=256

ps axwwwopid,user,state,command :
31110 freenet  S java -Xms128m -Xmx256m -Djava.library.path=lib
-classpath lib/wrapper.jar:freenet-cvs-snapshot.jar:freenet-ext.jar
-Dwrapper.key=PII4PXFbPlyaUE0E -Dwrapper.port=32000
-Dwrapper.jvm.port.min=31000 -Dwrapper.jvm.port.max=31999
-Dwrapper.pid=31108 -Dwrapper.version=3.2.0
-Dwrapper.native_library=wrapper -Dwrapper.ignore_signals=TRUE
-Dwrapper.service=TRUE -Dwrapper.cpu.timeout=10 -Dwrapper.jvmid=1
org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperSimpleApp freenet.node.Node

I'm assuming the 'Resident' size is the one controlled by -Xmx, as that
number had never been above 256mb in the past, but now is definitely
rising beyond that limit.

I will upgrade to Sun Java 1.5.0_07 and see if this takes care of the issue.

Thanks!

--
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/



[freenet-support] Build 754 uses all available RAM

2006-06-01 Thread CyberLeo
CyberLeo wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> Sounds like a bug to me. :)
>>
>> What was the node doing?
> 
> Two open connections, three backed off connections, 60-80% niced CPU 
> usage, and servicing frost with about seventy boards. That's about it.
> 
> The logs don't report much else than attempts at node contact and 
> splitfile block transfers.
> 
> This still occurs in build 760.

It appears that the memory usage only goes up when I'm downloading
splitfiles via Frost. I'm not sure if this happens while browsing
regular freesites or downloading frost messages, or if those are just
too tiny to seriously affect the memory usage as much as a bunch of
large files.

Is there any more information I can provide to help track this down?

--
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/




Re: [freenet-support] Build 754 uses all available RAM

2006-06-01 Thread CyberLeo

Matthew Toseland wrote:

I run my nodes in -Xmx100M. Well recently it's been 256 thanks to the
wrapper. Were you downloading many huge files? The JVM will not use a
gigabyte of RAM unless you actually tell it that it can. If it's using
(much) more than your -Xmx setting, then there is a bug _in the JVM_. It
should OOM and fail. So what was your -Xmx setting (if you are using the
wrapper, wrapper.java.maxmemory in wrapper.conf) ?


wrapper.conf:
wrapper.java.maxmemory=256

ps axwwwopid,user,state,command :
31110 freenet  S java -Xms128m -Xmx256m -Djava.library.path=lib
-classpath lib/wrapper.jar:freenet-cvs-snapshot.jar:freenet-ext.jar
-Dwrapper.key=PII4PXFbPlyaUE0E -Dwrapper.port=32000
-Dwrapper.jvm.port.min=31000 -Dwrapper.jvm.port.max=31999
-Dwrapper.pid=31108 -Dwrapper.version=3.2.0
-Dwrapper.native_library=wrapper -Dwrapper.ignore_signals=TRUE
-Dwrapper.service=TRUE -Dwrapper.cpu.timeout=10 -Dwrapper.jvmid=1
org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperSimpleApp freenet.node.Node

I'm assuming the 'Resident' size is the one controlled by -Xmx, as that
number had never been above 256mb in the past, but now is definitely
rising beyond that limit.

I will upgrade to Sun Java 1.5.0_07 and see if this takes care of the issue.

Thanks!

--
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] Build 754 uses all available RAM

2006-06-01 Thread CyberLeo

CyberLeo wrote:

Matthew Toseland wrote:

Sounds like a bug to me. :)

What was the node doing?


Two open connections, three backed off connections, 60-80% niced CPU 
usage, and servicing frost with about seventy boards. That's about it.


The logs don't report much else than attempts at node contact and 
splitfile block transfers.


This still occurs in build 760.


It appears that the memory usage only goes up when I'm downloading
splitfiles via Frost. I'm not sure if this happens while browsing
regular freesites or downloading frost messages, or if those are just
too tiny to seriously affect the memory usage as much as a bunch of
large files.

Is there any more information I can provide to help track this down?

--
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Build 754 uses all available RAM

2006-05-31 Thread CyberLeo
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Sounds like a bug to me. :)
> 
> What was the node doing?

Two open connections, three backed off connections, 60-80% niced CPU 
usage, and servicing frost with about seventy boards. That's about it.

The logs don't report much else than attempts at node contact and 
splitfile block transfers.

This still occurs in build 760.

--
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/



Re: [freenet-support] Build 754 uses all available RAM

2006-05-31 Thread CyberLeo

Matthew Toseland wrote:

Sounds like a bug to me. :)

What was the node doing?


Two open connections, three backed off connections, 60-80% niced CPU 
usage, and servicing frost with about seventy boards. That's about it.


The logs don't report much else than attempts at node contact and 
splitfile block transfers.


This still occurs in build 760.

--
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Build 754 uses all available RAM

2006-05-31 Thread CyberLeo
Freenet 0.7 build 754, 5GB datastore

Sun Java version "1.5.0_06"

Linux bawls 2.6.16-bawls #6 PREEMPT Sat May 13 22:03:41 CDT 2006 i686
athlon-4 i386 GNU/Linux

Since updating to 754, after about two hours of running, the node has
been consuming far more ram than the set limit of 256MB. In some cases,
this approaches 1-1.5GB of allocated RAM. The machine does not have any
swap.

Are there some command line options to help limit this usage? This does
tend to make the machine completely unusable, as the node causes other
applications to be killed due to lack of memory.

--
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/




[freenet-support] Build 754 uses all available RAM

2006-05-31 Thread CyberLeo

Freenet 0.7 build 754, 5GB datastore

Sun Java version "1.5.0_06"

Linux bawls 2.6.16-bawls #6 PREEMPT Sat May 13 22:03:41 CDT 2006 i686
athlon-4 i386 GNU/Linux

Since updating to 754, after about two hours of running, the node has
been consuming far more ram than the set limit of 256MB. In some cases,
this approaches 1-1.5GB of allocated RAM. The machine does not have any
swap.

Are there some command line options to help limit this usage? This does
tend to make the machine completely unusable, as the node causes other
applications to be killed due to lack of memory.

--
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]