Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-22 Thread Martin Freitag

Rufus schrieb:

Martin Freitag wrote:

Rufus schrieb:

Martin Freitag wrote:

Afaik Mail/News does not execute Javacript in SM2, so you turn it
on/off for the browser individually ;-)


Yes - that's my point. There are some digital art groups I subscribe to
where I'd like to have it on...SM 1.1.18 allowed me to choose - now I
can't.



You're saying you really getting Mails with Javascripts? I never saw 
that. What are those scripts doing in an email?




not knowing just what form of encryption is being applied
where and to what


Browser? MailNews?


Password and Forms Managers, and when storing or retaining PII in
general - it was pretty clear in the past that SM 1.1.x was using strong
128 bit encryption for Password storage...in 2.x.x they dropped the
notification text from the dialog, and when it comes to encryption I
never assume anything - other than that if you don't specifically tell
me otherwise I assume that I'm vulnerable.



Hum, okay I never noticed that, I guess that could easily be fixed once 
a bug is filed.



That's the most notable one - though I recently discovered (last night)
that there's some funkiness going on with the Customization of the
Taskbars too - if you select use small icons it changes both the
Navigation and Personal Taskbars to small. If you then select use large
icons it changes both the Navigation and Personal Taskbars to large.



I cannot confirm that:
http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/8031/smtoolbarsmall.png
http://img709.imageshack.us/img709/340/smtoolbarbig.png
Tried several times, no problems switching individually. Only thing I 
noticed it that the personal bar won't get bigger, no matter what 
setting is being chosen.




And I found I could only right-click up a contextual menu if I right
clicked in the Navigation Taskbar - that was the confusing part; I
should have been able to select either independently, I would think.
That's intuitive.


It is, it says settings-bla for _this_ bar and (at last for me) it 
behaves that way, too.


regards
Martin
--
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - http://www.asciiribbon.org/index-de.html
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-22 Thread Daniel

NFN Smith wrote:

Philip Chee wrote:

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:28:27 -0700, NFN Smith wrote:



snip


I have seen the discussion relating to Coral IETab, and I've played with
that briefly on a test configuration. Objectively, I would love to see a
way to get the necessary plugin support enabled, as I do think that
helps with long-term use of Seamonkey (where it's possible to get to IE
on the occasions that's needed). Given that SeaMonkey has a little more
of an enterprise focus that TB/FF, to some measure, I think that
SeaMonkey users may be more likely to bump into sites that require IE,
and having the ability to call IE from inside SeaMonkey would allow for
use SeaMonkey when they want, without having to do a separate launch of
IE for the sites that require IE.

Smith


Not that I've ever used IE Tab or Coral IE Tab but just sitting here 
reading, I'm thinking Do those that use these extensions ever bother to 
contact the site to say My SeaMonkey doesn't work with your site 
because your site is poorly coded!.


Then I thought Wouldn't it be possible to have this function built into 
the Extension?? so that it happens automatically!


Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


installationproblem with 2.0 and 2.0.1

2009-12-22 Thread Klaus Weber
I realized that Seamonkey 2.0 and 2.01 behaves different than previous 
versions

during installation.
It does not simply overwrite the previous version but installes another
file under programme/seamonkey. The previous versions have been 
installed at

programme/mozilla.org/seamonkey.
When I simply install it, Seamonkey 2.0 does not find my data. But it
does not either when I install user defined under mozilla.org. Even 
importing data is not possible because 2.0.1 cannot not find them.

Can anyone give me an instruction how to install seamonkey 2.0.1?


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: installationproblem with 2.0 and 2.0.1

2009-12-22 Thread Martin Freitag

Klaus Weber schrieb:

I realized that Seamonkey 2.0 and 2.01 behaves different than previous
versions
during installation.
It does not simply overwrite the previous version but installes another
file under programme/seamonkey. The previous versions have been
installed at
programme/mozilla.org/seamonkey.
When I simply install it, Seamonkey 2.0 does not find my data. But it
does not either when I install user defined under mozilla.org. Even
importing data is not possible because 2.0.1 cannot not find them.
Can anyone give me an instruction how to install seamonkey 2.0.1?


When the migration wizard does not show up after installing SM2 to a new 
directory, you can try to invoke it manually:

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_migration_-_SeaMonkey
regards

Martin
--
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - http://www.asciiribbon.org/index-de.html
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Seamonkey 2.0 problem

2009-12-22 Thread Billy
 I followed the instruction to completely clear my older version
of Seamonkey and have now paid a terrible price for doing this.  I now
have completely lost my entire email address books (3 of them).  More
importantly, my complete bookmark file with many years of research was
also gone.
 I appreciate your work to improve Seamonkey.  However, your
failure to address this possibility in your download instructions has
made this program useless to me.  Looks like I will have to move on
and start all over again with my research.  Bummer!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-22 Thread NFN Smith

Daniel wrote:



Not that I've ever used IE Tab or Coral IE Tab but just sitting here 
reading, I'm thinking Do those that use these extensions ever bother to 
contact the site to say My SeaMonkey doesn't work with your site 
because your site is poorly coded!.


Then I thought Wouldn't it be possible to have this function built into 
the Extension?? so that it happens automatically!


That would be nice.  I do use PrefBar, although it's very rare these 
days that I bump into a site that requires me to do spoofing.


When that does happen, I generally squawk at the site owner.

I've seen a number of sites that say they want Firefox (but accept 
SeaMonkey).  The ones that really irk me are the ones that say they want 
Netscape 6.  To me, that's indicative of an IE-centric developer, who 
supports something else because he has to, but doesn't really care to 
make the effort to do it.


Beyond that, for the sites that insist on Firefox as the alternative to 
IE, for a lot, it seems to be that many haven't bothered to 
differentiate between the browser itself and the rendering engine, and 
for those who do, it would seem that many may presume that non-technical 
users neither know nor want to know the difference -- it's easier just 
to say Firefox as the majority option, rather than an XUL browser. 
If it's any consolation to us SeaMonkey users, I presume that Camino 
users have the same issue.


Smith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.0 problem

2009-12-22 Thread Graham

Billy wrote:

  I followed the instruction to completely clear my older version
of Seamonkey and have now paid a terrible price for doing this.  I now
have completely lost my entire email address books (3 of them).  More
importantly, my complete bookmark file with many years of research was
also gone.
  I appreciate your work to improve Seamonkey.  However, your
failure to address this possibility in your download instructions has
made this program useless to me.  Looks like I will have to move on
and start all over again with my research.  Bummer!


Unless you deliberately, manually, removed your old profile, it is still 
there, but apparently did not get migrated when you first started SM2 
(you'll find a number of other instances of this occurring if you do a 
little searching in this newsgroup). You just need to find it. You might 
try re-installing the previous version of Seamonkey: it should find and 
use your old profile.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: inhibit asking for plugins

2009-12-22 Thread Gerd Schweizer

Leonidas Jones schrieb:



I'm not seeing this, however, Chatzilla, the IRC chat client, which
useful for accessing developer discussions, and test days, among other
things, and the DOM inspector, which is useful for troubleshooting, are
both pre-installed extensions as a part of the suite. If you prefer not
to use these components, they can be removed via Tools??Addons.
Hi Lee, i found it and told SM to deinstall. No i hope it will do as 
promissed ;-)

Thank You
--
Liebe Grüße, Gerd
Satelliten FAQ, PC-Tipps, Katzen, Mopped, Garten, Heimwerken:
http://www.satgerd.de/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?till not an answer

2009-12-22 Thread Benoit Renard

MCBastos wrote:

Again, it's a matter of manpower. SM *was* going somewhat independently
from Firefox for the last few years, on the 1.1 branch -- and what was
the result? The rendering engine was looking more and more dated every
day, ditto for the Javascript engine and other core stuff.


That had nothing to do with using XPFE instead of toolkit, though.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Unable to import seamonkey 1.x to Seamonkey 2.0

2009-12-22 Thread Philip Chee
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:24:31 +0100, Ray_Net wrote:

 That's a good idea,... but what programming knowledge is required to 
 help ? (if we don't have it , should we learn it ? (i have knowledge of 
 cobol, fortran, rpg, Linc-4GL, VisualBasic4.0, DMSII, UPL SDL, 
 Mainframes-Harware, MCPII ... would this help ?)

When I first started contributing to Flashblock, not even to SeaMonkey
(or Mozilla Suite at that time) the languages I knew were RPG III,
PL/SQL, xBase (Clipper, FoxPro, xHarbour), a bit of TurboPascal,
FORTRAN, COBOL. At university I learnt Algol68 and BCPL. Fast forward
five years later and I've suddenly become the Flashblock owner *and* am
listed as a active SeaMonkey developer. Go figure.

Phil

-- 
Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org
Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief,
oh Night, and so be good for us to pass.
[ ]Don't crij... You can format drive C:, can't you?
* TagZilla 0.066.6

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.0 problem

2009-12-22 Thread Mark Hansen
On 12/22/2009 5:10 AM, Billy wrote:
  I followed the instruction to completely clear my older version
 of Seamonkey and have now paid a terrible price for doing this.  I now
 have completely lost my entire email address books (3 of them).  More
 importantly, my complete bookmark file with many years of research was
 also gone.
  I appreciate your work to improve Seamonkey.  However, your
 failure to address this possibility in your download instructions has
 made this program useless to me.  Looks like I will have to move on
 and start all over again with my research.  Bummer!

All of your address books, e-mail, settings, etc. are stored in your
Profile. None of the instructions should have told you to delete
your profile.

It sounds more like you installed SM 2.0 and your SM 1.1.X profile was
not migrated properly. When you run SM 2.0, you won't see any of your
personal data, and this can look shocking.

Assuming you're willing to work with the folks here trying to help
(your message implies otherwise), then just ask and see who can
help.

Best of luck.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-22 Thread Benoit Renard

NFN Smith wrote:

Daniel wrote:
it's easier just to say Firefox as the majority option, rather than
an XUL browser.


A web browser doesn't need to use XUL to use the Gecko rendering engine. 
Look at K-Meleon for a good example. I think Camino doesn't use XUL either.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Web Developer Toolbar question

2009-12-22 Thread Leonidas Jones

»Q« wrote:

With Firefox, the Web Developer Toolbar extension provides a toolbar
button which can be used to hide/unhide the WDT.  With SeaMonkey 2.0.1,
I don't see that button available in the Customize dialog.

I'll take this to the author's registration-required web forum, but
first I thought I'd check here to see if it's just something peculiar
to my system.



You are correct, there is no button.  I wish there was, and it shouldn't 
be too big a deal for Chris to add, one would think.


Lee
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Change font/font size in Seamonkey2.0

2009-12-22 Thread Karl

Hi,
up to now i run SM1.1.18 under eCS2.0RC6a and tried to see how SM2.0 is 
usable for me. I am disappointed concerning windows display. The font 
size used are to large to describe the buttons and all other stuff 
including contents of some windows. My old window size is mostly to 
small to keep the text. The used times roman font is also not my favorite.


My question is: how can i modify or add which statements to about:config 
to adapt SM2.0 to look like SM1.1.18.


Thanks and have a nice day.
Karl
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Change font/font size in Seamonkey2.0

2009-12-22 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:11:01 +0100, /Karl/:

up to now i run SM1.1.18 under eCS2.0RC6a and tried to see how SM2.0 is 
usable for me. I am disappointed concerning windows display. The font 
size used are to large to describe the buttons and all other stuff 
including contents of some windows. My old window size is mostly to 
small to keep the text. The used times roman font is also not my favorite.


Where's the times roman font used - in Web content or in the 
SeaMonkey UI?


My question is: how can i modify or add which statements to about:config 
to adapt SM2.0 to look like SM1.1.18.


The Mozilla theme engine should pick the settings from the 
underlying system UI, but I really don't know what's the state with 
OS/2 (isn't eCS2.0 basically the same?) - whether there's an 
implementation for it.  I guess you could ask the folks over in the 
mozilla.dev.ports.os2 group.


In any case, you could customize the UI appearance through your 
userChrome.css.  You could experiment with the following style rules:


window {
  font: 9px sans-serif !important;
}
dialog, wizard, page {
  font: 9px sans-serif !important;
}
button, toolbar, .toolbar-holder, toolbarbutton, tree {
  font: inherit !important;
}
statusbar, tooltip {
  font: 9px sans-serif !important;
}

You may also try using system font keywords [1], like:

dialog, wizard, page {
  font: message-box !important;
}

But I guess these should already be employed by the Classic 
SeaMonkey theme and if you get only times roman then they are not 
accessible from the underlying system UI through the theme engine, 
and the engine is falling back to some default (times roman).


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html#x11

--
Stanimir
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


How to disable PDF files inline when Sending (Not Forwarding)

2009-12-22 Thread Arnie Goetchius
I just sent an email (SM 2.0.1) with a PDF file as an attachment. The 
recipient gets a 7 page email containing PDF code and also receives the 
PDF as an attachment.


The header of the email shows

Content Type: multipart/mixed; 
boundary=090302010906030408030600


but I think it should show Content Type: attachment/file or some such.

I have Preferences, Mail  Newsgroup Composition

Forward Messages check As Attached.

That may work for forwarding messages but what about sending messages? 
How do I make sending a file as an attachment as the default.? Anything 
in About:config that can fix this?


I have both Acrobat 9.0 Pro Extended and Acrobat Reader 9.0 installed. I 
don't know if that may be screwing things up.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-22 Thread Phillip Jones

Rufus wrote:

Phillip Jones wrote:

Rufus wrote:

Phillip Jones wrote:

Rufus wrote:


...not just Sno-Lep.  For any install of SM on a Mac you just drag the
app from the disk image to where you want it.

So I'm left thinking that a truly clean install on a Mac would
require
wiping out everything associated with SM by using a third party app
like
App Delete.  Which would of course mean you'd also be deleting all of
your previous Profile and Pref information.


I'm talking about install of Snow leopard system from the DVD.

Most all applications either install from a dmg file , Pkg install or
drag from dmg to appropriate folder. If you leave the old application in
the applications folder (Directory) it will ask if you wish to replace
and older version 

If you move old app to Trash you don't get this message.



...oh, I thought you were talking about a clean install of SM or other
apps.

As for Mac OS system upgrades, I've always just installed them over the
existing system and never had any issues.  I do the Repair Permissions
dance both before and after system upgrade/install, but other than that
nothing special.



In previous installs to Snow Leopard You were asked to do either a clean
install or Archive and Install, or install over previous install I tried
installing X.4 over 3 and never could not get it to work finally I had
to use the option of archive and install.



I think I've only ever done an Archive and Install once, and I can't
remember what the reason was...I must have been troubleshooting
something.  I installed Sno-Lep right over Lep on my Intel iMac, and Lep
right over 10.5.x on my G5 iMac.

Which I sort of wish I hadn't done now...I should have partitioned that
drive an created a tri-boot capable machine, or dual boot at the very
least.  I still have uses for OS 9, so one of these days I'll clone that
drive, partition, and do the dance to at least make it dual boot.



You considered the possibility of using SheepShaver runs OS 9 on Intel 
machines.


--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it
http://www.phillipmjones.net   http://www.vpea.org
mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: How to disable PDF files inline when Sending (Not Forwarding)

2009-12-22 Thread Phillip Jones

Arnie Goetchius wrote:

I just sent an email (SM 2.0.1) with a PDF file as an attachment. The
recipient gets a 7 page email containing PDF code and also receives the
PDF as an attachment.

The header of the email shows

Content Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary=090302010906030408030600

but I think it should show Content Type: attachment/file or some such.

I have Preferences, Mail  Newsgroup Composition

Forward Messages check As Attached.

That may work for forwarding messages but what about sending messages?
How do I make sending a file as an attachment as the default.? Anything
in About:config that can fix this?

I have both Acrobat 9.0 Pro Extended and Acrobat Reader 9.0 installed. I
don't know if that may be screwing things up.
Preferences  Mail  newsgroups  Send make sure to have checked the 
first Item ask me what to do (Mail prompts you to choose format) either 
choose HTML or Plain Text but not both.


--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it
http://www.phillipmjones.net   http://www.vpea.org
mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Unable to import seamonkey 1.x to Seamonkey 2.0

2009-12-22 Thread ad...@mmri.us

Does this mean that,  it is eventually the end  of all 1.x mail?
What about all my filters? Stored Passwords? etc

I use this in a corporate environment and it is going to be very painful
to tell everyone that this is now the end of their email and they will
have to completely start from scratch setting up everything.
I think it is a bit irresponsible to just drop all users on the path to 2.0.

Sure it is trivial for me to write a bash script to do all you mention
below but I am not so sure it will be easy to decipher how to create the
same user accounts and folders  on 2.0 before the script is used for the
migration.

And how about filters? Can anyone tell me if filters can be imported?
This is pretty serious as they work really great for me as I currently
filter on one account and copy the filters to all user accounts which
works very nicely. Almost no spam.

If full import from 1.9 to 2.0 is not possible, anyone interested in
forking development along 1.x ?
I guess it will be only us Linux users who want to fork as on Win you 
lose your data typically within a year anyway, so 2.0 makes more sense 
for windows.


Martin Freitag wrote:


No real solution but a possible workaround:
- set up new email-accounts like they were im SM1, close SM2
- copy the old mailbox-files (inbox, sent,...) to the new profile over 
the new empty files.

- restart SM2

regards
Martin



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


SM2.01 seems to keep all my site visit history ...

2009-12-22 Thread Ant

Hello!

I have SM2 configured to keep the last eight (8) days for the Web sites 
I visited: http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/9133/screenshotm.gif ... I 
notice it kept since day 1 (11/26/2009) of SM v2.0.0 on both my 
Linux/Debian and Windows XP boxes.


What's up? Is this a bug, I misconfigured, or missed an option?

Thank you in advance. :)
--
No, I'd prefer a cooler WITHOUT an ant-door, thank you... --unknown
   /\___/\
  / /\ /\ \Phil./Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
 | |o   o| |   Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
\ _ / Nuke ANT from e-mail address: phi...@earthlink.netant
 ( )   or ant...@zimage.com
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on his home computer.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-22 Thread Rufus

»Q« wrote:

In news:cfadnyjlv636srlwnz2dnuvz_hidn...@mozilla.org,
Rufus n...@home.com wrote:


»Q« wrote:

In news:j7qdntbkupghy7pwnz2dnuvz_uwdn...@mozilla.org,
Rufus n...@home.com wrote:
  
»Q« wrote:  
  

The form manager feature of SeaMonkey 1.x isn't in SM 2.0.x
because the codebase which supports it has been abandoned by the
people working on Mozilla core code.  Polling users wouldn't make
those people re-implement it for the newer codebase, and the
SeaMonkey team hasn't (yet) been able to do that themselves.  

...so, what you've just told me is that the Form Manager doesn't
have a snowball's chance of coming back.  

That's not at all what I've just told you or even based on what I've
just told you.  You must have some other reason for thinking there
will never again be a form manager in SeaMonkey.

...you used the words abandoned and core.  That means no, as
far as I'm concerned.


You're right that no one will revive the Mozilla 1.8 code, but that
certainly doesn't mean that SeaMonkey will never again have a forms
manager.



...but as the project is staffed, you can't really tell me when it 
will...I've been hearing nothing but we don't have someone to work 
that as opposed to how it could be worked.


--
 - Rufus
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


yahoo mail

2009-12-22 Thread ad...@mmri.us
Anyone remember what the server details are to get mail from yahoo into 
a seamonkey account?

Years ago yahoo was still pop based, but I cannot find any details lately.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: How to disable PDF files inline when Sending (Not Forwarding)

2009-12-22 Thread Arnie Goetchius

Phillip Jones wrote:

Arnie Goetchius wrote:

I just sent an email (SM 2.0.1) with a PDF file as an attachment. The
recipient gets a 7 page email containing PDF code and also receives the
PDF as an attachment.

The header of the email shows

Content Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary=090302010906030408030600

but I think it should show Content Type: attachment/file or some such.

I have Preferences, Mail Newsgroup Composition

Forward Messages check As Attached.

That may work for forwarding messages but what about sending messages?
How do I make sending a file as an attachment as the default.? Anything
in About:config that can fix this?

I have both Acrobat 9.0 Pro Extended and Acrobat Reader 9.0 installed. I
don't know if that may be screwing things up.

Preferences  Mail  newsgroups  Send make sure to have checked the
first Item ask me what to do (Mail prompts you to choose format) either
choose HTML or Plain Text but not both.

I checked the first choice but (1) Mail still does not prompt me and (2) 
I still get the pdf showing inline. See below for a snippet:


test pdf

accbill.pdf

%PDF-1.6 %âãÏÓ 7 0 obj  endobj 13 0 obj 
/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[098692A93BD42C4DA1EB4A755AC6744A098692A93BD42C4DA1EB4A755AC6744A]/Index[7 
8]/Info 6 0 R/Length 40/Prev 27093/Root 8 0 R/Size 15/Type/XRef/W[1 2 
0]stream hÞbbd`b`Òcb`°ab`\¤21XË21š ä;�+0Ê endstream endobj 
startxref 0 %%EOF 14 0 obj 
stream hÞb```a``üÌ�©˜€……Áø$øæKǃxÌ‡%€4#¿0�·z 
endstream endobj 8 0 obj 

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-22 Thread Robert Kaiser

Rufus wrote:

A two year cycle is about standard for what I do, and what I manage is
WAY more complex than something like SM...the short cycle model works
just fine for security and under the hood fixes, the long cycle model
works better for major interface changes.


You just have more or less said that what you work on is not in the 
slightest way related with the Internet. In this place, a few weeks or 
months can mean life or death for a software project.


Robert Kaiser
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-22 Thread Rufus

NoOp wrote:

On 12/21/2009 11:12 AM, Rufus wrote:

Martin Freitag wrote:

Rufus schrieb:

Just been looking over the user options between the two, and I have to
say that as far as the user is concerned, 1.1.18 had/has far more user
flexibility for configuration, far more informative dialog boxes,
buttons I could actually use, and with few exceptions behaved as I
wanted it to...


Which configuration options and buttons are missing for you now?
Have you filed enhancements bugs for them?

Martin
Not being able to turn Javascript on for the Browser or Mail/News 
individually, not knowing just what form of encryption is being applied 
where and to what, smaller non-user friendly buttons, no Forms 
Manager...to name a few.


about:config
javascript.allow.mailnews;false
set to true.



All that is well and good, but far more than an average user should have 
to do.  It's most grievous example of a user selection which was there 
previously and removed that I can think of - and such a simple one at that.


I understand the risks involved with fooling around with about:config if 
one doesn't know what one is doing...workarounds are fine for 
experienced users, but not for the masses.



You might want to look into prefbar; it essentially is a front end (and
more) to about:config settings. You can add your own buttons, and could
add a button to toggle that setting with a single click.

http://prefbar.mozdev.org/
It's the first thing that I install in SeaMonkey.
Also see:
http://prefbar.mozdev.org/help/


I'm not in the habit of using plugins, but Prefbar looks like it may 
have some merit...for other reasons than just the Mail/News script 
control.  Thanks.


--
 - Rufus
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


What is mozilla-temporary-internal-MDN-receipt-filter?

2009-12-22 Thread MCBastos
I noticed a new rule appeared by itself on top of my email rules, for
all accounts.
It's called mozilla-temporary-internal-MDN-receipt-filter, and checks
the X-Yahoo-Forwarded heading for the values multipart/report and
disposition-notification. If either is found, it moves the message to
the sent folder.

There's also a similar rule called SpamAssassinYes that checks the
same heading for Yes and for spam on the message title, and if so,
moves the message to the spam folder.

Now, the second rule *seems* to have something to do with the trust
SpamAssassin headers option... but I can't figure what added the first
one. Maybe it was the Mail Redirect extension?

Another funny thing with this is I think I already used the trust
SpamAssassin thing back in 1.1.x, but I don't remember any extra rules
(and I do fiddle with my mail rules in a regular basis). Were those two
hidden rules that now in version 2 became visible?

-- 
MCBastos

This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.

-=-=-
... BOFH excuse #390:
Increased sunspot activity.
* TagZilla 0.0661 * http://tagzilla.mozdev.org on Seamonkey 2.0
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-22 Thread Rufus

Robert Kaiser wrote:

Rufus wrote:

A two year cycle is about standard for what I do, and what I manage is
WAY more complex than something like SM...the short cycle model works
just fine for security and under the hood fixes, the long cycle model
works better for major interface changes.


You just have more or less said that what you work on is not in the 
slightest way related with the Internet. In this place, a few weeks or 
months can mean life or death for a software project.


Robert Kaiser


Exactly...which is why I'm so puzzled at the intransigence of some of 
the people on the team when I read the bug reports.  I would have 
expected the team to be far more flexible and responsive to user 
feedback...particularly in light of what has been said about not 
allowing the project to die.  Where is the teams sense of urgency?


--
 - Rufus
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-22 Thread Jens Hatlak
Leonidas Jones wrote:
[JS in MailNews]
 
 As I am sure you know, but for those who do not, in about:config:
 
 javascript.allow.mailnews
 
 Set to true.

That won't have any effect. JS in MailNews is gone for good:
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Javascript.allow.mailnews

The reason that the pref is still appearing in about:config is that the
relevant patch applies against core code which follows different time
schedules. The pref will be removed from about:config in SeaMonkey 2.1.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248280

HTH

Jens

-- 
Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-22 Thread Rufus

Jens Hatlak wrote:

Leonidas Jones wrote:

[JS in MailNews]

As I am sure you know, but for those who do not, in about:config:

javascript.allow.mailnews

Set to true.


That won't have any effect. JS in MailNews is gone for good:
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Javascript.allow.mailnews

The reason that the pref is still appearing in about:config is that the
relevant patch applies against core code which follows different time
schedules. The pref will be removed from about:config in SeaMonkey 2.1.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248280

HTH

Jens



I guess this doesn't surprise me.  Just one more example of the 
interface not being in step with the code...now I can't trust what I see 
in about:config or what it actually does either?


Thanks.

--
 - Rufus
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Using firefox add-ons...

2009-12-22 Thread me2
Since the code is getting to be very similar, are we going to be able
to get firefox add-ons, e.g., autofill forms?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM2.01 seems to keep all my site visit history ...

2009-12-22 Thread Jens Hatlak
Ant wrote:
 I have SM2 configured to keep the last eight (8) days for the Web sites
 I visited: http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/9133/screenshotm.gif ... I
 notice it kept since day 1 (11/26/2009) of SM v2.0.0 on both my
 Linux/Debian and Windows XP boxes.
 
 What's up? Is this a bug, I misconfigured, or missed an option?

You told SeaMonkey to always keep history entries for the last eight
days and allowed it to delete history entries that are older when the
maximum number of visited pages (in your case 40,000) has been reached.
To achieve what you want you should set the maximum number of visited
pages to zero. That should have the desired effect since the first pref
(Always remember...) takes precedence over the other two.

Please read the relevant Help section which explains it in depth.

HTH

Jens

-- 
Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Using firefox add-ons...

2009-12-22 Thread Jens Hatlak
me2 wrote:
 Since the code is getting to be very similar, are we going to be able
 to get firefox add-ons, e.g., autofill forms?

Someone needs to adjust it for full support but it basically works with
some simple modifications:

http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/msg/e1801e812307fb71

HTH

Jens

-- 
Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Web Developer Toolbar question

2009-12-22 Thread »Q«
In news:bqudnevai5yaya3wnz2dnuvz_jri4...@mozilla.org,
Leonidas Jones leonidasjo...@netscape.net wrote:

 »Q« wrote:
  With Firefox, the Web Developer Toolbar extension provides a toolbar
  button which can be used to hide/unhide the WDT.  With SeaMonkey
  2.0.1, I don't see that button available in the Customize dialog.
 
  I'll take this to the author's registration-required web forum, but
  first I thought I'd check here to see if it's just something
  peculiar to my system.
 
 You are correct, there is no button.  I wish there was, and it
 shouldn't be too big a deal for Chris to add, one would think.

It's the same extension package for Firefox and SeaMonkey, so the
button must be in there somewhere, heh.  Hopefully you're right and it
will be relatively easy for him to get it working with SM.  I posted to
his forum:

http://chrispederick.com/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=8259

-- 
»Q«  /\
  ASCII Ribbon Campaign  \ /
   against html e-mailX
 http://asciiribbon.org/   / \
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM2.01 seems to keep all my site visit history ...

2009-12-22 Thread Ant

On 12/22/2009 2:36 PM PT, Jens Hatlak typed:


I have SM2 configured to keep the last eight (8) days for the Web sites
I visited: http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/9133/screenshotm.gif ... I
notice it kept since day 1 (11/26/2009) of SM v2.0.0 on both my
Linux/Debian and Windows XP boxes.

What's up? Is this a bug, I misconfigured, or missed an option?


You told SeaMonkey to always keep history entries for the last eight
days and allowed it to delete history entries that are older when the
maximum number of visited pages (in your case 40,000) has been reached.
To achieve what you want you should set the maximum number of visited
pages to zero. That should have the desired effect since the first pref
(Always remember...) takes precedence over the other two.

Please read the relevant Help section which explains it in depth.


Ah thanks Jens. Is there a way to see how many pages I visited so far? 
4 seems too high. I'd like to know how many I have so far now.

--
The shadows now so long do grow,... That brambles like tall cedars 
show,... Molehills seem mountains, and the ant... Appears a monstrous 
elephant. --Charles Cotton's poem

   /\___/\
  / /\ /\ \Phil./Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
 | |o   o| |   Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
\ _ / Nuke ANT from e-mail address: phi...@earthlink.netant
 ( )   or ant...@zimage.com
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on his home computer.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-22 Thread Daniel

Leonidas Jones wrote:

Rufus wrote:

Martin Freitag wrote:

Rufus schrieb:

/snip/


snip



If Firefox/Thunderbird are harbingers of what's to become of SM due to
the SM team not being able to maintain their own code content for
functionality, then I'll just stick with SM 1.1.18 and call it good -
like some enterprise users I know that still depend on Netscape. I've
tried to get those users to upgrade from NS to SM in the past, I'm not
really sure I have a reason to do that any longer.



No I don't think so. Isn't the point of the SeaMonkey project to
reintegrate the split projects into a workable suite? I would suggest
giving it some time. It works very well for my personal use. For
business use it may take a while longer.

Lee


No, Lee, the point of the SeaMonkey Project is (or should that be was) 
to continue the development of the Mozilla Suite, which was abandoned by 
Mozilla (org or com or whatever) once Firefox and Thunderbird had become 
established.


Now, as SM is a volunteer enterprise, I've got no problems with the team 
taking the Open Source FF and TB code and incorporating them as part 
of the suite (no need to re-invent the wheel, here!!), but, IMHO, SM 
Suite should never have to become FFTB plus a few bits and pieces.


And, Lee, for what it's worth, rather than just siting back bitching, I 
now intend to assist the SM development as much as I can. Previously, 
the web account I was on and, even more so, being on dial-up, restricted 
me from helping but now that I've gone wireless, I have a greater 
ability to help out with smoke-testing (whatever that is) new releases 
and dual-booting Win7 and Mandriva Linux, I hope I will be able to do 
some cross platform comparision work, just as you do!


Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-22 Thread Daniel

Rufus wrote:

NoOp wrote:

On 12/21/2009 11:12 AM, Rufus wrote:

Martin Freitag wrote:

Rufus schrieb:


snip


about:config
javascript.allow.mailnews;false
set to true.



All that is well and good, but far more than an average user should have
to do. It's most grievous example of a user selection which was there
previously and removed that I can think of - and such a simple one at that.

I understand the risks involved with fooling around with about:config if
one doesn't know what one is doing...workarounds are fine for
experienced users, but not for the masses.



One wonders why there is that screen warning about fiddling with 
about:config, if the average user is now expected to do things in 
about:config??


Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-22 Thread Leonidas Jones

Jens Hatlak wrote:

Leonidas Jones wrote:

[JS in MailNews]


As I am sure you know, but for those who do not, in about:config:

javascript.allow.mailnews

Set to true.


That won't have any effect. JS in MailNews is gone for good:
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Javascript.allow.mailnews

The reason that the pref is still appearing in about:config is that the
relevant patch applies against core code which follows different time
schedules. The pref will be removed from about:config in SeaMonkey 2.1.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248280

HTH

Jens



That's mosst unfortunate, but thanks for the information.

Lee
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Using firefox add-ons...

2009-12-22 Thread Evan Davidson

me2 wrote:

Since the code is getting to be very similar, are we going to be able
to get firefox add-ons, e.g., autofill forms?


Go to: http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html#fireform and get 
fireform-0.5.0-mod.xpi. It's an auto form filler that works with 
Seamonkey 2.0.x.


Look on that site (Phil Chee's) for many more Seamonkey 2 add-ons. (They 
are all Firefox extensions that have been modified to work for Seamonkey 
but not all work on 2.0.x yet.) Check this site: 
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=19t=500361 for add-ons 
that have been modified for Seamonkey 2.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-22 Thread Rufus

Daniel wrote:

Leonidas Jones wrote:

Rufus wrote:

Martin Freitag wrote:

Rufus schrieb:

/snip/


snip



If Firefox/Thunderbird are harbingers of what's to become of SM due to
the SM team not being able to maintain their own code content for
functionality, then I'll just stick with SM 1.1.18 and call it good -
like some enterprise users I know that still depend on Netscape. I've
tried to get those users to upgrade from NS to SM in the past, I'm not
really sure I have a reason to do that any longer.



No I don't think so. Isn't the point of the SeaMonkey project to
reintegrate the split projects into a workable suite? I would suggest
giving it some time. It works very well for my personal use. For
business use it may take a while longer.

Lee


No, Lee, the point of the SeaMonkey Project is (or should that be was) 
to continue the development of the Mozilla Suite, which was abandoned by 
Mozilla (org or com or whatever) once Firefox and Thunderbird had become 
established.


Now, as SM is a volunteer enterprise, I've got no problems with the team 
taking the Open Source FF and TB code and incorporating them as part 
of the suite (no need to re-invent the wheel, here!!), but, IMHO, SM 
Suite should never have to become FFTB plus a few bits and pieces.


And, Lee, for what it's worth, rather than just siting back bitching, I 
now intend to assist the SM development as much as I can. Previously, 
the web account I was on and, even more so, being on dial-up, restricted 
me from helping but now that I've gone wireless, I have a greater 
ability to help out with smoke-testing (whatever that is) new releases 
and dual-booting Win7 and Mandriva Linux, I hope I will be able to do 
some cross platform comparision work, just as you do!


Daniel


Bravo, Daniel.  First encouraging words I've heard since 2.x was released!

--
 - Rufus
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-22 Thread NoOp
On 12/22/2009 05:10 PM, NoOp wrote:
 On 12/22/2009 05:04 PM, NoOp wrote:
 On 12/22/2009 02:02 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote:
 ...
 The reason that the pref is still appearing in about:config is that the
 relevant patch applies against core code which follows different time
 schedules. The pref will be removed from about:config in SeaMonkey 2.1.
 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248280
 
 Actually it's still there. Whether or not it still works I don't know as
 I don't accept email with html  javascript. However, this seems to tie
 back to:
 
 Sorry, I read 2.1 as 2.0.1. My apologies.
 

And checking from:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.3a1pre)
Gecko/20091222 Lightning/1.1a1pre SeaMonkey/2.1a1pre

I see that the option is no longer there. Again, apologies to Jen.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.0 problem

2009-12-22 Thread Mort

Billy wrote:

  I followed the instruction to completely clear my older version
of Seamonkey and have now paid a terrible price for doing this.  I now
have completely lost my entire email address books (3 of them).  More
importantly, my complete bookmark file with many years of research was
also gone.
  I appreciate your work to improve Seamonkey.  However, your
failure to address this possibility in your download instructions has
made this program useless to me.  Looks like I will have to move on
and start all over again with my research.  Bummer!


Hi,

Along these lines, when my Vista Home Premium worked poorly, a 
commercial computer tech switched my PC to run Windows XP Pro. Most 
things are stable since then, but I have an address book problem. My old 
and lengthy address book did not carry over to XP. My hard drive has all 
my old address book listings under abook., but in narrative text form. 
Try as I may, I cannot migrate it to the address book in SeaMonkey, 
where only my newer addresses are listed properly in nested categories 
that are clickable. Any help with this problem will be greatly appreciated.


Thanks,

Mort Linder
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-22 Thread Phillip Jones

NoOp wrote:
---snip---


But apparently do not understand the risks associated with html and
javascript in emails. You can of course choose to ignore the default
settings  SeaMonkey/about:config allows you to do that.

---snip---

JavaScript was in html mail as far as back perhaps Netscape Navigator 
3.0.1.a Gold.  and the h=whole time not once did I experience a Problem 
And I have viewed many a html or newsgroup post with JavaScript in it 
and not once a problem. Yet recently there is all the fear of JavaScript.


Talk about something dangerous, talk about Active-X. Active-X is a lot 
more Dangerous than JavaScript.



--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it
http://www.phillipmjones.net   http://www.vpea.org
mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-22 Thread NoOp
On 12/22/2009 06:39 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
 NoOp wrote:
 ---snip---
 
 But apparently do not understand the risks associated with html and
 javascript in emails. You can of course choose to ignore the default
 settings  SeaMonkey/about:config allows you to do that.
 ---snip---
 
 JavaScript was in html mail as far as back perhaps Netscape Navigator 
 3.0.1.a Gold.  and the h=whole time not once did I experience a Problem 
 And I have viewed many a html or newsgroup post with JavaScript in it 
 and not once a problem. Yet recently there is all the fear of JavaScript.
 
 Talk about something dangerous, talk about Active-X. Active-X is a lot 
 more Dangerous than JavaScript.

SeaMonkey doesn't run Active-X  so the reference isn't relevant here.

You've also been advocating html  javascript in email for as long as I
remember. I wonder how your spam rate is? Also keep in mind that you run
a Mac, so the issues of something spinning up on your Mac vs that of a
Windows user is perhaps different.

Just because you've kept the blinders on all these years doesn't mean
that html  javascript in emails is a good thing. Google will certainly
show you that.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-22 Thread NoOp
On 12/22/2009 08:37 PM, NoOp wrote:
 On 12/22/2009 06:39 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
 NoOp wrote:
 ---snip---
 
 But apparently do not understand the risks associated with html and
 javascript in emails. You can of course choose to ignore the default
 settings  SeaMonkey/about:config allows you to do that.
 ---snip---
 
 JavaScript was in html mail as far as back perhaps Netscape Navigator 
 3.0.1.a Gold.  and the h=whole time not once did I experience a Problem 
 And I have viewed many a html or newsgroup post with JavaScript in it 
 and not once a problem. Yet recently there is all the fear of JavaScript.
 
 Talk about something dangerous, talk about Active-X. Active-X is a lot 
 more Dangerous than JavaScript.
 
 SeaMonkey doesn't run Active-X  so the reference isn't relevant here.
 
 You've also been advocating html  javascript in email for as long as I
 remember. I wonder how your spam rate is? Also keep in mind that you run
 a Mac, so the issues of something spinning up on your Mac vs that of a
 Windows user is perhaps different.
 
 Just because you've kept the blinders on all these years doesn't mean
 that html  javascript in emails is a good thing. Google will certainly
 show you that.

Sorry, forgot to add:
http://www.cert.org/tech_tips/home_networks.html#IV-A-9
(you do know who cert is... right?)
quote
10. Disable scripting features in email programs

Because many email programs use the same code as web browsers to display
HTML, vulnerabilities that affect ActiveX, Java, and JavaScript are
often applicable to email as well as web pages. Therefore, in addition
to disabling scripting features in web browsers (see Disable Java,
JavaScript, and ActiveX if possible, above), we recommend that users
also disable these features in their email programs.
/quote

Rufus may have some reason to want to enable javascript in emails, but
if so I'd posit that he's working in an environment that is pretty
unstable. My recommendation to him (and you) is to find another email
client  be done with it. I'm sure that both of you Mac users have
alternatives... just do it. Simple as that.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: yahoo mail

2009-12-22 Thread Gene S.
ad...@mmri.us wrote:
 Anyone remember what the server details are to get mail from yahoo into 
 a seamonkey account?
 Years ago yahoo was still pop based, but I cannot find any details lately.
 
 

Mine is

POP mail server: pop.mail.yahoo.com port:110
Use secure connection: Never
Use secure authentication Unchecked.

Outgoing Server: smtp.mail.yahoo.com port:25
Use secure connection: No


-- 

Gene S. ;Remove '_' to reply.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-22 Thread Rufus

NoOp wrote:

On 12/22/2009 08:37 PM, NoOp wrote:

On 12/22/2009 06:39 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:

NoOp wrote:
---snip---


But apparently do not understand the risks associated with html and
javascript in emails. You can of course choose to ignore the default
settings   SeaMonkey/about:config allows you to do that.

---snip---

JavaScript was in html mail as far as back perhaps Netscape Navigator
3.0.1.a Gold.  and the h=whole time not once did I experience a Problem
And I have viewed many a html or newsgroup post with JavaScript in it
and not once a problem. Yet recently there is all the fear of JavaScript.

Talk about something dangerous, talk about Active-X. Active-X is a lot
more Dangerous than JavaScript.


SeaMonkey doesn't run Active-X  so the reference isn't relevant here.

You've also been advocating html  javascript in email for as long as I
remember. I wonder how your spam rate is? Also keep in mind that you run
a Mac, so the issues of something spinning up on your Mac vs that of a
Windows user is perhaps different.

Just because you've kept the blinders on all these years doesn't mean
that html  javascript in emails is a good thing. Google will certainly
show you that.


Sorry, forgot to add:
http://www.cert.org/tech_tips/home_networks.html#IV-A-9
(you do know who cert is... right?)
quote
10. Disable scripting features in email programs

Because many email programs use the same code as web browsers to display
HTML, vulnerabilities that affect ActiveX, Java, and JavaScript are
often applicable to email as well as web pages. Therefore, in addition
to disabling scripting features in web browsers (see Disable Java,
JavaScript, and ActiveX if possible, above), we recommend that users
also disable these features in their email programs.
/quote

Rufus may have some reason to want to enable javascript in emails, but
if so I'd posit that he's working in an environment that is pretty
unstable. My recommendation to him (and you) is to find another email
client  be done with it. I'm sure that both of you Mac users have
alternatives... just do it. Simple as that.




...yeah...most artists are unstable.  You just have to accept that and 
deal with it.


--
 - Rufus
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey