Verify Links in editor
Can Sea Monkey's web editor verify all links before upload? Also can the FTP app select directories on the FTP server in a window to upload too? -- Are there errors in the Bible? How should a church conduct its worship services? Is drinking Alcohol a sin? Is racism wrong? If you want to learn, get answers, and be able to defend the faith, CERM is your place. http://www.cerm.info ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Email trouble with v2.0.3 - maybe
I've been having a problem sending email to a verizon.net address known to be good. This morning, 5 to 10 attempts produced a popup message saying the addressee was not a customer and to check the address. I tried rebooting the computer and initiated dial-up several times to no effect. The last test I made was sending email to another address which was successful. Immediately after that I was able to send email to the problem address. Is this a known bug of some type with Seamonkey 2.0.3? I don't see how it can be a bug somewhere else given the sequence of events but it doesn't make much sense. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Help with Lightning for Seamonkey 2.0
Cecil Bankston schrieb: Lightning 1.0b2pre installed with no problems and seems to be working well in SM 2.0.2. Get the latest (Windows) nightly build from this URL Don't use use nightlies if you are a user, as there is a (beta) release that works. I think I recall that the latest release version would not install in SM 2.x. Just use Lightning 1.0 Beta 1 from addons.mozilla.org as that one works fine with all SeaMonkey 2.0.x versions. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM2.1 nightly SSL error renegotiation not allowed
dominique schrieb: Something to remember as the vulnerability is still open ! It can only safely be closed by turning off renegotiation, from what I read. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: remember the password 2.0.? does not work in one profile
David E. Ross wrote: On 2/19/2010 1:04 PM, Arnie Goetchius wrote: The remember the password function does not work after installing 2.0.2 and then 2.0.3 for my main profile. I have several other profiles where it works okay. Is there anything in about:config I can look for to set it to True or False to make the remember function work Some Web sites block browsers from remembering passwords. There was a capability using a pair of preference variables to override that block in many -- but not all -- cases. The capability was removed when the Password Manager was rewritten for Firefox. See bug #425145 at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425145. The sentiment among developers appears inclinde not to fix this. The best workaround that I found is at http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-remember-passwords/. This actually works for sites where even the old capability did not work. The problem is that you must manually tweak the nsLoginManager.js every time you update SeaMonkey. Note that the Activate Autocomplete extension should be avoided. See bug #529091 athttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529091. Thanks for the ideas. I have the same profile working on another computer and the remember feature works okay there. Before I try your workarounds, I'm going to see if there is any difference between the prefs.js between the two computers which would let it work on one computer but not the other. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Email trouble with v2.0.3 - maybe
On or about 2/20/2010 9:11 AM, robert.ga...@att.net typed the following: I've been having a problem sending email to a verizon.net address known to be good. This morning, 5 to 10 attempts produced a popup message saying the addressee was not a customer and to check the address. I tried rebooting the computer and initiated dial-up several times to no effect. The last test I made was sending email to another address which was successful. Immediately after that I was able to send email to the problem address. Is this a known bug of some type with Seamonkey 2.0.3? I don't see how it can be a bug somewhere else given the sequence of events but it doesn't make much sense. You can check the e-mail address here. If it returns good there's a problem someplace. http://hexillion.com/email_validation/ -- Ed Don't vote--it only encourages them! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Email trouble with v2.0.3 - maybe
On or about 2/20/2010 10:08 AM, BeeNeR typed the following: On or about 2/20/2010 9:11 AM, robert.ga...@att.net typed the following: I've been having a problem sending email to a verizon.net address known to be good. This morning, 5 to 10 attempts produced a popup message saying the addressee was not a customer and to check the address. I tried rebooting the computer and initiated dial-up several times to no effect. The last test I made was sending email to another address which was successful. Immediately after that I was able to send email to the problem address. Is this a known bug of some type with Seamonkey 2.0.3? I don't see how it can be a bug somewhere else given the sequence of events but it doesn't make much sense. You can check the e-mail address here. If it returns good there's a problem someplace. http://hexillion.com/email_validation/ Or another one is: http://centralops.net/co/ and scroll down to 'Email Dossier' -- Ed Cure the disease and kill the patient. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.3 Security Update
Ray_Net wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: The 2.0.3 version will just overwrite the older one, just like every time when you upgrade an add-on (and it does it in a safe way, AFAIK). Thanks ! It works like a charm. BTW may i suggest sometihing on the SeaMonkey web site http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/ I would be nice to see per exemple Main Downloads SeaMonkey 2.0.3 * Windows, English ((10,604,307 bytes)) instead of: Main Downloads SeaMonkey 2.0.3 * Windows, English (10 MB) This will permit to check if the download was successfully. (same thing for other downloads) Where should i speak about such modifications of the SM website ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Weird font behavior in email replies
When replying to an email, the reply begins with my chosen default font (Comic Sans MS). But if while typing I go back to correct something, when I return to where I left off in the email, the font becomes smaller and the font identification displayed in the email automatically changes to Variable Width. I'm using 2.0.3, but the problem has plagued me over the last few versions. How can I correct the problem? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: newest version
Interviewed by CNN on 19/2/2010 22:36, David E. Ross told the world:
On 2/19/2010 12:51 PM, JeffM wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Page designers that design pages for w3c [compliance]
should add a notation.
/This website was written to World Wide Web Consortium Standards
and should show properly on the vast Major of Web browsers
There's even a tag for that.
Put this in an HTML file and view that with IE, then Gecko:
!--[if IE]br
Only Internet Exploder can see this text.br
![endif]--br
/If not please contact the creator of the browser that does not,
and please tell them you will discontinue use of
[their] product until [it] meets specifications/.
...or simply:
This site best viewed with a standards-compliant browser.
http://google.com/search?q=%22+best.viewed.with.a.standards-compliant.browser
When combined with the tag shown above
and using large red text, it grabs the attention.
Using the flash tag would put the icing on the cake.
The funny thing about w3c is MS is one of the Signatories of W3C
It's easier to do damage when you're one of the Fifth Column
than when you're an overtly declared enemy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend_and_extinguish
If appears that more is required to sniff for IE. I tried your example.
The same text showed in both IE 7 and SeaMonkey 2.0.3.
Try this:
!--[if IE]
div id=ienote
p class=warningCompatibility Warning/p
pThis website was written to a href=http://www.w3.org/;World
Wide Web Consortium/a specifications and should display properly on
the vast majority of Web browsers on the market today./p
pIf you see rendering problems please contact the creator of the
browser that you used, and tell them you will discontinue use of their
product until it meets specifications./p
/div
![endif]--
You may style the note above as you wish, for instance, like this:
#ienote {border: thick red outset;
background-color:yellow;
color:red;
padding:0.5em;
clear:both;}
#ienote p.warning {font-weight:bold;
font-size:larger;
text-align:center;}
I tried using blink, but IE apparently doesn't support it -- even as a
style, which IS in CSS1. So it's useless in this context.
--
MCBastos
This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.
-=-=-
... BOFH excuse #118:
the router thinks its a printer.
*Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.0.3 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.3 Security Update
Ray_Net schrieb: I would be nice to see per exemple * Windows, English ((10,604,307 bytes)) No, that's useless information for the normal user. For actually checking integrity of the files, you should use the MD5 or SHA1 sums linked on the release download page, the file size is too little information. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Yenc decoder
Im wondering why Seamonky has never had a yEnc decoder built into the program? Also why people post yEnc pictures? Does yEnc encoded pictures save that much space or bandwidth? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Weird font behavior in email replies
William Greenwood wrote: When replying to an email, the reply begins with my chosen default font (Comic Sans MS). But if while typing I go back to correct something, when I return to where I left off in the email, the font becomes smaller and the font identification displayed in the email automatically changes to Variable Width. I'm using 2.0.3, but the problem has plagued me over the last few versions. How can I correct the problem? I've noticed this behavior since switching to to SM2 and using the HTML editor. The type is always smaller than it supposed to be. I never had that problem in SM1.x.x -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bad upgrade from 1.1.18 to 2.03
Robert Kaiser wrote: cmcadams schrieb: Leonidas Jones wrote: u...@domain.invalid wrote: cmcadams wrote: Last evening I finally uninstalled 1.1.18, and installed 2.03. My Profiles Bookmarks Email and newsgroup accounts Addresses Saved emails didn't make the trip. 2.0.3's wizard said it had imported everything, but no evidence of that. Asking 2.03 to import the missing items after installation was fruitless since I don't use Eudora, Outlook, etc. The browser itself was functional. 1.1.18 is now back in use. The OS is XP SP3. Yes, I have a nonstandard SM installation. Program files are installed to: E:\Mozilla\SMonkey to keep my boot partition smaller, which makes boot partition image backups easier. 2.0.3 was installed to the same location. 1.1.18's config files have always been in the standard place: C:\Documents and Settings\[myname]\Application Data Has anyone dealt with this before, or can point me to a page where someone has? I had issues like that clear back when they came-out with SeaMonkey 2- the best way is not to upgrade until they get all the bugs worked-out, I think there's a settings under preferences, advanced for Seamonkey not to search for a upgrade. Stay tuned to this channel for news of when a good version comes out. Jack I'm afraid you're wrong there. The problem the OP posted was one of a problem profile migration. That is not a flaw in the program itself, but in the migration process. That is not going to improve. Anyone who is waiting for an improved migration tool is going to have a long wait. In fact, the profile migration will probably go away entirely, though that will be a while. The real answer is to migrate the data manually. It may be a pain but once its done its done, and you willbe positioned to move on. Yes, we all hope that there will be many improvements to the suite, but an improved migration tool, probably not. Lee Okay, that worked. Thank you very much. For those who might Google this in the future, I copied the CONTENTS of 1.1.18's *.slt folder (not the folder itself, but from within the folder) to the clipboard, made a backup copy of 2.03's as-installed *.default folder (just in case) and then deleted the contents of that folder. I then Pasted the copied contents of 1.1.18's *.slt into 2.03's new *.default folder. That folder, containing 2.03's config files, is in the new 2.03-created Seamonkey folder visible from: C:\Documents and Settings\[myname]\Application Data\Mozilla Et voila. This is the best recipe to have a lot of garbled and useless data even in your future, and that's why migration selectively copies only the really needed data and what can safely be migrated without disturbing your existence. Robert Kaiser As it happens nothing appears to be garbled, and I'm down to tweaking the small settings. What would you have had me do, after the wizard failed and nothing else worked except what I described? Craig ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Yenc decoder
In news:lzsdneccf6uivr3wnz2dnuvz_oodn...@mozilla.org, Juiceman wrote: Im wondering why Seamonky has never had a yEnc decoder built into the program? Handling big binary newsgroups has never been a priority with Mozilla newsreaders. Also why people post yEnc pictures? Does yEnc encoded pictures save that much space or bandwidth? Yes. -- »Q« /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign\ / against html e-mail X http://www.asciiribbon.org/ / \ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Yenc decoder
Juiceman wrote: Im wondering why Seamonky has never had a yEnc decoder built into the program? Also why people post yEnc pictures? Does yEnc encoded pictures save that much space or bandwidth? From what I've seen, yEnc isn't particularly well supported...or standardized. I subscribe to several 3D artists binary groups and sometimes I can see yEnc posts with SM and sometimes I can't - I generally chalk this up to some server in the chain not knowing what to do with yEnc, or a poster switching to a newer version of yEnc that a server (or client) hasn't kept up with. I've seen that on several occasions when I've been able to see someones posts and suddenly can't - the poster then usually comes back and states that he has upgraded or switched versions. ...what I'd rather see is SM being able to support multi-threaded images; ones which are too large and are automatically broken into serial posts. That should be more doable. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Yenc decoder
Rufus wrote: Juiceman wrote: Im wondering why Seamonky has never had a yEnc decoder built into the program? Also why people post yEnc pictures? Does yEnc encoded pictures save that much space or bandwidth? From what I've seen, yEnc isn't particularly well supported...or standardized. I subscribe to several 3D artists binary groups and sometimes I can see yEnc posts with SM and sometimes I can't - I generally chalk this up to some server in the chain not knowing what to do with yEnc, or a poster switching to a newer version of yEnc that a server (or client) hasn't kept up with. I've seen that on several occasions when I've been able to see someones posts and suddenly can't - the poster then usually comes back and states that he has upgraded or switched versions. ...what I'd rather see is SM being able to support multi-threaded images; ones which are too large and are automatically broken into serial posts. That should be more doable. I agree with serial post idea. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
small problem with menus
In the SeaMonkey 2 pull-down menus, why are there pipe symbols | shown on menu items where previously in SM1 there were ellipses ... showing? Also, for any menu listing that may be too long, such as in a newsgroup listing, a | appears where it was truncated. Why are they there? When the early stable version of SM2 was released, I thought this was just a temporary glitch that would soon be fixed in an update, but it still remains. It shows in any theme. Has anyone else noticed this small annoyance? I'm using Windows XP Pro, sp3 with SM 2.0.3. (SM 1.1.18 doesn't have this problem, of course.) Might it be possible to change this in the config editor preferences? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Gmail interface for SM 2
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: BJ wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: Jeffrey Needle wrote: Philip Chee wrote: /snip/ But the Gmail interface is the same as all other IMAP mail servers, so why is it singles out. When you configure a new account and it's Gmail using IMPA (don't know if they do POP3 any more), it looks like Verizon, or ATT, or any other server. I can't see why Gmail is singled out. GMail does indeed offer both POP3 and IMAP for use in mail clients. I think that is the misunderstanding. The webmail interface for GMail is charitably described as clunky. I would describe it as unusable. No, I have had to use it once or twice on the road, and clunky it is. But why would anyone do that with SM? Using Gmail from the browser interface is just the wrong thing to do. :-( The only reason I can use GMail is to use it in SeaMonkey Mail/News as an IMAP account. There it behaves just like any other IMAP account. The POP version also behaves like any other POP account. I think we are comaring the Web interface with the Mail client interface. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bad upgrade from 1.1.18 to 2.03
cmcadams wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: cmcadams schrieb: Leonidas Jones wrote: u...@domain.invalid wrote: cmcadams wrote: /snip/ Okay, that worked. Thank you very much. For those who might Google this in the future, I copied the CONTENTS of 1.1.18's *.slt folder (not the folder itself, but from within the folder) to the clipboard, made a backup copy of 2.03's as-installed *.default folder (just in case) and then deleted the contents of that folder. I then Pasted the copied contents of 1.1.18's *.slt into 2.03's new *.default folder. That folder, containing 2.03's config files, is in the new 2.03-created Seamonkey folder visible from: C:\Documents and Settings\[myname]\Application Data\Mozilla Et voila. This is the best recipe to have a lot of garbled and useless data even in your future, and that's why migration selectively copies only the really needed data and what can safely be migrated without disturbing your existence. Robert Kaiser As it happens nothing appears to be garbled, and I'm down to tweaking the small settings. What would you have had me do, after the wizard failed and nothing else worked except what I described? Craig Transfer only the selected data you really needed, such as your email files, bookmarks, cookies, etc. SeaMonkey 2.0 ans sm 1.1 are very, very different programs. By copying over the entire profile, you are moving all kinds of data that does not apply to SM 2, and can cause problems. So far you seem to be lucky, but something may yet happen. For your sake, I hope not. The best case is there a lot of stuff in the profile that is just taking up space. The worst case it that it might cause corruption in the future. I was lucky in that all the profiles I transferred came through with no issues. Had I had a problem, I would have created a new, clean profile in SM 2, opened Mail/News, and recreated my mail accounts in the order I had them in SM 1.1.18. T would then close SeaMonkey, and move across the appropriate subfolders from the old profile to the new. After openinf SM and verifying that the data is there, I would have closed SM and moved bookmarks, passwords and cookies. For my use, that is all I need. Any extensions or themes need to be reinstalled anyway. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.3 Security Update
Robert Kaiser wrote: Ray_Net schrieb: I would be nice to see per exemple * Windows, English ((10,604,307 bytes)) No, that's useless information for the normal user. For actually checking integrity of the files, you should use the MD5 or SHA1 sums linked on the release download page, the file size is too little information. Thanks for this valuable information, i just have installed FCIV.exe to be able to check what i have downloaded :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: small problem with menus
Tom S. wrote: In the SeaMonkey 2 pull-down menus, why are there pipe symbols | shown on menu items where previously in SM1 there were ellipses ... showing? Also, for any menu listing that may be too long, such as in a newsgroup listing, a | appears where it was truncated. Why are they there? When the early stable version of SM2 was released, I thought this was just a temporary glitch that would soon be fixed in an update, but it still remains. It shows in any theme. Has anyone else noticed this small annoyance? I'm using Windows XP Pro, sp3 with SM 2.0.3. (SM 1.1.18 doesn't have this problem, of course.) Might it be possible to change this in the config editor preferences? I see ... with Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100205 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.3 under Windows XP Pro, SP3 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Virus in mail folders
I have an updated antivirus program but still got virus in 4 of my mail folders. F-secure can´t remove them it seems so I am wondering if I can just delete the mail folders where the viruses sit. Does anyone know ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Virus in mail folders
I have an updated antivirus program but still got virus in 4 of my mail folders. F-secure can´t remove them it seems so I am wondering if I can just delete the mail folders where the viruses sit. Does anyone know ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Virus in mail folders
Monica wrote: I have an updated antivirus program but still got virus in 4 of my mail folders. F-secure can´t remove them it seems so I am wondering if I can just delete the mail folders where the viruses sit. Does anyone know ? Monica, Try downloading Malwarebytes (free version), do a full scan, and see what it comes up with. You can also install Avast as well, for full time protection. I hope this helps. Glen ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Virus in mail folders
Glen wrote: Monica wrote: I have an updated antivirus program but still got virus in 4 of my mail folders. F-secure can´t remove them it seems so I am wondering if I can just delete the mail folders where the viruses sit. Does anyone know ? Monica, Try downloading Malwarebytes (free version), do a full scan, and see what it comes up with. You can also install Avast as well, for full time protection. I hope this helps. Glen I thought that my F-Secure Internet Security 2010 would be enough. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Lots of content in empty mail folders...
I have been looking in a couple of mail folders in my Profile using a text editor, and I see a lot of (text) content in there even though the folders are empty when I check them in the SM mail client. How can this be? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: small problem with menus
Tom S.: In the SeaMonkey 2 pull-down menus, why are there pipe symbols | shown on menu items where previously in SM1 there were ellipses ... showing? Also, for any menu listing that may be too long, such as in a newsgroup listing, a | appears where it was truncated. Probably the same issue as in this thread http://groups.google.com/group/de.comm.software.mozilla.misc/browse_thread/thread/3ce94be922e6bf03/1a44704bbc5d41f4?#1a44704bbc5d41f4 The '...' is a single utf-8 character and needs a suitable font to be displayed properly. Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Lots of content in empty mail folders...
Monica wrote: I have been looking in a couple of mail folders in my Profile using a text editor, and I see a lot of (text) content in there even though the folders are empty when I check them in the SM mail client. How can this be? You need to compact your folders. Messages deleted in the SM UI are not really deleted, rather they are removed from your view, and marked for deletion. Compacting the folders accomplishes this deletion. FileCompact Folders Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Virus in mail folders
On 2/20/2010 4:57 PM, Monica wrote: Glen wrote: Monica wrote: I have an updated antivirus program but still got virus in 4 of my mail folders. F-secure can´t remove them it seems so I am wondering if I can just delete the mail folders where the viruses sit. Does anyone know ? Monica, Try downloading Malwarebytes (free version), do a full scan, and see what it comes up with. You can also install Avast as well, for full time protection. I hope this helps. Glen I thought that my F-Secure Internet Security 2010 would be enough. It is if the results you're getting are good enough for you. Keep in mind too that you may have a false positive, where your virus software is reporting what it *thinks* is a virus. Whether or not there actually is a virus there is a different story. Perhaps you could try moving the messages from that mail folder into a temporary mail folder, and see if the virus moves with the messages. If it does, you can even go as far is moving only some messages at a time until you determine which one is causing the problem. Then just delete that message. Good luck. Sometimes, viruses can be pretty nasty. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bad upgrade from 1.1.18 to 2.03
Leonidas Jones wrote: cmcadams wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: cmcadams schrieb: Leonidas Jones wrote: u...@domain.invalid wrote: cmcadams wrote: /snip/ Okay, that worked. Thank you very much. For those who might Google this in the future, I copied the CONTENTS of 1.1.18's *.slt folder (not the folder itself, but from within the folder) to the clipboard, made a backup copy of 2.03's as-installed *.default folder (just in case) and then deleted the contents of that folder. I then Pasted the copied contents of 1.1.18's *.slt into 2.03's new *.default folder. That folder, containing 2.03's config files, is in the new 2.03-created Seamonkey folder visible from: C:\Documents and Settings\[myname]\Application Data\Mozilla Et voila. This is the best recipe to have a lot of garbled and useless data even in your future, and that's why migration selectively copies only the really needed data and what can safely be migrated without disturbing your existence. Robert Kaiser As it happens nothing appears to be garbled, and I'm down to tweaking the small settings. What would you have had me do, after the wizard failed and nothing else worked except what I described? Craig Transfer only the selected data you really needed, such as your email files, bookmarks, cookies, etc. SeaMonkey 2.0 ans sm 1.1 are very, very different programs. By copying over the entire profile, you are moving all kinds of data that does not apply to SM 2, and can cause problems. So far you seem to be lucky, but something may yet happen. For your sake, I hope not. The best case is there a lot of stuff in the profile that is just taking up space. The worst case it that it might cause corruption in the future. I was lucky in that all the profiles I transferred came through with no issues. Had I had a problem, I would have created a new, clean profile in SM 2, opened Mail/News, and recreated my mail accounts in the order I had them in SM 1.1.18. T would then close SeaMonkey, and move across the appropriate subfolders from the old profile to the new. After openinf SM and verifying that the data is there, I would have closed SM and moved bookmarks, passwords and cookies. For my use, that is all I need. Any extensions or themes need to be reinstalled anyway. Tried as you suggested after a little more creative directory backing up. The upshot is, it didn't work, and I don't propose wasting more time on it. What I've got works: All accounts, emails, passwords, permissions, et al are all in good working order and display and edit correctly in their respective manager screens. Perhaps my setup is a very simple one. If anyone has, say, a list of specific files to beware of, or measures to take, I'll take another look at it. In the meantime I'll let sleeping dogs lie until they stop breathing. In which case there's still 1.1.18. A question for the developers: In the installation there's a target field, displaying the default target, with a Browse button beside it. WHY is that button there if you already KNOW installing to an alternative destination will likely fail? Craig ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Email trouble with v2.0.3 - maybe
BeeNeR wrote: On or about 2/20/2010 9:11 AM, robert.ga...@att.net typed the following: I've been having a problem sending email to a verizon.net address known to be good. This morning, 5 to 10 attempts produced a popup message saying the addressee was not a customer and to check the address. I tried rebooting the computer and initiated dial-up several times to no effect. The last test I made was sending email to another address which was successful. Immediately after that I was able to send email to the problem address. Is this a known bug of some type with Seamonkey 2.0.3? I don't see how it can be a bug somewhere else given the sequence of events but it doesn't make much sense. You can check the e-mail address here. If it returns good there's a problem someplace. http://hexillion.com/email_validation/ Not as far as I can tell. The site promises email validation, but when I entered a test address all I got was a list of free online network utilities. It was a complete waste of time. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: small problem with menus
In news:4b8087f7.3080...@hfigge.myfqdn.de, Hartmut Figge h.fi...@gmx.de wrote: Tom S.: In the SeaMonkey 2 pull-down menus, why are there pipe symbols | shown on menu items where previously in SM1 there were ellipses ... showing? Also, for any menu listing that may be too long, such as in a newsgroup listing, a | appears where it was truncated. Probably the same issue as in this thread http://groups.google.com/group/de.comm.software.mozilla.misc/browse_thread/thread/3ce94be922e6bf03/1a44704bbc5d41f4?#1a44704bbc5d41f4 The '...' is a single utf-8 character and needs a suitable font to be displayed properly. I'd think computers without a font to display '…' would be rare. Tom, did the ellipsis show up for you between the quote marks in my previous sentence? -- »Q« /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign\ / against html e-mail X http://www.asciiribbon.org/ / \ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Email trouble with v2.0.3 - maybe
BeeNeR wrote: On or about 2/20/2010 10:08 AM, BeeNeR typed the following: On or about 2/20/2010 9:11 AM, robert.ga...@att.net typed the following: I've been having a problem sending email to a verizon.net address known to be good. This morning, 5 to 10 attempts produced a popup message saying the addressee was not a customer and to check the address. I tried rebooting the computer and initiated dial-up several times to no effect. The last test I made was sending email to another address which was successful. Immediately after that I was able to send email to the problem address. Is this a known bug of some type with Seamonkey 2.0.3? I don't see how it can be a bug somewhere else given the sequence of events but it doesn't make much sense. You can check the e-mail address here. If it returns good there's a problem someplace. http://hexillion.com/email_validation/ Or another one is: http://centralops.net/co/ and scroll down to 'Email Dossier' Yep, that'ne works, thanks. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: small problem with menus
»Q«: In news:4b8087f7.3080...@hfigge.myfqdn.de, The '...' is a single utf-8 character and needs a suitable font to be displayed properly. I'd think computers without a font to display '…' would be rare. Tom, did the ellipsis show up for you between the quote marks in my previous sentence? Don't assume that the same font is used for the message pane and the menus. ;) Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
