Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Security Update - Install fail
Lance Courtland wrote: The 2.0.11 update won't install. Going to Help/check for updates downloads the update. Restarting SM, gives this error: The update could not be installed. Please make sure there are no other copies of SeaMonkey running on your computer, and then restart SeaMonkey to try again. I know there are no other copies of SM running. Windows XP Pro Updating from SM 2.0.10 I do *always*: - re-boot and don't start SM. - uninstall SM. - re-boot. - install the news SM version. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Security Update - Install fail
Ray_Net wrote: Lance Courtland wrote: The 2.0.11 update won't install. Going to Help/check for updates downloads the update. Restarting SM, gives this error: The update could not be installed. Please make sure there are no other copies of SeaMonkey running on your computer, and then restart SeaMonkey to try again. I know there are no other copies of SM running. Windows XP Pro Updating from SM 2.0.10 I do *always*: - re-boot and don't start SM. - uninstall SM. - re-boot. - install the news SM version. Rebooting the computer fixed the install, although I have never had to do that before. Lance ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Syfy
Le 9 décembre 2010, d...@kd4e.com a écrit : BTW: Anyone notice that http://syfy.com does not render correctly under Seamonkey? I've observed problems with that site for months. Where exactly? -- LL ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Security Update
Le 10 décembre 2010, Bret Busby a écrit : Ah, but it is not available as a .deb package. Neither as rpm, etc. It's up to the distro maintainers to do that, so you should ask to a Debian forum. Or you could install by hand from the archive. It's not so hard, but you may lack dependencies if you really are on Debian etch: (http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/2.0/system-requirements) The following distributions should provide everything needed: * Debian Lenny (5.0.x) (or later) (BTW, why choose Debian if you want a cutting edge and easy to manage distribution?) -- LL ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: syfy.com [Was: SM 2.0.10 Shows two Flash Players]
Le 9 décembre 2010, d...@kd4e.com a écrit : No joy, still won't play the streaming video ... http://www.syfy.com/rewind/eureka/1263851 WDYT? The same streaming video is working fine via hulu.com http://www.hulu.com/watch/198860/eureka-o-little-town I can't test for not being in the US... Did you disable all blocking add-ons (adblock, noscript, etc.)? Did you test other browsers? At least you've got a workaround! -- LL ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: DNS Server
With patience akin to a cat's, David E. Ross, on 12/9/2010 10:07 AM typed: On 12/8/10 2:25 PM, David E. Ross wrote: When I select a link to a Web site in SeaMonkey, is there some way to determine the domain name or IP address of what DNS server was used? I connected my PC directly to the RoadRunner cable modem, bypassing our LAN router. Then IPConfig all showed actual IP addresses for RoadRunner's DNSs. According to TraceRoute, the RoadRunner DNSs are more than 16 hops from my PC. I also have a dial-up account at a regional ISP. Using IPConfig all again but through that other ISP, TraceRoute showed its DNSs are only 6 hops from my PC. All this might partially explain why my RoadRunner connection sometimes seems very sluggish. Although the RoadRunner connection is supposed to be broadband, it sometimes is slower than dial-up. This is no longer a SeaMonkey issue unless someone knows how to use SeaMonkey to find what DNS was used. In the meantime, this thread is not on-topic. Note that I have the ShowIP 0.8.19 extension from http://code.google.com/p/firefox-showip/. However, this only shows the IP address of the target Web page, not the DNS used to get that IP address. David, I think you'll find DNS Benchmark by Steve Gibson (creator of SpinRite and head of Gibson Research Corp.) valuable. The program can be found here: http://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm. I used the utility to switch my DNS servers from Verizon's to faster, more secure servers that didn't redirect certain web page errors to Verizon ad pages. I've seen a noticeable improvement in browser response time between pages since making the change. DNS Benchmark is a small, standalone utility without the need for traditional installation--simply copy the exe to a designated folder and run from there. For such a compact utility, it has many advanced features, so be sure to read the instructions and operation tips thoroughly for a clear understanding of your results. Purrs -- -- /\ /\ | A cat pours his body on the floor ^o o^D.K. Cat Kraft | like water. It is restful just -T- | to see him. ~ Lynnwood, WA | ___oOO___OOo___ | -- William Lyon Phelps ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Mail folders--is there any control available over recent folder list?
With patience akin to a cat's, Bob Fleischer, on 12/2/2010 10:38 AM typed: My recent folder list seems to get flushed too quickly to be useful much of the time. How is the list maintained? Do I have any control over the number of items in the list (or the age if that is a factor)? Bob I'm bumping this post, because I'd like to know this info, if available, as well. A search of the MozillaZine SeaMonkey forums yielded only one post that wasn't relevant; a Knowledge Base search yielded absolutely nothing of relevance. Hoping there is something applicable out there -- -- /\ /\ | A cat pours his body on the floor ^o o^D.K. Cat Kraft | like water. It is restful just -T- | to see him. ~ Lynnwood, WA | ___oOO___OOo___ | -- William Lyon Phelps ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Forms Fill
Phillip Jones schrieb: If they thought people used it they would made more of an effort. We are all volunteers and only can do so much. All the code is open for you to build on it and write patches though! Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible arguments that we as a community needs answers to. And most of the time, I even appreciate irony and fun! :) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Security Update
Bret Busby schrieb: Ah, but it is not available as a .deb package. Ask Debian/ubuntu or whoever you are using it from for help, or use our official .tar.bz2 packages, or use a decent distro that does packages for our software (like openSUSE). We are not doing any distro-specific packaging, that's the job or distros after all. Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible arguments that we as a community needs answers to. And most of the time, I even appreciate irony and fun! :) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Forms Fill
Phillip Jones a écrit : If they thought people used it they would made more of an effort. That is condescending to the point of being insulting. Way to go, mate. S. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Security Update - and no prompting
On 12/9/2010 12:30 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: As part of Mozilla's ongoing stability and security update process, SeaMonkey 2.0.11 is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux as a free download from www.seamonkey-project.org. We strongly recommend that all SeaMonkey and old suite users upgrade to this latest release. If you already have SeaMonkey 2.0, you will receive an automated update notification within 24 to 48 hours. This update can also be applied manually by selecting Check for Updates... from the Help menu. I was completely surprised that this update installed itself without prompting me. The Help instructions say it will prompt, but it didn't; Help also lists many options that are not listed in my Preferences/Advanced/Software Installation list, specifically the When updates to SeaMonkey are found and Show Update History sections. How do I get Seamonkey to check for updates and notify me they are available, but not install them without my permission? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Security Update - and no prompting
flyguy wrote: How do I get Seamonkey to check for updates and notify me they are available, but not install them without my permission? You need to change a pref (in about:config; for SM 2.1 alternatively in Preferences): http://kb.mozillazine.org/App.update.auto HTH Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Security Update - and no prompting
On 12/10/2010 8:57 AM, Jens Hatlak wrote: flyguy wrote: How do I get Seamonkey to check for updates and notify me they are available, but not install them without my permission? You need to change a pref (in about:config; for SM 2.1 alternatively in Preferences): http://kb.mozillazine.org/App.update.auto OK, I've changed the preference using about:config. Do you know why this behavior can't be set in Preferences, and why Help lists options that aren't in the Preferences? As it is, using the Preferences seems to result in two behaviors: 1) automatic update, no questions asked, just does it 2) no update, no notification of updates (I missed several updates until I realized that was happening) And it's been like this, I believe, ever since I got SM 2. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
!!! DANGER !!!! Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Security Update
This version just remove all mail marked as read in the inbox folder !!! Robert Kaiser a écrit : As part of Mozilla's ongoing stability and security update process, SeaMonkey 2.0.11 is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux as a free download from www.seamonkey-project.org. We strongly recommend that all SeaMonkey and old suite users upgrade to this latest release. If you already have SeaMonkey 2.0, you will receive an automated update notification within 24 to 48 hours. This update can also be applied manually by selecting Check for Updates... from the Help menu. For a list of changes and more information, please review the SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Release Notes. Note: All users of the outdated SeaMonkey 1.x, Mozilla or Netscape suites are encouraged to upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.0 by downloading it from www.seamonkey-project.org. Full news article: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2010-12-09 Downloads for all available platforms and languages: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/ Release notes: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0.11 System Requirements: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/2.0/system-requirements Robert Kaiser SeaMonkey project coordinator ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
!!! DANGER !!!! Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Security Update
This version just remove all mail marked as read in the inbox folder !!! Robert Kaiser a écrit : As part of Mozilla's ongoing stability and security update process, SeaMonkey 2.0.11 is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux as a free download from www.seamonkey-project.org. We strongly recommend that all SeaMonkey and old suite users upgrade to this latest release. If you already have SeaMonkey 2.0, you will receive an automated update notification within 24 to 48 hours. This update can also be applied manually by selecting Check for Updates... from the Help menu. For a list of changes and more information, please review the SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Release Notes. Note: All users of the outdated SeaMonkey 1.x, Mozilla or Netscape suites are encouraged to upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.0 by downloading it from www.seamonkey-project.org. Full news article: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2010-12-09 Downloads for all available platforms and languages: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/ Release notes: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0.11 System Requirements: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/2.0/system-requirements Robert Kaiser SeaMonkey project coordinator ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Security Update - and no prompting
flyguy wrote: You need to change a pref (in about:config; for SM 2.1 alternatively in Preferences): http://kb.mozillazine.org/App.update.auto OK, I've changed the preference using about:config. Do you know why this behavior can't be set in Preferences, Because that UI part has been implemented past SM 2.0. It will be in Preferences in SM 2.1, as I wrote. and why Help lists options that aren't in the Preferences? Because Help is text, and text needs to be written, and only so many (~4) people do that--in addition to contributing code or translations, in their free time, after many hours working on their day jobs. As it is, using the Preferences seems to result in two behaviors: 1) automatic update, no questions asked, just does it 2) no update, no notification of updates (I missed several updates until I realized that was happening) For SM 2.0 Preferences, yes. And it's been like this, I believe, ever since I got SM 2. SM 2.0 only receives security updates, that's why (the only exceptions are very safe/simple fixes and Help changes that do not introduce new source files, but for the latter, see above). New features are generally excluded (exceptions prove the rule, of course). HTH Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Security Update - Install fail
On 12/10/2010 12:26 AM PT, Lance Courtland typed: The 2.0.11 update won't install. Going to Help/check for updates downloads the update. Restarting SM, gives this error: The update could not be installed. Please make sure there are no other copies of SeaMonkey running on your computer, and then restart SeaMonkey to try again. I know there are no other copies of SM running. Windows XP Pro Updating from SM 2.0.10 I do *always*: - re-boot and don't start SM. - uninstall SM. - re-boot. - install the news SM version. Rebooting the computer fixed the install, although I have never had to do that before. That happened once to me with a previous version updater. :/ -- Many ants kill a camel. --Turkish /\___/\ Phil./Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: DNS Server
On 12/09/2010 10:07 AM, David E. Ross wrote: ... Note that I have the ShowIP 0.8.19 extension from http://code.google.com/p/firefox-showip/. However, this only shows the IP address of the target Web page, not the DNS used to get that IP address. It is OT. But once you get sorted out which dns servers you are using: NetRange: 76.168.0.0 - 76.175.255.255 CIDR: 76.168.0.0/13 OriginAS: NetName: RRACI NetHandle: NET-76-168-0-0-1 Parent: NET-76-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Allocation NameServer: DNS1.RR.COM NameServer: DNS5.RR.COM NameServer: DNS2.RR.COM NameServer: DNS6.RR.COM NameServer: DNS3.RR.COM (hint: use whois for finding the actual IP addresses of those) Then plug those into namebench: http://code.google.com/p/namebench/ for testing. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: !!! DANGER !!!! Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Security Update
vij a écrit : This version just remove all mail marked as read in the inbox folder Hum... no. Are you sure you haven't modified a setting without realizing it? There is one that hides all mail older than X days, for example. S. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: !!! DANGER !!!! Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Security Update
vij wrote: This version just remove all mail marked as read in the inbox folder !!! This was not my experience; all mail messages and folders are intact. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Sending E-Mails at a later time (Scheduling sending messages), is this possible.?
There are many reasons for setting up a schedule to send e-mails at various times. I would like to be able to set up e-mails and then send them at a preset time later that day, or even later. I cannot find a way to do this on Sea Monkey, is it hidden somewhere.? Thanks ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: !!! DANGER !!!! Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Security Update
vij wrote: This version just remove all mail marked as read in the inbox folder !!! Not here. Upgraded three separate machines today, none of them showed this behavior. -- Jaime A. Cruz President Nassau Wings Motorcycle Club http://www.nassauwings.org/ AMA District 34 http://www.AMADistrict34.com/ Pop's Run http://www.popsrun.org/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sending E-Mails at a later time (Scheduling sending messages), is this possible.?
Allan Bannister wrote: There are many reasons for setting up a schedule to send e-mails at various times. I would like to be able to set up e-mails and then send them at a preset time later that day, or even later. I cannot find a way to do this on Sea Monkey, is it hidden somewhere.? Here's a partial workaround: 1) In the preferences, choose Mail Newsgroups | Network Storage and set the preference for Send unsent messages when going online to Yes. 2) Queue your messages. 3) Terminate SeaMonkey. 4) Using the Windows scheduler utility, set SeaMonkey to launch at the desired date/time. On launch, the program should send unsent messages without prompting. The downside, of course, is that SM is not running until the scheduled time, so you'll be without email and Internet access for that time. Note also that the date/time stamp on your messages will be the date/time you queued them, not the date/time they were sent. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: DNS Server
D. K. Kraft wrote: With patience akin to a cat's, David E. Ross, on 12/9/2010 10:07 AM typed: On 12/8/10 2:25 PM, David E. Ross wrote: When I select a link to a Web site in SeaMonkey, is there some way to determine the domain name or IP address of what DNS server was used? I connected my PC directly to the RoadRunner cable modem, bypassing our LAN router. Then IPConfig all showed actual IP addresses for RoadRunner's DNSs. According to TraceRoute, the RoadRunner DNSs are more than 16 hops from my PC. I also have a dial-up account at a regional ISP. Using IPConfig all again but through that other ISP, TraceRoute showed its DNSs are only 6 hops from my PC. All this might partially explain why my RoadRunner connection sometimes seems very sluggish. Although the RoadRunner connection is supposed to be broadband, it sometimes is slower than dial-up. This is no longer a SeaMonkey issue unless someone knows how to use SeaMonkey to find what DNS was used. In the meantime, this thread is not on-topic. Note that I have the ShowIP 0.8.19 extension from http://code.google.com/p/firefox-showip/. However, this only shows the IP address of the target Web page, not the DNS used to get that IP address. David, I think you'll find DNS Benchmark by Steve Gibson (creator of SpinRite and head of Gibson Research Corp.) valuable. The program can be found here: http://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm. I used the utility to switch my DNS servers from Verizon's to faster, more secure servers that didn't redirect certain web page errors to Verizon ad pages. I've seen a noticeable improvement in browser response time between pages since making the change. DNS Benchmark is a small, standalone utility without the need for traditional installation--simply copy the exe to a designated folder and run from there. For such a compact utility, it has many advanced features, so be sure to read the instructions and operation tips thoroughly for a clear understanding of your results. Purrs -- No version for Mac -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net/ mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Security Update
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Lucas Levrel wrote: Le 10 décembre 2010, Bret Busby a écrit : Ah, but it is not available as a .deb package. Neither as rpm, etc. It's up to the distro maintainers to do that, so you should ask to a Debian forum. Been there, done that. It is apparently included in a testing or unstable version of Debian Linux, yet to be released as stable. Not available at present, and no Debian person appears inclined to do it, for Debian 5. Some software is available as .deb packages, set up by the software developers of the particular software. Opera is one (and, only one) example, of many applications that are released in the different packages, for installation using the system package management, for the different Linux distributions. It is a question of for whom software is written - whether it is written for the users (in which case, amongst other things, it is provided in the different packages, for the different distributions), or, whether it is written for the developers of the software (in which case, the design (including the interface) is designed to suit the developers, and the software might be released only as binaries, to make it difficult for users to install, restricting who may use the software). So, the question is, are developers of an operating system, expected to adapt software packages that may run on their syetem, to be easily installed on their system, or, are the software developers expected to develop their software to be able to be installed with a minimum of fuss (and, thus, as packages that can be easily installed using the operating system package management), on the operating systems on which the software is said to be able to run? I expect that software developers who want to increase the usage of their particular software, would act to make their software as easy to instal and run, on the particular operating systems for which they profess the software to be usable and compatible, so as to encourage more propsective users, to instal and use the software. It is a bit like some software houses, that provide software that only runs on MS Windows, such as Legacy genealogy software, Quicken accounting software, etc - they have previously advised that they have no intention of porting their software to Linux, and, by so doing, disenfranchise Linux users (unless the particular Linux users are willing and capable, to mess around with MS Windows emulation, if the particular software applications are compatible with Linux based MS Windows emulators). Thus, it includes the issue of the degree to which the software development projects want to increase usage of their product. If they want to increase usage of the product, then they act to make it as easy to instal and use, on as many operating systems, as possible. If not, they simply develop the policy we have developed this product for our benefit - take it or leave it, as it is - we are not interested in making it more usable, or more user-friendly - we are not that bothered, as long as it suits us, which is the apparent known history of Microsoft. And, it is not limited to Microsoft - many web sites exist, that are designed to work only with Internet Explorer, and, many computer peripheral devices, whether they be webcms, printers, or whatever, are designed to work fully with MS Windows, and, not at all, or, with limited funtionality, with Linux. Some companies do well with their hardware devices, Like Samsung, with its printers and multifunction devices, that run well with Linux, using the Samsung Unified Linux Driver, and, others simply treat Linux users with contempt. Or you could install by hand from the archive. It's not so hard, but you may lack dependencies if you really are on Debian etch: (http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/2.0/system-requirements) The following distributions should provide everything needed: * Debian Lenny (5.0.x) (or later) I am using Debian lenny, which is the current Debian stable version. etch is now oldstable and obsolete. I use the version of Iceape for etch which is, I believe, Debian 4, as that is the latest version of Iceape or a Seamonkey version, that is available to run on mys system, and, as previously mentioned, that version of Iceape is about 4 years old. Installing the binary, or whatever the tar/zip or whatever files is, is, from my experience, messy and difficult, and I had done that in the past, with a netscape or mozilla browser suite, and ended up having to instal, seven dfirectories down. The process is best described as a Kafkaesque nightmare, and, it is probably easier to make friends with a cthulu, or the creature that Gandalf was fighting, when he fell off the bridge. (BTW, why choose Debian if you want a cutting edge and easy to manage distribution?) It has been my experience, that, for the most part, Debian has been a more stable system than some others, and,
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Security Update
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Robert Kaiser wrote: Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:13:19 +0100 From: Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Newsgroups: mozilla.support.seamonkey Subject: Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Security Update Bret Busby schrieb: Ah, but it is not available as a .deb package. Ask Debian/ubuntu or whoever you are using it from for help, or use our official .tar.bz2 packages, or use a decent distro that does packages for our software (like openSUSE). We are not doing any distro-specific packaging, that's the job or distros after all. Robert Kaiser I understood that SUSE is now owned by Microsoft, and is thence, likely to follow Microsoft policies and procedures. As for the rest of the message, I have already addressed those issues, in a previous posting just sent by me to the list. -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .. So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means. - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of Book 1 of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: A Trilogy In Four Parts, written by Douglas Adams, published by Pan Books, 1992 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Image blocking in SM 2.0.10
For reasons that I can not sort out, images are being blocked in SM 2.0.10 used with my 933 mHz Dell 4100 using Windows XP-Home SP3 and Avast! security software. Specifically, the background maps when I go to Mapquest won't appear at all and images on e-Bay often appear for a second or two and then disappear. In both cases, SM is set to allow images from these two sites. Text displays correctly. Turning off Avast! doesn't fix the problem either. Could this problem be caused by an SM Add-On or is it more likely to be a preference setting that I don't know about? Any help and/or suggestions will be gratefully received. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Image blocking in SM 2.0.10
On 12/10/10 9:21 PM, HenriK wrote: For reasons that I can not sort out, images are being blocked in SM 2.0.10 used with my 933 mHz Dell 4100 using Windows XP-Home SP3 and Avast! security software. Specifically, the background maps when I go to Mapquest won't appear at all and images on e-Bay often appear for a second or two and then disappear. In both cases, SM is set to allow images from these two sites. Text displays correctly. Turning off Avast! doesn't fix the problem either. Could this problem be caused by an SM Add-On or is it more likely to be a preference setting that I don't know about? Any help and/or suggestions will be gratefully received. Mapquest requires you to set your preference to allow images from all domains, not only from Mapquest. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
