Re: SM Get Info discrepancy
Rufus wrote: Keith Whaley wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 5/23/11 7:20 PM, Keith Whaley wrote: I have what I thought was SM 1.1.13 in my applications folder. I select Get Info from the Finder, and it says it's v.1.1.13. But, if I double click on it and open it, and I choose SeaMonkey/About SeaMonkey, the revision says it's 1.1.14. Why is this? Has anyone else run across that? keith whaley You posted using SM 2.0.14. Yes, I did. I didn't have a choice. I don't know what you mean by Finder or Get Info. Are those Mac features? Yessir. What else from a Mac guy? That means you're probably a PC guy. Macs have a couple ways to determine what release version an app is. One is Finder/File/Get Info. The other is to select the app to open it, and when it opens choose the menu bar's About Firefox or About SeaMonkey and you'll get the release info. In any case, you should update to SM 2.0.14, which will soon be replaced by SM 2.1. Not bloody likely, as with MY setup, that version breaks Widgets. I really don't like that. Why do you guys keep insisting I move up to a version that is less perfect than the version that preceded it? 2.0.14 IS less than problem free. Especially in areas of what I use frequently. No thanks. keith That will/would be a deal breaker for me as well - I live on Widgets. If 2.0.14 is the end of days, then I guess I'll just have to live that way or start using Safari/Thunderbird in combination. Assuming that what David said is indeed the case, the Mac version of SM I have in in fact 2.0.13 and it only SAYs it's 2.0.14 under the About SeaMonkey icon. I believe what David said above, because I had downloaded and used 2.0.14 directly, and Widgets WAS demonstrably broken. So this one that shows the duplicious identity really IS 2.0.13, and it works just fine for me, Widgets and all. Clean and crisp. :-) Best to one and all... keith ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM Get Info discrepancy
On Wed, 25 May 2011 01:17:16 -0700, Keith Whaley wrote: Assuming that what David said is indeed the case, the Mac version of SM I have in in fact 2.0.13 and it only SAYs it's 2.0.14 under the About SeaMonkey icon. I believe what David said above, because I had downloaded and used 2.0.14 directly, and Widgets WAS demonstrably broken. So this one that shows the duplicious identity really IS 2.0.13, and it works just fine for me, Widgets and all. Clean and crisp. :-) Keith, Do you have an extension installed like User Agent Switcher, or Prefbar, or have manually edited about:config to change your user agent? Go to about:config and filter for useragent Any entries in bold have been changed from the default. To reset back to the defaults right click on such bolded entries and select Reset. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Loss of Homepage setting
SM 2.0.14 on Mandravia Linux 2009.0 on a HP 6230B Laptop This afternoon, I had SM running (Mail/News and Chatzilla but *NOT* browser as far as I can remember) but had finished with it so closed SM. No problems so far. This evening, I logged into my ISP, started SM and then started the Browser, and was presented with a screen offering to restore my last session. I selected to not restore, and was presented with a blank screen rather than SM displaying my homepage, as I expected. No problem, just closed that blank screen, and on the mail newsgroup screen I clicked on the Browser icon in the bottom left, and was presented with a blank screen. I checked Edit-Prefs-Browser-Home Page, and it still showed my three address Group homepage. I closed the prefs screen and clicked the Browser icon in the bottom left of the still showing *Browser* screen, and, as expected, a new screen opened up displaying my three address Group homepage. I've closed the Browser screens and just clicked the browser icon on this Compose screen and go a blank screen in the browser, again!! How do I fix this, so that the first browser screen displays my desired Home Group?? (Realising this could be difficult to chase down, as you need to cancel the Restore offering to have the possible fault to occur.) -- Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?
NoOp schrieb: $ memstat -w | grep seamonkey I think there's a number of blog posts out there that accurately tell how inaccurate measures like this really are when it comes to what actual memory is being used. All OSes only give you measures of either virtual memory or some random guesses, all which don't really map to actual memory usage, because doing that it almost impossible, given that some files from disk are mapped into memory and memory for code can be and are shared across applications and processes. Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible arguments that we as a community should think about. And most of the time, I even appreciate irony and fun! :) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: error 553
Ray_Net wrote: WLS wrote: Linda wrote: 553 Can't open that file: No such file or directory What ftp program are you using? What directory or file are you trying to open? Is there a typo in your connection attempt? Could it be that SM is the ftp program trying to load the file ? If yes, how to get the ftp log ? Looks like we will never know. But I see the images changing on the right side of the page where I am pretty sure they were not before. Problem solved? Would like to know how someone can tell the site was made with Dreamweaver. WLS -- openSUSE 11.3(x86_64) - Gnome2.30 - SeaMonkey 2.1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?
On 05/25/2011 05:15 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: NoOp schrieb: $ memstat -w | grep seamonkey I think there's a number of blog posts out there that accurately tell how inaccurate measures like this really are when it comes to what actual memory is being used. All OSes only give you measures of either virtual memory or some random guesses, all which don't really map to actual memory usage, because doing that it almost impossible, given that some files from disk are mapped into memory and memory for code can be and are shared across applications and processes. Robert Kaiser Understand. http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/maverick/en/man1/memstat.1.html quote DESCRIPTION memstat lists all accessible processes, executables, and shared libraries that are using up virtual memory. To get a complete list memstat has to be run as root to be able to access the data of all running processes. First, the processes are listed. An amount of memory is shown along with a process ID and the name of the executable which the process is running. The amount of memory shown does not include shared memory: it only includes memory which is private to that process. So, if a process is using a shared library like libc, the memory used to hold that library is not included. The memory used to hold the executable’s text-segment is also not included, since that too is shareable. After the processes, the shared objects are listed. The amount of memory is shown along with the filename of the shared object, followed by a list of the processes using the shared object. The memory is listed as the total amount of memory allocated to this object throughout the whole namespace. In brackets also the amount that is really shared is listed. Finally, a grand total is shown. Note that this program shows the amount of virtual (not real) memory used by the various items. /quote I'd be interested in reading one of those blogs relating to memstat if you have a link. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: error 553
WLS wrote: Would like to know how someone can tell the site was made with Dreamweaver. I must be that someone. I said, But, the page was written with DreamWeaver, instead of SeaMonkey Composer. If you look in the source of the cited page, you will see various bits of JavaScript included by default with most versions of DreamWeaver: function MM_preloadImages() function MM_swapImgRestore() function MM_findObj(n, d) function MM_swapImage() See answer by felgall. http://www.webdeveloper.com/forum/showthread.php?t=206522 Of course, Linda could be taking over for a previous DreamWeaver user, and trying to continue with Composer -- not a good idea, as all the DW templating advantages go away. There are lots of little 'signature' bits that the wysiwyg editors use. -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: error 553
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: WLS wrote: Would like to know how someone can tell the site was made with Dreamweaver. I must be that someone. I said, But, the page was written with DreamWeaver, instead of SeaMonkey Composer. If you look in the source of the cited page, you will see various bits of JavaScript included by default with most versions of DreamWeaver: function MM_preloadImages() function MM_swapImgRestore() function MM_findObj(n, d) function MM_swapImage() See answer by felgall. http://www.webdeveloper.com/forum/showthread.php?t=206522 Of course, Linda could be taking over for a previous DreamWeaver user, and trying to continue with Composer -- not a good idea, as all the DW templating advantages go away. There are lots of little 'signature' bits that the wysiwyg editors use. Thank you for the lesson. I looked at the source, but wasn't aware that section was a DreamWeaver signature. WLS -- openSUSE 11.3(x86_64) - Gnome2.30 - SeaMonkey 2.1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: error 553
On 25.05.2011 11:09, WLS wrote: --- Original Message --- Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: WLS wrote: Would like to know how someone can tell the site was made with Dreamweaver. I must be that someone. I said, But, the page was written with DreamWeaver, instead of SeaMonkey Composer. If you look in the source of the cited page, you will see various bits of JavaScript included by default with most versions of DreamWeaver: function MM_preloadImages() function MM_swapImgRestore() function MM_findObj(n, d) function MM_swapImage() See answer by felgall. http://www.webdeveloper.com/forum/showthread.php?t=206522 Of course, Linda could be taking over for a previous DreamWeaver user, and trying to continue with Composer -- not a good idea, as all the DW templating advantages go away. There are lots of little 'signature' bits that the wysiwyg editors use. Thank you for the lesson. I looked at the source, but wasn't aware that section was a DreamWeaver signature. WLS IIRC, Microsoft FrontPage has the same function or very similar. -- *Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion* www.ufaq.org Netscape - Firefox - SeaMonkey - Thunderbird ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?
NoOp schrieb: memstat lists all accessible processes, executables, and shared libraries that are using up virtual memory. The important hing to note here is the last two words: virtual memory. Processes reserve virtual memory for the chance that they might want to address that amount of memory at some time while they're running, but they usually don't use all of that virtual memory actively at any time. I'd be interested in reading one of those blogs relating to memstat if you have a link. I don't think any I read talk specifically about memstat, but I've seen them talk about virtual memory usage compared to other measures. Unfortunately, I right now don't find the posts that talked about the overall picture of this, I only find ones about details on memory profiling and trying to reduce memory usage. Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible arguments that we as a community should think about. And most of the time, I even appreciate irony and fun! :) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SM 2.0.10 Newsgroup problem
For the second time, I am having a problem with ONE newsgroup not loading. It's the same newsgroup and when I click to open it, TWO applications of the news server appear in my Task Manager and it consumes 100% of the CPU... and can not load. The last time this happened I just gave up, subscribed again and reset all of my filters, which happens to be quite a job in that ng. Is there anything I can do to get around whatever is happening... or does anyone have any idea WHAT is happening? TIA. bj ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?
Sun, 22 May 2011 07:32:50 -0700, /Ant/: On 5/22/2011 7:27 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed: Ant wrote: If so, then is there a way to disable it? SM 2.1 (ETA next week) will support all accelerations Firefox 4 supports, i.e. D2D, D3D etc. but you can easily disable them all via Preferences. AFAIK SM 2.0 has none of these. Ah cool! I hope it is by the long Memorial Day weekend so I can play with it! ;) Note, Windows XP user currently get less hardware acceleration than Vista/7 users. The plan is to enable full hardware acceleration on Windows XP, too, but I don't know which Gecko/Firefox it is expected to land with. I don't know what are the plans for the next SeaMonkey version (would based on which Gecko version?), also. http://hacks.mozilla.org/2010/09/hardware-acceleration/ -- Stanimir ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?
On 05/25/2011 10:38 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 22 May 2011 07:32:50 -0700, /Ant/: On 5/22/2011 7:27 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed: Ant wrote: If so, then is there a way to disable it? SM 2.1 (ETA next week) will support all accelerations Firefox 4 supports, i.e. D2D, D3D etc. but you can easily disable them all via Preferences. AFAIK SM 2.0 has none of these. Ah cool! I hope it is by the long Memorial Day weekend so I can play with it! ;) Note, Windows XP user currently get less hardware acceleration than Vista/7 users. The plan is to enable full hardware acceleration on Windows XP, too, but I don't know which Gecko/Firefox it is expected to land with. I don't know what are the plans for the next SeaMonkey version (would based on which Gecko version?), also. http://hacks.mozilla.org/2010/09/hardware-acceleration/ Interesting thanks for the link. Running the test in SeaMonkey 2.1RC1 (linux 32bit) I finally had to kill the test (it was just flipping between 1 2 fps). In Opera I get 8 fps (I have an old nVida NV25GL [Quadro4 900 XGL] workstation card on this machine). In Google Chrome Chromium 9 fps, epihany 4 fps, Firefox 4.0.1 4 fps (takes the cpu to 100%). ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM Get Info discrepancy
Keith Whaley wrote: Rufus wrote: Keith Whaley wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 5/23/11 7:20 PM, Keith Whaley wrote: I have what I thought was SM 1.1.13 in my applications folder. I select Get Info from the Finder, and it says it's v.1.1.13. But, if I double click on it and open it, and I choose SeaMonkey/About SeaMonkey, the revision says it's 1.1.14. Why is this? Has anyone else run across that? keith whaley You posted using SM 2.0.14. Yes, I did. I didn't have a choice. I don't know what you mean by Finder or Get Info. Are those Mac features? Yessir. What else from a Mac guy? That means you're probably a PC guy. Macs have a couple ways to determine what release version an app is. One is Finder/File/Get Info. The other is to select the app to open it, and when it opens choose the menu bar's About Firefox or About SeaMonkey and you'll get the release info. In any case, you should update to SM 2.0.14, which will soon be replaced by SM 2.1. Not bloody likely, as with MY setup, that version breaks Widgets. I really don't like that. Why do you guys keep insisting I move up to a version that is less perfect than the version that preceded it? 2.0.14 IS less than problem free. Especially in areas of what I use frequently. No thanks. keith That will/would be a deal breaker for me as well - I live on Widgets. If 2.0.14 is the end of days, then I guess I'll just have to live that way or start using Safari/Thunderbird in combination. Assuming that what David said is indeed the case, the Mac version of SM I have in in fact 2.0.13 and it only SAYs it's 2.0.14 under the About SeaMonkey icon. I believe what David said above, because I had downloaded and used 2.0.14 directly, and Widgets WAS demonstrably broken. So this one that shows the duplicious identity really IS 2.0.13, and it works just fine for me, Widgets and all. Clean and crisp. :-) Best to one and all... keith Ok...I'm running SM 2.0.14 and Widgets work...I was thinking you were talking about 2.1.x of some sort. I'm not liking much of what I read about 2.1.x. The most definitive way to find out which version of any app you actually have installed (or at least what OS X thinks you have installed) is to open System Profiler and look under Applications. Takes longer, because it shows you everything you have on your machine...but worth a cross-check. One other thing you may have run across is that going directly from any of the 1.1.x versions without installing 2.0.0 first can screw stuff up - I've seen that, too. I always advise Mac users moving up to 2.0.x to install 2.0.0 first and let it do the migration, then install 2.0.x. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Plan to Eliminate Address Area (URL Bar) Panned at Slashdot
According to Slashdot, Mozilla Labs is evaluating whether to eliminate the address area from Firefox. See http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/05/25/1532246/Mozilla-Labs-the-URL-Bar-Has-To-Go. The discussion at Slashdot also has some very negative comments about the elimination of the status bar, which has already happened in Firefox. PLEASE don't implement either of these dis-improvements in SeaMonkey. I use SeaMonkey because I think it has a superior user interface when compared with Firefox. The address area and status bar are both parts of the user interface that I use. Followup-To set to mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0.10 Newsgroup problem
chicagofan wrote: For the second time, I am having a problem with ONE newsgroup not loading. It's the same newsgroup and when I click to open it, TWO applications of the news server appear in my Task Manager and it consumes 100% of the CPU... and can not load. The last time this happened I just gave up, subscribed again and reset all of my filters, which happens to be quite a job in that ng. Is there anything I can do to get around whatever is happening... or does anyone have any idea WHAT is happening? TIA. bj Did you try right clicking on the newsgroup, select properties and then click Rebuild Summary File? Also updating to SeaMonkey 2.0.14 might help. Maybe a bug was fixed. WLS ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0.10 Newsgroup problem
WLS wrote: chicagofan wrote: For the second time, I am having a problem with ONE newsgroup not loading. It's the same newsgroup and when I click to open it, TWO applications of the news server appear in my Task Manager and it consumes 100% of the CPU... and can not load. The last time this happened I just gave up, subscribed again and reset all of my filters, which happens to be quite a job in that ng. Is there anything I can do to get around whatever is happening... or does anyone have any idea WHAT is happening? TIA. bj Did you try right clicking on the newsgroup, select properties and then click Rebuild Summary File? No, I haven't tried that. Thanks for the suggestion. :) bj Also updating to SeaMonkey 2.0.14 might help. Maybe a bug was fixed. WLS ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0.10 Newsgroup problem
chicagofan wrote: WLS wrote: chicagofan wrote: For the second time, I am having a problem with ONE newsgroup not loading. It's the same newsgroup and when I click to open it, TWO applications of the news server appear in my Task Manager and it consumes 100% of the CPU... and can not load. The last time this happened I just gave up, subscribed again and reset all of my filters, which happens to be quite a job in that ng. Is there anything I can do to get around whatever is happening... or does anyone have any idea WHAT is happening? TIA. bj Did you try right clicking on the newsgroup, select properties and then click Rebuild Summary File? No, I haven't tried that. Thanks for the suggestion. :) bj P.S. - It did rebuild the summary file and opened up however it dropped the 8 or 9 messages I had saved to reply to later. Maybe the news server re-numbered the messages and that's why it was having a problem retrieving/downloading the ng file for me before. Anyway, thanks for the rebuild suggestion, because that at least saves me from re-entering all my filters. :) bj ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Plan to Eliminate Address Area (URL Bar) Panned at Slashdot
Mike wrote: David E. Ross wrote: According to Slashdot, Mozilla Labs is evaluating whether to eliminate the address area from Firefox. See http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/05/25/1532246/Mozilla-Labs-the-URL-Bar-Has-To-Go. The discussion at Slashdot also has some very negative comments about the elimination of the status bar, which has already happened in Firefox. PLEASE don't implement either of these dis-improvements in SeaMonkey. I use SeaMonkey because I think it has a superior user interface when compared with Firefox. The address area and status bar are both parts of the user interface that I use. From the linked article: A guest blog post by community member, David Regev He's a community member. Not part of Mozilla. Not only there but reports on ZDnet, cNet, and Computerworld It is the most Dumba** idea anyone has ever come up with. I have a 17 LapTop and 17 Monitor for my desktop if I can see what I need to missing a 1/8 of an inch or less, I have more problems than just an extra 1/8' inch. Come on folks Just because Google does something Dumb. we don't have to follow suit. as one article said how are people going to figure what websites a Spam or Phishing. Come on Guys and Gals use some common sense if you have any. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0.10 Newsgroup problem
chicagofan wrote: WLS wrote: chicagofan wrote: For the second time, I am having a problem with ONE newsgroup not loading. It's the same newsgroup and when I click to open it, TWO applications of the news server appear in my Task Manager and it consumes 100% of the CPU... and can not load. The last time this happened I just gave up, subscribed again and reset all of my filters, which happens to be quite a job in that ng. Is there anything I can do to get around whatever is happening... or does anyone have any idea WHAT is happening? TIA. bj Did you try right clicking on the newsgroup, select properties and then click Rebuild Summary File? No, I haven't tried that. Thanks for the suggestion. :) Interesting. Out of curiosity, I tried it myself (had never done it before). CPU spiked to 95-99% and stayed there for about 10 minutes, while RAM usage spiked from 150 MB (I had a video loaded) to about 320 MB, bounced around for awhile in that general range. Finally, SM returned to normal and I was able to read messages and browse again. However, when it did, the unread message count in this NG was zero, despite the presence of six unread messages (in bold). As I advanced through them using N, the count stayed at zero, and when I got to the last one, N prompted me to go to the first unread message in my mail inbox. My view settings were: Sort by: Order received, Ascending, Threaded Messages: All Threads: Threads with unread When the process completed, my threads setting had been changed to all. After I read all unread messages, I set it back to Threads with unread, and all threads disappeared as they should. In the past, when it got confused about message count, it would display some threads containing no unread messages. And it would also advance to unread messages in response to N. We'll see how long this lasts before it gets confused again. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Plan to Eliminate Address Area (URL Bar) Panned at Slashdot
On 5/25/11 2:55 PM, Mike wrote: David E. Ross wrote: According to Slashdot, Mozilla Labs is evaluating whether to eliminate the address area from Firefox. See http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/05/25/1532246/Mozilla-Labs-the-URL-Bar-Has-To-Go. The discussion at Slashdot also has some very negative comments about the elimination of the status bar, which has already happened in Firefox. PLEASE don't implement either of these dis-improvements in SeaMonkey. I use SeaMonkey because I think it has a superior user interface when compared with Firefox. The address area and status bar are both parts of the user interface that I use. From the linked article: A guest blog post by community member, David Regev He's a community member. Not part of Mozilla. The page is hosted by Mozilla Labs, which should lend some credence to how serious this is. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Plan to Eliminate Address Area (URL Bar) Panned at Slashdot
On 05/25/2011 03:07 PM, PhillipJones wrote: ... It is the most Dumba** idea anyone has ever come up with. I have a 17 LapTop and 17 Monitor for my desktop if I can see what I need to missing a 1/8 of an inch or less, I have more problems than just an extra 1/8' inch. ... Ah, but all the world is turning to netbooks and iWhatevers... Seriously, this is what grippy is all about. Click the grippy the URL bar is gone, click it again and it is back... who woulda thunk it. :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?
Wed, 25 May 2011 11:17:19 -0700, /NoOp/: On 05/25/2011 10:38 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Note, Windows XP user currently get less hardware acceleration than Vista/7 users. The plan is to enable full hardware acceleration on Windows XP, too, but I don't know which Gecko/Firefox it is expected to land with. I don't know what are the plans for the next SeaMonkey version (would based on which Gecko version?), also. http://hacks.mozilla.org/2010/09/hardware-acceleration/ Interesting thanks for the link. Running the test in SeaMonkey 2.1RC1 (linux 32bit) I finally had to kill the test (it was just flipping between 1 2 fps). In Opera I get 8 fps (I have an old nVida NV25GL [Quadro4 900 XGL] workstation card on this machine). In Google Chrome Chromium 9 fps, epihany 4 fps, Firefox 4.0.1 4 fps (takes the cpu to 100%). Users with older video cards/drivers are likely to get no hardware acceleration at all: http://blog.mozilla.com/bjacob/2011/03/04/upgrade-your-graphics-drivers/ https://wiki.mozilla.org/Blocklisting/Blocked_Graphics_Drivers -- Stanimir ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
