Re: How to disable Seamonkey's memory of previously saved page directory paths...

[David E. Ross]

On 11/28/11 8:39 PM, Doc Crock wrote:
> Since about version 2.4. (?) Seamonkey remembers the Windows folder
> that Web pages were previously saved to. While this may suit some
> people it is annoying for my purposes.  I access a large number of
> sites daily and save their pages to a different directory every day.
> For example C:/2029 today, C:/2030 tomorrow, etc... Have been
> doing this successfully in Seamonkey for a long time.
> 
> Because Seamonkey now remembers yesterday's directory, every time I
> save a different page I have to change the 'save as' path to today's
> new directory. This is unlike Windows itself where once you save a
> file to a particular path that becomes your 'current' directory path
> and you don't need to specify it again unless you want to change to a
> new path.
> 
> Is there some way to configure Seamonkey so it acts like Windows and
> just remembers the current path after one file is saved?
> 
> Any help or suggestions would be appreciated.
> 
> Cheers, Doc Crock.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0.1) Gecko/2021 SeaMonkey/2.5

I just now tried a very small test.  SeaMonkey did indeed remember where
I saved a Web page as a file.  However, each Save request uses that
saved location.  Thus, if I save a Web page and then do a download of a
non-HTML file, the Save request will default to wherever I saved the Web
page.  If I choose to save the non-HTML file elsewhere and then go to
save another Web page, the Save request will default to wherever I saved
the non-HTML file.

That is, there is only one remembered Save location.  No matter what
kind of Save request SeaMonkey performs, that determines the remembered
Save location for all kinds of subsequent Save requests.

You can change that behavior.  On the menu bar, select [Edit >
Preferences].  On the left side of the Preferences window, select
[Browser > Downloads].  On the Downloads pane, select the radio button
for "Save files to" and select a location.  However, ALL Save requests
will then use that one location.

-- 

David E. Ross
.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation.
© 1997 by David E. Ross
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mozilla Firefox ? 3.6

[NoOp]

On 11/28/2011 10:14 AM, PhillipJones wrote:
> Rick Merrill wrote:
>> I have forgotten how to make SeaMonkey
>> pretend to be Mozilla Firefox ? 3.6.
>>
>> [ about? useragent? ]
> 
> Look in about config
> 
> type in useragent.
> 
> if your using SM 2.0.4 or lower, and if there s no mention of FireFox, 
> double click on it a new window, should come up showing the name. type 
> on the end:
> 
> "/not Firefox 3.6" (with out "'s) then click okay or save depending upon 
> the OS your using.
> 
> Now your version of SM will appear to the world as FF3.6
> 
> Supposedly after 2.1 SM Automatically u ser agent is Firefox.
> 

He's using SeaMonkey 2.5; there is no 'useragent' in about:config in
newer versions of SeaMonkey.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

How to disable Seamonkey's memory of previously saved page directory paths...

[Doc Crock]

Since about version 2.4. (?) Seamonkey remembers the Windows folder
that Web pages were previously saved to. While this may suit some
people it is annoying for my purposes.  I access a large number of
sites daily and save their pages to a different directory every day.
For example C:/2029 today, C:/2030 tomorrow, etc... Have been
doing this successfully in Seamonkey for a long time.

Because Seamonkey now remembers yesterday's directory, every time I
save a different page I have to change the 'save as' path to today's
new directory. This is unlike Windows itself where once you save a
file to a particular path that becomes your 'current' directory path
and you don't need to specify it again unless you want to change to a
new path.

Is there some way to configure Seamonkey so it acts like Windows and
just remembers the current path after one file is saved?

Any help or suggestions would be appreciated.

Cheers, Doc Crock.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Linking

[YorkJoanne]

freelance writer


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.5 kills needed Extensions

[MCBastos]

Interviewed by CNN on 29/11/2011 00:23, Frosted Flake told the world:
> Installed SeaMonkey 2.5 and it disabled:
> - CacheViewer
> - FireBug
> - FireFTP
> - HTML Validator
> - MeasureIt
> - Password Exporter
> - View formatted source
> Most of these are very useful for website development.
> Any way that these can tricked into working with SeaMonkey 2.5?

Well, did you try installing the Addon Compatibility Reporter extension?
In most cases, it will allow you to use flagged-as-incompatible extensions.

-- 
MCBastos

This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.

-=-=-
... Sent from my Atari 2600.
* Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.5 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mozilla Firefox ? 3.6

[NoOp]

On 11/28/2011 10:08 AM, Rick Merrill wrote:
> NoOp wrote:
>> On 11/28/2011 08:24 AM, Rick Merrill wrote:
>>> I have forgotten how to make SeaMonkey
>>> pretend to be Mozilla Firefox ? 3.6.
>>>
>>> [ about?  useragent? ]
>>
>> Prefbar.
>> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/seamonkey/addon/prefbar/
> 
> Apparently User Agent Switcher is not available for SM 2.5!
> 

So? I didn't suggest UAS, I suggested (and still do suggest) prefbar.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

SM 2.5 kills needed Extensions

[Frosted Flake]

Installed SeaMonkey 2.5 and it disabled:
- CacheViewer
- FireBug
- FireFTP
- HTML Validator
- MeasureIt
- Password Exporter
- View formatted source
Most of these are very useful for website development.
Any way that these can tricked into working with SeaMonkey 2.5?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Crash reports?

[Paul B. Gallagher]

Never mind. The computer rebooted from a bugcheck, and RAM diagnostics 
found a bad memory module. After I replace that pair, I'll see if that 
solves the problem.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Running a verify link check in Sea Monkey Composer

[John]

In article ,
 Rick Merrill  wrote:

> Here's one:
> 
> http://linkchecker.sourceforge.net/
> 
> haven't tried it but I would expect it to be ok.

Hmm... I need to try that one
-- 
Are there errors in the Bible? Is Jesus Christ God? 
After death whats on the other side? If you want to 
learn, get answers, and be able to defend the faith, 
CERM is your place. http://www.cerm.info
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: re-installing seamonkey

[LMH]

Mike C wrote:

LMH wrote:

JD wrote:

LMH wrote:

Mike C wrote:

LMH wrote:

I currently have seamonkey 2.4.1 installed and it is possible that I
have had a security breach. I would like to re-install seamonkey,
but I
need to be able to do that without losing my profiles (which are
stored
on another drive from the seamonkey install folder).

Is there a tutorial on how to do this without needing to re-import
everything, which is a pain.

LMH


Your existing profiles may contain something you don't want.
Copying them and then putting them into a new installation may just
transfer the problem. (What IS the problem?)

You should be able to reinstall a new SM right over the old one.

BUTI would create a new profile first and see if all is Ok there.

Mozbackup is a GREAT program. I've been using is for about 8 years!
It will back up your profile files instead of you doing it manually.
It will then restore the files to the new installation.

BUT... You need to explain what you mean by "security breach"?
Does someone know your passwords?
Do you have malware or a virus?
Is it only SM that's affected?


One of the reasons I use seamonkey is that it allows me to keep my
profiles in any location I designate. I have my profiles in a location
outside the seamonkey install directory, and off of the C: drive. These
folders are backed up every night along with all of my other data
(using
rsync). If I restore my OS from an image, or something like that, my
email and browser are usually not affected. The same goes for a full
re-install of windows.

I haven't used mozbackup because I try to avoid relying on additional
applications. My experience has been that simple file to file backups
are the most dependable. All that said, using mozbackup in the manner
suggested would not compromise the redundancy already in place. Worst
case, I can always re-import my profiles, so I don't mind trying other
solutions. I wish that seamonkey had a simpler import tool, like point
to a folder and say "import this one", instead of running from the
command line and all that.

I have a credit card that I use for online purchases only. That card
recently had a string of fraudulent charges run up on it, all of which
were online purchases from sites in Europe. My bank caught the charges
and flagged them as suspicious, so they never got past the pending
state. The charges have been canceled, along with the card. I am going
through some due diligence to make sure my system here hasn't been
compromised. Since these were online purchases, who ever used the card
would have needed to know the card number, name as printed on the card,
expiration date, card security number, and the entire correct billing
address. The two easiest places to acquire this data are from one of
the
emerchants I made purchases from, or from my browser. There are very
few
emerchants I do business with, and most of them are very reputable
(newegg, amazon, etc), but I still think an emerchant is the most
likely
source. Still, I think it makes sense to look at my browser.

It would be nice if there was a way to scan all of the browser
components and do an MD5SUM to confirm that all of the .exe, .dat, and
.dll files are unmodified. I'm not sure where to look in the profile
folders to see if anything is amiss.

LMH


What programs do you have to scan for spyware? That's a pretty good way
to take a look at the security of your browser.



I normally run Zone Alarm ISS (firewall and AV) and also have spybot SSD
installed. Along with a sofaware firewall router with AV, this has
always been enough.

I have run a full malware sweep based on the protocol recommended by
MajorGeeks (Super AntiSpyware, Malwarebytes, ComboFix, RootRepeal,
MGtools). Nothing was found in the sweep.

The fraud investigator at my bank said that it is unlikely that my
system is compromised. He said that some of the charges were rejected
because the all of the information given didn't match the card number.
He said that this was most likely a hacker trying random 16 digit
account numbers and random expiration dates. They keep trying
combinations by testing on small charges ($3 or less) until they get
something that authorizes. Once they have the combination they sell it.
Some places don't check if all of the data matches and just get an
authorization for the amount charged. Most of the places where the
number was used did check everything and canceled the order. It doesn't
look like anything got into my system here, otherwise they would have
had all of the information needed to use the card and not just the
number and expo date.

LMH


If SM is clean, go ahead and back it up with MozBackup.
Backup is simple and restoring is simple.


The reason I don't use MozBackup is that my email and web profile 
content changes on a daily basis. I back up my profile folders on a 
daily basis using rsync, like I back up all of my data.


I suppose MozBackup makes sense as a backup tool to use before a 
re-install, but unless yo

Re: Running a verify link check in Sea Monkey Composer

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

John wrote:

"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:

John wrote:

"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:

John wrote:

http://www.cerm.info/bible_studies/Topical/work.htm


You also need a grammar checker for your pages.

"The Bible has allot to say ..."  for example.


I did a search but did not find the word "allot" in the two
pages posted here. I always strive to correct grammar and
spelling errors. Where did you see that word used? Thanks..


Looking at the page just now, I see you have corrected it from
"allot" to "a lot". The wrong word was there an hour ago when I
last looked.

No response to any of my other comments?


If you have found other grammar errors please point them out as I
always strive to fix these errors.But I will say sometimes what
someone says is a error is just a way they would word things. I have
used editors before and some editors tried getting me to change my
meaning with some sentences on other articles on the site. I have
also had conflicts among editors. I used an editor and he cleaned up
some content, and sometime later another editor said what he
corrected was wrong, so editors do not always agree with each other.


I do not know of any 'editors' that want to change my content, other 
than words that do not exist in their dictionary files.



But regardless what you have suggested so far has been correct. The
word allot does not sound as good as "a lot."


Probably because they have completely different meanings.




But I meant my unaddressed comments of:
   "Note how my page passes validation: "
   "What are all those "https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Running a verify link check in Sea Monkey Composer

[Rick Merrill]

John wrote:

In article,
  Rick Merrill  wrote:


John wrote:

Is there a way to verify my HTML links that I create in a document with
Sea Monkey's Composer?

Second can someone using Microsoft IE verify that the following pages
display properly? Thanks..

http://www.cerm.info/bible_studies/Topical/work.htm
http://www.cerm.info/bible_studies/Topical/Loneliness.htm

I use Sea Monkey to compose many of my pages. Sometimes I have issues
with the pages displaying properly in IE.


You can verify HTML CODE with w3c.org,
but to verify LINKS or URLs you need a different tool.


What tool do I need? The old Claris Home Page (which I have not used
since Feb 2010) had a verify links feature built in.


Here's one:

http://linkchecker.sourceforge.net/

haven't tried it but I would expect it to be ok.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Running a verify link check in Sea Monkey Composer

[John]

In article ,
 "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"  wrote:

> John wrote:
> > "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
> >> John wrote:
> > http://www.cerm.info/bible_studies/Topical/work.htm
> 
>  You also need a grammar checker for your pages.
> >>> "The Bible has allot to say ..."  for example.
> >
> > I did a search but did not find the word "allot" in the two pages
> > posted here. I always strive to correct grammar and spelling errors.
> > Where did you see that word used? Thanks..
> 
> Looking at the page just now, I see you have corrected it from "allot" 
> to "a lot". The wrong word was there an hour ago when I last looked.
> 
> No response to any of my other comments?

If you have found other grammar errors please point them out as I always 
strive to fix these errors. But I will say sometimes what someone says 
is a error is just a way they would word things. I have used editors 
before and some editors tried getting me to change my meaning with some 
sentences on other articles on the site. I have also had conflicts among 
editors. I used an editor and he cleaned up some content, and sometime 
later another editor said what he corrected was wrong, so editors do not 
always agree with each other. 

But regardless what you have suggested so far has been correct. The word 
allot does not sound as good as "a lot."
-- 
Are there errors in the Bible? Is Jesus Christ God? 
After death whats on the other side? If you want to 
learn, get answers, and be able to defend the faith, 
CERM is your place. http://www.cerm.info
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: page works with Chrome but not with SM2.5

[Rick Merrill]

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

Rick Merrill wrote:

https://www.dcu.org/onlineserv/HB/HomeBanking.cgi

w3c.org complains that the page has no Doctype (true).

SM2.5 gives a blank page, apparently not recognizing the javascript at all.

Now Chrome, IE, Firefox 3.6 show the page correctly. Setting useragent
to Firefox 3.6 makes no difference. Why does SM 2.5 have trouble with this?

The page source opens with [snip]


Here's what I get, with SeaMonkey 2.5, with Firefox 8.0, and with Opera:

" Error #1518"
"You must first login to access Internet Banking. The page that you are 
requesting
can only be accessed after a successful login. If you have any further issues 
please
go to the website and try again or contact your financial institution for 
assistance."

There must be something you are doing ahead of the link you gave. It would 
appear you
have already passed the login page, so without your credentials, I doubt if 
anyone
here can help.



You are correct, and it looks like there was a forwarding from one page / domain
to another issue, which I seem to have solved.  Sorry to have thought it was
a SM2.5 problem, but it surly looked like it.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Running a verify link check in Sea Monkey Composer

[John]

In article ,
 Rick Merrill  wrote:

> John wrote:
> > Is there a way to verify my HTML links that I create in a document with
> > Sea Monkey's Composer?
> >
> > Second can someone using Microsoft IE verify that the following pages
> > display properly? Thanks..
> >
> > http://www.cerm.info/bible_studies/Topical/work.htm
> > http://www.cerm.info/bible_studies/Topical/Loneliness.htm
> >
> > I use Sea Monkey to compose many of my pages. Sometimes I have issues
> > with the pages displaying properly in IE.
> 
> You can verify HTML CODE with w3c.org,
> but to verify LINKS or URLs you need a different tool.

What tool do I need? The old Claris Home Page (which I have not used 
since Feb 2010) had a verify links feature built in.
-- 
Are there errors in the Bible? Is Jesus Christ God? 
After death whats on the other side? If you want to 
learn, get answers, and be able to defend the faith, 
CERM is your place. http://www.cerm.info
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: page works with Chrome but not with SM2.5

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Rick Merrill wrote:

https://www.dcu.org/onlineserv/HB/HomeBanking.cgi

w3c.org complains that the page has no Doctype (true).

SM2.5 gives a blank page, apparently not recognizing the javascript at all.

Now Chrome, IE, Firefox 3.6 show the page correctly. Setting useragent
to Firefox 3.6 makes no difference. Why does SM 2.5 have trouble with this?

The page source opens with  [snip]


Here's what I get, with SeaMonkey 2.5, with Firefox 8.0, and with Opera:

" Error#1518"
"You must first login to access Internet Banking. The page that you are 
requesting can only be accessed after a successful login. If you have 
any further issues please go to the website and try again or contact 
your financial institution for assistance."


There must be something you are doing ahead of the link you gave. It 
would appear you have already passed the login page, so without your 
credentials, I doubt if anyone here can help.


--
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Crash reports?

[Paul B. Gallagher]

Jens Hatlak wrote:


Paul B. Gallagher wrote:


Can someone remind me where to find the crash reports so I can post
some here and try to figure out what's going on?


about:crashes (linked from about:about and about:support).


It would also be helpful to know what data to post -- just the
number, or the details?


Just the (complete) ID.


Thanks. This enough?

Report ID   Date Submitted
bp-630d80e9-7c40-43d8-bea1-ac135228 11/28/2011 1:56 PM
bp-b9bdc93e-9a5b-499a-858f-e1c2a228 11/28/2011 1:15 PM
bp-1f0fe1e9-02bb-4881-a15c-714d7227 11/27/2011 5:29 AM
66b1f581-72f3-4272-9da7-49b8f8ce80e811/20/2011 1:52 AM
69355ae4-a3b2-4c7d-b1ff-3ca4fc34c1d911/20/2011 1:52 AM
91303250-da69-4ef0-99ec-c283c33e653611/18/2011 11:17 PM
33664951-0283-46dc-96ce-46050862c82411/18/2011 11:17 PM
0e5d4b87-86bb-4c64-9001-260765cfe3f111/11/2011 6:33 AM
bec12359-a22a-4311-8eff-a01e4977edf511/11/2011 6:33 AM
1f6c2d97-2528-4416-8179-a77b0adcfab811/6/2011 12:02 AM
22ea5f8d-4f11-439b-8c96-66143498a83f11/6/2011 12:02 AM
1290b756-6596-4359-a22a-e5725be0ad7811/5/2011 12:48 AM
44fd1bdd-4697-4466-aa28-b972fbf4d93c11/5/2011 12:44 AM
da9f2885-d8bb-4a94-98ab-d83bbad6156511/1/2011 12:03 PM
e78fd5f9-ca37-453a-8910-eac40462e5ce11/1/2011 12:03 PM
eef3060d-d9ce-494a-b7c6-2c56b1b6ec3d10/31/2011 4:43 AM
9e3fccbe-4fd3-4856-959b-72ebbfb6d5a810/31/2011 4:43 AM
8704e688-8281-4107-ab68-e76e5742565310/31/2011 4:42 AM
360aa56f-8445-4f90-a28e-b0b091b00ea510/31/2011 4:42 AM
0039092e-1539-4318-ba1c-ac5685639af810/31/2011 4:41 AM
0c5cc143-5374-4c7c-89c1-a3498be3494210/31/2011 4:40 AM
70a81215-772b-4ef4-b4b6-473954b67adc10/29/2011 7:46 PM
95f21024-9e8f-4f84-9f99-91e46f8b0b2410/29/2011 7:45 PM
d627ded6-9f05-4d5e-8c8d-682cb1e9af9a10/22/2011 12:01 AM
fd8eecb3-38f7-46af-8d13-1f874354be8f10/22/2011 12:01 AM
6578f178-8113-4a2b-a319-68e4aeecc91710/19/2011 3:51 AM
15445fd7-92c6-406a-8ead-22e2672c06b910/19/2011 3:51 AM
fdbe20ab-bffe-4cc6-b9de-621578c09f3f10/17/2011 5:55 PM
66825839-56fa-4805-9749-827e72d925c510/17/2011 5:55 PM
1d5b2e95-57ae-422d-bf07-635e123420b610/16/2011 11:00 PM
4243cd20-c42a-4c58-ba2a-835ace109c4c10/16/2011 11:00 PM
85a6dee8-f6fd-4101-84ee-c7b178fcc9fd10/12/2011 2:49 AM
cc82de50-9b8f-4fbd-9089-5d804ee9abf110/12/2011 2:49 AM
d5ea607c-79a0-4bf8-a298-2b8066c03e7010/10/2011 11:54 PM
73c8b5ee-2bdb-4ad5-9fde-7eee9823183910/10/2011 11:54 PM
0aa06bce-cd69-4a63-bf3a-5df108d0dea210/5/2011 1:34 PM
93e0d0c0-f3f8-449c-9a38-e2d14864e41b10/5/2011 1:34 PM

--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: page works with Chrome but not with SM2.5

[Hartmut Figge]

Rick Merrill:

>https://www.dcu.org/onlineserv/HB/HomeBanking.cgi
>
>w3c.org complains that the page has no Doctype (true).
>
>SM2.5 gives a blank page, apparently not recognizing the javascript at all.

SM 2.8a1 gives a window containing 'You must first login to access...'.
The error console of 2.8a1 gives several warnings after an information:

www.dcu.org : server does not support RFC 5746, see CVE-2009-3555

Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Bookmarks

[Jens Hatlak]

Not@home wrote:

I have a lot of bookmarks, most organized. But some I only want to keep
temporarily. When I want to keep one temporarily, I use bookmark this
page and the bookmark appears below those I have filed.


The easiest way to file temporary bookmarks is to click the bookmark 
icon at the right end of the location bar's URL field. This will add a 
bookmark to the Unsorted Bookmarks folder.


HTH

Jens

--
Jens Hatlak 
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker 
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Crash reports?

[Jens Hatlak]

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Can someone remind me where to find the crash reports so I can post some
here and try to figure out what's going on?


about:crashes (linked from about:about and about:support).


It would also be helpful to
know what data to post -- just the number, or the details?


Just the (complete) ID.

HTH

Jens

--
Jens Hatlak 
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker 
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mozilla Firefox ? 3.6

[Rick Merrill]

PhillipJones wrote:

Rick Merrill wrote:

I have forgotten how to make SeaMonkey
pretend to be Mozilla Firefox ? 3.6.

[ about? useragent? ]


Look in about config

type in useragent.

if your using SM 2.0.4 or lower, and if there s no mention of FireFox, double 
click
on it a new window, should come up showing the name. type on the end:

"/not Firefox 3.6" (with out "'s) then click okay or save depending upon the OS 
your
using.

Now your version of SM will appear to the world as FF3.6

Supposedly after 2.1 SM Automatically u ser agent is Firefox.



SM 2.5  has useragent of  "Firefox 3.6"  but it is not enough
to work with my credit union's "billpayer"!


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Crash reports?

[Paul B. Gallagher]

I've had over a dozen crashes since I upgraded to v. 2.5, but never more 
than one a year before that, so I'm unfamiliar with procedures. Most of 
them seem to come from out of the blue -- I'm just sitting here minding 
my own business, and boom!


Can someone remind me where to find the crash reports so I can post some 
here and try to figure out what's going on? It would also be helpful to 
know what data to post -- just the number, or the details?


Thanks.

--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Bookmarks

[David E. Ross]

On 11/28/11 9:16 AM, Not@home wrote:
> I have a lot of bookmarks, most organized.  But some I only want to keep 
> temporarily.  When I want to keep one temporarily, I use bookmark this 
> page and the bookmark appears below those I have filed.  For permanent 
> ones I use file bookmark.  Since my touchpad skills are deteriorating, I 
> have taken to keeping bookmark manager open, as it is easier for me to 
> navigate.  My problem is that the temporary bookmarks do not appear when 
> I open bookmark manager.
> 
> Is there a way to make them appear, or should I just create a folder in 
> the hierarchy to keep them in?

I just ran a test.

"Bookmark This Page" adds the bookmark at the very end of your list of
bookmarks.  With the Bookmarks Manager open, select the Bookmarks Menu
icon in the left pane.  Scroll the right pane to the bottom.  The new
bookmark should appear there.  HOWEVER, "Bookmark This Page" will NOT
add a bookmark that already exists.

-- 

David E. Ross
.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation.
© 1997 by David E. Ross
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: which is which

[David E. Ross]

On 11/28/11 8:27 AM, Rick Merrill wrote:
> I must have skipped the class: what are the differences between
> 
>   Add-Ons
> 
>   Plug-Ins
> 
>   Extensions
> 
> Thanks in advance.

Plugins are software applications developed independently of Mozilla
applications.  The often execute independently.  In many cases, the same
plugin works for Mozilla browsers, IE, Chrome, Opera, and Safari,
differing only in the platform and operating system.  That is, between a
PC running Windows and a PC running Linux, a different version of a
plugin might be required.  Examples of plugins include Flash,
RealPlayer, WinAmp, Adobe Reader, and Java.  Note that RealPlater and
WinAmp plugins cause their applications to operate outside of the
browser, continuing to run even when the browser is terminated.  On the
other hand, Flash, Java, and Adobe Reader operate within the browser.

Extensions are generally developed for specific applications.  They may
actually modify the code of the application to which they apply.  Thus,
an extension developed for Firefox might not even be compatible with
SeaMonkey (but many are indeed compatible).  Few (if any) extensions for
Mozilla browsers are compatible with IE, Opera, Chrome, or Safari.
Extensions operate within the browser.  Examples of browser extensions
include PrefBar, Adblock Plus, Preserve Download Modification Timestamp,
and Remember Passwords.  Examples of Thunderbird extensions include
Signature Switch and Compact Headers.

Themes are created for specific applications, to change their user
interfaces (e.g., button icons, tool bar colors).  Since Firefox and
SeaMonkey differ in their user interfaces, themes for one are generally
not compatible with the other.

Add-ons include all of the above.  This can be confusing because
"add-on" is often used by Mozilla developers when they really mean
"extension".  The Web site 
really contains extensions and themes; while it has a plugin checker, it
does not contain plugins.

-- 

David E. Ross
.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation.
© 1997 by David E. Ross
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mozilla Firefox ? 3.6

[PhillipJones]

Rick Merrill wrote:

I have forgotten how to make SeaMonkey
pretend to be Mozilla Firefox ? 3.6.

[ about? useragent? ]


Look in about config

type in useragent.

if your using SM 2.0.4 or lower, and if there s no mention of FireFox, 
double click on it a new window, should come up showing the name. type 
on the end:


"/not Firefox 3.6" (with out "'s) then click okay or save depending upon 
the OS your using.


Now your version of SM will appear to the world as FF3.6

Supposedly after 2.1 SM Automatically u ser agent is Firefox.

--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mozilla Firefox ? 3.6

[Rick Merrill]

NoOp wrote:

On 11/28/2011 08:24 AM, Rick Merrill wrote:

I have forgotten how to make SeaMonkey
pretend to be Mozilla Firefox ? 3.6.

[ about?  useragent? ]


Prefbar.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/seamonkey/addon/prefbar/


Apparently User Agent Switcher is not available for SM 2.5!

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Forms History Control Update to 2 Crashes and burns SeaMonkey 2.0.14

[PhillipJones]

Lucas Levrel wrote:

Le 26 novembre 2011, Justin Wood (Callek) a écrit :


PhillipJones wrote:


Why am I sticking with 2.0.14? *NoSquint*. NoSquint is so vital to me I
will not upgrade to the latest versions of SM. If someone will come up
with a NoSquint Equivalent or convert NoSquint I will move. Otherwise I
am not budging.


I seem to recall many in the group already explaining how with 2.5
NoSquint is no longer necessary and completely obsolete.


I seem to recall users of NoSquint already explaining how 2.5 features
are nowhere as rich as NoSquint's.


but sure, enjoy your security-hole-ridden version.


security-hole-ridden usable version

You/re talking to people that have their mind made up. Ty don't take 
others peoples needs into account.


I thought (perhaps naively  even at 62) that a software company duty was 
to provide service to their customers. I know they have no control over 
extensions but they could ask that extension providers, provide for TB, 
FF and SM if they can use the same features on all.
For example. the author of QuoteColors provides the extension for both 
TB and SM.


--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Bookmarks

[Not@home]

I have a lot of bookmarks, most organized.  But some I only want to keep 
temporarily.  When I want to keep one temporarily, I use bookmark this 
page and the bookmark appears below those I have filed.  For permanent 
ones I use file bookmark.  Since my touchpad skills are deteriorating, I 
have taken to keeping bookmark manager open, as it is easier for me to 
navigate.  My problem is that the temporary bookmarks do not appear when 
I open bookmark manager.


Is there a way to make them appear, or should I just create a folder in 
the hierarchy to keep them in?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mozilla Firefox ? 3.6

[NoOp]

On 11/28/2011 08:24 AM, Rick Merrill wrote:
> I have forgotten how to make SeaMonkey
> pretend to be Mozilla Firefox ? 3.6.
> 
> [ about?  useragent? ]

Prefbar.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/seamonkey/addon/prefbar/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: which is which

[WLS]

Rick Merrill wrote:

I must have skipped the class: what are the differences between

Add-Ons

Plug-Ins

Extensions

Thanks in advance.



Add-ons is the all encompassing name for Extensions, Appearance, and Plugins.

Extensions are items such as Add-on Compatibility Reporter, Lightning, Adblock 
Plus.

Appearance items are the Default theme, Modern theme, personas and other themes.

Plugins are items like Java, Adobe Reader and Flash.

--

 SeaMonkey - openSUSE 11.4 - KDE 4.6.0 - 1.8GHz CPU - 2GB RAM
 Get openSUSE: http://software.opensuse.org/121/en
 Firefox Support: http://support.mozilla.com
 Profile Manager: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Profile_Manager
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

which is which

[Rick Merrill]

I must have skipped the class: what are the differences between

Add-Ons

Plug-Ins

Extensions

Thanks in advance.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Mozilla Firefox ? 3.6

[Rick Merrill]

I have forgotten how to make SeaMonkey
pretend to be Mozilla Firefox ? 3.6.

[ about?  useragent? ]
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Running a verify link check in Sea Monkey Composer

[W3BNR]

On 11/28/2011 8:30 AM Rick Merrill submitted the following:
> John wrote:
>> Is there a way to verify my HTML links that I create in a document with
>> Sea Monkey's Composer?
>>
>> Second can someone using Microsoft IE verify that the following pages
>> display properly? Thanks..
>>
>> http://www.cerm.info/bible_studies/Topical/work.htm
>> http://www.cerm.info/bible_studies/Topical/Loneliness.htm
>>
>> I use Sea Monkey to compose many of my pages. Sometimes I have issues
>> with the pages displaying properly in IE.
> 
> You can verify HTML CODE with w3c.org,
> but to verify LINKS or URLs you need a different tool.
> 

You can also check for errors and warnings by using a program 'Tidy'.
It can also format your HTML coding to make it easier reading.
If it passes the 'TIDY' function it should also pass the W3C check.

http://tidy.sourceforge.net/

-- 
Ed, W3BNR
http://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR
Powered by SeaMonkey: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/

Can atheists get insurance for acts of God?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Running a verify link check in Sea Monkey Composer

[Rick Merrill]

John wrote:

Is there a way to verify my HTML links that I create in a document with
Sea Monkey's Composer?

Second can someone using Microsoft IE verify that the following pages
display properly? Thanks..

http://www.cerm.info/bible_studies/Topical/work.htm
http://www.cerm.info/bible_studies/Topical/Loneliness.htm

I use Sea Monkey to compose many of my pages. Sometimes I have issues
with the pages displaying properly in IE.


You can verify HTML CODE with w3c.org,
but to verify LINKS or URLs you need a different tool.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Lost Compacting InBox After Compacting

[Rick Merrill]

Is this nuisance/spam actually a form of 'hipcrime'?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Lost Compacting InBox After Compacting

[DonaMarks31]

freelance writer


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Forms History Control Update to 2 Crashes and burns SeaMonkey 2.0.14

[Lucas Levrel]

Le 26 novembre 2011, Justin Wood (Callek) a écrit :


PhillipJones wrote:


Why am I sticking with 2.0.14? *NoSquint*. NoSquint is so vital to me I
will not upgrade to the latest versions of SM. If someone will come up
with a NoSquint Equivalent or convert NoSquint I will move. Otherwise I
am not budging.


I seem to recall many in the group already explaining how with 2.5 NoSquint 
is no longer necessary and completely obsolete.


I seem to recall users of NoSquint already explaining how 2.5 features are 
nowhere as rich as NoSquint's.



but sure, enjoy your security-hole-ridden version.


security-hole-ridden usable version

--
LL
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Running a verify link check in Sea Monkey Composer

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

John wrote:

"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:

John wrote:

http://www.cerm.info/bible_studies/Topical/work.htm


You also need a grammar checker for your pages.

"The Bible has allot to say ..."  for example.


I did a search but did not find the word "allot" in the two pages
posted here. I always strive to correct grammar and spelling errors.
Where did you see that word used? Thanks..


Looking at the page just now, I see you have corrected it from "allot" 
to "a lot". The wrong word was there an hour ago when I last looked.


No response to any of my other comments?

--
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Doesn't SM trust me?

[BillieLindsay33]

freelance writer


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Running a verify link check in Sea Monkey Composer

[John]

In article ,
 "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"  wrote:

> John wrote:
> 
> > "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
> >> John wrote:
> >>> http://www.cerm.info/bible_studies/Topical/work.htm
> >>
> >> You also need a grammar checker for your pages.
> > "The Bible has allot to say ..."  for example.
> >
> > I am afraid I lack the technical skill in HTML to fix the problems.
> 
> Have you tried a tutorial? I'm pretty sure one was recommended to you in 
> the past when you used to post to the HTML newsgroups.
> 
> http://htmldog.com/  has often been recommended.

> 
> > Grammar? I did fix a number of grammar errors in those files.
> > Refresh them and tell me if you see them. If so please point where so
> > I can fix, thanks.. I have allot of pages..
> 
>  > "The Bible has allot to say ..."  for example.


I did a search but did not find the word "allot" in the two pages posted 
here. I always strive to correct grammar and spelling errors. Where did 
you see that word used? Thanks..


> 
> The word is not "allot" but is "a lot" ... both on your page and in your 
> post. "I have a lot of pages.."
> 
> 
> 
> Note how my page passes validation:
>  al%2Fchecker.php>
> 
> ..and that is HTML 4.01 Strict, not Transitional.
> 
> For your page:
>  e_studies%2FTopical%2Fwork.htm>
> "Errors found while checking this document as HTML 4.01 Transitional!
> Result:   27 Errors "
> 
>  %3A%2F%2Fwww.cerm.info%2Fbible_studies%2FTopical%2Fwork.htm>
> "Sorry! We found the following errors (3)"
> 
> What are all those " errors, whatever they are for. On your work.htm page, you are also 
> referencing a local file on your computer, which nobody on the WWW will 
> ever be able to see.
-- 
Are there errors in the Bible? Is Jesus Christ God? 
After death whats on the other side? If you want to 
learn, get answers, and be able to defend the faith, 
CERM is your place. http://www.cerm.info
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

“Live Bookmarks” or RSS,XML,Atom in “Places”

[get-funky.dig]

Hello. 

I'm looking for a means of organizing my Places Library in such a way that I 
might focus only on "Live Bookmarks"; Places commonly identifiable by unique 
"RSS"/ Live Bookmarks icons, as separate them from "regular" URL's, identifying 
those which point to a dynamic list of news, or new URLs.

I wish to limit "Library" queries to return only Places which are those RSS 
feeds, or "Live Bookmarks", yet I find such facility unbeknown to me. The 
default "Places"/ "Library", while it does afford several methods by which we 
might sort, and identify various Places, I know of no way of easily excluding 
common site URL's, as to return limited results from any Places search query.

I admit, my first thought gravitates toward expecting some XPI / add-on might 
exist, already affording the query results grouping I seek, though such 
consideration is in conflict with my truer nature: I tend to expect the 
solution is already before me; I can find what I want from an unmodified 
Seamonkey release, yet I continue to overlook the standard function which might 
produce the results I desire. Perhaps there is no need for any /add-on/; 
moreover, according to my queries at AMO, no such add-on exists. 

Ideally, I hope the experts here might recommend a particular search pattern, 
designed precisely for isolating the RSS / Live Bookmarks I, as I intend to 
return. Perhaps there's a syntax I might employ for such isolated results. 
Ideally, I'd improve my ability to better query the Library, w/out any 
"requisite" add-ons.

I look forward to your recommendations.

Thank you!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Running a verify link check in Sea Monkey Composer

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

John wrote:


"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:

John wrote:

http://www.cerm.info/bible_studies/Topical/work.htm


You also need a grammar checker for your pages.

"The Bible has allot to say ..."  for example.

I am afraid I lack the technical skill in HTML to fix the problems.


Have you tried a tutorial? I'm pretty sure one was recommended to you in 
the past when you used to post to the HTML newsgroups.


http://htmldog.com/  has often been recommended.


Grammar? I did fix a number of grammar errors in those files.
Refresh them and tell me if you see them. If so please point where so
I can fix, thanks.. I have allot of pages..


> "The Bible has allot to say ..."  for example.

The word is not "allot" but is "a lot" ... both on your page and in your 
post. "I have a lot of pages.."




Note how my page passes validation:


..and that is HTML 4.01 Strict, not Transitional.

For your page:

"Errors found while checking this document as HTML 4.01 Transitional!
Result:   27 Errors "


"Sorry! We found the following errors (3)"

What are all those "errors, whatever they are for. On your work.htm page, you are also 
referencing a local file on your computer, which nobody on the WWW will 
ever be able to see.


--
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey