Re: minidumps folder -- what are these files?

[NoOp]

On 06/12/2012 10:22 AM, Bob Fleischer wrote:
> With the latest versions of Firefox and SeaMonkey, I note that my 
> profiles have new folders names "minidumps" each containing some files.
> 
> What are these?
> 
> Bob

I believe that those are for crash reports. They are not new - I've
files going back to 2009. If you open the text file (the .extra) you'll
find a brief of the report.

Sample:

> Theme=classic/1.0
> StartupTime=1305927931
> ProductName=SeaMonkey
> FramePoisonSize=4096
> ServerURL=https://crash-reports.mozilla.com/submit
> Add-ons={3ed8cc52-86fc-4613-9026-c1ef969da4c3}:2.2,{B17C1C5A-04B1-11DB-9804-B622A1EF5492}:1.2.1,{59c81df5-4b7a-477b-912d-4e0fdf64e5f2}:0.9.86.1,{d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d}:1.3.6,inspec...@mozilla.org:2.0.10pre,{e2fda1a4-762b-4020-b5ad-a41df1933103}:1.0b4pre,sqlitemana...@mrinalkant.blogspot.com:0.7.2,{8A6C82A1-F6C9-481a-AAE7-C96444C9A754}:5.1.1,{a62ef8ec-5fdc-40c2-873c-223b8a6925cc}:0.8pre,moonli...@novell.com:3.99.0.3,{972ce4c6-7e08-4474-a285-3208198ce6fd}:1.0
> EMCheckCompatibility=true
> BuildID=20110511133425
> Vendor=Mozilla
> Version=2.1
> InstallTime=1305301232
> ReleaseChannel=release
> FramePoisonBase=f0dea000
> CrashTime=1305955671
> SecondsSinceLastCrash=3974770

The other file with matching name.dmp is the binary dump of the crash.

You should be able to review the crash reports, if you've submitted
them, in the browser. In the URL box enter: about:crashes and click on
the crash report ID.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: minidumps folder -- what are these files?

[David E. Ross]

On 6/13/12 1:15 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote, On 13/06/2012 17:06:
>> On 6/12/12 10:22 AM, Bob Fleischer wrote:
>>> With the latest versions of Firefox and SeaMonkey, I note that my
>>> profiles have new folders names "minidumps" each containing some files.
>>>
>>> What are these?
>>>
>>> Bob
>>>
>> I see the folders in all four of my profiles, but they are all empty.
>>
> Just before my folder began to have files - the first one is dated 
> 10/06/2012 11:23
> 
> Could this caused by this windows update ?
> 
> Update for Windows 7 (KB2718704)
> Installation date: ‎09/‎06/‎2012 22:41
> Installation status: Successful
> Update type: Important
> Install this update to resolve an issue which requires an update to the 
> certificate revocation list on Windows systems and to keep your systems 
> certificate list up to date. After you install this update, you may have 
> to restart your system.
> More information:
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2718704
> 
> 

Okay.  I dusted off my software test engineer hat -- which I put aside 9
years ago when I retired -- and did some investigating.

On my PC, the minidumps folders were created in my four SeaMonkey
profiles on 24 November 2011.  I installed the Windows XP KB2718704 fix
on 4 June 2012, more than six months later.  Thus, I do not think
minidumps has anything to do with the KB2718704 fix for any Windows
version.

The minidumps folder first appeared in my Thunderbird profile with TBird
3.0, which I installed on 10 December 2010.  However, the folder now has
a creation date of 28 September 2011, which is when I installed TBird
7.0.  I'm now at TBird 13.0.

I installed SeaMonkey 2.0.11 on 11 December 2010 (the day after TBird
3.0), but minidumps does not appear in my installation log for that
date.  I installed SM 2.5 on 23 November 2011, the day before the
current creation date for the folder in my SM profiles.  I'm now at SM
2.10.

I can't find any installation log for any software for 24 November 2011.
 However, my logging sometimes fails, leaving me without any log.

My current software inventory also shows no installation done on that
date.  My inventory only shows the most recent installation of a
software version, not a history.  Thus, an installation on 24 November
2011 would be replaced in my inventory if I then install a later version
of the same software.

I just now deleted folder minidumps from my "guest" profile (not my
primary profile).  I then switched to that profile.  When I switched
back to my primary profile, the folder reappeared in my "guest" profile.
 Thus, this folder appears to be a Mozilla artifact.

-- 

David E. Ross
.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation.
© 1997 by David E. Ross
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Fonts in e-mails

[NoOp]

On 06/13/2012 04:58 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
> NoOp:
> 
>>Problem was: the pull-down menu entry reads Other Languages instead of
>>Unicode or UTF-8. I never guessed that I had to enter there my preferred
>>fonts also.
> 
> AFAIR Unicode existed in the menu in the Mozilla Suite.
> 
> Hartmut

But wait... there's more :-)
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762325
Was marked as a dupe of 323747, but it's a nice read & references
several other similar/same reports. Apparently it popped it's ugly head
up again when Thunderbird users upgraded from 12 to 13.



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Fonts in e-mails

[Hartmut Figge]

NoOp:

>Problem was: the pull-down menu entry reads Other Languages instead of
>Unicode or UTF-8. I never guessed that I had to enter there my preferred
>fonts also.

AFAIR Unicode existed in the menu in the Mozilla Suite.

Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Fonts in e-mails

[NoOp]

On 06/13/2012 10:29 AM, G Tod wrote:
> Philip Chee wrote:
>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 03:46:38 -0500, G Tod wrote:
>>> Received e-mail messages, it seems just the html- type, have really
>>> small fonts, too tiny to read, really. It's also some ugly serifed font
>>> that I can't stand.  I can't seem to find any way to change thishelp?
>>
>> I just came across this Thunderbird thread:
>>
>> "UTF-8 messages ignore font/font size settings"
>> 
>>
>> Which points to:
>> Bug 763397 - UTF-8 messages ignore font/font size settings.
>> 
>>
>> +
>> Boris Zbarsky (:bz)  2012-06-11 08:44:34 PDT
>>
>> There are separate sets of font preferences for "Western" and "Other
>> Languages".  I'd think UTF-8 would typically use the latter...
>>
>> Alessandro Crismani (New to Bugzilla)  2012-06-11 08:47:29 PDT
>>
>> Changing the preferences for "other languages" fixes it for me, I have
>> again visible fonts for UTF-8 encoded messages.
>> +
>>
>> Phil
>>
> Aahhh!  That did the trick.  I thank you.  My eyes thank you (they feel 
> much better now).  Sois this a bug?  

Yes.

> Will it be fixed?   

It hasn't since 2006, so I wouldn't hold my breath:

[Clarify font prefs - Outgoing Mail as UTF-8 (Unicode) results in
strange font behaviour (rename "Other Languages" to "Unicode" in the
"Fonts & Encodings" dialog)]
and the workaround was also in that same bug (which is still open btw,
so 763397 should probably be tagged as a duplicate of 323747) in 2008:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323747#c5

I went to TB Preferences > Display > Formatting > Fonts & Encodings

At "Fonts for" I switched from Western to Other Languages.

There the fixed font was indeed Courier. I changed this to my preferred
font Consolas. Now Western and UTF-8 mails work without any problems.
Every line is in Consolas.

Problem was: the pull-down menu entry reads Other Languages instead of
Unicode or UTF-8. I never guessed that I had to enter there my preferred
fonts also.


> Or do I 
> have to try to remember to change these "other languages" settings from 
> now on?

Yes (IMO).
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Why doesn't SeaMonkey mail anymore show the input folder?!?

[Paul B. Gallagher]

Otto Wyss wrote:


Since the new version Seamonkey shows an empty window instead of the
previously set input folder after the start? How can I reset this?


Start by looking at your settings under Edit | Preferences | Appearance:

When SeaMonkey starts up, open
[ ] Browser
[x] Mail & Newsgroups
[ ] Composer
[ ] Address Book
[ ] ChatZilla

If "Mail & Newsgroups" is already checked, then look at the properties 
of the shortcut you use to launch SM. Are there any options selected 
after "...seamonkey.exe"?


I don't know of any way to force it to open the last open folder (in my 
experience, it does so without being told), but perhaps someone else 
does. For my purposes, as long as the mail/news window is open, it's 
enough that I can click the desired folder to show its contents.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Automatic Updates Update Question

[Jens Hatlak]

Rob Steinmetz wrote:

I recall early on using Seamonkey that if a Windows user did not have
sufficient permissions to install software but had automatic updates
turned on the update would download and then fail to install. Everytime
the user started Seamonkey after that, even after you actually installed
the update as administrator, those users would still get repeated
attempted updates until the update file was deleted.

Am I misremembering and if not has that been fixed?


AFAIK the check for updates part has been fixed since at least SM 2.0:
 [1]

Not sure about cases where an update has already been downloaded using a 
SM version without the above fix, but if the check for updates part 
really has been fixed so long ago, this hardly affects anyone still.


[1] Of course there's the possibility that this regressed meanwhile; 
didn't check.


HTH

Jens

--
Jens Hatlak 
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker 
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: minidumps folder -- what are these files?

[Ray_Net]

David E. Ross wrote, On 13/06/2012 17:06:

On 6/12/12 10:22 AM, Bob Fleischer wrote:

With the latest versions of Firefox and SeaMonkey, I note that my
profiles have new folders names "minidumps" each containing some files.

What are these?

Bob


I see the folders in all four of my profiles, but they are all empty.

Just before my folder began to have files - the first one is dated 
10/06/2012 11:23


Could this caused by this windows update ?

Update for Windows 7 (KB2718704)
Installation date: ‎09/‎06/‎2012 22:41
Installation status: Successful
Update type: Important
Install this update to resolve an issue which requires an update to the 
certificate revocation list on Windows systems and to keep your systems 
certificate list up to date. After you install this update, you may have 
to restart your system.

More information:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2718704


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Need Technical Support on your product

[Michael Gordon]

Tragianese Mark wrote:

I current have down loaded Sea Dog 2.10 to my new IMAC 27" running version 10.7.2  Lion.   I have chosen Sea Dog because it is a 
WYSIWYG editor.  I was using Mozilla before on my early IMAC running OS 10.4  Tiger and it worked fine.   When I upgraded to my new IMAC I 
started working with Sea Dog.  I can't get Sea Dog to  "Publish"  my changes to my web site I used it for editing.  My site is 
www.tragband.com  and  I purchased it from  "Go Daddy.com"   I got  my user name and password 
from them and the correct  "paths" as well as my IP address.   What happens is that I can go into my site after opening  Sea 
Monkey.   I can go to  Edit page.  I can make changes to  texts or graphics  but  when I go to "Publish"  I get this  error " 
Unknown Publishing Error".
Has anyone had this error and can help what to do?
Thanks!
Mark Tragianese
800-800-0019 ext 75006




Mark,

Let em clue you into a few net etiquette rules.
1. It is very rude to invite someone into your web site and the assault 
them with loud blasting sound files.
 2. It is very rude to invite someone into your web site with automatic 
sound file playing.
3. It is very rude to invite someone into your web site and the assault 
them with brightly flashing banner ads.
4. When inviting someone into your web site show the kindness you would 
if you invited them into your Mother's home.
5. Show the availability of the sound files, turn off the flashing 
banner ad, and make visitors comfortable and desiring to return.


For the problem you posted with Composer.  The first time you tried to 
publish with Composer it should have asked you for your User ID Name and 
Password,  that is required to gain access to your domain named site to 
add and remove files.


Composer cannot delete files from your domain named web site root 
directory, or sub-directories.  You need a specific FTP program to add 
and remove files from a web site directory.


You might look at WS_FTP Lite (I think it is still free).
There are many other free FTP programs available.  Be sure you select 
one that will display your web files on your computer and on your server 
side by side.


Michael G

 --
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Why doesn't SeaMonkey mail anymore show the input folder?!?

[Rickles]

Otto Wyss wrote:

Since the new version Seamonkey shows an empty window instead of the
previously set input folder after the start? How can I reset this?
It's a bug, Bugzilla # 748899.  The only way we've seen so far to 
guarantee your mail window opens the way you want is to open a browser 
window first, then open mail from there, using the little envelope icon 
in the lower left corner of the browser window.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Reload MAPI.

[hawker]

I just figured out an acceptable work around.
If you Right Mouse on the folder, select Properties then "repair folder" 
it seems to fix the problem. Or it did in a test case of 1 out of 1.


Hawker

On 6/13/2012 2:30 PM, Philip TAYLOR wrote:

Also regularly experienced here, the only difference being that I use the
IMAP protocol to retrieve the messages from an Exchange (2010)
server; I believe the problems first manifested themselves when the
server was "upgraded" to Exhange 2010.

Philip Taylor

hawker wrote:

Is there a command to re-load an e-mail?
I keep having issues with attachments (mostly larger PDFs for some
reason) that do not fully download and do not open.
They look fine in the web mail interface. I am using MAPI interface to
an exchange server.
Is there a command to ask Seamonkey to re-download the attachments? I
suspect the download process is being stopped mid process, perhaps
because I switch tabs before it completes, and never fully downloads.
The file size when saved is always smaller than it should be.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey






___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Automatic Updates Update Question

[Rob Steinmetz]

The recent discussion of the automatic update for Seamonkey 2.10 
reminded me of why I turned automatic updates off.


I recall early on using Seamonkey that if a Windows user did not have 
sufficient permissions to install software but had automatic updates 
turned on the update would download and then fail to install. Everytime 
the user started Seamonkey after that, even after you actually installed 
the update as administrator, those users would still get repeated 
attempted updates until the update file was deleted.


Am I misremembering and if not has that been fixed?

--
Rob
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Reload MAPI.

[Philip TAYLOR]

Also regularly experienced here, the only difference being that I use the
IMAP protocol to retrieve the messages from an Exchange (2010)
server; I believe the problems first manifested themselves when the
server was "upgraded" to Exhange 2010.

Philip Taylor

hawker wrote:

  Is there a command to re-load an e-mail?
I keep having issues with attachments (mostly larger PDFs for some 
reason) that do not fully download and do not open.
They look fine in the web mail interface. I am using MAPI interface to 
an exchange server.
Is there a command to ask Seamonkey to re-download the attachments?  I 
suspect the download process is being stopped mid process, perhaps 
because I switch tabs before it completes, and never fully downloads. 
The file size when saved is always smaller than it should be.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reload MAPI.

[hawker]

  Is there a command to re-load an e-mail?
I keep having issues with attachments (mostly larger PDFs for some 
reason) that do not fully download and do not open.
They look fine in the web mail interface. I am using MAPI interface to 
an exchange server.
Is there a command to ask Seamonkey to re-download the attachments?  I 
suspect the download process is being stopped mid process, perhaps 
because I switch tabs before it completes, and never fully downloads. 
The file size when saved is always smaller than it should be.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Need Technical Support on your product

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Tragianese Mark wrote:

> My site is www.trag

Please. The next time you publish your web site's URL, advise readers to 
turn off their speakers first.

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.10 under Linux does not find its shared libraries

[Jochen Roderburg]

On 2012-06-12, Hartmut Figge  wrote:
> Jochen Roderburg:
>
>>Problem solved now, see parallel thread titled "XPCOMGlueLoad error".   :-)
>
> The next one will come. Surely. :)
>
> Hart 'd&r' mut

Most certainly.
New versions, new features, new bugs.
Same procedure as every year.
Source of endless fun.  ;-)

CU, Jochen

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Fonts in e-mails

[G Tod]

Philip Chee wrote:

On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 03:46:38 -0500, G Tod wrote:

Received e-mail messages, it seems just the html- type, have really
small fonts, too tiny to read, really. It's also some ugly serifed font
that I can't stand.  I can't seem to find any way to change thishelp?


I just came across this Thunderbird thread:

"UTF-8 messages ignore font/font size settings"


Which points to:
Bug 763397 - UTF-8 messages ignore font/font size settings.


+
Boris Zbarsky (:bz)  2012-06-11 08:44:34 PDT

There are separate sets of font preferences for "Western" and "Other
Languages".  I'd think UTF-8 would typically use the latter...

Alessandro Crismani (New to Bugzilla)  2012-06-11 08:47:29 PDT

Changing the preferences for "other languages" fixes it for me, I have
again visible fonts for UTF-8 encoded messages.
+

Phil

Aahhh!  That did the trick.  I thank you.  My eyes thank you (they feel 
much better now).  Sois this a bug?  Will it be fixed?   Or do I 
have to try to remember to change these "other languages" settings from 
now on?


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Need Technical Support on your product

[Tragianese Mark]

I current have down loaded Sea Dog 2.10 to my new IMAC 27" running version 
10.7.2  Lion.   I have chosen Sea Dog because it is a WYSIWYG editor.  I was 
using Mozilla before on my early IMAC running OS 10.4  Tiger and it worked 
fine.   When I upgraded to my new IMAC I started working with Sea Dog.  I can't 
get Sea Dog to  "Publish"  my changes to my web site I used it for editing.  My 
site is www.tragband.com and  I purchased it from  
"Go Daddy.com"   I got  my user name and password from them and the correct  
"paths" as well as my IP address.   What happens is that I can go into my site 
after opening  Sea Monkey.   I can go to  Edit page.  I can make changes to  
texts or graphics  but  when I go to "Publish"  I get this  error " Unknown 
Publishing Error".
Has anyone had this error and can help what to do?
Thanks!
Mark Tragianese
800-800-0019 ext 75006
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

1)Lesezeichen,2) Email-Filter

[Norbert Esch]

Win XP prof de mit SP3 & letzte SM Version
Seit dem Umstieg auf die neuen SM Version haben sich folgende
Verschlimm-Besserungen eingeschlichen, 1)es werden zuvor angelegte
Lesezeichen-Ordner (Kategorien) nicht angezeigt bzw nur teilweise im
Fenster angezeigt und 2) Fehler beim Email Filter-Handling:
1a) Lesezeichen =>Lesezeichenablegen: erscheint Fenster:   "
Lesezeichen anlegen"
im Auswahl-Bereich => ORDNER : Lesezeichen-Menü:  liefert der  nur 5 Kategorien-Ansichten zur Auswahl (:
zeigt aber noch alle an!!)
1b)wie oben , aber  entschwindet und läßt keinen Namen
eintragen ,statt dessen erscheint  am Ende aller Kategorienlisten der
neue Ordner als Ordner mit dem Namen :"NEUER ORDNER" d.h. er muß
nachträglich erst nochmals über das Menu > Bearbeiten Eigenschaften
erst zu dem umbenannt werden wie es beim Button  gleich
hätte möglich sein sollen.
2a) neu angelegte Email Filter fallen am Listenende einfach raus und
verschwinden im Nirwana
und müssen somit  erneut angelegt werden
2b)Beim Verschieben ganzer Email -Listen -Filter-Zweige und deren
Inhalten unter EMAILS> EXTRAS> Nachrichten-Filter werden alle Filter
mit dem Verschobenen Listenzweig als Ziel für die  Email-Filterung auf
den Wert (Inhalt)der verschobenen
Position geändert.d.h. verschiebe ich von den Filter-Zweigen
A,B,C,D,E den Komplettinhalt von D durch up/down Sortier-Button ,
zwischen die  Ablage-Folder A-B sodaß die Filter-Reihenfolge: A-C-D
entsteht, so ändern sich alle dazwischen und danach-liegenden Filter
auf die Abfrage-Email-Adresse von D und alle Filter müssen einzeln
nachbearbeitet und auf Ihre korrekte email-filter Adresse entsprechend
dem jeweilen Filter zurückkorrigiert werden
die o.g. Probleme wurden mehrfach reproduziert und ich weiß aber nicht
ob hier die richtige  Stelle bzw Ansprechpartner dafür  überhaupt zu
finden sind.
Sorry  bin eben Anfänger
Gruß Norbert Esch
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: location bar blank, bookmarks toolbar only has "home"

[Bob Fleischer]

Bob Fleischer wrote:

I seem to have damaged my profile in such a way that browser windows no
longer show the bookmarks toolbar (the space for the bar is there, as is
the "Home" icon on the left, and it is selected under "show/hide").
Also, the location bar remains blank as I browse.

My profile still has the bookmark data, including the bookmarks for the
bookmarks toolbar -- I can see them if I go to "Manage Bookmarks".

It appears as if some UI information is damaged.  How do I fix it?

Bob
Well, I tried safe mode but it too had the main problem--the bookmarks 
toolbar and location bar not working correctly.  I tried all the usual 
delete this and delete that files, to no improvement in the situation.


(Other browser-based tool windows didn't work either; e.g, the add-ons 
manager window came up totally blank.)


I realized I had a file backup from less than a month ago, I restored 
everything but my mail folders (which seemed to be intact), and 
everything is working OK now.


Bob

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Noticingcan not sign in to websites I have user Name and password to.

[PhillipJones]

Philip Chee wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:51:18 -0400, PhillipJones wrote:

To day wasn't able to sign in to Linkedin or Onstar either using
SeaMonkey and FireFox. was able to using Chrome. have the developers
screwed with javascript on websites so much now you can't sign in. And
the other day there was another Web site I couldn't get into with either.

since this affects FireFox as well I am posting in FF group as well.


I don't know about Onstar but Linkedin just had a few million of it's
users passwords stolen.

Phil

I changed mine ASAP after this was announced while they were fumbling 
with deciding if it actually happened. a few years ago FaceBook had the 
worste ever in the entire history of the Internet  password breach. 
There customers should immediately quit them causing them to go out of 
business.
Companies are depending upon other companies to securely keep passwords 
for them. And these security companies are lax in keeping them safe. 
Those companies should be held accountable for each and every password 
breached and pay restitution to each person that becomes a victim. The 
shoul be using the highest availble security known. That would take one 
of those Cray super computer working 24/7 5000 years to crack.  and 
aanyone in charge of the password woul be immediately sent to prison if 
he so much as hints what the password is.


--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: minidumps folder -- what are these files?

[David E. Ross]

On 6/12/12 10:22 AM, Bob Fleischer wrote:
> With the latest versions of Firefox and SeaMonkey, I note that my 
> profiles have new folders names "minidumps" each containing some files.
> 
> What are these?
> 
> Bob
> 

I see the folders in all four of my profiles, but they are all empty.

-- 

David E. Ross
.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation.
© 1997 by David E. Ross
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: minidumps folder -- what are these files?

[Ray_Net]

Bob Fleischer wrote, On 12/06/2012 19:22:
With the latest versions of Firefox and SeaMonkey, I note that my 
profiles have new folders names "minidumps" each containing some files.


What are these?


I have also those files, starting 10 june 2012 - nothing before.
I had updated (to 2.8) a long time ago - so this is not the cause.
Should a experience Crashes ? If yes, the crashes are in the background.
I sthere nobody to help us with that issue ? Should we post a bug report ?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Poor performance with profile on SD card

[David Wilkinson]

Jim Taylor wrote:

Yes, I think you have found the cause (actually I guess it's the source, the
cause is still undetermined) of your performance problem. It would be
interesting to test the card on Windows 7 or XP or another machine. In any case
it's good to know that CrystalDiskMark runs on Windows 8.


I tested this card on my Windows 7 x64 desktop machine (using an external card 
reader) and got very similar results:


---
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
   Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
---
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

   Sequential Read :18.171 MB/s
  Sequential Write :11.250 MB/s
 Random Read 512KB :17.789 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 0.356 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 3.058 MB/s [   746.6 IOPS]
   Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 0.003 MB/s [ 0.8 IOPS]
   Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 4.018 MB/s [   981.0 IOPS]
  Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 0.003 MB/s [ 0.8 IOPS]

  Test : 1000 MB [I: 24.4% (7.3/29.8 GB)] (x5)
  Date : 2012/06/13 9:28:28
OS : Windows 7 Ultimate Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)

-

So I guess it is the card...

I have a couple of 8GB cards around somewhere, and if I can find them I will 
test them also.


Thanks for telling me about CrystalDiskMark!

--
David Wilkinson
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Why doesn't SeaMonkey mail anymore show the input folder?!?

[Otto Wyss]

Since the new version Seamonkey shows an empty window instead of the previously 
set input folder after the start? How can I reset this?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: XPCOMGlueLoad error

[Peter Nieman]

On 12/06/12 17:47, Jens Hatlak wrote:

Sounds like the following, which will be fixed in SM 2.10.1:




Thanks!

Peter
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Fonts in e-mails

[Philip Chee]

On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 03:46:38 -0500, G Tod wrote:
> Received e-mail messages, it seems just the html- type, have really 
> small fonts, too tiny to read, really. It's also some ugly serifed font 
> that I can't stand.  I can't seem to find any way to change thishelp?

I just came across this Thunderbird thread:

"UTF-8 messages ignore font/font size settings"


Which points to:
Bug 763397 - UTF-8 messages ignore font/font size settings.


+
Boris Zbarsky (:bz)  2012-06-11 08:44:34 PDT

There are separate sets of font preferences for "Western" and "Other
Languages".  I'd think UTF-8 would typically use the latter...

Alessandro Crismani (New to Bugzilla)  2012-06-11 08:47:29 PDT

Changing the preferences for "other languages" fixes it for me, I have
again visible fonts for UTF-8 encoded messages.
+

Phil

-- 
Philip Chee , 
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org
Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief,
oh Night, and so be good for us to pass.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 2.10 Problem

[Desiree]

"Tom Pamin"  wrote in message 
news:jdcdnrup6ug9ku_snz2dnuvz_qmdn...@mozilla.org...
> Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
>> It seems to use noticeably less CPU and memory than 2.9, but for some 
>> reason, 2.10 goes apeshit every few minutes and pegs one CPU core for a 
>> few seconds, going nonresponsive.  After a few seconds, it is fine again. 
>> However, it repeats every few minutes.
>>
>> Usually, it seems that the freeze is precipitated when I try to scroll 
>> content in one of the browser tabs.  I have a large number of tabs open 
>> and the process is using 1.3GB RAM.  This is on Windows 7 Pro x64 on a 
>> machine with 8GB RAM and a 2.5GHz Core 2 Duo.  I do have a few Addons 
>> running, and I will list them if necessary.
>>
>> This is quite annoying as it makes it pretty difficult to watch YouTube 
>> movies and the like.  Thanks.
>>
>> Peace...  Sridhar
>
> 2.10 is locking up terribly on my XP PC. Never really saw anything like it 
> on a release version. IE works fine, so I went back to 2.91 for SM, and 
> all is well. Was 2.10 tested sufficiently?
>

I've read all this bad stuff about 2.10 and I still have 2.7 on my host XP 
Pro machine so I was afraid to install it. I decided to install it a few 
hours ago on a virtual machine on XP Pro instead of the host machine. It 
works great so far. I just watched over an hour of tiger movies at youtube 
with no problems. I installed the extensions I have on 2.7 and they work 
fine.  I did not have SM on this guest machine at all so this was a clean 
install of 2.10 not an upgrade on top of an earlier version. That might have 
something to do with it working so well. 


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Fonts in e-mails

[G Tod]

G Tod wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

G Tod wrote:


Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

The most important setting if your incoming mail looks too small is the
minimum font size. The basic size setting applies when the HTML
document
(message or web page) doesn't specify a size; the minimum kicks in
if it
does specify a size smaller than the minimum


Thanks for taking the time, Paul.  So...if the minimum is supposed to
kick in if it does specify a smaller size, then there's something wrong
with my SM mail?  Because this is obviously not happening, with my
minimum set to 16 and no serifed fonts selected anywhere, I still get
tiny, serifed fonts...sounds like something's out of whack?

Or, is it possible the authors have somehow specified this particular
tiny font and "locked" it in so the recipient's mail program cannot
change it?


OK, two more questions:

1) What happens if you do CTRL-0 (numeral zero, not letter "O")? That
should reset the size. Doesn't it?


Yes, it does.



2) If you examine the full headers, can you find a line reading
charset=""? For example, if the sender specifies
charset="UTF-8" do you get different results from charset="Western"?


I'm not real sure exactly what I'm looking for here, but I see
nothing that says charset ="Western".  I checked the "Content-Type"
lines and found the following:

E-mails with the "tiny text syndrome" had the following Content Types:

text/html; charset="UTF-8"

text/html; charset=utf-8

multipart/alternative; boundary="_--=_MCPart_1593885945"

multipart/alternative; boundary="_--=_MCPart_669633312"

multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_5b0d220a1ea9cbaf6856fe8ef0fb81b5"

multipart/mixed; boundary=4Oz1cemc-VaPAg2ba9qUy7nc-P.mV

E-mails from one source with the following content type show up properly:

multipart/alternative; boundary="=_NextPart_000_02B2_01CD447D.ADE6FE90"

Also, I see some of my plain text messages are showing up in Arial and
some in Verdana.?  Two fonts I have chosen in Edit - Preferences -
Appearance - Fonts.  But I can't understand why the same one is not
being used all the time.


Hmmm...this is maybe a little weird...one of these problem e-mails has 
suddenly shown up with a content type of:  text/html; charset=us-ascii, 
which was previously text/html; charset=utf-8, and now the fonts are 
showing up just fine:  the type and size I want them to be!


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Fonts in e-mails

[Paul B. Gallagher]

G Tod wrote:


Paul B. Gallagher wrote:


OK, two more questions:

1) What happens if you do CTRL-0 (numeral zero, not letter "O")? That
should reset the size. Doesn't it?


Yes, it does.


Good, then do that whenever you need to. You can still use CTRL-+/- or 
the mouse wheel to increase/decrease zoom on the fly.



2) If you examine the full headers, can you find a line reading
charset=""? For example, if the sender specifies
charset="UTF-8" do you get different results from charset="Western"?


I'm not real sure exactly what I'm looking for here, but I see
nothing that says charset ="Western".


The most common examples in my incoming mail that would qualify as 
Western are US-ASCII, Windows-1252, and ISO-8859-1.


When you manually select the encoding for a message, the first item on 
the list reads "Western (ISO-8859-1)." You can refer to this list if you 
see an unfamiliar abbreviation such as EUC-KR because it gives the 
friendly name of each as well. Less-common Western encodings include 
ISO-8859-15, IBM-850, and MacRoman.



I checked the "Content-Type" lines and found the following:

E-mails with the "tiny text syndrome" had the following Content Types:

text/html; charset="UTF-8"

text/html; charset=utf-8

...


Hmm... So it's the Unicode messages that are affected.

On my machine, the zoom commands (CTRL-+/0/- and CTRL-mouse-wheel) 
affect all messages uniformly. Is this not so for you?


Of course, if one sender specifies 6 pt type and another specifies 12 pt 
type, the first will need help. But zooming will increase both by the 
same ratio. So when I get done with an uncooperative message, I do 
CTRL-0 to return to standard zoom for the rest of my mail.



Also, I see some of my plain text messages are showing up in Arial and
some in Verdana.?  Two fonts I have chosen in Edit - Preferences -
Appearance - Fonts.  But I can't understand why the same one is not
being used all the time.


If you've chosen both, then you must've specified one for some 
circumstances and the other for other circumstances, right? For example, 
if you chose Arial for Cursive and Verdana for Fantasy, and the incoming 
mail used both cursive and fantasy fonts, you'd see both.


If you really want one font to be used all the time, then that's what 
you have to specify. Computers are really good at following orders -- to 
the point that if you give them a stupid order, they'll do that, too. 
The paradoxical bit is that if you give them a smart order, they can 
sometimes foul it up. ;-)


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey