the life of the jews since 1913
http://www.israelvideonetwork.com/unbelievable-video-footage-from-israel-in-1913/ -- Vink home:http://ciudadpatricia.com User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/34.0 SeaMonkey/2.31b2 Build identifier: 20141020202138 /* * Oops. The kernel tried to access some bad page. We'll have to * terminate things with extreme prejudice. */ die_if_kernel(Oops, regs, error_code); -- From linux/arch/i386/mm/fault.c ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Flashblock 1.5 can be made to work in SeaMonkey 2.31!
Daniel wrote on 12/12/2014 8:27 PM: On 13/12/14 03:26, Ed Mullen wrote: Daniel wrote on 12/12/2014 7:14 AM: On 12/12/14 02:51, David E. Ross wrote: On 12/11/2014 12:30 AM, Daniel wrote: On 11/12/14 14:12, David E. Ross wrote: Snip Flashblock 1.5.18 is for Firefox. The latest version for SeaMonkey is 1.3.21, which should be good even for SeaMonkey versions starting with 3.nnn. What SeaMonkey versions start with 3.nnn.?? Or do you mean SM 2.3nn, David?? No, I really meant 3.nnn. The install.rdf file for Flashblock 1.3.21 anticipates a future SeaMonkey version number beginning with 3. Note the em:maxVersion in the following fragment from that install.rdf file: !-- Seamonkey TNG -- em:targetApplication Description em:id{92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a}/em:id em:minVersion2.1/em:minVersion em:maxVersion3.*/em:maxVersion /Description /em:targetApplication Ahh!! So it should work for every edition up to and *excluding* ver 3.n!! That seems reasonable. Err, I think that means up to and INCLUDING ver. 3.x. So does that mean it's good up to Ver 3.99?? Yes. I thought the maxVersion was the Version at which it would stop working!! It stops working when the version exceeds what is specified. In this example, the extension would not be compatible with SM version 4.x. -- Ed Mullen http://edmullen.net/ When it rains, why don't sheep shrink? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in? - SOLVED
Thanks Paul! Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Miles Fidelman wrote: Hi Folks, So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash plug-in if it's older than a certain version. But.. the update button takes one to a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions: You're right, that's really user-unfriendly and has been for some time. 1. How does one update it?, or If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I assume you're referring to http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download center. Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through all the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player Download Center near the bottom. 2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video (there is no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for extensions). (Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh) On Windows, the program has to be removed via the Control Panel -- it's not a feature of the browser, but an independent program (though it does generally play nice with the browser). For the Mac, look here: https://forums.adobe.com/thread/928315 -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. Yogi Berra ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?
Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 1:18 AM: Miles Fidelman wrote: Hi Folks, So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash plug-in if it's older than a certain version. But.. the update button takes one to a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions: You're right, that's really user-unfriendly and has been for some time. 1. How does one update it?, or If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I assume you're referring to http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download center. Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through all the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player Download Center near the bottom. 2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video (there is no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for extensions). (Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh) On Windows, the program has to be removed via the Control Panel -- it's not a feature of the browser, but an independent program (though it does generally play nice with the browser). For the Mac, look here: https://forums.adobe.com/thread/928315 Why not go directly there? https://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/downloads.html -- Ed Mullen http://edmullen.net/ I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. And tomorrow isn't looking good either. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.31 chase web site
On 12/12/2014 03:12 PM, David H. Durgee wrote: Marisa Ciceran wrote: Same problem here as of the start of this weekend. I've been on the phone several times with Chase support about this and this time the agent I spoke to said he sent a note to their compatibility developers. I am on 64-bit Windows 7 Pro on on ASUSI7 4790k processor. Marisa NoOp wrote: On 12/08/2014 10:21 AM, Lemuel Johnson wrote: On 12/8/2014 10:52 AM, NoOp wrote: On 12/08/2014 05:23 AM, J. Weaver Jr. wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Ron wrote: Just got the 2.31 upgrade now I can't log in to my account on chase.com I hit logon it just reloads the log on page. Works in IE and Seamonkey 2.30 Same thing happening here. This is frustrating. Can I go back to Seamonkey 2.30? Or maybe spoof the browser to firefox (which used to work when bank sites didn't accept SeaMonkey)? Same problem here: worked great with IE 2.30, not at all with 2.31. sigh Is there a Bugzilla entry for this yet? -JW https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109471 ( Unable to login at chase.com due to NS_ERROR_FAILURE (SeaMonkey only)) and for reference, here is a previous one that was fixed last year: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=924025 (Unable to log in at chase.com) I believe that's actually https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1094714 Lem Johnson You are correct - thanks for the catch! Gary Well, that is enough reason to hold back from upgrading for me! I have a Chase account, so until this is fixed or there is a work-around this one is a show-stopper. Dave There is a workaround: Use Firefox to login to your Chase account. WFM ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.31 chase web site
NoOp wrote: On 12/12/2014 03:12 PM, David H. Durgee wrote: Marisa Ciceran wrote: Same problem here as of the start of this weekend. I've been on the phone several times with Chase support about this and this time the agent I spoke to said he sent a note to their compatibility developers. I am on 64-bit Windows 7 Pro on on ASUSI7 4790k processor. Marisa NoOp wrote: On 12/08/2014 10:21 AM, Lemuel Johnson wrote: On 12/8/2014 10:52 AM, NoOp wrote: On 12/08/2014 05:23 AM, J. Weaver Jr. wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Ron wrote: Just got the 2.31 upgrade now I can't log in to my account on chase.com I hit logon it just reloads the log on page. Works in IE and Seamonkey 2.30 Same thing happening here. This is frustrating. Can I go back to Seamonkey 2.30? Or maybe spoof the browser to firefox (which used to work when bank sites didn't accept SeaMonkey)? Same problem here: worked great with IE 2.30, not at all with 2.31. sigh Is there a Bugzilla entry for this yet? -JW https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109471 ( Unable to login at chase.com due to NS_ERROR_FAILURE (SeaMonkey only)) and for reference, here is a previous one that was fixed last year: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=924025 (Unable to log in at chase.com) I believe that's actually https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1094714 Lem Johnson You are correct - thanks for the catch! Gary Well, that is enough reason to hold back from upgrading for me! I have a Chase account, so until this is fixed or there is a work-around this one is a show-stopper. Dave There is a workaround: Use Firefox to login to your Chase account. WFM I hate that new FireFox interface, so this is not a reasonable alternative to having SeaMonkey work with Chase. Dave ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.31 chase web site
On 12/13/2014 09:37 AM, David H. Durgee wrote: NoOp wrote: On 12/12/2014 03:12 PM, David H. Durgee wrote: Marisa Ciceran wrote: Same problem here as of the start of this weekend. I've been on the phone several times with Chase support about this and this time the agent I spoke to said he sent a note to their compatibility developers. I am on 64-bit Windows 7 Pro on on ASUSI7 4790k processor. Marisa NoOp wrote: On 12/08/2014 10:21 AM, Lemuel Johnson wrote: On 12/8/2014 10:52 AM, NoOp wrote: On 12/08/2014 05:23 AM, J. Weaver Jr. wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Ron wrote: Just got the 2.31 upgrade now I can't log in to my account on chase.com I hit logon it just reloads the log on page. Works in IE and Seamonkey 2.30 Same thing happening here. This is frustrating. Can I go back to Seamonkey 2.30? Or maybe spoof the browser to firefox (which used to work when bank sites didn't accept SeaMonkey)? Same problem here: worked great with IE 2.30, not at all with 2.31. sigh Is there a Bugzilla entry for this yet? -JW https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109471 ( Unable to login at chase.com due to NS_ERROR_FAILURE (SeaMonkey only)) and for reference, here is a previous one that was fixed last year: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=924025 (Unable to log in at chase.com) I believe that's actually https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1094714 Lem Johnson You are correct - thanks for the catch! Gary Well, that is enough reason to hold back from upgrading for me! I have a Chase account, so until this is fixed or there is a work-around this one is a show-stopper. Dave There is a workaround: Use Firefox to login to your Chase account. WFM I hate that new FireFox interface, so this is not a reasonable alternative to having SeaMonkey work with Chase. Dave https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/classicthemerestorer/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Silverlight not working with SM 2.31
I updated the Silverlight plugin, since I got a warning that it was outdated. SeaMonkey will not use it. If I clear the placeholder from plugins click-to-play, there is nothing under it. Firefox and Safari both work with Silverlight with no problem. Is there any way to fix Silverlight for SeaMonkey? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?
Miles Fidelman wrote: Hi Folks, So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash plug-in if it's older than a certain version. But.. the update button takes one to a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions: 1. How does one update it?, or 2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video (there is no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for extensions). (Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh) Help! Thanks, Miles Fidelman You can install a new version of Flash and it will simply replace the old plugin in Mac OS. I get my Flash plugin from here: http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Third-party cookie question
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: This evening, I cleared all private data (including cache and cookies), and then visited nhl.com. Immediately after aborting their troublesome javascript,* I inspected my cookies and discovered that google.com had set a cookie. Now, my cookie policy at Edit | Preferences | Privacy Security | Cookies is Allow cookies for the originating website only (no third-party cookies). So how was Google able to set a cookie if I never visited their site? It's bad enough that they update their dossier on me when I visit their own sites, do they have to do it everywhere else, too?\ More to the point, how can I set SeaMonkey to do as it says and block third-party cookies? * -- They have a series of annoying scripts that grind SM to a halt and must be aborted before the site becomes usable. The URLs are constantly changing; today's version was at http://cdn.nhle.com/projects/ice3-ui/com.nhl.ice3.ui.t5.components/GlobalPageImports/dist/js/GlobalPageImports.min.js?v=8.9:1. And I'm constantly updating my custom filter in AdBlock Plus. That isn't my question. Even though I default to blocking cookies, I added an exception to block Google cookies, just to make sure. That works. I have no Google cookies. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Flashblock 1.5 can be made to work in SeaMonkey 2.31!
Daniel wrote: On 13/12/14 03:26, Ed Mullen wrote: Daniel wrote on 12/12/2014 7:14 AM: On 12/12/14 02:51, David E. Ross wrote: On 12/11/2014 12:30 AM, Daniel wrote: On 11/12/14 14:12, David E. Ross wrote: Snip Flashblock 1.5.18 is for Firefox. The latest version for SeaMonkey is 1.3.21, which should be good even for SeaMonkey versions starting with 3.nnn. What SeaMonkey versions start with 3.nnn.?? Or do you mean SM 2.3nn, David?? No, I really meant 3.nnn. The install.rdf file for Flashblock 1.3.21 anticipates a future SeaMonkey version number beginning with 3. Note the em:maxVersion in the following fragment from that install.rdf file: !-- Seamonkey TNG -- em:targetApplication Description em:id{92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a}/em:id em:minVersion2.1/em:minVersion em:maxVersion3.*/em:maxVersion /Description /em:targetApplication Ahh!! So it should work for every edition up to and *excluding* ver 3.n!! That seems reasonable. Err, I think that means up to and INCLUDING ver. 3.x. So does that mean it's good up to Ver 3.99?? I thought the maxVersion was the Version at which it would stop working!! The max version is the version beyond which it stops working. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?
Ed Mullen wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 1:18 AM: Miles Fidelman wrote: Hi Folks, So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash plug-in if it's older than a certain version. But.. the update button takes one to a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions: You're right, that's really user-unfriendly and has been for some time. 1. How does one update it?, or If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I assume you're referring to http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download center. Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through all the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player Download Center near the bottom. 2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video (there is no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for extensions). (Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh) On Windows, the program has to be removed via the Control Panel -- it's not a feature of the browser, but an independent program (though it does generally play nice with the browser). For the Mac, look here: https://forums.adobe.com/thread/928315 Why not go directly there? https://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/downloads.html Yes, I agree the plugins check should link there, but it doesn't. Should the user have to bookmark or memorize that link instead, or come here to ask for it? -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Third-party cookie question
EE wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: This evening, I cleared all private data (including cache and cookies), and then visited nhl.com. Immediately after aborting their troublesome javascript,* I inspected my cookies and discovered that google.com had set a cookie. Now, my cookie policy at Edit | Preferences | Privacy Security | Cookies is Allow cookies for the originating website only (no third-party cookies). So how was Google able to set a cookie if I never visited their site? It's bad enough that they update their dossier on me when I visit their own sites, do they have to do it everywhere else, too?\ More to the point, how can I set SeaMonkey to do as it says and block third-party cookies? * -- They have a series of annoying scripts that grind SM to a halt and must be aborted before the site becomes usable. The URLs are constantly changing; today's version was at http://cdn.nhle.com/projects/ice3-ui/com.nhl.ice3.ui.t5.components/GlobalPageImports/dist/js/GlobalPageImports.min.js?v=8.9:1. And I'm constantly updating my custom filter in AdBlock Plus. That isn't my question. Even though I default to blocking cookies, I added an exception to block Google cookies, just to make sure. That works. I have no Google cookies. That's problematic for me because I do have a gmail account and sometimes use it to login to other sites (as soon as I'm done, I clear the cookies and resume living privately). nhl.com is not one of those, and AFAIK has not been bought by Google the way Yahoo has. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Western vs Unicode - why doesn't SM pick the right one?
flyguy wrote: mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote, On 12/12/2014 2:40 PM: flyguy wrote: mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote, On 12/11/2014 1:42 PM: flyguy wrote: Most of my email displays properly with Western character encoding, but about 10-20% requires selecting Unicode from the ViewCharacter Encoding list. I've tried to make SM select it automatically, but it still doesn't. Is there anyway to make it pick the proper character encoding? It should pick up the encoding from the Content-Type header of the email. Having said that, at one time I used to find the message pane in the main window didn't switch encodings when moving between emails, but pressing F8 a couple of times to hide and then show it again sorted it out. Haven't noticed that problem for a long time now. Even then, fully opening emails in a separate window did use the correct encoding. Alternatively, it could be that the problematic emails have the wrong encoding, or perhaps no encoding, specified in the header. e.g. the sending application has specified iso-8859-1 in the header but actually encoded the content in utf-8. If that's the case, at least you've got an option to manually override the encoding so that it can be displayed correctly ;o) The email has these lines in it: I hope you mean when looking at the message source; you shouldn't see these lines when reading normally (I do occasionally see some of the source in the message pane, but pressing F8 a couple of times to hide and show the message pane fixes that - which you mention below doesn't help in your case so I don't think that's it). Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=_--=_MCPart_1762143897 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed ... and two or three with Content-Type in parenthesis. The content following Content-Type: text/plain... will be the plain text version. If there's a text/html alternative SeaMonkey will probably display that instead, unless you've set View Message Body As Plain Text. I'm not sure what you mean about Content-Type being in parentheses, but that may be the problem. It would be interesting to see the complete structure of one of those emails. If you're not sure what to look for and there's nothing in one of them you don't mind sharing, it's probably easiest to View Message Source, copy the source into a plain text document, and upload it somewhere (or send as an attachment, but copy my address - mozilla-lists.mbourne at spamgourmet.com - if you do that as I think the mailing list strips attachments). I just forwarded the email to your spamgourment address. Thanks, but I'd need the original source. Forwarding causes SeaMonkey to reformat it, with any additional message you add, so loses any original signs of a problem. The following should work (easier than my previous instruction to view and copy the source): - Open the email. - Make sure it is one of the ones which displays incorrectly. - File Save As File - For Save as type, select Mail Files (*.eml) - Save - Attach that file to an email to me Oddly, tonight SM is displaying the email properly. The View Character encoding shows as Unicode after I click on the email, even if I set it to Western beforehand. I'm fairly sure I didn't change anything. I'm not sure, but it's possible that SeaMonkey remembers any manual selections for each email and uses them next time it's opened. Thanks, Mark. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Third-party cookie question
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: EE wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: This evening, I cleared all private data (including cache and cookies), and then visited nhl.com. Immediately after aborting their troublesome javascript,* I inspected my cookies and discovered that google.com had set a cookie. Now, my cookie policy at Edit | Preferences | Privacy Security | Cookies is Allow cookies for the originating website only (no third-party cookies). So how was Google able to set a cookie if I never visited their site? It's bad enough that they update their dossier on me when I visit their own sites, do they have to do it everywhere else, too?\ More to the point, how can I set SeaMonkey to do as it says and block third-party cookies? * -- They have a series of annoying scripts that grind SM to a halt and must be aborted before the site becomes usable. The URLs are constantly changing; today's version was at http://cdn.nhle.com/projects/ice3-ui/com.nhl.ice3.ui.t5.components/GlobalPageImports/dist/js/GlobalPageImports.min.js?v=8.9:1. And I'm constantly updating my custom filter in AdBlock Plus. That isn't my question. Even though I default to blocking cookies, I added an exception to block Google cookies, just to make sure. That works. I have no Google cookies. That's problematic for me because I do have a gmail account and sometimes use it to login to other sites (as soon as I'm done, I clear the cookies and resume living privately). nhl.com is not one of those, and AFAIK has not been bought by Google the way Yahoo has. I'm afraid that Google is among those who insist on setting cookies. Check out this link - https://www.facebook.com/SafariUsersAgainstGooglesSecretTracking ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?
Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 2:19 PM: Ed Mullen wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 1:18 AM: Miles Fidelman wrote: Hi Folks, So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash plug-in if it's older than a certain version. But.. the update button takes one to a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions: You're right, that's really user-unfriendly and has been for some time. 1. How does one update it?, or If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I assume you're referring to http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download center. Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through all the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player Download Center near the bottom. 2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video (there is no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for extensions). (Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh) On Windows, the program has to be removed via the Control Panel -- it's not a feature of the browser, but an independent program (though it does generally play nice with the browser). For the Mac, look here: https://forums.adobe.com/thread/928315 Why not go directly there? https://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/downloads.html Yes, I agree the plugins check should link there, but it doesn't. Should the user have to bookmark or memorize that link instead, or come here to ask for it? Fer God's sake, the user should bookmark the link to the add-on that needs frequent updating. Is that unreasonable? Jesus! Just save the frigging link instead of re-inventing the wheel. -- Ed Mullen http://edmullen.net/ And don't start a sentence with a conjunction. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Sync using SM 2.30
Is it possible to sync the mail and bookmarks with both computers using SM 2.30 and Windows XP? -- You either teach people to treat you with dignity and respect, or you don't. This means you are partly responsible for the mistreatment that you get at the hands of someone else. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Third-party cookie question
HilsB wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: EE wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: This evening, I cleared all private data (including cache and cookies), and then visited nhl.com. Immediately after aborting their troublesome javascript,* I inspected my cookies and discovered that google.com had set a cookie. Now, my cookie policy at Edit | Preferences | Privacy Security | Cookies is Allow cookies for the originating website only (no third-party cookies). So how was Google able to set a cookie if I never visited their site? It's bad enough that they update their dossier on me when I visit their own sites, do they have to do it everywhere else, too?\ More to the point, how can I set SeaMonkey to do as it says and block third-party cookies? * -- They have a series of annoying scripts that grind SM to a halt and must be aborted before the site becomes usable. The URLs are constantly changing; today's version was at http://cdn.nhle.com/projects/ice3-ui/com.nhl.ice3.ui.t5.components/GlobalPageImports/dist/js/GlobalPageImports.min.js?v=8.9:1. And I'm constantly updating my custom filter in AdBlock Plus. That isn't my question. Even though I default to blocking cookies, I added an exception to block Google cookies, just to make sure. That works. I have no Google cookies. That's problematic for me because I do have a gmail account and sometimes use it to login to other sites (as soon as I'm done, I clear the cookies and resume living privately). nhl.com is not one of those, and AFAIK has not been bought by Google the way Yahoo has. I'm afraid that Google is among those who insist on setting cookies. Check out this link - https://www.facebook.com/SafariUsersAgainstGooglesSecretTracking Well aware of that, as I've said twice already. WTF does this have to do with nhl.com? And how can I get SeaMonkey to honor its promise to reject third-party cookies? -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?
Ed Mullen wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 2:19 PM: Ed Mullen wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 1:18 AM: Miles Fidelman wrote: Hi Folks, So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash plug-in if it's older than a certain version. But.. the update button takes one to a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions: You're right, that's really user-unfriendly and has been for some time. 1. How does one update it?, or If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I assume you're referring to http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download center. Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through all the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player Download Center near the bottom. 2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video (there is no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for extensions). (Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh) On Windows, the program has to be removed via the Control Panel -- it's not a feature of the browser, but an independent program (though it does generally play nice with the browser). For the Mac, look here: https://forums.adobe.com/thread/928315 Why not go directly there? https://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/downloads.html Yes, I agree the plugins check should link there, but it doesn't. Should the user have to bookmark or memorize that link instead, or come here to ask for it? Fer God's sake, the user should bookmark the link to the add-on that needs frequent updating. Is that unreasonable? Jesus! Just save the frigging link instead of re-inventing the wheel. This isn't an Adobe support site, it's a SeaMonkey support site. The OP came here because _Mozilla's_ plugin check was so unfriendly he couldn't figure out how to update the plugin. So for us here at mozilla.support.seamonkey the issue is Mozilla's unfriendly plugin check. That's something we should fix. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Flashblock 1.5 can be made to work in SeaMonkey 2.31!
On 14/12/14 05:39, EE wrote: Daniel wrote: On 13/12/14 03:26, Ed Mullen wrote: Daniel wrote on 12/12/2014 7:14 AM: On 12/12/14 02:51, David E. Ross wrote: On 12/11/2014 12:30 AM, Daniel wrote: On 11/12/14 14:12, David E. Ross wrote: Snip Flashblock 1.5.18 is for Firefox. The latest version for SeaMonkey is 1.3.21, which should be good even for SeaMonkey versions starting with 3.nnn. What SeaMonkey versions start with 3.nnn.?? Or do you mean SM 2.3nn, David?? No, I really meant 3.nnn. The install.rdf file for Flashblock 1.3.21 anticipates a future SeaMonkey version number beginning with 3. Note the em:maxVersion in the following fragment from that install.rdf file: !-- Seamonkey TNG -- em:targetApplication Description em:id{92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a}/em:id em:minVersion2.1/em:minVersion em:maxVersion3.*/em:maxVersion /Description /em:targetApplication Ahh!! So it should work for every edition up to and *excluding* ver 3.n!! That seems reasonable. Err, I think that means up to and INCLUDING ver. 3.x. So does that mean it's good up to Ver 3.99?? I thought the maxVersion was the Version at which it would stop working!! The max version is the version beyond which it stops working. Thank you both. I'll try to remember this! ;-) -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.29 Build identifier: 20140829003846 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.31 Build identifier: 20141020202138 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sync using SM 2.30
On 12/13/2014 07:30 PM, JAS wrote: Is it possible to sync the mail and bookmarks with both computers using SM 2.30 and Windows XP? You cannot set up a new Sync account or pair a device anymore (bug 998807). Workaround: Use an older version of SeaMonkey for such tasks for now. REF: [SeaMonkey 2.30 Release Notes](http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.30/) -- One of the millions of Firefox makes me happy users https://input.mozilla.org/en-US/feedback/firefox/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Google/Yahoo (was: Re: Third-party cookie question)
On 14/12/14 06:22, Paul B. Gallagher wrote Snip That's problematic for me because I do have a gmail account and sometimes use it to login to other sites (as soon as I'm done, I clear the cookies and resume living privately). nhl.com is not one of those, and AFAIK has not been bought by Google the way Yahoo has. Sorry, Paul, are you suggesting Google owns Yahoo?? I would have thought there would have been some sort of anti-competition thing going on if this were the case! -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.29 Build identifier: 20140829003846 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.31 Build identifier: 20141020202138 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Third-party cookie question
On 12/13/2014 07:32 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: HilsB wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: EE wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: This evening, I cleared all private data (including cache and cookies), and then visited nhl.com. Immediately after aborting their troublesome javascript,* I inspected my cookies and discovered that google.com had set a cookie. Now, my cookie policy at Edit | Preferences | Privacy Security | Cookies is Allow cookies for the originating website only (no third-party cookies). So how was Google able to set a cookie if I never visited their site? It's bad enough that they update their dossier on me when I visit their own sites, do they have to do it everywhere else, too?\ More to the point, how can I set SeaMonkey to do as it says and block third-party cookies? * -- They have a series of annoying scripts that grind SM to a halt and must be aborted before the site becomes usable. The URLs are constantly changing; today's version was at http://cdn.nhle.com/projects/ice3-ui/com.nhl.ice3.ui.t5.components/GlobalPageImports/dist/js/GlobalPageImports.min.js?v=8.9:1. And I'm constantly updating my custom filter in AdBlock Plus. That isn't my question. Even though I default to blocking cookies, I added an exception to block Google cookies, just to make sure. That works. I have no Google cookies. That's problematic for me because I do have a gmail account and sometimes use it to login to other sites (as soon as I'm done, I clear the cookies and resume living privately). nhl.com is not one of those, and AFAIK has not been bought by Google the way Yahoo has. I'm afraid that Google is among those who insist on setting cookies. Check out this link - https://www.facebook.com/SafariUsersAgainstGooglesSecretTracking Well aware of that, as I've said twice already. WTF does this have to do with nhl.com? And how can I get SeaMonkey to honor its promise to reject third-party cookies? Start SeaMonkey with a test profile. Check cookies. I'll bet you see one for Google, as it is most likely set by the Google default search engine. My test profile had two Google cookies. Same name PREF, two different Content: ID's. Have you tried the Allow cookies for the originating site only (no third-party cookies) setting? -- One of the millions of Firefox makes me happy users https://input.mozilla.org/en-US/feedback/firefox/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Third-party cookie question
In news:i5udnddvg6jvvxbjnz2dnuu7-qmdn...@mozilla.org, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote: This evening, I cleared all private data (including cache and cookies), and then visited nhl.com. Immediately after aborting their troublesome javascript,* I inspected my cookies and discovered that google.com had set a cookie. Now, my cookie policy at Edit | Preferences | Privacy Security | Cookies is Allow cookies for the originating website only (no third-party cookies). So how was Google able to set a cookie if I never visited their site? My first guess is that it's the Google safebrowsing cookie. The browser connects to Google to get its lists of bad sites. After reports that the NSA was using the Google safebrowsing cookie to track people, Mozilla took a look at blocking the cookie, but AIUI it turned out that the safebrowsing API requires a cookie in order to work at all. It looks like they decided to sandbox the cookie somehow; I don't understand the details. I think they also got Google to promise never ever to use it for tracking or building dossiers. FWIW, the bugs are https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368255 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=897516 It's bad enough that they update their dossier on me when I visit their own sites, do they have to do it everywhere else, too?\ More to the point, how can I set SeaMonkey to do as it says and block third-party cookies? If my guess is right, turning off the safebrowsing features should do it. I dunno where they are in the SM UI. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Third-party cookie question
WaltS48 wrote: Have you tried the Allow cookies for the originating site only (no third-party cookies) setting? I refer you to my original query, which you apparently have not read. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Google/Yahoo
Daniel wrote: On 14/12/14 06:22, Paul B. Gallagher wrote Snip That's problematic for me because I do have a gmail account and sometimes use it to login to other sites (as soon as I'm done, I clear the cookies and resume living privately). nhl.com is not one of those, and AFAIK has not been bought by Google the way Yahoo has. Sorry, Paul, are you suggesting Google owns Yahoo?? I would have thought there would have been some sort of anti-competition thing going on if this were the case! Sorry, typo for YouTube. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Third-party cookie question
»Q« wrote: In news:i5udnddvg6jvvxbjnz2dnuu7-qmdn...@mozilla.org, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote: This evening, I cleared all private data (including cache and cookies), and then visited nhl.com. Immediately after aborting their troublesome javascript,* I inspected my cookies and discovered that google.com had set a cookie. Now, my cookie policy at Edit | Preferences | Privacy Security | Cookies is Allow cookies for the originating website only (no third-party cookies). So how was Google able to set a cookie if I never visited their site? My first guess is that it's the Google safebrowsing cookie. ... I don't think so. I tested as follows: From the last surviving browser window, clear private data (includes cookies and cache). Close the browser window. Open a fresh browser window, which by pref opens a blank page. Check cookies, nothing. Go to home page (my company website, which does not set cookies). Check cookies, nothing. Note that I have both safe browsing options enabled at Edit | Preferences | Privacy Security. I therefore conclude that Google is not setting a cookie on browser startup, and it's not setting one in order to evaluate whether my company website is or is not dangerous. The Google cookie I get from nhl.com is called NID, it's 131 characters of alphanumeric soup, and it varies from visit to visit. It's bad enough that they update their dossier on me when I visit their own sites, do they have to do it everywhere else, too?\ More to the point, how can I set SeaMonkey to do as it says and block third-party cookies? If my guess is right, turning off the safebrowsing features should do it. I dunno where they are in the SM UI. OK, let's try that... Nope, didn't change a thing. Google set another cookie called NID 131 characters long. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Third-party cookie question
On 12/13/2014 10:36 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: WaltS48 wrote: Have you tried the Allow cookies for the originating site only (no third-party cookies) setting? I refer you to my original query, which you apparently have not read. Slipped my mind when replying. Did you try a test profile, visit no web sites, check cookies. What did you find? -- One of the millions of Firefox makes me happy users https://input.mozilla.org/en-US/feedback/firefox/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Third-party cookie question
WaltS48 wrote: On 12/13/2014 10:36 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: WaltS48 wrote: Have you tried the Allow cookies for the originating site only (no third-party cookies) setting? I refer you to my original query, which you apparently have not read. Slipped my mind when replying. Did you try a test profile, visit no web sites, check cookies. What did you find? See the response I gave to »Q« 16 minutes ago downthread. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Third-party cookie question
On 12/13/2014 11:10 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 12/13/2014 10:36 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: WaltS48 wrote: Have you tried the Allow cookies for the originating site only (no third-party cookies) setting? I refer you to my original query, which you apparently have not read. Slipped my mind when replying. Did you try a test profile, visit no web sites, check cookies. What did you find? See the response I gave to »Q« 16 minutes ago downthread. So you didn't try a test profile. Okay, I started my SeaMonkey with the test profile. Had the 2 Google cookies I mentioned earlier. Cleared cookies, history, cache, and everything else I could check. Restarted SeaMonkey with the test profile, had the 2 Google cookies again, repeated the Clear history, restart process and the 2 Google cookies come back on every restart. Let me set Block Cookies from This Website, the website being http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/, clear history, restart and they're back. Block Cookies from The Website under Tools Cookie Manager is still enabled. Let me try checking When removing, block the listed websites from setting future cookies in the Cookies tab of Data Manager and using Remove there also. APPLAUSE! No Google cookies! That was an adventure. :) -- One of the millions of Firefox makes me happy users https://input.mozilla.org/en-US/feedback/firefox/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Streaming Netflix
Has any heard about being able to watch Netflix on SeaMonkey? Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Third-party cookie question
HilsB wrote on 14/12/2014 00:48: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: EE wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: This evening, I cleared all private data (including cache and cookies), and then visited nhl.com. Immediately after aborting their troublesome javascript,* I inspected my cookies and discovered that google.com had set a cookie. Now, my cookie policy at Edit | Preferences | Privacy Security | Cookies is Allow cookies for the originating website only (no third-party cookies). So how was Google able to set a cookie if I never visited their site? It's bad enough that they update their dossier on me when I visit their own sites, do they have to do it everywhere else, too?\ More to the point, how can I set SeaMonkey to do as it says and block third-party cookies? * -- They have a series of annoying scripts that grind SM to a halt and must be aborted before the site becomes usable. The URLs are constantly changing; today's version was at http://cdn.nhle.com/projects/ice3-ui/com.nhl.ice3.ui.t5.components/GlobalPageImports/dist/js/GlobalPageImports.min.js?v=8.9:1. And I'm constantly updating my custom filter in AdBlock Plus. That isn't my question. Even though I default to blocking cookies, I added an exception to block Google cookies, just to make sure. That works. I have no Google cookies. That's problematic for me because I do have a gmail account and sometimes use it to login to other sites (as soon as I'm done, I clear the cookies and resume living privately). nhl.com is not one of those, and AFAIK has not been bought by Google the way Yahoo has. I'm afraid that Google is among those who insist on setting cookies. Check out this link - https://www.facebook.com/SafariUsersAgainstGooglesSecretTracking As usual a facebook page is unreadable and full of unneeded infos. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey