Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On 25/03/15 02:04, pjdkru...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, March 23, 2015 at 3:33:24 PM UTC-4, mozilla-li...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Daniel wrote: On 23/03/15 14:46, Philip Chee wrote: On 22/03/2015 22:46, Daniel wrote: Thank you, Mark, I now understand. One wonders why they don't separate out the newer versions, maybe they only list the most popular two individually. There are several picklists and sliders on the right where you can change how many versions are shown for what time period, etc. Phil Thanks for that, Phil, I hadn't noticed that. I set the Top N to 10 and ver 2.33 was still not showing ... bit of a worry!! :-( 2.33 shows up when you set Top N to 15. When you do, you see that it's been more active than any other individual version for about the last week. Probably not quite more active than all other versions put together, but it doesn't look far off. Hence my doubts as to how the rankings for the Top N are calculated! Mark. IF the Top picks are cumulative then 2.33 will not be top because it hasn't been out long enough, and 2.26 will probably remain at the top because it was the stalled version, lasting for 3 entire release periods when 2.27 and 2.28 were skipped. but, one would then hope that 2.29, 2.30, 2.31 and 2.32, which have each had their full six weeks, would then have had heaps of installs! -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.32 Build identifier: 20141218225909 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33 Build identifier: 20150215202114 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On 24/03/15 06:32, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Daniel wrote: On 23/03/15 14:46, Philip Chee wrote: On 22/03/2015 22:46, Daniel wrote: Thank you, Mark, I now understand. One wonders why they don't separate out the newer versions, maybe they only list the most popular two individually. There are several picklists and sliders on the right where you can change how many versions are shown for what time period, etc. Phil Thanks for that, Phil, I hadn't noticed that. I set the Top N to 10 and ver 2.33 was still not showing ... bit of a worry!! :-( 2.33 shows up when you set Top N to 15. When you do, you see that it's been more active than any other individual version for about the last week. Probably not quite more active than all other versions put together, but it doesn't look far off. Hence my doubts as to how the rankings for the Top N are calculated! Mark. Yeap, you're right, it does show up in the top 15. One would think the graph would show the most recent version, then the next best two, and then the rest, unless, of course, no-one is downloading the most recent version. Humm, looking at the SeaMonkey ADI vs Locale/Country, Australia even makes it into the top 15 Yeah us!! -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.32 Build identifier: 20141218225909 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33 Build identifier: 20150215202114 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On Monday, March 23, 2015 at 3:33:24 PM UTC-4, mozilla-li...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Daniel wrote: On 23/03/15 14:46, Philip Chee wrote: On 22/03/2015 22:46, Daniel wrote: Thank you, Mark, I now understand. One wonders why they don't separate out the newer versions, maybe they only list the most popular two individually. There are several picklists and sliders on the right where you can change how many versions are shown for what time period, etc. Phil Thanks for that, Phil, I hadn't noticed that. I set the Top N to 10 and ver 2.33 was still not showing ... bit of a worry!! :-( 2.33 shows up when you set Top N to 15. When you do, you see that it's been more active than any other individual version for about the last week. Probably not quite more active than all other versions put together, but it doesn't look far off. Hence my doubts as to how the rankings for the Top N are calculated! Mark. IF the Top picks are cumulative then 2.33 will not be top because it hasn't been out long enough, and 2.26 will probably remain at the top because it was the stalled version, lasting for 3 entire release periods when 2.27 and 2.28 were skipped. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On 03/23/2015 05:53 AM, Desiree wrote: On 3/21/2015 6:17 AM, WaltS48 wrote: On 03/21/2015 12:03 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Eric wrote on 20/03/2015 17:56: Finally saw that Seamonkey got some recognition from PC Mag. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2898509/10-obscure-highly-specialized-browsers-that-will-make-you-forget-about-chrome-firefox-and-ie.html Bout time. Eric I did not see the seamonkey word on this page ... You need to learn how to navigate the site. Click the right facing arrow above the text 1 of 11. SeaMonkey is #7 of 11. I HATE sites like that forcing you to click on the next slide. I can never get all slides to show and even on a fast browser on a fast internet connection slides like that load EXTREMELY slowly. On this one, I could not get past slide 5 ...6 just forever says connecting and never loads. Sorry, to hear so many people have these problems that I never see. I must be blessed. Then again, I only have one device using my connection, and at times run torrents, download from Usenet, stream music and browse without a problem. -- Kubuntu 14.10 | KDE 4.14.1 | Thunderbird 38.0a2(Earlybird) [Coexist - Understanding Across Divides](https://www.coexist.org/) Obeying the law matters ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On 23/03/15 14:46, Philip Chee wrote: On 22/03/2015 22:46, Daniel wrote: Thank you, Mark, I now understand. One wonders why they don't separate out the newer versions, maybe they only list the most popular two individually. There are several picklists and sliders on the right where you can change how many versions are shown for what time period, etc. Phil Thanks for that, Phil, I hadn't noticed that. I set the Top N to 10 and ver 2.33 was still not showing ... bit of a worry!! :-( -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.32 Build identifier: 20141218225909 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33 Build identifier: 20150215202114 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
EE wrote: Ray_Net wrote: WaltS48 wrote on 21/03/2015 17:17: On 03/21/2015 12:03 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Eric wrote on 20/03/2015 17:56: Finally saw that Seamonkey got some recognition from PC Mag. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2898509/10-obscure-highly-specialized-browsers-that-will-make-you-forget-about-chrome-firefox-and-ie.html Bout time. Eric I did not see the seamonkey word on this page ... You need to learn how to navigate the site. Click the right facing arrow above the text 1 of 11. SeaMonkey is #7 of 11. OK, I see. thanks. I nerver use the maximized windows sot the arrows were missing :-) I am not using maximized windows and I was able to see the arrows. I have a big screen and a big browser window (but not maximized), but I doubt that would affect the size of the arrows. They seem to disappear off the left side of the page when the width is reduced below about 1050 pixels. At least on my setup - the exact point at which they disappear might depend on fonts, zoom settings, etc. Mark. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
Daniel wrote: On 23/03/15 14:46, Philip Chee wrote: On 22/03/2015 22:46, Daniel wrote: Thank you, Mark, I now understand. One wonders why they don't separate out the newer versions, maybe they only list the most popular two individually. There are several picklists and sliders on the right where you can change how many versions are shown for what time period, etc. Phil Thanks for that, Phil, I hadn't noticed that. I set the Top N to 10 and ver 2.33 was still not showing ... bit of a worry!! :-( 2.33 shows up when you set Top N to 15. When you do, you see that it's been more active than any other individual version for about the last week. Probably not quite more active than all other versions put together, but it doesn't look far off. Hence my doubts as to how the rankings for the Top N are calculated! Mark. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On 3/21/2015 6:17 AM, WaltS48 wrote: On 03/21/2015 12:03 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Eric wrote on 20/03/2015 17:56: Finally saw that Seamonkey got some recognition from PC Mag. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2898509/10-obscure-highly-specialized-browsers-that-will-make-you-forget-about-chrome-firefox-and-ie.html Bout time. Eric I did not see the seamonkey word on this page ... You need to learn how to navigate the site. Click the right facing arrow above the text 1 of 11. SeaMonkey is #7 of 11. I HATE sites like that forcing you to click on the next slide. I can never get all slides to show and even on a fast browser on a fast internet connection slides like that load EXTREMELY slowly. On this one, I could not get past slide 5 ...6 just forever says connecting and never loads. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
... I HATE sites like that forcing you to click on the next slide. I can never get all slides to show and even on a fast browser on a fast internet connection slides like that load EXTREMELY slowly. On this one, I could not get past slide 5 ...6 just forever says connecting and never loads. You could use http://deslide.clusterfake.net/ ... ;) -- Ants never sleep. --Ralph Waldo Emerson, poet /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) Chop ANT from its address if e-mailing privately. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On 22/03/2015 14:52, Daniel wrote: On 22/03/15 06:42, Philip Chee wrote: On 22/03/2015 00:33, Ant wrote: On 3/20/2015 6:12 PM, WaltS48 wrote: ... Nice article. Maybe SeaMonkey usage will bump up to 150,000 active daily installs. Who has access to the download and installation statistics? ;) 1. Go: https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2015-03-17#2.x_.28Last.2C_Current.2C_Next.29 2. Click on the dataviz link. Phil Phil, ref the Usage by Version graph, am I correct in reading this as V 2.26 (blue) is slightly more popular (by download numbers) than V 2.30 (green) which is then more popular than all other versions (including 2.32 and 2.33) added together (purple)?? If so, that doesn't seem right!! ;-( Sorry I have no idea how this works. Someone (not me) will have to RTFM. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On 22/03/15 18:30, Philip Chee wrote: On 22/03/2015 14:52, Daniel wrote: On 22/03/15 06:42, Philip Chee wrote: On 22/03/2015 00:33, Ant wrote: On 3/20/2015 6:12 PM, WaltS48 wrote: ... Nice article. Maybe SeaMonkey usage will bump up to 150,000 active daily installs. Who has access to the download and installation statistics? ;) 1. Go: https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2015-03-17#2.x_.28Last.2C_Current.2C_Next.29 2. Click on the dataviz link. Phil Phil, ref the Usage by Version graph, am I correct in reading this as V 2.26 (blue) is slightly more popular (by download numbers) than V 2.30 (green) which is then more popular than all other versions (including 2.32 and 2.33) added together (purple)?? If so, that doesn't seem right!! ;-( Sorry I have no idea how this works. Someone (not me) will have to RTFM. Phil O.K., Phil,thanks, and maybe someone (not you) will see this and explain!! :-) -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.32 Build identifier: 20141218225909 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33 Build identifier: 20150215202114 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
Daniel wrote: On 22/03/15 06:42, Philip Chee wrote: On 22/03/2015 00:33, Ant wrote: On 3/20/2015 6:12 PM, WaltS48 wrote: ... Nice article. Maybe SeaMonkey usage will bump up to 150,000 active daily installs. Who has access to the download and installation statistics? ;) 1. Go: https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2015-03-17#2.x_.28Last.2C_Current.2C_Next.29 2. Click on the dataviz link. Phil Phil, ref the Usage by Version graph, am I correct in reading this as V 2.26 (blue) is slightly more popular (by download numbers) than V 2.30 (green) which is then more popular than all other versions (including 2.32 and 2.33) added together (purple)?? If so, that doesn't seem right!! ;-( I've seen somewhere else ADI standing for Active Daily Installations. This looks like it explains it: https://wiki.mozilla.org/ADI Basically it's the number of running copies of SeaMonkey seen on each day, based on the browser checking for updates to the blocklist. It won't be 100% accurate, since some people disable that check, or can't connect to the server, but should give a good indication of variations in usage over time. Probably a better indication than counting downloads, since some people will download something and never install, or rarely use, it. It looks to me like a stacked chart, so the width of each coloured band (not the top of it) indicates the count. You can get the actual counts by hovering over the chart. e.g. on 20 March (the latest available date) there were: - 4,363 active installs of 2.26 - 3,855 active installs of 2.30 - 102,713 active installs of other versions The Top N dropdown to the right allows you to choose to see figures broken out for more versions. I'm not quite sure how they determine the top N versions, as setting it to 15 reveals that on 20 March there were: - 53,071 active installs of 2.33 - 25,497 active installs of 2.32 - 4,900 active installs of 2.31 All higher (2.32 and 2.33 much higher) than 2.26 and 2.30 on that most recent count. Even integrated over the period shown on the graph (almost 3 months), 2.32 looks far more active than 2.26 or 2.30, so I'm not sure why those versions appear as the top 2. Mark. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On 23/03/15 00:48, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Daniel wrote: On 22/03/15 06:42, Philip Chee wrote: On 22/03/2015 00:33, Ant wrote: On 3/20/2015 6:12 PM, WaltS48 wrote: ... Nice article. Maybe SeaMonkey usage will bump up to 150,000 active daily installs. Who has access to the download and installation statistics? ;) 1. Go: https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2015-03-17#2.x_.28Last.2C_Current.2C_Next.29 2. Click on the dataviz link. Phil Phil, ref the Usage by Version graph, am I correct in reading this as V 2.26 (blue) is slightly more popular (by download numbers) than V 2.30 (green) which is then more popular than all other versions (including 2.32 and 2.33) added together (purple)?? If so, that doesn't seem right!! ;-( I've seen somewhere else ADI standing for Active Daily Installations. This looks like it explains it: https://wiki.mozilla.org/ADI Basically it's the number of running copies of SeaMonkey seen on each day, based on the browser checking for updates to the blocklist. It won't be 100% accurate, since some people disable that check, or can't connect to the server, but should give a good indication of variations in usage over time. Probably a better indication than counting downloads, since some people will download something and never install, or rarely use, it. It looks to me like a stacked chart, so the width of each coloured band (not the top of it) indicates the count. You can get the actual counts by hovering over the chart. e.g. on 20 March (the latest available date) there were: - 4,363 active installs of 2.26 - 3,855 active installs of 2.30 - 102,713 active installs of other versions The Top N dropdown to the right allows you to choose to see figures broken out for more versions. I'm not quite sure how they determine the top N versions, as setting it to 15 reveals that on 20 March there were: - 53,071 active installs of 2.33 - 25,497 active installs of 2.32 - 4,900 active installs of 2.31 All higher (2.32 and 2.33 much higher) than 2.26 and 2.30 on that most recent count. Even integrated over the period shown on the graph (almost 3 months), 2.32 looks far more active than 2.26 or 2.30, so I'm not sure why those versions appear as the top 2. Mark. Thank you, Mark, I now understand. One wonders why they don't separate out the newer versions, maybe they only list the most popular two individually. -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.32 Build identifier: 20141218225909 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33 Build identifier: 20150215202114 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
Ray_Net wrote: WaltS48 wrote on 21/03/2015 17:17: On 03/21/2015 12:03 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Eric wrote on 20/03/2015 17:56: Finally saw that Seamonkey got some recognition from PC Mag. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2898509/10-obscure-highly-specialized-browsers-that-will-make-you-forget-about-chrome-firefox-and-ie.html Bout time. Eric I did not see the seamonkey word on this page ... You need to learn how to navigate the site. Click the right facing arrow above the text 1 of 11. SeaMonkey is #7 of 11. OK, I see. thanks. I nerver use the maximized windows sot the arrows were missing :-) I am not using maximized windows and I was able to see the arrows. I have a big screen and a big browser window (but not maximized), but I doubt that would affect the size of the arrows. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On 22/03/15 13:15, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: I maximized the window to get the arrows, but they only work twice then stop. Slide-shows have to be the absolute dumbest thing a page designer can do. Funny, I saw all 11 without difficulty, once I figured out what to do. Win7 Pro SP1, SM 2.33. Me, too. and me, too!! ;-) Linux 2.33B1 -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.32 Build identifier: 20141218225909 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33 Build identifier: 20150215202114 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On 22/03/15 06:42, Philip Chee wrote: On 22/03/2015 00:33, Ant wrote: On 3/20/2015 6:12 PM, WaltS48 wrote: ... Nice article. Maybe SeaMonkey usage will bump up to 150,000 active daily installs. Who has access to the download and installation statistics? ;) 1. Go: https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2015-03-17#2.x_.28Last.2C_Current.2C_Next.29 2. Click on the dataviz link. Phil Phil, ref the Usage by Version graph, am I correct in reading this as V 2.26 (blue) is slightly more popular (by download numbers) than V 2.30 (green) which is then more popular than all other versions (including 2.32 and 2.33) added together (purple)?? If so, that doesn't seem right!! ;-( -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.32 Build identifier: 20141218225909 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33 Build identifier: 20150215202114 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On 22/03/2015 22:46, Daniel wrote: Thank you, Mark, I now understand. One wonders why they don't separate out the newer versions, maybe they only list the most popular two individually. There are several picklists and sliders on the right where you can change how many versions are shown for what time period, etc. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
Eric wrote on 20/03/2015 17:56: Finally saw that Seamonkey got some recognition from PC Mag. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2898509/10-obscure-highly-specialized-browsers-that-will-make-you-forget-about-chrome-firefox-and-ie.html Bout time. Eric I did not see the seamonkey word on this page ... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
WaltS48 wrote on 21/03/2015 17:17: On 03/21/2015 12:03 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Eric wrote on 20/03/2015 17:56: Finally saw that Seamonkey got some recognition from PC Mag. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2898509/10-obscure-highly-specialized-browsers-that-will-make-you-forget-about-chrome-firefox-and-ie.html Bout time. Eric I did not see the seamonkey word on this page ... You need to learn how to navigate the site. Click the right facing arrow above the text 1 of 11. SeaMonkey is #7 of 11. OK, I see. thanks. I nerver use the maximized windows sot the arrows were missing :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On 3/20/2015 6:12 PM, WaltS48 wrote: ... Nice article. Maybe SeaMonkey usage will bump up to 150,000 active daily installs. Who has access to the download and installation statistics? ;) -- I once heard the survivors of a colony of ants that had been partially obliterated by a cow's foot seriously debating the intention of the gods towards their civilization --Archy the Cockroach from Don Marquis' Archy and Mehitabel book (Certain Maxims of Archy poem) /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) Chop ANT from its address if e-mailing privately. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On 03/21/2015 12:03 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Eric wrote on 20/03/2015 17:56: Finally saw that Seamonkey got some recognition from PC Mag. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2898509/10-obscure-highly-specialized-browsers-that-will-make-you-forget-about-chrome-firefox-and-ie.html Bout time. Eric I did not see the seamonkey word on this page ... You need to learn how to navigate the site. Click the right facing arrow above the text 1 of 11. SeaMonkey is #7 of 11. -- Kubuntu 14.10 | KDE 4.14.1 | Thunderbird 38.0a2(Earlybird) [Coexist - Understanding Across Divides](https://www.coexist.org/) Obeying the law matters ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
Item # 7 SeaMonkey Underpinnings: Gecko Focus: old-school all-in-one Internet suite SeaMonkey has been around for nearly ten years, and it’s still going strong—but SeaMonkey is an ideal choice only for hardcore web users who want almost everything you could possibly think of in one package. SeaMonkey integrates a browser, an email client, a RSS and newsgroup client, an HTML editor, and an IRC client. The only thing missing from this suite is the ability to download torrents… but you can get that as an add-on. - Original Message - From: Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 4:03:14 PM Subject: Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag Eric wrote on 20/03/2015 17:56: Finally saw that Seamonkey got some recognition from PC Mag. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2898509/10-obscure-highly-specialized-browsers-that-will-make-you-forget-about-chrome-firefox-and-ie.html Bout time. Eric I did not see the seamonkey word on this page ... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On 22/03/2015 00:33, Ant wrote: On 3/20/2015 6:12 PM, WaltS48 wrote: ... Nice article. Maybe SeaMonkey usage will bump up to 150,000 active daily installs. Who has access to the download and installation statistics? ;) 1. Go: https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2015-03-17#2.x_.28Last.2C_Current.2C_Next.29 2. Click on the dataviz link. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
Geoff Welsh wrote: I maximized the window to get the arrows, but they only work twice then stop. Slide-shows have to be the absolute dumbest thing a page designer can do. Funny, I saw all 11 without difficulty, once I figured out what to do. Win7 Pro SP1, SM 2.33. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
Ray_Net wrote: WaltS48 wrote on 21/03/2015 17:17: On 03/21/2015 12:03 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Eric wrote on 20/03/2015 17:56: Finally saw that Seamonkey got some recognition from PC Mag. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2898509/10-obscure-highly-specialized-browsers-that-will-make-you-forget-about-chrome-firefox-and-ie.html Bout time. Eric I did not see the seamonkey word on this page ... You need to learn how to navigate the site. Click the right facing arrow above the text 1 of 11. SeaMonkey is #7 of 11. OK, I see. thanks. I nerver use the maximized windows sot the arrows were missing :-) I maximized the window to get the arrows, but they only work twice then stop. Slide-shows have to be the absolute dumbest thing a page designer can do. GW OS X, SM 2.34a1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On 03/20/2015 08:22 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: Eric wrote: Finally saw that Seamonkey got some recognition from PC Mag. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2898509/10-obscure-highly-specialized-browsers-that-will-make-you-forget-about-chrome-firefox-and-ie.html Bout time. That is indeed awesome! Edmund Nice article. Maybe SeaMonkey usage will bump up to 150,000 active daily installs. -- Kubuntu 14.10 | KDE 4.14.1 | Thunderbird 38.0a2(Earlybird) [Coexist - Understanding Across Divides](https://www.coexist.org/) Obeying the law matters ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
Eric wrote: Finally saw that Seamonkey got some recognition from PC Mag. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2898509/10-obscure-highly-specialized-browsers-that-will-make-you-forget-about-chrome-firefox-and-ie.html Bout time. That is indeed awesome! Edmund ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
