[talk-ph] Unpassable roads TS mario
Ninoy from DSWD is asking for assistance to map unpassable roads. They have a list, still getting permission to share publicly. Those interested let me know. Keep safe everyone, dont do field mapping today! Maning Sambale (mobile) ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Unpassable roads TS mario
Dear everyone, Thanks Sorbi for the offer. As I said DSWD-DROMMIC a member of the NDRRM c/o Ninoy Castro is asking our help to locate unpassable roads. The list is here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-2WZQ1DwK_xc3lqanYwNFdKd3I1Wk9uS1U0WmdvYnVzY1Rn/edit?usp=sharing I created a geojson file yoy can edit via geojson.io here: http://geojson.io/#id=gist:maning/02cc96e4fb9e0b314a13map=11/14.6198/121.0172 I just added two tags: name and status Please edit that file (or create your own) and send the link in this thread. If you are not comfortable editing the file just send us coordinates of the roads in the list you can identify in the map. I'll check again later if there are updates. Thanks! On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:43 PM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote: Ninoy from DSWD is asking for assistance to map unpassable roads. They have a list, still getting permission to share publicly. Those interested let me know. Keep safe everyone, dont do field mapping today! Maning Sambale (mobile) -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ -- ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Unpassable roads TS mario
Alright, Maning. I'll update the geojson file as much as I can. On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:48 PM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote: Dear everyone, Thanks Sorbi for the offer. As I said DSWD-DROMMIC a member of the NDRRM c/o Ninoy Castro is asking our help to locate unpassable roads. The list is here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-2WZQ1DwK_xc3lqanYwNFdKd3I1Wk9uS1U0WmdvYnVzY1Rn/edit?usp=sharing I created a geojson file yoy can edit via geojson.io here: http://geojson.io/#id=gist:maning/02cc96e4fb9e0b314a13map=11/14.6198/121.0172 I just added two tags: name and status Please edit that file (or create your own) and send the link in this thread. If you are not comfortable editing the file just send us coordinates of the roads in the list you can identify in the map. I'll check again later if there are updates. Thanks! On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:43 PM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote: Ninoy from DSWD is asking for assistance to map unpassable roads. They have a list, still getting permission to share publicly. Those interested let me know. Keep safe everyone, dont do field mapping today! Maning Sambale (mobile) -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ -- ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Unpassable roads TS mario
The attached report was issued at 12:00H, that's 4 hours old. Are there more recent updates? *Erwin Olario* - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - » email: erwin@ er...@ngnuity.net*n**gnu**IT**y**.**net* http://ngnuity.net/ | gov...@gmail.com » mobile: (PHL): +63 908 817 2013 » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93 D56B On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:48 PM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote: Dear everyone, Thanks Sorbi for the offer. As I said DSWD-DROMMIC a member of the NDRRM c/o Ninoy Castro is asking our help to locate unpassable roads. The list is here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-2WZQ1DwK_xc3lqanYwNFdKd3I1Wk9uS1U0WmdvYnVzY1Rn/edit?usp=sharing I created a geojson file yoy can edit via geojson.io here: http://geojson.io/#id=gist:maning/02cc96e4fb9e0b314a13map=11/14.6198/121.0172 I just added two tags: name and status Please edit that file (or create your own) and send the link in this thread. If you are not comfortable editing the file just send us coordinates of the roads in the list you can identify in the map. I'll check again later if there are updates. Thanks! On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:43 PM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote: Ninoy from DSWD is asking for assistance to map unpassable roads. They have a list, still getting permission to share publicly. Those interested let me know. Keep safe everyone, dont do field mapping today! Maning Sambale (mobile) -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ -- ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Unpassable roads TS mario
Hello! Here's the geojson link http://geojson.io/#id=gist:sorbi/ec617f119126879136famap=14/14.5043/120.9940 I missed some though. Stay safe everyone! Cheers, Sorbi On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:48 PM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote: Dear everyone, Thanks Sorbi for the offer. As I said DSWD-DROMMIC a member of the NDRRM c/o Ninoy Castro is asking our help to locate unpassable roads. The list is here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-2WZQ1DwK_xc3lqanYwNFdKd3I1Wk9uS1U0WmdvYnVzY1Rn/edit?usp=sharing I created a geojson file yoy can edit via geojson.io here: http://geojson.io/#id=gist:maning/02cc96e4fb9e0b314a13map=11/14.6198/121.0172 I just added two tags: name and status Please edit that file (or create your own) and send the link in this thread. If you are not comfortable editing the file just send us coordinates of the roads in the list you can identify in the map. I'll check again later if there are updates. Thanks! On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:43 PM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote: Ninoy from DSWD is asking for assistance to map unpassable roads. They have a list, still getting permission to share publicly. Those interested let me know. Keep safe everyone, dont do field mapping today! Maning Sambale (mobile) -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ -- ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Unpassable roads TS mario
Thanks Sorbi! @LA and Ninoy, Please go to this link to download the geocoded points. http://geojson.io/#id=gist:maning/e4dc46623dc928165ccamap=11/14.5782/121.0414 You can get various formats such as KML, Shapefile, geojson, etc under the Save menu. Still incomplete but hope you find it useful. Let us know if you need more help. On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Sorvigenaleon Ildefonso sorbi.ildefo...@gmail.com wrote: Hello! Here's the geojson link http://geojson.io/#id=gist:sorbi/ec617f119126879136famap=14/14.5043/120.9940 I missed some though. Stay safe everyone! Cheers, Sorbi On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:48 PM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote: Dear everyone, Thanks Sorbi for the offer. As I said DSWD-DROMMIC a member of the NDRRM c/o Ninoy Castro is asking our help to locate unpassable roads. The list is here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-2WZQ1DwK_xc3lqanYwNFdKd3I1Wk9uS1U0WmdvYnVzY1Rn/edit?usp=sharing I created a geojson file yoy can edit via geojson.io here: http://geojson.io/#id=gist:maning/02cc96e4fb9e0b314a13map=11/14.6198/121.0172 I just added two tags: name and status Please edit that file (or create your own) and send the link in this thread. If you are not comfortable editing the file just send us coordinates of the roads in the list you can identify in the map. I'll check again later if there are updates. Thanks! On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:43 PM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote: Ninoy from DSWD is asking for assistance to map unpassable roads. They have a list, still getting permission to share publicly. Those interested let me know. Keep safe everyone, dont do field mapping today! Maning Sambale (mobile) -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ -- -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ -- ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Unpassable roads TS mario
uMap version: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/ts-mario_17234#11/14.6248/121.0128 On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:30 PM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Sorbi! @LA and Ninoy, Please go to this link to download the geocoded points. http://geojson.io/#id=gist:maning/e4dc46623dc928165ccamap=11/14.5782/121.0414 You can get various formats such as KML, Shapefile, geojson, etc under the Save menu. Still incomplete but hope you find it useful. Let us know if you need more help. On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Sorvigenaleon Ildefonso sorbi.ildefo...@gmail.com wrote: Hello! Here's the geojson link http://geojson.io/#id=gist:sorbi/ec617f119126879136famap=14/14.5043/120.9940 I missed some though. Stay safe everyone! Cheers, Sorbi On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:48 PM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote: Dear everyone, Thanks Sorbi for the offer. As I said DSWD-DROMMIC a member of the NDRRM c/o Ninoy Castro is asking our help to locate unpassable roads. The list is here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-2WZQ1DwK_xc3lqanYwNFdKd3I1Wk9uS1U0WmdvYnVzY1Rn/edit?usp=sharing I created a geojson file yoy can edit via geojson.io here: http://geojson.io/#id=gist:maning/02cc96e4fb9e0b314a13map=11/14.6198/121.0172 I just added two tags: name and status Please edit that file (or create your own) and send the link in this thread. If you are not comfortable editing the file just send us coordinates of the roads in the list you can identify in the map. I'll check again later if there are updates. Thanks! On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:43 PM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote: Ninoy from DSWD is asking for assistance to map unpassable roads. They have a list, still getting permission to share publicly. Those interested let me know. Keep safe everyone, dont do field mapping today! Maning Sambale (mobile) -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ -- -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ -- -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ -- ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fwd: Destination tagging on motorways
also for the link your page explaining connectivity:lane. I had not heard about that one before. but now I have to go over all my work of the past few months to add that tag where needed :-) since a lot ( 98%?) of the crossings are simple in terms of destination (like: when you go left you're driving towards Antwerp) and thus have obvious connectivity, a relation like connectivity:lane will not be needed often. There is no standard yet for tagging non-obvious connectivity. Please let me know if you think you have found a situation where non-obvious connectivity occurs. What I mean with splitting the outgoing road, is how far do we want the destination to extend: til the next crossing, even when that is kilometers away ? or the other extreme, split the street after a few meters, so that future mappers won't split the street further on, and still keep the destination tag on both segments ? Having destination info on way segments is just needed to provide information to the driver. Therefore, I would from a practical point of view limit this destination data to situations close to junctions. This will also avoid using the forward and backward destination tagging. The exact length is I think not so important. I would just use the first segment available regardless of its length. So you won't add lanes:destination before the crossing ? (just to make sure) No, not in this situation. That would only be needed in situations where there is a difference in destinations immediately áfter the crossing (the left lane directly after the crossing going to destination x, the right lane immediately after the crossing going to destination y) What I meant is that Google is only allowed to copyright artwork, not facts nor even some pictures or parts thereof representing facts like road signs. I don't see why you need copying pictures to build destination tags. The DWG is clear on using contents of Google's photos: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2014-April/007750.html. Luckily, However, Mapillary can be used: http://www.mapillary.com/osm.html. All it takes for Google (being the nice company they are) is start using the same words: For the purpose of contributing metadata to OpenStreetMap, we allow anyone to derive metadata from our photos. Cheers, Johan 2014-09-12 15:28 GMT+02:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com: On 2014-09-11 00:27, Johan C wrote : Hi André OSM GPS routers use destination http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination=* not to compute the routes, they can do without, but to know what the drivers see on the signs in order to use the same information in spoken instructions That's correct Shouldn't the same ref=* http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref as of the motorway be used on all highway http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway=motorway_link http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_link? *If the motorway link has these signs*, they can be used. *there is no name to use* for a GPS to call a motorway entrance. The OSM situation should *reflect current signage*: if there are no signs, the destination tag should not be used So, I had correctly understood despite that, as unfortunately often the case, the key definition is very badly stated (the proof of that is that the French and German translators have got it and translated totally wrong). So, I made the following change to the wiki: Old: The key *destination* describes the destination of the way by using the name of the city the way is heading to, which is explicitly indicated in a signpost or similiar on the ground. New: So that GPS-like software can refer to road signs that the driver actually sees, the key *destination*=* describes the contents of signposts or ground writing indicating the names of the cities that the way on which the key is tagged is leading to. It is worth spending time to precisely write definitions. It avoids many map mistakes needing much more time to fix and makes a much better OSM. I'm not sure you can copy the pictures Google is a nice company, but they are not open. Their terms prohibit copying contents pictures. But all it takes to get lane assistant in Belgium is a few people who access motorways every now and then taking pictures of the signs. What I meant is that Google is only allowed to copyright artwork, not facts nor even some pictures or parts thereof representing facts like road signs. I don't see why you need copying pictures to build destination tags. Cheers, André. Cheers, Johan 2014-09-10 23:30 GMT+02:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com: On 2014-09-09 22:14, Johan C wrote : In Nederland heb ik de snelwegen op veel plaatsen voorzien van bestemmingen. Als bijrijder ben ik in de gelegenheid geweest om afgelopen maand de bebording op de route Breda-Antwerpen-Gent-Kortrijk-Lille vice versa te fotograferen. Die wil ik graag op de manier zoals ik die in
[OSM-talk] Mapbox Data Team Guidelines
Two new full time OpenStreetMap mappers have joined the Mapbox team this week. This is exciting for me as it allows us to do more direct work on OSM and contribute back directly. With this recent addition we also want to introduce guidelines establishing some simple but important rules of how we want to map as a team within the OpenStreetMap community. I've summarized them on this diary entry. Looking forward to feedback: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/23801 There's been some prior discussion on organizational mapping policies and I want to thank people on the thread over here for inspiration: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-May/069772.html Have a great weekend everyone - Alex ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk-nl] Overlay met directionele metingen laagfrequent geluid
Hoi allemaal, Wat is de beste manier om een overlay te maken voor een project waarin metingen op verschillende locaties worden gedaan naar laagfrequent geluid. Per locatie zijn er verschillende type metingen en metingen die directioneel zijn, dus naar het noorden, oosten, zuiden en westen. Is dat handig in één of meerdere overlays op te slaan? Is het handig om gecombineerde iconen te gebruiken waarvan kleur, segment of grootte correspondeert met intensiteit en richting van de metingen? Is overpass-tubro hier geschikt voor? Ik las deze week dat GitHub zelfs geoJSON ondersteund en dat lijkt me gelijk ook een goede plek om een dergelijk project te hosten. Gaarne ontvang ik wat tips om dit efficiënt op te kunnen zetten. Mochten er meer mensen interesse hebben om onder leiding van experst met professionele meetapparatuur laagfrequent geluid in kaart te brengen vanwege meldingen van overlast dan hoor ik dat graag. Groetjes, Pander ___ Talk-nl mailing list Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nl
Re: [talk-au] Bicentennial National Trail is not a dedicated bicycle route
Thank you for the comments. Makes a lot of sense. Just on the BNT being happy with the route being mapped on OSM. Given the route is sign posted to the public on the ground there shouldn’t be an issue providing accuracy is maintained. It is also mapped in other public mapping resources. The route shouldn’t be changed readily without signage change. To be a useful online resource OSM must be kept up to date in accordance with any route changes. From: Warin [mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 15 September 2014 8:47 AM To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] Bicentennial National Trail is not a dedicated bicycle route On 14/09/2014 11:25 AM, Mark Rennick wrote: I note there has been mapping of the Bicentennial National Trail as a ‘bicycle route’ in the Victorian Alpine National Park area. I have two comments on this: 1. This trail is not a dedicated ‘bicycle route’. As stated on the http://www.bicentennialnationaltrail.com.au/about/ web site: ‘The Bicentennial National Trail is Australia’s premier long distance, multi-use recreational trekking route...The National Trail was originally conceived as a route for the long distance horse trekker but is now enjoyed by cyclists and hikers as well.’ I believe this trail should be mapped as a generic, not bicycle ‘route’, tagged with for example: horse trekking, mountain biking, hiking. It may however be desirable to have this trail additionally mapped as a ‘bicycle route’. For example, so that mountain bike route planning will see this route in applications such as ‘Openmtbmap’. It should be mapped as an additional relationship, to the generic Bicentennial National Trail route, without the name ‘Bicentennial National Trail’. A) Generic route? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route .. has bicycle, horse and walking ... how would you make it generic? Usually the particular activity (bicycle, horse or walking) make a map for that activity - that may not identify a 'generic' as being usable by that activity. So, as you point out it may be needed to map it for each activity. In which case the 'generic' loses its appeal. B) Name.. if it is the 'Bicentennial National Trail' (BNT) then it should carry that name. C) Copyright? Are the BNT happy with OSM mapping this data? I know they want to be able to change the route quickly (floods, fires etc.) but I have no idea as to their official attitude as to 'their' route being placed into OSM data. Similar thoughts on the 'alternate BNT routes'. - Words - dedicated .. as in 'exclusive'? Humm We have 'designated' bicycle routes - some of these are exclusive, most are shared. Think that is a poor choice of word .. maybe substitute designated for dedicated? -- I'm happy to map bits along the BNT .. but I map to the sides ... these are usefull for escape/access to/from the BNT .. and may be of use to others too. I tend to map water along there too .. as they too can be usefull. I do not map their campsites .. could lead to over use .. and at least some of them require permission (in some cases writen permission!). I don't know who is maping the BNT sections and if they have any permission to do so. I certainly don't have permission .. but they I don't identify my bits as part of the BNT. Some of my side bits will distract others from the BNT. Some of my side bits were part of teh BNT .. but are no longer part of the BNT - it changes over time. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [Talk-br] highway=living_street or residental in Brazilian cities?
Em 18-09-2014 19:28, Gerald Weber escreveu: On 18 September 2014 18:49, Roger C. Soares rogersoa...@gmail.com wrote: +1 - I would change those streets to residential. I would not do that without asking the original mapper or without having visited the location. There might be a reason for it. Having many streets mapped as living_street seems a bit odd, but who knows, perhaps it is that really way? Remember: this is a collaborative project. Please respect what others have done, especially if you haven't been to the location. I think a city this type should never have all the streets as living_street, it is too different from the standard classification that it should have a note to justify the choice, and not done with changesets without comments or source, that's why I didn't bother too much in it being changed. But I do agree that it is always best to contact the original author and check. On another topic, some time ago we had a discussion about not mapping the urban area of the city as landuse=residential. I actually deleted a couple, especially in the state of São Paulo. Don't know if people want to revisit that. Just to let you know Andreas, as in the future me or someone else could delete those areas.. I agree not to map all urban areas as simply landuse=residential, especially because not all urban areas are residential, some are industrial and so on. I would prefer leaving landuse=residential for special uses. But again: I don't think we should delete landuse=residential whenever we find it (I certainly do not) because it is not wrong either and there might be some legitimate reason for its existence which we may not be aware of. Again: this is a collaborative project, please ask first before deleting something. The only exception to that rule, of course, is if it is an obvious error, say a landuse=residential where satellite images show only water. Most of the areas I removed and didn't contact the author were in cities that were not mapped or being mapped. At the time, I read that it was a pattern to trace the area until the city streets were mapped, and then remove the area. I may have done something wrong and I apologize for that, I'll be more careful in the future and contact more. Thanks for the alert. cheers Gerald ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br Regards, Roger. ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-br] Coletar fotos para o Mapillary de byke ou moto
Boa! 2014-09-18 15:21 GMT-03:00 Edil Queiroz de Araujo edil...@gmail.com: Olá pessoal, consegui um tempinho para postar de forma resumida como foi montar a segunda versão do suporte que estou usando para meu celular: http://projetorgm.com.br/blog/mapeamento/coleta-de-dados/coletar-fotos-de-bike-ou-moto-segundo-prototipo/ []'s *Edil Queiroz de Araujo* Projeto Monitor Virtual http://rede.acessasp.sp.gov.br/projeto/monitor-virtual RGM - Região Georreferenciada em Mapas http://projetorgm.com.br/ ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
[Talk-br] RES: Reunião semanal OSM Brasil
Vitor boa trade, Gostaria de participar, por favor me mande os detalhes, e já tomei a liberdade de incluir logo e link numa área de parceria e apoios do meu site: www.equacao.com.br. Se houver outros links específicos Brasil por favor me informe que farei o mesmo. Abraços Reinaldo De: Vitor George [mailto:vitor.geo...@gmail.com] Enviada em: sexta-feira, 19 de setembro de 2014 13:14 Para: OSM talk-br Assunto: [Talk-br] Reunião semanal OSM Brasil Oi pessoal, Queria propor para vocês uma teleconferência semanal para discutir assuntos relacionados com a promoção do OpenStreetMap no Brasil. Eu tenho conversado regularmente com o Thierry e o Wille, mas seria bem legal se outros participassem também para articular melhor as atividades. Estamos fazendo toda quarta-feira às 13h. Quem quiser participar, me avise neste thread ou diretamente. Vamos usar o Gotomeeting ou o Google Hangout, dependendo do número de participantes. Abraços, Vitor ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-br] RES: Reunião semanal OSM Brasil
Oi Reinaldo, legal que você quer participar. Na terça-feira vou mandar informações. Se forem até umas oito pessoas poderemos fazer via Google Hangout, mas se for mais enviaremos um link para participar via Gotomeeting. Abraço 2014-09-19 13:24 GMT-03:00 Reinaldo Neves rne...@equacao.com.br: Vitor boa trade, Gostaria de participar, por favor me mande os detalhes, e já tomei a liberdade de incluir logo e link numa área de parceria e apoios do meu site: www.equacao.com.br. Se houver outros links específicos Brasil por favor me informe que farei o mesmo. Abraços Reinaldo *De:* Vitor George [mailto:vitor.geo...@gmail.com] *Enviada em:* sexta-feira, 19 de setembro de 2014 13:14 *Para:* OSM talk-br *Assunto:* [Talk-br] Reunião semanal OSM Brasil Oi pessoal, Queria propor para vocês uma teleconferência semanal para discutir assuntos relacionados com a promoção do OpenStreetMap no Brasil. Eu tenho conversado regularmente com o Thierry e o Wille, mas seria bem legal se outros participassem também para articular melhor as atividades. Estamos fazendo toda quarta-feira às 13h. Quem quiser participar, me avise neste thread ou diretamente. Vamos usar o Gotomeeting ou o Google Hangout, dependendo do número de participantes. Abraços, Vitor ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-br] RES: Reunião semanal OSM Brasil
Vitor, Quero participar nestes reuniões quando ha tempo. Os reuniões vai ser feiro por VoIP ou tem putro sistema? Que software vai precisar p accessar? Aun Johnsen Sent from my iPhone On 19. sep. 2014, at 13.35, Vitor George vitor.geo...@gmail.com wrote: Oi Reinaldo, legal que você quer participar. Na terça-feira vou mandar informações. Se forem até umas oito pessoas poderemos fazer via Google Hangout, mas se for mais enviaremos um link para participar via Gotomeeting. Abraço 2014-09-19 13:24 GMT-03:00 Reinaldo Neves rne...@equacao.com.br: Vitor boa trade, Gostaria de participar, por favor me mande os detalhes, e já tomei a liberdade de incluir logo e link numa área de parceria e apoios do meu site: www.equacao.com.br. Se houver outros links específicos Brasil por favor me informe que farei o mesmo. Abraços Reinaldo De: Vitor George [mailto:vitor.geo...@gmail.com] Enviada em: sexta-feira, 19 de setembro de 2014 13:14 Para: OSM talk-br Assunto: [Talk-br] Reunião semanal OSM Brasil Oi pessoal, Queria propor para vocês uma teleconferência semanal para discutir assuntos relacionados com a promoção do OpenStreetMap no Brasil. Eu tenho conversado regularmente com o Thierry e o Wille, mas seria bem legal se outros participassem também para articular melhor as atividades. Estamos fazendo toda quarta-feira às 13h. Quem quiser participar, me avise neste thread ou diretamente. Vamos usar o Gotomeeting ou o Google Hangout, dependendo do número de participantes. Abraços, Vitor ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-br] OpenStreetMap Brasil no Condatos
Poderia mencionar a conveniência da comunidade gerenciar pendências e mapear a partir de Mapillary e Field Papers. Uma instância do Tasking Manager 2 dá impulso a várias iniciativas de mapeamento e ajuda indispensavelmente a gerenciar os esforços, enquanto os projetos de software que importam tem seus forks e issues no Github. Essas coisas unem a comunidade no que ela pode fazer e faz. São ferramentas que podem vir a se estabelecer entre as principais do cotidiano de um mapeador. É como vejo. Gradualmente elas vão sendo aperfeiçoadas e integradas. Alexandre Magno Em 19 de setembro de 2014 13:49, Vitor George vitor.geo...@gmail.com escreveu: Oi pessoal, Agora no começo do mês vai ter o Condatos, uma conferência sobre dados abertos no México. Ele vai ter um evento paralelo no dia 2 de outubro sobre mapas abertos: http://condatos.org/mapa.html Vou lá dar uma oficina sobre o JEO e participar de um painel que vai discutir os desafios de promover o OpenStreetMap na América Latina. Pretendo falar sobre a iniciativa de criar um capítulo local, e também sobre as atividades que desenvolvemos para fortalecer a comunidade. Vou comentar sobre o projeto Brasil 250 Cidades http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/Brasil_250_Cidades, o trabalho com as traduções, o Mapas Livres, e gostaria de saber o que vocês também acham importante falar. Abraço, Vitor ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-br] RES: Reunião semanal OSM Brasil
Pelo que entendi, há a possibilidade de contratarem os serviço br.gotomeeting.com. Alexandre Magno Em 19 de setembro de 2014 13:52, Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org escreveu: Vitor, Quero participar nestes reuniões quando ha tempo. Os reuniões vai ser feiro por VoIP ou tem putro sistema? Que software vai precisar p accessar? ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-br] OpenStreetMap Brasil no Condatos
Pra quem quer saber o que é o JEO: oeco.github.io/jeo Em 19 de setembro de 2014 13:49, Vitor George vitor.geo...@gmail.com escreveu: http://condatos.org/mapa.html Vou lá dar uma oficina sobre o JEO e participar de um painel que vai discutir os desafios de promover o OpenStreetMap na América Latina. ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-br] OpenStreetMap Brasil no Condatos
Acho que pode falar de como a comunidade brasileira vem se organizando, as ações de divulgação, as mapatonas, os usuários que fazem um grande trabalho de revisar as modificações feitas pelos outros usuários. Em 2014-09-19 13:49, Vitor George escreveu: Oi pessoal, Agora no começo do mês vai ter o Condatos, uma conferência sobre dados abertos no México. Ele vai ter um evento paralelo no dia 2 de outubro sobre mapas abertos: http://condatos.org/mapa.html [1] Vou lá dar uma oficina sobre o JEO e participar de um painel que vai discutir os desafios de promover o OpenStreetMap na América Latina. Pretendo falar sobre a iniciativa de criar um capítulo local, e também sobre as atividades que desenvolvemos para fortalecer a comunidade. Vou comentar sobre o projeto Brasil 250 Cidades [2], o trabalho com as traduções, o Mapas Livres, e gostaria de saber o que vocês também acham importante falar. Abraço, Vitor Links: -- [1] http://condatos.org/mapa.html [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/Brasil_250_Cidades ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br -- wille http://wille.blog.br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-br] RES: Reunião semanal OSM Brasil
Sugestão: para até 8 participantes, há o https://appear.in não precisa instalar nada nem se registrar em nada, basta ter um navegador atualizado. - - - · Atenciosamente, Márcio Vinícius Pinheiro http://about.me/Doideira http://pt.gravatar.com/marciovinicius Em 19 de setembro de 2014 14:14, Alexandre Magno Brito de Medeiros alexandre@gmail.com escreveu: Pelo que entendi, há a possibilidade de contratarem os serviço br.gotomeeting.com. Alexandre Magno Em 19 de setembro de 2014 13:52, Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org escreveu: Vitor, Quero participar nestes reuniões quando ha tempo. Os reuniões vai ser feiro por VoIP ou tem putro sistema? Que software vai precisar p accessar? ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-br] RES: Reunião semanal OSM Brasil
Realmente Skype dar para fazer teleconferencias bem, e também eu pode entra mesmo se no rua (skype no celular), não sei quantos participantes no limite, fiz com 3 mas com certeza dar p mais Aun Johnsen On Sep 19, 2014, at 21:25, Márcio Vinícius Pinheiro marcioviniciu...@gmail.com wrote: Sugestão: para até 8 participantes, há o https://appear.in https://appear.in/ não precisa instalar nada nem se registrar em nada, basta ter um navegador atualizado. - - - · Atenciosamente, Márcio Vinícius Pinheiro http://about.me/Doideira http://about.me/Doideira http://pt.gravatar.com/marciovinicius Em 19 de setembro de 2014 14:14, Alexandre Magno Brito de Medeiros alexandre@gmail.com mailto:alexandre@gmail.com escreveu: Pelo que entendi, há a possibilidade de contratarem os serviço br.gotomeeting.com http://br.gotomeeting.com/. Alexandre Magno Em 19 de setembro de 2014 13:52, Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org mailto:li...@gimnechiske.org escreveu: Vitor, Quero participar nestes reuniões quando ha tempo. Os reuniões vai ser feiro por VoIP ou tem putro sistema? Que software vai precisar p accessar? ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
[Talk-de] Geocoder für Kreuzungen
Hi, gibt es einen Geocoder der Kreuzungen kann ? Ich weiss das Nominatim das nicht kann, deshalb hätte ich mir für diesen Anwendungsfall schnell was mit Postgis gestrickt. (Batch geocoding von Unfallpunkten) Flo -- Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-it] Cercasi, qualcuno che può rappresentare OSM ad un convegno a Roma il 25. Settembre
2014-09-17 13:36 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com: Sto scrivendo per Simone Cortesi, che al momento non può. Stiamo cercando una persona interessata ad rappresentare OSM alla Conferenza AMFM 2014 che si terrà a Roma il 25 Settembre. Io andrò in rappresentanza di GFOSS.it e mi farebbe piacere parlare anche a nome di OSM. -- ciao Luca http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/ www.lucadelu.org ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Cercasi, qualcuno che può rappresentare OSM ad un convegno a Roma il 25. Settembre
2014-09-19 8:49 GMT+02:00 Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com: Stiamo cercando una persona interessata ad rappresentare OSM alla Conferenza AMFM 2014 che si terrà a Roma il 25 Settembre. Io andrò in rappresentanza di GFOSS.it e mi farebbe piacere parlare anche a nome di OSM. Grazie a Martin per aver scritto a nome mio. Ottimo Luca. vorrei metterti in contatto con Andrea Deiana per l'organizzazione. Grazie mille! -- -S ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Cercasi, qualcuno che può rappresentare OSM ad un convegno a Roma il 25. Settembre
2014-09-19 8:49 GMT+02:00 Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com: Io andrò in rappresentanza di GFOSS.it e mi farebbe piacere parlare anche a nome di OSM. grazie Luca! Domanda: qualcuno ha letto il whitepaper e ha dei commenti in merito? L'indirizzo è qui: http://www.amfm.it/images/pdf/140615_annuncio/WP_it_0901.pdf ciao, Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Cercasi, qualcuno che può rappresentare OSM ad un convegno a Roma il 25. Settembre
2014-09-19 9:57 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com: Domanda: qualcuno ha letto il whitepaper e ha dei commenti in merito? L'indirizzo è qui: http://www.amfm.it/images/pdf/140615_annuncio/WP_it_0901.pdf non ancora, ma lo leggerò (forse questo weekend) ciao, Martin -- ciao Luca http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/ www.lucadelu.org ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Cercasi, qualcuno che può rappresentare OSM ad un convegno a Roma il 25. Settembre
Io l'ho letto, mi sembra interessante, anche se un po generico, non fa altro che sottolineare l'importanza della geo-referenziazione in qualsiasi campo. Parla poco di osm e tratta gli Open Data come una manna dal cielo, ma noi sappiamo che non è sempre rose e fiori, anzi spesso i dati da importare sono molto imprecisi. A proposito, visto che c'è un rappresentante di Istat, possiamo farlo vergognare del fatto che, a differenza della Danimarca, hanno rilasciato i civici senza coordinate? Comunque, imho, come possiamo rendere la partecipazione alla conferenza proficua per osm? Lo pubbliciziamo come scelta ideale per la PA, in quanto free e open? facile da aggiornare come database di POIs? Bisogna parlare anche di licenze e del fatto di preferire rilascio di dati il più open possibile magari in PD? grazie Luca! Domanda: qualcuno ha letto il whitepaper e ha dei commenti in merito? L'indirizzo è qui: http://www.amfm.it/images/pdf/140615_annuncio/WP_it_0901.pdf ciao, Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] OSMit 2014 a Matera
Ciao, volevo chiedere se qualcuno fosse così gentile da registrare le varie sessioni di OSMit per coloro che non potranno intervenire all'evento e magari caricarle da qualche parte per la visione successiva. Grazie! Leonardo ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] OSMit 2014 a Matera
Mi accodo alla richiesta. Il giorno 19/set/2014 14:35, Leonardo kinetocor...@gmail.com ha scritto: Ciao, volevo chiedere se qualcuno fosse così gentile da registrare le varie sessioni di OSMit per coloro che non potranno intervenire all'evento e magari caricarle da qualche parte per la visione successiva. Grazie! Leonardo ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Mappa eventi condivisi
Il giorno 17 settembre 2014 @ 09:00:10, Francesco Piero Paolicelli (pierso...@gmail.com) ha scritto: [...] In pratica le associazioni culturali e i privati inseriscono gli eventi da loro gestiti in autonomia su un form di google. Il csv cosi generato alimenta una mappa su layer osm mentre uno script alimenta un calendario google. Ora, dopo essere arrivati a 120 eventi un 40 giorni, mi chiedono di filtrare la mappa per giorno/mese/anno con un menù a tendina o similare. […] Leggendo le api di google potrei anche interrogare il csv facendo una query dinamica sulla colonna data inizio, ma ho pensato che quando questo giocattolo avrà migliaia di dati, sarà pesantino. A monte, durante l’inserimento, potrebbero scegliere una chiave di classificazione. Oppure puoi passare dal lato oscuro della forza e inserire i dati in un db, on the fly. :-) Se poi devi arrivare a fare un cms perché oltre la gestione del luogo e tempo vorranno anche la contestualizzazione dei contenuti… passa da me a prendere un caffè. Berti___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Mappa eventi condivisi
2014-09-17 9:43 GMT+02:00 Ida Leone ida.le...@gmail.com: Nel programma di OSMIT14 la domenica mattina è generalmente riservato al mapping party. Di cui Matera non ha bisogno, perchè è già ben mappata. in realtà c'è sempre qualcosa da mappare: numeri civici, cassette delle lettere, dimensioni, altezze e colori degli edifici, lampioni e loro potenza, orari dei negozi Quindi io pensavo ad una mattinata didattica per insegnare i rudimenti del mapping a giovani interessati. Ma nulla esclude che possiamo invece riservarla all'hackaton di cui parli, o magari fare ambedue le cose :) Purtroppo domenica devo partire :( ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Mappa eventi condivisi
- non c'è un cassonnetto del reciclaggio - vedo pochissimi numeri civici - ci sono alcune cose molto strano tipo questo [0] [0] http://osm.org/go/xcvxvwePJ intendi quel fonto numero di semafori qui? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232361461 ... interessante ... credo sia meglio contattare l'autore ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Mappa eventi condivisi
Concordo, Mai rinunciare ai mapping party che inoltre sono uno dei miglior modi per iniziare con osm. Francesca Il 19/Set/2014 15:40 Maurizio Napolitano napoo...@gmail.com ha scritto: - non c'è un cassonnetto del reciclaggio - vedo pochissimi numeri civici - ci sono alcune cose molto strano tipo questo [0] [0] http://osm.org/go/xcvxvwePJ intendi quel fonto numero di semafori qui? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232361461 ... interessante ... credo sia meglio contattare l'autore ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Mappa eventi condivisi
E' un pacheggio multipiano coperto e sopra anfiteatro per piccoli spettacoli :) Inviato da iPhone Il giorno 19/set/2014, alle ore 15:39, Maurizio Napolitano napoo...@gmail.com ha scritto: intendi quel fonto numero di semafori qui? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232361461 ... interessante ... credo sia meglio contattare l'autore ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Mappa eventi condivisi
È destino nom vederci napo :-) Vengo in trentino e non ci becchiamo, vieni a matera e idem. Vuol dire che ci vediamo in campo neutro :-) Inviato da iPhone Il giorno 19/set/2014, alle ore 15:38, Maurizio Napolitano napoo...@gmail.com ha scritto: Purtroppo domenica devo partire :( ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] OSMit 2014 a Matera
Non credo di potervi accontentare. La registrazione che richiedete è costosa (telecamera fissa, operatore, etc.), e non rientra nel budget. Mi spiace! Il giorno 19 settembre 2014 14:48, John Doe theguest...@gmail.com ha scritto: Mi accodo alla richiesta. Il giorno 19/set/2014 14:35, Leonardo kinetocor...@gmail.com ha scritto: Ciao, volevo chiedere se qualcuno fosse così gentile da registrare le varie sessioni di OSMit per coloro che non potranno intervenire all'evento e magari caricarle da qualche parte per la visione successiva. Grazie! Leonardo ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] OSMit 2014 a Matera
2014-09-19 16:35 GMT+02:00 Ida Leone ida.le...@gmail.com: Non credo di potervi accontentare. La registrazione che richiedete è costosa (telecamera fissa, operatore, etc.), e non rientra nel budget. Sono certo che qualche smartphone o tablet o altro sarà pronto a registrare l'evento :) ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] OSMit 2014 a Matera
Se c'è una connessione buona basterebbe un computer ed una webcam HD e ci arrangiamo con Livestream o simili? Stefano Il giorno 19 settembre 2014 16:35, Ida Leone ida.le...@gmail.com ha scritto: Non credo di potervi accontentare. La registrazione che richiedete è costosa (telecamera fissa, operatore, etc.), e non rientra nel budget. Mi spiace! Il giorno 19 settembre 2014 14:48, John Doe theguest...@gmail.com ha scritto: Mi accodo alla richiesta. Il giorno 19/set/2014 14:35, Leonardo kinetocor...@gmail.com ha scritto: Ciao, volevo chiedere se qualcuno fosse così gentile da registrare le varie sessioni di OSMit per coloro che non potranno intervenire all'evento e magari caricarle da qualche parte per la visione successiva. Grazie! Leonardo ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] OSMit 2014 a Matera
Il 19 settembre 2014 16:39, Maurizio Napolitano napoo...@gmail.com ha scritto: 2014-09-19 16:35 GMT+02:00 Ida Leone ida.le...@gmail.com: Non credo di potervi accontentare. La registrazione che richiedete è costosa (telecamera fissa, operatore, etc.), e non rientra nel budget. Sono certo che qualche smartphone o tablet o altro sarà pronto a registrare l'evento :) (a meno che qualche anima pia porti telecamera e treppiede e voglia farlo) Ciao, C ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] OSMit 2014 a Matera
Non il mio. Si tratta di registrare per 9 ore, io non ce la faccio :) Il 19/Set/2014 16:40 Maurizio Napolitano napoo...@gmail.com ha scritto: 2014-09-19 16:35 GMT+02:00 Ida Leone ida.le...@gmail.com: Non credo di potervi accontentare. La registrazione che richiedete è costosa (telecamera fissa, operatore, etc.), e non rientra nel budget. Sono certo che qualche smartphone o tablet o altro sarà pronto a registrare l'evento :) ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] OSMit 2014 a Matera
Il 19/09/2014 16:43, sabas88 ha scritto: Se c'è una connessione buona basterebbe un computer ed una webcam HD e ci arrangiamo con Livestream o simili? Sì dai, non ci interessa uno streaming in Ultra HD4K, basta anche un magnetofono della Geloso. Alessandro Ale_Zena_IT (che non può venire) ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-it] statale a Cavalese
In quel di Cavalese x questioni turistiche nel periodo estivo rendono la statale a senso unico come ho mappato... nel corso dell anno torna a doppio senso... Come si può mappare ,senza dover ogni estate inserire e poi togliere il senso unico, in modo definitivo x indicare che dal 21 giugno al 22 settembre la strada è oneway?___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] statale a Cavalese
Il giorno ven, 19/09/2014 alle 21.06 +0200, beppebo...@libero.it ha scritto: In quel di Cavalese x questioni turistiche nel periodo estivo rendono la statale a senso unico come ho mappato... nel corso dell anno torna a doppio senso... Come si può mappare ,senza dover ogni estate inserire e poi togliere il senso unico, in modo definitivo x indicare che dal 21 giugno al 22 settembre la strada è oneway? direi cosi: oneway:conditional=yes @ (Jun 21-Sep 22) Lorenzo ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] statale a Cavalese
Il 19 settembre 2014 19:24, Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi lomastr...@gmail.com ha scritto: Il giorno ven, 19/09/2014 alle 21.06 +0200, beppebo...@libero.it ha scritto: In quel di Cavalese x questioni turistiche nel periodo estivo rendono la statale a senso unico come ho mappato... nel corso dell anno torna a doppio senso... Come si può mappare ,senza dover ogni estate inserire e poi togliere il senso unico, in modo definitivo x indicare che dal 21 giugno al 22 settembre la strada è oneway? direi cosi: oneway:conditional=yes @ (Jun 21-Sep 22) So che non bisognerebbe mappare per il rendering o per le altre applicazioni, ma questo formato è starndard? È riconosciuto dai software di routing? Cristian ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] statale a Cavalese
Il giorno ven, 19/09/2014 alle 21.28 +0200, Cristian Consonni ha scritto: Il 19 settembre 2014 19:24, Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi lomastr...@gmail.com ha scritto: Il giorno ven, 19/09/2014 alle 21.06 +0200, beppebo...@libero.it ha scritto: In quel di Cavalese x questioni turistiche nel periodo estivo rendono la statale a senso unico come ho mappato... nel corso dell anno torna a doppio senso... Come si può mappare ,senza dover ogni estate inserire e poi togliere il senso unico, in modo definitivo x indicare che dal 21 giugno al 22 settembre la strada è oneway? direi cosi: oneway:conditional=yes @ (Jun 21-Sep 22) So che non bisognerebbe mappare per il rendering o per le altre applicazioni, ma questo formato è starndard? È riconosciuto dai software di routing? Cristian E' standard: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions Il formato orario è definito meglio qui: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours C'è questo esempio: Consecutive monthdays open separated by - · (e.g., Dec 20-26) or (e.g., Dec 20-Jan 06) Sulla seconda domanda sono meno sicuro :) ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Mappa eventi condivisi
Grazie a tutti. Nel frattempo Guenter Richter ha fatto la mappa degli eventi, filtrabile per data e contenuti: http://public.ixmaps.com.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/maptune2/BasilicataEventi_mapstraction_fullscreen.html ok penso di aver risolto. Piero Il giorno 19/set/2014, alle ore 15:54, Francesca Valentina coretodes...@gmail.com ha scritto: Concordo, Mai rinunciare ai mapping party che inoltre sono uno dei miglior modi per iniziare con osm. Francesca Il 19/Set/2014 15:40 Maurizio Napolitano napoo...@gmail.com ha scritto: - non c'è un cassonnetto del reciclaggio - vedo pochissimi numeri civici - ci sono alcune cose molto strano tipo questo [0] [0] http://osm.org/go/xcvxvwePJ intendi quel fonto numero di semafori qui? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232361461 ... interessante ... credo sia meglio contattare l'autore ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it Francesco Piero Paolicelli TW: @piersoft STORE: GooglePlay/AppStore WWW: www.apposta.biz Sorry for typos, sent by mobile. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-co] Posibilidad de reunión con UNGRD - OSM - OCHA ¿quien va?
2014-09-17 10:39 GMT-05:00 Luis Hernando Aguilar aguil...@un.org: Hola de nuevo. Estoy preparando esta comunicación para presentarle OSM a la UNGRD. Por favor 1) ¿cuantos voluntarios OSM hay en Colombia? y 2) Revisen esta nota, ¿está bien lo que se propone? ¿que otras cosas debemos tener en cuenta? *En la presente lista hay al momento 245 suscriptores que se pueden considerar la comunidad Colombiana* Un abrazo Hola, con el objeto de facilitar la edición colaborativa del documento lo he subido a Google Drive https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CVH7Ws0HOJF9T6bicNRFr6Umw09hiVUhRCmo340N2lE/edit?usp=sharing ___ Talk-co mailing list Talk-co@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-co
[Talk-co] Quien tiene algo adelantado de Geocodigo inverso para Bogotá
Saludos a todos los miembros del grupo. Quisiera saber si alguien ha hecho adelantos en openstreetmap en materia de geocodigo inverso para Bogotá, y si alguien sabe como funciona el sistema de coordenadas de mapacallejero? Gracias de antemano por culaquier información que me puedan dar. -- Saludos Cordiales Alejandro Plata O. ___ Talk-co mailing list Talk-co@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-co
[Talk-ca] Bing updated imagery in Windsor, Ontario
Just wanted to give you guys a heads up in anybody wanted to do a massive cleanup of the new 401 construction in that area. According to JOSM, the imagery Bing now has is about 3 months old taken between 05/31/14 and 06/15/14. So, if anybody feels like having some fun, have at it. ;) -James ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-ca] Bing updated imagery in Windsor, Ontario
The same here arround Québec City (QC, CA) !! According to JOSM, the imagery Bing is about 10 months. 2014-09-19 7:39 GMT-04:00 James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com: Just wanted to give you guys a heads up in anybody wanted to do a massive cleanup of the new 401 construction in that area. According to JOSM, the imagery Bing now has is about 3 months old taken between 05/31/14 and 06/15/14. So, if anybody feels like having some fun, have at it. ;) -James ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca -- Bruno Remy ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-ca] Bing updated imagery in Windsor, Ontario
Bonjour Bruno, quel outil pour vérifier date de production des images d'une zone? Pierre De : Bruno Remy bremy.qc...@gmail.com À : James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com Cc : talk-ca@openstreetmap.org talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Vendredi 19 septembre 2014 14h55 Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Bing updated imagery in Windsor, Ontario The same here arround Québec City (QC, CA) !! According to JOSM, the imagery Bing is about 10 months. 2014-09-19 7:39 GMT-04:00 James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com: Just wanted to give you guys a heads up in anybody wanted to do a massive cleanup of the new 401 construction in that area. According to JOSM, the imagery Bing now has is about 3 months old taken between 05/31/14 and 06/15/14. So, if anybody feels like having some fun, have at it. ;) -James ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca -- Bruno Remy ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-ca] Bing updated imagery in Windsor, Ontario
Bonjour Pierre, C'est intégré dans JOSM (sans plug-in supplémentaire ... sauf erreur de ma part) 1-selectionner la couche Bing Imagery en premier plan 2-Juste à faire un clic-droit pour afficher le menu contextuel: une des options propose l'affichage des informations de la tuile en cours. 3-Le timestamp de chaque tuile apparait en sur-couche en rouge. --- Il existe un outil d'information web, mais non fiable car ses données ne semblent pas être correctement mises à jour: Bing Aerial Imagery Analyzer for OpenStreetMap http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=49.3935298445362lon=10.976469421386724zoom=11 Bruno 2014-09-19 9:28 GMT-04:00 Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr: Bonjour Bruno, quel outil pour vérifier date de production des images d'une zone? Pierre -- *De :* Bruno Remy bremy.qc...@gmail.com *À :* James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com *Cc :* talk-ca@openstreetmap.org talk-ca@openstreetmap.org *Envoyé le :* Vendredi 19 septembre 2014 14h55 *Objet :* Re: [Talk-ca] Bing updated imagery in Windsor, Ontario The same here arround Québec City (QC, CA) !! According to JOSM, the imagery Bing is about 10 months. 2014-09-19 7:39 GMT-04:00 James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com: Just wanted to give you guys a heads up in anybody wanted to do a massive cleanup of the new 401 construction in that area. According to JOSM, the imagery Bing now has is about 3 months old taken between 05/31/14 and 06/15/14. So, if anybody feels like having some fun, have at it. ;) -James ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca -- Bruno Remy ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca -- Bruno Remy ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-ca] Bing updated imagery in Windsor, Ontario
Merci pour l’information! From: Bruno Remy [mailto:bremy.qc...@gmail.com] Sent: September-19-14 09:42 To: Pierre Béland Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Bing updated imagery in Windsor, Ontario Bonjour Pierre, C'est intégré dans JOSM (sans plug-in supplémentaire ... sauf erreur de ma part) 1-selectionner la couche Bing Imagery en premier plan 2-Juste à faire un clic-droit pour afficher le menu contextuel: une des options propose l'affichage des informations de la tuile en cours. 3-Le timestamp de chaque tuile apparait en sur-couche en rouge. --- Il existe un outil d'information web, mais non fiable car ses données ne semblent pas être correctement mises à jour: Bing Aerial Imagery Analyzer for OpenStreetMap http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=49.3935298445362 http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=49.3935298445362lon=10.976469421386724zoom=11 lon=10.976469421386724zoom=11 Bruno 2014-09-19 9:28 GMT-04:00 Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr: Bonjour Bruno, quel outil pour vérifier date de production des images d'une zone? Pierre _ De : Bruno Remy bremy.qc...@gmail.com À : James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com Cc : talk-ca@openstreetmap.org talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Vendredi 19 septembre 2014 14h55 Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Bing updated imagery in Windsor, Ontario The same here arround Québec City (QC, CA) !! According to JOSM, the imagery Bing is about 10 months. 2014-09-19 7:39 GMT-04:00 James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com: Just wanted to give you guys a heads up in anybody wanted to do a massive cleanup of the new 401 construction in that area. According to JOSM, the imagery Bing now has is about 3 months old taken between 05/31/14 and 06/15/14. So, if anybody feels like having some fun, have at it. ;) -James ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca -- Bruno Remy ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca -- Bruno Remy ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-ca] Bing updated imagery in Windsor, Ontario
Cela ne s'affiche pas pour moi dans JOSM. Mais j'ai retrouvé l'application qui le permet. De fait, la page wiki Bing Imagery Analyzer for OSM indique a deux sites Bing Analyzer. Et celui ci-dessous fournit la date de mise-a-jour des tuiles. On voit une image de 2012 de grande qualité au Mont Mégantic. Et dans la région autour de Montréal je ne retrouves toujours que du Mars-2001 -- Juillet 2004. http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=45.455744266624194lon=-71.15181999373625zoom=18 Pierre De : Daniel Begin jfd...@hotmail.com À : 'Bruno Remy' bremy.qc...@gmail.com Cc : talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Vendredi 19 septembre 2014 19h27 Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Bing updated imagery in Windsor, Ontario Merci pour l’information! From:Bruno Remy [mailto:bremy.qc...@gmail.com] Sent: September-19-14 09:42 To: Pierre Béland Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Bing updated imagery in Windsor, Ontario Bonjour Pierre, C'est intégré dans JOSM (sans plug-in supplémentaire ... sauf erreur de ma part) 1-selectionner la couche Bing Imagery en premier plan 2-Juste à faire un clic-droit pour afficher le menu contextuel: une des options propose l'affichage des informations de la tuile en cours. 3-Le timestamp de chaque tuile apparait en sur-couche en rouge. --- Il existe un outil d'information web, mais non fiable car ses données ne semblent pas être correctement mises à jour: Bing Aerial Imagery Analyzer for OpenStreetMap http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=49.3935298445362lon=10.976469421386724zoom=11 Bruno 2014-09-19 9:28 GMT-04:00 Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr: Bonjour Bruno, quel outil pour vérifier date de production des images d'une zone? Pierre De :Bruno Remy bremy.qc...@gmail.com À : James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com Cc : talk-ca@openstreetmap.org talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Vendredi 19 septembre 2014 14h55 Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Bing updated imagery in Windsor, Ontario The same here arround Québec City (QC, CA) !! According to JOSM, the imagery Bing is about 10 months. 2014-09-19 7:39 GMT-04:00 James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com: Just wanted to give you guys a heads up in anybody wanted to do a massive cleanup of the new 401 construction in that area. According to JOSM, the imagery Bing now has is about 3 months old taken between 05/31/14 and 06/15/14. So, if anybody feels like having some fun, have at it. ;) -James ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca -- Bruno Remy ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca -- Bruno Remy ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-cz] Problemy s ulicema a budovama
On 2014-09-18, 13:13 GMT, Marián Kyral wrote: No pokud zadám adresu ručně, tak tak asi nedám source mvcr:adresa ne? Aha, nepochopil jsem význam slova a :( Ach jo. Matěj ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] Atribut ref= na rozcestnících v OSM - zachovejte prosím
Ahoj, asi jsem technicky s fotákem trochu pozadu. Fotografie rozcestníků mám uloženy v adresářích, jméno adresáře je složeno z jméno rozcestníku a gps souřadnice např.: Hořejší Vrchlabí 50.6465028, 15.6073389 Potřeboval bych ještě dopracovat ještě ostatní fotky, ale buď se mi nechce nebo nemám čas. Zdraví Pavel Kwiecien -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Michal Grézl michal.gr...@openstreetmap.cz Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 18. 9. 2014 19:37:04 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Atribut ref= na rozcestnících v OSM - zachovejte prosím Pokud mate nekdo hodne rozcestniku s gps informacemi v exif, tak mi je poslete a ja je pridam na openstreetmap.cz(http://openstreetmap.cz) (vsechny naraz). Kdyby nekdo chtel nejakou integraci, tak udelam geojson nebo georss, staci rict. Zatim chybela motivace. ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz;___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] Atribut ref= na rozcestnících v OSM - zachovejte prosím
To myslím nebude problém. Otázka jednoduchého scriptu, který to přes exiftool nacpe do exifu. Marián -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Pavel Kwiecien pavel.kwiec...@seznam.cz Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 19. 9. 2014 13:11:45 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Atribut ref= na rozcestnících v OSM - zachovejte prosím Ahoj, asi jsem technicky s fotákem trochu pozadu. Fotografie rozcestníků mám uloženy v adresářích, jméno adresáře je složeno z jméno rozcestníku a gps souřadnice např.: Hořejší Vrchlabí 50.6465028, 15.6073389 Potřeboval bych ještě dopracovat ještě ostatní fotky, ale buď se mi nechce nebo nemám čas. Zdraví Pavel Kwiecien -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Michal Grézl michal.gr...@openstreetmap.cz Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 18. 9. 2014 19:37:04 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Atribut ref= na rozcestnících v OSM - zachovejte prosím Pokud mate nekdo hodne rozcestniku s gps informacemi v exif, tak mi je poslete a ja je pridam na openstreetmap.cz(http://openstreetmap.cz) (vsechny naraz). Kdyby nekdo chtel nejakou integraci, tak udelam geojson nebo georss, staci rict. Zatim chybela motivace. ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz; ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz;___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] Atribut ref= na rozcestnících v OSM - zachovejte prosím
Ahoj, no nějak to vymyslím. Podle internetu bych měl používat tento příkaz: exiftool -GPSLatitude=50.6465028 -GPSLongitude=15.6073389 obrázek.jpg Zdraví Pavel Kwiecien -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Marián Kyral mky...@email.cz Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 19. 9. 2014 13:52:57 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Atribut ref= na rozcestnících v OSM - zachovejte prosím To myslím nebude problém. Otázka jednoduchého scriptu, který to přes exiftool nacpe do exifu. Marián -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Pavel Kwiecien pavel.kwiec...@seznam.cz Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 19. 9. 2014 13:11:45 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Atribut ref= na rozcestnících v OSM - zachovejte prosím Ahoj, asi jsem technicky s fotákem trochu pozadu. Fotografie rozcestníků mám uloženy v adresářích, jméno adresáře je složeno z jméno rozcestníku a gps souřadnice např.: Hořejší Vrchlabí 50.6465028, 15.6073389 Potřeboval bych ještě dopracovat ještě ostatní fotky, ale buď se mi nechce nebo nemám čas. Zdraví Pavel Kwiecien -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Michal Grézl michal.gr...@openstreetmap.cz Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 18. 9. 2014 19:37:04 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Atribut ref= na rozcestnících v OSM - zachovejte prosím Pokud mate nekdo hodne rozcestniku s gps informacemi v exif, tak mi je poslete a ja je pridam na openstreetmap.cz(http://openstreetmap.cz) (vsechny naraz). Kdyby nekdo chtel nejakou integraci, tak udelam geojson nebo georss, staci rict. Zatim chybela motivace. ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz; ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz; ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz;___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
[OSM-talk-fr] utilisation d'osrm pour signaler un itinéraire alternatif
j'ai réussi a caser un itinéraire alternatif en utilisant osrm : http://www.sytadin.fr/sys/alert_reseau.jsp.html#379962 ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Calendrier des rencontres
Il n'y a pas de formulaire actuellement. Il me semble que j'ai paramétré Drupal pour permettre de créer un contenu (un évènement dans ce cas) et il suffit qu'un administrateur du site le valide pour publication. Indique-moi quel est ton compte sur openstreetmap.fr Le 18 septembre 2014 22:26, Gwen ping...@no-log.org a écrit : bonjour suite à la mise en ligne de la carte des rencontres des groupes locaux (Merci Frédéric !), je me demandais quelle était la procédure pour annoncer un événement dans le calendrier dispo sur opentreetmap.fr. A défaut de formulaire de saisie, à qui peut-on envoyer les infos ? d'avance merci Gwen ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr -- Christian Quest - OpenStreetMap France ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] utilisation d'osrm pour signaler un itinéraire alternatif
\o/ !! Doucement on grignote, on grignote ;) 2014-09-19 13:47 GMT+02:00 didier2...@free.fr: j'ai réussi a caser un itinéraire alternatif en utilisant osrm : http://www.sytadin.fr/sys/alert_reseau.jsp.html#379962 ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr -- Christian Quest - OpenStreetMap France ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[OSM-talk-fr] pendant qu'on parle d'OSRM
Quelqu'un d'autre a-t-il remarqué qu'OSRM semble limiter la vitesse à 90km/h sur autoroute ? osrm.at/9vt ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] pendant qu'on parle d'OSRM
C'est bien ce qu'il y a dans la configuration :
https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/blob/master/profiles/car.lua
speed_profile = {
[motorway] = 90,
[motorway_link] = 75,
[trunk] = 85,
[trunk_link] = 70,
[primary] = 65,
[primary_link] = 60,
[secondary] = 55,
[secondary_link] = 50,
[tertiary] = 40,
[tertiary_link] = 30,
[unclassified] = 25,
[residential] = 25,
[living_street] = 10,
[service] = 15,
-- [track] = 5,
[ferry] = 5,
[shuttle_train] = 10,
[default] = 10
Le 19/09/2014 14:33, Pierre-Yves Berrard a écrit :
Quelqu'un d'autre a-t-il remarqué qu'OSRM semble limiter la vitesse à
90km/h sur autoroute ?
osrm.at/9vt http://osrm.at/9vt
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[OSM-talk-fr] Re : Re: pendant qu'on parle d'OSRM
un peu plus bas dans le code .lua
if way.speed == -1 then
local highway_speed = speed_profile[highway]
local max_speed = parse_maxspeed( way.tags:Find(maxspeed) )
-- Set the avg speed on the way if it is accessible by road class
if highway_speed then
if max_speed highway_speed then
way.speed = max_speed
a prioris, il tient compte des vitesses saisie sur les ways
puis y applique un coef de 0.8 (truc pour simuler la vitesse reélle et non pas
la vitesse max)
Bref, les temps de trajets en Ile de France sont totalement faux aux heures de
pointes
- Mail d'origine -
De: Frédéric Rodrigo fred.rodr...@gmail.com
À: Discussions sur OSM en français talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 14:39:08 +0200 (CEST)
Objet: Re: [OSM-talk-fr] pendant qu'on parle d'OSRM
C'est bien ce qu'il y a dans la configuration :
https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/blob/master/profiles/car.lua
speed_profile = {
[motorway] = 90,
[motorway_link] = 75,
[trunk] = 85,
[trunk_link] = 70,
[primary] = 65,
[primary_link] = 60,
[secondary] = 55,
[secondary_link] = 50,
[tertiary] = 40,
[tertiary_link] = 30,
[unclassified] = 25,
[residential] = 25,
[living_street] = 10,
[service] = 15,
-- [track] = 5,
[ferry] = 5,
[shuttle_train] = 10,
[default] = 10
Le 19/09/2014 14:33, Pierre-Yves Berrard a écrit :
Quelqu'un d'autre a-t-il remarqué qu'OSRM semble limiter la vitesse à
90km/h sur autoroute ?
osrm.at/9vt http://osrm.at/9vt
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] pendant qu'on parle d'OSRM
Ok, merci pour vos réponses.
PY
Le 19 septembre 2014 15:25, didier2...@free.fr a écrit :
un peu plus bas dans le code .lua
if way.speed == -1 then
local highway_speed = speed_profile[highway]
local max_speed = parse_maxspeed( way.tags:Find(maxspeed) )
-- Set the avg speed on the way if it is accessible by road class
if highway_speed then
if max_speed highway_speed then
way.speed = max_speed
a prioris, il tient compte des vitesses saisie sur les ways
puis y applique un coef de 0.8 (truc pour simuler la vitesse reélle et non
pas la vitesse max)
Bref, les temps de trajets en Ile de France sont totalement faux aux
heures de pointes
- Mail d'origine -
De: Frédéric Rodrigo fred.rodr...@gmail.com
À: Discussions sur OSM en français talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 14:39:08 +0200 (CEST)
Objet: Re: [OSM-talk-fr] pendant qu'on parle d'OSRM
C'est bien ce qu'il y a dans la configuration :
https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/blob/master/profiles/car.lua
speed_profile = {
[motorway] = 90,
[motorway_link] = 75,
[trunk] = 85,
[trunk_link] = 70,
[primary] = 65,
[primary_link] = 60,
[secondary] = 55,
[secondary_link] = 50,
[tertiary] = 40,
[tertiary_link] = 30,
[unclassified] = 25,
[residential] = 25,
[living_street] = 10,
[service] = 15,
-- [track] = 5,
[ferry] = 5,
[shuttle_train] = 10,
[default] = 10
Le 19/09/2014 14:33, Pierre-Yves Berrard a écrit :
Quelqu'un d'autre a-t-il remarqué qu'OSRM semble limiter la vitesse à
90km/h sur autoroute ?
osrm.at/9vt http://osrm.at/9vt
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Hyperactivité d'un utilisateur
2014-09-18 21:37 GMT+02:00 didier2...@free.fr: pour les revert: si on veut faire un revert de plusieurs changesets, on commence par faire le revert du plus récent Attention, même en faisant le revert dans l'ordre inverse, on ne retrouvera pas les données antécédentes sans conflits. En effet, si le vandale a créé deux versions d'un élément (par ex, v1 - v2 puis v2 - v3), le premier revert crée une nouvelle version en revenant à T-1 (v3 - v4 avec les attributs de v2). Mais quand on tente d'annuler le deuxième changeset (le premier chronologiquement), JOSM va avoir un conflit puisque la version de l'élément a évolué depuis (le changeset parle d'un v1 - v2 qui n'est plus v2 mais v4 maintenant). Il faudrait en fait que le reverter prenne en charge des groupes de changesets au lieu de les faire un par un. Bien sûr, ça n'éviterait pas les problèmes si un deuxième contributeur interfère dans l'historique des changements mais ça faciliterait quand même les retours en arrière lorsque quelqu'un modifie plusieurs fois un objet. Pieren ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Hyperactivité d'un utilisateur
+1 pour l'explication Le vendredi 19 septembre 2014 à 17:46 +0200, Pieren a écrit : 2014-09-18 21:37 GMT+02:00 didier2...@free.fr: pour les revert: si on veut faire un revert de plusieurs changesets, on commence par faire le revert du plus récent Attention, même en faisant le revert dans l'ordre inverse, on ne retrouvera pas les données antécédentes sans conflits. En effet, si le vandale a créé deux versions d'un élément (par ex, v1 - v2 puis v2 - v3), le premier revert crée une nouvelle version en revenant à T-1 (v3 - v4 avec les attributs de v2). Mais quand on tente d'annuler le deuxième changeset (le premier chronologiquement), JOSM va avoir un conflit puisque la version de l'élément a évolué depuis (le changeset parle d'un v1 - v2 qui n'est plus v2 mais v4 maintenant). Il faudrait en fait que le reverter prenne en charge des groupes de changesets au lieu de les faire un par un. Bien sûr, ça n'éviterait pas les problèmes si un deuxième contributeur interfère dans l'historique des changements mais ça faciliterait quand même les retours en arrière lorsque quelqu'un modifie plusieurs fois un objet. Pieren ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] BANO/FANTOIR : deux orthographes pour une voie
Bonjour, Il me semble plus pertinent de mettre une balise alt_name http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:alt_name sur la rue en question et de faire une vérification par le code du soft en cas de non correspondance cette balise si cela n'est pas déjà le cas. Il y a une priorité sur les noms à prendre en compte il me semble: 1. name 2. official_name 3. int_name 4. nat_name 5. name:fr 6. reg_name 7. loc_name 8. old_name 9. alt_name [] (boucle avec séparateur ; si plusieurs nom) 10. short_name C'est plus propre et plus compréhensible surtout si dernière on laisse une note en expliquant que c'est pour faire une correspondance de nom entre BANO et FANTOIR. Vous en pensez quoi? Le 17 septembre 2014 12:11, rainerU ra...@sfr.fr a écrit : Am 17.09.2014 11:51, schrieb Christian Quest: Il faudrait pour ces cas que les 2 codes FANTOIR soient rattachés à la voie en question. On ne s'est pas encore mis d'accord sur la façon de procéder... donc laisse en l'état et si c'est toujours visible sur le rendu BANO et bien cela ne gêne pas ;) Ok. Ça me gêne juste un peu pour celui qui passera après moi et doit refaire les mêmes vérifications pour savoir si c'est rue ou avenue. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[OSM-talk-fr] Prix des carburants ?
Bonjour, pensez-vous qu'on puisse croiser ce jeu de données avec osm pour améliorer les tags, les corriger et/ou détecter les stations manquantes/en trop ? http://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/dataset/prix-des-carburants-en-france ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] On parle d'OSM-FR et de BANO dans L'Usine Digitale...
Bravo aux initiateurs et contributeurs de BANO dont le travail a permis d'aboutir à cette reconnaissance lors de la conférence de presse du 17/09 sur la stratégie numérique de l'Etat : /Par ailleurs, l'Etat a confirmé le soutien apporté cet été à un projet de base nationale d'adresses ouvertes initiée par OpenStreetMap France et qui devrait intéresser l'ensemble des organisations ou les gestionnaires de données localisées, à commencer par les collectivités territoriales. La constitution collaborative d'une base d'adresses nationale réalisée à partir des meilleures sources disponibles et libres comprendrait déjà environ 15 millions d'adresses./ (…) tiré de : http://www.localtis.info/cs/ContentServer?pagename=Localtis/LOCActu/ArticleActualitecid=1250267719845jid=1250267721082 Le 17/09/14 21:02, Christian Quest a écrit : C'est ici: http://www.usine-digitale.fr/article/e-gouvernement-la-france-s-engage-a-100-de-services-en-ligne-dans-un-an.N285088 Pour info, il y a eu une communication de Thierry Mandon sur le numérique lors du conseil des ministres de ce mercredi. BANO y a été évoqué et fait surtout partie du dossier de presse. Aujourd'hui a aussi été publié le décret concernant le poste d'Administrateur Général des Données (Chief Data Officer en anglais). C'est un décret très novateur pour les données en France et pour l'opendata. Il n'y a plus qu'à attendre la nomination de celui ou celle qui va tenir pour la première fois ce rôle. Aujourd'hui aussi... nouvelle version du site http://data.gouv.fr/ qui intègre (parmi un grand nombre de nouveautés) désormais des minicarte OSM (fond mapquest) pour localiser la couverture géographique des jeux de données. Grosse journée au boulot ;) -- Christian Quest - OpenStreetMap France ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] BANO/FANTOIR : deux orthographes pour une voie
Bonsoir, Le 19/09/2014 20:12, Jérôme Seigneuret a écrit : Il me semble plus pertinent de mettre une balise alt_name http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:alt_name sur la rue en question et de faire une vérification par le code du soft en cas de non correspondance cette balise si cela n'est pas déjà le cas. Il y a une priorité sur les noms à prendre en compte il me semble: 1. name 2. official_name 3. int_name 4. nat_name 5. name:fr 6. reg_name 7. loc_name 8. old_name 9. alt_name [] (boucle avec séparateur ; si plusieurs nom) 10. short_name C'est plus propre et plus compréhensible surtout si dernière on laisse une note en expliquant que c'est pour faire une correspondance de nom entre BANO et FANTOIR. Vous en pensez quoi? Actuellement les traitements de rapprochement des noms ne considèrent que le tag name=*, il y a donc une marge de progression de ce côté là. Mais à l'inverse, ajouter un alt_name uniquement sur la foi de Fantoir, pour moi c'est se tromper d'objectif. Le alt_name devrait être issu d'une observation de terrain. Si rien ne le justifie sur place, je ne rajoute pas de alt_name. C'est dit ici régulièrement, le fait de laisser du rouge sur le calque BANO n'est pas problématique. Après, laisser une note sur des objets OSM pour éviter une perte de temps par d'autres contributeurs, ça pourquoi pas. vincent ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] On parle d'OSM-FR et de BANO dans L'Usine Digitale...
Le 19/09/2014 21:58, Brice MALLET a écrit : Bravo aux initiateurs et contributeurs de BANO dont le travail a permis d'aboutir à cette reconnaissance lors de la conférence de presse du 17/09 sur la stratégie numérique de l'Etat : /Par ailleurs, l'Etat a confirmé le soutien apporté cet été à un projet de base nationale d'adresses ouvertes initiée par OpenStreetMap France et qui devrait intéresser l'ensemble des organisations ou les gestionnaires de données localisées, à commencer par les collectivités territoriales. La constitution collaborative d'une base d'adresses nationale réalisée à partir des meilleures sources disponibles et libres comprendrait déjà environ 15 millions d'adresses./ (…) tiré de : http://www.localtis.info/cs/ContentServer?pagename=Localtis/LOCActu/ArticleActualitecid=1250267719845jid=1250267721082 Z'ai cru voir un RatZillaS : http://data.blog.lemonde.fr/2014/09/19/henri-verdier-chief-data-officer-de-la-france/ ;) ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Prix des carburants ?
Oui bien sûr, j'ai prévu de l'ajouter à Osmose. On peut même avoir le type de carburant. Je suis preneur de toute aides. Frédéric. Le 19/09/2014 20:58, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft a écrit : Bonjour, pensez-vous qu'on puisse croiser ce jeu de données avec osm pour améliorer les tags, les corriger et/ou détecter les stations manquantes/en trop ? http://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/dataset/prix-des-carburants-en-france ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Hyperactivité d'un utilisateur
Le 19 septembre 2014 17:46, Pieren pier...@gmail.com a écrit : 2014-09-18 21:37 GMT+02:00 didier2...@free.fr: pour les revert: si on veut faire un revert de plusieurs changesets, on commence par faire le revert du plus récent Attention, même en faisant le revert dans l'ordre inverse, on ne retrouvera pas les données antécédentes sans conflits. En effet, si le vandale a créé deux versions d'un élément (par ex, v1 - v2 puis v2 - v3), le premier revert crée une nouvelle version en revenant à T-1 (v3 - v4 avec les attributs de v2). Mais quand on tente d'annuler le deuxième changeset (le premier chronologiquement), JOSM va avoir un conflit puisque la version de l'élément a évolué depuis (le changeset parle d'un v1 - v2 qui n'est plus v2 mais v4 maintenant). Il faudrait en fait que le reverter prenne en charge des groupes de changesets au lieu de les faire un par un. Pour compléter; c'est plus compliqué que ça car un même changeset peut contenir plusieurs versions successives d'un objet. Et lors d'une résolution de conflits entre deux changesets, ils vont chacun créer des versions sur des objets séparés mais entremêlés (et assez souvent pour les résoudre on est amené à modifier un même objet une seconde fois dans le changeset). L'autre cas c'est le changeset resté ouvert pour plusieurs modifs en séries. La granularité n'est donc pas le changeset mais uniquement objet par objet avec des version séparées; réparties dans un nombre variable de changesets. Noter aussi qu'il peut y avoir pluseurs changesets ouverts simultanément par le même utilisateur et quel leurs modifs peuvent aussi s'entre mêler (amais avec des conflits de versions possibles entre eux et à résoudre pour chacun). Bref, faire un revert d'un ou plusieurs changesets c'est aussi compliqué! Il faut lister toutes les versions de chaque objet modifié dans le(s) changet(s) et repérer les versions initiales. Si on veut éviter de compliquer avec des listes d'objets compliquées, on a intéret à faire les reverts non pas en groupant selon leur changset d'origine mais selon leur dépendances (objets liés : noeuds référencés par ways ou relations, ways et relations référencées par relations) et travailler sur ces jeux assez petits pour pouvoir traiter ces petits groupes séparément : ceci fait on peut alors les déversionner étape par étape en parcourant les versions en sens inverse ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[Talk-us] Merging NYC buildings
I've also see buildings merged that may appear to be one building from above but are in fact two. A single building cannot straddle two tax parcels. In general, visual information in NYC is sometimes not enough to warrant a change. Example below of a building with two separate address points sitting on two separate tax parcels that was merged when it should not have been. The intention of this email is to inform the group. I'm sure you can all imagine the challenges in managing data in Manhattan. Often multiple sources are necessary to validate changes. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3069855105/history#map=19/40.75931/-73.96838 Cheers, Colin Reilly Director, Geographic Information Systems New York City Department of Information Technology Telecommunications ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Merging NYC buildings
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Reilly, Colin crei...@doitt.nyc.gov wrote: I’ve also see buildings merged that may appear to be one building from above but are in fact two. Do you have better imagery that we would be able to use? I think that would help in this case. Cheers, Katie A single building cannot straddle two tax parcels. In general, visual information in NYC is sometimes not enough to warrant a change. Example below of a building with two separate address points sitting on two separate tax parcels that was merged when it should not have been. The intention of this email is to inform the group. I’m sure you can all imagine the challenges in managing data in Manhattan. Often multiple sources are necessary to validate changes. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3069855105/history#map=19/40.75931/-73.96838 Cheers, Colin Reilly Director, Geographic Information Systems *New York City Department of * *Information Technology Telecommunications* ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us -- Katie Filbert filbe...@gmail.com @filbertkm / @wikidata ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Merging NYC buildings
On 9/19/2014 7:00 AM, Bryan Housel wrote: We really should come up with a good way to make authoritative data harder to edit in the various editors. All that a particular data source can be authoritative for is what that data source says something is. What is authoritative for OSM is the ground truth. That's not to say that there aren't features that would be difficult to improve in accuracy. The Canada-US border on the west coast comes to mind. It's pieced together from multiple observations and data sources and it's unlikely someone could improve it's accuracy, but the possibility remains there. The idea of some tag to lock objects from normal editing because they are authoritative has occasionally been proposed, and to summarize the discussion, it's extremely unlikely to happen. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Merging NYC buildings
On 9/19/2014 6:19 AM, Reilly, Colin wrote: A single building cannot straddle two tax parcels. This seems incorrect. If I build a structure on two tax parcels, it can exist as a single building. It may not be legal, or may require planning tricks that make it two buildings in the eyes of the city, but if I survey it and it's one building, I will map it so. In dense urban areas the edges of buildings can often only be determined by surveys, not by imagery, as the imagery only shows the roofs generally, and roofs may change appearance within a building or not change appearance between two adjacent buildings. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Talk-us Digest, Vol 82, Issue 31
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us -- Katie Filbert filbe...@gmail.com @filbertkm / @wikidata ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20140919/b0025bdb/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 2 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:06:31 -0700 From: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Merging NYC buildings Message-ID: 541c5487.7000...@mac.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed On 9/19/2014 7:00 AM, Bryan Housel wrote: We really should come up with a good way to make authoritative data harder to edit in the various editors. All that a particular data source can be authoritative for is what that data source says something is. What is authoritative for OSM is the ground truth. That's not to say that there aren't features that would be difficult to improve in accuracy. The Canada-US border on the west coast comes to mind. It's pieced together from multiple observations and data sources and it's unlikely someone could improve it's accuracy, but the possibility remains there. The idea of some tag to lock objects from normal editing because they are authoritative has occasionally been proposed, and to summarize the discussion, it's extremely unlikely to happen. -- Message: 3 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:26:25 -0700 From: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Merging NYC buildings Message-ID: 541c5931.80...@mac.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed On 9/19/2014 6:19 AM, Reilly, Colin wrote: A single building cannot straddle two tax parcels. This seems incorrect. If I build a structure on two tax parcels, it can exist as a single building. It may not be legal, or may require planning tricks that make it two buildings in the eyes of the city, but if I survey it and it's one building, I will map it so. In dense urban areas the edges of buildings can often only be determined by surveys, not by imagery, as the imagery only shows the roofs generally, and roofs may change appearance within a building or not change appearance between two adjacent buildings. -- Message: 4 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:35:18 -0700 From: Darrell Fuhriman darr...@garnix.org To: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com Cc: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Merging NYC buildings Message-ID: 80377e08-f9f9-49b5-9b40-bf4a246a4...@garnix.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Yah, if that were true it would be a very strange and site-specific rule. I know of several buildings here that span multiple tax lots. d. On Sep 19, 2014, at 09:26, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: On 9/19/2014 6:19 AM, Reilly, Colin wrote: A single building cannot straddle two tax parcels. This seems incorrect. If I build a structure on two tax parcels, it can exist as a single building. It may not be legal, or may require planning tricks that make it two buildings in the eyes of the city, but if I survey it and it's one building, I will map it so. In dense urban areas the edges of buildings can often only be determined by surveys, not by imagery, as the imagery only shows the roofs generally, and roofs may change appearance within a building or not change appearance between two adjacent buildings. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us -- Message: 5 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 19:09:06 +0200 From: Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com To: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com Cc: osm talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Merging NYC buildings Message-ID: CABPTjTDM0QjYOnT-GakW5=X09-GOMPz2xO2crCC=imepu2e...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 2014-09-19 18:26 GMT+02:00 Paul Norman penor...@mac.com: but if I survey it and it's one building, I will map it so. Does this survey include the inside or will the judgement be based only on the outside? In dense urban areas the edges of buildings can often only be determined by surveys, not by imagery, as the imagery only shows the roofs generally, and roofs may change appearance within a building or not change appearance between two adjacent buildings. Typically there will be some kind of division in the roof because you have to avoid fire going from one building to the other. I think it is more probable that people will split one building into several buildings than the other way round. It may also not be very clear how many buildings there are in some cases, e.g. when dealing with very
Re: [Talk-us] Merging NYC buildings
The thing is, once it's in OSM, it's not NYC's data anymore--it's everyone's data. So it's no longer authoritative. Sometimes the crowd will improve it or add to it, sometimes the crowd will screw it up, sometimes the crowd will do it differently than you think is best. The theory (borne out in practice thus far) is that over time the data quality line keeps trending upwards. Best, Brad On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Reilly, Colin crei...@doitt.nyc.gov wrote: All that a particular data source can be authoritative for is what that data source says something is. What is authoritative for OSM is the ground truth. Not sure I understand the first sentence. As for the second, your eyes can deceive you. Nonetheless, I would argue that authoritative data should matter and could be tagged as source= authoritative. Intent not to prevent other from updating but more as a cautionary flag. To me accuracy and currency should be paramount. This seems incorrect. If I build a structure on two tax parcels, it can exist as a single building. It may not be legal, or may require planning tricks that make it two buildings in the eyes of the city, but if I survey it and it's one building, I will map it so. Not in NYC. Although there are some edge and legacy cases, you cannot legally build a building that straddles more than one parcel. You would first need to merge the tax parcels before constructing the building. Yah, if that were true it would be a very strange and site-specific rule. I know of several buildings here that span multiple tax lots. NYC specific. I was not speaking in general terms but to NYC building/finance codes. Without that requirement, code enforcement and tax assessment would be difficult. snip ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Merging NYC buildings
Hi, the building to the east. In this case it was the tax parcel and multiple address that indicate two buildings not one. We have a the MA state tax parcel data as a translucent imaging layer hosted on the US OSM. It can be used in JOSM, and it useful for all kinds of things. Perhaps, the same could be done for NY city. Jason ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] Speed limit sign tagging
How does the mapping community feel about tagging the location of speed limit signs? I remember another mapper brought up this topic somewhere outside the mailing list. The mapper explained that he mapped the location of speed limit signs for future reference to verify the speed limits of roads. I wanted other mappers opinions on how they feel about this. In my opinion i would 100% agree with this view. We need a way to verify a speed limit of a road if we want to keep the roads up to date. Regards, Hans ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Speed limit sign tagging
Hans, I think sign locations would be great! I just entered a ton of speed limits a couple months back and wish I'd had thought to add them somehow... The only concern I would have is that the direction they're facing be indicated. On long roads with few intersections, placing them by one side (for two-ways) would do the trick. In urban areas it might get more complicated. Which street does a sign right at an intersection belong to? I'm not sure how best to deal with that. I would not want to see signs placed as a point on the line except maybe on one-ways. How do other types of road signs indicate directionality? Has this already been effectively resolved? I don't actually think I've ever seen a sign in OSM around these parts. Rock on, Nate On 09/19/2014 08:49 PM, talk-us-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:49:37 -0700 From: Hans De Krygerhans.dekryge...@gmail.com To:talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Talk-us] Speed limit sign tagging Message-ID: CAOcDCsC4XXx+AjiwVasxdAorr5=-Xp8wnL=ucd8KN0Gsx0y=p...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 How does the mapping community feel about tagging the location of speed limit signs? I remember another mapper brought up this topic somewhere outside the mailing list. The mapper explained that he mapped the location of speed limit signs for future reference to verify the speed limits of roads. I wanted other mappers opinions on how they feel about this. In my opinion i would 100% agree with this view. We need a way to verify a speed limit of a road if we want to keep the roads up to date. Regards, Hans ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Speed limit sign tagging
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Nate Wessel bike...@gmail.com wrote: I would not want to see signs placed as a point on the line except maybe on one-ways. How do other types of road signs indicate directionality? Has this already been effectively resolved? I don't actually think I've ever seen a sign in OSM around these parts. Generally speaking, signs are posted on the same side of the road as the direction they effect (say drive-on-right, north-south road: Signs affecting northbound traffic would be on the east side of the roadway). There are some exceptions, however, such as conditional STOP and DO NOT ENTER signs that light up if a clearance is exceeded, and other warning signs (usually of the stop/yield/signal ahead or low clearance ahead variety) in which it's pretty obvious which way they're facing since there will be a corresponding pair on the other side of the span or intersection they're protecting facing the opposite direction. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
