Re: [talk-ph] TYPHOON RUBY - TASK CREATION NOTICE #801 - URGENT RESPONSE
According to the latest forecast, Hagupit/Ruby's expected landfall will be this evening around the area of Dolores. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/12.0376/125.4837 Lots of settlements here still need detailed mapping. It is now marked as priority in task 801: http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/801 Since the HIU tiles is panchromatic, it maybe difficult to do buildings. But, experienced mappers can easily do this. Please focus of settlements near the coast (usually along the major road). Thanks! On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Mark Cupitt markcup...@gmail.com wrote: THIS TASK REPLACES TASK #800 due to potential mapping conflicts with the number of people mapping *THIS TASK IS FOR EXPERIENCED MAPPERS* Typhoon Ruby has slowed slightly and the track has moved to the north of earlier predictions, giving us a longer window to complete pre-disaster mapping tasks. In support of The Philippine Government, Red Cross/Red Crescent, DHN and other Agencies, we have created our *third* task for this Activation. *http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/801 http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/801* We NOW HAVE have new Satellite Imagery for Samar courtesy of MapGive. Through the MapGive project, the Humanitarian Information Unit (HIU) of the U.S. Department of State is providing the OpenStreetMap community access to updated satellite imagery services to help assist with humanitarian mapping. This task covers an area with HiRes Black and White Imagery We will be looking to add or improve the following features - roads; schools, hospitals, churches, buildings, residential and commercial areas and waterfronts, malls, sports complexes. - open areas (not fields, just smooth open ground next to towns) as leisure=common as these are potential helicopter landing sites. This is a larger area, if you need to split the tiles you can do so up to two times. *We ask all Hotties to help in the response and to map this task as quickly as possible. We expect to make additional tasks available as the landfall track predictions improve.* Regards Mark Cupitt If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence Hire Me on Freelancer See me on Open StreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt *See me on StackExchange http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c* === The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the email and any attachments. === ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ -- ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
[talk-ph] TYPHOON RUBY - TASK CREATION NOTICE #804 - URGENT RESPONSE
Typhoon Ruby has made landfall in Northern Samar and is traveling in a North west Track In support of The Philippine Government, Red Cross/Red Crescent, DHN and other Agencies, we have created our *fourth* task for this Activation. *http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/804 http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/804* This Task covers un-mapped or poorly mapped areas on high risk islands to the west of Samar and Masbate along a corridor on the project path of the Typhoon. Please focus on the islands to the east where Hires Imagery is available. Imagery has been requested for islands with no coverage and will be included in a future task We will be looking to add or improve the following features - roads; schools, hospitals, churches, buildings, residential and commercial areas and waterfronts, malls, sports complexes. - open areas (not fields, just smooth open ground next to towns) as leisure=common as these are potential helicopter landing sites. This is a larger area, if you need to split the tiles you can do so up to two times. *We ask all Hotties to help in the response and to map this task as quickly as possible. We expect to make additional tasks available as the landfall track predictions improve.* Regards Mark Cupitt If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence See me on Open StreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
[talk-ph] TYPHOON RUBY (ISLANDS) - TASK CREATION NOTICE #807 - URGENT RESPONSE
Typhoon Ruby has made landfall in Northern Samar and is traveling in a North west Track In support of The Philippine Government, Red Cross/Red Crescent, DHN and other Agencies, we have created our *fifth* task for this Activation. *http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/807 http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/807* This Task covers a small group of un-mapped areas on high risk islands between Samar and Masbate We NOW HAVE have new Satellite Imagery for this area courtesy of MapGive. Through the MapGive project, the Humanitarian Information Unit (HIU) of the U.S. Department of State is providing the OpenStreetMap community access to updated satellite imagery services to help assist with humanitarian mapping. We will be looking to add or improve the following features - roads; schools, hospitals, churches, buildings, residential and commercial areas and waterfronts, malls, sports complexes. - open areas (not fields, just smooth open ground next to towns) as leisure=common as these are potential helicopter landing sites. *We ask all Hotties to help in the response and to map this task as quickly as possible. We expect to make additional tasks available as the landfall track predictions improve.* Regards Mark Cupitt If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence See me on Open StreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
[talk-ph] TYPHOON RUBY - TASK CREATION NOTICE #808 - URGENT RESPONSE
Typhoon Ruby has made landfall in Northern Samar. In support of The Philippine Government, Red Cross/Red Crescent, DHN and other Agencies, we have created our *sixth* task for this Activation. *http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/808 http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/808* This Task covers a small area around Borongon on the East Coast of Samar, mapping is required for torrential rain damage, potential storm surge and road access to remote areas. We NOW HAVE have new Satellite Imagery for this area courtesy of MapGive. Through the MapGive project, the Humanitarian Information Unit (HIU) of the U.S. Department of State is providing the OpenStreetMap community access to updated satellite imagery services to help assist with humanitarian mapping. We will be looking to add or improve the following features - roads; schools, hospitals, churches, buildings, residential and commercial areas and waterfronts, malls, sports complexes. - open areas (not fields, just smooth open ground next to towns) as leisure=common as these are potential helicopter landing sites. *We ask all Hotties to help in the response and to map this task as quickly as possible. We expect to make additional tasks available as the landfall track predictions improve.* Regards Mark Cupitt If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence See me on Open StreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
[talk-ph] [Typhoon Hagupit/Ruby] Visual tagging guide.
Hi, I'm creating a tagging guide for mappers showing screenshots of both bing and the hiu image. Please help improve the text and if you can find good sample imagery for each feature like churches as mentioned in the tagging priority, just add it in the document. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Team/Typhoon_Hagupit_%28Ruby%29#Mapping_Standards -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ -- ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
[talk-ph] Typhoon ruby Location Update
Dear All *Typhoon Ruby has made landfall over Cataingan, Masbate.* At 12:00 p.m. December 7, 2014, the eye of Typhoon Ruby was located based on all available data including Cebu Doppler radar at 35 km Southeast of Masbate City, Masbate (12.1°N, 123.8°E). [Source http://www.gov.ph/2014/12/07/weather-bulletin-no-14-tropical-cyclone-warning-typhoon-ruby-issued-at-1100-a-m-december-7-2014/ ] Strength: Maximum sustained winds of 140 kph near the center and gustiness of up to 170 kph. Regards Mark Cupitt If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence See me on Open StreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
[OSM-talk-be] Jachtpaden are not cycleway Highway (path along the rivers)
Hi, jachtpaden near the Leie Schelde Albert Kanaalenz... are tagged as cycleway but in serveye there is no sign http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fietspad And the owner of those ways says: http://www.descheepvaart.be/Rubriek/Recreatie/Jaagpaden.aspx What would be the correct tag? Jakka ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Jachtpaden are not cycleway Highway (path along the rivers)
This topic pops up from time to time, see e.g. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/2013-July/004376.html . Don't remember the outcome, besides that they are not cycleways and do not have names in general. If I would start completely afresh I would propose: highway=service service=towpath access=private bicycle=yes foot=yes surface=asphatl/earth/ maxspeed=30 In some cases the access might be more open, such as destination or even yes. m On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Jakka vdmfrank...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, jachtpaden near the Leie Schelde Albert Kanaalenz... are tagged as cycleway but in serveye there is no sign http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fietspad And the owner of those ways says: http://www.descheepvaart.be/Rubriek/Recreatie/Jaagpaden.aspx What would be the correct tag? Jakka ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] Balance of power (was: Re: How to vote to match your view)
[Apologies to talk@ readers for this follow-up to a post on osmf-talk@. I'm not an OSMF member and therefore can't post to osmf-talk@, but as I'm being spoken about over there, I'd appreciate the opportunity to respond.] Steve Coast wrote: See, there was no group that mobbed Richard out the board. The CWG took away Twitter access from everyone without any consultation, thinking Ivan's tweet was mine. I asked for it back, used every channel as I outlined. Richard sadly quit feeling CWG was being overpowered by the board but that's not what happened. The CWG took Twitter away from the people using it without talking to anyone, then was surprised this wasn't okay. For the record: Communications Working Group didn't think Ivan's tweet was yours. We genuinely didn't know who had sent it. (From what I remember of the content of the tweet, it didn't appear to be from a native English speaker, and at first I thought it might have been Emilie.) At the time, CWG was aiming for a step change in our communications. In particular, we were aiming to follow up our very successful switch2osm campaign, and were in the early stages of planning a second campaign aimed at recruiting new mappers. A large part of that was professionalising our message - bringing sharper focus to OSM's outbound communications, to consistently push the message that mapping was accessible, enjoyable, and made a difference. Basic marketing and not the sort of thing that should come as a surprise to anyone. To get this focused message across, we needed to ensure that everything going out on our Twitter, Facebook and Google+ accounts was in line. In an ideal world we would like to have drawn up simple house style and messaging guidelines (again, marketing 101) for those with access. However, our hand was forced by this badly phrased tweet, from persons unknown, endorsing a map which failed to attribute OSM (years later, I can't even remember what map it was!). Changing the Twitter password and asking those who wanted a message to go out to contact us, which is what we did, seemed the easiest and most sensible short-term measure. Unfortunately you decided to take this as a personal affront, when no such affront was intended, and to campaign volubly for CWG's work to be overruled because of this. There is absolutely no personal animus in this. Sure, I disagree with you on many things, but you're an engaging guy to chat to over a pint and I have no doubt we'll do so again some time. But let me make it clear that I did not quit because CWG was being overpowered by the board. I quit because it was clear that there was no likelihood of improving OSM through the Foundation, in any fashion, when well-intentioned, industrious, and skilled volunteer work could be overturned by emotive say-so. I see no sign that this has changed, and that is why I have no intention of rejoining the Foundation. As a postscript, I believe switch2osm was the last substantial marketing effort that OSMF has done. All the good publicity for OSM since then has been from third parties, particularly Mapbox. Progress in OSM happens despite the Foundation, not because of it. Richard ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] Balance of power (was: Re: How to vote to match your view)
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: [Apologies to talk@ readers for this follow-up to a post on osmf-talk@. I'm not an OSMF member and therefore can't post to osmf-talk@, but as I'm being spoken about over there, I'd appreciate the opportunity to respond.] Steve Coast wrote: See, there was no group that mobbed Richard out the board. The CWG took away Twitter access from everyone without any consultation, thinking Ivan's tweet was mine. I asked for it back, used every channel as I outlined. Richard sadly quit feeling CWG was being overpowered by the board but that's not what happened. The CWG took Twitter away from the people using it without talking to anyone, then was surprised this wasn't okay. For the record: Communications Working Group didn't think Ivan's tweet was yours. We genuinely didn't know who had sent it. (From what I remember of the content of the tweet, it didn't appear to be from a native English speaker, and at first I thought it might have been Emilie.) At the time, CWG was aiming for a step change in our communications. In particular, we were aiming to follow up our very successful switch2osm campaign, and were in the early stages of planning a second campaign aimed at recruiting new mappers. A large part of that was professionalising our message - bringing sharper focus to OSM's outbound communications, to consistently push the message that mapping was accessible, enjoyable, and made a difference. Basic marketing and not the sort of thing that should come as a surprise to anyone. To get this focused message across, we needed to ensure that everything going out on our Twitter, Facebook and Google+ accounts was in line. In an ideal world we would like to have drawn up simple house style and messaging guidelines (again, marketing 101) for those with access. However, our hand was forced by this badly phrased tweet, from persons unknown, endorsing a map which failed to attribute OSM (years later, I can't even remember what map it was!). Changing the Twitter password and asking those who wanted a message to go out to contact us, which is what we did, seemed the easiest and most sensible short-term measure. Unfortunately you decided to take this as a personal affront, when no such affront was intended, and to campaign volubly for CWG's work to be overruled because of this. There is absolutely no personal animus in this. Sure, I disagree with you on many things, but you're an engaging guy to chat to over a pint and I have no doubt we'll do so again some time. But let me make it clear that I did not quit because CWG was being overpowered by the board. I quit because it was clear that there was no likelihood of improving OSM through the Foundation, in any fashion, when well-intentioned, industrious, and skilled volunteer work could be overturned by emotive say-so. I see no sign that this has changed, and that is why I have no intention of rejoining the Foundation. As a postscript, I believe switch2osm was the last substantial marketing effort that OSMF has done. All the good publicity for OSM since then has been from third parties I think that the single most effective marketing message since Switch2OSM.org was Serge's article, Why the World Needs OpenStreetMap[1] [1] http://blog.emacsen.net/blog/2014/01/04/why-the-world-needs-openstreetmap/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] Balance of power (was: Re: How to vote to match your view)
We can agree to disagree that taking access away to a resource like Twitter is okay. It doesn't feel ok in an open project, and the solution of emailing a committee to send a tweet feels cumbersome. The actual solution of grouptweet feels like it works for everyone, including giving the accountability you wanted. Still sad you left over it. Steve On Dec 6, 2014, at 8:35 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: [Apologies to talk@ readers for this follow-up to a post on osmf-talk@. I'm not an OSMF member and therefore can't post to osmf-talk@, but as I'm being spoken about over there, I'd appreciate the opportunity to respond.] Steve Coast wrote: See, there was no group that mobbed Richard out the board. The CWG took away Twitter access from everyone without any consultation, thinking Ivan's tweet was mine. I asked for it back, used every channel as I outlined. Richard sadly quit feeling CWG was being overpowered by the board but that's not what happened. The CWG took Twitter away from the people using it without talking to anyone, then was surprised this wasn't okay. For the record: Communications Working Group didn't think Ivan's tweet was yours. We genuinely didn't know who had sent it. (From what I remember of the content of the tweet, it didn't appear to be from a native English speaker, and at first I thought it might have been Emilie.) At the time, CWG was aiming for a step change in our communications. In particular, we were aiming to follow up our very successful switch2osm campaign, and were in the early stages of planning a second campaign aimed at recruiting new mappers. A large part of that was professionalising our message - bringing sharper focus to OSM's outbound communications, to consistently push the message that mapping was accessible, enjoyable, and made a difference. Basic marketing and not the sort of thing that should come as a surprise to anyone. To get this focused message across, we needed to ensure that everything going out on our Twitter, Facebook and Google+ accounts was in line. In an ideal world we would like to have drawn up simple house style and messaging guidelines (again, marketing 101) for those with access. However, our hand was forced by this badly phrased tweet, from persons unknown, endorsing a map which failed to attribute OSM (years later, I can't even remember what map it was!). Changing the Twitter password and asking those who wanted a message to go out to contact us, which is what we did, seemed the easiest and most sensible short-term measure. Unfortunately you decided to take this as a personal affront, when no such affront was intended, and to campaign volubly for CWG's work to be overruled because of this. There is absolutely no personal animus in this. Sure, I disagree with you on many things, but you're an engaging guy to chat to over a pint and I have no doubt we'll do so again some time. But let me make it clear that I did not quit because CWG was being overpowered by the board. I quit because it was clear that there was no likelihood of improving OSM through the Foundation, in any fashion, when well-intentioned, industrious, and skilled volunteer work could be overturned by emotive say-so. I see no sign that this has changed, and that is why I have no intention of rejoining the Foundation. As a postscript, I believe switch2osm was the last substantial marketing effort that OSMF has done. All the good publicity for OSM since then has been from third parties, particularly Mapbox. Progress in OSM happens despite the Foundation, not because of it. Richard ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Nik4: mapnik → image
Today I have published Nik4. It makes everything easier. I see that it can split a large image into smaller mapnik rendering jobs and combine them after, with --tiles. That's already very useful but is it also possible to actually keep the tiles (e.g. for building a GDAL VRT from them)? This would require a separate .pgw file for each tile. Thanks for the suggestion, I've just published release 1.5 with `--just-tiles` option: when used, it does not merge tiles, but keeps them, and creates ozi/wld files for each if requested. I've tested it with gdal_merge. IZ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] planet.gpx
How often does planet.gpx get updated? And is there a version that doesn't strip out speed data? ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Some tools to help community-driven imports
Hello, I am writing to share some tools that we have developed in preparation for the City of Montreal open data community-driven import. (Said import is in preparation and has not yet begun.) These tools cover converting .csv files to .osm files and splitting .osm files for the Tasking Manager. The code is available in the following GitHub project: https://github.com/OsmQc/mtl2osm https://github.com/OsmQc/mtl2osm See this post for all the details: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Zethradon/diary/28183 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Zethradon/diary/28183 I’ll skip most of the post to cover the main points I would like to share with the mailing list. ## csv2osm: a tool for converting .csv files As ogr2osm cannot easily read .csv files as an input, I wrote a script that is similar to ogr2osm and provide the same translator concept, and works exclusively for .csv files. The script is called csv2osm and can be found here: https://github.com/OsmQc/mtl2osm/blob/master/mtl2osm/csv2osm.py https://github.com/OsmQc/mtl2osm/blob/master/mtl2osm/csv2osm.py Translators for this script have the same entry point as ogr2osm (the filterTags function). For example, Montreal's open dataset for bike parkings is provided as a .csv file. The translator for this dataset parses the description of each bike parking to extract the capacity and provides the following tags for each points. https://github.com/OsmQc/mtl2osm/blob/master/mtl2osm/donnees/arceaux-a-velos/traducteur-arceaux-a-velos.py https://github.com/OsmQc/mtl2osm/blob/master/mtl2osm/donnees/arceaux-a-velos/traducteur-arceaux-a-velos.py Instructions on using the script is available here: https://github.com/OsmQc/mtl2osm/blob/master/mtl2osm/donnees/arceaux-a-velos/ https://github.com/OsmQc/mtl2osm/blob/master/mtl2osm/donnees/arceaux-a-velos/ ## Splitting .osm files for the HOT Tasking Manager We are planning to use the HOT Tasking Manager for our import. To ease importing the generated .osm dataset into JOSM (for manual reconciliation with OSM data), we had to write a script that splits the .osm files into a series of sub-files, one per sub-task. Essentially the .osm file is split-up according to a grid defined in JSON format. This allows to see in JOSM only the part of the data for the task, instead of having to download the data for the whole city. Code is available here: https://github.com/OsmQc/mtl2osm/blob/master/mtl2osm/osm_grid_splitter.py https://github.com/OsmQc/mtl2osm/blob/master/mtl2osm/osm_grid_splitter.py I hope these tools can be of benefit to the OpenStreetMap community. Do not hesitate to reply if you have any question. I know the documentation on these tools is not 100% complete, so I'll certainly post more details if there is interest in them. Guillaume___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Some tools to help community-driven imports
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Guillaume Pratte guilla...@guillaumepratte.net wrote: ## Splitting .osm files for the HOT Tasking Manager We are planning to use the HOT Tasking Manager for our import. To ease importing the generated .osm dataset into JOSM (for manual reconciliation with OSM data), we had to write a script that splits the .osm files into a series of sub-files, one per sub-task. Essentially the .osm file is split-up according to a grid defined in JSON format. This allows to see in JOSM only the part of the data for the task, instead of having to download the data for the whole city. Code is available here: https://github.com/OsmQc/mtl2osm/blob/master/mtl2osm/osm_grid_splitter.py I hope these tools can be of benefit to the OpenStreetMap community. Do not hesitate to reply if you have any question. I know the documentation on these tools is not 100% complete, so I'll certainly post more details if there is interest in them. Thanks - this is just what I've been looking for. We wrote a clunky python script but yours looks much more elegant. I'll give it a try in the next week or so when I get finished cleaning up some buildings and addresses. Clifford -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk-nl] Lekenvraag
Hoi allemaal, Een vraag van mijn broer m.b.t. OSM: Als technisch bouwkundige wil ik graag een detailkaart geplaatst over een luchtfoto van het Dr. Jan Ingenhouszplein 2 te Breda. Waar kan ik die vinden? Verder heb van het gebouw, dat een monument is, een tekening beschikbaar waarbij de binnen- en buitenkant volledig is ingemeten met Total Station. Is dat zinvol om aan OSM of een andere open bron bij te dragen? Groeten, Pander -- Stichting OpenTaal http://opentaal.org http://twitter.com/opentaal ___ Talk-nl mailing list Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nl
Re: [Talk-de] Abbiegespuren mit Fahrradspur
715371 wrote on 2014-12-06 02:04: Was ist eigentlich mit solch einem Problem: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Bremen_street_with_cycleway_lane_between_car_lanes.jpg So eine Konstellation war ja wohl die einleitende Frage in diesem Thread :-) turn:lanes=left|through|cycleway:through|right ? Auch ein guter Vorschlag, hier kann der Renderer sich auf die Bezeichner konzentrieren die er kennt, und alle Spuren ignorieren, die ihm unbekannt sind, insbesondere müssen nicht vorher alle access-Matrizen geparst werden. Für die Breite gibt es width:lanes*=* Das weiß ich. Es geht mir um die Default-Breite, denn wer will schon bei einem stinknormalen Radweg die Breite taggen? Gibt es. Z. B. hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293395597 Wenn ulamm das nachgemessen hat kann er das ja gern auch ranschreiben, wobei mir 1.6m nicht sehr ungewöhnlich erscheint. Aber ich habe hierzulande schon 4 m breite Fahrradalleen gesehen ;-) Tom ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] Entfernungs-Skala/Massstab
Hallo an die Liste, vielleicht kann hier eine Frage beantwortet werden, auf die ich außerhalb keine Antwort gefunden habe. Im Gegensatz zu Google Maps oder Papierkarten ist bei OpenStreetmap zumindest per Vorgabe kein Maßstab ersichtlich. Es erschwert die Orientierung erheblich, bzw. macht sie umständlicher, wenn man die Entfernungen nicht einschätzen kann und erst den Routenplaner dafür bemühen muß. Mache ich was falsch oder ist Besserung in Sicht? -davidoff12001 ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Entfernungs-Skala/Massstab
openstreetmap.org: links unten in der Ecke Google Maps: rechts unten in der Ecke 2014-12-06 14:02 GMT+01:00 davidoff12...@yahoo.de: Hallo an die Liste, vielleicht kann hier eine Frage beantwortet werden, auf die ich außerhalb keine Antwort gefunden habe. Im Gegensatz zu Google Maps oder Papierkarten ist bei OpenStreetmap zumindest per Vorgabe kein Maßstab ersichtlich. Es erschwert die Orientierung erheblich, bzw. macht sie umständlicher, wenn man die Entfernungen nicht einschätzen kann und erst den Routenplaner dafür bemühen muß. Mache ich was falsch oder ist Besserung in Sicht? -davidoff12001 ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Entfernungs-Skala/Massstab
On 06.12.2014 20:02, davidoff12...@yahoo.de wrote: Im Gegensatz zu Google Maps oder Papierkarten ist bei OpenStreetmap zumindest per Vorgabe kein Maßstab ersichtlich. Es erschwert die Orientierung erheblich, bzw. macht sie umständlicher, wenn man die Entfernungen nicht einschätzen kann und erst den Routenplaner dafür bemühen muß. Mache ich was falsch oder ist Besserung in Sicht? was genau verstehst du unter Maßstab? So etwas wie die Anzeige unten links im Eck, die angibt wie lang 300km bzw. 100 Meilen sind? http://osm.org/go/euEQg- Die Anzeige verändert sich wenn du in die Karte reinzoomst. Stephan ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Entfernungs-Skala/Massstab
Zu beachten hier übrigens, dass ein einzelner Maßstab im Allgemeinen falsch und irreführend ist, da die Projektion einen variablen Maßstab hat. Bei hohen Zoomstufen ist das nicht so bedeutend, bei den niedrigen insbesondere bei höheren Breiten schon - im Standardausschnitt auf osm.org (5/51.500/-0.100) variiert das schon im Verhältnis von etwa 1:1.8 (siehe http://maps.imagico.de/#map=5/51.500/-0.100ui=10) -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] RadioOSM: OSMF-Abstimmung über Amtszeitbeschränkung
Hallo liebe OpenStreetMapper, die neuste Folge von RadioOSM - OSMF-Abstimmung über Amtszeitbeschränkung - ist verfügbar und sollte in Kürze in euren Podcatchern auftauchen. Natürlich könnt ihr diese Folge auch in unserem Blog hören: http://ift.tt/1vZcZBH Dort findet ihr auch Links zu allen Themen, über die wir gespochen haben. Viel Spaß damit und Liebe Grüße, euer RadioOSM Team - Andi, Marc und Michael ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-it] Aiuto con Overpass Turbo
Come si formula la ricerca per tutti ways con railway=abandoned che sono senza tag highway=* Deve essere semplice, ma io sono stupido ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Aiuto con Overpass Turbo
Il 6 dicembre 2014 10:14, Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com ha scritto: Come si formula la ricerca per tutti ways con railway=abandoned che sono senza tag highway=* Nel wizard basta scrivere railway=abandoned and highway!=* È molto lento, deve esistere un sistema computazionamente meno orrendo del mio ma non mi viene in mente. Su aree piccole fa comunque il suo dovere. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Mancanza attribuzione
Nel Padovano i POI sono OSM, ma non solo, *anche tutte le ferrovie abbandonate che non coincidono con un highway=** Per esempio c'è tutta la ex-ferrovia Ostiglia-Treviso a sud-ovest di Grisignano di Zocco (non visibili in Mapnik). http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=45.4906mlon=11.6925#map=15/45.4906/11.6925layers=D I binari delle ferrovie attive non sono copiate. Che facciamo? Andiamo da Carabinieri e facciamo denuncia di furto di proprietà intelletuale? :-) Seriamente, dobbiamo fare una cosa più formale. Adesso che abbiamo un chapter italiano di OSMF non possiamo utilizzare questo per un approccio gentile ma chiaro a questi casi? Che ne dici, Simone? Lettera standard per tutti questi casi? Volker Il giorno 6 dicembre 2014 00:17, Gianluca Boero gianlucabo...@alice.it ha scritto: Confermo anche io nel torinese...i Poi e i nomi dei luoghi sono di Osm, la rete viaria e l'uso del terreno no Il 12/05/2014 10:39 PM, Alessandro ha scritto: Il 05/12/2014 21:29, Andrea Musuruane ha scritto: La rete viaria non mi sembra di OSM, i POI e i nomi dei luoghi invece sì. A Genova i POI sono di OSM al 100% Ora abbiamo veramente oltrepassato il limite. Che facciamo stavolta? Zitti e mosca come al solito??? ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it -- Gianluca Boero ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Il fiume Olona lungo la circonvallazione milanese
Il 5 dicembre 2014 21:21, emmexx emm...@tiscalinet.it ha scritto: Ho notato che col nuovo rendering o forse a seguito di interventi sui dati conseguenti le recenti inondazioni milanesi, La way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70585878 ha almeno 4 anni. che a zoom abbastanza bassi appare la label Fiume Olona lungo la circonvallazione esterna di Milano. Tutto cio' e' molto bello ma forse un po' fuorviante visto che da quelle parti il fiume non vede la luce del sole da almeno 40 anni. Embè? Se l'acqua esiste è bene che ci sia nel database. Poi è scelta di chi fa il render scegliere cosa visualizzare e cosa no. Cosa fare? Secondo me, assolutamente nulla (se i dati sono corretti). Il 6 dicembre 2014 01:00, pjhooker lima.cityplan...@gmail.com ha scritto: In teoria c'è sotto ... me lo sono chiesto anche io... Forse si può mettere con layer -100? No. Al massimo i layer vanno da -5 a +5. Hanno un significato *esclusivamente* locale e *non* indicano se quella risorsa è sopra o sotto il livello medio del suolo. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer Per controllare eventuali problemi sui layer e waterway raccomando un software di quality assurance. Ad esempio qui http://keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=13lat=45.48012lon=9.13673layers=B0Tch=0%2C120%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C197%2C198%2C231%2C232show_ign=1show_tmpign=1 ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Il fiume Olona lungo la circonvallazione milanese
Il 12/06/2014 11:10 AM, Mauro Costantini scrisse: Embè? Se l'acqua esiste è bene che ci sia nel database. Poi è scelta di chi fa il render scegliere cosa visualizzare e cosa no. Secondo me, assolutamente nulla (se i dati sono corretti). Cioe' secondo te e' normale che si veda prioritariamente sulla mappa il nome di un torrentello, coperto da anni, al posto di una strada a 6 corsie larga 30 metri piu' una sopraelevata a 4 corsie? ciao maxx ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Il fiume Olona lungo la circonvallazione milanese
Per me sembra tutto apposto. E' rappresentato tratteggiato, cioè come tunnel. Di quello che ho capito questo corrisponde alla situazione reale. E' discutibile se non cambiarlo da tunnel a culvert, ma del resto mi sembra apposto. Se fosse una strada al posto del fiume, andrebbe rappresentata anche questo tratteggiata Volker Il giorno 5 dicembre 2014 21:21, emmexx emm...@tiscalinet.it ha scritto: Ho notato che col nuovo rendering o forse a seguito di interventi sui dati conseguenti le recenti inondazioni milanesi, che a zoom abbastanza bassi appare la label Fiume Olona lungo la circonvallazione esterna di Milano. Tutto cio' e' molto bello ma forse un po' fuorviante visto che da quelle parti il fiume non vede la luce del sole da almeno 40 anni. http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=45.4829mlon=9.1432#map= 15/45.4829/9.1432 Cosa fare? grazie maxx ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Il fiume Olona lungo la circonvallazione milanese
Il 12/06/2014 11:17 AM, Volker Schmidt scrisse: Per me sembra tutto apposto. E' rappresentato tratteggiato, cioè come tunnel. Di quello che ho capito questo corrisponde alla situazione reale. E' discutibile se non cambiarlo da tunnel a culvert, ma del resto mi sembra apposto. Se fosse una strada al posto del fiume, andrebbe rappresentata anche questo tratteggiata A volte e' veramente difficile discutere qui... :-( Se a qualcuno sembra normale che in un posto come questo https://www.google.it/maps/@45.4828654,9.1432725,3a,75y,355.95h,89.19t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1s1M-80ljXgz-zjGuKR9-QoA!2e0 sia normale vedere scritto Fiume Olona, mi sa che ho sbagliato mappa. http://www.emmexx.it/varie/osm(olona.jpg ciao maxx ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Mancanza attribuzione
Mah .. io la metterei su La sai l'ultima sui carabinieri? Guarda qua! Violano la licenza di osm. A chi mi rivolgo ora? Polizia postale? 2014-12-06 10:37 GMT+01:00 Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com: Nel Padovano i POI sono OSM, ma non solo, anche tutte le ferrovie abbandonate che non coincidono con un highway=* Per esempio c'è tutta la ex-ferrovia Ostiglia-Treviso a sud-ovest di Grisignano di Zocco (non visibili in Mapnik). http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=45.4906mlon=11.6925#map=15/45.4906/11.6925layers=D I binari delle ferrovie attive non sono copiate. Che facciamo? Andiamo da Carabinieri e facciamo denuncia di furto di proprietà intelletuale? :-) Seriamente, dobbiamo fare una cosa più formale. Adesso che abbiamo un chapter italiano di OSMF non possiamo utilizzare questo per un approccio gentile ma chiaro a questi casi? Che ne dici, Simone? Lettera standard per tutti questi casi? Volker Il giorno 6 dicembre 2014 00:17, Gianluca Boero gianlucabo...@alice.it ha scritto: Confermo anche io nel torinese...i Poi e i nomi dei luoghi sono di Osm, la rete viaria e l'uso del terreno no Il 12/05/2014 10:39 PM, Alessandro ha scritto: Il 05/12/2014 21:29, Andrea Musuruane ha scritto: La rete viaria non mi sembra di OSM, i POI e i nomi dei luoghi invece sì. A Genova i POI sono di OSM al 100% Ora abbiamo veramente oltrepassato il limite. Che facciamo stavolta? Zitti e mosca come al solito??? ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it -- Gianluca Boero ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it -- Maurizio Napo Napolitano http://de.straba.us ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Il fiume Olona lungo la circonvallazione milanese
Se a qualcuno sembra normale che in un posto come questo sia normale vedere scritto Fiume Olona, mi sa che ho sbagliato mappa. Non e` normale, ma quello che si e` detto in lista e` che il database e` corretto, il problema e` solo di rendering. Quindi va corretto il rendering, non il database. E il rendering ha un tot di problemi anche peggiori (come il database, ma comunque almeno in italia questo database e questo rendering sono gia` molto ma molto meglio delle alternative). La mappa perfetta non esiste, in ogni caso, anche perche` ognuno ha le sue preferenze. E questo problema non mi sembra gravissimo. A livelli di zoom sufficienti i nomi delle strade appaiono eccome, come tutte le altre informazioni di contorno. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Il fiume Olona lungo la circonvallazione milanese
E' discutibile per tutte le cose sotterranee. Lì vicino c'è anche un attraversamento sotterraneo della metro con questo fiume: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=45.4829mlon=9.1432#map=18/45.48637/9.13585 Probabilmente uno dice; metro si, ma non il fiume!. Io, da tedesco forse, dico: entrambi si, se tratteggiati. E' tutto opinabile. Il giorno 6 dicembre 2014 11:27, emmexx emm...@tiscalinet.it ha scritto: Il 12/06/2014 11:17 AM, Volker Schmidt scrisse: Per me sembra tutto apposto. E' rappresentato tratteggiato, cioè come tunnel. Di quello che ho capito questo corrisponde alla situazione reale. E' discutibile se non cambiarlo da tunnel a culvert, ma del resto mi sembra apposto. Se fosse una strada al posto del fiume, andrebbe rappresentata anche questo tratteggiata A volte e' veramente difficile discutere qui... :-( Se a qualcuno sembra normale che in un posto come questo https://www.google.it/maps/@45.4828654,9.1432725,3a,75y, 355.95h,89.19t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1s1M-80ljXgz-zjGuKR9-QoA!2e0 sia normale vedere scritto Fiume Olona, mi sa che ho sbagliato mappa. http://www.emmexx.it/varie/osm(olona.jpg ciao maxx ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Il fiume Olona lungo la circonvallazione milanese
Il 6 dicembre 2014 11:16, emmexx emm...@tiscalinet.it ha scritto: Cioe' secondo te e' normale che si veda prioritariamente sulla mappa il nome di un torrentello, coperto da anni, al posto di una strada a 6 corsie larga 30 metri piu' una sopraelevata a 4 corsie? Ovviamente no. Ma la strada (ad esempio questa http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285081332 ) su osm non è larga 30 metri ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width ), non è sopraelevata (forse https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge ma anche altre chiavi possono tornar utili) e non ha indicazioni di corsie ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes ). Un renderer, per decidere cosa mostrare e cosa no, è ragionevole che veda cosa sta intorno, se intorno non trova dati non può certo inventarseli. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Mancanza attribuzione
Il 06/12/2014 10:37, Volker Schmidt ha scritto: Che facciamo? Andiamo da Carabinieri e facciamo denuncia di furto di proprietà intelletuale? :-) No, dal sito stesso si può fare la denuncia via web :-) Confermo che i POI rappresentati e la posizione dei nomi dei luoghi hanno chiara provenienza da OSM, anche i landuse e i corsi d'acqua, ma sembrano dati vecchi di mesi. Nella mia città ho mappato il loro Comando di Compagnia, ma nella loro mappa mettono il comando di compagnia a 200m dalla posizione reale e una stazione carabinieri inesistente a 150m dalla posizione reale, almeno copiassero bene! Ciao Marcello ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Mancanza attribuzione
Giusto tre giorni fa mi hanno fermato, adducendo che la mia vecchia targa aveva perso la rifrangenza, minacciandomi il sequestro dell'auto: ora posso rispondere con la stessa minaccia, con l'aggravante che rispetto alla targa, l'attribuzione non si vede proprio! -- cascafico.altervista.org twitter.com/cascafico Syncthing Node ID 2M2D4D6-Q7QSYGE-VGLD4YO-KR62AOJ-F6MUSUA-AQRF27C-XVQP63G-4ADMFAA Il 05/dic/2014 20:37 Hartman sldr.hart...@gmail.com ha scritto: Se non sbaglio queste sono mappe osm... http://www.carabinieri.it/cittadino/informazioni/dove-siamo -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Mancanza-attribuzione-tp5826398.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Il fiume Olona lungo la circonvallazione milanese
Il 5 dicembre 2014 21:21, emmexx emm...@tiscalinet.it ha scritto: Tutto cio' e' molto bello ma forse un po' fuorviante visto che da quelle parti il fiume non vede la luce del sole da almeno 40 anni. Potrebbe essere utile indicare esplicitamente che è una way sotterranea. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:location Non è in contrasto nè con tunnel/culvert (che esprimono caratteristiche costruttive dell'oggetto) nè con i layers (che ne definiscono localmente la sovrapposizione verticale). ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-it] Tag per CAF?
È adatto per definire un centro di assistenza fiscale il tag office:accountant? ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Mancanza attribuzione
2014-12-05 22:39 GMT+01:00 Alessandro ale_z...@libero.it: Il 05/12/2014 21:29, Andrea Musuruane ha scritto: La rete viaria non mi sembra di OSM, i POI e i nomi dei luoghi invece sì. A Genova i POI sono di OSM al 100% Ora abbiamo veramente oltrepassato il limite. Che facciamo stavolta? Zitti e mosca come al solito??? Oggi ho provato a telefonare all'ufficio PR che cestisce il sito web, ovviamente essendo sabato non ha risposto nessuno. Riprovero' lunedi'. -- -S ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Mancanza attribuzione
Marcello Arcangeli wrote Il 06/12/2014 10:37, Volker Schmidt ha scritto: Che facciamo? Andiamo da Carabinieri e facciamo denuncia di furto di proprietà intelletuale? :-) No, dal sito stesso si può fare la denuncia via web :-) Ufficio Relazioni con il Pubblico mi pare più appropriato... Comunque nella mia città la caserma l'hanno piazzata al posto giusto... l'avevo indicata con un PDI su OSM! Mi chiedo se OSM non possa pensare di aggiungere alle immagini che rilascia come tile (almeno a quelle) un watermark, un po' come fa Google: non puoi muoverti di mezza schermata senza imbatterti in un Google stampigliato da qualche parte sullo sfondo... Ciao, MAx -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Mancanza-attribuzione-tp5826398p5826484.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Mancanza attribuzione
Il 06/dic/2014 23:55 Simone Cortesi sim...@cortesi.com ha scritto: Oggi ho provato a telefonare all'ufficio PR che cestisce il sito web, ovviamente essendo sabato non ha risposto nessuno. Riprovero' lunedi'. Meglio aspettare a martedì... Vorrei dire solo una cosa. I Carabinieri presumibilmente ignorano tutti 'sti problemi di licenze. Probabilmente ignorano l'esistenza del loro stesso sito web. Anche in questo caso l'inghippo è quasi sicuramente legato ai casini di qualche società appaltatrice. Se si trattasse di Sogei, allora ci sarebbe da ridere. Ciao /niubii/ ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-it] Conversione Coordinate Geografiche
Ciao a tutti… nel sito degli opendata della regione Toscana ci sono dei dataset che hanno coordinate geografiche che indicano NORD e EST ad esempio http://mappe.regione.toscana.it/db-webgis/luoghispettacolo/example_postgis.jsp?format=csv http://%20http//mappe.regione.toscana.it/db-webgis/luoghispettacolo/example_postgis.jsp?format=csv come si traducono in lat e long, in modo da poterli definire su OSM? Grazie! Matteo Tempestini Pratosmart pratosm...@gmail.com www.pratosmart.org ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-se] Min första ändring, några kommentarer?
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, Erik Lundin wrote: Det kan vara så för att webbläsaren har en gammal cache av de delarna av kartan. Testa att ladda om hårt (i Firefox är trycker man control-shift-r). Det är inte bara webbläsaren som har ett cache, utan även de servrar som gör kartbilderna (png-bilder) som används på openstreetmap.org osv. Att parken visas direkt i zoom 19 är troligen för att de flesta servrar inte orkar cacha eller för-rita så inzoomade bilder efersom de efterfrågas sällan och skulle ta mycket plats att spara. I zoom 18 fanns det uppenbarligen rätt ny-renderade kartbilder som visas i stället för att göra ny från databasen. De flesta kart-servrar sparar bilder 1-7 dagar, så om en vecka borde i alla fall din park synas i fler zoomnivåer på alla lager (prova mapnik, cykelkarta, kollektivtrafik osv). /Per Eric -- ^): Per Eric Rosén http://rosnix.net/~per/ / p...@rosnix.net GPG 7A7A BD68 ADC0 01E1 F560 79FD 33D1 1EC3 1EBB 7311___ Talk-se mailing list Talk-se@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se
Re: [Talk-cz] Osmose Česká republika
Cituji Kasparek Tomas kaspa...@fit.vutbr.cz: Uz se to rozjelo, jeste se budou ladit veci, ale: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?country=czech_republic_* Zamest si pred vlastnim prahem: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/cs/byuser/tkk Moc fajn ;-) Ahoj. ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] Osmose Česká republika
Škoda, myslel jsem, ze uděláme soutěž, ale píše mi to jen: Vice než 500 :-) A co jsem koukal, hodně to byly chybějící mosty na cestách. Marián 6. prosince 2014 16:51:18 SEČ, Kašpárek Tomáš kaspa...@fit.vutbr.cz napsal: Cituji Kasparek Tomas kaspa...@fit.vutbr.cz: Uz se to rozjelo, jeste se budou ladit veci, ale: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?country=czech_republic_* Zamest si pred vlastnim prahem: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/cs/byuser/tkk Moc fajn ;-) Ahoj. ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz -- Odesláno z mého telefonu s Androidem pomocí pošty K-9 Mail. Omluvte prosím moji stručnost. ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
[OSM-talk-fr] Fwd: [Hot-francophone] Le mapathon ouest-africain a débuté !!
Message transféré Sujet : [Hot-francophone] Le mapathon ouest-africain a débuté !! Date : Sat, 6 Dec 2014 10:16:02 + De :Augustin Doury augustindo...@gmail.com Pour : hot-francoph...@openstreetmap.org hot-francoph...@openstreetmap.org Bonjour à tous, Après plusieurs jours de coordination à distance au sein de différentes communautés OSM africaines du projet Espace OSM Francophone, le grand jour est arrivé ! Ce Samedi 6 Décembre c’est un nouveau mapathon ouest-africain qui démarre: depuis le Bénin, le Burkina-Faso, la Côte d’Ivoire, le Sénégal, le Niger et le Togo, de nombreux mappers des comunautés OSM locales traceront routes, cours d'eau, zones résidentielles et principaux immeubles du Sud de Bamako, Mali. Mapathon en continuité réponse Ebola + préparation déploiement Mali ProjetEOF (7-21Dèc) + soutien au lancement de The Missing Maps Project à Paris aujourd'hui. Nicolas Chavent et Awa Dia sont à Paris pour représenter ProjetEOF et OSM Sénégal. Pour nous rejoindre : Tâche #794 du Gestionnaire de Tâches : http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/794). Commentaire pour chaque envoi de données :*#hotosm-task-794 ; #projeteof-mali * Un chat IRC débute ici pour coordination : 1) aller sur http://webchat.freenode.net/ 2) choisissez un pseudo Nickname 3) indiquer #mapathoneof dans Channel 4) saisissez la CAPTCHA 5) appuyez sur Connect Un billet de blog en cours de rédaction pour projeteof.org http://projeteof.org, sera relayé dès que publié. gus ___ Hot-francophone mailing list hot-francoph...@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot-francophone ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[OSM-talk-fr] Lancement Missing Maps - Paris, à Montreuil aujourd'hui 14 h
Bonjour, Je ne retrouve pas de mention du lancement du projet Missing Maps à Paris aujourd'hui sur la liste. Cartopartie à Montreuil à 14 h aujourd'hui: https://www.facebook.com/events/1748056948752691/?ref=22 Bien cordialement, Jean-Guilhem ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[OSM-talk-fr] Maison de santé
Bonjour, Une maison de santé vient d’ouvrir dans ma région. Quels attributs utiliser ? Il existe une discussion de mai 2010 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2010-May/021835.html sur les maisons de retraites : je viens de trouver sur http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim/Special_Phrases http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim/Special_Phrases Maison de retraite: (amenity=retirement_home) Maison de santé: (amenity=nursing_home) Hors amenity=nursing_home http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=nursing_home décrit une maison de retraite médicalisé, pas un cabinet infirmier ni une maison de santé ;-) Une petite recherche avec Nominatim renvoi ceci : building=yes (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139471431 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139471431) il y en a beaucoup mais ce n’est pas suffisant. building=civic (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/277479886 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/277479886) ?? amenity=hospital (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253184040 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253184040) mais ce n’est pas ça amenity=clinic (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208554059 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208554059) non amenity=nursing_home (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268413745 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268413745) pas du tout (ça doit être l’exemple de la maison de retraite. La traduction dans nominatim/osm est Soins infirmiers” !) amenity=doctors (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148135789 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148135789) on se rapproche mais ce n’est pas encore ça amenity=dentist (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1409068528 http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1409068528) bien comme docteurs, mais incomplet office=physician (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2800705715 http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2800705715) bureau de médecin, bof (c’est iD qui propose ça ? http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/office=physician#projects http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/office=physician#projects) building=healthcare ± health_facility:type=health_centre (OSM affiche ça comme une “maison” http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304800741 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304800741) Le dernier semble bien mais comment est-il géré par les moteurs de recherche, de rendu (OSM France au hasard) et les éditeurs ?? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Tags/Humanitarian_Data_Model#Health_Facility http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Tags/Humanitarian_Data_Model#Health_Facility http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 Un rapide coup d’œil sur la proposition indique qu’on pourrait / devrait ? utiliser health_facility:type=office avec health_person:type= physician; psychologist;nurse;… sauf que ce champ n’a pas l’air d’accepter des valeurs multiples. Avez-vous des idées sur la question ? — Yves Requête overpass http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/6oU http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/6oU utilisant une expression rationnelle node[name~Maison de Santé,i]; Renvoie 32 chemins et 13 nœuds___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[OSM-talk-fr] Ouistreham Riva-Bella
Un article du monde.fr traite de la tentative de changement de nom de Ouistreham, pour Ouistreham Riva-Bella Les panneaux ont l'air d'être installés, mais le nouveau toponyme n'est pas encore officiel. On fait quoi ? Un alt_name=Ouistreham Riva-Bella en attendant ? http://www.lemonde.fr/m-actu/article/2014/12/06/pour-son-renom-ouistreham-veut-changer-de-nom_4534240_4497186.html Stf ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[OSM-talk-fr] Nouvelle analyse Osmose d'intégration des codes postaux
Bonjour, Suite à la libération du lien entre codes postaux et les codes INSEE j'ai pu ajouter un analyse Osmose pour détecter les manques et faire des proposition d'ajouts. http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#item=7160 http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#item=8221 Note: cette analyse est basé sur la tag addr:postcode, que je considère pour ma part comme n'étant pas le bon. Selon moi on devrait utiliser postal_code pour les surfaces de code postaux. Voir mon mail sur talk-fr De l'usage des tags postal_code addr:postcode qui n'a soulevait aucun intérêt. Frédéric. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] site web openstreetmap.fr et sa page comment contribuer
Bonsoir, Cette page actuelle (http://openstreetmap.fr/contribuer) ne reflète pas vraiment comment contribuer. Dans le sens où des articles tels que Plus de 2000 menhirs cartographiés à Carnac, Projet du mois autour des tags wikipédia, ou encore Nouveaux contributeurs grâce au Dessous des Cartes n'ont, je pense, pas leur place sur cette page, car ils ne décrivent pas comment contribuer. Car c'est je pense l'intérêt de cette page, uniquement le comment contribuer. Le reste devrait de mon point de vue être décrit sur les autres onglets du site (Le projet, Réutiliser, Actualités, etc.). Donc il faudrait je pense soit déplacer les articles cités ci-dessus tout en laissant les autres qui peuvent être intéressant pour la contribution, soit remplacer la page par un unique article dont il est question sur ce fil. Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 08:34:21 +0100 From: stephane.pen...@wanadoo.fr To: talk-fr@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-fr] site web openstreetmap.fr et sa page comment contribuer Salut, Le dimanche 16 novembre 2014 21:23:57, Félix Marty a écrit : Il serait à mon sens plus intéressant et plus simple que la page comment contribuer en création remplace celle-ci : http://openstreetmap.fr/contribuer Pour quelle raison ? Stéphane ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[OSM-talk-fr] Besoin d'aide pour faire avancer Switch2OSM en français
Bonsoir,
J'ai fini de traduire Switch2osm il y a quelques mois cf
http://switch2osm.org/fr/
Il me reste deux problèmes techniques:
* le menu déroulant pour passer d'une langue à l'autre a un bug
* le menu n'est pas traduit donc ce n'est pas très pratique pour naviguer:
il faut aller sur chaque page puis choisir la langue fr...
Pour donner le contexte, sur Switch2osm, Richard Fairhurst gère la partie
éditoriale mais n'a plus aucun droit pour modifier le code (il l'a
rétrocédé à la fondation).
C'est donc la fondation OSM qui s'en s'occupe. Mon contact technique est
l'un de ses admin mais je préfère éviter d'être nomitatif. Le but pour moi
est d'avancer pas de faire l'inquisition, sachant que chacun a ses
obligations et souvent contribue en dehors de ses horaires pro.
Pour les deux points, j'ai envoyé et relancé deux fois depuis Début Octobre.
Pour le point 1, j'avais fourni la correction à effectuer côté css en
enlevant dans .widget { ...}, la partie overflow: hidden
Pour le point 2, cet extrait de mail en anglais résume ma proposition:
contribuer mais le dépôt n'est pas public
Although my last email is due to the langage bar for the French
translation, it bothers me that the main menu bar is not in French too.
Because I'm a developer, I can make code changes. For this purpose, can I
have access to the code repo(s) for the switch2osm website?
I've already found the various private git repo e.g
https://trac.openstreetmap.org/browser/chef/cookbooks/switch2osm/recipes/default.rb?order=name
but with no luck to clone.
I would need the wordpress template code and the list of languages plugins
installed to reproduce the environment on my own machine.
Another solution would be to make the switch2osm code repo public on Github
or somewhere else if nothing sensitive?
J'aimerais que ça avance et je commence à perdre patience...
Des avis, des conseils pour cela?
Merci
Thomas Gratier
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[OSM-talk-fr] BANO FANTOIR : Libellé dans la couche Bano absent de la liste FANTOIR
Bonjour, Il semble s’agir d’une adresse (n° 11 Amancey) avec le nom de la ville : 25015B002M http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/~cquest/leaflet/bano.html#19/47.03626/6.07259 http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/~cquest/leaflet/bano.html#19/47.03626/6.07259 Et rien ici : http://cadastre.openstreetmap.fr/fantoir/#insee=25015 http://cadastre.openstreetmap.fr/fantoir/#insee=25015 Bon dimanche, — Yves ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-ja] 鯖江市の都市計画図が CC BY で公開されました。
いいだです。 作業ありがとうございます、 おおむね、よいかんじのように思います。 （英語だと、もうちょい手順を細かく書け、 といわれるかもしれませんが） あと、サンプルのファイル名を見ると 対象が普通建物（3001）のみ、ということのようなのですが、 堅牢建物（3002）なども同様の作業をする、ということでよいですよね？ -- Satoshi IIDA mail: nyamp...@gmail.com twitter: @nyampire ___ Talk-ja mailing list Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja
[Talk-GB] Update to Freemap
Hello everyone, Would just like to announce an update to Freemap, my site for showing walking-orientated maps of OSM data in England and Wales (http://www.free-map.org.uk). It's still using Kothic JS as it has been for some time now, but now uses Leaflet.draw for adding annotations and walking routes, resulting in a (hopefully) more user friendly UI. *Please do note* that this is a project I work on in my own time, so I don't necessarily have the time to make it completely slick and professional, also do note that the use of client side rendering can mean that the maps can be slow to render if you haven't visited that area before. It isn't intended to be the best mapping site out there... it is just a hobbyist project! On Chrome on Windows, rendering actually seems slower now than a year or two ago (not sure if this is chrome or the new version of Kothic) while Firefox and IE seem to be quicker. Does this sound familiar to anyone else using kothic-js? If you have previously registered, please note you need to re-register as I have upgraded the login system to use PHP's native password functions rather than the (now regarded as insecure) sha1. I'm hoping to also make it properly mobile-friendly in the next couple of weeks. Source code at https://github.com/nickw1/Freemap [https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/585388?v=3s=400]https://github.com/nickw1/Freemap nickw1/Freemap · GitHub Freemap - OpenStreetMap maps of the UK countryside - code for website and associated projects Read more...https://github.com/nickw1/Freemap Nick ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Update to Freemap
Oops... just noticed a somewhat inaccurate statement.Just to clarify: also do note that the use of client side rendering can mean that the maps can be slow to render if you haven't visited that area before. This isn't actually due to the client-side rendering, it's due to the process of generating the geojson from the server. Server side caching of geojson means that it's significantly quicker when you visit an area the second time. Nick? ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] Signup bug corrected (Re: Update to Freemap)
Hi, Sorry - a couple of people pointed out an error in the sign up link, which I thought I'd removed. If you were having problems signing up, try again now - it should work. Thanks, Nick From: Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk Sent: 06 December 2014 11:08 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Talk-GB] Update to Freemap Hello everyone, Would just like to announce an update to Freemap, my site for showing walking-orientated maps of OSM data in England and Wales (http://www.free-map.org.uk). It's still using Kothic JS as it has been for some time now, but now uses Leaflet.draw for adding annotations and walking routes, resulting in a (hopefully) more user friendly UI. *Please do note* that this is a project I work on in my own time, so I don't necessarily have the time to make it completely slick and professional, also do note that the use of client side rendering can mean that the maps can be slow to render if you haven't visited that area before. It isn't intended to be the best mapping site out there... it is just a hobbyist project! On Chrome on Windows, rendering actually seems slower now than a year or two ago (not sure if this is chrome or the new version of Kothic) while Firefox and IE seem to be quicker. Does this sound familiar to anyone else using kothic-js? If you have previously registered, please note you need to re-register as I have upgraded the login system to use PHP's native password functions rather than the (now regarded as insecure) sha1. I'm hoping to also make it properly mobile-friendly in the next couple of weeks. Source code at https://github.com/nickw1/Freemap [https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/585388?v=3s=400]https://github.com/nickw1/Freemap nickw1/Freemap · GitHub Freemap - OpenStreetMap maps of the UK countryside - code for website and associated projects Read more...https://github.com/nickw1/Freemap Nick ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-us] Nominatim address lookup
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 01:11:28AM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote: Is it just me or did Nominatim stop checking an external database for address lookups where in-DB addresses aren't available in the US? It never checked any external databases, it just uses house numbers from Tiger where they are missing in OSM. That means that the address down to street level still needs to be in OSM or the search fails. Nothing about that has changed in the last two years or so (although there was a Tiger data outage last weekend but we have been back to normal since Monday) Any partucular address you cannot find anymore? Sarah ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
