Re: [talk-ph] Invitation to DSWD Event: "MAPAbabae: OpenStreetMap Workshop With Women and For Women"

[Arnalie Faye Vicario]

I noticed the registration form hyperlink was removed from the original 
message. You may register here: https://goo.gl/forms/aeYdXpI34OMjhpZp2

See you and thanks again!
--Nalie


 

   - Forwarded Message - From: talk-ph-requ...@openstreetmap.org 
To: "talk-ph@openstreetmap.org" 
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018, 12:08:58 PM 
GMT+8Subject: talk-ph Digest, Vol 116, Issue 6
 Send talk-ph mailing list submissions to
    talk-ph@openstreetmap.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    talk-ph-requ...@openstreetmap.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
    talk-ph-ow...@openstreetmap.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of talk-ph digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Invitation to DSWD Event: "MAPAbabae: OpenStreetMap Workshop
      With Women and For Women" (Arnalie Faye Vicario)


--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 03:20:47 + (UTC)
From: Arnalie Faye Vicario 
To: "talk-ph@openstreetmap.org" 
Subject: [talk-ph] Invitation to DSWD Event: "MAPAbabae: OpenStreetMap
    Workshop With Women and For Women"
Message-ID: <1892519406.815350.1521084047...@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hello OSM Mappers! 
As part of the Women's Month Celebration, DSWD would like to invite OSM 
mappers/volunteers to participate in the activity: "MAPAbabae: OpenStreetMap 
Workshop With Women and For Women" on March 22, 2018, 12NN - 5:30 PM at the 
DSWD Central Office Auditorium (4F Matapat Building). The activity aims to 
identify women and child-friendly spaces and facilities that would help in 
providing the DSWD services, as well as other mapping priorities of women.
Participation is not limited to women only. This is a workshop and mapathon 
with women, and FOR women, so men are also encouraged to participate in the 
activity. However, there are only six (6) slots for OSM mappers/volunteers so 
it will be a first come, first serve basis. Please fill out this form to 
confirm your attendance.

Thank you and hope to see you there! :)


http://maps.dswd.gov.ph  

---
Nalie @arnalielsewhere


Save Paper. Think before you print.




-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Poster-MAPAbabae.png
Type: image/png
Size: 351607 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 


--

Subject: Digest Footer

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


--

End of talk-ph Digest, Vol 116, Issue 6
*** 
  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Invitation to DSWD Event: "MAPAbabae: OpenStreetMap Workshop With Women and For Women"

[Erwin Olario]

This is awesome, Arnalie!

Thank you for inviting the community. Too bad you didn't make it to ODD the
other week, we would have loved to chat with you.

/Erwin

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:09 PM Arnalie Faye Vicario 
wrote:

> Hello OSM Mappers!
>
> As part of the Women's Month Celebration, DSWD would like to invite OSM
> mappers/volunteers to participate in the activity:* "MAPAbabae:
> OpenStreetMap Workshop With Women and For Women" on March 22, 2018, 12NN -
> 5:30 PM at the DSWD Central Office Auditorium (4F Matapat Building)*. The
> activity aims to identify women and child-friendly spaces and facilities
> that would help in providing the DSWD services, as well as other mapping
> priorities of women.
>
> Participation is not limited to women only. This is a workshop and
> mapathon with women, and FOR women, so men are also encouraged to
> participate in the activity. However, there are only six (6) slots for OSM
> mappers/volunteers so it will be a* first come, first serve basis*.
> Please fill out this *form* to confirm your attendance.
>
>
> Thank you and hope to see you there! :)
>
>
>
> *http://maps.dswd.gov.ph *
>
> ---
> *Nalie *
>
> *@arnalielsewhere*
>
>
> Save Paper. Think before you print.
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
-- 

/Erwin Olario

e: er...@ngnuity.xyz | v/m: https://t.me/GOwin | s: https://mstdn.io/@GOwin
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-au] I have written a response to DNRM, please give feedback

[Michael Collinson]

I am the Michael Collinson mentioned by Simon, (hello Simon, it has been 
a while!). I still lurk on this list and after a long gap will be 
spending time in Australia each year. I am in Melbourne at the moment 
and look forward to meeting mappers here on my hopefully less busy visit 
later this year.



On 2018-03-12 22:57, Simon Poole wrote:

Am 12.03.2018 um 11:47 schrieb Jonathon Rossi:
Sorry Simon, I really didn't intend to make things more complicated. 
I just wanted to ensure someone else doesn't get caught in the future 
after thinking I was doing the right thing, and no one else has done 
this each time this has come up in the past.
Jonathon the effort is clearly appreciated. At the time the issue was 
rather hotly debated and (as I wasn't really involved at the time) we 
would likely need to ask Michael Collinson for the historic information. 


I have hesitated to get involved in this discussion as my knowledge is 
now several years out of date, particularly as regards CC 4.0. However, 
I can make some comments from a historical perspective ...


In summary, I 100% agree with Simon that while there may be issues with 
CC 4.0, earlier dataset incorporation is a "done deal" and history. We 
can clearly show with a paper trail that we have acted properly and in 
good faith. The only thing that I would suggest: Various Australian 
government organisations have been very helpful to us, and much earlier 
than most. As a courtesy, I feel we should add a line to our high-level 
page https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright, (Simon?)


In more detail ...

I pinpointed a number of datasets published on the data.gov.au website 
under a CC-BY 2.5 license that had already been or could be incorporated 
into OSM, (not CC-SA-BY and not CC 4.0, CC 4.0 did not exist then). 
CC-BY 2.5 is completely compatible with our license except the 
completely impractical provision, (for multi-sourced open data), that 
all contributors be attributed equally - imagine attributing 4m 
contributors on each map made from our data.


I made successful contact with the good folks at data.gov.au with the 
form that I have copied below. The upshot was a series of about 20 
emails between Sept and Nov 2011. They were very helpful and said, yep, 
fine to keep the data and attribute them at 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution (now 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#data.gov.au). They 
requested a number of changes to the exact wording and I have verified 
that it is still there.


Since paper trail is very important, I am happy to forward the whole set 
of emails to anyone who requests them - if you want to put them in a 
public place, great.


The most relevant email is this one from 2011-09-21:

 Start -
Hi Michael,

Thank you for contacting us.

We are happy to provide you with permission that end users of 
OpenStreetMap do not have to attribute all contributors equally, however 
within your wiki we would need links directly to each dataset you are 
using from data.gov.au.  Data.gov.au provides datasets from all three 
tiers of government which involved a number of different legal 
entities.  Providing a link to the record enables correct attribution of 
the data.  This also helps us to demonstrate to agencies how their 
information is being used positively and, hopefully, will encourage more 
open data with can be beneficial to services such as yours.


Please let us know when this alteration is made so we can promote it 
within Australian Government.


Could we also get you to change the reference to our catalogue from 
data.australia.gov.au to data.gov.au.


Thank you and please contact us if you require any further clarification.

Regards,
data.gov.au team.
 End -

Hope that helps,
Michael


Your Name (optional)

Michael Collinson

Email (optional)



mich...@osmfoundation.org

Topic (required)



Request to continue using geographic datasets

Message (required)



Hi,

Thank you for making geographic data available under an open license.

As chairman of the OpenStreetMap Foundation's License Working Group, I 
am writing to ask specific permission to continue incorporating a small 
number of your geographic coordinate datasets in our OpenStreetMap 
global geo-dataset. I previously wrote to Commonwealth Copyright 
Administration, Attorney General’s Department as per earlier 
instructions on your website, but did not receive an answer.


The datasets in question are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 
Australia (CC-BY). We changing our own license away from CC-BY-SA 2.0 
license since we were advised by Creative Commons that such a license is 
not suitable for highly factual data. We respect the IP rights of others 
and are concerned that with a different license we may not meet your 
needs. We feel that without specific permission to continue, we should 
remove your data.


In summary, we comply with all your licensing 

Re: [Talk-us] Microsoft Building Import for Greenville, SC

[Mike N]

FYI, this is proceeding with 2 people, on dedicated accounts 
Greenville_SC_City_MSImport_1 and Greenville_SC_City_MSImport_2


On 1/24/2018 8:28 PM, Mike N wrote:


The OSM Upstate SC group is planning an import of Microsoft building 
shapes for the city of Greenville, SC.   The candidate wiki page is at


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Greenville_SC_Building_Import

   The actual import won't take place for 1-2 months yet to allow time 
to review the plans.


   Mike



___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Diversity-talk] Who Maps The World

[alyssa wright]

Hi all,

City Lab article below on gender disparity in OSM. I actually think things
have evolved and are more nuanced then ever before. Wondering if I am being
naive.

https://www.citylab.com/equity/2018/03/who-maps-the-world/555272/


A map only reveals as much as the mapmaker knows about the world, or at
least, cares to show. When most mapmakers are men, there’s bound to be gaps.

For example, on Open Street Map, the free and open-source Google Maps
competitor edited by volunteers around the world, “childcare centers,
health clinics, abortion clinics, and specialty clinics that deal with
women’s health are vastly underrepresented,” reports Sarah Holder at CityLab
.
It’s estimated that just 2 to 5 percent of OSMers are women. The vast
majority are older, retired men.

That gender imbalance provokes serious debate among mapmakers—one of the
more contentious battles in OSM history was in 2011, when editors rejected
an appeal to tag “childcare” at all. (It’s since been added.) But more
importantly, a map that fails to represent the needs of more than half the
population is not a very a useful map. The stakes are highest in places
where there is no Google, Apple, or any other company working as a back-up.
Sometimes, a volunteer-made map is the only cartographic resource citizens
and humanitarian organizations in developing countries have to go on.
A childcare center in Scottsdale, Arizona. (OSM)

That’s why a team of OpenStreetMap users—with lots of women involved—is
intentionally creating maps that reflect space more inclusively. On
International Women’s Day, Holder reported on a “feminist map-a-thon” in
Washington, D.C., hosted by Missing Maps, a humanitarian mapping
organization. There, volunteers worked to build a map for an NGO in
Tanzania that shelters girls facing the threat of genital mutilation. Their
digital lines and labels (such as: “women’s toilet”) could become
real-world escape routes.

Inclusive geography is about more than mapping bridges and tunnels that
everybody uses. “It’s shaped by asking things like: Where on the map do you
feel safe?” Holder writes. “How would you walk from A to B in the city
without having to look over your shoulder? It’s hard to map these
intangibles—but not impossible.”
___
Diversity-talk mailing list
Code of Conduct: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Diversity/MailingList/CodeOfConduct
Contact the mods (private): diversity-talk-ow...@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-it] in mezzo alle rotonde

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 14. Mar 2018, at 19:14, liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu 
>  wrote:
> 
> Il 14/03/2018 16:34, demon.box ha scritto:
>> boh...
>> historic=artefact ha 2 ricorrenze
>> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/historic=artefact
>> mentre ovviamente artefact:type nemmeno 1...
>> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=artefact%3Atype
>> sarò estremamente sincero a costo di sollevare un mezzo vespaio...
>> se un tag non lo trovo nel wiki e praticamente è anche inesistente in
>> taginfo mi domando, ma che senso ha utilizzarlo?
>> preferisco utilizzare quello che più si avvicina (tourism=attraction) poi un
>> domani quando (e se) ci sarà scritto nel wiki qualcos'altro di più
>> appropriato ne riparleremo ;-)
> 
> Potresti avere l'onore di essere il primo... ;)
> 


si, tutti i tag hanno cominciato senza ricorrenze. 

Se tanto pensi di mettere un tag temporaneo da rivedere più tardi, sarebbe 
ancora più utile mettere un tag nuovo, perché è molto più facile mettere 
insieme più cose simili taggati con tag diversi che lo è di dividere cose 
diverse taggati con lo stesso tag.

Se vuoi soprattutto un label nel rendering di mapnik potresti mettere 
place=city, renderizza già in livelli di zoom bassi e con un font bello pesante 
;-)

Quello che si trova nel wiki è quello che noi ci scriviamo dentro, se non 
scrivi il tag per queste cose adesso, è probabile che fra qualche mese o anno, 
quando il prossimo chiederà, il tag mancherà ancora.


Ciao, Martin 
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-lt] Garmin žemėlapis

[Tomas Straupis]

2018 m. kovo 14 d. 21:44, Mindaugas rašė:
> 3. Minėjau, kad įrašius vietoje namo numerio tuščią eilutę randa visus
> namus.

  Įtariu, kad priežastis yra daugiau nei vienas objektas db su addr:
žymomis. Buvau rašęs prieš kelis mėnesius pasiūlymą palikti tik vieną
addr: objektą vienam adresui, o kitus žymėti contact: žymomis. Tada
buvo nuspręsta, kad paliekam kelis addr: objektus, nes tik addr:
objektus moka įvesti populiariausias poi redaktorius - iD. Todėl dabar
db tvarkingumo dėlei kontaktiniai adresai gauna žymą addr:contact=yes,
bet čia tik Lietuvoje suprantama žyma tvarkingumui, niekas daugiau jos
nenaudoja.

> Iš ten buvo ankstesnis Laisvės al. namų sąrašas. Pasirodo
> viskas yra sudėtingiau. Su nauju failu, įrašęs tuščią namo numerį,
> Laisvės al. randa namus: 19, 28, 30, 41, 42, 45, 49, 49 (antrą kartą),
> 50, 54, 59, 65, 65, 74, 74, 76, 78, 81, 83, 83, 84, 87, 91, 92. Taigi
> yra ir atsiradusių naujų ir dingusių lyginant su ankstesniu sausio
> mėn. failu. Tačiau, jei įrašai paieškoje namo numerį ne iš šio sąrašo,
> gali būti įvairiai: 3A) pvz. įrašius 80 - randa vienintelį 80-tą namą.
> 3B) įrašius pvz. 95 tarp paieškos rezultatų rodo namus: 94, 92, 94,
> 97, 97, 98, 91, 99, 101, 101, 101, 87, 85, 83, 84, 83, 78, 76, 76,
> 114, 74, 118, 65, 65, 63 (eilės tvarką išlaikiau, kaip rodo GPSe, t.y.
> ne iš eilės).

  Čia siūlyčiau ieškoti konkretaus adreso. Jei neranda - problema -
aiškinamės. Priešingu atveju - spėčiau tai Garmino akmens amžiaus
BK0010 sąsajos bėdos... Ir įtariu, kad veikimas priklausys nuo
konkretaus įrenginio ir jo programinės įrangos (versijos).

> Tačiau klausimas, kodėl 95-to namo nerado, nes jis yra OSM.

  Geras klausimas. Gal todėl, kad tai mokykla, turinti amenity žymą.
T.y. mokykla įrašoma į POI indeksą ir neįrašoma į adresų indeksą.

> Gal dar hint'u (o gal kaip tik neaiškumo padaugės) galėtų būti 81-mas
> namas. Jį randa du kartus - vieną objektą rodo su pašto indeksu 44291,
> kitą - be indekso. Kodėl?! OSM yra 81 ir 81A namai, bet abu be
> indekso. Garmin ieškant 81A vis tiek randa tuos pačius du 81 namus.
> Beje, abu adresus rodo ne namo centre, o labiau ant gatvės: 54.89736
> 23.90817 ir 54.89746 23.90817, t.y. jie yra skirtingose Laisvės al.
> pusėse.

  Kiek teko skaityti mkgmap sąrašyną, tai adresas pozicionuojamas ne
pagal poziciją OSM'e, o gatvėje (ant gatvės vektoriaus artai
kažkurioje pusėje nuo gatvės vektoriaus). T.y. gatvės taške arba
kairėje arba dešinėje pusėje nuo taško gatvės vektoriuje. Bet kodėl
vienas OSM objektas identifikuojamas du kartus negaliu pasakyti.

> Daugėdai nuo rugsėjo turi mano papildytą
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527966002 , tačiau nei sausio mėn.,
> nei dabartinis failas Daugėdų nerodo miestų sąraše!

  Paieška veikia pagal administracines ribas. Jų daug trūksta. Kadangi
turiu mažą motyvaciją tokius objektus suvedinėti, tai kartas nuo karto
pažiūriu, kokie yra miestai su daugiausia įvestų adresų ir be
administracinių ribų. Tada jiems suvedu admin ribas. Daugėduose yra
tik vienas adresas... Tai laukti teks ilgai... Arba reikia prašyti
manęs asmeniškai (be problemų rašykite, jei turite konkrečių poreikių,
bet be variantų „suvesk visus X apskrities miestus“), arba reikia
įvesti daugiau adresų tame mieste :-)

> 5. Vis dar randu mistinį adresą: 139 20, Kaunas koordinatėmis 54.84993 
> 23.96661

  Negaliu atsakyti. Nežinau. Bet panašu į Punia degalinę adresu
Marijampolės 20 (Marijampolės plentas turi ref=139)

> Taip pat susitvarkė ir kažkokie alternatyvūs gatvių pavadinimai. Pvz.
> buvo ir "Laisves Al." ir "Laisves Aleja". Dabar liko tik "Laisves Al."
> (gal OSM duomenys nuo sausio pataisyti). Jei gatvė yra mieste, galiu
> parinkti iš pradžių gatvę, paskui miestą ir gatvė nedingsta - anksčiau
> bent kai kuriasi atvejais dingdavo.

  Čia galiu pasakyti, kad (mano žiniomis) tvarkingai prižiūrimos tik
Vilniaus gatvės ir adresai. Pagrinde todėl, kad Vilnius kol kas
vienintelis drąsus miestas, atidavęs atvirai adresus (kur
Kauno/Matijošaičio fanai?:-). Bet tikriausiai ir todėl, kad tik
Vilniuje yra žmonių, užsiimančiu sisteminga adresų priežiūra. Taigi
kitiems miestams tiesiog reikia pasitempti, Vilniečiai už jus to
nepadarys.

> , išeities tekste randu visokių triukų - adresų interpoliavimo (kaip
> suprantu, turi 1 ir 11 namą, tai tarpe išdėlioji namus 3, 5, 7 ir 9),
> metodą housenumberMatch.getClosestPointOnRoad() ir t.t. Nelabai
> pagaunu viso konteksto, kada tos funkcijos naudojamos, bet gali būti,
> kad tas adresų indekso generavimas yra naudojamas kažkoks neaiškus
> algoritmas.

  Garminas niekada nepateikė savo failo formato aprašymo. mkgmap
programuotojai viską spėlioja... baitą po baito, bitą po bito... :-(
Stebuklas, kad jie išspėliojo tiek, kiek dabar jau turime. O formatas
tai keičiasi, įrenginių milijonas... Ir jau populiarėja naujas „NT“
formatas...

-- 
Tomas

___
Talk-lt mailing list
Talk-lt@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lt

[Talk-es] [Catastro] Instrucciones GitHub

[Javier Sánchez Portero]

Hola

Las instrucciones para subir los archivos de tareas al repositorio no
funcionan correctamente. Por su culpa, cuando un colaborador sube un
municipio elimina sin darse cuenta los cambios realizados por otros. Es
decir que se borran los municipios subidos por otros.

Para evitar conflictos, debemos de mantener todos una copia completa del
repositorio. Actualizarlo con el comando pull:

git pull

El principal problema era al usar la opción -f al subir archivos (push). No
debemos volver a usarlo.

Saludos
___
Talk-es mailing list
Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es

Re: [Talk-es] Importaciones catastro

[Javier Sánchez Portero]

Perfecto, adelante con la publicación.

No te preocupes, ese es el comentario que se añade al subir los cambios. No
tiene mayor importancia.


El 14 de marzo de 2018, 19:33, Joaquim  escribió:

> Hola,
>
> Creo que en la tarea de Menorca ya todo funciona. He pasado el archivo
> address.geojson a address.osm e introducido upload=never y he creado el
> vínculo correspondiente para que se abra en JOSM. De momento he eliminado
> de las instrucciones la referencia a los mapas de IDEIB hasta tener el
> permiso que ya he solicitado.
>
> Al subir a Github los archivos .osm he cometido un error y he cambiado el
> nombre de la carpeta 07052 que he titulado como 'Es Castell', cuando
> deberia decir 'Sant Lluis'. No he querido hacer experimentos para cambiarlo
> para no hacer algún estropicio. ¿Como puedo arreglarlo?
>
>
> Gracias
>
> Joaquim
>
>
> ___
> Talk-es mailing list
> Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
>
___
Talk-es mailing list
Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es

Re: [talk-au] I have written a response to DNRM, please give feedback

[Simon Poole]

Am 14.03.2018 um 22:50 schrieb Graeme Fitzpatrick:
>
>
> OK, a stupid, well & truly outside the box, thought here! :-)
>
> If we have discussions with CC, is there any possibility of getting
> them to write into CC BY 4.5 & following editions, that "by the
> Organisation agreeing to the terms of CC BY xx, that they also agree
> to ODbl" or something to that effect?
>
Hahaha :-)

Well CC BY 4.0 might have actually been that if they (all IMHO now)
hadn't given in to the group that didn't want to agree to parallel
distribution being an allowed method to guarantee that the underlying
data remains open (I spent a fair amount of time two years back reading
all the publicly available discussion leading up to 4.0, and a frequent
statement  in the context was that "everybody ignores it anyway" (it ==
the DRM prohibition)).

We would still have the attribution problem, but that is, as this
discussion shows, in general not an issue.

Simon

> Graeme
>
>
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] I have written a response to DNRM, please give feedback

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

Thanks mate - much nicerer! (at least for these tired old eyes) :-)

Good luck with your continuing efforts

Thanks

Graeme

On 14 March 2018 at 23:12, Andrew Harvey  wrote:

> Hey Graeme,
>
> Really appreciate the feedback!
>
> > What does the black type for  CC BY 4.0 eg  QSpatial State Controlled
> Roads&  QSpatial Property Address signify?
>
> It just means I haven't contacted them to get the waiver signed yet, I see
> in this thread others have tried to get the waiver completed for DNRM and
> have been pushed back, but I will try again with a different approach and
> if still no update it. State Controlled Roads is a TMR dataset which I'm
> contacting separately.
>
> > & could you possibly use a brighter green (fluoro perhaps) for those
> places that have given us the waiver? (on my screen, at least, your dark
> green is very similar to black)
>
> I've changed it to a background colour, I think it makes it easier to scan
> the list and identify the status easier.
>
>
> On 13 March 2018 at 08:30, Graeme Fitzpatrick 
> wrote:
>
>> I reckon some poor sod at DNRM must be getting sick & tired of hearing
>> from OSM contributors by now! They may grant us the waiver just to shut us
>> up & make us leave them alone! :-)
>>
>> On 12 March 2018 at 21:14, Andrew Harvey 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> As an aside I'm working on cataloguing Australian open data potentially
>>> useful for OSM with the goal to get the OSMF waiver completed for them all.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for all that work Andrew.
>>
>> Couple of questions thanks?
>>
>> What does the black type for  CC BY 4.0 eg  QSpatial State Controlled
>> Roads
>> &
>> QSpatial Property Address
>> 
>>  signify?
>>
>> & could you possibly use a brighter green (fluoro perhaps) for those
>> places that have given us the waiver? (on my screen, at least, your dark
>> green is very similar to black)
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Graeme
>>
>
>
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] I have written a response to DNRM, please give feedback

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

On 13 March 2018 at 19:47, Simon Poole  wrote:

>
> * a small note on the side, when discussing ODbL and CC BY 4.0
> compatibility with Creative Commons, representatives of the organisation
> voiced the opinion that most of the rewrite was just clarification of
> terms that the previous versions contained, in particular that the
> attribution requirement had always allowed indirect attribution if it
> was the appropriate choice.
>
>
OK, a stupid, well & truly outside the box, thought here! :-)

If we have discussions with CC, is there any possibility of getting them to
write into CC BY 4.5 & following editions, that "by the Organisation
agreeing to the terms of CC BY xx, that they also agree to ODbl" or
something to that effect?

Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [Talk-it] Nome ponti/gallerie

[scratera]

..personalmente sono per disegnare il ponte a se stante e 
man_made=bridge
name=pinco
è la strada che lo percorre
highway=primary
name=Via dell'Abetone
ref=...



--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[Talk-cz] Porušování licence pro mapové podklady - http://www.mapy-verejne-osvetleni.cz/

[Petr Schönmann]

 Dobrý den,
dovolil bych si upozornit na porušování licence na Vašem webu
http://www.mapy-verejne-osvetleni.cz/ ... cituji z položky Informace o
aplikaci ... "Poznámka: aplikace využívá mapových podkladů *GoogleMaps *a
její provoz je zcela zdarma "

Pouhým pohledem lze však zjistit že jde o mapy z *Openstreetmap.org*,
nikoliv *Google maps* ... avšak dobrá zpráva pro Vás !
Mapy lze i nadále používat, ale je třeba uvést autorství... viz informace
na https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright

Mail zasílám i jako kopii na konferenci české komunity Openstreetmap (
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz?language=cs ), kde vás
rádi přivítáme. Rozhodně by bylo pěkné mít data o lampách i v
openstreetmap, kde si je opět můžete vytěžit zpět když bude třeba a
komunita se může starat i o zmapování nových svítidel.

Co lze s takovými daty dělat lze vidět třeba zde  http://lightmap.uni-hd.de/

Přeji úspěšný den.
___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [Talk-cz] osmcz-app v0.21

[xkomc...@centrum.cz]

Nalij do nich pár stovek miliónů dolarů, jako to udělali ostatní 
investoři, a zařiď tak změnu kurzu. Co vím, tak snaha investorů je 
přeorientovat Mapbox na autonomní řízení automobilů s tím, že mapy pro 
web jsou až na druhém místě (nebo ještě dál). S tím také souvisí 
"četnost" updatů.



On 14.3.2018 20:44, Marián Kyral wrote:
Tak jsem kouknul. Taková drobnost. Jak se toho markeru zbavím, když už 
jej nepotřebuji? Zatím pomůže jedině reload.


Co to udělat stejně jako u gpx souborů? - Marker se zobrazí v seznamu 
vrstev a je možné jej skrýt nebo smazat?




A netušíš jak přesvědčit Mapbox, že obchvat Třince na I/11 je už 
několik měsíců v provozu?

V OSM samozřejmě dávno zprovozněno.




Díky,
Marián

Dne 14.3.2018 v 08:26 Marián Kyral napsal(a):

Díky,
večer na to snad mrknu. Bohužel se v práci nedostanu na bootstrap cdn 
(kolize ipv4 rozsahu s jednou lokální sítí), takže mi osmap.cz ani 
tvůj dev nefunguje jak má :-(


Marián

-- Původní e-mail --
Od: Pavel Zbytovský 
Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic 
Datum: 13. 3. 2018 22:47:47
Předmět: [Talk-cz] osmcz-app v0.21


Ahoj,

připravil jsem nové vydání v0.21, kde jsou některé příjemné změny:

 1. linkování domů zobrazuje těžiště (nikoliv první node jako
dosud) [3]

 2. vlastní marker dostal GUI - po kliku na souřadnice vlevo dole
je zde tlačítko "vytvořit značku"

 3. npress stránky můžou přepsat výchozí zobrazení mapy (tj.
třeba stránka školen ukáže marker s pozicí) [4]

+ malé úpravy: OpenTopoMap maxzoom + úpravy šablon (třeba už je
vidět celá 404 Not found stránka)

Testovat možno na: https://devosm.zby.cz/
Commity zde [1][2], pokud se nikdo neozve s chybou, zítra bych to
poslal na produkci.

Pavel


[1] https://github.com/osmcz/osmcz/compare/v0.20...v0.21
[2]

https://github.com/osmcz/osmcz-web/compare/osmcz:deploy_20180108...osmcz:devosm

[3] https://devosm.zby.cz/way/100959765
[4] https://devosm.zby.cz/skoleni/brezen18



___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz





___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz


___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [OSRM-talk] Does osrm-routing deal only with ordered points

[Xavier Prudent]

Thank you Nico and Daniel,

I guess that is so far all I need, I will now dig through the exemples.

BTW, the level of development & documentation of osrm is quite impressive.

Regards,
Xavier

2018-03-13 18:59 GMT-04:00 Nico Aymet :

> Yes, you are right.
> I'm sorry I give you an old link, here the current version documentation:
> http://project-osrm.org/docs/v5.15.2/api/#trip-service
>
> The route service finds the fastest route between coordinates *in the
> supplied order*.
>
> The trip plugin solves (try to) the *Traveling Salesman Problem. *(I
> think it's what you need)
> Please keep in mind the roundtrip option (route returns to first location)
> In the last version there are two new option source/destination if you
> want to fix the first and the last point and reorder the others, otherwise
> the service use the supplied points in any order to reach the goal. (please
> follow the supported combinations of roundtrip, source and destination
> according to the table)
>
> Rgds
>
> Nico Aymet
>
> 2018-03-13 22:38 GMT+00:00 Xavier Prudent :
>
>> Hello Nico,
>>
>> Thanks for that fast answer,
>> So if I understand well, the route service expects an order, while the
>> trip service can estimate this order, right?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Xavier
>>
>> 2018-03-13 18:28 GMT-04:00 Nico Aymet :
>>
>>> Hi Xavier,
>>> you can use the trip service:
>>>
>>> http://project-osrm.org/docs/v5.5.1/api/#trip-service
>>>
>>> Rgds
>>>
>>> Nico Aymet
>>>
>>> 2018-03-13 22:09 GMT+00:00 Xavier Prudent :
>>>
 Dear all,

 Given 4 points A,B,C,D
 osrm makes a nice job searching for a route that goes through
 A->B->C->D.

 Is that also able to estimate the optimal ordering, not necessarily the
 given one?

 Regards,

 Xavier

 --

 *Xavier Prudent *

 *Data Scientist  - Data Mining - Machine Learning*

 Web:* www.xavierprudent.com *
 Tel (Québec)  : (514) 668 76 46
 Skype : xavierprudent



 ___
 OSRM-talk mailing list
 OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk


>>>
>>> ___
>>> OSRM-talk mailing list
>>> OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Xavier Prudent *
>>
>> *Data Scientist  - Data Mining - Machine Learning*
>>
>> Web:* www.xavierprudent.com *
>> Tel (Québec)  : (514) 668 76 46
>> Skype : xavierprudent
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> OSRM-talk mailing list
>> OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>>
>>
>
> ___
> OSRM-talk mailing list
> OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>
>


-- 

*Xavier Prudent *

*Data Scientist  - Data Mining - Machine Learning*

Web:* www.xavierprudent.com *
Tel (Québec)  : (514) 668 76 46
Skype : xavierprudent
___
OSRM-talk mailing list
OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk

Re: [Talk-cz] osmcz-app v0.21

[Marián Kyral]

Tak jsem kouknul. Taková drobnost. Jak se toho markeru zbavím, když už
jej nepotřebuji? Zatím pomůže jedině reload.

Co to udělat stejně jako u gpx souborů? - Marker se zobrazí v seznamu
vrstev a je možné jej skrýt nebo smazat?



A netušíš jak přesvědčit Mapbox, že obchvat Třince na I/11 je už několik
měsíců v provozu?
V OSM samozřejmě dávno zprovozněno.




Díky,
Marián

Dne 14.3.2018 v 08:26 Marián Kyral napsal(a):
> Díky,
> večer na to snad mrknu. Bohužel se v práci nedostanu na bootstrap cdn
> (kolize ipv4 rozsahu s jednou lokální sítí), takže mi osmap.cz ani
> tvůj dev nefunguje jak má :-(
>
> Marián
>
> -- Původní e-mail --
> Od: Pavel Zbytovský 
> Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic 
> Datum: 13. 3. 2018 22:47:47
> Předmět: [Talk-cz] osmcz-app v0.21
>
>
> Ahoj,
>
> připravil jsem nové vydání v0.21, kde jsou některé příjemné změny:
>
>  1. linkování domů zobrazuje těžiště (nikoliv první node jako
> dosud) [3]
>
>  2. vlastní marker dostal GUI - po kliku na souřadnice vlevo dole
> je zde tlačítko "vytvořit značku"
>
>  3. npress stránky můžou přepsat výchozí zobrazení mapy (tj. třeba
> stránka školen ukáže marker s pozicí) [4]
>
> + malé úpravy: OpenTopoMap maxzoom + úpravy šablon (třeba už je
> vidět celá 404 Not found stránka)
>
> Testovat možno na: https://devosm.zby.cz/
> Commity zde [1][2], pokud se nikdo neozve s chybou, zítra bych to
> poslal na produkci.
>
> Pavel
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/osmcz/osmcz/compare/v0.20...v0.21
> [2]
> 
> https://github.com/osmcz/osmcz-web/compare/osmcz:deploy_20180108...osmcz:devosm
>
> [3] https://devosm.zby.cz/way/100959765
> [4] https://devosm.zby.cz/skoleni/brezen18
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-cz mailing list
> Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
>

___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [Talk-es] Importaciones catastro

[Joaquim]

Hola,

Creo que en la tarea de Menorca ya todo funciona. He pasado el archivo 
address.geojson a address.osm e introducido upload=never y he creado el 
vínculo correspondiente para que se abra en JOSM. De momento he 
eliminado de las instrucciones la referencia a los mapas de IDEIB hasta 
tener el permiso que ya he solicitado.


Al subir a Github los archivos .osm he cometido un error y he cambiado 
el nombre de la carpeta 07052 que he titulado como 'Es Castell', cuando 
deberia decir 'Sant Lluis'. No he querido hacer experimentos para 
cambiarlo para no hacer algún estropicio. ¿Como puedo arreglarlo?


Gracias

Joaquim


___
Talk-es mailing list
Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es

Re: [Talk-it] indagine/survey sulle proposte a State of the Map 2018

[Andrea Albani]

Mi sono guardato tutte le proposte e, tra le tante interessanti, ne ho
trovate alcune secondo me rilevanti rispetto ad alcuni temi di Quality
Assurance di cui spesso si parla in ML.
Eccole:

Can we validate every change on OSM? Presented by Lukas Martinelli, Mapbox
Verifying Our Edits Presented by Bogdan Petrea and Armin Gheorghina, Telenav
Making bot edits safe and acceptable Presented by Yuri Astrakhan, Elastic
Insights on OpenStreetMap contributor taxonomy starting from contribution
history Presented by Raphaël Delhome, Oslandia
Modding the OSM Data Model Presented by Jochen Topf

E poi quest'altra per capire il punto di vista dell'attuale "anima" di
Nominatim

Addressing addresses Presented by Sarah Hoffmann

Ciao

Il giorno 7 marzo 2018 08:51, Alessandro Palmas <
alessandro.pal...@wikimedia.it> ha scritto:

> *Partecipate alla nostra indagine OpenStreetMap*
>
> E' aperta a tutti, che stiate pianificando la visita a SOTM, partecipando
> virtualmente via streaming o anche solo pensando di vedere i video in
> seguito:
>
> https://stateofthemap.limequery.org/985188
>
> Una volta giunti alla pagina di partenza, dopo aver inserito il vostro
> nome utente, vi verrà presentata una lunga lista, ordinata casualmente, con
> le proposte di intervento.
>
> Non ci aspettiamo che diate il voto a tutte le 134 proposte; se ogni
> persona che legge ne giudicasse solamente 10 avremmo raccolto un grande
> numero di giudizi. Quando ne avrete avuto abbastanza scorrete la pagina
> sino in fondo e pigiate su "Next" per completare il processo e inviare le
> risposte. Non lasciate la pagina aperta per troppo tempo o la sessione
> potrebbe scadere.
>
> Coraggio, vogliamo avere i vostri pareri.
>
> NOTA: l’uso del nome OSM è solamente a scopo antispam, le vostre opinioni
> non saranno condivise.
>
> Alessandro Ale_Zena_IT
>
> ___
> Talk-it mailing list
> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>
>
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Nome ponti/gallerie

[liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu]

Il 14/03/2018 13:58, Andrea Musuruane ha scritto:

Ciao,

2018-03-14 13:12 GMT+01:00 Marco :


Tempo fa passando da Sondrio ho notato due cartelli con i nomi di due
ponti, ora però sono incerto su quale sia il metodo migliore per mappare
quei nomi. Qua potete vedere le note https://www.openstreetmap.org/
#map=16/46.1642/9.8511=N

Ora, se volessi indicare il nome dei ponti come dovrei fare? sostituisco
il valore del tag name attuale con il nome del ponte oppure converrebbe
usare qualche tag tipo bridge:name, name:bridge,...? lo stesso vale per le
gallerie immagino, giusto?



Il wiki è tuo amico :-)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:name
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel -> tunnel:name

Ciao,

Andrea


Io l'ho messo normalmente sulla highway (name), come una normale strada.


--
_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_
|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|
Simone Girardelli

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] in mezzo alle rotonde

[liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu]

Il 14/03/2018 16:34, demon.box ha scritto:

boh...

historic=artefact ha 2 ricorrenze

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/historic=artefact

mentre ovviamente artefact:type nemmeno 1...

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=artefact%3Atype

sarò estremamente sincero a costo di sollevare un mezzo vespaio...

se un tag non lo trovo nel wiki e praticamente è anche inesistente in
taginfo mi domando, ma che senso ha utilizzarlo?

preferisco utilizzare quello che più si avvicina (tourism=attraction) poi un
domani quando (e se) ci sarà scritto nel wiki qualcos'altro di più
appropriato ne riparleremo ;-)


Potresti avere l'onore di essere il primo... ;)




--
_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_
|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|
Simone Girardelli

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Nome ponti/gallerie

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

2018-03-14 13:58 GMT+01:00 Andrea Musuruane :

> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:name
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel -> tunnel:name
>
>


io userei man_made=bridge (se vuoi mappare un ponte esplicito), per esempio
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5676428

Ciao,
Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[OSM-talk] FOSS4G Conference Academic Proceedings (full proceedings and individual papers) available online

[Suchith Anand]

Happy to share this excellent updates. The full academic proceedings and 
individual papers from the last five FOSS4G Global conferences  [Starting  from 
Nottingham FOSS4G  http://2013.foss4g.org ] are now available at 
https://scholarworks.umass.edu/foss4g/


Thank you to Charlie and everyone who worked on this over the years and made 
possible this wonderful gift for the global community.


Recordings from FOSS4G presentations are also made available thanks to  
Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB) – German National Library of Science 
and Technology


https://av.tib.eu/series/169/foss4g+seoul+2015

https://av.tib.eu/series/253/foss4g+bonn+2016


Best wishes,


Suchith




From: GeoForAll  on behalf of Charlie 
Schweik 
Sent: 14 March 2018 13:27
To: OsGeo, GeoForAll; OSGeo Discussions
Cc: Erin Jerome
Subject: [Geo4All] Good news! We now have five past FOSS4G Conference Academic 
Proceedings (full proceedings and individual papers) available online

Dear OSGeo and GeoForAll colleagues,

I'm pleased to report that we now have full academic proceedings and individual 
papers from the last five FOSS4G conferences [1].
The website is: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/foss4g/


This system provides readership (download) statistics and distribution maps 
(see attached). For instance, as of today, across all volumes we already have a 
total of 3,409 full proceeding and individual paper downloads worldwide. 
Individual authors can see their individual download statistics by going to 
their individual paper entry (for example, see [2]). Scholarworks also feeds 
library database search engines.

Some thanks are in order:

1. To Barend Köbben, Venka Raghavan, and Sanghee Shin, for their assistance and 
encouragement on publishing their edited volumes;
2. To each conference program committee for their service;
3. To Andy Anderson, Franz-Joseph Behr, and Muhammad Yahya for their efforts 
formatting and publishing one or more volumes;
4. To Erin Jerome at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst's Library's 
Scholarly Communication office who 
provides us the Scholarworks platform and terrific technical support at no cost 
to OSGeo or GeoForAll; and last, but not least,
4. To Mohammed Zia who is the person behind the scenes who contributed time and 
expertise to really make this happen.

I apologize if I have forgotten someone!

We hope that we can continue to publish FOSS4G Academic proceeding pre-prints, 
both global and regional events, through this system, to maintain a longterm 
repository of FOSS4G scholarship. Proceeding editors of future conferences: 
Please contact us to coordinate.

Sincerely,

Charlie Schweik for the FOSS4G Proceedings editorial team:
(Mohammed Zia, Andy Anderson, and Franz-Josef Behr)

**

[1] Nottingham, 2013; Portland, 2014; Seoul, 2015; Bonn, 2016; and Boston, 2017

[2] As an example, the Boston 2017 FOSS4G paper by Agarwal and Rajan "Analyzing 
the performance of NoSQL vs. SQL databases for Spatial and Aggregate queries" 
has had 838 (!) downloads since Sept 22, 2017.  See 
https://scholarworks.umass.edu/foss4g/vol17/iss1/4/


--
Charlie Schweik

Professor
Department of Environmental Conservation & School of Public Policy
University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Facebook: Charles.Schweik
Twitter: @cschweik




This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
attachment. 

Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored 
where permitted by law.




___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-it] import numeri civici Regione Toscana

[Andrea Musuruane]

Ciao Alessandro,
 non sono un esperto di wiki ma credo che il nome della pagina dovrebbe
essere cambiato. Il prefisso IT: mi sembra indichi pagine scritte in lingua
italiana.

La pagina inoltre non è linkata da
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue, come richiesto dalle
import guidelines.

Dovresti aggiungere il file OSM che hai preparato per l'importazione,
quello che è risultante dalla trasformazione dei dati (sezione "OSM Data
Files": Link to your source data files that you have prepared for the
import - e.g. the .osm files you have derived from the data sources). Se
non è proponibile mettere il file OSM di tutta la Toscana, sarebbe bene
mettere almeno quello di un singolo comune che sia abbastanza significativo
(né troppo piccolo né troppo grande) su cui si possa vedere come è stata
fatta la traduzione dei dati, che la riproiezione è avvenuta in modo
corretto, ecc.

Vorrei far notare che, ad oggi, a differenza di Genova, Savona e Firenze
non seguono la seguente regola per i numeri civici:


* Nel caso sia presente la specificità "rosso" (a Genova, Savona e
Firenze), questa si inserisce in lettere minuscole e con uno spazio di
separazione dal numero civico (es: addr:housenumber
=9 rosso
).
La specificità "nero" non si deve inserire. *
A Firenze oggi viene usata la lettera R maiuscola per indicare i numeri
rossi, con uno spazio di separazione dal numero civico.

Nel tagging plan andrebbe quindi specificato meglio come viene composto il
valore di *addr:housenumber*.

Invece, *addr:street* = DUG+INDIRIZZO è errato perché INDIRIZZO = DUG +
TOPONIMO. Dovrebbe quindi essere *addr:street* = INDIRIZZO.

Tra l'altro INDIRIZZO e COMUNE sono scritti tutti in maiuscolo. Come
avverrà la conversione?

Sarebbe meglio aggiungere una sezione relativa al "Team Approach" (fai
sempre riferimento a Import/Plan Outline
). Dato che si
tratta di un import di una intera regione, secondo me è meglio far vedere
da subito che parteciperà più di una persona, meglio se attive in zona.
Sulla ML di import mi avevano fatto storie perché all'epoca della proposta
eravamo in due a partecipare all'import dei dati della Provincia di Biella.

La sezione workflow dovrebbe essere dettagliata meglio. Lo scopo è quello
di avere delle istruzioni da seguire passo dopo passo per poter importare
un singolo comune. Tieni inoltre presente che questa è la parte che
seguiranno le persone che faranno l'import, quindi deve essere il più
possibile chiara e accurata.

Personalmente aggiungerei qualche tag in più ai changeset, anche se non è
richiesto. Per esempio, noi abbiamo usato i seguenti (e avevamo preso
spunto da un import alto atesino):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Provincia_di_Biella/Addresses#Changeset_Tags

Hanno il vantaggio di specificare che si tratta di un import, di
dettagliare la licenza originaria dei dati e di rimandare alla pagina che
descrive l'import stesso.

Ciao,

Andrea




2018-03-13 15:50 GMT+01:00 Alessandro Palmas :

> Riprendo questo vecchio topic rimasto dormiente.
> Posto che andrebbe discusso come non perdere l'informazione sui passi
> carrabili (ma vehicle sui punti non si può usare, magari aggiungiamo
> description), chiedo alla comunità di riprendere la discussione e aiutarmi
> nel perfezionare la pagina wiki.
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Toscana_import_numeri_civici_2017
>
> Al termine della discussione potremmo chiedere alla regione se ci converte
> le coordinate.
>
>
> Alessandro Ale_Zena_IT
>
> ___
> Talk-it mailing list
> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-cz] dotaz k Osmhicheck

[Jakub Jelen]

Ted se to snazi pripojovat pres HTTPS z nejakeho duvodu, i kdyz tam mas
explicitne HTTP a samozrejme selhava, protoze JOSM neceka TLS zpravy.

Pro zajimavost jsem to ted vyzkousel i na osm.org a v HOT tasking manageru
a ani v jednom mi to neslo, takze to bude asi obecny problem. Vim, ze jeste
tak dva tydny zpet mi treba ten tasking manager fungoval.

Stale ale funguje workaround otevreni v novem okne/panelu.

2018-03-14 16:27 GMT+01:00 Tom Ka :

> OK, takze se to netyka iframe ale mixed content. https pro JOSM ma
> zase svoje problemy, uz to bylo i tady.
> Ted jsem nasel tohle: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/
> ticket/10033#comment:38
>
> tak jsem to upravil z localhost na 127.0.0.1, muzes prosim vyzkouset?
>
> Diky
>
>
> Dne 14. března 2018 15:17 Jakub Jelen  napsal(a):
> > Ja mam Fedoru 27 s Firefox 58.0.2. Kdyz si oteveru developer konzoli, po
> > kliknuti dostanu zpravu:
> >
> > Blocked loading mixed active content
> > “http://localhost:8111/load_object?relation_members=true=r18481”
> >
> > S odkazem na
> >
> > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Mixed_content
> >
> > Koukam, ze osmhicheck bezi na https, ale odkaz vece na http, coz je to
> co se
> > tomu nelibi -- asi by stalo za to pouzit take HTTPS odkaz a tim padem
> port
> > 8112, pokud tomu dobre rozumim.
> >
> > Jakub
> >
> > 2018-03-14 15:12 GMT+01:00 Tom Ka :
> >>
> >> Ahoj, podle mne to funguje porad stejne. Ten iframe je tam z toho, jak
> >> to kdysi udelal ten student jako reseni toho aby se po kliknuti nic
> >> dalsiho neotviralo a presto se provedl ten odkaz pro zavolani JOSM.
> >> Zna nekdo lepsi reseni? Rad ho tam upravim, ale ted nebudu mit cas
> >> neco hledat.
> >>
> >> Pokud to tedy prestalo fungovat - upgrade prohlizece? nebo problem s
> >> localhost certifikatem u JOSM?
> >>
> >> Zkus poslat blizsi info co mas za prohlizec/system a co to presne dela
> >> a muzu se na to zkusit mrknout.
> >>
> >> Bye
> >>
> >>
> >> Dne 13. března 2018 15:30 Zdeněk Pražák  napsal(a):
> >> > chtěl jsem opravit několik turistických tras na stránce
> >> > https://osm.fit.vutbr.cz/OsmHiCheck/tables/index.php?
> pg=table=all
> >> > V minulosti to fungovalo tak, že po kliknutí na id trasy v tabulce se
> >> > trasa
> >> > otevřela v JOSM
> >> > toto mi nyní nefunguje
> >> > co mám dělat pro obnovení uvedeného chování
> >> > Pražák
> >> >
> >> > ___
> >> > Talk-cz mailing list
> >> > Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
> >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
> >> >
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Talk-cz mailing list
> >> Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Talk-cz mailing list
> > Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
> >
>
> ___
> Talk-cz mailing list
> Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
>
___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [Talk-it] in mezzo alle rotonde

[demon.box]

boh...

historic=artefact ha 2 ricorrenze

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/historic=artefact

mentre ovviamente artefact:type nemmeno 1...

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=artefact%3Atype

sarò estremamente sincero a costo di sollevare un mezzo vespaio...

se un tag non lo trovo nel wiki e praticamente è anche inesistente in
taginfo mi domando, ma che senso ha utilizzarlo?

preferisco utilizzare quello che più si avvicina (tourism=attraction) poi un
domani quando (e se) ci sarà scritto nel wiki qualcos'altro di più
appropriato ne riparleremo ;-)

--enrico







--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-cz] dotaz k Osmhicheck

[Tom Ka]

OK, takze se to netyka iframe ale mixed content. https pro JOSM ma
zase svoje problemy, uz to bylo i tady.
Ted jsem nasel tohle: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/10033#comment:38

tak jsem to upravil z localhost na 127.0.0.1, muzes prosim vyzkouset?

Diky


Dne 14. března 2018 15:17 Jakub Jelen  napsal(a):
> Ja mam Fedoru 27 s Firefox 58.0.2. Kdyz si oteveru developer konzoli, po
> kliknuti dostanu zpravu:
>
> Blocked loading mixed active content
> “http://localhost:8111/load_object?relation_members=true=r18481”
>
> S odkazem na
>
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Mixed_content
>
> Koukam, ze osmhicheck bezi na https, ale odkaz vece na http, coz je to co se
> tomu nelibi -- asi by stalo za to pouzit take HTTPS odkaz a tim padem port
> 8112, pokud tomu dobre rozumim.
>
> Jakub
>
> 2018-03-14 15:12 GMT+01:00 Tom Ka :
>>
>> Ahoj, podle mne to funguje porad stejne. Ten iframe je tam z toho, jak
>> to kdysi udelal ten student jako reseni toho aby se po kliknuti nic
>> dalsiho neotviralo a presto se provedl ten odkaz pro zavolani JOSM.
>> Zna nekdo lepsi reseni? Rad ho tam upravim, ale ted nebudu mit cas
>> neco hledat.
>>
>> Pokud to tedy prestalo fungovat - upgrade prohlizece? nebo problem s
>> localhost certifikatem u JOSM?
>>
>> Zkus poslat blizsi info co mas za prohlizec/system a co to presne dela
>> a muzu se na to zkusit mrknout.
>>
>> Bye
>>
>>
>> Dne 13. března 2018 15:30 Zdeněk Pražák  napsal(a):
>> > chtěl jsem opravit několik turistických tras na stránce
>> > https://osm.fit.vutbr.cz/OsmHiCheck/tables/index.php?pg=table=all
>> > V minulosti to fungovalo tak, že po kliknutí na id trasy v tabulce se
>> > trasa
>> > otevřela v JOSM
>> > toto mi nyní nefunguje
>> > co mám dělat pro obnovení uvedeného chování
>> > Pražák
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Talk-cz mailing list
>> > Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
>> >
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-cz mailing list
>> Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-cz mailing list
> Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
>

___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [Talk-cz] dotaz k Osmhicheck

[Jakub Jelen]

Ja mam Fedoru 27 s Firefox 58.0.2. Kdyz si oteveru developer konzoli, po
kliknuti dostanu zpravu:

Blocked loading mixed active content “
http://localhost:8111/load_object?relation_members=true=r18481”

S odkazem na

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Mixed_content

Koukam, ze osmhicheck bezi na https, ale odkaz vece na http, coz je to co
se tomu nelibi -- asi by stalo za to pouzit take HTTPS odkaz a tim padem
port 8112, pokud tomu dobre rozumim.

Jakub

2018-03-14 15:12 GMT+01:00 Tom Ka :

> Ahoj, podle mne to funguje porad stejne. Ten iframe je tam z toho, jak
> to kdysi udelal ten student jako reseni toho aby se po kliknuti nic
> dalsiho neotviralo a presto se provedl ten odkaz pro zavolani JOSM.
> Zna nekdo lepsi reseni? Rad ho tam upravim, ale ted nebudu mit cas
> neco hledat.
>
> Pokud to tedy prestalo fungovat - upgrade prohlizece? nebo problem s
> localhost certifikatem u JOSM?
>
> Zkus poslat blizsi info co mas za prohlizec/system a co to presne dela
> a muzu se na to zkusit mrknout.
>
> Bye
>
>
> Dne 13. března 2018 15:30 Zdeněk Pražák  napsal(a):
> > chtěl jsem opravit několik turistických tras na stránce
> > https://osm.fit.vutbr.cz/OsmHiCheck/tables/index.php?pg=table=all
> > V minulosti to fungovalo tak, že po kliknutí na id trasy v tabulce se
> trasa
> > otevřela v JOSM
> > toto mi nyní nefunguje
> > co mám dělat pro obnovení uvedeného chování
> > Pražák
> >
> > ___
> > Talk-cz mailing list
> > Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
> >
>
> ___
> Talk-cz mailing list
> Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
>
___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [Talk-cz] dotaz k Osmhicheck

[Tom Ka]

Ahoj, podle mne to funguje porad stejne. Ten iframe je tam z toho, jak
to kdysi udelal ten student jako reseni toho aby se po kliknuti nic
dalsiho neotviralo a presto se provedl ten odkaz pro zavolani JOSM.
Zna nekdo lepsi reseni? Rad ho tam upravim, ale ted nebudu mit cas
neco hledat.

Pokud to tedy prestalo fungovat - upgrade prohlizece? nebo problem s
localhost certifikatem u JOSM?

Zkus poslat blizsi info co mas za prohlizec/system a co to presne dela
a muzu se na to zkusit mrknout.

Bye


Dne 13. března 2018 15:30 Zdeněk Pražák  napsal(a):
> chtěl jsem opravit několik turistických tras na stránce
> https://osm.fit.vutbr.cz/OsmHiCheck/tables/index.php?pg=table=all
> V minulosti to fungovalo tak, že po kliknutí na id trasy v tabulce se trasa
> otevřela v JOSM
> toto mi nyní nefunguje
> co mám dělat pro obnovení uvedeného chování
> Pražák
>
> ___
> Talk-cz mailing list
> Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
>

___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [talk-au] I have written a response to DNRM, please give feedback

[Jonathon Rossi]

Apologises, I missed that. BCC definitely seem one of the most progressive
Australian agencies surrounding open data so that should go well. Thanks
again for your work.

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:37 PM Andrew Harvey 
wrote:

> Oh I was referring to the Brisbane City Council data you mentioned not
> DNRM.
>
>
> On 15 Mar. 2018 12:26 am, "Jonathon Rossi"  wrote:
>
> I'll reach out to them to see if we can get the waiver completed tomorrow,
>> in the meantime I've added it too the list.
>>
>
> This isn't intended to sound rude, but why do you think they would have a
> different opinion on the CC BY 2.5 waiver and not just get the same
> response Joel received?
>
> It appears either DNRM either don't understand the waiver, or are not
> interested in passing it on to their lawyers. Do you have contacts there?
>
>
>
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] I have written a response to DNRM, please give feedback

[Andrew Harvey]

Oh I was referring to the Brisbane City Council data you mentioned not
DNRM.

On 15 Mar. 2018 12:26 am, "Jonathon Rossi"  wrote:

I'll reach out to them to see if we can get the waiver completed tomorrow,
> in the meantime I've added it too the list.
>

This isn't intended to sound rude, but why do you think they would have a
different opinion on the CC BY 2.5 waiver and not just get the same
response Joel received?

It appears either DNRM either don't understand the waiver, or are not
interested in passing it on to their lawyers. Do you have contacts there?
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] I have written a response to DNRM, please give feedback

[Jonathon Rossi]

>
> I'll reach out to them to see if we can get the waiver completed tomorrow,
> in the meantime I've added it too the list.
>

This isn't intended to sound rude, but why do you think they would have a
different opinion on the CC BY 2.5 waiver and not just get the same
response Joel received?

It appears either DNRM either don't understand the waiver, or are not
interested in passing it on to their lawyers. Do you have contacts there?
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] I have written a response to DNRM, please give feedback

[Andrew Harvey]

> I like the idea of getting a fresh agreement about attribution to
continue using the CC BY 2.5/3.0 licensed data, even if we cannot use the
CC BY 4.0 data today. I don't think it would be hard to get the rights
holder's okay that they are happy with our attribution of their data.

Agreed, that's what I've been working on with
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Catalogue to get all CC
licensed Open Data under the OSMF CC BY waiver.

> @AndrewH that looks great, once the page has got a heap of green it'll be
useful. I noticed you are missing the BCC datasets, although I've not used
them.

Thanks Jono, I'll reach out to them to see if we can get the waiver
completed tomorrow, in the meantime I've added it too the list.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] I have written a response to DNRM, please give feedback

[Simon Poole]

Am 14.03.2018 um 13:06 schrieb Jonathon Rossi:
> ...
>
> Could you please point me to a good resource that explains why CC BY
> 2.5 and 3.0 don't have the same problem with "technical protection
> measures" that we've got in the waivers because I'm obviously missing
> something. I've read the license texts
> and 
> https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/License_Versions#Application_of_effective_technological_measures_by_users_of_CC-licensed_works_prohibited.
>
> ...

There is no doubt that we have a moral and ethical obligation to keep CC
BY 2.X licensed data available free of restrictions, as the licensors
intended. The ODbL guarantees this via the parallel distribution
mechanism. But naturally it would be preferable if we could get complete
waivers for the CC BY 2.X datasets, sorry if I came across as implying
otherwise .

Simon


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [Talk-it] Nome ponti/gallerie

[Andrea Musuruane]

Ciao,

2018-03-14 13:12 GMT+01:00 Marco :

> Tempo fa passando da Sondrio ho notato due cartelli con i nomi di due
> ponti, ora però sono incerto su quale sia il metodo migliore per mappare
> quei nomi. Qua potete vedere le note https://www.openstreetmap.org/
> #map=16/46.1642/9.8511=N
>
> Ora, se volessi indicare il nome dei ponti come dovrei fare? sostituisco
> il valore del tag name attuale con il nome del ponte oppure converrebbe
> usare qualche tag tipo bridge:name, name:bridge,...? lo stesso vale per le
> gallerie immagino, giusto?
>

Il wiki è tuo amico :-)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:name
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel -> tunnel:name

Ciao,

Andrea
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [OSRM-talk] Does osrm-routing deal only with ordered points

[Daniel Hofmann]

Also check out

https://github.com/mapbox/node-or-tools#node-or-tools

which you can use on top of the routing engine's distance matrix output.

The repository contains an example how to do this with further optimization
constraints.

Hope that helps,
Daniel J H

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:59 PM, Nico Aymet  wrote:

> Yes, you are right.
> I'm sorry I give you an old link, here the current version documentation:
> http://project-osrm.org/docs/v5.15.2/api/#trip-service
>
> The route service finds the fastest route between coordinates *in the
> supplied order*.
>
> The trip plugin solves (try to) the *Traveling Salesman Problem. *(I
> think it's what you need)
> Please keep in mind the roundtrip option (route returns to first location)
> In the last version there are two new option source/destination if you
> want to fix the first and the last point and reorder the others, otherwise
> the service use the supplied points in any order to reach the goal. (please
> follow the supported combinations of roundtrip, source and destination
> according to the table)
>
> Rgds
>
> Nico Aymet
>
> 2018-03-13 22:38 GMT+00:00 Xavier Prudent :
>
>> Hello Nico,
>>
>> Thanks for that fast answer,
>> So if I understand well, the route service expects an order, while the
>> trip service can estimate this order, right?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Xavier
>>
>> 2018-03-13 18:28 GMT-04:00 Nico Aymet :
>>
>>> Hi Xavier,
>>> you can use the trip service:
>>>
>>> http://project-osrm.org/docs/v5.5.1/api/#trip-service
>>>
>>> Rgds
>>>
>>> Nico Aymet
>>>
>>> 2018-03-13 22:09 GMT+00:00 Xavier Prudent :
>>>
 Dear all,

 Given 4 points A,B,C,D
 osrm makes a nice job searching for a route that goes through
 A->B->C->D.

 Is that also able to estimate the optimal ordering, not necessarily the
 given one?

 Regards,

 Xavier

 --

 *Xavier Prudent *

 *Data Scientist  - Data Mining - Machine Learning*

 Web:* www.xavierprudent.com *
 Tel (Québec)  : (514) 668 76 46
 Skype : xavierprudent



 ___
 OSRM-talk mailing list
 OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk


>>>
>>> ___
>>> OSRM-talk mailing list
>>> OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Xavier Prudent *
>>
>> *Data Scientist  - Data Mining - Machine Learning*
>>
>> Web:* www.xavierprudent.com *
>> Tel (Québec)  : (514) 668 76 46
>> Skype : xavierprudent
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> OSRM-talk mailing list
>> OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>>
>>
>
> ___
> OSRM-talk mailing list
> OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>
>
___
OSRM-talk mailing list
OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk

Re: [OSM-ja] JOSMとJava

[ribbon]

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 09:54:15PM +, Kenichiro MATOHARA wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> matohara@鹿児島です．
> 
> Linux環境ですが以前よりOpenJDKを利用しています．
> Debian sid amd64/Ubuntu 16.04 LTS ARM64環境では以下のような感じで動いています．
> 
> - 
> OpenJDKのインストール(8以降)
> $ sudo apt install openjdk-8-jre

Linux環境だと、わざわざOracle Java入れることはないので、
普通は、open-jdk ですね。
でも、Windows版はそうもいかない。

JOSM使うときはLinuxにしないと駄目なのかな。

___
Talk-ja mailing list
Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja

[Talk-it] Nome ponti/gallerie

[Marco]

Tempo fa passando da Sondrio ho notato due cartelli con i nomi di due 
ponti, ora però sono incerto su quale sia il metodo migliore per mappare 
quei nomi. Qua potete vedere le note 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/46.1642/9.8511=N


Ora, se volessi indicare il nome dei ponti come dovrei fare? sostituisco 
il valore del tag name attuale con il nome del ponte oppure converrebbe 
usare qualche tag tipo bridge:name, name:bridge,...? lo stesso vale per 
le gallerie immagino, giusto?


Grazi


___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [talk-au] I have written a response to DNRM, please give feedback

[Jonathon Rossi]

>
> No, that was a deliberate attempt to take this discussion off-list as
> I'm not sure that there is much point in raking over old mistakes
> unless we are trying to learn from our mistakes.
>

I know at least I am learning a lot about the whole licensing area and from
these past mistakes here and also now have an appreciation of the effort
and heartache others have gone though to get things to where they are
today. Hopefully this thread results in something useful.

> Your interpretation makes sense to me the way you explained it, I
> > hadn't noticed that detail. I assume you expect that if the
> > data.gov.au  team really meant to include other
> > non-Australian Government agencies it would explicitly be "Australian
> > Government and state and territory governments"
>
> Yes. In light of comments like this:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-au@openstreetmap.org/msg07906.html
>
> we should be assuming that the attribution statement is precisely what
> the AGIMO meant it to be.
>

I had a look at some history of the data.australia.gov.au and data.gov.au
web sites, and as others claimed in those mailing list threads these web
sites appear to have always run as a portal where a government agency can
submit data and pick a license from a drop down, the data was even grouped
into "jurisdictions" on data.gov.au.

The copyright pages also had this:

> If you have any questions, please contact the contributing agency.
(captured 12 Nov 2009,
https://web.archive.org/web/20091112020639/http://www.australia.gov.au/about/copyright#data
)

> If you have any questions about a particular dataset on data.gov.au,
please contact the contributing agency.
> (captured 11 Mar 2011,
https://web.archive.org/web/20110311145839/http://data.gov.au/about/copyright/
)

Strangely the DCDB dataset was still available on data.australia.gov.au prior
to and on 26 Nov 2010, but disappeared by 01 Mar 2011:
https://web.archive.org/web/20101126161529/http://data.australia.gov.au:80/catalogue/property
https://web.archive.org/web/20110301031838/http://data.australia.gov.au/catalogue/property

... I thought maybe it moved to data.gov.au during a transition? However I
couldn't find it at any point in time under any of these (although that
doesn't mean it wasn't there):
- "Queensland" under jurisdictions (
https://web.archive.org/web/20110311235629/http://data.gov.au/jurisdiction/)
- "Property" category, while the other "property" category datasets did
come across from data.australia.gov.au
- QLD DERM agency (
https://web.archive.org/web/20110601192908/http://data.gov.au/data/?agency=Queensland+Department+of+Environment+and+Resource+Management
)

but I can't find any subsequent response to say if the ABS data was
> ever listed on data.gov.au. If anybody was mapping back in 2011 and
> knows it would be good to find out.
>

AndrewD, in Aug 2011 there were quite a lot of ABS datasets on data.gov.au:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110829100039/http://data.gov.au:80/data/?agency=Australian+Bureau+of+Statistics

To give a bit more context and perhaps point out a way to resolve this
> without every thing blowing up:
>
> At the time the permission from data.gov.au was obtained, OSM was in the
> final stages of the licence change. Normally the LWG wouldn't have
> become directly involved at all in the matter of licensing national
> datasets, just as it is now only involved on request in late stage
> vetting. However at the time there was a die hard group of people that
> wanted to derail the licence change at essentially all costs, and
> unluckily some of the louder voices were Australian. The people involved
> jumped on use of CC BY 2.* datasets from Australian government sources
> in OSM as one of the major arguments against the licence change and
> nobody local seemed to be willing to resolve the issue, as a result the
> LWG engaged directly with data.gov.au.
>

Simon, thanks for the background, I thought there was context I was missing
as I read though all the emails in those long threads yesterday. I can now
understand why various parties have a bad taste in their mouth over this
topic and why some people stepped away from the project.

Now it should be pointed out that, as I've said previously, the major
> concern, and why we wanted permission in the first place is that the
> ODbL doesn't require downstream attribution on derivative databases and
> works, it just requires a pointer back to the source of the database.
> That is the reason why OSM, in one way or the other, has always required
> that data sources that have licensed their data on CC BY 2.X/3.0 terms
> agree that indirect attribution via the website or the contributors page
> is sufficient. I have yet to hear that such agreement has been withheld,
> as clearly anything else would be totally impractical. It should be
> noted that we didn't require downstream attribution even when OSM data
> was licensed CC BY SA 2.0, and we would have needed exactly the same
> 

Re: [Talk-it] in mezzo alle rotonde

[liste_girarsi]

Il 14 Marzo 2018 10:46:13 CET, "demon.box"  ha scritto:
>per capire...
>
>per tutti questi oggetti (in mezzo ad una rotonda oppure no):
>
>vecchio attrezzo da lavoro
>vecchia molazza di una cartiera
>vecchio frantoio
>vecchio vagone di una miniera
>ruota di un mulino
>vecchio macchinario industriale
>vecchi amacina in pietra di un mulino
>
>ripeto, per TUTTO questo andrebbe bene historic=artefact ?
>
>grazie
>
>--enrico
>
>
>
>
>--
>Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html
>
>___
>Talk-it mailing list
>Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

sì, al limite puoi descrivere il singolo caso con artefact:type=* riusando 
qualche valore di man_made o altro.


--simone girardelli--
##
Inviato dal mio dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Perdonate la brevità.

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] in mezzo alle rotonde

[demon.box]

per capire...

per tutti questi oggetti (in mezzo ad una rotonda oppure no):

vecchio attrezzo da lavoro
vecchia molazza di una cartiera
vecchio frantoio
vecchio vagone di una miniera
ruota di un mulino
vecchio macchinario industriale
vecchi amacina in pietra di un mulino

ripeto, per TUTTO questo andrebbe bene historic=artefact ?

grazie

--enrico




--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-lt] Garmin žemėlapis

[Tomas Straupis]

Problema su gabalo Lietuvos dingimu buvo mkgmap riktas, kuris jau
pataisytas. Taigi „mistikos“ nebeliko.

-- 
Tomas

___
Talk-lt mailing list
Talk-lt@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lt

Re: [Talk-it] in mezzo alle rotonde

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 14. Mar 2018, at 07:32, Aury88  wrote:
> 
> e quando mai un artista pretende?...ci sono artisti che sono stati
> riconosciuti tali solo ben dopo la loro morte.


tipo? Mi puoi fare un unico esempio di un artista che ha creato un’opera 
pubblica (public art = tourism=artwork) ed è stato considerato artista solo ben 
dopo la sua morte?

Ciao, Martin 
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] in mezzo alle rotonde

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 13. Mar 2018, at 23:20, demon.box  wrote:
> 
> questi scambi di idee non nasce mai niente di concreto e quindi tutto rimane
> com'è con i suoi pregi e difetti...


se i tag vanno bene per te, li puoi direttamente usare, non devi aspettare 
niente, anche se non sarebbe male creare una proposta come inizio di una 
documentazione 

Ciao, Martin 
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[Talk-cz] WeeklyOSM 398

[Tom Ka]

Ahoj, je dostupné vydání 398 týdeníku WeeklyOSM:

http://www.weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/10092

* Kvartální pivo Praha, Brno, Ostrava.
* Zprávičky pro WeeklyOSM.
* Boj se SEO v OSM.
* 3. ročník Cen OpenStreetMap.
* Overpass API z pythonu.
* Statistiky stahování StreetComplete.
* Import adres na Slovensku.
* Dotazník pro SotM v Milánu.
* OSM a Den otevřených dat.
* Detektor spamu pro OSM.
* Opravy satelitů na orbitu.

Pěkné počtení ...

___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rencontre OSM à Namur 27/03/2018 OSM meeting in Namur

[Julien Minet]

On m'a indiqué que j'avais fait une erreur dans la date de la prochaine
rencontre: c'est bien le mardi 27 mars et non le 19 mars.

Inscription: https://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/events/248338003/

Julien

2018-03-02 15:43 GMT+01:00 Julien Minet :

>  FRANÇAIS 
>
> Rencontrons-nous à Namur pour le prochain rdv OpenStreetMap wallon le
> mardi 27 mars à 18h30! Tout le monde intéressé par OSM est le bienvenu, du
> parfait débutant au cartographe expérimenté. N'hésitez pas à venir si vous
> êtes juste intrigué par le projet OpenStreetMap et la cartographie
> participative. Lieu: une salle de Mundo-N (Rue Nanon, 98, Namur, 10 min. de
> la gare) avec un projecteur, si bien que quiconque intéressé paut apporter
> un PC portable et présenter quelque chose.
>
> Le thème du jour: OpenStreetMap et (Grandes) Randonnées (mais d'autres
> sujets sont possibles!)
>
> Des boissons & pizzas seront offertes!
>
>  ENGLISH 
>
> Let's meet in Namur for the next Wallonia OpenStreetMap meetup on the 27
> May 2018 , 6:30 PM ! Anyone interested in OSM is welcome, from the absolute
> beginner to the most experienced mapper. Do not hesitate to come if you are
> just curious about OpenStreetMap and participatory cartography. We have
> booked a room at Mundo-N (Rue Nanon, 98, Namur, 10 min. from the station)
> with a beamer, so anyone interested can bring a laptop and present
> something.
>
> Thema of the day: OpenStreetMap and Hiking
>
> Drinks and pizzas will be offered!
>
>
> --> https://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/events/248338003/
>
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [Talk-cz] osmcz-app v0.21

[Marián Kyral]

Díky,
večer na to snad mrknu. Bohužel se v práci nedostanu na bootstrap cdn
(kolize ipv4 rozsahu s jednou lokální sítí), takže mi osmap.cz ani tvůj dev
nefunguje jak má :-(

Marián

-- Původní e-mail --
Od: Pavel Zbytovský 
Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic 
Datum: 13. 3. 2018 22:47:47
Předmět: [Talk-cz] osmcz-app v0.21
"
Ahoj,



připravil jsem nové vydání v0.21, kde jsou některé příjemné změny:


   1. linkování domů zobrazuje těžiště (nikoliv první node jako dosud) [3]

   2. vlastní marker dostal GUI - po kliku na souřadnice vlevo dole je zde
   tlačítko "vytvořit značku"

   3. npress stránky můžou přepsat výchozí zobrazení mapy (tj. třeba stránka
   školen ukáže marker s pozicí) [4]



+ malé úpravy: OpenTopoMap maxzoom + úpravy šablon (třeba už je vidět celá
404 Not found stránka)






Testovat možno na: https://devosm.zby.cz/(https://devosm.zby.cz/)

Commity zde [1][2], pokud se nikdo neozve s chybou, zítra bych to poslal na
produkci.




Pavel







[1] https://github.com/osmcz/osmcz/compare/v0.20...v0.21
(https://github.com/osmcz/osmcz/compare/v0.20...v0.21)


[2] https://github.com/osmcz/osmcz-web/compare/osmcz:deploy_20180108...
osmcz:devosm
(https://github.com/osmcz/osmcz-web/compare/osmcz:deploy_20180108...osmcz:devosm)





[3] https://devosm.zby.cz/way/100959765(https://devosm.zby.cz/way/100959765)

[4] https://devosm.zby.cz/skoleni/brezen18
(https://devosm.zby.cz/skoleni/brezen18)










___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
"___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [Talk-cz] konec Strava heatmap?

[Lukáš Karas]

Neexistuje podobná heatmapa z gps logů nahraných na openstreetmap.org? 
Odhaduji že těch dat bude asi méně, ale přecijen je to pěkná sbírka...

Lukáš

Dne úterý 13. března 2018 20:53:05 CET Milan Cerny napsal(a):
> Strava se, jak se zdá, rozhodla omezit zobrazení heatmap.
> Neomezeně je nově k dispozici jen do zoomu 12, detailněji jen po přihlášení
> na stránce Stravy. Bohužel se to týká i podkladů pro OSM editory, veškeré
> detaily jsou pryč. Škoda, byl to šikovný nástroj.
> 
> Milan
> 
> ___
> Talk-cz mailing list
> Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [Talk-it] in mezzo alle rotonde

[Aury88]

dieterdreist wrote
> 
> appunto, si vuole qualcuno (l’artista) che pretende, 

 e quando mai un artista pretende?...ci sono artisti che sono stati
riconosciuti tali solo ben dopo la loro morte.


> ed un pubblico che lo segue. 

Anche questo non è assolutamente vero, ne all'inizio della carriera
dell'artista o addirittura durante la vita dell'artista necessariamente c'è
qualcuno che lo segue e comunque non sempre l'artista ha un seguito di
pubblico per tutte le arti da lui provate.

comunque sono d'accordo che il tag a mio avviso più corretto sia
historic=artefact






-
Ciao,
Aury
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [OSM-talk] Large number of seemingly automated, non-SEO spam edits

[Clifford Snow]

Ethan,
If DWG's interaction proves constructive, can you ask for their help
getting the word out to other SEO firms? I'm convinced we need to work with
them or be constantly faced with fixing or deleting there edits.

Is there any key publications/blogs they all follow? Who are the industry
leaders? What would they like from OSM to help them?

(Its late if this doesn't make much sense)

Clifford

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 8:18 PM, Ethan Nelson 
wrote:

> On Mar 13, 2018 22:09, "Paul Johnson"  wrote:
>
>
> > So what was the story
>
>
> It was the case of someone uploading data erroneously. After a block, they
> made contact to let us know.
>
>
> Best,
>
> Ethan
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>


-- 
@osm_seattle
osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us
OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk