Re: [Talk-at] Public Transport Schema und Wien
Kampf mit Linie die 2.Habe jetzt alle Kursvarianten des 25A eingegeben... Wieso stellt overpass die Relation Süßenbrunner Platz - Rennbahnweg (ohne besondere Stichfart) bitte einzeln dar? Wieder mal einfach ein API fehler, oder hab ich was übersehen?http://overpass-api.de/api/sketch-line?network=VORref=25Aoperator=correspondences=100width=2700height=495font-size=force-rows=1max-cors-per-line=max-cors-below=style= LGRobin ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
Re: [Talk-at] Wiener Katastralgemeinden
On 06.06.2015 11:46, Andreas Uller wrote: Aus diesem Grund (siehe unten) stellt sich auch die Frage, ob die Katastralgemeinden überhaupt als boundary=administrative definiert werden sollten, Katastralgemeinden sind das einzige, was der Definition von admin_level=10 entspricht, und admin_level=10 wird laut Taginfo-Karte überall in Mitteleuropa massenhaft verwendet. D.h. boundary=administrative ist für Katastralgemeinden ein De-facto-Standard, das werden wir jetzt nicht mehr umdrehen können. oder nicht in ein anderes Schema (mit Bezirksgerichten, Landesgerichten, OLG) gehören. Was haben sie mit Gerichten zu tun? Das zeigt, wie schwer es ist, ein passenderes Schema zu finden, solang keiner sagen kann, was Katastralgemeinden überhaupt noch für eine Funktion haben - außer dass sie unermüdlich in Statistiken, Gemeindehomepages und Wikipediaseiten aufgelistet werden. -- Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/ Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
[Talk-it] Nuovo portale CNT INGV visualizzazione epicentri su OSM
Sul nuovo bel portale (responsive) del Centro Nazionale Terremoti dell'INGV, tra le tante cose, sarà da oggi possibile visualizzare l'epicentro del evento sismico, anche su Openstreetmap. http://cnt.rm.ingv.it/ -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Nuovo-portale-CNT-INGV-visualizzazione-epicentri-su-OSM-tp5847310.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk] Can wikidata links help fight name inflation?
Phil phil at trigpoint.me.uk writes: Transliteration is something that can be done at application level, and a traveller would have learned the basics. You still need to be able to check the street names against.what is on the sign. Then why not have a single transliteration? A single cryllic to latin transliteration will serve all languages using the latin alphabet, do we need separate Russian, Ukrainian, Serbo Croat tags when they are identical? Transliteration is from one script to another, but many languages may share the same script, each with its own alphabet. Thus there are almost always multiple valid transliterations. It gets worse, especially when transliterating to or from non-European scripts: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Minh%20Nguyen/diary/35163 If you need to wayfind with OSM data, the unqualified `name` tag is your friend: as the primary name of a feature, it stands the greatest chance of appearing on signage. In any case, we shouldn't limit our imagination to travelers carrying OSM field maps or GPS units while roaming the English countryside. That use case certainly calls for consistency with signposts, but not at the expense of other use cases, such as OSM-based world maps, geography textbooks, board games, etc. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-GB] OS Open Names
OS Open Names seems at least in case I looked at not to handle curved roads as well as Codepoint in positioning centroid where most houses would be matched to correct postcode: http://oscompare.raggedred.net/?zoom=17lat=53.79255lon=-1.458961layers=B00FFTFT On Friday 05 Jun 2015 13:26:39 Chris Hill wrote: I've been looking more closely at the postcodes in the OS Open Names and there seems to be some problems with them. I've had a few comments about missing postcodes and some strange positions of a few too. I'm going to look into this and take it up with OS, but in the meantime I suggest sticking to ONS or Codepoint Open postcodes for now. -- -- ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-cz] Pozvánka na workshop + konferenci příští čtvrtek (Newsletter 1)
Zdravím, posílám k nahlédnutí 1. newsletter OpenStreetMap CZ [1], kde jsou pozvánky na dvě akce příští čtvrtek. 1) začátečnícký a pokročilý workshop OSM 2) konference #GeoinformaticsFSvCVUT zaměřená na Open Data - oragnizuje Martin Landa, který vás už zval dříve. Jinak poslední dobou se snažím svůj web o školeních http://osm.zby.cz předělat na takový portál OSM CZ pro veřejnost. Kdyste měl někdo zájem, můžeme nad tím společně přemýšlet, případně vám můžu dát editační přístup. Též nabízím přístup k FB a TW osmcz. Hezký den, Pavel Zbytovský zby.cz [1] http://us11.campaign-archive1.com/?u=cb9a83e4c66e393586b89e370id=7741140ba8e=c5329694ff ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
[Talk-GB] weeklyOSM - SotM US edition ;-)
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 254, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu Enjoy! The version was not proofread by a second pair of eyes. If you find any errors on the site or want to join the team to support and further improve this service please get in touch. Interested in proofreading? Drop us a mail. ;-) -- ## Manfred ## www.weeklyOSM.eu ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Where's the coastline?
I'm in two minds about it myself, I guess I would lean towards the Ordinance Survey map since you could argue there is some vegetation there. I personally would mark it inside the coastline and as wetland=tidalflat. Dafo Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 17:13:33 +0200 From: molto...@gmail.com To: talk-ie@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Where's the coastline? On 06/06/2015, Killian Driscoll killiandrisc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, maybe I'm getting the wrong end of the stick, but why try and reinvent the wheel when you can just compare how the land or water is already interpreted It's more important to be self-consistent than to follow another project's lead, even a well-respected one. Or to phrase it differently, sticking with your decision is more important than what your actual decision is. That said, I think that the coastline is at mean high-water spring tide principle is the most common (sometimes using high-water mark instead, which is close enough). look at the EPA map http://gis.epa.ie/Envision / http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Corine_Land_Cover and see what is land, transitional waterbody, coastline. AFAIU Corine doesn't have a notion of coastline the way OS does. It just deals with landcover, and categorizes those as salt marsh, which is an easy decision in OSM too. The OSi map on that website shows the north part of the wetland as land and the south part as water, which is really bogus and a nice example of the official government-funded maps not always being the best :p ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
[OSM-talk-ie] Overpass / relation issue
Hi, I am have a small issue with an overpass / relation issue, someone might be able to point me in the right direction... I have a geojson file containing the borders of all the counties in the republic. I extracted from OSM a few years back, I think I used XAPI to extract and did some conversion/flattening but I'm not 100% sure of the process. I now need all the counties in Ireland (the Island) and was trying to export these via Overpass Turbo, I thought I had it working but have hit a bit of an issue. My query and export go fine as does the conversion from json to geojson (using osmtogeojson), but I am ending up with a geojson file with ~9k features, where I was expecting 32. The overpass query returns 32 relations (as expected) and 9735 ways (which I presume make up the border), I know I am doing something wrong but I am not too sure if it is with my overpass query or my processing of the result set. Any pointers would be great, I have included the query below, it can also be viewed at http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/9N3 Thanks in advance, Keith [out:json][timeout:900]; ( area[name=Republic of Ireland]; area[name=Northern Ireland]; ); relation(area) [boundary~administrative|historic] [admin_level=6]; (._;;); out; ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Where's the coastline?
On 06/06/2015, Killian Driscoll killiandrisc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, maybe I'm getting the wrong end of the stick, but why try and reinvent the wheel when you can just compare how the land or water is already interpreted It's more important to be self-consistent than to follow another project's lead, even a well-respected one. Or to phrase it differently, sticking with your decision is more important than what your actual decision is. That said, I think that the coastline is at mean high-water spring tide principle is the most common (sometimes using high-water mark instead, which is close enough). look at the EPA map http://gis.epa.ie/Envision / http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Corine_Land_Cover and see what is land, transitional waterbody, coastline. AFAIU Corine doesn't have a notion of coastline the way OS does. It just deals with landcover, and categorizes those as salt marsh, which is an easy decision in OSM too. The OSi map on that website shows the north part of the wetland as land and the south part as water, which is really bogus and a nice example of the official government-funded maps not always being the best :p ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
[OSM-talk] weeklyOSM - SotM US edition ;-)
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 254, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu Enjoy! The version was not proofread by a second pair of eyes. If you find any errors on the site or want to join the team to support and further improve this service please get in touch. Interested in proofreading? Drop us a mail. ;-) -- ## Manfred ## www.weeklyOSM.eu ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk-fr] Panne de données de GraphHopper
Bonjour, Si vous avez ajouter des chemins la semaine dernière, ils ne sont pas (encore) utilisés par le calculateur d’itinéraires GraphHopper. Ils avaient un problèmes de données qui est réparé. Les mises à jours de sa base de données vont recommencer dès lundi au rythme d’une par 24 heures :) Bonne fin de semaine, — Yves PS: GraphHopper permet de calculer des itinéraires en voiture, en vélo, à pied et avec des “véhicules” personnalisés (fauteuil roulant, cheval…) ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo portale CNT INGV visualizzazione epicentri su OSM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 06/06/2015 08:51, Davide Mangraviti ha scritto: Sul nuovo bel portale (responsive) del Centro Nazionale Terremoti dell'INGV, tra le tante cose, sarà da oggi possibile visualizzare l'epicentro del evento sismico, anche su Openstreetmap. http://cnt.rm.ingv.it/ Non ho capito perchè fanno vedere di default quella di google, comunque, la possibilità di visualizzarla su OSM è già un bel traguardo. - -- Simone Girardelli _|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_ |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_| -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVcyTiAAoJEMTPIIVov0Ztt5YIAMKjfUDlz83Ae3yAfjyKyriI UsIBhg/+hJs1gCIJN0zTR1wK9BMXhojEaNLHa37S1JqSaDA50fmcH38+RmWKmsb9 pIzm/LrO9K9d/CkScxQ8JY/ExPGTwFtu5EsUX2s4IufIl3YCzKc45/och08vl2OE UHoG2XLvVon3/fMmaom4BHEPx39H24OWwNKHFxWdhahLSNCLjKUhS/aHJq64F1br UZjflkjJ7EAQYwTz55AgUOQwhaqVQ3Q91rP0jgMWFlIdkHbI8AvFBkEa413kma6X hnGlN8EGNNdleGyxfwpQ+JbHdBuX0Py6fV4o3x46s6juU5z7qzKS94ewd5wd+Yw= =/g7F -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-at] Public Transport Schema und Wien
Also bei mir sieht die U3 richtig aus... ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
Re: [Talk-at] Public Transport Schema und Wien
On 06/06/2015 11:09 PM, Thomas Konrad wrote: Weil ich mich grad mit der Overpass API gespielt habe: http://overpass-api.de/api/sketch-line?network=VORref=U3operator=correspondences=width=1700height=495font-size=force-rows=1max-cors-per-line=max-cors-below=style= http://overpass-api.de/api/sketch-line?network=VORref=U3operator=correspondences=width=1700height=495font-size=force-rows=1max-cors-per-line=max-cors-below=style= Bei der U3 fehlt in der Mitte die Station Stephansplatz, dafür wird sie am Anfang und am Ende jeweils ein Mal angezeigt. Ist das ein Overpass-Bug oder ist da ein Fehler in der Routenrelation? Die Station Stephansplatz war innerhalb der Relationen nicht richtig gereiht, habe das korrigiert, jetzt schauts richtig aus. lg ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] OSM is a right mess (was: Craigslist OpenStreetMap Rendering Issue)
On 5 June 2015 at 12:36, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: Am 05.06.2015 um 11:33 schrieb David Fisher djfishe...@gmail.com: As for landuse=residential -- I agree that we could probably do without it. But it does add to the readability of the map, especially at low zoom levels, as it enables you to see at a glance where places are and how big they are. residential landuse is often seen as default, it is often used to mark the built up area rather than just the residential areas (especially in villages). We should encourage place polygons for this and restrict the use of residential landuse to residential areas. It would help a LOT if they were rendered on the standard map ! WHY do we have this agony of stuff not being rendered ? Here's a map of the world. We've not marked on any places as we feel it would be too confusing. What's the flipping point. Flog the renderers I say. -- Mike. @millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to the country's ongoing harassment of me, my family, property pets* TCs https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] OSM is a right mess (was: Craigslist OpenStreetMap Rendering Issue)
WHY do we have this agony of stuff not being rendered ? Here's a map of the world. We've not marked on any places as we feel it would be too confusing. What's the flipping point. Flog the renderers I say. I use Maperitive to render some things a certain way. The maps are very specialised and show things clearly in a way that the default render does not. For example street names in some Canadian cities have an official English name and an official French name. The default rendering does not offer me the choice. Cycle paths, lanes etc, together with the rules around them are not of interest to many mappers but they are to a cyclist. The many different ways that OSM can be rendered are a strength not a weakness. Cheerio John On 6 June 2015 at 18:41, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com wrote: On 5 June 2015 at 12:36, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: Am 05.06.2015 um 11:33 schrieb David Fisher djfishe...@gmail.com: As for landuse=residential -- I agree that we could probably do without it. But it does add to the readability of the map, especially at low zoom levels, as it enables you to see at a glance where places are and how big they are. residential landuse is often seen as default, it is often used to mark the built up area rather than just the residential areas (especially in villages). We should encourage place polygons for this and restrict the use of residential landuse to residential areas. It would help a LOT if they were rendered on the standard map ! WHY do we have this agony of stuff not being rendered ? Here's a map of the world. We've not marked on any places as we feel it would be too confusing. What's the flipping point. Flog the renderers I say. -- Mike. @millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to the country's ongoing harassment of me, my family, property pets* TCs https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk-ie] bridges
On 07/06/2015, Caroline Lewis carolinele...@eircom.net wrote: not sure how to add bridges correctly - i split at the two nodes that define the bridge , add bridge tag and then should i also tag as layer = 1? Yes that's basicly it. The layer tag says which way is above the other. You can add layer=* to either way (or both) but a rule of thumb is to add it to the shortest way (usually the bridge). http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bridge has some more info. The bridge and the underlying waterway/rail/etc shouldn't share a node, which can be annoying when maping townlands that follow both the bridge and the waterway. In those case, you should use an extra way just for the townland boundary. For example http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273846258 or http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344169613 ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
Re: [OSM-talk-ie] bridges
To make it easier, go to preferences, and look for tag presets. Activate one click features or something named similar to that (sorry, afk so can't give you step by step guide on this bit). Once done, in the main josm screen, right click on the toolbar and edit it to add the one click bridge option. From now on just split the road, select the split piece and click the button and the tags for bridges that way. I have imagery layers, addressing plugins, often used tags etc all on the toolbar. Makes it much quicker rather than trying to remember tags or search through menus Dave On 7 Jun 2015 00:15, moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/06/2015, Caroline Lewis carolinele...@eircom.net wrote: not sure how to add bridges correctly - i split at the two nodes that define the bridge , add bridge tag and then should i also tag as layer = 1? Yes that's basicly it. The layer tag says which way is above the other. You can add layer=* to either way (or both) but a rule of thumb is to add it to the shortest way (usually the bridge). http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bridge has some more info. The bridge and the underlying waterway/rail/etc shouldn't share a node, which can be annoying when maping townlands that follow both the bridge and the waterway. In those case, you should use an extra way just for the townland boundary. For example http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273846258 or http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344169613 ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] OSM is a right mess (was: Craigslist OpenStreetMap Rendering Issue)
In the same vein: way=0: no way! Better not to lose sleep over 3 letters. Jo ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk-ie] bridges
still at correcting a tile for cork co. [which is taking so long as roads etc are v misaligned and streams missing ] but not sure how to add bridges correctly - i split at the two nodes that define the bridge , add bridge tag and then should i also tag as layer = 1? hopefully will be able to map more cork townslands soon :) ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo portale CNT INGV visualizzazione epicentri su OSM
girarsi_liste wrote - Non ho capito perchè fanno vedere di default quella di google, comunque, la possibilità di visualizzarla su OSM è già un bel traguardo. In realtà la mappa visualizzata sul loro sito è solo un immagine...non puoi spostare la visualizzazione non puoi ingrandire non puoi cambiare layer o sorgente della mappa. la mappa esplorabile sia di google sia di OSM sono link esterni alle relative mappe centrate con marcatore alle coordinate dell'epicentro... penso abbiano fatto questo perchè estremamente facile da realizzare e non appesantisce il caricamento del loro sito - Ciao, Aury -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Nuovo-portale-CNT-INGV-visualizzazione-epicentri-su-OSM-tp5847310p5847408.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Shape portale regione Lombardia
Avete per caso scoperto se le licenze sono compatibili? Sarei interessato anch'io ad usare alcuni dati presenti nel portale -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Shape-portale-regione-Lombardia-tp5814672p5847369.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-co] Cooperación con La Federación de Cafeteros de Colombia.
Hola,
La imagen esta disponible en TMS.
URL para JOSM :
tms:http://imagery.openstreetmap.fr/tms/1.0.0/salgar/{zoom}/{x}/{y}
(y también en WMS, desde la raiz :
http://imagery.openstreetmap.fr/wms)
Saludos,
Jean-Guilhem
- Mail original -
De: hyan...@gmail.com
À: OpenStreetMap Colombia talk-co@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé: Vendredi 5 Juin 2015 01:16:21
Objet: Re: [Talk-co]Cooperación con La Federación de Cafeteros de Colombia.
El 4 de junio de 2015, 17:59, hyan...@gmail.com hyan...@gmail.com escribió:
El 4 de junio de 2015, 17:41, Fredy Rivera fredyriv...@gmail.com escribió:
2015-06-04 17:38 GMT-05:00 Artesano arttes...@gmail.com :
Hola, yo tengo la información en una USB pesa 16GB, esta noche la estare
subiendo desde la conexion de mi casa (4MB) a un drive, y mañana intentaré en
MinTIC buscar una conexion de alta veolocidad.
Luego de que tengamos la info pre-procesada la serviremos en un TMS o
WMS para calcarla, ya que los términos de la licencia no nos permiten
distribuir la imagen en raw.
Excelente! He hecho la solicitud de colaboración al Activation Working Group
(AWG) del HOT para servir las imágenes una vez esté disponibles.
Saludos y éxitos,
Humberto Yances
Respuesta rápida, tenemos disponibles los servidores en Francia, detalles en el
chat de coordinación.
___
Talk-co mailing list
Talk-co@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-co
___
Talk-co mailing list
Talk-co@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-co
