Re: IMAP and Mail Fetching Quirks
Hi tbbeta, just now (on 02/23/2005 at 06:18) Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Okay, I'm kind of liking this new look, there are some odd quirks, like the envelope icons in the message list half appearing randomly, but I'm sure they'll get sorted (along with the other things). This email is concerning IMAP and message fetching quirks. It'd appear randomly TB wants to hang on fetching emails. I have sat here for an hour with 2 emails (yes only 2 emails) sitting in the queue to be processed with the Status of In Queue. It can sit there for ages. If I click on other messages, they get added to the queue, and nothing happens. If I then delete one of those messages that was in the queue, it'd seem like TB suddenly wakes up, and then processes a few of the messages you had in the queue, then goes back to sleeping away. If I then delete /all/ the tasks, then give it a few minutes, /then/ try getting a new message, everything is back to normal again. Mildly annoying, I wasn't expecting a degredation of IMAP handling, I was hoping for an improvement. Though I guess it is an improvement over beta 10 where I couldn't use it at all as it'd close the IMAP connection, and never work again. Confirmed :-( -- Bye, Frank Ein Spruch von einem unbekannten Verfasser: Wer sagt: Hier herrscht Frieden, der lügt, denn Frieden herscht nicht. Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP and Mail Fetching Quirks
Jonathan, On 23-02-2005 06:18, you [JA] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: JA This email is concerning IMAP and message fetching quirks. It'd JA appear randomly TB wants to hang on fetching emails. I have sat JA here for an hour with 2 emails (yes only 2 emails) sitting in the JA queue to be processed with the Status of In Queue. I get this problem with all versions past 3.0.1.33 (I have not tried the alpha). -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 3.0.1.33 Pro /thebat version env. ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. /env. os Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 /os Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Priority of IMAP (was: Quiet?)
Hi, Chris Weaven wrote: from what I've heard, IMAP is lacking somewhat. As I am entirely IMAP based, I'm in no great hurry to test in this case. ACK(*). New GUI(+) or no new GUI, working IMAP(#) is what I want. Regards, Markus * Acknowledge[d] (antonym: NACK (not acknowledged)) + Graphical User Interface # Internet Message Access Protocol P.S.: If acronym explanations become built-in, I'd opt for the tool-tip kind (switchoffable). -- Using The Bat! 3.0.2.8 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP and Mail Fetching Quirks
Hello tbbeta, just now (on 02/23/2005 at 09:16) Peter Fjelsten ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I get this problem with all versions past 3.0.1.33 (I have not tried the alpha). The v3.0.2.8 works well for me, but in the Alpha TB hangs up on the IMAP-Account after 1/2 hour, so that I had to re-start TB. -- Bye Bye, Frank Ein Spruch von einem unbekannten Verfasser: Ja, ich bin ein Träumer, denn Träumer sehen den Sonnenaufgang, bevor die Welt erwacht. Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP and Mail Fetching Quirks
On Tuesday, February 22, 2005 @ 9:18:50 PM [-0700], Jonathan Angliss wrote: quirks Ah yes...quirks. That's a much better word than my earlier post on quarks. I meant to say quirks. Nothing subatomic about TB. :) Back on topic, I have that same issue from time to time. Mostly when I come back to TB after a period of non-activity. I have to go into the CC and delete the IMAP session, then highlight any folder in the account to re-initiate it. -- Matt Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Connection Center and Details
Hello Jonathan, On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] JA I normally run with my connection center open, with full details being JA displayed. Today out of curiousity I turned of the details, and was JA left with a dark grey box, with no information in it at all. JA Shouldn't it at least have the connection status in it? Same here. -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha SpamPal | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2 | Opera 8.00 build 7401 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Quiet?
Hello Peter, A reminder of what Peter Fjelsten on TBBETA typed on: 22 February 2005 at 23:39:04 GMT +0100 PF Which apparently has a problem with sig delimiters... We know about that, and I've been in contact with Poco support a long while ago about it. I just had a post from them telling me about a new version so I thought I'd try it. -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 :gentoo: www.gentoo.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Alpha Account Tree
Hello Richard, A reminder of what Richard Wakeford on TBBETA typed on: 23 February 2005 at 01:24:50 GMT +0100 RW They seem so far away butted up against the message window. I noticed that, it messed all the appearance up. The one thing I did like is the dividing line separating the accounts in the account tree. -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 :gentoo: www.gentoo.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Quiet?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 IMHO, this level of Alpha version should never go public, not even to this list. By releasing a program in this embryonic state, there is a chance that it will disappoint a lot of people. They're damned if they do and damned if they don't. - -- Stuart Hemming Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.12 Pre-release, MyGate v1.0, rss2pop3 v1.2, SpamPal v1.70, MyMacros 1.11a and Universal Macro eXtender 2.1.1119 rc6 special. PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com There are 3 kinds of people in this world...those who want things to happen, those that make things happen, and those who just wonder what the hell happened! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2 Comment: Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com; iQA/AwUBQhxNOdttnLhkydF1EQKQGwCeNtWfuMPqt8y9i6cIzN3rpBcUUYcAoM71 rCaHVHJbp57tfmLH8uu/0uFb =/J05 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Quiet?
David, On 22-02-2005 23:52, you [DE] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: DE I am sorry but it was released a alpha release. DE Yea and ?? I did not write what you answering. You cut out my reply to that message. That being said, I don't mind Ritlabs releasing an Alpha to the general public (although it as per BS standards would be a Beta :-) ) as long as it is clearly marked as such. DE But they follow the correct protocols. DE They announced it as an an alpha. Yes they did. But again, according to BS 7925-1 (AFAIR), alpha tests take place in-house. Anyway this is off-topic and not that interesting. People (including myself) have anxiously been waiting for news from Ritlabs and I suppose that they have released this version to give people something to work with. DE ... DE Then wait for a beta. Which I also wrote I would. I don't know why you are suggesting I should do what I already have said I would do? -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 3.0.1.33 Pro /thebat version env. ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. /env. os Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 /os Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Priority of IMAP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Markus Gloede schrieb: |from what I've heard, IMAP is lacking somewhat. As I am entirely |IMAP based, I'm in no great hurry to test in this case. | | ACK(*). New GUI(+) or no new GUI, working IMAP(#) is what I want. DITO. But it seems that RITlabs want to sit the problems with IMAP out. Hoping that no one cares or notices... Or any other explanation for bugs and behaviors, being there since the early beginnings of IMAP or several versions? Best statement ever (out of many): - -- | 1. If a mail is moved through a filter from an imap-folder to a local |folder, the imap-folder is marked as unread but there is no |number about how many mails are unread. (screen shot 1) | |Hmm, had sometimes the same effect, will work it. -- The developer knows the bug, got the bug himself etc. ... but he doesn't get the idea to fix it ... :-D Any words for this? RITlabs just prefers to code a new GUI but stabalize their product. Sorry, but I'm just mad about RITlabs and their behavior regarding IMAP :-( Michael - -- Die kleinen Alltagsleistungen setzen viel mehr Energie in die Welt als die seltenen heroischen Taten. PGP oder S/MIME-Verschlüsselung erwünscht! Fingerprint: 5E4A 25B3 0B24 4C5C 7668 7A66 C127 968D E59F D50D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFCHHH9wSeWjeWf1Q0RAsGcAKCQb66VfP5Z7jNbg9Ev+kB34NAXvACeIdyO QqoCLv1cVdkfXAjcOeCRe8A= =2MZw -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Priority of IMAP
Hi Michael, On 23/02/2005 07:07 AM, you wrote: But it seems that RITlabs want to sit the problems with IMAP out. Hoping that no one cares or notices... I doubt this very much. From my observation and experience, it would seem that they're very motivated to have IMAP working, but it's proving to be a challenge. At the same time, TB!'s development in other areas cannot be left at a standstill because IMAP has problems. It's still first and foremost, a POP3 client and works fantastically as such. Or any other explanation for bugs and behaviors, being there since the early beginnings of IMAP or several versions? IMAP has been grafted unto a mainly POP3 foundation. I guess they'll eventually work things out. I don't know when though. The developer knows the bug, got the bug himself etc. ... but he doesn't get the idea to fix it ... :-D Any words for this? It seems to be very challenging for them and we have to be prepared to wait for things to be fixed. We'll feel left behind as the client is enhanced in other areas because they have a mainly POP3 userbase to cater to. RITlabs just prefers to code a new GUI but stabalize their product. Sorry, but I'm just mad about RITlabs and their behavior regarding IMAP :-( I'm now indifferent since I've freed myself of relying on TB! to come of age with IMAP. I have a reliable solution for IMAP and that's ThunderBird. TB! is a potentially better solution if the IMAP actually works without crippling problems. I wait patiently in the sidelines for if and when that happens. In the meantime ThunderBird is improving as well. -- -= Allie =- Why do we read left to right yet turn pages right to left? Using ThunderBird v1.0 IMAP Server: MDaemon Pro Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
IMAP Search...
Hi, Seems IMAP searching is still flaky at best. It also seems to have an issue with timeouts. If the connection timesout while requesting the search data, it never reconnects. You have to manually force a connection, at which point it starts the search again. After a predetermined time, TB disconnects again. Now for the unusual bit... I hit search again, and I then get a timer scrolling along at the bottom that wasn't there the first 3 attempts, however the search results are incomplete. I did a search in my TBBETA archives in the body for a.htm. It returned 3 results. So I enabled the protocol logging option, and I hit the start button a few times, nothing appeared in the log, but everything else was being logged just fine... So what is going on there? So I hit search a few more times, still nothing being logged. Does this go to reflex that the Search feature is not working at all, or limited to checking only the local cache? Or does it suggest that somewhere along the way, the Search dialog just forgot to ask the IMAP server? -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Using The Bat! v3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha on Windows XP Service Pack 2 Beer: So much more than a breakfast drink. Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Quiet?
Hello David Calvarese everyone else, on 23-Feb-2005 at 00:33 you (David Calvarese) wrote: and the GnuPG support via Enigmail is better than the PGP support in TB! as well Then why's your message signed inline and not PGP/MIME? :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Dilbert's Words of Wisdom: I don't suffer from stress. I'm a carrier. Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Quiet?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Alexander S. Kunz wrote: Hello David Calvarese everyone else, on 23-Feb-2005 at 00:33 you (David Calvarese) wrote: and the GnuPG support via Enigmail is better than the PGP support in TB! as well Then why's your message signed inline and not PGP/MIME? :-) Because I prefer inline signing over PGP/MIME. :) Enigmail can do PGP/MIME as well. Dave -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1rc1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCHL7lSlxKVhydU2ARA5pUAJ0QgAvbImLFc93QVeJhP+1bSwhn3QCfRicu XXn2EgHjhTr196nranCXUfQ= =uw9p -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: Quiet?
Het was op woensdag 23 februari 2005 om 18:17 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'Quiet?' : Hallo Alexander, and the GnuPG support via Enigmail is better than the PGP support in TB! as well ASK Then why's your message signed inline and not PGP/MIME? :-) that's because it's kinda difficult to get to work properly, if you have more than one emailaddress in TheBat! and secondly to NOT get a BAD signature :-( -- regards, Cees A morning without coffee is like something without something else. The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha [A12F0392] running on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 Service Pack 2 pgpuOCpKBJhbG.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: I like the threading
Hello Roelof, I like the threading of the alpha. I'm threading by references, but when a message is lacking In-Reply-To and References but has a subject like Re same subject then the message is added to the thread anyhow. I can't take the risk of installing the Alpha, at least not till next weekend. But what you say about threading sounds just great. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Quiet?
Hello David Calvarese everyone else, on 23-Feb-2005 at 18:35 you (David Calvarese) wrote: Then why's your message signed inline and not PGP/MIME? :-) Because I prefer inline signing over PGP/MIME. :) Enigmail can do PGP/MIME as well. Its the year 2005. I find that PGP gibberish is totally unneccessary, it can be avoided and the functionality stays the same (personally, I find the readability is increased, which I, personally again, find more functional in an email message) ... imagine there was something like inline HTML or whatever. Yikes! :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Deliplayer2 is playing: Jack-In-The-Box by Man With No Name from the album 'Experiments That Identify Change' Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Priority of IMAP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Michael Schneider wrote: Any words for this? RITlabs just prefers to code a new GUI but stabalize their product. Sorry, but I'm just mad about RITlabs and their behavior regarding IMAP :-( I'm a tad upset with them too. I've used (and registered) TB! since Version 1 and the IMAP support is still far behind what Thunderbird's (or God forbid, Outlook Express's) is. That's why I'm currently using Thunderbird, that and a few GnuPG quirks. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1rc1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCHIljSlxKVhydU2ARA+BPAJ99GpIFD5uJRoOO2LT+Q34zYK9rFgCeOsnV kWVGP1AepPiBZr4WSgqJ+tM= =Ul+H -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Quiet?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Alexander S. Kunz wrote: Hello David Calvarese everyone else, on 23-Feb-2005 at 18:35 you (David Calvarese) wrote: Then why's your message signed inline and not PGP/MIME? :-) Because I prefer inline signing over PGP/MIME. :) Enigmail can do PGP/MIME as well. Its the year 2005. I find that PGP gibberish is totally unneccessary, it can be avoided and the functionality stays the same (personally, I find the readability is increased, which I, personally again, find more functional in an email message) ... imagine there was something like inline HTML or whatever. Yikes! :-) There is 'Inline HTML'. It's what Outlook Express uses by default. :) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1rc1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCHMXxSlxKVhydU2ARA/NDAJ0V+xc/SNq1xe0ZO8Weg4J6W180qQCfVz0u AQDI8Szm3URijpJdDCXk0h4= =4OsF -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: I like the threading
Hello Roelof, On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RO Yep, though it's somewhat of a double edged sword. RO Just was looking for a message and couldn't find it even though I RO could find the first message of the thread. RO Turned out that my contact had been using a thing called 'Internet RO mail system' that didn't include threading headers. Because of the Re: RO in the subject, it was rightly deemed a reply. So TB hung it to the RO first message with that subject. And as we were discussing a yearly RO returning event, TB thought the replies were related to a message RO almost a year old in stead of one a mere ten days ago. RO Got to revise my archiving system I think. Try unselecting Options/Preferences/Messages and the second box down the oldest message... That has worked for me and threading is now far more accurate than before. What used to arrive as individual mails (and to old subjects) are now arriving as properly threaded replies to the correct subjects. Lovely :-) -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha SpamPal | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2 | Opera 8.00 build 7401 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Quiet?
Hello David Calvarese everyone else, on 23-Feb-2005 at 19:05 you (David Calvarese) wrote: There is 'Inline HTML'. It's what Outlook Express uses by default. :) You know what I meant. Btw. now I know whats so ugly about your messages and why it jumped in my face so much - you have no sig delimiter to at least color your PGP gibberish grey (here). :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Deliplayer2 is playing: Fast Forward To The Future (Voodoo People Remix) by Zodiac Youth from the album 'Experiments That Identify Change' Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Quiet?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Alexander S. Kunz wrote: Hello David Calvarese everyone else, on 23-Feb-2005 at 19:05 you (David Calvarese) wrote: There is 'Inline HTML'. It's what Outlook Express uses by default. :) You know what I meant. Btw. now I know whats so ugly about your messages and why it jumped in my face so much - you have no sig delimiter to at least color your PGP gibberish grey (here). :-) I'm working on that... I'm pretty new to Thunderbird and I haven't figured out how to do that yet. :) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1rc1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCHMtoSlxKVhydU2ARA6nfAJ42iFIwpUKP9yREC16Uje/yNN8UoACcDoTE EGj+JqVdRdydiQWbfKMjMMA= =j2qb -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Quiet?
Hi David, On 23/02/2005 01:28 PM, you wrote: I'm working on that... I'm pretty new to Thunderbird and I haven't figured out how to do that yet. :) Other than compatibility, I struggle to think of a meaningful reason for using inline PGP signatures. If you send PGP/MIME signatures to this list, you don't have to worry about users not being able to verify your sigs since the overwhelming majority use TB!, a PGP/MIME aware client, while others use clients that are also PGP/MIME aware. I'd recommend stretching Enigmail's legs a bit and setup a recipient specific rule for these lists to have posts PGP/MIME and not inline signed. The messages to other recipients will remain inline signed. :) -- -= Allie =- Why do we read left to right yet turn pages right to left? Using ThunderBird v1.0 IMAP Server: MDaemon Pro Keyboard? How quaint! - Scotty Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Quiet?
AC Martin wrote: Hi David, On 23/02/2005 01:28 PM, you wrote: I'm working on that... I'm pretty new to Thunderbird and I haven't figured out how to do that yet. :) Other than compatibility, I struggle to think of a meaningful reason for using inline PGP signatures. If you send PGP/MIME signatures to this list, you don't have to worry about users not being able to verify your sigs since the overwhelming majority use TB!, a PGP/MIME aware client, while others use clients that are also PGP/MIME aware. I'd recommend stretching Enigmail's legs a bit and setup a recipient specific rule for these lists to have posts PGP/MIME and not inline signed. The messages to other recipients will remain inline signed. :) I'll give it a shot... Any chance you can tell me how to do a sig like yours in Thunderbird? :) Dave signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: I like the threading
At 18:44 [GMT+0100] on Wednesday February 23 (actual time - 1:44am on Thursday in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote: I like the threading of the alpha. I'm threading by references, but when a message is lacking In-Reply-To and References but has a subject like Re same subject then the message is added to the thread anyhow. I can't take the risk of installing the Alpha, at least not till next weekend. But what you say about threading sounds just great. ME TOO!! BYE!! -- cheers, mic Sometimes I get the feeling the whole world is against me, but deep down I know that's not true. Some smaller countries are neutral. Robert Orben Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
