Trouble managing threads

2003-07-18 Thread Steve M. Sawczyn
Hello everyone,

  Again I come asking for help -- this time with thread
  management.  I have messages grouped by
  thread/references standard.  I'm not sure how to go
  about deleting an entire thread -- if the thread is
  closed and I hit delete on the first message, I am moved
  to the second message in the thread, or at least that's
  what it seems is going on.  Is there an easy, one-key
  stroke way to delete a thread, or the rest of a thread?

  Another problem I'm having has to do with wanting to
  delete all messages in a folder.  I have a few mailing
  lists which I'm way behind on.  In an effort to get
  caught up, my thought is to just delete all messages and
  start from scratch.  I went to that folder, hit ctrl-a
  to select all, then hit delete and nothing happened.  I
  then tried hitting shft/end thinking that this would
  select the entire message list.  Hitting delete there
  didn't seem to do anything either.

  Lastly, and this is a bit off-topic, I've been in
  contact with the developers of my screen reading
  software and they gave me some information on ways the
  Bat could be made more accessible to blind folks.  I'd
  like to pass this info along, but am not sure where to
  send it.  If anyone has any technical contact at
  RITlabs who might find this information useful, I'd be
  glad to send it along.

  Again, thanks for all help.
  

-- 
Best regards,
 Steve  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Trouble managing threads

2003-07-18 Thread Wilfried Mestdagh
Hello Steve,

  To delete a complete thread: shift + ctrl + del
  To delete acomplete folder:  ctrl + del

-- 
Rgds, Wilfried
http://www.mestdagh.biz
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows NT 4.0 Build  1381 Service Pack 6



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Trouble managing threads

2003-07-18 Thread audiac
The answers to your first two questions are in the right click context
menus.

   thread/references standard.  I'm not sure how to go
   about deleting an entire thread -- if the thread is

If you right click on a thread, go to the Thread submenu, there is a
Delete Thread option. The hotkey for this is Shift+Ctrl+Del.

   Another problem I'm having has to do with wanting to
   delete all messages in a folder.  I have a few mailing

Similarly, you can right click on the folder and select mark all
messages read. The hotkey for this is Ctrl+M.



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Encrypt to self?

2003-07-18 Thread Rafi Avital
Using TB 1.62r and GnuPG 1.22 Windows 2000 SP2.

Is there a way to encrypt to myself from within the editor in TB when
I select the Privacy|OpnePGP|Sing$Encrypt...?

Do I have to add myself to the recipient list in order to accomplish
that?  Is there another way?

Thanks and best regards



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Encrypt to self?

2003-07-18 Thread Alexander
18-Jul-2003 03:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Is there a way to encrypt to myself from within the editor in TB when
 I select the Privacy|OpnePGP|Sing$Encrypt...?

Thats in Tools / OpenPGP / OpenPGP preferences, first tab, first checkbox
always encrypt to default key

(I just recently stumbled over the same problem;-)


-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)

The discovery of a new dish does more for human happiness than the
discovery of a new star. -- Anthelme Brillat-Savarin



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Trouble managing threads

2003-07-18 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Steve,

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:09:05 -0400 GMT (18/07/03, 04:09 +0700 GMT),
Steve M. Sawczyn wrote:

 Lastly, and this is a bit off-topic,

I don't think so.

 I've been in contact with the developers of my screen reading
 software and they gave me some information on ways the Bat could be
 made more accessible to blind folks. I'd like to pass this info
 along, but am not sure where to send it.

I would think the first step is here, and if you find seconders, I
would suggest the wishlist.

 If anyone has any technical contact at RITlabs who might find this
 information useful, I'd be glad to send it along.

The technical contact for v 1.xx is Stefan [EMAIL PROTECTED]. But
send it here first, I'd be interested.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Wear short sleeves! Support your right to bare arms!

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Mass mailing with BCC

2003-07-18 Thread Mary Cassidy
I want to send a message to all my clients with my holiday dates.

I've set up two groups, so I can send the message in two different
languages to various clients.

However, I want all the addresses to appear in the BCC field so that
the clients don't see each other's addresses.

I can't find a way to do this automatically, even using macros; any
suggestions?

-- 
Mary

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Mass mailing with BCC

2003-07-18 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Friday, July 18, 2003, Mary Cassidy wrote...

 I want to send a message to all my clients with my holiday dates.

 I've set up two groups, so I can send the message in two different
 languages to various clients.

 However, I want all the addresses to appear in the BCC field so that
 the clients don't see each other's addresses.

 I can't find a way to do this automatically, even using macros; any
 suggestions?

Well, you have half the steps done by the looks of it. You created
them as groups, which will probably save you a fair bit of time. Start
a new message, make sure the bcc field is visible. If it is not, go to
View, and check the BCC option. You now should have two choices from
this point. If you right click in the BCC field, and address menu will
drop down, you should see your groups at the bottom, move your mouse
over the group, and it should expand, notice the top option should be
Listname entire list. The other option is to click the little
address card icon on the end of the line, from the drop list in the
top right, select the group, and press the  icon, and click okay.
Now write your message :)

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])


Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Mass mailing with BCC

2003-07-18 Thread Mary Cassidy

Jonathan Angliss wrote:


 Well, you have half the steps done by the looks of it. You created
 them as groups, which will probably save you a fair bit of time. Start
 a new message, make sure the bcc field is visible. If it is not, go to
 View, and check the BCC option. You now should have two choices from
 this point. If you right click in the BCC field, and address menu will
 drop down, you should see your groups at the bottom, move your mouse
 over the group, and it should expand, notice the top option should be
 Listname entire list. The other option is to click the little
 address card icon on the end of the line, from the drop list in the
 top right, select the group, and press the  icon, and click okay.
 Now write your message :)


Now why didn't I think of that? I was trying to do it with a Quick
Template. Actually I spent ages looking in the Help and the FAQ, and
didn't find that simple solution.

Thanks a million!

-- 
Mary

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Encrypt to self?

2003-07-18 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Fri 18-Jul-03 5:37am -0400, Alexander wrote:

 18-Jul-2003 03:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Is there a way to encrypt to myself from within the editor in TB when
 I select the Privacy|OpnePGP|Sing$Encrypt...?

 Thats in Tools / OpenPGP / OpenPGP preferences, first tab, first checkbox
 always encrypt to default key

That sure doesn't work here with GPG 1.2.2 (what Rafi is using).
Clicking on OpenPGP Preferences does nothing.

It MAY work with some GUI addon, but neither of you mentioned using
one - I don't either.

-- 
Best regards,
Bill



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Encrypt to self?

2003-07-18 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Thu 17-Jul-03 9:53pm -0400, Rafi Avital wrote:

 Using TB 1.62r and GnuPG 1.22 Windows 2000 SP2.

 Is there a way to encrypt to myself from within the editor in TB when
 I select the Privacy|OpnePGP|Sing$Encrypt...?

 Do I have to add myself to the recipient list in order to accomplish
 that?  Is there another way?

That's a known bug and persists in the Beta.  TB fails to send the
correct `-r` options.

A temporary work-around is to add a line to your gpg.conf file:

recipient `your email address`

This will give you warnings when `-r your email address` is not
needed.

-- 
Best regards,
Bill



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Mass mailing with BCC

2003-07-18 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Fri 18-Jul-03 1:00pm -0400, Mary Cassidy wrote:

 Jonathan Angliss wrote:

 Well, you have half the steps done by the looks of it. ...

 Now why didn't I think of that?

The BCC approach will work fine but is a bit impersonal.  Why not just
use the mass mailing feature to individually address each email?

Just set mail delivery to deferred (so you can check out the results
before they're sent).  Then from the AB, click on the group you want
to mail to and click on File; Mail Mailing using Template; pick your
template and click OK.  Your Outbox will be filled with the results -
if you don't like them, delete, revise your template and repeat.

-- 
Best regards,
Bill




Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Encrypt to self?

2003-07-18 Thread Rafi Avital


On Friday, July 18, 2003, 4:37:47 AM, you wrote:
A 18-Jul-2003 03:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Is there a way to encrypt to myself from within the editor in TB when
 I select the Privacy|OpnePGP|Sing$Encrypt...?

A Thats in Tools / OpenPGP / OpenPGP preferences, first tab, first checkbox
A always encrypt to default key

A (I just recently stumbled over the same problem;-)



Thanks.  Unfortunately, this only works for the Internal OpenPGP engine, not for GnuPG.

I have just tested it.  In fact, there is no way to determine preferences (or anything 
else
like location of keyring files, options file etc) when GnuPG is used.

I tried to change the version of OpenPGP to the internal one, then set the option you
described, then change it back to GnuPG, and encrypt to a recipient.  GnuPG refused to
decrypt it for me reporting that there was no secret key available.  Had it been
encrypted to me as well as the recipient, I should have been able to decrypt this.

Thanks anyway.  If you think/learn of anything else, please let me know.



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


GnuPG Options

2003-07-18 Thread Rafi Avital
I have several questions as I am evaluating TB for my use.  Many thanks in advance to 
anyone who can answer.

Using TB 1.62r, Win 2000 Pro SP2, GnuPG 1.2.2.

1. The only way to encrypt to myself is to add myself to the recipient list.  This is 
not like the internal GPG engine within TB which allows me to check the always 
encrypt to default key.  I've tried this but it has no effect on GnuPG.  Is there a 
way around that?

2. In the editor, after completing a message, I go to the Privacy menu and select 
Encrypt and Sign and I am prompted for a passphrase.  If I use the keyboard shortcut 
(Shift+Alt+E), the message is immediately encrypted without prompting for a 
passphrase.  I don't know if I ever stored the passphrase, and I am unable to find out 
where I would disable such a feature.  Can anyone let me know where/how to force TB to 
prompt me for a passphrase every time?

[As an aside, this is the first time since Windows 3 10 years ago that I've seen a 
keyboard shortcut produce a different behavior that clicking on the menu option.  Very 
questionable.]


Many thanks and warmest regards



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Antivirus question

2003-07-18 Thread Rafi Avital
Hello all,

Using TB 1.62r Windows 2000 Pro SP2.

Does TB have its own built-in virus-checking engine?  If not, is a
separate engine required?

I am thinking of using the Kaspersky (either Personal Pro or Small
Business versions) - is this tool compatible with TB?  Does anyone
know if it offers/uses periodically updated virus info files?

Alternately, can McAffee VirusScan be used and how?

Many thanks in advance and best regards



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Antivirus question

2003-07-18 Thread Steve Mary King
 Rafi, Friday, July 18, 2003, 4:10:56 PM, you wrote:==

RA Hello all,

RA Using TB 1.62r Windows 2000 Pro SP2.

RA Does TB have its own built-in virus-checking engine?  If not, is a
RA separate engine required?

RA I am thinking of using the Kaspersky (either Personal Pro or Small
RA Business versions) - is this tool compatible with TB?  Does anyone
RA know if it offers/uses periodically updated virus info files?

RA Alternately, can McAffee VirusScan be used and how?

RA Many thanks in advance and best regards

RA  Current version is
RA 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: RA

Rafi,

Grisoft's free-for-personal-use AVG runs fine with The Bat! on my Windows
98SE systems.  It's stopped quite a few viri (viruses???).

Steve . . .



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Antivirus question

2003-07-18 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Rafi!

On Friday, July 18, 2003, 6:10 PM, you wrote:

R Does TB have its own built-in virus-checking engine?  If not, is a
R separate engine required?

To my knowledge, it does not. However, the ability to delete
questionable mails on the server through the Connection Centre is
really helpful, I think.

R I am thinking of using the Kaspersky (either Personal Pro or Small
R Business versions) - is this tool compatible with TB?  Does anyone
R know if it offers/uses periodically updated virus info files?

I have used Kaspersky Personal Pro for almost 8 months now. It offers
updated virus-protection files daily, and sometimes several times a
day. You can set it to check automatically at a time of your choosing,
or update manually with a couple of mouse clicks.

It includes a plug-in for The Bat! You have to enable the plug-in
through TB!'s settings. But that's simple. Just go to Options/Virus
Protection in the main window for the dialogue window to do this.

When I accidentally started to download a message attachment
containing SoBig a couple of months ago, Kaspersky AV brought the
download to a halt and gave me a loud audible and a visual warning
before it was halfway to my machine.

Needless to say, I was grateful!

R Alternately, can McAffee VirusScan be used and how?

I had some difficulties with Mcafee last year. I like Kaspersky
better.

-- 
Best regards,
Mary

The Bat! 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Antivirus question

2003-07-18 Thread Philip Storry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Steve,

Saturday, July 19, 2003, 12:32:59 AM, you wrote:

SMK Grisoft's free-for-personal-use AVG runs fine with The Bat! on my Windows
SMK 98SE systems.  It's stopped quite a few viri (viruses???).

Viruses. Virii is more commonly used in the virus writing and magazine
community.

The antivirus community prefers to use the word viruses. They claim
grammatical correctness, but there can sometimes be a sense that
they're just doing it to set up a culture barrier between themselves
and the virus-creators.

If you want to be taken seriously by those who are in the anti-virus
industry, use the word viruses - not virii. Some of them get snippy
about it. ;-)

- --
Best regards,
 Philipmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build  2195
Service Pack 4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPxiIPv5iYgfYHvp6EQJwpACeIR/zcZ3sViKSAQjbjiG2VRtloAkAoNn0
irJYk3QmmHEw7aI7zYbng9Fo
=qqNF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Nothing to send?

2003-07-18 Thread Vishal
Monday, July 14, 2003, 10:43:26 PM, you wrote:


AM - - Now just use the check mail for all command. If there's message to
AM send in the Outbox, then they will be sent as well. You can setup a
AM system hot-key for the check command as well.

RMR even with the options setup like this, I have seen it happen here.
RMR It's a very erratic but recurring bug, unfortunately.

I agree with Ricardo. I already have the options set up as you mentioned, Allie.
Thanks though.

btw..sorry for the late reply..I was out of town.

-Vishal



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Nothing to send?

2003-07-18 Thread Vishal
Monday, July 14, 2003, 1:35:42 PM, you wrote:

MT thats because it is trying to send from an account that has nothing to send.
MT then it ends up in the account that has mail to send and sends that account.

Ah, I see. I was under the impression that the message was displayed when there
was no mail to send in *any* account. This is what made it seem like it was
erratic, since there clearly was mail to send in at least one account.

Thanks

-Vishal



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: GnuPG Options

2003-07-18 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Rafi Avital, [RA] wrote:

RA 1. The only way to encrypt to myself is to add myself to the
RA recipient list. This is not like the internal GPG engine within TB
RA which allows me to check the always encrypt to default key. I've
RA tried this but it has no effect on GnuPG. Is there a way around
RA that?

You need to install a GnuPG front end (I recommend GPG Shell) so that
you can configure GnuPG. TB!'s internal support for GnuPG doesn't
provide any means for specifically configuring GnuPG. It only allows you
to sign, encrypt, decrypt via TB! commands or through the use of macros.

If you install GPGShell and go into the GnuPG options panel, use the
'encrypt to keyid' option to make GnuPG always encrypt to one of your
keys.

You can also do this by entering the following line in your gpg.conf
file:

  encrypt-to 0x2B0717E2

That was taken from my gpg.conf file.

RA 2. In the editor, after completing a message, I go to the Privacy
RA menu and select Encrypt and Sign and I am prompted for a
RA passphrase.

Yes.

RA If I use the keyboard shortcut (Shift+Alt+E), the message is
RA immediately encrypted without prompting for a passphrase.

Hmmm.

RA I don't know if I ever stored the passphrase, and I am unable to
RA find out where I would disable such a feature.

When using TB!'s GnuPG plugin, the passphrase prompt dialog has a toggle
switch to enable caching of the passphrase. Once cached, it's always
cached.

RA Can anyone let me know where/how to force TB to prompt me for a
RA passphrase every time?

Delete the file PWDCACHE.INI that's in your MAIL directory (in your TB!
installation directory by default).

Don't enable the option to cache your passphrase and you'll be asked for
it everytime.

- --
 -= allie_M =- | List Moderator
_

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2

iQA/AwUBPxic81fJ62ArBxfiEQKKbACeIzChwGIj7cfVIy6qG1L8Zbq7JdUAn3ow
4KeKPqglGNpev0OGXIXsIVDI
=+4HP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Antivirus question

2003-07-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Rafi,

@18-Jul-2003, 18:10 -0500 (00:10 UK time) Rafi Avital [RA] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

RA Does TB have its own built-in virus-checking engine?  If not, is
RA a separate engine required?

No and yes. TB has an interface for BAV (Bat Anti-Virus) plug ins.
Any AV software for which there is a BAV available can be used.

See here: ftp://www.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/bav/

Also, AVG have BAV support.

RA I am thinking of using the Kaspersky (either Personal Pro or
RA Small Business versions) - is this tool compatible with TB?

Kaspersky support is built in - enjoy!

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its 
affiliated companies.

iQA/AwUBPxiJcTnkJKuSnc2gEQK4qwCZAWtH01Ppifoq9600xbCOlYZO8A4An20+
s3QjRh0qk/LUtVmh4GFuTE9C
=XhcJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: GnuPG Options

2003-07-18 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Fri 18-Jul-03 7:04pm -0400, Rafi Avital wrote:

 I have several questions as I am evaluating TB for my use.  Many
 thanks in advance to anyone who can answer.

 Using TB 1.62r, Win 2000 Pro SP2, GnuPG 1.2.2.

 1. The only way to encrypt to myself is to add myself to the
 recipient list.  This is not like the internal GPG engine within
 TB which allows me to check the always encrypt to default key.
 I've tried this but it has no effect on GnuPG.  Is there a way
 around that?

Yes, see my reply to you in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 2. In the editor, after completing a message, I go to the Privacy
 menu and select Encrypt and Sign and I am prompted for a
 passphrase.  If I use the keyboard shortcut (Shift+Alt+E), the
 message is immediately encrypted without prompting for a passphrase.
 I don't know if I ever stored the passphrase, and I am unable to
 find out where I would disable such a feature.  Can anyone let me
 know  where/how to force TB to prompt me for a passphrase every time?

Shift-Alt-E always asks me for my password.  Did you accidently hit
Shift-Ctrl-E?  The latter is encrypt only and obviously doesn't
require a password.

-- 
Best regards,
Bill



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Antivirus question

2003-07-18 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Philip,

On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 00:52:13 +0100 GMT (19/07/03, 06:52 +0700 GMT),
Philip Storry wrote:

 Viruses. Virii is more commonly used in the virus writing and
 magazine community.

You have just enlightened me.

 If you want to be taken seriously by those who are in the anti-virus
 industry, use the word viruses - not virii. Some of them get snippy
 about it. ;-)

But wouldn't the plural of virus be viri - not virii? And I would
think that viri are those little thingies in medical science that
makes you sick, like the flu virus.

Oh, and before I hear fish flying: f'up2tbot.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

...und wir gingen mit unserer Lehrerin im Park spazieren. Gegenueber
dem Park war ein Haus, wo die Muetter ihre Kinder gebaeren. Eine
Gebaermutter schaute aus dem Fenster und winkte uns freudig zu.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Antivirus question

2003-07-18 Thread Auke Beerschoten
Hello Thomas,

Friday, July 18, 2003, 11:23:54 PM, you wrote:

TF Hello Philip,

TF On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 00:52:13 +0100 GMT (19/07/03, 06:52 +0700 GMT),
TF Philip Storry wrote:

 Viruses. Virii is more commonly used in the virus writing and
 magazine community.

TF You have just enlightened me.

 If you want to be taken seriously by those who are in the anti-virus
 industry, use the word viruses - not virii. Some of them get snippy
 about it. ;-)

TF But wouldn't the plural of virus be viri - not virii? And I would
TF think that viri are those little thingies in medical science that
TF makes you sick, like the flu virus.

TF Oh, and before I hear fish flying: f'up2tbot.


That's like the Roman who asked for a Martinus,
The bartender said you mean a Martini. The Roman
said: If I want more than one I'll ask for it.



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html