Re: how to do this with sorting-office?
Hello Joseph, On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 21:54:47 -0500 GMT (01/10/2003, 09:54 +0700 GMT), Joseph N. wrote: It would be more sensible and I assume not too difficult to provide two extra options when a user filters on a string in the headers: filter outgoing and incoming the same way; or, as an alternative, filter outgoing and read msgs the same way. I agree with that and am eagerly looking forward to the completely rewritten filtering system that we will apparently see soon. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. If you're born again, do you have two bellybuttons? Message reply created with The Bat! 2.00.18 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Silly Folder Question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I've been using TB for a while... but something puzzled me today, and I'm not sure why I didn't spot it earlier. Under each folder, there is an option use the account default specific columns... Okay, this seems logical, you set the column specifics for the columns you want displayed at the account level, and then this folder follows on... right? Okay... where do we set these Account default specific columns ? If I select the account level, and change the column properties, select any folder, then return back to the account folder, it hasn't kept the settings, either that, or the display doesn't refresh as it maintains the preferences for the folder I just had selected after changing the account level. So my question is... how do we change that? Or is it miss-worded, and should it read parent folder? - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) All animals are equal, some more than others. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQA/AwUBP3pTXiuD6BT4/R9zEQJfxQCfdaFJrzAIHVF7nkmmKTg3xFpjghEAoLIk S4jWHwwSEreTCEy3p7H5tBqC =1sK6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Toolbar(s)
Hi Marek Tuesday, September 30, 2003, 9:38:50 PM, you wrote: MM Version 2.0 have not this feature, but this is planned for Christmas MM version, as Stefan said. Any idea if flat toolbars are on the cards? They would contribute enormously to TB's interface and make it much more contemporary. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: how to do this with sorting-office?
30-Sep-2003 22:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MW Can't you create a corresponding outgoing mail filter based on similar MW rules as incoming mail? yes, this is also the idea that pops up in my head at the first time. but the problem is that it cost too much time. So in essence what you're looking for would be like Outlooks (rgh, I said it!!) option keep reply with original message (dunno what it is called in english I only know the german UI). It simply puts the reply into the same folder where the original message was. I'd find that option useful for TB, too. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de) To restore silence is the role of objects. -- Samuel Beckett Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: filing/moving messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, September 30, 2003, ken green wrote... I get tons of e-mail and spend time going back through my Inbox filing and deleting when I can. I use the Ctrl + V shortcut a lot, which brings up the move message(s) to... dialog window. [..] But I have a lot of folders, and many start with the same letter, so this wasn't always the best method. But today, on a whim, I typed more than one letter - just started typing the folder name - and BAM! there's the folder I want. This little hint also applies to the folder tree window in the main viewer as well (in case you hadn't randomly tried in there too). Just make sure you have the window selected first. - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) How do they get Teflon to stick to the pans? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQA/AwUBP3pcciuD6BT4/R9zEQLuaQCg3cG8jSQ6KQiF5iJ8YHswaUYg1ZIAoODF 1lVF+VapRHCckoHEReKfe4i7 =v2X/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, September 30, 2003, Marck D Pearlstone wrote... BB The problem with lists is that when people see something done BB wrong and no correction is issued on the list, the lesson learned BB is that the inappropriate behavior is correct and accepted. This posting benefits greatly from nail-on-the-head syndrome. That is *precisely* why all rule-break moderation is done on-list. There is another reason though. When the moderators don't step in visibly, 100+ irate member sure 'nuff will. What would you prefer? One post from a moderator or a free for all of admonishments from any offended party? Or the moderators get 100+ messages saying why aren't you doing anything? ;) I actually resigned from a list for the moderator refusing to perform on-list moderation. It makes no sense at any level. I tend to keep it all on list on the ones I manage, if they decided to complain about it, then it goes off-list. The third explanation is that we're just a bunch power hungry megalomaniacs who love to see our admonishments hurled around the planet in the form of irate electrons. But, hey, aren't we all? At heart? I mean, c'mon fellas (and fella-ettes)! *grins* see... we all knew that was the reason... there is no need to hide it from us... we're all friends here ;) - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Diagonally parked in a parallel universe. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQA/AwUBP3pduiuD6BT4/R9zEQI69QCgyDWwfZOP9iUOwxj43Dmjg61Ab90AoKCB Ed30FqoJYrZ938PIyu/DS3iN =jiyt -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MyGate 2.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andrew, On Sep 30, 2003, 19:59 +0300 (12:59 PM here), Andrew Perevodchik [AP] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: AP I have those tmps too. Can anyone confirm that those are because AP of MyGate? Strange thing is that MyGate doesn't use any temp files AP in tmp folder and is not supposed to affect TB behaviour at all, AP cause it runs as a separate task... I just tried another test. The results were rather strange. I started downloading and my temp folder went from 6 files to 6032 after the download. These are bat.tmp files, all zero bytes. During the download it said there were 17.7 megs of messages. After the download I had 64 new messages all text (no binaries) and certainly not 17 megs worth of data. The Bat! has been downloading mail to the other accounts for an hour or so before the test so the tmp files must be from the MyGate process as that is configured to run manually. I do have this account in The Bat! configured to delete downloaded messages from the server. I will check the X-MyGate-MID on the dups with the next download. - -- Kevin Coates Dewitt, NY USA Using TB! v2.00.22 under Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP1 (see kludges for my pgp key) . -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE/emR6RbTFvUNHmLkRAttEAKDV2EU3bBIyb9oX/5ioDLPza3opkACePfhB yREONUceO9S/sEzWeNfv76c= =FiFo -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
The Bat 2.00 and support for HTML
Hello all, I didn't really follow the development of version 2, but I surely picked up support for HTML all along the long road leading to the release of version 2. To my great surprise this support is really very limited. Too limited in my opinion, and it does not even function well. Now, I personally never use formatted e-mail (I use The Bat! ;-)), but I there are several instances when HTML format does add quality to the message created. For one: I maintain a scientific NGO's mailinglist and for obvious reasons a well structured HTML formatted e-mail is superior to any text message (And here you might feel provoked ;-)). So we do use HTML and our current implementation of it with The Bat! includes several work-arounds. It seems that with the release of version 2 we'll have to live with these work-arounds a little longer, since replying, forwarding or redirecting an HTML formatted message does not preserve the original HTML format (as it should be IMO, and even included in the sorting office as an option). (For another: Kids...) Also the current HTML editing capacities are unsatisfactory. Simply from a general point of view: I cannot use TAB to align, I think supporting of (un)numbered lists is basic (but currently lacking) and not supporting alignment on the level of a paragraph seems unsatisfactory to me as well. And what seems to be a a bug to me (or at least a bad implementation): My boilerplate includes e-mail addresses and Internet addresses in the form of mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and http://visit.here.org. If I change between the different message formats while composing my e-mail, these tags are deleted by The Bat!. -- Best regards, Gerrit Kiers Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re:Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?
Why these repetitve instructions?!? Maybe some of us need to be reminded about the list rules constantly. For example, the message about inserting a sig delimiter doesnt seem to have reached you yet :( -- regards Clive Taylor Using TB 2.00.18 Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
long messages get truncated
Hi tbudl, I have a problem on theBat 2.00.6 Business Ed. Lately i have been getting some rather longish business-mails, and theBat insists on truncating them about half-way throgh. I have to resort to the message source (f9) to read the complete contents. If i make a reply, the entire contents are there. Anyone experienced anything similar ? -- Geir Bækholt Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: long messages get truncated
Hæ! Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 10:08, Geir Bækholt wrote: Lately i have been getting some rather longish business-mails... How long is a longish email for you? I just tested it with a plain text newsletter I got (which is roughly 53KB big) and I can read the whole message without problems. -- Kveðja! Thorvald Neumann | aesir media http://www.aesir.de/ [The Bat! v2.00.22 on Windows 2000 Service Pack 3] Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Silly Folder Question
Hi Jonathan, on Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:08:52 -0500GMT (01.10.03, 06:08 +0200GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : JA use the account default specific columns... As far as I understand the account default refers to all folders that have this option checked. Any change you make in one of them should apply to all the others, at least that's how it works here. -- Cheers Peter Life is sexually transmitted, and terminal... Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: XLAT-Table for UTF-8?
Hæ! Tuesday, September 30, 2003, 22:20, Marek Mikus wrote: no, but Unicode should be supported very soon, AFAIK. Soon? According to Bugtrack Unicode-support is open since January 2002... ;) -- Kveðja! Thorvald Neumann | aesir media http://www.aesir.de/ [The Bat! v2.00.22 on Windows 2000 Service Pack 3] Listening to: DeutschlandRadio Berlin Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Silly Folder Question
Hallo Jonathan, On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:08:52 -0500GMT (1-10-03, 6:08 +0200, where I live), you wrote: JA I've been using TB for a while... but something puzzled me today, JA and I'm not sure why I didn't spot it earlier. Under each folder, JA there is an option use the account default specific columns... You select this option for a number of folders. Now when you change the column settings for one of these folders, you'll see that all of them have changed accordingly. There's no root folder that takes these settings along, just change one and you'll change all of them. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: XLAT-Table for UTF-8?
Hæ! Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 11:36, Thorvald Neumann wrote: Soon? According to Bugtrack Unicode-support is open since January 2002... ;) It is in the Wishlist section... https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=234 -- Kveðja! Thorvald Neumann | aesir media http://www.aesir.de/ [The Bat! v2.00.22 on Windows 2000 Service Pack 3] Listening to: DeutschlandRadio Berlin Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Screen readers and TheBat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andrew, In a message with mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 30 Sep 2003 23:39:42 (my local time 1 okt 2003 00:39:42), you typed: AH If I get the following: AH Subject Author AH Test Message Andrew Hodgson AH Test Message Another user AH Then when arrowing through those messages, my screen reader would AH read the first line out completely, but the second line would only AH read out the author of the new message, not the subject again, as AH this is the same. The same principal works for the author. I know you don't have the inbox threaded by reference, but how if at all, do you have it threaded? or do you have the same problem even if threading by reference? I can't remember having that problem with jfw, but then again, it was quite a while since i last used Jaws to read the bat! mail. - -- - -- /Krister mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This mail brought to you by The bat! V2.00.22, on Windows XP 5 1 build 2600 Pgp keys available here: Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-nr2 (Windows XP) iD8DBQE/epF9ODlJeoMTOQsRAioVAJ4mo0Y5XlPzweyheAZEpfQ2o7XmzwCgyWOG 9qmeq4Q5pZ+c+Lh+9OIZ3K4= =7ucz -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat 2.00 and support for HTML
Hello batters, Noticed I forgot my question: Can anyone tell me what the further goals for HTML support are? -- Best regards, Gerrit Kiers Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Invalid HTML Message Given for a Plain Text Message
Hi all, Last night, when receiving a reply for a customer support inquiry I made to an online software company, I received this information in the message section of the Bat, instead of the actual reply: Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers. Thanks. EConvertError '121612161216' is not a valid integer value The error message was printed in blue and red lettering. However, when I also received this same message on my little PDA, it came through fine (the PDA doesn't allow any HTML in an e-mail message though). I went to the customer support site for the software vendor and looked up my support request manually in their system, where I was able to get the text. I then copied the text from the original message there, and e-mailed it to myself. This time the error didn't appear, and I saw the text of the message fine. I did view the source code of the problematic message, which included the following: X-Mailer: JMail 4.3.0 by Dimac Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I have received messages previously from customer support from the same software vendor without problems. Those messages used the same mailer and content type as the message that gave the HTML error. The messages all appear to have been sent in plain text, which makes the HTML error message even more strange. The most recent message I received from this company prior to the one with the error was about two weeks ago. I was using the same version of the Bat then, as I am now. I'm currently using the Bat Personal Edition 2.00.6. Has anyone else come across a similar error in version 2 of the Bat? Thanks in advance. -- Best regards, Kim Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Invalid HTML Message Given for a Plain Text Message
Hello all, Wednesday, October 1, 2003, Kim wrote: Has anyone else come across a similar error in version 2 of the Bat? Thanks in advance. this problem was already fixed, wait for new version, it will be released this week AFAIK. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 2.00.22 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 AMD ThunderBird 1,2 GHz, 512 MB RAM Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Invalid HTML Message Given for a Plain Text Message
Hi Kim, On Wed, 01 Oct 2003, at 06:50:59 [GMT-0400] (which was 20:50:59 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: Has anyone else come across a similar error in version 2 of the Bat? Thanks in advance. This has been raised a few times - supposed to be fixed real soon now. -- John Phillips, Sydney, Australia Using The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Docs? Why look at the Docs? Nurses are better. Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Invalid HTML Message Given for a Plain Text Message
Hæ! Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 12:50, Kim wrote: Has anyone else come across a similar error in version 2 of the Bat? This is a known bug with UTF-8 messages in TB!. A fix was promised soon. -- Kveðja! Thorvald Neumann | aesir media http://www.aesir.de/ [The Bat! v2.00.22 on Windows 2000 Service Pack 3] Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Screen readers and TheBat
Hello Krister, Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 9:33:54 AM, you wrote: KE Hi Andrew, KE In a message with mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] KE On 30 Sep 2003 23:39:42 (my local time 1 okt 2003 00:39:42), you KE typed: AH If I get the following: AH Subject Author AH Test Message Andrew Hodgson AH Test Message Another user AH Then when arrowing through those messages, my screen reader would AH read the first line out completely, but the second line would only AH read out the author of the new message, not the subject again, as AH this is the same. The same principal works for the author. KE I know you don't have the inbox threaded by reference, but how if at KE all, do you have it threaded? or do you have the same problem even if KE threading by reference? I have the same problem regardless of how it is threaded. When you spoke of TB not speaking in the message list view, I was wondering whether you had the same issue. Andrew. -- Best regards, Andrew Hodgson, Bromyard, Herefordshire, UK. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat 2.00 and support for HTML
On Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 2:19:19 AM, Gerrit Kiers wrote: GK I didn't really follow the development of version 2, but I surely GK picked up support for HTML all along the long road leading to the GK release of version 2. To my great surprise this support is really GK very limited. Too limited in my opinion, and it does not even GK function well. I agree with this. It's not even possible to cut paste html into an email using v2's html editor. -- Deborah Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit. Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MyGate 2.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andrew, On Sep 30, 2003, 19:59 +0300 (12:59 PM here), Andrew Perevodchik [AP] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: AP Check out, if numbers of X-MyGate-MID are the same in duplicate AP messages. This header is added by MyGate 2.5, so I hope you have AP some recently-recieved dupes. Here are the X-MyGate-MID entries contained in 3 duplicate messages from 3 different usenet groups: X-MyGate-MID: roadrunner.twcny.help:241 X-MyGate-MID: roadrunner.twcny.help:241 X-MyGate-MID: roadrunner.twcny.security:41 X-MyGate-MID: roadrunner.twcny.security:41 X-MyGate-MID: roadrunner.twcny.general:6767 X-MyGate-MID: roadrunner.twcny.general:6767 - -- Kevin Coates Dewitt, NY USA Using TB! v2.00.22 under Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP1 (see kludges for my pgp key) . -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE/emoRRbTFvUNHmLkRAkDWAJ4sg4i+DfVDmRiPTF5jF0ls2kvgMwCfcafs OrBJ471ejGLdQWt7FYucxX4= =Pqje -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Screen readers and TheBat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andrew, In a message with mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 1 Oct 2003 13:35:15 (my local time 14:35:15), you typed: AH When you AH spoke of TB not speaking in the message list view, I was wondering AH whether you had the same issue. I had it when viewing a folder with the message list visible. It was because of that that i started to use the main message view instead of the folder view. It was much smoother for me. - -- - -- /Krister mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This mail brought to you by The bat! V2.00.22, on Windows XP 5 1 build 2600 Pgp keys available here: Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-nr2 (Windows XP) iD8DBQE/etb4ODlJeoMTOQsRAjIIAJ0Za8emdMUZ5rAGqvALDeUCdShpNACg8ui9 uG6dfIDErQU5hNeHztPzKaY= =f3/A -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?
Hello Clive, Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 12:28:29 AM, you wrote: CT Maybe some of us need to be reminded about the list rules CT constantly. For example, the message about inserting a sig CT delimiter doesnt seem to have reached you yet :( *Exactly* the point! There are boatloads of lurkers on the lists. While everything is spelled out in the list rules that *everyone* gets when they subscribe, nobody ever seems to read them. Therefore, the lurkers would never know what's allowed and not allowed if it's not public. I've had this same conversation with Yuki off-list. Marck, Allie and I have been moderating the TB lists for ages now. We've just about tried every form and fashion of moderation known to mankind, and we stick with what works for us over the years. We still tweak here and now (i.e. the recent standardization of moderation messages for example), but for the most part what we're doing does work. Marck pointed out in his reply about users taking up the moderation when the moderators don't make it public. When we were privately moderating, it was unbelievable how much traffic was generated by users telling the person who did The Bad Thing (tm) that they violated the rules. We've been there and done that. We still use private moderation for sensitive issues, but those are much more rare occasions. Alas, what Marck said also is most true... We just like to hear ourselves talk. ;-) -- Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user). Using The Bat! 2.00.18 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 on a Pentium 4 2GHz with 512MB Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Silly Folder Question
On Wednesday, October 01, 2003, Peter Meyns wrote... JA use the account default specific columns... As far as I understand the account default refers to all folders that have this option checked. Any change you make in one of them should apply to all the others, at least that's how it works here. Ahh see... now I knew it was a silly question ;) Thanks, that certain behaves as you (and Roelof) described it... I think the wording on it is a little unusual however, but that might be just me. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Catastrophe n. an award for the cat with the nicest buns pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: how to do this with sorting-office?
Hello Edgar, E 1) You can enter a new headerfield in your mail called projectid E 2) You can also make a reply template that gives this projectid the name Eof the folder where you answered the original message. E 3) Then you can filter on projectid for outgoing mails. This sounds like a good solution. At least it unifies the way to create outgoing filters. Will adding a non-standard header in the mail affect compatibility? Thanks Edgar. Anyway I'll try this first. (Using The Bat! v2.00.22 on Windows NT Clone 5.2 Build 3790 ) -- Best regards, Samsonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
folder templates inheritance?
Hello tbudl, if i have a folder tree like this: - projects +-- project_a +-- project_b +-- ... is it possible to only modify the reply template of projects, and let project_* sub folders inherit this parent template so i don't have to edit them one by one? thanks. (Using The Bat! v2.00.22 on Windows NT Clone 5.2 Build 3790 ) -- Best regards, Samson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: long messages get truncated
Hello Thorvald, Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 10:35:14 AM, you wrote: Hæ! Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 10:08, Geir Bækholt wrote: Lately i have been getting some rather longish business-mails... How long is a longish email for you? I just tested it with a plain text newsletter I got (which is roughly 53KB big) and I can read the whole message without problems. ahh. no , nothing like that. i just checked again, to try to find symptoms. strange. One mail this happened to was about 15-20kb size itself, and had two attachments : one of about 7 and one of 56kb. When i first got it, it was mangled badly, truncated after 8kb, and with the rest of the mail and the attachments as an attached winmail.dat I don't know what client made it because it has been passed through a mailinglist-thing that sets its own header for that before it reached me, but i expect it to originate from outlook or something similar. Here are some headers, edited slightly for privacy : Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 40414 invoked by uid 1003); 23 Sep 2003 17:30:43 - Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 40409 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2003 17:30:43 - Received: from server2.omnimedia.no (HELO plonesolutions.com) (213.236.237.166) by ting.net with SMTP; 23 Sep 2003 17:30:43 - Received: from server2.omnimedia.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by plonesolutions.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 367863E632D; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:30:36 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from homer.lld.dk (mail.lld.dk [130.226.204.66]) by plonesolutions.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B4E3E632C for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:30:34 +0200 (CEST) Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:34:06 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thread-Topic: schedule Thread-Index: AcN+rVR3UkafWvPfQ1aVPK/7DgMIbgDR40c5 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: =?UTF-8?Q?Geir_B=C3=A6kholt_=C2=B7_Plone_Solutions?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_=_NextPart_001_01C381F8.E36D86F7 X-mailer: PloneMail Subject: RE: schedule X-Text-Classification: inbox X-POPFile-Link: http://127.0.0.1:8079/jump_to_message?view=popfile14837=2.msg I had a friend who also received it, forward it to me in his opera-mailer. That copy was all fine. Also, if i reply to it, the entire text is in the reply, no truncating there. It is also all available if i view the message source. I have all html turned off. i am very puzzled. -- Geir Bækholt Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Toolbar(s)
Tuesday, September 30, 2003, 11:47:48 PM, you wrote: Any idea if flat toolbars are on the cards? They would contribute enormously to TB's interface and make it much more contemporary. Any idea what flat toolbars even are? I haven't a clue. But then, I often don't. :) -- Best regards, Jack Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: how to do this with sorting-office?
Hallo Samson, On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 08:56:06 -0700GMT (1-10-03, 17:56 +0200, where I live), you wrote: S Will adding a non-standard header in the mail affect compatibility? No. It's common though, when you invent your own header, to let the header tag be preceded by 'X-'. So instead of Folder-ID, you'd better use X-Folder-ID. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: folder templates inheritance?
Hallo Samson, On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 09:00:34 -0700GMT (1-10-03, 18:00 +0200, where I live), you wrote: S is it possible to only modify the reply template of projects, and S let project_* sub folders inherit this parent template so i don't have S to edit them one by one? No. However if you use the %FolderName macro, you can insert it in your account macro and as long as you haven't yet created folder templates, all folders will use this. %SetHeader(X-Folder-ID,%FolderName)%- -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 9:10:41 AM, you wrote: [] I've had this same conversation with Yuki off-list. Marck, Allie and I have been moderating the TB lists for ages now. We've just about tried every form and fashion of moderation known to mankind, and we stick with what works for us over the years. [] I've frequented a *lot* of help lists over the years (because I usually need a *LOT* of help), and this one could, or should, be the prototype on how to run one efficiently. I even moderate a few lists myself. And I definitely give it a two thumbs up these days! If I had a third thumb, you'd get that one, too. Keep up the great work, guys! You'll never make everyone 100% happy, but you're getting close enough for government work. -- Best regards, Jack Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?
Hallo Jack, On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:10:28 -0500GMT (1-10-03, 21:10 +0200, where I live), you wrote: JM I've frequented a *lot* of help lists over the years (because I usually JM need a *LOT* of help), and this one could, or should, be the prototype on JM how to run one efficiently. Okay, admit it. How much did they pay you. ;-) -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?
Hello Jack, Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 1:10:28 PM, you wrote: JM If I had a third thumb, you'd get that one, too. Thanks... grin JM Keep up the great work, guys! You'll never make everyone 100% JM happy, but you're getting close enough for government work. Since I work for the gov't that makes it just fine! ;-) -- Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user). Using The Bat! 2.00.22 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 on a Pentium 4 2GHz with 512MB Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: folder templates inheritance?
Hello Roelof, Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 9:14:22 PM, you wrote: However if you use the %FolderName macro, you can insert it in your account macro and as long as you haven't yet created folder templates, all folders will use this. %SetHeader(X-Folder-ID,%FolderName)%- I could not find the %SetHeader in the macro list in the help file. Maybe I missed it but just in case I did not, is there a place where to find these Macro's that are not in the help file or better yet a complete overview of the macro's (and purpose). -- Cheers, Edgar Communicating with TB! v2.00.6, Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 I'd probably be famous now if I wasn't such a good waitress. Jane Siberry Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: folder templates inheritance?
Hallo Roelof, Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 9:14:22 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: RO However if you use the %FolderName macro, you can insert it in your RO account macro and as long as you haven't yet created folder templates, RO all folders will use this. RO %SetHeader(X-Folder-ID,%FolderName)%- This sounds like a trick I'd like to use, but unfortunately I don't understand it. I know I can create templates at account level, and that all folders will default to these templates, unless at folder level I create a specific template. Where and how should I use the %FolderName macro? -- Best regards, Gerrit Kiers Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?
At 3:52 PM on 10/1/2003, Melissa Reese typed ... M By the way...shouldn't this thread be moved to TBOT? ;-) No thread praising the administrators should moved anywhere. -- Bill Blinn Technology Editor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - 10/1/2003 at 4:20 PM Technology Editor, Newsradio 610 WTVN, Columbus, Ohio Using The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Random thought: Do not put statements in the negative form. Location: 40.1054688°N 83.0212173°W (approximately) Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 2:43:24 PM, you wrote: Hallo Jack, On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:10:28 -0500GMT (1-10-03, 21:10 +0200, where I live), you wrote: JM I've frequented a *lot* of help lists over the years (because I usually JM need a *LOT* of help), and this one could, or should, be the prototype on JM how to run one efficiently. Okay, admit it. How much did they pay you. ;-) Unlimited free upgrades, a subscription to Skeptic Magazine, a mixed fruit and cheese basket, and, of course, a promise never to bounce me. :) -- Best regards, Jack Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
OT: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?
Hello Melissa, Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 1:52:30 PM, you wrote: MR When it comes to typing, some of us are all thumbs...so I'll add MR my extra thumbs to yours! :-) MR By the way...shouldn't this thread be moved to TBOT? ;-) True enough Not that I think anybody would like to move to TBOT just to sing our praises! grin moderator This thread is moving into the Off-Topic realm. Please continue this on TBOT (this message has been CC'd to the TBOT list to maintain threading.) You can subscribe to TBOT by sending a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you. /moderator -- Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user). Using The Bat! 2.00.22 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 on a Pentium 4 2GHz with 512MB pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Note to screenreader users, was Re: Screen readers and TheBat
Hello Krister, Tuesday, September 30, 2003, 11:50:47 AM, you wrote: KE A note to our screen reader using friends, a way of trimming the reply KE is that when you read the message, you can actually select text rather KE like in a word processor, ie by using the shift key in conjunction KE with up-or down arrow, pgup or pgdown, home or end respectively. After KE selecting your text, press f4 and you're in the message editor with KE the text you selected as quoted text. What a cool feature!!! Only problem is, how can I copy more text from the original message? Every day I learn something new about TB, truely an amazing program. Steve Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: folder templates inheritance?
Hallo Edgar, On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 21:51:22 +0200GMT (1-10-03, 21:51 +0200, where I live), you wrote: However if you use the %FolderName macro, you can insert it in your account macro and as long as you haven't yet created folder templates, all folders will use this. %SetHeader(X-Folder-ID,%FolderName)%- E I could not find the %SetHeader in the macro list in the help file. Go (in the index) for 'Template Macros' and select 'header macros' E Maybe I missed it but just in case I did not, is there a place where E to find these Macro's that are not in the help file or better yet a E complete overview of the macro's (and purpose). The help-file isn't as far developed as we'd like. It's always behind the development of the actual release. That's why this list is so useful. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Folder purging/cleaning ??
Hi, i just noticed a whole bunch of very recent (1 from today!) TBUDL posts in my Trash folder, which is a bit odd as i have '999' as 'maximum number of stored messages' and '21 days' as 'keep messages in the base for ...' for the TBUDL folder. Still there are 1196 messages in the folder (even after 'purge compress') and the messages in the Trash are as recent as 27 28 Sep. while there are still messages in the TBUDL folder dated 9 Sep. ?! Either i'm missing something or is there a buglet ?? -- Rob Using The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 ~ Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 2:40:22 PM, you wrote: JM Keep up the great work, guys! You'll never make everyone 100% JM happy, but you're getting close enough for government work. Since I work for the gov't that makes it just fine! ;-) I should probably quit while I'm ahead, eh? :) -- Best regards, Jack Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: how to do this with sorting-office?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Roelof, On 01 October 2003, 21:07 +0200 (01/10/200320:07 local time) Roelof Otten [RO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: S Will adding a non-standard header in the mail affect compatibility? RO No. It's common though, when you invent your own header, to let the RO header tag be preceded by 'X-'. So instead of Folder-ID, you'd better RO use X-Folder-ID. Is that possible? As far as I know you cannot use the - character with %HDR; e.g. %HDRX-List-ID=%FOLDERNAME%-. Or am I missing something? - -- As ever, Martin Webster The Bat! 2.00.22 w/ BayesIt! 0.4fm (Windows XP Professional Service Pack 1) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2 iQA/AwUBP3s8nlv+PP8p0/caEQKVkQCgsjHf7TWFlYnYYMGRjfbEWQgAddwAn1rN 9ASLs6Y50oRaxqkM1xExqmhx =1dGW -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: how to do this with sorting-office?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Roelof, On 01 October 2003, 21:07 +0200 (01/10/200320:07 local time) Roelof Otten [RO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: S Will adding a non-standard header in the mail affect compatibility? RO No. It's common though, when you invent your own header, to let the RO header tag be preceded by 'X-'. So instead of Folder-ID, you'd better RO use X-Folder-ID. Is that possible? As far as I know you cannot use the - character with %HDR; e.g. %HDRX-List-ID=%FOLDERNAME%-. Or am I missing something? - - -- As ever, Martin Webster The Bat! 2.00.22 w/ BayesIt! 0.4fm (Windows XP Professional Service Pack 1) - -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2 iQA/AwUBP3s8nlv+PP8p0/caEQKVkQCgsjHf7TWFlYnYYMGRjfbEWQgAddwAn1rN 9ASLs6Y50oRaxqkM1xExqmhx =1dGW - -END PGP SIGNATURE- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2 iQA/AwUBP3s9glv+PP8p0/caEQLDzQCfVM0VgHaQzeZWykIiHP84mtzSp40AoON1 2uxb0WXpknBsCCRJrDm5NuXE =dmOH -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: folder templates inheritance?
Hallo Gerrit, On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:17:37 +0200GMT (1-10-03, 22:17 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RO %SetHeader(X-Folder-ID,%FolderName)%- GK This sounds like a trick I'd like to use, but unfortunately I don't GK understand it. I know I can create templates at account level, and GK that all folders will default to these templates, unless at folder GK level I create a specific template. GK Where and how should I use the %FolderName macro? Samson wanted to filter his message back to the folder where they were created. To do that, you need to identify to the folder. That's done with the macro I suggested. You place the macro on a single line, doesn't matter where in your templates. (New message, Reply, Forward) Now you need to filter the messages back to their originating folder after sending. (Or to a related folder.) For a message from the Inbox, you need this string: X-Folder-ID: Inbox to be present in the kludges, it needs to be an outgoing filter, since it's going to process outgoing messages. Create a likewise filter for every folder you'd like the outgoing messages to be processed different from the default. Of course you don't need to use an extra header to place the foldername, but a header makes it less visible for the recipient. There's no need to bother your contacts with your archiving system. Since most e-mail clients are able to show the headers, you'll need a little bit of prudence when naming your folders. It wouldn't do to have a header like: 'X-Folder-ID: Mindless twits' ;-) But, I suppose, you wouldn't care in this case. eg -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?
This thread is moving into the Off-Topic realm. Please continue this on TBOT (this message has been CC'd to the TBOT list to maintain threading.) Point taken - but to those who don't follow TBOT, I'd like to say: Please spank me no more! Weeeny! I am a repentant! Have Mercy! :) -- St Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Note to screenreader users, was Re: Screen readers and TheBat
Hallo Steve, On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 11:48:51 -0400GMT (1-10-03, 17:48 +0200, where I live), you wrote: KE After selecting your text, press f4 and you're in the message KE editor with the text you selected as quoted text. SMS What a cool feature!!! Only problem is, how can I copy more text from SMS the original message? When you want to quote multiple phrases, I suppose it's easiest way to quote the whole message and delete what you don't want to include. If you prefer to insert several quotes over deleting the uinwanted stuff, you can go back to the original message (while you're composing your reply) select a phrase, copy it with Ctrl-C, go back to the edit window and paste with Alt-Ins (Edit - Paste as quotation) -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Folder purging/cleaning ??
Hallo Rob, On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:42:59 +0200GMT (1-10-03, 22:42 +0200, where I live), you wrote: R Either i'm missing something or is there a buglet ?? You wouldn't have parked all of those 1196 messages, would you? Delete the messages.tbi in the tbudl folder, maybe its corrupt. (Don't touch the messages.tbb file) -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Note to screenreader users, was Re: Screen readers and TheBat
On Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 17:48:51, Steve M. Sawczyn wrote: What a cool feature!!! Only problem is, how can I copy more text from the original message? Every day I learn something new about TB, truely an amazing program. Use Shift+Tab when you're in the message body, and focus should jump to the preview pane - you can select more text there again. To paste as quote, use Alt+Insert. -- Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/ http://deepthought.ena.si/ Nothing matters very much, and few things matter at all. -- Erhard's Contention Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: folder templates inheritance?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Roelof, On 01 October 2003, 21:14 +0200 (01/10/200320:14 local time) Roelof Otten [RO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: S is it possible to only modify the reply template of projects, and S let project_* sub folders inherit this parent template so i don't have S to edit them one by one? RO No. RO However if you use the %FolderName macro, you can insert it in your RO account macro and as long as you haven't yet created folder templates, RO all folders will use this. RO %SetHeader(X-Folder-ID,%FolderName)%- What if you already have folder templates? And how does this differ from the %HDR macro? - -- As ever, Martin Webster The Bat! 2.00.22 w/ BayesIt! 0.4fm (Windows XP Professional Service Pack 1) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2 iQA/AwUBP3tF+lv+PP8p0/caEQItxwCg/eXc+RNMUProvHuHz0mOedkDIkIAoMeW jxuru6nBxdDSRgrqnKiZJNM4 =Lm6r -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
MyGate References
TheBat-users, On replying to a post with the following references ,- [ ] | References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- I get the message: Message has not been sent. Server reply - Rejected. Server said 441 437 References header too long Has anybody experienced that before? I don't if the server is my news server or MyGate. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 2.00.22 /thebat version os Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 /os Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?
Hello St, Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 3:05:47 PM, you wrote: SMN Point taken - but to those who don't follow TBOT, I'd like to SMN say: Please spank me no more! Weeeny! I am a repentant! Have SMN Mercy! :) Sorry, gotta do it one more time... The sig delimiter is: dash dash space It looks like you're missing the space afterwards. It's gotta be there. :-) moderator This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out St. Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. This consists of a dashdashspacereturn, i.e., a '-- ' by itself on a line. This allows your readers, when replying, to quote your text without the signature and list footers since everything below and including the sig delimiter is excluded when quoting. You can easily automate this process by including the sig delimiter in your templates. Thank you. /moderator -- Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user). Using The Bat! 2.00.22 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 on a Pentium 4 2GHz with 512MB pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: how to do this with sorting-office?
Hallo Martin, On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 21:48:00 +0100GMT (1-10-03, 22:48 +0200, where I live), you wrote: MW Is that possible? As far as I know you cannot use the - character with Maybe I'm missing something, can't get it to work. I thought it would though. :-( -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: folder templates inheritance?
Hallo Martin, On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:24:01 +0100GMT (1-10-03, 23:24 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RO %SetHeader(X-Folder-ID,%FolderName)%- MW What if you already have folder templates? Then you're without luck. MW And how does this differ from the %HDR macro? Can't find any %hdr macro in the help, nor in the readme that was released together with 2.00.06 Apart from that, I can't get any of them to work. :-( -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re:Folder purging/cleaning ??
Hi Roelof, on Wed, 1 Oct 2003, at 23:22:31 local time (GMT +0200), you wrote: RO You wouldn't have parked all of those 1196 messages, would you? Nope, just a dozen or so ... RO Delete the messages.tbi in the tbudl folder, maybe its corrupt. Tried it, no change. But i see what's happening now ; when i purge the folder, all messages i just read are moved to Trash, regardless of their date ?! I would expect that older, un-read messages should be trashed first ... -- Rob using The Bat! 2.00.6 Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Folder purging/cleaning ??
Hallo Rob, On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 00:42:05 +0200GMT (2-10-03, 0:42 +0200, where I live), you wrote: R But i see what's happening now ; when i purge the folder, all messages i R just read are moved to Trash, regardless of their date ?! That's not the intended behaviour. R I would expect that older, un-read messages should be trashed first That's how it happens here. Well, now I realise that you've got (lots of) unread messages in your folder. Maybe that's the problem. What happens when you mark all messages read? (Select the folder in the account tree pane and press Ctrl-M) -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: First impressions
Bats- After spending a bit of time evaluating this I have now reverted to v1.63. V2 has proven to be *significantly* slower than previous versions, especially in dealing with network issues. It easily takes 15 seconds to respond when I try to delete a message - meanwhile TB's CPU usage goes up to 30%. Also, folder event updates don't seem to propagate around the network. When the server receives a new message or when a message goes out from the outbox the client machines never receive an update. I have to move the focus to each individual folder to see if there's anything new. Either one of these would rule out TBv2 for me as an email client. I make a living as a QA engineer, and I'd be embarrassed to have this released on my watch. I'm going back to my favorite email client, even if I can't write macros to fiddle with the headers. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Delete highlights in Editor
Lately when I use the Plain Text (MicroEd) editor when I highlight a line it deletes only letter by letter. If I recall earlier the highlighted text deleted in one keystroke, as in other editors. I probably changed some setting inadvertently but cannot find which one. Note: if I change to Plain Text (Windows) it works OK. Would appreciate help. -- Best regards, Peter Kerekes (Toronto, Canada) Using The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows 98 Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete highlights in Editor
Hi Peter, @1-Oct-2003, 17:04 -0400 (02-Oct 22:04 UK time) Peter Kerekes [PK] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: PK I probably changed some setting inadvertently but cannot find PK which one. Preferences | Editor | Persistent blocks [Off] Overwrite blocks [On ] Those settings should normalise things for you. -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.00.22 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: folder templates inheritance?
Hello Roelof, RO Samson wanted to filter his message back to the folder where they were RO created. To do that, you need to identify to the folder. That's done RO with the macro I suggested. You place the macro on a single line, RO doesn't matter where in your templates. (New message, Reply, Forward) Yes exactly. Using something like a X-Folder-ID header will at least make all outgoing filter look alike (they all filter by Kludge X-Folder-ID: project_name). So far I'm setting this Setheader macro in each of my project sub folder one by one. seems no way to change once and apply to all... (Using The Bat! v2.00.22 on Windows NT Clone 5.2 Build 3790 ) -- Best regards, Samsonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: folder templates inheritance?
Hello Roelof, RO Apart from that, I can't get any of them to work. :-( %Setheader works for me (i didn't try %HDR because %setheader is good enough). I think the key is, before you specify your own header, you must first define this header in option/preference/message-headers. otherwise %setheader won't work. (Using The Bat! v2.00.22 on Windows NT Clone 5.2 Build 3790 ) -- Best regards, Samsonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
TheBat mailbox format
Hi all, In what format does TheBat store its mail boxes? Does it use the unix style mail format like Eudora? Pranav Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
