Regex in Message Finder
You'll have to pardon me, I've been away from TB for a year or two and am both a bit rusty with its intricacies and trying to get up to speed with all the changes. This time around, my question is about the message finder--it used to support regex, but now it doesn't seem to. Am I overlooking something or has the power of regex been deprecated from the message finder in exchange for speed? Thanks A. -- Remember, no matter where you go, there you are. The Bat! 3.65.03 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: IMAP setup-message bodies not being downloaded
Hello SL, A reminder of what SL typed on: Sunday, February 05, 2006 at 17:17:57 GMT +1100 S Hello tbudl, S I can't figure out why The Bat no longer is downloading message bodies S for my IMAP account. I am not sure if this started happening when I S upgraded from Home to Pro (not sure). (...although it worked fine...I S think...when I tried Voyager...) S In 'IMAP Fine Tune', I have 'retrieve message structures...' enabled. S In 'Manage IMAP Folders' , I have sync mode set to Full Messages/All S Messages' and I have tried 'New Messages' as well. S The answer is doubtless staring me in the face, but right now I can't S see it... It is working well here for me (home and pro). These are the settings I would check as well. Just noticed you are using 3.65.03, which is the official release version, I think. The current beta 3.70.07 is now working correctly with IMAP syncing and is the best version I have ever had for IMAP. There are still some problems, but message downloading seems to be fixed. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.70.07 Qigong (Beta) On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Concrete example of creating READ filter and a question
Hello TBUDL,
I am helping a friend learn to use his new copy of The Bat! This
morning I wrote out a long explanation for him of how to create a READ
filter to assign a manual HotKey to the action the filter performs,
and because I always value seeing a concrete explanation of how to do
things like this on the list, I thought I'd share what I have written
with you. At the end of this explanation, however, I have a question
I'd appreciate some help with. So here is what I wrote for him.
The experiment I was inspired to conduct this morning was with READ
filters. I already had a color group (or colour group, as The Bat!
calls it) that was called Reply Needed, and I have a Virtual Folder
that displays those messages (also called Reply Needed). What I
wanted was a keyboard shortcut that I could use to quickly apply that
color group to a message I had just read.
So I went into the Sorting Office for each of the three accounts I
have and created the same filter. I added it in the READ filters
section, chose NEW filter, then clicked on the SENDER and selected ANY
MESSAGE (the bottom most item in the list that pops up). Next I went
to the ACTIONS tab and chose SET MESSAGE COLOUR. Then a window will
pop up for you to select the color group you wish to use. Naturally, I
chose Rely Needed. Once that action was displayed, I chose the
OPTIONS tab. On that tab I made sure This filter is active was
selected, then checked Use this filter for manual re-filtering only
and then checked Execute actions of this filter by pressing this Hot
Key. That will cause the window right below that statement to become
active. I clicked in that window, which by default says None, and
pressed the keys I wanted to use as a hot key. I chose the keys
Ctrl+Shift+Alt+R. You make that choice by simply pressing all those
keys simultaneously, and it will replace the word None.
Although I created the filter three times for the three accounts I
have, I realized afterwards that I didn't need to do that. I could
have simply selected the filter in one of the accounts and pressed
CTRL-C, to copy it to the clipboard, and then gone to another account
and opened the READ filter section and then pressed CTRL-V to paste
the filter into that account too.
Obviously, creating this one read filter helps me to realize that I
can create other such READ filters to do other things, such as add
other color groups to messages by shortcut keys, etc. This is the
first time I've used READ filters, but it opens up a whole new range
of options for me, so I am pleased with myself and wanted to share my
discovery with you, in case you might find it useful.
Here is the filter:
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [EB5A48C0.01C62A57.7ADD9BF8.52886FDC]
Name: Set\20Colour\20to\20Reply\20Needed
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`0`0`\0D\0A}
SetColour 1302808744
IsManual
IsActive
IsHotkey
Ignore
endFilter
Now for my question.
Is there a way to have the Virtual Folder, Reply Needed, become
color coded with the Reply Needed color group when there are messages
in it? I realize I can choose the Virtual Tab to see my Virtual
Folders, but I'd like the folder to be colored, if possible, in the
folder list, but only when there are messages in it.
I appreciate any help anyone might provide me.
--
Regards,
Perry
Using The Bat! v3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Regex in Message Finder
Hello Allen, A reminder of what Allen Day typed on: Sunday, February 05, 2006 at 09:10:27 GMT -0500 AD You'll have to pardon me, I've been away from TB for a year or two and AD am both a bit rusty with its intricacies and trying to get up to speed AD with all the changes. This time around, my question is about the AD message finder--it used to support regex, but now it doesn't seem to. AD Am I overlooking something or has the power of regex been deprecated AD from the message finder in exchange for speed? When using the message finder if you you use Match or Does not Match you will use regex. If you use Contains or Does no Contain it won't. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.70.07 Qigong (Beta) On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Concrete example of creating READ filter and a question
Hello Perry, A reminder of what Perry Nelson typed on: Sunday, February 05, 2006 at 09:53:38 GMT -0500 PN Is there a way to have the Virtual Folder, Reply Needed, become PN color coded with the Reply Needed color group when there are messages PN in it? I realize I can choose the Virtual Tab to see my Virtual PN Folders, but I'd like the folder to be colored, if possible, in the PN folder list, but only when there are messages in it. When you create a color group you can assign the color for the font and for the background when the messages are read or unread. This should let you do what you want. Go to Options/Preferences/Messages/Color Groups Fonts, select the color group you want to change and set the Read color to black and the Unread color to to your color group color. You may have to create a new color group for this and give it a different name and then assign it to your virtul folder. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.70.07 Qigong (Beta) On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Concrete example of creating READ filter and a question
Hello Stuart Cuddy everyone else, on 05-Feb-2006 at 16:11 you (Stuart Cuddy) wrote: PN Is there a way to have the Virtual Folder, Reply Needed, become PN color coded with the Reply Needed color group when there are messages PN in it? I realize I can choose the Virtual Tab to see my Virtual PN Folders, but I'd like the folder to be colored, if possible, in the PN folder list, but only when there are messages in it. When you create a color group you can assign the color for the font and for the background when the messages are read or unread. This should let you do what you want. Go to Options/Preferences/Messages/Color Groups Fonts, select the color group you want to change and set the Read color to black and the Unread color to to your color group color. You may have to create a new color group for this and give it a different name and then assign it to your virtul folder. I don't think thats it, because if there are *unread* messages in the VF, it will be shown in bold (by default), anyway. However, what Perry wants to do (and what I'd like to do as well:-) is to show the folder in a different color if it *contains* messages, no matter if read or not. Its the same as showing the outbox with a different icon/colour when there are drafts or unsent messages in it. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) The product of mental labor-science always stands far below it's value, because the labor-time neccessary to reproduce it has no relation at all to the labor-time required for it's original production. -- Karl Marx Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Concrete example of creating READ filter and a question
Hello Alexander, A reminder of what Alexander S. Kunz typed on: Sunday, February 05, 2006 at 16:19:50 GMT +0100 ASK I don't think thats it, because if there are *unread* messages in the VF, ASK it will be shown in bold (by default), anyway. However, what Perry wants to ASK do (and what I'd like to do as well:-) is to show the folder in a different ASK color if it *contains* messages, no matter if read or not. ASK Its the same as showing the outbox with a different icon/colour when there ASK are drafts or unsent messages in it. I see what you mean. If as part of your marking the messages as needing to be replied to you mark them as Unread as well then it would work. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.70.07 Qigong (Beta) On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Concrete example of creating READ filter and a question
Hi Alexander, Sunday, February 5, 2006, 10:19:50 AM, you wrote: ASK I don't think thats it, because if there are *unread* messages in ASK the VF, it will be shown in bold (by default), anyway. However, ASK what Perry wants to do (and what I'd like to do as well:-) is to ASK show the folder in a different color if it *contains* messages, no ASK matter if read or not. Yes, that is exactly what I want to do! In my case, the message is already read when I use the HotKey to apply the color group. I'm guessing from your response that isn't possible at the moment, correct? -- Regards, Perry Using The Bat! v3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Concrete example of creating READ filter and a question
Hi Stuart, Sunday, February 5, 2006, 10:29:01 AM, you wrote: ASK However, what Perry wants to do (and what I'd like to do as ASK well:-) is to show the folder in a different color if it ASK *contains* messages, no matter if read or not. SC I see what you mean. If as part of your marking the messages as SC needing to be replied to you mark them as Unread as well then it SC would work. I'm just made that change, and you are right, it does now show up in bold. I haven't yet set the folder to display in the color I want, but this change achieves the same objective ... sort of. And I can live with this work-around if it isn't possible to have the folder display a color group when there are messages in it. -- Regards, Perry Using The Bat! v3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Regex in Message Finder
Sunday, February 5, 2006, 10:00:16 AM, Stuart wrote: Hello Allen, A reminder of what Allen Day typed on: Sunday, February 05, 2006 at 09:10:27 GMT -0500 AD message finder--it used to support regex, but now it doesn't seem to. AD Am I overlooking something or has the power of regex been deprecated AD from the message finder in exchange for speed? When using the message finder if you you use Match or Does not Match you will use regex. If you use Contains or Does no Contain it won't. Ah, very good -- didn't pick up on that subtlety immediately but it does make sense. Thanks much! A. -- Remember, no matter where you go, there you are. The Bat! 3.65.03 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Concrete example of creating READ filter and a question
Hello Perry, A reminder of what Perry Nelson typed on: Sunday, February 05, 2006 at 10:40:03 GMT -0500 PN I'm just made that change, and you are right, it does now show up in PN bold. I haven't yet set the folder to display in the color I want, but PN this change achieves the same objective ... sort of. And I can live PN with this work-around if it isn't possible to have the folder display PN a color group when there are messages in it. Now you will need another Read filter that will let you mark the message as read when you reply to it and change the color group back to normal. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.70.07 Qigong (Beta) On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Regex in Message Finder
Hello Allen, A reminder of what Allen Day typed on: Sunday, February 05, 2006 at 10:47:50 GMT -0500 AD Ah, very good -- didn't pick up on that subtlety immediately but it AD does make sense. Thanks much! Most welcome. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.70.07 Qigong (Beta) On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Concrete example of creating READ filter and a question
Hi Stuart, Sunday, February 5, 2006, 10:29:01 AM, you wrote: SC If as part of your marking the messages as needing to be replied SC to you mark them as Unread as well then it would work. I created a companion READ filter, set to manual, had it mark the color group as Generic Group and READ. I also experimented with a Replied filter that takes the same actions but set it so that it should occur automatically. After I click send, I'll find out if that works. -- Regards, Perry Using The Bat! v3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Concrete example of creating READ filter and a question
Hi Stuart, Sunday, February 5, 2006, 10:59:57 AM, you wrote: SC Now you will need another Read filter that will let you mark the SC message as read when you reply to it and change the color group back SC to normal. As you'll see from the message I had just composted when this one from you came in, I have already done that. And by the way the REPLIED filter I created did automatically achieve the same objective once I clicked SEND. Thanks to both you and Alexander for your assistance. -- Regards, Perry Using The Bat! v3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Concrete example of creating READ filter and a question
Hi Perry (you dummy), Sunday, February 5, 2006, 11:07:39 AM, you wrote: PN As you'll see from the message I had just composted ... Actually I didn't compost it, I composed it. (I hate it when that happens. ;-) -- Regards, Perry Using The Bat! v3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Concrete example of creating READ filter and a question
Hello Alexander, On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 16:19:50 +0100 GMT (05/02/2006, 22:19 +0700 GMT), Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK I don't think thats it, because if there are *unread* messages in the VF, ASK it will be shown in bold (by default), anyway. However, what Perry wants to ASK do (and what I'd like to do as well:-) is to show the folder in a different ASK color if it *contains* messages, no matter if read or not. I see Perry's question has already been answered, but I am a bit confused here. I thought he used a READ filter, and wouldn't that mean that all message with that colour group are already read? -- Cheers, Thomas. The most precious thing we have is life. Yet it has absolutely no trade-in value. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.70.06 Qigong (Beta) under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Concrete example of creating READ filter and a question
Hello Perry, A reminder of what Perry Nelson typed on: Sunday, February 05, 2006 at 09:53:38 GMT -0500 PN Although I created the filter three times for the three accounts I PN have, I realized afterwards that I didn't need to do that. I could PN have simply selected the filter in one of the accounts and pressed PN CTRL-C, to copy it to the clipboard, and then gone to another account PN and opened the READ filter section and then pressed CTRL-V to paste PN the filter into that account too Just had a thought here that you could have just created this as a common filter. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.70.07 Qigong (Beta) On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
RegEx not perfect (yet)
Hello Bat-Folk! The RegEx we worked on seems to work but only sometimes as today this email (header excerpt) got thru: Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Linda A. Liar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: =?iso-8859-1?B?UG9wdWxhciBwaWxscyAtICQyLjk5L2Rvc2U=?= Here's the selective download KILL filter: BeginFilter Name: Bogus sale Active: 1 Source: \\Account\Inbox Target: \\Account\Inbox CopyFolder: none MainSet: (?!Real name) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actions: fkoDetectHeader AddGroups: DelGroups: ForwardTemplate: ConfirmTemplate: ReplyTemplate: FwdAddr: RedirectAddr: NewAddr: NewTemplate: ExtCmd: ExtFile: ExtractDir: ColourGroup: default AddAddrItems: DelAddrItems: HotKey: 0 IsOfColour: default SizeBigger: 0 SizeSmaller: 0 AgeOlder: 0 AgeNewer: 0 InAddrPos: 0 OutAddrPos: 0 InAddrGroups: NoAddrGroups: KillFile: KillMethod: 4 SaveTemplate: SndFile: SysSound: 0 SoundTime: 0:00-0:00 AllowTime: 0:00-0:00 EndFilter Any ideas? Thx mucho Richie G -- Beautiful Butterfly Displays http://FramedButterflyArt.com Random tagline: Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity. Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Concrete example of creating READ filter and a question
Hi Stuart, Sunday, February 5, 2006, 11:51:43 AM, you wrote: PN I could have simply selected the filter in one of the accounts and PN pressed CTRL-C, to copy it to the clipboard, and then gone to PN another account and opened the READ filter section and then pressed PN CTRL-V to paste the filter into that account too SC Just had a thought here that you could have just created this as a SC common filter. Thanks for the suggestion. I'll consider that in the future for other similar filters. I haven't used common filters before, but using them for this kind of filter would seem to make sense. As one of my taglines says ... There is always one more thing to learn about The Bat. -- Miguel A. Urech -- Regards, Perry Using The Bat! v3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Concrete example of creating READ filter and a question
Hi Stuart, Sunday, February 5, 2006, 11:51:43 AM, you wrote: SC Just had a thought here that you could have just created this as a SC common filter. To test this suggestion out, I copied the three filters I created (the one to manually mark the message as Reply Needed and UNREAD, the one to manually mark it as Generic Group and READ if I changed my mind, and the Replied filter that also sets the color group to Generic Group and READ automatically after I have replied) and pasted them into Common Filters. I then deleted them from each of the accounts. However, when I tried to use them, they didn't work. I then went back to the Common Filters and realized there is an additional tab in it called Share with ... in which I had to check each of the accounts to which I wanted each filter to apply. That produced the desired results. Again, thanks for the suggestion. Using this strategy results in having to create fewer filters. -- Regards, Perry Using The Bat! v3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: RegEx not perfect (yet)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sun, 5 Feb 2006, @ @ at 11:52:30 -0500, when rich gregory wrote: Hello Bat-Folk! The RegEx we worked on seems to work but only sometimes as today this email (header excerpt) got thru: Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Linda A. Liar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: =?iso-8859-1?B?UG9wdWxhciBwaWxscyAtICQyLjk5L2Rvc2U=?= We worked on Name address, at your own request, not on address. That's the reason why Linda Wily Liar got through this what we didn't work on. Here's the selective download KILL filter: BeginFilter Name: Bogus sale Active: 1 Source: \\Account\Inbox Target: \\Account\Inbox CopyFolder: none MainSet: (?!Real name) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actions: fkoDetectHeader AddGroups: DelGroups: ForwardTemplate: ConfirmTemplate: ReplyTemplate: FwdAddr: RedirectAddr: NewAddr: NewTemplate: ExtCmd: ExtFile: ExtractDir: ColourGroup: default AddAddrItems: DelAddrItems: HotKey: 0 IsOfColour: default SizeBigger: 0 SizeSmaller: 0 AgeOlder: 0 AgeNewer: 0 InAddrPos: 0 OutAddrPos: 0 InAddrGroups: NoAddrGroups: KillFile: KillMethod: 4 SaveTemplate: SndFile: SysSound: 0 SoundTime: 0:00-0:00 AllowTime: 0:00-0:00 EndFilter Dear Richie Gee, :unreal: Since we don't like Lindas Any Liers, this Selective Kicking Out filter kills any her attempt to comloonycate with us 12/7/24/1440/86400: BeginFilter Name: For Linda A. Liar Active: 1 Source: \\Account\Inbox Target: \\Account\Inbox CopyFolder: none MainSet: From: Linda A. Liar [EMAIL PROTECTED] MainSet: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actions: fkoDetectHeader AddGroups: DelGroups: ForwardTemplate: ConfirmTemplate: ReplyTemplate: FwdAddr: RedirectAddr: NewAddr: NewTemplate: ExtCmd: ExtFile: ExtractDir: ColourGroup: default AddAddrItems: DelAddrItems: HotKey: 0 IsOfColour: default SizeBigger: 0 SizeSmaller: 0 AgeOlder: 0 AgeNewer: 0 InAddrPos: 0 OutAddrPos: 0 InAddrGroups: NoAddrGroups: KillFile: KillMethod: 1 SaveTemplate: SndFile: SysSound: 0 SoundTime: 0:00-0:00 AllowTime: 0:00-0:00 EndFilter What she has offered this time? Enlargement again? (-: You could offer her a shrinkment in friendly return. - -- Mica PGP keys nestled at: http://blueness.port5.com/pgpkeys/ [Earth LOG: 522 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OSs: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium Windows XP(ee) Micro Lite Professional 1.6, and, for TB sometimes, Gentoo and Vector Linuxes via Wine... ~~~ For personal mail please use my address as it is *exactly* given in my From|Reply To field(s). ~~~ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEVAwUBQ+ZLqrSpHvHEUtv8AQMcfQgAnc5JiO5u5fqNaq4BOxLTyb0C4lmBhBaT 2zkPDiB+nbXKRNnfMP3mm8vQKXg1NuXv+if3001KUTurkgrN+sTRnfhTooXcmYSu uLK2TX03Eb9vknNrkuMLhfLbiEq5FhMOlDD4ZyCtTLcadsu6iJbzQRjmn4JG6VC7 dnusX4+vrexnNQXD3bZySv9oc08W4zNd8uhvJGAs7gM7L/sktuHdmM5jtWvnhQw8 7r6FJy+0d6BgA9pUXCYDJy2XAfS7cgHZ16pEQ+hT2v6BAp/jn13zGfWfP5JiMCAu E39ETRAJreRrQFSeEt500F262qSQyY71O8+7TDaw5mX+WjfNPOHvMg== =6hXT -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: RegEx not perfect (yet)
The RegEx we worked on seems to work but only sometimes as today this email (header excerpt) got thru: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MM We worked on Name address, at your own request, not on address. MM That's the reason why Linda Wily Liar got through this what we didn't MM work on. Sure, we worked on that! Don't you remember? ;) (OK, maybe you did all the coding work but I did spec out the job!) Actually, my original request for help DID mention that A) any name that does not = Real Name OR B) any name that is BLANK should be killed. The examples I gave were something like this: Good email:Real Name [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bad email :Incorrect Name [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bad email :[EMAIL PROTECTED] In the above example of a spam that did make it thru the name field was blank. Actually now I am seeing emails come in with random characters added as part of the good address such as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Very distressing! I wonder (Batters) what more we can do! MM What she has offered this time? Enlargement again? (-: You could offer MM her a shrinkment in friendly return. Wouldn't it be more polite to offer my enlargement to her in return? (Oh, did I say that out loud?) Thank you all Richie G -- Beautiful Butterfly Displays http://FramedButterflyArt.com Random tagline: Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: RegEx not perfect (yet)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sun, 5 Feb 2006, @ @ at 15:04:17 -0500, when rich gregory wrote: Sure, we worked on that! Don't you remember? ;) Could I forget it? You were silent for a while and I already wanted to ask you how it goes with the last killer-filter. I wondered if you had wrecked more mails due to some typo/bad retyping then you wished to... (OK, maybe you did all the coding work but I did spec out the job!) You're decently good too, in specifying the jobs out. Problem is with those knowing not what they want. Polyvalent thinkers. Actually, my original request for help DID mention that Yes I remember this request, it was interesting, and I did already give you one very good solution, but...will be that you are not very willing, or at least are hesitant, to change a bit some routines...okay, that's not a problem, you will have just to have more filters/work to do then. Let us see... A) any name that does not = Real Name OR B) any name that is BLANK should be killed. The examples I gave were something like this: Good email:Real Name [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bad email :Incorrect Name [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bad email :[EMAIL PROTECTED] In the above example of a spam that did make it thru the name field was blank. Yep. Okay... Well, nothing then, you just will have to add another filter which will destroy yet on server all what is not addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can do it by treating entire header part, with _no_ specific TO, CC etc. field. It means, any message which doesn't have address [EMAIL PROTECTED] in its header part will be exterminated from server (the filter is in the flat forefootnote).[1] Except something like this... Actually now I am seeing emails come in with random characters added as part of the good address such as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...hmmm... Very distressing! I wonder (Batters) what more we can do! ...yes, purpose of existence of spammers is to annoy you in order to be destroyed. Basically those are suicides lacking necessary courage. I will give you my opinion/solution these days, if you in the mean time don't get something effective already. MM What she has offered this time? Enlargement again? (-: You could offer MM her a shrinkment in friendly return. Wouldn't it be more polite to offer my enlargement to her in return? I didn't get any spam for many moons and few sun eclipses now, and today I passed through one of them manually to see how it looks. The old same story. I think the shrinkment would be enough. (Oh, did I say that out loud?) More polite would be something which wouldn't be polite to say it aloud here. (-: ___ [1] BeginFilter Name: For Linda A. Liar 2 Active: 1 Source: \\Account\Inbox Target: \\Account\Inbox CopyFolder: none MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actions: fkoDetectHeader AddGroups: DelGroups: ForwardTemplate: ConfirmTemplate: ReplyTemplate: FwdAddr: RedirectAddr: NewAddr: NewTemplate: ExtCmd: ExtFile: ExtractDir: ColourGroup: default AddAddrItems: DelAddrItems: HotKey: 0 IsOfColour: default SizeBigger: 0 SizeSmaller: 0 AgeOlder: 0 AgeNewer: 0 InAddrPos: 0 OutAddrPos: 0 InAddrGroups: NoAddrGroups: KillFile: KillMethod: 0 SaveTemplate: SndFile: SysSound: 0 SoundTime: 0:00-0:00 AllowTime: 0:00-0:00 EndFilter - -- Mica PGP keys nestled at: http://blueness.port5.com/pgpkeys/ [Earth LOG: 522 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OSs: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium Windows XP(ee) Micro Lite Professional 1.6, and, for TB sometimes, Gentoo and Vector Linuxes via Wine... ~~~ For personal mail please use my address as it is *exactly* given in my From|Reply To field(s). ~~~ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEVAwUBQ+ZtsbSpHvHEUtv8AQOs1Qf9GVPoliCLByHvkhYs72m5GOVs/0N1n7CL X16dcASMAH9hI3qqHYW9afjz48tHp6oUq1fAZ8BtCEqZf8b1CmIsayYZb1dOlFFy nRDJX9EhCVfREmaqKGriwJybVb/M/GGC0RK3AGPIY76zWJArvg7r4aZZSL3S0J8w LmMTcobDzvPyw47gK/SLHIPtZfXOiYCxatyMdwz+xKmWZRWIzpstZDJwZFuMULOj oT113F5GgflQxLjsypp8wiSeyPtSuDrATCn9tBbdHN7kRpJQP4TV8ysUGbssey6p 6nfoYfL9tmt6FFLwmaB5BLViSI4NC3ho09574w324qdNMkrLqHZSWQ== =E0nC -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: IMAP setup-message bodies not being downloaded
Hello Stuart TBUDL, Monday, February 6, 2006, 1:52:25 AM, you wrote: S Hello SL, S A reminder of what SL typed on: S Sunday, February 05, 2006 at 17:17:57 GMT +1100 S Hello tbudl, S I can't figure out why The Bat no longer is downloading message bodies S for my IMAP account. I am not sure if this started happening when I S upgraded from Home to Pro (not sure). (...although it worked fine...I S think...when I tried Voyager...) S In 'IMAP Fine Tune', I have 'retrieve message structures...' enabled. S In 'Manage IMAP Folders' , I have sync mode set to Full Messages/All S Messages' and I have tried 'New Messages' as well. SNIPOLA S It is working well here for me (home and pro). These are the settings S I would check as well. S Just noticed you are using 3.65.03, which is the official release S version, I think. The current beta 3.70.07 is now working correctly S with IMAP syncing and is the best version I have ever had for IMAP. S There are still some problems, but message downloading seems to be S fixed. Hmm...I am now in the Voyager...and IMAP...with the same settings as in Pro ver 3.65.03 on my hard drive is doing the same thing...ie not downloading message bodies(unless I click on the message) On another matter, I note that the latest/current version of Voyager (which basically is a type of the professional version) is 3.65.02 (not 3.65.03) Later I might see if I can find the the beta version (3.70.07???) and try that... -- Thanks, Stephenmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8:49 AM Monday, 6 February 2006 Using The Bat! E-mail client ver 3.65.02 (Pro/Voyager...current official version). Win XP Serv Pack 2 etc... Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: RegEx not perfect (yet)
Sure, we worked on that! Don't you remember? ;) MM Could I forget it? You were silent for a while and I already wanted to MM ask you how it goes with the last killer-filter. I wondered if you had MM wrecked more mails due to some typo/bad retyping then you wished to... No, a family emergency has been / continues to take all my time. It continues to keep my mind elsewhere. :( Actually, my original request for help DID mention that MM Yes I remember this request, it was interesting, and I did already MM give you one very good solution, but...will be that you are not MM very willing, or at least are hesitant, to change a bit some MM routines... okay, that's not a problem, you will have just to have MM more filters/work to do then. Let us see... I am not understanding this paragraph too well... I am indeed open to doing what I must (or thought I was!) but I do not remember any solution other than: (?!Real Name) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Which we now know does not work entirely. If I remember correctly I was wondering if I would need more than 1 filter... What was odd was that it seemed to do as hoped in my tests! A) any NAME that does not = Real Name -- OR B) any NAME that is BLANK-- Should be killed MM Yep. Okay... Well, nothing then, you just will have to add another MM filter which will destroy yet on server all what is not addressed to MM [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can do it by treating entire MM header part, with _no_ specific TO, CC etc. field. MM It means, any message which doesn't have address MM [EMAIL PROTECTED] in its header part will be MM exterminated from server (the filter is in the flat forefootnote).[1] I am embarrassed to say I do not understand what you are saying here. (As I said, my mind is very much elsewhere these days.) The filter below I do not understand either. Can you please tell me exactly what it is to do? All can see (I think I understand) is that it looks for ANY mail with [EMAIL PROTECTED] somewhere in the header... Then what does it do??? (fkoDetectHeader??) Thank you very much Rich MM BeginFilter MM Name: For Linda A. Liar 2 MM Active: 1 MM Source: \\Account\Inbox MM Target: \\Account\Inbox MM CopyFolder: none MM MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MM Actions: fkoDetectHeader MM AddGroups: MM DelGroups: MM ForwardTemplate: MM ConfirmTemplate: MM ReplyTemplate: MM FwdAddr: MM RedirectAddr: MM NewAddr: MM NewTemplate: MM ExtCmd: MM ExtFile: MM ExtractDir: MM ColourGroup: default MM AddAddrItems: MM DelAddrItems: MM HotKey: 0 MM IsOfColour: default MM SizeBigger: 0 MM SizeSmaller: 0 MM AgeOlder: 0 MM AgeNewer: 0 MM InAddrPos: 0 MM OutAddrPos: 0 MM InAddrGroups: MM NoAddrGroups: MM KillFile: MM KillMethod: 0 MM SaveTemplate: MM SndFile: MM SysSound: 0 MM SoundTime: 0:00-0:00 MM AllowTime: 0:00-0:00 MM EndFilter -- Beautiful Butterfly Displays http://FramedButterflyArt.com Random tagline: You will not remember the words of your enemies, only the silence of your friends. Martin Luther King Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
