RE: Licence unhappiness?
The Bat! is a great client and if you were happy enough with it to buy it then I don't think you have wasted your money. However I have moved from TB! to Outlook 2003 with Nelson Email Organiser and I am loving it. It is an amazing bit of software :) -- Morgan Pugh E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.mpugh.co.uk PGP Key @ http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryan Anderson Sent: 03 September 2004 16:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Licence unhappiness? Well - having been using The Bat! for a bit longer than was strictly legal I finally decided to buy it and give something back to the fine people who develop it. Butwhat has happened? I buy the software, install it and sign up to the mailing list only to discover dissent in the rankswhat is the score with the licence and why are so many people unhapy with the new version? Have I made a guff in deciding to stay away from Outlook and stay with/invest in The Bat!? Bryan Anderson. Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Migrated to Outlook 2003
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Well last night I decided I would install the copy of Outlook 2003 I got with my PocketPC. I'm not really sure why I decided to I just did. After a fight with several programs I found a [free and very easy] way to import my mail from The Bat! To Outlook while keeping the full folder structure. For those who might be interested here is how I did it... 1. Created a folder on my desktop called TBMAIL and mirror my folder setup in TB! in this folder. This was the longest task however as I have a very simple folder layout (why have a complex one with such a powerful search system in TB! ?) it was pretty easy to do. For those interested in how I store my mail I will put a little bit of info about it at the bottom of this post. 2. I then went into each folder in TB! and selected all of the mail in the folder (Ctrl+A) then selected Tools - Export Messages - Message Files (.EML) and selected the appropriate folder to export them to. I did this for each folder including Sent Items, Trash, etc. 3. Loaded Outlook Express and again created the folder structure in there (again this was annoying but not awful as I have a simple folder setup. 4. I then selected all of the mail in each folder in Explorer and just dragged them into the appropriate folder in Outlook Express. They automatically import keeping all of the correct settings (date, etc.). I did this for each folder. 5. Loaded Outlook 2003 and selected to import mail fom Outlook Express and everything was imported without a single lost mail :) If you have a lot of folders this will take a while. As I have said already my folder setup was very simple. All I do is have a root folder for each year and then sub-folders for each month (January, February, etc.). Then if an email arrives in September I just move it to the September folder. Pretty simple and very, very, very easy and fast to find what I am looking for. I use colour groups to label email however I never used it all that much so not having this option in Outlook should not be an issue (for me at least). The only issue I have found with Outlook 2003 is that I can't order the folders how I want. It automatically sorts them alphabetically which is a little annoying but easy to get around by putting the month's number from 01 to 12 at the start. So I have managed to successfully migrate from TB! to Outlook 2003! I hope anyone else planning on doing the same has such an easy job as I did. In all it took me 7 minutes to create all the folders and import the e-mail into Outlook Express and then Outlook 2003. As I said if you have a very complex folder setup it will take longer but it isn't an impossible task and it shouldn't take you more than an hour no matter how complex your setup is. Hope this post helps some people. I know I said I was going to stick with TB! But I thought why spend money when I have Outlook 2003 just sitting there? Also I like the way I can sync my e-mail with my PocketPC now rather than have to download them in Pocket Outlook as well as TB! and then using the mail on server feature to remove the messages manually. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me directly. Thanks to all on this DL for all of the help you have given me while I have been a member of TBUDL which has been a long time even though I have been on and off the DL a few times. Cheers and all the best in the future to Ritlabs. I hope that in the future I will use TB! again, perhaps at version 4 (so September 2005 yeah ;) ) - -- Morgan Pugh E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.mpugh.co.uk PGP Key @ http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 8.1 Comment: Key at http://www.mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc iQIVAwUBQTd0Yyz7FTt7FlahAQLvHg/9E0aHXKkZ1hgLrO5QRaFr0GW+eN2sqHDK FO46LtWy+CIJqakUNIBf/WK3S/YGx7y6jtCVKAO5CGTT4IKOZ/A5WAeKFE0RQeFD R2EVF3LxjoV5TrqYYDrrmvVTx7OR9HYPlO5Z+qzFGpSlZDRhLH8FicMv/1jWEW63 aXAQmVJfFEB1TQi+0OeR+eLWosNx6d79/kAUjo+xBf9B11JDDnbjmapl4D9Q8Rf5 7gCUQaSpemu7KgjHsmea1yTpVMgfw5C06xBF6+6Pwy0fcCYsca3wNod0jSOP8lxf YgAd1IunR522mS8DND6kFAUhlPhmOFDTERAcJKg+919llbhArldBRuLztbeoNiMI YVa5vA0JCKnRAkebIkCanCl3iut5IGrVkP8rnH/ALaUYVSvKq4DwjAa477R5S8tR VSdFpgdM9nOUl7uAhf5qm5JSB+GG+vzaJmTljECwkfWAzsRPR17JUyJyXaC+2rDU 5iM5sOGNcKJof9TABYDCHWGS48cU/UT9j7A2hHtERgOIW9UYchLc8VcYBzKzuads rKuijD1euJNpuvF/OIdksT5lFJze/xPT9EyM+DDb8LVHI7yuoX/FMV8D1CXAYPPk vyvUcfW89BC/a1sutaag4d17cPpRe+To8nBfDrjpdSNqy6+lykcVGvJpsis3unDr lGnFYqJaLe8= =+D19 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Version3 ?!
Hi TBUDL, I woke up this morning to see an e-mail from Ritlabs saying version 3 of TB! is available. I am a little shocked at this. It took them several years to make TB!2 and now about 1 year after TB!2 was released they release TB!3. I can't really see any major differences between TB!2 and TB!3 to be honest. Also I can't find any information on what is different between TB!3 Home and TB!3 Pro other than a few MB in the filesize. Please someone help me! -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Version3 ?!
Hi John, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 10:43:48 AM, you wrote: JP Hi Morgan, JP On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 10:39:22 [GMT+0100] (which was 19:39:22 Australian JP Eastern Time) you wrote: I can't really see any major differences between TB!2 and TB!3 to be honest. Also I can't find any information on what is different between TB!3 Home and TB!3 Pro other than a few MB in the filesize. JP That is something we would all like to know! I am very disappointed with TB!3. I can't find anything that wasn't in the 2.13 beta. Anyway a jump for 2.12 to 3.x is pretty impressive, you would think loads of new features would have been added but I can't find them. All i can see is an ugly UI. I think I will stick with 2.12 and look for another client :( I guess September 1st 2004 was the day they destroyed The Bat! :( R.I.P -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: [News] TheBat! 3.0 new version announcement **SPAM** **SPAM P2Pplugin BODY**
Hi Cory, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 10:57:47 AM, you wrote: C On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 17:26:07 +1000, John Phillips C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Bat! 3.0 has taken the developers a year of work in close contact with users to achieve their goals. C I've received this annoucement too. BULLSHIT!! Hey, RitLabs, you hear C that? BULLSHIT!! C Most annoying bugs in (basic) mail protocol functionality as reported C for v1 *and* v2 are still in, and certainly others will be introduced. C And now you want us to improve your cash flow? Forget it, not me!! :( Looks like im not the only person to think like this. I am seriously thinking of installing Outlook 2003. It is a very good client (have to use it at work) and is pretty damn secure these days. TB! is just a huge let down now :( I hope Ritlabs go bust, nobody should pay for TB!3, it just isn't worth the money. -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Filtering Question
Hi tbudl, I am trying out TB!3 to see what it is like (as you all know I am not very happy with it). I am stuck with this new filtering system. I want to make a filter to auto move all of the message on TBUDL. Personally I preferred the old system however others are saying that this new system will be much better. Lets see how much better. -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: [News] TheBat! 3.0 new version announcement **SPAM** **SPAMP2Pplugin BODY**
Hi MAU, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:25:03 PM, you wrote: M Hello Martyn, TB! is just a huge let down now :( I hope Ritlabs go bust, nobody should pay for TB!3, it just isn't worth the money. I think that's a bit harsh - I wouldn't wish anybody to be unemployed. People do have the choice whether or not to buy it - the upgrade is not being forced down anybody's throats. M I fully agree with you. And it also shows a complete lack of respect for M those of us who, after all and aside of other issues, think the upgrade M is worth the money it costs. Sorry if I offended anyone. I didn't mean to but you have to understand where I am coming from? Ritlabs are pretty much screwing over all its users. I bought both V1 and V2 and I don't think that anything added in V3 warrants it being a major upgrade from V2. Perhaps the problem was how Ritlabs announced this? I think they should have put an announcement on there site for the past month or so, then it wouldn't be such a big shock. Also they should have called 2.13 beta the 3.0 beta to avoid confusion. Also Ritlabs really need to improve there support. The e-mail address they supply with TB! ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has never worked for me since V1 yet they still use it as the official contact from in the program. It isn't all that hard to have decent support. Get just one person who knows the program inside out and pay them to reply to emails all day. Other companies manage to do it just fine so I don't know why Ritlabs cant! -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Filtering Question
Hi MAU, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:28:36 PM, you wrote: M Hello Morgan, I am stuck with this new filtering system. I want to make a filter to auto move all of the message on TBUDL. Personally I preferred the old system however others are saying that this new system will be much better. Lets see how much better. M With NFS you should be able to do whatever you did with OFS and much M more. What do you really mean by a filter to auto move all of the M message on TBUDL? Actually, what I don't get is what you mean by auto M move. In the email I got when joining TBUDL it says quote Set up a filter for incoming mail which looks for Strings Location Presence Reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Kludges Yes Options: Regular expressions (Checked). /quote How do I do this in the NFS? I can't find all the options that were in OFS. Maybe I am just being stupid? Is there any way to use the OFS again? I preferred it. -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: v3.0 b1
Hi Alexander, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 1:40:10 PM, you wrote: ASK On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 20:01:38 +0800, M i c C u l l e n [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASK wrote: The real problem here is, as ever, the complete lack of meaningful communication from Ritlabs. ASK Makes me wonder how a company selling email products can't handle it... ASK :-) I mean... I subscribed to their newsletter or announce mailinglist or ASK whatever it was called when I bought v1.62r, and did so again when I ASK upgraded to v2. The only mail I ever got was an advertisement for their ASK SecureDisk product. ASK who *has* the information? Did beta testers know that everything in ASK v2.13beta would turn into a new v3? I get the feeling they just decided the other day to change it to v3 to get some extra cash. It didn't seem planned at all. -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Filtering Question
Hi MAU, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:59:41 PM, you wrote: M Hello Morgan, quote Set up a filter for incoming mail which looks for Strings Location Presence Reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Kludges Yes Options: Regular expressions (Checked). /quote How do I do this in the NFS? I can't find all the options that were in OFS. Maybe I am just being stupid? M If you had that filter in OFS when you upgraded to v3.0 it should have M been automatically converted to something like: M Header match Reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] M And it should work, but I haven't tried it. M I try to get away from Regex as much as I can (also did with OFS). So, M what I would really do (and have done for some other filters) in which M you want to use the 'Reply-To' header field is is changing the filter M to: M Header field Reply-To contains [EMAIL PROTECTED] M This last form I know it works. Worked a charm thank you :) -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: What's the diff....
Hi Marck, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 1:59:15 PM, you wrote: MDP Dear Jim, MDP @1-Sep-2004, 03:34 -0400 (01-Sep 08:34 UK time) Jim Dever [JD] in MDP mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: JD Ok people... JD What's the feature difference between The Bat! Pro and The Bat! Home? MDP ,--/ From a RITlabs mailing I got earlier \-- MDP What are the differences between Home and Professional package: MDP Professional version supports hardware authentication and biometrics, and will soon MDP support on-the-fly encryption of the message base, MDP configuration files and address MDP books, thus it will do everything that SecureBat! MDP (http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/securebat/) does. MDP Professional version does also MDP have the multilingual interface and spell checker MDP dictionaries incorporated into the MDP installation package. For the home version, these language files have to be MDP downloaded separately. MDP `--\ End /-- So basically they are killing of SecureBat. Not a bad idea. So basically I only need the Home Edition as I do not care for biometric security, etc. The way I read it is that Home Edition is The Bat! and Professional Edition is SecureBat. Yes? -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc The Bat! 3.0 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Change of heart
Hi The Bat! User DL, Well I just installed every e-mail I could find and have spent the past 5 hours testing them all out. I have not found one that is as good as TB! I have also been talking to a friend of mine who is currently using a trial copy TB! after I told him to give it a try and he said something which really made me think. What he said was why am I complaining about £20 (or so) when TB! is such a good client? I could spend £100 (approx.) on Outlook, or spend £20 or so on a lesser client. Yes Ritlabs were idiots in how they handled this but instead of having a go at them and all of us throwing our toys out of the pram. We need to explain to Ritlabs what upset us so that they can better deal with things in the future. Therefore I have made the radical decision to buy TB!3. I would rather pay for a product I love that buy another product just because of some poor communication from Ritlabs. I hope that what I have said makes sense to others as well. I am glad my friend is such a logical thinker :) The 50% discount isn't all that bad, more than most companies offer (most companies offer 20-30% if you look around). I will try it out for the remainder of my trial but I plan to buy V3 when my trial is over :) -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc The Bat! 3.0 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Refund Claim
Hi Mark, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 2:35:24 PM, you wrote: MP Hello John, MP Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 1:17:18 PM, you wrote: That being said, I must say that as far as the law is concerned, you won't get far with this argument. Sorry. JP Depends what country he is in. MP Well, to start with, fill me in on the Australian situation. How much time MP (after buying things or services) does a consumer have to claim a refund? MP 1 year (would be very generous), a month, 10 days? MP And, is there really a basis for granting such a request? Does he have a MP written contract in which is stated that specified bugs would be solved? In the UK you have 14 days however companies that offer a trial version for at least 14 days (which Ritlabs does with a 30 day trial) means they do not have to offer any refunds as the user is able to use the product to its full capacity before buying it. As for what Ritlabs said they would do feature wise in TB! it depends if it was a true contract or just features they are planning on adding/fixing. I am not a lawyer so this might not be 100% but I highly doubt you would be entitled to any sort of refund now. Just stick with V2 if you are unhappy. It is a great client and nobody is forcing you to upgrade to V3 yet just, however if you do you will get a nice 50% discount. -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc The Bat! 3.0 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: [thebat] Re: v3.0 b1
Hi Mark, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 2:53:52 PM, you wrote: MP Hello M, MP Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 1:18:01 PM, you wrote: Mark Does it still uses loads of memory for doing practically nothing? :-) MicCullen But if it's already your calendar because it syncs with yer Palm... MP Must be you didn't try Time Chaos (that does sync too)! :-) I wish it were possible to sync my TB! calander with a portable device (I have a Pocket PC so there is probably no chance in hell but I would gladly switch to a Palm if I could sync with TB!). Does anyone know if this is possible? Sorry for the thread hijack :/ -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc The Bat! 3.0 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: v3.0 b1
Hi Chris, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 1:52:17 PM, you wrote: As a new user who bought my v2 licence on 20th August, try *very* annoyed. C Yeah, I know how you feel Mike - I only got my licence on the C 6th of August myself. I found out about the v2.13 beta on BetaNews, C was looking forward to the final (due to apparently being able to C customize the toolbar). I followed it through from v2.13 Beta 1, C Beta 2 etc, all the way up to Beta 8 (I wasn't a tester, I was just C watching out for the new features/fixes in each version). Then, a C day or two ago, I got a message from BetaNews (I signed up my email C to get notification of new versions of some programs, including The C Bat!), stating that The Bat! v3.0 Beta 1 had been released. I C couldn't believe it at first, but when I checked the site, I found C out it was true. Ritlabs had dumped the v2.13 Beta, gone straight C to a v3.0 Beta. Now I read that the final version is due out today, C after only one day or so of testing. Add on to that the fact that a C whole new licence is required to be bought to register v3, to say C that I am angry at Ritlabs is a major understatement (and I will C not be paying to upgrade to v3.0). C -- C Chris C C Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: C http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html I am sure Ritlabs will give users who purchased in the past month or two free upgrade to V3. If they don't it is a disgusting attitude for a company. They will not be doing themselves any favours. -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc Using TB! 3.0 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Help file in V3 is still the V2 help file!
Hi The Bat! User DL, Just checked the help and it is all about whats new in Version 2 heh. -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc Using TB! 3.0 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: BayesIT Macros
Hi Michael, Monday, August 2, 2004, 7:23:00 PM, you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings All, According to the BayesIT help, the following macros are included in the latest version: %STATSPAMLETTERS(hours) %STATSPAMTRAFFIC(hours) %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(hours) %STATNONSPAMTRAFFIC(hours) %STATSPAMERLETTERS(hours) %STATSPAMERTRAFFIC(hours) %STATNONSPAMERLETTERS(hours) %STATNONSPAMERTRAFFIC(hours) They return numbers. What do the numbers mean? I have often wondered this as well. -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Compressing folders
Hi Thomas, Friday, July 30, 2004, 6:17:29 PM, you wrote: Friday, July 30, 2004, 7:08:33 PM, you wrote: [snip, snip] ASK PS: forgive me, I can't resist... is that really your true name? Mr. ASK Andersson? :-) It sure is! First time I saw the movie I laughed loudly in the cinema. Do I need to mention that I was the only one laughing... Didn't think so... :-) Thanks for explaining compression! Cheers /Thomas Andersson aka Neo --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0431-2, 2004-07-29 Tested on: 2004-07-30 19:17:31 avast! is copyright (c) 2000-2003 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html OT You are the one :-| -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
The Bat! 2.12.00 and Exchange 2000 Server (e-mail and address book)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi TBUDL, I work at Xerox UK and like most large companies we use Exchange Server for corporate e-mail and Outlook (XP) as the client. As I had a spare few minutes today waiting for some files to copy I decided to download and install the latest version of TB! to try out the Exchange Server support (MAPI). Setting up e-mail was very easy which I was happy about however I had some issues with the global address book. This is why I am posting this :) I tried searching Google however it didn't turn up much which was a shame. The problem I was having was that I could not get a complete listing from the server. I worked out that if I searched for somebody e.g. 'Pugh, Morgan' w/o the quotes it would find me no problem however it would not automatically download the whole address book which was what I wanted. Does anyone know if it is possible to download the whole address book and then just every now and then do a sync or something similar? I would love to be able to use TB! at work as well as at home (more money for RitLabs as well!). Is the problem just that TB! only supports LDAP and not the Exchange Address Book system? That seems a little strange as, IIRC, the Exchange address book uses MAPI also. Has anyone else managed to get the whole address book from an exchange server in TB! ? TIA to all who reply :) - -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2 Comment: Key at http://www.mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc iQIVAwUBQQfOPSz7FTt7FlahAQKrGRAApt1qS5ZlgZrafs2QvLYMbJLDzbmvJ0Ck xNcJbwiyljCDSfiv+FXRZTuWS8+KPWK/xS6lIjCYaIB/tTTzSifS2S9/rWtsNZk2 z3ZwP0z12Jpcc/3EkOstmANIdc30z7tJz+TkbrAJ+4YrREyDiaZaOOMgJLeOQDPK ZZBSdt2TEGp0xfb817DBNUetzGHeIyvt0EZUWyhqgUOU3nS1Hgv2nVMxVuelLRTW ugOpsPjAhRqfu+2XoKOdBw+jTRuJe4EhGlGVYLcyEiyFNsANrMxixgtgcsaUtBSa g/gclFB6Qf9hJfg9HUMdaAVEfiUQOVi46ZNLew0TlKaS/D+6r6c7cb0R0Xi7ReBl /pBpSXv/+HCQpNwqzldBzuV02nFXa5y+ybCk+LKXjBPL7cyHTLHI+Q0Cs7jXw2bC ybKF147P/FHxG05/+oJe2FRwHN95Vk+GpUEJf5C+O1JF2YFgZI4rshU4fukCNsV2 lyWot6nkhkb9c9bj9KJz5W+VetJ3Ij52VB+/PBUe1lvMWcCc0sq4Z8ubu6V153Ot mSb8EBdbO2hhe0KEs/w2cwjcXiLYCM+LfjZEuCy4whpybMO/yIA6NUOOnopLwJq5 ngs64iS78+zSjNeEz6ookFgnc1Ic6/pI2YDMXxTh3j0VIstRLha5hLb14il873+J vfRovZvJvQA= =YoRX -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Check Mail for All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Anne, Friday, July 16, 2004, 12:50:38 AM, you wrote: Thursday, July 15, 2004, 10:28:01 PM, Ben wrote: B You could just press Alt-F2 or F11 :) F11 is good enough for now however I would love to be able to make it so I can click the button (not have to click on the arrow and then click Check for all mail as that is annoying. Cheers Anne :) - -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 8.1 Comment: Key at http://www.mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc iQIVAwUBQPfvgSz7FTt7FlahAQLMgQ/+MmoLiRsvh5N7wogDOgv4bVEWjgBd1VYh YNkOR8K5IHWauXzShkGGS8ASWNi72QjcIsdQjk6nbuLF3laJE2UIpi7S9wzOJUm7 WsEHVSQgd/5e/bcL4JvfxKEW5dMQ0DEbyJ96aLa9nwS8hWtoGmjRu1dLup68tuaP syHt7/iIVItf4Mgc8S/5qBTpb7fBTbGqqNv+0YjYpXMQ0rldijZc0Ohy8S05VdUJ e+3xK369uBeR3dKLLHaoYwoSuFG4ZgNwNM2mQUUzMlQS95kV6rj9Ip/tNOUq2BQE y0Add9yGTjemTRLeqjCe0G0ZaMacJfvMLDVl5RFNSG8b9WWSlP4pazriFy7IhFzJ UVBqHwCR7ZZp+vvrPR4Oo0XeQKzeiHJDd338OcDpcxrXEOTN0BJwGTPbuiP4CUoQ LFsafqCJJ3a0mR96+h0OuPxWofTnxl/tanVT5enR5AY4NlFejB1jqLy0ZFDS9AMA l8gswbY72ESCk2sxKg0YqbSg5osaqykcwAEx95WREcnyeHirxwGmHS/UKhGgIuoy QjmZohcNHVXng3sXvEiHgvGnyXbfOGVxtF4FDRm9K1zeNvQom6JJHuhC/LNN8TSb YdInefy3ZQNxvy+kGYktWI5Za3LEnTYf7xLC3haYpERkhQXyoERkVXCqgukyqIs8 IaU4SYVNjhQ= =VTZf -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Check Mail for All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi TBUDL, I was wondering if it is possible to make it so that when I click on the Get New Mail button it checks mail for ALL accounts not just the active one? I am sure this has been asked before and I apologize if it is answered somewhere it is just that I have not been able to find an answer anywhere. - -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2 Comment: Key at http://www.mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc; iQIVAwUBQPb1yiz7FTt7FlahAQI7CA//Wu9oa/lMz+5FxPrdRuK4z8tt0OSOuxYD H+dJs9oRk1cRdZkONqoyvOzSQLS7qU/7pdA/l/ml33Z+5VKaFCURrYlJP3/V9Umq w3gvyGeNC4x6RlEf5ewkCDWeQCirqq86eSH830/NazvrVlkI3ohcjoRA6KQec7kX efKLlcxzPsgBKutdCa08oQGwGphsrcyz9LviBg81BnnxYjiZeG+64Z9iuGqG//ZQ EnsMjWaCtosWDcQOV5fejrqzhHDtd8ucYlv8EjPm2Nbeb7MHgCD4ZkO7S+muvxht 3ju9HtSnABEJ4Yc7sSc+dz7QoLLJKYEFzRYS+mEyi1qLSLdWju7nML7hqMpCZ5Ui 2aZzjWrDsqoA1MHS5TNTTs7ImG8Cc9eWpfjX364j50jbSO6gu5Y0D8M1MJiYdYUy +dBexKCxrq/W977VkbdUWqkXaLtNFqb+1X929h4mnQSiPjpO+iWibbdRy4fGoHaF paTPpAG5qAj0l+38M1Mlb74/NJHmAZpQDf8EvTYC7KJ+P9IgGe2jVwn17N/duqL1 iFZPl6Iu9i8JQmNSl51kra1bwTfuHtsf9OqUWjfhVZgL79mj8exhqAxfwEx/ACp/ tdPpIxxZX2Q8UofKuL4pBjV9tavsndzZGetVEaSiMuH+ySm37SUEwLiYr8ES3IaR mOS7P8P2U3M= =DPtU -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Check Mail for All
Hi subscriber2list, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 10:30:40 PM, you wrote: Hello Morgan, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 5:23:26 PM, you wrote: snip MP I was wondering if it is possible to make it so that when I click on MP the Get New Mail button it checks mail for ALL accounts not just MP the active one? MP I am sure this has been asked before and I apologize if it is MP answered somewhere it is just that I have not been able to find an MP answer anywhere. I believe Alt + F2 will do that. Yes Alt + F2 will do it but is there anyway I can make it so the button does it? -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Check Mail for All
Hi Ben, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 10:36:24 PM, you wrote: Howdy Ben, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 10:28:01 PM, Ben wrotened: Ben Howdy Morgan, Ben Thursday, July 15, 2004, 10:23:26 PM, Morgan wrotened: MP I was wondering if it is possible to make it so that when I MP click on the Get New Mail button it checks mail for ALL MP accounts not just the active one? MP I am sure this has been asked before and I apologize if it is MP answered somewhere it is just that I have not been able to find an MP answer anywhere. Ben You could just press Alt-F2 or hold shift and click Yeah I want to make it so that it does that but when I just click it! I can't seem to find an option to swap the config over. -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
