Re: template adressbook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Allie, On 29 Dec 2001 at 21:23:04 -0500, Allie C Martin [ACM] wrote concerning 'template adressbook': ACM Your signature verified as bad again when tested with TB!'s fixed ACM width font viewer. Over here his signature verifies valid with TB! fixed with font viewer and with the RTF viewer. - -- Best regards, David ** Why doesn't DOS ever say Excellent command or filename! ** [TB! 1.54 Beta/19] [Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2] [Running on a Celeron 800@1176 256 Mb RAM] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Build 06 Comment: PGPKeys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_PGP_key iQA/AwUBPC2PGVK9yf5+yp9NEQIIjACfe7agisNnPymfYIQpAeIinMo/OeEAn3nx cy5QGZp5LdHV1QBOQe0+YeP2 =UF0Y -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: template adressbook
On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 04:09:29 +0100, Luc [L] graced us with these comments: ... L Strange, nothing changed since the last time you checked :-( L Is this better now ? It's better now. Signature made 12/28/01 21:09:17 using DSA key ID 85840713 Good signature from Luc Knaepkens [EMAIL PROTECTED] A good thing to do is to construct your signature in an editor that gives you the column and line position of your cursor. In this way you don't exceed the character limit per line for your signature. You can also output your signatures and see what they look like in terms of line length before using them. -- | ©Allie Martin - Moderator o|--- | TB! v1.54 Beta/19 WinXP Home PGPKey - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=PGPPubKey1 ¯¯ -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: template adressbook
On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 11:38:29 +0100, David Van Zuijlekom [DVZ] wrote these comments: ... DVZ Over here his signature verifies valid with TB! fixed with font DVZ viewer and with the RTF viewer. It may verify for some while it will not verify for others. The problem here is that some of his signature lines were long. In the message in question, three lines in his signature were 103 characters long, while another was 143 characters long. If you have auto-wrap toggled on in the editor settings, the fixed width viewer will window wrap lines that exceed its window width. My preview window width, at its present size, will accommodate lines with up to 100 characters without wrapping. Since his tagline was 143 characters, it window wrapped and the signature was broken. Window wrapping in the fixed width viewer equals the insertion of hard returns at each window wrap point, and this breaks the signature when checked with PGP Tray or GnuPG Shell. If you copy and paste the text to another window, you'll see what I mean. The window wrapping that TB! did is preserved. OTOH, the RTFV does soft wrapping like most other viewers. Checking with PGP Tray or GPG Shell therefore gives a good signature. After all I've written, if you check the signature using the PGP Plugin, then the check will show up a good signature, no matter whether or not you're using the RTFV or FWFV. I assume you did the signature check using the PGP plug-in? I was doing the checks with GPG Shell. -- | ©Allie Martin - Moderator o|--- | TB! v1.54 Beta/19 WinXP Home PGPKey - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=PGPPubKey1 ¯¯ -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: template adressbook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Allie, On 29 Dec 2001 at 07:00:53 -0500, Allie C Martin [ACM] wrote concerning 'template adressbook': ... ACM After all I've written, if you check the signature using the PGP ACM Plugin, then the check will show up a good signature, no matter ACM whether or not you're using the RTFV or FWFV. I assume you did ACM the signature check using the PGP plug-in? I was doing the checks ACM with GPG Shell. Yes I was using the PGP plug-in and I was reading the message in folder view with maximised view. So TB! didn't wrap the long lines and all the signatures came out as valid. I almost never use the preview window to read messages, so I never encounter that problem. - -- Best regards, David ** Microsoft: The company that made eMail dangerous. ** [TB! 1.54 Beta/19] [Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2] [Running on a Celeron 800@1176 256 Mb RAM] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Build 06 Comment: PGPKeys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_PGP_key iQA/AwUBPC2ynFK9yf5+yp9NEQL+KwCg+K7x/A6D0IbUcYEa0b0vM0lEbegAoMyc nct3F2LM8pXXJNeMI/D0Lvrl =A494 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: template adressbook
@ 14:09:58 +0100 [ Sat, 29 Dec 2001], David Van Zuijlekom [DVZ]
contributed this to our collective wisdom:
...
DVZ I almost never use the preview window to read messages, so I never
DVZ encounter that problem.
You don't have to use the preview window to encounter the problem.
It's the maximize view that's saving you. Even if you didn't maximize
and window wrapping occurred, you'd still be immune to the problem
since you use the plugin. Unfortunately, the PGP 7.x.x users and PGP
Tray lovers will run into the problem if the window wrapping is there.
--
.-,
/, \ ©Allie C Martin
{_}`{} List Moderator and fellow end user
(/ . . \) TB! v1.54 Beta/19 WinXP Home
{`-=^=-`}-
{ ` } PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=PGPPubKey1
{ }
`-,-`
¯¯
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: template adressbook
Hello Luc. At 8:58 PM on Friday, December 28, 2001 you wrote the following on the posted subject 'template adressbook': Luc [...] It looks just fine on my laptop, but is this any Luc better for you? (wrap from 80 to 72) [...] Of course each to their own but I've got mine set @ 60 to accommodate those who want to use less monitor real estate. -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB! V1.54 Beta/18/W2K_SP2/PGP Key ID: 0x3F14A060 -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: template adressbook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Itwasforetoldthat on 29/12/2001 @ 22:00:58 GMT-0800 (which was 7:00 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and spread these wise comments on template adressbook: That has to be a system specific problem for you. You are the only one I've ever heard of having that kind of problem. Stange, if i do a diagnostic my system comes out clean. One thing I would do is turn off Options/Editor Preferences Justify on Wrap. Done that now, let's see if this is better. -- Best regards, Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 = public key directly: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x85840713 = It is often said: Always put off tomorrow what you can do today, but if the toilet is out of order, I am not sure if that still holds. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com Comment: Key ID 0x56E226B8 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/ iQA/AwUBPC3fkUOsAqmFhAcTEQI6EACg1jXehPd3fvVd6NGz0eJZhEfhFrcAnioC KzjcjqyOF8gGWC9iahOjyzby =uWRy -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: template adressbook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Itwasforetoldthat on 29/12/2001 @ 06:29:32 GMT-0500 (which was 12:29 where I live) Allie C Martin wrote and spread these wise comments on template adressbook: It's better now. Slowly we proceed ;-) don't exceed the character limit per line for your signature. which are? Would it be better that i disable autowrap? justify wrap is disabled too. - -- Best regards, Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 = public key directly: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x85840713 = My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people. Orson Welles - actor, writer, director. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com Comment: Key ID 0x56E226B8 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/ iQA/AwUBPC3hgEOsAqmFhAcTEQJwvwCg3WJPljJLcWzyLmAWR3fqEbIX5rEAoPfw qVdhihKeX2N9mKUw7Hw64pNd =KP2B -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: template adressbook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It was foretold that on 29-12-2001 @ 22:00:58 GMT-0800 (which was 7:00 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and spread these wise comments on template adressbook: But maybe my key comment was way to long to handle, i have shortened it hopefully this will be the end of it pgp that doesn't work correctly, That has to be a system specific problem for you. You are the only one I've ever heard of having that kind of problem. Nick, i had just a systemcrash and installed it again: again a virgin pc lol. Still the same pgp problems though. :-( wrapping that causes problems: one begins to wonder why do i even bother? :) Btw, could you check my sig again please? - -- Best regards, Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 = public key directly: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x85840713 = It is often said: Always put off tomorrow what you can do today, but if the toilet is out of order, I am not sure if that still holds. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Build 06 http://www.ipgpp.com/ Comment: PGP Key ID 0x56E226B8 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/ iQA/AwUBPC56OkOsAqmFhAcTEQIFgACg+Fv57ZoY1emk0Lzlu/VYT/ODk/sAniQ2 iH29P0Rj2R+VE+3ZXh25Mr40 =G51H -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: template adressbook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Luc, On 30 December 2001 at 04:22:00 [GMT+0100] (which was 03:22 where I live) Luc knaepkens wrote to Nick Andriash and made these points: That has to be a system specific problem for you. You are the only one I've ever heard of having that kind of problem. Lk Nick, i had just a systemcrash and installed it again: again a Lk virgin pc lol. Still the same pgp problems though. :-( wrapping that causes problems: one begins to wonder why do i even bother? :) Lk Btw, could you check my sig again please? gpg: Signature made 12/30/01 02:21:46 044 using DSA key ID 85840713 gpg: Good signature from Luc Knaepkens [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator ~~~ \ BrainStorm - free thinking - www: http://www.brainstormsw.com / \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com / · TB! v1.54 Beta/20-14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 · -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) iD8DBQE8LolDOeQkq5KdzaARAkvKAKCvzNR+eQXLnWxvlNISjrc9CqAK0gCfVV/q MQbP0NMe/oeHUC4SAixI3K4= =UGN+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
template adressbook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I'm new to The Bat! and just figuring everything out. I have set my templates and they do what they are supposed to do (with a little help from this lol). I curious though about templates and individual mail addresses: if i want to use the same templates to new contacts i add, do i have to manually copy and paste the templates (message, reply,) or do i have to create a group, In short: if i add a new contact to my adressbook (outside a group) how do i apply the templates i already use, supposing there is another way then copy paste. - -- Best regards, Luc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 Life is a sexually transmitted disease. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com Comment: PGP Key ID 0x56E226B8 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/ iQA/AwUBPCyhxkOsAqmFhAcTEQIplACgp1s7cuDGNGmLEENV6Jl47cXE+ZsAnAyA WHeEGz6r2LdPnpwEDgyeUoZp =S/iJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: template adressbook
Hello Luc, It was foretold that on Friday, December 28, 2001 at 18:46 GMT +0100, Luc [L] would type: L In short: if i add a new contact to my adressbook (outside a group) how do i L apply the templates i already use, supposing there is another way then copy L paste. If you want to have a special template for your friends, but it is the same template for all friends, you have a couple of options. One is that you create a group and add your friends to that group. Then you can define a group template and all contacts in that group will use the specialized template. If you would prefer to avoid group templates, you should create your templates in Quick Templates. Then the person's individual template would just have one line: %QINCLUDE=QT Handle (Note: You need to replace QT Handle with the relevant quick template name.) The advantage of either of these methods is that you only need to change one set of templates and you'll affect all your contacts. The group method has the advantage that adding new contacts is a couple of steps simpler than the second method. However, if you have contacts in multiple groups and more than one of those groups has a group template, the second method will result in fewer problems. -- Thanks for writing, Januk Aggarwal Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/19 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 67766446 A His nerves. His memory. And I can't remember the third thing. -Lee Trevino on the three things that go as a golfer ages. -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: template adressbook
Hello Luc! On 28 Dec 2001 at 18:46:43 you wrote: In short: if i add a new contact to my adressbook (outside a group) how do i apply the templates i already use, supposing there is another way then copy paste. Account templates will be used automatically as will folder templates. If you want group or individual templates for them, you have to either put your contacts into a group or copy/paste templates into the templates area of the AB entry. To ease things up, you can use Quick Templates. In these you define templates and have then only to insert these (%QINCLUDE=TemplateName). I have 10 default QT's for different purposes (private and business) which are used this way. Another advantage of this approach: You can invoke the QT's manually in any message you create (type in the QT name and hit Ctrl+Space). As to how to individualise templates you surely know already. -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.54 Beta/20 on Windows 95 4.0 67306684 C Remember the three R's: Respect for self; Respect for others; Responsibility for your actions. -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
thank you (was: template adressbook)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, Dierk, Januk, tnx a lot for the reply. I thought it had something to do with QT ;-) Better safe then sorry though lol - -- Best regards, Luc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 The favourite game in Austria is Mikado. The one who moves something first, loses. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com Comment: PGP Key ID 0x56E226B8 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/ iQA/AwUBPCzjo0OsAqmFhAcTEQKHrwCgqG7mIdhvcOuIpOlBj89S9BTeE98AnjDj pTGOGVek+8UnBOrTi273zNLL =achA -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: template adressbook
Hello Luc, On Friday, December 28 2001 at 09:46 AM PDT, you wrote: I'm new to The Bat! and just figuring everything out. I have set my templates and they do what they are supposed to do (with a little help from this lol). I curious though about templates and individual mail addresses: if i want to use the same templates to new contacts i add, do i have to manually copy and Is there _any_ way we can convince you to shorten your lines? ;o) I don't know what you see above, but from my standpoint it's extremely hard to read your postings. :o( -- Nick -=N.J. Andriash | Courtenay, B.C. Canada=- List Moderator | PGP 7.1 | Becky v2.00.08 -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: template adressbook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It was foretold that on 29/12/2001 @ 17:38:28 GMT-0800 (which was 2:38 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and spread these wise comments on template adressbook: Hello Luc, On Friday, December 28 2001 at 09:46 AM PDT, you wrote: I'm new to The Bat! and just figuring everything out. I have set my templates and they do what they are supposed to do (with a little help from this lol). I curious though about templates and individual mail addresses: if i want to use the same templates to new contacts i add, do i have to manually copy and Is there _any_ way we can convince you to shorten your lines? ;o) I don't know what you see above, but from my standpoint it's extremely hard to read your postings. :o( It looks just fine on my laptop, but is this any better for you? (wrap from 80 to 72) - -- Best regards, Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 == To get my public key directly, go to http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x85840713 == -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com Comment: PGP Key ID 0x56E226B8 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/ iQA/AwUBPC0VGUOsAqmFhAcTEQI0nwCeKXUzZOkOHkx2zwtDH1U+En6RJxoAoMNb UFz+2RQh0xiC/2vNeYjwNyUd =lbv1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: template adressbook
On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 02:58:20 +0100, Luc [L] wrote these comments:
...
L It looks just fine on my laptop, but is this any better for you? (wrap
L from 80 to 72)
72 is a limit that most clients will use by default. I personally
prefer no more than 74 character limits.
Although 80 characters is the acceptable limit, I always thought it
was too much, but that's just me.
--
.-,
/, \ ©Allie C Martin
{_}`{} List Moderator and fellow end user
(/ . . \) TB! v1.54 Beta/19 WinXP Home
{`-=^=-`}-
{ ` } PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=PGPPubKey1
{ }
`-,-`
¯¯
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: template adressbook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It was foretold that on 29/12/2001 @ 21:06:42 GMT-0500 (which was 3:06 where I live) Allie C Martin wrote and spread these wise comments on template adressbook: 72 is a limit that most clients will use by default. I personally prefer no more than 74 character limits. Although 80 characters is the acceptable limit, I always thought it was too much, but that's just me. Oh but i don't mind setting it to 72 if others find it better. I personally don't mind _to_ much_ if the text is a bit long so one has to use his scrollingbars. But, as you said ... that's just me ;-). I hope this setting is better for nick - -- Best regards, Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 == To get my public key directly, go to http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x85840713 == It is often said: Always put off tomorrow what you can do today, but if the toilet is out of order, I am not sure if that still holds. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com Comment: PGP Key ID 0x56E226B8 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/ iQA/AwUBPC0Z3UOsAqmFhAcTEQKmgACgk+x4rUHffm2VbgqjCmG2vG7fwswAoL3H Lr0XDGaVF2XO/ul1hiLnP2Rt =tB7l -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: template adressbook
On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 03:18:23 +0100, Luc [L] graced us with these
comments:
...
L Oh but i don't mind setting it to 72 if others find it better. I
L personally don't mind _to_ much_ if the text is a bit long so one has to
L use his scrollingbars. But, as you said ... that's just me ;-).
L I hope this setting is better for nick
Your signature verified as bad again when tested with TB!'s fixed
width font viewer.
Signature made 12/28/01 20:18:21 using DSA key ID 85840713
BAD signature from Luc Knaepkens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The part about your where to find your public key and the tag line are
way too long again, thus breaking your signature check in TB!'s
fixed width viewer. In the RTF viewer the sig check is fine.
However, it's good netiquette to get those lines sorted out.
--
.-,
/, \ ©Allie C Martin
{_}`{} List Moderator and fellow end user
(/ . . \) TB! v1.54 Beta/19 WinXP Home
{`-=^=-`}-
{ ` } PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=PGPPubKey1
{ }
`-,-`
¯¯
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: template adressbook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It was foretold that on 29/12/2001 @ 21:23:04 GMT-0500 (which was 3:23 where I live) Allie C Martin wrote and spread these wise comments on template adressbook: The part about your where to find your public key and the tag line are way too long again, thus breaking your signature check in TB!'s fixed width viewer. In the RTF viewer the sig check is fine. Strange, nothing changed since the last time you checked :-( Is this better now ? - -- Best regards, Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 = public key directly: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x85840713 = The favourite game in Austria is Mikado. The one who moves something first, loses. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com Comment: PGP Key ID 0x56E226B8 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/ iQA/AwUBPC0lzUOsAqmFhAcTEQIPLwCeJ2kTqIrJXtKXfxFgOMzMSgphbmsAn3XJ jtUy7ZW/ZhnHtZURRMfIb6C4 =IOaQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: template adressbook
Hello Luc, On Friday, December 28 2001 at 05:58 PM PDT, you wrote: It looks just fine on my laptop, but is this any better for you? (wrap from 80 to 72) Much better. Thank you. :o) -- Nick -=N.J. Andriash | Courtenay, B.C. Canada=- Win 98SE | PGP 7.1 | Becky v2.00.08 -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: template adressbook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It was foretold that on 29/12/2001 @ 19:06:37 GMT-0800 (which was 4:06 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and spread these wise comments on template adressbook: Much better. Thank you. :o) Glad that it's me this time who can do something ;-) - -- Best regards, Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 = public key directly: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x85840713 = The favourite game in Austria is Mikado. The one who moves something first, loses. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com Comment: PGP Key ID 0x56E226B8 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/ iQA/AwUBPC0uc0OsAqmFhAcTEQI7vwCeKenSYACPtPFP/w0tYIShdrNY+KUAoKid AJaQx0u3zsqHLMyNrhuisR6f =zNG0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: template adressbook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Luc, On Friday, December 28 2001 at 07:46 PM PDT, you wrote: *** PGP Signature Status: good *** Signer: Luc Knaepkens [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Invalid) *** Signed: 28/12/01 6:46:11 PM *** Verified: 28/12/01 7:47:15 PM *** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** Glad that it's me this time who can do something ;-) Thanks again... it means reading your postings with greater ease. BTW, your signatures in this thread anyway have all been Good on my copy of Becky. I remember trying to verify your signatures on TB and always having them come out Bad, and I can't remember Allie's explanation except that it did involve the on-screen wrapping in TB's FWF Viewer. I don't seem to have that problem here with Becky, yet I was led to understand the viewers act the same. - -- Nick - -=N.J. Andriash | Courtenay, B.C. Canada=- Win 98SE | PGP 7.1 | Becky v2.00.08 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.1 Comment: Join [EMAIL PROTECTED] iQA/AwUBPC09w9rrL7k7yn3SEQIwDQCfXN9wIHTqew+fWdgdJYyRugFq+CcAnjd3 0jjQMmzamnN7M4bTAg4dZvu9 =CSSJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: template adressbook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It was foretold that on 29/12/2001 @ 19:51:36 GMT-0800 (which was 4:51 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and spread these wise comments on template adressbook: ... BTW, your signatures in this thread anyway have all been Good on my copy of Becky. I remember trying to verify your signatures on TB and always having them come out Bad, and I can't remember Allie's explanation except that it did involve the on-screen wrapping in TB's FWF Viewer. I don't seem to have that problem here with Becky, yet I was led to understand the viewers act the same. Well, it's strange because one of the reason i changed from outlook to The Bat! was it's wrapping: as i was led to believe, the wrapping problems in pgp would be history with The Bat! But maybe my key comment was way to long to handle, i have shortened it hopefully this will be the end of it pgp that doesn't work correctly, wrapping that causes problems: one begins to wonder why do i even bother? :) - -- Best regards, Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 = public key directly: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x85840713 = -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com Comment: PGP Key ID 0x56E226B8 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/ iQA/AwUBPC0z6UOsAqmFhAcTEQLZDwCfXNiMRkpdnKJX4lMjrFjFnowaiJwAoPfE 1CSrJrochiI4ux0Dm0AEZBRk =l9QZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: template adressbook
Hello Nick, On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 19:51:36 -0800 GMT (29/12/2001, 11:51 +0800 GMT), Nick Andriash wrote: *** PGP Signature Status: good *** Signer: Luc Knaepkens [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Invalid) *** Signed: 28/12/01 6:46:11 PM *** Verified: 28/12/01 7:47:15 PM *** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** NA Thanks again... it means reading your postings with greater ease. BTW, NA your signatures in this thread anyway have all been Good on my copy of NA Becky. I remember trying to verify your signatures on TB and always NA having them come out Bad, TB says invalid here, but of course I don't have Luc's public key in my keyring. TB used to go and search the keyservers in those cases, but it didn't search. Why not? Did I miss some setting somewhere? -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Salmon day: Swimming upstream all day to get screwed in the end. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.54 Beta/20 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 67766446 A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: template adressbook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It was foretold that on 29/12/2001 @ 13:28:03 GMT+0800 (which was 6:28 where I live) Thomas F wrote and spread these wise comments on template adressbook: TB says invalid here, but of course I don't have Luc's public key in my keyring. TB used to go and search the keyservers in those cases, but it didn't search. Why not? Did I miss some setting somewhere? Thomas, i'm not that expert in pgp but i believe it's your setting: it worked for me so far. Choose options in PGP, go to servers then synchronize with server upon and enable the possibility verification. This makes sure that pgp will automatically search and import the public key upon verifying. - -- Best regards, Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 = public key directly: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x85840713 = I know a man who gave up smoking, drinking, sex and rich food. He was healthy right up to the time he killed himself. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com Comment: Key ID 0x56E226B8 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/ iQA/AwUBPC1NU0OsAqmFhAcTEQJvSgCfeGNiFczL1FEvOVlmCUIBb583wO4AoLzf dJqWKZqsWdfI6I4uq+Qg4S0P =t8Bj -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: template adressbook
Hello Luc, On Friday, December 28 2001 at 08:09 PM PDT, you wrote: Well, it's strange because one of the reason i changed from outlook to The Bat! was it's wrapping: as i was led to believe, the wrapping problems in pgp would be history with The Bat! They are history. With TB, you can turn PGP's wrapping off altogether, and simply go with TB's wrapping set at a comfortable 76 to 74. But maybe my key comment was way to long to handle, i have shortened it hopefully this will be the end of it pgp that doesn't work correctly, That has to be a system specific problem for you. You are the only one I've ever heard of having that kind of problem. wrapping that causes problems: one begins to wonder why do i even bother? :) One thing I would do is turn off Options/Editor Preferences Justify on Wrap. It too adds difficulty in reading your messages because of the extra spaces that are inserted. If you consider that, along with your previous 80 character line length, and your especially long and unwrapped opening and closing lines, you can quickly see how you've set yourself up for wrapping/PGP signature and readability problems. However, we seem to be slowly winning the battle. :o) -- Nick -=N.J. Andriash | Courtenay, B.C. Canada=- Win 98SE | PGP 7.1 | Becky v2.00.08 -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: template adressbook
Hello Nick, On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 22:11:53 -0800 GMT (29/12/2001, 14:11 +0800 GMT), Nick Andriash wrote: NA To validate that Public Key, you must first sign it with a non-exportable NA signature, and then you can assign it a level of trust. Thanks, worked fine. :-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. I saw a woman wearing a sweatshirt with 'Guess' on it. I said, 'Thyroid problem?' Message reply created with The Bat! 1.54 Beta/20 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 67766446 A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
