Re[2]: filter renaming
Hello Wolffe, Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 10:55:22 PM, you wrote: W> when I zapped mine, I cheated to get it back .. I created a new W> (dummy) account then copy and pasted the from there to the W> old account. Then deleted the dummy account. Yes, it works! Thanks a lot. I did it other way though. I copied (Ctrl+C) filter and pasted it into blank text document. Then I changed The "Name:" string to and pasted it back to the account. The Bat! just asked if I wanted to replace the current filter. This way you can name it as you wish. I think the matter is in the "Action: faoIsKnown" string of the filter. But idea was yours, so thank again. By the way, yesterday the bug "[The Bat 0001182]: Name of Known filter can be changed in Sorting Office" was introduced: The following NEW bug has been ADDED. === https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view_bug_page.php?f_id=1182 === Reporter: marek Handler: === Project:The Bat Bug ID: 0001182 Category: Interface Reproducibility:always Severity: trivial Priority: normal Status: new === Date Submitted: 04 Feb 2003 19:36 CST Last Modified: 04 Feb 2003 19:36 CST === Summary:Name of Known filter can be changed in Sorting Office Description: Open Sorting Office, select any incoming filter and click to "Name" field in "Rule" section. When You select filter now, name is changed to name of previously selected filter. === But now it is not a problem anymore, I hope :) -- Artemich Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: filter renaming
Hello Thomas, Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 4:43:11 PM, you wrote: TF> I am not sure, but I think you need to name it "$Known$" (without TF> quotes). It is not the solution :( Sad, but true. Anyway thanks. -- Best regards, Artemichmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Couldn't mail to an IP address directly
Hello Jonathan, On Wednesday, February 5, 2003 at 11:42:26 PM you [JA] wrote (at least in part): >> Hmmm... it's interesting. Maybe your recent tries were successful >> because you're using an 1.63 Beta/5 version of the TB!. Mine was >> 1.62e and is 1.62i now. No. I've tried it making a native telnet session to port 25 of my MTA and succeeded too. Seems my qmail silently "stripped" the backslashes for recognizing the correct address. They were not stripped in the mail itself, they cam through, but I can imagine qmail stipped them while parsing the envelope recipient. I'll have to have a look at the source code to know this for sure. JA> It could be that they fixed it... I cannot see anything in the beta JA> files that mentions it, so it could have silently been fixed. So you JA> are possibly quite correct. I don't think. I've done a test: I exported a new generated mail which contained those bachslashes, removed the bakslashes and re-imported the message. In message list no escaping backslashes were shown, in header pane they were. I captured a SMTP session when sending the message and The Bat! sent it _with_ backslashes. JA>>> The question is, what was the error message you got back from JA>>> your undelivered email to the literal address? Did you even get JA>>> one? >>- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - >> >> >>- Transcript of session follows - >> 550 5.1.2 ... Host unknown (Name server: >> [80\.80\.100\.216]: host not found) >> The server is running Sendmail 8.12.6 under FreeBSD 4.7-Release. Well ... Andrey: I have tried to open a telnet session on port 25 to that particular server and send the mail "manually" by copying the message from TB! source view and initiate the process by myself. >telnet 80.80.100.216 25 220 post.tp.ru ESMTP Sendmail 8.11.0/8.11.0; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:17:31 +0300 (MSK) EHLO 80.80.100.216 250-post.tp.ru Hello siliki.zentrumderarbeit.org [212.99.128.226], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-EXPN 250-VERB 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 1000 250-DSN 250-ONEX 250-ETRN 250-XUSR 250 HELP MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 250 2.1.0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender ok RCPT TO: 550 5.7.1 ... Relaying denied RCPT TO: 250 2.1.5 ... Recipient ok QUIT Seems this sendmail sever is quite strict about the syntax, which is OK ... it's following RFCs. So The Bat! is buggy, albeit some MTAs can handle it's output. JA> - From a guess, TB! seems to want to put in the \ for some reason. I guess something "thinks" there's a regular expression in this string. Maybe some used components that could show that string would interpret a text to show containing '[...]' as "regular expression" and therefore the period as special character is "escaped" to prevent it form being misunderstood. Of course this should be "internal" only, every visualization should be done without the escape characters and _of course_ the process of sending the mail has to "flatten" the string! Andrey: would you file a bug report, if there's not already one that deals with the subject? http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/ -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) "Reliable software must kill people reliably." -- Andy Mickel Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Couldn't mail to an IP address directly
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, 8:25:15 AM, Peter Palmreuther wrote: > I guess something "thinks" there's a regular expression in this > string. Maybe some used components that could show that string would > interpret a text to show containing '[...]' as "regular expression" > and therefore the period as special character is "escaped" to prevent > it form being misunderstood. Of course this should be "internal" only, > every visualization should be done without the escape characters and > _of course_ the process of sending the mail has to "flatten" the > string! I have had this problem with the address book and on the To: line. Anything that is wrapped in [...] is mangled by TB. To test this yourself, change the <...> wrapping an email address to [...] and you will see that the '.' and '@' are all escaped. I don't know whether this is a bug or a "feature" Julian -- Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter (Regular Expression) Me and "Only" ME
Hello ~John, On Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 19:35:20 -0600 you wrote: > Now I can safely say that I am close to spam free, while only using > theBat! filters! I am sure you must have a reason to have your date set to 5 years ago. With this, my systems regards all your messages as SPAM. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Problems importing emails from outlook
Hi all, I've been trying to convert a friend of mine to The Bat, but we're having a lot of trouble importing his existing emails from Outlook (Office XP version). Whenever we attempt to import the messages, TB throws up an error about lack of storage space. I had a search of the list archives and saw that other people have had this problem before, and the solution was to split the messages up into smaller folders and importing them folder at a time. We tried splitting his messages in Outlook down to folders of about 500 messages but still got the same error. There are well over 60,000 messages to import so splitting them into smaller groups than that really isn't an option. His machine has several gig of disc space and 512MB of RAM, so it's not that. Are there any other ways around this? Converting people will be tricky if we can't import from Outlook properly :(. Cheers, Tim. Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Sending mail from MS Excel
Hello, I have a simple automated "send as attachment" macro in an excel workbook: > Private Sub SubmitButton_Click() > ActiveWorkbook.SendMail Recipients:="", Subject:="" > End Sub This works fine when Outlook is the default mail client, but not when TB is selected, returning: > Run-time error '1004': > Method 'SendMail' of object '_Workbook' failed Can anyone tell me how to make this work please? Regards, -- Nick Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Sending mail from MS Excel
On 06 February 2003, 10:42, Nick Dutton wrote: > Can anyone tell me how to make this work please? ~~~ FWIW, I tried the following in the Immediate window of Excel 2000: ActiveWorkbook.SendMail Recipients:="", Subject:="Test Message" and it worked without problems. However, your comment that it works when Outlook is selected as the default mail client but not when TB is selected gives me a clue. Outlook and TB require different versions of the MAPI DLL to act as default simple MAPI handler and I suspect that, while you switched default client, you did not configure TB as the default simple MAPI handler. Outlook is brain dead and can't (IME) act as simple MAPI handler unless it is also the default mail client -- so simple MAPI has no valid handler on your system. Caveat: setting TB as your default MAPI handler may render Outlook unserviceable. To set TB as your simple MAPI Handler: 1. From the Options menu, choose Preferences. 2. Click the Applications tab. 3. Click "Install The Bat! as the simple MAPI request hander" HTH, -- Geoff Lane Cornwall, UK -- Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Word Happens Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Access Violation in xxxxx ?
Hello telepro, On or about Thursday, February 06, 2003 at 06:22:02GMT +0100 (which was 12:22 AM in the tropics where I live) telepro postulated, ruminated and made these points on the subject of "Access Violation in x ?": t> Hello, t> I've sometimes (perhaps one time in a day) Access Violation in x ; t> it does not disturb the good running of the programm, a simple OK and t> the program continues... This usually happens when a mail folder (messages.tbb) gets larger than 2GB. This exceeds the FAT32 file size limit. You'll find that some mail folder can no longer accept new messages too! Just happened (again) to me on Monday ;-( t> Have you got these little errors, if yes, in which frequencies ? Yes, when you allow a messages.tbb to get too large for the O/S to handle! t> Config : Millenium, The Bat 1.62i -- Warmest tropical wishes, Spike When I was a kid, I used to pray every night for a new bicycle. Then I realized that the Lord, in his wisdom, didn't work that way. So I just stole one and asked him to forgive me. -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Against HTML Mail \ / If it aint a webpage it shouldn't be HTML. XSay NO! to bloatmail - ban HTML mail! / \ Ask Spikey, he hates everything (HTML). -- Using TheBat! v1.61 hamstrung by Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 -- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problems importing emails from outlook
Hello Tim Fountain, On or about Thursday, February 06, 2003 at 10:05:52GMT + (which was 5:05 AM in the tropics where I live) Tim Fountain observed: TF> Hi all, TF> I've been trying to convert a friend of mine to The Bat, but we're TF> having a lot of trouble importing his existing emails from Outlook TF> (Office XP version). What a true friend you are!! TF> Whenever we attempt to import the messages, TB throws up an error TF> about lack of storage space. I had a search of the list archives and TF> saw that other people have had this problem before, and the solution TF> was to split the messages up into smaller folders and importing them TF> folder at a time. We tried splitting his messages in Outlook down to TF> folders of about 500 messages but still got the same error. See elow explanation! TF> There are well over 60,000 messages to import so splitting them into TF> smaller groups than that really isn't an option. His machine has TF> several gig of disc space and 512MB of RAM, so it's not that. How large are the mail folders in MS Outhouse? TB! needs the same or slightly more disk space to import them, as they are being DUPLICATED and imported without DELETING the MSO mail files! When compressing folders, you need DOUBLE the space of your largest mail folder, as a duplicate is created to delete the ones that are 'flagged' deleted. Only when you compress the mail folder is the mail(s) actually DELETED fropm the folder, but it is still in the TRASH until it, too is DELETED and COMPRESSED!!. TF> Are there any other ways around this? Converting people will be TF> tricky if we can't import from Outlook properly :(. More disk space (double or more than you THINK you need) is always advisable! -- Warmest tropical wishes, Spike Reality is for those too scared of computer generated images... -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Against HTML Mail \ / If it aint a webpage it shouldn't be HTML. XSay NO! to bloatmail - ban HTML mail! / \ Ask Spikey, he hates everything (HTML). -- Using TheBat! v1.61 hamstrung by Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 -- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Access Violation in xxxxx ?
Hello Spike, > On or about Thursday, February 06, 2003 at 06:22:02GMT +0100 > (which was 12:22 AM in the tropics where I live) telepro > postulated, ruminated and made these points on the subject of > "Access Violation in x ?": > When I was a kid, I used to pray every night for a new bicycle. > Then I realized that the Lord, in his wisdom, didn't work that > way. So I just stole one and asked him to forgive me. > > -- > /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Against HTML Mail > \ / If it aint a webpage it shouldn't be HTML. > XSay NO! to bloatmail - ban HTML mail! > / \ Ask Spikey, he hates everything (HTML). > -- > Using TheBat! v1.61 hamstrung by Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 > Service Pack 3 > -- NO! to bloat mail ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problems importing emails from outlook
Hi Tim, on Thu, 6 Feb 2003 10:05:52 +GMT (06.02.03, 11:05 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : TF> I've been trying to convert a friend of mine to The Bat, but we're TF> having a lot of trouble importing his existing emails from Outlook TF> (Office XP version). AFAIR from reading in this list, it is not possible to import Outlook messages directly to TB!. They have to be converted to the format used by Outlook Express which then can be imported by TB!. I hope, someone more knowledgeable can give the details or correct me if I'm wrong - I never used Outlook. -- Cheers Peter Press any key... no, no, no, NOT THAT ONE! Winamp currently playing: - silence - Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Question about greyed out signatures
Hi All, I've been a very happt The Bat! user for only a few short weeks, and I'm trying to learn all I can about the application. My questions is, I believe, simple, yet I cannot seem to find the answer to it. Most of the messages I see on this list have the signtaure and footer in a light greyed out text. It looks quite sharp. When I send myself a message I am unable to duplicate this effect. Is this a function of The Bat! (something I'm missing), or is it something out illustrious moderator is doing? Thanks. Best regards, Scott A. Blystone Rochester, New York "I sometimes wonder if the manufacturers of foolproof items keep a fool or two on their payroll to test things." - Alan Coren Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re:Question about greyed out signatures
Hello, Adjust your Options -> Preferences ->Viewer -> Rich Text/HTML. Now it should be nicer. I hope it helps. -- Best regards, Csaba Kiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+4687286259 fax:+468330498 This message was created on Thursday, February 6, 2003. Thursday, February 6, 2003, 2:12:30 PM, you wrote: lsu> Hi All, lsu> I've been a very happt The Bat! user for only a few short weeks, and I'm lsu> trying to learn all I can about the application. My questions is, I believe, lsu> simple, yet I cannot seem to find the answer to it. lsu> Most of the messages I see on this list have the signtaure and footer in a lsu> light greyed out text. It looks quite sharp. When I send myself a message I am lsu> unable to duplicate this effect. Is this a function of The Bat! (something I'm lsu> missing), or is it something out illustrious moderator is doing? Thanks. lsu> Best regards, lsu> Scott A. Blystone lsu> Rochester, New York lsu> "I sometimes wonder if the manufacturers of foolproof items keep a fool or two lsu> on their payroll to test things." - Alan Coren Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Question about greyed out signatures
Hi Csaba, Thanks for the answer, but it answers the wrong question. I already HAVE that option selected. My changes need, I think, to be in the EDITOR, not the viewer. Best regards, Scott A. Blystone Rochester, New York Thursday, February 6, 2003, 8:23:01 AM, you wrote: CK> Hello, CK> Adjust your Options -> Preferences ->Viewer -> Rich Text/HTML. CK> Now it should be nicer. CK> I hope it helps. CK> -- CK> Best regards, CK> CK>Csaba Kiss CK> [EMAIL PROTECTED] CK> tel:+4687286259 CK> fax:+468330498 CK> CK> This message was created on Thursday, February 6, 2003. CK> Thursday, February 6, 2003, 2:12:30 PM, you wrote: lsu>> Hi All, lsu>> I've been a very happt The Bat! user for only a few short weeks, and I'm lsu>> trying to learn all I can about the application. My questions is, I believe, lsu>> simple, yet I cannot seem to find the answer to it. lsu>> Most of the messages I see on this list have the signtaure and footer in a lsu>> light greyed out text. It looks quite sharp. When I send myself a message I am lsu>> unable to duplicate this effect. Is this a function of The Bat! (something I'm lsu>> missing), or is it something out illustrious moderator is doing? Thanks. lsu>> Best regards, lsu>> Scott A. Blystone lsu>> Rochester, New York lsu>> "I sometimes wonder if the manufacturers of foolproof items keep a fool or two lsu>> on their payroll to test things." - Alan Coren CK> CK> Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: CK> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re:Question about greyed out signatures
Hello to Rochester, to get this straight... Your problem is that you want to see those color effects (like the light grey for the sig part) in your EDITOR, when you actually WRITE a message? or that you can't see that effect when you look at messages that you wrote? Jürgen Thursday, February 6, 2003, 2:35:14 PM, you wrote: > Thanks for the answer, but it answers the wrong question. I already HAVE that > option selected. My changes need, I think, to be in the EDITOR, not the > viewer. > Thursday, February 6, 2003, 8:23:01 AM, you wrote: CK>> Hello, CK>> Adjust your Options -> Preferences ->Viewer -> Rich Text/HTML. CK>> Now it should be nicer. CK>> I hope it helps. -- Gruß, Jurgenmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Win.XP.5.1.2600.SP1 http://members.ud.com/services/teams/team.htm?id=E3ECFC2E-5950-4AF5-A604-140301A81367 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Question about greyed out signatures
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Scott, @6-Feb-2003, 08:12 -0500 (13:12 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SAB] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: SAB> Most of the messages I see on this list have the signtaure SAB> and footer in a light greyed out text. It looks quite sharp. SAB> When I send myself a message I am unable to duplicate this SAB> effect. Is this a function of The Bat! (something I'm missing), SAB> or is it something out illustrious moderator is doing? Thanks. Two things: 1) The editor doesn't show "rich text" formatting, so you won't see the fancy sig display while composing a message. 2) To be a signature, the signature text has to be separated from the body text by a "cut mark". There's quite a good explanation of the cut mark in the help file but to "cut" a long story short it is . Like mine would have been if PGP hadn't fooled around with it! - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE+Qmn4OeQkq5KdzaARAh4SAKCGmT7kLKMez7XBSO6xnTBFZJLU5ACePoNo GVnw2Y52nkD/cAt22oxY6q4= =dE8x -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Question about greyed out signatures
Hi Jurgen, Perhaps I'm not explaining myself well. I actually do not care what the text looks like as I compose it. I'm speaking about the end result, the received message after I send it. When I look at most of the posts I see on this reflector (except for the one you just sent), I see that the signatures come out in a very light greyed-out text. I wish to duplicate that effect in the messages I send out. Does this clarify what I mean? Thanks. Best regards, Scott A. Blystone Rochester, New York Thursday, February 6, 2003, 8:46:29 AM, you wrote: JH> Hello to Rochester, JH> to get this straight... Your problem is that you want to see those JH> color effects (like the light grey for the sig part) in your EDITOR, JH> when you actually WRITE a message? or that you can't see that effect JH> when you look at messages that you wrote? JH> Jürgen JH> Thursday, February 6, 2003, 2:35:14 PM, you wrote: >> Thanks for the answer, but it answers the wrong question. I already HAVE that >> option selected. My changes need, I think, to be in the EDITOR, not the >> viewer. >> Thursday, February 6, 2003, 8:23:01 AM, you wrote: CK>>> Hello, CK>>> Adjust your Options -> Preferences ->Viewer -> Rich Text/HTML. CK>>> Now it should be nicer. CK>>> I hope it helps. Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Question about greyed out signatures
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, 1:35:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks for the answer, but it answers the wrong question. I already HAVE that > option selected. My changes need, I think, to be in the EDITOR, not the > viewer. The reason that you cannot see the grayed out signatures in your own messages is because you do not use a cut mark above your signature. TB uses this to work out where your signature starts, and what to show in grey in the Rich Text Viewer. The cut mark is the '-- ' (dash dash space) that you see on the messages. Using this helps many mail clients recognise signatures, which will then be automatically cut off on replies. Julian -- Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Question about greyed out signatures
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED], On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:12:30 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've been a very happt The Bat! user for only a few short weeks, and > I'm trying to learn all I can about the application. My questions is, I > believe, simple, yet I cannot seem to find the answer to it. > > Most of the messages I see on this list have the signtaure and footer in > a light greyed out text. It looks quite sharp. When I send myself a message > I am unable to duplicate this effect. Is this a function of The Bat! > (something I'm missing), or is it something out illustrious moderator is > doing? Thanks. Put a so called "signature delimiter" at the (or near the) end or your message. This can be done in the template (I guess it will be the account templates) so you haven't to enter it every time manually. The signature delimiter is a line of '' all by itself on one line, nothing in front, nothing behind. Simply type '--' than hit space bar and . You will not see the additional space, and you'll certainly not be able to "detect" it by pressing when the cursor is in that line. The only way to "see" it is putting the cursor in the next line at the very beginning and pressing (don't forget to after this test, so the _important_ lin break is there again). HTH -- Peter Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Question about greyed out signatures
On 06 February 2003, 13:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Most of the messages I see on this list have the signtaure and footer in a > light greyed out text. It looks quite sharp. When I send myself a message I am > unable to duplicate this effect. Is this a function of The Bat! (something I'm > missing), or is it something out illustrious moderator is doing? Thanks. ~~~ The issue is probably that your signature doesn't have a cut line. This is something that many mail clients, including TB, use to determine where the signature starts. Everything below the cut line is considered part of the sig and is greyed out. A cut line consists of two dashes (minus signs) followed by a space. The space character is essential. HTH, -- Geoff Lane Cornwall, UK -- Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Need a solution? ... just add water. Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Question about greyed out signatures
Hi Marck, Bingo! That's it. Thanks a bunch! PS: I haven't movified THIS template yet to add the cut mark! :-) Best regards, Scott A. Blystone Rochester, New York Thursday, February 6, 2003, 8:58:15 AM, you wrote: MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP> Hash: SHA1 MDP> Hi Scott, MDP> @6-Feb-2003, 08:12 -0500 (13:12 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SAB] in MDP> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: SAB>> Most of the messages I see on this list have the signtaure SAB>> and footer in a light greyed out text. It looks quite sharp. SAB>> When I send myself a message I am unable to duplicate this SAB>> effect. Is this a function of The Bat! (something I'm missing), SAB>> or is it something out illustrious moderator is doing? Thanks. MDP> Two things: MDP> 1) The editor doesn't show "rich text" formatting, so you won't see MDP>the fancy sig display while composing a message. MDP> 2) To be a signature, the signature text has to be separated from MDP>the body text by a "cut mark". There's quite a good explanation MDP>of the cut mark in the help file but to "cut" a long story short MDP> it is . Like mine would have MDP>been if PGP hadn't fooled around with it! MDP> - -- MDP> Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator MDP> TB! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 MDP> ' MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- MDP> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) MDP> iD8DBQE+Qmn4OeQkq5KdzaARAh4SAKCGmT7kLKMez7XBSO6xnTBFZJLU5ACePoNo MDP> GVnw2Y52nkD/cAt22oxY6q4= MDP> =dE8x MDP> -END PGP SIGNATURE- MDP> MDP> Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: MDP> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter (Regular Expression) Me and "Only" ME
LOL, I forgot all about my date being messed up. I was playing with the clock a few days ago and forgot to set it back up. Thanks to all that pointed this out to me. :) -- Best Regards, ~John - - - Miguel A. Urech wrote - - - > On Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 19:35:20 -0600 you wrote: >> Now I can safely say that I am close to spam free, while only using >> theBat! filters! > I am sure you must have a reason to have your date set to 5 years ago. > With this, my systems regards all your messages as SPAM. - - - End of Miguel A. Urech's message - - - Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter (Regular Expression) Me and "Only" ME
No, this doesn't work either. -- Best Regards, ~John - - - Marck D Pearlstone wrote - - - > How about the advanced setting of "Address must be listed in address > book" and choose "All recipients"? Wouldn't that catch it? - - - End of Marck D Pearlstone's message - - - Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter (Regular Expression) Me and "Only" ME
I finally got this filter to work, if anyone else is interested in it, here is how to do it: I would like to thank Mr.Peter Palmreuther of the Bat TECH List! for figuring this out for me! Here is what he wrote; Give this a try: (.+@.+[,;].*[EMAIL PROTECTED])|([EMAIL PROTECTED]*[,;].+@.+) Location: Recipient Presence: Yes Regular Expression: Yes Untested, but could work. Your expression missed the fact your address could be in angel brackets and there don't need to be a space between comma and your address. Additionally a semicolon could be used as delimiter. The expression above checks for a "seems to be an e-mail-address" either before or behind your own address, delimited by a comma or semicolon. Quite far from being perfect, but might help as a first step. -- Best Regards, ~John - - - ~John wrote - - - > I have been getting allot of Spam here lately that is addressed to me > along with several random or generated e-mail addresses. > So my question is, how do I create a filter that will "trash" any > e-mail to me [in either the To: or CC:] that has my address > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) listed with *any* other e-mail address. > This is tricky, because the filter has to catch the e-mail whether or > not my e-mail address is listed first,last, or in the middle. > So In other words I want the filter to allow mail to my inbox that is > addressed to me and *only* me. Other e-mail, such as lists will be > filtered to the appropriate folder prior to this filter, so that I > won't miss any list mail. > (I'm CC'ing this to TBTECH just in case its too complicated for TBUDL) > But I'm hoping someone, somewhere can tell me how to do this, I think > it would be a helpful filter for everyone as well. - - - End of ~John's message - - - Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Empty trash on multiple account w/o exiting the BAT
Hello tbudl, Is there a way to empty trash on multiple accounts w/o existing the program? Right now I have to do this on individual account if I don't want to exit. -- Best regards, Kenneth mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sending mail from MS Excel
Geoff, Thursday, February 6, 2003, 11:25:44 AM, you wrote: GL> On 06 February 2003, 10:42, Nick Dutton wrote: >> Can anyone tell me how to make this work please? GL> ~~~ GL> FWIW, I tried the following in the Immediate window of Excel 2000: GL> ActiveWorkbook.SendMail Recipients:="", Subject:="Test Message" GL> and it worked without problems. GL> However, your comment that it works when Outlook is selected as the GL> default mail client but not when TB is selected gives me a clue. GL> Outlook and TB require different versions of the MAPI DLL to act as GL> default simple MAPI handler and I suspect that, while you switched GL> default client, you did not configure TB as the default simple MAPI GL> handler. Outlook is brain dead and can't (IME) act as simple MAPI GL> handler unless it is also the default mail client -- so simple MAPI GL> has no valid handler on your system. Hmmm, this sounds familiar. I had some MAPI of problems while running TB! in parallel with OL during my migration. GL> Caveat: setting TB as your default MAPI handler may render Outlook GL> unserviceable. That's OK, I'm pure now. GL> To set TB as your simple MAPI Handler: GL> 1. From the Options menu, choose Preferences. GL> 2. Click the Applications tab. GL> 3. Click "Install The Bat! as the simple MAPI request hander" Hmmm again. I've done this and still no joy. Is there anything that I should be looking at to check that it's working OK? Is there a test that I can perform from outside office? Ta, -- Nick Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Sending mail from MS Excel
On 06 February 2003, 15:36, Nick Dutton wrote: > Hmmm again. I've done this and still no joy. Is there anything that I > should be looking at to check that it's working OK? ~~~ Just a thought, did you reboot after installing TB as your default simple MAPI handler? You can check whether MAPI is configured in Word by issuing the following command in the Immediate window: MsgBox "MAPI is " & IIf(Application.MAPIAvailable, "available", "not available") (all the above command should be on one line) Because you're working with Excel macros, I assume you know how to access the Immediate window in Word. However, if you don't, here's how: 1. Start Word 2. Press Alt+F11 3. If the Immediate window isn't visible, press Ctrl+G 4. type the MsgBox command above. You should see a message box that tells you whether MAPI is available. Another thought -- AIUI, Windows 2000 and XP are "self-healing" and can restore "essential" system files when overwritten. Thus, Windows could (unhelpfully) retore the Outlook version of MAPI. Try running OL after you've set TB as the handler for simple MAPI. If OL starts without complaining, its MAPI library is still installed, in which case, someone else can hopefully enlighten us on preventing Windows restoring that DLL after TB replaces it. Other than that, I'm stumped. -- Geoff Lane Cornwall, UK -- Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Insanity is hereditary ... you get it from your kids! Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Empty trash on multiple account w/o exiting the BAT
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, 3:37:41 PM, Kenneth S. Rhee wrote: KSR> Is there a way to empty trash on multiple accounts w/o existing the program? Folder menu - Purge all folders - will empty trash from all folders, in all accounts, using the settings you've chosen :-) -- Deborah Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Empty trash on multiple account w/o exiting the BAT
Hello Deborah, Thursday, February 6, 2003, 1:03:02 PM, you wrote: DW> Folder menu - Purge all folders - will empty trash from all folders, in DW> all accounts, using the settings you've chosen :-) It doesn't work on my system. I usually have fresh messages on my trash, and nothing gets rid of those unless I empty folders or exit the program. -- Best regards, Kennethmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Empty trash on multiple account w/o exiting the BAT
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, 19:12, Kenneth S. Rhee wrote: DW>> Folder menu - Purge all folders - will empty trash from all DW>> folders, in all accounts, using the settings you've chosen :-) > It doesn't work on my system. I usually have fresh messages on my > trash, and nothing gets rid of those unless I empty folders or exit > the program. Right click the folder you want emptied and tick mark "Maximum number of stored messages is". Leave the number at zero. Next time you purge all folders the messages in this folder will be deleted. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.62/Beta7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Empty trash on multiple account w/o exiting the BAT
Hello Marcus, Thursday, February 6, 2003, 1:18:11 PM, you wrote: MO> Right click the folder you want emptied and tick mark "Maximum number MO> of stored messages is". Leave the number at zero. Next time you purge MO> all folders the messages in this folder will be deleted. Thanks. It worked. -- Best regards, Kennethmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Empty trash on multiple account w/o exiting the BAT
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, 6:12:10 PM, Kenneth S. Rhee wrote: DW>> Folder menu - Purge all folders - will empty trash from all DW>> folders, in all accounts, using the settings you've chosen :-) KSR> It doesn't work on my system. I usually have fresh messages on my KSR> trash, and nothing gets rid of those unless I empty folders or exit KSR> the program. You need to change the settings for your Trash folder then. If you set the maximum number of stored messages to none, the folder will be emptied when you purge folders. -- Deborah Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Empty trash on multiple account w/o exiting the BAT
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, 6:18:11 PM, Marcus Ohlström wrote: MO> Right click the folder you want emptied and tick mark "Maximum MO> number of stored messages is". Leave the number at zero. Next time MO> you purge all folders the messages in this folder will be deleted. Ooops - I should have downloaded new messages before responding to older ones :-) -- Deborah Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: good anti-spam prog for use with TB!
RK> I use SpamAssassin (yes, in Windows). It's free and pretty powerful. Very RK> configurable. Not all that hard to set up, but requires Perl and Pop3Proxy RK> (both free aswell). RK> I installed PopFile for a friend of mine. It's easy to set up and to train, RK> so that seemed the best solution for her. It's free aswell. I've found SpamPal (www.spampal.us) to be the easiest to install and use, most flexible WinDoze filter, and which is freely available. In conjunction with Web2POP (which is NOT free) for webmail accounts (including Hotmail, AOL, Yahoo), my daughter is now using her Hotmail account without SPAM. And, she can use the SpamPal Bayesian GUI to mark "clean" and "SPAM" mail appropriately. -- Best regards, Alan K. Stebbens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Voice/Fax: +1.866.579.0801) Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Access Violation in xxxxx ?
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, 12:22:02 AM, telepro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: t> I've sometimes (perhaps one time in a day) Access Violation in x ; t> it does not disturb the good running of the programm, a simple OK and t> the program continues... t> Have you got these little errors, if yes, in which frequencies ? I get access violations frequently when starting up TB and have for quite a while. As you said, it doesn't affect the operation of the program (other errors pop up from time to time and prevent me from properly terminating TB other than the task manager.) And I do NOT have a large message database as others have suggested as the problem... jon -- jwayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MIME Question
Hello Allie, On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, at 17:03:12 [GMT -0500] you wrote: > I'd love to elaborate on this especially for those who > don't fully understand the functionality being discussed > here. At least from the POV of a mere user, rather than > someone with technical background. ;) And I love you did :-) Thank you very much! > You can easily create a MIME digest with TB! by opening a > new message and then going back to the main TB! window and > drag and drop messages from the message list straight unto > the editor window. Just a note here. I tried as you said but it didn't work. It seems that dragging and dropping only works if you don't have the main TB! windows maximized. -- Best regards, Eduard. [Mallorca, Spain] Running The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 on Windows XP Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: changing received emails?
Jurgen On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 12:36:44 AM, you wrote: > h, the upset date is (strangely enough) the 'received date' and > that does not seem to be written in the mail itself? Then export it to a UNIX mailbox which DOES include the received date. Robin -- Robin Anson Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MIME Question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Eduard Fabra-Roca [EFR] wrote:'
EFR> And I love you did :-) Thank you very much!
You're welcome.
EFR> Just a note here. I tried as you said but it didn't work. It
EFR> seems that dragging and dropping only works if you don't
EFR> have the main TB! windows maximized.
This is a common limitation with dragging and dropping from one
window to another. If the window you're dragging from is maximized,
then you're in trouble unless, the target application can be made
to stay on top, or you can do the following:
Open a new editor window. Bring the main window into focus. Select
your message/s from the message list and start the drag operation.
While holding unto your selected messages with the mouse, hit
- to bring the editor window into focus. You can now
finish the drag and drop operation.
- --
-=] allie_M [=- {List Moderator}
MUA: TB! v1.63 Beta/5 ___ OS: WinXP Pro (SP1)
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: My Public Keys - http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html
iD8DBQE+QvpoV8nrYCsHF+IRAlz2AKDzP2CT1i6+erDtAih1w+xN0byhMwCfUzkQ
Ph/HiheHeGzt3ffYig4I+Xo=
=YHij
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Access Violation in xxxxx ?
Hi Spike, Thursday, February 6, 2003, 12:18:27 PM, you wrote: S> This usually happens when a mail folder (messages.tbb) gets S> larger than 2GB. This exceeds the FAT32 file size limit. You'll S> find that some mail folder can no longer accept new messages too! S> Just happened (again) to me on Monday ;-( You mean...there are people out there still using FAT? ;-) -- Best regards, Mike Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Access Violation in xxxxx ?
Hello Mike Alexander, On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 00:25:21 + GMT your local time, which was Friday, February 7, 2003, 7:25:21 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Mike Alexander wrote: > Hi Spike, > Thursday, February 6, 2003, 12:18:27 PM, you wrote: S>> This usually happens when a mail folder (messages.tbb) gets S>> larger than 2GB. This exceeds the FAT32 file size limit. You'll S>> find that some mail folder can no longer accept new messages too! S>> Just happened (again) to me on Monday ;-( > You mean...there are people out there still using FAT? > ;-) I do and I always ask customers if they want Fat or NTFS. Reason is that if they mess up windows Xp as an example its much easier to get data off and reinstall then having to fight NTFS and its 'security'. One can do it, just much more of a headache. My data drive has NTFS on my video system for obvious reasons.. -- Best regards, tracer Using theBAT 1.63 Beta/5 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] C.C.S. Associates handphone : 01-891-9560 FAX (USA): (208) 460-3753 pgp 6.5.3 : 0x909D9B10 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Access Violation in xxxxx ?
Hello Miguel A. Urech, On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 13:53:34 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, February 6, 2003, 7:53:34 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Miguel A. Urech wrote: > Hello Spike, > NO! to bloat mail ;-) He probably can can save half the space in that file by removing the quotation at the end of the messages -- Best regards, tracer Using theBAT 1.63 Beta/5 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] C.C.S. Associates handphone : 01-891-9560 FAX (USA): (208) 460-3753 pgp 6.5.3 : 0x909D9B10 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Forwarding and Redirected messages are stalled
I manage email to a group I belong to, and I've set up a filter so that email to the groups address will get redirected to someone else while I'm on vacation. When I tested this, everything seemed to work except that the forwarded and redirected emails are now just sitting in my Outbox, and have been for more than a day now. Any ideas on what I've missed? -- Jim Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Forwarding and Redirected messages are stalled
Hello Jim Kilgannon, On or about Thursday, February 06, 2003 at 22:11:44GMT -0500 (which was 10:11 PM in the tropics where I live) Jim Kilgannon queried: JK> I manage email to a group I belong to, and I've set up a filter so JK> that email to the groups address will get redirected to someone else JK> while I'm on vacation. JK> When I tested this, everything seemed to work except that the JK> forwarded and redirected emails are now just sitting in my Outbox, and JK> have been for more than a day now. JK> Any ideas on what I've missed? Did you select IMMEDIATE DELIVERY in the filter Options _. Send Messages tab of the filter? -- Warmest tropical wishes, Spike "The future isn't what it used to be." -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Against HTML Mail \ / If it aint a webpage it shouldn't be HTML. XSay NO! to bloatmail - ban HTML mail! / \ Ask Spikey, he hates everything (HTML). -- Using TheBat! v1.61 hamstrung by Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 -- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Access Violation in xxxxx ?
Hello jwayne, Thursday, February 6, 2003, 4:41:10 PM, you wrote: > On Thursday, February 6, 2003, 12:22:02 AM, telepro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I get access violations frequently when starting up TB and have for quite a > while. As you said, it doesn't affect the operation of the program (other errors > pop up from time to time and prevent me from properly terminating TB other than > the task manager.) Thanks, I'm not alone :-) > And I do NOT have a large message database as others have suggested as the > problem... So do I, I just began with TB :-) Friendly Christophe Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Mail Synchronisation ?
Hello, I don't understand very well the Mail Synchronisation :-( I tried it to synchronize my PC and my notebook ; On my PC, it created two small files TB1 and TB2, so I Carried these two files in my notebook, and I submitted synchronisation archive (process 3), it told me, synchronisation ok, but according to me, no change ! I suspected that it could not be able to recover all datas, in vue of the fact files were too small. (50k) I have a PC and a notebook ; I leave tomorrow with my notebook and I want to bring with me all I have in my PC of The bat (settings, mails,...) and I want when I'm back in a few days, just retrieve like if I hadn't leave. Usually in my notebook, I "leave messages on server" and when I'm back, I have hundreds of mails to check and organize... and I don't want that no more, am I clear ? I'd want just arrive and all retrieve in a few minutes, like if I had not gone ;-) What is the best solution ? How can I simply do that ? Thanks a lot -- Best regards, Christophe France mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Access Violation in xxxxx ?
Hello Spike, Thursday, February 6, 2003, 1:18:27 PM, you wrote: > This usually happens when a mail folder (messages.tbb) gets > larger than 2GB. This exceeds the FAT32 file size limit. You'll > find that some mail folder can no longer accept new messages too! > Just happened (again) to me on Monday ;-( It isn't the case, I just begin with TB Thanks -- Best regards, Christophe, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Access Violation in xxxxx ?
Hello telepro, On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 04:37:44 +0100 GMT (07/02/03, 10:37 +0700 GMT), telepro wrote: >> This usually happens when a mail folder (messages.tbb) gets >> larger than 2GB. This exceeds the FAT32 file size limit. You'll >> find that some mail folder can no longer accept new messages too! >> Just happened (again) to me on Monday ;-( > It isn't the case, I just begin with TB Are you sure teh AV was caused by TB? What is the exact wording, which you have left out? -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. "I am loyal to my employer at all costs Please feel free to respond to my resume on my office voice mail." Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re:changing received emails?
Hello Robin, Friday, February 7, 2003, 1:00:54 AM, you wrote: > Jurgen > On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 12:36:44 AM, you wrote: >> h, the upset date is (strangely enough) the 'received date' and >> that does not seem to be written in the mail itself? > Then export it to a UNIX mailbox which DOES include the received date. > Robin hey that works, thank you! :-) -- Ciao, Jurgenmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Win.XP.5.1.2600.SP1 while listening to Yello - Homage to the Mountain http://members.ud.com/services/teams/team.htm?id=E3ECFC2E-5950-4AF5-A604-140301A81367 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Whitelist, can you do this with thebat ?
Monday, February 3, 2003, 10:14:45 PM, you wrote, in part: ~> How can I setup theBat to make sure that I get mail from everyone in ~> my address book, so that my filters don't intercept anyones email that ~> is in my address book or in other words a sort of whitelist? Howdy ~John, There is a rule called "Known" which can be used to sort incoming mail from *known* addresses into a specific folder. The definition of "known" addresses depends upon which of your configured address books and groups are selected. So, you could file all known users into a subfolder of the Inbox called "known". There is an option to continue with other rules, in case you want to perform other filtering actions on known users. If you leave that option unset, then the following rules will only be applied to unknown addresses. You can also setup an Outgoing Mail rule, which I call "Capture Recipient Addresses", which can add recipient addresses to your address book. Thus, people with whom you correspond automatically become "known". Hope this helps. -- Best regards, Alan K. Stebbens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Voice/Fax: +1.866.579.0801) Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problems importing emails from outlook
Hello Peter, On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 14:04:55 +0100 GMT (06/02/03, 20:04 +0700 GMT), Peter Meyns wrote: > AFAIR from reading in this list, it is not possible to import Outlook > messages directly to TB!. They have to be converted to the format used > by Outlook Express which then can be imported by TB!. I understand this is not true anymore. You can import directly from OL; this was fixed a few versions ago. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. A bartender is just a pharmacist with a limited inventory. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Access Violation in xxxxx ?
Hello Thomas, > Are you sure teh AV was caused by TB? Yes, absolutely ! > What is the exact wording, which > you have left out? I don't remember, but a dialog box of the bat indicating : access violation to the adress , the next time I have it,i note ! -- Best regards, Christophemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Whitelist, can you do this with thebat ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, February 06, 2003, Alan K. Stebbens wrote... > Monday, February 3, 2003, 10:14:45 PM, you wrote, in part: ~>> How can I setup theBat to make sure that I get mail from everyone in ~>> my address book, so that my filters don't intercept anyones email that ~>> is in my address book or in other words a sort of whitelist? > Howdy ~John, [..] I've no idea how you managed to do it, but you seem to be sending 2 copies of your mails to the list and one to the original sender. I suggest checking templates, or making sure you're not hitting your "Reply-to All" button. I don't think there is a need for anybody on this list to get duplicated mail. - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Fingerprint: 676A 1701 665B E343 E393 B8D2 2B83 E814 F8FD 1F73 iQA/AwUBPkM/SyuD6BT4/R9zEQLarwCg+/50zA4RA/98oEO2RPTujxbTWscAnjWM LxBSWIsyA7h5Uh4aQPFRra9s =4ypg -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Forwarding and Redirected messages are stalled
Hello Jim, On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 22:11:44 -0500 GMT (07/02/03, 10:11 +0700 GMT), Jim Kilgannon wrote: > When I tested this, everything seemed to work except that the > forwarded and redirected emails are now just sitting in my Outbox, > and have been for more than a day now. For periodic sending, you need to set two tickmarks: 1.) Account / Properties / Options: [X] Periodilcal check every ... minutes. 2.) Account / Properties / Transport: [X] Combined delivery (send and receive). -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Comparisons are as bad as cliches. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Access Violation in xxxxx ?
Hello telepro, On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 05:57:32 +0100 GMT (07/02/03, 11:57 +0700 GMT), telepro wrote: > I don't remember, but a dialog box of the bat indicating : access > violation to the adress , the next time I have it,i note ! Yes please. The dialogue gives you the address as well as the module that caused the AV. Without this information, we can only wildly guess what may have caused it. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Auf Tiramisu von Tesco`s (auf die Unterseite aufgedruckt): "Nicht umdrehen". Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
