[tips] Pavlov and bells

2013-09-28 Thread sblack
Paul Brandon told us:

 OK -- I cleaned up the Wikipedia article a bit.
 It did already indicate that Pavlov used a number of different 
 conditional  stimuli.

Fast action! Much better now. The entry under Classical 
Conditioning needs similar treatment. The myth will not die. 

I also have reservations about the continued endorsement in the 
Wikipedia entry of Roger Thomas' claim (in an otherwise fine article) 
to have discovered bells in Pavlov's past.  

The entry reads:

Catania[29] cast doubt on whether Pavlov ever actually used a bell 
in his famous experiments...  until Thomas [31 (AJP, 1997)] found 
several references that unambiguously stated Pavlov did, indeed, use 
a bell.

Consider Thomas's references:

1) In a 1906 lecture published in _Science_,  Pavlov noted the 
relative ineffectiveness of a violent ringing of a bell as a CS for 
salivation.

Thomas himself discounts this reference as there was no indication 
that the bell was effective at lower intensities. A bell which does 
not work seems a poor impetus for generating the Pavlov bell legend. 

Thomas's second reference is to Pudovkin's film _Mechanics of the 
Brain_. He did not view the film himself (not so easily done back 
then) but rashly depended on _Time Magazine's_ account of it, despite 
later in the article pointing out _Time's_ tendency to fabrication as 
illustrated by its account of Pavlov's mugging (Aside from that, Dr. 
Pavlov, did you enjoy your visit to New York?) (that's me, BTW, not 
_Time_)

As anyone can see for themselve now on the Vimeo link, _Time's_ claim 
that the film showed dogs which dripped saliva at the sound of a 
bell  is pure fiction. In fact, a metronome figures prominently in 
the proceedings, and a hand bell makes an appearance only to elicit 
an orienting reflex. No bell is used to elicit salivation. 

Thomas's final reference is to Lamarckian experiments involving 
electric bells, carried out late in Pavlov's career (probably well 
after the legend was started)  and  which Pavlov eventually 
repudiated. This in itself would not recommend it as the origin of a 
myth, but there are other reasons:

-Anrep, Pavlov's translator, when using the term electric bell 
routinely described it as buzzing  and the bell itself was 
sometimes referred to as an electric buzzer. This is not the bell 
of legend, which goes ding-dong rather than buzz. 

-The experiment concerned mice, not dogs, and running to food, not 
salivation

And that's all Thomas had. This is far from the unambigous support 
claimed to document the use of the bell to condition salivation 
reported by Wikipedia. 

More on the film: the Vimeo link provided by Mike P.  at
http://vimeo.com/20583313 is not the original Myekhanika Golovnogo 
Mozga (Mechanics of the Brain) but a version edited for an English 
audience called Function of the Brain. I have a videotape (remember 
that?) copy of the original _Mechanics_ obtained with considerable 
difficulty from the British Film Institute. 

Nevertheless the Vimeo version corresponds well to what I remember of 
the last time I looked at the original, except that the Vimeo version 
seems to be truncated.. There was more human stuff in the original 
involving childbirth or breast-feeding, children puzzle-solving, and 
footage showing an intellectually-impaired adult.  I also have a 
video copy of the Vimeo one which turns out to have been kindly sent 
to me back in 2004 by someone named Chris Green.

One of the more disturbing aspects of this film, Peta aside, is the 
treatment of children depicted in it. One child is clearly shown with 
a surgically-implanted artificial fistula for studying salivary 
conditioning. The child was probably an orphan and ethics committees 
were many years in the future. Wikipedia also took note of this:  It 
is less widely known that Pavlov's experiments on the conditional 
reflex extended to children, some of whom underwent surgical 
procedures, similar to those performed on the dogs, for the 
collection of saliva.

Stephen


Stephen L. Black, Ph.D.  
Professor of Psychology, Emeritus   
Bishop's University
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada   
e-mail:  
sblack at 
ubishops.ca

-


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=28179
or send a blank email to 
leave-28179-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


RE: [tips] Pavlov and bells

2013-09-27 Thread rfro...@jbu.edu
I think the evidence points to the fact that what was called (or translated?) 
as “bell” was not indicative of the hand bell we see pictured in textbooks but 
was instead what we would call today a “buzzer” (at least where I am from – 
descriptors like this probably vary regionally). This does make a bit of a 
difference because whereas a bell of the type often pictured would make a 
fairly discrete sound (that would take some time to fade), both a metronome and 
a buzzer can sustain the stimulus presentation until the delivery of the US 
which would work better for the delay conditioning procedure where the onset of 
the CS precedes but continues until the delivery of the US.

Rick

Dr. Rick Froman, Chair
Division of Humanities and Social Sciences
Professor of Psychology
Box 3519
John Brown University
2000 W. University Siloam Springs, AR  72761
rfro...@jbu.edumailto:rfro...@jbu.edu
(479) 524-7295
http://bit.ly/DrFroman

From: Christopher Green [mailto:chri...@yorku.ca]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 11:57 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: [tips] Pavlov and bells











Pavlov's (1927) CONDITIONED REFLEXES: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE =
PHYSIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX:

p. 27: With another dog the loud buzzing of an electric bell set going =
5 to 10 seconds after administration of food failed to establish a =
conditioned alimentary reflex even after 374 combinations,

p. 34: A [p. 34] dog has two primary alimentary conditioned stimuli =
firmly established, one to the sound of a metronome and the other to the =
buzzing of an electric bell.

p. 145: There were used, for example, in one case the four tones C, D, =
E, F of one octave; and in another case the four stimuli were made up of =
a noise, two different tones and the sound of a bell.


Chris
---
Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada

chri...@yorku.camailto:chri...@yorku.ca
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/
-



On 2013-09-26, at 5:23 PM, sbl...@ubishops.camailto:sbl...@ubishops.ca wrote:


On 26 Sep 2013 at 17:07, Christopher Green wrote:

=20

Thomas, R. K. (1997). Correcting some Pavlovian regarding Pavlov's

bell and Pavlov's mugging. American Journal of Psychology , 110,

115-125.


Read it, consider his evidence, and then get back to me.



Stephen







Stephen L. Black, Ph.D.

Professor of Psychology, Emeritus

Bishop's University

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

e-mail:  sblack at ubishops.cahttp://ubishops.ca/

-



---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
rfro...@jbu.edumailto:rfro...@jbu.edu.

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13039.37a56d458b5e856d05bcfb3322db5f8an=Tl=tipso=28145

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to 
leave-28145-13039.37a56d458b5e856d05bcfb3322db5...@fsulist.frostburg.edumailto:leave-28145-13039.37a56d458b5e856d05bcfb3322db5...@fsulist.frostburg.edu







---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=28152
or send a blank email to 
leave-28152-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


Re: [tips] Pavlov and bells

2013-09-27 Thread John Kulig

I have the Dover edition of Conditioned Reflexes in English (Anrep, translator) 
and I don't recall bells, but there are buzzers, metronomes, light flashes and 
tactile stimuli. The Russian word for bell .. well, hard to do on keyboard...  
'E'BOHOK but my 'E' is that iconic backwards E which is not an E in Russian, 
and the B and H are pronounced more like English V and N . someone must 
have access to the original ... 


== 
John W. Kulig, Ph.D. 
Professor of Psychology 
Coordinator, Psychology Honors 
Plymouth State University 
Plymouth NH 03264 
== 

- Original Message -

From: rfro...@jbu.edu 
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) 
tips@fsulist.frostburg.edu 
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 8:54:23 AM 
Subject: RE: [tips] Pavlov and bells 












I think the evidence points to the fact that what was called (or translated?) 
as “bell” was not indicative of the hand bell we see pictured in textbooks but 
was instead what we would call today a “buzzer” (at least where I am from – 
descriptors like this probably vary regionally). This does make a bit of a 
difference because whereas a bell of the type often pictured would make a 
fairly discrete sound (that would take some time to fade), both a metronome and 
a buzzer can sustain the stimulus presentation until the delivery of the US 
which would work better for the delay conditioning procedure where the onset of 
the CS precedes but continues until the delivery of the US. 



Rick 




Dr. Rick Froman, Chair 

Division of Humanities and Social Sciences 

Professor of Psychology 

Box 3519 

John Brown University 

2000 W. University Siloam Springs, AR 72761 

rfro...@jbu.edu 

(479) 524-7295 

http://bit.ly/DrFroman 





From: Christopher Green [mailto:chri...@yorku.ca] 
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 11:57 PM 
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) 
Subject: [tips] Pavlov and bells 


















Pavlov's (1927) CONDITIONED REFLEXES: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE = 
PHYSIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX: 

p. 27: With another dog the loud buzzing of an electric bell set going = 
5 to 10 seconds after administration of food failed to establish a = 
conditioned alimentary reflex even after 374 combinations, 

p. 34: A [p. 34] dog has two primary alimentary conditioned stimuli = 
firmly established, one to the sound of a metronome and the other to the = 
buzzing of an electric bell. 

p. 145: There were used, for example, in one case the four tones C, D, = 
E, F of one octave; and in another case the four stimuli were made up of = 
a noise, two different tones and the sound of a bell. 


Chris 
--- 
Christopher D. Green 
Department of Psychology 
York University 
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3 
Canada 

chri...@yorku.ca 
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/ 
- 












On 2013-09-26, at 5:23 PM, sbl...@ubishops.ca wrote: 






On 26 Sep 2013 at 17:07, Christopher Green wrote: 







=20 






blockquote

blockquote


Thomas, R. K. (1997). Correcting some Pavlovian regarding Pavlov's 




/blockquote

/blockquote

blockquote

blockquote


bell and Pavlov's mugging. American Journal of Psychology , 110, 




/blockquote

/blockquote

blockquote

blockquote


115-125. 
/blockquote

/blockquote

blockquote







/blockquote

blockquote


Read it, consider his evidence, and then get back to me. 




/blockquote

blockquote







/blockquote

blockquote


Stephen 




/blockquote

blockquote







/blockquote

blockquote







/blockquote

blockquote


 




/blockquote

blockquote


Stephen L. Black, Ph.D. 




/blockquote

blockquote


Professor of Psychology, Emeritus 




/blockquote

blockquote


Bishop's University 




/blockquote

blockquote


Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada 




/blockquote

blockquote


e-mail: sblack at ubishops.ca 




/blockquote

blockquote


- 
/blockquote








--- 

You are currently subscribed to tips as: rfro...@jbu.edu . 

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13039.37a56d458b5e856d05bcfb3322db5f8an=Tl=tipso=28145
 


(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken) 

or send a blank email to 
leave-28145-13039.37a56d458b5e856d05bcfb3322db5...@fsulist.frostburg.edu 












--- 

You are currently subscribed to tips as: ku...@mail.plymouth.edu . 

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13338.f659d005276678c0696b7f6beda66454n=Tl=tipso=28152
 


(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken) 

or send a blank email to 
leave-28152-13338.f659d005276678c0696b7f6beda66...@fsulist.frostburg.edu 









---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=28153
or send a blank email to 
leave

Re: [tips] Pavlov and bells

2013-09-27 Thread Mike Palij
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:21:08 -0700, John Kulig wrote:
I have the Dover edition of Conditioned Reflexes in English (Anrep, 
translator) and I don't recall bells, but there are buzzers, metronomes, 
light flashes and tactile stimuli. The Russian word for bell .. well, hard 
to do on keyboard...  'E'BOHOK but my 'E' is that iconic backwards E 
which is not an E in Russian, and the B and H are pronounced more 
like English V and N . someone must have access to the original ... 

May I suggest that for those who are interested, go to the
Google translate page and enter bell on the left side and ask
for a Russian translation; see:
https://translate.google.com/?hl=entab=TTauthuser=0#en/ru/bell

One will see various Russian words in Cyrillic that will be more or
less close translations of the English word bell.  I believe that the
word the John is referring to above is звонок and it listed second.
I would make good sense to ask a Russian with knowledge of
Pavlov's writings to provide appropriate translations and interpretations.

As for whether a bell is different from a buzzer, I'm not sure what
the point it is.  It's like asking what is the difference between a d*ck
and an @sshole.  But some people might be interested is such things.

-Mike Palij
New York University
m...@nyu.edu

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=28154
or send a blank email to 
leave-28154-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Re: [tips] Pavlov and bells

2013-09-27 Thread John Kulig

Yup .. that's the word! Don't know how to get the Russian font on my keyboard. 

== 
John W. Kulig, Ph.D. 
Professor of Psychology 
Coordinator, Psychology Honors 
Plymouth State University 
Plymouth NH 03264 
== 

- Original Message -

From: Mike Palij m...@nyu.edu 
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) 
tips@fsulist.frostburg.edu 
Cc: Michael Palij m...@nyu.edu 
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 9:58:48 AM 
Subject: Re: [tips] Pavlov and bells 

 








On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:21:08 -0700, John Kulig wrote: 
I have the Dover edition of Conditioned Reflexes in English (Anrep, 
translator) and I don't recall bells, but there are buzzers, metronomes, 
light flashes and tactile stimuli. The Russian word for bell .. well, hard 
to do on keyboard...  'E'BOHOK but my 'E' is that iconic backwards E 
which is not an E in Russian, and the B and H are pronounced more 
like English V and N . someone must have access to the original ... 
May I suggest that for those who are interested, go to the 
Google translate page and enter bell on the left side and ask 
for a Russian translation; see: 
https://translate.google.com/?hl=entab=TTauthuser=0#en/ru/bell 
One will see various Russian words in Cyrillic that will be more or 
less close translations of the English word bell. I believe that the 
word the John is referring to above is звонок and it listed second. 
I would make good sense to ask a Russian with knowledge of 
Pavlov's writings to provide appropriate translations and interpretations. 
As for whether a bell is different from a buzzer, I'm not sure what 
the point it is. It's like asking what is the difference between a d*ck 
and an @sshole. But some people might be interested is such things. 
-Mike Palij 
New York University 
m...@nyu.edu 



--- 

You are currently subscribed to tips as: ku...@mail.plymouth.edu . 

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13338.f659d005276678c0696b7f6beda66454n=Tl=tipso=28154
 


(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken) 

or send a blank email to 
leave-28154-13338.f659d005276678c0696b7f6beda66...@fsulist.frostburg.edu 









---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=28155
or send a blank email to 
leave-28155-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Re: [tips] Pavlov and bells

2013-09-27 Thread Christopher Green
Rick, It was not a buzzer. It was an electric bell. We know this because just 
after the first passage is another sentence in which a buzzer is mentioned, 
so Anrep (the translator) could distinguish between the two. The mistranslation 
(if it is one) is in describing the action of a bell a buzzing rather than 
ringing (though if it was this style of bell -- 
http://www.stmary.ws/highschool/physics/home/notes/electricity/magnetism/elec_bell_36084_lg.gif
 -- then I think it is easy to understand why he might have used that word). 

I don't think that it was not a hand bell (or a dinner bell, as Stephen 
called it) means that it wasn't a bell. Pavlov clearly used a bell sometimes. 
He used it repeatedly. So the answer to the question of whether Pavlov used a 
bell is clearly yes. It is the denial that he ever used a bell that is the 
myth. Not the claim that he did.

Chris
---
Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada

chri...@yorku.ca
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/
=

On 2013-09-27, at 8:54 AM, rfro...@jbu.edu wrote:

  
 
  
 
  
 
 I think the evidence points to the fact that what was called (or translated?) 
 as “bell” was not indicative of the hand bell we see pictured in textbooks 
 but was instead what we would call today a “buzzer” (at least where I am from 
 – descriptors like this probably vary regionally). This does make a bit of a 
 difference because whereas a bell of the type often pictured would make a 
 fairly discrete sound (that would take some time to fade), both a metronome 
 and a buzzer can sustain the stimulus presentation until the delivery of the 
 US which would work better for the delay conditioning procedure where the 
 onset of the CS precedes but continues until the delivery of the US.
  
 Rick
  
 Dr. Rick Froman, Chair
 Division of Humanities and Social Sciences
 Professor of Psychology
 Box 3519
 John Brown University
 2000 W. University Siloam Springs, AR  72761
 rfro...@jbu.edu
 (479) 524-7295
 http://bit.ly/DrFroman
  
 From: Christopher Green [mailto:chri...@yorku.ca] 
 Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 11:57 PM
 To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
 Subject: [tips] Pavlov and bells
  
  
 
  
  
 
  
  
 
  
 
 Pavlov's (1927) CONDITIONED REFLEXES: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE =
 PHYSIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX:
 
 p. 27: With another dog the loud buzzing of an electric bell set going =
 5 to 10 seconds after administration of food failed to establish a =
 conditioned alimentary reflex even after 374 combinations,
 
 p. 34: A [p. 34] dog has two primary alimentary conditioned stimuli =
 firmly established, one to the sound of a metronome and the other to the =
 buzzing of an electric bell.
 
 p. 145: There were used, for example, in one case the four tones C, D, =
 E, F of one octave; and in another case the four stimuli were made up of =
 a noise, two different tones and the sound of a bell.
 
 
 Chris
 ---
 Christopher D. Green
 Department of Psychology
 York University
 Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
 Canada
 
 chri...@yorku.ca
 http://www.yorku.ca/christo/
 -
 
 
 
 On 2013-09-26, at 5:23 PM, sbl...@ubishops.ca wrote:
 
 
 On 26 Sep 2013 at 17:07, Christopher Green wrote:
 
 =20
 
 Thomas, R. K. (1997). Correcting some Pavlovian regarding Pavlov's
 
 bell and Pavlov's mugging. American Journal of Psychology , 110,
 
 115-125.
 
 
 Read it, consider his evidence, and then get back to me.
 
 
 
 Stephen
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Stephen L. Black, Ph.D. 
 
 Professor of Psychology, Emeritus  
 
 Bishop's University
 
 Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada  
 
 e-mail:  sblack at ubishops.ca
 
 -
  
  
 ---
 
 You are currently subscribed to tips as: rfro...@jbu.edu.
 
 To unsubscribe click here: 
 http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13039.37a56d458b5e856d05bcfb3322db5f8an=Tl=tipso=28145
 
 (It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)
 
 or send a blank email to 
 leave-28145-13039.37a56d458b5e856d05bcfb3322db5...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
 
  
  
 
  
  
 
 
 ---
 
 You are currently subscribed to tips as: chri...@yorku.ca.
 
 To unsubscribe click here: 
 http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=430248.781165b5ef80a3cd2b14721caf62bd92n=Tl=tipso=28152
 
 (It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)
 
 or send a blank email to 
 leave-28152-430248.781165b5ef80a3cd2b14721caf62b...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
 
 
  
 
  


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=28157
or send a blank email to 
leave-28157-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Re: [tips] Pavlov and bells

2013-09-27 Thread sblack
On 27 Sep 2013 at 10:31, Christopher Green wrote:

 Pavlov clearly used a bell sometimes. He used it repeatedly. So the
 answer to the question of whether Pavlov used a bell is clearly yes.
 It is the denial that he ever used a bell that is the myth

I'll concede that there are two instances where Pavlov referred to 
the use of a belll (not a buzzer) in salivary conditioning: 1) in the 
report published in _Science_  in 1906 where he noted the 
ineffectiveness of  the violent ringing of a bell; and (2) in the 
description of a bell as a compound stimulus retrieved by Chris from 
_Conditioned Reflexes_.

I would not describe the frequency of this use sometimes or 
repeatedly,  I would call it rare and special use,  and most unlike 
the common concepton of how Pavlov used a bell.

On the other hand,  there is the evidence (or lack of it) in 
Pudovkin's film Mechanics of the Brain, described in a New York 
Times review dated 1928 as based on experiments made by Professor 
Ivan Pavlov [which] presumes to be a film digest of his many years of 
work. The Times review notes that the Russian representative further 
describes the film as depicting twenty-seven years of uninterrupted 
thinking concerning the nature of animal and human behavior, and is, 
in fact, an animated photgraphic record of the experiments and 
studies of a single individual, Professor Pavlov.

It includes footage of a dog salivating to the ticking of a 
metronome. It also includes footage of a dog showing an orienting 
reaction to the sound of a hand bell. It does not show a single 
instance of a dog salivating to the sound of a bell. This, 
incidentally,  makes the description in Time magazine in 1928 that 
the film shows dogs which dripped saliva at the sound of a bell 
pure fiction (see Thomas's article (in AJP, 1997) for further 
examples of  Time Magazine's predilection for fabrication in relation 
to Pavlov's adventures). 

Yet Wikipedia assures us:

Pavlov had learned then when a bell was rung in subsequent time with 
food being presented to the dog in consecutive sequences, the dog 
will initially salivate when the food is presented. The dog will 
later come to associate the ringing of the bell with the presentation 
of the food and salivate upon the ringing of the bell.

Similarly, the Nobel Foundation tells us:

In a series of experiments, Pavlov then tried to figure out how 
these phenomena were linked. For example, he struck a bell when the 
dogs were fed. If the bell was sounded in close association with 
their meal, the dogs learnt to associate the sound of the bell with 
food. After a while, at the mere sound of the bell, they responded by 
drooling.

Or you could just search on Pavlov and bell, and come up with a 
thousand such descriptions. Or go to textbooks of introductory 
psychology.

There's a real mystery here. Why, when there is such an extraordinary 
poverty of evidence that Pavlov's work was fundamentally based on 
observing the salivary behaviour of a dog in response to a ringing 
bell, do people continue to believe this?

That's the myth.

Stephen


Stephen L. Black, Ph.D.  
Professor of Psychology, Emeritus   
Bishop's University
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada   
e-mail:  sblack
 at ubishops.ca
-


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=28160
or send a blank email to 
leave-28160-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


Re: [tips] Pavlov and bells

2013-09-27 Thread Rick Stevens
One possibility for why we don't remember the metronome could be that it
doesn't fit well into our schemas for CS.  My limited memory of a metronome
is a thing on a piano that makes noise continuously.  A bell is more of a
discrete stimulus.

Rick Stevens
Psychology Department
University of Louisiana at Monroe
stevens.r...@gmail.com
OSGrid - Evert Snicks


On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:32 AM, sbl...@ubishops.ca wrote:



 On 27 Sep 2013 at 0:56, Christopher Green wrote:

  Pavlov's (1927) CONDITIONED REFLEXES: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE =
  PHYSIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX:
 
  p. 27: With another dog the loud buzzing of an electric bell set
  going = 5 to 10 seconds after administration of food failed to
  establish a = conditioned alimentary reflex even after 374
  combinations,
 
  p. 34: A [p. 34] dog has two primary alimentary conditioned stimuli =
  firmly established, one to the sound of a metronome and the other to
  the = buzzing of an electric bell.
 
  p. 145: There were used, for example, in one case the four tones C,
  D, = E, F of one octave; and in another case the four stimuli were
  made up of = a noise, two different tones and the sound of a bell.


 Good response. Careful reading. But note:

 1) a buzzer is not a bell

 2) a single mention of the sound of a bell as part of a compound
 stimulus in an entire work devoted to the study of classical
 conditioning does not persuade. Where is the archetypal dinner bell,
 ringing in solitary majesty to evoke dog slobber, as pictured in a
 thousand introductory textbooks of psychology?

 Nevertheless, I see I have to take greater care in how I phrase my
 myth.  In my note which Jim Matiya retrieved,  I expressed it like
 this ...that Pavlov routinely used a bell in training salivary
 conditioning in dogs.

 Now really. How do we get from an occasional buzzer, and a rare
 instance of a compound stimulus which includes a bell, to the
 universal belief (minus one) that when Pavlov wanted to condition dog
 drool, it was bells all the way down.

 If we had to remember something  about Pavlov and his dogs, why
 didn't we remember the metronome?

 Stephen

 
 Stephen L. Black, Ph.D.
 Professor of Psychology, Emeritus
 Bishop's University
 Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
 e-mail:  sblack at ubishops.ca
 -


 ---
 You are currently subscribed to tips as: stevens.r...@gmail.com.
 To unsubscribe click here:
 http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13526.d532f8e870faf8a0d8f6433b7952f38dn=Tl=tipso=28149
 or send a blank email to
 leave-28149-13526.d532f8e870faf8a0d8f6433b7952f...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=28161
or send a blank email to 
leave-28161-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Re: [tips] Pavlov and bells

2013-09-27 Thread Paul Brandon
OK -- I cleaned up the Wikipedia article a bit.
It did already indicate that Pavlov used a number of different conditional 
stimuli.

On Sep 27, 2013, at 11:06 AM, sbl...@ubishops.ca wrote:

 Yet Wikipedia assures us:
 
 Pavlov had learned then when a bell was rung in subsequent time with 
 food being presented to the dog in consecutive sequences, the dog 
 will initially salivate when the food is presented. The dog will 
 later come to associate the ringing of the bell with the presentation 
 of the food and salivate upon the ringing of the bell.
 
 Similarly, the Nobel Foundation tells us:
 
 In a series of experiments, Pavlov then tried to figure out how 
 these phenomena were linked. For example, he struck a bell when the 
 dogs were fed. If the bell was sounded in close association with 
 their meal, the dogs learnt to associate the sound of the bell with 
 food. After a while, at the mere sound of the bell, they responded by 
 drooling.
 
 Or you could just search on Pavlov and bell, and come up with a 
 thousand such descriptions. Or go to textbooks of introductory 
 psychology.
 
 There's a real mystery here. Why, when there is such an extraordinary 
 poverty of evidence that Pavlov's work was fundamentally based on 
 observing the salivary behaviour of a dog in response to a ringing 
 bell, do people continue to believe this?
 
 That's the myth.
 
 Stephen

Paul Brandon
Emeritus Professor of Psychology
Minnesota State University, Mankato
pkbra...@hickorytech.net




---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=28162
or send a blank email to 
leave-28162-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


RE: [tips] Pavlov and bells

2013-09-27 Thread Jim Clark
Hi

I'm not sure the distinction between buzzer and bell is as sharp as Stephen is 
suggesting.  Here's Wikipedia on electromechanical buzzers, presumably the kind 
available to Pavlov.

Early devices were based on an electromechanical system identical to an 
electric bell without the metal gong.

So does it boil down to whether there was a gong at the end of the arm?  Or 
perhaps the same device was used sometimes with and sometimes without a gong.

Take care
Jim

Jim Clark
Professor  Chair of Psychology
204-786-9757
4L41A

-Original Message-
From: sbl...@ubishops.ca [mailto:sbl...@ubishops.ca] 
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 11:08 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] Pavlov and bells

On 27 Sep 2013 at 10:31, Christopher Green wrote:

 Pavlov clearly used a bell sometimes. He used it repeatedly. So the 
 answer to the question of whether Pavlov used a bell is clearly yes.
 It is the denial that he ever used a bell that is the myth

I'll concede that there are two instances where Pavlov referred to the use of a 
belll (not a buzzer) in salivary conditioning: 1) in the report published in 
_Science_  in 1906 where he noted the ineffectiveness of  the violent ringing 
of a bell; and (2) in the description of a bell as a compound stimulus 
retrieved by Chris from _Conditioned Reflexes_.

I would not describe the frequency of this use sometimes or repeatedly,  I 
would call it rare and special use,  and most unlike the common concepton of 
how Pavlov used a bell.

On the other hand,  there is the evidence (or lack of it) in Pudovkin's film 
Mechanics of the Brain, described in a New York Times review dated 1928 as 
based on experiments made by Professor Ivan Pavlov [which] presumes to be a 
film digest of his many years of work. The Times review notes that the Russian 
representative further describes the film as depicting twenty-seven years of 
uninterrupted thinking concerning the nature of animal and human behavior, and 
is, in fact, an animated photgraphic record of the experiments and studies of a 
single individual, Professor Pavlov.

It includes footage of a dog salivating to the ticking of a metronome. It also 
includes footage of a dog showing an orienting reaction to the sound of a hand 
bell. It does not show a single instance of a dog salivating to the sound of a 
bell. This, incidentally,  makes the description in Time magazine in 1928 that 
the film shows dogs which dripped saliva at the sound of a bell 
pure fiction (see Thomas's article (in AJP, 1997) for further examples of  Time 
Magazine's predilection for fabrication in relation to Pavlov's adventures). 

Yet Wikipedia assures us:

Pavlov had learned then when a bell was rung in subsequent time with food 
being presented to the dog in consecutive sequences, the dog will initially 
salivate when the food is presented. The dog will later come to associate the 
ringing of the bell with the presentation of the food and salivate upon the 
ringing of the bell.

Similarly, the Nobel Foundation tells us:

In a series of experiments, Pavlov then tried to figure out how these 
phenomena were linked. For example, he struck a bell when the dogs were fed. If 
the bell was sounded in close association with their meal, the dogs learnt to 
associate the sound of the bell with food. After a while, at the mere sound of 
the bell, they responded by drooling.

Or you could just search on Pavlov and bell, and come up with a thousand such 
descriptions. Or go to textbooks of introductory psychology.

There's a real mystery here. Why, when there is such an extraordinary poverty 
of evidence that Pavlov's work was fundamentally based on observing the 
salivary behaviour of a dog in response to a ringing bell, do people continue 
to believe this?

That's the myth.

Stephen


Stephen L. Black, Ph.D.  
Professor of Psychology, Emeritus   
Bishop's University
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada   
e-mail:  sblack
 at ubishops.ca
-


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a891720c9n=Tl=tipso=28160
or send a blank email to 
leave-28160-13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a89172...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=28163
or send a blank email to 
leave-28163-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


RE: [tips] Pavlov and bells

2013-09-27 Thread rfro...@jbu.edu
Rick Stevens suggested:

One possibility for why we don't remember the metronome could be that it 
doesn't fit well into our schemas for CS.  My limited memory of a metronome is 
a thing on a piano that makes noise continuously.  A bell is more of a discrete 
stimulus.
I think this is exactly why the bell vs. metronome is a useful pedagogical 
distinction. A bell is a discrete stimulus that would work as a CS in trace 
conditioning (where there is a trace interval between the off-set of the CS and 
the onset of the US) and a metronome or buzzer would work as a CS in delay 
conditioning (where the CS continues and overlaps with the onset of the US). 
The delay procedure usually produces the quickest learning so, although the 
discrete bell would work, it would take longer to train than the metronome or 
buzzer. I think the delay procedure would have been likely to have been used 
more often except when studying the effects of trace conditioning.

To do some myth-building myself, the metronome always made sense to me as the 
logical next step after Pavlov discovered that the dogs he was studying for his 
work on digestion were salivating before the food was put into their mouths. I 
assume (without evidence) that they hypothesized that the dogs began salivating 
to the psychic stimulus of the footsteps of the lab assistant approaching to 
provide the food and then the metronome was eventually used to simulate 
approaching footsteps. So that's my myth.

Rick

Dr. Rick Froman, Chair
Division of Humanities and Social Sciences
Professor of Psychology
Box 3519
John Brown University
2000 W. University Siloam Springs, AR  72761
rfro...@jbu.edumailto:rfro...@jbu.edu
(479) 524-7295
http://bit.ly/DrFroman




---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=28164
or send a blank email to 
leave-28164-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Re: [tips] Pavlov and bells

2013-09-27 Thread Ken Steele

On 9/27/2013 12:24 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:

One possibility for why we don't remember the metronome could be that it
doesn't fit well into our schemas for CS.  My limited memory of a
metronome is a thing on a piano that makes noise continuously.  A bell
is more of a discrete stimulus.

Rick Stevens
Psychology Department
University of Louisiana at Monroe
stevens.r...@gmail.com mailto:stevens.r...@gmail.com
OSGrid - Evert Snicks




One advantage of a metronome is that it gives you a wide range of 
stimuli that can be varied systematically.




Kenneth M. Steele, Ph. D.steel...@appstate.edu
Professor
Department of Psychology http://www.psych.appstate.edu
Appalachian State University
Boone, NC 28608
USA


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=28165
or send a blank email to 
leave-28165-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


Re: [tips] Pavlov and bells

2013-09-27 Thread Mike Palij
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:08:59 -0700, Stephen Black wrote:
On 27 Sep 2013 at 10:31, Christopher Green wrote:
 Pavlov clearly used a bell sometimes. He used it repeatedly. So the
 answer to the question of whether Pavlov used a bell is clearly yes.
 It is the denial that he ever used a bell that is the myth

I'll concede that there are two instances where Pavlov referred to 
the use of a belll (not a buzzer) in salivary conditioning: 1) in the 
report published in _Science_  in 1906 where he noted the 
ineffectiveness of  the violent ringing of a bell; and (2) in the 
description of a bell as a compound stimulus retrieved by Chris from 
_Conditioned Reflexes_.

Far be it for me to come between two Canadians engaged in a pissing
contest but allow me to make a couple of points:

(1)  The film that Prof. Black refers to (i.e., the NY Times review) is
available on the web and can be downloadable here:
http://vimeo.com/20583313

It is a silent film with cards with Russian and English explanations.

(2) At about the 12 minute mark there is a transition to the classical
conditioning experiments beginning with the ringing of a hand bell
to produce a startle response in a dog.  The bell is not used in any
of the experimental displays that are presented but a key point made
in the series of experimental studies presented is that anything can be
used as a conditioned stimulus.  The use of the metronome is presented
but not only to show that it can be used as a conditioned stimulus but
that an animal can discriminate the clicking made at different frequencies,
only one of which is predictive of the unconditioned stimulus. This
is an interesting demonstration of discrimination learning.  Other species
including humans are used.  I personally like the use of the orangutan.
Members of Peta will lose their minds watching this video.

With regard to whether or not Pavlov used a bell as an unconditioned
stimulus in any experiments may I suggest that that interested parties
read the reports of the studies in the original Russian or have someone
familiar with Russian scientific writing read it.  English speaking folks
talking about what they think are in Russian scientific journals is like 
listening
to virgins talk about the joys of vaginal sex. YMMV.


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=28166
or send a blank email to 
leave-28166-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Re: [tips] Pavlov and bells

2013-09-27 Thread Ken Steele

On 9/27/2013 1:23 PM, Mike Palij wrote:


(1) The film that Prof. Black refers to (i.e., the NY Times review) is
available on the web and can be downloadable here:
http://vimeo.com/20583313




Wow!! Imagine showing the 15-37 min section of that film in class.

Ken


Kenneth M. Steele, Ph. D.steel...@appstate.edu
Professor
Department of Psychology http://www.psych.appstate.edu
Appalachian State University
Boone, NC 28608
USA


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=28167
or send a blank email to 
leave-28167-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


[tips] Pavlov and bells

2013-09-26 Thread Christopher Green

Pavlov's (1927) CONDITIONED REFLEXES: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE =
PHYSIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX:

p. 27: With another dog the loud buzzing of an electric bell set going =
5 to 10 seconds after administration of food failed to establish a =
conditioned alimentary reflex even after 374 combinations,

p. 34: A [p. 34] dog has two primary alimentary conditioned stimuli =
firmly established, one to the sound of a metronome and the other to the =
buzzing of an electric bell.

p. 145: There were used, for example, in one case the four tones C, D, =
E, F of one octave; and in another case the four stimuli were made up of =
a noise, two different tones and the sound of a bell.


Chris
---
Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada

chri...@yorku.ca
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/
-


On 2013-09-26, at 5:23 PM, sbl...@ubishops.ca wrote:

 On 26 Sep 2013 at 17:07, Christopher Green wrote:
 =20
 Thomas, R. K. (1997). Correcting some Pavlovian regarding Pavlov's
 bell and Pavlov's mugging. American Journal of Psychology , 110,
 115-125.
 
 Read it, consider his evidence, and then get back to me.
 
 Stephen
 
 
 
 Stephen L. Black, Ph.D. 
 Professor of Psychology, Emeritus  
 Bishop's University
 Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada  
 e-mail:  sblack at ubishops.ca
 -


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=28145
or send a blank email to 
leave-28145-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Re: [tips] Pavlov and bells

2013-09-26 Thread sblack


On 27 Sep 2013 at 0:56, Christopher Green wrote:

 Pavlov's (1927) CONDITIONED REFLEXES: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE =
 PHYSIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX:
 
 p. 27: With another dog the loud buzzing of an electric bell set
 going = 5 to 10 seconds after administration of food failed to
 establish a = conditioned alimentary reflex even after 374
 combinations,
 
 p. 34: A [p. 34] dog has two primary alimentary conditioned stimuli =
 firmly established, one to the sound of a metronome and the other to
 the = buzzing of an electric bell.
 
 p. 145: There were used, for example, in one case the four tones C,
 D, = E, F of one octave; and in another case the four stimuli were
 made up of = a noise, two different tones and the sound of a bell.


Good response. Careful reading. But note:

1) a buzzer is not a bell

2) a single mention of the sound of a bell as part of a compound 
stimulus in an entire work devoted to the study of classical 
conditioning does not persuade. Where is the archetypal dinner bell, 
ringing in solitary majesty to evoke dog slobber, as pictured in a 
thousand introductory textbooks of psychology?

Nevertheless, I see I have to take greater care in how I phrase my 
myth.  In my note which Jim Matiya retrieved,  I expressed it like 
this ...that Pavlov routinely used a bell in training salivary 
conditioning in dogs.

Now really. How do we get from an occasional buzzer, and a rare 
instance of a compound stimulus which includes a bell, to the 
universal belief (minus one) that when Pavlov wanted to condition dog 
drool, it was bells all the way down.

If we had to remember something  about Pavlov and his dogs, why 
didn't we remember the metronome?

Stephen


Stephen L. Black, Ph.D.  
Professor of Psychology, Emeritus   
Bishop's University
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada   
e-mail:  sblack at ubishops.ca
-


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=28149
or send a blank email to 
leave-28149-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu