RE: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-22 Thread Martin Algesten


 -Original Message-
 From: V. Cekvenich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 21 January 2003 23:04
 
 TC5 is ways of.
 And I think everyone can agree that JDK1.4 is more stable than 1.3.

I don't agree. Stability is the sum of your whole infrastructure, API,
web servers etc etc. Most of my old sites are 1.3 and a handful of new
ones are on 1.4, for my purposes seem to be as stable as another.

Martin

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-22 Thread Henri Gomez
I'm very happy that Tomcat works well on 1.4, I can't however see any
reason to requiring 1.4, what are the benefits? Should we artificially
create obstacles for the sake of it?


+1


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-22 Thread Martin Algesten


 -Original Message-
 From: Sean Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 21 January 2003 23:37
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: RE: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?
 
 The many other arguments against requiring 1.4 
 notwithstanding (and I'm not attempting to refute _any_ of 
 them here), it would seem to me that testing a major version 
 change of Tomcat + a JVM  change wouldn't incur much more 
 overhead than testing a major version change of Tomcat alone. 
  Does anyone have any comments/opinions/counterarguments? Or 
 should I just shut my trap and concentrate on the other 
 reasons requiring J2SE 1.4 is a bad idea ;-)
 

I'm very happy that Tomcat works well on 1.4, I can't however see any
reason to requiring 1.4, what are the benefits? Should we artificially
create obstacles for the sake of it?

Martin

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-22 Thread V. Cekvenich


I'm very happy that Tomcat works well on 1.4, I can't however see any
reason to requiring 1.4, what are the benefits? Should we artificially
create obstacles for the sake of it?

Martin


Would you be more happier if JDK 1.4 made tomcat faster and more 
stable and have less jars, relative to other containers?
Nothing to lose people, and something to gain.
1.3 has a bad GC for one.

I think TC4 = JDK1.3, but TC5 = JDK1.4.




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-22 Thread Henri Gomez
V. Cekvenich wrote:



I'm very happy that Tomcat works well on 1.4, I can't however see any
reason to requiring 1.4, what are the benefits? Should we artificially
create obstacles for the sake of it?

Martin



Would you be more happier if JDK 1.4 made tomcat faster and more 
stable and have less jars, relative to other containers?
Nothing to lose people, and something to gain.
1.3 has a bad GC for one.

I think TC4 = JDK1.3, but TC5 = JDK1.4.

TC5, TC4 and TC3 requires also external jars, like 
jakarta-commons-logging, beantutils and so on, so there will be
still external jars.

Also many features in JDK 1.4 and which could be required in TC4/5
are also present in OSS land, like ssl/crypto and for many of us
it sometimes mandatory to use OSS libraries when using crypto stuff,
that's why there is PureTLS/Cryptix supported by TC3/4/5 via JTC.

So could we close this stream which generate more noise and personal
opinion than usefull advices on a developper list ?

Thanks



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-22 Thread Costin Manolache
V. Cekvenich wrote:



I'm very happy that Tomcat works well on 1.4, I can't however see any
reason to requiring 1.4, what are the benefits? Should we artificially
create obstacles for the sake of it?

Martin



Would you be more happier if JDK 1.4 made tomcat faster and more 
stable and have less jars, relative to other containers?
Nothing to lose people, and something to gain.
1.3 has a bad GC for one.

A lot to lose, little to gain. You can use JDK1.4 with tomcat5.0 ( or 
tomcat3.0 if you want ), and so get the stability and speed - without
removing the choice to use JDK1.3 or open source VMs for other people.

A lot of people preffer more jars ( they can choose to replace ) versus 
the bloated rt.jar. Jasper requires Xerces2.x.y - while JDK1.4
bundles crimson. Log4j is better for logging than what is bundled in 1.4.

Do you see many programs that work only on windowsXP, but not on 2000 or 
9x ? Are people writting many applications
that work only on MacOS X 1.4, but not on MacOS X 1.3 ( I have no idea
what's the real version number ) ? Most linux applications will work
even with 0.99 kernel ( after a recompilation maybe ).

What we lose is choice - and that's a _lot_. Choice to use an open 
source VM, choice on the OS/platforms we support ( think FreeBSD and 
Linux on Arm/Sparc/PPC ), etc.

I think TC4 = JDK1.3, but TC5 = JDK1.4.


Let's close this discussion. This is a decision that tomcat committers 
can make. My vote will be -1.

Costin



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-22 Thread Jindong Li
Sorry if I'm intruding here, I've been following the discussion and I have
to say I agree with Costin...

What we have here is that due to a JDK14 bug that's preventing our
application from working properly we have to stay with JDK131 for now until
JDK142 is out.

We're trying to move to a newer version of TC (406 or 4118?) from 401 which
is what we've been using without any problem.

The thing is that with TC406 or 4118, it seems that it takes a long time to
shut down (around 30 - 40 secs), could be related to bug 3597, however TC401
is fine, so I think in a sense, TC has already become unfriendly with
JDK131...to say the least...

When we tried JDK141 + TC406/4118, it works just fine...

Any comments would be greatly appreciated...:-)

Jindong.

 -Original Message-
From:   Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

V. Cekvenich wrote:
 
 I'm very happy that Tomcat works well on 1.4, I can't however see any
 reason to requiring 1.4, what are the benefits? Should we artificially
 create obstacles for the sake of it?

 Martin
 
 
 Would you be more happier if JDK 1.4 made tomcat faster and more 
 stable and have less jars, relative to other containers?
 Nothing to lose people, and something to gain.
 1.3 has a bad GC for one.

A lot to lose, little to gain. You can use JDK1.4 with tomcat5.0 ( or 
tomcat3.0 if you want ), and so get the stability and speed - without
removing the choice to use JDK1.3 or open source VMs for other people.

A lot of people preffer more jars ( they can choose to replace ) versus 
the bloated rt.jar. Jasper requires Xerces2.x.y - while JDK1.4
bundles crimson. Log4j is better for logging than what is bundled in 1.4.

Do you see many programs that work only on windowsXP, but not on 2000 or 
9x ? Are people writting many applications
that work only on MacOS X 1.4, but not on MacOS X 1.3 ( I have no idea
what's the real version number ) ? Most linux applications will work
even with 0.99 kernel ( after a recompilation maybe ).

What we lose is choice - and that's a _lot_. Choice to use an open 
source VM, choice on the OS/platforms we support ( think FreeBSD and 
Linux on Arm/Sparc/PPC ), etc.

 I think TC4 = JDK1.3, but TC5 = JDK1.4.

Let's close this discussion. This is a decision that tomcat committers 
can make. My vote will be -1.

Costin



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-21 Thread Martin Algesten
 In Java, the whole point is you can go switch out a VM, at a 
 drop of a hat.
 I mean, JDK 1.5 is coming out.

That's just moronic and plain wrong and if you truly believe that I'm
feeling sorry for you. If you'd had any experience running live servers
you'd know that changing API's _always_ have consequences. I'm worried
about even changing trivial things like upgrading minor versions of XML
parsers. To change the VM I rely on is a serious undertaking and
certainly not done at a drop of a hat.

 But if I am the only one asking, maybe I am drunk. The thing is go to 
 your IDE (IDEj) and flag target 1.4, do you see all the 
 import changes?

IDE? Flag target 1.4? That says it then.

The first thing I ask programmers I hire is How do you prefer to
program? What is your environment like? ... If the answer is along the
lines of vi, emacs, notepad, zsh, bash, windows command
line, then I feel much relieved...

Martin


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-21 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy,

The first thing I ask programmers I hire is How do you prefer to
program? What is your environment like? ... If the answer is along the
lines of vi, emacs, notepad, zsh, bash, windows command
line, then I feel much relieved...

Wow, that's kind of amazing -- I use the exact same question and like
the same answers ;)

Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-21 Thread Glenn Nielsen
This is off topic, but I do the same.

Glenn

Shapira, Yoav wrote:

Howdy,



The first thing I ask programmers I hire is How do you prefer to
program? What is your environment like? ... If the answer is along the
lines of vi, emacs, notepad, zsh, bash, windows command
line, then I feel much relieved...



Wow, that's kind of amazing -- I use the exact same question and like
the same answers ;)

Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
--
Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /* Spelin donut madder|
MOREnet System Programming   |  * if iz ina coment.  |
Missouri Research and Education Network  |  */   |
--


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-21 Thread Henri Gomez
V. Cekvenich wrote:

For TC 4 OK, but TC5 will have tested 4 vendors JVM 1.4.

Most people run JDK 1.4 now.


There is at least one person which didn't run JDK 1.4,
me, since the JDK 1.4 is not available on my iSeries.





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-21 Thread Henri Gomez
V. Cekvenich wrote:



Glenn Nielsen wrote:


V. Cekvenich wrote:


For TC 4 OK, but TC5 will have tested 4 vendors JVM 1.4.

Most people run JDK 1.4 now.



Perhaps you do, but where is the data to support your claim above that
most people run JDK 1.4?



Going around to clients site. What are you running..


Those who have systems in production and have spent alot of time 
developing
applications which are hosted on those systems can't do a major 
upgrade like
JVM 1.3 - JVM 1.4 at the drop of a hat.


Drop of the hat == when is TC5 due?

Anyway, no one is arguing my side that we must have progress.
JRockit, a popular VM is JDK 1.4. And IBM has a download that supports 
AS400 on 1.4, and Apple is coming out.
In Java, the whole point is you can go switch out a VM, at a drop of a hat.
I mean, JDK 1.5 is coming out.

iSeries got support for 1.4 ?

I just discovered it but I didn't see how to get it on my V5R2
and there is not a major announce of it on iseries site.

BTW, why should we make JDK 1.4 mandatory ?





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-21 Thread Costin Manolache
I use Idea. I should start learning vi :-) 

( well, I do use emacs and vi a lot - but not for java, so I
may still have a chance ... )

Costin

Glenn Nielsen wrote:

 This is off topic, but I do the same.
 
 Glenn
 
 Shapira, Yoav wrote:
 Howdy,
 
 
The first thing I ask programmers I hire is How do you prefer to
program? What is your environment like? ... If the answer is along the
lines of vi, emacs, notepad, zsh, bash, windows command
line, then I feel much relieved...
 
 
 Wow, that's kind of amazing -- I use the exact same question and like
 the same answers ;)
 
 Yoav Shapira
 Millennium ChemInformatics
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
 commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-21 Thread Henri Gomez
Costin Manolache wrote:

I use Idea. I should start learning vi :-) 

( well, I do use emacs and vi a lot - but not for java, so I
may still have a chance ... )

I use vi for at least 14 years, but for java dev I turned to
eclipse last year, and it's hard to reswicth to vi ;)





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-21 Thread Costin Manolache
Martin Algesten wrote:

 I use vi for at least 14 years, but for java dev I turned to
 eclipse last year, and it's hard to reswicth to vi ;)
 
 Wow! I tried to use Borland J something or another a long time ago and
 got to frustrated that I didn't have control over what I was doing...
 what are the advantages?

Very fast navigation if you work with hundreds of classes.
Code completion that works ( and is context sensitive, displays
param info as you type, etc ). Refactoring ( rename or move something and 
it'll find all usages and replace them ). Find who uses or implements 
something. 

I only used vi 12 years, and emacs for about 7 - but I don't think
I can turn back.
( eclipse looks nice, but it needs real key customization. Netbeans
is even nicer - but too slow for my laptop )

Costin


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-21 Thread Martin Algesten
 I use vi for at least 14 years, but for java dev I turned to 
 eclipse last year, and it's hard to reswicth to vi ;)

Wow! I tried to use Borland J something or another a long time ago and
got to frustrated that I didn't have control over what I was doing...
what are the advantages?

Martin

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-21 Thread V. Cekvenich
iSeris has JDK 1.4 download from IBM, that is my point. (BEA, and Apple 
have it as well so we have multi source).

Today when you download Tomcat 4 you have the 1.4 LE edition just loook 
at the site
Also downloading a jar, ex: http://jdbc.postgresql.org/download.html 
have 1.4 required.
Today!

TC5 is ways of.
And I think everyone can agree that JDK1.4 is more stable than 1.3.

.V

Henri Gomez wrote:
V. Cekvenich wrote:


For TC 4 OK, but TC5 will have tested 4 vendors JVM 1.4.

Most people run JDK 1.4 now.



There is at least one person which didn't run JDK 1.4,
me, since the JDK 1.4 is not available on my iSeries.




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-21 Thread Sean Reilly
This might start a bit of a flame-fest here, and if so I appologize, but I feel that 
this is a valid point.
A lot of people have been critizing V. Cekvenich for his suggestion, and one of the 
common reasons given was:

Those who have systems in production and have spent alot of time developing
applications which are hosted on those systems can't do a major upgrade like
JVM 1.3 - JVM 1.4 at the drop of a hat.

This particular version of the argument was posted by Glenn, and I believe he's 
correct in stating this.
However, if you can't do a major upgrade like JVM 1.3 - JVM 1.4 at the drop of a hat, 
why would you consider
a major upgrade like Tomcat 4.X - Tomcat 5 at the drop of a hat?

The many other arguments against requiring 1.4 notwithstanding (and I'm not attempting 
to refute _any_ of them here), it would seem to me that testing a major version change 
of Tomcat + a JVM  change wouldn't incur much more overhead than testing a major 
version change of Tomcat alone.  Does anyone have any 
comments/opinions/counterarguments? Or should I just shut my trap and concentrate on 
the other reasons requiring J2SE 1.4 is a bad idea ;-)

Sean Reilly
Software Architect, Point2 Technologies, Inc.
(306) 955-1855
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
 From: V. Cekvenich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 5:04 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?
 
 
 iSeris has JDK 1.4 download from IBM, that is my point. (BEA, 
 and Apple 
 have it as well so we have multi source).
 
 Today when you download Tomcat 4 you have the 1.4 LE edition 
 just loook 
 at the site
 Also downloading a jar, ex: http://jdbc.postgresql.org/download.html 
 have 1.4 required.
 Today!
 
 TC5 is ways of.
 And I think everyone can agree that JDK1.4 is more stable than 1.3.
 
 .V
 
 Henri Gomez wrote:
  V. Cekvenich wrote:
  
  For TC 4 OK, but TC5 will have tested 4 vendors JVM 1.4.
 
  Most people run JDK 1.4 now.
  
  
  There is at least one person which didn't run JDK 1.4,
  me, since the JDK 1.4 is not available on my iSeries.
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-20 Thread Henri Gomez
V. Cekvenich wrote:

Does Tomcat 5 Target JDK 1.4?
It not...it should please.
Apple, IBM, BEA have JDK1.4 (betas) available to download.

The imports might change a bit.


Tomcat5 should support JDK 1.4 but JDK 1.4 MUST NOT BE A PRE REQUISITE 
for TC 5



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-20 Thread V. Cekvenich
Why? I say TC5 should require JDK1.4 or above.

TC5 is JSP2.0.
JDK1.4 is now available from multiple sources. It would make some code 
and imports easier.
Even now, TC4 is run on JDK1.4.
There is JDK 1.5 coming up, we would be one back.

We do need to move ahead, and clean up the import so that TC5 does not 
need to carry as much jars.

V

Henri Gomez wrote:
V. Cekvenich wrote:


Does Tomcat 5 Target JDK 1.4?
It not...it should please.
Apple, IBM, BEA have JDK1.4 (betas) available to download.

The imports might change a bit.



Tomcat5 should support JDK 1.4 but JDK 1.4 MUST NOT BE A PRE REQUISITE 
for TC 5



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-20 Thread V. Cekvenich
For TC 4 OK, but TC5 will have tested 4 vendors JVM 1.4.

Most people run JDK 1.4 now.

Costin Manolache wrote:

V. Cekvenich wrote:



Why? I say TC5 should require JDK1.4 or above.



Why would you decide for what other people ? 


TC5 is JSP2.0.
JDK1.4 is now available from multiple sources. It would make some code
and imports easier.



Not everyone can play with the VM version they run. Production servers
usually preffer more tested and stable VMs. 

Some people may also preffer an open-source VM ( kaffe, GCJ, etc ).


Costin


Even now, TC4 is run on JDK1.4.
There is JDK 1.5 coming up, we would be one back.

We do need to move ahead, and clean up the import so that TC5 does not
need to carry as much jars.







V

Henri Gomez wrote:


V. Cekvenich wrote:



Does Tomcat 5 Target JDK 1.4?
It not...it should please.
Apple, IBM, BEA have JDK1.4 (betas) available to download.

The imports might change a bit.



Tomcat5 should support JDK 1.4 but JDK 1.4 MUST NOT BE A PRE REQUISITE
for TC 5






--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-20 Thread Glenn Nielsen
V. Cekvenich wrote:

For TC 4 OK, but TC5 will have tested 4 vendors JVM 1.4.

Most people run JDK 1.4 now.



Perhaps you do, but where is the data to support your claim above that
most people run JDK 1.4?

Those who have systems in production and have spent alot of time developing
applications which are hosted on those systems can't do a major upgrade like
JVM 1.3 - JVM 1.4 at the drop of a hat.

Glenn



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-20 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy,

Most people run JDK 1.4 now.

Where, pray tell, did you gather that statistical gem? ;)

Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Tomcat 5 target JDK1.4?

2003-01-20 Thread V. Cekvenich


Glenn Nielsen wrote:

V. Cekvenich wrote:


For TC 4 OK, but TC5 will have tested 4 vendors JVM 1.4.

Most people run JDK 1.4 now.



Perhaps you do, but where is the data to support your claim above that
most people run JDK 1.4?



Going around to clients site. What are you running..


Those who have systems in production and have spent alot of time developing
applications which are hosted on those systems can't do a major upgrade 
like
JVM 1.3 - JVM 1.4 at the drop of a hat.


Drop of the hat == when is TC5 due?

Anyway, no one is arguing my side that we must have progress.
JRockit, a popular VM is JDK 1.4. And IBM has a download that supports 
AS400 on 1.4, and Apple is coming out.
In Java, the whole point is you can go switch out a VM, at a drop of a hat.
I mean, JDK 1.5 is coming out.

But if I am the only one asking, maybe I am drunk. The thing is go to 
your IDE (IDEj) and flag target 1.4, do you see all the import changes?

.V

Glenn




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]