RE: mod_jk error under load (errno codes)
Hi I just searched through google. I didn't find any lists of error codes - which is something that I would find quite useful as well. All I found was someone elses post to another forum. Question for developers people in the know: I realise that I could read the source to find this out but I would rather not have to (I use Tomcat at work and my boss would not appreciate me spending the time to do this)... Is there any way of obtaining a list of what these errno's mean? It might be a handy appendix to future documentation - it would certainly give competent sys-admins/users more of a clue where to look for the problem. Thanks, Anthony. -Original Message- From: Marc [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 September 2002 14:23 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk error under load Hi, where can I find a description for each 'errno'? I receive errno = 110 when I try to access tomcat connecting to a *.jsp page through apache. Thank you!!! Marc Anthony Milbourne wrote: Hi 146 is a socket connection error. Try checking your workers.properties file (or the JBoss file that generates it ?) and making sure that the only connectors mentioned in workers.list also have connectors defined in server.xml. Specifically - check there isn't an ajp12 in workers.properties and not in server.xml. Hope that helps. Anthony. -Original Message- From: David Ward [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 September 2002 17:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mod_jk error under load In running an automated load test against our app, we get the following errors in or jk.log file: [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 [jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 [jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 [jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 [jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 [jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 Anyone know what these errors are? I can't find anything conclusive about them searching various lists/forums. We are running Apache 1.3.12 on a Solaris 7 Ultra 10 using mod_jk/ajp12 to talk to JBoss-2.4.7_Tomcat-3.2.3 on a Solaris 7 E250, JDK 1.3.1_02. The symptoms we see are that the number of httpd processes maxes out on the web server box, though the CPU is almost completely idle. The weird thing is that the app server is mostly idle too, and doing a thread dump on the java (jboss+tomcat in same vm) process shows that there are lots of threads waiting for work to do. Once we stop the load test, things are still messed up until I restart apache, then we can access the app again. Note that I didn't have to touch the app server at all. Accessing URLs that aren't configured to go through mod_jk have no problem, until the max http children process gets reached, of course... I haven't gotten a response from the Tomcat forum at JGuru. Thanks all, David -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands
RE: Help with test needed.
Hi I had a look from JANET (UK Academic network) which is 10Mbit when we get it. Initial page load was slow and some impatient folks might give up (maybe a please wait message ?). After that it was all fairly responsive. Zooming in was fairly quick (The delay while it went and got the image was less than the time it took to download the image). Everyone in my office thought it was a cool site :-). Anthony. -Original Message- From: Martin Jacobson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2002 08:31 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Help with test needed. Robert L Sowders wrote: I've just about completed a new site and I've been wondering about a few things, specifically how does the public see it. It's an ArcIMS site and I know it will appear to load a bit slow, (that's just how ArcIMS works). I'm hosting the front end in one place and the data at another. I'm wondering about the network latency that is built in. If you would go to http://terra.wr.usgs.gov/pilots/wa-id/viewer.htm, then zoom in about three times and click on the orthophoto check box that comes up on the right hand side, then hit the refresh button, this final refresh will give you an idea of the network latency. I can't see it because I'm on the DOI backbone. Any help is appreciated. I just tried it - I'm connected @ 10Mb/s to a fast backbone in Italy - and although it takes ~ 10 sec to display the page, the delay BEFORE it starts loading the image is only of the order of a second or two, so it's not too bad. I'm glad I'm not trying this at home via 56K dialup, 'though! HTH, Martin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Documentation
Hi -1 for shooting developers :-) I can see your point John, but in the real world people are slack and miss bits. Also, as has been pointed out, writing technical notes for technical people is a very different skill to writing a user manual for lay-people. I would rather have the best developers doing the development and the best authors writing the docs. Also a lot of minor patches and fixes are submitted by people other than the core developers - often without updates to the docs (if they are needed). I think the doc project is a good idea. I don't feel I know enough about Tomcat to contribute source (I doubt they would take it :-), but I do feel I have used Tomcat enough to comment on, and maybe even contribute, docs. I am certainly willing to contribute to a project - although I suspect there are people more qualified who have already volunteered. Anthony. -Original Message- From: Turner, John [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2002 13:12 To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Documentation -Original Message- From: Glenn Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:18 PM I would tend to agree with the above, those writing the code either don't have the inclination or time to write up good documentation. In my mind, these developers should be shot. Or at least confined to a tiny little box for an extended period of time. Or maybe just put in charge of a large data center running their software, and their email and cell phones the only contact info on the 24/7/365 call list. Not to rant, but any developer, open source or not, that writes code but fails to provide good or better documentation at the same time is a poor developer, regardless of their technical skill, and regardless of their commitment or uncompensated participation. I'm no developer, but even I know that documentation is key...I probably spend 60% of my sys-admin time writing recipes and docs for other people to descibe what and how I did the things I did in the other 40%. I think that the argument that the developers don't have time is a cop-out, especially under the Apache style of development and release schedules. There's no pressure to meet release dates in that mode of development, so time is technically unlimited. I would say it's more don't have the inclination because documentation isn't as cool as code and my ego gets more of a boost from writing the latest whiz-bang feature or finding a bug in some other guy's code than it does writing a doc that explains how to perform an installation. Which is a shame. Besides, isn't Java self-documenting? ;) Have you looked at the latest docs for Tomcat 4.1? Much better jk documentation, existing docs updated, and even some new documents at: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/index.html I've been all through them, they're pretty much just a rehash of 4.0 docs with a new design template. The new design is pretty, granted, but that's a far cry from where the docs should be. The connector docs are a little better, but in my opinion they don't cover nearly the amount of information they should cover. If they did, this list wouldn't get 100-150 messages every night. That said, I would gladly participate in any documentation project that is started. I could contribute several hours ( 3 time 10 ) each week. ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk error under load
Hi 146 is a socket connection error. Try checking your workers.properties file (or the JBoss file that generates it ?) and making sure that the only connectors mentioned in workers.list also have connectors defined in server.xml. Specifically - check there isn't an ajp12 in workers.properties and not in server.xml. Hope that helps. Anthony. -Original Message- From: David Ward [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 September 2002 17:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mod_jk error under load In running an automated load test against our app, we get the following errors in or jk.log file: [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 [jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 [jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 [jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 [jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 [jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 Anyone know what these errors are? I can't find anything conclusive about them searching various lists/forums. We are running Apache 1.3.12 on a Solaris 7 Ultra 10 using mod_jk/ajp12 to talk to JBoss-2.4.7_Tomcat-3.2.3 on a Solaris 7 E250, JDK 1.3.1_02. The symptoms we see are that the number of httpd processes maxes out on the web server box, though the CPU is almost completely idle. The weird thing is that the app server is mostly idle too, and doing a thread dump on the java (jboss+tomcat in same vm) process shows that there are lots of threads waiting for work to do. Once we stop the load test, things are still messed up until I restart apache, then we can access the app again. Note that I didn't have to touch the app server at all. Accessing URLs that aren't configured to go through mod_jk have no problem, until the max http children process gets reached, of course... I haven't gotten a response from the Tomcat forum at JGuru. Thanks all, David -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: binary mod_webapp.so for solaris7?
Sorry We have one for Solaris 8 - but that probably won't help. Anthony. -Original Message- From: David Bishop [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 September 2002 20:53 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: binary mod_webapp.so for solaris7? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 See subject :-) Anyone have one of those? I was never able to get the module to load correctly with a self-compiled version, even with Solaris 8, but the binary modules seem to work fine, when I can get them. I am running Apache 1.3.26, Solaris 7 on an ultra 60, tomcat 4.0.4. Thanks *very* much. - -- A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in. --Kim Alm, a.s.r -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9lLcIEHLN/FXAbC0RAs5qAKDRS0k9JH1RYWVejGOZKZ5oJ6EngQCfXujH tesH8v2Al8zEGXEjzS/S08o= =AJT9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: understanding Jkmount
Hi Try adding the line below: Jkmount / ajp13 I'm not sure what exactly the difference between these lines is, but I suspect that it may help your problem. Anthony. -Original Message- From: Matthew Hannigan [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2002 08:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: understanding Jkmount This is a bit puzzling. In a bid to understand the jkmount line in the mod_jk.conf configuration file, I set it to: Jkmount /* ajp13 so that tomcat would serve all content, and removed any apache Alias directive from mod_jk.conf that pointed to the tomcat instance. (I'm doing this as a prelude to putting them on separate machines) This following url is served up by apache. I presume that this is because there is a specific alias for index.html in apache's httpd.conf. http://dev:30080/manual/index.html but the following is served by apache too! http://dev:30080/manual/new_features_1_3.html with broken images, because the image requests are sent to tomcat. However! I get a 404 for http://dev:30080/manual/upgrading_to_1_3.html because that is directed to tomcat, and of course tomcat cannot find it. The new_features_1_3.html doc and the upgrading_to_1_3.html pages are right next to each other in the apache htdocs dir. Why is one directed to tomcat and the other not!? (It's not another proxy or local caching doing it; I checked the tomcat and apache log files) Regards, Matt -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Apache 2.0.42
Hi Don't get me wrong, binaries are good, but... I might have missed something but wouldn't it be better to build against Apache 1.3.26. I thought this was the recommended version of the 1.3 branch (as it has security fixes etc.). Of course mods compiled against 1.3.22 may work on 1.3.26. Thanks for your (collective) efforts, Anthony. -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2002 12:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.42 JK 1.2.0 is tagged (JK_1_2_0_rel) and source tarball is being constructed (without webapp, jk/native2, java parts). I'll provide rpm for Redhat users, against Apache 1.3.22 (with ssl), Apache 2.0.42 (also with SSL). mod_jk.so for Apache 1.3 (with and without SSL), and 2.0.42 will also be provided. IIS binaries should follow shortly, may be even iSeries V5R1 SAVF. Stay tuned ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk_ajp errors in mod_jk.log ???
Hi John I onjy just noticed that this is in your HowTo (Apache 1.3.26 - Tomcat 4.0.4, at least) as well as in the list archives. The example wrokers.properties file you have given has a minor error. It should be: # BEGIN workers.properties # # Setup for apache system # # make this equal to CATALINA_HOME workers.tomcat_home=/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4 # # make this equal to JAVA_HOME workers.java_home=/usr/java/j2sdk1.4.0_01 # ps=/ worker.list=ajp13 # Definition for Ajp13 worker # worker.ajp13.port=8009 # change this line to match apache ServerName and Host name in server.xml worker.ajp13.host=localhost worker.ajp13.type=ajp13 # # END workers.properties I have removed ajp12 from line 12 as Tomcat 4.0.4 doesn't need it (as far as I know) and if you have it there without the appropriate connector defined in server.xml it causes communication errors. I hope that helps... Anthony. -Original Message- From: Turner, John [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 17:27 To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: jk_ajp errors in mod_jk.log ??? Oops. What's the fixed file, or the fix itself? I will gladly update things. John -Original Message- From: Anthony Milbourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:24 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: jk_ajp errors in mod_jk.log ??? It looks to me like you may have an extra ajp entry in your config file. Try getting rid of the ajp12 connector int the worker list. John accidentally posted a broken file to this list in a reply to one of my questions. It caused me loads of trouble, although I'm not complaining as John (and his HowTo) has solved many problems for me. Unfortunately a lot of people must have used it. Hope that helps, Anthony. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 02:15 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: jk_ajp errors in mod_jk.log ??? snip Please post the contents of your workers.properties file. This error seems to indicate that your apache machine cannot establish a connection to the tomcat machine. You are running apache and tomcat on different machines, correct? Correct, I am running them on different machines. Attached hereto the workers.properties in /usr/local/tomcat4/conf/jk File: workers.propertiesFile: ATT553709.txt ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Running multiple tomcat instances ?????
Hi Thanks for that - my sysadmins told me i couldn't have more than 80 characters of process name. My previous post was wrong, and that version of ps is much more useful. Anthony. -Original Message- From: Raj Mettai [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 21:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Running multiple tomcat instances ? Thanks John, I will read the doc and try to get that code working, meanwhile, I have a found att version of ps under /usr/ucb/ps (solaris) which will give you a whole lot of information about the processes... example: # /usr/ucb/ps -auxwww |grep tomcat root 5629 0.0 5.65760827824 ?S Sep 20 0:27 /usr/java/bin/../bin/sparc/native_threads/java -Djava.endorsed.dirs=/opt/tomcat2/bin:/opt/tomcat2/common/lib -classpath /usr/java/lib/tools.jar:/opt/tomcat2/bin/bootstrap.jar -Dcatalina.base=/opt/tomcat2 -Dcatalina.home=/opt/tomcat2 -Djava.io.tmpdir=/opt/tomcat2/temp org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap start -Raj ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Broken Pipe Errors
Hi Thanks for the feedback. I don't think that, in our case, there are any direct connections to Tomcat as it is behind a firewall and only Apache is visible. Also we put no-cache etc. in the headers - so hopefully IE will not decide it hasn't changed. Thanks anyway, Anthony. -Original Message- From: Mike Jackson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 23:34 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Broken Pipe Errors In my experience those broken pipe errors seem to happen most often when Internet Exploder decided that the page hasn't changed. So they may or may not be a real symtom of your problem. But I only got those when I was directly connecting to tomcat, not when I'm using apache as a front end. Don't know if that'll help, but maybe it will. --mikej -=- mike jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Anthony Milbourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:11 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: Broken Pipe Errors Hi I have an install of Apache 1.3.26 talking over mod_jk (4.0.4) to Tomcat 4.0.4 on Solaris 8. All seems to work fine for a while (a couple of days perhaps) - but after a while I get a lot of broken pipe errors in catalina_out.xxx.txt. I previously thought these were due to a missmatch between the number of tomcat processors (maxProcessors) and the number of Apache clients, but this doesn't seem to be the case. The errors are as below. 2002-09-23 00:19:30 Ajp13Processor[8009][3] process: invoke java.io.IOException: Broken pipe at java.net.SocketOutputStream.socketWrite(Native Method) at java.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStream.java:91) at org.apache.ajp.Ajp13.send(Ajp13.java:525) at org.apache.ajp.RequestHandler.finish(RequestHandler.java:495) at org.apache.ajp.Ajp13.finish(Ajp13.java:395) at org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Response.finishResponse(Ajp13Response.java:196 ) at org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Processor.process(Ajp13Processor.java:464) at org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Processor.run(Ajp13Processor.java:551) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) 2002-09-23 00:48:51 Ajp13Processor[8009][11] process: invoke java.io.IOException: Broken pipe at java.net.SocketOutputStream.socketWrite(Native Method) at java.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStream.java:91) at org.apache.ajp.Ajp13.send(Ajp13.java:525) at org.apache.ajp.RequestHandler.finish(RequestHandler.java:495) at org.apache.ajp.Ajp13.finish(Ajp13.java:395) at org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Response.finishResponse(Ajp13Response.java:196 ) at org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Processor.process(Ajp13Processor.java:464) at org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Processor.run(Ajp13Processor.java:551) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) Eventually I get the error (lots of times): 2002-09-23 10:02:05 Ajp13Connector[8009] No processor available, rejecting this connection Which is fairly serious as nobody can see the site at this point. At this point direct connections to Tomcat (via its HTTP connector on port 8080) don't get a response either. If anyone has any experience/info regarding this I would love to hear it. Thanks, Anthony. ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat start up errors
Hi I had a problem involving errno = 146 (Connection refused). It turned out to be because I had an error in my workers.properties file. Check that this file only mentions connectors that you actually have. Specifically: check that there isn't config for the ajp14 connector in there. Also check that the port numbers in this file tally with the port numbers in server.xml. Hope that helps, Anthony. -Original Message- From: Kathleen Flores [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 September 2002 17:42 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: tomcat start up errors Hi All, When I startup tomcat, I receive the following error multiple times...until what seems to be within 3 hours, tomcat stops running. Hence, I need to restart tomcat every 3 hours - what a pai! =) Does anyone know what these error messages mean and how I can prevent this from happening ? [jk_uri_worker_map.c (335)]: jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_close, NULL par ameter [jk_uri_worker_map.c (185)]: In jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_free, NULL p arameters [jk_uri_worker_map.c (335)]: jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_close, NULL par ameter [jk_uri_worker_map.c (335)]: jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_close, NULL par ameter [jk_uri_worker_map.c (185)]: In jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_free, NULL p arameters [jk_uri_worker_map.c (335)]: jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_close, NULL par ameter [jk_uri_worker_map.c (185)]: In jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_free, NULL p arameters [jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 [jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 [jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 [jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 [jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 [jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 [jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 Thanks, Kat ERG Group -- The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may only be read by the intended recipient. - -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jboss-tomcat and apache integration.
Hi I'm not sure you want the ajp12 connector in the worker list, unless you actually have an ajp12 connector defined in server.xml. Try using: worker.list=ajp13 Hope that helps, Anthony. -Original Message- From: Nani Jon [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 September 2002 21:33 To: tomcat users Subject: jboss-tomcat and apache integration. Hello: I have the jboss-3.0.0_tomcat-4.0.3 bundle which I am trying to integrate with apache2, the latest version. I followed all the steps based on one of the HOWTOs. I have placed the mod_jk2.dll in the /conf directory of apache. I have created a workers2.properties file with the following contents: # Start setup file # workers2.tomcat_home=D:\\Programs/jboss-3.0.0_tomcat-4.0.3\\catalina workers2.java_home=D:\\j2sdk1.4.0 ps=\\ worker.list=ajp12, ajp13 # Definition for Ajp13 worker # worker.ajp13.port=8009 worker.ajp13.host=localhost worker.ajp13.type=ajp13 # # End setup file I put the line: LoadModule jk2_module modules/mod_jk2.dll in the httpd.conf for apache. When I start apache, it finds the workers2.properties file, but when I check the error.log file for apache the following errors are generated during startup: [notice] Parent: Created child process 1780 [error] env.createBean2(): Error getting factory for [workers2.tomcat_home] (null) [error] config.update(): Can't create workers2.tomcat_home [error] env.createBean2(): Error getting factory for [workers2.java_home] (null) [error] config.update(): Can't create workers2.java_home [error] env.createBean2(): Error getting factory for [ps] (null) [error] config.update(): Can't create ps [error] env.createBean2(): Error getting factory for [worker.list] (null) [error] config.update(): Can't create worker.list [error] env.createBean2(): Error getting factory for [worker.ajp13.port] (null) [error] config.update(): Can't create worker.ajp13.port [error] env.createBean2(): Error getting factory for [worker.ajp13.host] (null) [error] config.update(): Can't create worker.ajp13.host [error] env.createBean2(): Error getting factory for [worker.ajp13.type] (null) [error] config.update(): Can't create worker.ajp13.type [error] shm.init(): No file [notice] Child 1780: Child process is running [error] shm.init(): No file [notice] Child 1780: Acquired the start mutex. [notice] Child 1780: Starting 250 worker threads. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Regards, Nani Jon. ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk_ajp errors in mod_jk.log ???
It looks to me like you may have an extra ajp entry in your config file. Try getting rid of the ajp12 connector int the worker list. John accidentally posted a broken file to this list in a reply to one of my questions. It caused me loads of trouble, although I'm not complaining as John (and his HowTo) has solved many problems for me. Unfortunately a lot of people must have used it. Hope that helps, Anthony. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 02:15 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: jk_ajp errors in mod_jk.log ??? snip Please post the contents of your workers.properties file. This error seems to indicate that your apache machine cannot establish a connection to the tomcat machine. You are running apache and tomcat on different machines, correct? Correct, I am running them on different machines. Attached hereto the workers.properties in /usr/local/tomcat4/conf/jk File: workers.propertiesFile: ATT553709.txt ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Running multiple tomcat instances ?????
Hi John I don't think this option is available under Solaris :-(. Anthony. -Original Message- From: Turner, John [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 16:17 To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Running multiple tomcat instances ? Not sure about Solaris, but on Linux you can add --cols=XXX to the ps command, where XXX is a numeric column width. So, while ps -ef doesn't show much, ps -ef --cols=300 will show you everything you need to know. John -Original Message- From: Raj Mettai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Running multiple tomcat instances ? Hi, what is the best way to run multiple tomcat instances on single solaris box ? 1) Is it Installing multiple tomcats physically. or else 2) Installing once and use different server.xml files to start different instances. any advantages for one over the other ? Also, if I do use 2nd process, and if one of the tomcat crashes, how would I know which tomcat is running and which one crashed, because ps -ef|grep tomcat listing is identical for both instances. how do you know which instance is using which server.xml ? thanks -Raj -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Broken Pipe Errors
Hi I have an install of Apache 1.3.26 talking over mod_jk (4.0.4) to Tomcat 4.0.4 on Solaris 8. All seems to work fine for a while (a couple of days perhaps) - but after a while I get a lot of broken pipe errors in catalina_out.xxx.txt. I previously thought these were due to a missmatch between the number of tomcat processors (maxProcessors) and the number of Apache clients, but this doesn't seem to be the case. The errors are as below. 2002-09-23 00:19:30 Ajp13Processor[8009][3] process: invoke java.io.IOException: Broken pipe at java.net.SocketOutputStream.socketWrite(Native Method) at java.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStream.java:91) at org.apache.ajp.Ajp13.send(Ajp13.java:525) at org.apache.ajp.RequestHandler.finish(RequestHandler.java:495) at org.apache.ajp.Ajp13.finish(Ajp13.java:395) at org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Response.finishResponse(Ajp13Response.java:196) at org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Processor.process(Ajp13Processor.java:464) at org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Processor.run(Ajp13Processor.java:551) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) 2002-09-23 00:48:51 Ajp13Processor[8009][11] process: invoke java.io.IOException: Broken pipe at java.net.SocketOutputStream.socketWrite(Native Method) at java.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStream.java:91) at org.apache.ajp.Ajp13.send(Ajp13.java:525) at org.apache.ajp.RequestHandler.finish(RequestHandler.java:495) at org.apache.ajp.Ajp13.finish(Ajp13.java:395) at org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Response.finishResponse(Ajp13Response.java:196) at org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Processor.process(Ajp13Processor.java:464) at org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Processor.run(Ajp13Processor.java:551) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) Eventually I get the error (lots of times): 2002-09-23 10:02:05 Ajp13Connector[8009] No processor available, rejecting this connection Which is fairly serious as nobody can see the site at this point. At this point direct connections to Tomcat (via its HTTP connector on port 8080) don't get a response either. If anyone has any experience/info regarding this I would love to hear it. Thanks, Anthony. ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk log file errors
Hi We had similar looking errors to you (including some broken pipe messages in catalina_log) and did a lot of searching for solutions. There are a lot of people posting about this sort of thing and no definitive answers that we could find. but... We found a suggested solution which I will repeat. We have implemented this (along with other changes) and are in the process of checking whether it has worked. The suggestion was (and I would love someone to confirm this) that Apache is accepting and passing to Tomcat more concurrent requests than Tomcat has threads to deal with them. Apache has a setting in httpd.conf called MaxClients which is 150 by default - but the AJP Connector element in Tomcats server.xml file defines the maxProcessors attribute to be 75 by default. The quickest fix is to up the maxProcessors value to 150. If anyone can confirm that this mismatch could cause communication problems over the mod_jk connector that would be very helpful. I hope that helps, Anthony. -Original Message- From: Ago Meister [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 September 2002 18:10 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk log file errors Hello there, My mod_jk log file contains many error messages? We are using Apache 1.3.26 and Tomcat 4.0.4 with AJP13 and RH 6.2. Does anybody any ideas or has experience with similar problems? errors are: [Mon Sep 16 15:38:18 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (933)]: Error ajp_process_callback - write failed [Mon Sep 16 15:38:20 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (933)]: Error ajp_process_callback - write failed [Mon Sep 16 15:43:27 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (933)]: Error ajp_process_callback - write failed [Mon Sep 16 15:44:12 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (652)]: ajp_connection_tcp_get_message: Error - jk_tcp_socket_recvfull failed [Mon Sep 16 15:44:12 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (1013)]: Error reading reply [Mon Sep 16 15:44:12 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (1150)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, ajp_get_reply failed in send loop 0 [Mon Sep 16 15:44:12 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (652)]: ajp_connection_tcp_get_message: Error - jk_tcp_socket_recvfull failed [Mon Sep 16 15:44:12 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (1013)]: Error reading reply [Mon Sep 16 15:44:12 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (1150)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, ajp_get_reply failed in send loop 0 [Mon Sep 16 15:44:15 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (652)]: ajp_connection_tcp_get_message: Error - jk_tcp_socket_recvfull failed [Mon Sep 16 15:44:15 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (1013)]: Error reading reply and [Mon Sep 16 15:44:22 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (1153)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, ajp_send_request failed in send loop 2 [Mon Sep 16 15:44:22 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (652)]: ajp_connection_tcp_get_message: Error - jk_tcp_socket_recvfull failed [Mon Sep 16 15:44:22 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (1013)]: Error reading reply [Mon Sep 16 15:44:22 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (1150)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, ajp_get_reply failed in send loop 1 [Mon Sep 16 15:44:22 2002] [jk_connect.c (151)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 111 [Mon Sep 16 15:44:22 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (599)]: In jk_endpoint_t::ajp_connect_to_endpoint, failed errno = 111 [Mon Sep 16 15:44:22 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (844)]: Error connecting to the Tomcat process. [Mon Sep 16 15:44:22 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (1153)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, ajp_send_request failed in send loop 2 [Mon Sep 16 15:44:22 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (652)]: ajp_connection_tcp_get_message: Error - jk_tcp_socket_recvfull failed [Mon Sep 16 15:44:22 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (1013)]: Error reading reply kind regards, Ago Meister -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Hosting and Contexts
Hi I have been trying to get Tomcat Contexts mapped to the root of an Apache VirtualHost. I did what you did too (under instruction from this list), and used: Context path= ... / Which successfully mapped the context to the root of the VirtualHost if I connected direct to Tomcat. It didn't seem to work for connections via Apache though. I then discovered that the auto-generated config file for mod_jk didn't have any mappings for my root context. If I changed the path to a non empty string then mappings were generated. This seems to be a bug but I may have just done something wrong. The way I got round it was to use a non-empty path in order to get Tomcat to generate some mappings. Then I cut and pasted those mappings into httpd.conf and edited them to what I wanted. It is a cludge but it is working as far as I can see. I hope that helps, Anthony. -Original Message- From: Brian Topping [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2002 15:03 To: Tomcat Users List (E-mail) Subject: Virtual Hosting and Contexts Good day, I'm rather new to setting up vhosting on Tomcat, but am quite familiar with it on Apache. I am having some problems understanding the correct configuration to set up a root context on each apache virtual host, and was hoping someone here might be able to offer some pointers. Basically, I would like to have a different Tomcat context mapped to the root of each Apache VirtualHost/. I am able to map a context with a different name to each site, in other words, one url http://a.foo.com/a-context/ and another http://b.foo.com/b-context, but not simply http://a.foo.com where the root goes to a-context and http://b.foo.com where the root goes to b-context. Httpd and Tomcat are on separate machines, for development httpd is on SuSE and Tomcat is on W2K, for deployment both with be on SuSE. I've taken a look at the autoconfiguration stuff, but it's leaving me lost in the weeds, and I don't mind maintaining the stuff manually anyway, so if you could, please help me focus on that. I'm using httpd 1.3.36 with Tomcat 4.0.4 and the mod_jk 4.0.4 connectors under DSO with EAPI. Of course what I have below isn't working. Can someone help me understand what I am missing? My problem is in the context mapping stuff, otherwise all the connectors are confirmed to be working. Thanks a million for your consideration!! Brian #=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=# Server Service name=JBoss-Tomcat Engine name=MainEngine defaultHost=a.digidemic.com Logger className=org.jboss.web.catalina.Log4jLogger verbosityLevel=trace category=org.jboss.web.localhost.Engine/ Host name=a.digidemic.com Valve className=org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve prefix=localhost_access suffix=.log pattern=common directory=../server/default/log/ Context path= docBase=C:/dev/jboss-3.0.1_tomcat-4.0.4/server/default/deploy/root.war debug=0/ /Host Host name=b.digidemic.com Valve className=org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve prefix=localhost_access suffix=.log pattern=common directory=../server/default/log/ Context path= docBase=C:/dev/jboss-3.0.1_tomcat-4.0.4/server/default/deploy/jmx-console .wa r debug=0/ /Host /Engine !-- A HTTP Connector on port 8080 -- Connector className=org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector port=80 minProcessors=3 maxProcessors=10 enableLookups=true acceptCount=10 debug=5 connectionTimeout=6/ Connector className=org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Connector port=11009 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 acceptCount=10/ /Service /Server #=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=# VirtualHost a.digidemic.com DocumentRoot /usr/local/httpd/htdocs/a.digidemic.com ServerName a.digidemic.com Alias /dav /usr/local/httpd/htdocs/a.digidemic.com Location /dav DAV On Limit PUT POST DELETE PROPFIND PROPPATCH MKCOL COPY MOVE LOCK UNLOCK AuthUserFile /usr/local/httpd/htdocs/users AuthType Basic AuthName WebDAV Require user topping /Limit /Location JkMount /* tomcat1 /VirtualHost VirtualHost b.digidemic.com DocumentRoot /usr/local/httpd/htdocs/b.digidemic.com ServerName b.digidemic.com Alias /dav /usr/local/httpd/htdocs/b.digidemic.com Location /dav DAV On Limit PUT POST DELETE PROPFIND PROPPATCH MKCOL COPY MOVE LOCK UNLOCK AuthUserFile /usr/local/httpd/htdocs/users AuthType Basic AuthName
RE: Tomcat 4.0.4 and Apache 1.3.26 and mod_jk issues
Hi I had a problem which looked a bit like that... It was caused by the fact that the default workers.properties file that comes with mod_jk 4.0.4 doesn't seem to work with tomcat 4.0.4. Check the workers.properties file to see if it mentions ajp14. If it does then that is probably your problem... To fix it take a look at the example workers.properties in the (very good) HowTo by John Turner: http://www.johnturner.com/howto/apache-tomcat-howto.html I hope that helps... Anthony. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 September 2002 22:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat 4.0.4 and Apache 1.3.26 and mod_jk issues -- Forwarded by Charbel Achkar/Bos/Teradyne on 09/11/2002 05:34 PM --- Charbel Achkar 09/11/2002 05:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Tomcat 4.0.4 and Apache 1.3.26 and mod_jk Hello, I have installed and configured Apache 1.3.26 with modssl and openssl + tomcat 4.0.4 with the corresponding Apache mod_jk. I started tomcat then apache and when I attempted to access the index.jsp under ROOT, the browser hangs and goes no where. the following error can be observed when info mode is set in httpd.conf INFO [Mon Sep 09 18:18:39 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (652)]: ajp_connection_tcp_get_message: Error - jk_tcp_socket_recvfull failed [Mon Sep 09 18:18:39 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (1013)]: Error reading reply [Mon Sep 09 18:18:39 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (1150)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, ajp_get_reply failed in send loop 0 [Mon Sep 09 18:18:39 2002] [jk_connect.c (151)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 [Mon Sep 09 18:18:39 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (599)]: In jk_endpoint_t::ajp_connect_to_endpoint, failed errno = 146 [Mon Sep 09 18:18:39 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (844)]: Error connecting to the Tomcat process. [Mon Sep 09 18:18:39 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (1153)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, ajp_send_request failed in send loop 1 [Mon Sep 09 18:18:39 2002] [jk_connect.c (151)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 146 [Mon Sep 09 18:18:39 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (599)]: In jk_endpoint_t::ajp_connect_to_endpoint, failed errno = 146 [Mon Sep 09 18:18:39 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (844)]: Error connecting to the Tomcat process. [Mon Sep 09 18:18:39 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (1153)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, ajp_send_request failed in send loop 2 And the followin is observed under DEBUG mode [Wed Sep 11 16:53:04 2002] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (460)]: Into jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker [Wed Sep 11 16:53:04 2002] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (477)]: Attempting to map URI '/test.jsp' [Wed Sep 11 16:53:04 2002] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (558)]: jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a suffix match jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4 - *.jsp [Wed Sep 11 16:53:04 2002] [jk_worker.c (132)]: Into wc_get_worker_for_name jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4 [Wed Sep 11 16:53:04 2002] [jk_worker.c (136)]: wc_get_worker_for_name, done found a worker [Wed Sep 11 16:53:04 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (1355)]: Into jk_worker_t::get_endpoint [Wed Sep 11 16:53:04 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (1079)]: Into jk_endpoint_t::service [Wed Sep 11 16:53:04 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (280)]: Into ajp_marshal_into_msgb [Wed Sep 11 16:53:04 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (413)]: ajp_marshal_into_msgb - Done [Wed Sep 11 16:53:04 2002] [jk_connect.c (116)]: Into jk_open_socket [Wed Sep 11 16:53:04 2002] [jk_connect.c (123)]: jk_open_socket, try to connect socket = 9 [Wed Sep 11 16:53:04 2002] [jk_connect.c (132)]: jk_open_socket, after connect ret = 0 [Wed Sep 11 16:53:04 2002] [jk_connect.c (140)]: jk_open_socket, set TCP_NODELAY to on [Wed Sep 11 16:53:04 2002] [jk_connect.c (148)]: jk_open_socket, return, sd = 9 [Wed Sep 11 16:53:04 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (589)]: In jk_endpoint_t::ajp_connect_to_endpoint, connected sd = 9 [Wed Sep 11 16:53:04 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (613)]: sending to ajp13 #379 [Wed Sep 11 16:53:04 2002] [jk_ajp_common.c (854)]: ajp_send_request 2: request body to send 0 - request body to resend 0 Why is the browser locking and what is happening? Thanks! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Url Mapping with mod_jk
Hi I'm still trying to get this URL mapping to work. I have sorted out some other problems in the mean time but still have a problem (a different one) with URL Mapping. As an asside: Your HowTo was very useful Jonh. It turned out that I had a previous deffinition of the virtualhost I wanted in Apache's httpd.conf file. I thought Apache would merge duplicates or complain - but it just ignores redeffinitions. It may be worth putting an asside in the HowTo telling people to make sure the virtualhost isn't already defined. Back to the URL mapping problem: I tried using a command (in server.xml) such as: Context path= docBase=stagenewngfl / But this didnt generate a corresponding entry in the autogenerated mod_jk.conf. The standard entry mapping the stagenewngfl webapp to /stagenewngfl was there but nothing else. As an experiment I tried: Context path=/ docBase=stagenewngfl / which did generate an extra mapping in mod_jk.conf. That mapping unfortunately has an extra / in front of all the URL paths. So /stagenewngfl/index.jsp is now mapped to //index.jsp. Any ideas why Tomcat is ignoring the context with the empty path parameter? Thanks, Anthony. PS - Thanks also to Vincent Gaboriau for your response - hopefully I have moved on a bit now. -Original Message- From: Turner, John [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 13:18 To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Url Mapping with mod_jk This is a working workers.properties file, RH 7.2, Tomcat 4.0.4/4.1.10, Apache 1.3.26/2.0.40 using mod_jk 4.0.4 (NOT 4.1.10): # Setup for apache system # workers.tomcat_home=/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4 workers.java_home=/usr/java/j2sdk1.4.0_01 ps=/ worker.list=ajp12, ajp13 # Definition for Ajp13 worker # # worker.ajp13.port=8009 # worker.ajp13.host=localhost # worker.ajp13.type=ajp13 worker.ajp13.port=8009 worker.ajp13.host=xxx.yyy.com worker.ajp13.type=ajp13 John ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: French characters displaying using Tomcat 3.3
I have had problems with foreign characters under Solaris (not debian but still unix). In my case it turned out to be because of several things (at different times) so I would check the following: - Check the locale of your machine is set to something sensible. - Check you have some foreign character packs installed. - If MySQL is involved - check you are not using the (old) version of the mm.mysql driver that messes up foreign characters. I hope that helps, Anthony. -Original Message- From: KONHAWA [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 17:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: French characters displaying using Tomcat 3.3 Hi to all, I'm using Tomcat 3.3 for a web application. I deployed it on Win 2000 and on Linux Mandrake 8.0 and I didn't faced no problem. But when I deployed it on Debian Linux, accent characters and other special french characters did not apear like they shoud. Is it possible to configure Tomcat so that it could support a type of character encoding, or it's the OS whish have to be configured? in any case tell me how to proceed. Tanks! ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Url Mapping with mod_jk
I'm replying to my own message because I have sort of made some progress I have found (by reading the mod_jk.log - which I should have checked before) that mod_jk was failing to connect to a socket. I spent a long time trying to figure out whi it couldn't connect as I could do it manually. Eventually I realised that the latest version of mod_jk comes with a default workers.properties file that is set up to use AJP14. Tomcat 4.0.4 doesn't seem to support AJP14 and the connection refused was caused by this. All the HowTos say you don't need to touch workers.properties unless you need to do something unusual - this is not the case. I have now got rid of the connection refused problem - but I still can't get Apache/mod_jk to pass requests to Tomcat. Could someone post or point me at a working workers.properties file as I have now hacked mine arround and I'm not sure it is OK. Also (going back to my orriginal problem) if anyone has any ideas why apache isn't passing requests to tomcat I would love to hear them. I get nothing in any of the Tomcat or mod_jk logs and apache returns a page not found. Sorry to keep posting here - but I really don't know what's going on. Thanks, Anthony. PS - What does AJP14 do ? I tried to find info but all I found was a faq post saying AJP14 didn't exist as it was a failed experiment !? -Original Message- From: Anthony Milbourne [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 16:38 To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Url Mapping with mod_jk Hi again The stagenewngfl host element is defined twice (which is a bit strange now I look at it). Once in the Tomcat-Standalone service section and once in the Tomcat-Apache service section. I do want it to be available both through Apache and direct from Tomcat. I took a guess and got rid of the host in the Tomcat-Apache service. This seems to have worked as the generated conf file now only has one virtualhost entry for stagenewngfl. I presume from this that all contexts are shared among all services (even if the context isn't defined in the given service) - which seems a bit odd. Then I started playing and seeing if I could define an examples context under stagenewngfl. I couldn't get it to work and it just gave me page not found. I then tried changing the path attribute for the stagenewngfl context to be /stagenewngfl. That didn't work either. It seems that I can't get http://stagenewngfl.ngfl.gov.uk/anything-at-all/ to work. However I still seem to be able to get pages from my webapp if I go to the root (for instance http://stagenewngfl.ngfl.gov.uk/index.jsp), but that is when I get JSP source back. I am now more confused than I was :-( I hope this all means something to someone as I have lost it. I hope you can help, Anthony. PS I doubt the links in this mail will work as our firewall will probably block them. -Original Message- From: Turner, John [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 13:31 To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject:RE: Url Mapping with mod_jk Make sure there is only one Host container in server.xml for stagenewngfl.ngfl.gov.uk. There should only be three Listener elements, one for Server, one for localhost, and one for stagenewngfl.ngfl.gov.uk. Do you get the source of the JSP pages when you access http://localhost/examples or only when you access http://stagenewngfl.ngfl.gov.uk/some.jsp ? What is the URL of the JSP page you are trying to test...does it match any of the URL mappings in your mod_jk.conf? John ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Running tomcat 4.x using JBuilder
Hi Jbuilder 6 Pro Ent come with Tomcat 4 as part of the product (well a closely integrated add-on). Juilder 7 doesn't have a Pro version (because Borland wanted to force everyone to upgrade to the rather expensive Enterprise edition), but the Ent version has Tomcat too. If you don't have one of these versions (I presume not) then I'm affraid I have not got any experience of manual integration. I hope that helps. Anthony. -Original Message- From: Michael Petres [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 02:16 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Running tomcat 4.x using JBuilder Is it at all possible??? I have been using the following command successfully from within JBuilder for tomcat 3.2.2: java -classpath %CLASS_PATH% -Dtomcat.home=%TOMCAT_HOME% org.apache.tomcat.startup.Tomcat I cannot figure out what to use for 4.x ... Any ideas? Michael Petres ~ InnovObjX Corp. Web: www.innovobjx.com Tel: 905-729-2235 x3 Fax: 905-729-2235 ~ ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Host Auto Config
Hi I am trying to get virtual hosts working too and am having problems. I have however got further than you (I think) thanks to help from people in this group (notably John Turner). If you look back in the archives (the last few weeks) for a thread called URL mapping with mod_jk, you will probably find it helpful. -Original Message- From: Gerstel, Rachel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 15:53 To: Tomcat Users List (E-mail) Subject: Virtual Host Auto Config Hi, Sorry if this question has already been asked, but I have searched and not yet found the answer I need. I have an apache server 1.3.26 that I wish to integrate with tomcat and have name-based virtual hosts on. I think I am getting confused between the server itself and the virtual hosts. I am running tomcat 4.0.4 and when I start up Tomcat everything seems ok, but when I start up apache I get the following warning: [Tue Sep 10 16:26:30 2002] [warn] VirtualHost tre-mmc-pl.fra.ib.commerzbank.com:80 overlaps with VirtualHost cogapi01:80, the first has precedence, perhaps you need a NameVirtualHost directive This is the first time I have ever set-up tomcat so please excuse any glaring newbie mistakes in my config. Also, if anyone has input - how would I then set up the Apache side to serve static files? If I am automatically generating the Virtual Hosts directives, where I assume this information would need to be added then I am not sure how to get this extra information in there and still use the auto-config feature in tomcat. Thanks in advance for any help, Rachel This is my server.xml: Note - I have only have the one actual application right now so I used the name of the server as the first virtual host and the examples for tomcat as it's webapp: SNIP ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Url Mapping with mod_jk
/stagenewngfl/servlet/* ajp13 JkMount /stagenewngfl/servlet/UserUpdateServlet ajp13 JkMount /stagenewngfl/servlet/RoleDeleteServlet ajp13 JkMount /stagenewngfl/servlet/CreateFeatureServlet ajp13 JkMount /stagenewngfl/*.jsp ajp13 stagenewngfl.ngfl.gov.uk:/manager # Static files Alias /manager /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4/webapps/manager Directory /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4/webapps/manager Options Indexes FollowSymLinks DirectoryIndex index.html index.htm index.jsp /Directory # Deny direct access to WEB-INF and META-INF # Location /manager/WEB-INF/* AllowOverride None deny from all /Location Location /manager/META-INF/* AllowOverride None deny from all /Location JkMount /manager/*.jsp ajp13 JkMount /manager/servlet/* ajp13 JkMount /manager/* ajp13 /VirtualHost --- cut --- Thanks again, Anthony. -Original Message- From: Turner, John [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 September 2002 17:19 To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Url Mapping with mod_jk Actually, posting your mod_jk.conf file would be of more help...that's where the JkMount directives that aren't working should be. You have the Listener elements (*.ApacheConfig) in your server.xml. There's no need to have anything in httpd.conf except: Include /some/path/to/tomcat/conf/auto/mod_jk.conf The other thing I would change is to add forwardAll=false to your Listener directives...the default is true, and as far as I know, unless you explicitly state false, all requests for that URL will go to Tomcat, making Apache (and mod_jk) redundant. You want only dynamic requests (*.jsp and servlet/*) to go to Tomcat. A working mod_jk.conf file is here: http://www.johnturner.com/howto/mod_jk_conf.html That file was generated by Tomcat, I didn't do anything to it except sub in xxx.yyy.com for my actual hostname. John -Original Message- From: Anthony Milbourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:10 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Url Mapping with mod_jk Hi Thanks for that help - I now realise more about how the server.xml works. I have done what you said and my webapp now appears in the root url when I connect direct to Tomcat (which is great). Unfortunately when I connect via Apache I get back the JSP source, as if it has not gone through Tomcat. I have played around a bit and can't figure out what is going on. Could you (or anyone) take a look at the config snippets below and see if you can spot the problem. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Url Mapping with mod_jk
Hi again The stagenewngfl host element is defined twice (which is a bit strange now I look at it). Once in the Tomcat-Standalone service section and once in the Tomcat-Apache service section. I do want it to be available both through Apache and direct from Tomcat. I took a guess and got rid of the host in the Tomcat-Apache service. This seems to have worked as the generated conf file now only has one virtualhost entry for stagenewngfl. I presume from this that all contexts are shared among all services (even if the context isn't defined in the given service) - which seems a bit odd. Then I started playing and seeing if I could define an examples context under stagenewngfl. I couldn't get it to work and it just gave me page not found. I then tried changing the path attribute for the stagenewngfl context to be /stagenewngfl. That didn't work either. It seems that I can't get http://stagenewngfl.ngfl.gov.uk/anything-at-all/ to work. However I still seem to be able to get pages from my webapp if I go to the root (for instance http://stagenewngfl.ngfl.gov.uk/index.jsp), but that is when I get JSP source back. I am now more confused than I was :-( I hope this all means something to someone as I have lost it. I hope you can help, Anthony. PS I doubt the links in this mail will work as our firewall will probably block them. -Original Message- From: Turner, John [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 13:31 To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Url Mapping with mod_jk Make sure there is only one Host container in server.xml for stagenewngfl.ngfl.gov.uk. There should only be three Listener elements, one for Server, one for localhost, and one for stagenewngfl.ngfl.gov.uk. Do you get the source of the JSP pages when you access http://localhost/examples or only when you access http://stagenewngfl.ngfl.gov.uk/some.jsp ? What is the URL of the JSP page you are trying to test...does it match any of the URL mappings in your mod_jk.conf? John ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Url Mapping with mod_jk
not confident enough with server.xml to know which bits are relevant. Thanks for any help, Anthony. -Original Message- From: Turner, John [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 September 2002 15:18 To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Url Mapping with mod_jk How is this not handled with a Host and Context element? Apache config: VirtualHost one.host.com JkMount /*.jsp AJP13 VirtualHost two.host.com JkMount /*.jsp AJP13 Tomcat: Host name=one.host.com Context path= docBase=one Host name=two.host.com Context path= docBase=two Host one files go in $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/one, host two files go in $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/two. So then you would have one.host.com/index.jsp and two.host.com/index.jsp. I haven't tried this with 4.x, the tomcats I have with virtual hosts are all 3.x and server.xml is quite a bit different, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, especially with some tweaking. John -Original Message- From: Anthony Milbourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Url Mapping with mod_jk Hi I know this question was asked in Feb but it didn't seem to get a full reply back then - so I'm asking again. I have one instanve of Apache 1.3 talking over mod_jk to one instance of Tomcat 4.0.4. Apache has 2 virtualhosts set up for the 2 webapps deployed on Tomcat. Both virtualhosts need to have the webapps mapped to the root url. Currently I am using directives like: JkMount /app1/*.jsp ajp13 but this mounts the webapp under the /app1 url. I can't make app1 the Tomcat root app as this would also need to be done for app2. With mod_webapp you can mount a given webapp under a given URL - but I haven't seen anything like this for mod_jk. Is it possible with mod_jk or do I have to kludge it with an apache alias ? Thanks, Anthony. PS - sorry if Outlook has filled this post with HTML. ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Load Balancing Tomcat 3.2.3
Hi I found a reasonably good article on this at http://www.ubeans.com/tomcat/. It covers Tomcat 4.0.2 so there may be some differences but I imagine the mod_jk bits will be the same. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 September 2002 13:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Load Balancing Tomcat 3.2.3 Hi, I am currently trying to install and configure Tomcat 3.2.3 in a Load Balanced configuration across two Solaris Servers. I have tried to find a documented procedure for this but no joy. Does anyone have such procedure? Thanks in Advance, Ian. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Warp connector segfault
I have been working with Apache + Tomcat with the warp connector under Solaris 8. We have just switched to using the mod_jk connector as it seems to be the more supported option. Several pointers that might help: If you get Apache as a binary from sun it will be compiled with the sun compiler - this can cause problems if you try to integrate it with things built using GCC. Best to build your own (newer) version of Apache. As has been said your Apache version is very old. When you build Apache enable EAPI support as it will save you time later. We had some problems building mod_jk but have done it now. We have binaries for Apache 1.3.26 on solaris 8 if you want them (also the jar to integrate with Tomcat 4.0.4). Hope that helps, Anthony. -Original Message- From: Zabel, Ian [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 September 2002 22:55 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Warp connector segfault Hello all, We are trying to get Apache 1.3.12 working with Tomcat 4.0.4 and are using the warp(1.2.0-dev, i think) connector. We are using solaris8, and Apache and Tomcat are on different servers. But, whenever we try to connect to / or /examples, we get segmentation faults in apache. Something's not right, and we have been spent over a week trying to get Apache to work with Tomcat using the warp connector. If we can't get this working in about a day or so, we will probably be going for NewAtlanta's ServletExec. The boss doesn't mind paying if he can get support, I guess... so, here's our config and the errors we're seeing: We've gotten the connector compiled, and included in Apache like this: LoadModule webapp_module libexec/mod_webapp.so AddModule mod_webapp.c VirtualHost 10.101.10.100:17890 ServerName server.ourcompanyname.com ... other directives, including a DocumentRoot... WebAppConnection warpConnection warp 10.101.10.98:8181 WebAppDeploy examples warpConnection /examples/ WebAppDeploy cirqit-tom warpConnection / WebAppInfo /webapp-info /VirtualHost We also have other virtual hosts in apache that are on different IP addresses, and different ports. 10.101.10.100:17890 is the only host with WebApp directives. The other hosts are all using ServletExec as a servlet engine. (So, of course, that means, we also have mod_servletexec loaded!) In Tomcat, we have the Http and mod_jk connector tags commented out, and only the webapp one enabled. here's what it looks like: Service name=Tomcat-Apache Connector className=org.apache.catalina.connector.warp.WarpConnector port=8181 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true acceptCount=10 debug=0/ !-- Replace localhost with what your Apache ServerName is set to -- Engine className=org.apache.catalina.connector.warp.WarpEngine name=server.ourcompanyname.com defaultHost=server.ourcompanyname.com debug=1 appBase=webapps !-- Global logger unless overridden at lower levels -- Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=apache_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ !-- Because this Realm is here, an instance will be shared globally -- Realm className=org.apache.catalina.realm.MemoryRealm / /Engine /Service Apache error log gets these whenever I make a request to /: [Wed Sep 4 17:30:40 2002] [notice] child pid 13483 exit signal Segmentation Fault (11) [Wed Sep 4 17:34:34 2002] [notice] child pid 13513 exit signal Segmentation Fault (11) Tomcat's apache access log has this in it: 2002-09-04 17:38:22 [org.apache.catalina.connector.warp.WarpConnector] Connection from /10.101.10.99:59781 to /10.101.10.98:8181 2002-09-04 17:38:27 WarpEngine[cirqit-dev.cirqit.com]: Mapping request 2002-09-04 17:38:27 WarpHost[cirqit-dev.cirqit.com]: Mapping request for Host 2002-09-04 17:38:27 [org.apache.catalina.connector.warp.WarpConnection] Exception on socket java.io.IOException: Premature packet header end at org.apache.catalina.connector.warp.WarpConnection.recv(WarpConnection.java :2 37) at org.apache.catalina.connector.warp.WarpRequestHandler.handle(WarpRequestHa nd ler.java:112) at org.apache.catalina.connector.warp.WarpConnection.run(WarpConnection.java: 19 4) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:536) 2002-09-04 17:38:28 [org.apache.catalina.connector.warp.WarpConnector] Connection from /10.101.10.99:59782 to /10.101.10.98:8181 2002-09-04 17:39:34 [org.apache.catalina.connector.warp.WarpConnector] Connection from /10.101.10.99:59783 to /10.101.10.98:8181 2002-09-04 17:39:36 [org.apache.catalina.connector.warp.WarpConnector] Connection from /10.101.10.99:59784 to /10.101.10.98:8181 So, what seems like it could be wrong? Is our actual mod_webapp.so screwed up? Is it just our configuration? What could be causing these segfaults in the connector? Should
Url Mapping with mod_jk
Hi I know this question was asked in Feb but it didn't seem to get a full reply back then - so I'm asking again. I have one instanve of Apache 1.3 talking over mod_jk to one instance of Tomcat 4.0.4. Apache has 2 virtualhosts set up for the 2 webapps deployed on Tomcat. Both virtualhosts need to have the webapps mapped to the root url. Currently I am using directives like: JkMount /app1/*.jsp ajp13 but this mounts the webapp under the /app1 url. I can't make app1 the Tomcat root app as this would also need to be done for app2. With mod_webapp you can mount a given webapp under a given URL - but I haven't seen anything like this for mod_jk. Is it possible with mod_jk or do I have to kludge it with an apache alias ? Thanks, Anthony. PS - sorry if Outlook has filled this post with HTML. *** Becta's new 'Ask an Expert' service provides you with the opportunity to consult an online panel of experts for help with a whole range of advice on ICT issues, with a different theme each month. The theme for September's 'Ask an Expert' is Technical Enquiries - a specialist panel of experts are available to help you with any technical issues that are worrying you - there are no restrictions on what you can ask. So whether you simply want to know how to connect up your printer, or if you need advice on buying ICT equipment and services, our experts will be on hand to offer advice and guidance. Find out more at: http://www.ictadvice.org.uk/expert *** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
